Psycho‐Politics: The Cross‐Sections of Science and Ideology in the History of Psy‐Sciences International conference organized by the Social and Cultural Psychology Group of the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences 30–31 October 2015 Central European University 1051 Budapest, Október 6. str. 7. Floor 1, room 101. Abstracts 1 2 ZSUZSANNA AGORA (KISS) , VIRÁG RAB 1 Assistant Professor, Institute of Foreign Languages, University of Pécs, Hungary E‐mail:
[email protected] 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Modern History, University of Pécs, Hungary E‐mail:
[email protected] Which of the two was mentally ill? Psychiatry and the individual in the interwar period 1. The individual from the perspective of psychiatry The paper’s title is provocative: Which of the two was pathological, the individual who was traumatized by inhuman historical events or psychiatry, which used its specialized knowledge (and its power) to liquidate and stigmatize millions of people, and provided the scientific background for the construction of enemy‐images? How did the individual react to the abnormality (WW1) of that time? How could the individual survive in the world of the nationalized, militarized, traumatized and ideologically and emotionally determined German and Hungarian society? The borderline between normality and abnormality can change according to the given culture. For example, a soldier’s fear of warfare is logical; however it was abnormal in the German psychiatry’s view. The re‐traumatisation of an already traumatized individual is abnormal, yet the front‐line psychiatry in WW1 assisted with it. The psychiatric way of thinking was not independent of the culture and the political system of which it was a part and a paid servant, and in which it was an active participant.