Final Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan
June 2015
PAK: MFF Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program Tranche 3 – Transmission Line 3rd Circuit Project (Lot 3: Goth Qazi Mahar-Rahim Yar Khan Section)
Prepared by the National Transmission and Despatch Company for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in September 2009 available on http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/power-transmission-enhancement-investment-program- tranche-3-volume-1-main-report.
This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Asian Development Bank (ADB)
FINAL
LARP for 500 kV Moro-Dadu-Rahim Yar Khan
Transmission Line (Third Circuit) Project
Under ADB Tranche-III
Lot-III: Goth Qazi Mahar – Rahim Yar Khan Section
APRIL, 2015
By
Muzaffar Iqbal,
Social/Resettlement Expert House # 134/6 FG, Wafaqi Colony Lahore, Pakistan Email: [email protected] Contact No. 0321-7999963
Page 1 of 107
Table of Contents Abbreviations ...... 4 Definition of Terms ...... 5 Executive Summary...... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 13
1.1 BACKGROUND ...... 13 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SUB-PROJECT ...... 13 2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ...... 16
2.1 CENSUS OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ...... 16 2.2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ...... 16 2.2.1 INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ...... 16 2.3 DATA ON AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS AND POPULATION ...... 16 2.3.1 HOUSEHOLDS ...... 16 2.3.2 HOUSING ...... 17 2.3.3 LIVELIHOOD AND INCOMES ...... 17 2.3.4 POVERTY LEVEL ...... 18 2.3.5 LITERACY ...... 19 3. PROJECT IMPACTS/APs BASELINE INFORMATION ...... 20
3.1 RESETTLEMENT FIELD SURVEY ...... 20 3.2 MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS ...... 20 3.3 IMPACTS OF THE TRANSMISSION LINE ...... 21 3.3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ...... 21 3.3.2 AFFECTED PRODUCTIVE LANDS ...... 21 3.3.3 IMPACTS OF TOWERS ...... 23 3.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS ...... 23 4. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ...... 24
4.1 LAND ACQUISITION ACT ...... 24 4.2 TELEGRAPH ACT (TA), 1885...... 25 4.3 ADB'S POLICY AND RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES ...... 26 4.4 COMPARISON OF LAA AND ADB POLICY PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES ...... 28 4.5 RECONCILIATION BETWEEN PAKISTAN’S ACTS AND ADB SPS...... 30 4.6 LEGISLATION RELEVANT TO LAND CLASSIFICATION ...... 30 5. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOSURE ...... 31
5.1 GENERAL...... 31 5.2 STAKEHOLDER’S CONSULTATIONS...... 31 5.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS...... 31 5.4 SOCIAL AND RESETTLEMENT SPECIFIC CONCERNS RAISED BY THE APS ...... 33 5.5 OTHER GENERAL CONCERNS RAISED BY THE APS ...... 34 5.6 Information Disclosure………………………………………………...…………………………….34 6. COMPENSATION ELIGIBILITY………………………………………………………………………………………36
6.1 COMPENSATION ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE SUBPROJECT ...... 36
Page 2 of 107
6.2 ELIGIBILITY ...... 39 6.3 STRATEGY FOR COMPENSATION OF LAND AFFECTED BY TOWERS ...... 40 6.4 COMPENSATION ENTITLEMENTS ...... 40 6.5 ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION UNIT VALUES ...... 41 7. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS...... 43
7.1 NATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND DESPATCH COMPANY ...... 43 7.2 ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL IMPACT CELL (E&SIC) ...... 43 7.3 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT (PIU) ...... 44 7.4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ...... 45 7.5 ADB ...... 45 7.6 LAR COORDINATION COMMITTEE ...... 45 7.7 AFFECTED PERSON COMMITTEE ...... 46 7.8 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 46 7.9 ORGANOGRAM ...... 48 8. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ...... 49 9. BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION ...... 51
9.1 BASIS FOR COMPENSATION ...... 51 9.2 DETERMINING THE RATES FOR COMPENSATION ...... 51 9.3 BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION ...... 55 10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...... 57 10.1 GENERAL………………….……………………………………………….………………………..57 10.2 INTERNAL MONITORING ...... 57 10.3 EXTERNAL MONITORING ...... 57 Appendices Appendix A – List of Affected Productive Land (Crop damages) Appendix B – List of Affected Trees Appendix C – List of Affected House Holds
Page 3 of 107
Abbreviations
ADB Asian Development Bank AHs Affected households APs Affected people DCO District Coordination Officer DOR District Officer (Revenue) EDO-R Executive District Officer (Revenue) EIA Environmental Impact Assessment (Report) EMA External Monitoring Agency EHV Extra High-Tension Voltage (a division of NTDC) ESIC Environmental and Social Impact Cell (NTDC) GM General Manager GRC Grievance Redress Committee GSC Grid System Construction (a division of NTDC) GSO Grid System Operation (a division of NTDC) IEE Initial Environmental Assessment (Report) IPDF Indigenous Peoples Development Framework IPDP Indigenous Peoples Development Plan kanal unit of land measurement: 1 kanal = 50.54 m2 (or, 1 ha = 19.786 kanals) LAA Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended) LAC Land Acquisition Collector LARF Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MOWP Ministry of Water and Power NGO Non-Governmental Organization NTDC National Transmission and Dispatch Company PD Project Director, NTDC PIU Project Implementation Unit (NTDC) PMU Project Management Unit (NTDC) PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RFS Resettlement Field Surveys ROW Right-of-way SLARP Short Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan TL Transmission Line TOR Terms of Reference WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority
Page 4 of 107
Definition of Terms
Affected persons/households (APs/AHs) mean all the people affected by land acquisition, relocation, or loss of incomes and include any person, household (referred to as project affected family or affected household [AH]), firms, or public or private institutions. APs therefore include; i) persons affected directly by the safety corridor, right-of-way, tower or pole foundations or construction work area; (ii) persons whose agricultural land or other productive assets such as trees or crops are affected; (iii) persons whose businesses are affected and who might experience loss of income due to the project impact; (iv) persons who lose work/employment as a result of project impact; and (v) people who lose access to community resources/property as a result of the project. Compensation means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by a project at replacement cost at current market value. Cut-off-date means the date after which people will NOT be considered eligible for compensation i.e. they are not included in the list of APs/AHs as defined by the census. Normally, the cut-off date is the date of the detailed measurement survey. Encroachers mean those people who extend their occupation beyond the lands they legally own; usually not entitled to compensation but at times provided with assistance if they are vulnerable. Entitlement means the range of measures comprising cash or in-kind compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, income/livelihood restoration which are due to AHs, depending on the type and degree nature of their losses to restore their social and economic base. Inventory of losses means the pre-appraisal inventory of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets. Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to the ownership and possession of the agency for public purposes, in return for fair compensation. The land acquisition and resettlement plan is known as a LARP. Non-titled means those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying and includes people using private or state land without permission, permit or grant i.e. those people without legal title to land and/or structures occupied or used by
Page 5 of 107
them. ADB’s policy explicitly states that such people cannot be denied compensation. Poor means those falling below the official national poverty line (equivalent to 2,350 calories per day) of Rs 3750 per person per month (2014). Replacement cost means the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market value, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged. Resettlement Field Survey means the detailed inventory of losses that is completed after detailed design and marking of project boundaries on the ground, socioeconomic data on the affected households/families, and stakeholder consultations. Sharecropper means the same as tenant cultivator or tenant farmer, and is a person who cultivates land they do not own for an agreed proportion of crop or harvest. Significant impact means 200 people or more will experience major impacts, which are defined as; (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing ten per cent or more of their productive assets (income generating). Vulnerable means any people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being marginalized from the effects of resettlement and includes; (i) female-headed households with dependents; (ii) disabled household heads; (iii) poor households (within the meaning given previously); (iv) landless; (v) elderly households with no means of support; (vi) households without security of tenure; (vii) ethnic minorities; and (viii) marginal farmers (with landholdings of five acres or less).
Page 6 of 107
Executive Summary
1. The Subproject. The Third Circuit 500kV transmission line and new Moro 500kV grid station subproject has been designed to interlink the existing and new 500kV grid station in the southern region. The transmission line will start from the existing Jamshoro 500kV grid station, provide in and out connections to new Moro 500kV grid station (included in this subproject) and the existing Dadu 500kV grid station, and finally end at the new Rahim Yar Khan 500kV grid station (not included in this subproject). The new TL will be 600 km long passing through a total 10 districts; 9 districts in the Sindh province and 1 district (RYK) in the Punjab province, and traverse mostly private agricultural lands (80%). A plot of 152 acres (61.5 ha) of land had already been acquired by WAPDA/NTDC for the new Moro 500kV grid station in 1995, from a total of six landowners (6 AHs; 54 APs) of Bhirya town in Nauhshahro Feroze district in the Sindh province. To implement the construction of 600 km long 500KV transmission line the project is divided into three construction Lots’.
• Lot-I 202 Km TL from Jamshoro to Moro. • Lot-II 232 km Tando Dadu to Moro & Qazi Mahar • Lot-III 166 Km Goath Qazi Mahar to Rahim Yar Khan
2. This LARP deals only with Lot-III, 166 km: Goth Qazi Mahar – Rahim Yar Khan Section only. Lot-III transverse through Gotki Disrtict (76 km) of Sindh Province and Rahim Yar Khan District (90 km) of Punjab Province. Total 436 towers will be constructed in this lot. Resettlement Impacts.
3. The subproject will affect 592 households (AHs) with a total population of 5328 affected persons (APs). 445 out of 592 will be affected by temporary loss of 665.66 ha of their productive lands, in terms of crop and 147 will be affect from tree losses (crops: 639.30 ha and fruit orchards: 26.36 ha), and removal of a total of 1048 trees (fruit trees: 391; wood trees: 657). No built-up structures remain affected, as all the formerly affected 32 structures have now successfully been avoided by NTDC by inserting diversions in 8 reaches of the transmission line in Lot-III. To sum up, despite a very large number of AHs, the severity of resettlement impact on them is insignificant, as no AHs will suffer from a loss of 10% or more of their household incomes. They will be compensated for the loss of their respective assets at the current market values of the same (see Table 1). 4. To ensure that the compensation is reflective of appropriate rates corresponding to actual impacts, the updated rates shall be applied, if and when the delivery of compensation gets delayed.
Page 7 of 107
Table 1: Compensation and Entitlement Matrix
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements1 Persons Temporary Access is not • Farmers/ No compensation for land provided that impacts on restricted and Titleholders the land is rehabilitated/ restored to its arable land existing or former quality following completion of current land works; use will Leaseholders/ • No compensation for land provided that remain Sharecroppers the land is rehabilitated/ restored to its unchanged (registered or former quality following completion of not) works; • Agricultural Compensation, in cash for lost workers employment for the affected period. • Squatters Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and trees, where these are owned by the squatters. • All adverse Farmers/ Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the effects on Titleholders land use plots lost; or; • independent Cash compensation plus 15% CAS for affected land at replacement cost based of severity of impact on market value free of taxes, Permanent registration, and transfer costs impacts on Leaseholders/ • Renewal of lease/ sharecropping arable land Sharecroppers contract in other plots of equal value/ where (registered or productivity of plots lost, or access is not) • Cash equivalent to market value of gross restricted yield of affected land for the remaining and/or land lease/ contract years (up to a maximum use will be of 3 years). • affected Agricultural Cash indemnity corresponding to their workers losing salary (including portions in kind) for their contract the remaining part of the agricultural year. • Squatters 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross harvest (in addition to crop compensation) for land use loss.
1 Compensation for all assets will be to the owner of the asset.
Page 8 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements1 Persons • Additional Farmers/ 1 severe impact allowance equal to provisions for Titleholders market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of severe Leaseholders impacts winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) (More than • Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to 10% of land market value of share of harvest lost loss) (registered or (additional to standard crop not) compensation) • Squatters 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crops and additional to standard crop compensation) • Residential/ Titleholders Land for land compensation through provision of a plots comparable in Commercial value/ location to plot lost or Land • Cash compensation plus 15% CAS for affected land at full replacement cost free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs. • Renters/ 3 months rent or a value proportionate Leaseholders to the duration of the remaining lease, including any deposits they may lose. • Squatters Accommodation in available alternate land/ or a self-relocation allowance (Rs. 9,000). • Houses/ All relevant APs Cash compensation plus 10% electrification allowance at replacement Structures (including rates for affected structure and other squatters) fixed assets free of salvageable materials, depreciation and transaction costs. • Affected tenants will receive cash compensation of a value proportionate to the duration of the remaining lease period, or three months, whichever is higher. • In case of partial permanent impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure, in addition to compensation at replacement cost for the affected part of the structure.
Page 9 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements1 Persons • Crops Crops All APs owning Crop compensation in cash at full affected crops market rate for one harvest (either (including winter or summer) by default for squatters) impacts caused by grid construction, tower base, stringing and access. • All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. • Trees Trees affected All APs owning For timber/ wood trees, the trees (including compensation will be at market value squatters) of tree's wood content. • Fruit trees: Cash compensation based on lost production for the entire period needed to reestablish a tree of equal productivity. • Business/ Temporary or All APs Business owner: i) Cash compensation permanent (including equal to one year income, if loss is Employmen loss of squatters, permanent; ii) In case of temporary loss, t business or agriculture cash compensation equal to the period employment workers) of the interruption of business up to a maximum of six months or covering the period of income loss based on construction activity. • Workers/ employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption up to a maximum of 3 months (at OPL level Rs. 9,000/ month). • Relocation Transport and All APs affected Provision of sufficient allowance to transitional by relocation cover transport expenses and livelihood livelihood expenses for one month (Rs. 9,000 per costs household). • Community Mosques, Affected Rehabilitation/ substitution of affected assets footbridges, community structures/ utilities (i.e. mosques, roads, footbridges, roads, schools, health schools, centers). health center • Vulnerable Households’ All affected Lump sum one time livelihood APs below vulnerable APs assistance allowance (Rs. 9,000 at OPL livelihood poverty line Punjab) on account of livelihood and female restoration support. headed • Temporary or permanent employment households,
Page 10 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements1 Persons disable during construction or operation, where persons of ever feasible. HH. Unidentified Unanticipated All APs • Deal appropriately during sub-project Losses impacts implementation according to the ADB Safeguard Policy
5. Significance of Impact. As there is no restriction on access to, or use of, land, the impacts will be temporary. The temporary impact on crops and trees is such that AHs will not experience a loss of 10% or more of their productive assets (income generating). There are no built-up structures, namely, houses, shops or community structures affected. Thus, none of the 592 AHs will experience significant impacts. Therefore the overall resettlement impact is considered non-significant.
6. Indigenous People Issues. All AHs are Muslim and ethnically Sindhi, Baluch and Punjabis. There are neither tribal nor minority people amongst the AHs, and all affected land is held in private or government ownership (i.e. not tribally owned or communally held land). The ADB’s Policy on Indigenous People, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for the program is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject.
7. Participatory Land Acquisition Process. The program’s LARF has been translated into Urdu and disclosed according to ADB’s public communications policy, and it has also been uploaded to ADB’s website. Consultation has been undertaken through a series of meetings with local government agencies, AHs, as well as wider community group meetings. The RFS was a participatory process, with the head of household assisting in the identification and calculation of losses. Further community consultations will be carried out during the implementation of the LARP.
8. Grievance Redress Mechanism. There is also a process established to deal with any issues or concerns raised on any aspect of the LARP or compensation process. The verbal or written grievances of AHs will be heard by the district level Land Acquisition Coordinating Committees, which will be established to assist NTDC implement the LARP.
9. Cost of Plan. The total land acquisition and resettlement cost for the Third Circuit 500kV (Qazi Meher-RYK) Transmission Line Subproject is estimated at Rs. 289.832 millions ($ 2898330.). The NTDC will set aside this amount of funds and utilize in complete implementation of this LARP prior to awarding of civil works contracts under this Subproject. See Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: LARP Budget for Third Circuit (Qazi Mahar-RYK) 500kV TL Subproject No. Resettlement Activity No. Unit Rs./Unit Total Rs. Asset Compensation for Qazi A Mahar-RYK 500 kV TL:
Page 11 of 107
A.1 Trees: 992 tree - 3809200 A.1.1 Fruit Trees 345 tree lumpsum 1747000 A1.2 Wood Trees 647 tree lumpsum 2062200 A.2 Crops: 1,578.83 Acre - 259675330 A.2.1 Sugarcane 116.03 Acre lumpsum 51053200 A.2.2 Rabi 1151.48 Acre lumpsum 152162380 A.2.3 Kharif 311.32 Acre lumpsum 56459750 B Subtotal (A.1+A.2) - 263,484,530 C Contingency (10% of B) 0.1 lumpsum 26,348,453 Total Amount (Pak. Rupees): - - - 289,832,983 2,827,639 Total Amount (US Dollars*): - - - * US$ 1.00 = Rs. 102.5 (as on 23-04-2015)
Page 12 of 107
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1. In response to the Government of Pakistan’s request, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) had agreed to finance the implementation of the Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program (the program), to be executed through a Multi-tranche Financial Facility (MFF) divided into four tranches. The Ministry of Water and Power and the National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) are the Executing Agency (EA) and the Implementing Agency (IA), respectively. Each tranche would constitute a project which, in turn, would be divided into several subprojects involving the construction/upgrading of power grid stations (or sub-stations) and installation of power transmission lines.
2. The Third Circuit 500kV Transmission Subproject (Subproject No. 1 in Tranche 3 of this MFF 1: ADB-NTDC: Pak - Power Transmission Enhancement Program) includes the construction of a new Moro 500kV sub-station and a 600 km long 500kV transmission line, interconnecting the Jamshoro, Moro, Dadu and Rahim Yar Khan 500kV sub-stations. The subproject was devided into three Lots (Lot-1, 2 & 3). This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared for Lot-3 of the Subproject, to fit the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) prepared in for the program as a whole. As such the Subproject will fit the following LAR-related implementation conditions: • Signing of contracts awards for the Subproject’s civil works will be contingent to the preparation of a LARP fitting the LARF and ADB relevant polices; and • ADB issuance of notice to proceed for the implementation of the subproject’s civil works will be contingent to the full implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation programs detailed in this LARP.
This revised LARP is based on former line alignment, with recent diversions to avoid affecting built-up structures and landless hari families, and tower positions and fully fits the provisions of the LARF already prepared. As required by the LAR-related conditionalities for the program the LARF has been reviewed and modified as per SPS 2009 requirements. 5. The following chapters of this LARP include details on: (i) the principles and eligibility/entitlement criteria for compensation or rehabilitation of AHs and APs; (ii) the LARP institutional organization; (iii) the various LARP implementation mechanisms (AH information disclosure, participation & consultation, grievance redress and monitoring); and (iv) time schedules and cost estimates.
1.2 Description of the Sub-project
The Third Circuit 500kV Power Transmission scheme is designed to provide interconnection to the existing and new 500kV grid stations at Jamshoro, Moro, Dadu and Rahim Yar Khan, and in near future it will also be connected to another 500kV grid station to be constructed in Hyderabad or Matyari district.
This Subproject accounts for a major part of the whole 500kV transmission scheme. It includes the construction of an interconnecting 500kV Transmission Line (Jamshoro – Moro – Dadu – Rahim Yar Khan) and Moro 500kV Grid Station (at Bhirya town). The Subproject will
Page 13 of 107
be funded by ADB under Tranche 3 of MFF 1 for the NTDC’s Power Transmission Enhancement Program. The following Figure 1.1 provides an overall view of this Subproject.
Figure 1.1: Image of Third Circuit 500kV (Jam-RYK) TL and Moro GS Subproject
The new 500kV transmission line (TL) is 600 km long and includes construction of a total of 1,603 towers and stringing of power cables. The TL is split into three Lots: Lot-I (202 Km) TL from Jamshoro to Moro, Lot-II (232 km) Tando Dadu to Moro & Qazi Mahar and Lot-III (166 Km) Goath Qazi Mahar to Rahim Yar Khan
1.3 Sub-Project Allignment
The TL traverses a total of 10 administrative districts, of which 9 districts fall in the Sindh province (495.99 km) and only one district (RYK) is in the Punjab province (104.10 km). They are: (1) Jamshoro, (2) Hyderabad, (3) Matyari, (4) Nawab Shah, (5) Naushahro Feroze, (6) Dadu, (7) Khairpur, (8) Sukkur and (9) Ghotki districts in the Sindh province; and (10) Rahim Yar Khan district in the Punjab province. This LARP deals with Lot-3 including District Ghotki (Sindh) and Rahim Yar Khan (Punjab). See Tables 1.2 and 1.3. Table 1.2: District, Province and Section Wise Length of Qazi Mahar-RYK 500kV TL District Name Length of TL by Sections / Sub-Sections (km) %age Ghotki 76 45.8 Rahim Yar Khan 90. 54.2 Overall Total: 166 100.0
Page 14 of 107
Table 1.3: Distribution of 500kV TL's Length and Towers by Districts and Provinces Name of District / Total Length of TL Total Towers No. Province Length (km) %age Number %age 1 Ghotki District 76 45.8 197 45.18 2 Rahimyar Khan District 90 54.2 239 54.82 Total 166 100.0 436 100.0
Table 1.4 shows that overall 80.07% of the total length of TL traverses the productive lands belonging to the local communities. It shows that over four-fifths (80%) of the length of the TL passes through an intensively cultivated area, and only one-fifth (20%) of it passes through the non-productive barren and waterlogged/saline lands. Overall, this seems quite a high percentage of productive lands being temporarily affected, but individually none of the 592 AHs (landowners and sharecroppers) will suffer a 10% or more loss of crop income, pointing to an insignificant impact of this new 500kV transmission line. Table 1.4: Temporarily Affected Length of Productive Lands (QaziMahar -RYK: 500kV TL) Section of TL by District (Name of Total Length TL in Productive Land (km) Section/Districts) of TL (km) Length of TL %age Qazi Mahar-RYK 166 132 79.51 Ghotki District 76 60 78.94 Rahimyar Khan District 90 72 80.00
Page 15 of 107
2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE
2.1 Census of Affected Households
As stated in the preceding Chapter 3, Resettlement Field Surveys (RFS), including measurement of affected assets, Census of AHs and community consultations (see Section 6) were initially carried out from 1st January to 24th February 2009. The same exercise was repeated in the 20 diversion reaches from 7th to 16th July 2009. The Census included questions about the socio-economic characteristics of AHs in order to obtain necessary information about their livelihoods and conditions.
2.2 General Information on Affected Households
2.2.1 Indigenous People
None of the AHs are tribal or minority members and all affected land is held in private ownership (i.e. no tribal or communal ownership). Similarly, none of AHs were found to be vulnerable minorities (either female, disabled/aged persons or poor; and, the 16 landless Hindu haris have already been avoided through diversions in the TL). Therefore the standard provisions of the LARF and this LARP are sufficient to ensure an effective compensation process and the requirements of ADB Policy on Indigenous People are complied with. The ADB’s policy, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for this project is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject.
2.3 Data on Affected Households and Population
2.3.1 Households
The overall total population of the 592 AHs is calculated at 5290 persons (APs) who will temporarily suffer insignificantly by the loss of crops and trees. As such their average household size comes out at 9 Persons, which indicates extend/joint family system being dominant among the AHs to share in the responsibilities and benefits and serve as safety net.
Table 2.1: Average HH Size and Population of AHs by Districts (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL) Affected District Affected Landowners* (No.) No. Name of District No. AHs Population HH Size 1 Ghotki 233 2167 9.3 2 Rahim Yar Khan 359 3123 8.7 Total (Subproject): 592 5290 9.0
Table 2.2: Summary of Affected Households, Population and Household Size (500kV TL) Tenurial Status Affected Households Affected Population Average No. District No. (AHs) %age No. (APs) %age HH Size 1 Ghotki 233 39 2167 41 9.3
Page 16 of 107
2 R.Y.Khan 359 61 3123 59 8.7 Total: 592 100 5290 100 9.
Overall gender composition ratio of the 592 AHs is almost 50:50, and the total population of 5290 APs is distributed into 2637 males and 2653 females. Table 4.4 below presents district- wise detail of the male and female populations of each group of the APs.
Table 2.3: Gender Composition & Population of AHs by Districts (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL) Affected District Affected People No. Name Male Female Total 1 Ghotki 1070 1097 2167 2 Rahim Yar Khan 1567 1556 3123 Total (Subproject): 2637 2653 5290 Percentages (M:F): 49.84 50.16 100.00
2.3.2 Housing
According to the RFS interviews and field observation, it was found that a great majority of the AHs (82%) live in small to medium sized (having 7 to 20 marla plots) mud-brick houses with wooden or semi-concrete roofing, the size depending upon their socio-economic status, affordability and size of household. However, most large landowners live in relatively large houses, built mostly with brick-mud-wood and partially concreted; only 23 of them are very large concrete houses with otaks (in Sindh) and deras (in Punjab), large men’s houses used for meetings, guests, with additional usage for storage of agricultural equipment, parking of vehicles and tractors. The formerly affected 22 landless hari families (16 Hindus and 6 Muslims) having very small mud-houses have been avoided through diversions, and therefore excluded from the list of affected households.
2.3.3 Livelihood and Incomes
As all 592 AHs rely on farming most, if not all of their income, the tenure of agricultural land is an important factor in terms of security and sustainability of livelihood. All the landowners are registered.
An analysis of the total farm sizes of the farming 592 AHs (see Table 5.4) shows that: (i) farm sizes range from 5.O6 ha to 194.42 ha (very wide range) and average at 289.1 ha. Thus, overall the farming AHs have mostly medium to large, and larger farm holdings; and smaller farms (up to 5 ha) are very few. Table 2.4: Total Farm Size of Affected Households in Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL Affected District Landowners (ha) No. Name of District Minimum Maximum Mean 1 Ghotki 5.06 206.39 208.92 2 Rahim Yar Khan 5.06 182.11 184.64 Overall (Subproject): 5.06 194.24 289.1
Page 17 of 107
The involvement of affected population in major rural economic sectors as the means of their livelihood was assessed on the basis of number of APs involved in each sector. The findings presented in Table 5.5 show that their highest involvement of the AHs and dependence on is in the prime agriculture sector (63.2%), while employment and business sectors are found to be far lower, as their involvement in these two sectors is 20.3% and 16.5%, respectively. Further assessment of gender-wise involvement of the affected population in these three major economic activities come out to be in a ratio 2:1, as 66.2% of the total actively earning population are men, while women account for only 33.8% in this regard. Moreover, the women’s involvement in the saving side of the household economy is far higher than that of men who are normally involved mainly on the earning side of the household economy. Table 2.5: Involvement of Affected Persons in Major Economic Activities (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL) Number of Persons Involvement in Economic Activities Economic Sector Affected Landowners Men Women Total 3,957 2,875 1,082 Business 681 296 977 Employment 695 347 1,042 Overall: 4,251 1,725 5,976 %ages: 47.1 19.1 66.2
2.3.4 Poverty Level
The national poverty line of 2014 is estimated at Rs. 3750 per person per month. Based on the data provided in the RFS, there are no AHs that fall on or below the poverty line. The mud-houses and sharecropped farmlands of the 16 landless haris, who were close to the poverty line, have successfully been avoided by NTDC by making diversions in the TL alignment. The remaining 614 AHs are landowners and sharecroppers/renters, who generally stand well above the poverty line, and none of them falls on or below the poverty line. The socio-economic survey identified 506 economically active persons in 165 households, means at least 3 bread earners in each household of average 6 persons per household.
As shown in Table monthly per capita incomes of the Affected Households average at Rs 11803, range from Rs. 4250 to Rs. 31000. The figures indicate that majority of the AHs are economically fairly to well off. The relatively poor haris are no longer affected by the Subproject. Table 2.6: Monthly per Capita Incomes of Affected Households (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL) Affected District Affected People (Rs.) No. Name Minimum Maximum Average 1 Ghotki 4000 30000 11116 2 Rahim Yar Khan 4500 32000 12490 Total (Subproject): 4250 31000 11803
Page 18 of 107
2.3.5 Literacy
The overall literacy rate of all APs is 59%. And overall literacy rate of all the male population is 74%, while it is 44% for the female population.
Table 2.7: Literacy Rates of APs by Tenurial Status and Gender (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500kV TL) Affected District Affected People (%) No. Name Male Female Both 1 Ghotki 70 36 53 2 Rahim Yar Khan 78 52 65 Overall (%): 74 44 59
Page 19 of 107
3. PROJECT IMPACTS/ APs BASELINE INFORMATION
3.1 Resettlement Field Survey
As a general strategy, the identification and layout of the site and a technical drawing showing line profile with complete tower spotting have been made as pre-requisites for carrying out the resettlement field surveys (RFS). The resettlement survey involved impact assessment by quantifying and costing the affected lands, structures and other assets (crops, trees, etc.) through a participatory approach, socio-economic data on AHs, and consultation with the men and women of AHs and the affected communities.
The RFS team, comprising one resettlement specialist, one male and one female field surveyors, conducted an intensive fieldwork in the subproject area between 12th. February to 1st. March 2015. Thus, NTDC has fixed 1st.March 2015 as the cut-off-date for this subproject. No subsequent changes made in land use pattern or construction of any structure will be entertained for any compensation or financial assistance.
3.2 Minimization of Impacts
The NTDC normally safeguards against and/or minimizes the likely adverse impacts on the local communities in survey, design and implementation of its power transmission subprojects, involving construction of sub-stations and transmission lines. Accordingly, the alignment of this transmission line was altered slightly at a number of places to avoid compact housing areas (villages/towns) throughout, and a large date-palm orchard area in Ghotki and R.Y.Khan districts, to avoid and minimize the likely resettlement impacts.
The original design of this Third Circuit 500kV Transmission Line (Jam-RYK) was prepared by WAPDA in early 1990s, following which the construction of tower foundations was begun in early 1996. But then the work was discontinued mid-way in April 1997, reportedly because of non-availability of funds. Considering the subproject abandoned, the local people started constructing residential and commercial structures on their lands, right in the 50m wide Right-of-Way (RoW) of the TL.
Table 3.1: Proposed Diversions in Transmission Line (Jam-RYK 500kV TL Subproject) Based on Field Resettlement and Environmental Assessments (Feb-March 2015) Field Observations Proposed Diversions Section Tower No. Constructions/Problems Found in TL's Tower No. No. of No. From To ROW From To Towers Qazi Mahar- Three Extended Villages with Mud-Built R.Y.Khan) and Semi-Pucca Houses of Haris 63 84 (landless tenants) 1 63 84 22 Two Extended Villages with Mud- 200 208 Built/Semi-Pucca Houses and One Otak 2 200 208 9 256 257 New Village Housing area established 3 255 257 3 301 303 Two Pucca Schools (Boys & Girls) 4 301 303 3
Page 20 of 107
One Pucca House (Dr. Muhd. Fatal 310 311 Bloch) 5 310 311 2 One Large Pucca House on T322 (Mira 321 323 Khalid) 6 321 323 3 Passanwali Village: New Pucca School, 353 358 and Semi-Pucca Houses and Shops 7 353 358 6 Extended Villages: Pucca/Semi-Pucca 371 376 Houses 8 371 376 6 428 430 New Village Housing area established 9 428 431 4 Total Diversions: 9 - - 58
3.3 Impacts of the Transmission Line
3.3.1 General Description
Of the total 436 towers, 365 towers will be located on private productive lands. None of the towers will be located in an urban area where it could hinder housing development, and none will have a low-bar to restrict future cultivation of the farmlands. Therefore, no land compensation will be applicable to the lands under towers, and only crop and tree compensation will be paid to the AHs for temporary affect on their productive lands by the tower construction.
All the formerly affected 15 built-up structures falling within the 50 m wide corridor (RoW) of the TL have successfully been avoided by NTDC by making diversions. Similarly, the mud- houses and sharecropped farmlands of the 22 landless haris have also been avoided. As a result, only agricultural crops, and fruit and wood trees will be affected by the TL construction, and compensated for accordingly.
The construction of towers on agricultural land will require compensation for crops and trees lost from the area under the tower and also in a small perimeter surrounding it. The area included in this perimeter has been assessed to be 2,500 m2 (or, 0.25 ha) for a 500kV tower. Crop cultivation within the corridor can continue after the stringing of lines has taken place. During the construction and stringing operations the loss of three crops is expected.
3.3.2 Affected Productive Lands
The transmission line will traverse, for the most part (80%), intensively irrigated private farmlands and some uncultivated lands (barren desert, waterlogged/saline patches). No lands will be acquired permanently for the transmission lines. However, its construction and installation works will temporarily affect agricultural and horticultural crops. 48. Overall, the agricultural crops cover 592.45ha (80 %) of the affected farmland area, while 73.23 ha (11%) of it is covered by fruit orchards (see Tables 3.6). Major most crops grown in the subproject area are wheat in rabi season (winter-spring), cotton in kharif season (summer-autumn). Secondly, mustard is cultivated in rabi season and rice in kharif season, while annual crop of sugarcane is quite common. These crops along with fruit orchards cover about 98% of the affected farmland area, while maize/fodder and vegetables are grown on the remaining 2% of the farmlands. Thus, the subproject’s impact assessment has been made on the basis of wheat, mustard, cotton, rice and sugarcane crop losses.
Page 21 of 107
A total of 992 trees (345 fruit trees and 647 wood trees) will be removed from the 50m wide RoW of the TL. The partially affected fruit orchards are planted mostly with banana orchards, and secondly with mango and date-palm., Table 4.2 shows that a total of 992 fruit will be affected, of which 134 are banana trees, mango are 183 and date-palm trees are 18 and the remaining fruit trees are guava, lemon and berri trees are 10. Besides, the affected kikar plantations are found commonly in patches, as well as in scattered form, while among the scattered wood trees shisham, eucalypts trees are common. Table 3.8 shows that a total of 657 wood trees will be affected, of which only kikar trees account for 375 trees Shesham are 209, eucliptus are 44 while the remaining 29 trees are poplar neem, and sumbal trees.
Table 3.2: Temporarily Affected Area of Productive Lands (Qazi Mahar-RYK: 500kV TL) Section of TL by District (Name of Total Land Area Affected Productive Land Section/Districts) Traversed (ha) Area (ha) %age QaziMahar-RYK 820.12 665.68 81.17 Ghotki District 369.63 301.81 81.65 Rahimyar Khan District 450.49 363.88 80.77 Total (Subproject): 2,930.43 2,346.30 80.07
Table 3.3: Temporarily Affected Productive Land by Use (500kV TL Qazi Mahar -RYK) Affected Area (ha) %age Name of District / Province Crops Orchards Total Ghotki District 355.96 2.82 358.78 49.64 Rahimyar Khan District 338.43 25.43 363.86 50.36
Table 3.4: Number of Affected Fruit Trees (500kV TL Qazi Mahar -RYK) Affected District / Province Number of Affected Fruit Trees %age No. Name of District Dates Mango Banana Others* Total 1 Ghotki District 18 15 134 3 170 49.27 2 Rahimyar Khan District 0 168 0 7 175 50.73 Total Subproject 18 183 134 10 345 100.0 Note: * Others (Fruit), include Lemon, Guava and Berri trees.
Table 3.5: Number of Affected Wood Trees (500kV TL Qazi Mahar -RYK) Affected District / Province Number of Affected Wood Trees Shisha Others %age No. Name of District m Kikar eucalipts * Total 9 Ghotki District 31 67 15 10 123 18.72 Rahimyar Khan 10 District 178 308 29 9 524 81.28 Total Subproject 209 375 44 19 657 100.0 * Others (Wood) include Neem, and Sumbal trees.
Page 22 of 107
3.3.3 Impacts of Towers
The new 500kV transmission line will require the construction of a total 436 towers, of which 358 towers (82%) will be constructed in productive lands (298 in croplands and 60 towers in fruit orchards and kikar plantations). None of the towers will be placed in urban area or have a low-bar, and sufficient clearance will be provided to ensure access by tractors and allow the affected farmers continued and unhindered cultivation of their land. The farmland under and around towers will, however, be affected temporarily by the loss of crops and trees during a 3-tier process of tower construction, namely: (i) construction of foundations, (ii) erection of towers, and (iii) stringing of power cables. The whole process is usually completed in a period of 24 to 36 months, thereby causing crop losses for up to three cropping seasons. Accordingly, cash compensation will be paid to the affected farmers for the loss of agricultural crops for three seasons. Table 3.9 shows that a total of 436 towers will be constructed on 109 ha of productive farmlands.
Table 3.6: Towers in Productive Farmlands and Affected Crops (Qazi Mahar -RYK 500 kV TL)
Cropping Season Affected Crop No. of Towers Affected Crop Area (ha)
Annual Crop (49 Towers) Sugarcane 49 46.96 Rabi Season Crops Wheat 300 400.35 Mustard 58 66.00 Kharif Season Crops Cotton 315 100.00 Rice 43 25.99 Total: - 436 629.30
3.4 Significance of Impacts
The impact of loss of crops will be insignificant on all the 592 AHs, as none of them will lose >10% of his total crop income. The 50m wide strip of land will be acquired temporarily as a working corridor for installation of new towers and stringing of power lines. Fair compensation will be paid to all the affected landowners and sharecroppers for the loss of their crops and trees.
Page 23 of 107
4. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
4.1 Land Acquisition Act
The Pakistan law governing land acquisition is the LAA of 1894 and successive amendments. The LAA regulates the land acquisition process and enables the provincial government to acquire private land for public purposes. Land acquisition is a provincial responsibility and provinces have also their own province specific implementation rules like Sindh Land Acquisition Rules, 1983. The LAA and its Implementation Rules require that, following an impact identification and valuation exercise, land and crops are compensated in cash at the current market rate to titled landowners. The LAA mandates that land valuation is to be based on the last 3 to 5 years average registered land-sale rates. However, in several recent cases, the median rate over the past 1 year, or even the current rates, have been applied with an added 15% Compulsory Acquisition Surcharge according to the provision of the law. The displaced persons, if not satisfied, can go to the Court of Law to contest the compensation award of the Land Acquisition Collector (LAC). The various sections relating to the land acquisition are briefly discussed. SALIENT FEATURES OF PAKISTAN’S LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 (AMENDED)
Key Sections Salient Features of the Key Sections of LAA 1894 Publication of preliminary notification and power for conducting survey Section-4 and investigation.. Section-5 Formal notification of land needed for a public purpose
Section-5A Providing right of complaints to APs for review/ inquiry for quantities and compensation.
Section-6 The Government makes a more formal declaration of intent to acquire land. Section -7 Land Commissioner shall direct Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) to take order for the acquisition of land. Section-8 The LAC to direct the land required to be physically marked out, measured and planned. Section-9 The LAC gives notice to all affected/displaced persons (APs/DPs) that the Government intends to take possession of the land and if they have any claims for compensation then those claims are to be made to him at an appointed time. Section-10 Delegates power to the LAC to record statements of APs/DPs in the area of land to be acquired or any part thereof as co-proprietor, sub- proprietor, mortgagee, and tenant or otherwise. Section-11 Enables the LAC to make enquiries into the measurements, value and claim and then to issue the final “award". The award includes the land's marked area and the valuation of compensation. Section-16 When the LAC has made an award under Section 11, he will then take
Page 24 of 107
possession and the land shall thereupon vest absolutely in the Government, free from all encumbrances. Section-17 Urgency acquisition whereby land possession is taken prior to payment of compensation Section-18 In case of dissatisfaction with the award, DPs may request the LAC to refer the case onward to the court for a decision. This does not affect the Government taking possession of the land. Section -23 The award of compensation for the owners for acquired land is determined at its market value plus 15% in view of the compulsory nature of the acquisition for public purposes. Section-28 Relates to the determination of compensation values and interest premium for land acquisition Section-31 Authorizing LAC, instead of awarding cash compensation in respect of any land, to make any arrangement with APs having an interest in such land, including grant of other lands in exchange. Section-35 Refers to the temporary occupation of arable or waste land subject to the provision of Part VII of the Act. The provincial government may direct the Collector to procure the occupation and use of the same for such term as it shall think fit, not exceeding three years from the commencement of such occupation. Section-36 Provides information relating to the power to entre and take possession, and compensation on restoration. On the payment of such compensation, or on executing such agreement or on making a reference under Section 35, the Collector may entre upon and take possession of the land, and use or permit the use thereof in accordance with the terms of the said notice.
4.2 Telegraph Act (TA), 1885.
In case of impacts caused by poles and towers for public facilities and transmission lines, the land acquisition is not regulated by the LAA but instead by the Telegraph Act, 1885 (amended in 1975). The original provision of this law was that the land occupied by telegraph poles was not to be compensated (only crops destroyed during the erection of the pole were compensated).This was based on the logic that a pole, covering only a negligible land area, does not cause substantial impacts to land users. This, however, is no longer the case once the same provision is extended to transmission towers.
The Telegraph Act (Section 11) confers powers on the NTDC to enter private lands and (Section 10) construct/maintain electric poles and lines without the need to acquire the land affected and paying compensation for it.However, theSub-section 10 (d), provides that a DISCOs is required to avoid causing unnecessary damages to the affected land and associated assets. Finally, theSection 16 provides that if any such damage occurs (i.e. damages to crops, irrigation facilities, land quality or land income). The proponent has to provide compensation for the damages.
To accommodate the APs needs, under this Program, the DISCOs have agreed to apply the Telegraphic Act liberally by i) compensating at market rates all land occupied by towers in urban areas; ii) by avoiding land impacts in rural areas through the use of towers with
Page 25 of 107
sufficient vertical clearance to allow the continuation of unrestricted farming and animal grazing; and iii) if the construction of such towers is impossible, by compensating the land occupied by tower bases land also in rural areas. In addition, the DISCOs will compensate by default all crops expected to be affected by the 3 major distribution lines construction phases, i.e. i) construction of tower bases; ii) tower erection; and iii) stringing.
4.3 ADB's Policy and Resettlement Principles
The policy principles and objectives are discussed below with the key principles. When land other than government owned land is to be acquired then a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) is required. In cases, where just unused government land needs to be acquired then a LARP is required. The Objective of SPS2 is to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring sub- project and design alternatives; to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-sub-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. The involuntary resettlement safeguards covers physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas.The major Policy Principles are briefly discussed as under:
1. Screen the sub-project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of displaced persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.
2. Carry out meaningful consultations with displaced persons, host communities, and concerned non- government organizations. Inform all displaced persons of their entitlements and resettlement options; and also pay particular attention to the needs of vulnerable groups3, especially those below the poverty line. Specific safeguards cover Indigenous People, including those without statutory title to land, including those having communal rights. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the displaced persons' concerns.
3. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons through (i) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based, and where it is possible to give cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where these are possible.
4. Provide physically and economically displaced persons, with needed assistance, including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land,
2 . ADB Safeguard Policy statement, 2009.
3These include the landless, the elderly, women and children. Page 26 of 107
better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of sub-project benefits to host communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.
5. Improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.
6. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement to ensure that those people who enter into negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better income and livelihood status.
7. Ensure that displaced persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.
8. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on displaced persons' entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.
9. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before sub-project appraisal, in an accessible place a form and language(s) understandable to displaced persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the resettlement plan and its updates to displaced persons.
10. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development sub- project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of sub-project's costs and benefits. For a sub-project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the sub-project as a stand-alone operation.
11. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout sub-project implementation.
12. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of displaced persons and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of the resettlement monitoring.
13. Disclose monitoring reports.
Page 27 of 107
4.4 Comparison of LAA and ADB Policy Principles and Practices
The review of land acquisition act and ADB policy principles has been done to identify the differences and gaps between the ADB assessment procedures and the requirements of the government of Pakistan. Comparison of Pakistan's Acts4and ADB SPS Telegraph Act (1885)& ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) Pakistan Land Acquisition Act (1894) Telegraph Act (1885 • Based on ADB policy all land impacts • The Telegraph act (TA) provides that land are to be compensated. As urban/ for tower construction or under a residential-commercial land is transmission, line is not to be acquired or affected both if a tower provides compensated as long as the land's clearance and not, the TA provisions permanent productive potential is not have been modified for this sub- affected. Under the TA therefore only project, so as to address damages temporary impacts on crops are that a tower causes to plots with compensated. real estate value. For this sub- project urban and commercial or residential plots whether urban or LAA 1894 • Lack of title should not be a bar to • Only titled landowners or customary compensation. Requires equal rights holders are recognized for treatment of those without clear compensation. land titles (e.g., squatters or other informal settlers) in terms of their entitlements for resettlement • Only titled landowners or customary • Lack of title should not be a bar to rights holders are recognized for compensation. Requires equal compensation. treatment of those without clear land titles (e.g., squatters or other informal settlers) in terms of their entitlements for resettlement • Only registered landowners, • Crop compensation is to be sharecroppers and leaseholders are provided irrespective of the land eligible for compensation of crop losses. registration status of the affected farmers/share croppers. Crops for two seasons Rabi (winter) and Kharif (summer) for full one year • Tree losses are compensated based on • Tree losses are to be compensated outdated officially fixed rates by the according to market rates based on relevant forest and agriculture productive age or wood volume, departments. depending on tree type. All the removed trees will remain the
4Telegraph Act,1885 & LAA 1894
Page 28 of 107
• Land valuation is based on the median • Land valuation is to be based on registered land transfer rate over the 3 current replacement (market) years prior to Section 4 of the LAA being value with an additional payment invoked.15% compulsory acquisition of 15%. The valuation for the charges are paid over and above the acquired housing land and other assessed compensation. However, assets is the full replacement costs recent practice is that prices based on keeping in view the fair market the average over the last one year prior values, transaction costs and other to acquisition commencing is applied. applicable payments that may be • The valuation of structures is based on • The valuation of built-up structures official rates, with depreciation deducted is based on current market value from gross value of the structure and but with consideration of the cost also 15% of the value of salvaged of new construction of the materials, structure, with no deduction for depreciation. The APs can salvage • The decisions regarding land acquisition • Information related to the and the amounts of compensation to be quantification and valuation of paid are published in the official Gazette land,structures, other immovable and notified in accessible places so that assets, entitlements and amounts the people affected are well informed, of compensationand financial assistance are to be disclosed to the displaced persons prior to sub-
• There is no provision for income and • The ADB policy requires livelihood rehabilitation measures. There rehabilitation for lost income and are also no special allowances for special AP expenses during the vulnerable displaced persons relocation process. There are also including vulnerable groups such as provisions to be made for women headed households. There are transitional period costs, and no requirements to assess opportunities livelihood restoration. for benefit sharing. Particular attention must be paid to the poor and vulnerable groups, including women. A guiding principle is that APs should at least be able to reach a defined • Prepare and disclose resettlement plans • Resettlement plans are prepared in (RPs) - there is no law or policy that English and disclosed to the requires preparation of RPs. displaced peoples in local language (Urdu). • Grievance redress is established through • Provide a continuous mechanisms/ the formal land acquisition process at a set-up that are accessible locally point in time or through appeals to the and available throughout sub- • Onlycourt. compensation is paid but not • Allproject compensation implementation. and allowances resettlement allowances, there is no to be paid prior to physical or mechanism to ensure payment is made economic dislocation. • No requirements to prepare and disclose • Prepare and disclose monitoring monitoring reports. reports.
Page 29 of 107
4.5 Reconciliation between Pakistan’s Acts and ADB SPS
To reconcile the differences between the LAA (1894), Telegraph Act 1885 and ADB policy, a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) has been prepared by the NTDC (EA). This LARF ensures that compensation to the affected people will be provided at replacement cost basis for all direct and indirect losses, so that no one could be worsen-off because of the sub-project. The provision of subsidies or allowances will also need to be given for affected households (AHs) that may be relocated, suffer business losses, or may be vulnerable.In this context, the following ADB Safeguard principles are considered to reconcile the differences: i). the need to screen the sub-project early at the planning stage ii). carry out meaningful consultations iii). at the minimum restore livelihood levels to what they were before the sub-project, improve the livelihoods of affected vulnerable groups iv). prompt compensation at full replacement cost is to be paid v). provide affected people with adequate assistance vi). ensure that affected people who have no statutory rights to the land that they are working and eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for the loss of non-land assets; and vii). Disclose all reports.
4.6 Legislation relevant to Land Classification
In terms of implementation of this LARP, identifying the type of land affected will be an important step in determining eligibility for compensation for land. The land classification is governed by the Land Revenue Act (1967) which should be read in conjunction with the LAA 1894; and other legislation that may apply, including the Punjab Alienation of Land Act (1900), Colonization of Government Lands Act (1912) and the various Land Reform Regulations. The LRA 1967 classifies the land as Rural and Urban. Rural land falls under the jurisdiction of revenue districts. Land, other than rural is urban and include all permutations there-under such as residential, commercial, built upon and buildable, and is governed by various regulations and ordinances including the People’s Local Government Ordinance (1972) for each province, Cantonments Act (1924), and Land Control Act (1952). Urban land falls under the jurisdiction of Municipal and Local Government Authorities. For this sub- project, the urban and rural areas have been identified on the basis of board of revenue records. Similarly, the residential, commercial and agricultural plots were identified based on the classification provided by district revenue records as well as by considering the actual use of the affected land prior to the entitlements cut-off date. In case of discordance between revenue records and actual use, the actual use was adopted. Therefore, during the field survey for the preparation of this LARP, the identification of land ownership was done with the assistance of local people, LAC and Patwari of the area.
Page 30 of 107
5. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOSURE
5.1 General.
The main objectives of the consultation were to provide a platform to the stakeholders, to voice concerns or suggestions to the Project team and to develop a collective sense of ownership for the activities of the Project team. Consultations were made with the stakeholders and general public. Consultative meetings, scoping sessions and focused group discussions were held to learn about the views and concerns of the public on the proposed development works. The concerns raised by the stakeholders were considered in developing the compensation packages and social mitigation plan, in order to enhance the Project acceptability for the general public on social considerations.
5.2 Stakeholder’s Consultations.
There are two types of stakeholders, i.e. primary and secondary stakeholders. The primary stakeholders are the initial stakeholders, such as affected persons, general public including women resided in villages in the vicinity of the sub-project area.Accordingly; the consultations were made with all primary stakeholders for sharing the information regarding the sub-project and feedback from the community.
The consultations were also held with the secondary stakeholdersincludingtheofficials/ staff involved in land acquisition, survey & investigation, planning& design, and management. A list of consultative meetings with officials is presented in Table 3.1. Table 5.1: List of Officials Consulted Location/ Name of Sr.No. Date Designation Venue Officials
1 14 -02- 2015 NESPAK Office, 1. Sanaullah Ghotki 1. Eng. NESPAK 2. M. Aqib , 2.Line Superintendent - I 3. M. Ayoob 3. Assistant Land Acquisition 4. Sanaullah Officer 4. Patwari (Village Accountant 1 2 20- 02- 2015 NTDC XEN Office 1. Akram . XEN NTDC Rahim Yar Khan Dhareejo 2. Khurram 2. SDO NTDC 3. Naeem ullah 3. Eng. NESPAK
5.3 Public Consultations.
Four consultations were made with the affectees and other local community to share the information about the sub-project and record their concerns/ feedback associated with this
Page 31 of 107
sub-project. In this context, the APs shared their point of view regarding payment of their affected land;as most the local people had their concerns regarding true assessment of compensation.
List ofpublicconsultations carried out in the APs of the proposed sub-projectlandis given in Table 3.2 as follow. Table 5.2: List of Stakeholders Consultations Public Consul Location/ Category of Name of Main Date tation Venue participants Participants No. 1 Feb. 14 Village Rahim Businessman, 1. Feroz-u-Din 2015 Bushkh Chacher Farmers Mehrani Tehsil &i Mason 2. Bagul Chacher District Ghotki Labour 3. Mumtaz Chacher Affectees 4. Sher Mohammad Chacher 5. Rafeeq Chachar 6. Nasir Mahmood 2 Feb. 19 2015 Village Darga Hakeem, 1. Molah Bushkh Syed Poor Shah Farmers, 2. Kandar Ali District Ghotki Affectees 3. Mohd Bushkh Mehear
4. Shakh Mohd Samejo 5. Gul Mohammad Samejo 6. Ghulam Hussen Samejo 7. Khuda Bushkh Rahar 8. Chakh Basheer Arian 3. Feb. 23 2015 Village Khair Farmers, 1. Mohamad Asghar Habib Langah Affectees Kokar Tehsil 2. Ghulam Akbar Kokar Sadiqabad, 3. Daud Ahmad Distt. R.Y.Khan Sheikh 4. Habib Ahmad Sheikh 5. Javed Ahmad Jatt 6. Sharif Ahmad Bhatti 7. Javed Ahmad Jatt
Page 32 of 107
8. Sharif Ahmad Bhatti 9. Khalid Saleem Arain 10. Saleh Mohamad Manga 4 Feb. 27 2015 Village Hassan Farmers, 1. Allah Hussen Dando Tehsil & Affectees Dando Distt. R.Y.Khan 2. Khuda Bushkh Dando 3. Allah Hussen Dando 4. Allah Diwah Dando 5. Jam Allah Daiwah 6. Jam Rabnawaz Dando 7. Allah Diwah Dando 8. Ghulam Shabir Jath 9. Pir Hassan Shah Jelani 10. Manzoor Hussen 11. Jameel Hussen
5.4 Social and Resettlement Specific Concerns Raised by the APs
The major concerns raised during the consultation are i) adequacy and timely payment of compensation, ii) employment opportunity for local population during construction activities, iii) safe and free mobility of locals especially women and children and iv) safety measures to be taken during construction activities. Local community response regarding project perception and resettlement related matters is summarized below: • The project will help in the stable supply of electricity in the area. • More income earning opportunities will be available as a result of project implementation. • Compensation for the affected land should be made on the prevailing market rates; • Affected trees should also be compensated according to the current market rates; • Compensation payments to the APs should be made before the start of subproject works; • Local skilled and unskilled labour should be employed at the subproject, where possible; • The lands under the Contractor’s use should be rehabilitated by the Contractor after
Page 33 of 107
the construction work is completed;
The APs concerns and suggestions have been incorporated in the social mitigation and resettlement plan and will be implemented as an integral part of the resettlement activities. On the basis of these sessions and meetings, and the provisions of the LARF that is based on ADB SPS 2009, Entitlement Matrix (EM) and compensation packages were prepared for the APs.
5.5 Other General Concerns Raised by the APs
The other major concerns raised during the consultations included the adequacy and timeliness of compensation payments, as well as safety measures to be taken during the construction of the sub-project. The views of the APs and local communities (awareness, perceptions and preferences) about the subproject and resettlement related matters are summarized as follows: • This subproject is necessary to fulfil the electricity needs of the local area; • Subproject works should be completed in time. • The compensation for the affected structures, crops and trees should be fair and timely. • The existing low tension lines should also be replaced so that people could receive the full benefits of the subproject. • Affected trees should be given fair compensation at prevailing market rates. • Local norms should be honoured during the course of execution of project works. • Transmission line should be kept away from the settlements for the safety of general public. • Construction work should be completed in time. • Stakeholder’s consultation should be an integral part of the resettlement process. 5.6 Information Disclosure.
This LARP in English is to be disclosed on the ADB website, while the one in local language will be disclosed in the EA website and in local administrative offices. A summary pamphlet of the LARP in English is included in the Annex-A of the LARP and that a copy of its version in local language will be sent to all APs. Disclosure is a condition for LARP approval.
Furthermore, this LARP will also be disclosed in local language to the Aps and some other key local persons resided in the vicinity sub-project area, so that each AP could be able to understand the sub-project activities, i.e. the sub-project, cut-off date, eligibility for entitlement of compensation, methods of measurement, price assessment & valuation of losses, payment of compensation, community complaints redress system, budget and monitoring & evaluation.
The PIU will keep the APs informed about the impacts and entitlement of compensation and facilitate in addressing grievance (s) of the APs as well as local community members. Finally,
Page 34 of 107
there will be on-site community/ APs gathering to monitor the entitled disbursement of the compensation to the APs.
A copy of the information brochure will also be placed at PIU at field level and in PMU at sub-project level for ready reference.
Page 35 of 107
6 COMPENSATION ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENTS
Land acquisition tasks under the program, and for this subproject, will be implemented according to a compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with Pakistan’s law/ regulation and ADB Policy.
A summary entitlements matrix is included in Table 3.3 below. Table 6.1: Compensation and Entitlement Matrix
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements5 Persons Temporary Access is not • Farmers/ No compensation for land provided impacts on restricted Titleholders that the land is rehabilitated/ restored arable land and existing to its former quality following or current completion of works; land use will Leaseholders/ • No compensation for land provided remain Sharecroppers that the land is rehabilitated/ restored unchanged (registered or to its former quality following not) completion of works; • Agricultural Compensation, in cash for lost workers employment for the affected period. • Squatters Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and trees, where these are owned by the squatters. • All adverse Farmers/ Land for land compensation with plots effects on Titleholders of equal value and productivity to the
land use plots lost; or; • independent Cash compensation plus 15% CAS for affected land at replacement cost of severity of impact based on market value free of taxes, Permanent registration, and transfer costs impacts on Leaseholders/ • Renewal of lease/ sharecropping arable land Sharecroppers contract in other plots of equal value/ where (registered or productivity of plots lost, or access is not) • Cash equivalent to market value of restricted gross yield of affected land for the and/or land remaining lease/ contract years (up to a maximum of 3 years).
5 Compensation for all assets will be to the owner of the asset.
Page 36 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements5 Persons • use will be Agricultural Cash indemnity corresponding to their affected workers losing salary (including portions in kind) for their contract the remaining part of the agricultural year. • Squatters 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross harvest (in addition to crop compensation) for land use loss. • Additional Farmers/ 1 severe impact allowance equal to provisions Titleholders market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of for severe Leaseholders impacts winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop (More than compensation) 10% of land • Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to loss) market value of share of harvest lost (registered or (additional to standard crop not) compensation) • Squatters 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crops and additional to standard crop compensation) • Residential/ Titleholders Land for land compensation through provision of a plots comparable in Commercial value/ location to plot lost or Land • Cash compensation plus 15% CAS for affected land at full replacement cost free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs. • Renters/ 3 months rent or a value Leaseholders proportionate to the duration of the remaining lease, including any deposits they may lose. • Squatters Accommodation in available alternate land/ or a self-relocation allowance (Rs. 9,000). • Houses/ All relevant Cash compensation plus 10% APs electrification allowance at Structures replacement rates for affected (including structure and other fixed assets free of salvageable materials, depreciation
Page 37 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements5 Persons squatters) and transaction costs. • Affected tenants will receive cash compensation of a value proportionate to the duration of the remaining lease period, or three months, whichever is higher. • In case of partial permanent impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure, in addition to compensation at replacement cost for the affected part of the structure. • Crops Crops All APs owning Crop compensation in cash at full affected crops market rate for one harvest (either (including winter or summer) by default for squatters) impacts caused by grid construction, tower base, stringing and access. • All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. • Trees Trees All APs owning For timber/ wood trees, the affected trees compensation will be at market (including value of tree's wood content. • squatters) Fruit trees: Cash compensation based on lost production for the entire period needed to reestablish a tree of equal productivity. • Business/ Temporary All APs Business owner: i) Cash compensation (including equal to one year income, if loss is Employmen or permanent squatters, permanent; ii) In case of temporary t loss of agriculture loss, cash compensation equal to the business or workers) period of the interruption of business employment up to a maximum of six months or covering the period of income loss based on construction activity. • Workers/ employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption up to a maximum of 3 months (at OPL level Rs. 9,000/ month). • Relocation Transport All APs Provision of sufficient allowance to and affected by cover transport expenses and transitional relocation livelihood expenses for one month (Rs. livelihood 9,000 per household).
Page 38 of 107
Asset Specification Affected Compensation Entitlements5 Persons costs • Community Mosques, Affected Rehabilitation/ substitution of assets footbridges, community affected structures/ utilities (i.e. roads, mosques, footbridges, roads, schools, schools, health centers). health center • Vulnerable Households’ All affected Lump sum one time livelihood APs below vulnerable APs assistance allowance (Rs. 9,000 at OPL livelihood poverty line Punjab) on account of livelihood and female restoration support. headed • Temporary or permanent employment households, during construction or operation, disable where ever feasible. persons of HH. Unidentified Unanticipated All APs • Deal appropriately during sub-project Losses impacts implementation according to the ADB Safeguard Policy
6.2 Eligibility
AHs entitled for compensation or rehabilitation provisions under the program are: • All AHs affected by restricted access to, or use of, land whether they have legal title/traditional land rights or not; • Tenants and sharecroppers whether registered or not; • Owners of crops, plants, or other objects attached to the land.
Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date to be set for each subproject on the last date of the Resettlement Field Surveys (RFS). AHs who settle in the affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. They will, however, be given sufficient advance notice, requested to vacate premises and dismantle affected structures prior to project implementation. Their dismantled structures will not be confiscated and they will not pay any fine or sanction. Forced eviction will only be considered after all other efforts are exhausted.
Cut-off Date: Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date fixed by NTDC 1st. March 2015 for this subproject. AHs that settle in the affected areas and/or make changes in the land use patterns after this cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. They will, however, be given sufficient advance notice requesting them to vacate premises/corridor and dismantle all affected structures and other establishments (if any) prior to project
Page 39 of 107
implementation. They will be allowed to reuse their salvaged material for free and they will not be asked to pay any fine for making those change. Forced eviction will only be considered after all other efforts are exhausted.
6.3 Strategy for Compensation of Land Affected by Towers
Besides the amended LAA, the NTDC has adopted the Telegraph Act, 1885 (amended) for the construction and maintenance of power transmission lines. The latter Act was originally framed for the construction of telegraphic poles during the British Era and later inherited by Pakistan upon independence. This Act was subsequently adopted by WAPDA for electric poles and supply lines, and eventually passed to NTDC. However, telegraphic or electric poles cover a much smaller area of land compared with transmission towers which have the potential to affect crops, orchards and scattered wood and fruit trees. The NTDC makes utmost efforts to minimize resettlement impacts, alternatively the affected farmers are compensated for their crop and tree losses, and built-up structures requiring relocation, based on prevalent market prices.
Based on current Pakistani Law and NTDC’s practice, the land under the towers is not acquired permanently and therefore compensation is not required for land. For this Program, however, it was agreed between NTDC and ADB that the land under the tower will not be acquired, but would only require compensation in the case where: (i) in rural areas, the tower hinders access to the land under the tower for cultivation; and/or, (ii) in urban/residential areas, the tower restricts use of the land for housing development.
In the case of urban/residential areas, the land under towers will be considered as being permanently affected and therefore it will be compensated in full. In the case of rural areas and agricultural land, as long as the towers provide sufficient clearance to allow the continuation of crop cultivation, the land will be considered to be temporarily affected (for the duration of tower installation and stringing of the lines) and therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. However, the respective landowners can reuse such land for cultivation or similar purposes. But, as none of the towers of this 500kV TL are located in an urban area nor they will hinder future cultivation of land in rural areas, no land compensation will be applicable for the land under tower, and only crop and tree compensation will be paid to the AHs.
The construction of towers on agricultural land however will still require the provision of compensation for crops and loss of trees, for the area under the tower plus a small perimeter surrounding it (an access and working area). The area included in the perimeter has been assessed at 2,500 m2 (or 0.25 ha) for a 500 kV tower. Furthermore, as the construction of towers involves a 3-tier process, namely: (i) preparation of the foundation; (ii) erection of the tower; and, (iii) stringing of the power cables, and this process has the potential to affect three crops, and thus, compensation for three crops will be paid to the affected farmers.
6.4 Compensation Entitlements
Entitlement provisions for AHs cover such impacts as land losses, house and buildings losses, crops and trees losses, a relocation subsidy, rehabilitation measures, and a business losses allowance based on tax declarations and/or lump sums. Under the resettlement entitlement
Page 40 of 107
if unanticipated impacts are encountered during the implementation of the LARP, the entitlement as defined by the LARF shall be applied, and consultation shall be done to inform APs or new APs of the additional impacts. To ensure that the compensation is reflective of appropriate rates corresponding to actual impacts, the updated rates shall be applied, if and when the delivery of compensation gets delayed. These entitlements are detailed below: • Agricultural land impacts will be compensated based on whether an AH’s access to, or use of, their land is restricted. For AHs whose access to, and use of, agricultural land is not restricted i.e. they can continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be for removed or damaged crops and trees. For AHs whose access to, or use of, agricultural land is restricted i.e. they cannot continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be paid at replacement value in: (i) cash at current market rates plus a 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge (CAS), or (ii) through replacement land equal in value/productivity to the plot lost. When >10% of an AH’s income or agricultural land is affected, AHs (owners, leaseholders and sharecroppers) will get an additional allowance for severe impacts equal to the market value of a year’s gross yield of the land lost (inclusive of winter and summer harvest). Eventual transaction taxes/fees will either be paid by NTDC or waived by local governments. Market rates will be assessed through a survey of prevalent land prices, carried out by local government financing institutions. • Renters/leaseholders will receive an allowance corresponding to 3 months’ rent. However, the land under towers and line (50m wide RoW) can be used by the landowner or sharecropper for cultivation or the like. • Crops: Cash compensation at current market rates for the net harvest actually lost being as it may be the winter, the summer crop, or both. Crop compensation will be paid both to landowners and tenants based on their specific sharecropping agreements. • Trees: Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement • Agricultural land leaseholders, sharecroppers, and workers: Where the access to, or use of, the land is restricted; affected leaseholders will receive either a renewal of the lease in other plots or cash corresponding to the yearly yield of land lost for remaining years of the lease up to a maximum of 3 years. Sharecroppers will receive their share of harvest at market rates (if impact is temporary) or if the land is lost permanently additional compensation for 1 crop. Agricultural workers, with contracts interrupted, will get an indemnity in cash corresponding to their salary in cash and kind for the remaining part of the agricultural year (inclusive of both winter and summer crops).
6.5 Assessment of Compensation Unit Values
The methodology for assessing unit compensation values of different items is as illustrated as follows:
Page 41 of 107
• Annual crops will be valued at net market rates at the farm gate for the first year crop. In the eventuality that more than one-year compensation is due to the AHs the crops after the first will be compensated at gross market value. • Fruit trees will be valued based on age category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive trees will be valued at gross market value of 1 year income x the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree.
Page 42 of 107
7. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
1. The coordination involved for various institutions for the implementation of LARP include NTDC (Executing Agency) and other line Departments, such as Revenue, Forest, Agriculture including Horticulture wing; Wapda, and other concerned.
2. The PMU (NTDC) will be responsible for the updation of this draft LARP at final detailed design and implementation of final LARP of 500 kV Janshoro-Moro transmission line. The Project Director (PMU) through the Environment and Social Impact Cell (E&SIC) will be responsible for the implementation of LARP in accordance with the procedures laid-down in this updated LARP and LARF.
7.1 National Transmission and Despatch Company
3. The NTDC (Executing Agency) will be responsible for the project preparation, implementation and financing of all LAR tasks and coordination with line agencies. NTDC will perform its functions through the Project Management Unit. The PMU is headed by a General Manager (Projects) will be responsible for general project execution through the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) at field level (District level), which will tasked with day to day project activities.
4. For updating, implementation and monitoring of LAR activities, the PMU (GM- Projects) will be facilitated by i) E&SIC at project level, ii) PIU at field level, iii) GRC at both field and project level to ensure timely implementation of LARP. a) Environment and Social Impact Cell (E&SIC)
5. At project level, an E&SIC is already in place at PMU, NTDC, which needs to be strengthened by adding one position for data management/ MIS. Thus, the team composition of E&SIC includes:
i). Manager, E&SIC, NTDC Focal Member ii). Deputy Manager (Environment) Member iii). Assistant Manager (Social Safeguard) Member iv). Assistant Manager (Environment), NTDC Member v). Assistant Manager (MIS/ Data Management)6 Member vi). Surveyor Member
6. In addition to ToR, the E&SIC will have the following functions in this sub-project:
i). The E&SIC will be responsible for the updation, implementation and monitoring of land acquisition and resettlement plan through the assistance of PIU (Project Implementation Unit at field). The E&SIC will have regular monthly meetings to review the progress regarding LARP implementation and accordingly prepare
6 For data management, a position of assistant manager, data management/ MIS will be added to undertake proper data management regarding, i) baseline data & impact data, ii) implementation of LARP, iii) grievances/ and redress of grievances, iv) internal & external monitoring and other relevant data.
Page 43 of 107
actions in accordance with the implementation schedule given in the LARP.
ii). The E&SIC will have close liaison and coordination with the PIU (field level) and Grievance Redress Committee (GRC).
iii). The E&SIC will manage the updation of LARP at final design, including updation of surveys, measurements/ assessment, valuation in coordination with concerned department.
7. Some specific functions of the E&SIC through the assistance of field level PIU include: i). Implementation of approved LARP as per implementation schedule given in LARP. ii). Preparation of internal monitoring reports, initially on monthly basis and then quarterly basis and submits to ADB. iii). Updation of LARP (if necessary depending upon the final design) including surveys, measurements/ assessment, valuation in coordination with concerned department and community consultations. iv). Disclosure of final LARP to the APs and place at field office (PIU). v). Close coordination with field level PIU vi). Other relevant activities
8. All activities related to the LARP updation, and implementation of LARP and preparation of internal monitoring reports will be the responsibility of Manager (E&SIC) under the overall supervision of PMU (GM Projects). While the disclosure of LARP after translating onto local language and continuous community consultations/ mobilization will be under the purview of Assistant Manager (Social Safeguard). Manager (E&SIC) will develop a close liaison with the PIU and GRC regarding a smooth and timely implementation of LARP.
9. An independent monitoring agency or individual external monitor/ external monitoring agency (which may be an academic institute, consultancy or professional NGO or panel of experts, or individual consultant) will be hired by the NTDC (PMU) to conduct the short and medium term tasks of external monitoring activities7.
10. As per SPS 2009, all monitoring reports will be disclosed to the affected parties (APs) including the preparation of corrective action plan (if any). b) Project Implementation Unit (PIU)
11. The project implementation Unit (PIU) to be in place at Field level and will be notified by the PMU. The composition of PIU will be as follow:
i). Executive Engineer (NTDC) ii). DO (Revenue)/ LAC iii). Representative of E&SIC, PMU (AM, Social Safeguards) iv). Assistant Manager (Social Mobilization/ Social Mobilizer)
7The short term tasks will occur in parallel and immediately after the delivery of LARP compensation. They will preparation a compliance report which is a condition to start civil works. The medium term task will be the monitoring of the effectiveness of the compensation package.
Page 44 of 107
v). Contractor vi). Project Management Consultant (Safeguard Implementation Specialist) vii). Patwari viii). Representative of Affected Party Committee (APC).
12. The PIU to be notified at Field level headed by the Executive Engineer, NTDC.
13. The major responsibilities of PIU will include:
• Distribute the notices to the entitled APs regarding their payment of compensation; • Facilitate the APs in completion of necessary documentation to receive their entitled payments; • Develop a close interaction with the APs/ community to address their possible concerns. • Provide proper guidance for the submission of their requests for compensation as per eligibility & entitlement. • Help the APs to put their complaints (if any) in front of GRC, if still issue not resolved consult the Court of law. • Help the APs in other related activities.
14. The PIU will have close interaction with E&SIC especially with Manager (E&SIC) and AM (Social Safeguards).
7.2 Local Government
15. The concerns relating to the land acquisition (if any) will be dealt by the concerned District Officer (Revenue)/ LAC. Other supporting staff especially the Patwari will carry out some specific functions like titles identification as per Revenue record. The functions pertaining to compensation of other assets, such as trees, crops, structures and income rehabilitation/ livelihood assistance, the assessment and valuation will be carried out by the LAC in coordination with District Officer (s) of concerned Departments.
7.3 ADB
16. Review and approval of documents, i.e. LARP, internal monitoring and external monitoring reports as well corrective action plan (if any).
7.4 LAR Coordination Committee
17. With the effective coordination of all concerned departments/ agencies, the assessment and valuation of losses will be carried out and accordingly, payment of compensation will be made to eligible and entitled APs. Timely payment to the APs will ensure the smooth implementation of this sub-project. This committee will be notified by the EA (PMU-NTDC) in order to coordinate for updation and implementation of this LARP.
18. The composition of the committee will include:
i). GM Projects (PMU, NTDC) ii). Manager (E&SIC)
Page 45 of 107
iii). Executive Engineer (PIU) iv). DO (Revenue)/ LAC v). DO (s) of concerned Departments (such as Agriculture, Forest, C&W, PHE)
19. The LAR CC will meet preferably quarterly to ensure proper and timely implementation of the approved LARP.
7.5 Affected Person Committee
20. The affected person committee (APC) will be formed at sub-project level representing the participation from each village constituting a Chairman, secretary and member (s).
21. The APC will be responsible for the following activities:
• Interaction between the community/ affectees and the PIU • Information disclosure and consultations • Help in the completion of requisite documents for payment • Ensure the payment of compensation in accordance with the entitlement matrix/ LARP. • Redress complaints at local level • Other
7.6 Grievance Redress Mechanism
22. This section of the LARP describes mechanism to receive and facilitates the resolution of affected party including women’ concerns and grievances. A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an AP appealing any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets compensation. APs will be fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints whether verbally or in writing during consultation, survey, and time of compensation.
23. APs/ local community will enter their complaints/ concerns and issues formally including the information of date, name and address of complainant, description of complain. The Assistant Manager (social mobilization) at PIU will maintain a register named as “community complaint register (CCR)”. The register will include the information as date, name and address of complainant, description of complaints, and will enter the complaints in a date covering the minimum information of name and address of complaint, description of complaints, action taken, status of redress of complaints and reasons in case issue not resolved.
24. GRC will work at field level, while unsettled issues will be referred to the PMU at sub- project level. The field level PIU (AM Social Mobilization) will inform the affected persons about GRC and its mechanism by passing the information at known places.
25. Efforts will be made to avoid the APs/ community concerns by implementing the sub- project in accordance with the LARP, i.e. proper information disclosure, community consultations, payments as per entitlements and coordination with APs/ APC, PIU and PMU.
Page 46 of 107
However, a Grievance Redress Committees (GRC) will also be established to redress the unresolved issues.
26. The composition of GRC will as below:
GRC at PIU Level
i). Executive Engineer (NTDC) ii). DO (Revenue)/ LAC iii). Representative of E&SIC iv). Assistant Manager (Social Mobilization)/ Social mobilizer v). Representative of Affected Person Committee (APC) vi). Patwari
27. A comprehensive grievance redress process regarding land compensation and other compensation is described below. The grievance redress mechanism will be gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to the APs at no cost and without retribution.
Grievance Redress Process
Land Compensation Issues Other Items Compensation Issues
• First, complaints will be redressed at • First, complaints will be redressed at field field level through the involvement of level through the involvement of PIU and PIU and APC as well as other local APC as well as other local committees. committees. • If issue is unresolved, then it will be • If no solution is accomplished, then lodged to the DO (Revenue)/ LAC who grievance will be lodged to GRC. will have 14 day to make decision on it. • The GRC will provide the decision within 3 weeks. The GRC decision must be in compliance with this LARP and provisions given in the LARF. • If issue still unsettled, then grievance • If the grievance redress system does not will be forwarded to GRC. satisfy the APs, then, the grievance can be submitted to the GM Projects (PMU), • GRC will provide decision within 3 where decision will be made in a period weeks, which should be in compliance of 2 weeks. with the LARP and provisions given in the LARF. • In case, the grievance redressal • If still APs are not satisfied, they can system does not satisfy the APs, then pursue their case to appropriate Court of they can pursue by submitting their law. case to the appropriate court of law as per the process set out in Section 18 to 22 of the LAA 1894.
Page 47 of 107
7.7 Organogram
28. An Organogram showing the institutional arrangements for the implementation of LARP has been illustrated through a diagram presented in Figure 7.1. a. Figure 7.1: Institutional set-up for the Implementation of LARP
ADB (Coordination)
NTDC - PMU (GM Projects) Project Management Consultants (PMC)
Contractor
Environmental &Social External Monitor/ Impact Cell EMA (E&SIC) - Manager (E&SIC) - DM (Environment) - AM (Social Safeguards) - AM (Environment) - AM (MIS/ Data Management)
District Level Coordination Project Implementation Unit (PIU) (At Field Level) - Executive Engineer (NTDC) - DO (R)/ LAC - DO (Revenue)/ LAC - Executive Engineer - Representatives of E&SIC Grievance Redress Committee (NTDC) - Assistant Manager (SM) (GRC) - DO (Agri.) - Contractor - Executive Engineer (NTDC) - Directorate (Horticulture) - PMC-Safeguard Implementation - DO (Revenue)/ LAC - DFO Specialist - Representatives of E&SIC - C&W Department - Patwari - AM (Social Mobilization) - WAPDA - Representative of APC - Representative of APC - PHED
Affected Persons Committee (APC)
ADB: Asian Development Bank AM: Assistant Manager Affected Person AP: Affected Person (AP) C&W: Communication & Works DFO: District Forest Officer DM: Deputy Manager DO: District Officer EMA: External Monitoring Agency GM: General Manager LAC: Land Acquisition Collector PHE: Public Health Engineering
Page 48 of 107
8. LARP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
The commencement of civil work will be subject to the satisfactory implementation of this LARP including payment of compensation for the loss of land, crops and trees; and also redress of community concerns. Based on the implementation experience of previous projects, it is expected that the implementation of LARP of this sub-project including construction of grid station and installation of transmission line will take about 4–6 months.
The LARP implementation schedule, shown below, envisages the following sequence of activities; some of these steps will overlap in their timing and some will be repeated throughout the project schedule. Table 8.1: Implementation Schedule for Third Circuit (Qazi Mahar -RYK) 500kV TL Subproject
Tentative Main Activities Date Remarks 2015 2016 - Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Already Establishment of PMU ------in place Already Setting-up the E&SIC ------in place Project Implementation Unit March To be
(PIU) at field level 15. notified Establish Grievance Redress To be May 15. Committee (GRC). notified Submission of draft LARP to - March 15 ADB Urdu translation and - April 2015 disclosure of LARP Formation of APC at District - April - level representing to all May 15 concerned villages Payment of compensation - to the APs for the loss of July-Dec
crops & trees and other 2015. losses. Relocation of public utilities/ July-July -
infrastructures (if any) 2915. Date of Contract Award - Dec 14 (expected)
Hiring of EMA (if required) June 15 -
Employment to the APs in May – -
Page 49 of 107
the project related jobs. onwards . July-July - Full Implementation of LARP 2016.
EMR confirming LARP Quarterly - implementation . Continuo Redress of community Continuo us complaints us activity
Page 50 of 107
9. BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION
9.1 Basis for Compensation
Compensation for projects requiring land acquisition can often differ between the borrower and ADB (and other providers of official development assistance). To comply with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, rates used to compensate for lost land and assets must be replacement cost at current market value, in order to meet the policy objective of “at least” restoring people’s livelihoods and ensuring that people affected by a project are not left worse off.
According to the project’s LARF, replacement cost is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing or better condition, and is the value determined as compensation for the current market price without depreciation or deduction of the costs of any transaction or for any material salvaged. The processes for establishing the rates used for this Third Circuit (Jam-RYK) 500kV Transmission Line and Moro 500kV Grid Station Subproject followed the methodology of LARF.
9.2 Determining the Rates for Compensation
Based on the foregoing requirements and the LARF provisions, the methodology for assessing unit compensation values of the different items is described as follows: • Urban land prices were based on the actual sale vales of the similar lands in the respective areas / districts with similar opportunity vales; • Structure valuation was carried out on the basis of the affected persons’ own costs incurred, and cross-checked with current local rates, collected from local petty contractors and masons; • Basic annual crop compensation was valued at net farm-gate market rates. If additional crops compensation is due it will be calculated at market value minus inputs. As noted earlier, compensation for crops affected by tower bases and perimeters is three-crop and for stringing of the lines is for one- crop; and • Fruit trees were valued based on age and productivity category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive fruit trees were valued at gross market value of one year’s income multiplied by the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree. Wood trees were valued based on type, size, and age (dimensions rather than productivity). AHs are entitled to keep the wood (as salvaged material) without any deductions from the amount of compensation.
The valuation survey registered recent and current replacement values of urban lands, built- up structures, and in market sale values of agricultural crops, and fruit and wood trees, and was based on AH and community consultation (including relevant local government agencies). The results of RFS Prices Survey and compensation assessments for the affected crops and trees are provided in the following below. The rates so collected were also
Page 51 of 107
discussed with, readjusted and gotten approved from the District LACs of the nine affected districts (minus Jamshoro district), and the average rates were applied to assessment of compensations for the affected crops, and fruit and wood trees, as shown in the following tables. Table 9.1: Average Crop Income per Unit Area of Farmland (Qazi Mahar Jam-RYK 500kV TL) Affecte Cropping Season d Crop Average Crop Income per Unit Area (Rs.) No. Name Acre (basis) Hectare Sq. Meter Annual Crop (2 Seasons) 1 Sugarcane 220,000.00 543,620.00 54.3632702 Rabi (Autumn- Winter) 2 Wheat 52,225.00 129,047.98 12.90509903 3 Mustard 150,000.00 370,650.00 37.06586604 Kharif (Spring- Summer) 4 Cotton 202,500.00 500,377.50 50.03891916 5 Rice 100,000.00 247,100.00 24.71057736 Sum Total Crop 1,790,795.4 Income - All Crops 724,725.00 8 179.0837318 Average Crop Income: - All Crops 144,945.00 358,159.10 35.81674636
Table 9.2: Assessment of Crop Compensation for New Towers (Qazi Mahar Jam-RYK 500 kV TL) Affected No. of Cropping Affected No. of Crop Area Crops Season Crop Towers (acre) Affected Compensation Assessed Rate Total (Rs./acre) Amount (Rs)
Sugarcan Annual Crop e 49 116.03 2 220,000.00 51,053,200 Rabi Crops 0 Wheat 300 988.4 2 52,225.00 103,238,380 Mustard 58 163.08 2 150,000.00 48,924,000 Sub. Total 152,162,38 (Rabi) 0 Kharif Crops Cotton 315 247.1 1 202,500.00 50,037,750 Rice 43 64.22 1 100,000.00 6,422,000 Sub. Total (Kharif) 56,459,750 Total: - 436 1578.83 - 259,675,33
Page 52 of 107
0
Table 9.3: Categorization and Compensation of Fruit Trees (Qazi Mahar Jam-RYK 500kV TL) Name of Affected No. Fruit Tree Categorization Loss of Income per Fruit Tree Age of Rate of Tree Potential Annual Compensation Maturity Level (Years) Period (Yr) Income (Rs.) per Tree (Rs.) 1 Date Palm Immature up to 5 5 3,500 17,500 Mature-1 up to 15 10 7,000 70,000 Mature-2 Above 15 10 10,000 100,000 2 Mango Immature up to 5 5 4500 22,500 Mature-1 up to 15 10 6,000 60,000 Mature-2 Above 15 10 9000 90,000 3 Banana 5500/40 kg production 1800 kg/acre 247,500 4 Lemon Immature up to 5 3 3000 9,000 Mature-1 up to 15 5 4500 22,500 Mature-2 Above 15 5 8500 42,500 5 Guava Immature up to 5 5 2500 12,500 Mature-1 up to 15 10 3500 35,000 Mature-2 Above 15 10 7500 75,000 6 Berri Immature up to 5 5 2000 10,000 Mature-1 up to 15 10 5000 50,000 Mature-2 Above 15 10 8000 80,000
Table 9.4: Number and Compensation of Affected Fruit Trees (Qazi Mahar Jam-RYK 500kV TL) Name of Number Average Compensation Affected Maturity of fruit Rate Amount (Rs.) No. Fruit Tree Level trees (Rs/Tree 14,000 1 Date Palm Immature 4 3,500 42,000 Mature-1 6 7,000 80,000 Mature-2 8 10,000 Sub-total (a): 136,000 Date Palm - 18 189,000 2 Mango Immature 42 4500 348,000 Mature-1 58 6,000
Page 53 of 107
747,000 Mature-2 83 9000 Sub-total (b):Mango - 183 1,284,000 5500/40 kg production 1800 247,500 3 Banana kg/acre Sub-total (c): Banana 247,500 4 Lemon Immature 0 Mature-1 0 Mature-2 3 8500 25,500 Sub-total (d): Lemon 3 25500 5 Guava Immature Mature-1 Mature-2 4 7,500 30,000 Sub-total (e): Guava 4 30000 Berri 6 (Ziziphus) Mature-2 3 8000 24000 Sub-total (f): Berri - 3 24000
Table 9.5: Relative Sizes of Wood Trees by Height and Girth (Qazi Mahar Jam- RYK 500kV TL) Name of Wood No. Tree Small Tree Medium Tree Large Tree Rates Girth Girth Rates Girth (m) (Rs.) (m) Rates (Rs.) (m) (Rs.) 1 Shisham up to 0.5 1200 0.5 - 0.9 2500 1.0/+ 11000 2 Kikar up to 0.5 1200 0.5 - 0.9 2000 1.0/+ 4500 3 Poplar/Euc. up to 0.3 1100 0.4 - 0.5 3200 0.5/+ 6000 4 Neem up to 0.5 1150 0.5 - 0.9 3200 1.0/+ 8000 6 Sumbal up to 0.4 1200 0.4 - 0.5 3000 1.0/+ 7500
Table 9.6: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees (Qazi Mahar Jam-RYK 500kV TL) Average Compensatio Name of Number Rate n Amount Affected Wood of Wood (Rs./Tree (Rs.) No. Tree Relative Size Trees ) 33,600 1 Shisham (Sisso) Small 28 1,200 Medium 148 2,500 370,000
Page 54 of 107
363,000 Large 33 11,000 Sub-total (a): 766,600 Shisham - 209 0 116,400 2 Kikar (Acasia) Small 97 1,200 246,000 Medium 123 2,000 697,500 Large 155 4,500 Sub-total (b): 1,059,900 Kikar - 375 Poplar/Eucalyp 9,900 3 ts Small 9 1,100 92,800 Medium 29 3,200 36,000 Large 6 6,000 Sub-total (c): Poplar/Eucalyp 138,700 ts - 44 0 4 Neem Small 0 1,150 0 Medium 0 3,200 64,000 Large 8 8,000 Sub-total (d): 64,000 Neem - 8 0 6 Sumbal Small 0 1,200 33,000 Medium 11 3,000 0 Large 0 7,500 Sub-total (d): 33,000 Sumbal - 11 2,062,200 TOTAL: - 647
9.3 Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition
This LARP includes the cost estimate based on the rates derived through consultation and survey as described in Section 8.2. The rates for compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation as well as allowances payable to AHs will be adjusted annually, based on the actual annual inflation rate. NTDC, with the LACs, will determine the annual inflation rates
Page 55 of 107
and adjust all cash entitlements. The NTDC will pay a total of Rs. 289.832 million as compensation for the affected crops and trees.
A contingency of 10 per cent of the subtotal of the compensation has been included in the cost estimate. Funds for compensation and implementation of the LARP will be from the Government (counterpart funds) via NTDC, budgetary requirements for economic restoration, as part of resettlement budget will also come from the counterpart funds and shall be identified as allowances. As shown in Table 9.7, the total cost of LARP implementation, will be 289.832/- million Rs (US$ 2,827,639/-).
Table 9.7: Estimated LARP Costs of Third Circuit (Qazi Mahar -RYK) 500kV TL & GS Subproject No. Resettlement Activity No. Unit Rs./Unit Total Rs. Asset Compensation for Qazi A Mahar-RYK 500 kV TL: A.1 Trees: 992 tree - 3809200 A.1.1 Fruit Trees 345 tree lumpsum 1747000 A1.2 Wood Trees 647 tree lumpsum 2062200 A.2 Crops: 1,578.83 Acre - 259675330 A.2.1 Sugarcane 116.03 Acre lumpsum 51053200 A.2.2 Rabi 1151.48 Acre lumpsum 152162380 A.2.3 Kharif 311.32 Acre lumpsum 56459750 B Subtotal (A.1+A.2) - 263,484,530 C Contingency (10% of B) 0.1 lumpsum 26,348,453 Total Amount (Pak. Rupees): - - - 289,832,983 Total Amount (US Dollars*): - - - 2,827,639 * US$ 1.00 = Rs. 102.5 (as on 23-04-2015)
Page 56 of 107
10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
10.1 General
29. LAR tasks under the Project will be subjected to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by the PMU. External monitoring will be assigned to an External Monitoring Agency (EMA) to be hired by PMU, and approved by ADB. The EMA will be selected among local consultants/ consulting firms.
30. PMU will prepare the terms of reference (TOR), in consultaion with ADB, for the EMA before to start the LARP implementation.
10.2 Internal Monitoring
31. Internal monitoring will be carried out by the PMU through E&SIC assisted by the Project Management Consultants (Safeguard Implementation Specialist). The results will presented in the quarterly project implementation reports and submitted to ADB.
32. The internal monitoring reports include the ‘process’ and ‘output’ indicators. This information will be collected directly from the field and reported monthly by PIU to the PMU in order to assess the progress and results of LARP implementation, and to adjust the work plan/ activities in accordance with the LARP requirements as well as implementation schedule.
33. The following will be the specific aspects to be covered under the internal monitoring report. a) Consultation with APs and information disclosure; b) Disbursement of compensation for the affected items – land, structures, crops, tree and other assets; c) Relocation of community structures/ public utilities ; d) Payments for loss of income; e) Land for land compensation (if any); f) Income restoration activities; g) Status of grievance redressal;
34. The above information will be collected by the Manager (E&SIC) through Assistant Manager (Social Safeguard) and PIU including Assistant Manager (Social Mobilization).
10.3 External Monitoring
35. External monitoring will be carried out by the External Monitoring Agency to be hired by the PMU among the local consultants/ consulting firms.
36. The external monitoring activities will have short and medium term tasks. The short term tasks will occur in parallel and immediately after the delivery of LARP compensation. They will prepare a compliance report which is a condition to start civil works.
Page 57 of 107
37. The medium term task will include the monitoring of the effectiveness of the compensation package.
38. As the number of impacts are limited, so that the external monitoring report at the initial stage of the LARP implementation and on its completion will be prepared. However, some additional external monitoring report may be prepared depending upon the requirements of ADB.
39. The proposed indicators for external monitoring tasks include:
a) Review and validate the internal monitoring reports prepared by PMU (E&SIC); b) Status of LARP implementation including payment of compensation to the APs c) Review the status of relocation of community structure/ public utilities; d) Status of redressal of community complaints and time spent to resolve the community grievances e) Carry out the consultations with APs, officials of project management and other concerned departments to share the feedback/ lessons learnt; f) Identify gaps regarding LARP implementation and suggest remedial measures; and also develop a corrective action plan
g) Assess the LAR implementation efficiency, effectiveness, impact and its sustainability.
40. The EMA will also assess the status of project affected vulnerable groups such as female-headed households, disabled/elderly and families below the poverty line.
Page 58 of 107
Annex-A AFFECTED PRODUCTIVE LANDS Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 1 1 13,950 - - - - - 1 13,950 - 2 1 13,550 - - - - - 1 13,550 - 3 1 16,200 - - - - - 1 16,200 - 4 1 18,200 - - - - - 1 18,200 - 5 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 6 1 18,900 - - - - - 1 18,900 - 7 1 17,850 - - - - - 1 17,850 - 8 - 17,100 ------17,100 - 9 1 9,650 - - - - - 1 9,650 - 10 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 11 - 15,200 ------15,200 - 12 - 7,375 ------7,375 - 15 1 1,238 - - - - - 1 1,238 - 16 - 17,700 ------17,700 - 18 1 16,213 - - - - - 1 16,213 - 19 1 18,125 - Banana 3,0 - - 1 15,125 - 20 1 16,850 - - - - - 1 16,850 - 21 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 22 - 19,900 ------19,900 - 23 1 14,675 - - - - - 1 14,675 - 24 1 15,650 - - - - - 1 15,650 - 25 1 14,100 - - - - - 1 14,100 - 26 1 9,850 - - - - - 1 9,850 - 27 1 18,050 - - - - - 1 18,050 - 28 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 -
Page 59 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 29 1 16,300 - - - - - 1 16,300 - 30 1 17,750 - - - - - 1 17,750 - 31 1 18,350 - - - - - 1 18,350 - 32 1 19,400 - - - - - 1 19,400 - 33 1 19,825 - - - - - 1 19,825 - 34 1 17,450 - - - - - 1 17,450 - 35 1 17,250 - - - - - 1 17,250 - 36 1 15,700 - - - - - 1 15,700 - 37 1 16,750 - - - - - 1 16,750 - 38 1 16,050 - - - - - 1 16,050 - 39 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 19,200 - 40 1 18,650 - - - - - 1 18,650 - 41 1 17,950 - - - - - 1 17,950 - 42 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 43 1 19,550 - - - - - 1 19,550 - 44 1 16,650 - - - - - 1 16,650 - 45 1 20,350 - - - - - 1 20,350 - 46 1 19,300 - - - - - 1 19,300 - 47 1 18,150 - - - - - 1 18,150 - 48 1 14,000 - - - - - 1 14,000 - 49 1 16,550 - - - - - 1 16,550 - 50 1 20,700 - - - - - 1 20,700 - 51 1 18,350 - - - - - 1 18,350 - 52 1 17,575 - - - - - 1 17,575 - 53 1 18,338 - - - - - 1 18,338 - 54 1 21,388 - - - - - 1 21,388 - 55 1 18,300 - - - - - 1 18,300 - 56 1 15,950 - - - 1 1,350 - 14,600 -
Page 60 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 57 1 19,375 - - - 1 19,375 - - - 58 1 19,650 - - - - 1,550 1 18,100 - 59 1 19,700 - - - - - 1 19,700 - 60 1 18,100 - - - - - 1 18,100 - 61 1 18,250 - - - - - 1 18,250 - 62 1 19,300 - - - - - 1 19,300 - 63.d 1 17,600 - - - - - 1 17,600 - 64.d - 13,200 ------13,200 - 65.d 1 16,350 - - - - - 1 16,350 - 66.d 1 18,400 - - - - - 1 18,400 - 67.d - 7,400 ------7,400 - 68.d 1 17,800 - - - - - 1 17,800 - 69.d 1 18,500 - - - 1 18,500 - - - 70.d 1 18,725 - - - - - 1 18,725 - 71 1 18,200 - - - - - 1 18,200 - 72 1 16,350 - - - - - 1 16,350 - 73 1 18,600 - - - - - 1 18,600 - 74 1 17,400 - - - - - 1 17,400 - 75 1 17,600 - - - - - 1 17,600 - 76 1 18,800 - - - - - 1 18,800 - 77 1 19,450 - - - - - 1 19,450 - 78 1 16,900 - - - - - 1 16,900 - 79 1 19,100 - - - - - 1 19,100 - 80 - 15,200 ------15,200 - 81 1 8,900 - - - - - 1 8,900 - 82.d - 17,400 ------17,400 - 83.d 1 18,800 - - - - - 1 18,800 - 84.d - 12,650 ------12,650 -
Page 61 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 85.d 1 17,900 - - - - - 1 17,900 - 86 1 15,750 - - - - - 1 15,750 - 87 1 13,975 - - - - 5,450 1 8,525 - 88 1 21,450 - - - - - 1 21,450 - 89 1 12,550 - - - - - 1 12,550 - 90 1 13,900 - - - - - 1 13,900 - 91 1 12,650 - - - - - 1 12,650 - 92 1 20,100 - - - - 5,850 1 14,250 - 93 1 13,800 - - - - - 1 13,800 - 94 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 95 1 18,850 - - - - - 1 18,850 - 96 1 9,150 - - - - - 1 9,150 - 97 - 6,900 ------6,900 - 99 1 4,200 - - - - - 1 4,200 - 100 1 19,250 - - - - - 1 19,250 - 101 1 19,650 - - - - - 1 19,650 - 102 - 19,750 ------19,750 - 103 1 17,063 - - - - - 1 17,063 - 104 1 16,850 - - - - - 1 16,850 - 105 1 19,800 - - - - - 1 19,800 - 106 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 19,200 - 107 - 9,150 ------9,150 - 109 1 11,200 - - - - - 1 11,200 - 110 1 14,400 - - - - - 1 14,400 - 111 1 16,300 - Banana 63 - - 1 10,000 - 112 1 12,850 - - - - - 1 12,850 - 113 1 12,200 - - - - - 1 12,200 - 114 1 20,825 - - - - - 1 20,825 -
Page 62 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 115 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 116 1 19,550 - - - - - 1 19,550 - 117 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 118 1 17,650 - - - - - 1 17,650 - 119 1 19,450 - - - - - 1 19,450 - 120 1 19,500 - - - - - 1 19,500 - 121 1 20,075 - - - - - 1 20,075 - 122 1 17,150 - - - - - 1 17,150 - 123 1 17,000 - - - - - 1 17,000 - 124 1 17,350 - - - - - 1 17,350 - 125 1 16,150 - - - - - 1 16,150 - 126 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 127 1 14,800 - - - - - 1 14,800 - 128 1 19,850 - - - - - 1 19,850 - 129 1 19,550 - - - - - 1 19,550 - 130 1 20,325 - - - - - 1 20,325 - 131 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 19,200 - 132 1 16,575 - - - - - 1 16,575 - 133 - 8,200 ------8,200 - 136 1 3,275 - - - - - 1 3,275 - 137 1 17,900 - - - - - 1 17,900 - 138 1 18,050 - - - - - 1 18,050 - 139 1 18,000 - - - - - 1 18,000 - 140 1 19,688 - - - - - 1 19,688 - 141 1 21,375 - - - - - 1 21,375 - 142 1 18,400 - - - - - 1 18,400 - 143 1 20,000 - - - - - 1 20,000 - 144 1 13,575 - - - - - 1 13,575 -
Page 63 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 145 1 19,850 - - - - - 1 19,850 - 146 - 7,088 ------7,088 - 148 1 4,700 - - - - - 1 4,700 - 149 - 4,725 ------4,725 - 152 1 1,100 - - - - - 1 1,100 - 153 1 19,400 - - - - - 1 19,400 - 154 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 155 1 19,650 - - - - - 1 19,650 - 156 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 157 1 20,200 - - - - - 1 20,200 - 158 1 18,675 - - - - - 1 18,675 - 159 1 18,800 - - - - - 1 18,800 - 160 1 10,200 - - - - - 1 10,200 - 161 - 6,375 ------6,375 - 163 1 15,000 - - - - - 1 15,000 - 164 1 24,050 - - - - - 1 24,050 - 165 - 11,850 ------11,850 - 167 - 15,675 ------12,525 3,150 168 - 13,225 ------9,225 4,000 169 1 9,150 - - - - - 1 9,150 - 170 1 15,150 - - - - - 1 15,150 - 171 1 19,750 - - - - - 1 19,750 - 172 1 19,300 - - - - - 1 19,300 - 173 1 13,350 - - - - - 1 13,350 - 174 1 20,550 - - - - - 1 20,550 - 175 1 19,700 - - - - - 1 19,700 - 176 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 177 1 12,150 - - - - - 1 12,150 -
Page 64 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 178 1 13,200 - - - - - 1 13,200 - 179 - 7,800 ------7,800 - 180 1 1,050 - - - - - 1 1,050 - 181 1 17,900 - - - - - 1 17,900 - 182 1 17,338 - - - - - 1 17,338 - 183 1 10,650 - - - - - 1 10,650 - 184 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 185 1 19,400 - - - - - 1 19,400 - 186 1 18,850 - - - - - 1 18,850 - 187 1 19,125 - - - - - 1 19,125 - 188 1 20,625 - - - - 6,250 1 8,625 5,750 189 1 19,300 - - - - - 1 19,300 - 190 1 18,650 - - - - - 1 18,650 - 191 1 18,950 - - - - - 1 18,950 - 192 1 18,200 - - - - - 1 18,200 - 193 1 19,150 - - - - 8,600 1 6,300 4,250 194 1 16,850 - - - - - 1 9,350 7,500 195 1 19,550 - - - - - 1 19,550 - 196 1 19,800 - - - - - 1 19,800 - 197 1 15,800 - - - - - 1 15,800 - 198 - 8,500 ------5,000 3,500 199 1 10,900 - - - - - 1 10,900 - 200 1 16,450 - - - - - 1 8,650 7,800 201.d - 13,350 ------13,350 - 202.d 1 20,400 - - - - - 1 20,400 - 203.d 1 16,200 - - - - - 1 16,200 - 204.d 1 16,300 - - - - - 1 16,300 - 205.d - 11,650 ------11,650 -
Page 65 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 206 1 8,650 - - - - - 1 5,100 3,550 207 1 15,800 - - - - - 1 - 15,800 208 1 18,900 - - - - - 1 18,900 - 209 1 16,750 - - - - - 1 9,800 6,950 210 1 12,200 - - - - - 1 12,200 - 211 1 18,100 - - - - - 1 18,100 - 212 1 17,800 - - - - - 1 17,800 - 213 1 19,100 - - - - 11,450 1 7,650 - 214 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 215 1 19,050 - - - - - 1 19,050 - 216 1 19,125 - - - - - 1 19,125 - 217 - 9,825 ------9,825 - 221 1 16,050 - - - - - 1 16,050 - 222 1 19,300 - - - - - 1 19,300 - 223 1 13,350 - - - - - 1 13,350 - 224 1 19,050 - - - - - 1 19,050 - 225 1 18,150 - - - - - 1 18,150 - 226 1 12,850 - - - - - 1 - 12,850 227 1 20,100 - - - - - 1 20,100 - 228 1 17,750 - - - - - 1 17,750 - 229 1 17,400 - - - - - 1 17,400 - 230 1 18,550 - - - - - 1 18,550 - 231 - 19,200 ------19,200 - 232 - 1,800 ------1,800 - 233 - 8,800 ------4,600 4,200 234 1 15,950 - - - - - 1 15,950 - 235 1 18,000 - - - - - 1 18,000 - 236 1 18,050 - - - - - 1 18,050 -
Page 66 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 237 1 20,050 - - - - - 1 20,050 - 238 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 239 1 18,800 - - - - 8,950 1 9,850 - 240 1 16,550 - - - - - 1 16,550 - 241 1 18,400 - - - - - 1 18,400 - 242 1 19,150 - - - - - 1 19,150 - 243 1 15,450 - - - - - 1 15,450 - 244 - 1,200 ------1,200 - 246 1 1,400 - - - - - 1 1,400 - 247 1 12,000 - - - - - 1 7,000 5,000 248 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 249 1 12,950 - - - - - 1 12,950 - 250 1 19,800 - - - - - 1 19,800 - 251 1 18,200 - - - - - 1 10,600 7,600 252 1 18,350 - - - - 2,800 1 15,550 - 253 1 18,900 - - - - - 1 18,900 - 254 1 19,900 - - - - - 1 19,900 - 255 1 17,600 - - - - - 1 17,600 - 256.d 1 18,250 - - - - 7,300 1 8,850 2,100 257.d - 6,600 ------6,600 - 258.d - 9,200 ------9,200 - 259.d 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 16,700 2,500 260 1 19,250 - - - - - 1 19,250 - 261 1 20,350 - Mango 10,000 1 10,350 - - - 262 1 18,950 - Mango 5,450 1 13,500 - - - 263 1 15,150 1 Mango 9,400 - 5,750 - - - 264 1 17,800 1 Mango 9,850 - 4,350 - 3,600 - 265 1 16,850 - Mango 6,400 1 10,450 - - -
Page 67 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 266 1 17,675 - - - - - 1 17,675 - 267 - 14,500 ------14,500 - 268 1 7,550 - - - - - 1 7,550 - 269 1 18,250 - - - - - 1 18,250 - 270 1 16,200 - - - 1 16,200 - - - 271 1 17,250 - - - - - 1 17,250 - 272 1 17,100 - - - - - 1 17,100 - 273 1 18,050 - - - - 5,450 1 12,600 - 274 1 18,750 - - - - - 1 18,750 - 275 1 17,600 - - - - 6,400 1 11,200 - 276 1 19,150 - - - - 5,650 1 13,500 - 277 1 18,100 - - - - - 1 18,100 - 278 1 18,575 - - - - - 1 18,575 - 279 1 19,700 - - - - - 1 19,700 - 280 1 17,650 - - - - - 1 17,650 - 281 1 12,600 - - - - - 1 12,600 - 282 1 19,950 - - - - 9,700 1 10,250 - 283 - 9,300 ------9,300 - 286 1 17,600 - - - - - 1 17,600 - 287 1 19,650 - - - - - 1 19,650 - 288 1 15,850 - - - - - 1 15,850 - 289 1 11,500 - - - - - 1 11,500 - 290 1 11,250 - - - - - 1 11,250 - 291 1 16,800 - - - - - 1 16,800 - 292 1 16,350 - - - - - 1 - 16,350 293 1 20,450 - - - - - 1 20,450 - 294 1 19,000 - - - - 12,050 1 6,950 - 295 1 16,850 - - - - - 1 16,850 -
Page 68 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 296 1 18,400 - - - - - 1 18,400 - 297 - 9,150 ------9,150 - 298 1 550 - - - - - 1 550 - 299 1 14,850 - - - - - 1 14,850 - 300 1 15,150 - - - - - 1 15,150 - 301.d 1 14,000 - - - - - 1 11,600 2,400 302.d - 6,725 ------5,050 1,675 304.d 1 12,800 - - - - - 1 12,800 305 1 18,900 - - - - - 1 18,900 - 306 1 19,850 - - - - - 1 19,850 - 307 1 15,000 - - - - - 1 15,000 - 308 1 10,550 - - - - - 1 10,550 - 309.d - 15,800 - 15,800 - 310.d 1 18,450 1 17,200 1,250 311.d - 18,800 - 16,400 2,400 312.d 1 16,075 1 14,075 2,000 313 1 18,550 - - - 1 4,800 - 13,750 - 314 1 16,725 - - - - 8,775 1 7,950 - 315 1 18,000 - - - - - 1 18,000 - 316 - 17,100 ------17,100 - 317 1 11,100 - - - - - 1 11,100 - 318 1 18,500 - - - - - 1 18,500 - 319 1 17,200 - - - - - 1 9,700 7,500 320 1 16,850 - - - 1 16,850 - - - 321.d 1 16,800 - - - 1 11,256 - 5,544 - 322.d - 12,900 - - - - 8,063 - 4,838 - 323.d - 12,350 ------10,700 1,650 324.d 1 20,600 - - - 1 20,600 - - -
Page 69 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 325 - 15,850 ------7,700 8,150 326 1 11,800 - - - - - 1 11,800 - 327 1 18,725 - - - - - 1 10,450 8,275 328 - 9,150 ------9,150 - 329 1 11,600 - - - - - 1 6,000 5,600 330 - 15,200 ------15,200 - 331 - 2,050 ------2,050 - 335 - 9,300 ------9,300 - 336 - 5,900 ------5,900 - 337 1 3,750 - - - - - 1 3,750 - 338 1 18,650 - - - - - 1 18,650 - 339 1 19,100 - - - - - 1 19,100 - 340 1 19,500 - - - - - 1 19,500 - 341 1 17,700 - - - - - 1 17,700 - 342 1 18,250 - - - 1 4,650 - 13,600 - 343 1 18,350 - - - 1 10,350 - 8,000 - 344 1 21,100 - Mango 4,200 1 16,900 - - - 345 1 18,100 1 Mango 10,350 - 7,750 - - - 346 1 21,300 - Mango 3,650 - - 1 8,900 8,750 347 1 17,150 - - - - - 1 8,200 8,950 348 1 16,200 - - - - - 1 9,100 7,100 349 1 16,750 - - - - 9,600 1 7,150 - 350 1 18,400 - Mango 1,050 - - 1 17,350 - 351 1 19,750 - - - - - 1 19,750 - 352 1 19,450 - - - - - 1 19,450 - 353 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 19,200 - 354.d 1 11,750 - - - - - 1 11,750 - 355.d - 11,800 ------11,800 -
Page 70 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 356.d - 12,250 ------12,250 - 357.d 1 18,000 - - - - - 1 18,000 - 358.d 1 20,600 - - - - - 1 20,600 - 359 1 19,650 1 Mango 19,650 - - - - - 360 1 18,850 - - - - - 1 18,850 - 361 1 19,050 - - - - - 1 10,300 8,750 362 1 17,388 - - - - - 1 17,388 - 363 1 15,600 - - - - - 1 15,600 - 364 1 16,800 - - - - - 1 16,800 - 365 1 13,700 1 Mango 3,150 - - - 10,550 - 366 1 17,650 1 Mango 17,650 - - - - - 367 1 20,563 - Mango 17,763 1 2,800 - - - 368 1 17,900 - - - 1 17,900 - - - 369 1 18,150 - - - 1 18,150 - - - 370.d 1 15,800 1 Mango 12,500 - 3,300 - - - 371.d - 14,700 - - - - 6,150 - 5,650 2,900 372.d - 13,700 - Mango 2,100 - 8,100 - 3,500 - 373.d - 6,700 - Mango 2,250 - - - 4,450 - 374.d - 13,150 ------10,600 2,550 375.d 1 12,400 - Mango 4,250 - - 1 5,350 2,800 376.d 1 14,650 1 Mango 5,650 - - - 7,200 1,800 377 1 18,850 - - - - - 1 18,850 - 378 1 14,650 - - - - - 1 14,650 - 379 1 17,500 - - - - - 1 17,500 - 380 - 16,050 - Mango 5,900 - 6,250 - 3,900 - 381 1 5,950 - - - - - 1 5,950 - 382 1 16,250 - - - - - 1 16,250 - 383 1 18,350 - - - - - 1 18,350 -
Page 71 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 384 1 17,150 - - - - - 1 17,150 - 385 1 18,300 - - - - - 1 18,300 - 386 1 17,450 - Mango 6,850 - - 1 10,600 - 387 1 17,800 - - - - - 1 17,800 - 388 1 19,200 - - - - - 1 19,200 - 389 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 390 1 18,500 - - - - - 1 18,500 - 391 1 19,650 - - - - - 1 19,650 - 392 1 18,700 - - - - - 1 18,700 - 393 1 13,475 - - - - - 1 13,475 - 394 - 1,050 ------1,050 - 395 1 2,150 - - - - - 1 2,150 - 396 1 19,050 - - - - - 1 19,050 - 397 1 15,100 1 Mango 9,000 - - - 6,100 - 398 - 12,375 - Mango+Ban 11,175 - - - 1,200 - 399 - 10,750 - Mango 8,550 - - - 2,200 - 400 - 16,850 - Mango 10,950 - - - - 5,900 401 1 13,550 1 Mango 6,500 - - - 7,050 - 402 1 21,850 - Mango 11,250 1 10,600 - - - 403 1 17,600 - Mango 10,000 - - 1 7,600 - 404 1 11,350 - - - - - 1 11,350 - 405 1 12,000 - - - - - 1 12,000 - 406 1 15,475 - Mango 3,600 - - 1 11,875 - 407 1 19,350 - - - - - 1 19,350 - 408 1 16,100 - - - - 9,000 1 7,100 - 409 1 19,650 - - - 1 18,600 - 1,050 - 410 1 19,200 - - - - 6,400 1 12,800 - 411 1 16,100 - - - - - 1 16,100 -
Page 72 of 107
Productive Land Compact Orchard/Plantation Number of Towers and Affected Area of Crops Annual Crop Affected Seasonal Crops Names of (Sugarcane) Tower No. No. of Affected Area No. of Affected Area Fruit/Forest Rabi Season Towers (m2) Towers (m2) No. of Affected No. of Trees Mustard Towers Area (m2) Towers Wheat (m2) (m2) 412 1 12,825 - - - - - 1 12,825 - 413 - 16,150 ------16,150 - 414 1 2,300 - - - - - 1 2,300 - 415 1 19,100 - - - 1 17,250 - 1,850 - 416 1 1,925 - - - - 875 1 1,050 - 417 1 19,250 - - - - - 1 19,250 - 418 1 17,700 - - - - - 1 17,700 - 419 1 21,700 - - - - 8,650 1 6,250 6,800 420 1 19,150 - - - - - 1 19,150 - 421 1 15,300 - Mango 3,500 - - 1 11,800 - 422 1 19,600 - - - - - 1 19,600 - 423 1 19,100 - - - - - 1 19,100 - 424 1 18,100 - - - - - 1 18,100 - 425 1 17,400 - - - - - 1 17,400 - 426 1 17,450 - - - - - 1 13,800 3,650 427 1 16,550 - - - - - 1 12,650 3,900 428.d 1 17,600 - - - - - 1 11,850 5,750 429.d - 6,900 ------4,800 2,100 430.d - 6,150 ------6,150 - 431.d 1 16,200 - - - - - 1 10,350 5,850 431-436 9 117,100 2 3 Mango 21,750 2 18,700 5 48,050 28,600
Page 73 of 107
...... ANNEX-B AFFECTED TREES Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 1 ------1 - - 1 1 2 ------3 ------2 - - 2 2 4 - - - 1 1 - 2 1 - 3 4 5 - - - 1 1 1 - - - 1 2 6 ------7 ------1 1 2 2 8 ------9 ------2 - - 2 2 10 ------1 - 2 3 3 11 ------12 ------15 ------16 - - - - - 3 - - - 3 3 18 - - - - - 3 1 - - 4 4 19 1 - 41 - 42 1 1 - - 2 44 20 ------21 - - - - - 1 2 - - 3 3 22 ------23 1 - - - 1 1 2 - - 3 4 24 - - - - - 2 1 - 1 4 4 25 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 2 26 ------27 ------28 ------29 ------2 - - 2 2 30 ------31 - - - - - 3 4 - - 7 7 32 ------
Page 74 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 33 ------34 ------35 ------36 ------37 ------38 ------39 ------40 ------41 ------42 ------43 ------44 ------45 ------46 ------47 ------48 ------49 ------50 ------51 ------52 ------53 ------54 ------55 ------56 ------57 ------58 ------59 ------60 ------61 ------62 ------63.d ------
Page 75 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 64.d ------65.d 1 - - - 1 1 1 2 - 4 5 66.d ------1 - - 1 1 67.d - - - - - 1 - 1 - 2 2 68.d - - 12 - 12 - - - - - 12 69.d - 2 - - 2 1 2 - 1 4 6 70.d - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - 1 2 71 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - 1 2 72 - - - 1 1 - 1 - 2 3 4 73 1 - - - 1 2 - - - 2 3 74 ------75 ------76 ------77 ------78 ------79 ------80 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 2 81 ------82.d ------83.d - - - - - 1 1 - - 2 2 84.d ------1 2 - 3 3 85.d - - - - - 1 - - - 1 1 86 ------87 ------2 - - 2 2 88 ------89 ------1 - 1 1 90 ------91 ------1 - - 1 1 92 1 - - - 1 - - - - - 1 93 3 - - - 3 - - - - - 3 94 7 - - - 7 - - - - - 7
Page 76 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 95 ------96 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 97 ------99 ------100 ------1 2 3 3 101 ------102 ------103 ------1 - 1 1 104 ------105 ------106 ------107 ------109 ------110 ------111 - - 81 - 81 - - - - - 81 112 ------113 ------114 ------115 ------116 ------117 ------118 ------119 ------120 ------121 ------122 ------123 ------124 ------125 ------126 ------127 ------
Page 77 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 128 ------129 ------130 ------131 ------132 ------133 ------136 ------137 ------138 ------139 ------140 ------141 ------142 ------143 ------144 ------145 ------146 ------148 ------149 ------152 ------153 ------154 ------155 ------156 ------157 ------158 ------159 ------160 ------161 ------163 ------164 ------
Page 78 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 165 ------167 ------3 2 - 5 5 168 ------1 - - 1 1 169 ------170 ------171 ------172 ------173 - - - - - 1 2 - 1 4 4 174 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 175 ------176 ------177 ------178 ------2 - - 2 2 179 ------180 ------181 ------2 - - 2 2 182 - 4 - - 4 - 3 - - 3 7 183 ------184 ------2 - - 2 2 185 ------186 ------187 - 4 - - 4 4 - - - 4 8 188 ------3 1 - 4 4 189 ------190 ------4 - - 4 4 191 ------1 - - 1 1 192 - 1 - - 1 - 2 - - 2 3 193 ------4 - - 4 4 194 - 3 - - 3 - 5 - - 5 8 195 ------196 ------
Page 79 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 197 ------6 - - 6 6 198 ------7 - - 7 7 199 ------200 ------3 - - 3 3 201.d - 1 - - 1 - 1 - - 1 2 202.d - - - 1 1 - 2 - - 2 3 203.d - 2 - - 2 - 1 2 - 3 5 204.d ------2 - 2 2 205.d ------1 - - 1 1 206 - - - - - 4 - - - 4 4 207 1 - - - 1 - 6 - - 6 7 208 ------4 - - 4 4 209 ------210 ------3 - - 3 3 211 - - - - - 1 2 - - 3 3 212 - - - - - 3 - - - 3 3 213 ------214 ------215 ------216 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 217 ------1 - - 1 1 221 ------222 ------1 - - 1 1 223 ------1 - - 1 1 224 - - - - - 3 - - - 3 3 225 - - - - - 1 2 - - 3 3 226 - - - - - 4 2 - - 6 6 227 ------228 ------229 ------230 ------
Page 80 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 231 ------3 - - 3 3 232 ------233 ------234 ------235 ------236 - - - - - 1 - - - 1 1 237 ------1 - - 1 1 238 ------239 ------240 ------241 ------2 - - 2 2 242 ------243 ------244 ------245 ------246 ------247 ------248 ------249 ------250 - 9 - - 9 - 4 1 - 5 14 251 ------252 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 253 ------254 - - - - - 3 1 - - 4 4 255 - - - - - 4 - - - 4 4 256.d - - - - - 2 - 1 - 3 3 257.d ------2 - - 2 2 258.d - - - - - 1 - - - 1 1 259.d ------260 - - - - - 5 - - - 5 5 261 - 77 - - 77 - - - - - 77
Page 81 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 262 - 41 - - 41 - - - - - 41 263 - 72 - - 72 5 - - - 5 77 264 - 75 - - 75 - - - - - 75 265 - 49 - - 49 - - - - - 49 266 ------267 - - - - - 2 3 - - 5 5 268 - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 1 269 ------270 ------1 4 - 5 5 271 ------272 ------273 ------274 ------1 - - 1 1 275 - - - - - 3 - - - 3 3 276 - - - - - 4 - - - 4 4 277 ------278 ------279 - - - - - 5 - - - 5 5 280 - 7 - - 7 - 2 - - 2 9 281 - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 1 282 ------283 ------286 ------287 ------3 - - 3 3 288 ------289 - 6 - - 6 - - - - - 6 290 - 4 - - 4 - - - - - 4 291 - 4 - - 4 - 2 - - 2 6 292 ------3 - - 3 3 293 - - - - - 2 1 - - 3 3 294 ------3 - - 3 3
Page 82 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 295 1 - - - 1 4 2 - - 6 7 296 ------297 ------298 ------299 ------300 ------301.d ------302.d ------304.d ------305 ------306 ------307 ------308 ------309.d ------310.d ------311.d ------312.d ------313 ------314 - 2 - - 2 4 2 - - 6 8 315 - - - - - 3 2 - - 5 5 316 ------317 ------1 - - 1 1 318 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 319 ------320 - 8 - - 8 - - - - - 8 321.d ------322.d 1 - - - 1 1 2 - - 3 4 323.d - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - 1 2 324.d - - - - - 1 1 - - 2 2 325 - 4 - - 4 - - - - - 4 326 - 2 - - 2 1 - - - 1 3
Page 83 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 327 - - - 3 3 - - - - - 3 328 - 3 - - 3 2 20 - - 22 25 329 - - - - - 4 17 - - 21 21 330 - - - - - 4 - - - 4 4 331 ------20 - - 20 20 335 ------5 - - 5 5 336 ------13 - - 13 13 337 - 2 - - 2 - 12 - - 12 14 338 - - - - - 2 4 - - 6 6 339 ------3 - - 3 3 340 - - - - - 1 2 - - 3 3 341 ------342 - 3 - - 3 3 3 - - 6 9 343 ------3 - - 3 3 344 - 31 - - 31 - - - - - 31 345 - 80 - - 80 - - - - - 80 346 - 27 - - 27 3 4 - - 7 34 347 - - - - - 3 - - - 3 3 348 - - - - 2 4 - - - 4 6 349 - 8 - - 8 4 6 - - 10 18 350 - 9 - - 9 4 2 - - 6 15 351 - 10 - - 10 - 3 - - 3 13 352 - 8 - - 8 - 2 - - 2 10 353 ------354.d ------355.d 2 2 - - 4 - - 2 - 2 6 356.d ------1 - - 1 1 357.d - 1 - - 1 - 1 2 - 3 4 358.d - 3 - - 3 - 1 1 - 2 5 359 - 152 - - 152 - - - - - 152 360 - 4 - - 4 - - - - - 4
Page 84 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 361 ------362 ------363 - - - - - 1 1 - - 2 2 364 ------2 - - 2 2 365 - 23 - - 23 - - - - - 23 366 - 136 - - 136 - - - - - 136 367 - 137 - - 137 - - - - - 137 368 ------369 ------370.d - 36 - - 36 - - - - - 36 371.d ------372.d - 24 - - 24 - - - - - 24 373.d - 27 - - 27 - - - - - 27 374.d - 2 - - 2 - - - - - 2 375.d - 22 - - 22 - - - - - 22 376.d - 23 - - 23 - - - - - 23 377 ------378 ------5 - - 5 5 379 ------380 ------381 ------2 - - 2 2 382 ------4 - - 4 4 383 2 10 - - 12 - 14 - - 14 26 384 2 5 - - 7 - 11 - - 11 18 385 - - - - - 2 3 - - 5 5 386 - 52 - - 52 2 4 - - 6 58 387 ------388 - 3 - - 3 - 1 - - 1 4 389 - - - - - 2 4 - - 6 6 390 ------391 - - - - - 1 3 - - 4 4
Page 85 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 392 - 3 - - 3 3 7 - - 10 13 393 - 9 - - 9 2 3 - - 5 14 394 ------395 ------396 - 8 - - 8 2 3 - - 5 13 397 - 68 - - 68 - - - - - 68 398 - 38 33 43 114 - - - - - 114 399 - 66 - - 66 - - - - - 66 400 - 85 - - 85 - - - - - 85 401 - 69 - - 69 - - - - - 69 402 - 87 - - 87 - - - - - 87 403 - 77 - - 77 - - - - - 77 404 - - - - - 6 4 - - 10 10 405 - 12 - - 12 3 - - - 3 15 406 6 25 - - 31 - - - - - 31 407 ------408 ------409 - - - - - 3 1 - - 4 4 410 ------411 ------412 - 3 - - 3 2 1 - - 3 6 413 ------414 ------415 ------416 ------417 - 12 - - 12 - - - - - 12 418 - - - - - 21 - - - 21 21 419 - 5 - - 5 7 - - 4 11 16 420 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 2 421 1 26 - - 27 - 1 - - 1 28 422 - 2 - - 2 - 4 - - 4 6
Page 86 of 107
Affected Fruit Trees Affected Wood Trees (No.) Tower No. Total No. of Number of Fruit Trees (Others: Lemon, Guava, Berri) Number of Wood Trees (Others: Neem, Jaman, Sumbal) (Back Span) Affected DatePalm Mango Banana Others Total (F) Shisham Kikar Poplar/Euc Others Total (W) Trees (No.) 423 - - - - - 2 2 - - 4 4 424 - 7 - - 7 - - - - - 7 425 - - - - - 2 2 - - 4 4 426 ------3 - - 3 3 427 ------428.d ------1 - - 1 1 429.d ------2 2 - 4 4 430.d ------431.d ------1 1 - 2 2 431-436 - 168 - 7 175 8 12 10 5 35 210
Page 87 of 107
...... ANNEX-C AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age
1. Sultan Mehear Hur Abad 476/001 Owner-Farmer 67.00 27.11 1.40 5.16 - - 2. Amanullah Faqeer Mehear Hur Abad 001/002 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.35 5.21 - - 3. Dhargahi Mehear Ismail Mehear 002/003 Owner-Farmer 58.00 23.47 1.62 6.90 - - 4. Abdul Raheem Mehear Ismail Mehear 003/004 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.51 2.10 - - 5. Hadil Mehear Ismail Mehear 003/004 Owner-Farmer 43.00 17.40 0.75 4.31 - - 6. Rajjab Mehear Ismail Mehear 003/004 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.56 3.84 - - 7. Shafeeq Arian Suleman Mehear 004/005 Owner-Farmer 123.00 49.78 1.88 3.78 - - 8. Abdullah Arian Suleman Mehear 005/006 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 1.89 6.49 - - 9. Haji Ameen Arian Suleman Mehear 006/007 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 0.96 3.16 - - 10. Mohammad Sabir Suleman Mehear 006/007 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 0.83 2.56 - - 11. Mohamad Maluk Chachar Sheral Chacher 007/011 Landlord 270.00 109.27 6.13 5.61 - - 12. Mamood Ali Chachar Sheral Chacher 007/011 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.78 5.72 13. Mohammad Ramzan Sheral Chacher 007/011 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 3.35 5.52 14. Rafeeq Chachar Derha 011/012 Landlord 120.00 48.56 0.74 1.52 - - 15. Nasir Magmood Chahar Derha 011/012 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 0.74 1.52 16. Feroz-u-Din Mehrani Mehrani 14/15 Owner-Farmer 27.50 11.13 0.12 1.08 - - 17. Nazer Mohammad Wirand Mehrani 15/16 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 1.77 5.47 - - 18. Rahim Bushkh Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 17/18 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.62 6.25 - - 19. Bagul Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 18/19 Owner-Farmer 66.00 26.71 1.81 6.78 - - 20. Shair Mohamad Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 19/20 Owner-Farmer 58.00 23.47 1.69 7.20 - - 21. Lotuf Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 20/21 Owner-Farmer 74.00 29.95 1.88 6.28 - - 22. Mumtaz Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 21/22 Owner-Farmer 94.00 38.04 1.99 5.23 - - 23. Sher Mohammad Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 22/23 Owner-Farmer 112.00 45.33 1.47 3.24 - - 24. Siraj Ahmad Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 23/24 Owner-Farmer 108.00 43.71 1.56 3.57 - - 25. Sorab Chacher Rahim Bushkh Chacher 24/25 Owner-Farmer 67.00 27.11 1.41 5.20 - - 26. Rafeeq Chachar Rahim Bushkh Chacher 25/27 Landlord 165.00 66.77 2.78 4.16 - - 27. Nasir Mahmood Rahim Bushkh Chacher 25/27 Sharecropper 165.00 66.77 - - 2.78 4.16
Page 88 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 28. Ramzan Kalwar Chinglani 27/28 Owner-Farmer 132.00 53.42 1.87 3.50 - - 29. Hazoor Bushkh Langa Chinglani 28/29 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 1.63 3.22 - - 30. Ali Murad Langa Chinglani 29/30 Owner-Farmer 124.00 50.18 1.78 3.55 - - 31. Sorab Kalwar Chinglani 30/31 Owner-Farmer 102.00 41.28 1.83 4.43 - - 32. Mohamad Ayub Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 31/32 Landlord 160.00 64.75 1.94 3.00 - - 33. Jameel Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 31/32 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 0.97 3.00 34. Gul Jan Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 31/32 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 0.97 3.00 35. Ramil Khan Kalwar Mohamad Ayub Lughari 32/33 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.98 5.10 - - 36. Jaju Kalwar Mohamad Ayub Lughari 33/34 Owner-Farmer 87.00 35.21 1.75 4.97 - - 37. Ashraf Kalwar Mohamad Ayub Lughari 34/35 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.72 5.67 - - 38. Haqnawa Kalwar Mohamad Ayub Lughari 35/36 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.57 6.06 - - 39. Shair Mohammad Kalwar Mohamad Ayub Lughari 36/37 Owner-Farmer 83.00 33.59 1.68 5.00 - - 40. Mohmood Khan Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 37/39 Landlord 210.00 84.99 3.53 4.15 - - 41. Jameel Khan Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 37/39 Sharecropper 85.00 34.40 - - 1.37 3.98 42. Gul Nawaz Leghari Mohamad Ayub Lughari 37/39 Sharecropper 125.00 50.59 - - 2.16 4.27 43. Mohamad Ramzan Buriro Wali Mohammad Buriro 39/41 Landlord 230.00 93.08 3.66 3.93 - - 44. Dost Mohammad Wali Mohammad Buriro 39/41 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 2.46 4.05 45. Shoukat Ali Kalwar Wali Mohammad Buriro 39/41 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 1.20 3.71 46. Sanaullah Buriro Wali Mohammad Buriro 41/42 Owner-Farmer 205.00 82.96 1.87 2.25 - - 47. Mohamad Sachal Buriro Wali Mohammad Buriro 42/43 Owner-Farmer 220.00 89.03 1.95 2.19 - - 48. Yar Mohammad Buriro Wali Mohammad Buriro 43/45 Owner-Farmer 186.00 75.27 3.70 4.92 - - 49. Syed Sikandar Shah Syed Sikindar Shah 45/47 Landlord 240.00 97.13 3.75 3.86 - - 50. Rahmat Ali Buriro Syed Sikindar Shah 45/47 Sharecropper 78.00 31.57 - - 1.23 3.90 51. Mantar Husain Syed Sikindar Shah 45/47 Sharecropper 62.00 25.09 - - 0.96 3.83 52. Abdul Kareem Syed Sikindar Shah 45/47 Sharecropper 100.00 40.47 - - 1.56 3.85 53. Saeed Ahmad Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 47/48 Owner-Farmer 136.00 55.04 1.40 2.54 - - 54. Habib Ahmad Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 48/49 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.73 3.01 - - 55. Mohamad Tayib Arain Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 48/49 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 0.92 2.77 - - 56. Abdul Gafoor Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 49/50 Owner-Farmer 128.00 51.80 2.07 4.00 - - 57. Mohamad Yaqub Arain Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 50/51 Owner-Farmer 120.00 48.56 1.84 3.79 - -
Page 89 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 58. Abdul Majeed Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 51/52 Owner-Farmer 123.00 49.78 1.76 3.54 - - 59. Abdul Hameed Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 52/53 Owner-Farmer 135.00 54.63 1.83 3.35 - - 60. Mohammad Asgar Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 53/54 Owner-Farmer 162.00 65.56 2.14 3.26 - - 61. Molvi Abdul Majid Mehr Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 54/55 Owner-Farmer 158.00 63.94 1.83 2.86 - - 62. Mukhtiar Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 55/57 Owner-Farmer 225.00 91.06 3.53 3.88 - - 63. Rasheed Arian Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 57/58 Owner-Farmer 154.00 62.32 1.97 3.16 - - 64. Allah Diutta Jatt Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 58/59 Owner-Farmer 175.00 70.82 1.97 2.78 - - 65. Maj. Jan Mohamad Malik Mohamad Ibrahim Arain 59/60 Owner-Farmer 170.00 68.80 1.81 2.63 - - 66. Mohamad Anwar Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 60/61 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 1.82 5.48 - - 67. Noor Ahmad Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 61/62 Landlord 150.00 60.70 1.93 3.18 - - 68. Shah Mohammad Noor Ahmad Mehear 61/62 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 0.79 3.25 69. Imdad Hussain Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 61/62 Sharecropper 90.00 36.42 - - 1.14 3.13 70. Jangal Mehear Noor Ahmad Mehear 62/63 Owner-Farmer 112.00 45.33 1.78 3.93 - - 71. Mohammad Azim Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 63/64 Owner-Farmer 68.00 27.52 1.33 4.83 - - 72. Safzal Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 64/65 Owner-Farmer 137.00 55.44 2.62 4.73 - - 73. Badar Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 65/66 Owner-Farmer 98.00 39.66 1.85 4.66 - - 74. Haji Gul Shair Mehar Noor Ahmad Mehear 66/67 Owner-Farmer 129.00 52.21 1.98 3.79 - - 75. Syed Ali Haidar Shah Rang Ali Shsh Pir Zada 67/68 Landlord 163.00 65.97 1.52 2.30 - - 76. Bablu Mehar Rang Ali Shsh Pir Zada 67/68 Sharecropper 98.00 39.66 - - 1.52 3.83 77. Rang Ali Shah Rang Ali Shsh Pir Zada 68/69 Landlord 176.00 71.23 1.76 2.47 - - 78. Nabi Bushkh Rang Ali Shsh Pir Zada 68/69 Sharecropper 176.00 71.23 - - 1.76 2.47 79. Qadir Bushkh Mehear Kaldin Mehear 69/70 Owner-Farmer 173.00 70.01 1.74 2.49 - - 80. Ali Akbar Ali Shah Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 70/71 Owner-Farmer 98.00 39.66 1.82 4.59 - - 81. Bagh Ali Shah Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 71/73 Landlord 180.00 72.85 3.50 4.80 - - 82. Nabi Bukhsh Marri Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 71/73 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.32 4.78 83. Ali Hassan Marri Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 71/73 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 1.18 4.86 84. Ghulam Ali Mehar Kaldin Mehear 73/74 Owner-Farmer 95.00 38.45 1.74 4.53 - - 85. Lal Bushkh Mehar Kaldin Mehear 74/75 Owner-Farmer 187.00 75.68 1.76 2.33 - - 86. Qadir Bushkh Mehar Kaldin Mehear 75/76 Owner-Farmer 105.00 42.49 1.88 4.42 - - 87. Haji Khalil Arian Kaldin Mehear 76/77 Owner-Farmer 145.00 58.68 1.95 3.32 - -
Page 90 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 88. Riaz Ali Shah Pirzada Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 77/78 Landlord 125.00 50.59 1.69 3.34 - - 89. Nabi Bushkh Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 77/78 Sharecropper 160.00 64.75 - - 1.69 2.61 90. Haji Mubarak Chachar Haji Mubarak Chachar 78/79 Landlord 90.00 36.42 1.91 5.24 - - 91. Wali Mohammad Haji Mubarak Chachar 78/79 Sharecropper 125.00 50.59 - - 1.91 3.78 92. Saif Ali Shsh Pirzada Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 79/80 Landlord 84.00 33.99 1.52 4.47 - - 93. Nabi Bukhsh Rang Ali Shah Pirzada 79/80 Sharecropper 96.50 39.05 - - 1.52 3.89 94. Haji Ramzan Chachar Haji Mubarak Chachar 80/81 Landlord 64.00 25.90 0.89 3.44 - - 95. Wali Mohammad Haji Mubarak Chachar 81/82 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 0.89 2.75 96. Mohammad Younas Arian Mohamad Yunas Arain 82/83 Owner-Farmer 220.00 89.03 2.86 3.21 - - 97. Khadim Ali Chacher Ismail Chacher 83/84 Owner-Farmer 126.00 50.99 1.96 3.84 - - 98. Saleh Mohamad Chacher Ismail Chacher 84/85 Owner-Farmer 95.00 38.45 1.85 4.81 - - 99. Noor Mohammad Chacher Ismail Chacher 85/86 Owner-Farmer 73.00 29.54 1.58 5.35 - - 100.Mohamad Ramzan Arian Ismail Chacher 86/87 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.40 3.60 - - 101.Puni Chambro Mohammad Hayat 87/88 Owner-Farmer 51.00 20.64 1.14 5.52 - - 102.Syed Shabad Ali Shah Mirpur Mathelo 88/89 Landlord 150.00 60.70 1.26 2.08 - - 103.Khadim Ali Mohammad Hayat 88/89 Sharecropper 75.00 30.35 - - 0.63 2.08 104.Ghulam Rasool Mohammad Hayat 88/89 Sharecropper 75.00 30.35 - - 0.63 2.08 105.Rasheed Machi Mohammad Hayat 89/90 Owner-Farmer 78.00 31.57 1.39 4.40 - - 106.Ahmad Lahoti Pattan Ahmad Lahuti Pathan 90/91 Owner-Farmer 84.00 33.99 1.26 3.71 - - 107.Imdad Sameja Ahmad Lahuti Pathan 91/93 Owner-Farmer 260.00 105.22 3.39 3.22 - - 108.Ahmad Rukkan Ahmad Lahuti Pathan 93/94 Owner-Farmer 154.00 62.32 1.87 3.00 - - 109.Jamaldin Meerani Lashari 94/95 Owner-Farmer 147.00 59.49 1.02 1.71 - - 110.Khan Mohammad Kaloro Lashari 94/95 Owner-Farmer 57.00 23.07 0.86 3.73 - - 111.Mohammad Alim Kalaro Lashari 95/96 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.37 2.54 - - 112.Abdul Rasool Koso Lashari 95/96 Owner-Farmer 40.00 16.19 0.55 3.40 - - 113.Ali Bushkh Kalaro Jam Mubarak 96/97 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.48 3.71 - - 114.Nawab Ali Kalaro Jam Mubarak 96/97 Owner-Farmer 12.50 5.06 0.21 4.15 - - 115.Haji M Wakeel Javed Jam Mubarak 98/100 Owner-Farmer 158.00 63.94 2.35 3.68 - - 116.Niazdin Darkan Jam Mubarak 100/101 Owner-Farmer 81.00 32.78 1.97 6.01 - - 117.Sharif Kolachi Chakar Khan Kolachi 101/102 Owner-Farmer 78.00 31.57 1.97 6.24 - -
Page 91 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 118.Mohd Anwar Kolachi Chakar Khan Kolachi 102/103 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.71 6.60 - - 119.Haji Wasawah Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 103/104 Owner-Farmer 84.00 33.99 0.87 2.56 - - 120.Ghazi Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 103/104 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 0.82 3.62 - - 121.Haji Lateef Kolachi Chakar Khan Kolachi 104/105 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.51 2.63 - - 122.Khamisa Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 104/105 Owner-Farmer 61.00 24.69 0.83 3.36 - - 123.Nooral Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 104/105 Owner-Farmer 53.00 21.45 0.64 2.98 - - 124.Nazeer Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 105/106 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.72 2.78 - - 125.Allahdin Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 105/106 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.46 2.27 - - 126.Ghulam Nabi Lashari Chakar Khan Kolachi 105/106 Owner-Farmer 78.00 31.57 0.74 2.34 - - 127.Ghulam Ali Kolachi Chakar Khan Kolachi 106/107 Owner-Farmer 62.50 25.29 0.91 3.60 - - 128.Hoat Khan Kolachi Chakar Khan Kolachi 108/109 Owner-Farmer 62.50 25.29 1.12 4.43 - - 129.Syed Arbab Shah Darga Syed Poor Shah 109/111 Landlord 250.00 101.17 3.07 3.03 - - 130.Molah Bushkh Darga Syed Poor Shah 109/111 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 2.02 3.33 131.Kandar Ali Darga Syed Poor Shah 109/111 Sharecropper 100.00 40.47 - - 1.05 2.59 132.Mohd Bushkh Mehear Darga Syed Poor Shah 111/112 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.28 3.29 - - 133.Shakh Mohd Samejo Darga Syed Poor Shah 112/113 Owner-Farmer 92.00 37.23 1.22 3.28 - - 134.Gul Mohammad Samejo Darga Syed Poor Shah 113/114 Owner-Farmer 118.00 47.75 2.08 4.36 - - 135.Ghulam Hussen Samejo Darga Syed Poor Shah 114/115 Owner-Farmer 132.00 53.42 1.88 3.52 - - 136.Khuda Bushkh Rahar Darga Syed Poor Shah 115/116 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 1.96 3.87 - - 137.Chakh Basheer Arian Chakh Iltaf Arian 116/119 Landlord 325.00 131.53 5.65 4.30 - - 138.Farooq Ahmad Chakh Iltaf Arian 116/119 Sharecropper 175.00 70.82 - - 3.48 4.91 139.Yar Mohammad Chakh Iltaf Arian 116/119 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 2.17 3.57 140.Rana Maqsood Arian Chakh Iltaf Arian 119/121 Landlord 285.00 115.34 3.96 3.43 - - 141.Shah Mohammad Chakh Iltaf Arian 119/121 Sharecropper 160.00 64.75 - - 2.27 3.51 142.Mohammad Eajaz Chakh Iltaf Arian 119/121 Sharecropper 125.00 50.59 - - 1.69 3.34 143.Shakh Atif Hafeez Arian Chakh Iltaf Arian 121/124 Landlord 360.00 145.69 5.15 3.53 - - 144.Mumtaz Ali Chakh Iltaf Arian 121/124 Sharecropper 210.00 84.99 - - 3.20 3.77 145.Ahmad Ali Chakh Iltaf Arian 121/124 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 1.95 3.21 146.Mohammad Riaz Chakh Iltaf Arian 124/126 Landlord 348.00 140.83 3.49 2.48 - - 147.Yaseen Malik Arain Chakh Iltaf Arian 124/126 Sharecropper 168.00 67.99 - - 1.53 2.25
Page 92 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 148.Shahnawaz Arain Chakh Iltaf Arian 124/126 Sharecropper 180.00 72.85 - - 1.96 2.69 149.Lala Naseer Pattan Shakat Pattan 126/127 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.48 5.71 - - 150.Sheikh Mushtaq Kambo Shakh Mushtaq Kambo 127/129 Landlord 412.00 166.73 3.94 2.36 - - 151.Zahid Hussain Kambo Shakh Mushtaq Kambo 127/129 Sharecropper 240.00 97.13 - - 2.38 2.45 152.Ramzan Ali Kambo Shakh Mushtaq Kambo 127/129 Sharecropper 172.00 69.61 - - 1.56 2.24 153.Shokat Bhutta Jabbar Butta 129/130 Owner-Farmer 134.00 54.23 2.03 3.74 - - 154.Jabbar Bhutta Jabbar Butta 130/131 Landlord 165.00 66.77 1.92 5.90 - - 155.Mohammad Pir Jabbar Butta 130/131 Sharecropper 70.00 28.33 - - 0.81 2.86 156.Naik Mohammad Jabbar Butta 130/131 Sharecropper 95.00 38.45 - - 1.11 2.89 157.Khuda Bushkh Rajni Jabbar Butta 131/132 Owner-Farmer 172.00 69.61 1.66 2.38 - - 158.Mohamad Azim Chacher M Azeem Chacher 132/133 Landlord 160.00 64.75 0.82 1.27 - - 159.Mohammad Mittal M Azeem Chacher 132/133 Sharecropper 160.00 64.75 - - 0.82 1.27 160.Shah Mohamad Chacher M Azeem Chacher 135/136 Owner-Farmer 44.50 18.01 0.33 1.83 - - 161.Ghaffar Chacher M Azeem Chacher 136/137 Owner-Farmer 124.00 50.18 1.16 2.31 - - 162.Jewar Kosh Baloch Allah Bachio Kosh 136/137 Owner-Farmer 87.00 35.21 0.63 1.79 - - 163.Abdul Lateef Kosh Baloch Allah Bachio Kosh 137/138 Owner-Farmer 146.00 59.09 1.80 3.05 - - 164.Ramzan Kosh Baloch Allah Bachio Kosh 138/139 Owner-Farmer 90.00 36.42 1.80 4.94 - - 165.Mohammad Pinnal Kosh Qadir Bushkh Baloch 139/140 Owner-Farmer 88.00 35.61 1.97 5.53 - - 166.Mohammad Bushkh Kosh Qadir Bushkh Baloch 140/141 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 0.68 2.24 - - 167.Subdar Kosh Baloch Qadir Bushkh Baloch 140/141 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 1.46 2.89 - - 168.Pir Bushkh Kosh Baloch Allah Dad Kosh Baloch 141/142 Owner-Farmer 118.00 47.75 1.84 3.85 - - 169.Allah Warayo Kosh Allah Dad Kosh Baloch 142/143 Owner-Farmer 168.00 67.99 2.00 2.94 - - 170.Azoor Bushkh Kosh Allah Dad Kosh Baloch 143/144 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.41 1.69 - - 171.Arshad Kosh Baloch Allah Dad Kosh Baloch 143/144 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.33 1.94 - - 172.Qadir Bushkh Kosh Allah Dad Kosh Baloch 143/144 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.62 2.39 - - 173.Sahu Kosh Baloch Dost M Kosh Baloch 144/145 Owner-Farmer 123.00 49.78 1.98 3.98 - - 174.Rasheed Kosh Baloch Dost M Kosh Baloch 145/146 Owner-Farmer 26.00 10.52 0.08 0.76 - - 175.Noor Hassan Kosh Dost M Kosh Baloch 145/146 Owner-Farmer 32.50 13.15 0.15 1.14 - - 176.Hazur Bukhsh Kosh Dost M Kosh Baloch 145/146 Owner-Farmer 28.00 11.33 0.21 1.85 - - 177.Zaffar Arain Dost M Kosh Baloch 145/146 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.27 2.08 - -
Page 93 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 178.Ahmad Kosh Baloch Dost M Kosh Baloch 147/148 Owner-Farmer 44.00 17.81 0.47 2.64 - - 179.Ghulam Qadir Kosh Dost M Kosh Baloch 148/149 Owner-Farmer 63.00 25.50 0.47 1.84 - - 180.Hazoor Bukhsh Arain Dost M Kosh Baloch 151/153 Owner-Farmer 145.00 58.68 2.05 3.49 - - 181.Zaffar Arian Dost M Kosh Baloch 153/154 Owner-Farmer 148.00 59.89 1.88 3.14 - - 182.Bahzad Almani Dost M Kosh Baloch 154/155 Owner-Farmer 165.00 66.77 1.97 2.95 - - 183.Waddan Dando Ghulam Rasool Dando 155/156 Owner-Farmer 150.00 60.70 1.87 3.08 - - 184.Zaffar Ali Dahio Zaffar Ali Dahio 156/157 Owner-Farmer 213.00 86.20 2.02 2.34 - - 185.Mir Shar Zaffar Ali Dahio 157/158 Owner-Farmer 185.00 74.87 1.87 2.50 - - 186.Kando Mehaer Zaffar Ali Dahio 158/159 Owner-Farmer 210.00 84.99 1.88 2.21 - - 187.Ghulam Rasool Dando Ghulam Rasool Dando 159/160 Owner-Farmer 140.00 56.66 1.02 1.80 - - 188.Tanweer Khan Deher Ghulam Rasool Dando 160/161 Owner-Farmer 27.50 11.13 0.64 5.75 - - 189.Allahdino Chawar Allahdino Chawar 162/165 Landlord 360.00 145.69 5.09 3.49 - - 190.Abdul Sattar Allahdino Chawar 162/165 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 1.81 3.73 191.Jan Mohammad Allahdino Chawar 162/165 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 1.56 3.21 192.Arbela Allahdino Chawar 162/165 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 1.72 3.54 193.Din Mohammad Mehrani Allahdino Chawar 166/167 Owner-Farmer 54.00 21.85 0.70 3.20 - - 194.Ali Bushkh Mehrani Allahdino Chawar 166/167 Owner-Farmer 89.00 36.02 0.87 2.42 - - 195.Jam Muneer Allahdino Chawar 167/168 Owner-Farmer 97.50 39.46 1.32 3.35 - - 196.Jam Shafi Allahdino Chawar 168/169 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.91 5.00 - - 197.Badal Mehrani Allahdino Chawar 169/170 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.52 5.87 - - 198.Ali Dost Bugti Allahdino Chawar 170/171 Owner-Farmer 72.50 29.34 1.79 6.10 - - 199.Majo Malik Allahdino Chawar 171/173 Owner-Farmer 212.00 85.80 3.27 3.81 - - 200.Elahi Bukhsh Chowan Elahi Bukhsh Chowan 173/178 Landlord 510.00 206.39 8.49 4.11 - - 201.Allah Bushkh Elahi Bukhsh Chowan 173/178 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 1.67 3.44 202.Molah Bushkh Elahi Bukhsh Chowan 173/178 Sharecropper 125.00 50.59 - - 2.03 4.01 203.Abdul Malik Elahi Bukhsh Chowan 173/178 Sharecropper 115.00 46.54 - - 2.36 5.07 204.Hafeez Elahi Bukhsh Chowan 173/178 Sharecropper 150.00 60.70 - - 2.43 4.00 205.Bakhsh Jannu Mehboob Shar 178/179 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.78 4.02 - - 206.Mohamad Panna Shar Haji M Panna Shar 179/181 Landlord 102.00 41.28 1.90 4.60 - - 207.Dilawer Haji M Panna Shar 179/181 Sharecropper 62.00 25.09 - - 1.04 4.14
Page 94 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 208.Rajjab Ali Haji M Panna Shar 179/181 Sharecropper 40.00 16.19 - - 0.86 5.31 209.Mohammad Ali Shar Haji M Panna Shar 181/182 Owner-Farmer 128.00 51.80 1.73 3.34 - - 210.Haji M Panna Shar Haji M Panna Shar 182/183 Landlord 96.00 38.85 1.07 2.75 - - 211.Dilawer Haji M Panna Shar 182/183 Sharecropper 48.00 19.43 - - 0.57 2.93 212.Rajjab Ali Haji M Panna Shar 182/183 Sharecropper 48.00 19.43 - - 0.50 2.57 213.Khadim Hussen Chacher Saleh Chacher 183/184 Owner-Farmer 136.00 55.04 1.93 3.51 - - 214.Ghulam Sarwer Chacher Saleh Chacher 184/186 Landlord 315.00 127.48 3.83 3.00 - - 215.Mohammad Ali Saleh Chacher 184/186 Sharecropper 315.00 127.48 - - 3.83 3.00 216.Dadla Chacher Saleh Chacher 186/187 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.94 3.63 - - 217.Sawan Chacher Saleh Chacher 186/187 Owner-Farmer 71.00 28.73 0.97 3.38 - - 218.Ismail Chacher Saleh Chacher 187/188 Owner-Farmer 124.00 50.18 2.06 4.11 - - 219.Imam Bushkh Chacher Saleh Chacher 188/189 Owner-Farmer 87.00 35.21 0.53 1.51 - - 220.Rahim Bushkh Kori Saleh Chacher 188/189 Owner-Farmer 67.00 27.11 0.42 1.55 - - 221.Mohd Saleh Chacher Saleh Chacher 188/189 Owner-Farmer 53.00 21.45 0.34 1.59 - - 222.Habibullah Kori Saleh Chacher 188/189 Owner-Farmer 92.00 37.23 0.64 1.72 - - 223.Mohd Ibrahim Somro Pir Bushkh Chacher 189/190 Owner-Farmer 28.00 11.33 0.64 5.65 - - 224.Abdul Majeed Chacher Pir Bushkh Chacher 189/190 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.23 4.75 - - 225.Jumman Khan Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 190/191 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 1.89 5.84 - - 226.Sodo Khan Chacher Pir Bushkh Chacher 191/192 Owner-Farmer 120.00 48.56 1.82 3.75 - - 227.Jumman Khan Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 192/193 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.92 4.94 - - 228.Waheed Khan Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 193/194 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.68 5.54 - - 229.Sumar Chacher Pir Bushkh Chacher 194/195 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 1.34 5.52 - - 230.Ghulam Qadir Chacher Pir Bushkh Chacher 194/195 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.62 3.40 - - 231.Majeed Khan Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 195/196 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 0.86 2.95 - - 232.Mohammad Ali Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 195/196 Owner-Farmer 98.00 39.66 1.12 2.82 - - 233.Hameed Khan Deher Pir Bushkh Chacher 196/197 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.58 4.07 - - 234.Rahim Bushkh Chacher Jummah Chacher 197/198 Owner-Farmer 28.00 11.33 0.85 7.50 - - 235.Jam Sattar Jummah Chacher 198/199 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.72 4.24 - - 236.Lowang Chacher Jummah Chacher 198/199 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.37 2.54 - - 237.Alim Gori Jummah Chacher 199/200 Owner-Farmer 27.00 10.93 0.48 4.39 - -
Page 95 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 238.Akbar Solangi Ismail Solangi 199/200 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.65 2.64 - - 239.Abdul Hameed Solangi Ismail Solangi 199/200 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.51 3.50 - - 240.Sefal Solangi Ismail Solangi 200/201 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.64 3.29 - - 241.Bilawal Solangi Ismail Solangi 200/201 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.64 3.29 - - 242.Bahawal Solangi Ismail Solangi 200/201 Owner-Farmer 24.00 9.71 0.27 2.78 - - 243.Jam Abdullah Chowan Jam Akbar Chowan 201/202 Landlord 96.00 38.85 2.16 5.56 - - 244.Ramzan Jam Akbar Chowan 201/202 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.72 5.56 245.Abdullah Jam Akbar Chowan 201/202 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.72 5.56 246.Qurban Jam Akbar Chowan 201/202 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.72 5.56 247.Jam Attah M Chowan Jam Akbar Chowan 202/203 Owner-Farmer 116.00 46.94 2.48 5.28 - - 248.Jam Akhtar Chowan Jam Akbar Chowan 203/204 Landlord 154.00 62.32 3.15 5.05 - - 249.Kabeer Chowan Jam Akbar Chowan 203/205 Sharecropper 52.00 21.04 1.06 5.04 250.Iqbal Arain Jam Akbar Chowan 204/205 Sharecropper 52.00 21.04 1.06 5.04 251.Arshad Arain Jam Akbar Chowan 204/205 50.00 20.23 1.03 5.09 252.Jam Abeedullah Chowan Jam Akbar Chowan 203/306 Landlord 240.00 97.13 4.24 4.37 3.15 3.24 253.Ramzan Jam Akbar Chowan 203/306 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 1.48 4.57 254.Abdullah Jam Akbar Chowan 203/306 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 1.54 4.76 255.Qurban Jam Akbar Chowan 203/306 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 1.22 3.77 256.Jam Jindwanda Chowan Jam Jindwanda Chowan 206/208 Landlord 220.00 89.03 3.47 3.90 - - 257.Mohammad Ashraf Jam Jindwanda Chowan 206/208 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 1.95 4.02 258.Mohammad Aslam Jam Jindwanda Chowan 206/208 Sharecropper 100.00 40.47 - - 1.52 3.76 259.Allahdiwah Butta Jam Jindwanda Chowan 208/209 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 1.68 6.92 - - 260.Jam Kamar Chowan Jam Jindwanda Chowan 209/210 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 1.22 7.18 - - 261.Rawol Khalil Rajput Jam Jindwanda Chowan 210/211 Owner-Farmer 78.00 31.57 1.81 5.73 - - 262.Kalil Rana Jam Jindwanda Chowan 211/212 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.82 4.82 - - 263.Maqsood Rana Jam Jindwanda Chowan 211/212 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 0.96 4.24 - - 264.Maqsood Rana Jam Jindwanda Chowan 212/213 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.95 4.89 - - 265.Abbas Shah Rahees Khalil Mehaer 212/213 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.96 4.94 - - 266.Abbas Shah Rahees Khalil Mehaer 213/214 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.87 7.22 - - 267.Mazar Shah Rahees Khalil Mehaer 214/215 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.90 6.26 - -
Page 96 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 268.Rahees Khalil Mehaer Rahees Khalil Mehaer 215/217 Landlord 160.00 64.75 2.90 4.48 - - 269.Jummah Rahees Khalil Mehaer 215/217 Sharecropper 64.00 25.90 - - 1.20 4.63 270.Shakat Rahees Khalil Mehaer 215/217 Sharecropper 48.00 19.43 - - 0.85 4.38 271.Dur Mohammad Rahees Khalil Mehaer 215/217 Sharecropper 48.00 19.43 - - 0.85 4.38 272.Rahees Jameel Mehaer Rahees Khalil Mehaer 220/221 Landlord 134.00 54.23 1.60 2.95 - - 273.Gul Mohammad Rahees Khalil Mehaer 220/221 Sharecropper 84.00 33.99 - - 1.70 5.00 274.Noor Ahmad Rahees Khalil Mehaer 220/221 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 1.25 6.18 275.Rahim Bushkh Mehaer Rahees Khalil Mehaer 221/222 Owner-Farmer 76.00 30.76 1.93 6.28 - - 276.Nawaz Arian Meawah Kosh 222/223 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 1.34 6.90 - - 277.Jam Doda Arian Meawah Kosh 223/224 Owner-Farmer 92.00 37.23 1.90 5.10 - - 278.Ghandad Putar Meawah Kosh 224/225 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.82 6.00 - - 279.Meah Jameel Qureshi Puran Sanjar Pur 225/226 Landlord 68.00 27.52 1.28 4.65 - - 280.Anwar Kunja Puran Sanjar Pur 225/226 Sharecropper 68.00 27.52 - - 1.28 4.65 281.Shabir Karik Dildar Chacher 226/227 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 2.01 6.62 - - 282.Master Jameel Arian Punjab 227/228 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.78 6.87 - - 283.Mohammad Ali Arian Punjab 228/229 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.87 4.30 - - 284.Mohammad Sharif Arian Punjab 228/229 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.87 4.30 - - 285.Anwar Arian Chak 44 NP 229/230 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 1.85 6.35 - - 286.Haji Dahood Arian Chak 44 NP 230/231 Owner-Farmer 70.00 28.33 1.92 6.78 - - 287.Saeed Ahmad Arian Chak 44 NP 231/232 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.18 1.24 - - 288.Zaffar Arian Chak 44 NP 232/233 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.88 3.40 - - 289.Anwar Arian Chak 44 NP 233/234 Owner-Farmer 62.50 25.29 0.80 3.16 - - 290.Abdul Rehman Pattan Jam Khan Deher 233/234 Owner-Farmer 62.50 25.29 0.80 3.16 - - 291.Kandal Khan Jam Khan Deher 234/235 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 1.80 5.42 - - 292.Mehmood Bardar Jam Khan Deher 235/236 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 1.81 5.45 - - 293.Eizat Sameja Jam Khan Deher 236/237 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 2.00 6.03 - - 294.Ramzan Rajput Jam Khan Deher 237/238 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 1.94 5.85 - - 295.Khurshed Ahmad Khan Deher Khan 238/242 Landlord 450.00 182.11 7.29 4.00 - - 296.Dost Ali Deher Khan 238/242 Sharecropper 225.00 91.06 - - 3.65 4.01 297.Allahdad Deher Khan 238/242 Sharecropper 225.00 91.06 - - 3.64 4.00
Page 97 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 298.Fazal Ahmad Deher Khan 242/243 Owner-Farmer 68.00 27.52 1.54 5.60 - - 299.Kareem Bushkh Deher Deher Khan 243/244 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.12 0.82 - - 300.Bago Meher Kot Datha 245/246 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.14 0.96 - - 301.Wahid Bushkh Shakh Kot Datha 246/247 Owner-Farmer 55.00 22.26 0.60 2.70 - - 302.Tlib Hussen Arian Kot Datha 246/247 Owner-Farmer 55.00 22.26 0.60 2.70 - - 303.Laiqat Arian Kot Datha 247/248 Owner-Farmer 86.00 34.80 1.88 5.40 - - 304.Badar Islam Arian Kot Datha 248/249 Owner-Farmer 54.00 21.85 1.29 5.90 - - 305.Zulfaqar Multani Kot Datha 249/250 Owner-Farmer 47.00 19.02 0.61 3.21 - - 306.Siddiq Malana Kot Datha 249/250 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 0.73 3.22 - - 307.Mohammad Arif Arian Kot Datha 249/250 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.64 3.51 - - 308.Master Abdul Rashid Arain Kot Datha 250/251 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 1.04 4.14 - - 309.Nasrullah Arian Nasrullah Arian 250/251 Owner-Farmer 37.50 15.18 0.78 5.14 - - 310.Talib Hussen Arian Kot Datha 251/252 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 0.97 3.20 - - 311.Mohamad Aslam Multani Nasrullah Arain 251/252 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.87 3.36 - - 312.Mohamad Husen Multani Nasrullah Arain 252/253 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.92 6.50 - - 313.Mohammad Shafi Arian Nasrullah Arain 252/253 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.97 5.71 - - 314.Haji Sardar Mohani Nasrullah Arain 253/254 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.99 6.56 - - 315.Yaseen Mohani Nasrullah Arain 254/255 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.84 5.77 - - 316.Bibi Sharifa Dogar Nasrullah Arain 254/255 Landlord 60.00 24.28 1.13 4.65 - - 317.Bibi Hanifa Dogar Nasrullah Arain 255/256 Landlord 60.00 24.28 1.13 4.65 - - 318.Ashraf Arain Nasrullah Arain 255/256 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.26 4.65 319.Shah Mohammad Arian Ghulam Fareed Banga 255/256 Owner-Farmer 30.00 12.14 0.64 5.27 - - 320.Safdar Arian Ghulam Fareed Banga 256/257 Owner-Farmer 27.50 11.13 0.75 6.74 - - 321.Mohd Bushkh Chacher Ghulam Fareed Banga 256/258 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.62 6.16 - - 322.Ashiq Malik Dehera Mubashir Khan 257/258 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 2.08 6.42 - - 323.Kamran Ali Arain Dehera Mubashir Khan 258/259 Owner-Farmer 34.50 13.96 0.87 6.23 - - 324.Khair Habib Langah Khair Habib Langah 259/260 Landlord 95.00 38.45 1.92 4.99 - - 325.Ashraf Ali Khair Habib Langah 259/260 Sharecropper 62.00 25.09 - - 1.27 5.06 326.Bilal Hussen Khair Habib Langah 259/260 Sharecropper 33.00 13.35 - - 0.65 4.87 327.Mohamad Asghar Kokar Khair Habib Langah 260/261 Landlord 90.00 36.42 1.58 4.34 - -
Page 98 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 328.Ghulam Akbar Kokar Khair Habib Langah 260/261 Sharecropper 90.00 36.42 - - 1.58 4.34 329.Daud Ahmad Sheikh Khair Habib Langah 260/261 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.46 2.53 - - 330.Habib Ahmad Sheikh Khair Habib Langah 261/262 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.77 2.97 - - 331.Javed Ahmad Jatt Javed Ahmad Jatt 261/262 Landlord 85.00 34.40 1.12 3.26 - - 332.Sharif Ahmad Bhatti Javed Ahmad Jatt 261/262 Sharecropper 85.00 34.40 - - 1.12 3.26 333.Javed Ahmad Jatt Javed Ahmad Jatt 262/263 Landlord 78.00 31.57 1.52 4.82 - - 334.Sharif Ahmad Bhatti Javed Ahmad Jatt 262/263 Sharecropper 78.00 31.57 - - 1.52 4.82 335.Khalid Saleem Arain Javed Ahmad Jatt 263/264 Owner-Farmer 28.00 11.33 0.41 3.62 - - 336.Saleh Mohamad Manga Javed Ahmad Jatt 263/264 Owner-Farmer 28.00 11.33 0.34 3.00 - - 337.Mohamad Nawaz Manga Javed Ahmad Jatt 263/264 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.44 3.40 - - 338.Mohamad Yasin Manga Javed Ahmad Jatt 263/264 Owner-Farmer 47.00 19.02 0.59 3.10 - - 339.Mubashir Khan Pathan Lahore City 264/265 Landlord 132.00 53.42 1.68 3.14 - - 340.Tariq Husain Javed Ahmad Jatt 264/265 Sharecropper 72.00 29.14 - - 0.95 3.26 341.Shahzad Ali Javed Ahmad Jatt 264/265 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 0.73 3.01 342.Khalid Saleem Arian Javed Ahmad Jatt 265/266 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.69 4.74 - - 343.Shabir Ahmad Bhayo Allahdin Bhayo 265/266 Owner-Farmer 57.00 23.07 1.08 4.68 - - 344.Allah Bushkh Bhayo Allahdin Bhayo 266/267 Owner-Farmer 70.00 28.33 1.45 5.12 - - 345.Riaz Ahmad Bhayo Allahdin Bhayo 267/268 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.76 5.37 - - 346.Abdul Rehman Arian Chak 23 NP 268/269 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 1.82 6.25 - - 347.Fazal Ahmad Majir Chak 23 NP 269/270 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.75 5.79 - - 348.Yaqoob Jaht Chak 23 NP 269/270 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.87 6.14 - - 349.Asgar Arian Chak 23 NP 270/271 Owner-Farmer 66.00 26.71 1.73 6.48 - - 350.Akbar Meher Chak 23 NP 271/272 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.71 6.60 - - 351.Kandal Bahra Jam Shair Bahra 272/273 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.80 5.93 - - 352.Jam Lal Mohamad Bahra Jam Shair Bahra 273/274 Owner-Farmer 46.00 18.62 1.06 5.69 - - 353.Jam Kal Mohamad Bahra Jam Shair Bahra 273/274 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.82 5.79 - - 354.Shakh Mohammad Ali Chak 24 NP 274/275 Owner-Farmer 67.50 27.32 1.76 6.44 - - 355.Rizwan Rana Dolat Pur 275/276 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.79 5.42 - - 356.Jam Ayoub Dolat Pur 275/276 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 1.12 6.15 - - 357.Jam Khadim Hussen Dolat Pur 276/277 Owner-Farmer 69.00 27.92 1.81 6.48 - -
Page 99 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 358.Jam Ghulam Fareed Dolat Pur 277/278 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 1.02 5.25 - - 359.Jam Jindwanda Dolat Pur 277/278 Owner-Farmer 47.00 19.02 0.84 4.42 - - 360.Jam Shabir Dolat Pur 278/279 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 1.97 6.76 - - 361.Jam Sachu Dolat Pur 279/280 Owner-Farmer 44.00 17.81 0.57 3.20 - - 362.Jam Ghulam Dolat Pur 279/280 Owner-Farmer 53.00 21.45 0.66 3.08 - - 363.Rafeeq Jaht Walidad Jatt 279/280 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.53 3.64 - - 364.Arif Jaht Walidad Jatt 280/281 Owner-Farmer 62.50 25.29 1.26 4.98 - - 365.Ghafoor Jaht Walidad Jatt 281/282 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 2.00 6.18 - - 366.Younas Jaht Walidad Jatt 282/283 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.93 7.18 - - 367.Mehmood Kokar Chak 12 NP 285/287 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.64 5.40 - - 368.Rafeeq Arian Chak 12 NP 285/287 Owner-Farmer 98.00 39.66 2.08 5.24 - - 369.Tuffel Gujjar Chak 12 NP 287/288 Owner-Farmer 72.50 29.34 1.59 5.42 - - 370.Akram Arian Chak 12 NP 288/289 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 1.15 5.07 - - 371.Riaz Arian Chak 12 NP 289/290 Owner-Farmer 52.00 21.04 0.78 3.71 - - 372.Basheer Arian Chak 12 NP 289/290 Owner-Farmer 31.00 12.55 0.34 2.71 - - 373.Aslam Arian Chak 12 NP 290/291 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.68 6.39 - - 374.Iqbal Arian Chak 12 NP 291/292 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.64 6.23 - - 375.Sarwar Mattar Imam Bushkh Mattar 292/293 Owner-Farmer 90.00 36.42 2.04 5.60 - - 376.Mehboob Khan Pattan Lahore City 293/294 Landlord 75.00 30.35 1.90 6.26 - - 377.Abdul Sattar Langa Imam Bushkh Mattar 293/294 Sharecropper 40.00 16.19 - - 1.02 6.30 378.Mohammad Ali Langa Imam Bushkh Mattar 293/294 Sharecropper 35.00 14.16 - - 0.88 6.21 379.Afzal Arian Imam Bushkh Mattar 294/295 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 1.69 6.74 - - 380.Mehboob Khan Pattan Lahore City 295/297 Landlord 125.00 50.59 2.75 5.44 - - 381.Abdul Sattar Langa Imam Bushkh Mattar 295/297 Sharecropper 75.00 30.35 - - 1.67 5.50 382.Mohammad Ali Langa Imam Bushkh Mattar 295/297 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 1.08 5.34 383.Mohbat Sehial Hakeem Sehyal 297/298 Owner-Farmer 23.00 9.31 0.06 0.64 - - 384.Fareed Sehial Hakeem Sehyal 298/299 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 1.48 5.90 - - 385.Azeem Sehial Hakeem Sehyal 299/300 Owner-Farmer 54.00 21.85 1.52 6.96 - - 386.Heabat Sehial Hakeem Sehyal 300/301 Owner-Farmer 73.00 29.54 1.96 6.63 - - 387.Darmir Khan Seyal Hakeem Sehyal 301/302 Landlord 75.00 30.35 1.62 5.34 - -
Page 100 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 388.Sarwar Hakeem Sehyal 301/302 Sharecropper 37.50 15.18 - - 0.81 5.34 389.Atif Hakeem Sehyal 301/302 Sharecropper 37.50 15.18 - - 0.81 5.34 390.Fidah Hussen Shah Chak 2 NP 303/304 Owner-Farmer 23.50 9.51 0.55 5.78 - - 391.Ameer Khan Seyal Hakeem Seyal 303/304 Landlord 60.00 24.28 1.18 4.86 - - 392.Sarwar Husain Arain Hakeem Seyal 303/304 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.62 4.79 393.Arif Ali Arain Hakeem Seyal 303/304 Sharecropper 28.00 11.33 - - 0.56 4.94 394.Zamir Khan Seyal Hakeem Seyal 304/305 Landlord 92.00 37.23 1.89 5.08 - - 395.Mohammad Sarwar Hakeem Seyal 304/305 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 1.09 5.39 396.Atif Mehmood Hakeem Seyal 304/305 Sharecropper 42.00 17.00 - - 0.80 4.71 397.Master Basheer Seyal Hakeem Seyal 305/306 Owner-Farmer 135.00 54.63 1.98 3.62 - - 398.Rasool Bushkh Rind Pataqi 306/307 Owner-Farmer 157.00 63.54 1.50 2.36 - - 399.Mohammad Javed Majir Pataqi 307/309 Landlord 213.00 86.20 2.76 3.20 - - 400.Hafiz Gul Khan Pataqi 307/309 Sharecropper 213.00 86.20 - - 2.76 3.20 401.Rana Abdul Rehman Pucca Munnah 309/310 Owner-Farmer 160.00 64.75 3.21 4.96 - - 402.Rana Abdul Raheem Pucca Munnah 310/311 Owner-Farmer 34.00 13.76 0.74 5.38 - - 403.Akram Baloch Pucca Munnah 310/311 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.88 4.53 - - 404.Shabir Majir Pataqi 311/312 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 2.08 4.11 - - 405.Saeed Majir Pataqi 312/313 Owner-Farmer 40.00 16.19 0.78 4.82 - - 406.Basheer Khan Pattan Pataqi 312/313 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.08 3.56 - - 407.Malik Khalid Ahmad Khurshed Malik 313/314 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.89 4.58 - - 408.Malik Munshi Khurshed Malik 313/314 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.78 5.51 - - 409.Malik Niamat Ali Khurshed Malik 314/315 Landlord 106.00 42.90 1.80 4.20 - - 410.Murad Ali Khurshed Malik 314/315 Sharecropper 64.00 25.90 - - 0.97 3.75 411.Mohammad Shafi Khurshed Malik 314/315 Sharecropper 42.00 17.00 - - 0.83 4.88 412.Allah Ditta Khurshed Malik 315/316 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 1.71 5.28 - - 413.Mohammad Aslam Arian Khurshed Malik 316/317 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 1.11 4.90 - - 414.Pir Bushkh Hoth Baloch Khurshed Malik 317/318 Owner-Farmer 112.50 45.53 1.85 4.06 - - 415.Mohamad Hussen Kambo Khurshed Malik 318/319 Owner-Farmer 123.00 49.78 1.72 3.46 - - 416.Abdul Shakoor Kambo Khurshed Malik 319/320 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.69 4.35 - - 417.Allah Ditta Mangrio Khurshed Malik 320/321 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 1.34 5.52 - -
Page 101 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 418.Dost Ali Malik Aqeel Mirza 320/321 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.63 4.86 419.Shameer Malik Aqeel Mirza 320/321 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.89 6.87 420.Saifullah Malik Aqeel Mirza 320/321 Sharecropper 32.00 12.95 - - 0.54 4.17 421.Malik Shakeel Mirza Malik Aqeel Mirza 321/323 Landlord 180.00 72.85 3.12 4.28 - - 422.Dost Ali Malik Aqeel Mirza 321/323 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 1.04 4.28 423.Shameer Malik Aqeel Mirza 321/323 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 1.04 4.28 424.Safullah Malik Aqeel Mirza 321/323 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 1.04 4.28 425.Malik Mujtaba Mirza Malik Aqeel Mirza 323/324 Landlord 176.00 71.23 3.15 4.42 - - 426.Akbar Ali Mirza Malik Aqeel Mirza 323/324 Sharecropper 96.00 38.85 - - 1.72 4.43 427.Jan Mohammad Malik Aqeel Mirza 323/324 Sharecropper 80.00 32.38 - - 1.43 4.42 428.Malik Aqeel Mirza Malik Aqeel Mirza 324/325 Landlord 86.00 34.80 1.59 4.57 - - 429.Tariq Jameel Malik Aqeel Mirza 324/325 Sharecropper 36.00 14.57 - - 0.63 4.32 430.Barkat Ali Malik Aqeel Mirza 324/325 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 0.96 4.74 431.Mohammad Tariq Chowan Charenja Chowan 325/326 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 1.18 5.21 - - 432.Sarfaraz Arian Charenja Chowan 326/327 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.95 5.22 - - 433.Javed Jatt Charenja Chowan 326/327 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.92 4.74 - - 434.Haji Abdul Khaliq Machi Charenja Chowan 327/328 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.92 5.41 - - 435.Jam Azizullah Chowan Molvi Tariq Chowan 328/329 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.16 4.41 - - 436.Jam Dodal Chowan Molvi Tariq Chowan 329/330 Owner-Farmer 82.00 33.18 1.52 4.58 - - 437.Jam Saeed Chowan Molvi Tariq Chowan 330/331 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.20 1.54 - - 438.Molvi Ayoub Chowan Molvi Tariq Chowan 334/335 Landlord 50.00 20.23 0.62 3.06 - - 439.Kamil Husain Molvi Tariq Chowan 334/335 Sharecropper 25.00 10.12 - - 0.31 3.06 440.Ghulam Nabi Molvi Tariq Chowan 334/335 Sharecropper 25.00 10.12 - - 0.31 3.06 441.Molvi Attahullah Chowan Molvi Tariq Chowan 334/335 Owner-Farmer 27.00 10.93 0.31 2.84 - - 442.Khadim Chowan Wahid Bushkh Chowan 335/336 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.26 1.78 - - 443.Wahid Bushkh Chowan Wahid Bushkh Chowan 335/336 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.33 1.63 - - 444.Ghouse Bushkh Arian Abdul Aziz Chowan 336/337 Owner-Farmer 54.00 21.85 0.38 1.74 - - 445.Irshad Husain Arain Abdul Aziz Chowan 337/338 Owner-Farmer 93.00 37.64 1.86 4.94 - - 446.Molvi Abdul Hadi Chowan Abdul Aziz Chowan 338/342 Landlord 360.00 145.69 7.46 5.12 - - 447.Sadiq Ali Chowan Abdul Aziz Chowan 338/342 Sharecropper 180.00 72.85 - - 3.73 5.12
Page 102 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 448.Abdul Rasheed Chowan Abdul Aziz Chowan 338/342 Sharecropper 180.00 72.85 - - 3.73 5.12 449.Raja M Khan Rajput Abdul Aziz Chowan 342/344 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 2.91 5.75 - - 450.Haji Inayatullah Chowan Abdul Aziz Chowan 342/344 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.03 3.92 - - 451.Habibullah Chowan Jan Mohammad Chohan 344/345 Owner-Farmer 66.00 26.71 0.91 3.41 - - 452.Haji Ashraf Rajput Jan Mohammad Chohan 344/345 Owner-Farmer 54.00 21.85 0.90 4.12 - - 453.Haji Ashraf Rajput Jan Mohammad Chohan 345/346 Owner-Farmer 84.00 33.99 1.59 4.68 - - 454.Master Habib Rajput Jan Mohammad Chohan 345/346 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.54 3.81 - - 455.Jam Basheer Chowan Jan Mohammad Chohan 346/348 Landlord 82.00 33.18 1.89 5.70 - - 456.Ghulam Fareed Jan Mohammad Chohan 346/348 Sharecropper 82.00 33.18 - - 1.89 5.70 457.Mushtaq Chowan Jan Mohammad Chohan 346/348 Landlord 64.00 25.90 1.44 5.56 - - 458.Imam Bukhsh Jan Mohammad Chohan 346/348 Sharecropper 64.00 25.90 - - 1.44 5.56 459.Mohammad Ismail Tib Chohan 348/349 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.75 4.12 - - 460.Jam Nawaz Chowan Tib Chohan 348/349 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.93 3.59 - - 461.Jam Mohammad Chowan Tib Chohan 349/350 Owner-Farmer 80.00 32.38 1.84 5.68 - - 462.Jam Nawaz Chowan Tib Chohan 350/351 Owner-Farmer 72.00 29.14 1.97 6.76 - - 463.Jam Sarwar Chowan Tib Chohan 351/352 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.95 5.02 - - 464.Jam Khadim Chowan Tib Chohan 352/353 Owner-Farmer 100.00 40.47 1.92 4.74 - - 465.Abdul Majeed Tawari Tib Chohan 353/354 Owner-Farmer 91.00 36.83 1.51 4.10 - - 466.Faiz Mohammad Chacher Pasan Wali Nigrah 354/355 Owner-Farmer 25.00 10.12 0.56 5.54 - - 467.Jam Shabir Nigrah Pasan Wali Nigrah 354/355 Owner-Farmer 16.00 6.48 0.37 5.71 - - 468.Jam Ashraf Chajju Pasan Wali Nigrah 354/355 Owner-Farmer 12.50 5.06 0.29 5.73 - - 469.Jam Shair M Chajju Pasan Wali Nigrah 354/355 Owner-Farmer 17.50 7.08 0.41 5.79 - - 470.Jam Ashiq Nigrah Pasan Wali Nigrah 355/356 Owner-Farmer 33.00 13.35 0.73 5.47 - - 471.Jam Noor M Nigrah Pasan Wali Nigrah 355/356 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 1.20 5.93 - - 472.Elai Bushkh Chajju Pasan Wali Nigrah 356/357 Owner-Farmer 70.00 28.33 1.87 6.60 - - 473.Haq Nawaz Chajju Pasan Wali Nigrah 357/358 Owner-Farmer 85.00 34.40 2.01 5.84 - - 474.Abdul Kareem Chajju Derah Chajju 358/359 Owner-Farmer 23.00 9.31 0.56 6.02 - - 475.Daryah Chajju Derah Chajju 358/359 Owner-Farmer 18.00 7.28 0.43 5.90 - - 476.Abdul Razzaq Chajju Derah Chajju 358/359 Owner-Farmer 21.00 8.50 0.51 6.00 - - 477.Jam Hassan Chajju Derah Chajju 358/359 Owner-Farmer 20.00 8.09 0.47 5.81 - -
Page 103 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 478.Jam Gulzar Chajju Derah Chajju 359/360 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 1.88 7.26 - - 479.Malik Hafiz Meah Mureed Abad Khokhar 360/361 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 1.90 7.22 - - 480.Abid Khan Mureed Abad Khokhar 361/362 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.74 5.73 - - 481.Malik Shohib Khan Meah Mureed Abad Khokhar 362/363 Owner-Farmer 40.00 16.19 0.67 4.14 - - 482.Amir Bushkh Dindar Mureed Abad Khokhar 362/363 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.89 4.58 - - 483.Malik Arshad Khan Meah Masjid Wali 363/367 Landlord 312.00 126.26 6.87 5.44 - - 484.Farooq Ahmad Masjid Wali 363/367 Sharecropper 160.00 64.75 - - 3.55 5.48 485.Mohammad Hafiz Aslam Masjid Wali 363/367 Sharecropper 152.00 61.51 - - 3.32 5.40 486.M Musharaf Parant 367/370 Landlord 185.00 74.87 5.14 6.87 - - 487.Kareem Bushkh Parant 367/370 Sharecropper 45.00 18.21 - - 1.23 6.75 488.Iqbal Ahmad Parant 367/370 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 1.39 6.87 489.Abdul Razaq Parant 367/370 Sharecropper 48.00 19.43 - - 1.33 6.85 490.Ghulam Qasim Parant 367/370 Sharecropper 42.00 17.00 - - 1.19 7.00 491.Abid Hameed Rahu Mohamad Nawaz Abad 370/372 Landlord 142.00 57.47 3.71 6.46 - - 492.Mohammad Iqbal Bhatti Mohamad Nawaz Abad 370/372 Sharecropper 142.00 57.47 - - 3.71 6.46 493.Raho Saeed Ahmad Mohamad Nawaz Abad 372/373 Owner-Farmer 68.00 27.52 1.63 5.92 - - 494.Mohammad Qasum Arian Mohamad Nawaz Abad 373/374 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 1.52 6.06 - - 495.Amjad Waraich Imdad Waraich 374/376 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.82 6.33 - - 496.Rafaqat Waraich Imdad Waraich 374/376 Owner-Farmer 12.50 5.06 0.33 6.52 - - 497.Sajjad Waraich Imdad Waraich 374/376 Owner-Farmer 22.50 9.11 0.55 6.04 - - 498.Imtiaz Waraich Imdad Waraich 374/376 Owner-Farmer 25.00 10.12 0.55 5.44 - - 499.Imtiaz Waraich Imdad Waraich 376/377 Landlord 76.00 30.76 1.88 6.11 - - 500.Farooq Ahmad Imdad Waraich 376/377 Sharecropper 40.00 16.19 - - 1.12 6.92 501.Jameel Imdad Waraich 376/377 Sharecropper 36.00 14.57 - - 0.76 5.22 502.Ghulam Fareed Baloch Malik Mitta 377/378 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 1.47 6.49 - - 503.Ashraf Arian Malik Mitta 378/379 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.75 5.77 - - 504.Malik Haji Ahmad Malik Mitta 379/380 Owner-Farmer 90.00 36.42 1.60 4.39 - - 505.Haji Ajmal Qurrai Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 380/381 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.60 2.32 - - 506.Haji Akbar Qurrai Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 381/382 Owner-Farmer 96.00 38.85 1.62 4.17 - - 507.Haji Dildar Qurrai Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 382/383 Owner-Farmer 127.00 51.40 1.84 3.58 - -
Page 104 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 508.Majnu Khan Qurrai Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 383/384 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.73 4.29 - - 509.Hameedullah Qurrai Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 383/384 Owner-Farmer 52.00 21.04 0.98 4.66 - - 510.Ghulam Mustafa Baloch Mud Doda Korai Baloch 384/385 Owner-Farmer 113.00 45.73 1.83 4.00 - - 511.Manzoor Khan Qurrai Mud Doda Korai Baloch 385/386 Owner-Farmer 128.00 51.80 1.75 3.38 - - 512.Rehman Khan Qurrai Mud Doda Korai Baloch 386/387 Owner-Farmer 103.00 41.68 1.78 4.27 - - 513.Riaz Jam Ganga Allah Bajiah 387/388 Owner-Farmer 154.00 62.32 1.92 3.08 - - 514.Amir Raja Allah Bajiah 388/390 Owner-Farmer 230.00 93.08 3.79 4.07 - - 515.Rahim Bushkh Dando Allah Bajiah 390/391 Owner-Farmer 22.50 9.11 0.39 4.28 - - 516.Sadiq Dando Allah Bajiah 390/391 Owner-Farmer 25.00 10.12 0.40 3.95 - - 517.Jam Piran Dando Allah Bajiah 390/391 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.60 3.09 - - 518.Jam M Hussen Dando Allah Bajiah 390/391 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.57 3.13 - - 519.Hazoor Bushkh Dando Allah Bajiah 391/392 Owner-Farmer 55.00 22.26 0.64 2.88 - - 520.Mohammad Rafeeq Dando Allah Bajiah 391/392 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.23 4.05 - - 521.Mohammad Yunas Dando Allah Bajiah 392/393 Owner-Farmer 18.00 7.28 0.26 3.57 - - 522.Ghulam Shabir Dando Allah Bajiah 392/393 Owner-Farmer 16.00 6.48 0.31 4.79 - - 523.Mohammad Aslam Dando Allah Bajiah 392/393 Owner-Farmer 12.50 5.06 0.18 3.56 - - 524.Ghulam Fareed Dando Allah Bajiah 392/393 Owner-Farmer 12.50 5.06 0.11 2.17 - - 525.Khuda Bushkh Dando Hassan Dando 392/393 Owner-Farmer 15.00 6.07 0.17 2.80 - - 526.Allah Hussen Dando Hassan Dando 392/393 Owner-Farmer 24.00 9.71 0.32 3.29 - - 527.Khuda Bushkh Dando Hassan Dando 393/394 Owner-Farmer 16.00 6.48 0.04 0.62 - - 528.Allah Hussen Dando Hassan Dando 393/394 Owner-Farmer 20.00 8.09 0.07 0.86 - - 529.Allah Diwah Dando Hassan Dando 394/395 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.21 1.62 - - 530.Jam Allah Daiwah Jam Mussa 395/396 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 1.91 3.78 - - 531.Jam Rabnawaz Dando Jam Mussa 396/397 Owner-Farmer 64.00 25.90 0.87 3.36 - - 532.Allah Diwah Dando Jam Mussa 396/397 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 0.64 2.11 - - 533.Ghulam Shabir Jath Jam Mussa 397/398 Owner-Farmer 130.00 52.61 1.24 2.36 - - 534.Pir Hassan Shah Jelani ahim Yar Khan City 398/401 Landlord 240.00 97.13 4.12 4.24 - - 535.Manzoor Hussen Jam Mussa 398/401 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.06 4.24 536.Jameel Hussen Jam Mussa 398/401 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.06 4.24 537.Mohammad Arabi Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 401/402 Owner-Farmer 48.00 19.43 0.81 4.17 - -
Page 105 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 538.Abdul Hadi Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 401/402 Owner-Farmer 42.00 17.00 0.74 4.35 - - 539.Malik Farooq Gul Mohamad Mallana 401/402 Owner-Farmer 40.00 16.19 0.63 3.89 - - 540.Malik Manzur Ahmad Gul Mohamad Mallana 402/403 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.71 2.92 - - 541.Hazoor Bushkh Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 402/403 Owner-Farmer 25.00 10.12 0.43 4.25 - - 542.Ahmad Bushkh Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 402/403 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.62 3.06 - - 543.Ahmad Bushkh Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 403/404 Owner-Farmer 118.00 47.75 1.14 2.39 - - 544.Abdul Hadi Kahal Gul Mohamad Mallana 404/405 Owner-Farmer 32.50 13.15 0.60 4.56 - - 545.Mahammad Alim Mallana Gul Mohamad Mallana 404/405 Owner-Farmer 32.50 13.15 0.60 4.56 - - 546.Rab Nawaz Mallana Gul Mohamad Mallana 405/406 Owner-Farmer 33.00 13.35 0.75 5.62 - - 547.Ghulam Hussen Mallana Gul Mohamad Mallana 405/406 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.80 4.39 - - 548.Azizullah Bullah Master Jamshed Dashti 406/407 Owner-Farmer 132.00 53.42 1.93 3.61 - - 549.Master Jamshed Dushti Master Jamshed Dashti 407/408 Owner-Farmer 116.00 46.94 1.61 3.43 - - 550.Riaz Hussen Dashti Master Jamshed Dashti 408/409 Owner-Farmer 180.00 72.85 1.97 2.70 - - 551.Master Jamshed Dashti Master Jamshed Dashti 409/410 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 1.11 4.42 - - 552.Hashiq Hussen Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 409/410 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.81 4.00 - - 553.Hashiq Hussen Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 410/411 Owner-Farmer 68.00 27.52 1.61 5.85 - - 554.Makkan Khan Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 411/412 Owner-Farmer 44.00 17.81 0.42 2.36 - - 555.Khuda Bushkh Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 411/412 Owner-Farmer 44.00 17.81 0.50 2.81 - - 556.Wazeer Khan Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 411/412 Owner-Farmer 44.00 17.81 0.36 2.02 - - 557.Mohammad Khan Mastoi Ghulam Mastoi Baloch 412/413 Owner-Farmer 31.00 12.55 0.68 5.42 - - 558.Zahid Khan Dashti Baloch Ghulam Qadir Dashti 412/413 Owner-Farmer 65.00 26.31 0.94 3.57 - - 559.Khalil Khan Dashti Baloch Ghulam Qadir Dashti 413/414 Owner-Farmer 22.00 8.90 0.23 2.58 - - 560.Zahid Khan Dashti Baloch Ghulam Qadir Dashti 414/415 Owner-Farmer 94.00 38.04 2.10 5.52 - - 561.Jam Riaz Arian Ghulam Qadir Dashti 416/417 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.58 3.98 - - 562.Jam Faiz Arian Ghulam Qadir Dashti 416/417 Owner-Farmer 62.00 25.09 0.71 2.83 - - 563.Jam Taj Arian Ghulam Qadir Dashti 416/417 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.64 2.64 - - 564.Allah Wasaiah Nigra Mohammad Amin Jatoi 417/418 Owner-Farmer 27.00 10.93 0.39 3.57 - - 565.Allah Ditha Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 417/418 Owner-Farmer 20.00 8.09 0.32 3.95 - - 566.Abdul Rasheed Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 417/418 Owner-Farmer 32.00 12.95 0.54 4.17 - - 567.Allah Daio Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 417/418 Owner-Farmer 40.00 16.19 0.52 3.21 - -
Page 106 of 107
AH No. Name of Affected Farmer Name of Hamlet/Village Tower Tenurial Total Farm Size Temporarily Affected Farmlands (Head of Household) (Goth) Nos. Status Owned Sharecropped Acres Hectares Hectares %age Hectares %age 568.Riaz Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 418/419 Owner-Farmer 53.00 21.45 0.62 2.89 - - 569.Abdul Rasheed Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 418/419 Owner-Farmer 45.00 18.21 0.56 3.08 - - 570.Siraj Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 418/419 Owner-Farmer 35.00 14.16 0.46 3.25 - - 571.Qasim Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 418/419 Owner-Farmer 52.00 21.04 0.53 2.52 - - 572.Idayatullah Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 419/420 Owner-Farmer 91.00 36.83 0.81 2.20 - - 573.Mohammad Alim Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 419/420 Owner-Farmer 36.00 14.57 0.47 3.23 - - 574.Faqeer Bushkh Jathoi Mohammad Amin Jatoi 419/420 Owner-Farmer 56.00 22.66 0.63 2.78 - - 575.Haji Khan Gopan Baloch Jandu Gopan Baloch 420/421 Owner-Farmer 34.00 13.76 0.60 4.36 - - 576.Zulfaqar Husain Arain Jandu Gopan Baloch 420/421 Owner-Farmer 60.00 24.28 0.93 3.83 - - 577.Abdul Qadir Arain Kot Datha 421/422 Owner-Farmer 88.00 35.61 1.96 5.50 - - 578.Abdul Khaliq Arain Kot Datha 422/425 Landlord 180.00 72.85 3.10 4.26 - - 579.Badur Din Arain Kot Datha 422/425 Sharecropper 120.00 48.56 - - 2.02 4.16 580.Abdul Kareem Arain Kot Datha 422/425 Sharecropper 60.00 24.28 - - 1.08 4.45 581.Ameen Abbasi Sari Abbasi 422/425 Owner-Farmer 84.00 33.99 0.96 2.82 - - 582.Allah Wasaiah Abbasi Sari Abbasi 422/425 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.67 3.31 - - 583.Najeeb Abbasi Sari Abbasi 422/425 Owner-Farmer 53.00 21.45 0.73 3.40 - - 584.Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Abbasi Sari Abbasi 425/426 Owner-Farmer 50.00 20.23 0.68 3.36 - - 585.Maqsood Alwani Sari Abbasi 425/426 Owner-Farmer 75.00 30.35 1.07 3.53 - - 586.Rasool Bushkh Jathoi Sari Abbasi 426/427 Owner-Farmer 90.00 36.42 1.65 4.53 - - 587.Jam Abdullah Arian Sari Abbasi 427/428 Landlord 120.00 48.56 2.63 5.42 - - 588.Mohammad Khan Sari Abbasi 427/428 Sharecropper 50.00 20.23 - - 1.36 6.72 589.Irfan Ahmed Abbasi Sari Abbasi 427/428 Sharecropper 70.00 28.33 - - 1.27 4.48 590.Abdul Karim Gopang Sharukh Khan Gopang 428/430 Owner-Farmer 124.00 50.18 2.58 5.14 - - 591.Allah Bukhsh Gopang Sharukh Khan Gopang 429/431 Owner-Farmer 112.00 45.33 2.11 4.66 - - 592.Abdul Aziz Gopang Jan Khan Gopang 431/436 Owner-Farmer 125.00 50.59 2.31 4.57 - -
Page 107 of 107