DOCSLIB.ORG

Airliner Accident Statistics 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 Statistical summary of fatal multi-engine airliner accidents in 2004 Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 Statistical summary of fatal multi-engine airliner accidents in 2003 Statistical summary of fatal multi-engine airliner accidents in 2004 © Harro Ranter, the Aviation Safety Network January 1, 2005 this publication is available also on http://aviation-safety.net/pubs/ front page photo: non-fatal MD-10 accident at Memphis, December 18, 2003 © Dan Parent, kc10.net Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 2 CONTENTS SUMMARY .............................................................................. 4 SCOPE & DEFINITION .............................................................. 5 2004: ACCIDENT SUMMARY...................................................... 6 2004 IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ........................................... 7 AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS..................................................... 9 COUNTRIES ......................................................................... 10 REGIONS ............................................................................. 12 FLIGHT NATURE.................................................................... 13 FLIGHT PHASE...................................................................... 14 AVIATION SAFETY PRIORITIES................................................ 14 APPENDIX 1 – List of airliner types covered............................... 15 Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 3 SUMMARY The year 2004 was an exceptionally safe one for civil aviation. Statistics show a record low number of 425 airliner accident 1) fatalities as a result of 26 accidents. By comparison, the second-safest year, 1955, recorded 572 fatalities. With regards to the number of accidents, just one year was safer: 2003 when 25 accidents occurred. The decreasing number of accidents is in line with the downward trend that started in 1989. While the number of accidents and fatalities dropped sharply, the survival-rate (percentage of occupants that survived fatal airliner accidents) did not show any progress: on average almost 13% of the occupants survived an accident, which is significantly lower than the 1993-2002 average of 32%. Also in 2004, Canadair's RegionalJet model, in service for over twelve years suffered it's first passenger fatalities in airline service. Despite the fact that 2004 was an extremely safe year, there is a reason for concern in Africa. It was again the most unsafe continent: 27% of all fatal airliner accidents happened in Africa, while the region only accounts for approximately 3 percent of all world aircraft departures. The moving 10-year average trend shows an almost continuous increase in the average number of fatal accidents for the last ten years. On the other hand, trends show a decrease in the number of fatal accidents for North- and South America over the past six years and notably Europe, with just one fatal accident last year. A breakdown by flight nature shows a continuous decrease in the number of scheduled passenger flight accidents over the last five years. On the other hand, the number of cargo plane accidents shows a marked increase. 1) for definitions see the chapter "Scope and definitions" The figures have been compiled using the airliner accident database of the Aviation Safety Network, the Internet leader in aviation safety information. The Aviation Safety Network uses information from authoritative and official sources like NTSB, ICAO etc. The goal of the Aviation Safety Network is to provide everyone with a (professional) interest in aviation with up-to-date, complete and reliable authoritative information on airliner accidents and safety issues. More information: http://aviation-safety.net/ Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 4 SCOPE & DEFINITION The Aviation Safety Network’s Aviation Safety Database (http://aviation- safety.net/database/) covers descriptions of over 10,800 airliner/corporate jet accidents, incidents and hijackings that have occurred since 1945. To be able to analyse data over a 50-year period of time, and to ascertain that the core selection of data is complete, clear and distinctive criteria have to be defined. Thus, the analysis has been limited to airliner accidents using the following definitions: Accident “An occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked, in which a person on the airplane is fatally injured and the airplane is damaged beyond repair.” Airliner “Commercial multi-engine airplane which, in certificated maximum passenger configuration, is capable of carrying 14 or more passengers.” A list of aircraft types covered can be found in Appendix 1. Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 5 2004: ACCIDENT SUMMARY The year 2004 recorded 26 fatal airliner hull-loss accidents and an all-time low number of 425 fatalities. A detailed description of each accident can be found in Appendix 2. Date Aircraft type Operator Location Fatalities 1 03 JAN Boeing 737-300 Flash Airlines Off Sharm el Sheikh 148 2 13 JAN Yakovlev 40 Uzbekistan Airways Tashkent 37 3 28 JAN Beech 1900 Tassili Airlines Near Ghardaia 1 4 10 FEB Fokker 50 Kish Air Sharjah 43 5 04 MAR Ilyushin 76 Azov-Avia Airlines Baku 3 6 07 MAY Let 410 Air Cush Jiech 6 7 12 MAY Antonov 12 El Magal Aviation near Dalang 1 8 14 MAY Embraer 120 Rico Linhas Aéreas near Manaus 33 9 18 MAY Ilyushin 76 Azal Cargo near Urumqi 7 10 23 MAY Let 410 Blue Bird Aviation near Mwingi 2 11 25 MAY DHC-6 Twin Otter Yeti Airlines near Lukla 3 12 08 JUN HS-748 Gabon Express near Libreville 19 13 26 JUN Lisunov Li-2 FLA RF Moskva-Myachkovo 2 14 12 JUL Convair CV-440 Dodita Air Cargo off Beef Island 1 15 29 JUL DHC-6 Twin Otter Airlines of PNG near Ononge 2 16 13 AUG Convair CV-580 Air Tahoma Cincinnati 1 17 17 AUG Beechcraft 99 Alpine Aviation near Neihart 2 18 05 OCT Antonov 12 Sarit Airlines near Higlig 4 19 14 OCT Boeing 747-200 MK Airlines Halifax 7 20 14 OCT Canadair CRJ200 Pinnacle Airlines Jefferson City 2 21 15 OCT Douglas DC-3 Aerovanguardia near Medellín 3 22 19 OCT Jetstream 32 Corporate Airlines near Kirksville 13 23 18 NOV Jetstream 31 Venezolana Caracas 4 24 21 NOV Canadair CRJ200 China Yunnan Airlines Baotou 53+1 25 30 NOV MD-82 Lion Airlines Solo City 26 26 11 DEC Embraer 110 NHR Táxi-Aéreo Uberaba 2+1 425+2 *) *) 425 fatalities of airplane occupants plus two fatalities on the ground Other fatal airliner hull-loss occurrences: Date Aircraft type Operator Location Fatalities 1 24 AUG Tupolev 134 Volga-Aviaexpress near Buchalki 44 2 24 AUG Tupolev 154 Sibir Airlines near Gluboki 46 515+2 Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 6 2004 IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The year 2004 was one of the safest years ever. The number of fatal airliner accidents of 26 was one up compared to 2003, but is perfectly in line with the continuing downward trend of the last ten years. The number of fatalities (425) was an all-time low since 1945. The figures exclude non-accident occurrences (hijackings, sabotage etc.). • The 2004 death toll of 425 was below the 1974-2003 average death toll of 1348 casualties • The 2004 death toll of 425 was below the 1994-2003 average death toll of 1191 casualties • The 2004 number of occupants involved in fatal airliner accidents of 610 was far lower than the 1993-2002 average of 1586 • The 2004 fatality rate (percentage of occupants killed in fatal airliner accidents) of 70% was lower than the 1993-2002 average of 75% • The 2004 number of 26 fatal airliner accidents was far below the 1974-2003 average number of fatal airliner accidents of 48,8 per year • The 2004 number of 26 fatal airliner accidents was far below the 1994-2003 average number of fatal airliner accidents of 42 per year 2500 80 70 2000 60 1500 50 40 1000 30 20 500 10 0 0 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 fatalities accidents • The 2004 number of fatal jet airliner accidents of 8 was below the 1974-2003 average of 14,2 accidents per year • The 2004 number of fatal prop airliner accidents of 15 was on the 1974-2003 average of 22 accidents per year • The 2004 number of 3 fatal piston airliner accident was far below the 1974-2003 average of 9,1 accidents • The 2004 number of 3 fatal piston airliner accident was below the 1994-2003 average of 3,7 accidents Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 7 80 jet 70 prop 60 piston 50 40 30 20 10 0 1945 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 fatal airliner accidents by propulsion Airliner Accident Statistics 2004 by Harro Ranter, aviation-safety.net 8 AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS Although the total number of accidents does not say anything about the safety of an aircraft model or manufacturer, a few things about 2004 must be noted. For instance Canadair’s RegionalJet model, in service for over twelve years now suffered it’s first passenger fatality accident in airline service when a Chinese CRJ200 crashed at Baotau, killing all 53 on board. Manufacturer 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Aérospatiale / BAC 0 0 0 0 1 0 Airbus 0 0 0 1 2 0 Antonov 2 3 5 2 5 3 ATR 0 0 2 0 0 2 BAC 0 0 1 0 0 0 Beechcraft 2 2 1 1 1 3 Boeing 2 3 7 6 3 5 BAe/Avro 2 1 0 1 2 1 Canadair
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Information Summary
    The purpose of the Dutch Safety Board’s work is to prevent future accidents and incidents or to limit their after-effects. It is no part of the Board’s remit to try to establish the blame, responsibility or liability attaching to any party. Information gathered during the course of an investigation – including statements given to the Board, information that the Board has compiled, results of technical research and analyses and drafted documents (including the published report) – cannot be used as evidence in criminal, disciplinary or civil law proceedings. GENERAL INFORMATION Identification number: 2007044 Classification: Serious incident Date, time1 of occurrence: 18 May 2007, 20.53 hours Location of occurrence: Groningen Airport Eelde (EHGG) Aircraft registration: OO-VLI Aircraft model: Fokker F27 MK50 (Fokker 50) Type of aircraft: Passenger Aircraft Type of flight: Scheduled passenger transport Phase of operation: Landing Damage to aircraft: Minor Cockpit crew: Two Cabin crew: One Passengers: Eleven Injuries: None Other damage: One runway edge light and a runway end light destroyed Light conditions: Daylight (sunset at 21.32 hours) SUMMARY A Fokker 50 made a flight from Amsterdam Schiphol Airport to Groningen Airport Eelde. After executing a visual approach to runway 05, the aircraft landed long (approximately halfway along the runway) and at high speed. The crew was unable to stop the aircraft within the remaining runway length. Subsequently, it ran off the end of the runway and came to a halt in the grass. None of the fourteen persons on board was injured. The aircraft sustained minor damage. This report is mainly based on information from the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder and interviews with the flight crew members.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Flight Bag (EFB): 2010 Industry Survey
    Electronic Flight Bag (EFB): 2010 Industry Survey Scott Gabree Michelle Yeh Young Jin Jo U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration John A. Volpe National DOT-VNTSC-FAA-10-14 Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142 Air Traffic Organization Operations Planning Human Factors Research and Engineering Group September 2010 Washington, DC 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 22161 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Notice The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES September 2010 COVERED Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Construire Un Système De Formation Professionnelle Pour Les Ouvriers De L’Industrie Aéronautique : Le Cas De La SNCASE De Toulouse (1944-1956) Clair Juilliet
    Construire un système de formation professionnelle pour les ouvriers de l’industrie aéronautique : le cas de la SNCASE de Toulouse (1944-1956) Clair Juilliet To cite this version: Clair Juilliet. Construire un système de formation professionnelle pour les ouvriers de l’industrie aéronautique : le cas de la SNCASE de Toulouse (1944-1956). Cahiers d’histoire du Cnam, Cnam, 2018, Former la main-d’oeuvre industrielle en France. Acteurs, contenus et territoires (fin xixe et xxe siècles) – II/II, 9-10 (9-10), pp73-96. hal-03040035 HAL Id: hal-03040035 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03040035 Submitted on 4 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Construire un système de formation professionnelle pour les ouvriers de l’industrie aéronautique : le cas de la SNCASE de Toulouse (1944-1956) Clair Juilliet Docteur en histoire, FRAMESPA (UMR 5136) et LabEx SMS. Durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, à fournir une main-d’œuvre en quantité l’industrie aéronautique française connaît suffisante et disposant de qualifications en un affaiblissement industriel important, adéquation avec les besoins de l’industrie qui va jusqu’à compromettre son existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Propeller Slipstream Effect on the Longitudinal Stability and Control
    Modelling the Propeller Slipstream Effect on the Longitudinal Stability and Control Thijs Bouquet Technische Universiteit Delft MODELLINGTHE PROPELLER SLIPSTREAM EFFECT ON THE LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND CONTROL by Thijs Bouquet in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday January 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM. Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. L. L. M. Veldhuis Dr. ir. R. Vos Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. van Kampen TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Thesis registration number: 069#16#MT#FPP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis marks the conclusion of my time as a student at the faculty of Aerospace Engineering of Delft Uni- versity of Technology. This was no small feat, which could not have been done without the help of others, I would therefore like to express my gratitude. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr.ir.Roelof Vos and Prof.dr.ir.Leo Veldhuis, for their guid- ance, support and feedback throughout the past year. Secondly, I would like to thank Dr.ir.Erik-Jan van Kam- pen for being a part of my thesis committee. I would also like to thank my friends and colleagues for their support. A special mention has to be made for the students of ’Kamertje-1’, whose mutual goals created a sense of camaraderie which motivated me greatly. Finally, I would like to thank my family, who were never more than a phone call away to support and en- courage me throughout my entire education.
    [Show full text]
  • \Aircraft Recognition Manual
    Jf V t 9fn I 4-'!- Vw'^ ' 'o | ^ renai; 408.$ /•> ,A1.AI / -3o FM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 \AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL SI ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF\ CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS \ \ I 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL •a ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS JUNE 1962 DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY AND THE AIR FORCE, WASHINGTON 25, D.C., 15 June 1962 FM 30-30/NAVWEPS 00-80T-75/AFM 50-40/NAVMC 2522, Aircraft Recognition Manual, is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. i BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY, AND THE AIR FORCE: G. H. DECKER, General, Umted States Army, Official: Chief of Staff. J. C. LAMBERT, Major General, United States Army, The Adjutant General. PAUL D. STROOP Rear Admiral, United States Navy, Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons. CURTIS E. LEMAY, Official: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, R. J. PUGH, Colonel, United States Air Force, Director of Administrative Services. C. H. HAYES, Major General, U.S. Marine Corps, Deputy Chief of Staff (Plans). H DISTRIBUTION: ARMY: Active Army : DCSPER (1) Inf/Mech Div Co/Btry/Trp 7-2 44-112 ACSI (1) (5) except Arm/Abn Div 7- 44-236 52 DCSLOG (2) Co/Trp (1) 8- 44-237 137 DCSOPS(5) MDW (1) 8-500 (AA- 44-446 ACSRC (1) Svc Colleges (3) AH) 44447 CNGB (1) Br Svc Sch (5) except 10-201 44^536
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTION Fokker 50
    Fokker 50 - Power Plant DESCRIPTION The aircraft is equipped with two Pratt and Whitney PW 125B turboprop engines, which are enclosed, in wing-mounted nacelles. Each engine drives a Dowty Rotol six-bladed reversible- pitch constant-speed propeller. The engine is essentially a twin-spool turbojet combined with a free power-turbine assembly, which drives the reduction gearbox and propeller via a third concentric shaft. Engine layout Air intake The air intake is located below the propeller spinner. The intake has an anti-icing system. Combustion section The combustion section comprises an annular combustion chamber, fourteen fuel nozzles, and two igniters. Fuel control is through combined mechanical and electronic control systems. High pressure spool This spool comprises a centrifugal compressor and a single stage axial turbine. HP-spool rpm (NH) is governed by fuel metering. The spool drives the HP fuel pump and the lubrication oil pumps. Low pressure spool This spool comprises a centrifugal compressor and a single stage axial turbine. The LP spool is ungoverned; it is free to adapt itself to the operating conditions. LP-spool rpm is designated NL. To ease the gas flow paths and to minimize the gyroscopic moment, the LP spool rotates in a direction opposite to the HP spool and power-turbine shaft. Power turbine The two-stage axial power turbine drives the propeller via the reduction gearbox. The propeller shaft line is set above the engine shaft centerline. Propeller rpm is designated NP. The reduction gearbox also drives an integrated drive generator, a hydraulic pump, a propeller-pitch-control oil pump, a propeller overspeed governor, and the NP indicator.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing Shape Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
    Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Wing Shape Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Jan Mariens August 2, 2012 Wing Shape Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Master of Science Thesis For obtaining the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at Delft University of Technology Jan Mariens August 2, 2012 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology · Delft University of Technology Copyright c Jan Mariens All rights reserved. Delft University Of Technology Department Of Flight Performance and Propulsion The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Aerospace En- gineering for acceptance a thesis entitled “Wing Shape Multidisciplinary Design Optimization” by Jan Mariens in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Dated: August 2, 2012 Head of Department: Dr. ir. Dries Visser Supervisor: Ali Elham, MSc. Reader one: Prof. dr. ir. Egbert Torenbeek Reader two: Dr. ir. Roelof Vos Summary Multidisciplinary design optimizations have shown great benefits for aerospace applications in the past. Especially in the last decades with the advent of high speed computing. Still computational time limits the desire for models with high level of fidelity cannot be always fulfilled. As a conse- quence, fidelity is often sacrificed in order to keep the computing time of the optimization within limits. There is always a compromise required to select proper tools for an optimization problem. In this final thesis work, the differences between existing weight modeling techniques are investi- gated. Secondly, the results of using different weight modeling techniques in multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft wings is compared. The aircraft maximum take-off weight was selected as the objective function.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport
    The History of Air Transport KOSTAS IATROU Dedicated to my wife Evgenia and my sons George and Yianni Copyright © 2020: Kostas Iatrou First Edition: July 2020 Published by: Hermes – Air Transport Organisation Graphic Design – Layout: Sophia Darviris Material (either in whole or in part) from this publication may not be published, photocopied, rewritten, transferred through any electronical or other means, without prior permission by the publisher. Preface ommercial aviation recently celebrated its first centennial. Over the more than 100 years since the first Ctake off, aviation has witnessed challenges and changes that have made it a critical component of mod- ern societies. Most importantly, air transport brings humans closer together, promoting peace and harmo- ny through connectivity and social exchange. A key role for Hermes Air Transport Organisation is to contribute to the development, progress and promo- tion of air transport at the global level. This would not be possible without knowing the history and evolu- tion of the industry. Once a luxury service, affordable to only a few, aviation has evolved to become accessible to billions of peo- ple. But how did this evolution occur? This book provides an updated timeline of the key moments of air transport. It is based on the first aviation history book Hermes published in 2014 in partnership with ICAO, ACI, CANSO & IATA. I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Martin Dresner, Chair of the Hermes Report Committee, for his important role in editing the contents of the book. I would also like to thank Hermes members and partners who have helped to make Hermes a key organisa- tion in the air transport field.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Aviation Services Limited A.C.N
    Alliance Aviation Services Limited A.C.N. 153 361 525 PO Box 1126 EAGLE FARM QLD 4009 Telephone +61 7 3212 1212 Facsimile +61 7 3212 1522 www.allianceairlines.com.au 25 November 2015 Alliance Aviation Services (ASX code: AQZ) Alliance Aviation creates a new business and establishes a European presence . Alliance Aviation Services Limited (Alliance or the Company) today announced that it has contracted to purchase Austrian Airlines entire fleet of 21 Fokker Aircraft for a total consideration of USD 15 million ( a combination of shares and deferred cash payments). This fleet consists of 15 Fokker 100 and 6 Fokker 70 aircraft. It provides Alliance with a cost effective and guaranteed supply of engines and parts for its existing fleet. This acquisition provides significant revenue opportunities in wet leasing, dry leasing, engine sales and leasing, spare parts sales and aircraft sales. It diversifies Alliance’s revenue streams. No debt funding is required to undertake this acquisition. Austrian Airlines AG becomes a shareholder of Alliance. The transaction will be earnings accretive in future years. Overview Alliance Aviation Services Limited (Alliance or the Company) today announced that it has executed a binding contract to purchase Austrian Airlines entire fleet of 21 Fokker Aircraft for a total consideration of USD 15 million. This fleet consists of 15 Fokker 100 and 6 Fokker 70 aircraft. Strategic Rationale Over the last 18 months Alliance has undertaken a strategic review of its operations as a result of reduced activity in the resources sector. This has resulted in a number of measures For personal use only being undertaken that have improved our cost base and the efficient delivery of our services to our clients whilst at the same time looking for revenue opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 Aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the Accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967
    CIVIL AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 1/71 ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION BRANCH Department of Trade and Industry Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967 LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1971 List of Civil Aircraft Accident Reports issued by AIB in 1971 No. Short title Date of publication 1nl Hawker Siddeley HS 748's G-ATEK and March 1971 G-ATEH at Portsmouth, August 1967 SBN 11 5106308 Department of Trade and Industry Accidents Investigation Branch Shell Mex House Strand London WC2 November 1970 The Rt Hon John Davies MP Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Sir , I have the honour to submit the report of Mr RC Warren, an Inspector of Accidents, on the circumstances of the accidents to Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH which occurred at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire on 15 August 1967. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, V AM HUNT Chief Inspector of Accidents Accidents Investigation Branch Civil Accident Combined Report Nos EW/C/0179 and EW/C/0180 Aircraft: Hawker Siddeley HS 748, .Series , 2, G-ATEK and G-ATEH Engines: Each aircraft was fitted with two Rolls Royce Dart Type 531 engines. Owner and Channel Airways Limited, Southend Airport, Essex Operator: Crews: G-ATEK Commander Captain D P Dogherty Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer K F Fenton Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J W Goody Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J Hoare Uninjured G-ATEH Commander Captain F P Mannl Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer C Petrides Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss G M Smith Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss P Crane Uninjured Passengers: G-ATEK 19 Uninjured G-ATEH 62 Uninjured Other Persons: Nil Place of Accident: Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire Date and Times: 15 August 1967 at 1148 hrs (G-ATEK) and 1334 hrs (G-ATEH) All times in this report are GMT The abbreviation MOA/DTI is used in this report to refer to the authority previously exercised by the Ministry of Aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prendre L'air
    PRENDRE L’AIR Musée Saint-Chamas – Barillet des moteurs Atar 8 et 9 N°3 La revue de l’Association des Amis du Musée Safran Décembre 2019 Contact Rond Point René Ravaud 77550 Réau Tél : 01 60 59 72 58 Mail : [email protected] Sommaire Editorial 3 Jacques Daniel Le mot du Président 3 Jean Claude Dufloux L’avionnerie isséenne 4 Henri Couturier Mr René Farsy : pilote d’essais à la Snecma 9 Jacques Daniel Le Dassault Mirage III T : banc d’essais volant 18 Jacques Daniel Le projet de Caravelle à moteurs Atar 101 22 Jacques Daniel Junkers Jumo 004 et BMW 003 26 Pierre Mouton Débuts de l’électronique à Snecma 29 Pierre Mouton Vintage Motor Cycle Club (VMCC) Manx Rally 2019 - Mésaventures et mes aventures 31 Gérard Basselin Notes de lecture 32 Jacques Daniel Crédits Photographies : Henri Couturier, Jacques Daniel Les articles et illustrations publiées dans cette revue ne peuvent être reproduits sans autorisation écrite préalable. 2 Editorial Pour ce troisième numéro, nous vous proposons un article sur l’industrie aéronautique d’Issy-les- Moulineaux du début du siècle dernier. A cette époque et jusqu’au milieu des années 1930, on utilisait plutôt le terme " avionnerie " pour désigner les constructeurs d’avions. Dans le domaine des turboréacteurs, la Snecma répondit, au début des années 1950, à un appel d’offre pour la motorisation du programme phare de l’aviation commerciale française : le SE-210 Caravelle. Entre 1951 et 1953, la société participa activement au projet en proposant des formules bi, tri et même quadriréacteurs basées sur le tout nouvel Atar 101.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    Inhaltsverzeichnis Zur Gecchichte das Flugzeugs 7 7 Transavia PI-12 „Airtruk'7PL-12 U „Flying CHINA Mango" 36/570 1. Die Nachahmung des Vogelflugs 77 Harbin C-11 57/572 „Jie-Fang" 57/572 2. Die Vorbilder Nanchang F-6bis 58/572 für den Flug des Menschen 12 BELGIEN „Peking-1" 58/572 3. Die ersten Motorflugzeugprojekte 12 Avions Fairey „Tipsy Nipper" 37/570 4. Die Verwirklichung des Gleitflugs- SABCAS-2 37/570 Voraussetzung für den Motorflug 14 Stampe et Renard SV-4 C 38/570 CSSR 6. Der erste Motorflug der Brüder Wright 75 Aero Ae-02 59/572 6. Die ersten Motorflüge in Europa AeroA-42 59/572 und die Entwicklung der Luftfahrttechnik BRASILIEN Aero 145 60/572 bis zum Jahre 1914 76 AviaBH-3 60/572 7. Der erste Weltkrieg EMBRAER EMB-110 „Bandeirante" 39/570 Avia B-534 67/572 und die Luftfahrttechnik 17 EMBRAER EMB-200/201 „Ipanema" 39/570 AviaB-135 67/572 ITA „Urupema" 40/570 HC-2 „Heli Baby'7HC-102 62/572 8. Der Aufschwung der Luftfahrttechnik Neiva 360 C „Regente"/„Regenta Elo'7 L-13„Blanik" 63/572 in den Jahren 1919 bis 1939 19 „Lanceiro" 40/570 L-60 „Brigadyr" 63/572 8.1. Bauweisen 19 Neiva Paulistinha 56-C/56-D 47/570 L-40 „Meta Sokol" 64/572 8.2. Triebwerke 20 Neiva N-621 „Universal"/T-25 47/570 L-200 „Morava" 64/572 8.3. Aerodynamik 21 L-29 „Delfin" 65/572 8.4. Geschwindigkeiten 22 L-39 „Albatros" 65/572 8.5. Das Verkehrsflugzeug 24 L-410 „Turbolet" 66/572 8.6.
    [Show full text]