1 Catriona Macleod (Office) Department of Germanic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Catriona Macleod (Office) Department of Germanic Catriona MacLeod (Office) Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures University of Pennsylvania 745 Williams Hall Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 Tel: (215) 898-7107 Fax: (215) 573-7794 e-mail: [email protected] DEGREES 1992 Ph.D. Harvard University, Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures. 1986 M.A. University of Glasgow, U.K., honours French and German (First Class). ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2014-19 Edmund J. and Louise W. Kahn Term Professor of German, University of Pennsylvania 2012- Professor, Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pennsylvania. 2001-12 Associate Professor (with tenure), Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pennsylvania. 1999-01 Assistant Professor, Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pennsylvania. 1998-99 Visiting Assistant Professor, Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pennsylvania. 1993-99 Assistant Professor, Germanic Languages and Literatures, Yale University. Promotion to Associate Professor (without tenure), Spring 1999. 1992-93 Randall McIver Fellow, St. Hugh’s College, Oxford University. TEACHING AND RESEARCH INTERESTS Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century German Literature, Aesthetics, and Culture; Literature and the Visual Arts; Cinema Studies; Narrative Theory; Ekphrasis and Description; Material Culture; Gender Theory. FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS 2017 Penn Undergraduate Research Mentoring award. 2015 NEH summer stipend for book project Romantic Scraps. 2015 Jean-Pierre Barricelli Prize for best book of 2014 in Romanticism Studies, International Conference on Romanticism. Awarded for Fugitive Objects. 2011 Ira H. Abrams Award for Distinguished Teaching, School of Arts and 1 Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. 2011 Ben Franklin Seminar course design grant, University of Pennsylvania. 2010-11 Penn Humanities Forum, Mellon Faculty Fellow. 2011 DAAD Grant (for conference “Un/Translatables: Across Germanic Languages and Cultures”). 2011 University Research Fund grant, University of Pennsylvania (for conference “Un/Translatables: Across Germanic Languages and Cultures”). 2011 Mellon Cross-Cultural grant, University of Pennsylvania (for conference “Un/Translatables: Across Germanic Languages and Cultures”). 2007 Penn Humanities Forum Award for course related to “Origins” (graduate seminar on Winckelmann). 2004 University Research Foundation award for conference “Elective Affinities” (International Association of Word and Image Studies, Seventh International Conference). 2000 Finalist, German Studies Association Book Award, for Embodying Ambiguity: Androgyny and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Keller, (Detroit: Wayne State U P, 1998). 2000 Penn Humanities Forum, Faculty Fellow. 1997 Two awards from Griswold Research Fund, Yale University. 1996 Award from Hilles Publications Fund, Yale University. 1996 Poorvu Family Prize for Teaching in Yale College. Awarded for outstanding interdisciplinary teaching. (Introduction to German Culture and Thought). 1996 Morse Junior Faculty Fellowship, Yale University. 1991 Whiting Fellowship. 1990 Honorable Mention, American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies prize for best graduate student paper. 1992 Randall MacIver Junior Research Fellowship, Oxford University. 1989 Esther Sellholm Walz Essay Prize, German Department, Harvard University. 1989 Harvard University Teaching Awards. 1989 Jack Stein Teaching Prize, German Department, Harvard University. 1988 Westengard Award for summer study at the Humboldt-Universität, Berlin. 1987 Bernhard Blume Prize for graduate work, German Department, Harvard University. PUBLICATIONS Books Monographs: Fugitive Objects: Sculpture and Literature in the German Nineteenth Century. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2013.) 252pp. 2 Fugitive Objects examines the question of why sculpture is both intensively discussed and yet rendered immaterial in German literature. It focuses on three forms of disappearance: sculpture’s vanishing as a legitimate art form at the beginning of the nineteenth century in German aesthetics, statues’ migration from the domain of high art into mass reproduction and popular culture, and sculpture’s dislodging and relocation into literary discourse. Through original readings of Clemens Brentano, Achim von Arnim, Adalbert Stifter, Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, and others, the book reveals that if sculpture has disappeared from much of nineteenth-century German literature and aesthetics, it is a vanishing act that paradoxically relocates the statue back onto another cultural pedestal, attesting to the powerful force of the medium. Reviewed in: Goethe Yearbook 23 (2106): 310-12; Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies 53.1 (2017): 85-87. Embodying Ambiguity: Androgyny and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Keller (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1998). 302pp. Taking as its starting point the hermaphroditic ideal that dominates Winckelmann's writings on art, the book traces the androgyne as a key figure in both Classical and Romantic aesthetic theory (von Humboldt, Schiller, Schlegel), and explores its implications for male Bildung in such novels as Goethe's Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre, Schlegel's Lucinde, Eichendorff's Ahnung und Gegenwart and Stifter's Der Nachsommer. Reviewed in: “The Year’s Work in Romanticism Studies,” Prisms: Essays in Romanticism 6 (1998): 107-17; Colloquia Germanica 32.4 (1999): 367-68; Germanic Review 75.4 (2000): 317-20; Monatshefte 92.3 (2000): 362-64; The Modern Language Review 96.1 (2001): 256-57; Seminar 38.3 (2002): 296-97. Edited Volumes: Co-Editor (with Bethany Wiggin), Un/Translatables: New Maps for Germanic Literatures (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2016). 324pp. Co-Editor (with Jan Baetens and Véronique Plesch), Éfficacité/Efficacity: How to Do Things with Words and Images?, (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 2011). 320 pp. Co-Editor (with Véronique Plesch and Charlotte Schoell-Glass), and introduction, Elective Affinities: Testing Word and Image Relationships, (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 2009). 422 pp. Articles “Flirting with Sculptural Indecency: Theodor Storm’s Realist Psyche.” In Sculpture, Sexuality and History: Encounters in Literature, Culture and the Arts from the Eighteenth Century to the Present, ed. Jana Funke and Jen Grove. In press, Palgrave Macmillan. 3 “Blind Spots of Narration? Ekphrasis and Laocoön Digressions in the Novel.” In Ekphrastic Encounters: New Interdisciplinary Essays on Literature and the Visual Arts, ed. Richard Meek and David Kennedy. In press, Manchester University Press. “Invisible Sculpture and Latent Violence in Mädchen in Uniform (1931).” Under review in special issue of Seminar, Revisiting Mädchen in Uniform: Media, Texts, Contexts, 1930-2015, ed. Ilinca Iurascu and Gaby Pailer. “Displaced Vernaculars: Edwin and Willa Muir, Kafka, and the Languages of Modernism,” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 93.1 (2018): 48-57. “Word & Image à 32” (with Michèle Hannoosh and John Dixon Hunt), La Part de l’Oeil 31 (2017-18): 179-82. “The Living Past: Folklore and Fairy Tales in Literature and Art.” In The Enchanted World of German Romantic Prints, ed. John Ittmann (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2017), 208-27. “The Reading Public: Taschenbücher and Other Illustrated Books.” In The Enchanted World of German Romantic Prints, ed. John Ittmann (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2017), 198-207. “Lost and Found in Translation: The Itinerant Kafka Translations of Edwin and Willa Muir,” in Un/Translatables: New Maps for Germanic Literatures, ed. Bethany Wiggin and Catriona MacLeod (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2016), 177-90. “Brentano’s Remains: Visual and Verbal Bricolage in Gockel, Hinkel und Gackeleia (1838),” The Goethe Yearbook 23 (2016): 221-43. “Cutting up the Salon: Adele Schopenhauer’s ‘Zwergenhochzeit’ and Goethe’s ‘Hochzeitlied.’” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte (March, 2015): 70-87. “Sculptural Blockages: Wilhelm Heinse’s Ardinghello, Clemens Brentano’s Godwi, and the Early Romantic Novel.” Seminar 49.2 (2013): 232-47. (Special issue: The Eighteenth-Century Novel as Media Event.) “Talk Talk: Using Discussion Boards to Promote Student Conversations.” “Talk About Teaching and Learning” series, University of Pennsylvania Almanac, 54.18, 22 January 2008: 8. “Still Alive: Tableau Vivant and Narrative Suspension in Sacher-Masoch’s Venus im Pelz.” In Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 80.4 (2006): 640-65. “Sweetmeats for the Eye: Porcelain Miniatures in Classical Weimar.” In The 4 Enlightened Eye: Goethe and Eighteenth Century Culture, ed. Patricia A. Simpson and Evelyn Moore, (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006): 41-72 “Skulptur als Ware: Gottlieb Martin Klauer und das Journal des Luxus und der Moden.” In Das Journal des Luxus und der Moden: Kultur um 1800, ed. Angela Borchert and Ralf Dressel, (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag, 2004): 261-80. “Floating Heads: Portrait Busts in Classical Weimar.” In Unwrapping Goethe's Weimar: Essays in Cultural Studies and Local Knowledge, ed. Burkhard Henke, Susanne Kord and Simon Richter, (Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2000): 65-96. “Sculpture and the Wounds of Language in Clemens Brentano's Godwi.” In The Germanic Review 74.3 (1999): 178-94. Reprinted in Nineteenth Century Literature Criticism, ed. Russel Whitaker, (Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2008). “Performing Thirdness: Goethe on the Roman Stage.” In The Clothes that Wear Us: Essays in Dressing and Transgressing in Eighteenth-Century Culture, ed. Jessica Munns and Penny
Recommended publications
  • Positionings of Jewish Self
    “SCHREIBEN WAS HIER WAR” BEYOND THE HOLOCAUST-PARADIGM: (RE)POSITIONINGS OF JEWISH SELF-IDENTITY IN GERMAN-JEWISH NARRATIVES PAST AND PRESENT by Martina Wells B.A equivalent, English and History, University of Mainz, Germany 1985 M.A., German Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Martina Wells It was defended on March 31, 2015 and approved by Randall Halle, Klaus W. Jonas Professor of German Film and Cultural Studies, Department of German John B. Lyon, Associate Professor, Department of German Lina Insana, Associate Professor, Department of French & Italian Languages and Literatures Dissertation Advisor: Sabine von Dirke, Associate Professor, Department of German ii Copyright © by Martina Wells 2015 iii “SCHREIBEN WAS HIER WAR” BEYOND THE HOLOCAUST-PARADIGM: (RE)POSITIONINGS OF JEWISH SELF-IDENTITY IN GERMAN-JEWISH NARRATIVES PAST AND PRESENT Martina Wells, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2015 This dissertation examines the stakes of self-Orientalizing in literary and cinematographic texts of German-Jewish cultural producers in the context of Jewish emancipation and modernization. Positing Jewish emancipation as a trans-historical and cultural process, my study traces the poetic journey of a particular set of Orientalist tropes from 19th century ghetto stories to contemporary writings and film at the turn of the millennium to address a twofold question: what could this problematic method of representation accomplish for Germany’s Jewish minority in the past, and how do we understand its re-appropriation by Germany’s “new Jewry” today.
    [Show full text]
  • Jiddistik Heute
    לקט ייִ דישע שטודיעס הנט Jiddistik heute Yiddish Studies Today לקט Der vorliegende Sammelband eröffnet eine neue Reihe wissenschaftli- cher Studien zur Jiddistik sowie philolo- gischer Editionen und Studienausgaben jiddischer Literatur. Jiddisch, Englisch und Deutsch stehen als Publikationsspra- chen gleichberechtigt nebeneinander. Leket erscheint anlässlich des xv. Sym posiums für Jiddische Studien in Deutschland, ein im Jahre 1998 von Erika Timm und Marion Aptroot als für das in Deutschland noch junge Fach Jiddistik und dessen interdisziplinären אָ רשונג אויסגאַבעס און ייִדיש אויסגאַבעס און אָ רשונג Umfeld ins Leben gerufenes Forum. Die im Band versammelten 32 Essays zur jiddischen Literatur-, Sprach- und Kul- turwissenschaft von Autoren aus Europa, den usa, Kanada und Israel vermitteln ein Bild von der Lebendigkeit und Viel- falt jiddistischer Forschung heute. Yiddish & Research Editions ISBN 978-3-943460-09-4 Jiddistik Jiddistik & Forschung Edition 9 783943 460094 ִיידיש ַאויסגאבעס און ָ ארשונג Jiddistik Edition & Forschung Yiddish Editions & Research Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Band 1 לקט ִיידישע שטודיעס ַהנט Jiddistik heute Yiddish Studies Today Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Yidish : oysgabes un forshung Jiddistik : Edition & Forschung Yiddish : Editions & Research Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Band 1 Leket : yidishe shtudyes haynt Leket : Jiddistik heute Leket : Yiddish Studies Today Bibliografijische Information Der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deut- schen Nationalbibliografijie ; detaillierte bibliografijische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © düsseldorf university press, Düsseldorf 2012 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urhe- berrechtlich geschützt.
    [Show full text]
  • Schiller's Egmont and the Beginnings of Weimar Classicism*
    Steffan Davies Schiller’s Egmont and the Beginnings of Weimar Classicism* This essay examines Schiller’s stage version of Goethe’s Egmont, which was performed in Weimar in April 1796 and which Schiller described as “gewissermaasen Göthens und mein gemeinschaftliches Werk”. Beginning with his review of Egmont in 1788 the essay demonstrates some of the principles on which Schiller amended the text, and then shows that these match changes in Goethe’s own writing by the mid-1790s. On this basis it evalu- ates the correspondence between Goethe and Schiller, and other biographical texts, to reconsider the view that Goethe’s misgivings about the adaptation marked a low-point in their relationship. It argues that Schiller’s work on Egmont instead deserves to be seen as a constructive experience in the development of the Weimar alliance. I. Schiller had spent three weeks in Weimar watching performances by Iffland and his visiting theatre company when he wrote a letter to Körner on 10 April 1796. His aim: to persuade Körner to join him for Iffland’s last performance, Goethe’s Egmont, which he had adapted for the stage. He sounds happy with his stay and with his work, describing the new Egmont as “gewissermaasen Göthens und mein gemeinschaftliches Werk” (NA 28. 210–211). Goethe, Schiller and Iffland – surely Körner would not want to miss experiencing such a combination of talents.1 * Schiller’s texts are quoted from Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe. Ed. by Julius Petersen, Gerhard Fricke et al. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf. 1943ff. Quotations are identified by NA with volume and page numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enlightenment Novel As Artifact
    4 The Enlightenment Novel as Artifact J. H. Campe’s Robinson der Jüngere and C. M. Wieland’s Der goldne Spiegel How did German authors respond to the widespread perception of literature as a luxury good and reading as a form of consumption? Or, to use a more mod- ern idiom, how did German literature around 1800 respond to its own commodi- fi cation? The question is not new to scholars of German culture; nonetheless, the topic deserves further attention. 1 The idea of literature as a potentially pernicious form of luxury posed a serious challenge to writers in this period, a challenge that not only infl uenced conceptions of the book as artifact and of the impact of read- ing, but also shaped the narrative structure and rhetorical features of the literary works themselves. Previous analyses of the subject have tended to be either too broad or too restric- tive in their approach. Too broad in the sense that they have addressed general con- cerns, such as the rise of the middle class or the dehumanizing impact of modern capitalism rather than the way in which evolving, complex, and often confl icted 1. Daniel Purdy addresses the topic in his insightful treatment of neoclassicism (Weimar classi- cism), and it has also been dealt with in some recent and not so recent genealogies of aesthetic auton- omy and of what is known in German as Trivialliteratur. See Purdy, The Tyranny of Elegance: Consumer Capitalism in the Era of Goethe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), esp. 28–34; Martha Woodmansee, The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics (New York: Colum- bia University Press, 1994); and Jochen Schulte-Sasse, Der Kritik der Trivialliteratur seit der Aufklärung (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Novalis's Magical Idealism
    Symphilosophie International Journal of Philosophical Romanticism Novalis’s Magical Idealism A Threefold Philosophy of the Imagination, Love and Medicine Laure Cahen-Maurel* ABSTRACT This article argues that Novalis’s philosophy of magical idealism essentially consists of three central elements: a theory of the creative or productive imagination, a conception of love, and a doctrine of transcendental medicine. In this regard, it synthesizes two adjacent, but divergent contemporary philosophical sources – J. G. Fichte’s idealism and Friedrich Schiller’s classicism – into a new and original philosophy. It demonstrates that Novalis’s views on both magic and idealism, not only prove to be perfectly rational and comprehensible, but even more philosophically coherent and innovative than have been recognised up to now. Keywords: magical idealism, productive imagination, love, medicine, Novalis, J. G. Fichte, Schiller RÉSUMÉ Cet article défend l’idée selon laquelle trois éléments centraux composent ce que Novalis nomme « idéalisme magique » pour désigner sa philosophie propre : la conception d’une imagination créatrice ou productrice, une doctrine de l’amour et une théorie de la médecine transcendantale. L’idéalisme magique est en cela la synthèse en une philosophie nouvelle et originale de deux sources philosophiques contemporaines, à la fois adjacentes et divergentes : l’idéalisme de J. G. Fichte et le classicisme de Friedrich Schiller. L’article montre que les vues de Novalis tant sur la magie que sur l’idéalisme sont non seulement réellement rationnelles et compréhensibles, mais philosophiquement plus cohérentes et novatrices qu’on ne l’a admis jusqu’à présent. Mots-clés : idéalisme magique, imagination productrice, amour, médecine, Novalis, J. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Article “On the Mysteries of the Egyptians” (“Ueber Die Mysterien Der Aegyptier”) of 1784
    © Bildarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller, oil painting by Gerhard von Kügelgen, 1808–1809. Original: Freies Deutsches Hochstift, Frankfurt am Main. Schiller’s philosophy of moral education, an integral part of Weimar Classicism and devel- oped most fully in On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters (1795), is a productive eighteenth-century lens through which to view the ideas of moral progression found in The Magic Flute. Photograph by Lutz Braun. From Arcadia to Elysium in The Magic Flute and Weimar Classicism The Plan of Salvation and Eighteenth-Century Views of Moral Progression John B. Fowles The painful sighs are now past. Elysium’s joyful banquets Drown the slightest moan— Elysium’s life is Eternal rapture, eternal flight; Through laughing meadows a brook pipes its tune. Here faithful couples embrace each other, Kiss on the velvet green sward As the soothing west wind caresses them; Here love is crowned, Safe from death’s merciless blow It celebrates an eternal wedding feast. ₁ —Friedrich Schiller resumably, many people gloss over the aphorism that life is a journey— ₂ Pindeed, for Latter-day Saints, an “eternal journey” —as cliché. But this aphorism encapsulates profound theological, philosophical, moral, and even teleological implications that should indeed interest most people. The journey metaphor connotes progress and ascension, indicating beginning, purpose, and end to mortal existence. True, moving linearly from point A to point B—metaphorically ascending a ladder or climbing a steep moun- ₃ tain —fittingly illustrates the progress inherent in this eternal journey. But a cyclical understanding of this progression—spiraling upward from one state of being to another—also captures and perhaps even enriches the sense of mankind’s journey.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Very Little Almost Nothing Simon Critchley
    Unworking romanticism America, to which I shall return in my discussion of Cavell. It is rather the offer of a new way of inhabiting this place, at this time, a place that Stevens names, in his last poem and piece of prose, ‘the spare region of Connecticut’ , a place inhabited after the time when mythology was possible.51 As Stevens puts it: A mythology reflects its region. Here In Connecticut, we never lived in a time When mythology was possible. Without mythology we are offered the inhabitation of this autumnal or wintry sparseness, this Connecticut, what Stevens calls ‘a dwindled sphere’: The proud and the strong Have departed. Those that are left are the unaccomplished, The finally human, Natives of a dwindled sphere. (CP 504) ‘A dwindled sphere’…this is very little, almost nothing. Yet, it is here that we become ‘finally human natives’. (c) Romantic ambiguity The limping of philosophy is its virtue. True irony is not an alibi; it is a task; and the very detachment of the philosopher assigns to him a certain kind of action among men.52 Romanticism fails. We have already seen how the project of Jena Romanticism is riddled with ambiguity. On the one hand, romanticism is an aesthetic absolutism, where the aesthetic is the medium in which the antinomies of the Kantian system— and the Enlightenment itself—are absolved and overcome. For Schlegel, the aesthetic or literary absolute would have the poetic form of the great novel of the modern world, the Bible of secularized modernity. However, on the other hand, the audacity of romantic naïveté goes together with the experience of failure and incompletion: the great romantic novel of the modern world is never written, and the romantic project can be said to fail by internal and external criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Mppwp1 2019 SR
    The Aesthetic Turn The Cultivation and Propagation of Aesthetic Experience after its Declaration of Independence Raffnsøe, Sverre Document Version Final published version Publication date: 2019 License CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Raffnsøe, S. (2019). The Aesthetic Turn: The Cultivation and Propagation of Aesthetic Experience after its Declaration of Independence. Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS. MPP Working Paper No. 2019/1 Link to publication in CBS Research Portal General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us ([email protected]) providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Porcelænshaven 18B DK-2000 Frederiksberg T: +45 3815 3636 E: [email protected] cbs.dk/mpp facebook.com/mpp.cbs twitter.com/MPPcbsdk THE AESTHETIC TURN The Cultivation and Propagation of Aesthetic Experience after its Declaration of Independence Sverre Raffnsøe Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy Copenhagen Business School Working paper no [1] - 2019 MPP WORKING PAPER ISBN: 978-87-91839-39-9 2 The Aesthetic Turn The Cultivation and Propagation of Aesthetic Experience after its Declaration of Independence Sverre Raffnsøe Table of Contents I. The genie of aestheticism .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Aesthetic transitions .................................................................................................................................. 5 III. The normative ‘poetic’ approach to aesthetics in Plato, Baumgarten and Boileau .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Political Imagination in German Romanticism John Thomas Gill
    Wild Politics : Political Imagination in German Romanticism John Thomas Gill A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Gabriel Trop Eric Downing Stefani Engelstein Jakob Norberg Aleksandra Prica i © 2020 John Thomas Gill ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT John Gill: Wild Politics : Political Imagination in German Romanticism (Under the direction of Gabriel Trop) The political discourse of German Romanticism is often interpreted reductively: as either entirely revolutionary, reactionary, or indeed apolitical in nature. Breaking with this critical tradition, this dissertation offers a new conceptual framework for political Romanticism called wild politics . I argue that Romantic wild politics generates a sense of possibility that calls into question pragmatic forms of implementing sociopolitical change; it envisions imaginative alternatives to the status quo that exceed the purview of conventional political thinking. Three major fields of the Romantic political imaginary organize this reading: affect, nature, and religion. Chapter 1 examines Novalis’ politics of affect. In his theory of the fairy tale—as opposed to the actual fairy tales he writes—Novalis proposes a political paradigm centered on the aesthetic dimension of love. He imagines a new Prussian state constituted by emotional attachments between the citizen and the monarch. Chapter 2 takes up the “new mythology” in the works of F.W.J. Schelling, Friedrich Schlegel, and Johann Wilhelm Ritter, the comprehensive project of reorienting modern life towards its most transformative potentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuer Nachrichtenbrief Der Gesellschaft Für Exilforschung E. V
    Neuer Nachrichtenbrief der Gesellschaft für Exilforschung e. V. Nr. 53 ISSN 0946-1957 Juli 2019 Inhalt In eigener Sache In eigener Sache 1 Bericht Jahrestagung 2019 1 Später als gewohnt erscheint dieses Jahr der Doktoranden-Workshop 2019 6 Sommer-Nachrichtenbrief. Grund ist die Protokoll Mitgliederversammlung 8 diesjährige Jahrestagung, die im Juni AG Frauen im Exil 14 stattfand. Der Tagungsbericht und das Ehrenmitgliedschaft Judith Kerr 15 Protokoll der Mitgliederversammlung Laudatio 17 sollten aber in dieser Ausgabe erscheinen. Erinnerungen an Kurt Harald Der Tagungsbericht ist wiederum ein Isenstein 20 Gemeinschaftsprojekt, an dem sich diesmal Untersuchung Castrum Peregrini 21 nicht nur „altgediente“ GfE-Mitglieder Projekt „Gerettet“ 22 beteiligten, sondern dankenswerterweise CfP AG Frauen im Exil 24 auch zwei Doktorandinnen der Viadrina. CfP Society for Exile Studies 25 Ich hoffe, für alle, die nicht bei der Tagung Suchanzeigen 27 sein konnten, bieten Bericht und Protokoll Leserbriefe 27 genügend Informationen. Impressum 27 Katja B. Zaich Aus der Gesellschaft für Exilforschung Exil(e) und Widerstand Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Exilforschung in Frankfurt an der Oder vom 20.-22. Juni 2019 Die Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft fand in diesem Jahr an einem sehr würdigen und dem Geiste der Veranstaltung kongenialen Ort statt, waren doch die Erbauer des Logenhauses in Frankfurt an der Oder die Mitglieder der 1776 gegründeten Freimaurerloge „Zum aufrichtigen Herzen“, die 1935 unter dem Zwang der Nazi-Diktatur ihre Tätigkeit einstellen musste und diese erst 1992 wieder aufnehmen konnte. Im Festsaal des Logenhauses versammelten sich am Donnerstagnachmittag Exilforscher/innen, Studierende und Gäste aus verschiedenen Ländern, darunter etwa 30 Mitglieder der Gesellschaft. Auf die Frage „Was ist die Freimaurerei?“ findet sich auf der Homepage der heute wieder dort arbeitenden Loge eine alte englische Definition, in der es unter anderem heißt: „gegen das Unrecht ist sie Widerstand“.
    [Show full text]
  • Artikel Voor 'De HTV' "Man Is Actually Chaos"
    Artikel voor 'de HTV' "Man is actually chaos" Sytze Steenstra Introduction "Man is actually chaos." Novalis "A good confusion has more value than a bad order." Ludwig Tieck To deal with contemporary experiences of chaos, diversity and cultural incomprehensibility, some form of postmodernism or post-structuralism is often considered to offer the best chance to arrive at some form of understanding. The following fragments point instead to a much older philosophical and artistic response to cultural diversity and chaos, namely the poetics of reflexivity that was developed before the year 1800 by the Early German Romantics. Of course, this group of poets, writers, theorists and philosophers (Novalis, the brothers Friedrich Schlegel and August Wilhelm Schlegel, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Ludwig Tieck, Wilhelm Wackenroder) made their work before the inventions of photography, the shopping mall, the cinema, the internet, global cultural exchange, and so on; in some respects, it can only seem to be outdated. On the other hand, they responded immediately to the French Revolution, with its promises of religious and civil freedom, and to the Enlightenment, with its promise of scientific explanations for everything under the sun. Their response to these unprecedented events was a demand for complete artistic freedom. And what is more, their experimental proposals for dealing with that freedom appear to be as fresh and relevant today as they were over two centuries ago. In many interesting respects, such as their insistence on irony, chaos and incomprehensibility as formative elements of art, the Early Romantics may be seen as the predecessors of the avant-gardes of the first decades of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Da-Oz Medal
    200 Da-Oz medal. 1933 forbidden to work due to "half-Jewish" status. dir. of Collegium Musicum. Concurr: 1945-58 dir. of orch; 1933 emigr. to U.K. with Jooss-ensemble, with which L.C. 1949 mem. fac. of Middlebury Composers' Conf, Middlebury, toured Eur. and U.S. 1934-37 prima ballerina, Teatro Com- Vt; summers 1952-56(7) fdr. and head, Tanglewood Study munale and Maggio Musicale Fiorentino, Florence. 1937-39 Group, Berkshire Music Cent, Tanglewood, Mass. 1961-62 resid. in Paris. 1937-38 tours of Switz. and It. in Igor Stravin- presented concerts in Fed. Repub. Ger. 1964-67 mus. dir. of sky's L'histoire du saldai, choreographed by — Hermann Scher- Ojai Fests; 1965-68 mem. nat. policy comm, Ford Found. Con- chen and Jean Cocteau. 1940-44 solo dancer, Munic. Theater, temp. Music Proj; guest lect. at major music and acad. cents, Bern. 1945-46 tours in Switz, Neth, and U.S. with Trudy incl. Eastman Sch. of Music, Univs. Hawaii, Indiana. Oregon, Schoop. 1946-47 engagement with Heinz Rosen at Munic. also Stanford Univ. and Tanglewood. I.D.'s early dissonant, Theater, Basel. 1947 to U.S. 1947-48 dance teacher. 1949 re- polyphonic style evolved into style with clear diatonic ele- turned to Fed. Repub. Ger. 1949- mem. G.D.B.A. 1949-51 solo ments. Fel: Guggenheim (1952 and 1960); Huntington Hart- dancer, Munic. Theater, Heidelberg. 1951-56 at opera house, ford (1954-58). Mem: A.S.C.A.P; Am. Musicol. Soc; Intl. Soc. Cologne: Solo dancer, 1952 choreographer for the première of for Contemp.
    [Show full text]