Corporeal Expression and the Paradox of Acting in the German Theater Discourse Around 1800
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thesis Slabaugh Ms072117
THE NECESSITY AND FUNCTION OF THE DRAMATURG IN THEATRE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Melanie J. Slabaugh August, 2017 THE NECESSITY AND FUNCTION OF THE DRAMATURG IN THEATRE Melanie J. Slabaugh Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ ______________________________ Advisor School Director James Slowiak J. Thomas Dukes, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the College Durand L. Pope John Green, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Hillary Nunn, Ph.D. Chand Midha, Ph.D. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………….. 5 II. HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF DRAMATURGY ……………………… 3 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing and the Hamburg National Theatre ……… 4 Lessing’s Influence on the Dramaturgical Movement …………………. 8 Dramaturgy in American Theatre ……………………………………….. 16 III. PRODUCTION DRAMATURGY ……………………………………………. 13 The Production Dramaturg/Director Relationship ……………………. 15 New Production Dramaturgies …………………………………………… 18 IV. NEW PLAY DEVELOPMENT ………………………………………………… 20 The Role of the Dramaturg in New-Play Development …………..…… 22 The Dramaturg as Supporter ………………………………………..….… 22 The Dramaturg as Guardian ………………………………..………….…. 26 The Dramaturg as Questioner …………………………………..……….. 29 V. DEVISED THEATRE ………………………………………….…………..……. 32 The Tasks of the Dramaturg in Devised Theatre ………………….….… -
Positionings of Jewish Self
“SCHREIBEN WAS HIER WAR” BEYOND THE HOLOCAUST-PARADIGM: (RE)POSITIONINGS OF JEWISH SELF-IDENTITY IN GERMAN-JEWISH NARRATIVES PAST AND PRESENT by Martina Wells B.A equivalent, English and History, University of Mainz, Germany 1985 M.A., German Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Martina Wells It was defended on March 31, 2015 and approved by Randall Halle, Klaus W. Jonas Professor of German Film and Cultural Studies, Department of German John B. Lyon, Associate Professor, Department of German Lina Insana, Associate Professor, Department of French & Italian Languages and Literatures Dissertation Advisor: Sabine von Dirke, Associate Professor, Department of German ii Copyright © by Martina Wells 2015 iii “SCHREIBEN WAS HIER WAR” BEYOND THE HOLOCAUST-PARADIGM: (RE)POSITIONINGS OF JEWISH SELF-IDENTITY IN GERMAN-JEWISH NARRATIVES PAST AND PRESENT Martina Wells, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2015 This dissertation examines the stakes of self-Orientalizing in literary and cinematographic texts of German-Jewish cultural producers in the context of Jewish emancipation and modernization. Positing Jewish emancipation as a trans-historical and cultural process, my study traces the poetic journey of a particular set of Orientalist tropes from 19th century ghetto stories to contemporary writings and film at the turn of the millennium to address a twofold question: what could this problematic method of representation accomplish for Germany’s Jewish minority in the past, and how do we understand its re-appropriation by Germany’s “new Jewry” today. -
Jiddistik Heute
לקט ייִ דישע שטודיעס הנט Jiddistik heute Yiddish Studies Today לקט Der vorliegende Sammelband eröffnet eine neue Reihe wissenschaftli- cher Studien zur Jiddistik sowie philolo- gischer Editionen und Studienausgaben jiddischer Literatur. Jiddisch, Englisch und Deutsch stehen als Publikationsspra- chen gleichberechtigt nebeneinander. Leket erscheint anlässlich des xv. Sym posiums für Jiddische Studien in Deutschland, ein im Jahre 1998 von Erika Timm und Marion Aptroot als für das in Deutschland noch junge Fach Jiddistik und dessen interdisziplinären אָ רשונג אויסגאַבעס און ייִדיש אויסגאַבעס און אָ רשונג Umfeld ins Leben gerufenes Forum. Die im Band versammelten 32 Essays zur jiddischen Literatur-, Sprach- und Kul- turwissenschaft von Autoren aus Europa, den usa, Kanada und Israel vermitteln ein Bild von der Lebendigkeit und Viel- falt jiddistischer Forschung heute. Yiddish & Research Editions ISBN 978-3-943460-09-4 Jiddistik Jiddistik & Forschung Edition 9 783943 460094 ִיידיש ַאויסגאבעס און ָ ארשונג Jiddistik Edition & Forschung Yiddish Editions & Research Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Band 1 לקט ִיידישע שטודיעס ַהנט Jiddistik heute Yiddish Studies Today Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Yidish : oysgabes un forshung Jiddistik : Edition & Forschung Yiddish : Editions & Research Herausgegeben von Marion Aptroot, Efrat Gal-Ed, Roland Gruschka und Simon Neuberg Band 1 Leket : yidishe shtudyes haynt Leket : Jiddistik heute Leket : Yiddish Studies Today Bibliografijische Information Der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deut- schen Nationalbibliografijie ; detaillierte bibliografijische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © düsseldorf university press, Düsseldorf 2012 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urhe- berrechtlich geschützt. -
Schiller's Egmont and the Beginnings of Weimar Classicism*
Steffan Davies Schiller’s Egmont and the Beginnings of Weimar Classicism* This essay examines Schiller’s stage version of Goethe’s Egmont, which was performed in Weimar in April 1796 and which Schiller described as “gewissermaasen Göthens und mein gemeinschaftliches Werk”. Beginning with his review of Egmont in 1788 the essay demonstrates some of the principles on which Schiller amended the text, and then shows that these match changes in Goethe’s own writing by the mid-1790s. On this basis it evalu- ates the correspondence between Goethe and Schiller, and other biographical texts, to reconsider the view that Goethe’s misgivings about the adaptation marked a low-point in their relationship. It argues that Schiller’s work on Egmont instead deserves to be seen as a constructive experience in the development of the Weimar alliance. I. Schiller had spent three weeks in Weimar watching performances by Iffland and his visiting theatre company when he wrote a letter to Körner on 10 April 1796. His aim: to persuade Körner to join him for Iffland’s last performance, Goethe’s Egmont, which he had adapted for the stage. He sounds happy with his stay and with his work, describing the new Egmont as “gewissermaasen Göthens und mein gemeinschaftliches Werk” (NA 28. 210–211). Goethe, Schiller and Iffland – surely Körner would not want to miss experiencing such a combination of talents.1 * Schiller’s texts are quoted from Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe. Ed. by Julius Petersen, Gerhard Fricke et al. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf. 1943ff. Quotations are identified by NA with volume and page numbers. -
The Enlightenment Novel As Artifact
4 The Enlightenment Novel as Artifact J. H. Campe’s Robinson der Jüngere and C. M. Wieland’s Der goldne Spiegel How did German authors respond to the widespread perception of literature as a luxury good and reading as a form of consumption? Or, to use a more mod- ern idiom, how did German literature around 1800 respond to its own commodi- fi cation? The question is not new to scholars of German culture; nonetheless, the topic deserves further attention. 1 The idea of literature as a potentially pernicious form of luxury posed a serious challenge to writers in this period, a challenge that not only infl uenced conceptions of the book as artifact and of the impact of read- ing, but also shaped the narrative structure and rhetorical features of the literary works themselves. Previous analyses of the subject have tended to be either too broad or too restric- tive in their approach. Too broad in the sense that they have addressed general con- cerns, such as the rise of the middle class or the dehumanizing impact of modern capitalism rather than the way in which evolving, complex, and often confl icted 1. Daniel Purdy addresses the topic in his insightful treatment of neoclassicism (Weimar classi- cism), and it has also been dealt with in some recent and not so recent genealogies of aesthetic auton- omy and of what is known in German as Trivialliteratur. See Purdy, The Tyranny of Elegance: Consumer Capitalism in the Era of Goethe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), esp. 28–34; Martha Woodmansee, The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics (New York: Colum- bia University Press, 1994); and Jochen Schulte-Sasse, Der Kritik der Trivialliteratur seit der Aufklärung (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1971). -
Core Reading List for M.A. in German Period Author Genre Examples
Core Reading List for M.A. in German Period Author Genre Examples Mittelalter (1150- Wolfram von Eschenbach Epik Parzival (1200/1210) 1450) Gottfried von Straßburg Tristan (ca. 1210) Hartmann von Aue Der arme Heinrich (ca. 1195) Johannes von Tepl Der Ackermann aus Böhmen (ca. 1400) Walther von der Vogelweide Lieder, Oskar von Wolkenstein Minnelyrik, Spruchdichtung Gedichte Renaissance Martin Luther Prosa Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen (1530) (1400-1600) Von der Freyheit eynis Christen Menschen (1521) Historia von D. Johann Fausten (1587) Das Volksbuch vom Eulenspiegel (1515) Der ewige Jude (1602) Sebastian Brant Das Narrenschiff (1494) Barock (1600- H.J.C. von Grimmelshausen Prosa Der abenteuerliche Simplizissimus Teutsch (1669) 1720) Schelmenroman Martin Opitz Lyrik Andreas Gryphius Paul Fleming Sonett Christian v. Hofmannswaldau Paul Gerhard Aufklärung (1720- Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Prosa Fabeln 1785) Christian Fürchtegott Gellert Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Drama Nathan der Weise (1779) Bürgerliches Emilia Galotti (1772) Trauerspiel Miss Sara Samson (1755) Lustspiel Minna von Barnhelm oder das Soldatenglück (1767) 2 Sturm und Drang Johann Wolfgang Goethe Prosa Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (1774) (1767-1785) Johann Gottfried Herder Von deutscher Art und Kunst (selections; 1773) Karl Philipp Moritz Anton Reiser (selections; 1785-90) Sophie von Laroche Geschichte des Fräuleins von Sternheim (1771/72) Johann Wolfgang Goethe Drama Götz von Berlichingen (1773) Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz Der Hofmeister oder die Vorteile der Privaterziehung (1774) -
Bach Festival the First Collegiate Bach Festival in the Nation
Bach Festival The First Collegiate Bach Festival in the Nation ANNOTATED PROGRAM APRIL 1921, 2013 THE 2013 BACH FESTIVAL IS MADE POSSIBLE BY: e Adrianne and Robert Andrews Bach Festival Fund in honor of Amelia & Elias Fadil DEDICATION ELINORE LOUISE BARBER 1919-2013 e Eighty-rst Annual Bach Festival is respectfully dedicated to Elinore Barber, Director of the Riemenschneider Bach Institute from 1969-1998 and Editor of the journal BACH—both of which she helped to found. She served from 1969-1984 as Professor of Music History and Literature at what was then called Baldwin-Wallace College and as head of that department from 1980-1984. Before coming to Baldwin Wallace she was from 1944-1969 a Professor of Music at Hastings College, Coordinator of the Hastings College-wide Honors Program, and Curator of the Rinderspacher Rare Score and Instrument Collection located at that institution. Dr. Barber held a Ph.D. degree in Musicology from the University of Michigan. She also completed a Master’s degree at the Eastman School of Music and received a Bachelor’s degree with High Honors in Music and English Literature from Kansas Wesleyan University in 1941. In the fall of 1951 and again during the summer of 1954, she studied Bach’s works as a guest in the home of Dr. Albert Schweitzer. Since 1978, her Schweitzer research brought Dr. Barber to the Schweitzer House archives (Gunsbach, France) many times. In 1953 the collection of Dr. Albert Riemenschneider was donated to the University by his wife, Selma. Sixteen years later, Dr. Warren Scharf, then director of the Conservatory, and Dr. -
A Re-Evaluation of the Aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold Ephraim Lessing" (1991)
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1-1-1991 A re-evaluation of the aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold phrE aim Lessing John Grayson Nichols Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Nichols, John Grayson, "A re-evaluation of the aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold Ephraim Lessing" (1991). Honors Theses. Paper 235. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A RE-EVALUATION OF THE AESTHETICS OF JEAN-BAPTISTE DUBOS AND GOTTHOLD EPHRAIM LESSING IN LIGHT OF HISTORICAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE UT PICTURA POESIS DEBATE A THESIS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF DR. HUGH WEST PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HISTORY HONORS PROGRAM BY JOHN GRAYSON NICHOLS 1991 LIBRA HY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. Introduction . ............................................. 1 II. Theoretical Similarities in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ...•................................. 2 III. Theoretical Differences in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ..................................... 7 IV. Historical Circumstances in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ..................................... 13 V. Conclusion . ............................................... 17 1 I. Horace did remark "ut pictura poesis," as in painting so poetry. But the rest of the pronouncement, rarely quoted, - "one work seizes your fancy if you stand close to it, another if you stand at a distance" - refers to how the arts can been viewed from similar angles, not that the arts are essentially created with the same purposes. -
Simon Beattie
Simon Beattie The 18th Century Books, manuscripts, music November 2012 FINANCING ENLIGHTENMENT 01. [ACADÉMIE DE DIJON.] Mémoire pour l’Académie des Sciences. [Dijon, c.1740.] Manuscript, small folio (285 × 200 mm), pp. 23, [1], stitched with blue silk in a single bifolium wrapper; edges a little dusty, slight fraying to upper cover and first leaf of text, stitching loose; old stamp ‘GG’ and ms inventory number to upper cover. £1300 The Dijon Academy was founded in 1725 by Hector- Bernard Pouffier, doyen of the Parlement de Bourgogne, and subsequently received a large endowment from Pouffier on his death in 1736. As a new foundation, removed from direct influence of church and state, it played an important part in fostering the Enlightenment project, and counted several eminent scholars among its early members, including the pioneering chemist Louis- Bernard Guyton de Morveau, historian and philosopher Charles de Brosses, and naturalists Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon and Bernard Germain, Comte de Lacépède. The Academy’s most enduring contribution to the Enlightenment, however, was in awarding a young Jean-Jacques Rousseau one of its annual prizes in 1750 for his essay Discours sur les sciences et les arts, in which he famously argued that the arts and sciences corrupt human morality. It was this essay which first found him fame as a philosopher and provided the germ for much of his later philosophy on the corruptive power of civilization. The present Mémoire has a good deal to say about the Academy prizes. It is a report, presumably drawn up on behalf of the governors or directors, which sought to clarify the terms of Pouffier’s will. -
1 Schiller and the Young Coleridge
Notes 1 Schiller and the Young Coleridge 1. For the details of Schiller’s career and thought I am drawing on a number of works including Lesley Sharpe, Friedrich Schiller: Drama, Thought and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991); Walter Schafarschik, Friedrich Schiller (Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1999); F. J. Lamport, German Classical Drama: Theatre, Humanity, and Nation, 1750–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990); and T. J. Reed, The Classical Centre: Goethe and Weimar, 1775–1832 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), and Schiller- Handbuch, ed. Helmut Koopmann (Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner, 1998). 2. Schiller later revised the essay and published it in his Shorter Works in Prose under the title ‘The Stage Considered as a Moral Institution’ (‘Die Schaubühne als eine moralische Anstalt betrachtet’). 3. See David Pugh, ‘“Die Künstler”: Schiller’s Philosophical Programme’, Oxford German Studies, 18/19 (1989–90), 13–22. 4. See J. M. Ellis, Schiller’s ‘Kalliasbriefe’ and the Study of his Aesthetic Theory (The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1969). 5. See Paul Robinson Sweet, Wilhelm von Humboldt: a Biography, 2 vols (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978–80) and W. H. Bruford, The Ger- man Tradition of Self-Cultivation: ‘Bildung’ from Humboldt to Thomas Mann (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), ch. 1; also E. S. Shaffer, ‘Romantic Philosophy and the Organization of the Disciplines: the Found- ing of the Humboldt University of Berlin’, in Romanticism and the Sciences, ed. Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 38–54. 6. Norbert Oellers, Schiller: Geschichte seiner Wirkung bis zu Goethes Tod, 1805– 1832 (Bonn: Bouvier, 1967). -
Emilia Galotti
königs erläuterungen Band 16 Textanalyse und Interpretation zu Gotthold Ephraim Lessing emilia galotti Rüdiger Bernhardt Alle erforderlichen Infos für Abitur, Matura, Klausur und Referat plus Musteraufgaben mit Lösungsansätzen Zitierte Ausgaben: Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Emilia Galotti. Ein Trauerspiel in fünf Aufzügen. Heftbearbeitung: Uwe Lehmann. Husum/Nordsee: Hamburger Lesehefte Verlag 2010 (Hamburger Leseheft Nr. 149). Zitatverweise sind mit HL gekennzeichnet. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Emilia Galotti. Ein Trauerspiel in fünf Aufzügen. Anmerkungen von Jan-Dirk Müller, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun., durchgese- hene Ausgabe 2001 (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek Nr. 45). Zitatverweise sind mit R gekennzeichnet. Über den Autor dieser Erläuterung: Prof. Dr. sc. phil. Rüdiger Bernhardt lehrte neuere und neueste deutsche sowie skandinavische Literatur an Universitäten des In- und Auslandes. Er veröffentlichte u. a. Studien zur Literaturgeschichte und zur Antikerezeption, Monografien zu Henrik Ibsen, Gerhart Hauptmann, August Strindberg und Peter Hille, gab die Werke Ibsens, Peter Hilles, Hermann Conradis und anderer sowie zahlreiche Schulbücher heraus. Von 1994 bis 2008 war er Vorsitzender der Gerhart-Hauptmann-Stiftung Kloster auf Hiddensee. 1999 wurde er in die Leibniz-Sozietät gewählt. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schrift- lichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Hinweis zu § 52 a UrhG: Die öffentliche Zugänglichmachung eines für den Unterrichtsgebrauch an Schulen bestimmten Werkes ist stets nur mit Einwilligung des Berechtigten zulässig. 3. Auflage 2013 ISBN 978-3-8044-1923-0 PDF: 978-3-8044-5923-6, EPUB: 978-3-8044-6923-5 © 2010, 2002 by C. Bange Verlag, 96142 Hollfeld Alle Rechte vorbehalten! Titelbild: Peter Mosbacher mit Judith Holzmeister in Emilia Galotti, Theater am Kurfürstendamm, Berlin 1953, © ullstein bild – Ruth Wilhelmi Druck und Weiterverarbeitung: Tiskárna Akcent, Vimperk inhalt 1. -
Schiller's Jungfrau, Euripides's Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 Sisters in Sublime Sanctity: Schiller's Jungfrau, Euripides's Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage John Martin Pendergast Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1090 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SISTERS IN SUBLIME SANCTITY: Schiller’s Jungfrau, Euripides’s Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage by John Pendergast A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 JOHN PENDERGAST All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 21 May 2015 Dr. Paul Oppenheimer________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee 21 May 2015______________ Dr. Giancarlo Lombardi ______________________ Date Executive Officer Dr. Paul Oppenheimer Dr. Elizabeth Beaujour Dr. André Aciman Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract Sisters in Sublime Sanctity: Schiller’s Jungfrau, Euripides’s Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage by John Pendergast Adviser: Professor Paul Oppenheimer At the dawn of the nineteenth century, Friedrich Schiller reinvented the image of Joan of Arc in his play, Die Jungfrau von Orleans, with consequences that affected theatrical representations of Joan for the rest of that century and well into the twentieth.