Thesis Slabaugh Ms072117

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thesis Slabaugh Ms072117 THE NECESSITY AND FUNCTION OF THE DRAMATURG IN THEATRE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Melanie J. Slabaugh August, 2017 THE NECESSITY AND FUNCTION OF THE DRAMATURG IN THEATRE Melanie J. Slabaugh Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ ______________________________ Advisor School Director James Slowiak J. Thomas Dukes, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the College Durand L. Pope John Green, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Hillary Nunn, Ph.D. Chand Midha, Ph.D. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………….. 5 II. HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF DRAMATURGY ……………………… 3 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing and the Hamburg National Theatre ……… 4 Lessing’s Influence on the Dramaturgical Movement …………………. 8 Dramaturgy in American Theatre ……………………………………….. 16 III. PRODUCTION DRAMATURGY ……………………………………………. 13 The Production Dramaturg/Director Relationship ……………………. 15 New Production Dramaturgies …………………………………………… 18 IV. NEW PLAY DEVELOPMENT ………………………………………………… 20 The Role of the Dramaturg in New-Play Development …………..…… 22 The Dramaturg as Supporter ………………………………………..….… 22 The Dramaturg as Guardian ………………………………..………….…. 26 The Dramaturg as Questioner …………………………………..……….. 29 V. DEVISED THEATRE ………………………………………….…………..……. 32 The Tasks of the Dramaturg in Devised Theatre ………………….….… 34 iii Dramaturgy and the Saratoga International Theatre Institute …..……. 36 Other Methods of Dramaturgy in Devised Theatre ……….….………… 38 The Actor as Dramaturg …………………………………….………..……. 39 The Director as Dramaturg ………………………………………………… 44 Production Staff as Dramaturg ……………………………….…………… 48 VI. CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………. 55 Suggestions for Further Research ………………………………………… 55 Summary ………………………………………………………….…………. 51 iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The dramaturg in western theatre, especially American theatre, has always been a difficult role to define. The dramaturg does so many different things, ranging from selecting plays for production and helping to write new ones, to translating foreign plays, to adapting literature for the stage, to research and education. Oftentimes a dramaturg herself may have a hard time saying exactly what it is she does, because the role is so diverse and fills different needs within different organizations. Traditionally, the role of dramaturg has also been thought by others to be one of passive and distant critic and researcher, an aloof and rarely-seen presence in the life of a production. However, dramaturgy in western theatre, especially in the United States, is currently expanding to many different roles beyond the traditional as the world simultaneously expands and contracts. Thanks to the internet and the explosion of social media, YouTube, and other communication platforms, people are more aware of cultures and peoples beyond their own geographical borders and can also freely interact with 1 these cultures and peoples digitally and in real time. People have more and more access to others’ lives through texting and messaging, video, Skype and FaceTime, and other up-and-coming media that previous generations would never have been able to imagine. In the world of theatre, this increased global connectivity means anyone can log onto an electronic device and access thousands — if not millions — of videos and pictures of theatrical productions, both amateur and professional; scripts and cuttings of scripts from any country or culture; and chats, listserves, and entire websites dedicated to theatre and performance. Performers can create collaborative projects across cultures, languages, and time zones. Playwrights can weigh in on productions from half a world away, and anyone can have access to the most influential people alive in ways that weren’t available twenty, or even ten, years ago. This myriad of means to access people and information across the globe expands individual worlds beyond places that can easily be accessed physically, but also shrinks the world with the far-reaching arms of the digital age as people are able to pull these cultures and people closer to them. Does this change the way dramaturgy works in today’s American theatre? If so, how? Is it necessary 2 to shift the function and role of the dramaturg in American theatre as culture shifts to a more global and more culturally aware frame? Dramaturgy itself is an inexact role. The word itself translates from the German language to “play-making,” but the role is not so simple. Those who practice dramaturgy have a hard time defining it as well, and it is often used synonymously with the term “literary manager.” Dramaturgy has evolved throughout theatre history along many far-reaching branches, and according to the needs and desires of the individual organizations and directors who work with a dramaturg. The journey of this paper will explore several of these arms, but the role of dramaturgy remains vague. This paper will first lay the groundwork of the history of dramaturgy and attempt to explain and describe the field and its place in the theatre. An exploration of the traditional function and role of the dramaturg in several aspects of western — mainly American — theatre, especially in the realms of production dramaturgy, new-play development, and devised theatre will follow. The shifts within those realms will be addressed in relation to how the world and culture changes. This study will attempt to answer the question: why is the dramaturg important in theatre today? 3 CHAPTER 2 HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF DRAMATURGY The formal role of dramaturg as a separate theatrical function began officially in 18th-century Germany, when playwright Gotthold Ephraim Lessing was first employed at the Hamburg National Theatre as in-house critic and published his Hamburgische Dramaturgie, or Hamburg Dramaturgy, a collection of his essays and critiques. It was in fact Aristotle, with his The Poetics, who was truly the first Western dramaturg (“Introduction” 1). Dramaturgy essentially is concerned with “well-structured drama,” which is also Aristotle’s main concern in The Poetics: Trying to find the optimal recipe for a successful piece of dramatic work, Aristotle deconstructed all its components, including plot, character, theme, language, rhythm, and spectacle. In The Poetics, he considers plot . as the most important element of drama, defining it as ‘the arrangement of the incidents.’ A plot must have all the necessary elements: unified and logical beginning, middle, and end . A successful plot has all the elements in the proper order . A plot is not a story or a narrative but rather a dramaturgical scaffolding that arranges the order of storytelling incidents in an order that culminates in cathartic release. (1-2) 4 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing and the Hamburg National Theatre Artistotle’s theory of dramatic structure was supported formally by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, during his tenure at the Hamburg National Theatre. Already a celebrated playwright, Lessing took the position of resident critic in 1767. Lessing had first hoped to gain employment at the Royal Library in Berlin, but the king granted the job to someone else, and Lessing settled for the position at the theatre out of financial necessity. The consortium that was behind the Hamburg National Theatre actively pursued Lessing, believing him to be a welcome and necessary addition to the staff in order to achieve their goals for the organization. Lessing agreed to join the theatre after much negotiation and reconfiguring of the position. Thus, the field of dramaturgy began almost accidentally. It is important to understand the make-up of the Hamburg National Theatre, along with its goals for reforming German theatre, before exploring Lessing’s role both in the organization and in the larger scope of German theatre. At this time, Germany was not a unified country; rather, it was comprised of more than three hundred small units. One of the main focuses of the Hamburg National Theatre was to help cultivate a German theatre tradition that would be a stepping stone to creating a unified country. Previously, theatres 5 consisted of a troupe of actors led by a principal, or main actor, who made the decisions for productions, casting, staging, and publicity. Because the actors -- and not an artistic director or similar person -- selected the repertoire, the trend among principals was to choose plays that had little literary merit, but that would instead showcase them in the roles they were most known for and had already played many times. Lessing later described these plays as “mediocre,” produced only to show off the actors’ talents and fame, and not to promote quality theatre or even to challenge the theatre artists or their audiences (Luckhurst 26). The consortium of the Hamburg National Theatre – along with Johann Friedrich Lowen, the theatre’s managing director – had some very specific goals regarding the organization, designed to change the way theatre was “done” in Germany. First, the consortium wanted to provide a “stimulating and disciplined” training ground for German playwrights and actors. To do this, they reconfigured the principal role, choosing instead to defer decision-making to a consortium made up of twelve Hamburg businessmen, similar to today’s organizational board of directors in non-profit theatres. They also hired Konrad Ekhof, a famous German performer, to train
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 the Period of the Weimar Republic Is Divided Into Three
    CHAPTER 2 BERLIN DURING THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC The period of the Weimar Republic is divided into three periods, 1918 to 1923, 1924 to 1929, and 1930 to 1933, but we usually associate Weimar culture with the middle period when the post WWI revolutionary chaos had settled down and before the Nazis made their aggressive claim for power. This second period of the Weimar Republic after 1924 is considered Berlin’s most prosperous period, and is often referred to as the “Golden Twenties”. They were exciting and extremely vibrant years in the history of Berlin, as a sophisticated and innovative culture developed including architecture and design, literature, film, painting, music, criticism, philosophy, psychology, and fashion. For a short time Berlin seemed to be the center of European creativity where cinema was making huge technical and artistic strides. Like a firework display, Berlin was burning off all its energy in those five short years. A literary walk through Berlin during the Weimar period begins at the Kurfürstendamm, Berlin’s new part that came into its prime during the Weimar period. Large new movie theaters were built across from the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial church, the Capitol und Ufa-Palast, and many new cafés made the Kurfürstendamm into Berlin’s avant-garde boulevard. Max Reinhardt’s theater became a major attraction along with bars, nightclubs, wine restaurants, Russian tearooms and dance halls, providing a hangout for Weimar’s young writers. But Berlin’s Kurfürstendamm is mostly famous for its revered literary cafés, Kranzler, Schwanecke and the most renowned, the Romanische Café in the impressive looking Romanische Haus across from the Memorial church.
    [Show full text]
  • “Almost Invisible Until Now” Antigone, Ismene, and the Dramaturgy of Tragedy
    NORDIC THEATRE STUDIES Vol. 31, No. 1. 2019, 141-154 “almost invisible until now” Antigone, Ismene, and the Dramaturgy of Tragedy KRISTINA HAGSTRÖM-STÅHL ABSTRACT This essay discusses Sophocles’ Antigone in relation to its Hegelian legacy, engaging with the play from a directorial perspective. Drawing on the work of Judith Butler, Anne Carson , Bonnie Honig, Peggy Phelan and Cecilia Sjöholm, I attempt to envision a contemporary mise en scène that repositions feminine subjectivity within the dramaturgy of tragedy. Centering on the relationship between Antigone and Ismene, as well as on the possibility of revaluing Ismene’s position in terms of political and dramaturgical agency, I hope to challenge dramaturgical conventions that assume binary, heteronormative relations as the primary framework of interpretation for female characters, and death and destruction as the only possible outcome for what is positioned as feminine. This resituated reading of the drama examines the function of embodied performance in processes of meaning-making, and offers dramaturgical structure as a site for strategies of resistance. KEYWORDS dramaturgy, tragedy, Hegelian dialectics, feminist theory, performance practice ISSN 2002-3898 © Kristina Hagström-Ståhl and Nordic Theatre Studies PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE Open access: https://tidsskrift.dk/nts/index Published with support from Nordic Board for Periodicals in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NOP-HS) DOI: 10.7146/nts.v31i1.113013 “almost invisible until now” “almost invisible until now” Antigone, Ismene, and the Dramaturgy of Tragedy1 Elle pense qu’elle va mourir, qu’elle est jeune, et qu’elle aussi, elle aurait bien aimé vivre. Mais il n’y a rien à faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dramaturgy Handbook
    Marat/Sade Emerson Stage 2007-08 Photo Brendan Koons DRAMATURGY STUDENT HANDBOOK Compiled by Magda Romanska, Ph.D. Head of Theatre Studies and Dramaturgy Advisor Emerson College Department of Performing Arts 120 Boylston St Boston, MA 02116 [email protected] 2 TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS WHAT IS DRAMATURGY? ........................................................................... 4 DRAMATURGY AND THE LIBERAL ARTS ............................................... 6 INSTITUTIONAL DRAMATURGY .............................................................. 7 PRODUCTION DRAMATURGY ................................................................. 9 AMERICAN VS. EUROPEAN DRAMATURGY ........................................ 13 DRAMATURGY PORTFOLIO .................................................................... 14 RECOMMENDATION LETTERS ............................................................... 15 DRAMATURGY CAREER RESOURCES ............................................... 17 INTERNSHIPS ......................................................................................... 17 GRADUATE PROGRAMS - M.F.A. /Ph.D. ............................................... 24 JOURNALS ......................................................................................................28 CONFERENCES & ORGANIZATIONS .................................................... 49 OTHER CAREER RESOURCES ............................................................. 53 DRAMATURGY BEYOND THEATRE DRAMATURGY FOR FILM SCRIPTS.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Brechtian Elements in Process Drama1
    Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, Year: 2015, Vol: 48, No: 2, 19-36 Reconsidering Brechtian Elements in Process Drama1 Özgehan UŞTUK, MA Balıkesir University [email protected] ABSTRACT. It is known that process drama is parallel to non-Aristotelian structure of Brecht’s epic theatre in certain ways. Techniques and structure as the elements of these two notions (O’Neill’s process drama and Brecht’s epic theatre) resemble to each other not only by the usage and also by the relationship between the process and the participants as well. Brecht intended to engage actively with the audience and makes them engage with the play critically; similarly in process drama structures, participants are actively engaged with the material and the theme of the work. Moreover, in process drama, participants are assigned as meaning-makers throughout the process since they actively shouldered the role of writer, director, actor/actress and the audience. This quality lets them engage with the process in ways that are not only aesthetic but also critical and purposeful. Thus, there are also some elements that Brechtian plays and O'Neill's structures may share but they are included with different intentions. Taking all the similarities and differences that can be referred from texts into consideration, it can be suggested that further discussion is needed to reveal the dichotomy. This paper intends to build a direct link between drama in education and theatre and to explain this link from a structural point of view by comparing and contrasting examples from plays of Brecht and process drama sessions of O'Neill.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature and Film of the Weimar Republic (In English Translation) OLLI@Berkeley, Spring 2019 Mondays, April 1—29, 2019 (5 Weeks), 10:00 A.M
    Instructor: Marion Gerlind, PhD (510) 430-2673 • [email protected] Literature and Film of the Weimar Republic (in English translation) OLLI@Berkeley, Spring 2019 Mondays, April 1—29, 2019 (5 weeks), 10:00 a.m. — 12:30 p.m. University Hall 41B, Berkeley, CA 94720 In this interactive seminar we shall read and reflect on literature as well as watch and discuss films of the Weimar Republic (1919–33), one of the most creative periods in German history, following the traumatic Word War I and revolutionary times. Many of the critical issues and challenges during these short 14 years are still relevant today. The Weimar Republic was not only Germany’s first democracy, but also a center of cultural experimentation, producing cutting-edge art. We’ll explore some of the most popular works: Bertolt Brecht and Kurt Weill’s musical play, The Threepenny Opera, Joseph von Sternberg’s original film The Blue Angel, Irmgard Keun’s bestseller The Artificial Silk Girl, Leontine Sagan’s classic film Girls in Uniform, Erich Maria Remarque’s antiwar novel All Quiet on the Western Front, as well as compelling poetry by Else Lasker-Schüler, Gertrud Kolmar, and Mascha Kaléko. Format This course will be conducted in English (films with English subtitles). Your active participation and preparation is highly encouraged! I recommend that you read the literature in preparation for our sessions. I shall provide weekly study questions, introduce (con)texts in short lectures and facilitate our discussions. You will have the opportunity to discuss the literature/films in small and large groups. We’ll consider authors’ biographies in the socio-historical background of their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Reading List for M.A. in German Period Author Genre Examples
    Core Reading List for M.A. in German Period Author Genre Examples Mittelalter (1150- Wolfram von Eschenbach Epik Parzival (1200/1210) 1450) Gottfried von Straßburg Tristan (ca. 1210) Hartmann von Aue Der arme Heinrich (ca. 1195) Johannes von Tepl Der Ackermann aus Böhmen (ca. 1400) Walther von der Vogelweide Lieder, Oskar von Wolkenstein Minnelyrik, Spruchdichtung Gedichte Renaissance Martin Luther Prosa Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen (1530) (1400-1600) Von der Freyheit eynis Christen Menschen (1521) Historia von D. Johann Fausten (1587) Das Volksbuch vom Eulenspiegel (1515) Der ewige Jude (1602) Sebastian Brant Das Narrenschiff (1494) Barock (1600- H.J.C. von Grimmelshausen Prosa Der abenteuerliche Simplizissimus Teutsch (1669) 1720) Schelmenroman Martin Opitz Lyrik Andreas Gryphius Paul Fleming Sonett Christian v. Hofmannswaldau Paul Gerhard Aufklärung (1720- Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Prosa Fabeln 1785) Christian Fürchtegott Gellert Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Drama Nathan der Weise (1779) Bürgerliches Emilia Galotti (1772) Trauerspiel Miss Sara Samson (1755) Lustspiel Minna von Barnhelm oder das Soldatenglück (1767) 2 Sturm und Drang Johann Wolfgang Goethe Prosa Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (1774) (1767-1785) Johann Gottfried Herder Von deutscher Art und Kunst (selections; 1773) Karl Philipp Moritz Anton Reiser (selections; 1785-90) Sophie von Laroche Geschichte des Fräuleins von Sternheim (1771/72) Johann Wolfgang Goethe Drama Götz von Berlichingen (1773) Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz Der Hofmeister oder die Vorteile der Privaterziehung (1774)
    [Show full text]
  • Demarcating Dramaturgy
    Demarcating Dramaturgy Mapping Theory onto Practice Jacqueline Louise Bolton Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Workshop Theatre, School of English August 2011 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 11 Acknowledgements This PhD research into Dramaturgy and Literary Management has been conducted under the aegis of an Arts and Humanities Research Council Collaborative Doctoral Award; a collaboration between the University of Leeds and West Yorkshire Playhouse which commenced in September 2005. I am extremely grateful to Alex Chisholm, Associate Director (Literary) at West Yorkshire Playhouse, and Professor Stephen Bottoms and Dr. Kara McKechnie at the University of Leeds for their intellectual and emotional support. Special thanks to Professor Bottoms for his continued commitment over the last eighteen months, for the time and care he has dedicated to reading and responding to my work. I would like to take this opportunity to thank everybody who agreed to be interviewed as part of this research. Thanks in particular to Dr. Peter Boenisch, Gudula Kienemund, Birgit Rasch and Anke Roeder for their insights into German theatre and for making me so welcome in Germany. Special thanks also to Dr. Gilli Bush-Bailey (a.k.a the delightful Miss. Fanny Kelly), Jack Bradley, Sarah Dickenson and Professor Dan Rebellato, for their faith and continued encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Poetics, Bharatamuni's Natyasastra, and Zeami's Treatises: Theory As Discourse
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Aristotle's Poetics, Bharatamuni's Natyasastra, and Zeami's Treatises: Theory as Discourse AUTHORS Ley, Graham JOURNAL Asian Theatre Journal DEPOSITED IN ORE 26 January 2009 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/48013 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Aristotle's Poetics, Bharatamuni's Natyasastra, and Zeami's Treatises: Theory as Discourse Author(s): Graham Ley Source: Asian Theatre Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Autumn, 2000), pp. 191-214 Published by: University of Hawai'i Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1124489 Accessed: 26/01/2009 04:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=uhp. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporeal Expression and the Paradox of Acting in the German Theater Discourse Around 1800
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository STAGING SPONTANEITY: CORPOREAL EXPRESSION AND THE PARADOX OF ACTING IN THE GERMAN THEATER DISCOURSE AROUND 1800 Matthew West Feminella A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures (German). Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Clayton Koelb Eric Downing Jonathan Hess Gabriel Trop Inga Pollmann © 2016 Matthew West Feminella ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT MATTHEW WEST FEMINELLA: Staging Spontaneity: Corporeal Expression and the Paradox of Acting in the German Theater Discourse Around 1800 (Under the direction of Clayton Koelb) This dissertation explores how theories of spontaneity and the body are integrated into acting discourses on the German stage. I argue that the spontaneity of the human body represents a recurring feature in the acting discourses around 1800, which provoked a variety of responses from theorists of the theaters. These responses range from theorizing how to utilize corporeal spontaneity for the benefit of the theater to how to diminish its potential inimical effects on dramatic production. Theorizing about actors and spontaneity led these thinkers to re-conceptualize their notions of anthropology, semiotics, media, and human agency. Chapter 1 examines how Gotthold Ephraim Lessing in his correspondences and dramaturgical writings develops acting techniques that seek to reconcile intentionality and spontaneity: actors create mental images of bodies through poetic language that in turn are integrated into their own affective and bodily motions, thus artificially producing the impression of spontaneous natural action on stage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold Ephraim Lessing" (1991)
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1-1-1991 A re-evaluation of the aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold phrE aim Lessing John Grayson Nichols Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Nichols, John Grayson, "A re-evaluation of the aesthetics of Jean-Baptiste Dubos and Gotthold Ephraim Lessing" (1991). Honors Theses. Paper 235. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A RE-EVALUATION OF THE AESTHETICS OF JEAN-BAPTISTE DUBOS AND GOTTHOLD EPHRAIM LESSING IN LIGHT OF HISTORICAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE UT PICTURA POESIS DEBATE A THESIS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF DR. HUGH WEST PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HISTORY HONORS PROGRAM BY JOHN GRAYSON NICHOLS 1991 LIBRA HY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. Introduction . ............................................. 1 II. Theoretical Similarities in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ...•................................. 2 III. Theoretical Differences in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ..................................... 7 IV. Historical Circumstances in the Works of Dubas and Lessing . ..................................... 13 V. Conclusion . ............................................... 17 1 I. Horace did remark "ut pictura poesis," as in painting so poetry. But the rest of the pronouncement, rarely quoted, - "one work seizes your fancy if you stand close to it, another if you stand at a distance" - refers to how the arts can been viewed from similar angles, not that the arts are essentially created with the same purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart's View of the World
    Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World by Thomas McPharlin Ford B. Arts (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy European Studies – School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Adelaide July 2010 i Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World. Preface vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Leopold Mozart, 1719–1756: The Making of an Enlightened Father 10 1.1: Leopold’s education. 11 1.2: Leopold’s model of education. 17 1.3: Leopold, Gellert, Gottsched and Günther. 24 1.4: Leopold and his Versuch. 32 Chapter 2: The Mozarts’ Taste: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s aesthetic perception of their world. 39 2.1: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s general aesthetic outlook. 40 2.2: Leopold and the aesthetics in his Versuch. 49 2.3: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s musical aesthetics. 53 2.4: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s opera aesthetics. 56 Chapter 3: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1756–1778: The education of a Wunderkind. 64 3.1: The Grand Tour. 65 3.2: Tour of Vienna. 82 3.3: Tour of Italy. 89 3.4: Leopold and Wolfgang on Wieland. 96 Chapter 4: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1778–1781: Sturm und Drang and the demise of the Mozarts’ relationship. 106 4.1: Wolfgang’s Paris journey without Leopold. 110 4.2: Maria Anna Mozart’s death. 122 4.3: Wolfgang’s relations with the Weber family. 129 4.4: Wolfgang’s break with Salzburg patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Review: the Journal of Dramaturgy, Volume 23, Issue 1
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas LMDA Review Other Publications Summer 2013 Review: The ourJ nal of Dramaturgy, volume 23, issue 1 Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell Vicki Stroich Martine Kei Greene-Rodgers Curtis Russell Will Daddario See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/lmdareview Recommended Citation Cheek-O'Donnell, Sydney; Stroich, Vicki; Greene-Rodgers, Martine Kei; Russell, Curtis; Daddario, Will; Hollingshaus, Wade; and Becker, Becky, "Review: The ourJ nal of Dramaturgy, volume 23, issue 1" (2013). LMDA Review. 46. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/lmdareview/46 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Other Publications at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in LMDA Review by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell, Vicki Stroich, Martine Kei Greene-Rodgers, Curtis Russell, Will Daddario, Wade Hollingshaus, and Becky Becker This book is available at Sound Ideas: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/lmdareview/46 The Journal of Dramaturgy Published by Literary Managers and Review Dramaturgs of the Americas ISSN 2157-1007 Volume 23, Issue 1 Summer 2013 TRAVELOGUE 3 “Dramaturgy and Risk in Pakistan” by Vicki Stroich BOOK REVIEW PHOTO: 7 The Process of Dramaturgy by Scott R. Irelan, Anne Fletcher, and Julie Felise Dubiner CHRISTOPHER MORRIS Reviewed by Martine Kei Green-Rogers and Curtis Russell PEER-REVIEWED CONTENT 10 “Emancipating Dramaturgy: From Pedagogy to Psychagogy” by Will Daddario and Wade Hollingshaus 20 “Directing Like a Dramaturg: The Art of Being a Whale” by Becky Becker PHOTO: JOHN W.
    [Show full text]