Download the Scanned

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download the Scanned THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 53, NOVEMBER DECEMBER, 1968 BEUSITE, A NEW MINERAL FROM ARGENTINA, AND THE GRAFTONITE-BEUSITE SERIES1 C. S. Hunr.nur, JR., exo L. F. AnrsrenerN, Departmentof Geolo gi c al Sci en c e s, H araar d, U nh ersity, Combrid ge, M ass achu s etts 0 2 1 3 I ABSTRACT Beusite, (Mn, Fe, Ca, Mg)3(POa),is the manganeseanalogue of graftonite and with it forms a continuous series. The new mineral was found in granite pegmatites in three localities in San Luis Province, Argentina: Los Aleros, Amanda and San Salvador. The mineral from Los Aleros has the following properties: It occurs in rough prismatic crystals up to 30 cm long, interlaminated with lithiophilite. Beusite is monoclinic, 2f m; space grotpP21/c,a:8.78,b:11.52andc:6.15 A,B:99"25',aibic:0.7621i1:0.5338;volume 613.7 N; Z:4. Strongest lines in X-ray powder photographarein A:3.50 (100), 2.863 (100), 2. 708 (60), 3. 13 (40), r.e24(40), 3.0 1 (3s), 2.Se (30), 2.4o2 (30). The new mineral is optically biaxial, positive,a:l702, p:1.703, t:1.722,2V:25", r)z strong, X:b ZAc:37o. The color is reddish-brown,cleavage: {010} good, {100} fair. The hardness is 5; density 3.702 (meas), 3.715 (calc). A wet chemical analysis recalculated to 100 percent is: CaO, 4 78; MgO, 2.64; FeO, 14.62; MnO, 36.56: PzOs, 41.40. DTA shows one endothermic peak at 960'C resulting from fusion. Optical properties, specific gravity and analyses by X-ray fluorescence and atomic absorption show beusite from San Salvador and Amanda to be similar to that from Los Aleros. The difierencesin the properties that result from changesin FeO:MnO ratio are offset by MgO and CaO making a chemical analysis necessary to distinguish between graftonite and beusite. The interlaminated lithiophilite is interpreted as exsolved from a high temperature disordered phase A wet chemical analysis of this mineral from Los Aleros recalculated to 100 percent is: LLO, 9.58; NarO, 0.03; FeO, 13.04; MnO, 23.02; Mgp,6.45; PzOr, 47.88. Optical properties of triphylite-lithiophilite from five localities and of graftonite from Ranquel and Cacique Canchuleta, all from San Luis, are presented. Beusite is named in honor of Professor Alexey Beus, formerly Professor of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Moscow Polytechnical Institute. fnrnooucrroN During a field study of granite pegmatites in Argentina (1964 and 1965) specimensof what appeared to be graftonite triphylite inter- growths were collectedfrom four localitiesin the Province of San Luis (Fig. 1). The most remarkablespecimens, because of sizeand freshness, came from the small pegmatitelocally known as Los Aleros.The others camefrom the mines: San Salvador,Amanda, and CaciqueCanchuleta. An additional specimenshowing a similar intergrowth from the Ranquel mine in the sameprovince was given to us by Dr. Maria A. R. Benyacar. The physical propertiesand X-ray powder photographsof the "graf- l Mineralogical Contribution No. 457, Harvard University 1799 1800 C. S. HURLBUT, JR. AND L F. ARISTARAIN qEUSlf E_:O LOS ALERoS @AMANoA @sAN srLvADoR qn4rIeNrrE: El RANOUEL c cANcHULEI^ (r) 6 o o ) )i"""-;-:'i"'1Y"t-!o) SanLuis = .!". c) i l5o.*{ (I) I a , Concaran t9, S r,an.'sco dA lo ,C) tQ) (u q Frc. 1.Beusite and graftonite localities, San Luis, Argentina. tonite" pointed to the presenceof this mineral in all specimens.Ilowever, chemical analyses of the graftonite-like mineral from the first three aforementionedlocalities showed MnO to be in excessof FeO rather than the reversewhich is characteristicof graftonite. This indicated the necessitl, of discriminating between graftonite and the manganese analogue. A review of the literature shows uncertainty regarding the names applied to the minerals whose general formula can be expressedas (Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg)3(POr)r. De Tesris(1933) describedas mangualdite a mineral whose chemical anall'sis ,vieldeda formula close to 2MnO' CaO'PzOi, but whose ph-vsicalproperties were somewhat different from those of graftonite. Mason (1941) mentions the "graftonite- mangualdite group" (p. 119) thus suggestinga seriesexisted between the two minerals.Ilowever, in an addendum to the samepaper (p. 175) he found by X-ra.v examination of t1'pe material that mangualditeis a member of the apatite group. In 1950 Beus determined the weight percentagesof oxides in a graftonite-likemineral as: FeO, 16.95:MnO, 30.77;CaO, 0.54; XIgO, 9.50. The principal lines in a X-ray powder photograph of this mineral check with those of graftonite, but the physical properties are incom- plete. Beus stressedthe high content of MgO by naming the mineral magniophilite, although his was the first analysis of a graftonite-like mineral in which MnO was greater than FeO. Brooks and Shipwav (1960) also presenteda chemicalanall''sis (p. 522) of a "member of the graftonite isomorphottsseries" in which MnO exceedsFeO. Sincethe mineral of Brooks and Shipwal-(Australia) and the minerals BL.USITT. 1801 from Los Aleros, San Salvador and Amanda (Argentina) are ver,vlow in MgO (1.2 to 2.56 wt. /o) the name magniophilite is inapplicableto them. Recent chemical analysessuggest (see Fig. 5) that a complete solid solution exists, as in many other phosphates,between iron and manganesebut only partial solid solution with regard to magnesium and calcium. To avoid further confusionin the nomenclature,we pro- pose the name beusite for those members of the seriesin which the weight percent of MnO is greater than FeO. Beusiter (pronouncedbay' oosite)is named in honor of Alexey Beus, the first to report a mineral in the graftonite seriesin which Mn ex- ceeded Fe. Dr. Beus, formerly Professor of Mineralogy and Geo- chemistry, Moscow Polytechnical Institute, is at present a Technical Adviser to the United Nations Secretariat. GBor,ocrcer SBrrnqc The beusiteand graftonite localitiesin San Luis Province,Argentina are located on the easternslope of the Sierrade San Luis. Thesemoun- tains, part of the SierrasPampeanas, begin at the city of San Luis and extend to the Sierra de los Comechingones,approximately 150 kilo- meters to the northeast. They are fault-block mountains with sharp escarpmentsto the northwest but tilted toward the southeastand rise abovesea level to an elevationof 2000meters, or 1500meters above the surroundingplains. The basementcomplex of the Sierrade San Luis is formed essentially of schists,gneisses, and quartzites,that have been intruded by granite with the formation of migmatites. The metamorphic rocks strike N-S with, in general,an easterly dip ranging from 40o to 90o. Genetically associatedwith the granite are abundant pegmatites and aplites. The ageof the basementrocks is given as pre-Cambrian(GonzLlez Bonorino, 1950;Linares, 1959)but other authors considerit Lower to Middle (?) Paleozoic.(Pastore and Ruiz Huidobro, 1952; Pastore and Gonz6les, 1954).The erosionfollowing the uplift of the sierra during the Tertiary removed most of the pre-Tertiary and Tertiary sedimentary rocks Ieaving only minor patches of Permian rocks. Finally, rninor effusions of Tertiary andesiticrocks and Quarternary basalts complete the gen- eral geologicpicture of the sierra. For details of the geologyof the region one is referred to the papers by Pastore and Ruiz Huidobro (1952). Pastore and Gonz6lez(1954), Gonz|lez (1957) and Methol.2 I'fhe mineral and name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, IMA. 2 Methol, E. (1964) Descripci6n geol6gica de la Hoja 22 h, Santa Rosa, Provincia de San Luis, Argent Reprh Dir. Nac. Mineria. Unpublished. 1802 C. S. IIURLBUT, JR. AND L F. ARISTARAIN OccunnBNcB The pegmatites of the Sierra de San Luis are tabular or lenticular, concordant bodies, generally zoned and manl' contain lithium and beryllium minerals.(Angelelli and Rinaldi, 1963;Herrera, 1963).All of them at which beusiteor graftonite werefound have commercialamounts of spodumene,beryl or muscovite, a characteristicof two-thirds of the reported graftonite Iocalities. The obscureLos Aleros pegmatite located in the Departamento de Pringles, San Luis Province, is 800 meters to the west of the large pegmatiteand beryl mine known as SantaAna. This mine can be reached by following a secondaryroad 35 kilometersfrom La Toma toward Paso del Rey and from this point following the mine road for 8 kilometersto the north. The Los Aleros pegmatite is tabular with N.S. strike and 80" dip to the east conformingto the enclosingmica schist.At the southernend of a small prospectpit (14 m long, 1.5 m wide,5 m deep) rough prismatic crystalsof beusiteup to 30 centimetersin length were collected.Triplite and tourmaline were found in addition to qtartz, microcline,plagioclase and muscovite. In the northern part of the Sierra de San Luis, approximately 100 kilometers from Los Aleros in the Departamento Junin, there are two beryl mines known as Amanda and San Salvador. On the dumps at both of thesepeglnatites, specimens of beusite were collected.Amanda is approximately 36 kilometers northwest of Santa Rosa south of the road between this town and Balde de Escudero. San Salvador is ap- proximately 20 kilometers NNW of Santa Rosa, west of the road from Santa Rosa to Punta del Agua. A few kilometerssouth of Los Aleros and south of the Pasodel Rey- La Toma road are the pegmatitesof Ranquel and Cacique Canchuleta operating for ber,'-land muscovite. Graftonite was collectedfrom the dump at Cacique Canchuletabut that from Ranquel was given to us. AII the beusiteand graftonite from theseArgentine localitiesare fresh with the exception of graftonite from Cacique Canchuleta which has partially altered to heterosite.This changeis similar to the first sl2oe nf alterationreported by Stanek(1955). Pnvsrcar ANDOPTrcAr, PnopnnrrBs Beusite. Fresh beusite from Los Aleros is reddish-brown with the cleavages:{010} good and {100} fair. Its hardnessis 5 and specific gravity, measuredon the Berman Balance is 3.702+0.005.
Recommended publications
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • SUBJECT TNDEX, VOLUME 76, L99l
    American Mineralogist, Volume 76, pages2040-2055, l99I SUBJECT TNDEX, VOLUME 76, l99l AgrsBis.sSg,665 Amphibole, tremolitic (synthetic), Analysis, chemical (mineral), cozt. Agr.sBiz.sSira,665 l8l I clinopyroxene,756, 1061, 1141, AgeSbTezS+,665 Amphibolile,956, 1184 1306. 1328 AgroFeTezSr665 Anaglyphic filters, 557 clinozoisite,589, 1061 27A,1,309 Analcime, lE9 clintonite, 1061 AlzSiOs,677 Analcimechannel HrO, 189 columbite, 1261, 1897 AuPbzBiTezS* 1434 Analcime phenocryst,189 cordierite,942 Aug(Ag,Pb)As2Te3,1434 Analcime phonolite, 189 corrensite, 628 o-spodumene,42 Analysis,chemical (mineral) crocidolite, 1467 Actinolite. 1184 actinolite, ll84 cummingtonite, 956, 97| Actinolite and hornblende. akagan€ite,272 diopside, 904 coexisting, 11E4 alkali feldspar,218, 913 dissakisite-(Ce),1990 Actinolite and hornblende, allanite, 589 dolomite,713 exsolution between, 1184 amesite,647 edenite,Mn-rich, 1431 Activity model amphibole,548,755, 1002, 1305, elbaite, cuprian, 1479 staurolite,1910 l&6, t920 epidote, 528 AFM analcime,189 Fe-Ti oxide, 548 hematite, 1442 anandite.1583 fayalite, manganoan,288 Akagangite,2T2 andradite,1249 feldspar, 1646 Alaska anorthite(synthetic), 1110 fergusonite, 1261 dacite. 1662 anthophyllite, 942, 956 fluocerite. 1261 Alberta apatite,83,574,6E1, 1857, 1990 fumarole, 1552 analcime, 189 apatite,rare-earth bearing, 1165 garnet,138, 756, 956, 1061, analcime phonolite, 189 arsenopyrite,1964 1153,1431, 1950 blairmorite, 189 ashburtonite,1701 garnet, grossular-andradite,1319 sanidine, 189 augite,956 garnet, zone4 1781 trachyte, 189 barite, 1964 gedrite,942,956 Albite, 1328, 1646, L773 beusite,1985 gillulyite, 653 Albite, Ga analogue,92 biotite,138, 218, 548,574,713, glaucophane,971 Albite, Ga-bearing,92 956, rt74, l26t graftonite, 1985 Albite, Ge analogue,92 biotite, Ba-rich, 1683 grossular,1153 Albite, Ge-bearing,92 biotite.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Index
    Mineral Index Abhurite T.73, T.355 Anandite-Zlvl, T.116, T.455 Actinolite T.115, T.475 Anandite-20r T.116, T.45S Adamite T.73,T.405, T.60S Ancylite-(Ce) T.74,T.35S Adelite T.115, T.40S Andalusite (VoU, T.52,T.22S), T.27S, T.60S Aegirine T.73, T.30S Andesine (VoU, T.58, T.22S), T.41S Aenigmatite T.115, T.46S Andorite T.74, T.31S Aerugite (VoU, T.64, T.22S), T.34S Andradite T.74, T.36S Agrellite T.115, T.47S Andremeyerite T.116, T.41S Aikinite T.73,T.27S, T.60S Andrewsite T.116, T.465 Akatoreite T.73, T.54S, T.615 Angelellite T.74,T.59S Akermanite T.73, T.33S Ankerite T.74,T.305 Aktashite T.73, T.36S Annite T.146, T.44S Albite T.73,T.30S, T.60S Anorthite T.74,T.415 Aleksite T.73, T.35S Anorthoclase T.74,T.30S, T.60S Alforsite T.73, T.325 Anthoinite T.74, T.31S Allactite T.73, T.38S Anthophyllite T.74, T.47S, T.61S Allanite-(Ce) T.146, T.51S Antigorite T.74,T.375, 60S Allanite-(La) T.115, T.44S Antlerite T.74, T.32S, T.60S Allanite-(Y) T.146, T.51S Apatite T.75, T.32S, T.60S Alleghanyite T.73, T.36S Aphthitalite T.75,T.42S, T.60 Allophane T.115, T.59S Apuanite T.75,T.34S Alluaudite T.115, T.45S Archerite T.75,T.31S Almandine T.73, T.36S Arctite T.146, T.53S Alstonite T.73,T.315 Arcubisite T.75, T.31S Althausite T.73,T.40S Ardaite T.75,T.39S Alumino-barroisite T.166, T.57S Ardennite T.166, T.55S Alumino-ferra-hornblende T.166, T.57S Arfvedsonite T.146, T.55S, T.61S Alumino-katophorite T.166, T.57S Argentojarosite T.116, T.45S Alumino-magnesio-hornblende T.159,T.555 Argentotennantite T.75,T.47S Alumino-taramite T.166, T.57S Argyrodite (VoU,
    [Show full text]
  • Wyllieitej Na2fe~~1 [P04 ]31 a New Species by Paul B
    WyllieiteJ Na2Fe~~1 [P04 ]31 A New Species by Paul B. Moore, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 and Jun Ito Department of Geological Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 INTRODUCTION mention that optical studies indicated a 7(n:, triphylite the After two field and collecting excursions to 102 Black composition. We have good evidence that this phase was Hills pegmatites in the summers of 1971 and 1972, it be­ indeed the wyllieite. A 70% triphylite would have a ml'an he came clear that the Victory mine pegmatite was chemi­ index of refraction around 1.695, the value found hy Pe­ cally unique, so peculiar in fact that a major mineralogical cora and Fahey (1949) for their "triphylitc" fWIll the Vic­ m. investigation is now in progress. Not only is the pegmatite tory mine, the sample of which we found to hc in fact not ile of interest to the mineralogist for an unusual abundance triphylite but wyllieite. This index of refraction i~ practi­ >cr· ., of Na-rich primary phosphates rarely encountered else­ cally identical to our observations on wyllicite. Finally. where, but the textures of the cocrystallizing phases are we remark that our wyllieite specimcns show abundant in themselves a source of interest to petrologists as well. coarse quartz and perlhile as well as the pl;lgioda~e, ~ug­ Our account concerns a new species which evidently oc­ gesting that the mineral crystallized toward the end of thl! curred in considerable abundance during operation of the wall zone formation and during early core cot1\olidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List
    LIST L - MINERALS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Specific mineral Group name Specific mineral Group name acanthite sulfides asbolite oxides accessory minerals astrophyllite chain silicates actinolite clinoamphibole atacamite chlorides adamite arsenates augite clinopyroxene adularia alkali feldspar austinite arsenates aegirine clinopyroxene autunite phosphates aegirine-augite clinopyroxene awaruite alloys aenigmatite aenigmatite group axinite group sorosilicates aeschynite niobates azurite carbonates agate silica minerals babingtonite rhodonite group aikinite sulfides baddeleyite oxides akaganeite oxides barbosalite phosphates akermanite melilite group barite sulfates alabandite sulfides barium feldspar feldspar group alabaster barium silicates silicates albite plagioclase barylite sorosilicates alexandrite oxides bassanite sulfates allanite epidote group bastnaesite carbonates and fluorides alloclasite sulfides bavenite chain silicates allophane clay minerals bayerite oxides almandine garnet group beidellite clay minerals alpha quartz silica minerals beraunite phosphates alstonite carbonates berndtite sulfides altaite tellurides berryite sulfosalts alum sulfates berthierine serpentine group aluminum hydroxides oxides bertrandite sorosilicates aluminum oxides oxides beryl ring silicates alumohydrocalcite carbonates betafite niobates and tantalates alunite sulfates betekhtinite sulfides amazonite alkali feldspar beudantite arsenates and sulfates amber organic minerals bideauxite chlorides and fluorides amblygonite phosphates biotite mica group amethyst
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Gravity Index for Minerats
    A SPECIFICGRAVITY INDEX FOR MINERATS c. A. MURSKyI ern R. M. THOMPSON, Un'fuersityof Bri.ti,sh Col,umb,in,Voncouver, Canad,a This work was undertaken in order to provide a practical, and as far as possible,a complete list of specific gravities of minerals. An accurate speciflc cravity determination can usually be made quickly and this information when combined with other physical properties commonly leads to rapid mineral identification. Early complete but now outdated specific gravity lists are those of Miers given in his mineralogy textbook (1902),and Spencer(M,i,n. Mag.,2!, pp. 382-865,I}ZZ). A more recent list by Hurlbut (Dana's Manuatr of M,i,neral,ogy,LgE2) is incomplete and others are limited to rock forming minerals,Trdger (Tabel,l,enntr-optischen Best'i,mmungd,er geste,i,nsb.ildend,en M,ineral,e, 1952) and Morey (Encycto- ped,iaof Cherni,cal,Technol,ogy, Vol. 12, 19b4). In his mineral identification tables, smith (rd,entifi,cati,onand. qual,itatioe cherai,cal,anal,ys'i,s of mineral,s,second edition, New york, 19bB) groups minerals on the basis of specificgravity but in each of the twelve groups the minerals are listed in order of decreasinghardness. The present work should not be regarded as an index of all known minerals as the specificgravities of many minerals are unknown or known only approximately and are omitted from the current list. The list, in order of increasing specific gravity, includes all minerals without regard to other physical properties or to chemical composition. The designation I or II after the name indicates that the mineral falls in the classesof minerals describedin Dana Systemof M'ineralogyEdition 7, volume I (Native elements, sulphides, oxides, etc.) or II (Halides, carbonates, etc.) (L944 and 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Evolution
    American Mineralogist, Volume 93, pages 1693–1720, 2008 REVIEW PAPER Mineral evolution ROBERT M. HAZEN,1,* DOMINIC PAPINEAU,1 WOUTER BLEEKER,2 ROBERT T. DOWNS,3 JOHN M. FERRY,4 TIMOTHY J. MCCOY,5 DIMITRI A. SVERJENSKY,4 AND HEXIONG YANG3 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OE8, Canada 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A. 5Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The mineralogy of terrestrial planets evolves as a consequence of a range of physical, chemical, and biological processes. In pre-stellar molecular clouds, widely dispersed microscopic dust particles contain approximately a dozen refractory minerals that represent the starting point of planetary mineral evolution. Gravitational clumping into a protoplanetary disk, star formation, and the resultant heat- ing in the stellar nebula produce primary refractory constituents of chondritic meteorites, including chondrules and calcium-aluminum inclusions, with ~60 different mineral phases. Subsequent aque- ous and thermal alteration of chondrites, asteroidal accretion and differentiation, and the consequent formation of achondrites results in a mineralogical repertoire limited to ~250 different minerals found in unweathered meteorite samples. Following planetary accretion and differentiation, the initial mineral evolution of Earth’s crust depended on a sequence of geochemical and petrologic processes, including volcanism and degassing, fractional crystallization, crystal settling, assimilation reactions, regional and contact metamorphism, plate tectonics, and associated large-scale fluid-rock interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogical Magazine
    MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE VOLUME 43 NUMBER 331 SEPTEMBER 1980 Johnsomervilleite, a new transition-metal phosphate mineral from the Loch Quoich area, Scotland A. LIVINGSTONE Department of Geology, Royal Scottish Museum, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EHI IJF SUMMAR Y. Johnsomervilleite, NaIOCa6Mgls(Fe, Mnhs as a, member of the graftonite-beusite solid- (P04h6 has Z = 3, a 15.00 A, c 42.75 A and cell volume solution series whereas an electron probe analysis 8330 A3 and is a new rhombohedral species occurring in characterized the mineral as graftonite. (Three spot two metamorphic segregation pods in Moine gneiss of analyses on the same grain showed the following kyanite-sillimanite grade. Associated minerals are compositional range FeO 34.2-34.4, MnO 8.2-9.7, apatite, jahnsite, graftonite, mineral A, phosphosiderite, MgO 4.6-5.9, CaO 9.5-9.7, PzOs 42.2-44.6 wt %). rockbridgeite, mitridatite, and vivianite. It is dark brown, Within the graftonite are located numerous, brittle, and glassy, H = 41, D = 3.35 (calc. 3-41) with a perfect basal (?) cleavage. Eight electron probe analyses minute, colourless inclusions, mainly rod-like to are given and d spacings for 50 lines. The mineral, which irregularly shaped with the rods elongated on is a Mg-'Fe analogue of fillowite, is named after the late cleavage planes of a phase (mineral A) which is not Mr J. M. Somerville who presented a specimen of yet positively identified. Six individual inclusions garnet-quartz rock, which contained the new species, to were analysed, one analysis per inclusion, and the the Royal Scottish Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 6Th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM on GRANITIC PEGMATITES
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE 6th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GRANITIC PEGMATITES EDITORS WILLIAM B. SIMMONS KAREN L. WEBBER ALEXANDER U. FALSTER ENCARNACIÓN RODA-ROBLES SARAH L. HANSON MARÍA FLORENCIA MÁRQUEZ-ZAVALÍA MIGUEL ÁNGEL Galliski GUEST EDITORS ANDREW P. BOUDREAUX KIMBERLY T. CLARK MYLES M. FELCH KAREN L. MARCHAL LEAH R. GRASSI JON GUIDRY SUSANNA T. KREINIK C. MARK JOHNSON COVER DESIGN BY RAYMOND A. SPRAGUE PRINTED BY RUBELLITE PRESS, NEW ORLEANS, LA PEG 2013: The 6th International Symposium on Granitic Pegmatites PREFACE Phosphate Theme Session Dedicated to: François Fontan, André-Mathieu Fransolet and Paul Keller, It is a pleasure for the organizing committee to phosphates during the evolution of the pegmatites introduce the special session on phosphates, as an and on their relationship to other mineral phases, important part of the program of the 6th such as silicates. These kinds of studies are getting International Symposium on Granitic Pegmatites. more and more abundant, with some interesting The complexity of phosphate associations, examples in this volume. commonly occurring as a mixture of several fine- We take this opportunity to honor François grained phases, make their study difficult. However Fontan, Paul Keller and André-Mathieu Fransolet. over the last decades, the number of publications on These three exceptional researchers have pegmatite phosphate minerals has increased contributed enormously to the advancement in the exponentially as a result of new techniques. The knowledge on phosphates during the last decades. early investigations focused on description, They worked individually and jointly, always in an composition and paragenesis. Now that most of the enthusiastic, effective and tireless way. They passed phases have been extensively described and their knowledge and interest in phosphates onto replacement sequences of secondary phosphates are many younger researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW ACQUISITIONS to the FERSMAN MINERALOGICAL MUSEUM RAS: the REVIEW for 2009–2010 Dmitriy I
    New Data on Minerals. 2011. Vol. 46 139 NEW ACQUISITIONS TO THE FERSMAN MINERALOGICAL MUSEUM RAS: THE REVIEW FOR 2009–2010 Dmitriy I. Belakovskiy Fersman Mineralogical Museum, RAS, Moscow, [email protected] In 2009–2010 to the main collection of the Fersman Mineralogical museum RAS were acquired 840 specimens of minerals, meteorites, tectites, stone artpieces etc. The systematic collection was replenished with 339 mineral species including 90 new mineral species for the Museum, 42 of which are represented by the type specimens (holotypes, co-types and their fragments). 5 of them were discovered with help of the Museum researchers. Two species were discovered in the specimens from the Museum collection. Geography of acquisitions includes 62 countries and also extraterrestrial objects. More than 77% of all the acquisitions were donated by 105 private per- sons and 2 organizations. Museum collecting resulted in slightly over 12% of acquisitions; 6,5% arrived from an exchange and 3% was purchased. Less than 2% is represented by another types of acquisitions. In this paper, the new acquisitions are described by mineral species, geography, acquisition type and donors. The list of the new acquisitions is given. 2 tables, 19 photographs, 6 references. Keywords: new arrivals, Mineralogical museum, collection, minerals, meteorites, donors. In 2009–2010 period 840 items were acquired from the authors of description. Five added to the main collections of the Fersman of these mineral species were discovered in Mineralogical museum RAS. The majority of collaboration with the Museum staff. Two them (480 items) was cataloged to the system- new mineral species, pertsevite-OH and atic collection, 156 specimens – to the cбmaraite, were discovered on the specimens deposits collection, 108 – to the collection of from the Museum collection.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA–CNMNC Approved Mineral Symbols
    Mineralogical Magazine (2021), 85, 291–320 doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43 Article IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols Laurence N. Warr* Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Abstract Several text symbol lists for common rock-forming minerals have been published over the last 40 years, but no internationally agreed standard has yet been established. This contribution presents the first International Mineralogical Association (IMA) Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) approved collection of 5744 mineral name abbreviations by combining four methods of nomenclature based on the Kretz symbol approach. The collection incorporates 991 previously defined abbreviations for mineral groups and species and presents a further 4753 new symbols that cover all currently listed IMA minerals. Adopting IMA– CNMNC approved symbols is considered a necessary step in standardising abbreviations by employing a system compatible with that used for symbolising the chemical elements. Keywords: nomenclature, mineral names, symbols, abbreviations, groups, species, elements, IMA, CNMNC (Received 28 November 2020; accepted 14 May 2021; Accepted Manuscript published online: 18 May 2021; Associate Editor: Anthony R Kampf) Introduction used collection proposed by Whitney and Evans (2010). Despite the availability of recommended abbreviations for the commonly Using text symbols for abbreviating the scientific names of the studied mineral species, to date < 18% of mineral names recog- chemical elements
    [Show full text]
  • The Microscopic Determination of the Nonopaque Minerals
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ALBERT B. FALL, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 679 THE MICROSCOPIC DETERMINATION OF THE NONOPAQUE MINERALS BY ESPER S. LARSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1921 CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Introduction.................................................. 5 The immersion method of identifying minerals........................... 5 New data............................................................. 5 Need of further data.................................................... 6 Advantages of the immersion method.................................... 6 Other suggested uses for the method.................................... 7 Work and acknowledgments............................................. 7 CHAPTER II. Methods of determining the optical constants of minerals ....... 9 The chief optical constants and their interrelations....................... 9 Measurement of indices of refraction.................................... 12 The embedding method............................................ 12 The method of oblique illumination............................. 13 The method of central illumination.............................. 14 Immersion media.................................................. 14 General features............................................... 14 Piperine and iodides............................................ 16 Sulphur-selenium melts....................................... 38 Selenium and arsenic selenide melts........................... 20 Methods of standardizing
    [Show full text]