Environmental Performance Reviews Croatia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Performance Reviews Croatia ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS CROATIA UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1999 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 7 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 99.II.E.37 ISBN 92-1-116736-1 ISSN 1020-4563 1 Preface The Environmental Performance Review of Croatia began with the preparatory mission in June 1998. The agreement on the structure of the report was followed by the constitution of the review team, in which national experts from Armenia, Israel, Italy, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom participated together with the ECE secretariat, experts from UNEP and from the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. The costs of the participation of experts from countries in transition, as well as the travel expenses of the ECE secretariat, were covered by extrabudgetary funds from Austria, Italy and the Netherlands. All contributions were essential for the conclusion of the project. This report was prepared on the basis of the team’s review mission to Croatia in March 1999. Its draft was submitted to the ECE Committee on Environmental Policy at its annual session in Geneva on 22 September 1999. A high-level delegation from Croatia attended this evaluation, which was prepared in-depth by two reviewing countries, the Netherlands and Slovakia. At the end of its evaluation, the Committee approved the recommendations as set out in this report. The review of Croatia’s environmental performance identified a number of strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of environmental policy and management. The systematic and professional preparation of environmental management measures in the State Directorate for the Protection of Nature and the Environment is often impressive. However, their implementation and enforcement suffer from a lack of institutional weight and cooperation throughout State institutions. Therefore, improving the cooperation with all key partners is an important task. Furthermore, greater involvement of the general public in environmental management might help to strengthen the overall recognition and results of environmental management. Finally, the review also found impediments to better performance with regard to remediation of the environmental consequences of the war – a problem that can be successfully dealt with only if sufficient funds are allocated for that work. The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy and the ECE review team wish the Croatian Government success in their tasks, including the implementation of the recommendations contained in the present report. iv LIST OF TEAM MEMBERS Mr. Andreas KAHNERT (ECE secretariat) Team Leader Ms. Martina PALM (UNEP) Chapter 1 and Project Coordinator Ms. Cvetka KRAJIC-TOMIN (SLOVENIA) Chapter 2 Mr. Mervyn RICHARDSON (United Kingdom) Chapter 3 Ms. Sabine HOEFNAGEL (UNEP) Chapter 4 Ms. Katarina MAGULOVA (SLOVAKIA) Chapter 5 Ms. Catherine MASSON (ECE secretariat) Chapter 6 and Project Coordinator Mr. Branko BOSNJAKOVIC (ECE secretariat) Chapter 7 Mr. Eliezer FRANKENBERG (ISRAEL) Chapter 8 Ms. Zerrin LEBLEBICI (TURKEY) Chapter 9 Mr. Ivan NARKEVITCH (ECE secretariat) Chapter 10 Ms. Nune DARBINYAN (ARMENIA) Chapter 11 Mr. Christophe CLIVAZ (SWITZERLAND) Chapter 12 Mr. Michal KRZYZANOWSKI (WHO/ECEH) Chapter 13 Ms. Marina PENNA (ITALY) Chapter 14 Mr. Lovorko BARBARIC (CROATIA) Technical Advisor The preparatory mission for the project took place from 10-14 June 1998. The review mission was organized from 9 to 19 March 1999. The Peer review was held on 22 September 1999 in Geneva. The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy adopted the recommendations set out in this publication. Information cut-off date: 23 September 1999 v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures........................................................................................................................................... viii List of tables............................................................................................................................................. ix List of boxes............................................................................................................................................. xi Abbreviations........................................................................................................................................... xii Signs and measures .................................................................................................................................. xiii Currency................................................................................................................................................... xiv PART I: THE FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Chapter 1 Legal instruments and institutional arrangements for environmental protection ............................................................................................ 3 - 18 1.1 The legal framework ......................................................................................... 3 1.2 The policy framework....................................................................................... 6 1.3 Basic structure of environmental management................................................. 7 1.4 Environmental impact assessment .................................................................... 10 1.5 Enforcement...................................................................................................... 11 1.6 Environmental information and monitoring...................................................... 13 1.7 NGOs, public awareness and participation, environmental education.............. 14 1.8 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 16 Chapter 2 Economic and regulatory instruments....................................................................... 19 - 26 2.1 Economic instruments for environmental protection........................................ 19 2.2 Regulatory instruments ..................................................................................... 21 2.3 Financing of environmental expenditures......................................................... 22 2.4 Main policy objectives and institutional responsibilities.................................. 23 2.5 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 24 Chapter 3 Environmental consequences of armed conflict........................................................ 27 - 36 3.1 Early effects on environmental media and their evolution over time ............... 27 3.2 Effects on environmental protection facilities and industrial safety................. 30 3.3 Possible remediation requirements and strategies............................................. 30 3.4 Relevant management issues for remediation................................................... 34 3.5 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 34 Chapter 4 International cooperation............................................................................................ 37 - 48 4.1 General objectives for international cooperation .............................................. 37 4.2 Regional cooperation in the framework of UN/ECE ........................................ 38 4.3 Other regional cooperation................................................................................ 40 4.4 Bilateral cooperation......................................................................................... 42 4.5 Global cooperation............................................................................................ 42 4.6 International funding......................................................................................... 46 4.7 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 47 PART II: MANAGEMENT OF POLLUTION AND OF NATURAL RESOURCES Chapter 5 Air management........................................................................................................... 51 - 68 5.1 State and determinants of air pollution ............................................................. 51 5.2 Policy objectives and management practices.................................................... 58 5.3 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 64 vi Chapter 6 Management of freshwater resources and quality.................................................... 69 - 88 6.1 Quantity and quality of freshwater resources.................................................... 69 6.2 Water protection and use................................................................................... 73 6.3 Water policy objectives and management practices ......................................... 78 6.4 Conclusions and recommendations................................................................... 84 Chapter 7 Waste
Recommended publications
  • Vegetation FORESTS
    CROATIA Climate and vegetation Geographic position of Croatia- Central European-mediterranean country Basic information about Croatia The land area 56594 km2 The teriritorial waters 31.067 km2 Lenght of coast 1777 km Number of islands, islets and reefs 1185 The highest point above the sea level 1831 m Number of countys 21 Number of cities and municiplalities 127 - 429 Population 4.290.612 Population on km2 78,1 Number of inhabited islands 48 Language Croatian Script Latin Political system Parliamentary democracy GDP per capita in 2012 10203 Breaking up Croatia into Counties Natural-geographic areas of Croatia Panonian-peripanonian region(includes 55% of the territory and 66% of the population) Mediterranean or Croatian coastal region(includes 31% of the territory and 31% of the population) Mountainous or Dinaric region (includes 14% of the territory and 3% of the population) Climate Climactic characteristics of Croatia are a result of its location in the mid-latitude, the influence of the Mediterranean and Atlantic seas as well as the shape and relief (mountains along the coast and Panonian plain). - moderate continental climate - Mediterranean climate - mountainous climate Vegetation FORESTS (climazonal vegetation) Mediterannean region covers approximately 40% of Croatia’s surface, here we find 17 forest communities; Eurosiberian-North American region covers about 60% of Croatia’s surface, where there are 45 forest communities. NON-FOREST VEGETATION Created by human activity – lawns, meadows, pastures, underbrush Spatial distribution
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 –
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia Document reference FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date of approval: 02 July 2020 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2020 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non-government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 2 of 186 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Croatia .............................................. 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Croatia ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Godišnji Financijski Izvještaji Hrvatskih Voda Za 2020. Godinu
    HRVATSKE VODE Godišnji financijski izvještaji za 2020. godinu UVODNE NAPOMENE Hrvatske vode su pravna osoba za upravljanje vodama koja je počela djelovati 1. srpnja 1996. godine kao pravni slijednik Javnog vodoprivrednog poduzeća Hrvatska vodoprivreda sukladno članku 200. stavka I.Zakona o vodama (N.N. 107/95.) Hrvatske vode su sukladno Zakonu o vodama ustrojene i registrirane kod Trgovačkog suda u Zagrebu kao ustanova čiji je osnivač Republika Hrvatska. Sukladno zakonski determiniranom pravnom statusu Hrvatske vode posluju kao neprofitna organizacija. Člankom 186. Zakona o vodama (N.N. 153/09, 63/11, 130/11, 56/13, 14/14, 46/18) regulirana je djelatnost Hrvatskih voda te su određeni poslovi Hrvatskih voda od kojih su najvažniji: - izrada planskih dokumenata za upravljanje vodama, - izrada projektnih zadataka, koncepcijskih rješenja, studija i investicijskih programa, - uređenje voda i zaštita od štetnog djelovanja voda, - investitorski poslovi u gradnji i održavanju građevina za osnovnu melioracijsku odvodnju; nadzor nad građenjem i održavanjem građevina; - upravljanje kakvoćom voda, provedba monitoringa površinskih, uključivo i priobalnih voda i podzemnih voda, - upravljanje projektima gradnje građevina za navodnjavanje u vlasništvu jedinica područne (regionalne) samouprave sukladno nacionalnim programima i projektima; sufinanciranje gradnje, - upravljanje javnim vodnim dobrom, - vođenje vodne dokumentacije i jedinstvenoga informacijskog sustava voda te izdavanje vodopravnih akata, - stručni poslovi u vezi s davanjem koncesija, - stručni nadzor nad provođenjem uvjeta iz vodopravnih akata i koncesijskih uvjeta, - obračun i naplata naknada za koncesije za gospodarsko korištenje voda, - obračun i naplata vodnih naknada, - upravljanje posebnim projektima. Zakonski okvir za izradu temeljnih financijskih izvještaja Zaključno sa 31.12. 2015. Hrvatske vode su svoje poslovanje vodile sukladno Uredbi o računovodstvu neprofitnih organizacija (Nar.nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Land Use Analyses
    The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd countries project Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains Wageningen International December 2009 WageningenInternational The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd Countries Program Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplain (LIFE06 TCY INT 246 ) The following report is based on the reports of the Land Use Working Group The editors of the three country reports are: Croatia- Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Andreja Ribaric State Institute for Nature Protection of Croatia Serbia- Alen Kis, Laslo Galambos, Dejan Bakovic, Klara Szabados and Milos Vukelic; Institute for Nature Conservation Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovia- Tihomir Predic- Agricultural Institute Banja Luka ABSTRACT Author(s) Zingstra, Henk ( final edit), Alen Kis, Andreja Ribaric, Dejan Bakovic, Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Laslo Galambos, Klara Szabados, Milos Vukelic, Tihomir Predic ; The relevance of farmland and farming for the protection of the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava Floodplains, Final Report of Task C of the EU-LIFE06 TCY INT 246 Project. Photos: Institute for Nature Conservation of Croatia, Agricultural Institute Banja Luka. Keywords: Land use, agriculture, agri environment, flood protection, nature conservation. © 2009 Wageningen International P.O. Box 88; 6700 AB Wageningen; The Netherlands No part of this publication may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system without the written permission of Wageningen International.
    [Show full text]
  • Opmaak Both/Definitief 02-08-2000 15:13 Pagina 1
    * From Indifference to 19-12-2003 17:26 Pagina 1 NORBERT BOTH NORBERT NORBERT BOTH Fr om Indifference to Entrapment to om Indifference The Yugoslav crisis represents a formidable foreign policy challenge to many Western and Islamic government bureaucracies. From Indifference to Entrapment deals with the question of how the Netherlands faced up to this challenge during the years 1990-1995. It was during this period that the crisis erupted into armed conflict and the single worst war crime in Europe since the end of World War II took place in the ‘safe area’ of Srebrenica. The role of the Netherlands is particularly interesting, as the country held the EC/EU Presidency during the recognition debate in 1991 and supplied the peacekeeping presence in Srebrenica. The questions addressed in this book include: Did early warning work? What role did the Dutch Presidency (July-December 1991) play in the recognition debate? What motiv- ated the Dutch opposition to the Vance-Owen Peace Plan? Why did the Netherlands become From Indifference entrapped, as symbolised through its isolated peacekeeping commitment to Srebrenica? Finally, what can this story tell us about the ability of small and medium powers to in- fluence international affairs? This study is based on interviews with key players, including former Cabinet Minis- ters, and on documents from the Netherlands Ministry to Entrapment of Foreign Affairs, made available under the Dutch ‘freedom of information act’. ISBN 90-5356-453-5 Dr. Norbert Both, formerly a research assistant The Netherlands for David Owen, now works at the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • External Experts' Reports
    EXTERNAL EXPERTS’ REPORTS ZAGREB, 2012 CONTENT 1. Report on preparation climate data 3 2. Report on preparation climate maps 29 3. Report on standard precipitation index (SPI) and Palmer’s drought severity index (PDSI) 37 4. Report on standard precipitation index and Irrigation 44 5. Report on historical overview of drought impact records 71 6. Report on drought vulnerability estimates based on climatological and geomorfological data 87 7. Report on drought vulnerability maps 102 - 2 - 1. Report on preparation climate data - 3 - PROJECT INFORMATION Project acronym: DMCSEE Project title: Drought Management Centre for South East Europe Contract number: 2008-0017-201002 Starting date: 17. 05. 2010 Ending date: 17. 05. 2012 Project WEB site address: http://meteo.hr/DMCSEE/ Partner organisation: Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia Name of representative: M. Sc. Ivan Čačić, director Project manager: dr. Krešo Pandži ć E-mail: [email protected] Telephone number: +386 (0)1 45 65 684 DELIVERABLE INFORMATION Title of the deliverable: Report on preparation of climate data WP/activity related to the Act. 3.1 Preparation of climate data and maps deliverable: Type (internal or restricted or Public public): Location (if relevant): Zagreb, Croatia Author: Mrs Marina Mileta, external expert Deadline 17.04.2012. Draft report - 4 - Description of available meteorological (including climatological) data 1.1.1 Description of measurement network operated by DHMZ Density of the network:: DHMZ is operating 41 main (M), 117 climatological (C), 336 precipitation (P) and 23 rain storage stations. Automated weather stations (AMS) are co-located at 32 main meteorological station sites, and 26 AMS are installed at other locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Primjena Indeksa Kvalitete Vode U Ocjeni Kakvoće Vode Krških Jezera
    D. tomas et al. PrimjenA inDeksa kvAlitete voDe u ocjeni kAkvoće voDe kRških Jezera Stručni članak Professional paper UDk 556.55:556.114/.115>(497.5 Cres) primljeno (Received): 10. 7. 2013.; prihvaćeno (Accepted): 27. 11. 2013. primjena inDeKsa Kvalitete voDe u oCjeni KaKvoće voDe KršKih jezera U radu je prikazana kakvoća vode jezera primjenom indeksa Damir tomas, dipl. ing. kvalitete vode (eng. Water Quality Index, WQI) i njihov kemijski Hrvatske vode, Glavni vodnogospodarski laboratorij sastav Piperovim dijagramom. Ispitivana su jezera: Vrana na otoku Ulica Grada Vukovara 220, 10000 Zagreb Cresu, Vransko jezero kod Biograda na Moru, Baćinsko jezero [email protected] Crniševo i akumulacija Butoniga u razdoblju 2010.-2012. godine. Krešimir maldini, dipl. ing. U izračunu WQI korišteni su sljedeći pokazatelji: pH vrijednost, Hrvatske vode, Glavni vodnogospodarski laboratorij ukupna otopljena tvar (TDS), hidrogenkarbonati, ukupna tvrdoća, Ulica Grada Vukovara 220, 10000 Zagreb kloridi, sulfati, nitrati, fluoridi, kalcij, magnezij, željezo i mangan. Za izračun WQI korištene su preporuke vode za piće Svjetske natalija matić, dipl. ing. Hrvatske vode, EU jedinica zdravstvene organizacije (eng. World Health Organization, WHO) Ulica Grada Vukovara 220, 10000 Zagreb te dobiveni WQI predstavlja prikladnost voda za uporabu u vodoopskrbi. mr. sc. marija marijanović rajčić, dipl. ing. Istraživanjem je utvrđeno da je kakvoća vode na Vranskom jezeru Hrvatske vode, Glavni vodnogospodarski laboratorij kod Biograda n/m bila najlošije kvalitete u 2012. godini (WQI=870), Ulica Grada Vukovara 220, 10000 Zagreb dok je najbolja kakvoća vode zabilježena na jezeru Vrana na otoku Cresu u 2012. godini (WQI=31,2). Prema Piperovom dijagramu ispitivana jezera se po kemijskom sastavu razlikuju ovisno o hidrološkom dobu, dok je Vransko jezero na Cresu ujednačene kakvoće.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Guidance Document on Measures for Flood Protection
    Guidance d ocument on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering measures for flood protection Disclaimer This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication EU IPA 2010 TWINNING PROJECT are the sole responsibility of the implementing partners “Development of Flood Hazard Maps and Flood Risk Maps” and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Twinning No: HR/2010/IB/EN/01 European Union http://twinning.voda.hr guidance document on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering 2 measures for flood protection This document is also available in Croatian language March 2014 guidance document on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering 3 measures for flood protection Table of content Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2. A typology of measures....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Why do we need a typology?.............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Cascades of measures ......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Bodies at Risk
    Results of initial characterization of the groundwater bodies in Croatian karst Zeljka Brkic Croatian Geological Survey Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Zagreb, Croatia Contractor: Croatian Geological Survey, Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Team leader: dr Zeljka Brkic Co-authors: dr Ranko Biondic (Kupa river basin – karst area, Istria, Hrvatsko Primorje) dr Janislav Kapelj (Una river basin – karst area) dr Ante Pavicic (Lika region, northern and middle Dalmacija) dr Ivan Sliskovic (southern Dalmacija) Other associates: dr Sanja Kapelj dr Josip Terzic dr Tamara Markovic Andrej Stroj { On 23 October 2000, the "Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy" or, in short, the EU Water Framework Directive (or even shorter the WFD) was finally adopted. { The purpose of WFD is to establish a framework for the protection of inland surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater (protection of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, reduction in pollution groundwater, protection of territorial and marine waters, sustainable water use, …) { WFD is one of the main documents of the European water policy today, with the main objective of achieving “good status” for all waters within a 15-year period What is the groundwater body ? { “groundwater body” means a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or aquifers { Member States shall identify, within each river basin district: z all bodies of water used for the abstraction of water intended for human consumption providing more than 10 m3 per day as an average or serving more than 50 persons, and z those bodies of water intended for such future use.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities
    Workshop on Flood Risk Management measures & links to EU WFD November 11-12, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE IN CROATIA: regulatory framework, roles & responsibilities Zoran Đurokovi ć, M.Sc.C.E. Croatian Waters Main Flood Protection Centre Head of Main Centre ∗ Climate change has intensified in recent years worldwide, including Croatia ∗ Extremely dry and wet periods have been alternating frequently in the last approximately 15 years ∗ Damage from extreme hydrological events is increasing ∗ “Average” or “normal” years are becoming increasingly rarer ∗ The frequency of high water waves and extreme water levels including floods is increasing ∗ There are almost no longer any rules concerning the occurrence of high water waves ∗ Forecasting climate models indicate increasingly frequent extreme climate events, both globally and locally ∗ Only in the last 15 years or so, the major part of the Croatian territory has experienced frequent extreme hydrological events which caused droughts in the years 2000, 2003, 2011 and 2012, but also floods in the years 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 ∗ Heavy damage is recorded, primarily in agriculture, but settlements, infrastructure and industrial facilities are also at risk ∗ Still, unlike in many other countries, major fatalities and disastrous damage in the urban areas have been avoided in Croatia ∗ Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be completely prevented. However, flood risks can be reduced to an acceptable level through constant development of flood
    [Show full text]
  • DIKTAS Country Report
    Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Country Report (Regional Aspect) - Croatia http://diktas.iwlearn.org Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Contents HYDROGEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 1. Introduction 1.1. Project task and role of WG1 1.2. General on karst – term, distribution. Importance 1.3. Histrical review of karst researches 2. Physiography and climate 2.1. Geographic position and boundaries 2.2. Vegetation and land cover 2.3. Rainfall regime 2.4. Air temperature 2.5. Other climate elements 3. Hydrology 3.1. Hydrographic network 3.2. Stream-flow regime 3.3. Controlling streamflow – dams and reservoirs 4. Geological pattern 4.1. Paleogeography of Dinaric region 4.2. Dinaric Carbonate Platform (External Dinarides) - litostratigraphic units 4.3. Tectonic 5. Geomorphology and karstification 5.1. Karstification process 5.2. Karstic features 5.2.1. Surface karstic features 5.2.2. Potholes and caves 6. Aquifer systems 6.1. Aquifers classification and distribution 7. Groundwater basins 7.1. Regional groundwater direction 7.2. Grounwater bodies ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC OVERVIEW 1. Administrative boundaries 2. Population and demography 3. Tourism 4. Land use 5. Sources of income 6. Agriculture 7. Roads 8. Industries 9. Mining sites 10. Solid waste disposal 11. Wastewater treatment Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System 12. Dams and Hydropower Plants 13. Protected areas 14. Karstic caves 15. Groundwater dependent ecosystems 16. Water use 17. Surface water quality LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY 1. Introduction 2. Updated report on legal, institutional and policy framework in Croatia 3.
    [Show full text]