DOCSLIB.ORG

Lukhuni Hpp Cascade Project Stekeholder Engagement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lukhuni Hpp Cascade Project Stekeholder Engagement Photo by Giorgi Kekenadze LUKHUNI HPP CASCADE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT STEKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by SRF Gamma Tbilisi, 2012 TITLE PAGE Project Title: Lukhuni Hydropower Cascade Project Document Title: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ‐ Stakeholder Engagement Plan Prepared by: SRF Gamma Date Prepared: February, 2012 Project Manager: Vakhtang Gvakharia, President SRF GAMMA SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Contents Glossary 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 2 3 Stakeholder Engagement ‐ National and International Regulations and Requirements ................... 5 3.1. Stakeholder Engagement ‐ National Requirements for Public Participation ..................................... 6 3.2. Stakeholder Engagement ‐ EBRD Policy/IFC Performance Standard .................................................. 7 3.3. International Conventions for Public Participation ............................................................................. 7 4 Project Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................. 7 5 Consultation Activities .......................................................................................................................... 8 6 Disclosure of documentation ............................................................................................................... 9 7 Public notification ............................................................................................................................... 10 8 Resources and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................... 10 9 Grievance Mechanism ......................................................................................................................... 11 10 Monitoring and Reporting .................................................................................................................. 13 11 Contact Details for the Public .............................................................................................................. 13 ANNEX 1. LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ANNEX 2. PUBLIC GRIEVANCE LEAFLET SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Glossary EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan MoE Ministry of Environment Protection SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan NTS Non Technical Summary NGO Non‐governmental organization SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Page | 1 1 Introduction Rusmetali Ltd plans to construct a 30.3 MW cascade of small hydro power plant cascade (Lukhuni 1, Lukhuni 2 and Lukhuni 3) in the gorge of the Lukhuni River. Figure 1.1 Location of the project The project design of the cascade is developed by Stucky Caucasus Ltd. Construction and operation of the Lukhuni HPP cascade is in full compliance with EC European Energy Policy adopted in 2007 and the UN framework convention on Climate Change (enacted by Kyoto Protocol in 2005), which appeals to all states to concentrate efforts towards increasing of energy consumption efficiency through increased utilization of renewable energy sources and decrease of environmental degradation. Construction of the HPPs and provision of the grid with additional power will facilitate economic grow in the region. On construction and operation phases will be established number of work places favoring to employment of local population and improvement of their economic conditions. Execution of the project will help the region to preserve existed jobs and businesses (including service sphere), what on its side will promote improvement of life conditions of laborers. Besides, local budget will receive taxes paid for water use, as well as taxes paid by service provides delivering their services to the HPPs. On the broader scale, the HPP cascade will contribute to reduction of power import and increase power export to the neighboring countries. Under the Georgian legislation implementation of the project under consideration requires authorization from the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Georgia. The authorisation (impact permit) is issued based on consideration of the documents picturing expected impact on the biophysical and socio‐economical environment with indication of mitigation measures to reduce adverse effect and SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Page | 2 description of cumulative and residual impacts expected on construction and operation stages of the project. With consideration of potential involvement of International Financial Institutions in the project assessment of impact on natural and social environments has been carried out with consideration of the both – national and international requirements, such as those set in the EBRD’s environmental and social policy (ESP). With consideration of that documents developed during the ESIA process include Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and a Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP). This document presented the Stakeholder Engagement Plan for the Lukhuni HPP project and details Rusmetal’s consultation activities to date and its future plans for the Project disclosure and stakeholder consultation in respect of the new development. This SEP is designed to ensure that Rusmetal identifies all stakeholders with an interest in the Project, and can engage these stakeholders during the development and life of the Project. This SEP therefore outlines the company’s previous consultation activities and future plans to engage with stakeholders during pre‐construction, construction and operational phases of the Project. Stakeholder engagement includes: 1. The provision of relevant, timely and accessible information to stakeholders in a culturally appropriate and understandable format; and 2. Consultation with stakeholders on their opinions, concerns, preferences and perceived gains and risks with respect to the Project planning and implementation, including the design and proposed management and mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts and to enhance possible benefits. 3. A grievance mechanism to guide Rusmetal’s response and resolution process for stakeholder concerns or grievances. This SEP therefore describes the: • National and good international practice requirements for public consultation and disclosure that the Rusmetal will conform to; • Project stakeholders that have been identified; • Strategy, format and timetable for consultation and information disclosure; • Ruemetal’s resources and management structure for developing and implementing the SEP; • Grievance mechanism(s) for stakeholders, and: • Means of reporting on consultation and disclosure activities. 2 Project Description Rusmetal Ltd is developing Lukhuni HPP cascade consisting of three HPPs: Lukhuni 1 (10.8MW); Lukhuni 2 (12mW) and Lukhuni 3 (7.5MW). HPP1 – Two intakes will be built. One on the Lukhunistskali, another on the Lashaturi, both located at 1485 m above datum. Water from the Lashaturi intake will be delivered through tunnel to the main free flow tunnel. The tunnel from the Lukhunistskali headworks to the power penstock forebay will be 10.5 km long with diameter – 2.5‐3.0 m. Two penstocks (diameter 600mm, length 1.4km) will deliver water from the forebay to two Pelton turbines. The power station will be arranged within the above‐floodplain terrace at 1150 m above datum. Design water flow of the HPP is 4.01m3/sec, design head ‐ 335 m, installed capacity – 10.8 MW, average annual power generation – 66.07 mln kW. Along with the mentioned facilities 10/35kV substation and 16.8km long 35kV overhead transmission line connecting the HPP1 substation to the HPP2 transmission line will be built. HPP 2 ‐ Headworks will be located on the Lukhunistskali at 1150 m above datum. The scheme includes: diversion tunnel (length‐ 5.3 km, diameter – 3.0 m), penstock forebay, two penstocks (length 700m, SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Page | 3 diameter 600 mm) delivering water to two Pelton turbines and power station built within above‐ floodplain terrace (890 m above datum). Design water flow of the HPP is 7,0m3/sec, design head ‐ 286m, installed capacity – 12.0 MW, average annual power generation – 73.58 mln kW. Along with the mentioned facilities 10/35kV substation and 2291m long overhead transmission line connecting to the 35 kV substation of Uravi will be arranged. Figure 2.1. Location of the main components of the scheme HPP3 ‐ Headworks will be located on the Lukhunistskali at 885 m above datum and provide design flow to the free low derivation tunnel. Length of the circular section tunnel is 6.7 km, diameter – 3.0 m. The tunnel will connect to the penstock forebay. Two penstocks (length 830m, diameter 700m) will deliver water to two Pelton turbines. The power house will be built within the above‐floodplain terrace at 765 m above datum. Design water flow of the HPP is 9.6 m3/sec, design head ‐ 120 m, installed capacity ‐ 7,5 SCIENTIFIC‐ RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Page | 4 MW, average annual power generation – 46.03 mln kW. The scheme also comprises 10/35kV substation and 1.9 m long 35kV overhead transmission line connecting to 35 kV substation of Sori. All substations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 14 July 2015 Assessment of Wood and Agricultural Residue Biomass
    ASSESSMENT OF WOOD AND AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA Prepared for UNDP under Micro-Capital Grant Agreement for Non-Credit Related Activities of 26.06.14 WORLD EXPERIENCE FOR GEORGIA TBIILISI 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Assessment of Agricultural Residue Availability from Perennial Crops in Georgia ...................................... 13 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Methodology for Perennial Crops ............................................................................................................ 15 Vineyards’ Pruning Residue ...................................................................................................................... 17 Fruit orchards’ Pruning Residue................................................................................................................ 23 Apple, pear, peach ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives, Obstacles and the Ongoing Development of CMM/CBM in Georgia Frameworks for Cooperation COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE GIG Group and Its Subsidiaries
    Perspectives, Obstacles and the Ongoing Development of CMM/CBM in Georgia Frameworks for Cooperation COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE GIG Group and Its Subsidiaries With more than 4000 employed staff Georgian Industrial Group (GIG) is one of the largest industrial conglomerates in Georgia The business of GIG has been expanding quite steadily over the last years by means of acquisitions but also through organic growth e.g. by construction of new generation facilities such as power plants. “One Team - Multiple Energies” OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO Renewables Coal Mining Thermal Power Plants The company operates hydro power plants GIG owns and operates the only coal mine in The group owns and operates thermal power plants with with a total installed capacity of 50MW. GIG Georgia with the 331 Mt coal extraction a total installed capacity of 600 MW. A 300 MW coal fired furthermore has some 70 MW of hydro and license. Tkibuli Coal mine envisages rising power plant with modern combustion technology is wind energy facilities under planning and annual output up to 1 million tons by 2021. currently under development. development. Electricity Trading CNG Refueling, Natural Gas Trading GIG and it’s subsidiaries are the largest electricity Through its subsidiary NEOGAS, GIG owns and/or trader in Georgia handling export/import, transit and operates 20 CNG refueling stations across Georgia. swap transactions with all of its neighboring Besides, GIG is involved in regional gas trading as well as countries. wholesale trading in Georgia. FURTHER INFORMATION: WWW.GIG.GE http://www.gig.ge/index.php SAKNAKHSHIRI GIG TKIBULI-SHAORI COALFIELD Location, Ownership and Reserves Coal Reserves Ownership Exploration Defined by Total 50%License JORC Area Standards Saknakhshiri 331 Mt 500 Mt 5,479.9 ha GIG 0% Tkibuli 0% Location Tbilisi Tkibuli-Shaori Coalfield locates on the southern slope of the Great Caucasus in the Tkibuli and Ambrolauri Districts to the 200 km northeastward of the capital of Georgia Tbilisi.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.1～2.1.4 95/06/12
    Appendices Appendix-1 Member List of the Study Team (1) Field Survey 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Hideo EGUCHI Security Control Deputy Resident Representative, Planner United Kingdom Office (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 4. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Dr. Tomoyuki KURODA Health Sector Surveyor CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 6. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 7. Mr. Haruo ITO Equipment Planner / CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. Cost and Procurement Planner 8. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. (2) Explanation of Draft Report 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 4. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. A-1 Appendix-2 Study Schedule (1) Field Survey No. Date Movement Activities Accommodation 1 Apr. 5 (Sat) Narita→Frankfurt Frankfurt (A) (B) (D) (A) (C) (D) 2 Apr. 6 (Sun) Frankfurt→Baku Baku (A) (C) (D) (A) (C) (D) 3 Apr. 7 (Mon) Baku→A) (C) (D) Visit the Embassy of Japan in Baku Train (A) (C) (D) London→(B) (A) (C) (D) Flight (B) (F) (G) Narita→Vienna→ (F) (G) 4 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review
    UNECE Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review UNITED NATIONS ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS GEORGIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2016 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 43 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Georgia (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 30) in 2010. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.16.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117101-3 e-ISBN 978-92-1-057683-3 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword It is essential to monitor progress towards environmental sustainability and to evaluate how countries reconcile environmental and economic targets and meet their international environmental commitments. Through regular monitoring and evaluation, countries may more effectively stay ahead of emerging environmental issues, improve their environmental performance and be accountable to their citizens. The ECE Environmental Performance Review Programme provides valuable assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance so that they can take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 66462-GE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 25.8 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$40.00 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$30 MILLION TO GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SECOND SECONDARY AND LOCAL ROADS PROJECT (SLRP-II) FEBRUARY 21, 2012 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 1, 2012) Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) GEL 1.66 = US$ 1.00 US$1.551 = SDR 1.00 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation ADB Asian Development Bank MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources CPS Country Partnership Strategy MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development EA Environmental Assessment MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure EIB European Investment Bank NBG National Bank of Georgia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NCB National Competitive Bidding EMP Environmental Management Plan NPV Net Present Value ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework FA Financing Agreement PAD
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Development in Georgia
    Key facts and figures relating to housing and urban development in Georgia Nino Gventsadze Head of spatial planning department Ministry of regional development and infrastructure of Georgia Housing in Georgia Current conditions Housing in Georgia is characterized with long and deep systematic crisis which are caused by the following reasons: non- existent policy, non-sufficient legislative base and non-adequate institutional set-up. Georgian government still doesn’t have a well-defined, clear policy in the field of Housing, also not a single office directly governs and works on Housing issues neither on legislation or enforcement level. Estimated future plan in Housing • To define short, medium and long term priorities Short term priority – should focus on how to fix homelessness, clearly define the terminology, exact identification of beneficiary groups and setting criteria for people who will receive the support, launching an institution, drafting legislation etc. Medium and long term - should focus on large number of people who will be able to afford the Housing (affordable Housing), provide an adequate Housing, improve policy making in regard of construction and urban development, solving demographic issues in the country etc. Improvements In 2018, Government of Georgia has taken a duty in implementing a “Housing policy documentation and strategic plan”, for that reason in 2019, April a special committee was established who will define a strategic plan. So far consultations are taking place. It is planned to make an amendments in legislation (In Georgian legislation there is the only law, which is dedicated to housing and needs a great deal of revise and improvement) The Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories and Refugees of Georgia has realized several projects: • Ministry purchased 300 accommodations from the Chinese company “Hualing” • Throughout the country, ministry purchased several accommodations from developers, reconstructed, built new constructions etc.
    [Show full text]
  • How Preparedness Pays Off
    Community early warning systems: Howguiding preparedness principles pays off Evolution, costs, benefits and prospects of disaster risk management in Georgia www.ifrc.org Saving lives, changing minds. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is the world’s largest volunteer-based humanitarian network. Together with our 189 member National Red Cross and Red Crescent TheSocieties International worldwide, Federation we reach of 97 Red million Cross people and Red annually Crescent through Societies long- (IFRC)term services is the world’s and development largest volunteer-based programmes humanitarian as well as 85 millionnetwork. people Togetherthrough disasterwith our response 189 member and earlyNational recovery Red Cross programmes. and Red WeCrescent act before, Societiesduring and worldwide, after disasters we reach and 97 health million emergencies people annually to meet through the needs long- and termimprove services the lives and ofdevelopment vulnerable people.programmes We do as so well with as impartiality 85 million peopleas to throughnationality, disaster race, responsegender, religious and early beliefs, recovery class programmes. and political We opinions. act before, during and after disasters and health emergencies to meet the needs and Guided by Strategy 2020 – our collective plan of action to tackle the improve the lives of vulnerable people. We do so with impartiality as to major humanitarian and development challenges of this decade – we are nationality, race, gender, religious beliefs, class and political opinions. committed to ‘saving lives and changing minds’. Guided by Strategy 2020 – our collective plan of action to tackle the Our strength lies in our volunteer network, our community-based major humanitarian and development challenges of this decade – we are expertise and our independence and neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • European Researcher. 2010
    European Geographical Studies, 2020, 7(1) EUROPEAN Geographical Studies Has been issued since 2014. E-ISSN 2413-7197 2020. 7(1). Issued once a year EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Rybak Oleg – Scientific Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russian Federation (Editor-in-Chief) Dr. Elizbarashvili Elizbar – Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia (Deputy Editor-in- Chief) Dr. Abdrakhmatov Kanat – Institute of seismology NAS, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Dr. Barmin Aleksandr – Astrakhan State University, Astrakhan, Russian Federation Dr. Basilashvili Tsisana – Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia Dr. Chincharashvili Iza – Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University, Telavi, Georgia Dr. Deene Shivakumar – Central University of Karnataka, Karnataka, India Dr. Kalinichenko Valerii – Don State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russian Federation Dr. Rajović Goran – International Network Centre for Fundamental and Applied Research, Russian Federation Dr. Tikunov Vladimir – Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation Journal is indexed by: CiteFactor (USA), CrossRef (UK), EBSCOhost Electronic Journals Service (USA), Electronic scientific library (Russia), Open Academic Journals Index (USA), Sherpa Romeo (Spain), Universal Impact Factor (Australia). All manuscripts are peer reviewed by experts in the respective field. Authors of the manuscripts bear responsibility for their content, credibility and reliability. Editorial board doesn’t expect the manuscripts’ authors to always agree with its opinion. uropean Geographical Studies E Postal Address: 1367/4, Stara Vajnorska Release date 15.09.20. А str., Bratislava – Nove Mesto, Slovak Format 21 29,7/4. Republic, 831 04 2020 Headset Georgia. Website: http://ejournal9.com/en/index.html E-mail: [email protected] Founder and Editor: Academic Publishing Order № 117. Is. House Researcher s.r.o. 1 №201 0 © European Geographical Studies, 2020 1 1 European Geographical Studies, 2020, 7(1) C O N T E N T S Articles Global Warming Impact on Ecosystems N.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value Chain in Imereti and Racha Regions Fruit Processing
    Agricultural Value Chain in Imereti and Racha regions Fruit processing 1 Introduction The present research was carried out by the Association of Young Economists of Georgia in collaboration with Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences) and People in Need from July 2014 to May 2015. This study is a part of regional value chain analysis for the main products of agricultural sector in Imereti and Racha regions. The goal of this analysis is to provide background information and baseline data for subsequent implementation stages of the project Enhancing Small Farmers’ Cooperation and Productivity in Imereti Region financed in the framework of European Neighborhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development in Georgia (ENPARD Georgia) - Small Farmers Co-operation component. This research would not have been possible without funding from the ENPARD Georgia and Czech Development Agency project “Support for Cooperatives in Imereti, Georgia”. 2 Methodology The research team followed an approach that allowed handling several issues concurrently. Data collection was organized and methods selected in order to assess specific issues from different angles supported by a triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods. After the identification of local products with the highest development potential (based on local expert and government officials interviews), we carried out a more detailed survey thematically focused around each selected product. The survey revealed that fruit processing is very poorly represented in target regions. There are no any organized fruit farms that produce fruit and deliver for processing. In this terms only two directions are identified – sour plump souse producing and draying wild fruits collected in forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia
    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia 2007 - 2009 FOREWORD This National Report on the State of Environment 2007-2009 has been developed in accordance with the Article 14 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection and the Presidential Decree N 389 of 25 June 1999 on the Rules of Development of National Report on the State of Environment. According to the Georgian legislation, for the purpose of public information the National Report on the State of Environment shall be developed once every three years. 2007-2009 National Report was approved on 9 December 2011. National Report is a summarizing document of all existing information on the state of the environment of Georgia complexly analyzing the state of the environment of Georgia for 2007-2009. The document describes the main directions of environmental policy of the country, presents information on the qualita- tive state of the environment, also presents information on the outcomes of the environmental activities carried out within the frames of international relations, and gives the analysis of environmental impact of different economic sectors. National Report is comprised of 8 Parts and 21 chapters: • Qualitative state of environment (atmospheric air, water resources, land resources, natural disasters, biodiversity, wastes and chemicals, ionizing radiation), • Environmental impact of different economic sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, industry and en- ergy sector), • Environmental protection management (environmental policy and planning, environmental regula- tion and monitoring, environmental education and awareness raising). In the development of the present State of Environment (SOE) the Ministry of Environment Protection was assisted by the EU funded Project Support to the Improvement of the Environmental Governance in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Socio-Economic Implications of the Mining Sector
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE MINING SECTOR AND PROSPECTS OF RESPONSIBLE MINING IN GEORGIA The study was prepared within the framework of the project 'Promoting Environmental and Social Accountability in the Mining Sector in the Caucasus', which is being implemented with the financial support of the Bread for the World Protestant Development Service (BftW). The content of the publication is the responsibility of the implementing organisation alone. 2 CONTENT INTRODUCTION 5 1. Mineral reSourceS of GeorGia anD The hiSTory of Their MininG anD ProceSSing 7 1.1 Brief DeScriPTion of Mineral reSources 7 1.2 Brief hiSTory of MininG in GeorGia 7 1.3 DynaMicS of The DeveloPMenT of MininG inDuSTry in GeorGia 9 1.3.1 SoliD MineralS 9 1.3.2 oil anD Gas 10 2. GeorGian laWS anD inSTiTuTional SeT-uP relaTeD To MininG 13 2.1 naTional leGiSlaTion 13 2.1.1 conSTiTuTion of GeorGia 13 2.1.2 laW of GeorGia on enTrailS of The earTh 13 2.1.3 laW of GeorGia on licenceS anD PerMits 13 2.1.4 laW of GeorGia on environMenTal ProTecTion 14 2.1.5 laW of GeorGia on culTural heriTaGe 14 2.1.6 oTher reGulaTionS relaTeD To culTural heriTaGe 14 2.1.7 inTernaTional convenTionS relaTeD To culTural heriTaGe raTifieD By GeorGia 14 2.2 inSTiTuTional fraMeWork of The GeorGian MininG inDuSTry 15 2.2.1 STaTe inSTiTuTionS anD Their ManDaTes 15 2.2.2 inTeraGency cooPeraTion 17 3. inTernaTional DeveloPMenT orGanizaTionS acTive in GeorGia anD caTeGorieS of DeveloPMenT Projects 19 4. STa.TiSTicS of inveSTMenTS MaDe in The MininG SecTor of GeorGia (2009-2015) 23 4.1 aMounT of inveSTMents 23 4.2 inveSTMenT SourceS 24 5.
    [Show full text]