İSİM\� YAYINLARI Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Erdoğan Tokmakçıoğlu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

İSİM\� YAYINLARI Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Erdoğan Tokmakçıoğlu İSİM\� YAYINLARI Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Erdoğan Tokmakçıoğlu Yayın Yönetmeni: İsmail Samgam Yayın Editörü: Elif Çelik Sayfa Düzeni ve Kapak Tasarımı: İsim Yayınları © İsim Yayınları Tüm hakları saklıdır Ankara, Haziran 2011 İsim Yayın No: 23 Yayıncı sertifika No: 19154 ISBN: 978-605-5410-06-3 Baskı ve Cilt: BRC Matbaası, Ankara İsim Yayınları Yüksel Cad. 34/A Kızılay/ANKARA Tel: 0(312) 433 77 17 Faks: 0(312) 435 43 96 e-posta: [email protected] http://www.isimyayinlari.com Bu baskının bütün hakları Ezel Basım Yayın Dağıtım Ltd . Şti.'ne aittir. İsim Yayınları Ezel Basım Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.'nin markasıdır. İsim Yayınları'nın yazılı izni olmaksızın kitabın tümünün veya bir kısmının elektronik, mekanik ya da fotokopi yoluyla basımı, yayımı, çoğaltımı ve dağıtımı yapılamaz. Kütüphane Bilgi Kartı: Tokmakçoğlu, Erdoğan. Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor?, Ta­ rih/Araştırma-inceleme, Ankara, 2011, 210 s. 13.5x21, ISBN: 978-605- 5410-06-3 Kentlerimizin Adı Nereden Geliyor? Erdoğan Tokmakçıoğlu .....� iSiM YAYINLARI Erdoğan Tokmakçıoğlu, 1934'te Denizli Sarayköy' de doğdu. 1951'de İzmit Lisesi'ni bitirdi. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi ve DTCF Tiyatro Enstitüsü'nde öğrenim gördü (1951-1959). 1952'den bu ya­ na, Ankara ile İstanbul'da çeşitli gazete ve belli başlı ansiklopediler­ de çalıştı. Edebiyata şiirle başlayan Tokmakçıoğlu, ilk öyküsü Dol­ muş Türk Dili Dergisi Öykü Yarışması'nda derece alınca (1953) öy­ küye yöneldi. Çocuğun Biri adlı öyküsü Dünya Gazetesi Yarışması'n­ da birincilik kazandı (1954). 1951'de ilk baskısı yapılan Bütün Yönle­ riyle Nasreddin Hoca adlı yapıtı yurtiçinde ve dışında geniş yankı uyandırdı. Kültür ve Dışişleri bakanlıklarının seçkisiyle, yapıt Bulga­ ristan'da Gobrova-836. Uluslararası Biennali'nde Türkiye'yi temsil etti. Yazarın bazı eserleri: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda İsyanlar, Geçit Kitabevi, 2006 Osmanlı Kadın Alemleri, Geçit Kitabevi, 1991 Ünlü TürkHainleri, İsim Yayınları, 2011 Türk Basın Tarihi, İsim Yayınları, 2011 İçindekiler Önsöz .............................................................................................. 21 1. Abana ......................................................................................... 27 2 •. Acıpayam .................................................................................... 27 3. Adana ........................ ................................................................. 27 4. Adapazarı .................................................................................... 28 5. Adıyaman.................................................................................... 29 6. Adilcevaz ..................................................................................... 29 7. Afşin ............................................................................................ 29 8. Afyonkarahisar (Afyon) ............................................................... 30 9. Ağaçören ..................................................................................... 30 10. Ağrı ............................................ ............................................... 30 11. Ahlat ......................................................................................... 31 12. Ahmetli ..................................................................................... 31 14. Akçadağ .................................................................................... 31 15. Akçakale ................................................................................... 32 16. Akçakent ................................................................................... 32 17. Akçakoca ......... .......................................................................... 32 18. Akdağmadeni ............................................................................ 32 19. Akhisar...................................................................................... 32 20. Akkışla ...................................................................................... 33 21. Akköy ........................................................................................ 33 22. Akkuş ........................................................................................ 33 23. Aksaray ....................................................... .............................. 33 24. Aksaray (Semt) .......................................................................... 34 25. Akseki ....................................................................................... 34 26. Akşehir...................................................................................... 34 5 27. Alaca ......................................................................................... 35 28. Alaçam ................................................... �·························· .. •••·•• 35 29. Aladağ••••..••••••.•••••••••••••••..••••••.••••....••..•....••••••.••••••••••••••••..••••••.. 35 30. Alanya ....................................................................................... 35 31. Alaşehir ..................................................................................... 36 32. Altınözü ..... .......................................... ................................... 36 33. Altınyayla .................................................................................. 36 34. Altınyayla .................................................................................. 36 35. Amasra ...................................................................................... 36 36. Amasya ..................................................................................... 37 37. Anadolu .................................................................................... 37 35. Anamur..................................................................................... 38 39. Ankara ................................................... ................................... 38 40. Antakya ..................................................................................... 39 41. Antalya ...................... ............................................................. 39 42. Araklı ........................................................................................ 40 43. Ardahan .................................................................................... 40 44. Ardanuç .................................................................................... 40 45. Arnavutköy ................................................. .............................. 41 46. Arhavi ....................................................................................... 41 47. Artvin ....................................................................................... 41 48. Avanos ....................................................................... ............... 42 49. Avcılar ....................................................................................... 42 50. Ayancık ..................................................................................... 42 51. Ayaş .......................................................................................... 42 52. Aydın ........................................................................................ 42 53. Aydınlar .................................................................................... 43 54. Aydıntepe ................................................................................. 43 55. Ayrancı ...................................................................................... 43 56. Ayvacık •••••••••••••••..•••..••.•.•.•.•..•.•..•.••.•...••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••.••••• 43 57. Ayvalık ...................................................................................... 44 58. Ayvansaray ............................................................................... 44 59. Azapkapı ................................................................................... 44 60.· Babadağ .................................................................................... 45 61. Babaeski................ .................................................................... 45 62. Bafra ......................................................................................... 45 63. Bahçelievler .............................................................................. 46 64. Bahçesaray... ............................................................................. 46 65. Bakırköy .................................................................................... 46 6 66. Bala ................................................•....................•..................... 46 67. Balıkesir •..................•..........•.......•..•......•.•..........•...................... 47 68. Balışeyh •...................................................................•............... 47 69. Baltalimanı....•...............................................•..................•........ 47 70. Banaz .........•........................•.............................•....................... 48 71. Bandırma ............................•............................•....•................... 48 72. Bartın............•........................................................................... 48 73. Batman ..................................................................................... 49 74. Bayat..............•........••.........•.....•.......•.....•••..•.........................•... 49 75. Bayburt............................................•..•.........•..........•..••.•.........
Recommended publications
  • Ortaçağ Anadolu Ticaret Yolları Yrd. Doç. Dr.Adnan ESKİKURT
    Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 33, 2014 Güz, 15-40 Ortaçağ Anadolu Ticaret Yolları Yrd. Doç. Dr.Adnan ESKİKURT İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü [email protected] Özet Anadolu yarımadasını kat eden ticaret yollarının gelişimi Ortaçağ genelinde devam etmiştir. Bu durum, ticaret ve vergi gelirlerinin sürekliliğini garantileme arzusundaki siyasal iktidarların istikrara önem vermelerinin bir sonucudur. İmkânlarını muhafaza etmek için de sık sık askerî seferler tertip etmişlerdir. Ekseriyeti uzak ülkelerle irtibatlı, gelişmiş ve detaylı güzergâhların meydana gelişi ağırlıkla bu şartlar altında mümkün olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ortaçağ, Anadolu, Yollar, Ticaret Middle Ages Anatolia Trade Routes Abstract The development of the trade roads passing through Anatolian Peninsula continued throughout the Middle Ages. This was a result of the stability considered important by the political powers aiming to guarantee the continuity of the trade and tax revenues. They also arranged military expeditions over and over again to protect their opportunities. The occurrence of the developed and detailed routes, the majority of which were connected with distant countries, had been possible mainly under these conditions. Keywords: Middle Ages, Anatolia, Roads, Trade Dâhilinde İpek yolunun yarımada güzergâhının da yer aldığı Anadolu ticaret yolları, Doğu Roma döneminden itibaren birbirini izleyen siyasî, ekonomik ve askerî gelişmelerin tesirinde kalmıştır. Bu durum hükümet merkezleri
    [Show full text]
  • Constantinople As Center and Crossroad
    Constantinople as Center and Crossroad Edited by Olof Heilo and Ingela Nilsson SWEDISH RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN ISTANBUL TRANSACTIONS, VOL. 23 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 7 OLOF HEILO & INGELA NILSSON WITH RAGNAR HEDLUND Constantinople as Crossroad: Some introductory remarks ........................................................... 9 RAGNAR HEDLUND Byzantion, Zeuxippos, and Constantinople: The emergence of an imperial city .............................................. 20 GRIGORI SIMEONOV Crossing the Straits in the Search for a Cure: Travelling to Constantinople in the Miracles of its healer saints .......................................................... 34 FEDIR ANDROSHCHUK When and How Were Byzantine Miliaresia Brought to Scandinavia? Constantinople and the dissemination of silver coinage outside the empire ............................................. 55 ANNALINDEN WELLER Mediating the Eastern Frontier: Classical models of warfare in the work of Nikephoros Ouranos ............................................ 89 CLAUDIA RAPP A Medieval Cosmopolis: Constantinople and its foreigners .............................................. 100 MABI ANGAR Disturbed Orders: Architectural representations in Saint Mary Peribleptos as seen by Ruy González de Clavijo ........................................... 116 ISABEL KIMMELFIELD Argyropolis: A diachronic approach to the study of Constantinople’s suburbs ................................... 142 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS MILOŠ
    [Show full text]
  • The Synopsis of the Genus Trigonella L. (Fabaceae) in Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2020) 44: 670-693 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-2004-63 The synopsis of the genus Trigonella L. (Fabaceae) in Turkey 1, 2 2 Hasan AKAN *, Murat EKİCİ , Zeki AYTAÇ 1 Biology Department, Faculty of Art and Science, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey 2 Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey Received: 25.04.2020 Accepted/Published Online: 23.11.2020 Final Version: 30.11.2020 Abstract: In this study, the synopsis of the taxa of the genus Trigonella in Turkey is presented. It is represented with 34 taxa in Turkey. The name of Trigonella coelesyriaca was misspelled to Flora of Turkey and the correct name of this species, Trigonella caelesyriaca, was given in this study. The endemic Trigonella raphanina has been reduced to synonym of T. cassia and T. balansae is reduced to synonym of T. corniculata. In addition, T. spruneriana var. sibthorpii is reevaluated as a distinct species. Lectotypification was designated forT. capitata, T. spruneriana and T. velutina. Neotypification was decided for T. cylindracea and T. cretica species. Trigonella taxa used to be represented by 52 taxa in the Flora of Turkey. However, they have later been evaluated by different studies under 32 species (34 taxa) in Turkey. In this study, taxonomic notes, diagnostic keys are provided and general distribution as well as their conservation status of each species within the genus in Turkey is given. Key words: Anatolia, lectotype, Leguminosae, neotype, systematic 1. Introduction graecum L. (Fenugreek) were known and used for different The genus Trigonella L.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Urban Settlement in Late Roman and Byzantine Anatolia Edited by John Haldon , Hugh Elton , James Newhard Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47115-2 — Archaeology and Urban Settlement in Late Roman and Byzantine Anatolia Edited by John Haldon , Hugh Elton , James Newhard Index More Information 369 Index Avkat, Beyözü, and Euchaïta have not been indexed f = i gure, t = table A b a n t , 3 7 , 3 8 , 4 0 Amorium, 269 Abbasids, 156 anagnōstēs (reader), 286 , 290 , 291 , 296 , 311 Acıçay River, 30 Anastasiopolis, 149 Adata, 235 Anastasius (emperor), 17 , 22 , 23 , 63 , 185 , 188 , A d a t e p e , 3 8 189 , 192 , 196 , 202 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 214 , 221 , Aegean Sea, 27 , 28 222 , 222n55 , 222n55 , 224 , 271 , 291 , 293 Aght’amar, 213 , 214n15 Anatolides- Taurides (tectonic unit), 25 , 26 Agricola from Gazacene, 20 Anatolikon (theme), 101 agricultural produce/ output, 30 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , Anazarba, 235 40 , 49 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 100 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , Anazarbos. See Anazarba 107t5.1 , 109 , 110 , 113 , 114 , 123 , 125 , 127 , Anderson, J.G.C., 73 , 81 , 89 , 90 , 102 , 105 , 106 , 128 , 128n79 , 129 , 131 , 132 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 193 , 195 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 150 , 151n93 , 152 , 152n96 , 153 , 155n119 , 208 159 , 161n143 , 162 , 175 , 211 , 226 , 227 , Andrapa. See N e a p o l i s 249 , 276 Androna, 156 A h l a t . See Chliat animal husbandry/ herding, 9 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , Ahmetsaray, 193 41 , 88 , 98 , 100 , 104 , 110 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 118 , Aizanoi, 301 123 , 132 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 155 , 159 , 165 Akören, 83n73 , 193 Ankara/Ankyra, 9 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 23 , 26 , 44 , 82 , Akroinon, 245 89 , 149 , 186 ,
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of Michael the Syrian and the Armenian Version (1248): a Textual Comparison
    The Chronicle of Michael the Great, Patriarch of the Syrians Translated from Classical Armenian by Robert Bedrosian For Reverend Father Krikor Vardapet Maksoudian, who taught me the language Sources of the Armenian Tradition (Long Branch, N.J., 2013) This work is in the public domain. It may be copied and distributed freely. Maps: From Atlas Antiquus (Berlin, 1869) by Heinrich Kiepert: Asia Minor and Neighbors Syria Mesopotamia Greater Cappadocia Armenia and Neighbors Additional maps are available on the Maps page. Chronological tables are available on the Chronological Tables page. Translator's Preface Composite 1871 Edition 1870 Edition 1871 Edition (below) The Chronicle of Michael the Great, Patriarch of the Syrians The following Table of Contents for the Composite 1871 edition was created for the convenience of readers and is not part of the Armenian text. Author's Preface Sources Problems of Chronology Adam Seth Jared; Mt. Hermon Chaldean Kings Methusaleh Noah Sons of Noah and Their Lands Tower of Babel The Amazons Rulers of Babylon Abraham Shamiram (Semiramis) Jacob Moses Exodus Judges Saul Solomon The Queen of Sheba and Her Riddles Rulers after Solomon Tiglathpilesar Shalmaneser Darius, Daniel, Cyrus Xerxes, B.C. 486-465 Persian Kings Alexander, B.C. 356-323 Ptolemy, B.C. 323-285 Translators of the Bible Haykazean Kings Maccabees, B.C. 167-160 138 B.C. 90 B.C. Genealogy of Herod Barzaphran Julius Caesar, B.C. 100-44 Herod's Rule over the Jews Cleopatra, reigned B.C. 51-30 Birth of Jesus Coming of the Magi Selection of the Apostles Selection of the Disciples Philo, Jewish Sects Abgar, King of Edessa Claudius, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fethiye-Antalya-Kaş-Finike (Güneybati Anadolu) Bölgesinde Yapilan Jeolojik Etüdler
    FETHİYE-ANTALYA-KAŞ-FİNİKE (GÜNEYBATI ANADOLU) BÖLGESİNDE YAPILAN JEOLOJİK ETÜDLER Hans J. COLIN Geologischen Landesamt, Nordheim-Westfalen ÖZET. — Eser, müellifin Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü namına 1953 ve 1954 sene- leri yaz aylarında Fethiye, Antalya, Kaş ve Finike bölgelerinde yapmış olduğu jeolojik araştırmala- ra dayanmaktadır. Gerek stratigrafik ve tektonik müşahedeler, gerekse Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsünün yapmış olduğu paleontolojik ve mineralojik tesbitler, bu bölgelerde genç Paleozoik, Mesozoik ve Senozoik yapılı sahre cinslerinin yayılmış olduğu neticesini vermektedir. Bu arada muhtelif fasies gelişmelerini tefrik etmek mümkün olmaktadır. Dik ve yatık tektonik kitleleri birbirinden ayıran büyük çapta kaymalara raslanmıştır. Muhtelif Struktur istikametlerinin göze batan girişimleri daha evvel vuku bulmuş olan tabakalaşmaya dayanmaktadır. Genç Tersiyer ve Pleistosende bölge büyük faylanmalar tesiriyle parçalanmıştır. I. ÖNSÖZ 1953 ve 1954 senesi yaz aylarında, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü em- riyle Fethiye, Antalya, Kaş ve Finike arasındaki bölgenin jeolojik haritasının tan- zimi işi ile görevlendirildim. Jeolojik bakımdan olduğu kadar manzara ve arkeoloji bakımından da çok ilginç olan bu bölge, E. Tietze'nin etüdlerinden (1885) bu yana ve A. Philippson'- dan (1915) beri hemen hemen hiç dikkate alınmamıştır. Son zamanların krom ve manganez zuhurları hakkındaki birkaç raporundan başka (G. Hiessleitner, 1951/52; V. Kovenko, 1937, 1943, 1945; Oelsner, 1932, 1936) ve yer gazı ile asfalt zuhur- ları hakkında verilen bir iki rapor müstesna olmak üzere (H. Kirk, 1937; M. Lucius, 1925a ve 6, 1930; J. Maxson, 1937; C.E. Taşman, 1930), sadece Elmalı ve Kaş paftalarının bazı durum löveleri mevcuttur. Bu itibarla önce, bölgenin tümü hakkındaki jeolojik durum bakımından bil- gi edinmek icabetmiştir ki, bu da sahanın genişliği ve Alpin karakterli olması karşısında, elde bulunan zaman içinde ancak geniş aralıklı bir gezi şebekesi tesisi suretiyle temin edilebilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Galata Experience”
    Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, 2010 AN ARCHITECTURAL DESING STUDIO IN APPROACH: “GALATA EXPERİENCE” Özgür EDİZ* Nilüfer AKINCITÜRK* Yıldız ÇAĞLI* Yasemin ERBİL* Miray GÜR* Haluk ÇETİNKAYA** Abstract: This study has been brought about due to the projects carried out in our country in recent years under the name of “transformation”. We believe it is both valuable and necessary that these transformation projects, which involve individuals who take part in the academic process and who are concerned with studio education, should also be dealt with in the architectural education process. Formed out of this idea, the “architectural design studio” was conceived with the aim of enabling students to “re-think” the above concepts and, by creating various projects in this context, of increasing their “internalisation” and “awareness” of the subject. In this case study, concepts such as urban transformation, urban change and urban environment, which are the “artificial” and, unfortunately, “sterile” concepts mentioned above, are discussed with the “Galata experience” on the basis of the students’ designs. Key Words: Architectural education, design studio, urban transformation, case study, Galata. Bir Mimari Tasarım Stüdyosu Yaklaşımı: “Galata Deneyimi” Özet: Ülkemizde son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen “dönüşüm” adı altındaki projeler bu çalışmayı tetiklemiştir. Akademik süreçte yer alan ve stüdyo eğitimi ile ilgilenen bireyler olarak söz konusu dönüşüm projelerinin mimarlık eğitim sürecinde de ele alınmasının
    [Show full text]
  • 22-Erendiz Özbayoglu
    ISSN 1301-7667 m MERS‹N ÜN‹VERS‹TES‹ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJ‹S‹N‹ ARAfiTIRMA MERKEZ‹ MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA VIII (Özel Say›) MERS‹N 2003 KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA VIII (Özel Say›) © 2003 Mersin/Türkiye ISSN 1301-7667 OLBA dergisi hakemlidir ve May›s-Haziran aylar›nda olmak üzere, y›lda iki kez bas›lmaktad›r. Published each year in May and June. KAAM’›n izni olmadan OLBA’n›n hiçbir bölümü kopya edilemez. Al›nt› yap›lmas› durumunda dipnot ile referans gösterilmelidir. It is not allowed to copy any section of OLBA without the permit of KAAM. OLBA’ya gönderilen makaleler afla¤›daki web adresinde yada KAAM taraf›ndan da¤›t›lan broflürlerde bildirilmifl olan formatlara uygun oldu¤u taktirde bas›lacakt›r. Articles should be written according the formats mentioned in the following web address or brochures distributed by KAAM Yay›nlanmas› istenilen makalelerin, her y›l›n sonuna kadar afla¤›da belirtilen iletiflim adreslerine teslim edilmifl olmas› gerekmektedir. Articles should be sent to the following correspondence addresses till the end of the year. OLBA’n›n yeni say›lar›nda yay›nlanmas› istenen makaleler için yaz›flma adresi: Correspondance addresses for sending articles to following volumes of OLBA: Prof. Dr. Serra Durugönül Mersin Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü Çiftlikköy Kampüsü 33342-MERS‹N TURKEY Di¤er ‹letiflim Adresleri Other Correspondance Addresses Tel:00.90.324.361 00 01 (10 Lines)/162-163 Fax: 00.90.324.361 00 46 web mail: www.kaam.mersin.edu.tr e-mail: [email protected] m MERS‹N ÜN‹VERS‹TES‹ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJ‹S‹N‹ ARAfiTIRMA MERKEZ‹ (KAAM) YAYINLARI-VIII MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY (KAAM)-VIII (Özel Say›) Editör Serra DURUGÖNÜL Murat DURUKAN Bilim Kurulu Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Climate Been Changing in Turkey? Regional Climate Change
    The following supplement accompanies the article Has the climate been changing in Turkey? Regional climate change signals based on a comparative statistical analysis of two consecutive time periods, 1950-1980 and 1981-2010 Murat Türkeş*, Ceylan Yozgatlıgil, İnci Batmaz, Cem İyigün, Elçin Kartal Koç, Fidan M. Fahmi, Sipan Aslan* *Corresponding author: [email protected] Climate Research 70: 77–93 (2016) Table S1. Observation periods as and proportion of missing observations of all stations used in the study. Station Station name Establishment Closing dates Proportion Proportion missing number date missing for for temperature (dd.mm.yy) precipitation data data 17020 Bartin 01.01.1952 19.13 27.05 17022 Zonguldak 01.01.1931 0.14 3.42 17024 İnebolu 10.02.1931 1933 - 1942 1.37 4.78 17026 Sinop 01.01.1929 1929 - 1931 0.41 3.42 17030 Samsun 01.01.1929 0.55 0.27 17033 Ordu 01.01.1929 1948 - 1950 16.39 21.99 17034 Giresun 01.01.1929 0.00 0.00 17038 Trabzon 01.01.1949 0.00 0.00 17040 Rize 01.01.1929 0.14 0.41 17042 Hopa 01.01.1938 1954 -1961 19.67 19.67 17045 Artvin 01.01.1929 1932 -1946 0.00 0.00 17046 Ardahan 01.01.1938 13.66 18.03 17050 Edirne 01.01.1929 3.42 6.69 17052 Kirklareli 01.01.1929 16.26 25.00 17054 corlu 01.01.1937 8.61 12.70 17056 Tekirdag 01.01.1929 2.05 3.42 17059 Kumkoy 01.01.1951 3.28 5.19 17061 Sariyer 01.01.1930 1931 - 1937 1.09 4.10 17062 Istanbul 01.01.1929 5.33 3.55 17066 Kocaeli 01.09.1960 1934 - 1937 12.84 15.57 17069 Sakarya 01.01.1965 1952 - 1954 6.42 9.43 17070 Bolu 01.01.1929 0.68 3.42 17072 Duzce 01.04.1944 15.71
    [Show full text]
  • ECCLESIAE OCCIDENTALIS MONUMENTA IURIS ANTIQUISSIMA Ed
    ECCLESIAE OCCIDENTALIS MONUMENTA IURIS ANTIQUISSIMA ed. C.H. Turner (Oxford, 1899-1939) Index of Names and Selected Words Corrected, revised, and extended 2008 by Philip R. Amidon, S.J. Creighton University [email protected] It has seemed opportune to republish this index in a corrected and extended version; there has been added to the list of names a list of selected words, and the method of referring to the text has been somewhat altered. The exact scope of C.H. Turner’s masterpiece is not immediately apparent from its title or subtitles (Canonum et conciliorum graecorum interpretationes latinae; Canones et concilia graeca ab antiquis interpretibus latine reddita). What one in fact finds here is an edition of the earliest surviving collections of church canons in Latin which are undoubtedly from the fourth century or have been assigned to it by at least some consensus of scholarship; some of them are translations from Greek, while others were originally drafted in Latin itself. Most of them, with the exception of the Apostolic Constitutions and Canons, are attributed to church councils. Turner, however, also offers a selection of doctrinal and historical material of enormous value, some of it indeed connected to the councils whose canons he edits; a comparison, for instance, of the creed contained in the synodical letter of the Council of Sardica with the Tomus Damasi, will suggest how far the doctrinal education of the western church advanced during the course of the fourth century. The connection of other historical matter to the canons is less obvious, however; one wonders what the Athanasian Historia acephala is doing here (granted that it is part of the collection of Theodosius the Deacon), however grateful one is to have the edition.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Panteleimon Orthodox Church OCA - Diocese of the Midwest
    St. Panteleimon Orthodox Church OCA - Diocese of the Midwest Christ is risen! Indeed He is risen! (Ortanne Laivino! Anwa ortanne Laivino!) 基復了 他實活 (Jīdū fùhuó le! Tā quèshí fùhuó le!) Quenya-a constructed language Mandarin Chinese Христос ылыж кынелын! Чынак ылыж кынелын! Meadow Mari –a Uralic language Krista uttitaha! Satvam ¡Cristo ha resucitado! ¡En uttitaha! verdad ha resucitado! Sanskrit Spanish Христос васкрсе! Cristo è risorto! Ваистину васкрсе! È veramente risorto! (Khristos vaskrse! Italian Vaistinu vaskrse!) Serbian Asréracht Críst! Christus het Asréracht Hé–som co opgestaan! Hy het dearb! waarlik opgestaan! Old Irish Afrikaans המשיח קם! באמת קם! !Χριστὸς ἀνέστη! Ἀληθῶς ἀνέστη (Khristós anésti! Alithós anésti!) (HaMashiach qam! Be'emet qam!) Greek Hebrew (modern) Христосъ воскресе! Воистину воскресе! (Khristos voskrese! Voistinu voskrese!) Church Slavonic Sunday, May 15, 2016 Tone 2 Gospel: St. Mark 15:43-16:8 Epistle: Acts 6:1-7 3rd SUNDAY OF PASCHA Ven. Pachomius the Great, Founder of Cœnobitic Monasticism / Myrrhbearing Women May Bulletin Sponsor Father Andrew in Memory of His Eminence Metropolitan Nicholas & his parents George & Dorothy Liturgical & Events Schedule TWO WEEK EDITION Cristo ha resucitado! En verdad ha resucitado! Sunday, May 15 Sunday, May 22 9:10 am: Paschal Matins followed by Divine Liturgy 9:10 am: Paschal Matins followed by D. L. / 40 DayPa- Memorial Sunday / Church School / Social nachida / Social / c. School / Monthly Board 5:00 pm: Annual Clergy Paschal Gathering @ Holy Meeting Trinity Cathedral 5:00 pm: St Romanos Choir performs @ Serbian Cathe- dral Monday, May 16 3:00 pm: Priest Convocation in Burr Ridge Tuesday, May 24 7:00 pm: Village of Summit Meeting 10:00 am Clergy Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesaurus Systématique 2007
    Banco de datos bibliograficos Gnomon Tesauro sistematico Auctores Acacius theol. TLG 2064 Accius trag. Achilles Tatius astron. TLG 2133 Achilles Tatius TLG 0532 Achmet onir. C. Acilius phil. et hist. TLG 2545 (FGrHist 813) Acta Martyrum Alexandrinorum TLG 0300 Acta Thomae TLG 2038 Acusilaus hist. TLG 0392 (FGrHist 2) Adamantius med. TLG 0731 Adrianus soph. TLG 0666 Aegritudo Perdicae Aelianus soph. TLG 545 Aelianus tact. TLG 0546 Aelius Promotus med. TLG 0674 Aelius Stilo Aelius Theon rhet. TLG 0607 Aemilianus rhet. TLG 0103 Aemilius Asper Aemilius Macer Aemilius Scaurus cos. 115 Aeneas Gazaeus TLG 4001 Aeneas Tacticus TLG 0058 Aenesidemus hist. TLG 2413 (FGrHist 600) Aenesidemus phil. Aenigmata Aeschines orator TLG 0026 Aeschines rhet. TLG 0104 Aeschines Socraticus TLG 0673 Aeschrion lyr. TLG 0679 Aeschylus trag. TLG 0085 Aeschyli Fragmenta Aeschyli Oresteia Aeschyli Agamemnon Aeschyli Choephori Aeschyli Eumenides Aeschyli Persae Aeschyli Prometheus vinctus Aeschyli Septem contra Thebas Aeschyli Supplices Aesopica TLG 0096 Aetheriae Peregrinatio Aethicus Aethiopis TLG 0683 Aetius Amidenus med. TLG 0718 Aetius Doxographus TLG 0528 Banco de datos bibliograficos Gnomon La busqueda de un descriptor en español dentro de la busqueda de texto completo corresponde a la misma de un descriptor en aleman y conduce al mismo resultado Versión 2009 Pagina 1 Banco de datos bibliograficos Gnomon Tesauro sistematico Aetna carmen Afranius Africanus, Sextus Iulius Agapetus TLG 0761 Agatharchides geogr. TLG 0067 (FGrHist 86) Agathemerus geogr. TLG 0090 Agathias Scholasticus TLG 4024 Agathocles gramm. TLG 4248 Agathocles hist. TLG 2534 (FGrHist 799) Agathon hist. TLG 2566 (FGrHist 843) Agathon trag. TLG 0318 Agathyllus eleg. TLG 2606 Agnellus scr.
    [Show full text]