Baseline Mobility Assessment

Home , Badghis Province, Bala Murghab

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT BADGHIS SUMMARY RESULTS 173,757 IDPs and returnees in Badghis indicated lacking access to sufficient drinking water, making it the province with the highest drinking water needs. Communities often resort to ROUND 10 ▪ JAN – JUN 2020 fetching drinking water from open, unprotected water sources. © IOM 2020 ABOUT DTM The Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a system that tracks HIGHLIGHTS and monitors displacement and population mobility. It is designed districts assessed (1 district was inaccessible) to regularly and systematically capture, process and disseminate 6 information to provide a better understanding of the movements 273 settlements assessed and evolving needs of displaced populations, whether on site or en route. For more information about DTM in Afghanistan, please 1,582 visit www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan. key informants interviewed In Afghanistan, DTM employs the Baseline Mobility Assessment 124,911 tool, designed to track mobility, determine the population sizes and returnees from abroad [2012-2020] locations of forcibly displaced people, reasons for displacement, places of origin, displacement locations and times of displacement, 314,536 including basic demographics, as well as vulnerabilities and priority IDPs [2012–2020] currently in host communities needs. Data is collected at the settlement level, through key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations. 116,779 former IDPs have returned to their homes [2012–2020] DTM enables IOM and its partners to deliver evidence-based, better targeted, mobility-sensitive and sustainable humanitarian 128,473 assistance, reintegration, community stabilization and development out-migrants fled abroad [2012–2020] programming. 6,641 out-migrants fled to Europe (5%) 5 TARGET POPULATIONS 142,109 Through the Baseline Mobility Assessments, DTM tracks the returnees and IDPs live in tents or in the open air locations, population sizes, and cross-sectoral needs of five core – Badghis has the second largest need of shelter target population categories: nationwide 1. Returnees from Abroad 173,757 Afghans who had fled abroad for at least 6 months and have now IDPs and returnees in do not have access to safe returned to Afghanistan drinking water sources – Badghis has the greatest 2. Out-Migrants need for water, nationwide Afghans who moved or fled abroad Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), subdivided into the following 1 in 2 three categories: persons (48%) in Badghis is either an IDP or returnee 3. Fled IDPs 2 in 3 Afghans from an assessed village who fled as IDPs to reside elsewhere persons (69%) in Qala-e-Naw are IDPs in Afghanistan 4. Arrival IDPs 3 in 5 IDPs from other locations currently residing in an assessed village 60% of all returnees and IDPs in Badghis reside in 5. Returned IDPs Qala-e-Naw district – Qala-e-Naw has the third Afghans from an assessed village who had fled as IDPs in the past largest inflow of IDPs and returnees, nationwide and have now returned home 4 in 5 Data on population sizes for the 5 target population categories is 80% of former IDPs from Muqur district, and over collected by time of displacement, using each of the following time 34% from Ab Kamari and Qala-e-Naw districts, have frames: 2012-2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018. • 2019 • 2020 returned home

For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 2 Displaced Individuals in all 5 Target Populations | Summary Overview by District Total Inflow *Base (Returnees + % of % of % of Arrival % of Returned % of Out % of District Population Arrival IDPs) Pop. Returnees Pop. Fled IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. Migrants Pop. Qala-e-Naw 72,619 263,067 78% 30,095 9% 35,393 49% 232,972 69% 24,910 34% 21,808 30% Ab Kamari 80,325 30,255 27% 19,998 18% 36,452 45% 10,257 9% 29,237 36% 28,218 35% Muqur 25,919 24,749 49% 12,746 25% 30,716 119% 12,003 24% 20,796 80% 17,423 67% Qadis 99,316 28,355 22% 19,379 15% 22,705 23% 8,976 7% 8,862 9% 9,301 9% Bala Murghab 106,116 72,015 40% 28,373 16% 94,505 89% 43,642 24% 22,600 21% 44,432 42% Jawand 86,100 21,006 20% 14,320 13% 10,315 12% 6,686 6% 10,374 12% 7,291 8% Total 470,395 439,447 48% 124,911 14% 230,086 49% 314,536 35% 116,779 25% 128,473 27%

* Base Population source: NSIA Population Estimates for 1397 (2018 to 2019) Symbology:target population ≥ 200,000 % of base population ≥ 25% ** Of the 7 districts in Badghis, only 6 were accessible and assessed, therefore the sum population of the 6 listed districts does not equal the total population of Badghis reflected in the above table.

DTM contributes to the ongoing COVID-19 response by disseminating COVID-19 RCCE information materials in communities covered during its baseline mobility and needs assessments, like in this village in Ab Kamari district. © IOM 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 3 METHODOLOGY KEY INFORMANTS The overall objective of DTM's Baseline Mobility Assessment DTM’s field enumerators collect data at the settlement level, in Afghanistan is to track mobility and displacement, provide predominantly through focus group discussions with key population estimates, locations and geographic distribution of informants. While assessing communities, enumerators also displaced, return and migrant populations, as well as refugees, observe the living conditions and availability of multi-sectoral nomads, cross-border tribal groups, and both domestic and services. In the rare case that DTM’s District Focal Points cannot international labour migrants. DTM captures additional mobility physically reach a community, due to insecurity, conflict, or risk of information, including reasons for displacement and return, retaliation, DFPs meet the focus groups at safe locations outside places of origin and destination, times of displacement and their communities or conduct the assessments by phone. return, secondary displacements, and population demographics, vulnerabilities and multi-sectoral needs. By actively recruiting more female enumerators, though challenging, DTM has made significant strides to improve DTM predominantly employs enumerators who originate from gender inclusion in focus group discussions, although there is the areas of assessment. Enumerators collect quantitative data much room for improvement. While women only represent 2% at the settlement level, through focus group discussions with key of the key informants in Badghis, this is an improvement from informants (KIs). Through direct observations, enumerators also the national average of 0.1% female representation in DTM 's collect qualitative data on living conditions, basic services, and first round, completed in March 2017. security and socio-economic situation. Due to security risks, enumerators cannot carry smart-phones 1,582 88 or tablets in the field, therefore they collect data, daily, using key informants (KIs) key informants are IDPs a paper-based form, which is pre-filled with data from the interviewed or returnees (6%) previous round for verification of existing data and to expedite 30 341 the assessment process. Completed forms are submitted weekly female key informants KIs from host to the provincial DTM office and verified for accuracy bythe (2%) communities (22%) team leader and data entry clerk. Once verified, the data is entered electronically via mobile devices, using KoBo forms, and 1,552 481 submitted directly into DTM's central SQL server in Kabul, where male key informants KIs from multi-sectoral it is systematically cleaned and verified daily, through automated (98%) and social services (30%) and manual systems. This stringent review process ensures that DTM data is of the highest quality, accuracy and integrity. 5.8 652 average number of KIs KIs from local When DTM assesses a province for the first time, enumerators per focus group authorities (41%) collect data through two rounds of two-layered assessments: 1. District-level assessment (B1): this assessment aims to identify settlements with high inflows and outflows of Key Informants by Type | Badghis Afghan nationals and provide estimated numbers of each target population category.

2. Settlement-level assessment (B2): based on the results of B1, 7% 1% 0.4% this assessment collects information on inflows and outflows 1% 2% 22% of each target population category at each settlement 6% (village), identified through B1. Additional villages are also identified and assessed, based on referrals from KIs. Since DTM has now assessed all 34 provinces, only settlement- level assessments will be conducted in the future. Pending 15% continued funding, DTM aims to conduct baseline mobility assessments, nationwide, twice per year. 6%

40%

Community/Tribal Representative Community Development Council (CDC) Representative Displaced Groups Representative Education Representative Health Sector Representative Humanitarian/Social Organization Other District Authority Representative Small/Medium Enterprise Representative Agriculture Representative Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, DTM enumerators have been, when feasible, conducting FGDs outdoors. © IOM 2020 Other BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 4 RETURNEES Returnees are Afghan nationals who have returned to Afghanistan in the assessed location after having spent at least Returnees from Abroad | Country/Region of Origin | Badghis six months abroad. This group includes both documented 120,000 80% returnees (Afghans who were registered refugees in host 99,768 countries and then requested voluntary return with UNHCR and 100,000 relevant national authorities) and undocumented returnees 80,000 (Afghans who did not request voluntary return with UNHCR, but rather returned spontaneously from host countries, irrespective 60,000 of whether or not they were registered refugees with UNHCR Individuals 40,000 16% 20,241 4% and relevant national authorities). 20,000 0% 0.0% 0% 4,864 38 0 0 2016 to 2018, saw record numbers of Afghan returnees, 0 with approximately 20,000 returned each year, based on key Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other including informants' estimates. In comparision to 2018, the overall Turkey number of returnees dramatically decreased by 63% in 2019. 2020 appears to be on track to exceed 20,000 returnees for the year, likely due to COVID-related returns. Qala-e-Naw (urban) Returnees from Abroad | Annual Trends | Badghis and Bala Murghab (conflict-affected) districts are the most 40,000 critically affected, hosting 47% of all returnees in the province. 35,991 35,000 30,000 23,389 124,911 20,241 25,000 22,794 19,281 returnees from returned from 20,000 abroad Pakistan (16%) 15,081

Individuals 15,000 101,504 99,768 10,000 8,375 undocumented returned from Iran 5,000 0 returnees from (80%) 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Pakistan + Iran (81%) 18,505 4,902 documented returnees from Returnees from Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Badghis returnees from non-neighbouring 1,400 1,322 Pakistan + Iran (15%) countries (4%) 1,200 1,136 979 1,000 852 800 600 Individuals 400 275 300 Returnees from Abroad by District | Badghis 200 0 Qala-e-Naw 30,095 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Bala Murghab 28,373 Returnees from Iran | Annual Trends | Badghis

35,000 30,170 30,000 Ab Kamari 19,998 25,000 20,000 16,257 17,797 13,938 14,102 15,000 Qadis 19,379 Individuals 10,000 7,504 5,000 0 Jawand 14,320 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Undocumented Documented Muqur 12,746

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Returnees from Pakistan | Annual Trends | Badghis Individuals 5,980 6,000 4,969 2012-15 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 5,000 4,356 4,000 3,661 3,000

Individuals 2,000 679 1,000 596 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Undocumented Documented BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 5 ARRIVAL IDPs Arrival IDPs (IDPs) are Afghans who fled from other settlements Arrival IDPs | Annual Trends | Badghis in Afghanistan and have arrived and presently reside at the 180,000 assessed location / host community, as a result of, or in order to 162,589 avoid, the effects of armed conflict, generalized violence, human 160,000 rights violations, protection concerns, or natural and human- 140,000 made disasters. 120,000 100,000 80,000 62,287 314,536 60% Individuals 60,000 IDPs currently reside displaced due to 37,784 40,000 in host communities conflict 14,629 17,500 19,747 20,000 232,972 40% 0 IDPs in Qala-e-Naw displaced due to 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 district, which hosts natural disaster the most IDPs (74%)

0 95% Arrival IDPs by Province of Origin | Badghis IDPs reside in informal displaced within their settlements home province 15,794 5%

Arrival IDPs by District | Badghis

298,742 95% Qala-e-Naw 232,972

Same Province Other Provices

Bala Murghab 43,642

Muqur 12,003 Arrival IDPs | Shelter | Badghis

0.15% Ab Kamari 10,257 17%

Own House Qadis 8,976 Rented House 45% 18% Host Family Tent Jawand 6,686 Open Air

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 Individuals 20%

2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 6

+ TOTAL INFLOW [RETURNEES + ARRIVAL IDPs]

Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Badghis Overall, Badghis province hosts a total inflow of 439,447 returnees and IDPs, of which 28% (124,911) are returnees

Qala-e-Naw 263,067 and 72% (314,536) are IDPs. The table below shows the 40 settlements in Badghis that are most affected by this influx. These 40 settlements (15% of the 273 settlements assessed Bala Murghab 72,015 in Badghis) host 68% of the province’s returnees and IDPs. These communities are especially fragile and susceptible Ab Kamari 30,255 to social instability induced by this large influx and the subsequent competition for limited, already overstretched

Qadis 28,355 resources and job opportunities.

Muqur 24,749 Top 40 settlements hosting the most Returnees + IDPs Rank Settlement District Individuals

Jawand 21,006 1 Baghelar Sarmaidan Qala-e-Naw 74,572 2 Jar Khoshk Qala-e-Naw 43,244 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 3 Haji Abad Qala-e-Naw 30,479 Returnees from Abroad Arrival IDPs 4 Qadis Abad Qala-e-Naw 13,764 5 Haji Mohammad Rahim Qala-e-Naw 12,506 6 Rais Sharaf Qala-e-Naw 10,645 Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Summary by District 7 Rais Sharaf Bala Mala Qala-e-Naw 7,919 8 Taraz Qala-e-Naw 7,584 District Returnees Arrival IDPs Total Inflow 9 Darwishi Ahmadi Qala-e-Naw 6,665 Qala-e-Naw 30,095 232,972 263,067 10 Arbab Abdul Hay Qala-e-Naw 6,509 Bala Murghab 28,373 43,642 72,015 11 Jar Haji Wali Abad Qala-e-Naw 4,736 Ab Kamari 19,998 10,257 30,255 12 Deh Sorkhak Payen Qala-e-Naw 4,269 Qadis 19,379 8,976 28,355 13 Pai Ziarat Qala-e-Naw 4,180 Muqur 12,746 12,003 24,749 14 Dara Boom Bala Qadis 3,904 Jawand 14,320 6,686 21,006 15 Bala Shar Qala-e-Naw 3,850 Grand Total 124,911 314,536 439,447 16 Mohammad Zaiee Ha Qala-e-Naw 3,794 17 Garwatoo Herati ha Bala Murghab 3,364 18 Bokan Bala Bala Murghab 3,302 19 Miranzai Bala Murghab 3,147 20 Baghelar Zadmurad Qala-e-Naw 3,140 21 Panirak Bala Bala Murghab 3,044 22 Masjid Jamai Qala-e-Naw 2,804 23 Sin Bala Murghab 2,662 24 Deh Sorkhak Bala Qala-e-Naw 2,634 25 Cha Karan Qala-e-Naw 2,576 26 Jowi Khoja Dahan Morghab Bala Murghab 2,547 27 Kalan Zaiee Qala-e-Naw 2,496 28 Garwato Kandahri Bala Murghab 2,407 29 Panirak Mossa Bala Murghab 2,292 30 Gulab Khail Miranzai Bala Murghab 2,227 31 Chakar Olya Qala-e-Naw 2,222 32 Bobakr Ab Kamari 2,190 33 Kapa Baba Bala Murghab 2,084 34 Jai Numai Timori Bala Murghab 2,040 35 Chalonak Bala Bala Murghab 1,987 36 Jowi Khoja Bala Murghab 1,962 37 Salam Bay Qala-e-Naw 1,896 38 Bazar To Bala Murghab 1,870 39 Khoja Pesta Ab Kamari 1,785 40 Panirak Mashahd Yan Bala Murghab 1,778 Total 297,076 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 7

Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 ,00 ,0 00 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. IDP rn 5, 5,0 0,0 ,00 ,0 < 10 50 1, 2,5 5,0 No - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 10 Total Inflow (Returnees+IDPs) | June 2020 etu 1 1 - > https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 7 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Province of Interest Countries Province District Not Accessible Province: Badghis 1:740,000 0 15 30 60 Shirin Tagab

Khwaja Sabz Posh

Almar Maymana

Ghormach

TURKMENISTAN Pashtun Kot FARYAB

Qaysar

Garzewan

Bala Murghab

Kohistan BADGHIS

Charsadra

Muqur

Ab Kamari Kushk Jawand

Kushk-e-Kuhna

Qadis Qala-e-Naw GHOR HERAT Feroz Koh

Karukh Obe Shahrak Chisht-e-Sharif Total Inflow (Returnees + Arrival IDPs) by district

Returnees From Abroad per District Returnees From Abroad per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMSD, oCSLOa, yOnSMa DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returnees from Abroad | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 7 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Badghis 1:740,000 0 15 30 60 Shirin Tagab

Khwaja Sabz Posh

Almar Maymana

Ghormach

TURKMENISTAN Pashtun Kot FARYAB

Qaysar

Garzewan

Bala Murghab

Kohistan BADGHIS

Charsadra

Muqur

Ab Kamari Kushk Jawand

Kushk-e-Kuhna

Qadis Qala-e-Naw GHOR HERAT Feroz Koh

Karukh Obe Shahrak Chisht-e-Sharif Districts of return of Returnees from Abroad DoLayna BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 8 FLED IDPS Fled IDPs are Afghans who have fled from an assessed location Fled IDPs by District | Badghis or settlement within which they previously resided and now currently reside in a different settlement in Afghanistan, as a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects of armed conflict, Bala Murghab 94,505 generalized violence, human rights violations, protection

concerns, or natural and human-made disasters. Ab Kamari 36,452 230,086 62% Fled IDPs fled IDPs displaced in Qala-e-Naw 35,393 Badghis 57% 43% Muqur 30,716 displaced due to displaced due to conflict natural disaster Qadis 22,705

Jawand 10,315 Fled IDPs | Annual Trends | Badghis 70,000 64,180 65,030 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 60,000 Indviduals

50,000 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

40,000 33,410 30,000 26,330 Individuals 22,553 18,583 20,000

10,000

0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total Fled IDPs per District Total Fled IDPs per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Fled IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 7 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Badghis 1:740,000 0 15 30 60 Shirin Tagab

Khwaja Sabz Posh

Almar Maymana

Ghormach

TURKMENISTAN Pashtun Kot FARYAB

Qaysar

Garzewan

Bala Murghab

Kohistan BADGHIS

Charsadra

Muqur

Ab Kamari Kushk Jawand

Kushk-e-Kuhna

Qadis Qala-e-Naw GHOR HERAT Feroz Koh

Karukh Obe Shahrak Chisht-e-Sharif Districts of origin of Fled IDPs DoLayna BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 9 RETURNED IDPS Returned IDPs are Afghans who have returned to their home place Returned IDPs by District | Badghis of origin in the assessed location or settlement from which they had fled as IDPs in the past, as a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects of armed conflict, generalized violence, human rights violations, Ab Kamari 29,237 protection concerns, or natural and human-made disasters.

Qala-e-Naw 24,910 116,779 63% Returned IDPs returned from other locations in Badghis Bala Murghab 22,600

1 in 2 1 in 4 Muqur 20,796 former IDPs returned 25% of all returned to only 2 districts: Ab IDPs in Badghis La,aro amd Qala-e-Naw returned to Ab Jawand 10,374 (46%) Kamari district

Qadis 8,862 Returned IDPs | Annual Trends | Badghis 40,000 0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 18,000 21,000 24,000 27,000 30,000 33,965 Individuals 35,000 33,049

30,000 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

25,000 18,961 20,000

Individuals 15,000 12,257 11,036 10,000 7,511

5,000

0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total Returned IDPs per District Total Returned IDPs Per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returned IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 7 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Badghis 1:740,000 0 15 30 60 Shirin Tagab

Khwaja Sabz Posh

Almar Maymana

Ghormach

TURKMENISTAN Pashtun Kot FARYAB

Qaysar

Garzewan

Bala Murghab

Kohistan BADGHIS

Charsadra

Muqur

Ab Kamari Kushk Jawand

Kushk-e-Kuhna

Qadis Qala-e-Naw GHOR HERAT Feroz Koh

Karukh Obe Shahrak Chisht-e-Sharif Districts of return of Returned IDPs DoLayna BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 10 OUT-MIGRANTS Out-Migrants are Afghans who have moved or fled abroad from the assessed location, whatever the cause, reason or duration Out-Migrants | Annual Trends | Badghis of expatriation. This category includes refugees, displaced and 40,000 34,896 uprooted people, and economic migrants who have left Afghanistan. 35,000

30,000 25,615 26,589 24,442 128,473 6,641 25,000 fled abroad fled to Europe (5%) 20,000

97,682 23,935 Individuals 15,000 fled to Iran (76%) fled to Pakistan (19%) 10,410 10,000 6,521 5,000

0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Out-Migrants by District | Badghis

Bala Murghab 44,432 Out-Migrants to Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Badghis 2,500 Ab Kamari 28,218 2,000 1,915 1,687 1,425 Qala-e-Naw 21,808 1,500

Individuals 1,000 804

Muqur 17,423 495 500 315

0 Qadis 9,301 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Jawand 7,291

Out-Migrants to Pakistan | Annual Trends | Badghis 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 Individuals 7,000 6,172 5,852 6,000 5,550 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 4,870 5,000

4,000

3,000 Individuals

Out-Migrants by Country/Region of Destination | Badghis 2,000 120,000 869 1,000 622 97,682 100,000 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 80,000

60,000

Individuals 40,000 23,935 Out-Migrants to Iran | Annual Trends | Badghis 20,000 6,641 30,000 28,238 214 1 0 0 25,000 Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other including 19,728 20,000 18,323 Turkey 16,768

15,000

Individuals 9,044 10,000 5,581 5,000

0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BADGHIS ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 11

International Organization for Migration 17 Route des Morillons P.O. box 17 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland

International Organization for Migration House #27 4th Street Ansari Square Shahr-e Naw Kabul, Afghanistan

The data used in this report was collected under a collaborative effort by the IOM Afghanistan Mission and the Global DTM support team. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries.

Please visit the DTM Afghanistan web page for more information, including downloadable maps and datasets, as well as interactive maps and dashboards: www.displacement.iom.int-afghanistan

CONTACT US For further information, please contact the DTM Team: [email protected] facebook.com-iomafghanistan twitter.com-iomafghanistan instagram.com-iomafghanistan

in coordination with

DTM in Afghanistan is generously supported by:

Co-funded by the European Union

For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int-afghanistan