THE ANSO REPORT -Not for Copy Or Sale
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship Between Aid and Security in Afghanistan’S Faryab Province Geert Gompelman ©2010 Feinstein International Center
JANUARY 2011 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship between Aid and Security in Afghanistan’s Faryab Province Geert Gompelman ©2010 Feinstein International Center. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image files from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 200 Boston Ave., Suite 4800 Medford, MA 02155 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fic.tufts.edu Author Geert Gompelman (MSc.) is a graduate in Development Studies from the Centre for International Development Issues Nijmegen (CIDIN) at Radboud University Nijmegen (Netherlands). He has worked as a development practitioner and research consultant in Afghanistan since 2007. Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank his research colleagues Ahmad Hakeem (“Shajay”) and Kanishka Haya for their assistance and insights as well as companionship in the field. Gratitude is also due to Antonio Giustozzi, Arne Strand, Petter Bauck, and Hans Dieset for their substantive comments and suggestions on a draft version. The author is indebted to Mervyn Patterson for his significant contribution to the historical and background sections. Thanks go to Joyce Maxwell for her editorial guidance and for helping to clarify unclear passages and to Bridget Snow for her efficient and patient work on the production of the final document. -
Child Friendly School Baseline Survey
BASELINE SURVEY OF CHILD-FRIENDLY SCHOOLS IN TEN PROVINCES OF AFGHANISTAN REPORT submitted to UNICEF Afghanistan 8 March 2014 Society for Sustainable Development of Afghanistan House No. 2, Street No. 1, Karti Mamorin, Kabul, Afghanistan +93 9470008400 [email protected] CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 STUDY MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 STUDY DETAILS ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................... 6 2. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 7 2.1 APPROACH .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 8 3. TRAINING OF FIELD STAFF ..................................................................................... 14 3.1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ -
Aid Afghanistan Education Assessment of Learning Outcomes
AID AFGHANISTAN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES FINAL REPORT Submitted by Stephen McLaughlin, Ed.D. Consultant to The Asia Foundation-Afghanistan September 24, 2011 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 6 Assessment Approach and Methods 6 Extent to which the AAE Mission is Fulfilled by AAE Schools 7 Extent to which the AAE Learning Environment Yields Effective Results 9 The Extent to which AAE Education is Cost-Effective 17 Future Issues and Opportunities for AAE Schools 18 Conclusion 21 Recommendations 22 Appendices 23 3 Executive Summary This assessment applies to theAid Afghanistan Education Program (AAE)portion of the project Strengthening Education in Afghanistan, funded under a cooperative agreement between The Asia Foundation and USAID Afghanistan. It assesses the programmatic impact of AAE’s schools for mostly female disadvantaged students, which is defined by research questions relating to: the (1) current and future need for AAE schools’ services; (2) extent that AAE schools create a learning environment that produces effective results; (3) extent that AAE-delivered education is commensurate with government-school education; and (4) cost-effectiveness of AAE schools. The AAE Program consists of 13 schools with combined primary and secondary grade levels currently located in Kabul and eight other provinces, mostly, in the North: Badakhshan, Balkh, Bamyan, Ghazni, Jazjan, Parwan, Samangan, and Serepul.All but one school, in Jazjan Province with 114 boys, enrolls girls and young women who have been unable to begin or complete their education in government schools. Total AAE enrollment is 3,500, while the most recent total of actively attending students is 2,786. -
Pdf | 364.18 Kb
AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (28 December 2020 – 3 January 2021) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2020 (AS OF 3 JANUARY) 344,750 People displaced by conflict 237,670 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 3 JANUARY) 104,470 Number of people affected by natural disasters UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Conflict incident IN 2020 (AS OF 19 DECEMBER) Internal displacement 832,630 Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 7,590 Returnees from Pakistan 3,260 Returnees from other South: 8,898 people recommended to receive countries HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE humanitarian assistance PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & Fighting between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state armed FUNDING group (NSAG) continued in Hilmand, Kandahar, Uruzgan and Zabul provinces. 1.13B Sporadic armed clashes continued in Shah Joi, Tarnak Wa Jaldak, Mizan and Requirements (US$) – HRP Arghandab districts in Zabul province. 2020 In Hilmand province, fighting between the ANSF and an NSAG was reported in 554.4M Nahr-e-Saraj, Lashkargah, Nad-e-Ali and Nawa-e-Barakzaiy districts. Airstrikes 49% funded (US$) in 2020 were also reported in Nawa-e-Barakzaiy and Nahr-e-Saraj and clearing operations of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the same districts are reportedly AFGHANISTAN ongoing. HUMANITARIAN FUND (AHF) 2021 In Kandahar province, the security situation remained volatile mainly in Zheray, Panjwayi, Arghandab, Shah Wali Kot, Arghestan and Shorabak districts. Several 0M roadside IEDs were reportedly discovered and diffused in the Zala Khan area, Contributions (US$) Panjwayi district. The overall presence of IEDs continued to hinder civilian movements. 17.50M In Uruzgan province, the security situation deteriorated in Gizab district with Pledges (US$) ongoing clashes between an NSAG and ANSF. -
“Poppy Free” Provinces: a Measure Or a Target?
Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series WATER MANAGEMENT, LIVESTOCK AND THE OPIUM ECONOMY “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? This report is one of seven multi-site case studies undertaken during the second stage of AREU’s three-year study “Applied Thematic Research into Water Management, Livestock and the Opium Economy” (WOL). David Mansfield Funding for this research was provided by the European Commission. May 2009 Editor: Emily Winterbotham Layout: AREU Publications Team © 2009 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or by calling (+93)(0)799 608 548. “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? About the Author David Mansfield is a specialist on development in drugs-producing environments. He has spent 17 years working in coca- and opium-producing countries, with over ten years experience conducting research into the role of opium in rural livelihood strategies in Afghanistan. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to conduct high-quality research that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and facilitating reflection and debate. Fundamental to AREU’s vision is that its work should improve Afghan lives. -
Evaluation of “Sustainable Livelihood Programme Through Community Mobilization and Establishing Knowledge Resource Centre in Mazar-E-Sharif” Final Report
2013:39 Sida Decentralised Evaluation Sarah Gray Elisabeth Montgomery Evaluation of “Sustainable Livelihood Programme through Community Mobilization and Establishing Knowledge Resource Centre in Mazar-e-Sharif” Final Report Evaluation of “Sustainable Livelihood Programme through Community Mobilization and Establishing Knowledge Resource Centre in Mazar-e-Sharif ” Final Report December 2013 Sarah Gray Elisabeth Montgomery Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:39 Sida Authors: Sarah Gray and Elisabeth Montgomery The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:39 Commissioned by Sida - Afghanistan Unit Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: December 2013 Published by Citat 2013 Art. no. Sida61667en urn:nbn:se:sida-61667en This publication can be downloaded from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: S-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Office: Valhallavägen 199, Stockholm Telephone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Telefax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64 E-mail: [email protected]. Homepage: http://www.sida.se SIPU International –Final Evaluation Report Acronyms, Abbreviations and Local Terms AMA Association of Microfinance Agencies AREDP Afghanistan Rural Enterprise Development Programme CDC Community Development Council CIA Conflict Impact Assessment EIF Enterprise Incubation Fund DDH District Development Hub FGD Focus Group Discussion GDP Gross Domestic -
Murghab District, Badghis District Narrative Assessment 5 May 2010
(UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Murghab District, Badghis District Narrative Assessment 5 May 2010 By the Stability Operations Information Center (SOIC) Camp Julien, Kabul (UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY) (UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Table of Contents (U) Key Findings .......................................................................................................................................... 3 (U) Background & Methodology ................................................................................................................. 6 (U) Geography ............................................................................................................................................ 8 (U) Political History of Badghis .................................................................................................................. 11 (U) Popular Perceptions and Atmospherics .............................................................................................. 13 (U) Badghis’ Tajik-Pashtun Divide ............................................................................................................. 15 (U) Relationship with ISAF......................................................................................................................... 15 (U) Tribal Dynamics ................................................................................................................................... 17 (U) Security and Insurgency ..................................................................................................................... -
PDMC Laghman Meeting Minutes
Laghman Provincial Disaster Management Committee (PDMC) Meeting Minutes Provincial Governor’s Office – Wednesday, 04 March, 2015 Participants: WFP, UNICEF, WHO, NCRO, SERVE, IRC, NRC, MADERA, SCA, IOM, DRC, ARCS, OCHA, ANDMA, ANA, ANP, DRRD, DoPH, DoRR, DoEnvironment, DoEducation, DoPW, DoAIL, Governor’s Office and other government officials. A. Introduction and Opening Remarks of Provincial Governor: On Wednesday 04 October 15, the Provincial Governor (PG) for Laghman called a Provincial Disaster Management Committee meeting (PDMC). After a short round of introductions, the PG welcomed PDMC members, further he extend of condolences with families, lost their family members due to recent rainfall, snowfall/avalanches and flood particularly to the people of Laghman province and he also highlighted on recent natural hazards (Rainfall, Flood and Snowfall) occurred on 25 February, 2015. The PG gratitude from humanitarian community’s efforts for there on timely response to the affected families he also appreciated the ANSAF’s on time action in rescued the people in Mehterlam and Qarghayi districts of Laghman province, especially ANA rescued 90 Nomad people Marooned in Qarghayi district of Laghman. The PG also highlighted on devastation caused by rainfall and flood which lifted 5 killed, 13 injured, about more than 500 families affected, 800 Jirebs or 400 Acores Agriculture land/Crops washed away and about 39 irrigation canal and intakes severely damaged or destroyed. The PG calcified devastations in three categories to facilitate the response for both (Humanitarian Community and Government line departments). 1. Response to Emergency need and saves lives. 2. Mid-terms actions as reactivation of irrigation system (cleaning of intakes and irrigation canal) opening the routs. -
Briefing Notes 20 March 2017
Group 22 – Information Centre for Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes 20 March 2017 Summarised edition owing to reprioritisation of tasks Afghanistan Armed conflicts Armed conflicts, cleansing campaigns and raids by security forces continue unabated; the same applies to suicide bombings and attacks by rebels in which civilians are being killed or wounded. According to press reports, the following provinces were affected last week: Nangarhar (eastern Afghanistan), Paktika, Paktia, Ghazni (south-eastern Afghanistan), Helmand, Kandahar, Zabul, Uruzgan (southern Afghanistan), Kunduz, Baghlan (north-eastern Afghanistan), Farah (western Afghanistan), Faryab (northern Afghanistan), Logar and Kabul (central Afghanistan). Suicide bombings and attacks On 13 March 2017, a minibus hit a roadside bomb in the 10th police district of the capital Kabul, killing one woman and wounding at least 29 persons who were employees of a telecommunications company. In Nangarhar (eastern Afghanistan) three children were killed when a booby trap exploded. In the 8th police district of Kabul, unknown gunmen shot dead two police officers. In Obe district of Herat province (western Afghanistan), members of the Taliban amputated the hand and foot of a young man who had reportedly committed a robbery. On 16 March 2017, ISIS militants beheaded three tribal elders in Sayyad district of Sar-i-Pul province (in northern Afghanistan). In Samangan (northern Afghanistan), an important Taliban Commander and an explosives expert of the Jundullah militia were arrested. On 17 March 2017, two Afghan troop were killed in a suicide bombing in Khost (south-eastern Afghanistan), wounding at least 29 persons, including civilians. In Nangarhar, one person was killed in a suicide bombing in front of a mosque. -
Badghis Province
AFGHANISTAN Badghis Province District Atlas April 2014 Disclaimers: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. http://afg.humanitarianresponse.info [email protected] AFGHANISTAN: Badghis Province Reference Map 63°0'0"E 63°30'0"E 64°0'0"E 64°30'0"E 65°0'0"E Legend ^! Capital Shirintagab !! Provincial Center District ! District Center Khwajasabzposh Administrative Boundaries TURKMENISTAN ! International Khwajasabzposh Province Takhta Almar District 36°0'0"N 36°0'0"N Bazar District Distirict Maymana Transportation p !! ! Primary Road Pashtunkot Secondary Road ! Ghormach Almar o Airport District p Airfield River/Stream ! Ghormach Qaysar River/Lake ! Qaysar District Pashtunkot District ! Balamurghab Garziwan District Bala 35°30'0"N 35°30'0"N Murghab District Kohestan ! Fa r y ab Kohestan Date Printed: 30 March 2014 08:40 AM Province District Data Source(s): AGCHO, CSO, AIMS, MISTI Schools - Ministry of Education ° Health Facilities - Ministry of Health Muqur Charsadra Badghis District District Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS-84 Province Abkamari 0 20 40Kms ! ! ! Jawand Muqur Disclaimers: Ab Kamari Jawand The designations employed and the presentation of material !! District p 35°0'0"N 35°0'0"N Qala-e-Naw District on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, Qala-i-Naw Qadis city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation District District of its frontiers or boundaries. -
Afghanistan: Annual Report 2014
AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT 2014 PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT © 2014/Ihsanullah Mahjoor/Associated Press United Nations Assistance Mission United Nations Office of the High in Afghanistan Commissioner for Human Rights Kabul, Afghanistan February 2015 Kabul, Afghanistan July 2014 Source: UNAMA GIS January 2012 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT 2014 PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT United Nations Assistance Mission United Nations Office of the High in Afghanistan Commissioner for Human Rights Kabul, Afghanistan February 2015 Photo on Front Cover © 2014/Ihsanullah Mahjoor/Associated Press. Bodies of civilians killed in a suicide attack on 23 November 2014 in Yahyakhail district, Paktika province that caused 138 civilian casualties (53 killed including 21 children and 85 injured including 26 children). Photo taken on 24 November 2014. "The conflict took an extreme toll on civilians in 2014. Mortars, IEDs, gunfire and other explosives destroyed human life, stole limbs and ruined lives at unprecedented levels. The thousands of Afghan children, women and men killed and injured in 2014 attest to failures to protect civilians from harm. All parties must uphold the values they claim to defend and make protecting civilians their first priority.” Nicholas Haysom, United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General in Afghanistan, December 2014, Kabul “This annual report shows once again the unacceptable price that the conflict is exacting on the civilian population in Afghanistan. Documenting these trends should not be regarded -
Who's Helping Who?NGO Coordination of Humanitarian
Who’s helping Who? NGO Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance With Special Reference to Afghanistan (1985 -2001) Arne Strand Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Post-War Recovery August 2003 University of York Department of Politics Post-War Reconstruction and Development Unit Abstract Abstract The subject of this thesis is the coordination of humanitarian assistance in complex political emergencies undertaken by non-governmental organisations (NGOs), primarily assistance directed towards forced migrants. The study aims to address the paucity of literature and theories on NGO coordination, and focuses primarily on the situation in Afghanistan during the period 1985 to 2001. The research is drawing on the author’s field experience and an extensive literature review outlining and discussing complex political emergencies, forced migration, NGOs and NGO coordination. An empirical investigations was carried out at village level in Herat, Afghanistan, in a highly conflict-ridden environment. Questions emerging from the primary field research were then followed-up through interviews and surveys among NGOs at a regional and national level in Afghanistan, and later broadened and compared with case studies from other conflict contexts. This in order to respond to the following hypothesis: The existing NGO coordination arrangement seems to serve primarily the interests of their NGO members, by promoting their organisational interests and facilitating interagency communication, rather than serving the interests of their intended beneficiaries. NGOs are willing to join a coordinating body, but they will remain reluctant to be directed by such a coordination structure if it limits their organisational independence. The major contribution of this thesis is the empirical findings on forced migrants knowledge and views on NGOs and the assistance they provide, and to what extent such assistance meet the needs of forced migrants.