DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Risk Assessment HSE Health & Safety Executive Marine risk assessment Prepared by Det Norske Veritas for the Health and Safety Executive OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY REPORT 2001/063 HSE Health & Safety Executive Marine risk assessment Det Norske Veritas London Technical Consultancy Palace House 3 Cathedral Street London SE1 9DE United Kingdom HSE BOOKS © Crown copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to: Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ First published 2002 ISBN 0 7176 2231 2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. This report is made available by the Health and Safety Executive as part of a series of reports of work which has been supported by funds provided by the Executive. Neither the Executive, nor the contractors concerned assume any liability for the reports nor do they necessarily reflect the views or policy of the Executive. ii Summary Risk assessment provides a structured basis for offshore operators to identify hazards and to ensure risks have been to reduced to appropriate levels in a cost-effective manner. The regulations applying to offshore operations in the UK require operators to undertake risk assessment in order to identify appropriate measures to protect people against accidents, so far as is reasonably practicable. However, few marine operations have been reviewed using risk assessment methods. It may well be that the use of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for Temporary Refuges has given the impression that risk assessment is synonymous with QRA. The safety of offshore installations against marine hazards has traditionally relied on International Maritime Organization (IMO) legislation and classification society rules. These rules have been developed by expert judgement, responding to previous accident experience, and in general prescribe specific design solutions. They are only rarely based on risk assessment, and do not by themselves satisfy the requirement to perform a risk assessment. It is the purpose of this Guidance to encourage greater use of risk assessment methods for marine operations – especially those methods towards the simpler end of risk assessment: the qualitative and semi-quantitative techniques. It explains risk assessment technology as it might apply to marine operations, emphasising techniques appropriate to marine hazards. While QRA has a role in some marine applications, this Guidance demonstrates how the wider range of techniques can help operators perform a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, and demonstrate that risks are As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). Section 1 of the guide outlines the regulatory system for safety of marine operations, and discusses the role of risk assessment in meeting this framework. In particular, it reviews some recent HSE and industry views on risk assessment; and considers the overlap with Classification Society Rules and newer risk-based rules. Section 2 gives details on the various approaches to risk assessment, including qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative techniques. It considers their strengths and weaknesses for marine applications, and gives references to source material with further information. Section 3 describes the way risk assessment results can be used to provide input to a decision- making process. This includes the use of risk criteria and cost-benefit analysis within an ALARP framework. Appendix I gives a glossary of terms and abbreviations used in the guide. Appendix II gives some worked examples of how to choose an approach to marine risk assessment that will be suitable and sufficient. This guide primarily covers mobile offshore installations, which include semi-submersibles, jack-ups and heavy lift vessels. It also covers floating production systems (FPS), which are often based on semi-submersible or ship hulls. Some of the hazards and hence the guidance may also be relevant for fixed steel and concrete installations and tension leg platforms. The guide does not cover shuttle tankers, supply vessels, stand-by vessels and other offshore industry vessels not required to submit a safety case. iii iv Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Application.....................................................................................................................2 1.3 Regulatory Context ........................................................................................................3 1.4 Marine Regulations ........................................................................................................5 1.5 Risk Management and Decision-Making.......................................................................9 1.6 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................12 2. RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES...................................................................13 2.1 Choice of Approach .....................................................................................................13 2.2 Hazard Identification....................................................................................................16 2.3 Qualitative Methods.....................................................................................................28 2.4 Semi-Quantitative Methods..........................................................................................33 2.5 Quantitative Methods...................................................................................................37 2.6 Human Element............................................................................................................49 3. DECISION MAKING......................................................................................................53 3.1 Overall Concept............................................................................................................53 3.2 The ALARP Principle ..................................................................................................53 3.3 Risk Criteria.................................................................................................................55 3.4 Cost-Benefit Analysis ..................................................................................................60 3.5 Demonstration of ALARP............................................................................................64 3.6 Uncertainty in Decision-Making..................................................................................67 3.7 Benefits Beyond Decision-Making ..............................................................................68 3.8 Suitable and Sufficient Risk Assessment.....................................................................68 4. REFERENCES.................................................................................................................69 Appendices APPENDIX I GLOSSARY APPENDIX II WORKED EXAMPLES v vi 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The use of risk assessment techniques in major hazard industries has grown significantly in recent years. This is particularly true in the offshore industry in the UK where many aspects are subject to full risk assessment, notably the Temporary Refuge assessment which is mandated to be analysed using Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). Other aspects of offshore facilities, such as related marine operations have tended to rely on meeting regulatory requirements, industry codes of practice, or Classification Society Rules. Risk assessment is now a proven technology for operators to address larger hazards in a structured manner, and to ensure risks have been to reduced to appropriate levels cost effectively. This applies as well to marine operations as to topsides safety. However, the Offshore Safety Division (OSD) has noted few marine operations have been reviewed using risk assessment methods. It may well be that the use of QRA for Temporary Refuges have confused people in the maritime industry into thinking that risk assessment was synonymous with QRA. At the QRA: Alchemy to Acceptability Conference in London in 1993, a set of quotes was presented reflecting the industry view of risk assessment and how this perception had changed over a 15 year period. Whilst this was specifically the oil industry view, it is likely that other industries introducing these techniques will also pass through these stages, albeit in less time if they learn from other industry’s lessons. Changing attitudes to Risk Assessment Bleak: (1980: Major Oil Company Representative) “QRA is equivalent to counting the number of angels that can stand on the head of a pin. It can be concluded that risk analysis is likely to be a waste of time if applied to chemical processes.” Bland: (1985: International Study Group on Risk Analysis) “The whole analytical exercise might be considered to be objective. However, it must be realised that because of the large body of assumptions, estimates, judgements and opinions involved, much of the input information is often subjective.” Bullish: (1993: Extract Major Oil Company
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evacuation Coordinator Handbook
    EVACUATION COORDINATOR HANDBOOK EC Prepared by: Luella Ackerson, Risk Control Analyst DAS EGS Risk Management Revised 2017 - New 2013 Page 1 of 37 Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary 4 Resources 4 Site Emergency Coordinator (SEC) 5 Evacuation Coordinator (EC) 6 Basic Planning Information for SECs and ECs 7 Evacuation, Route and Assembly Area Summary 12 Emergency Roles of Other Entities 13 Assisting Individuals with Disabilities 15 Fire Emergencies: For SECs, ECs and Employees 21 Earthquakes: Two Levels of Risk 22 Earthquake Instructions for Office Workers 25 Hazardous Materials: Two Levels of Risk 27 Chemical Spill Outside of Building 29 Armed and Dangerous Intruders 31 Threat of Explosion: Two Levels of Risk 33 Extreme Events 35 Evacuation in Progress Sign 37 DAS East Evacuation Assembly Area Map A1 Capitol Mall Building Drills and Site Emergency Coordinators A2 Page 3 of 37 GLOSSARY ADA – Americans with Disability Act DAS – Department of Administrative Services EA – Evacuation Assistant EC – Evacuation Coordinator Emergency Responder – Local Fire Department, city, county or State Police Employee – State of Oregon worker Employer – State of Oregon SEC – Site Emergency Coordinator Statewide Emergency Entities – Fire Marshal, Emergency Management, ORNG, etc. RESOURCES Administrative Rule for Earthquake Preparedness Drills OAR 104-020 Hazards and Preparedness: Earthquakes Earthquakes and Other Natural Hazards in the Pacific Northwest Oregon Office of Emergency Management 9-1-1 Program Put Together an Emergency Kit Emergency Evacuation Planning Guide for People with Disabilities Page 4 of 37 SITE EMERGENCY COORDINATOR (SEC) The Site Emergency Coordinator (SEC) and one back-up SEC must be appointed for each office building.
    [Show full text]
  • Permits-To-Work in the Process Industries
    SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 151 # 2006 IChemE PERMITS-TO-WORK IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES John Gould Environmental Resources Management, Suite 8.01, 8 Exchange Quay, Manchester M5 3EJ; John.gould@erm.com The paper presents the collective results from a number of Safety Management System audits. The audit protocol is based on the Health and Safety Executive pub- lication ‘Successful health and safety management’ and takes into account formal (written) and informal procedures as well as their implementation. Focused on permit-to-work systems, these have shown a number of common failings. The most common failure in implementing a permit-to-work system is the issue of too many permits. However, the audit protocol considers the whole risk control system. The failure to ‘close’ the management loop with an effective regular review process is the largest obstacle to an effective permit system. INTRODUCTION ‘Permits save lives – give them proper attention’. This is a startling statement made by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in its free leaflet IND(G) 98 (Rev 3) PTW systems. The leaflet goes on to state that two thirds of all accidents in the chemical industry are main- tenance related, with the permit-to-work (PTW) failures being the largest single cause. Given these facts, it comes as no surprise that PTW systems are a key part in the provision of a safe working environment. Over the past four years Environmental Resources Management (ERM) has been auditing PTW systems as part of its key risk control systems audits. Numerous systems have been evaluated from a wide rage of industries, covering personal care products man- ufacturing to refinery operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Hazardous Energy: De-Energization and Lockout Iii Trapped-Key Interlock Systems
    Controlling Hazardous Energy De-Energization and Lockout About WorkSafeBC At WorkSafeBC, we’re dedicated to promoting safe and healthy workplaces across B.C. We partner with workers and employers to save lives and prevent injury, disease, and disability. When work-related injuries or diseases occur, we provide compensation and support injured workers in their recovery, rehabilitation, and safe return to work. We also provide no-fault insurance and work diligently to sustain our workers’ compensation system for today and future generations. We’re honoured to serve the workers and employers in our province. Prevention Information Line We provide information and assistance with health and safety issues in the workplace. Call the information line 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to report unsafe working conditions, a serious incident, or a major chemical release. Your call can be made anonymously. We can provide assistance in almost any language. If you have questions about workplace health and safety or the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, call during our office hours (8:05 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) to speak to a WorkSafeBC officer. If you’re in the Lower Mainland, call 604.276.3100. Elsewhere in Canada, call toll-free at 1.888.621.7233 (621.SAFE). Health and safety resources You can find our health and safety resources on worksafebc.com, and many of them can be ordered from the WorkSafeBC Store at worksafebcstore.com. In addition to books, you’ll find other types of resources at the WorkSafeBC Store, including DVDs, posters, and brochures. If you have any questions about placing an order online, please contact a customer service representative at 604.232.9704 or toll-free at 1.866.319.9704.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Six Steps to Risk Management
    Guide Six step to risk management www.worksafe.nt.gov.au Disclaimer This publication contains information regarding work health and safety. It includes some of your obligations under the Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act – the WHS Act – that NT WorkSafe administers. The information provided is a guide only and must be read in conjunction with the appropriate legislation to ensure you understand and comply with your legal obligations. Acknowledgement This guide is based on material produced by WorkSafe ACT at www.worksafe.act.gov.au Version: 1.2 Publish date: September 2018 Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................4 Good management practice.....................................................................................................4 Defining Hazard and Risk.....................................................................................................5 Systematic approach to the management of Hazards and associated Risks ......................5 Step 1: Hazard identification ....................................................................................................6 Examples of Hazards ...........................................................................................................6 Step 2: Risk identification.........................................................................................................7 Examples of risk identification ..............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Prevention Plan for Contractor Companies. Construction Stage
    ANNEX 3 CONTINGENCIES AND RISK PREVENTION MANUAL - Risk Prevention Plan for Contractor Companies. Construction Stage. - Contingency Plan for Contractor Companies. Construction Stage. - Emergency Plan for Cordillera Complex. - Spillage Management Plan for Cordillera Hydro Power Complex. RISK PREVENTION PLAN FOR CONTRACTOR COMPANIES PHAM CONSTRUCTION STAGE May 2008 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide the regulatory provisions in Risk Prevention that will rule all contracting activities for works and/or services that AES Gener S.A., hereafter Gener, undertakes with third parties under the umbrella of construction of hydro power houses Alfalfal II and Las Lajas which are part of Alto Maipo Hydro Power Project or PHAM, in order to protect the physical integrity of people rendering services during the execution as well as to prevent risks of accident that compromise Gener's human and material resources. The application of these provisions is mandatory for all and every person involved in the construction works of the Project, either contractors or sub-contractors. In this regard, Gener holds the right to enforce the regulatory provisions stated in the Document herein. It is important to highlight the accuracy of the scopes included in the present document shall be defined and rendered official by Gener once each contractor is awarded the works following the bidding process and taking into account the strategies in terms of risk prevention that each contracted companies has in place. Notwithstanding the above, such provisions shall not be less restrictive than those considered herein. 1. OBJECTIVE Provide provisions and measures that shall rule and guide work contractors and the workers thereof in risk prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for the Assessment and Control of Biological Hazards Volume 2
    Best Practices for the Assessment and Control of Biological Hazards VOLUME 2 Best Practices Guidelines for Occupational Health and Safety in the Healthcare Industry CREDITS This document has been developed by the Government of Alberta, with input from: » Alberta Employment and Immigration » Alberta Health Services » Alberta Continuing Care Safety Association » The Health Sciences Association of Alberta (HSAA) » United Nurses of Alberta » Alberta Union of Provincial Employees » Alberta Home Care and Support Association » Alberta Health and Wellness COPYRIGHT AND TERMS OF USE This material, including copyright and marks under the Trade Marks Act (Canada) is owned by the Government of Alberta and protected by law. This material may be used, reproduced, stored or transmitted for non- commercial purpose. However, Crown copyright is to be acknowledged. If it is to be used, reproduced, stored or transmitted for commercial purposes written consent of the Minister is necessary. DISCLAIMER The information provided in this Guidance Document is solely for the user’s information and convenience and, while thought to be accurate and functional, it is provided without warranty of any kind. If in doubt, please refer to the current edition of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, Regulation and Code. The Crown, its agents, employees or contractors will not be liable to you for any damages, direct or indirect, arising out of your use of the information contained in this Guidance Document. This Guidance Document is current to May 2011. The law is constantly changing with new legislation, amendments to existing legislation, and decisions from the courts. It is important that you keep up with these changes and keep yourself informed of the current law.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Control Plan Form and Guidance (PDF)
    Risk Control Plan Form and Guidance (Adapted from the Michigan Department of Agriculture) Overview: The purpose of this guide is to help food operators, with the help of an Environmental Health Specialist/Practitioner, write a simple, yet effective, Risk Control Plan. The use of Risk Control Plans for addressing chronic and continuous violations in food service establishments is encouraged and may be utilized to satisfy one of the Peoria City/County Health Department’s informal compliance requirements. Benefits of a Risk Control Plan include: • The plan, developed by the operator, allows the operator to consider all of the options and decide what is best for his/her establishment. • Input from the Environmental Health Specialist/Practitioner helps to create a team approach to problem solving. • Creates long-term behavioral changes. • Restores managerial control over procedures that have the potential to cause foodborne illness. Definitions: CDC Identified Foodborne Illness Risk Factors: The practices or behaviors, which have been identified by the Centers for Disease Control through epidemiological data as being the most prevalent contributing factors of foodborne illness or injury. CDC foodborne illness risk factors include: • Poor personal hygiene • Food from unsafe sources • Inadequate cooking • Improper holding temperatures • Contaminated equipment Food Code Interventions: 5 key public health interventions identified by the FDA to protect consumer health. • Demonstration of knowledge • Hands as a vehicle of contamination • Employee health • Time temperature relationships • Consumer advisory Hazard: Any biological, physical, or chemical property that may cause an unacceptable consumer health risk. Risk: The chance or probability for harm to occur. 2-21-2019 SS M:\Food\Enforcement\Informal Enforcement\Risk Control Plan Risk-based Inspection: An inspection approach focused on identifying significant behaviors and practices associated with the risk factors identified by the CDC and the Food Code interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Training Topic PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    Safety Training Topic PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Purpose of Meeting To remind workers that using personal protective equipment (PPE) can protect them from serious injury. To reinforce PPE safety rules. To consider ways to protect yourself through the proper use of PPE. Materials and Preparation A copy of the written PPE safety rules or policy. Note to Trainer Enter your name and the training date on the Training Sign In Sheet. Have each attendee sign the Training Sign In Sheet next to their name. Use this page for your reference and give attendees copies of the remaining pages. CSRMA Tailgate Topics © 2010 DKF Solutions LLC Page 1 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Introduction NOTES: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is designed to reduce employee exposure to hazards. We do everything possible to reduce these hazards through engineering and administrative controls such as safety guards or permit requirements. However, at times PPE is still needed to reduce hazard exposure to acceptable levels. As your employer, we are responsible for determining what PPE is required to adequately protect you. You may also choose to wear non-required PPE at times-- that is your option as long as wearing the additional PPE does not create an additional hazard. This training has been developed to educate workers about how to use PPE properly in order to work safely. Types of PPE There are six main categories of PPE: Eye and Face Protection Head Protection Hand Protection Foot Protection SAFETY TRAINING TOPIC Hearing Protection Respiratory Protection CSRMA Tailgate Topics © 2010 DKF Solutions LLC Page 2 Eye and Face Protection NOTES: Eye and face protection must be worn when you are at risk from flying particles, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Protective Equipment
    LABORATORY BIOSAFETY MANUAL FOURTH EDITION AND ASSOCIATED MONOGRAPHS PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT LABORATORY BIOSAFETY MANUAL FOURTH EDITION AND ASSOCIATED MONOGRAPHS PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Personal protective equipment (Laboratory biosafety manual, fourth edition and associated monographs) ISBN 978-92-4-001141-0 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-001142-7 (print version) © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/ mediation/rules/). Suggested citation. Personal protective equipment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 (Laboratory biosafety manual, fourth edition and associated monographs).
    [Show full text]
  • Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation Yokogawa Electric Cooperation
    Yokogawa Advanced Solutions Mark Carter & Niels Huttenhuis Consulting Director for Business Development Business Manager Development May 2020 | Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation Yokogawa electric cooperation As a company, our goal is to contribute to society through broad-ranging activities in the areas of measurement, control, and information. Individually, We aim to combine good citizenship with courage to innovate | Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation 1 Yokogawa Advanced Solutions & Innovation Advanced Control Alarm Management & Rationalisation Control of Work Cybersecurity Yokogawa RAP Ltd Digitalisation & IIOT Risk Assessment (Functional) Safety Management Supply Chain Management | Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation 2 RAP Clients & Locations 30 Countries UK Europe 20,000+ Users The Americas Asia & Middle East 26 Languages 10mil+ Permits | Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation 3 RAP Modules | PTW & Options Isolations GIS Risk Assessment / JHA Barcoding & Permit to Utilities & Offline Work Infrastructure Turnaround Reporting Mobile | Yokogawa RAP Limited | 2020 | © Yokogawa Electric Corporation 4 The Causes of Accidents (HSE, UK) Data derived from: Underlying Causes of Offshore Incidents ◼ Underlying causes of accidents (The Dirty Dozen) FP/09/21 The Causes of Major Hazard Incidents and ◆ Inadequate hazard analysis / risk assessment How to Improve Risk Control and Health and Safety Management: A Review of the ◆ Poor management
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Control Self-Assessment Checklist for Nurse
    October 9, 2017 8:05 AM Risk Control Self-assessment Checklist for Nurse Practitioners Thisresourceisdesignatedtohelpnursepractitionersevaluateriskexposuresassociatedwiththeircurrentpractice�Foradditionalrisk controltoolsandinformationgearedtotheneedsofNPs,visitwww.cna.comandwww.nso.com� Scope of Practice Yes No Comments/Action Plan I read my state nurse practice act at least once per yeartoensurethat Iunderstandandprovidecarewithinthelegalscopeofpracticeinmystate� I know and comply with the requirements of my state regarding physician collaborative or supervisory agreements,andIreviewandrenewmyagreements atleastannually� I collaborate with or obtain supervision from a physicianasdefinedbymy statelawsand/orregulationsandasrequiredbytheneedsofmypatients� I seek alternative physician consultationifIamnotprovidedwithappropriate supportfrommycollaborating/supervising/employingphysician(s),andmodify myagreementsaccordingly� I decline to perform requested actions if they are outside of my legal scope of practiceasdefinedbymystatenursepracticeact� Nurse Practitioner-Patient Relationship Yes No Comments/Action Plan Are problems clearly conveyed to patients,includingthespecificrisks associatedwithnotcarryingoutinstructions?Forexample,“Your wound must be cleaned three times a day in the first week after surgery, in order to avoid hard-to-treat infections and permanent scarring. What questions do you have about dressing changes?” Are patients told that they must take some responsibility for the outcome of their care or treatment?Forexample,“We both
    [Show full text]
  • The Owner's Role in Project Risk Management
    The Owner’s Role in Project Risk Management Committee for Oversight and Assessment of U.S. Department of Energy Project Management Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by Contract Number DEAM01-99PO8006 between the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions, findings, con- clusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 0-309-09518-2 (book) International Standard Book Number 0-309-54754-7 (PDF) Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2005 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare.
    [Show full text]