DOCSLIB.ORG

FGF Signaling Pathways in Endochondral and Intramembranous Bone Development and Human Genetic Disease

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FGF Signaling Pathways in Endochondral and Intramembranous Bone Development and Human Genetic Disease Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease David M. Ornitz1,3 and Pierre J. Marie2 1Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA; 2Laboratory of Osteoblast Biology and Pathology, INSERM U349 affiliated CNRS, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris cedex 10, France Over the last decade the identification of mutations in ized type II collagen-expressing chondrocytes and more the receptors for fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) has de- peripherally localized type I collagen-expressing peri- fined essential roles for FGF signaling in both endochon- chondrial cells (Kosher et al. 1986). At this stage, chon- dral and intramembranous bone development. FGF sig- drocytes begin to elaborate a specialized extracellular naling pathways are essential for the earliest stages of matrix containing type II collagen. Midway between the limb development and throughout skeletal develop- ends of this elongated cartilaginous template, chondro- ment. In this review, we examine the role of FGF signal- cytes exit the cell cycle, hypertrophy, and begin to syn- ing in bone development and in human genetic diseases thesize type X collagen in place of type II collagen that affect bone development. We also explore what is (Schmid and Linsenmayer 1985). presently known about how FGF signaling pathways in- To synthesize bone, a center of ossification forms in teract with other major signaling pathways that regulate the mid-hypertrophic zone by neovascularization of the chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. initially avascular cartilaginous template. The secretion and mineralization of a type I collagen-containing extra- cellular matrix is mediated by osteoblasts that are asso- Overview of skeletal development ciated with the newly developed vasculature. As bones grow, this center of ossification propagates toward the Skeletal elements are formed through two distinct de- two epiphyseal plates. velopmental processes. Endochondral ossification gives The epiphyseal growth plate consists of well-demar- rise to long bones that comprise the appendicular skel- cated zones of cells that follow an elegant developmental eton, facial bones, vertebrae, and the lateral medial program (Caplan and Pechak 1987; Hall and Miyake clavicles. Intramembranous ossification gives rise to the 1992; Olsen et al. 2000; Wagner and Karsenty 2001; flat bones that comprise the cranium and medial Karsenty and Wagner 2002). Proximally (toward the end clavicles. Both types of ossification involve an initial of a developing bone), a pool of chondrocytes (called the condensation of mesenchyme and the eventual forma- resting or reserve zone) supplies cells to a population of tion of calcified bone. However, intramembranous bone proliferating chondrocytes. Proliferating chondrocytes in formation accomplishes this directly, whereas endo- turn differentiate to form a transient pool of prehyper- chondral ossification incorporates an intermediate step trophic and then a more long-lived pool of hypertrophic in which a cartilaginous template regulates the growth chondrocytes. At the distal end of the epiphyseal growth and patterning of the developing skeletal element. plate, hypertrophic chondrocytes die by apoptosis and Development of endochondral bones initiates shortly are replaced by trabecular bone. In this manner, hyper- after the formation of the limb bud with the condensa- trophic chondrocytes provide a template for the forma- tion of loose mesenchyme, marked by expression of type tion of trabecular bone. II collagen (Fig. 1A; Kosher et al. 1986; Nah et al. 1988). In addition to the cartilaginous and trabecular core, Condensing mesenchyme forms an anlage for the endo- endochondral bone contains a hard outer shell of cortical chondral skeleton and can either branch or segment to bone (the bone collar), which surrounds the marrow cav- form individual skeletal elements (Hall and Miyake ity centrally and is contiguous with the perichondrium 1992, 2000). Differentiation of condensing mesenchyme proximally (Caplan and Pechak 1987). The perichon- gives rise to a proliferating population of centrally local- drium contains precursor pools of cells that give rise to osteoblasts that line the endosteal (inner) and periosteal 3Corresponding author. (outer) surface of cortical bone. Osteoblasts differentiate E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (314) 362-7058. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ into osteocytes, which become embedded within corti- gad.990702. cal bone. The center of ossification in the perichondrium 1446 GENES & DEVELOPMENT 16:1446–1465 © 2002 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/02 $5.00; www.genesdev.org Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press FGF pathways in skeletal development Figure 1. Endochondral and intramembranous bone development. (A) Schematic representation of a developing endochondral bone. Endochondral skeletal development begins with the formation of a mesenchymal condensation, expressing type II collagen (blue). Centrally, cells differentiate into chondrocytes, which hypertrophy and express type X collagen (purple). Progression to the mature growth plate accompanies development of the perichondrium (yellow), vascular invasion, and the formation of a center of ossification containing type I collagen-expressing osteoblasts (yellow). (B) Schematic representation of a developing intramembranous bone. Undifferentiated mesenchymal cells differentiate into osteoprogenitor cells expressing Cbfa1 (pink). Osteoprogenitor cells progress to mature osteoblasts that express Cbfa1 and type I collagen (yellow). These cells deposit and mineralize bone matrix. Osteoblasts either die by apoptosis or are embedded in the matrix, becoming osteocytes. is aligned with the center of ossification at the chondro– into osteoprogenitor cells and then into osteoblasts that osseous junction of the growth plate. A key feature of the express type I collagen, bone sialoprotein, and osteocal- growth of long bones is the coordination of chondrogen- cin, and synthesize bone matrix along the bone margins. esis and ossification in the epiphyseal growth plate and Growth and differentiation at the suture is regulated by osteogenesis in the perichondrium/periosteum (Fig. 1A). interactions between the mesenchyme, the osteogenic Cranial vault development is a complex process in- front, and the Dura mater, a tough, fibrous membrane volving cells of neural crest origin (Couly et al. 1993) and forming the outer envelope of the brain and the inner paraxial mesoderm that contribute to intramembranous lining of cranial bones and sutures. (see Fig. 3C below; bones of the cranial vault and sutures (Noden 1992; Op- Most et al. 1998; Opperman 2000; Morriss-Kay et al. perman 2000). Intramembranous bone growth begins 2001). Because sutures are the major sites of intramem- with the condensation of mesenchymal cells (Fig. 1B). branous bone growth during cranial vault development, Ossification centers are formed by direct bone matrix the events occurring at the suture are essential for the deposition-forming plates, which expand during develop- regulation of intramembranous ossification (Cohen ment but do not fuse at the junction with other cranial 2000a). bones (Hall and Miyake 2000). The junction between cal- varial bones is a functional structure called a suture, FGFs and FGF receptors—a brief introduction which is responsible for the maintenance of a separation between membranous bones and for regulating the ex- FGFs comprise a family of 22 genes encoding structur- pansive growth of the skull. In the vicinity of the suture, ally related proteins (Ornitz and Itoh 2001). Six subfami- a minority of osteogenic mesenchymal cells differentiate lies of FGFs, grouped by sequence similarities, tend to GENES & DEVELOPMENT 1447 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Ornitzand Marie share biochemical and functional properties and are ex- cations that are required for, and may actually regulate, pressed in specific spatial and developmental patterns. functional ligand–receptor interactions (Rapraeger 1995; Four distinct FGF receptor tyrosine kinase molecules Guimond and Turnbull 1999; Ornitz 2000; Allen et al. bind and are activated by most members of the FGF fam- 2001). ily. Alternative mRNA splicing produces FGF receptors with unique ligand binding properties (Johnson and Mutations in FGF receptors in chondrodysplasia Williams 1993; Ornitz et al. 1996). Alternative splicing is and craniosynostosis syndromes mostly tissue-specific, producing epithelial variants (b splice forms) and mesenchymal variants (c splice forms; The importance of FGF signaling in skeletal develop- Miki et al. 1992; Orr-Urtreger et al. 1993; Chellaiah et al. ment was first revealed with the discovery that a point 1994; Naski and Ornitz 1998). FGF activity and specific- mutation in the transmembrane domain of FGFR3is the ity are further regulated by heparan sulfate oligosaccha- etiology of Achondroplasia, the most common genetic rides, in the form of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hep- form of dwarfism in humans (Fig. 2; Rousseau et al. 1994; arin/Heparan sulfate, FGF, and an FGF receptor (FGFR) Shiang et al. 1994). Since this discovery, the etiology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ICRS Heritage Summit 1
    ICRS Heritage Summit 1 20th Anniversary www.cartilage.org of the ICRS ICRS Heritage Summit June 29 – July 01, 2017 Gothia Towers, Gothenburg, Sweden Final Programme & Abstract Book #ICRSSUMMIT www.cartilage.org Picture Copyright: Zürich Tourismus 2 The one-step procedure for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions Aesculap Biologics Facing a New Frontier in Cartilage Repair Visit Anika at Booth #16 Easy and fast to be applied via arthroscopy. Fixation is not required in most cases. The only entirely hyaluronic acid-based scaffold supporting hyaline-like cartilage regeneration Biologic approaches to tissue repair and regeneration represent the future in healthcare worldwide. Available Sizes Aesculap Biologics is leading the way. 2x2 cm Learn more at www.aesculapbiologics.com 5x5 cm NEW SIZE Aesculap Biologics, LLC | 866-229-3002 | www.aesculapusa.com Aesculap Biologics, LLC - a B. Braun company Website: http://hyalofast.anikatherapeutics.com E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +39 (0)49 295 8324 ICRS Heritage Summit 3 The one-step procedure for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions Visit Anika at Booth #16 Easy and fast to be applied via arthroscopy. Fixation is not required in most cases. The only entirely hyaluronic acid-based scaffold supporting hyaline-like cartilage regeneration Available Sizes 2x2 cm 5x5 cm NEW SIZE Website: http://hyalofast.anikatherapeutics.com E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +39 (0)49 295 8324 4 Level 1 Study Proves Efficacy of ACP in
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Osteoblast and Adipocyte Lineages in the Bone Marrow
    Bone 118 (2019) 2–7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Bone journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bone Full Length Article Defining osteoblast and adipocyte lineages in the bone marrow T ⁎ J.L. Piercea, D.L. Begunb, J.J. Westendorfb,c, M.E. McGee-Lawrencea,d, a Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA b Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA c Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA d Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Bone is a complex endocrine organ that facilitates structural support, protection to vital organs, sites for he- Bone marrow mesenchymal/stromal cell matopoiesis, and calcium homeostasis. The bone marrow microenvironment is a heterogeneous niche consisting Osteogenesis of multipotent musculoskeletal and hematopoietic progenitors and their derivative terminal cell types. Amongst Osteoblast these progenitors, bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (BMSCs) may differentiate into osteogenic, Adipogenesis adipogenic, myogenic, and chondrogenic lineages to support musculoskeletal development as well as tissue Adipocyte homeostasis, regeneration and repair during adulthood. With age, the commitment of BMSCs to osteogenesis Marrow fat Aging slows, bone formation decreases, fracture risk rises, and marrow adiposity increases. An unresolved question is whether osteogenesis and adipogenesis are co-regulated in the bone marrow. Osteogenesis and adipogenesis are controlled by specific signaling mechanisms, circulating cytokines, and transcription factors such as Runx2 and Pparγ, respectively. One hypothesis is that adipogenesis is the default pathway if osteogenic stimuli are absent. However, recent work revealed that Runx2 and Osx1-expressing preosteoblasts form lipid droplets under pa- thological and aging conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Endochondral Skeleton
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Development of the Endochondral Skeleton Fanxin Long1,2 and David M. Ornitz2 1Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 2Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Correspondence: fl[email protected] SUMMARY Much of the mammalian skeleton is composed of bones that originate from cartilage templates through endochondral ossification. Elucidating the mechanisms that control endochondral bone development is critical for understanding human skeletal diseases, injury response, and aging. Mouse genetic studies in the past 15 years have provided unprecedented insights about molecules regulating chondrocyte formation, chondrocyte maturation, and osteoblast differ- entiation, all key processes of endochondral bone development. These include the roles of the secreted proteins IHH, PTHrP, BMPs, WNTs, and FGFs, their receptors, and transcription factors such as SOX9, RUNX2, and OSX, in regulating chondrocyte and osteoblast biology. This review aims to integrate the known functions of extracellular signals and transcription factors that regulate development of the endochondral skeleton. Outline 1 Introduction 5 Osteoblastogenesis 2 Mesenchymal condensation 6 Closing remarks 3 Chondrocyte differentiation References 4 Growth plate development Editors: Patrick P.L. Tam, W. James Nelson, and Janet Rossant Additional Perspectives on Mammalian Development available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008334 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5:a008334 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex Vivo Systems to Study Chondrogenic Differentiation and Cartilage Integration
    Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Review Ex Vivo Systems to Study Chondrogenic Differentiation and Cartilage Integration Graziana Monaco 1,2, Alicia J. El Haj 2,3, Mauro Alini 1 and Martin J. Stoddart 1,2,* 1 AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, CH-7270 Davos Platz, Switzerland; [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (M.A.) 2 School of Pharmacy & Bioengineering Research, University of Keele, Keele ST5 5BG, UK; [email protected] 3 Healthcare Technology Institute, Translational Medicine, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-81-414-2448 Abstract: Articular cartilage injury and repair is an issue of growing importance. Although common, defects of articular cartilage present a unique clinical challenge due to its poor self-healing capacity, which is largely due to its avascular nature. There is a critical need to better study and understand cellular healing mechanisms to achieve more effective therapies for cartilage regeneration. This article aims to describe the key features of cartilage which is being modelled using tissue engineered cartilage constructs and ex vivo systems. These models have been used to investigate chondrogenic differentiation and to study the mechanisms of cartilage integration into the surrounding tissue. The review highlights the key regeneration principles of articular cartilage repair in healthy and diseased joints. Using co-culture models and novel bioreactor designs, the basis of regeneration is aligned with recent efforts for optimal therapeutic interventions. Keywords: bioreactors; osteochondral; integration; tissue engineering Citation: Monaco, G.; El Haj, A.J.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Limb Development
    Upper Limb Development Alphonsus Chong Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery National University Hospital Why bother? Most congenital limb anomalies are due to: Disorders of embryogenesis or Problems during fetal development Some terminology Embryogenesis 0-8 weeks – new organ systems appear Fetal period Appearance of primary ossification center in humerus Differentiation, maturation and enlargement of existing organs Limb Development Limb Patterning Tissue Differentiation Why is it an arm and not Skeletal a leg? Joint Vascular Nerve Muscle and Tendon Positional Information and Axes of the upper limb Limb Bud in E3 Chick Embryo Limb bud (lateral plate) Loose mesenchymal cells from lateral plate mesoderm Ectodermal epithelial cells Migrating cells Somites --> Muscle Nerves Vasculature Limb Bud Development Limb bud Ectoderm and mesenchyme Not fully differentiated yet but all ingredients there If transplanted ectopic limb Limb Bud Regions AER Progress zone Zone of polarizing activity AER – Proximal to Distal formation Zone of Polarizing Actvity – AP development Morphogen Gradient Model Dorsal / ventral patterning less well understood Separation of Digits Apoptosis (Programmed cell death) of interdigital mesenchyme BMPs important Starts post-axial to pre-axial Mesoderm specifies amount of apoptosis How does this relate to pathogensis? Picture from Greene Learning Points UE development occurs early in embryogenesis – most risk of development congenital anomalies Pattern of limb development follows a body plan Digit formation is by apoptosis Thank You Further Reading Principles of Development 3rd Ed by Lewis Wolpert. Oxford University Press Growing Hand. Amit Gupta and Louisville Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Genes D11–D13 and A13 Control Mouse Autopod Cortical
    Research article Homeobox genes d11–d13 and a13 control mouse autopod cortical bone and joint formation Pablo Villavicencio-Lorini,1,2 Pia Kuss,1,2 Julia Friedrich,1,2 Julia Haupt,1,2 Muhammed Farooq,3 Seval Türkmen,2 Denis Duboule,4 Jochen Hecht,1,5 and Stefan Mundlos1,2,5 1Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany. 2Institute for Medical Genetics, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute for Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan. 4National Research Centre Frontiers in Genetics, Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 5Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. The molecular mechanisms that govern bone and joint formation are complex, involving an integrated network of signaling pathways and gene regulators. We investigated the role of Hox genes, which are known to specify individual segments of the skeleton, in the formation of autopod limb bones (i.e., the hands and feet) using the mouse mutant synpolydactyly homolog (spdh), which encodes a polyalanine expansion in Hoxd13. We found that no cortical bone was formed in the autopod in spdh/spdh mice; instead, these bones underwent trabecular ossification after birth. Spdh/spdh metacarpals acquired an ovoid shape and developed ectopic joints, indicating a loss of long bone characteristics and thus a transformation of metacarpals into carpal bones. The perichon- drium of spdh/spdh mice showed abnormal morphology and decreased expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), which was identified as a direct Hoxd13 transcriptional target. Hoxd11–/–Hoxd12–/–Hoxd13–/– tri- ple-knockout mice and Hoxd13–/–Hoxa13+/– mice exhibited similar but less severe defects, suggesting that these Hox genes have similar and complementary functions and that the spdh allele acts as a dominant negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomina Histologica Veterinaria, First Edition
    NOMINA HISTOLOGICA VETERINARIA Submitted by the International Committee on Veterinary Histological Nomenclature (ICVHN) to the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists Published on the website of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists www.wava-amav.org 2017 CONTENTS Introduction i Principles of term construction in N.H.V. iii Cytologia – Cytology 1 Textus epithelialis – Epithelial tissue 10 Textus connectivus – Connective tissue 13 Sanguis et Lympha – Blood and Lymph 17 Textus muscularis – Muscle tissue 19 Textus nervosus – Nerve tissue 20 Splanchnologia – Viscera 23 Systema digestorium – Digestive system 24 Systema respiratorium – Respiratory system 32 Systema urinarium – Urinary system 35 Organa genitalia masculina – Male genital system 38 Organa genitalia feminina – Female genital system 42 Systema endocrinum – Endocrine system 45 Systema cardiovasculare et lymphaticum [Angiologia] – Cardiovascular and lymphatic system 47 Systema nervosum – Nervous system 52 Receptores sensorii et Organa sensuum – Sensory receptors and Sense organs 58 Integumentum – Integument 64 INTRODUCTION The preparations leading to the publication of the present first edition of the Nomina Histologica Veterinaria has a long history spanning more than 50 years. Under the auspices of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists (W.A.V.A.), the International Committee on Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature (I.C.V.A.N.) appointed in Giessen, 1965, a Subcommittee on Histology and Embryology which started a working relation with the Subcommittee on Histology of the former International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee. In Mexico City, 1971, this Subcommittee presented a document entitled Nomina Histologica Veterinaria: A Working Draft as a basis for the continued work of the newly-appointed Subcommittee on Histological Nomenclature. This resulted in the editing of the Nomina Histologica Veterinaria: A Working Draft II (Toulouse, 1974), followed by preparations for publication of a Nomina Histologica Veterinaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Delineating the Heterogeneity of Matrix-Directed Differentiation Toward Soft and Stiff Tissue Lineages Via Single-Cell Profiling
    Delineating the heterogeneity of matrix-directed differentiation toward soft and stiff tissue lineages via single-cell profiling Shlomi Briellea,b,c, Danny Bavlid, Alex Motzikd, Yoav Kan-Torc, Xue Sund, Chen Kozulind, Batia Avnie, Oren Ramd,1, and Amnon Buxboima,b,c,1 aAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; bDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; cRachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; dDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; and eDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hadassah Medical Center, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel Edited by David A. Weitz, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved March 7, 2021 (received for review August 2, 2020) Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) form a heterogeneous (7, 8). Characterizing MSC heterogeneity and its clinical implica- population of multipotent progenitors that contribute to tissue tions will thus improve experimental reproducibility and biomedical regeneration and homeostasis. MSCs assess extracellular elasticity standardization. by probing resistance to applied forces via adhesion, cytoskeletal, MSCs are highly sensitive to the mechanical properties of their and nuclear mechanotransducers that direct differentiation to- microenvironment. These extracellular, tissue-specific cues are ward soft or stiff tissue lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Osteocyte: from “Prisoner” to “Orchestrator”
    Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Review The Osteocyte: From “Prisoner” to “Orchestrator” Carla Palumbo * and Marzia Ferretti Section of Human Morphology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Osteocytes are the most abundant bone cells, entrapped inside the mineralized bone matrix. They derive from osteoblasts through a complex series of morpho-functional modifications; such modifications not only concern the cell shape (from prismatic to dendritic) and location (along the vascular bone surfaces or enclosed inside the lacuno-canalicular cavities, respectively) but also their role in bone processes (secretion/mineralization of preosseous matrix and/or regulation of bone remodeling). Osteocytes are connected with each other by means of different types of junctions, among which the gap junctions enable osteocytes inside the matrix to act in a neuronal-like manner, as a functional syncytium together with the cells placed on the vascular bone surfaces (osteoblasts or bone lining cells), the stromal cells and the endothelial cells, i.e., the bone basic cellular system (BBCS). Within the BBCS, osteocytes can communicate in two ways: by means of volume transmission and wiring transmission, depending on the type of signals (metabolic or mechanical, respectively) received and/or to be forwarded. The capability of osteocytes in maintaining skeletal and mineral homeostasis is due to the fact that it acts as a mechano-sensor, able to transduce mechanical strains into biological signals and to trigger/modulate the bone remodeling, also because of the relevant role of sclerostin secreted by osteocytes, thus regulating different bone cell signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Transformation of Bone Biology
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The genetic transformation of bone biology Gerard Karsenty1 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 The skeleton, like every organ, has specific developmen- condensations differentiate into chondrocytes forming tal and functional characteristics that define its identity the “cartilage anlagen” of the future bones. In the pe- in biologic and pathologic terms. Skeleton is composed riphery of the anlage, cells from the perichondrium dif- of multiple elements of various shapes and origins spread ferentiate into osteoblasts, while the periphery of the throughout the body. Most of these skeletal elements are anlage become hypertrophic. Eventually, the matrix sur- formed by two different tissues, cartilage and bone, and rounding these hypertrophic chondrocytes calcifies and each of these two tissues has its own specific cell types: blood vessel invasion of the calcified cartilage brings in the chondrocyte in cartilage, and the osteoblast and os- osteoblasts ∼14.5–15.5 dpc (Horton 1993; Erlebacher et teoclast in bone. Finally, each of these cell types has its al. 1995). Once a bone matrix is deposited the bone mar- own differentiation pathway, physiological functions, row forms and the first osteoclasts appear (Hofstetter et and therefore pathological conditions. The complexity of al. 1995). Thus, sequential appearance of a cartilage an- this organ in terms of developmental biology, physiol- lage, calcified cartilage, and then bona fide bone charac- ogy, and pathology, along with the multitude of impor- terizes the endochondral ossification. Regardless of the tant conceptual advances in our understanding of skel- mode of ossification, osteoblast differentiation precedes etal biology, are such that it has become impossible to osteoclast differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Development in Human: a Model for the Study of Developmental Genes Page 1 Sur 10
    Skeletal development in human: a model for the study of developmental genes Page 1 sur 10 Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology Home Genes Leukemias Tumors Cancer prone Deep Insight Portal Teaching Skeletal development in human: a model for the study of developmental genes * I- Introduction I-1. Developmental genes in Drosophila I-2. Skeletal development in human II- Development of the axial skeleton II-1. Signaling molecules involved in the determination of sclerotome to cartilage II- 2. Role of Hox genes in the regulation of vertebral segments III- Development of the limbs (appendicular skeleton) III-1. Limb bud differentiation with respect to three axes III-2. Role of FGF and their receptors in limb development III-3. The role of Hox and BMP genes in the limb bud development IV- Development of the skull IV-1. Signalling molecules involved in craniofacial development V- Conclusion * I. Introduction Our understanding of the genetic and molecular control of development in vertebrates has dramatically increased during the last 10 years through the discovery that molecular processes that control development in invertebrates have been conserved during evolution and are also found in vertebrates. Important developmental genes were identified that are not only similar in sequence but also in their molecular function in widely diverged organisms such as C.elegans, Drosophila, zebrafish, mice and man. From Drosophila studies it is now clear that epigenetic development is regulated by cascades of gene expression. Early acting regulatory genes initiate the developmental process and induce the expression of other downstream genes. http://www.infobiogen.fr/services/chromcancer/IntroItems/GenDevelLongEngl.html 25/01/2006 Skeletal development in human: a model for the study of developmental genes Page 2 sur 10 I.1 Developmental genes in Drosophila Phenotypic analysis of Drosophila mutants has allowed identification in the early eighties of more than 50 developmental genes that fall into three broad classes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW the Bone Marrow Niche: Habitat to Hematopoietic
    Leukemia (2008) 22, 941–950 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/08 $30.00 www.nature.com/leu REVIEW The bone marrow niche: habitat to hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells, and unwitting host to molecular parasites Y Shiozawa1, AM Havens2, KJ Pienta3 and RS Taichman1 1Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA In post-fetal life, hematopoiesis occurs in unique microenvir- In the marrow, bone marrow stromal cells derived from onments or ‘niches’ in the marrow. Niches facilitate the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are believed to provide the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) as unipotent, while supporting lineage commitment of the expanding blood basis for the physical structures of the niche. As such, bone populations. As the physical locale that regulates HSC function, marrow stromal cells are thought to regulate self-renewal, the niche function is vitally important to the survival of the proliferation and differentiation of the HSCs through production organism. This places considerable selective pressure on of cytokines and intracellular signals that are initiated by cell- HSCs, as only those that are able to engage the niche in the to-cell adhesive interaction.4 Bone marrow stromal cells are appropriate context are likely to be maintained as stem cells. composed of cells of mesenchymal origin known to include Since niches are central regulators of stem cell function, it is 5 not surprising that molecular parasites like neoplasms are osteoblasts, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and adipocytes.
    [Show full text]