John F. Thornell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John F. Thornell The American Fighter Aces Association Oral Interviews The Museum of Flight Seattle, Washington John F. Thornell Interview Date: February 1990 2 Abstract: Fighter ace John F. Thornell discusses his military service with the United States Army Air Forces during World War II. He describes his wartime experiences as a fighter pilot, including his time stationed in England with the 328th Fighter Squadron of the 352nd Fighter Group. Special focus on four combat missions that took place in 1944: a skip-bombing mission against a German submarine pen (March 11, 1944), a bomber escort mission against Northeim, Germany (April 19, 1944), a bomber escort mission against Brunswick, Germany (May 8, 1944), and a patrol mission over France (June 10, 1944). Biography: John F. Thornell was born on April 19, 1921 in Stoughton, Massachusetts. He joined the United States Army in 1940 and applied for flight training after the United States entered World War II. Completing his training in 1943, Thornell was then deployed to England, where he served with the 328th Fighter Squadron of the 352nd Fighter Group. His combat tour included combat air patrol and bomber escort missions over France and Germany. After the end of World War II, Thornell briefly left active duty to attend college at the University of California. He was recalled to active duty 1948 and served with the Air Force until 1971, when he retired as a lieutenant colonel. Thornell passed away in 1998. Biographical information courtesy of: Boyce, Ward J., ed., American fighter aces album. Mesa, Ariz: American Fighter Aces Association, 1996. Restrictions: Permission to publish material from the American Fighter Aces Association Oral Interviews must be obtained from The Museum of Flight Archives. Transcript: Transcribed by Pioneer Transcription Services 3 Index: Skip-bombing mission against submarine pens (March 11, 1944) ................................................. 4 Bomber escort mission against Northeim, Germany (April 19, 1944) ........................................... 6 Bomber escort mission against Brunswick, Germany (May 8, 1944) ............................................ 7 Patrol mission over France (June 10, 1944).................................................................................... 7 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 8 4 John F. Thornell [START OF INTERVIEW] 00:00:00 [Skip-bombing mission against submarine pens (March 11, 1944)] JOHN F. THORNELL: Eric, this is Mr. Thornell—Colonel Thornell, Retired—[unintelligible 00:00:08] the mission information that you requested in your letter. Sorry to be late about getting it to you. But I’ll try to do the best I can. The first one that you requested was 11 March 1944. That was Field Order No. 265. Time of mission: 3 hours and 15 minutes. Target was submarine pens at Saint-Nazaire, France, with the strafing mission of targets of opportunity over the Pas-de-Calais area en route home to England, which would bring us out over what would later become the Utah and Omaha beaches four months later. The reason for this mission, being the first low-level ever done by P-47s, was to find out what the intense antiaircraft fire would be and what the ground forces would face during the invasion. We operated out of an advanced base of the RAF Coastal Command at RAF Station Ford, which was down in Southern England. We went down there on the afternoon of the 10th. We were a group of 36 aircrafts, three 12-ship squadrons, not the usual three 16-ship squadrons because these submarine pens were a smaller target, being dug into the side of a cliff at Saint- Nazaire. We could not operate [unintelligible 00:01:44] large frontal assault, so we were operating, like I say, in three 16-ship squadrons—three 12-ship squadron, rather. So we went down on the 10th of March 1944. The RAF put us up for the night, armed our aircraft with 500-pound high explosive bombs, ten-second time-delayed fuses, so that would give us time enough to skip-bomb into the submarine pens with the doors were open, we had hoped, and still get up over the top of the cliffs before the bombs exploded and continue on with our mission. We had to have it timed right to the—almost to the second because the tide in that area is very changeable. Low tide, the submarines cannot come in or out. High tide, they have to close submarine pen doors because it’d be flooded. So we had to hit the target between 10:00 and 11:00 in the morning in order to be at the optimum tide and find the doors open to service— surface—service the submarines. What we did was we left Ford on the deck all the way, carrying the, like I say, centerline bombs. No external fuel. So we came down and weather was not too good. About 1,000-foot ceiling, visibility about two miles. Joe Mason—Colonel Joe Mason was leading our group. Took us down, and we managed to get just about on target. We swung in from the English Channel in toward Saint-Nazaire. And we could see the submarine pens ahead of us, and the doors were open. But apparently they’d picked us up on radar because you could see some of the doors were starting to close. So we went line abreast in three squadrons. And I picked out a submarine pen 5 ahead of me. I had Bill Schwenke, was my wingman. And we went in. We dropped our bombs, pulled up over the cliff, and we were hit by 88- and 40-millimeter, both. 88s had been leveled down to fire down on us as we came in and then immediately went up and got us as we came up over the top. We continued on the strafing mission through the Pas-de-Calais area and crossed—supposedly crossed out at what would be the invasion beaches. On the way, we were following a highway into that area, and Bill and I got separated due to visibility from the rest of the flight. But we were operating as element leader and wingman. I came upon a B-17 that had been bellied in by an American crew, and the Germans were working on it, trying to get it back into operation. I called Bill and said I was coming back and that I was going to strafe the airplane so that they wouldn’t have the opportunity to put it back in commission. So we swung around, I hit it, set it on fire, and we continued on out. And we were being hit all the time. It felt like we were flying through a hailstorm because we knew we were being hit by machine gun fire and light antiaircraft. 00:04:52 As we crossed the coast, Bill said he had been hit. I looked over, and sure enough, the air—his airplane was covered with oil. He said he couldn’t see out the windscreen or the canopy. And I said, “Okay, we’ll start to climb so you can jump out.” And we climbed up to about 1,500, 1,600 feet, and he got out okay. His airplane went into the Channel, left a big oil slick. And he had a good chute. And I watched him as he hit the water, and I was waiting for him to inflate his Mae West and his life raft, which he did not do for some reason. And he went down in the chute. So I circled down, and I called the Air/Sea Rescue. And they said they’d be right out. I continued on because my emergency fuel warning light had come on. I still didn’t have England in sight. Pretty soon, in the distance, I could see the white cliffs showing up, so I knew I was down just about on course, just south of Dover. About that time, my red warning light came on, showing that I only had three minutes of fuel left. About that time, I spotted an airfield. It was a Spitfire base. And it was RAF Hawkinge. So I put my gear and flaps down and made a straight-in approach. And just about the time I crossed the end of the field, my engine quit. Ran out of fuel. So I put the aircraft down, not knowing and not realizing it, but that there was a steamroller crossing the field in front of me, hard-packing the ground for the Spitfires. Because they didn’t use runways; they used hard-packed grass fields. Well, I clipped the steamroller with my left wingtip, knocking off my pitot tube and making a hole in my wingtip. But I came to a stop in front of base operations. Talked to the RAF, they patched up the hole in my wing, but I had no airspeed indicator. They fed me lunch because, by this time, it was now 1:00 in the afternoon. So I call my base, told them I was safe at home but that I had lost my wingman, Bill Schwenke. I told them I’d be flying 6 home without an airspeed and to have somebody meet me over the base to bring me in on a formation landing, which they did. Earl Abbott met me over the base, and we landed together and made it home. It was—we found out later, and it’s shown on page five of the aircraft group history, that—says for March 11, which was the first low-level attack by fighters in the Pas-de- Calais area, it was the most intense AA fire ever encountered by any group of fighters up till that time of the war. 00:07:30 [Bomber escort mission against Northeim, Germany (April 19, 1944)] Okay, the next mission that you requested was the 19th of April 1944, which was my 21st birthday.
Recommended publications
  • E10 Trondheim Norway
    E10TRONDHEIM_NORWAY EUROPAN 10 TRONDHEIM_NORWAY 2 DEAR EUROPAN CONTENDERS xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [Show full text]
  • (Iowa City, Iowa), 1943-03-07
    ...... ... ... _,- ... .. .. Ration Calendar Continued Cold OAI "1\" ••• p.n 4 UII.". lII .... b .11 ,Vt:L on. •••pvn _ explr .. Ap.1I U, IOWA: C.. ttlDlIfd eo" today, low. 00"1'11" '.UPOtl 28 expl .., 111 ..." II I est temperature lero to 8 sua". .oupon Ij • pi rei III•• " 161 TilE DAILY IOWAN 8HO.I, .oup... n upl... J.D. U. Iowa City/s Morning Newspaper below ID lOath portloa. fIVE CENTS TBI AS80ClATBD PBE88 IOWA CITY, IOWA SUNDAY, MARCH 1, 1943 THB ASSOCIATBD na VOLUME XLID NUMBER 138 • GERMAN SAILORS F!EL WRATH OF BRITISH JACKTARS .Rommel Begi.ns D~ive Against British 'Eighth' Russians Take lone American Sub Sinks 13 Jap Ships; Lashes Oul Along Mareth line Gzhatsk, Nazi Commander Describes BaHle Experiences In Savage 'Delaying' Assault hat WASHINGTON (AP) - The Chappel explalned. "After a very de navy disclosed last night that a few minutes that ship blew up with ALLIED HEADQUARTER IN ·ORTH AFRICA (AP)­ single American submarine has the damnedest explosion I ever Defense Point saw. I guess he was loaded with t\[arsbal En\'in Rommel' axi fore la ht'd outll\'agt'ly at the sunk 13 Japancse srupS-IO cargo ammunition," British Eil!'hth army at da\D1 y terda), in Ull ofrt'll i"\'l~ aguin t vessels and three warships, A few month alter Pearl Har­ en. ir Beruard Montgomery for the fil t time ' in~c the battle City's Seizure Blunts The submarine, which was not bor, Chappell and his crew had of El Alameiu in Egypt. named, was commanded by Li ut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial – a Guide to The
    PUBLISHED BY Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial Jean-Dolidier-Weg 75 21039 Hamburg Phone: +49 40 428131-500 [email protected] www.kz-gedenkstaette-neuengamme.de EDITED BY Karin Schawe TRANSLATED BY Georg Felix Harsch PHOTOS unless otherwise indicated courtesy We would like to thank the Friends of of the Neuengamme Memorial‘s Archive the Neuengamme Memorial association and Michael Kottmeier for their financial support. Maps on pages 29 and 41: © by M. Teßmer, graphische werkstätten This brochure was produced with feldstraße financial support from the Federal Commissioner for Culture and the Media GRAPHIC DESIGN BY based on a decision by the Bundestag, Annrika Kiefer, Hamburg the German parliament. The Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial – PRINTED BY A Guide to the Site‘s History and the Memorial Druckerei Siepmann GmbH, Hamburg Hamburg, November 2010 The Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial – A Guide to the Site‘s History and the Memorial The Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial – A Guide to the Site's History and the Memorial Published by the Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial Edited by Karin Schawe Contents 6 Preface 10 The NeueNgamme coNceNTraTioN camP, 1938 To 1945 12 chronicle of events, 1938 to 1945 20 The construction of the Neuengamme concentration camp 22 The Prisoners 22 German Prisoners 25 Prisoners from the Occupied Countries 30 The concentration camp SS 31 Slave Labour 35 housing 38 Death 40 The Satellite camps 42 The end 45 The Victims of the Neuengamme concentration camp 46 The SiTe afTer 1945 48 chronicle of events from 1945 58 The British internment camp 59 The Transit camp 60 The Prisons and the memorial at the historical Site of the concentration camp Contents 66 The NeueNgamme coNceNTraTioN camP memoriaL 70 The grounds 93 archives and Library 70 The house of commemoration 93 The Archive 72 The exhibitions 95 The Library 72 Main Exhibition Traces of History 96 The Open Archive 73 Research Exhibition Posted to Neuengamme.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the German Decision Not to Invade the Iberian Peninsula, 1940-1945
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1958 Factors affecting the German decision not to invade the Iberian peninsula, 1940-1945 Gerard F. Rutan The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Rutan, Gerard F., "Factors affecting the German decision not to invade the Iberian peninsula, 1940-1945" (1958). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2310. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2310 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTORS AFFECTING THE GERMAN DECISION NOT TO INVADE THE IBERIAN PENINSULA, 1940-1945 by Gerard Francis Rutan B. A. Montana State University, 1957 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1958 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School AUG 1 81958 Date UMI Number: EP34253 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI EP34253 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN INFERNO by PATRICK DENKER
    AMERICAN INFERNO by PATRICK DENKER (Under the Direction of Reginald McKnight) ABSTRACT American Inferno, a novel, is a loose transposition of Dante‟s Inferno into a contemporary American setting. Its chapters (or “circles”) correspond to Dante‟s nine circles of Hell: 1) Limbo, 2) Lust, 3) Gluttony, 4) Hoarding & Wasting, 5) Wrath, 6) Heresy, 7) Violence, 8) Fraud and 9) Treachery. The novel‟s Prologue — Circle 0 — corresponds to the events that occur, in the Inferno, prior to Dante‟s and Virgil‟s entrance into Hell proper. The novel is a contemporary American moral inquiry, not a medieval Florentine one: thus it is sometimes in harmony with and sometimes a critique of Dante‟s moral system. Also, like the Inferno, it is not an investigation just of its characters‟ personal moral struggles, but also of the historical sins of its nation: for Dante, the nascent Italian state; for us, the United States. Thus the novel follows the life story of its principal character as he progresses from menial to mortal sins while simultaneously considering American history from America‟s early Puritan foundations in the Northeast (Chapters 1-4) through slavery, civil war and manifest destiny (Chapters 5-7) to its ultimate expression in the high-technology West-Coast entertainment industry (Chapters 8-9). INDEX WORDS: Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, Inferno, Sin, American history, American morality, Consumerism, Philosophical fiction, Social realism, Frame narrative, Christianity, Secularism, Enlightenment, Jefferson, Adorno, Culture industry, lobbying, public relations, advertising, marketing AMERICAN INFERNO by PATRICK DENKER B.A., Duke University, 1992 M.F.A., San Francisco State University, 2002 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2010 Patrick Denker All Rights Reserved AMERICAN INFERNO by PATRICK DENKER Major Professor: Reginald McKnight Committee: O.
    [Show full text]
  • Drone Flight and Failure: the United States’ Secret Trials, Experiments and Operations in Unmanning, 1936-1973
    Drone Flight and Failure: the United States’ Secret Trials, Experiments and Operations in Unmanning, 1936-1973 By Katherine Fehr Chandler A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric and the Designated Emphasis in New Media in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor David Bates, Co-Chair Professor Charis Thompson, Co-Chair Professor Samera Esmeir Professor Jake Kosek Spring 2014 Drone Flight and Failure: the United States’ Secret Trials, Experiments and Operations in Unmanning, 1936-1973 ©2014 by Katherine Fehr Chandler Abstract Drone Flight and Failure: the United States’ Secret Trials, Experiments and Operations in Unmanning, 1936-1973 by Katherine Fehr Chandler Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric and the Designated Emphasis in New Media University of California, Berkeley Professor David Bates, Co-Chair Professor Charis Thompson, Co-Chair I examine the precursors to contemporary unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs) to ask what is at stake in the designation “unmanned?” The apparent misnomer dissociates technologies and humans, occluding how international interventions, including surveillance, military support, signals intelligence, and targeted killing, are carried out through actions networked between humans and nonhumans. I use a genealogical approach to address how tensions and contradictions articulated by unmanning emerge, using the development, operation and failure of unmanned systems to complicate divisions between human and nonhuman; “us” and the enemy; immersion and distance; military and industry; and above and below. I identify two phases in the development of remote controlled and unmanned aircraft in the United States: targeting and reconnaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • WAKE ISLAND HALS UM-1 (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS UM-1 (Peale Island) (Wilkes Island) (Wake Atoll) Wake Island US Minor Islands
    WAKE ISLAND HALS UM-1 (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS UM-1 (Peale Island) (Wilkes Island) (Wake Atoll) Wake Island US Minor Islands PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY WAKE ISLAND (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS No. UM-1 Location: Wake Atoll is a small tropical coral atoll in the Pacific Ocean consisting of three islands (Peale, Wake, and Wilkes) enclosing the shallow, central lagoon and surrounded by a narrow fringing reef. From reef to reef, the atoll is approximately 5 miles long and 2.5 miles wide. At 19 degrees 17 minutes north latitude and 166 degrees 3 8 minutes east longitude, the atoll lies just west of the International Date Line. Wake Atoll is 2,458 miles west ofHawai'i, 1,591 miles east of Guam, and 691 miles north ofKwajalein in the Marshall Islands (Aaron 2008:1-1). (Refer to Figure 1). Present Owner: Wake Island is an unorganized, unincorporated territory (possession) of the United States, part of the United States Minor Outlying Islands, administered by the Office of Insular Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior (Aaron 2008b and Aaron 2008: 1-1 ). Effective October 1, 2010, 611 th Air Force in Alaska assumed management responsibility for the atoll. Previously, this responsibility was under 15th Air Wing (AW) of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) at Hickam AFB in Honolulu. Present Occupant and Use: Access to the island is managed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming the Transformed
    S. Carstens, Int. J. of Herit. Archit., Vol. 1, No. 2 (2017) 247–255 TRANSFORMING THE TRANSFORMED S. CARSTENS Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway. ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to examine how Marinewerft Drontheim, U Boot Stutzpunkt DORA, estab- lished at Nyhavna (Trondheim, Norway) during World War II, faced fundamental changes regarding its physical outlook and intended role and use after World War II. The changes were due to an interplay of prewar plans, post-war distance towards occupation and changing socioeconomic realities and trends in urban development ideology. We ask how this German submarine base was understood in post-war Trondheim. How could the basic principles behind the gradual transformation into a massive non-military complex be described, and what was the result of this process? Trondheim is currently growing. The har- bour areas are natural urban renewal sites. In 2015, the municipal authorities put forward a plan for the transformation of Nyhavna into an urban city area. Most of the post-war buildings were to be demolished; however, the remnants of the German naval yard were not to face such a destiny. These buildings with their ‘extreme’ architecture and massively powerful outlook appear as a defining principle for further development of a new urban city district. The article examines the changing perspectives, visions and un- derstandings applied by local authorities during the last decades. This leads towards an understanding of how this area came to be regarded as a potential hub for a major urban redevelopment plan transforming a post-military/industrial town area into an area wherein the larger part is occupied by residential quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Above to View
    BOMBER COMMAND ASSOCIATION IN AUSTRALIA Inc. BCAA 75 Spring 2020 Patron President Secretary Treasurer Air Chief Marshal Dr Ron Houghton DFC Annette Guterres OAM Anthony Trayhurn Sir Angus Houston 2502/37 Glen Street 15 Flavelle Street 4 Fern Street AK AFC Ret’d Milsons Point NSW 2061 Concord NSW 2137 Pymble NSW 2073 Tel. 02 9954 7000 Tel. 0412 759 912 Tel. 02 9488 7436 Editor – Geoff Raebel 1/27 National Avenue Loftus NSW 2232 Tel 0417 203 146 email [email protected] F/O Alastair Panton in his Bomber Command Bristol Blenheim dodging Messer- schmitts in France during the first weeks of WW2 – Story – Page 8 COMMAND ROUTINE ORDERS BY AIR CHIEF MARSHAL SIR A.T. HARRIS KCB, CBE, AFC A.52. SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY - 10th May 1945 Men and Women of Bomber Command. More than 5 ½ years ago, within hours of the declaration of War. Bomber Command first assailed the German enemy. You were then but a handful. Inadequate in everything but the skill and determination of the crews for that sombre occasion and for the unknown years of unceasing battle which lay beyond horizons black indeed. You, the aircrews of Bomber Command, sent your first ton of bombs away on the morrow of the outbreak of war. A million tons of bombs and mines have followed from Bomber Command alone. From Declaration of war to cease fire a continuity of battle without precedent and without relent. Page 1 of 8 In the Battle of France your every endeavour bore down upon an overwhelming and triumphant enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Toolkit
    Tourism Toolkit for European Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Tourism Toolkit for European Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Tourism Toolkit for European Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Authors Universidad de Cádiz with contribution from the TIDE Partnership & Interreg Atlantic Area Final Version Carlota Pérez-Reverte Mañas This document has been produced under the coordination of Universidad de Cádiz with the contribution of the TIDE partnership TIDE PARTNERSHIP ERNACT - Caitriona Strain & Juanita Blue CLARTE - Lionel Dominjon Direcao Regional do Turismo (Madeira) - Bárbara SpÍnola Derry City and Strabane District Council - Ronan McConnell Devon County Council - Bill Horner Donegal County Council - Barney McLaughlin & Margaret Storey Gobierno de Cantabria - Jorge Muyo López Universidad de Cádiz - Carlota Pérez-Reverte Mañas & Felipe Cerezo Andreo © Front cover images: Fanad Lighthouse by Michal Osmenda (CC-BY-SA-2.0); Nao Victoria by Christian Ferrer (CC BY 4.0); Amphorae ©Isla Grosa Project; Irish immigrants in Kansas City, Missouri in c.1909. Family photo scanned by Jeanne Boleyn; Bark Europa by Żeglarz; The fort of Saint John the Baptist ©Madeira Tourism Board; Cádiz by Emilio J. Rodríguez Posada (CC-BY-SA-3.0). Diseño y maquetación: Alfredo Candela ISBN 978-84-120406-5-4 Depósito legal: SE:1767-2020 Foreword The TIDE Toolkit is a fundamental output of the Atlantic Network for Developing Historical Maritime Tourism project funded by the Interreg Atlantic Area programme. The toolkit has been developed to address the programme’s priority of ‘Enhancing biodiversity and the natural and cultural assets’ with the main objective of enhancing natural and cultural assets to stimulate economic development. The TIDE project focuses on the sustainable development of onshore and underwater sites of historical interest on the Atlantic Area coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxithe Naval Wonder Weapon 1943-1945
    XXITHE NAVAL WONDER WEAPON 1943-1945 RULES of PLAY Design Steven Cunliffe TABLE OF CONTENTS Development Russ Lockwood 1.0 INTRODUCTION Art & Layout 2.0 GAME COMPonEntS And TERMS Mark Mahaffey 3.0 SEQUEncE OF PLAY 4.0 DRAW PHASE Production Stephen Rawling 5.0 ALLOCAtion PHASE 6.0 BOMbing DEVASTAtion PHASE Editing Jack Beckman 7.0 MoVEMEnt PHASE 8.0 XXI ConStruction PHASE Playtesting 9.0 BAttLE PHASE Dan Burkley Dennis Shorthouse 10.0 Grinding WAR PHASE 11.0 REPAir PHASE 12.0 End PHASE 13.0 GAME SET UP 14.0 HoW to Win LANDSKNECHT PUBLISHING SERVICES, Inc. Part # GA2018R4 15.0 OPtionAL RULES Printed in the USA Copyright © 2020 Steven Cunliffe 16.0 DEVELOPER NotES And PLAY BALAncE 2 XXI Rules of Play 1.0 INTRODUCTION READ THIS FIRST XXI: The Naval Wonder Weapon 1943-1945 is a solitaire game that We’ve organized the overall structure of the rules of this LPS simu- places you in charge of building a fleet of war-winning submarines: the lation game to follow this game’s sequence of play in introducing Type XXI U-boats. Construction of these large, complex, and resource- concepts. The rules themselves are written in a format known as the and manpower-intensive submarines requires a radical transformation in Case System. This approach divides the rules into Modules (each of shipbuilding techniques. which deals with a major important aspect of play). Modules are You must figure out how to coordinate the accumulation of hulls, systems, numbered sequentially as well as possessing a title. Each Module is crew, and other resources from factories and training bases spread all over divided into Sections (that deal with a major sub-topic inside the Germany to make the XXI U-boat flotillas.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Defense Department Report Fy1977 Report of Secretary of Defense
    Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld ANNUAL DEFENSE DEPARTMENT REPORT FY1977 REPORT OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DONALD H. RUMSFELD TO TH E CONGRESS ON THE FY 1977 BUDGET AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FY 1978 AUTHORIZATION REQUEST AND THE FY 1977 -1981 DEFENSE PROGRAMS JANUARY 27,1976 STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE DONALD H. RUMSFELD SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, JANUARY 27, 1976 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: I am pleased to present the proposed defense budget for FY 1977 and its implications for the defense authorization request for FY 1978, and a preliminary five-year defense projection for FY 1977-1981. In FY 1977, the Department proposes a defense budget of $112.7 billion in total obligational authority and $100.1 billion in estimated outlays. The details of this request as well as its justification are set forth in the annual Defense Department Report. I will touch on some of the points of particular interest. I. The Defense Budget We estimate that because of a declining rate of inflation, the defense budget for FY 1976 could permit some small real growth in defense funding for the first time since FY 1968. The budget request for FY 1977 and the preliminary five-year defense projection reflect our conviction that there must be a real program gorwth in the years immediately ahead. The Defense establishment is engaged in a crucial function of government ­ providing for the common defense - contributing to peace, stability, and the preservation of freedom. I know it will receive your most serious consideration. Within roughly three months, as prescribed by the new budget reform guidelines, you and your colleagues in the House and Senate will determine the total federal spending level, and the portion of that total which will be devoted to defense and deterrence.
    [Show full text]