DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Outline of Revised Transport Master Plan By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Outline of Revised Transport Master Plan By Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary 5 OUTLINE OF REVISED TRANSPORT MASTER PLAN BY JUTPI 1) Overview In the JUTPI Project, the Comprehensive Transport Master Plan for JABODETABEK was revised based on the SITRAMP Study Master Plan taking into account of the updated urban transport demand and the central and local government plans such as PTM and RTRW. The revised plan was submitted to the Indonesian government in 2011 and being evaluated for the approval of the President. This revised plan is the basis of the planning for road-based public transport system in JAPTraPIS. In this chapter, the outline of the revised transport master plan by the JUTPI Project is outlined. In the revision of the transport master plan, the following major issues are examined: • Evaluation of Progress of the SITRAMP Study Master Plan • Socio Economic Changes Between 2002 and 2010 • Future Perspectives and Travel Demand 2) Development Goals and Strategies The JUTPI Project, after analysis of socio-economic changes from 2002-2010 trends, supports the goals set in previous Transport Master Plans which are outlined as: (1) Efficiency in transport system to support economic activities – citing the economic loss caused by congestion and improvements to efficiency through managing supply and demand factors (2) Equity in transport to all members in society – this relates specifically to provide affordable mobility options to vulnerable sections of society. (3) Environmental betterment related to transport - specifically air pollution and noise are the environmental factor to be considered. (4) Transportation safety and security – specifically raises minimizing accidents of road and rail transport. Strategies for the development of regional trunk transportation system are also defined as follows: • Development of Primary Transport System to Support Inter-regional Cargo and Passenger Transport Demand • East-West Strategic Transport Corridor Development • Strengthening Accessibility between Urban Centers in Jabodetabek The JUTPI Project proposes four key urban transport policies and strategies to support the previously outline goals, these policies and strategies are the basis of the Master Plan. 3) Urban Transport Development Scenarios The revised plan nominates three urban transportation system development scenarios to evaluate their efficiency and appropriateness. These include: (1) Intensive Highway Network Development Scenario - includes six inner toll roads and non-toll elevated roads with an alternative for intra-urban tollway is East West link between Jakarta Merak Toll Road at Tomang and on the Jakarta Intraurban tollway N-S 5-1 Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary Link at Cempak Putih. (2) Intensive Public Transportation System Development Scenario - includes all the proposed rail-based public transportation system including three East - West MRT system, with the Monorail Green Line included with its extension to Ragnan Zoo. (3) Intensive Highway and Public Transportation Development Scenario which accelerates both highway network development and public transportation system development, and where they overlap are built as an integrated elevated road and an underground MRT, citing a Tokyo example. 4) Future Public Transport Demand (1) Assumption for Travel Demand Forecast The future population framework by region was set as shown in Table 5.1. The residential area would spread to outside of DKI Jakarta and work place locations would also spread out, but the highest density would remain in the CBD area. Table 5.1 Future Population Framework by Region Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 DKI Jakarta 9,588 9,883 10,066 10,161 10,263 Bogor 7,484 7,983 8,432 8,828 9,247 Tangerang 5,940 6,478 6,946 7,382 7,851 Bekasi 5,021 5,356 5,657 5,923 6,204 BODETABEK 18,444 19,817 21,036 22,132 23,301 JABODETABEK 28,033 29,701 31,102 32,294 33,564 Source: Population Census and JUTPI Estimate Table 5.2 shows the projected GRDP and per capita GRDP in JABODETABEK. JUTPI assumed that GRDP growth rate of JABODETABEK is 5% from 2008 considering the recent trend of GRDP. Table 5.2 Projected GRDP and Per Capita GRDP Year 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 GRDP (bill. Rupiah) 419,611 548,232 699,698 893,011 1,139,734 1,454,621 Per Capita GRDP (mil. Rupiah) 17.7 21.7 26.1 31.9 39.2 48.2 Source: JUTPI (2) Demand Forecasting Methodology JUTPI used conventional 4-step method to develop demand forecasting model for JABODETABEK. JUTPI model has its root from SITRAMP model. Since the 2004 SITRAMP study, there has been a considerable number of changes in trip making and trip pattern in the study area. To capture these changes, JUTPI conducted several surveys such as commuter survey 2010 and person tracking survey 2010 based on which a comprehensive JUTPI model is developed using state-of-the-art software CUBE. (3) Travel Demand Forecast Trip Production and Attraction: Figure 5.1 shows total trip production/attraction forecasted for years 2020 and 2030 and that of year 2010. 5-2 Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary Figure 5.1 Present and FutureTrips in JABODETABEK Source: JUTPI Trip Distribution: Trip OD matrices of JABODETABEK for the base year 2010 and forecast years 2020 and 2030 are developed. Modal Choice: The modal share for each of the analysis case (scenario) in the study area is estimated. The trips by non-motorized modes are excluded. The modal share for the Case 0 (Do Nothing Scenario) and Case 2 (Highway Moderate and Public Transport Intensive Development Scenario) is show in Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3, respectively. In JAPTraPIS, estimated demand of Case 2 was used for the planning of road-based public transport master plan. The modal share of public transport increases from 27% in 2010 to 34% in 2020. Figure 5.2 Modal Choice for Case 0 (Do Nothing) ı 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2010 20% 53% 27% 2020 28% 50% 22% 2030 31% 48% 20% Car Motorcycle Public Transport Source: JUTPI 5-3 Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary Figure 5.3 Modal Choice for Case 2 (Highway Moderate and Public Transport Intensive) ı 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2010 20% 53% 27% 2020 24% 42% 34% 2030 25% 36% 39% Car Motorcycle Public Transport Source: JUTPI 5) Revised Urban Transport Master Plan (1) Key Project Components The revised master plan lists a total of 120 projects. It covers entire area of urban transport system categorized as follows: • Road Network Development • Improvement of Traffic Control System and Demand Management • Bus Transport System and Interchange Facility Development • Railway System Development • Access to International and Inter-regional Transportation • Improvement of Transport Safety and Security • Environment Betterment • Measure in Urban Planning • Institutional Setup and Reform • Financial Arrangement (2) Revised Urban Transport Network The revised master plan proposed backbone network of urban transport system up to target year of 2020 (refer to Figure 5.4 and Figure 5.5). A number of ring roads and radial roads, inner toll roads, non-toll elevated roads, road widening and access roads to station also were proposed in the master plan. As for public transportation network, a number of busway developments, MRT, airport access and monorail were proposed. 5-4 Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary Figure 5.4 2020 Road Network by JUTPI Revised Master Plan Source: JUTPI Revised Master Plan Figure 5.5 2020 Public Transport Network by JUTPI Revised Master Plan Source: JUTPI Revised Master Plan 5-5 Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Summary 6 DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND STRATEGIES 1) Core Issues In order to deliver a relevant and appropriate Master Plan and associated recommendations the study identified core issues facing the study area including: • The challenges of traffic congestion and decreasing mobility • A transport network approach • Public transport sustainability • Specific issues of TransJakarta: including i) performance of the busway system, ii) management and customer service delivery, iii) system speed and iv) system control. • Development of a city transport system These included assessment and analysis of the issues to be able to develop a strategic planning framework (how to approach the project planning). 2) Goals and Supporting Strategies for Urban Mobility A Strategic Planning Framework must 1) identify goals supported by objectives that are sufficiently tangible and realistic to enable all stakeholders to understand clearly what needs to be achieved; and 2) develop strategies and actions and to be able to declare success when goals are reached. This JAPTraPIS study makes a preliminary list of goals and objectives as follows: (1) To make JABODETABEK a prosperous and livable city (2) To create a highly efficient transport network (3) To reduce car use through supply and demand measures (4) To create efficient urban transport systems: including i) efficiency in infrastructure, ii) efficiency in transport management and operation, and iii) efficiency delivers sustainability and equity. (5) To improve system management supported by a sustainable business model 3) Project Approach Based on the assessment and analysis of the core issues, the strategic project approach was developed describing the areas of project work and outcomes. It was evident that a comprehensive approach was needed, encompassing planning and infrastructure, systems and operations design and effective business and management frameworks. A number of approaches were evaluated and tested which informed the final plan. Clearly the evaluation showed that the planned MRT is a vital part of the future network but on its own would not deliver the wide network necessary to provide alternative public transport options.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Penentuan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Park & Ride Sebagai Fasilitas Pergerakan Komuter Pada Koridor Bekasi-Jakarta
    TUGAS AKHIR – RP141501 PENENTUAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PEMILIHAN PARK & RIDE SEBAGAI FASILITAS PERGERAKAN KOMUTER PADA KORIDOR BEKASI-JAKARTA MOHAMAD FARIDZ NAZALAPUTRA 3612 100 056 Dosen Pembimbing Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT JURUSAN PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya 2017 FINAL PROJECT – RP141501 DETERMINING THE FACTOR OF PARK & RIDE CHOOSEN FOR COMMUTERS MOBILITY FACILITIES IN CORRIDORS OF BEKASI-JAKARTA MOHAMAD FARIDZ NAZALAPUTRA 3612 100 056 Advisor Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology Surabaya 2017 ii LEMBAR PENGESAHAN PENENTUAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR PEMILIHAN PARK & RIDE SEBAGAI FASILITAS PERGERAKAN KOMUTER PADA KORIDOR BEKASI-JAKARTA Nama Mahasiswa : Mohamad Faridz Nazalaputra NRP : 3612100056 Jurusan : Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Dosen Pembimbing : Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT. ABSTRAK Setiap hari penduduk di DKI Jakarta bertambah hingga 1.382.296 jiwa pada siang hari. Kota Bekasi menyumbang jumlah komuter terbanyak di DKI Jakarta yaitu sebanyak 460.069 jiwa. Kereta rel listrik (KRL) merupakan moda transportasi yang cukup efisien untuk melayani pergerakan komuter di Koridor Bekasi-Jakarta. Sebanyak 31.373 memilih KRL sebagai moda transportasi pergerakan, namun pergerakan dari Kota Bekasi menuju DKI Jakarta masih didominasi oleh pengguna kendaraan pribadi yaitu sebesar 331.244 jiwa. Park & ride merupakan sebuah fasilitas penunjang moda transportasi KRL yang dapat mengalihkan pengguna pribadi untuk menggunakan moda transportasi KRL. Dalam optimalisasi fasilitas park & ride, perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk mencari faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan park & ride pada Koridor Bekasi- Jakarta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menentukan faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan park and ride untuk mendorong komuter menggunakan KRL koridor Bekasi – Jakarta.
    [Show full text]
  • Rencana Induk Transportasi Jabodetabek (Ritj)
    RENCANA INDUK TRANSPORTASI JABODETABEK (RITJ) BADAN PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PERHUBUNGAN PUSAT PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN DARAT DAN PERKERETAAPIAN 2015 Daftar Isi Bab I PENDAHULUAN 4.2. Rencana Pengelolaan (kebijakan dan program) 1.1 Latar Belakang 4.2.1. Penataan Tata Guna Lahan dan TOD 1.2 Kondisi Transportasi di Jabodetabek 4.2.2. Transportasi Tidak Bermotor dan Integrasi Angkutan Umum 1.3 Konteks Sosial Ekonomi Demogra Perkotaan 1.4 Desentralisasi dan Konektivitas antar Wilayah di Jabodetabek 4.2.3. Manajemen Jaringan Jalan 1.5 Kondisi Keuangan dan Belanja Daerah 4.2.4. Pengaturan Lalu Lintas Kendaraan dan Parkir 1.6 Studi Terkait Pengembangan Kawasan Jabodetabek 4.2.5. Teknologi Kendaraan dan Bahan Bakar 1.7 Regulasi terkait BPTJ dan RITJ 4.2.6. Logistik Perkotaan 1.8 Maksud Penyusunan RITJ 4.2.7. Akes Pelabuhan dan Bandar Udara 4.2.8. Konektitas Regional Bab II STRATEGI TATA RUANG PERKOTAAN JABODETABEK 4.3. Hasil Simulasi 2.1 Latar Belakang Masalah 2.2 Konsep Bab V STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI 2.3 Sejarah Pengelolaan Kawasan Jabodetabekjur 5.1 Regulasi Implementasi 2.4 Struktur dan Pola Ruang 5.2 Pembiayaan Penyelenggaraan 2.5 Pengendalian 5.3 Kelembagaan Rencana Induk 5.4 Kemitraan dengan Pemangku Kepentingan Bab III BASELINE DAN SASARAN KINERJA TRANSPORTASI 5.4.1. Penyedia Jasa dan Operator 3.1 Denisi Baseline RITJ 5.4.2. Konsumen Pengguna Layanan Transportasi Perkotaan 3.2 Indikator Kinerja Utama 5.4.3. Lembaga Donor 3.3 Baseline Transportasi 5.5 Partisipasi Masyarakat 3.4 Sasaran Kinerja 5.5.1. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perumusan Rencana dan 3.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Development Goals and Strategies
    Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) FINAL REPORT: Main Text 6 DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND STRATEGIES 6.1 Core Issues 1) The Challenges of Traffic Congestion and Decreasing Mobility Transport and mobility is a major community concern affecting the daily lives of millions of citizens in Jakarta with traffic congestion inflicting a high social and economic cost due to wasted time, increased transport cost and loss of productivity. The Transportation Ministry estimates that traffic jams cost Jakarta IDR 28.1 trillion rupiah ($3.2 billion) yearly in fuel costs, lost productivity and health costs. Traffic congestion erodes the benefits of economic growth and development. Citizen’s also raise transport as a strong area of concern, emphasizing that better solutions are needed, involving improvements to the existing public transport network, and for governments to place restrictions on car use. Congestion impacts on all sectors, in that all, ravel choices are inconvenient; cars, motorcycles, and public transport are all, in varying degrees, inconvenient, time wasting, expensive, and unsafe. Jakarta’s development also faces 21st century challenges; specifically energy cost and security; pollution and carbon emissions and increasingly limited space for car traffic. European cities are leading the way in addressing these issues and actually develop policies to make car travel more inconvenient in favour of to promoting more efficient modes such as public transport, cycling and pedestrian space. While it is necessary to have an efficient and well connected road network, building road space with the expectation to relieve traffic congestion is often counterproductive, as the extra road space is quickly absorbed by more cars and motorcycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Harapan Indah
    KOTA Vol. 06 / 2017 HARAPAN INDAH GAYA URBAN RUMAH VERTIKAL Hidup lebih mudah dengan APLIKASI ONLINE APARTEMEN NYAMAN Mendatangkan Keberuntungan SMALL ROOM LITTLE PROBLEM Kota Harapan Indah - 1 Editorial DI BA I PR I : DOKUMENTAS I ILUSTRAS HIGH LIFE Kesibukan dan mobilitas yang tinggi membuat masyarakat kelas menengah banyak memilih apartemen sebagai tempat tinggal. Dengan harga lebih terjangkau, rumah vertikal menawarkan kepraktisan dan keamanan di lokasi strategis. Belum lagi berbagai fasilitas yang ditawarkan, mulai dari klub kebugaran, kolam renang, commercial area, Majalah Kota Harapan Indah playground hingga kawasan kuliner yang mendukung gaya hidup urban keluarga adalah majalah komunitas masa kini. wilayah Kota Harapan Indah yang diterbitkan oleh Damai Putra Tinggal di rumah vertikal tentu saja membutuhkan berbagai penyesuaian. Untuk itu Group, PT.Hasana Damai Putra kami mempersembahkan edisi ini sebagai pendukung diluncurkannya Apartemen bekerja sama dengan: SAYANA di Kota Harapan Indah yang juga memiliki potensi investasi yang sangat baik. Pilih dan lakukan reservasi unit apartement Sayana sekarang, dan nikmati gaya hidup masa kini yang serba praktis. Jangan lupa untuk bahagia! Jl. Kebon Kacang Raya No.1 Flat IV Jakarta 10240 Salam, T. o21.3141710 F. 021.31935677 Marketing Communication Claudya Hayat Catherine Gunawan 021.8898 6688 ext. 153 Marketing & Iklan Ria Larasati [email protected] 2 - Vol. 06 2017 Kota Harapan Indah - 3 28 Family Teknologi (jangan) 6 KHI News Menjauhkan Kota Harapan Indah Meraih My Home At Home Awards 2017 16 - Trends Alerts 18 - Feature 22 - Home Solutions YANG 28 - Family TETAP 31 - Recipe 3 - Editorial 4 - TOC 32 Health 6 - KHI News URBAN Fun and 12 Event Refreshing Merayakan 36 Tahun Damai Putra Group 9 - Hello LIVING 10 - Events 26 - Digital Life 14 - Highlights 34 - Feng Shui 46 - Directory 36 - Finance 38 - Hobby 40 - Hangout UPDATE 30 - Beauty 14 Highlight 40 Hangout Sayana Apartment, 32 - Health Hawkers Food Street The Art of Bersantap lezat Comfortable Sambil Selfie Living 42 - Travel 4 - Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region (JMR): a Perspective of Spatial Segregation
    New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region (JMR): a Perspective of Spatial Segregation Tommy Firman Department of Regional and City Planning Institute of Technology, Bandung Indonesia The extent to which land and new town development has reinforced spatial segregation in Jakarta Metropolitan Region (JMR) is discussed. The demand for new town has been essentially generated by the need for security and fulfilling exclusive life style, while innovative have been able to sell an image of new town as a symbol of ‘modernism.’ New town development has reinforced spatial segregation in three ways: First, it has polarized the middle and upper income groups, resulting in scattered pockets of exclusive residential areas. Second, within the new towns themselves, the upper middle and high class occupied exclusive designed areas and to the highest security possible. Third, in several new towns urban development management are carried out by the developers, instead of by the City Hall. The spatial segregation in JMR can be classified as ‘self segregation’ or ‘voluntary segregation.’ It would continue and it is inevitable, resulted from socioeconomic and political condition of the urban society as a whole. This paper is concerned with the extent to which land and new town development have reinforced spatial segregation in Jakarta Metropolitan Region, the largest concentration of urban population and economic activities in Indonesia. Spatial segregation refers to the residential separation of sub-groups within a wider population which could be associated primarily with racial groups, ethnicity, religious beliefs or income status (Johnston et al, 1983). According to van Kempen and Ozuckren (1998) spatial segregation comes into existence when some areas show an overrepresentation and other areas an underrepresentation of members of group.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES
    http://englishkyoto-seas.org/ View the table of contents for this issue: http://englishkyoto-seas.org/2015/12/vol-4-no-3-of-southeast-asian-studies-2/ Subscriptions: http://englishkyoto-seas.org/mailing-list/ For permissions, please send an e-mail to: [email protected] Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES Vol. 4, No. 3 December 2015 CONTENTS Articles ARAI Kenichiro Jakarta “Since Yesterday”: The Making of the Post-New Order Regime in an Indonesian Metropolis ...............................................(445) Wu-Ling CHONG Local Politics and Chinese Indonesian Business in Post-Suharto Era ...............................................................................(487) Elizabeth CHANDRA Blossoming Dahlia: Chinese Women Novelists in Colonial Indonesia ............................................................................................(533) Rosalina PALANCA-TAN Tourism and Crime: Evidence from the Philippines ...........................(565) Len Patrick Dominic M. GARCES Angelica Nicole C. PURISIMA Angelo Christian L. ZARATAN Arthur C. K. CHIA Inclusive Spirituality: The Bodhisattva Kuan-yin as Moral Exemplar and Self-Cultivation in a Malaysian Dharma House ......(581) Book Reviews Faisal CHAUDHRY Khoo Boo Teik, Vedi Hadiz, and Yoshihiro Nakanishi, eds. Between Dissent and Power: The Transformation of Islamic Politics in the Middle East and Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, xv+298p., index. .....................................................................(605)
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies in Peri-Urban Areas in Indonesia)
    land Article Transformation of Local People’s Property Rights Induced by New Town Development (Case Studies in Peri-Urban Areas in Indonesia) Rahmat Aris Pratomo 1,2,* , D. Ary A. Samsura 2,3 and Erwin van der Krabben 2 1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta Km. 15, Karang Joang, Balikpapan 76127, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia 2 Institute for Management Research, Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 141, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (D.A.A.S.); [email protected] (E.v.d.K.) 3 Department of Environment and Urban Studies, UNIKA Soegijapranata, Jl. Pawiyatan Luhur Sel. IV No.1, Semarang 50234, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-657-114-141 Received: 26 May 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; Published: 21 July 2020 Abstract: New town development as a form of large-scale development is not a new phenomenon, particularly in developing countries. This development mainly takes place in peri-urban areas due to the high pressure caused by the growing population and the lack of facilities and infrastructure in city centres. As an effect, local communities who originally occupied the land often lose their rights over the property their livelihood might have relied on. Property rights can be grouped differently, classified according to different bundles: appropriation, ownership, and formality of rights. This paper investigates to what extent new town development in Indonesia has affected the property rights of local communities, in terms of the transformation of rights and security level.
    [Show full text]
  • Transjakarta Trans Kota Tangerang
    Kali Adem 12A Transjakarta Perumahan Perumahan Buddha Buddha Tzu Chi Tzu Chi Terminal Terminal Muara Muara Angke Angke Peta Jaringan BRT Jabodetabek Layanan Dalam Koridor Main Corridor Service Muara AngkeBaywalk Mall Baywalk1 Mall 2 SD Diakonia Stella Maris Jabodetabek BRT Network Map Karang Asri SD Stella 1 Blok M - Kota 2A Kalideres - Pulogadung 1 PLTU Maris Diakonia Waduk Pluit SMAK Penabur 6 12B 9F PIK AvenueRuko CordobaWaterbom RS.Jakarta PIK Simpang MandaraMandara Permai PermaiMediterania 6 Margasatwa Boulevard 9 2 Pulogadung 1 - Harmoni 2C Monas - JIEXPO Kemayoran 9A FRESH MARKET PIK SMKN 9-27 PLUIT 56 1A Jl. Pluit SaktiAston Pluit12-2 LandmarkSDN Penjaringan LuarAuto Batang Plaza12-3 Pakin 9A 9 9F 12B 12-4 GedongJembatan Panjang Kota12-5 Intan Museum Fatahillah 3 Kalideres - Pasar Baru 5C PGC 1 - Harmoni Margasatwa Ruko Cordoba RS. PIK/Ozone Buddha Tzu Chi Simpang Waterbom Jakarta Gedong Pulogadung 2 - Dukuh Atas 2 SMAK Penabur 6 Simpang 4 5D PGC 1 - Ancol Pluit Karang Indah Panjang Centro Metro Broadway Pasar MuaraMuara Karang Karang Raya 9-26 Penjaringan Pakin Gedong Simpang Mandara Permai RS. Pluit Panjang Pluit Raya 2 3D 12 Jl. Murta Baru Jl. Kunir Museum Bahari/ Bahari/ 5 Kampung Melayu - Ancol 5E Pasar Ikan Museum BNI 46 Kampung Rambutan - Ancol Pasar IkanJl. TongkolJl. Cengkeh Simpang Pluit Raya Kelurahan Penjaringan Jl. Tanah Pasir 12 10 B12 10A 6 Ragunan - Dukuh Atas 2 6A Ragunan - Monas via Kuningan Jembatan Tiga/PLN 9-25 Jembatan 1-20 12-6 ST. KOTA 10-1 12-21 TANJUNG PRIOK Tiga 1 9B 12A Jembatan Dua Selatan Teluk Jakarta Al Muklisin Jakarta Bay Kecamatan Tambora Jl.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Using Collaborative Planning in Building Large Scale Housing in Jakarta Metropolitan
    Transit Oriented Development Using Collaborative Planning in Building Large Scale Housing in Jakarta Metropolitan Andri Dirgantara Head of Sub-Division Planning Preparation for Landed and Thematic Housing, Deputy of Formal Housing Ministry of Housing of Republic of Indonesia Background There are many issues and aspects of urban development; one of the important issues is controlling the urban growth. It is interesting because almost of the developing countries facing the high urbanization do not well prepares and plans to deal with that issue. Government, both central and local, cannot move and react as fast as urbanization does. That condition lead to unplanned of city growth with its settlement and push the urban sprawl and slum area. Urbanization cannot be avoided and continue whether we like or not, but it needs to be controlled. In order to help control urbanization, preparing the expansion of the city with development satellite city is an important aspect. I agree with statement that city is an engine of development, but we must think about the city’s capacity. We cannot let the urbanization happen without control. The government both central and local must be aware of and concerned to the issue otherwise many problems will arise and become more complicated if not anticipated properly. To deal with the complex problems we need to accommodate all of the involved actors/stakeholders. To integrated so many actors and stakeholders there is a need to apply a collaborative planning which considers all of the involved actors from the beginning of the process so they can support more in achieving the goals.
    [Show full text]
  • New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region (JMR)
    Large-Scale Housing and New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA): Towards an Urban Spatial Segregation Tommy Firman Department of Regional and City Planning Institute of Technology, Bandung Indonesia This paper discusses the extent to which land and new town development has reinforced spatial segregation in Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA). The demand for new town has been essentially generated by the need for security and fulfilling exclusive life style, while innovative have been able to sell an image of new town as a symbol of ‘modernism.’ New town development has reinforced spatial segregation in three ways: First, it has polarized the middle and upper income groups, resulting in scattered pockets of exclusive residential areas. Second, within the new towns themselves, the upper middle and high class occupied exclusive designed areas and to the highest security possible. Third, in several new towns urban development management are carried out by the developers, instead of by the City Hall. The spatial segregation in JMA can be classified as ‘self segregation’ or ‘voluntary segregation.’ It would continue and it is inevitable, resulted from socioeconomic and political condition of the urban society as a whole. Spatial segregation refers to the residential separation of sub- groups within a wider population which could be associated primarily with racial groups, ethnicity, religious beliefs or income status (Johnston et al, 1983). According to van Kempen and Ozuckren (1998) spatial segregation comes into existence when some areas show an overrepresentation and other areas an underrepresentation of members of group. It could exist between housing estates within neighborhoods, between urban neighborhoods, and between cities and its surounding areas (p.1632; see also Marcuse and van Kempen, 2000a).
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Tujuan Dan Strategi Pembangunan
    Project for the Study on JABODETABEK Public Transportation Policy Implementation Strategy (JAPTraPIS) LAPORAN AKHIR: Teks Utama 6 TUJUAN DAN STRATEGI PEMBANGUNAN 6.1 Masalah Utama 1) Tantangan Kemacetan Lalu Lintas dan Penurunan Mobillitas Transportasi dan mobilitas merupakan persoalanan utama masyarakat yang mempengaruhi kehidupan sehari-hari jutaan penduduk di Jakarta dengan kemacetan lalu lintas yang menimbulkan biaya sosial dan ekonomi yang tinggi karena kerugian waktu, peningkatan biaya transportasi dan hilangnya produktivitas. Kementerian Perhubungan memperkirakan bahwa biaya kemacetan lalu lintas di Jakarta mencapai Rp 28.1 triliun rupiah ($ 3.2 milyar) per tahun dalam biaya bahan bakar, kehilangan produktivitas dan biaya kesehatan. Kemacetan lalu lintas mengikis manfaat dari pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pembangunan. Penduduk juga menganggap transportasi sebagai sektor yang harus mendapatkan perhatian serius, menekankan bahwa solusi yang lebih baik diperlukan, yang melibatkan perbaikan jaringan transportasi umum yang ada, sedangkan bagi pemerintah tugasnya melakukan pembatasan terhadap penggunaan mobil. Kemacetan berdampak pada semua sektor, pada semua alternatif pilihan yang cenderung kurang nyaman; mobil, sepeda motor, dan angkutan umum semuanya, dalam derajat yang bervariasi, dirasakan kurang nyaman, membuang waktu, mahal, dan tidak aman. Pembangunan Jakarta juga menghadapi tantangan abad 21; khususnya biaya energy dan keamanan; polusi dan emisi karbon dan semakin terbatasnya ruang untuk lalu lintas mobil. Kota-kota di Eropa adalah
    [Show full text]
  • Others) Kapuk Jakarta Group
    http://englishkyoto-seas.org/ Arai Kenichiro Jakarta “Since Yesterday”: The Making of the Post-New Order Regime in an Indonesian Metropolis Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, December 2015, pp. 445-486. How to Cite: Arai, Kenichiro. Jakarta “Since Yesterday”: The Making of the Post- New Order Regime in an Indonesian Metropolis. Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, December 2015, pp. 445-486. Link to this article: http://englishkyoto-seas.org/2015/12/vol-4-no-3-arai/ View the table of contents for this issue: http://englishkyoto-seas.org/2015/12/vol-4-no-3-of-southeast-asian-studies-2/ Subscriptions: http://englishkyoto-seas.org/mailing-list/ For permissions, please send an e-mail to: [email protected] u.ac.jp Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University Jakarta “Since Yesterday”: The Making of the Post-New Order Regime in an Indonesian Metropolis Arai Kenichiro* This paper is an attempt to explore the features of Indonesia’s post-New Order regime in terms of the reorganization of the spatial, economic, and socio-political order in the Jabodetabek region. Although buoyant property investments in the last seven to eight years significantly changed the skyline of the metropolis, this paper reveals that the basic pattern did not alter after the regime change, with major developers taking control of vast areas of suburban land and creating an oligopolistic order. This paper argues that this continuity was due greatly to the developers’ ability to organize and protect their collective interests through business associa- tions and strong ties with political parties and the administration.
    [Show full text]