DOCSLIB.ORG

Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2018-2028

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2018-2028 Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2018-2028 Approved by Loudoun County Board of Supervisors on June 23, 2016 Updated by county staff on January 10, 2018 Prepared by Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1: Overview of Loudoun County Transit .......................................................................................... 1 History ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Commuter Bus ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Local Bus ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Governance ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Organizational Structure ........................................................................................................................... 5 Transit Services Provided and Areas Served ............................................................................................. 7 Long Haul Routes .................................................................................................................................. 8 Metro Connection Routes ................................................................................................................... 10 Local Routes ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Paratransit and Demand-Response Services ...................................................................................... 20 Fare Structure ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Vehicle Fleet ............................................................................................................................................ 22 Existing Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Commuter Bus Maintenance Facility .................................................................................................. 24 Local Bus and Paratransit Maintenance Facility ................................................................................. 24 Park and Ride Lots ............................................................................................................................... 24 Bicycle Lockers .................................................................................................................................... 25 Bus Stops ................................................................................................................................................. 26 Transit Security Program ......................................................................................................................... 26 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program .................................................................................. 26 Communications ................................................................................................................................. 26 Data Collection and Ridership and Revenue Reporting Methodology ................................................... 27 Public Outreach ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 2: Goals, Objectives, and Standards .............................................................................................. 29 Transportation Goals and Strategies ...................................................................................................... 29 Public Transit Policies .............................................................................................................................. 30 Guiding Principles ............................................................................................................................... 30 Transit and Land Use........................................................................................................................... 31 Public Transit Service .......................................................................................................................... 32 Dulles Corridor Metrorail (Silver Line Phase 2) Project Policies ......................................................... 33 Park and Ride Lot Policies ................................................................................................................... 33 Bus Shelters and Amenities Standards ............................................................................................... 33 Performance Standards .......................................................................................................................... 34 Chapter 3: Service and System Evaluation.................................................................................................. 35 Retrospective Analysis of Performance .................................................................................................. 35 Peer Comparisons ................................................................................................................................... 36 Commuter Bus Peer Analysis .............................................................................................................. 36 Commuter Bus Operators in the Washington, DC Region .................................................................. 42 Local Bus Peer Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 44 Onboard Ridership Survey ...................................................................................................................... 51 Loudoun County Page i January 2018 Transit Development Plan Update: FY 2018-2023 Commuter Bus Survey Highlights ....................................................................................................... 51 Local Bus Survey Highlights ................................................................................................................. 52 Stakeholder Outreach and Focus Groups ............................................................................................... 53 Recent Changes in Patronage, Operating Costs, and Operating Revenue ............................................. 56 Long Haul Commuter Bus ................................................................................................................... 56 Metro Connection Bus ........................................................................................................................ 56 Local Fixed Route Service.................................................................................................................... 57 ADA Paratransit and Demand Response............................................................................................. 60 Land Use Plans Supporting Transit .......................................................................................................... 61 Intelligent Transportation Systems ......................................................................................................... 66 Deviations from Service Standards ......................................................................................................... 67 Long Haul ............................................................................................................................................ 67 Metro Connection ............................................................................................................................... 67 Local Bus ............................................................................................................................................. 67 ADA Paratransit ................................................................................................................................... 68 Equipment and Facility Deficiencies ....................................................................................................... 69 Park and Ride Lots ............................................................................................................................... 69 Rail Station Parking Garages ............................................................................................................... 71 Bus Fleet .............................................................................................................................................. 71 Bus Maintenance Facilities ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town of Leesburg
    DRAFT LOUDOUN COUNTY Transit Management Analysis Report Prepared for: Prepared by: October 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Study Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................................................3 2. Institutional Stakeholders and Existing Funding .....................................................................4 Loudoun County .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Town of Leesburg .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) .................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC) ........................................................................................... 4 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) ...............................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, Et Al, Texas Southern University
    Texas Southern University From the SelectedWorks of Earthea Nance, PhD (Stanford University, 2004) 2017 Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, et al, Texas Southern University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/nanceea/25/ 1 Invited Student Paper: Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating 2 Buses in Managed Lanes 3 4 5 6 7 Velyjha Southern 8 Graduate Research Assistant 9 Texas Southern University 10 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 11 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 12 [email protected] 13 14 Earthea Nance, Ph.D. 15 Associate Professor 16 Texas Southern University 17 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 18 713-313-4854 (p) 713-313-7153 (f) 19 [email protected] 20 21 Carol Abel Lewis, Ph.D. 22 Professor and Director, CTTR 23 Texas Southern University 24 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 25 713-313-7924 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 26 Jermaine Potts 27 Graduate Research Assistant 28 Texas Southern University 29 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 30 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 31 32 33 Prepared for consideration for 34 Presentation at the 96th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 35 Washington D.C. January 2017 36 37 Word Count: 6,237 (Body) + 1,250 (Tables and Figures) = 7,487 38 References= 18 39 Submission date: November 14, 2016 40 41 42 Southern, Nance, Lewis, and Potts 2 1 2 3 4 5 ABSTRACT 6 This paper examines high intensity bus (HIB) service in managed lanes in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax Connector Route
    Contact Fairfax Connector 480 For general inquiries; to offer a suggestion; to file a compliment or complaint; or report a lost item, Effective May 23, 2019 please contact Fairfax Connector. fairfaxconnector.com Wolf Trap [email protected] Express West Falls Church Metro Station • Fairfax Connector Information Center Wolf Trap Filene Center 703-339-7200, TTY 703-339-1608 MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR Monday - Friday: 5 a.m. – 10 p.m. Service operates seasonally for Saturday - Sunday: 7 a.m. – 9 p.m. Wolf Trap Filene Center events only WOLF TRAP EXPERIENCE (Closed on most observed holidays) For The Best Seats, /fairfaxconnector Buy Your Tickets Early Choose reserved in-house seats to be under cover or general admission lawn tickets to picnic and @ffxconnector kick back during the show. For tickets, visit wolftrap.org or call 1.877.WOLFTRAP For more travel information For fares and important information Dine Under the Stars about the bus system, see the brochure: ■ wmata.com Pack a picnic with your own food and drinks, or Fares, Policies & General Information pick up delicious fare, wine, and local microbrews ■ wolftrap.org/metro at Wolf Trap. Know Before You Go For FAQs, ticket policies, cooler/bag inspections, and house rules, go to wolftrap.org/visit Stay Connected Get show updates, enter giveaways, and much 703-339-7200 TTY 703-339-1608 more at wolftrap.org/email ® @ffxconnector /fairfaxconnector Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) ensures SmarTrip® Card Accepted nondiscrimination in all programs and activities in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
    [Show full text]
  • Jo U Rn a L O F P U B Lic T Ransp O Rta Tio N
    Vo Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 lume 12, No. 3 Journal of Public Public of Journal Tr Brian Caulfield A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time ansp Margaret O’Mahony Public Transit Stop Information or Laura Eboli A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Gabriella Mazzulla Evaluating Transit Service Quality ta tion Ahmed M. El-Geneidy Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a John Hourdos Competitive Environment Jessica Horning Matthew H. Hardy Transit Response to Congestion Pricing Opportunities: Policy and Practice in the U.S. John Pucher Integrating Bicycling and Public Transport in North America Ralph Buehler Mario G. Beruvides The Concept of a Regional Maintenance Center James L. Simonton Natalie M. Waters Ean Ng Siva Chaivichitmalakul Cheng-Chu Chiu-Wei Pelin Z. Altintas Phil Nash 2009 Luis Barroso Paul Moon N C T R JOURNAL OF Public Transportation Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X TheJournal of Public Transportation is published quarterly by National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida • College of Engineering 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 Phone: (813) 974-3120 Fax: (813) 974-5168 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm © 2009 Center for Urban Transportation Research Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X CONTENTS A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time Public Transit Stop Information Brian Caulfield, Margaret O’Mahony ...............................................................................................1 A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Evaluating Transit Service Quality Laura Eboli, Gabriella Mazzulla ....................................................................................................... 21 Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a Competitive Environment Ahmed M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study
    Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study DTGH61-99-Z-00027 Final Report December 8, 1999 Prepared for Mr. Phil Hanley, HMCE-10 Federal Highway Administration Office of Motor Carriers 400 Seventh Street, SW, Room 4432A Washington, DC 20590 Prepared by Arrowhead Space & Telecommunications, Inc. 803 W. Broad Street, Suite 400 Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 241-2801 voice (703) 241-2802 fax www.arrowheadsat.com Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Approach 3 III. Literature Search 6 IV. Video Search 10 V. World Wide Web Search 11 VI. Industry Advisory Panel 32 VII. Federal and State Officials 35 VIII. Focus Group Sessions 36 IX. Identification of Issues from Focus Group Sessions and Phone Survey 39 X. Countermeasures 49 Appendix A: Focus Group and Phone Survey Participants Appendix B:Issues Identified at Focus Group Sessions Appendix C:Travel Industry Focus Group Report Appendix D:Safety Study Performed by Greyhound Lines, Inc. Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Final Report November 18, 1999 I INTRODUCTION Arrowhead Space and Telecommunications, Inc. conducted a research project to identify unique aspects of operations within the motorcoach industry which may produce bus driver fatigue and stress. Funding for and oversight of the study was provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Motor Carriers (OMC). The purpose of this study is to (1) identify from direct interaction with motorcoach owners, safety directors, operations managers, and drivers those fatigue-inducing stresses which they believe are unique to the motorcoach industry; (2) evaluate the relative influence of these stresses on bus driver fatigue; (3) provide relevant feedback to the FHWA/OMC for its use in future decisions which will affect the motorcoach industry; and (4) develop an outreach video to help motorcoach drivers understand the effects of fatigue, the stresses that induce it, and means to reduce it.
    [Show full text]
  • DE60LF Continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April Slide Presentation
    OFFICIAL NEWSLEITER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. MAY 2008 Welcome to another issue of The Green Pennant Special, than waiting until sufficient capital funds are available to the official publication of The Omnibus Society of America. purchase. Through this publication we hope to keep our readers -, informed of events happening in the transit industry in Chicago and other cities in the United States. Visit the Omnibus Society of America website at ..www.osabus.com ''. At osabus.com we will be posting upcoming fan trips and meetings information, as well as membership information. Please visit our site when you have a chance and give us your opinions and comments. • MAY MEETING The May meeting of the Omnibus Society of America will be held on May 2, 2008, in the Anderson Pavilion of Swedish Covenant Hospital, 2751 W. Winona Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting will start at 7:30 pm. Our program for the evening, "Unfiled, Part 2," will be a DE60LF continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April slide presentation. Delivery of the New Flyer Hybrid articulated buses will begin in August 2008. The hospital is on California near Foster. Winona is one half-block south of Foster. By public transportation, take In December, the Chicago Transit Board approved the 92 Foster to California. From the Ravenswood Brown reassignment of a contract option from King County Metro, Line, take the 93 North California from Kimball, get off after Seattle's public transit agency, for the 60-foot hybrid buses it turns onto California from Foster and walk back south. manufactured by New Flyer Industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised
    Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised Accessibility Guidelines for Buses, Over-the-Road Buses, and Vans (36 CFR Part 1192, Subpart B) UNITED STATES ACCESS BOARD WASHINGTON, DC United States Access Board 1331 F Street, NW – Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004-111 www.access-board.gov Nov. 9, 2016 (This page intentionally blank.) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 3. Background ....................................................................................................................................5 3.1. Existing Regulatory Requirements for Buses, Vans, and OTRBs .........................................5 3.2. Announcements on Fixed Route Buses – History of Compliance Issues ..............................6 3.3. Growing Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems by Transit Agencies ............................7 3.4. Final Rule – New or Revised Accessibility Requirements with Cost Impacts ......................9 4. Overview of Cost Methodology ...................................................................................................11 4.1. Automated Stop Announcement Systems – Large Transit Agencies ..................................11 4.2. Other Accessibility Requirements - Over-the-Road Buses .................................................13 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Transit Fare Collection Practices
    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 26 Bus Transit Fare Collection Practices A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1997 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation District Chair: DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Commission Vice Chair: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS MEMBERS AC Transit LEE BARNES BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, Barwood Inc University of Texas at Dallas GERALD L. BLAIR LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Commerce Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Indiana County TransitAuthority Jersey (Past Chair, 1995) SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO DAVID G. BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy New Jersey Transit Corporation E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation ROD J. DIRIDON JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner. Minnesota Department of Transportation International Institute for Surface JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University Transportation Policy Study DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority SANDRA DRAGGOO DAVID R. GOODE, Chairman, President, and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation CATA DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering SEPTA JAMES L.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements
    Metro Transit Central-South (Sector 5) Final Plan 4.5 Public Outreach Conclusions Stakeholder and public comments provided guidance to improve various elements of the plan. About one fifth of the comments favored the plan. Four cities, one county and the University of Minnesota also supported the plan. Several neighborhood groups expressed concerns about specific elements of the plan. The majority of comments (over 60 percent) were in response to the proposed route elimination or service reductions on Routes 7, 8, 18, 19, 22, 52B, 84, 538 and 539. Another frequent comment was concern regarding increased transfers and loss of direct service to key destinations. For example, the proposed elimination of some direct service to the University of Minnesota was the source of many complaints. The Concept Plan was modified to address many of the stakeholder and customer concerns within the current operating budget and the tenants identified in the previous chapters. Of the 55 routes in the sector, 32 or 58 percent of routes were modified in response to public comment. The final plan preserves geographic coverage in all of the urban area, and most of the suburban areas, and direct service to the University of Minnesota from France Avenue/ W. 50th Street, Cedar Avenue/Portland Avenue and Snelling Avenue. This final plan, as modified to address the concerns raised during the public outreach phase, is supported by all five cities and the two counties found in the study area. 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements 5.1 Planned Transit Service Network The service improvement program begins with a high-to-medium frequency grid network of local service in high-density population and employment areas such as south Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service from Pentagon
    Bus Service from Pentagon - Dupont Shaw Sunset Hills Rd POTOMAC RIVER Circle Howard U schematic map Wiehle Ave BUS SERVICE AND BOARDING LOCATIONS LEGEND not to scale 267 WASHINGTON 599 The table shows approximate minutes between buses; check schedules for full details Farragut Mt Vernon Rail Lines Metrobus Routes 599 Wiehle- Foggy Bottom- Farragut North McPherson Union Square MONDAY TO FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Reston East GWU West Square NY 7Y Station BOARD AT Spring Hill Ave 16A Metrobus Major Route K St ROUTE DESTINATION BUS BAY AM PEAK MIDDAY PM PEAK EVENING DAY EVENING DAY EVENING 10th St 13Y Metrorail Frequent, seven-day service on the core route. On branches, service levels vary. Metro Gallery Judiciary LINCOLNIA-NORTH FAIRLINGTON LINE Station and Line Greensboro 66 Center Place Square 9A Metrobus Local Route RESTON 7A Lincolnia via Quantrell Ave U5 30-50 40 -- 15-40 60 30-60 40 60 Less frequent service, with some evening North St Capitol Metrorail 599 7F Lincolnia via N Hampton Dr, Chambliss St U5 60 40 -- 60 60 -- -- -- and weekend service available. Tysons Corner 7Y Under Construction Washington Blvd 18th St 14th St 7Y New York Ave & 9th St NW U9 7-25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18P Metrobus Commuter Route 42 Rosslyn E St Peak-hour service linking residential areas McLean East Falls Church 22A Ballston-MU Virginia Square-GMU Clarendon Court House 16X 7A 7Y Southern Towers U5 -- -- 5-15 -- -- -- -- -- to rail stations and employment centers. 22C St 23rd Federal LINCOLNIA-PARK CENTER LINE Commuter 16X MetroExtra Route Triangle Archives Rail Station Limited stops for a faster ride.
    [Show full text]