Al Roshdieh, Director, Department Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Resolution #20-9
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public. -
Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq.. -
2021 MCTS NEXT Recommended System Route Design Plans Text Narratives by MCTS Planning
2021 MCTS NEXT Recommended System Route Design Plans Text Narratives by MCTS Planning Route 11: A new Route 11 will serve Hampton Avenue between Green Bay Road and N. 124 th Street. The eastern terminus will be at Green Bay Road and Hampton. The western terminus will be at Hampton & N. 124 th . Frequency will be one bus every 30 minutes for most of the day. Route 12: A modified Route 12 will serve N. 12 th Street, N. Teutonia Avenue, and N. Green Bay Road from the Intermodal Station at W. St. Paul Avenue & N. 5 th Street to Schroeder Drive. There will be new routing on W. Wells Street between 6 th Street and 12 th Street. The route will have a turnback at N. Teutonia Avenue and W. Good Hope Road meaning every other bus will end its northbound routing at N. Teutonia Avenue and W. Good Hope Road after looping around W. Clinton Avenue and N. 38th Street and layover on the farside of N. Teutonia Avenue and W. Good Hope Road before returning southbound. Every other bus will continue north on Teutonia and Green Bay to terminate at Service Road & Schroeder. The southern terminus layover will be at N. 5th & Clybourn near the Intermodal Station. Frequency will be one bus every 15 minutes for most of the day on weekdays, 20 minutes on Saturdays, and 20 minutes on Sundays. Route 14: Route 14 will maintain the same routing as it exists today. Frequency will be one bus every 20 minutes for most of the day on weekdays, 20 minutes on Saturdays and 25 minutes on Sundays. -
Hand Sanitizer Corp Site Store List
Store Address City State Zip Phone 2899 PO BOX 1630 AVON CT 6001 8604090404 2232 120 COMMERCIAL PKWY BRANFORD CT 6405 2034884106 2719 1400 FARMINGTON AVE BRISTOL CT 6010 8605851700 5777 450 PROVIDENCE ROAD BROOKLYN CT 6234 8604125137 2299 161 BERLIN RD CROMWELL CT 6416 8606350458 3543 67 NEWTOWN RD DANBURY CT 6810 2037911929 2282 44 PROSPECT HILL ROAD EAST WINDSOR CT 6088 8602921235 2200 150 GOLD STAR HWY GROTON CT 6340 8604482022 3544 900 BOSTON POST RD GUILFORD CT 6437 2034581252 3545 2300 DIXWELL AVE HAMDEN CT 6514 2032300285 5095 495 FLATBUSH AVENUE HARTFORD CT 6106 8609530040 2854 180 RIVER RD LISBON CT 6351 8603763254 1891 420 BUCKLAND HILLS DR MANCHESTER CT 6042 8606445100 5294 1365 BOSTON POST RD MILFORD CT 6460 2033010559 2284 1100 NEW HAVEN RD NAUGATUCK CT 6770 2037299100 5439 315 FOXON BLVD NEW HAVEN CT 6513 2034677509 3546 164 DANBURY RD NEW MILFORD CT 6776 8603504823 2965 3164 BERLIN TPKE NEWINGTON CT 6111 8606677657 2022 474 BOSTON POST RD NORTH WINDHAM CT 6256 8604564399 2954 650 MAIN AVE NORWALK CT 6851 2038464514 3547 680 CONNECTICUT AVE NORWALK CT 6854 2038545236 2170 220 SALEM TPKE NORWICH CT 6360 8608897745 2898 665 BOSTON POST RD OLD SAYBROOK CT 6475 8603880584 1980 625 SCHOOL ST PUTNAM CT 6260 8609283999 2900 80 TOWN LINE RD ROCKY HILL CT 6067 8605634355 2163 465 BRIDGEPORT AVE SHELTON CT 6484 2039291110 2897 235 QUEEN ST SOUTHINGTON CT 6489 8606219540 2585 150 BARNUM AVENUE CUTOFF STRATFORD CT 6614 2035027631 2144 970 TORRINGFORD ST TORRINGTON CT 6790 8604968653 2371 844 N COLONY RD WALLINGFORD CT 6492 2032696622 3548 910 WOLCOTT ST WATERBURY CT 6705 2037591000 2331 155 WATERFORD PARKWAY NO. -
Transitcenter Equity Dashboard: Technical Documentation
TransitCenter Equity Dashboard: Technical Documentation June 2021 Prepared for: TransitCenter Prepared by: Sustainable Systems Research, LLC SF2 Enterprises Inc Klumpentown Consulting University of Vermont Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Dashboard overview 2 3. Data and analysis 4 3.1. Scope 4 3.1.1. Spatial areas 4 3.1.2. Time periods 5 3.2. Accessibility 5 3.2.1. Time periods 5 3.2.2. Transit travel times 5 3.2.3. Automobile travel times 6 3.2.4. Destinations 7 3.2.5. Fare data, fare rules and fare analysis 8 3.2.6. Evaluating accessibility 11 3.3. Transit service analysis 14 3.3.1. Transit service intensity 14 3.3.2. Transit reliability 14 3.4. Equity analysis 15 4. Web framework and database 17 4.1. Conceptual design 17 4.2. Code structure 17 4.3. Web application 18 4.4. URL structure 19 4.5. Backend data queries 20 4.5.1. Score queries 20 4.5.2. Date queries 21 4.6. Database 21 4.7. Updating the dashboard 25 5. References 26 Appendix A: Definition of essential workers 27 Appendix B: Fare calculations and assumptions 33 TransitCenter Equity Dashboard Technical Documentation 1. Introduction The purpose of this project is to provide timely indicators of public transit system performance via a publicly available web dashboard. The focus of the dashboard is to track the equity of transit service over time in seven US regions. The dashboard facilitates visualization and assessment of changes in accessibility (measured as access to various opportunities with and without a fare constraint), transit service intensity, and transit reliability (delay) and their varying effects on different neighborhoods and populations. -
MCTS NEXT Recommended System Tentative Route Design Plans Text Narratives by MCTS Planning
MCTS NEXT Recommended System Tentative Route Design Plans Text Narratives by MCTS Planning Route 11: A new Route 11 will serve Hampton Avenue between Green Bay Road and N. 124 th Street. The eastern terminus will be at farside Green Bay Road and Hampton. The western terminus will be at nearside Hampton & 124 th . Frequency will be one bus every 25 minutes for most of the day. Route 12: A modified Route 12 will serve N. 12 th Street, N. Teutonia Avenue, and N. Green Bay Road from the Intermodal Station at W. St. Paul Avenue & N. 5 th Street to Schroeder Drive, and W. Florist Avenue and W. Mill Road between N. Teutonia Avenue and Park Place near W. Good Hope Road. At Florist and Teutonia, the route branches meaning one bus will serve Teutonia and Green Bay Road between Florist and Schroeder Drive while the next bus will serve Florist and Mill between Teutonia and Good Hope Road. The Teutonia/Green Bay branch northern terminus layover will tentatively be at Service Road & Schroeder. The Mill Road branch northern terminus will be at Park Place & Liberty. The southern terminus layover will tentatively be at N. 5th & Clybourn near the Intermodal Station. Frequency will be one bus every 15 minutes for most of the day on weekdays, 20 minutes on Saturdays, and 20 minutes on Sundays. Route 14: Route 14 will maintain the same routing as it exists today. Frequency will be one bus every 20 minutes for most of the day on weekdays, 20 minutes on Saturdays and 25 minutes on Sundays. -
Park-And-Ride Lots Guide
Park & Ride Commuter Lots Serving I-270 and US 29 Corridors in Montgomery County, Maryland A Handy Guide to FREE PARKING and an Easier Commute To Work! Revised October 2014 Please Note: Information in this guide is an outline of transportation services; resource information, bus & train schedules are subject to change. Please refer to your specific routes schedule or timetable for additional information. The Park and Ride Lot Maps were prepared by the Department of Technology Services Geographic Information Systems Table of Contents PARK & RIDE LOTS in the Montgomery County US 29 Corridor and Vicinity Burtonsville .................................................................... 3 Briggs Chaney .................................................................4 Greencastle .....................................................................5 Tech Road .......................................................................6 PARK & RIDE LOTS in the Montgomery County I-270 Corridor and Vicinity Westfield Shoppingtown Montgomery ........................... 7 (Montgomery Mall) Montrose Parking/MD 355 Parking Facility .....................9 Lakeforest Transit Center ...............................................10 Gaithersburg (I-270 & MD 124) ....................................11 Germantown/MARC Station ..........................................12 Germantown/Kingsview ................................................13 Germantown Transit Center (GTC) ................................14 Germantown/Milestone Shopping Center .....................16 -
Draft Final Plan 2050
u People u Transportation u Opportunity FINAL DRAFT • August 11, 2021 Table of Contents DRAFT PLAN 2050 • August 11, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: Public Involvement.............................................................................................. 11 CHAPTER 3: Context and Trends ............................................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 4: Transportation System Performance................................................................... 34 CHAPTER 5: Strategies and Implementation ........................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 6: Environment ....................................................................................................... 90 CHAPTER 7: Financing Plan 2050........................................................................................... 105 CHAPTER 8: Moving Forward ................................................................................................ 123 PROJECT INDEX .................................................................................................................... PI-1 APPENDICES – available at njtpa.org/plan2050 APPENDIX A: Background Papers Active Transportation in the NJTPA Region Climate Change and Transportation The COVID-19 Pandemic -
KANSAS CITY STREETCAR MAIN STREET EXTENSION Corridor Planning Analysis
KANSAS CITY STREETCAR MAIN STREET EXTENSION Corridor Planning Analysis November 2018 Prepared by: Kansas City Streetcar Authority Kansas City Area Transportation Authority City of Kansas City, Missouri KC Streetcar Main Street Extension Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: Purpose and Need ................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 2: Environmental Constraints ..................................................................................11 Chapter 3: Alignment Planning ..............................................................................................24 Chapter 3.1: Station Stop Locations ................................................................................25 Chapter 3.2: Best Lane Analysis ......................................................................................55 Chapter 3.3: Traffic and Parking Analysis .......................................................................84 Chapter 3.4: Vehicle Maintenance Facility Analysis ..................................................... 104 Chapter 3.5: Power Systems .......................................................................................... 112 Chapter 4: Operational Planning & Estimated Annual Operating Costs ........................... 115 Chapter 5: Ridership Analysis ............................................................................................ -
Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2018-2028
Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2018-2028 Approved by Loudoun County Board of Supervisors on June 23, 2016 Updated by county staff on January 10, 2018 Prepared by Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1: Overview of Loudoun County Transit .......................................................................................... 1 History ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Commuter Bus ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Local Bus ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Governance ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Organizational Structure .......................................................................................................................... -
Community Facilities Element FINAL 2008-03-17
Gaithersburg A Character Counts! City City of Gaithersburg COMMUNITY FACILITIES A Master Plan Element DRAFT: March 7, 2008 Adopted March 17, 2008 Published April 1, 2008 2003 MASTER PLAN CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2003 MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT Planning Commission Approval: March 5, 2008, Resolution PCR-1-08 Mayor and City Council Adoption: March 17, 2008, Resolution R-29-08 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sidney A. Katz Council Vice President Henry F. Marraffa, Jr. Jud Ashman Cathy C. Drzyzgula Michael A. Sesma Ryan Spiegel PLANNING COMMISSION Chair John Bauer Vice-Chair Leonard J. Levy Commissioner Matthew Hopkins Commissioner Lloyd S. Kaufman Commissioner Danielle L. Winborne Alternate Commissioner Geraldine Lanier ACTING CITY MANAGER James D. Arnoult PLANNING AND CODE ADMINISTRATION Greg Ossont, Director Lauren Pruss, Planning Director Kirk Eby, GIS Planner Raymond Robinson III, Planner PARKS, RECREATION, AND CULTURE Michele McGleish, Director PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING James D. Arnoult, Director AD-HOC COMMUNITY FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE Richard Arkin Nancy Ashby Charles Farrell Bruce Goldensohn Erin McNulty Cathy Salgado CITYOF GAITHERSBURG CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2003 MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 5 COMMUNITY FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.U U UIntroductionU .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1U U AdoptionU of the Community Facilities ElementU .......................................................... 1 2.U U CityU of -
Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2022
Loudoun County Transit Development Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2022 Approved by Loudoun County Board of Supervisors on ____June______ 23, 2016 Prepared by Table of Contents Chapter 1: Overview of Loudoun County Transit .......................................................................................... 1 History …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Commuter Bus ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Local Bus ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Governance ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Organizational Structure ........................................................................................................................... 4 Transit Services Provided and Areas Served ............................................................................................. 6 Long Haul Routes .................................................................................................................................. 7 Metro Connection Routes ................................................................................................................... 10 Local Routes .......................................................................................................................................