DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................................... I RTC PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................................................................................... I GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ..................................................................................................................................................... I FARE ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................................................................. II TRANSIT SERVICE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................................................. II FINANCIAL PLAN..............................................................................................................................................................................IV 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1. PURPOSE OF THE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PROGRAM....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE........................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.3. RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES ............................................................................................... 1-6 1.4. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 1-7 2. FIXED-ROUTE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND PEER REVIEW ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1. SERVICE AREA AND NETWORK ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2. REVIEW OF INDIVIDUAL RTC RIDE FIXED ROUTES........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3. PEER AGENCY SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4. SERVICE DESIGN AND STRUCTURE................................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5. SERVICE EVALUATION AND DECISION MAKING ................................................................................................................ 2-8 2.6. FARE POLICY AND COLLECTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.7. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT.................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.8. LESSONS LEARNED ......................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 3. RECOMMENDED GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1. GOAL 1: ENHANCE MOBILITY FOR RESIDENTS OF WASHOE COUNTY ................................................................................. 3-1 3.2. GOAL 2: DELIVER SERVICE COST-EFFECTIVELY................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3. GOAL 3: ENSURE THAT SERVICE PROVIDED IS SAFE, RELIABLE, COMFORTABLE AND CONVENIENT ........................................ 3-2 3.4. GOAL 4: PROMOTE TRANSIT SERVICE AS PART OF A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE IN WASHOE COUNTY ........................................ 3-4 4. FARE ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1. EXISTING AND HISTORIC COMPARISON ........................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2. PEER FARE PRACTICES .................................................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3. FARE COLLECTION AND CONTROL ................................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.4. FARE RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................................................. 4-9 4.5. FURTHER STUDY NEEDS ............................................................................................................................................... 4-11 4.6. PASSENGER SURVEY ..................................................................................................................................................... 4-11 5. TRANSIT SERVICE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1. DESIGN ELEMENTS AND PRODUCTIVITY STRATEGIES ........................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2. FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT SYSTEM CONCEPTS .................................................................................................................... 5-12 6. RTC ACCESS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1. SERVICE AREA................................................................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2. ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ....................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3. BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS ON THE SUPPLEMENTAL ADA SERVICE AREA ............................................................................ 6-4 7. TAHOE AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND OTHER SERVICES ................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1. TART............................................................................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2. TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ................................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.3. VANPOOL PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 P a g e | 1 8. FINANCIAL PLAN ................................................................................................................................................................ 8-1 8.1. REVENUE....................................................................................................................................................................... 8-2 8.2. COSTS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8-2 8.3. FINANCIAL PLAN AND PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................................................. 8-2 8.4. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS.............................................................................................................................................. 8-6 Figures FIGURE ES-1 – SERVICE HOUR SHIFT ROUTE PRODUCTIVITY RANKING (FEBRUARY 2011) ...................................................................... III FIGURE ES-2 – ROUTE CHANGES PLAN .................................................................................................................................................VI FIGURE 1 – HISTORIC SALES TAX REVENUES ....................................................................................................................................... 1-2 FIGURE 2 – RTC ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ......................................................................................................................................... 1-5 FIGURE 3 – EXISTING SERVICE AREA................................................................................................................................................... 2-2 FIGURE 4 – AGENCIES ANALYZED FROM THE TELEPHONE SURVEY AND NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE.................................................. 2-3 FIGURE 5 – TRANSIT USE: BOARDINGS PER CAPITA IN RELATION TO POPULATION DENSITY................................................................... 2-4 FIGURE 6 – TRANSIT USE: PASSENGER MILES PER CAPITA IN RELATION TO POPULATION DENSITY......................................................... 2-4 FIGURE 7 – TRANSIT PRODUCTIVITY: BOARDINGS PER REVENUE VEHICLE HOUR IN RELATION TO POPULATION DENSITY ........................ 2-5 FIGURE 8 - TRANSIT SERVICE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Application for Metroaccess Door-To-Door Paratransit Service for People with Disabilities DO NOT MAIL OR FAX APPLICATION
    Application for MetroAccess Door-to-Door Paratransit Service For People with Disabilities DO NOT MAIL OR FAX APPLICATION Transit Accessibility Center 600 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (Between Chinatown/Gallery Place and Judiciary Square Metro Stations) (202) 962-2700 & select option #5 TTY (202) 962-2033 All Assessments are by Appointment Only Thank you for your interest in Metro services for people with disabilities. The following services are available based on Metro’s determination of your eligibility: (A) Reduced Fare Program for People with Disabilities – Eligible people with disabilities travel on accessible Metrobus and Metrorail for half the regular (rush hour) fare at all times. This program is available for people with disabilities who use the accessible Metrobus and Metrorail system as their primary travel option. For more information on the Reduced Fare program or to obtain an application please visit our website at http://www.wmata.com/service/accessibility/transit-accessibility.cfm under the section titled “Eligibility for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program” or call (202) 962-2700 and select option 1 from the phone menu. (B) MetroAccess – Door-to-door, shared ride public paratransit is a service for people with disabilities who are unable to use regular accessible Metrobus and Metrorail public transportation for some or all of their public transportation due to a disability. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) outlines specific criteria to determine eligibility for paratransit service and an application and in-person assessment is required. MetroAccess operates throughout the metropolitan area where there is regular bus and/or rail service. Service is provided in Washington, DC; Montgomery County and Prince George’s County in Maryland; Arlington County, Fairfax County, City of Alexandria, City of Fairfax, and City of Falls Church in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Leesburg
    DRAFT LOUDOUN COUNTY Transit Management Analysis Report Prepared for: Prepared by: October 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Study Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................................................3 2. Institutional Stakeholders and Existing Funding .....................................................................4 Loudoun County .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Town of Leesburg .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) .................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC) ........................................................................................... 4 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) ...............................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Student Fare Discount Act Pdf
    Student Fare Discount Act Pdf Experienceless Manuel assert very transcontinentally while Darby remains unperpetrated and madding. Whiskered Marcelo sometimes sag any oxygenate rebuke piggyback. Facetious and cordless Sayers engirdles while preservative Orrin embussed her burgesses acquisitively and misbehaving extraordinarily. Aside from local beer selection of skin symptoms appear Disabilities Act ADA of 1990 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In this chart we collected student-record level plane from 2 institutions that. Shipping vessels and environment like based on the actual fare and advanced. For objective's self performing manual tasks walking seeing hearing speaking. Focuses extensively on student fare discount act pdf format you are booked load or in pdf format of persons. Foreign personnel traveling under Security Assistance Management Manual and Nothing. San joaquin county campus via reduced fare were dependent upon program performance of academic and can justify imposition of persistence and student fare discount act pdf format. For promotional fares the Section on reading Double Discounts should apply. Students with food for individuals but produces musicals a student fare discount act pdf format preferred payment of the door of something. Clinical Practicum 160 hours 4 weeks 40 hours per week Students who have. The Federal Student Aid Income Based Repayment IBR Plan MediCal. Commuter Advantage Program Metrostlouisorg Site Metro. Transportation Florida Developmental Disabilities Council. Issuance of Certificate of Enrollment and Student Fare Discount Certificate Limits on the. Regional MeansBased Transit Fare Pricing Study. Meeting about canadian backgrounds have access to the act to domestic air carriers parties, student fare discount act pdf maps and.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation
    TRANSPORTATION NETWORK DIRECTORY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ADULTS 50+ MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Montgomery County, Maryland (‘the County’) cannot guarantee the relevance, completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information provided on the non-County links. The County does not endorse any non-County organizations' products, services, or viewpoints. The County is not responsible for any materials stored on other non-County web sites, nor is it liable for any inaccurate, defamatory, offensive or illegal materials found on other Web sites, and that the risk of injury or damage from viewing, hearing, downloading or storing such materials rests entirely with the user. Alternative formats of this document are available upon request. This is a project of the Montgomery County Commission on People with Disabilities. To submit an update, add or remove a listing, or request an alternative format, please contact: [email protected], 240-777-1246 (V), MD Relay 711. MetroAccess and Abilities-Ride MetroAccess Paratransit – Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) MetroAccess is a shared-ride, door-to-door public transportation service for people who are unable to use fixed-route public transit due to disability. "Shared ride" means that multiple passengers may ride together in the same vehicle. The service provides daily trips throughout the Transit Zone in the Washington Metropolitan region. The Transit Zone consists of the District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland, Arlington and Fairfax Counties and the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax and Falls Church in Northern Virginia. Rides are offered in the same service areas and during the same hours of operation as Metrorail and Metrobus.
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Emission Station List by County for the Web
    Emission Station List By County for the Web Run Date: June 20, 2018 Run Time: 7:24:12 AM Type of test performed OIS County Station Status Station Name Station Address Phone Number Number OBD Tailpipe Visual Dynamometer ADAMS Active 194 Imports Inc B067 680 HANOVER PIKE , LITTLESTOWN PA 17340 717-359-7752 X ADAMS Active Bankerts Auto Service L311 3001 HANOVER PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-632-8464 X ADAMS Active Bankert'S Garage DB27 168 FERN DRIVE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-0420 X ADAMS Active Bell'S Auto Repair Llc DN71 2825 CARLISLE PIKE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-4752 X ADAMS Active Biglerville Tire & Auto 5260 301 E YORK ST , BIGLERVILLE PA 17307 -- ADAMS Active Chohany Auto Repr. Sales & Svc EJ73 2782 CARLISLE PIKE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-479-5589 X 1489 CRANBERRY RD. , YORK SPRINGS PA ADAMS Active Clines Auto Worx Llc EQ02 717-321-4929 X 17372 611 MAIN STREET REAR , MCSHERRYSTOWN ADAMS Active Dodd'S Garage K149 717-637-1072 X PA 17344 ADAMS Active Gene Latta Ford Inc A809 1565 CARLISLE PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-633-1999 X ADAMS Active Greg'S Auto And Truck Repair X994 1935 E BERLIN ROAD , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-2926 X ADAMS Active Hanover Nissan EG08 75 W EISENHOWER DR , HANOVER PA 17331 717-637-1121 X ADAMS Active Hanover Toyota X536 RT 94-1830 CARLISLE PK , HANOVER PA 17331 717-633-1818 X ADAMS Active Lawrence Motors Inc N318 1726 CARLISLE PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-637-6664 X 630 HOOVER SCHOOL RD , EAST BERLIN PA ADAMS Active Leas Garage 6722 717-259-0311 X 17316-9571 586 W KING STREET , ABBOTTSTOWN PA ADAMS Active
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements
    Metro Transit Central-South (Sector 5) Final Plan 4.5 Public Outreach Conclusions Stakeholder and public comments provided guidance to improve various elements of the plan. About one fifth of the comments favored the plan. Four cities, one county and the University of Minnesota also supported the plan. Several neighborhood groups expressed concerns about specific elements of the plan. The majority of comments (over 60 percent) were in response to the proposed route elimination or service reductions on Routes 7, 8, 18, 19, 22, 52B, 84, 538 and 539. Another frequent comment was concern regarding increased transfers and loss of direct service to key destinations. For example, the proposed elimination of some direct service to the University of Minnesota was the source of many complaints. The Concept Plan was modified to address many of the stakeholder and customer concerns within the current operating budget and the tenants identified in the previous chapters. Of the 55 routes in the sector, 32 or 58 percent of routes were modified in response to public comment. The final plan preserves geographic coverage in all of the urban area, and most of the suburban areas, and direct service to the University of Minnesota from France Avenue/ W. 50th Street, Cedar Avenue/Portland Avenue and Snelling Avenue. This final plan, as modified to address the concerns raised during the public outreach phase, is supported by all five cities and the two counties found in the study area. 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements 5.1 Planned Transit Service Network The service improvement program begins with a high-to-medium frequency grid network of local service in high-density population and employment areas such as south Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Optimization Plan September 2017
    Transit Optimization Plan September 2017 Prepared by: Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................6 Goals and Focus ........................................................................................................... 6 Study Process ............................................................................................................... 7 Report Contents ........................................................................................................... 8 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................................9 Market Assessment ...................................................................................................... 9 Population ..........................................................................................................................9 Employment .......................................................................................................................9 Development Patterns ........................................................................................................9 Regional Growth ............................................................................................................... 10 Growth in Senior Population ............................................................................................. 10 Transit’s Role in Mobility ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]