Muskegon River Watershed Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Muskegon River Watershed Assessment Michigan STATE OF MICHIGAN DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 19 July 1997 Muskegon River Watershed Assessment Richard P. O’Neal www.dnr.state.mi.us FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 19 July, 1997 MUSKEGON RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT Richard P. O’Neal The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and for access to Michigan’s natural resources. State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, age, marital status, height and weight. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please write the MDNR Equal Opportunity Office, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909, or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 1200 6th Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. 20204. For more information about this publication or the American Disabilities Act (ADA), contact, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Total number of copies printed 150 — Total cost $987.56 — Cost per copy $6.58 Muskegon River Watershed Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 9 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................................ 10 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 11 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 16 Watershed Assessment......................................................................................................................... 19 Geography ........................................................................................................................................ 19 History .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Biological Communities................................................................................................................... 20 Original Fish Communities .......................................................................................................... 20 Present Fish Communities............................................................................................................ 23 Aquatic Invertebrates.................................................................................................................... 25 Amphibians and Reptiles .............................................................................................................. 26 Mammals and Birds...................................................................................................................... 26 Other Natural Features ................................................................................................................ 27 Pest Species................................................................................................................................... 27 Geology and Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 28 Geology and Soils ......................................................................................................................... 28 Stream Discharge ......................................................................................................................... 28 Stream Velocity............................................................................................................................. 31 Channel Morphology........................................................................................................................ 31 Soils and Land Use Patterns............................................................................................................. 33 Land Development ........................................................................................................................ 33 Designated Drains ........................................................................................................................ 35 Irrigation....................................................................................................................................... 35 Logging ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Floodplain Use ............................................................................................................................. 36 Gas and Oil Storage ..................................................................................................................... 36 Special Jurisdictions......................................................................................................................... 36 Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Code, Public Act 451, 1994 ........................... 36 Federal Regulation Over Dredged and Fill.............................................................................. 36 Michigan Coastal Zone Management Program........................................................................ 37 Michigan Natural River Designation........................................................................................ 37 Michigan Water Quality Standards .......................................................................................... 37 Identification of Land and Water Contamination Sites ............................................................ 37 Designated Trout Streams......................................................................................................... 38 Blue Ribbon Trout Streams........................................................................................................... 38 Designated Drains ........................................................................................................................ 38 Navigable Waters.......................................................................................................................... 38 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...................................................................................... 39 2 Muskegon River Watershed Assessment International Joint Commission Areas of Concern.......................................................................40 Public Lands..................................................................................................................................40 Public Health Advisories on Eating Fish......................................................................................40 Recreational Use ...............................................................................................................................41 Dams and Barriers.............................................................................................................................41 Offer of Settlement for Hydroelectric Dam Issues ........................................................................43 Water Quality....................................................................................................................................44 Fisheries Management ......................................................................................................................50 Fisheries and Management Programs ..........................................................................................50 Higgins Lake to Big Rapids.......................................................................................................50 Big Rapids to Croton .................................................................................................................53 Croton to Muskegon Lake..........................................................................................................55 Muskegon Lake ..........................................................................................................................58 Avian, Mammal and Fish Interactions..........................................................................................58 Beaver, Wildlife Floodings, and Coldwater Fish......................................................................59 Bald Eagle, Mink, River Otter and Potamodromous Fish ........................................................59 Potential for Improvements and Expanded Sport Fisheries .........................................................63 Citizen Involvement..........................................................................................................................66 Management Options............................................................................................................................67
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation: Fort Mccoy, WI 5B
    1 - 16 - ERDC TN ERDC Center for the Advancement of Sustainability Innovations (CASI) Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation Fort McCoy, WI Irene E. MacAllister, Jinelle H. Sperry, and Pamela Bailey April 2016 Results of an insect pollinators bipartite mutualistic network analysis. Construction Engineering Construction Laboratory Research Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) solves the nation’s toughest engineering and environmental challenges. ERDC develops innovative solutions in civil and military engineering, geospatial sciences, water resources, and environmental sciences for the Army, the Department of Defense, civilian agencies, and our nation’s public good. Find out more at www.erdc.usace.army.mil. To search for other technical reports published by ERDC, visit the ERDC online library at http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/default. Center for the Advancement of ERDC TN-16-1 Sustainability Innovations (CASI) April 2016 Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation Fort McCoy, WI Irene E. MacAllister and Jinelle H. Sperry U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 2902 Newmark Dr. Champaign, IL 61822 Pamela Bailey U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory (EL) 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Final Report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Under Center for the Advancement of Sustainability Innovations (CASI) Program Monitored by U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ERDC-CERL) 2902 Newmark Drive Champaign, IL 61822 ERDC TN-16-1 ii Abstract Pollinating insects and pollinator dependent plants are critical compo- nents of functioning ecosystems yet, for many U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • North Country Trail — New Ayg O County
    E 92nd E 96th Meceola W 96th W 96th Catalpa Coolidge Locust 17 Mile 23 Mile Centerline 17 Mile Hoover Newcosta Green Osborn West Michigan Trails 220th Greenly Mundy 22 Mile 16 Mile 16 Mile 16 Mile 131 Hoover to Baldwin 11 15 Mile Bingham North Country Trail (Newaygo County) Elm 230th Ash Beech BUS Cypress The NorthSpruce Country National Scenic Trail, better Willow 131 14 Mile Angler known simply as the North Country Trail or NCT, travels 4,600 miles through seven states from New Poplar Bitely 37 York to North Dakota. Michigan boasts over13 Mile 1,150 Walkup Lake Campground 200th miles of the NCT, the most of all seven states, and 190th 10 Cleveland Walnut includes some of the most scenic sections of the trail. Nichols 12 Mile Hemlock Lake Newaygo County is home to one of these Arbutusmost Hayes 9 31st Hayes scenic sections, weaving its way 48 miles through WoodbridgeAve 235th Woodland Park Newcosta 17 Mile 11 Mile the wilderness of Manistee National Forest. Ideal for 230th multi-day backpacking adventures, you’ll find several Madison established campgrounds near the trail with toilets 10 Mile and drinking water. Primitive camping is also allowed Lincoln Lincoln Hungerford Lake anywhere along the trail in Manistee HickoryNational Forest. 15 Mile 9 Mile BuchananThis nicely developed and maintained trail begins County — Newaygo Trail Country North Brohman Pierce Manistee Benton Lake Pierce at Croton Dam on the Muskegon River. The southern National Forest Campground 8 Mile section8 Mile passes through matureHardwick second growth 205th Maple Polk forest, pine plantations and several nativePolk prairies with unique plants including prickly pear7 Mile cactus.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Population Dynamics of Lake Sturgeon
    LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF LAKE STURGEON, Acipenser fulvescens, IN THE MUSKEGON RIVER, MICHIGAN by Paul Joseph Vecsei (Under the direction of Douglas L. Peterson) ABSTRACT The lake sturgeon was once abundant throughout Lake Michigan with an estimated 11 million fish prior to human exploitation. By the early 1900s, however, most populations had been decimated by severe over-fishing and habitat degradation. Despite recent interests in restoring the species in Lake Michigan, little is known about the current status of remnant populations. The primary objectives of this study were to estimate annual spawning stock abundance and to identify potential spawning habitat for lake sturgeon on the Muskegon River, Michigan. To capture adult lake sturgeon, I used large-mesh, bottom-set gill nets deployed at the mouth of the Muskegon River from mid- March through May, 2002-2005. Radio telemetry was used to monitor seasonal movements and to identify likely spawning habitats. Sampling for larval lake sturgeon was conducted in May of each year using D-frame drift nets anchored in the mainstream of the river channel. During the 4 years of the study, I expended more than 5000 gill-net hours and captured 59 individual adult lake sturgeon. Larval lake sturgeon were captured in 2 years, suggesting that at least some natural reproduction still occurs. Habitat analysis revealed that the lower Muskegon River likely contains extensive reaches of potential spawning habitat for lake sturgeon. INDEX WORDS: Biology, population dynamics, habitat, lake
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan
    An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan Prepared by: Stephanie M. Carman and Reuben R. Goforth, Ph.D. Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit November 2003 Report Number 2003-18 Front Cover Photograph Courtesy of David Kenyon, Michigan Department of Natural Resources An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan Prepared by: Stephanie M. Carman and Reuben R. Goforth, Ph.D. Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit November 2003 Report Number 2003-18 Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Muskegon River Watershed, Michigan ....................................................................................................................... 1 Muskegon River Initiative ........................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Data Compilation ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002
    Lake Michigan Committee Meeting Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 19-20, 2003 Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002 Prepared by Jessica M. Richards and Charles R. Bronte U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fishery Resources Office 2661 Scott Tower Drive New Franken, WI 54229 This report summarizes trout and salmon stocking in Lake Michigan from 1976-2002. Stocking information was provided by the Department of Natural Resources of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, who stock Pacific salmon, brown trout, and splake, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who provides all lake trout for restoration purposes. These data should be considered provisional because not all agencies have officially verified the stocking numbers. With the exception of lake trout, no attempt was made to express stocking totals in yearling equivalents. Consequently, numbers for all life stages stocked for a given species were added together. To accurately examine trends in adult trout and salmon abundance in Lake Michigan, detailed information on hatchery programs, genetic strains, size at stocking, and stocking practices would have to be considered. Lakewide Trends: The number of trout and salmon stocked into Lake Michigan in 2002 totaled 12.0 million fish (Table 1), which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year. This level of stocking was 2.4 million less than the long term average of 14.5 million, and one of the lowest levels since 1977. Total stocking peaked at 17.3 million fish in 1984. Chinook Salmon: Chinook salmon stocking in Lake Michigan decreased to 3.3 million fish in 2002, which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Take Me to the River
    July 2011 Free © northerncamper.com Pine, Muskegon, & Manistee Take Me to the River Recipes Festivities Puzzles American Legion Post 300 Open to public July 1-2 With Ron on Oneal July 1 Small TOWN 8 -11 p.m. Marshue’s Tantastic Boutique Tanning, Body Wraps, Gifts Bait Shop North 231-839-TANS 231-839-FISH “Where you are brown year ‘round” Stops Full Line of Bait & Tackle Beach Supplies, Pop, Snacks The Coffee Cup See Ad Below Baldwin Wood Products 231-839-0042 The Missaukee Sentinel Special Orders Taken Missaukee County News Source Open 7 Days a Week, 7 - ? Copy/Fax, Office Supplies, Dry Cleaning 231-839-5400, missaukeesentinel.com Cadillac Mortgage 41 N. Morey Rd. The Town Pump 231-839-0600 See Ad Below www.cadillacmortgage.com Videos North Curves of Lake City Mon. - Thurs., Noon - 9 p.m. 57 N. Morey Rd. (Across from McDonald’s) Fri. - Sun., Noon - 10 p.m. 231-839-6889 105 South Main Street 30 Minute Workout, Fun/Fast/Safe WhiteTail Realty In The North! The In Don’s American Pizza See Ad Page 3 th Open July 4th 231-839-2670 Woodstock Gifts Homemade Pizza, Pepperoni Rolls Up North Lodge Decor Unique & Practical Gifts Larsen’s Early Learning Center Lots of Tee Shirts & Sweatshirts Ages 2½ - 12, D.H.S. Accepted Building Block to Your Child’s Future 231-839-7779 Have Fun In Lake City Lake In Fun Have Greatest 4 Greatest Town Pump The Coffee Cup Biggest Breakfast In the North! Editor’s Editor’s choice best breakfast! choice coldest Saloon 7 am – 3 pm • 7 Days • Daily Specials beer! Keno • Pull Tabs • Pool Locally Owned & Operated 5 Large Screen TVs • 42" Plasma TV 231-839-4859 Burgers & Pizza • Coney Islands (Saturdays) 84 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issue
    THETHE BUILDINGBUILDING Since 1952 TRADESMANTRADESMAN Official Publication of the Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council Serving the highly skilled men and women in Michigan’s building trades unions VOL. 70, NO. 17 August 27, 2021 SHORT The holiday’s The trades are pleased: CUTS origin: killing Senate OKs the largest of 30 strikers Candidates picked infrastructure bill ever launches the By Mark Gruenberg deserve. We must seize for November ballot PAI Staff Writer this opportunity. It is time to get Absentee ballots will be WASHINGTON (PAI) – With the job done so Laborers mem- mailed soon for voters to cast day in 1894 the Senate’s bipartisan approval, bers, who are ready, willing, and their ballot in this year’s Gen- Scheduled every year on the 69-30, of a $1 trillion bill to recon- able, can get to work now build- eral Election. first Monday in September, the struct or replace the nation’s crum- ing America and securing our fu- The following candidates Labor Day holiday in the United bling roads, failing bridges, eld- ture,” he added. have been endorsed by the States wasn’t al- erly subways and lead-lined wa- Bricklayers President Tim Greater Detroit ways a fixture on ter pipes, while adding affordable Driscoll agreed, then quickly re- Building and the calendar like broadband for everybody, there’s minded lawmakers to pass the Construction Christmas Day or a caution flag. There’s a lot of second and much larger reconcili- Trades Council New Year’s Day. heavy lifting still to come on the ation, bill, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation Plan
    MISSAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY RECREATION PLAN Adopted by the Missaukee County Board of Commissioners September 10, 2019 MISSAUKEE COUNTY P LA NN I NG DEPARTMENT 105 S. Canal Street Lake City, MI 49651 231.839.7264 Ext 3 1 MISSAUKEE COUNTY BOARDS Missaukee County Board of Commissioners Lan Bridson Dean Smallegan Frank Vanderwal Star Hughston Pamela Niebryzdowski Hubert Zuiderveen Roger Ouwinga Missaukee County Planning Commission Craig Ardis Bruce Miller Charles Belser Don Shaarda Sherry Blaszak Dean Smallegan Craig Fisher Mimi Zwolak Alex Lutke Linda Hartshorne-Shafer—Staff Missaukee County Parks Commission Lan Bridson Tim Smith Brian Getty Hubert Zuiderveen Kerwin Karsten Mimi Zwolak Lonny Lutke Jack McGee Josh Pellow Larry Richardson - Staff Linda Hartshorne-Shafer – Ex Officio member – Planning Director i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION A: Community Description (Social and Physical Characteristics) 1 Map A – Missaukee County 2 Social Characteristics 3 Table 1 – Population and Household Density 5 Table 2 – Population by Race 6 Table 3 – Population by Age Group 7 Table 4 – Seasonal Home Monthly Occupancy Rate 7 Table 5 – Monthly Seasonal, Permanent, and Transient Residents 8 Population Projections 8 Table 6 – Historic and Projected Population 9 Physical Characteristics 9 Graph 1 – Temperature Averages 10 Graph 2 – Snowfall in Inches 11 Graph 3 – Precipitation in Inches 11 Map B – Median Fall Freeze 1971 – 2000 12 Map C – Median First Freeze 1980 – 2010 12 Soils for Recreation Planning 13 Map D – General Soils Map 14 Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Classes to Start Tuesday, Sept. 4 in Lowell Schools
    mmm n t r YOUR ' j WASHINGTON Established June, 1693 LOWELL. MICH., THURSDAY, AUGUST 23, 195 Number 17 1 REVIEW A report from Lowell Police De- partment for the period Aug. 6-19, Citizens Post Reword Lody Leatherneck Pvt. gives 16 speed violations, all warn- Classes To Start For Arrest of Vondds Kent 441 Club Filr '!n Full Swing In N. C. Supply School Cpl. Donald Keiser ings; 94 parking violations, 14 sum- mons, 80 warnings; 21 equipment A reward of $26 has been posted Marine Pvt. A. Berneice Mullen. violations, 4 summons, 17 warnings. Tuesday, Sept. 4 for anyone giving Information lead- All Exhibition Space Well Filled 27, daughter of Clyde Mullen. R.R. On Maneuver With Obeying the laws means safety ing to the apprehension and arrest 2, Lowell. Is currently enrolled in for everybody. of the party or parties who de- supply school at Camp Lejeunc, N. * • • In Lowell Schools stroyed the petunia tubs on Low- Many Attractive Features Added C. Marine amphibious training 196th In Alaska For the convenience of the gen- ell's Main street on the night of base. the Kent County Farm Bureau fhe Russian Communist regime eral public the Michigan Bell Tel- In leas than two weeka teachers, Tuesday, July 81, between the For the first time since the event Miss Mullen will receive eight with renewed vigor, and children, waa begun, the 17th annual Kent who will award a prize for the best recently upset the U. S. State De- ephpone Co. has installed an out- hours of 8:00 and 11:00 p.
    [Show full text]