DOCSLIB.ORG

An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan Prepared by: Stephanie M. Carman and Reuben R. Goforth, Ph.D. Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit November 2003 Report Number 2003-18 Front Cover Photograph Courtesy of David Kenyon, Michigan Department of Natural Resources An Assessment of the Current Distribution and Status of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) in the Muskegon River, Michigan Prepared by: Stephanie M. Carman and Reuben R. Goforth, Ph.D. Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit November 2003 Report Number 2003-18 Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Muskegon River Watershed, Michigan ....................................................................................................................... 1 Muskegon River Initiative ........................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Data Compilation ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Current Mussel Distribution Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 3 Current vs. Historical Mussel Status .......................................................................................................................... 4 Physicochemcial Habitat Measures and Analysis ...................................................................................................... 5 Fish Community Data and Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 6 Spatial Data and Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 10 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................................................10 Historical Data Compilation ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Current Mussel Distribution Surveys ....................................................................................................................... 10 Current vs. Historic Mussel Status ............................................................................................................................ 12 Mussel-Physicochemical Habitat Analyses ................................................................................................................ 14 Mussel-Fish Community Analyses ............................................................................................................................ 14 Spatial Analysis Results ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Local Buffer Land Cover Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 14 US1 Buffer Land Cover Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 14 US2 Buffer Land Cover Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 17 US3 Buffer Land Cover Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 17 DISCUSSION ...............................................................................................................................................................38 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................41 LITERATURE CITED ...............................................................................................................................................41 Muskegon River Mussel Assessment- i Muskegon River Mussel Assessment- ii List of Tables Table 1. Historical (1934) mussel survey sites (VDS) in the Muskegon River watershed (van der Schalie 1941). Sites that were visited by MNFI during the summer of 2002 are indicated on the right. ..................................................... 6 Table 2. Mussel survey sites in tributaries of the Muskegon River visited by MNFI during Summer 2002. ................... 7 Table 3. Mussel survey sites in the mainstem of the Muskegon River visited by MNFI during Summer 2002. ............. 8 Table 4. Sites used for comparison of historical (VDS 1934, van der Schalie 1941) and current (MNFI 2002) mussel populations in the Muskegon River watershed. ......................................................................................................... 13 Table 5. Historical mussel survey results for tributaries of the Muskegon River reported by van der Schalie (VDS, 1941). The number of live individuals observed for each species is provided. Current State of Michigan listing status for relevant species is shown in parentheses (SC=special concern, E=endangered)........................................ 15 Table 6. Historical mussel survey results for the mainstem of the Muskegon River reported by van der Schalie (VDS, 1941). The number of live individuals observed for each species is provided. Current State of Michigan listing status for relevant species is shown in parentheses (SC=special concern, E=endangered)........................................ 16 Table 7. Muskegon River watershed mussel survey results for tributary sites visited by MNFI in Summer 2002. Numbers reflect the number of live individuals found for each species. Current State of Michigan listing status for relevant species is provided in parentheses (SC=special concern, E=endangered). The presence of the exotic species Dreissena polymorpha and native spherid fingernail clams at a site is indicated by an “X.” ........................ 18 Table 8. Muskegon River watershed mussel survey results for mainstem sites visited by MNFI in Summer 2002. Numbers reflect the number of live individuals found for each species. Current State of Michigan listing status for relevant species is provided in parentheses (SC=special concern, E=endangered). The presence of the exotic species Dreissena polymorpha and native spherid fingernail clams at a site is indicated by an “X.” ........................ 21 Table 9. Comparison of historical (1934; van der Schalie 1941) and current (2002) mussel species survey data in the Muskegon River watershed. An “X” indicates the presence of live individuals and an “S” indicates the presence of spent shells only. Current conservation status for relevant species is provided in parentheses (SC=special concern and E=endangered). .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Table 10. Correlations of local land cover properties with principal components from the PCA of local land cover data for unionid mussel survey sites in the Muskegon River watershed, Michigan. Pearson correlation coefficients (R) and statistical significance values (p) are provided for each buffer land cover component (n=50). Significant correlations (p<0.005) are highlighted in gray. The percentage of the variance in the data explained by each component is also provided....................................................................................................................................... 33 Table 11. Correlations of US1 buffer land cover properties with principal components from the PCA of US1 buffer land cover data for unionid mussel survey sites in the Muskegon River watershed, Michigan. Pearson correlation coeffi- cients (R) and statistical significance values (p) are provided for each buffer land cover component (n=50). Signifi- cant correlations (p<0.005) are highlighted in gray. The percentage of the variance in the data explained by each component is also provided....................................................................................................................................... 33 Table 12. Correlations of US2 buffer land cover properties with principal components from the PCA ordinations of US2 buffer land cover data for unionid mussel survey sites in the Muskegon River watershed, Michigan. Pearson correlation coefficients (R) and statistical significance values (p) are provided for each buffer land cover compo- nent (n=50). Significant correlations (p<0.005) are highlighted in gray. The percentage of the variance in the data explained for each component is also provided. ....................................................................................................... 37 Table 13. Correlations of US3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Country Trail — New Ayg O County
    E 92nd E 96th Meceola W 96th W 96th Catalpa Coolidge Locust 17 Mile 23 Mile Centerline 17 Mile Hoover Newcosta Green Osborn West Michigan Trails 220th Greenly Mundy 22 Mile 16 Mile 16 Mile 16 Mile 131 Hoover to Baldwin 11 15 Mile Bingham North Country Trail (Newaygo County) Elm 230th Ash Beech BUS Cypress The NorthSpruce Country National Scenic Trail, better Willow 131 14 Mile Angler known simply as the North Country Trail or NCT, travels 4,600 miles through seven states from New Poplar Bitely 37 York to North Dakota. Michigan boasts over13 Mile 1,150 Walkup Lake Campground 200th miles of the NCT, the most of all seven states, and 190th 10 Cleveland Walnut includes some of the most scenic sections of the trail. Nichols 12 Mile Hemlock Lake Newaygo County is home to one of these Arbutusmost Hayes 9 31st Hayes scenic sections, weaving its way 48 miles through WoodbridgeAve 235th Woodland Park Newcosta 17 Mile 11 Mile the wilderness of Manistee National Forest. Ideal for 230th multi-day backpacking adventures, you’ll find several Madison established campgrounds near the trail with toilets 10 Mile and drinking water. Primitive camping is also allowed Lincoln Lincoln Hungerford Lake anywhere along the trail in Manistee HickoryNational Forest. 15 Mile 9 Mile BuchananThis nicely developed and maintained trail begins County — Newaygo Trail Country North Brohman Pierce Manistee Benton Lake Pierce at Croton Dam on the Muskegon River. The southern National Forest Campground 8 Mile section8 Mile passes through matureHardwick second growth 205th Maple Polk forest, pine plantations and several nativePolk prairies with unique plants including prickly pear7 Mile cactus.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Classes to Start Tuesday, Sept. 4 in Lowell Schools
    mmm n t r YOUR ' j WASHINGTON Established June, 1693 LOWELL. MICH., THURSDAY, AUGUST 23, 195 Number 17 1 REVIEW A report from Lowell Police De- partment for the period Aug. 6-19, Citizens Post Reword Lody Leatherneck Pvt. gives 16 speed violations, all warn- Classes To Start For Arrest of Vondds Kent 441 Club Filr '!n Full Swing In N. C. Supply School Cpl. Donald Keiser ings; 94 parking violations, 14 sum- mons, 80 warnings; 21 equipment A reward of $26 has been posted Marine Pvt. A. Berneice Mullen. violations, 4 summons, 17 warnings. Tuesday, Sept. 4 for anyone giving Information lead- All Exhibition Space Well Filled 27, daughter of Clyde Mullen. R.R. On Maneuver With Obeying the laws means safety ing to the apprehension and arrest 2, Lowell. Is currently enrolled in for everybody. of the party or parties who de- supply school at Camp Lejeunc, N. * • • In Lowell Schools stroyed the petunia tubs on Low- Many Attractive Features Added C. Marine amphibious training 196th In Alaska For the convenience of the gen- ell's Main street on the night of base. the Kent County Farm Bureau fhe Russian Communist regime eral public the Michigan Bell Tel- In leas than two weeka teachers, Tuesday, July 81, between the For the first time since the event Miss Mullen will receive eight with renewed vigor, and children, waa begun, the 17th annual Kent who will award a prize for the best recently upset the U. S. State De- ephpone Co. has installed an out- hours of 8:00 and 11:00 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Closer to Nature Enjoy Michigan’S Rivers and Natural Woodlands
    GET CLOSER TO NATURE ENJOY MICHIGAN’S RIVERS AND NATURAL WOODLANDS. A LITTLE WILD, A LOT WONDERFUL CONSUMERS ENERGY GET CLOSER TO NATURE • 1 GET CLOSER TO NATURE A LITTLE WILD, A LOT WONDERFUL xperience the best nature has to offer. Whether it’s a leisurely bike ride or hike through miles Eof pine forests with hardly another human passerby. Built and operated by Consumers Rogers Hydro Energy since the early 1900s, the 12,000 acres of land and water at our 13 hydro- electric dams offer many recreational opportunities: Au Sable River Mio • Fishing or camping. Alcona • Picnicking and swimming. Manistee River Cooke • Canoeing and seeing a deer take a Hodenpyl PAGE Foote PAGE drink at the edge of the water. Five Channels • Catching sight of a bald eagle soaring Tippy 6 Loud high above its nest or a family of 4 trumpeter swans gliding silently across Muskegon River the water. Hardy • Viewing Michigan’s fall foilage along Rogers PAGE the brilliantly colorful landscape. Croton Consumers Energy works with town- 8 ship, county, state and federal govern- ment officials, plus many volunteer Grand River PAGE organizations and private businesses to provide access to the clear water and Webber cool forests. 10 So grab the family, hop in the car and Kalamazoo River enjoy Michigan’s rivers and natural Allegan PAGE woodlands today. (Calkins Bridge) Let your family experience something a 10 little wild, but a lot wonderful. YOUR SAFETY IS A PRIORITY. See page 15 for tips. CONSUMERS ENERGY GET CLOSER TO NATURE • 3 MANISTEE RIVER Known locally as the “Big Manistee,” so as not to be confused with its smaller southern neighbor, the Little Manistee River, the Manistee River stretches about 170 miles from its headwaters near Alba to Manistee Lake and then Lake Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporter 2012 Hydro Reporter • 3
    HYr e p Do rRt erO 2 0 12 CONTENTS Flood of 1986 Challenged Cooke Dam Tours Employees and Machines Featured During Centennial Celebration 4 Cooling Outflow Water wenty- five years ago, as Consumers Croton Hydro Temperatures in 2011 5 Energy celebrated the 100th anniver- Tsary of its 1886 founding, a two-day Foote Dam Tailwater storm of epic proportions tested its Mus- Access Being Readied kegon River dams and the people of west for Reconstruction 6 Michigan like no weather event has, before or since. By the time it was over, west Mich- Hardy Pond Trail igan was swamped with more than a foot Development and a half of rain, at least six people died, 89 Effort Delayed 7 more were injured and public and private property suffered millions in damages. The Trumpeter Swans of storm posed a real threat to the integrity of the Au Sable Valley 8 Rogers, Hardy and Croton dams. Had they Mio Dam Tailwater Fishing failed, the scope of the disaster unquestion- Access Improvements 9 ably would have been much worse. The week of Sept. 7, 1986 started out as As dawn approached on Improving Fish Habitat 10 routine as any for the Muskegon River dam Thursday, flow passage operations and maintenance staff. Periodic unit inspections were getting under way had to increase at all three for Croton unit 1 and 2 and Hardy Pond plants as rising pond levels had been lowered one foot to decrease the chances that it would need to pass flows need to be controlled. through the spill gates at Croton while the two units were out.
    [Show full text]
  • Newaygo County Recreation Plan: 2018 - 2022 Page I
    Newaygo County Recreation Plan 2018 - 2022 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Community Description ....................................................................................................................... 2 Administrative Structure .................................................................................................................... 7 Roles of the Newaygo County Board and Parks & Recreation Commission ............ 7 General Summary of Parks and Recreation Director Responsibilities ..................... 7 Newaygo County Parks & Recreation Commission Organizational Chart ................ 8 Annual and Projected Budget .................................................................................................. 9 Sources of Funding ....................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation Programming .......................................................................................................... 9 Role of Volunteers ........................................................................................................................ 9 Relationship(s) with Other Public or Private Organizations. .................................... 10 Recreation & Resources Inventory ............................................................................................... 11 Methods Used
    [Show full text]
  • Muskegon River Fisheries Management Summaries 02232017
    Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division Muskegon River Fisheries Management Summaries February 23, 2017 Richard P. O’Neal The Muskegon River begins in north-central Lower Michigan, flowing from Higgins Lake and Houghton Lakes, southwesterly to the City of Muskegon and discharging into central Lake Michigan. The river is 212 miles long and drops 575 feet in elevation between its headwater and mouth (O’Neal 1997). The watershed incorporates over 2,350 square miles of land and approximately 94 tributaries flow directly into the mainstem. The original fish community of the river system was composed of 97 species, and there have been a number of species that colonized or were introduced. The most recent fish community surveys were conducted on Higgins Lake (unpublished 2011), Houghton Lake (O’Neal 2011), the river and large impoundments (O’Neal 2002), and Muskegon Lake (unpublished 2008). The Muskegon River Watershed Assessment provides substantial background on the physical characteristics of the river (O’Neal 1997), along with Wiley et al. (2009). The hydrology of the river is intermediate between coldwater and warmwater Michigan streams. Water temperature data and fisheries surveys verify the coolwater nature of this river (O’Neal 2001; O’Neal 2011). The predominant species of fish found in the river are suckers, but there are many sport fish also present in the river as well as the lakes. The lower river (from Croton Dam to Muskegon Lake), Muskegon Lake, Houghton Lake, and Higgins Lake provide some of the best fishing in Michigan. These summaries are intended to highlight the existing fisheries in the river system, and provide brief summaries of recent studies conducted on important fish species along with needed research.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskegon Futures: Vol 4 Dams & Fishes
    Muskegon Futures: Dams & Fishes Muskegon Watershed Research Partnership Bulletin 4 Introduction Economic boon, or ecological disaster? Put ten Rogers Dam Muskegon River lovers in a room and you will un- doubtedly find takers for both of these points of view and many in between. One thing is clear, for over 150 years dams have been an integral part of the Muske- gon River ecosystem. The first major dam was built on the Muskegon main stem at Newaygo in 1854 to power a sawmill. Then came a dam at Big Rapids in 1866. The Big Rapids Dam became the river's first hydroelectric station in 1889. Next came Rogers Dam Hardy in 1906 and Croton Dam in 1907. Hardy Dam was Dam built in 1931, and last of all Reedsburg Dam near the Muskegon headwaters was built in 1940. Today Rogers, Hardy, and Croton dams lie at the heart of a sprawling hydropower operation. Together they pro- vide the regional grid with about 46,000 kilowatts of Croton Dam power, with Hardy Dam providing the majority of the generation. Despite the clear economic contributions of the hydropower dams, many people are con- cerned about their impacts on water quality and fish populations in the Muskegon River water- shed. MWRP modeling studies can provide some useful insights on both sides of the argument. The Croton Dam in Newaygo County “The facilities are li- censed to operate through 2034, at which time the structures could be re-licensed, decom- missioned and left in place, or removed from the river.” -Jeff Alexander 2005 “To those who live here, it’s alive, a part of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Flashiness Analysis of Gaged Michigan Rivers and Streams
    MI/DEQ/WRD-12/028 Application of the Richards-Baker Flashiness Index to Gaged Michigan Rivers and Streams Dave Fongers Hydrologic Studies and Dam Safety Unit Water Resources Division With Assistance from Robert Day Joseph Rathbun Nonpoint Source Unit Water Resources Division May 3, 2012 This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded wholly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through a Part 319 grant to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For more information, please visit www.michigan.gov/nps. The cover depicts the United States Geological Survey gages analyzed using the Richards-Baker Flashiness Index method. For comments or questions relating to this document, please contact Dave Fongers at: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division P.O. Box 30458 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7958 [email protected] Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 Methodology............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Trail
    41 ICONS KEY Paved Trail Crushed Stone Unimproved Road Portions Boardwalk Horses Snowmobiles ORV * Indicates companion notes regarding the trail, which may be found here: http://bit.ly/traildirectorynotes. MICHIGAN MULTI-USE TRAIL DIRECTORY & MAP ID NAME OF TRAIL MILES ENDPOINTS ID NAME OF TRAIL MILES ENDPOINTS Go for a bike ride, run or hike on Michigan's multi-use trails, stretching more than 2,100 miles across the state. 1 North Western State Trail 32 Mackinaw City, Petoskey 51 Ionia River Trail 4 City of Ionia This directory features trails over 3.5 miles, though there are many more across the state with less mileage. Trails http://bitly.com/nwstrail http://bit.ly/IRtrail Map Key Multi-Use Trails 2 Burt Lake Trail 5.5 Maple Bay Rd., Topinabee 52 *Fred Meijer Clinton-Ionia-Shiawassee Trail 42 Prairie Creek Bridge Ionia, Smith Rd., Owosso in the Lower Peninsula are mostly surfaced in asphalt, or crushed stone (granite/limestone). Trails in the Upper http://bit.ly/Blaketrail http://bit.ly/FMCIStrail Peninsula include some unimproved rail-trails (dirt/grass/gravel/ballast) as well as linear mountain bike trails 24 Trail ID - See Trail Table 3 *North Central State Trail 62 Mackinaw City, Gaylord 53 Portland Riverwalk 15 Portland High School -Cutler Rd. http://bitly.com/ncstrail http://bit.ly/Prtrail (dirt) through forests and parks. State parks are included as additional places to bike and hike, and many offer Connection Between Trails 4 North Eastern State Trail 71 Cheboygan, Alpena camping accommodations. This map may be downloaded from www.michigantrails.org/trails.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muskegon River
    Get Closer to Nature Come fi sh or camp … canoe or walk a nature trail … catch sight of a bald eagle or spot a deer … glimpse trumpeter swans or Karner blue butterfl ies … enjoy Michigan’s rivers and natural woodlands. A little wild, a lot wonderful ISITORS TO MICHIGAN’S rivers and riverlands can experience a leisurely ride between high, wooded banks or hike miles through pine forests with hardly another Vhuman passerby. But those riverlands hold other possibilities, too. Boat launches … campgrounds … smooth, broad ponds where fishing is superb … picnicking and swimming … the sight of deer wandering to water’s edge for an evening drink … a family of trumpeter swans gliding silently across the water … or a bald eagle soaring high over its nest ... tourist accommodations. All of these are part of the riverlands that have been nurtured for decades by Consumers Energy. 1 Almost every kind of outdoor activity a person could want can be found on the ponds behind the 13 hydroelectric dams built and operated by Consumers Energy since the early 1900s. We work in partnership with township, county, state and federal government units, plus many volunteer organizations and private businesses to provide access to the clear water and cool forests. Barrier-free access is a prominent feature of many of the recreation sites that have been developed or improved over the past 10 years. 2 THINGS TO DO The Manistee River N northwest Michigan, halfway between Manistee and Cadillac, the IManistee River is home to two of our hydroelectric dams, which together produce enough electricity to meet the annual power needs of about 13,000 of our residential customers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Well Taken: a Father and Son Experience
    A Journey Well Taken: A Father and Son Experience Ken Johnson Reflections on a trip taken down the Muskegon River: July 27, 2007 (Note: See map and key, last two pages) I remember seeing a movie a few years back that starred Bill Murray. It was not really a comedy (although I can hardly imagine a movie with Bill Murray that wouldn’t be funny at least a couple times) but a more serious movie; some might even call it depressing. The movie? Lost in Translation. Anyway, I will never forget a line from that movie. Bill Murray was having a conversation with Scarlett Johansson, and he says something to the effect of, “Your children are the most intriguing people you will ever meet in your life.” This is a story about a journey taken with one of those people. In April of this year I started reading a book about the Muskegon River written by Jeff Alexander. A co-worker had told me about the book and it sounded interesting. I have lived in Muskegon my whole life (except for a brief 5 year period in the early 80’s when the economy was so rotten that I think half the state left. Sound familiar?) and I thought it would be fun to read something about an area that I know and love. I was smitten by the book from the first page. At first the book takes you back to a time when the area was virgin and not spoiled by European settlers. What an unspoiled paradise Michigan once was.
    [Show full text]