DOCSLIB.ORG

A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.13A: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey in 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.13A: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey in 2018 A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.13a: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey in 2018 Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 April 2019 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010027 Application Document Ref: TR010027/APP/7. A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A38 Derby Junctions Development Consent Order 202[ ] 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.13a: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey in 2018 Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010022 Reference Application Document Reference 6.3 Author A38 Derby Junctions Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.3 A38 Derby Junctions Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 2018 Report Number: HE514503-ACM-EBD-A38_SW_PR_ZZ-RP-EG-0023 P02 S4 December 2018 A38 Derby Junctions Highways England Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 2018 Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and Scope ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scheme and Study Area ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Relevant Legislation............................................................................................................. 2 2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Desk Study .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Field Assessment of Sites Surveyed in 2015 ........................................................................ 4 2.3 2018 Site Surveys ................................................................................................................ 5 2.4 Survey Method for the 2018 Sites ........................................................................................ 5 2.5 Sample Data Processing ...................................................................................................... 7 2.6 Assessment of Rarity ........................................................................................................... 7 2.7 Overall Ranking of Site Value .............................................................................................. 8 2.8 Limitations ........................................................................................................................... 8 3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Desk Study .......................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey ........................................................................................... 11 3.3 Key Species ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Section 41 Species ............................................................................................................ 11 4 Species Analysis ............................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Markeaton Proposed Construction Compound ................................................................... 13 4.2 Kingsway Roundabout LWS............................................................................................... 14 4.3 Little Eaton Proposed Construction Compound .................................................................. 16 5 Habitat Assessment ......................................................................................................... 19 6 Site Assessments and Conclusions ............................................................................... 20 6.1 Key Species ...................................................................................................................... 20 6.2 Habitats ............................................................................................................................. 20 6.3 Markeaton Proposed Construction Compound ................................................................... 20 6.4 Kingsway Roundabout ....................................................................................................... 20 6.5 Little Eaton Proposed Construction Compound .................................................................. 20 7 References ....................................................................................................................... 21 Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Assessment Criteria Appendix C Species List List of Tables Table 1: Visit dates and conditions ..................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: DaNES Desk Study Records for Protected or Notable Invertebrate Species ......................... 9 Table 3: DWT Desk Study Records for Protected or Notable Invertebrate Species ........................... 10 Table 4: Key Species Recorded ....................................................................................................... 11 HE514503-ACM-EBD-A38_SW_PR_ZZ-RP-EG-0023 Revision P02 December 2018 Status S4 A38 Derby Junctions Highways England Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 2018 Table 5: BATs Represented at Markeaton Proposed Construction Compound - the ISIS scores and the number of species on which each score is based ....................................................................... 13 Table 6: Broad Biotopes Represented in the Markeaton Proposed Construction Compound ............ 13 Table 7: Specific Assemblage Types for Markeaton Proposed Construction Compound ................... 14 Table 8: BATs Represented at Kingsway Roundabout LWS - the ISIS scores and the number of species on which each score is based ............................................................................................. 15 Table 9: The Broad Biotopes Represented in the Kingsway Roundabout LWS Survey Area ............. 15 Table 10: Specific Assemblage Types for Kingsway Roundabout LWS ............................................ 16 Table 11: BATs Represented at Little Eaton Proposed Construction Compound - the ISIS scores and the number of species on which each score is based ....................................................................... 16 Table 12: The Broad Biotopes represented in the Little Eaton Proposed Construction Compound Survey Area .................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 13: Specific Assemblage Types for Little Eaton Proposed Construction Compound ................ 17 HE514503-ACM-EBD-A38_SW_PR_ZZ-RP-EG-0023 Revision P02 December 2018 Status S4 A38 Derby Junctions Highways England Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 2018 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Scope 1.1.1 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (AECOM) has been commissioned by Highways England to provide design services with regards to the A38 Derby Junctions Scheme (referred to herein as “the Scheme)”. 1.1.2 The Scheme concerns the grade separation of three junctions on the A38 in Derby, namely: · A38/ A61 Little Eaton junction · A38/ A52 Markeaton junction · A38/ A5111 Kingsway junction 1.1.3 These three junctions are located along an approximate 5.5km length of the A38 national trunk road, to the west and north of Derby. 1.1.4 In order to assist with the assessment of the Scheme’s potential environmental effects, a range of environmental surveys have been undertaken to define prevailing baseline conditions. 1.1.5 The extended Phase 1 Habitat survey of the Scheme in 2015 (AECOM, 2016a) identified potential habitat to support terrestrial invertebrates; therefore, dedicated terrestrial invertebrate surveys were undertaken during the summer of 2015 (AECOM, 2016b). Further terrestrial invertebrate surveys were then carried out in 2018 to take into account amendments to the Scheme boundary and also to provide up to date survey information on those areas previously surveyed in 2015 (where applicable), given the 2015 data were over 2 years old. 1.1.6 The objective of the survey was to evaluate the Scheme in terms of its entomological fauna. A total of three daytime visits were undertaken to meet the minimum requirements for assessing the invertebrate fauna of a site in terms of conservation evaluation (Drake et al 2007). 1.1.7 The aims of the survey were: · To sample areas of perceived high entomological value using several sampling methods · To identify collected specimens to species level were possible · To identify any significant species either in terms of local or national rarity · To identify any significant groups of species associated with specific habitats or plants · To identify the most likely areas of the site to have a diverse invertebrate fauna · To identify the areas with the most potential for invertebrates 1.1.8 This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species List
    1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder Symphyta – Sawflies and Wood Wasps
    20 Yu.N. Sundukov SUBORDER SYMPHYTA – SAWFLIES Subfamily MACROXYELINAE AND WOOD WASPS MEGAXYELA Ashmead, 1898 (Odontophyes Konow, YU.N. SUNDUKOV 1899; Megaloxyela Schulz, 1906; Paraxyela Mac- Gillivray, 1912). The larvae feed on the Juglanda- Sawflies are distinguished from otherHymenoptera ceae. Type species Xyela major Cresson, 1880. by the anterior margin of the tergum 1, which appears The genus is distributed in East Palaearctic and as part of abdomen rather than thorax, though it is Nearctic region. Number of species: World – 11; fused to the postnotum of the metathorax. The sub- Palaearctic – 6; Russia – 2. order is distributed worldwide. Number of recent taxa: World – 15 familes, 45 subfamilies, about 650 genera, Megaxyela gigantea Mocsàry, 1909 (M. mikado Sato, about 8250 species; Palaearctic – 13/24/>310/about 1930). Host plant: Juglans mandshurica Maxim., 4400; Russia – 13/22/170/1546. J. ailanthifolia Carr., J. regia L. (Juglandaceae). The classification used here reflects classification, Russia: FE (KH, PR). – Korean Peninsula. derived from the “World catalog of Symphyta” (Taeger Megaxyela pulchra Blank, Shinohara et Sundukov, et al., 2010), taking into account the latest taxonomic 2017. Host plant: Juglans mandshurica Maxim., changes (see the list of references). ?J. ailanthifolia Carr., ?J. regia L., ?Pterocarya spp. (Juglandaceae). Russia: FE (PR). – China (NE, WP, INFRAORDER XYELOMORPHA SE), Korean Peninsula. SUPERFAMILY XYELOIDEA Subfamily XYELINAE One family: Xyelidae. PLERONEURA Konow, 1897 (Manoxyela Ashmead, 1898). T y p e s p e c i e s Xyela dahli Hartig, 1837. 1. FAMILY XYELIDAE The larvae of species bores in the shoot of Abies and Picea (Pinaceae). The genus is distributed in Xyelidae is the earliest known family of Hyme- the Holarctic and Neotropical regions.
    [Show full text]
  • ZOOLOGY Zoology 110 (2007) 409–429
    ARTICLE IN PRESS ZOOLOGY Zoology 110 (2007) 409–429 www.elsevier.de/zool Towards an 18S phylogeny of hexapods: Accounting for group-specific character covariance in optimized mixed nucleotide/doublet models Bernhard Misofa,Ã, Oliver Niehuisa, Inge Bischoffa, Andreas Rickerta, Dirk Erpenbeckb, Arnold Staniczekc aAbteilung fu¨r Entomologie, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany bDepartment of Coelenterata and Porifera (Zoologisch Museum), Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands cStaatliches Museum fu¨r Naturkunde Stuttgart, Abt. Entomologie, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany Received 19 May 2007; received in revised form 2 August 2007; accepted 22 August 2007 Abstract The phylogenetic diversification of Hexapoda is still not fully understood. Morphological and molecular analyses have resulted in partly contradicting hypotheses. In molecular analyses, 18S sequences are the most frequently employed, but it appears that 18S sequences do not contain enough phylogenetic signals to resolve basal relationships of hexapod lineages. Until recently, character interdependence in these data has never been treated seriously, though possibly accounting for the occurrence of biased results. However, software packages are readily available which can incorporate information on character interdependence within a Bayesian approach. Accounting for character covariation derived from a hexapod consensus secondary structure model and applying mixed DNA/RNA substitution models, our Bayesian analysis of 321 hexapod sequences yielded a partly robust tree that depicts many hexapod relationships congruent with morphological considerations. It appears that the application of mixed DNA/RNA models removes many of the anomalies seen in previous studies. We focus on basal hexapod relationships for which unambiguous results are missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Pflanzenwespen
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mitteilungen der Abteilung für Zoologie am Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz Jahr/Year: 1987 Band/Volume: 40_1987 Autor(en)/Author(s): Schedl Wolfgang Artikel/Article: Die Pflanzenwespen (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) des Landesmuseums Joanneum in Graz Teil 6: Tenthredinoidea: Familie Tenthredinidae, Unterfamilie Tenthredininae 1-23 ©Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Mitt. Abt. Zool. Landesmus. Joanneum Heft 40 S. 1—23 Graz 1987 Aus dem Institut für Zoologie der Universität Innsbruck Abteilung für Terrestrische Ökologie und Taxonomie Die Pflanzenwespen (Hymenoptera, Sym- phyta) des Landesmuseums Joanneum in Graz Teil 6: Tenthredinoidea: Familie Tenthredinidae, Unter- familie Tenthredininae Von Wolfgang SCHEDL Eingelangt am 14. April 1986 Mit 4 Abbildungen Inhalt: Es handelt sich um Ergebnisse der weiteren Bearbeitung von Pflanzenwespen des Landesmuseums Joanneum durch den Verf., speziell der Unterfamilie Tenthredininae innerhalb der Blattwespen i. e. S. Dabei wurden 502 Exemplare 72 Spezies und 3 Subspezies aus 10 Genera zugeordnet. Besonders bemerkenswert für die Fauna Österreichs sind die Taxone Tenthredo bifasciata violacea (ANDRÉ), T. neobesa ZOMBORI, T. succincta LEP. sensu CHEVIN 1983 und Macrophya alboannulata COSTA, sind neu für Österreich. Unter den behandelten Exemplaren befinden sich auch solche aus Deutschland (BRD und DDR), Italien, Jugoslawien und Ungarn. Abstract: Results of the further study of sawflies s. str. of the Landesmuseum Joanneum by the author. 502 specimens were studied and determined all of the subfamily Tenthredininae belonging to 10 genera, 72 species and 3 subspecies. Of special interest for the Austrian fauna are Tenthredo bif asciata violacea (ANDRÉ), T. neobesa ZOMBORI, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 16 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Article 5 October 1983 Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan Mark F. O'Brien The University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation O'Brien, Mark F. 1983. "Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 16 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/5 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. O'Brien: Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan 1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 87 BIBLIOGRAPHIC GUIDE TO THE TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS OF MICHIGAN Mark F. O'Brienl ABSTRACT Papers dealing with distribution, faunal extensions, and identification of Michigan insects and other terrestrial arthropods are listed by order, and cover the period of 1878 through 1982. The following bibliography lists the publications dealing with the distribution or identification of insects and other terrestrial arthropods occurring in the State of Michigan. Papers dealing only with biological, behavioral, or economic aspects are not included. The entries are grouped by orders, which are arranged alphabetically, rather than phylogenetic ally , to facilitate information retrieval. The intent of this paper is to provide a ready reference to works on the Michigan fauna, although some of the papers cited will be useful for other states in the Great Lakes region.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Scaffolds and Crop Development R U I T U N a July 31, 2000 VOLUME 9, No
    Update on Pest Management scaffolds and Crop Development R U I T u N A July 31, 2000 VOLUME 9, No. 20 Geneva, NY PLEASE DON'T They are also very expensive. EAT THESE DAISIES This regular annual article used (Dave Kain & to state that the four most common Art Agnello, botanicals available for use in fruit Entomology, crops today were rotenone, pyre- Geneva) thrin, sabadilla and ryania. Unfortu­ nately, for those who found them use­ ❖ ❖ Naturally occuring pesticides ful, sabadilla and ryania are no longer on that are derived from plants or plant parts are the list due to voluntary cancellation of their commonly referred to as “botanicals”. Botani- registrations. To round out the article, we’ll sub­ cals have been around for quite a while. Along stitute information on a few, newer, natural ma­ with arsenicals and other inorganic pesticides, terials that, while not technically botanicals, kind they were pretty commonly used before the of fit the category. Information on these products advent of the synthetic, organic pesticides ren­ appears in the 2000 Tree-Fruit Recommenda­ dered them “obsolete”. From time to time they’re tions (pp. 24-26). re-examined for various reasons and may be familiar. Botanicals are of interest to those ROTENONE Rotenone is derived from the root concerned with pest management for a variety of of various plants of the Derris or Lonchocarpus reasons. They are generally less toxic to the species from Southeast Asia, Central and South applicator than many synthetic pesticides. They America. It is available as at least 118 formu­ may be acceptable in the organic market where lated products from a large number of manufac­ synthetic pesticides are not.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 1
    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
    [Show full text]
  • Arge Indicura N. Sp. Feeding on Potentilla and Sanguisorba (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Argidae) from Japan
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 35(1), pp. 55–71, March 22, 2009 Arge indicura n. sp. Feeding on Potentilla and Sanguisorba (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Argidae) from Japan Akihiko Shinohara1 and Hideho Hara2 1 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Hokkaido Forestry Research Institute, Koshunai, Bibai-shi, Hokkaido, 079–0198 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new argid sawfly, Arge indicura, is described from Japan. It was identified with Arge nigrovaginata Malaise, 1931, described from the Russian Far East, for more than seven decades, but a recent examination of Malaise’s type material has revealed the misidentification. Previously unknown immature stages are described, new host plant records are given, and the distribution and life history are discussed based on the specimens examined and rearing experiments. The mostly greenish, solitary and cryptic larvae feed on the leaves of Potentilla and Sanguisorba (also Fra- garia and Duchesnea in the laboratory), all belonging to the clade Sanpotina of the Rosaceae. Arge indicura probably has three generations a year in the lowland of central Honshu. Key words : Argidae, Arge indicura, new species, Potentilla, Sanguisorba. In the course of our revisionary works on the Our examination of the holotype of Arge pa- sawfly genus Arge of Japan and adjacent regions, gana var. nigrovaginata has revealed that the we have found that the Japanese species previ- Japanese species does not belong to Malaise’s ously determined as Arge nigrovaginata Malaise, taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014
    Jukka Salmela, Stefan Siivonen, Patrycja Dominiak, Antti Haarto, Kai Heller, Juhani Kanervo, Petri Martikainen, Matti Mäkilä, Lauri Paasivirta, Aki Rinne, Juha Salokannel, Guy Söderman ja Pekka Vilkamaa Malaise-hyönteispyynti Lapin suojelualueilla 2012–2014 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A 221 Jukka Salmela, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, jukka.salmela(at)metsa.fi Stefan Siivonen, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, stefan.siivonen(at)metsa.fi Patrycja Dominiak, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdansk, heliocopris(at)gmail.com Antti Haarto, Mietoinen, ahaarto(at)gmail.com Kai Heller, Quickborn, kaiheller(at)gmx.de Juhani Kanervo, Turku, jussi.kanervo(at)luukku.com Petri Martikainen, Juva, petri.martikainen(at)uef.fi Matti Mäkilä, Rovaniemi, makila.entomology(at)gmail.com Lauri Paasivirta, Salo, lauri.paasivirta(at)suomi24.fi Aki Rinne, Helsinki, aki.rinne(at)pintakasittelytekniikka.fi Juha Salokannel, Tampere, juha.salokannel(at)gmail.com Guy Söderman, Helsinki, guy.soderman(at)pp.inet.fi Pekka Vilkamaa, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, pekka.vilkamaa(at)helsinki.fi Kansikuva: Malaise-pyydys Pallas–Yllästunturin kansallispuiston Röyninkurussa 2013. Lähteisten latvapurojen varret, varsinkin sellaiset joita ympäröi luonnontilainen havu- metsä, ovat monimuotoisia elinympäristöjä. Tältä paikalta havaittiin mm. Euroopalle uusi sienissääskilaji Mycetophila monstera, erittäin harvinainen pikkuvaaksiainen ou- taruskokirsikäs (Limonia messaurea) ja pohjoinen surviaissääski
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Genera Delomerista, Iseropus, and Perithous (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) from South Korea
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 36, No. 1: 91-105, January 2020 https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2020.36.1.041 Review article Review of the Genera Delomerista, Iseropus, and Perithous (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) from South Korea Geun-Myeong Song1, Jin-Kyung Choi2, Jong-Wook Lee1,* 1Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea 2Department of Science Education, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu 42411, Korea ABSTRACT The eight newly recognized species of the genera Delomerista, Iseropus, and Perithous are reported in this study: Delomerista kusuoi Uchida & Momoi, 1957, D. mandibularis (Gravenhorst, 1829), D. pfankuchi Brauns, 1905, Isero­ pus stercorator stercorator (Fabricius, 1793), Perithous albicinctus (Gravenhorst, 1829), P. septemcinctorius (Thun- berg, 1822), P. speculator Haupt, 1954, and P. townesorum (Gupta, 1982). The genus Delomerista Förster, 1869 is a small group that includes 18 species worldwide that, for the first time, has been recorded from South Korea. Iseropus Förster, 1869 is a small group that includes nine species worldwide. The genus Perithous Holmgren, 1859 is also small group including 18 species worldwide. In this study, keys to species of these genera and illustrations and diag- noses of each species are provided. Keywords: Eastern Palaearctic, Delomerista, Iseropus, Perithous, taxonomy INTRODUCTION ceived very little attention, and no additional records had been reported. Perithous species are ectoparasitoids such as The tribe Delomeristini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) is the species from the genus Delomerista (Danks, 1970; Tor- the smallest group of the subfamily Pimplinae and currently mos et al., 1999; Sheng et al., 2002). includes 38 species in three genera worldwide. Among them, The tribe Ephialtini is the largest group within the subfam- the genus Delomerista Förster, 1869 is moderately sized ily Pimplinae and currently includes 963 species in 59 gen- group that includes 18 species worldwide, 10 of which inhab- era worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Chilena De Entomología
    Rev. Chilena Ent. 1990, 18: 5-7 AMETASTEGIA GLABRATA (FALLEN) ESPECIE FITÓFAGA INTRODUCIDA A CHILE (HYMENOPTERA: TENTHREDINIDAE) Roberto Carrillo Ll.\ Nelly Mundaca B.' y Ernesto Cisternas A.^ RESUMEN Se señala la presencia en Chile del tentredínido Ametastegia glabrata (Fallen), especie holártica de hábitos polífagos, que se alimenta de diversas plantas cultivadas y malezas. Este insecto ha sido encontrado en diversas localidades de la X Región. Se entregan algunos antecedentes de su biología y de sus plantas hospederas. ABSTRACT The presence in Chile of the holoartic sawfly Ametastegia glabrata (Fallen) is reported. It is a polypha- gous insect, that feed on different cultivated plants and weeds. The insect has been reported in different localities of the X'^ Región. Aspects of its biology and hosts are reported. INTRODUCCIÓN de crianza (± 19°C). En el mes de junio se obtuvo un adulto en Remehue, y a partir de En el otoño de 1987, en la comuna de La fines de octubre, en la Universidad Austral de Unión, en el lugar denominado Choroico, se Chile. Los adultos fueron enviados al Dr. Da- observó en una plantación de frambuesa de vid Smith, del U.S. National Museum, quien primer año, cv. Heritage, algunas cañas caídas identificó la especie como A. glabrata Fallen. sobre el suelo y otras se encontraban dobladas en forma de V invertida. Examinadas estas Clasifícación cañas se observó, en su interior o en el lugar en el cual se había producido el quiebre, una La especie A. glabrata pertenece a la familia larva de tendredínido de color verde. Revisio- Tenthredinidae, subfamilia Allantinae y tribu nes efectuadas en la misma temporada en Empriini.
    [Show full text]