The Protestant Churches and Totalitarianism (Germany, 1933-1945)*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Protestant Churches and Totalitarianism (Germany, 1933-1945)* THE PROTESTANT CHURCHES AND TOTALITARIANISM (GERMANY, 1933-1945)* Three delimitations of this paper are immediately stated, for reasons of clarity in handling a very large and involved subject. In the first place, although the problem of the care and cure of souls is the most acute aspect of church life under Nazism or Communism, this matter has recently been dis­ cussed in a professional paper by the present writer, and it is unnecessary to travel again the same path.1 Second, the more general lines of the relation of the German churches to Nazism have been rather thoroughly exploited, al­ though there is good reason to feel that further research on the ground by a competent professional staff would bring forth additional information.2 Third, this paper will make no attempt to assess the Roman Catholic record during the period treated, although I believe that any attempt to understand postwar Germany will give considerable attention to comparisons and contrasts between the Evangelical and Catholic situations under Hitler and under the occupying powers. This is a neglected factor in most current discussions, yet basic to comprehending the roles of Niemo'ller, Heinemann, Dibelius, Held, Iwand, and others upon whose activities and influence so much now depends.3 The burden of this paper will be to review a matter too little considered outside the theological faculties, yet of basic significance to an understand­ ing of the capacity of religious bodies to resist totalitarianism: the role of dogmatic formulas in laying the grounds for and developing a disciplined community of opposition. This field, a happy hunting ground for professional theologians for some years, deserves more serious attention from social and political scientists than it has yet received. The problem may be bluntly introduced by quoting from one of Hitler's most gallant and persistent opponents on the Continent: "The liberal theology in Germany and in her orbit utterly failed. It was willing to compromise on the essential points of divine law and of 'the law of nature'; to dispose of the Old Testament and to accept the law of the Nordic race instead; and to replace the 'Jewish' law of the Old Testament by the autonomous law of each race and nation respectively. It had made all the necessary preparation for the 'Germanization of Christianity' and for a racial Church."14 These are harsh words. But they are no more harsh than the parallel judgment of a distinguished British scholar: "The Protestant Churches also welcomed Hitler. They had steadily been losing ground in the Germany of the Weimar Republic. The Liberal Theology had done much to dis­ integrate the theological integrity of the Protestant Churches. Activity in the field of social reform was { *A paper by Dr. Franklin H. Littell at a Conference on Totalitarianism, held under the auspices of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston, March 6-8, 1953; subsequently published in Friedrich, Carl J., ed., Totalitarianism (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 195*0, pp. 108-19. -2 taking the place of witness to the Gospel of Redemption. And there were those who were willing to fill the void created by their own disbelief by political enthusiasms - enthusiasm for Socialism, or, in the situation of 1933, for National Socialism, It was from these people that the so-called 'German Christians' emerged. "And yet the Protestant Churches were not as weak as they seemed. There were within them strong conservative elements, loyal to the theologies of the Reformation: while, in the dialectical theology, there had emerged a new, post-liberal re-statement of the theology of the Reformation, It was particularly out of this post- liberal reaffirmation of the Gospel that the Confessional Church was born. Ihey very exaggerations of this theology were a source of strength. They made possible a radical­ ism of dogmatic statement that would hardly have been possible within, what we in England would regard as, a more balanced presentation of the Christian Gospel."5 In what respect did the nineteenth century liberal theology of Schleiermacher, Ritschl, and Harnack fail the church in the middle twentieth century? How were even the exaggerations of the Crisis Theology a source of strength to the centers of resistance? No net for the feet of the unwary was ever more cleverly laid than that hidden in the twenty-fourth article of the NSDAP platform: We demand the freedom of all religious confessions in the state, in so far as they do not imperil its stability or offend against the ethical and moral senses of the German race. The Party, as such, adopts the standpoint of a positive Christianity, without binding itself confessionally to a particular creed. Certain content-laden word-symbols stand out: "freedom" (plus), "a positive Christianity" (plus), "binding...confessionally" (negative). Here is an obvious appeal to the spiritualizers, the individualists, the emancipated - the "third type" which Ernst Troeltsch mentioned in the Soziallehren, so common in the latter years of the Enlightenment and so resentful of the "offense" and "sectarianism" of fixed belief: "...that third sociological type of Christian thought, which does not depend, like the Church, upon the insti­ tutions, nor like the sect on the liberal interpretation of the Law of God in the Bible, but which is an in­ dividualism which freely combines Christian ideas with all kinds of other elements, and which is entirely un­ recognized, or else exists along side of the Church and assumes its necessity for the mass of mankind. "Full of the sense that today it still does represent the highest ethical ideals of humanity, it is still unable easily to formulate for itself the unwritten social programme which the Gospel contains, nor to apply it clearly to the conditions which oppose it. Gradually, in the Modern World of educated people, the third type has come to predominate. This means, the, that all that is left is voluntary association with the like-minded people, which is equally remote both from Church and sect."6 The millennial age prophesied by Joachim of Fiore,7 when Church and World Should become one in the power of the Spirit, when the divisiveness of ec­ clesiastical institutions and dogma should wither away, was realized for many in the passionate Blut und Volk of the Thousand Years of the Third Reich. What was this "positive Christianity" of which totalitarian party ap­ proved? What were the characteristics which made it appealing to so many sections of German Christendom? (We are not dealing here with the passive nonresistance of the Lutheran leadership which remained reluctantly obedient to state policy, nor with the so-called "intact Churches" who walked a difficult path between resistance and capitulation, but rather with the convinced Deutsche Christen.) 1. It was grounded in a thorough acceptance of the most radical interpretations of textual critics of the Bible and practitioners of the comparative method in the study of religions. This led readily to placing an equal value (Gleichwertung) upon all religious myths. This fact is evident not only in continual attacks on "Christian priestcraft" and "sectarian dogmatics" in popular circles, such as ' Amheiligen Quell Deutscher Kraft: Ludendorffs Halbmonatschrift, but in tracts and monographs by professors and alumni of the leading theological and related faculties,8 An interesting illustration of this point is the book by Professor Wilhelm Vollrath of Erlangen: Houston Stewart Chamberlain und seine Theologie. Under this unlikely title the author demonstrates Chamberlain's dependence on Renan, Wellhausen, and other liberal critics; armed with such references, and making a practical use of scientific knowledge,10 he was able to reduce the Jewish mythology and folk­ lore of the Old Testament to its proper insignificance, defend an instrument­ alist interpretation of the function of the Aryan Jesus of Nazareth, separate the simple teachings of Jesus (best understood, according to Chamberlain, by those good German mystics Eckhart, Tauler, and Bohme) from the accumulated priestcraft and dogmatics of the Christian churches. In Karl Dworski's Die Entdeckung eines arischen Evangeliurns11 Jesus is shown to be not a Jew but of Persian extraction, and a frontal attack is made on all systematic theology which has but obscured the simple Aryan truth which he taught. The author of a popular Deutsche Christen attack on the Confessing Church, Friedrich Murawski, leans heavily upon the radical speculations of such as Professor Lietzmann of Berlin and numerous scholarly articles of liberal persuasion in the second edition of the five-volume Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart.i2 His rejection of the Biblical World view is a revealing repudiation of myths, legends, folklore, fairy tales: l -4 "The theological judgment is unanimous and no longer to be put aside. And there remains open only the question: Why is there still taught in the German schools as 'history' that which the theologians themselves term 'lore' and 'fairy tales'? What significance should Jewish myth­ ological stories have for Germans? "When the overwhelming majority of the teachers of the Church repudiate the whole evaluation of the historicity of the Bible as free invention, when they don't pause once before the concepts of the founders of the churches, when they announce the very focus of church life to be untrue, when according to their demonstration the Bible is nothing other than a book of folklore - shouldn't the German man of the twentieth century decisively renounce the myths of Asia Minor and the Jewish Church for himself and his children, in order to choose his own myth, which is part of his blook, his world-view, his feeling for life: The Myth of the Twentieth Century?,f13 At one time it was hotly debated whether there could be traced through the underbrush a road leading from Luther to Hitler.
Recommended publications
  • 181 Chapter VII a World of Many
    181 Chapter VII A World of Many: Giving up the Belief in the Possibility of Universal Rule (1648/59 – 1714) A Description of the “State” of the Holy Roman Empire Slightly less than twenty years after the treaties of Munster and Osnabrück, the jurist and historian Samuel von Pufendorf (1632 – 1694) clad his description of the Holy Roman Empire into a fictitious travel report. He took the role of a Veronese citizen named Severinus de Monzambano, explaining to his alleged brother the oddities of the form of government of the Empire. The choice of Veronese identity had not been random, as the city of Verona the lay on Venetian territory and, from the fourteenth century, Venice had no longer been considered part of the Empire,1 from the turn towards the sixteenth century even as the foe of the Emperor. Pufendorf explained the form of government of the Empire in historical terms, described the processes by which the centre of rule had shifted from the Italian Peninsula to areas north of the Alps and, at the very beginning of his report, made it clear that the Empire was known by the wrong official name. Instead of “Holy Roman Empire”, it should, Pufendorf insisted, be called the “new state of the Germans”, because it had nothing to do with the ancient empire of the Romans. It was a grave mistake, he wrote, to believe that this ancient empire of the Romans had continued to be in existence. Quite on the contrary, the empire, whose capital the city of Rome had once been, had been destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Endc Proceedings 12/2009
    ENDC PROCEEDINGS 12/2009 ■ ENGLISH SUMMARIES 3 ESTONIAN NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE CULTURAL, PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES SERIES ■ SERIES EDITORS: ANDRES SAUMETS AND ALAR KILP VOLUME 1: RELIGION AND POLITICS IN MULTICULTURAL EUROPE: PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets Proceedings 12/2009 EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Andres Saumets (Estonia) EDITORIAL BOARD: Ken Kalling (Estonia) Alar Kilp (Estonia) Peeter Kukk (Estonia) Rain Liivoja (Finland) Enno Mõts (Estonia) Erik Männik (Estonia) Andreas Pawlas (Germany) Claus Freiherr von Rosen (Germany) Volker Stümke (Germany) LANGUAGE EDITORS: Reet Hendrikson (Estonia) Karen Kuldnokk (Estonia) Epp Leete (Estonia) Roy Lowthian (United Kingdom) EDITORIAL COUNCIL: Aarne Ermus (Estonia) Wilfried Gerhard (Germany) Rudolf Hamann (Germany) Jakob Kübarsepp (Estonia) Ants Laaneots (Estonia) Raul Mälk (Estonia) Ago Pajur (Estonia) Eric Allan Sibul (USA) Villu Tamul (Estonia) Peeter Tulviste (Estonia) Matti Turtola (Finland) ISSN 1736–0242 ISBN 978–9985–9513–7–8 Copyright: Estonian National Defence College, 2009 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee CONTENTS ■ FOREWORD ............................................................................................ 9 RELIGION AND POLITICS IN MULTICULTURAL EUROPE Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets ................................................................ 13 1. Theoretical Considerations .................................................................. 18 1.1. Culture .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archiv Der Evangelischen Kirche Im Rheinland Düsseldorf
    Archiv der Evangelischen Kirche im Rheinland Düsseldorf 1OB 017 Landeskirchenamt Sachakten 2 : Az. 11 1972-1984 Die Lesezeichen (2. Icon am linken Rand) erleichtern Ihnen die Navigation durch dieses Findbuch. Bearbeitet von Bert Buchholz und Tatjana Klein 19.02.2015 2 Inhalt Vorwort ...................................................................................................... 3 11 - Verfassung und Verwaltung ................................................................ 8 11-1 Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland .................................................. 8 11-2 Evangelische Kirche der Union ........................................................ 58 11-3 Evangelische Kirche im Rheinland .................................................. 72 11-4 Katholische Kirche ......................................................................... 102 11-5 Ökumene ....................................................................................... 114 11-6 Bund und Länder ........................................................................... 146 11-7 Militärregierung .............................................................................. 157 11-8 Verschiedenes ............................................................................... 158 11-9 Kreisgemeinden ............................................................................. 164 11-10 Kirchengemeinden ....................................................................... 171 11-11 Pfarrstellen ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journalists and Religious Activists in Polish-German Relations
    THE PROJECT OF RECONCILIATION: JOURNALISTS AND RELIGIOUS ACTIVISTS IN POLISH-GERMAN RELATIONS, 1956-1972 Annika Frieberg A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Konrad H. Jarausch Dr. Christopher Browning Dr. Chad Bryant Dr. Karen Hagemann Dr. Madeline Levine ©2008 Annika Frieberg ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ANNIKA FRIEBERG: The Project of Reconciliation: Journalists and Religious Activists in Polish-German Relations, 1956-1972 (under the direction of Konrad Jarausch) My dissertation, “The Project of Reconciliation,” analyzes the impact of a transnational network of journalists, intellectuals, and publishers on the postwar process of reconciliation between Germans and Poles. In their foreign relations work, these non-state actors preceded the Polish-West German political relations that were established in 1970. The dissertation has a twofold focus on private contacts between these activists, and on public discourse through radio, television and print media, primarily its effects on political and social change between the peoples. My sources include the activists’ private correspondences, interviews, and memoirs as well as radio and television manuscripts, articles and business correspondences. Earlier research on Polish-German relations is generally situated firmly in a nation-state framework in which the West German, East German or Polish context takes precedent. My work utilizes international relations theory and comparative reconciliation research to explore the long-term and short-term consequences of the discourse and the concrete measures which were taken during the 1960s to end official deadlock and nationalist antagonisms and to overcome the destructive memories of the Second World War dividing Poles and Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Postwar Transformation of German Protestantism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository FAITH AND DEMOCRACY: POLITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS AT THE GERMAN PROTESTANT KIRCHENTAG, 1949-1969 Benjamin Carl Pearson A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Dr. Konrad H. Jarausch Dr. Christopher Browning Dr. Chad Bryant Dr. Lloyd Kramer Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Benjamin Carl Pearson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT BENJAMIN CARL PEARSON: Faith and Democracy: Political Transformations at the German Protestant Kirchentag, 1949-1969 (Under the direction of Konrad H. Jarausch) In the decades following World War II, German Protestants worked to transform their religious tradition. While this tradition had been previously characterized by rigidly hierarchical institutional structures, strong nationalist leanings, and authoritarian political tendencies, the experiences of dictatorship and defeat caused many Protestants to question their earlier beliefs. Motivated by the desire to overcome the burden of the Nazi past and by the opportunity to play a major role in postwar rebuilding efforts, several groups within the churches worked to reform Protestant social and political attitudes. As a result of their efforts, the churches came to play an important role in the ultimate success and stability of West German democracy. This study examines this transformation at the meetings of the German Protestant Kirchentag, one of the largest and most diverse postwar gatherings of Protestant laity. After situating the Kirchentag within the theological and political debates of the immediate postwar years, it focuses on changing understandings of the role of the church in society, the pluralization of Protestant political attitudes, and the shift from national to international self-understandings within the churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Präses Professor D. Dr. Joachim Beckmann
    Archiv der Evangelischen Kirche im Rheinland 6HA 003 Präses Professor D. Dr. Joachim Beckmann 1945-1977 Überarbeitet von Andreas Steinberg 26.9.2019 2 Inhalt Vorwort ...................................................................................................... 3 1. Serie A: Korrespondenzserie 1946-1973 ............................................... 5 2. Serie B: Handakten der Präseskanzlei 1945-1977 .............................. 63 3 Vorwort: Präses Professor D. Dr. Joachim Beckmann Präses Professor D. Dr. Joachim Beckmann (1901-1987) übernahm nach dem Tod des ersten Präses der Evangelischen Kirche im Rheinland, D. Heinrich Held, 1958 für dreizehn Jahre das Amt des Präses. Zuvor war er Landespfarrer für Innere Mission und Wohlfahrtspflege in Wiesbaden (1926-1928), Pfarrer der westfälischen Frauenhilfe in Soest (1928-1933), ab 1932 zusätzlich Geschäftsführer des Evangelischen Männerdienstes in Westfalen ge- wesen. 1933-1948 wirkte er als Pfarrer der Lutherkirchengemeinde in Düsseldorf. Sein Engagement für die Bekennende Kirche - er war u.a. Mitbegründer der "Rheinischen Pfarrbruderschaft" 1933, Mitglied der "Freien evangelischen Synode im Rheinland" und Mitglied des Reichsbruderrats - führte ihn in die zu Kriegsende gebildete "Vorläufige Leitung der Evangelischen Kirche der Rheinprovinz" als geschäftsführender Vorsitzender. Von der Konstituierung der Evangelischen Kir- che im Rheinland an bis zu seiner Wahl zum Präses war er bereits hauptamtliches Mitglied der Kirchenleitung und theologischer Dirigent im Landeskirchenamt. Er hatte
    [Show full text]
  • Das Tübinger Memorandum Von 1961
    MARTIN GRESCHAT „MEHR WAHRHEIT IN DER POLITIK!" Das Tübinger Memorandum von 1961 „Mehr Wahrheit in der Politik!" Unter dieser Devise verfaßten im Herbst 1961 acht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland hochangesehene Persönlichkeiten eine kurze Denkschrift. Darin warfen sie den Führungskräften sämtlicher Parteien vor, wesent­ liche politische Realitäten gegenüber der Bevölkerung zu verschleiern und dringend gebotene Entscheidungen zu verschleppen. Die Autoren erläuterten diese Behaup­ tung unter fünf Gesichtspunkten: 1. Es fehle an einer „aktiven Außenpolitik", die ei­ nerseits unbeirrbar an der Verteidigung Westberlins und der Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands im europäischen Kontext festhalte, die jedoch andererseits durch den Verzicht auf die Rückgewinnung der Gebiete östlich von Oder und Neiße zur Beru­ higung und Normalisierung der Verhältnisse in Ost und West beitrage. 2. Geboten sei eine „militärisch effektive, politisch behutsame Rüstungspolitik", also keinesfalls ein Drängen der Bundesrepublik auf die Verfügungsgewalt über Atomwaffen. Gleichzeitig gelte es 3., ernsthaft Sorge zu tragen und konkrete Schritte einzuleiten für „richtig begrenzte, aber energische Maßnahmen zum Bevölkerungsschutz". 4. Zu einer wirksamen Sicherung gegenüber dem Kommunismus gehörten nicht nur Waffen, sondern eine sinnvolle Sozialpolitik, die es nicht bei zufälligen einzelnen Maßnahmen und Wahlgeschenken bewenden ließe. Erforderlich sei vielmehr eine „unnachgiebige und planvolle Sozialpolitik". 5. Die tiefgreifenden technischen, indu­ striellen und wirtschaftlichen Umbrüche in der Gegenwart verlangten größte An­ strengungen für eine „tiefgreifende Schulreform". Weil Teile dieses Memorandums durch eine Indiskretion in die Öffentlichkeit ge­ langt waren, veröffentlichten die Autoren den vollständigen Text am 24. Februar 19621. Die Wirkung war enorm. Bereits am selben Tag brachten große überregionale Tageszeitungen im Westen wie im Osten Deutschlands Berichte mit Überschriften wie „Oder-Neiße-Grenze anerkennen", „Bonns Politik unreal und gefährlich", „Dem Volk die Wahrheit sagen"2.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinrich Held Heinrich Held
    Heinrich Held Heinrich Held Als der Pastor Heinrich Held um die Jahresmitte 1930 eine neue Arbeit in der evangelischen Kirchengemein- de Essen-Rüttenscheid aufnahm, standen in den Städ- ten des Ruhrgebiets die Zeichen auf Sturm. Der große Bankenkrach in den USA am „schwarzen Freitag“, dem 29. Oktober 1929 (der tatsächlich ein Montag war), hatte den Anfang einer Weltwirtschaftskrise nie gekannten Ausmaßes signalisiert, die nicht zuletzt auch Deutsch- land mit seinen chronischen Wirtschafts- und Finanzpro- blemen in eine schlimme Mitleidenschaft zog. Die Ar- beitslosigkeit der Massen, die politische Unzufrieden- heit und die soziale Unrast steigerten sich ins noch nicht Dagewesene. Die junge parlamentarische Demokratie geriet in ernsthafte Turbulenzen. Vielerorts lag eine bürgerkriegsähnliche Stimmung in der Luft. Der neue Pfarrer mußte sich klar werden, wo er kirchlich und politisch zu stehen gedenkt. Heinrich Held war am 25. September 1897 in Saar- brücken als Sohn eines Schneidermeisters geboren wor- den, der aus einer kleinbäuerlichen Familie im ober- bergischen Land stammte. Nach kurzer Zeit in Trier wurde er 1908 als Direktor einer privaten Zuschneide- schule nach Köln berufen. Dort geht der Sohn aufs Gymnasium, macht 1915 mitten im ersten Weltkrieg das Notabitur und meldet sich als Freiwilliger zu Nach- richtentruppe. Er nimmt am Feldzug auf dem Balkan in Serbien und Mazedonien bis zur griechischen Küste Abb. 29: Heinrich Held 123456789012345 123456789012345 teil, kommt Ende 1916 nach einer schweren Typhuser- 123456789012345 123456789012345
    [Show full text]
  • Kirchenkampfakten Von Joachim Beckmann
    Archiv der Ev. Kirche im Rheinland Bestand Kirchenkampfakten von Joachim Beckmann 6 HA 004 Inhalt 1 Kirchenkampf Akten Präses Beckmann Inhalt 1. A. Schriftwechsel von 1938 bis 1945................................ 3 2. B. Kirchenkampf im Rheinland ..................................... 10 3. B.1 Evangelische Bekenntnissynode im Rheinland............ 10 3.1. a. Allgemeine Rundschreiben ..................................... 10 3.2. b. Schriftwechsel der Synode und des Rates................. 11 3.3. c. Provinizialkirchenrat .............................................. 14 3.4. d. Generalsuperintendent .......................................... 15 3.5. 2 Rheinische Bekenntnisgemeinden........................... 16 3.6. 3 Rheinisches Pfarrbruderschaft.................................. 18 3.7. 4 Ausbildungsamt, theologische Prüfungen.................. 19 3.8. 5 Schulfrage, Katechetisches Amt ............................... 21 3.9. 6 Rechnungswesen der BK, Kollekten, Gehalt ............... 23 3.10. 7 Konsistorium der Rheinprovinz.............................. 25 3.10.1. a. Schriftwechsel ................................................... 25 3.10.2. b. Legalisierung..................................................... 26 3.10.3. c. Eid ................................................................... 27 3.10.4. d. Rechtsgutachten der BK...................................... 28 3.11. 8 Arbeitsgemeinschaft lutherischer Pastoren im Rheinland ........................................................................ 29 3.12. 9 Zur Person von J. Beckmann
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Protestantischer Think Tank in Den Langen Sechziger Jahren Der Bundesrepublik: Georg Picht Und Die Forschungsstätte Der Evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft
    Ein protestantischer Think Tank in den langen sechziger Jahren der Bundesrepublik: Georg Picht und die Forschungsstätte der Evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft Claudia Lepp Im klassischen Wortsinn handelt es sich bei Think Tanks, zu Deutsch Denkfabriken, um abgeschiedene Orte, an denen konzentriert und in Ruhe interdisziplinär nachgedacht wird1. Ein solcher Ort war die 1957/58 gegründete Forschungsstätte der Evangelischen Studienge- meinschaft (FEST)2, idyllisch gelegen nahe des Heidelberger Schlos- ses, zweifelsohne. Doch war sie auch eine politische Denkfabrik, d. h. ein Forschungsinstitut, das Kirche und Politik beriet sowie wissen- schaftliche und öffentliche Debatten forcierte3? Ihr erster und lang- jähriger Leiter, der Philosoph Georg Picht, umschrieb die Aufgaben der FEST einmal wie folgt: „Das Institut muss gleichzeitig Grundlagenforschung betreiben, spezialwissenschaftlich gute Arbeiten vorlegen können, im Feld des Aufbaus von beratungsorientiertem Sachverstand voranschrei- ten und die Vermittlung seiner Arbeitsergebnisse in kirchliche wie politische Praxis leisten.“4 1 Vgl. Gellner, Winand / Hammer, Eva-Maria: Policyforschung. München 2010, 33 u. 35. 2 Anfang 1957 wurde die Studiengemeinschaft der Evangelischen Akademien, ein Kreis von circa 100 Wissenschaftlern verschiedener Disziplinen, und das von sechs Landeskirchen gegründete Christopherus-Stift zur Evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft vereinigt. Im April 1958 erfolgte die Verlegung der Forschungsstätte nach Heidelberg. Vgl. Picht, Georg: Die Evangelische Stu- diengemeinschaft (BA N 1225/51). 3 Zu den bundesdeutschen Think Tanks vgl. Thunert, Martin: Think Tanks in Deutschland – Berater der Politik? In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 51 (2003), 30–38; ders.: Think Tanks als Ressourcen der Politikberatung. Bun- desdeutsche Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven. In: Forschungsjournal NSB 12 (1999), H. 3, 10–18. 4 Protokoll der Mitgliederversammlung am 22./23. Mai 1981, Bericht des Leiters (EZA, 2/7360).
    [Show full text]
  • Sonntagsgruß Saar Fotobestand)
    Repertorium AEKR Best 8SL 078 (Bildarchiv Sonntagsgruß Saar Fotobestand) geordnet von Pfarrer Prof. Dr. Joachim Conrad Synodalarchivpfleger des Kirchenkreises Saar-West 2015 2 Vorwort Im Sommer 2014 übergab der Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragte der Kirchenkreise Saar-Ost und Saar-West, Helmut Paulus, der ei- ner der letzten Redakteure des „Sonntagsgrußes“ war, einen umfangreichen, großenteils ungeordneten und unbeschrifteten Fotobestand aus dem Nachlass des „Sonntagsgrußes“ an den unterzeichnenden Synodalarchivpfleger. Dieser Bestand wurde geordnet und verzeichnet, um ihn dem Archiv der Ev. Kirche im Rheinland zu übergeben. Das Gros der Bilder stammt von Hans Lachmann, dessen Fotonachlass sich bereits im Besitz des Lan- deskirchlichen Archivs befindet; ein namhafter Anteil der Bilder gehört zur Arbeit des Saarbrücker Fotografen Reiner Oettinger. Die größte Mühe machte die Identifizierung von Personen und Orten; dies ist bis auf einen kleinen Restbestand gelungen. Im Register sind die Personen nach Möglichkeit mit den vollständi- gen Namen und Lebensjahren ausgewiesen. Besonders ist zu danken dem Synodalarchivpfleger des Kirchenkreises Saar-Ost, Pfarrer Hartmut Thömmes, Pfarrer i.R. Hans-Dieter Osenberg, Alt-Superintendent Hartmut Richter und vielen anderen, die den ein oder anderen Hinweis lieferten. Die Systematik des Bildbestandes ergab sich aus der Thematik der vorgelegten Bilder und orientiert sich am Registraturplan der Ev. Kirche im Rheinland. Sofern der Fotograf oder die Foto- grafin genannt sind, stehen die Namen im Verzeichnis, ggf. auch die vom Fotografen oder der Fotografin vergebene Bild- nummer. Die Jahreszahl ergab sich aus dem Kontext, etwa bei Kirchentagen, oder gelegentlichen Notizen auf der Rückseite. Zumeist musste „ohne Angabe“ vermerkt werden. Der Unterzeichnende dankt besonders Frau cand. theol. Christi- ne Schoen, z.Zt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Struggle and the Confessing Church: an Introduction to Bonhoeffer’S Context” Matthew D
    Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations 2/1 (2007):1-20 Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations A peer-reviewed e-journal of the Council of Centers on Jewish-Christian Relations Published by the Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College “The Church Struggle and the Confessing Church: An Introduction to Bonhoeffer’s Context” Matthew D. Hockenos Skidmore College 2/1 (2007): 1-20 http://escholarship.bc.edu/scjr/vol2/iss1/art1 Author’s note: Significant portions of this essay draw on the introduction and chapter 1 of my book, A Church Divided: German Protestants Confront the Nazi Past (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004). Hockenos, “The Church Struggle and the Confessional Church” 1 http://escholarship.bc.edu/scjr/vol2/iss1/art1 Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations 2/1 (2007):1-20 In a recent review of the seventeen-volume Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s striking albeit marginal role in the German Bonhoeffer Werke, edited by Eberhard Bethge and others, church struggle and his inability to affect significantly the church historian Andrew Chandler writes, “For in the so- direction of the Confessing Church was due to many factors, called Church Struggle, Bonhoeffer was a striking but including his young age, his liberal-democratic politics, his marginal figure. He was young, he could not often persuade absence from Germany from October 1933 to April 1935, his his elders toward more decisive opinions and measures, he vacillating and at times contradictory positions on central did not much affect events. Historians have certainly not issues, his radical theological critique of the Nazi state, his found Bonhoeffer standing at the heart of the circles of friendship with and family ties to Christians of Jewish resistance with which he became associated after 1939.”1 descent, and ultimately his willingness to risk his life to And Victoria Barnett writes in an essay addressing destroy Hitler’s regime.
    [Show full text]