INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #1/14

Friday, February 28, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014 2

APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS 2

APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND DESIGNATION AS PROVINCIAL OFFENCES OFFICER 3

HUMBER RIVER INTER-REGIONAL TRAIL CONNECTION Claireville Conservation Area/Highway 427 Underpass Extension of Contract 4

IN THE NEWS 4

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED 7

CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 9

VICE CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 9

PRESENTATIONS Years of Service Award to Chris Fonseca, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Glenn Mason and John Sprovieri 9 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY Annual #1/14 February 28, 2014

The Authority Meeting Annual #1/14, was held in the Weston Theatres, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, February 28, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 10:39 a.m.

PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Ben Cachola Member Ronald Chopowick Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Jack Heath Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Anthony Perruzza Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT David Barrow Member Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Vincent Crisanti Member Colleen Jordan Member Mujeeb Khan Member Peter Milczyn Member Linda Pabst Member John Parker Member Dave Ryan Member Jim Tovey Member

1 RES.#A1/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A2/14 - APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS The Conservation Authorities Act requires each conservation authority to undergo an external audit of its accounts and transactions each year.

Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Grant Thornton LLP be appointed auditors of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for the year 2014, in accordance with section 38 of the Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED BACKGROUND Section 38 of the Conservation Authorities Act reads as follows:

38. (1) Every authority shall cause its accounts and transactions to be audited annually by a person licensed under the Public Accountancy Act . R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (1).

(2) No person shall be appointed as auditor of an authority who is or during the preceding year was a member of the authority or who has or during the preceding year had any direct or indirect interest in any contract or any employment with the authority other than for services within his or her professional capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (2).

(3) An authority shall, upon receipt of the auditors report of the examination of its accounts and transactions, forthwith forward a copy of the report to each participating municipality and to the Minister. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (3).

At Authority Meeting #8/10, held on October 29, 2010, Resolution #A182/10 was approved, in part, as follows:

THAT the contract for Audit Services be awarded to Grant Thornton at an initial annual cost not to exceed $46,725.00, plus applicable taxes for 2010 and an annual increase of two to four per cent for the following four years, for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto (CFGT);

2 THAT, pursuant to Section 38 of the Conservation Authorities Act, the firm of Grant Thornton be appointed auditors of TRCA, effective November 1, 2010;

THAT the term of the engagement be for five years subject to annual appointments by the Authority based on satisfactory performance; ...

RATIONALE Grant Thornton LLP has been appointed TRCA's auditor since 2004, following a competition for audit services conducted in the summer of 2004 and the summer of 2010. Although the contract period is for five years starting with 2010, the annual reappointment is subject to performance satisfactory to TRCA. Staff is pleased to report that the most recent audit was completed to its satisfaction and it anticipates similar performance for 2014.

Staff recommends the reappointment of Grant Thornton LLP for the 2014 audit year, as required by the Rules of Conduct.

Report prepared by: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 Emails: [email protected] Date: February 19, 2014

______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A3/14 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND DESIGNATION AS PROVINCIAL OFFENCES OFFICER Approval to appoint a Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff member as an Officer and Provincial Offences Officer. (Executive Res.#B178/13)

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the appointment of Michael Brestansky as an Officer under the Conservation Authorities Act, as per Section 28(1)(d)(e), and as a Provincial Offences Officer be approved for the purposes of: i) Enforcing Regulations made by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) pursuant to Section 28 and 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act; and ii) Enforcing the Trespass to Property Act. CARRIED ______

3 RES.#A4/14 - HUMBER RIVER INTER-REGIONAL TRAIL CONNECTION Claireville Conservation Area/Highway 427 Underpass. Extension of Contract. Extension of contract to integrate engineering design and details/specifications into the Ontario Ministry of Transportation tender contract for the widening of Highway 427 as requested by City of Toronto. (Executive Res.#B179/13 & Res.#B180/13)

Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: John Sprovieri

THAT the existing contract for the preparation of tender ready details and specifications for the Humber River Inter-Regional Trail and local trail connections at Claireville/West Humber River in the City of Toronto, be extended with SNC-Lavalin Inc. by an amount of not to exceed $22,260.00 plus HST for a total revised cost of $55,560.00 plus HST;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 10% of the total contract price as a contingency allowance, if deemed necessary;

THAT staff be authorized and directed to take such action as may be necessary to implement this contract, including the signing of contract documents, or payment authorizations;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the Pan Am trail work north of the City of Toronto. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A5/14 - IN THE NEWS Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority media activities October - December, 2013.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT the summary of media coverage from October - December, 2013 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's news coverage for the preceding few months is provided to the Authority on a quarterly basis.

4 Media Coverage Highlights

A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period from October – December, 2013 that mentioned Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) or Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) and other TRCA properties and programs (example: Tommy Thompson Park) produced 39 media mentions. The total media hits resulted in a total circulation/reach of approximately 4,200,000 with a total advertising value of $154,000.

These results only reflect a portion of media coverage, since the database does not monitor on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv interviews, smaller community papers and trade publications.

The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage received for October – December 2013:

October rd  On October 3 , the Toronto Star story “Destructive beetle found in Mississauga” outlines the re-emergence of the Asian long-horned beetle in trees within Mississauga. The article mentions a 2011 technical report by TRCA that says that 56 per cent of Mississauga’s tree population is susceptible to the beetle. th  On October 4 , the Toronto Star story “Pipeline near rivers causes alarm” reviews Enbridge’ s Line 9B pipeline that crosses all nine watershed in the TRCA jurisdiction. A TRCA spokesperson is quoted in the article to say that Enbridge’s monitoring of the pipeline is comprehensive. TRCA has dealt with three Line 9B exposures in the past three years. The TRCA spokesperson indicated they would like the company to take it further with more testing and detailed survey with a more proactive approach. The article also mentions that TRCA has met with Enbridge to outline concerns and is satisfied with the company’s response so far. Meetings will continue. th  On October 8 , the Daily Oil Bulletin story “NEB Hearing Final Arguments in Enbridge Line 9B Re-reversal” mentions that TRCA considers establishment of a Greater Toronto Area based spills response team as an immediate requirement and urges the National Energy Board to strengthen proposed conditions, including proactive spill response planning. th  On October 15 , the Toronto Star continued its coverage of the Line 9 story in article “GTA pipeline plan to face rigorous fight”. The article mentions that the pipeline runs the length of the Greater Toronto Area crossing all nine watersheds in the TRCA jurisdiction. Communities along the pipeline are concerned with Enbridge’s estimated 1.5 – 4 hour emergency response time although the company said it can shut off the flow of the product within as few as 13 minutes. Canada has no regulatory minimums for response time. th  On October 4 , the Bloor West Villager story “Many Toronto stormwater ponds are full of sediment and need dredging” indicated that many stormwater ponds in Toronto are so full of sediment they are nearly useless in controlling floods and keeping pollution out of city waterways. The City has formed a partnership which should see TRCA clean out seven priority stormwater ponds in Scarborough and High Park. th  On October 4 , the Scarborough Mirror story “Wildflower trail in Scarborough aims to attract butterflies” on October 4th, is about the public event to plant a wildflower trail that will bring butterflies to the Centre of Scarborough. The project would be completed with a $300,000 grant over three years from The W. Garfield Weston Foundation.

5 th  On October 15 , the Brampton Guardian story “Urban Farm centre of innovation” profiled Brampton’s McVean Farm, a 15 hectare historical farm that is getting a new lease on life as a training ground for entrepreneurial, ecological and locally-oriented farmers that was launched with TRCA. th  On October 17 , the North York Mirror story “City Farm at Black Creek grows thanks to Weston Donation” profiles an eight acre site on Jane Street, owned by TRCA and leased to farm-based charity Everdale. Workshops, an edible forest and a trail will now be part of the Black Creek Community Farm thanks to a $400,000 donation from the W. Garfield Weston Foundation. The three year grant was made possible through the foundation’s Weston Family Parks Challenge. The funds donated to the farm will be used to restore woodlands, build a trail system, create a community fruit and nut orchard, plant native pollinator and community gardens and provide community programming such as workshops on food, gardening and nature and school visits and a children’s farm camp. The Toronto Star also th published a story on the farm on October 17 titled “Jane-Finch reaps its first harvest” th  On October 18 , the Scarborough Mirror story “Shorework at Scarborough’s Meadowcliffe bluff completed” article reports on how years of shoreline construction are now finished on another part of the Scarborough waterfront. TRCA in the fall 2013 completed beaches and headlands along 600 metres of shore west of the Bellamy Ravine. Plantings and cleanup operations will be done in 2014. This Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project was built in front of the last section of Scarborough Bluffs that could have crumbled over time. th  On October 25 , the Brampton Guardian story “Lakeview project gets blessing from Peel Council” mentions that TRCA is partnered with Peel Region, Credit Valley Conservation and the City of Mississauga on the Lakeview Waterfront Connection, which will create a new waterfront park along the eastern Mississauga shoreline of Lake Ontario. th  On October 30 , the Scarborough Mirror story “Armourstones to be used to combat Highland Creek erosion” reports that TRCA will spend up to $120,000 on 2,500 tonnes of rock in the fall of 2013 to contain the power of Highland Creek in Scarborough. TRCA formed a plan with the City of Toronto to restore the creek, clear away piles of rock lying on the south and north banks with a wall of armour stones. th  On October 30 , the Toronto Star in story “Scary, wet weather forecast for Halloween” and City Centre Mirror in story “Rain and winds blowing in for Halloween” warns readers about the possibility of localized flooding with dangerous conditions anticipated in rivers and streams according to TRCA Flood Management. th  On October 20 , the North York Mirror story titled “Haunted happenings North York style” includes spotlight on the haunted tales of BCPV and the ghost tours being offered on site.

November th  On November 5 , the Globe and Mail story “Creative solutions to fight flood vulnerability” showcases the flood response mechanism at Evergreen at the Brick Works. The location has flooded twice in 2013, and is in the most flood prone property within the TRCA jurisdiction. According to program director of University of Waterloo’s Sustainability Practice, climate change is a clear and present danger, bringing with it a combination of warmer, wetter weather. Flooding, he predicts, will be a fact of life for the foreseeable future. th  On November 6 , the Mississauga News story “Lakeview waterfront park to boast three new islands” outlines the project's goal to remedy the shoreline just west of Marie Curtis Park. According to Credit Valley Conservation, which is leading the makeover along with the Region of Peel, with support from TRCA and the City of Mississauga. 6 th  On November 28 , Enroute Magazine included Christmas by Lamplight in its lineup in the story “The Hot List: December Events in Toronto + Montreal Your Montreal and Toronto to-dos this month”.

December th  On December 5 , the Almonte/Carleton Place EMC News story “A first for Canada: Rouge th Park to be new National Urban Park in Toronto” on December 5 profiles what makes Rouge Park unique. It mentions that TRCA is the managing authority for the existing Rouge Park, and is working closely with Parks Canada and local municipalities to ensure decisions are made in the best interest of the new park.  The December issue of SNAP Vaughan East as well as Sasstainable.ca both covered the Living City Environmental Dinner with photos from the event. th ,  On December 6 , the Globe and Mail story "Great cross-country ski spots in Ontario " lists Albion Hills Conservation Area as best spot for beginner skiers. th  On December 20 , the Toronto Star December 20th story “A gatekeeper of Toronto’s History” writer Eric Veillette sits down with BCPV spokesperson to talk about the social issues Toronto faced in the 19th century. th  On December 14 , the Globe and Mail story “What to do for twelve days of Christmas” profiled Christmas by Lamplight as one of the holiday events to do in the city. th  On December 6 , the North York Mirror story “See pioneer village by lamplight” featured Christmas by Lamplight at BCPV. th  On December 18 , CBC National Talkshow Steven and Chris aired their BCPV visit. The hosts visited several of the Village’s historic homes and shops and participated in pioneer activities. th  On December 13 , Today’s Parent Magazine story “Celebrating the holidays at Black Creek” as well as “An Old Fashioned Christmas at Black Creek Pioneer Village” on th December 16 on website Small Home Big Start featured holiday activities at BCPV.

Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] Date: February 12, 2014

______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A6/14 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

7 THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as Amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.3, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #12/13, held on February 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ANNUAL/INAUGURAL MEETING

APPOINTMENTS TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FOR 2014-2015 The Secretary-Treasurer can advise that all the persons listed below have been duly appointed and are entitled to sit as Members of this Authority for the 2014-2015 year, or until their successors are appointed.

ADJALA-TOSORONTIO/MONO Glenn Mason

DURHAM Colleen Jordan Gerri Lynn O'Connor Dave Ryan

TORONTO Paul Ainslie Maria Augimeri Ben Cachola Raymond Cho Ronald Chopowick Vincent Crisanti Glenn De Baeremaeker Mujeeb Khan Gloria Lindsay Luby Mike Mattos Peter Milczyn John Parker Anthony Perruzza Cynthia Thorburn

PEEL Bob Callahan Chris Fonseca John Sprovieri Jim Tovey Richard Whitehead

YORK David Barrow Michael Di Biase Jack Heath Linda Pabst Deborah Schulte ______

8 CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

Gerri Lynn O'Connor was nominated by Glenn De Baeremaeker.

RES.#A7/14 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT nominations for the office of Chair of the Authority be closed. CARRIED

Gerri Lynn O'Connor was declared elected by acclamation as Chair of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

______

VICE CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

Maria Augimeri was nominated by Ben Cachola.

RES.#A8/14 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Paul Ainslie

THAT nominations for the office of Vice Chair of the Authority be closed. CARRIED

Maria Augimeri was declared elected by acclamation as Vice Chair of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) Years of Service Awards to the following Members of the Authority: Chris Fonseca and Gloria Lindsay Luby for three years of service and Glenn De Baeremaeker, Glenn Mason and John Sprovieri for ten years of service.

RES.#A9/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED ______9 TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:00 a.m., on Friday, February 28, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

10 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #2/14

Friday, March 28, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on February 28, 2014 12

PRESENTATIONS Years of Service Awards to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff. 12 Horner, Janet, Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee, re: Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance Memorandum of Understanding 12 Toninger, Ralph, Manager, Restoration Services, TRCA re: Double-Crested Cormorants 2013 Management Summary and 2014 Management Strategy. 12

GREATER TORONTO AREA AGRICULTURAL ACTION COMMITTEE AND GOLDEN HORSESHOE FOOD AND FARMING ALLIANCE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 12

2013 ICE STORM DEBRIS REMOVAL AND 2014 SPRING FLOOD POTENTIAL 15

PEEL REGION CHANNEL REMEDIATION STRATEGY AND SPRING CREEK SUBWATERSHED CHANNEL NATURIZATION IMPLEMENTATION - ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED 23

SEA LAMPREY CONTROL PROJECT Partnership with Fisheries and Oceans Canada 29

SUPPLY OF RENTAL RATES FOR OPERATED HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND DUMP TRUCKS Contract Extension 30

RESTORATION SERVICES CENTRE Photovoltaic System - Design/Build 32 ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA VISITOR SERVICES GATEHOUSE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Tender PMO14-03 35

ENERLIFE CONSULTING INC. AGREEMENT 39

SOURCE PROTECTION PLANNING Award of Extension of Contract for Professional Services for the CTC Source Protection Region 41

OFFICE ACCOMMODATION Lease of Office Space 44

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, Sanmike Construction Ltd. 45

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Berkley Homes Ltd. 46

JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTS Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I 47

IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREET Proposed Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications – Ontario Municipal Board Order, City of Toronto, North York Community Council Area 47

ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER PROGRAM IN HUMBER BAY Technical Support Services 47

JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTS Contract #RSD14-03 - Area E, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F, Contract #RSD14-03 – Area G, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H and Contract #RSD14-03 – Area J 47

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Summary of 2013 Requests 48

WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL Minutes of Meeting #6/13, held on November 21, 2013 49 Minutes of Meeting #7/13, held on December 12, 2013 49

PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN WATER STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on February 18, 2014 49 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #2/14 March 28, 2014

The Authority Meeting #2/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, March 28, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:56 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair David Barrow Member Ben Cachola Member Raymond Cho Member Ronald Chopowick Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Jack Heath Member Colleen Jordan Member Mujeeb Khan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Mike Mattos Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair John Parker Member Anthony Perruzza Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Jim Tovey Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Paul Ainslie Member Bob Callahan Member Vincent Crisanti Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Glenn Mason Member Peter Milczyn Member Linda Pabst Member Dave Ryan Member Cynthia Thorburn Member

11 RES.#A10/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: David Barrow

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on February 28, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) Years of Service Awards to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff.

(b) A presentation by Janet Horner, Executive Director, Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance Memorandum of Understanding.

(c) A presentation by Ralph Toninger in regard to Double-Crested Cormorants 2013 Management Summary and 2014 Management Strategy.

RES.#A11/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT above-noted presentations (a) be received. CARRIED RES.#A12/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT above-noted presentation (c) be deferred. CARRIED ______

SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A13/14 - GREATER TORONTO AREA AGRICULTURAL ACTION COMMITTEE AND GOLDEN HORSESHOE FOOD AND FARMING ALLIANCE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Signing of the new Memorandum of Understanding between Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance.

12 Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT above-noted presentation (b) on the Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and the Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance by Janet Horner, Coordinator, Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee (GTA AAC) be received;

THAT the Memorandum of Understanding between Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), the Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance, which expires on March 31, 2014, be renewed on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to finalize the Memorandum of Understanding between TRCA, the Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance, including the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Established in 2005, the GTA AAC is a unique partnership involving the four regional municipalities of Halton, Peel, York and Durham, the four Greater Toronto Area Federations of Agriculture (Halton, Peel, York and Durham), the City of Toronto, the Toronto Food Policy Council, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of Rural Affairs, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and the food sector. The partnership developed as the various stakeholders worked together to write the GTA Agricultural Action Plan.

The Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance (GHFFA) is comprised of the Niagara Agricultural Task Force, TRCA, Friends of the Greenbelt, Ontario Ministry of Food and Agriculture, regions of Durham, Halton, Niagara, Peel, York and the cities of Hamilton and Toronto, as well as local representatives from the food and farming value chain.

This is the first time such a diverse group, with members encompassing regions and municipalities across the Greater Golden Horseshoe, have come together collaboratively to work on complex food and farming-related projects.

In 2012, the GHFFA released the Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Action Plan 2021, which identifies pathways for a more integrated and coordinated approach to food and farming viability in the area, to ensure that the Golden Horseshoe retains, enhances and expands its role as a leading food and farming cluster. The Food and Farming Action Plan 2021 for the Golden Horseshoe provides a blueprint for supporting and growing a thriving, integrated food and farming sector in the Golden Horseshoe. It responds to the common challenges and opportunities the area shares. These challenges and opportunities arise from the large concentration of population, growth pressures, juxtaposition of agricultural and urban land uses, myriad of regulations and overlapping agencies, and cluster of food and farming enterprises located within it. The plan focuses on enhancing competitiveness, promoting sustainability and removing barriers that stand in the way of achieving these goals.

The Action Plan focuses specifically on actions that support food and farming businesses in the Golden Horseshoe. To assess which actions should be included in the plan, a Steering Committee used three fundamental tests: 13  Is the action addressing a Golden Horseshoe specific issue?  Will the action make a real difference to the future of food and farming in the Golden Horseshoe?  Is the action realistic and therefore achievable?

The Action Plan focuses on five opportunities to achieve it's vision. A. GROW THE CLUSTER - Grow the Golden Horseshoe cluster so it becomes the leading food and farming cluster in the world, renowned for healthy and safe products. B. LINK FOOD, FARMING AND HEALTH - Educate current and future consumers about the importance of locally sourced food and farming products for enhancing their health and well-being. C. FOSTER INNOVATION - Encourage and support innovation to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of the Golden Horseshoe food and farming cluster. D. ENABLE THE CLUSTER - Align policy tools and their appreciation to enable food and farming businesses to be increasingly competitive and profitable. E. CULTIVATE NEW APPROACHES - Pilot new approaches to support food and farming in the Golden Horseshoe.

The Action Plan covers a ten year period from 2011 to 2021. This timeline was chosen in response to election timetables at the municipal and provincial levels, census cycles and to incorporate the scheduled review of the Greenbelt Plan in 2015. A ten year time frame allows sufficient time to achieve the longer term goals, and is of manageable duration when asking partners for commitments. The Action Plan will guide decision-making, projects for implementation and ongoing membership of the GTA AAC and GHFFA.

In November, 2013, the GTA AAC completed an Asset Mapping Project in response to the "Grow the Cluster" action which included mapping the agri-food supply chain assets across the Golden Horseshoe including farms, processors and distributors, as well as infrastructure, research centres and the service industry. The project looked at geographical distribution, occupational distribution, and trends, size distribution and sector economic trends with a focus on which sectors are thriving, retracting, persevering and diminishing. The outcomes of the Asset Mapping project will help point to areas of needed focus to strengthen the food and farming sector and can act as a guide to groups who wish to map complimentary assets in the future. In addition, the project confirmed that the agri-food sector is an essential component of the economy for both the rural and urban areas of the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

TRCA has been assisting the GTA AAC by acting as trustee of funds held for GTA AAC purposes, providing accounting, secretariat, advisory and other support services. The GTA AAC is not a legal entity and TRCA acts for the GTA AAC in signing contracts and agreements. TRCA's purchasing policies are followed by the GTA AAC.

The memorandum of understanding between the GTA AAC and TRCA has expired and needs to be renewed as soon as possible. Staff from both agencies will meet in the near future to make any necessary revisions to the MOU.

14 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the implementation of the Food and Farming Action Plan 2021 is being provided by the participating regional municipalities. In addition, grant funding from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs supported a recent workshop on grass fed beef held in partnership with Sustain Ontario.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff and the Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee and Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance will complete the work to renew the March 31, 2014, Memorandum of Understanding based on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA and GTA AAC.

Report prepared by: Victoria McGrath, extension 5211 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Victoria McGrath, extension 5211 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 14, 2014

______

RES.#A14/14 - 2013 ICE STORM DEBRIS REMOVAL AND 2014 SPRING FLOOD POTENTIAL Update on debris removal from the 2013 ice storm and the 2014 spring flood potential due to ice jams.

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT staff be directed to continue to seek compensation for ice storm related damages through the by requesting funds directly or through the respective processes of the regional municipalities, to access the provincial assistance that has been announced;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA’s municipal partners be requested to circulate the staff report on a Council agenda. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, staff presented a report entitled "Extreme Weather Events: Assessing the 2013 Ice Storm" that provided an overview of the impacts of the storm to TRCA operations. The findings with respect to forest management found that although the TRCA managed forests showed a high level of resiliency to the storm, edges of the forests and areas with "linear trees" (for example, urban streets and parking lots) were particularly susceptible to damage. Authority Members, along with several of TRCAs municipal partners, expressed concern about the potential increase for flooding in spring 2014 due to the greater amount of woody debris in the channels. As such, an amended Resolution #A234/13 was approved as follows:

AND FURTHER THAT staff report on the status of removal of debris from watercourses in TRCA's jurisdiction at Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held on March 28, 2014. 15 In order to determine the appropriate plan of action for debris removal, TRCA staff approached the issue in several ways: 1. determine the overall condition of the watercourses; 2. determine TRCA's role in debris removal; 3. determine the municipalities role in debris removal;

Overall Condition of the Watercourses Staff gathered information from municipal partners and conducted field surveys in order to gain a better understanding of the actual risks posed by an increased amount of woody debris within the watercourses. On February 13, 2014, staff conducted field surveys of the western half of TRCA's jurisdiction (Don River, Humber River, Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek) via helicopter and obtained photographic and video documentation. Although significant woody debris was expected, in actual fact, there was a minimal amount of debris observed in areas that would exacerbate flood risks (e.g., trees fallen across watercourses, or broken off limbs within the floodplain). All photographs are available for viewing by using the following website link: www.bit.ly/1i4X5iZ.

In addition to TRCA surveys, municipalities were contacted and asked to provide information about woody debris within their areas. Several municipalities, including the City of Markham, City of Toronto, City of Brampton and the Town of Caledon were already in the process of developing their own plan of operations and had completed comprehensive surveys. Based on municipal reports and TRCA River Watch observations, conditions in the eastern half of the jurisdiction were found to be similar to those in the west end.

TRCAs role in debris removal As stated previously in the Extreme Weather Events: Assessing the 2013 Ice Storm report, woody debris in a valley is natural and is only a concern in areas where it may compromise the function of infrastructure and therefore exacerbate flooding (e.g., blocking crossings) or put infrastructure at risk from erosion. TRCA does not actively manage debris in watercourses, with the exception of TRCA-owned flood control channels. After the storm, woody debris in five flood control channels was identified for removal (Bolton Channel, Sheppard Channel, Yonge/York Mills Channel, Woodbridge Channel and Mimico Malton Channel). This work has been completed for all but the Sheppard and Malton channels which are larger projects requiring large scale cleanouts due only in part to the ice storm.

TRCA provides advice to municipalities as well as permits for debris management where required. A permit exemption protocol has been developed, whereby under specific circumstances municipalities/proponents do not need to contact TRCA, provided that best management practices are employed. If the situation does not meet these criteria, then municipalities/proponents have been encouraged to contact TRCA Planning and Development staff for guidance prior to removal of debris. Any debris removal should take place before March 31st or after July 1st, if possible, so as not to impact the spring spawning period for fish.

16 Municipality role in debris removal The primary responsibility for responding to flood risk lies with the municipality. As stated above, several municipalities have been very proactive in managing the potential risks in 2014. It is very difficult to tell what debris may ultimately cause a blockage leading to flooding. As such, many municipalities have decided to increase monitoring during the spring melt and will remove blockages at crossings when they occur, rather than removing all woody debris at this time. This approach is supported by TRCA. Where debris removal does not meet the exemption protocols, municipalities must obtain a permit from TRCA (and in some cases from Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)) prior to removals.

Other Issues - Ice Jamming and 2014 Spring Melt While the issue of woody debris in the watercourses was not as significant as anticipated, the extremely cold and prolonged winter conditions have resulted in another cause for heightened awareness due to flooding this spring. That is, potential flooding due to ice jams and snow melt. Over 60% of the watercourses south of Major MacKenzie were observed to be completely frozen (northern rivers are less prone to full freezing due to higher stream gradients, although there is a significant amount of ice in the northern portions of the watersheds also). The snowpack within TRCA watersheds is also quite significant, with over 130mm of water equivalent stored in the snowpack when surveyed at the end of February 2014. In recent years, southern Ontario has experienced fluctuating warm and cold periods during the winter months allowing for a gradual melt of snow and impeded ice cover development. However, the 2013/2014 winter has brought sustained sub-zero temperatures with no opportunity for melt. If the milder temperatures of spring emerge gradually, the 130mm of water will pose no threat as it melts slowly and finds its way to the watercourses. However, sudden and prolonged temperature spikes will result in quick melts and faster flowing water in rivers. Unfortunately, fast water moving underneath frozen ice cover causes the ice to break up into large pieces which can create ice jams in the watercourses and at crossings. A second risk that can exacerbate flooding even further during the spring is precipitation. If a significant rainfall event occurs when 1) ground is still frozen or 2) when ice jams are present, then there is a much greater potential for flooding.

TRCA, along with the other conservation authorities in the GTA, have been actively raising awareness of the heightened risks of flooding. TRCA specifically, has issued a special spring outlook communications letter (February 14, 2014) and has been providing weekly "River Ice Forecast" communications to TRCA's municipal partners (Attachment 1). In addition, TRCA developed an "Ice Management 101" bulletin to provide municipal partners with the basic facts about how to predict, prevent and mitigate ice jams (Attachment 2).

FINANCIAL DETAILS To date, the majority of costs for debris removal from watercourses has been borne by the municipalities. The costs incurred for flood control channel cleanout was $65,000 (originally estimated at $75,000) with funds from the capital accounts 107-03 for work within the City of Toronto and Region of York, and Peel Flood Remedial Works 129-19 for work in the Bolton Channel. Additional costs for field surveys was approximately $5,000 and funds were available in capital accounts 107-02 and 129-19.

17 In February 2014 the Province of Ontario announced that it would be providing assistance to municipalities impacted by the ice storm through a one-time Ice Storm Assistance Program. At the time of writing of this report, municipalities had not received direction from the Province as to how to apply for these funds. In response to inquiries from York Region, Peel Region and the City of Toronto, TRCA provided initial damage cost estimates in January 2014. Due to the recent announcement of provincial assistance, TRCA has formally requested financial support to recover the cost of damages due to the ice storm, and provided the regions of York, Peel and Durham, and the City of Toronto with updated cost estimates as of March 18, 2014. Changes to the overall cost estimates were minimal (i.e., damages were estimated at $1.3 million in January and have been revised to $1.25 million to date). Table 1 provides the estimated damage costs by region.

TABLE 1: 2013 Ice Storm Estimated Cost of Damages by Region (as of March 13, 2014)

Region Insurable Costs Non-Insurable Costs Total Peel $63,426 $519,069 $582,495 Durham $11,547 $132,778 $144,325 York $64,433 $302,621 $367,054 Toronto $97,980 $53,472 $151,452 Total $237,386 $1,007,940 $1,245,326

Report prepared by: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601 Emails: [email protected] Date: February 03, 2014 Attachments: 2

18 Attachment 1

19 20 Attachment 2

21 ______

22 RES.#A15/14 - PEEL REGION CHANNEL REMEDIATION STRATEGY AND SPRING CREEK SUBWATERSHED CHANNEL NATURIZATION IMPLEMENTATION - ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED Support for implementation of the Peel Region Channel Remediation Strategy and formal contract with The Faculty of Geography at the University of Guelph for the development of concept designs, engineering designs and research for individual implementation projects.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the Peel Channels Remediation Strategy in Spring Creek be implemented within the City of Brampton;

THAT the Authority support applying the evaluation methodology developed in the Peel Channels Remediation Strategy: Spring Creek Pilot Study to the rest of Peel Region;

AND FURTHER THAT a preferred source contract to undertake concept and engineered implementation designs, and research in cooperation with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), City of Brampton, the Region of Peel and the public be awarded to the Faculty of Geography at the University of Guelph at a total cost not to exceed $50,000 plus HST. CARRIED BACKGROUND Many sections of watercourses within Peel Region have been channelized with concrete lining or other hard bed and bank treatments. While this approach was intended to improve the conveyance capacity of the channel, current knowledge on the mechanisms of fluvial geomorphology shows that this approach is detrimental-to the overall health of the stream and can lead to extreme erosion problems at the site or downstream of the channelization. The end of the design life of many of these channels is approaching (concrete lined channels typically are designed for 75+/-years) and with weather systems increasing in intensity within southern Ontario, some of these channels are being stressed beyond their current structural stability and major failures have already been observed.

In 2012 the Peel Channels Remediation Strategy: Spring Creek Pilot Study was initiated to develop an evaluation methodology to identify where extensive naturalization of channelized areas could occur across the Region of Peel without compromising the need for adequate flood control and protection for human safety and property while improving ecological health and maximizing the benefits of ecosystem services to local neighbourhoods. Through extensive consultation with Peel Region, City of Brampton, City of Mississauga, TRCA technical staff and the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition, a total of eight categories of interest were identified: Infrastructure Risk, Public Use, Flexibility of Design, Co-ordination with Municipal Capital Works, In-stream Ecology, Forest Health, Terrestrial Habitat Connectivity and Restoration Opportunity Planning. These categories created the framework for evaluating where stream naturalization could occur.

23 The pilot study focused on approximately 13 km of hardened sections of stream in the Spring Creek subwatershed within Etobicoke Creek located in the City of Brampton (there are a total of 26 km of stream in this subwatershed). Hydrologic modelling was used to screen for stream reaches where extensive naturalization would not cause additional flood risk at the regional storm event; field data collection and further consultation were then used to prioritize nine sites for stream naturalization in Spring Creek (site map and more information on categories of interest are in Attachment 1; a study report will be available on the TRCA website in April 2014). These nine sites represent approximately 4.78km of stream where extensive naturalization could occur. Determining the extent of naturalization appropriate for stream areas in-between these sites was out of project scope.

The evaluation methodology and findings for Spring Creek were presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (includes municipal representation) and Stakeholders on December 10, 2013. These committees endorsed the evaluation methodology, supported the implementation of priority stream naturalization in Spring Creek, and supported the application of the evaluation methodology across the Region of Peel. The Spring Creek Pilot Study results were also presented to the Brampton Environmental Planning Advisory Committee on February 11, 2014 and support for implementation in Spring Creek was received. TRCA has 2014 funding available to proceed with implementing the Peel Channels Remediation Strategy in Spring Creek.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA is the lead agency for this implementation project with respect to project direction, administration and support. The University of Guelph will appoint a project manager, who is a professor and licensed professional geoscientist and will supervise students, faculty and direct the production of engineered plans and designs as well as logistics of the overall project. Through a comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding, TRCA and the Faculty of Geography- University of Guelph will work together to develop a Spring Creek Subwatershed Naturalization Implementation Plan taking guidance from the understanding already gained through the Peel Region Channel Remediation Strategy: Spring Creek Pilot Study.

The Faculty of Geography will use a holistic approach to all aspects of this project and consider the following planning and design issues:

Sections of Spring Creek subwatershed within the Etobicoke Creek watershed consist of degraded and failing concrete-lined straightened channels devoid of natural morphology or habitat features. This design and implementation plan provides a unique opportunity to remove sections of engineered concrete channel and hardened bed for restoration purposes, while maintaining their integrity and ability to safely convey flood flows. Natural channel design methods will be employed, with a focus on channel habitat and floodplain enhancements. Due to constraints associated with the urban hydrology, narrow stream corridors and adjacent infrastructure a hybrid design approach will be used with applied geomorphic principles using bioengineering to improve the function of the system while still maintaining stability.

24 These projects will also be designed to reconnect the creek back to the floodplain in areas where predicted changes in water levels are not anticipated to cause local flooding on adjacent private lands. Reconnection to the floodplain is a natural process and will assist in dissipating the energy and stress to the channel during high flows by allowing it to spill into associated wetlands with the added benefit of a healthier riparian corridor and terrestrial habitat. Improvements to the ecology are also expected to provide enhanced local community amenities such as aesthetics, greenspace and potential increase in property values.

Due to the location of the Spring Creek subwatershed (flows through high density residential), it will be necessary to have extensive public consultation as part of this undertaking prior to any in-ground works. Through this process, benefits to the natural environment, potential reduction in long term costs for channel maintenance and increases in ecological services will be quantified, to the extent possible. Areas that experience flood control issues which can only be addressed through an engineered approach will necessarily be identified. In these cases, options to remediate through retrofitting with updated technologies may be recommended. This work will build on TRCA's successful stream naturalization projects in both the Etobicoke and Mimico watersheds expanding on the lessons learned at the Alfred Kuehne stream naturalization and the Upper Mimico Creek naturalization.

The University of Guelph through this partnership with TRCA will produce and deliver the following:

1. Review existing information, drawings and documents as provided by TRCA and/or municipal, provincial and federal agencies for the overall assessment area. 2. In consultation with TRCA and using habitat restoration principles, prepare a fluvial geomorphology assessment of the overall assessment area in its existing form that will guide the planning and implementation process. 3. Work with TRCA to develop the best options for restoring the aquatic, terrestrial, stormwater and wetland ecosystem components of Spring Creek in the study area, based on fluvial geomorphologic, hydrologic and hydraulic constraints, terrestrial natural heritage data, aquatic data, surrounding land use, and stormwater inputs to the overall assessment area. 4. Provide conceptual designs and mapping identifying restoration opportunities for aquatic, terrestrial, stormwater and wetland components of the ecosystem in the overall assessment area. 5. Provide a detailed stamped engineered construction drawing and associated materials list suitable for implementation of one high priority site located in Spring Creek (as identified in the Peel Channels Remediation Strategy) and based on the approved concept for in-stream, aquatic and stormwater management components of the project. 6. Identify the fluvial effects to the post-implementation hydraulics for the preferred alternative to ensure that no adverse impacts will occur due to flooding caused by the proposed changes. An update to the HECRAS hydraulic model may be required. 7. Provide to TRCA, in digital and hard copy, the final designs as outlined above. TRCA will then develop detailed construction estimates for the project components.

25 RATIONALE Through the process of developing the stream remediation strategy guidance for Spring Creek, the need to repair, maintain and manage urban streams using natural channel design principles, to the extent appropriate, was confirmed and supported by Peel Region, local municipalities and stakeholders. This work will assist TRCA in cultivating TRCA's Natural Channel Program in Peel Region while addressing the growing issues in urban streams and developing leading edge technology that can be transferred jurisdictional wide.

Engaging the University of Guelph to assist TRCA in developing the details of the Spring Creek Subwatershed Naturalization Implementation Plan has many benefits. Primarily the interaction with academia allows TRCA access to the faculty and student resources of a leading resource management university. This arrangement will provide the opportunity for TRCA staff development, promotion of TRCA expertise, and the timely development of detailed engineered plans providing similar results that a geomorphic consultant would produce with the added benefit of working with academia.

As a result, staff recommends awarding the contract to the University of Guelph on a preferred source basis as per Section 9.3.5 of TRCA's Purchasing Policy as follows:

Special research and development projects with academic institutions, government bodies, industry organizations and similar bodies.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost of this research and design partnership with the University of Guelph - Faculty of Geography including all fees, materials and all other costs has an upset limit of $50,000. TRCA staff proposes that this partnership would commence April 2014 and provide two deliverables: detailed design of one construction project ready for implementation in late fall 2014 (estimated cost $500,000 - $750,000) and the implementation plan for the rest of Spring Creek completed in spring 2015. Confirmed financial support for research and design partnership is from Peel Natural Channel Habitat Implementation Projects Account 128-70 and Peel Climate Channel Remediation Account 129-30.

Report prepared by: Rick Portiss, extension 5302 and Christine Tu, extension 5707 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] For Information contact: Rick Portiss, extension 5302 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 04, 2014 Attachments: 1

26 Attachment 1

27 ______

28 RES.#A16/14 - SEA LAMPREY CONTROL PROJECT Partnership with Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Continued partnership with Fisheries and Oceans Canada for sea lamprey control within the Toronto region.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) continue to work in partnership with Fisheries and Oceans Canada to reduce the impact of sea lamprey on fish communities within Lake Ontario. CARRIED BACKGROUND Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) serves as an agent of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) fulfilling the GLFC’s sea lamprey management obligations in Canada. The Sea Lamprey Control Centre (SLCC) based in Sault Ste. Marie is DFO’s operational arm tasked with this obligation. For the past nine years, TRCA has worked with SLCC to operate the trapping facilities on the Humber River and Duffins Creek and have developed an outdoor facility to retain captured live sea lamprey for past years sterilization program. Upon request, the sea lamprey are also held in these tanks where they are then distributed to universities and the Ministry of Natural Resources for research projects.

Within the TRCA jurisdiction two sea lamprey trapping stations have been established by DFO. One is at the southernmost weir of Duffins Creek and the other is at the southernmost weir of the Humber River at the Old Mill. These weirs prevent the upstream migration of lamprey and permanent traps are built at the base of these weirs to funnel and capture the sea lamprey. During the spawning season, which runs from approximately mid April to mid June, TRCA staff check the traps daily, process the fish and, a percentage of the lamprey captured are marked and released for a population study. Other captured incidental fish species such as minnows or shiners are counted, identified and released.

Sea lamprey are a parasitic fish native to the Atlantic Ocean. Sea lamprey have a suction cup mouth lined with teeth which they use to attach to other fish. They then use their rasping tongue to tear through the fish’s scales and flesh in order to feed on the bodily fluids. A sea lamprey can destroy up to 18 kilograms of fish during its lifetime and generally only one in seven fish will survive an attack. The first reported occurrence of sea lamprey in the Great Lakes was in the 1830's and it is believed that they entered the Great Lakes through the shipping channels. Sea lamprey are not preyed on by other fish and are not considered to have any commercial value within this region.

The sea lamprey’s lifecycle consists of a three to six year larval phase, an adult phase and a spawning phase. Adult sea lamprey migrate upstream to spawn during which time they stop feeding. Once the fertilized eggs hatch, the larvae burrow into the substrate where they feed on algae and detritus. After the larval phase the sea lamprey transform into adults and migrate into the Great Lakes to begin the parasitic phase of their lifecycle. The sea lamprey spends 12 to 20 months in the adult phase before returning back upstream to spawn and die.

29 Sea lamprey populations were at their peak in the 1940's and 1950's during which time there were no control methods. In the 40’s and 50’s sea lamprey had a significant role in the collapse of the lake trout and whitefish fisheries, which have both been historic economic mainstays of the Great Lakes fishery.

RATIONALE Current control practices on Lake Ontario include lampricide applications, operation of barriers and trapping spawning-phase adults. The abundance of sea lamprey is estimated using a model combining adult mark-recapture data, estimates of larval production potential and spawning potential in producing streams. Estimates from this model show a substantial decline in the spawning-phase sea lamprey population since 1982 and is expected to remain low and stable.

From TRCA's perspective, the incidental data collected during these operations are transferred to TRCA’s fisheries databases adding to its extensive long term fish monitoring information. This not only benefits the Toronto region but also provides a lake wide perspective and highlights how the Toronto waterfront and surrounding region fits into the entire Lake Ontario system.

DFO gains a local partner with extensive knowledge and expertise of the jurisdictional watersheds and highly trained technical professionals to help with the daily operations.

With this work, TRCA is able to add another facet to their continued partnership with DFO by expanding into the management and control of a devastating invasive species while continuing to show a commitment to excellence in environmental science. TRCA is committed to work with outside agencies with a collaborative interest in fish community health and to provide both expertise and financial support for the benefit of not only TRCA’s jurisdiction but also to the ancillary benefits of the greater Great Lakes region.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The sea lamprey control program is funded by DFO for $30,000. Funding for this project is managed through account 251-75.

Report prepared by: Danny Moro, extension 5372 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Danny Moro, extension 5372 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 04, 2014

______

RES.#A17/14 - SUPPLY OF RENTAL RATES FOR OPERATED HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND DUMP TRUCKS Contract Extension. Extension of Contract RSD13-01 for the Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks, for the period April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015.

30 Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Contract RSD13-01 for Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks, awarded in 2013 to TBG Landscape and Sartor & Susin Ltd., be extended from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015 subject to terms, conditions and performance satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, at an estimated total cost of $4,500,000, plus HST; CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013, Resolution #A45/13 was approved as follows:

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to have two vendors of record for the supply of operated heavy construction equipment and dump trucks for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014;

THAT TBG Landscape Inc. be recognized as the primary supplier of operated heavy equipment and dump trucks during the contract period, it being the proposal that best meets the general requirements of TRCA at a competitive cost;

THAT Sartor & Susin Ltd. be recognized as the supplier of operated heavy equipment and dump trucks on shoreline armouring, lakefilling and natural channel projects during the contract period, it being the proposal that best meets TRCA's requirements for this specialized work at a competitive cost;

THAT Sartor & Susin Ltd. be permitted to continue to supply operated heavy equipment and dump trucks to projects already in progress until completion;

THAT where the vendors of record are not available for a particular project, staff be authorized to use the next lowest bidder;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents.

In preparation of the original tender documents, staff included a provision whereby the successful bidder could request a one year extension to the contract at a specific maximum percent increase or decrease to the unit prices bid.

TBG Landscape Inc. have agreed to a contract extension and have submitted, in writing, a request for an increase of 2% to all unit rates to cover increases in their operating costs should the contract be extended on April 1st.

Sartor & Susin Ltd. have agreed to a contract extension and have submitted, in writing, a request for an increase of 3% to all unit rates to cover increases in their operating costs should the contract be extended on April 1st.

31 RATIONALE TRCA and TBG Landscape have worked together on numerous successful projects over the years and through the tendering process, TBG Landscape have consistently provided the lowest unit rates with a broad spectrum of equipment and fully experienced operators.

Sartor and Susin Ltd. are currently supplying heavy operated machinery for the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project and have over 40 years of expertise in environmental construction including shoreline protection and other specialized erosion control experience.

Staff has reviewed the proposed new rate structure for both TBG Landscape Inc. and Sartor & Susin Ltd, in conjunction with a review of performance over the past year, and is satisfied that the requested 2% increase for TBG Landscape Inc. and the requested 3% increase for Sartor & Susin Ltd. is indicative of overall industry operating cost increases and is warranted.

Therefore staff recommends extending contract RSD13-01 to TBG Landscape Inc. and Sartor and Susin Ltd. from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015 with the respective increases to the original unit rates.

In the event that the preferred bidder cannot provide all of the specified equipment required for daily construction operations, staff will solicit services from the next lowest bidder.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The value of this contract is estimated to be approximately $4,500,000 based upon a review of projects scheduled for implementation during the contract period, which is estimated to be shared between the two vendors of record at approximately 50% each. An increase or decrease in workload will have an impact on the value of this contract. The contractors understand both the potential cost and resource implications associated with potential workload changes. The operated equipment is rented on an as required basis with no minimum hours guaranteed.

Funds for the contract are identified in TRCA's 2014 and 2015 capital budgets.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 416-786-5128 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 12, 2014

______

RES.#A18/14 - RESTORATION SERVICES CENTRE Photovoltaic System - Design/Build. Award of Contract RSD#14-09 for Restoration Services Centre photovoltaic system - design/build.

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

32 THAT contract RSD#14-09 for the design/build of a turnkey photovoltaic (PV) system at Restoration Services Centre (RSC) be awarded to RESCo Energy Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $217,496.15, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 15% of the total cost of the contract as a contingency allowance, if deemed necessary;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized staff be directed to take the action necessary to implement the contract including obtaining any approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2013 TRCA acquired a 20-year fixed price Feed-in-Tariff (FIT 2.0) contract from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) as established under the Green Energy and Green Economy Act 2009. TRCA staff is seeking approval to select a qualified proponent to design, supply, install, test and commission a fully operational grid connected 50kW AC rated solar PV system to be installed on the roof and/or exterior wall of the truck port projection of TRCA’s Restoration Services Centre, a “Leadership in Engineering and Environmental Design” (LEED) facility.

Under the terms of the FIT contract, TRCA must deliver the PV system not later than the OPA’s “Milestone Operational Date” of April 18, 2015 or the contract becomes void. In exchange, the OPA will pay TRCA at the rate of $0.548/kWh for the power delivered to the grid.

This project initiative aligns with TRCA’s objective of Business Excellence and strategic priority of Green the Toronto Region's Economy.

RATIONALE Request for Pre-Qualification (RFPQ) for Tender RSD#14-09 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo (http://www.biddingo.com/) on January 24, 2014 and closed on February 7, 2014. The work includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the provision of engineering design services and the supply of labour, material, supervision and equipment required to complete the scope of work for the project. The successful proponent will prepare the design and coordinate permitting, approvals and construction activities which comprise of a fully functional and compliant rooftop and/or wall mounted solar PV system.

A total of 29 companies took the pre-qualification documents and five companies submitted completed packages in accordance with the requirements of the pre-qualification process. Proponents interested in pre-qualifying were advised that the criteria for evaluation would include the following:  CCDC 11 (Canadian Construction Documents Committee) requirements and completion;  completeness of submission;  relevant project experience - type and budget;  financial references and bonding ability;  ability to meet project milestones/timing;  ability to coordinate work by others;  experience dealing with projects with construction budgets of $150,000.00 to $250,000.00;  personal resumes for key project staff;  project references - client and/or consultant. 33 A total of five companies were pre-qualified to submit tender bid prices. Tender bid documents were distributed to the following pre-qualified companies with a closing date of March 10, 2014:

 Ainsworth Electric Inc.;  Bluewater Energy Inc.;  Carmanah Technologies;  Essex Energy Corporation;  RESCo Energy Inc.

A mandatory pre-bid site meeting was held on February 24, 2014 to review the project scope and site conditions with prospective bidders. All of the prequalified bidders attended the mandatory site meeting. Ainsworth Electric Inc. withdrew from the bid process prior to close citing existing project commitments would preclude them from being able to bid. Three completed tender bids were received.

The Selection Committee of TRCA staff (Alex Waters, Svend de Bruyn, Leigh St. Hiliare and Dave Rogalsky) reviewed the proposals during the week of March 14, 2014. The criteria used to evaluate and select the recommended consultant included the following:

Criteria Description Points Total Qualifications Company history and experience 5 20 and FIT program experience 5 Experience Implemented projects (of similar size and scope) 5 Experience and qualifications of key individuals 5 Quality of the Understanding of the RFP and approach to RFP objectives 5 20 Proposal Technical approach and flexibility to conditions 5 Performance monitoring and reporting 5 Implementation schedule reasonable 5 Photovoltaic Proposed photovoltaic system technologies 10 25 System & Other equipment items – metering/monitoring, display 5 Equipment Warranty 5 Projected Technical Performance 5 Financial Lump-sum cost 20 35 Cost per kW installed 15 Total 100

A summary of the received fee proposals is as follows:

Contract RSD#14-09 - Restoration Services Centre – Photovoltaic System Design/Build Fees BIDDERS (Including Permitted Expenses, Plus HST) Bluewater Energy $244,867.00 Carmanah Technologies No bid Essex Energy $253,804.00 Option 1 - $206,672.40 RESCo Energy Option 2 - $217,496.15 34 The scoring was completed by each member of the evaluation committee, and averaged to produce total scores as follows:

Company Proposal Score (/100) Bluewater Energy 67.5 Carmanah Technologies N/A Essex Energy 71.5 RESCo Energy 95.0

Only RESCo Energy provided an optional cost proposal (Option 2) for a PV system based on the use of microinverters. Staff is of the opinion that the use of microinverters (as opposed to string inverters), while marginally more costly, offers the ability to provide module level monitoring and the highest level of arc-fault protection available.

Based on the Selection Committee’s review of the proposals, RESCO Energy Inc. was evaluated the highest by the Committee. Therefore, staff is recommending that the contract be awarded to RESCo Energy Inc. at a total upset cost not to exceed $217,496.15 , plus HST, plus a contingency allowance of 15% as deemed necessary by TRCA staff.

FINANCIAL DETAILS All expenditures that pertain to this contract will be assigned to the RSC PV System project budget account 123-11. Funding is available from reserves and budgeted within the 2014 capital budget to support this project initiative.

Revenues are anticipated in the order of $32,000 per year based on the projected system kWh’ s generated during the FIT contract 20 year period (2015-2034). Revenues are expected to provide a return that will pay back the capital investment within 8-10 years. Beyond pay back, revenues will help offset a portion of the annual operating cost of the RSC facility.

Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 14, 2014

______

RES.#A19/14 - ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA VISITOR SERVICES GATEHOUSE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Tender PMO14-03. Award of Contract PMO14-03 for the construction of a new Albion Hills Conservation Area Visitor Services Gatehouse.

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan 35 THAT contract PMO14-03 for the construction of a new Albion Hills Conservation Area Visitor Services Gatehouse be awarded to Ameresco Canada Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $475,709.00, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, subject to receipt of all necessary approvals, permits and funding, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT the contract be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and, as necessary, solicitor;

THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Currently, Albion Hills Conservation Area has two registration intake locations for customers visiting its facilities. Day use clients are processed at the front gate and overnight campers are processed at the campground registration office. This system relies heavily on customer understanding and honesty as TRCA staff cannot ensure that overnight customers will proceed to register and pay camper/client fees at the appropriate location. In order to improve customer service and capture potential loss of revenue, it is the intention of TRCA to streamline its services by combining various administrative functions and relocating them to one centralized location at the main entrance to the park.

While the existing front entrance gatehouse is structurally sound, it does not meet the needs of a registration administration office in terms of available space, safety, security, storage, administration and staff washroom facilities. In contrast, the campground registration office requires immediate attention due to its overall state of disrepair. The campground office is declining at a rapid rate due to age, moisture related issues, pest infiltration and overall weather related damage. In order to meet health and safety standards, customer expectations, safeguard internal equipment and streamline registration services to one location, staff propose the construction of a new front entrance gatehouse.

For the construction of a new visitor services gatehouse, TRCA engaged Paul Didur Architects to undertake a facility assessment and prepare detailed design and construction drawings that meet Ontario Building Code (OBC) requirements. The new Visitor Services Gatehouse will provide the following specific primary functions:  primary site day use and overnight registration fee collection;  main park administration office;  centralized customer information kiosk; and  small retail store.

The construction of the new four season, approximately 635 square foot building, will consist of the following features:  staff washroom;

36  staff office and lunch room;  small storage area;  entrance to accommodate walk-in customers;  small retail space; and  parking lot extension and improvements.

In July, 2012, the Authority approved Resolution #A145/12, directing staff to enter into an agreement with Frontier Group of Companies for the construction of a new Albion Hills Conservation Area Visitor Services Gatehouse. Upon receipt of the tender documents, TRCA proceeded to obtain a building permit from the Town of Caledon, which required Ministry of the Environment (MOE) approval due to a septic system comprising part of the design of the new facility. MOE informed TRCA that as per the Ontario Water Resources Act R.S.O. 1990, Section 53 (1):

"Subject to Section 47.3 of the Environmental Protection Act, no person shall use, operate, establish, alter, extend or replace new or existing sewage works except under and in accordance with an environmental compliance approval 2010, c. 16, Schedule 7, s. 3 (9)."

Therefore, to comply with the aforementioned legislation, and as per agreement with MOE officials, TRCA completed an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) - Sewage Works for the proposed Albion Hills Visitor Services Gatehouse project, and received conditional approval from MOE for the construction of the facility, barring that an ECA - Sewage Works will be completed by TRCA for the entire Albion Hills Conservation Area. The process and completion of the ECA took over eight months, and therefore, the firm originally retained to complete the construction of the gatehouse in 2012 was not able to guarantee its pricing for that extended period of time.

In the spring of 2013, TRCA staff initiated a new tender process for the construction of the Albion Hills Gatehouse. The lowest bid of $534,800.00, plus HST was a significant increase from the previous quotes. The increase in price was due to general inflation, changes in the design of the gatehouse as per the sewage system reconfiguration, and an active construction market with a high number of construction projects being tendered for at the time. Based on these factors and the increase in price, TRCA staff decided to postpone the award of the tender and proceed with a valued engineering re-design of the gatehouse to attain additional cost savings.

Following the re-design of the gatehouse, TRCA staff initiated a new tender process in February, 2014. The new process involved further changes to the design of the building as well as consideration of the construction market during this time of year. The re-design of the gatehouse included a decrease in the square footage of the building, a decrease in the amount of concrete used in some areas, changes to the foundation footings, more affordable finishing materials such as stone veneer, fiber cement siding, plywood and laminate, the removal of the roof canopy, and a change to a gravity force septic system. In addition, the ECA-Sewage Works for the entire Albion Hills Conservation Area will be completed in the summer of 2014.

37 RATIONALE Request for Pre-Qualification (RFPQ) for general contractors was advertised online with biddingo.com on May 13, 2013 and closed on May 24, 2013. This list of pre-qualified general contractors was used in the new tender process, with the addition of one other general contractor that was pre-qualified for another TRCA project. The work includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the supply of labour, material, supervision and equipment to perform the prescribed scope of work. The general contractor will coordinate all construction activities to facilitate this work.

General contractors interested in pre-qualifying were advised of the criteria for evaluation, including:  completeness of submission;  past experience with building retrofit and/or construction projects of a similar program;  past experience with the proposed scope of work;  ability to meet construction schedule milestones;  ability to coordinate work by others; and  experience dealing with projects with construction budgets of $500,000 to $1 million.

Bidders were required to submit a bid bond of 10% of the contract price at the time of the tender submission, as well as an Agreement to Bond from a bonding company for 50% Performance and 50% Labour and Material.

The pre-qualifying documents were reviewed by the selection committee made up of TRCA staff that has extensive background in new building and retrofit construction projects. The proposals were evaluated using the following criteria being met in order to receive a tender package:  CCDC 11 (Canadian Construction Documents Committee) Contractor's Qualification Statement;  company experience and background in similar works;  experience of suggested personnel for this project;  project record over the past five years; and  references focusing on firms history of project control and experience.

Based on the evaluation process, tender documents were made available to the following eight general contractors:  Ameresco Canada Inc.;  Berkim Construction Inc.;  Martinway Contracting Ltd.;  Morosons Construction Ltd.;  Silver Birch Contracting Ltd.;  Snyder Construction;  J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd.; and  Steelcore Construction Ltd.

All but one of the pre-qualified companies attended a mandatory site meeting on February 12, 2014.

Tenders closed on March 6, 2014 and were opened at a Tender Opening Committee Meeting held on March 7, 2014 with the following results: 38 BIDDERS TOTAL (Plus HST) Ameresco Canada Inc. $475,709.00 Silver Birch Contracting Ltd. $520,000.00 Snyder Construction $529,900.00 Martinway Contracting Ltd. $651,224.00 J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd. Disqualified Berkim Construction Inc. Disqualified Steelcore Construction Ltd. No Bid

J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd. and Berkim Construction Inc. were disqualified as their tender submissions were not complete.

Therefore, based on the bids received, staff recommends that Contract PMO14-03 for the Albion Hills Conservation Area Visitors Centre Gatehouse be awarded to Ameresco Canada Inc. for the total cost not to exceed $475,709.00, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available through Region of Peel within the Peel Campground account 420-63.

Report prepared by: Lisa Moore, 416-704-2476 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Aaron D'Souza, extension 5775 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 7, 2014

______

RES.#A20/14 - ENERLIFE CONSULTING INC. AGREEMENT Annual renewal of agreement.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the agreement for the development and delivery of sector based energy management programs with Enerlife Consulting Inc. be renewed for the period, April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, at an estimated total cost of $247,000.00, plus HST;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the agreement including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED

39 BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #5/07, held on June 22, 2007, Resolution #A145/07 was approved as follows:

THAT approval be granted for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Enerlife Consulting Inc. for the development and delivery of key programs for The Living City, including Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge, Greening Health Care, Sustainable Schools, Home Energy Clinic and the Community Scorecard;

THAT appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the signing of documents;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority on an annual basis, with an update on the status of the business relationship.

TRCA began working with Enerlife Consulting Inc. in 2002 when they were contracted to assist in the development of programs for The Living City Centre. In 2007, TRCA entered into a formal business relationship with Enerlife Consulting to develop and deliver sector based energy programs. Five programs were identified in the original agreement and include: Mayors' Megawatt Challenge; Greening Health Care; Sustainable Schools; Home Energy Clinic and Community Scorecard.

The working relationship with Enerlife Inc. has been quite successful. Although some of the programs are no longer active, the approach to building performance management developed through this relationship has influenced the development of other significant initiatives. These include the Canada Green Building Councils GREENUP program, the Real Property Association of Canada's "20 by 15" national energy consumption target for office buildings, as well as the Greening Greater Toronto "Race to Reduce" for building landlords and tenants. In addition, the Greening Health Care program has continued to expand to 40 hospitals in Ontario and 13 in Alberta. The Mayors' Megawatt Challenge also expanded with nine municipalities in Ontario including, Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Richmond Hill, Caledon, Barrie, Oshawa and Windsor. In addition there is a municipality in Quebec and another in New Brunswick also participating.

The agreement with Enerlife is reviewed on an annual basis following the evaluation of the success of the programs, to ensure the agreement is still appropriate for the current circumstances. Feedback from the program steering committee members has indicated that the programs provide significant value and that more should be done to foster collaboration and increase membership. In addition, in discussion with Enerlife Consulting it was agreed that the programs were continuing to transform approaches to energy efficiency in the target sectors. TRCA and Enerlife were invited to submit a proposal to the Ontario Power Authority for a pilot project with three local distribution companies in southern Ontario.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The agreement is due to expire on March 31, 2014. With Authority direction, staff will renew the agreement for an additional year.

40 FINANCIAL DETAILS Revenues for the program are derived from membership fees charged to municipalities and hospitals participating in the programs as well as utility companies that pay to sponsor the programs. TRCA manages the program while Enerlife provides the technical content and support. TRCA collects all revenues generated and pays Enerlife monthly for their portion of the work. The budget for payment to Enerlife for 2014 under the agreement is estimated to be $247,000 if program membership and sponsorship projections are met. Under the agreement, Enerlife billing cannot exceed a specific proportion of the program revenue received. Thus, if revenue projections are not met, Enerlife billing would be reduced accordingly. TRCA keeps a portion of the revenue to defray program management expenses.

Report prepared by: Bernie McIntyre, extension 5326 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Bernie McIntyre, extension 5326 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 4, 2014

______

RES.#A21/14 - SOURCE PROTECTION PLANNING Award of Extension of Contract for Professional Services for the CTC Source Protection Region. Extension of contract to provide professional management services for the CTC Source Protection Region through the submission of the amended source protection plan and final approval.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the sole source contract with Thorpe & Associates, be extended for an additional 21 months as a preferred source contract, commencing April 1, 2014, to provide professional services for the source water protection planning process for the CTC Source Protection Region - Toronto and Region Source Protection Authority (TRSPA), Credit Valley Source Protection Authority (CVSPA) and Central Lake Ontario Source Protection Authority (CLOSPA);

THAT Beverley Thorpe of Thorpe & Associates be the exclusive project manager with no substitution;

THAT funding for Thorpe & Associates be capped at $185,000, plus a 10% contingency for the date beginning April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 plus HST;

THAT the contract be subject to termination by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) or Thorpe & Associates, for any reason, upon 30 days notice;

THAT this contractual obligation be binding on TRCA acting as lead source protection authority only to the extent that the Province of Ontario continues to provide funding;

41 AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be authorized and directed to take such actions as necessary to implement the contract including the execution and signing of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The proclamation of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (CWA) and promulgation of the regulations which accompanies the Act, imposes legal and timeline requirements on source protection authorities which were created by the regulation. TRCA was partnered with their neighboring conservation authorities (CAs), Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA), forming the CTC Source Protection Region. Through discussions by the partner CAs, TRCA was named the lead source protection authority within the CTC Source Protection Region by regulation under the CWA. As the program moved forward it became evident that the CTC Region required the skills and expertise of a project manager to address all interests of the region. Therefore, at Executive Committee Meeting #2/05, held on April 8, 2005, by Resolution #B37/05, the principal of Thorpe & Associates, Beverley Thorpe, was hired to provide project management services in support of source water protection planning for the CTC Source Protection Region, until the end of March, 2008. Thorpe & Associates initial assignment was to guide staff from the three participating conservation authorities in developing the Terms of Reference for the program and participating in public consultations, which was the first deliverable to the Province.

Upon successful completion of the initial assignment, an extension was authorized by Resolution #A297/07 at Authority Meeting #A10/07, held on January 4, 2008, for annual renewal starting in April 2008, ending in March 2011. Beverley Thorpe with her previous knowledge and experience with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) was an invaluable asset to the CTC Region and its staff. The extension allowed for continued consistent guidance to technical staff from the three participating conservation authorities in preparing work plans for the next phase, preparing deliverables, completing technical studies including peer review, and the successful submission of the Proposed Assessment Reports to the province.

With the second deliverable of the source protection program submitted to the Province for review, the program moved forward to the final deliverable of the source protection plan. It was agreed by partner CAs that Thorpe & Associates project management role should be continued for consistency. Approval was obtained by Resolution #A34/11 at Authority Meeting #2/11, held on February 25, 2011 for annual renewal starting in April 2011, ending in March 2013. During the development phase of the source protection plan, technical work continued or was further refined. The Proposed Source Protection Plan was submitted to the Minister for approval on October 22, 2012

In addition to these revisions, technical work required peer review and consultation with implementing bodies and the public. Some of these matters were unforeseen as the Province was releasing evolving direction on requirements for technical work and source protection plan development which further increased the workload leading to delays. Thorpe & Associates was authorized to be extended for an additional year, at Executive Committee Meeting #1/13, held on March 1, 2013, by Resolution B7/13, to the date of March 31, 2014. In September 2013, the project coordinator commenced a year's maternity leave, with a projected return date of late September 2014. It is necessary to retain Thorpe and Associates to cover this leave period and to ensure an orderly transition of the program to implementation after Plan approval.

42 RATIONALE The Ministry of the Environment review has been underway since October 2012 and the CTC team has only recently received and is responding to partial ministry comments on quantity and quality policies, and is still awaiting comments on the Lake Ontario policies. It is essential during this final phase to ensure that the CTC Source Protection Region has the continuity in program management support in place to develop a framework for municipal implementation readiness while awaiting the Minister's final approval of the CTC Source Protection Plan and to put in place the reporting, record keeping and governance structure for the program beyond plan approval. The amended Source Protection Plan is scheduled to be re-submitted in October 2014 and the Ministry has projected approval by the latter half of 2015. After submission, staff will focus their efforts on supporting municipalities to prepare to implement the policies, put in place the required data management and reporting procedures required after approval, and develop business processes to transition from project development to program implementation.

To date, Thorpe & Associates has successfully executed all responsibilities and submitted all deliverables to the Province, as illustrated in the Background above in addition to supporting the CTC Management Committee of chief administrative officers, making presentations to the CA boards and local councils, and leading a municipal technical advisory committee comprised of representatives from the planning, works and health departments of all the upper, lower and single tier municipalities wholly or partially within the CTC Region. Furthermore, Thorpe & Associates, at the request of the Province and TRCA has presented papers on source water issues at a number of conferences and forums and was instrumental in assisting in the development of a near shore study for Lake Ontario.

Technical work is essentially complete and is being incorporated into further updates to the Assessment Reports for the Region. This work includes Tier 3 Water Budget work in both CVSPA and TRSPA. These deliverables require preparation of technical material and communication products, review and endorsement by the SPC, public consultation and review by the respective source protection authorities prior to submission to the Province, and the continued supporting role of CAs to assist municipalities in achieve implementation readiness.

The drinking water source protection process has broken new ground in water management and requires an experienced project manager. Thorpe & Associates has a wealth of experience, a well established network of senior managers within the Province and the project management skills to lead not only the CTC Region activities but also to be a resource for other CA's and source protection committees. The CTC SPC Chair and members greatly appreciate the consistent leadership and benefit from the historical and technical knowledge available. CTC staff over this period will receive mentoring to allow their professional development to meet the needs of the succession planning process. Senior staff at Central Lake Ontario and Credit Valley conservation authorities are also in support of this contract extension. There will be no increase in hourly rate for the purpose of this extension. The partner CAs are in agreement with the continued excellent project management services of Thorpe & Associates for an additional 21 months to December 31, 2015. Therefore, staff recommend the extension of the contract to Thorpe & Associates contingent on funding for the period of 21 months commencing April 1, 2014 and ending at December 31, 2015, on a Preferred Source basis as per Section 9.3.3 of TRCA's Purchasing Policy as follows (under TRCA's previous Purchasing Policy this was a sole source contract for the same reason as cited below):

43 The required goods and services are to be supplied by a particular vendor or supplier having special knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be provided by any other supplier.

FINANCIAL DETAILS This position is funded completely from allocation by the Province of Ontario for source water protection planning, and thus is contingent on funding approval. Funding will be billed on account code 121-20.

Report prepared by: Sylvia Waters, extension 5633 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 03, 2014

______

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RES.#A22/14

Moved by: Colleen Jordan Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the committee move into closed session to discuss item AUTH7.10 - Office Accommodation, as it pertains to ongoing property negotiations. CARRIED ARISE AND REPORT RES.#A23/14

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT the committee arise and report from closed session. CARRIED

RES.#A24/14 - OFFICE ACCOMMODATION Lease of Office Space.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT confidential item AUTH7.10 - Office Accommodation be approved;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back when the item is completed and can be made public.

44 RECORDED VOTE David Barrow Yea Ben Cachola Nay Raymond Cho Nay Ronald Chopowick Yea Chris Fonseca Yea Jack Heath Yea Colleen Jordan Yea Mujeeb Khan Yea Gloria Lindsay Luby Nay Mike Mattos Yea Gerri Lynn O'Connor Yea John Parker Yea Anthony Perruzza Nay Deb Schulte Yea John Sprovieri Yea Jim Tovey Yea Richard Whitehead Yea

THE MOTION WAS CARRIED

______

RES.#A25/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York Sanmike Construction Ltd., CFN 50485. Acquisition of property located south of Elgin Mills Road East and east of Bayview Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT 1.868 hectares (4.616 acres), more or less, of vacant land being part of Lot 25, Concession 2, and designated as Blocks 2 and 3 on a Draft Plan of subdivision prepared by KRCMAR Surveyors Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 11-261, dated October 22, 2013, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Elgin Mills Road East and east of Bayview Avenue be purchased from Sanmike Construction Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

45 THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A26/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York Berkley Homes Ltd., CFN 50486. Acquisition of property located north of Nashville Road and west of Regional Road 27, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT 3.336 hectares (8.244 acres), more or less, of vacant land being part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 8, and designated as Blocks 49 and 50 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Nanfara & NG Surveyors Inc., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Project No. 20080243M1, dated September 24, 2013, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located to the north of Nashville Road and west of Regional Road 27 be purchased from Berkley Homes Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

That Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

46 RES.#A27/14 - JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTS Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I. Award of Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I for completion of detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments for properties located in Area I categorized as medium-high to high priority sites following the July 8th, 2013 storm event.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

WHEREAS the significant rainfall event of July 8th, 2013 caused very high flows and resulting erosion damages along a number of river systems, creating new sites where existing development and infrastructure is endangered, particularly within the City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS the preliminary assessment process recommended detailed geotechnical investigations of 147 additional properties be carried out as part of the July 8th, 2013 storm damage response efforts to confirm the full extent of risk;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I to complete detailed assessments for 57 properties within the West Humber River subwatershed be awarded to Terraprobe Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $214,714.25 plus a contingency allowance of $200,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area I;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such actions as is necessary to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A28/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.3, inclusive, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #1/14, held on March 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.3, inclusive IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREET (Executive Res.#B7/14) ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER PROGRAM IN HUMBER BAY (Executive Res.#B8/14) JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTS (Executive Res.#B9/14) 47 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A29/14 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Summary of 2013 Requests. Provides a summary of requests under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the report dated March 6, 2014, on summary of 2013 freedom of information requests, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. TRCA is also subject to the provisions of the federal Personal information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).

Requests under the Act are dealt with by the Manager, Corporate Secretariat, who is designated as TRCA's Information and Privacy Officer. Staff reports to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario annually on the number and type of applications received by TRCA each year. The activity in 2013 is summarized below.

RATIONALE In 2013, TRCA received 42 requests for information under the Act. This is a decrease in the number of requests over 2012 (61 in 2012), but the complexity of some of the requests was much greater. In the period 2001 to 2006, TRCA received fewer than five requests each year. From 2007 to 2011, the average was 23 annually. Of the 42 requests, 38 were completed in 2013 while the other four carry over into 2014 for completion.

All but one of the requests related to "general records" as opposed to "personal information". The latter relates to requests by individuals about information that TRCA has concerning the applicant personally. Of the 38 requests completed, 36 requests were from individuals and two from businesses.

Of the 38 requests completed in 2013, 32 were responded to within the 30 day limit required under the Act. Three requests took 31 - 60 days, one took 61 - 90 days and two took 91 days or more. Extensions were needed in some cases because of the volume of records to be searched and prepared.

Of the 38 requests, all information was disclosed in five situations; partial information was disclosed in 14 situations; no information was disclosed in three situations; no records existed in nine situations so there was no disclosure; and in eight situations, the request was withdrawn or abandoned. In 14 situations where general information was disclosed, personal information was removed for privacy purposes. Examples of the personal privacy exemption being applied include copies of cheques which may be on file and personal telephone numbers.

Also, TRCA receives many requests about permit and planning applications which, once approved by the Executive Committee, are a matter of public record.

48 The Act requires that a $5 fee be included with each application. Also, the Act allows TRCA to charge for photocopies (20 cents/page) and search and preparation time ($30/hour). In 2013, TRCA collected fees of $1,578.40.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 6, 2014

______

RES.#A30/14 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT Section IV item AUTH8.2 - Watershed Committee Minutes, be received. CARRIED Section IV Item 8.2 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL Minutes of Meeting #6/13, held on November 21, 2013 Minutes of Meeting #7/13, held on December 12, 2013 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN WATER STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on February 18, 2014.

______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A31/14 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: David Barrow

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.8, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #1/14, held on March 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

49 TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:03 p.m., on Friday, March 28, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

50 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #3/14

Friday, April 25, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #2/14, held on March 28, 2014 52

PRESENTATIONS Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, TRCA, in regard to item BAAB7.1 - 2014 Budget, Operating and Capital. 52

CORRESPONDENCE A letter dated April 15, 2014 from Mayor Frank Scarpitti, City of Markham, re: request to name a woodlot in Milne Dam Conservation Area in honour of Lesley Price. 52

FRENCHMAN’S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT Contracts RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 - Boardwalk Construction 54

SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT ACCESS PLAN Environmental Assessment 56

MULTI-USE TRAIL AND RESTORATION ALONG WEST DUFFINS CREEK (PICKERING) Valley Farm Road 59

WARWICK NURSERY EXPANSION AND OPERATION TRCA/CVC Partnership 62

RENTAL OF A TEMPORARY BRIDGE Contract RSD14-52 64

SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD RETROFIT ACTION PLAN Progress Report and Program Review 67

FOREST HEALTH AND EMERALD ASH BORER Annual Update 81 BOLTON CAMP REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Terms of Reference 88

WEST NILE VIRUS UPDATE 93

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LANDS Boyd Conservation Area, Regional Municipality of York 99

2014 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL 103

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed 2058460 Ontario Inc. 104

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed Whitetail Estates Ltd. 105

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed Glen Rouge Homes (Fawnridge) Inc. 106

TOWN OF AJAX Request for a Permanent Easement for a Splash Pad Outfall Structure, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, Carruthers Creek 106

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance of Land for the Widening of Bathurst Street, between Regional Road 7 and Teston Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Don River Watershed 108

CITY OF MARKHAM Conveyance of Lands required for widening of Main Street at the Bridge across the Rouge River, City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River Watershed 109

THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LAND Steeles Avenue and West of Goreway Drive, in the Mimico Creek Watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel 110

TREES FOR LIFE: A CAMPAIGN OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ONTARIO 111

SUPPLY OF RENTAL RATES FOR AN OPERATED HYDRAULIC BACKHOE 111

NATIVE MEADOW ENHANCEMENTS Gatineau Hydro Corridor and Claireville Conservation Area 112

ACQUISITION OF VEHICLES 112 WORLD WILDLIFE FUND CANADA HUMBER FRESHWATER HEALTH ASSESSMENT 112

MAYORS' MEGAWATT CHALLENGE UPDATE 117

SOCIAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT 122

GOOD NEWS STORIES 125

IN THE NEWS 129

2013 YEAR END FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT 132

RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROGRAM 133 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #3/14 April 25, 2014

The Authority Meeting #3/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, April 25, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:37 a.m.

PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Ben Cachola Member Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Ronald Chopowick Member Vincent Crisanti Member Michael Di Biase Member Jack Heath Member Mujeeb Khan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Peter Milczyn Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member John Parker Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair David Barrow Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Chris Fonseca Member Colleen Jordan Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Jim Tovey Member

51 RES.#A32/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/14, held on March 28, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation by Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, TRCA, in regard to item BAAB7.1 - 2014 Budget, Operating and Capital..

RES.#A33/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED ______

CORRESPONDENCE

(a) A letter dated April 15, 2014 from Mayor Frank Scarpitti, City of Markham, in regard to request to name a woodlot in Milne Dam Conservation Area in honour of Lesley Price.

RES.#A34/14 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

WHEREAS the City of Markham has requested permission to name a woodlot within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) holdings at Milne Dam Conservation Area in memory of Lesley Price;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA advise the City of Markham that TRCA fully supports the naming proposal and thanks the City of Markham for this initiative. CARRIED

52 CORRESPONDENCE (A)

______

53 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A35/14 - FRENCHMAN’S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT Contracts RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 - Boardwalk Construction. Award of contracts RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for the construction of two concrete boardwalks at Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project, City of Pickering, Region of Durham.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT contracts RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 for the construction of two concrete boardwalks at the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project, City of Pickering, be awarded to Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $1,558,973.93, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $156,000.00 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2008, the City of Pickering working in partnership with TRCA, initiated the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Class Environmental Assessment (EA). The purpose of this undertaking is to create a safe harbour entrance that supports the marine function of the embayment, while preserving or enhancing the ecological conditions. Through the EA process, the preferred design was selected and consisted of two breakwater structures running perpendicular from the east and west spits of the harbour entrance that would replace the existing aging and deficient crib structures. The breakwaters are constructed of various types of aggregate material and would provide the adequate protection needed for proper marine navigation.

As part of the final phase of the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project, the EA process proposed to include two concrete boardwalks, one on the west breakwater that extends 235 metres and one on the east breakwater that extends 168 metres. Construction activities will also include the refurbishment and reinstallation of the previously existing navigation light towers and the installation of marine obstruction lighting on both breakwaters. Additionally, a steel sheet pile wall will be installed along the east breakwater at the north end of the spit that will tie into the breakwater revetment and provide added protection.

54 The proposed works is an integral part of City of Pickering’s overall commitment to make the Pickering waterfront a place that achieves a wide range of objectives including creating formal public access, meeting accessibility guidelines, enhance tourism opportunities and commercial linkages, and improving terrestrial and aquatic habitat of the landscape.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through improvements of the flow regime, this project will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Tenders RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 were publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo(http://www.biddingo.com/) on Tuesday February 25, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Wednesday, March 5, 2014. Tender packages were sent to 20 contractors as follows:

 Aecon Construction and Materials  Ground Force Foundations; Limited;  Hawkins Contracting Services Ltd.;  Alpeza General Contracting;  Hobden Construction;  Bridgecon Construction;  Iron Bridge Fabrication Inc.;  Cedar Springs Landscape Group Ltd.;  McPherson Andrews Contracting;  CRCE Construction;  Metric Contracting Services Corporation  Dagmar Construction Inc.; ;  Elirpa Construction & Materials Ltd.;  PCL;  Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd.;  Somerville Construction;  Galcon Marine Ltd;  Sunrise Contracting; and  Grascan Construction Limited;  The Ontario Construction Company Limited.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Thursday, April 27th, 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project – Boardwalk Construction

West East Total Cost Breakwater Breakwater (Plus HST) BIDDERS Total Unit Price Total Unit Price (Plus HST) (Plus HST) Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd. $744,931.52 $814,042.41 $1,558,973.93 Bridgecon Construction $790,841.77 $996,599.03 $1,787440.80 PCL Constructors Inc. $761,837.00 $1,035,114.00 $1,796,951.00 McPherson Andrews Contracting $903,894.20 $1,091,150.40 $1,995,044.60 Sunrise Contracting $1,015,422.00 $1,014,105.50 $2,029,527.50 Hawkins Contracting $1,192,962.00 $1,267,410.00 $2,460,372.00 Elirpa Construction $1,237,075.99 $1,353,203.67 $2,590,279.79

55 Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd. against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd.'s experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that confirmed their capability to perform the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Esposito Bros. Construction Ltd. be awarded contracts RSD14-42 and RSD14-48 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for construction of two concrete boardwalks at the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project for a total amount not to exceed $1,558,973.93, plus a contingency amount of $156,000.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project are 100% recoverable from the City of Pickering.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Aaron D'Souza, extension 5775 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 08, 2014

______

RES.#A36/14 - SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT ACCESS PLAN Environmental Assessment. Initiation of the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan Environmental Assessment.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

WHEREAS at Executive Committee Meeting #1/13, held on April 12, 2013, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff was directed to seek funding opportunities to develop the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan (SWAP) project and initiate an Individual Environmental Assessment;

AND WHEREAS Toronto City Council on December 16, 2013 adopted, in part, as follows:

that City Council amend the Toronto Water budget by including $1.5 million for Environmental Assessment work on the Scarborough Waterfront Erosion Control and Access Plan with funding coming from the Toronto Water Capital Reserve (Ex.36.17);

56 THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to work with the City of Toronto to initiate the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan Individual Environmental Assessment. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1996, TRCA developed the Integrated Shoreline Management Plan (ISMP) “to provide an ecosystem-based framework to ensure that shoreline management activities result in a clean, green, accessible, diverse, connected, open, affordable, attractive and useable waterfront”. The ISMP set out recommendations for shoreline regeneration, public access and safety, natural heritage targets, aquatic habitat restoration and public use for the area between Tommy Thompson Park and Frenchman’s Bay.

The shoreline treatment below Sylvan Park and Sylvan Avenue east of the Bellamy Ravine, was the first section of the Scarborough waterfront designed utilizing an ecosystem approach, combining shoreline protection works with public accessibility and habitat restoration. The ISMP sought input and direction from agencies and the public to guide waterfront planning priorities.

The key recommendations of the ISMP were to:  improve aquatic habitat along existing revetments;  develop Bellamy Ravine as a local trailway;  establish a waterfront trail loop between Bellamy and Guildwood ravines;  develop a beach walk trail between Bluffer’s Park and Bellamy Ravine;  create a beach walk to connect Sylvan Shoreline to Bellamy Ravine; and  extend the trail from Guildwood Parkway to East Point Park.

Further to the recommendations for this section of the Scarborough shoreline, the vision of the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan is a system of linked scenic landscapes both along the top of the bluffs and at the water’s edge that provide a waterfront experience with opportunities to actively enjoy the outdoors, to relax and reflect, and to learn about and appreciate the natural and cultural heritage.

Three key objectives of the environmental assessment will be:  to integrate existing shoreline infrastructure to provide safe public access to and along the waterfront while respecting the natural and scientific importance of the Scarborough Bluffs;  to provide an environmentally sustainable waterfront experience including sweeping views and vistas, terrestrial and aquatic habitat improvements, and recreational and cultural amenities; and  to assess opportunities to adjust shoreline erosion protection measures to facilitate cost and construction efficiencies.

RATIONALE TRCA has been implementing shoreline protection and public access projects, on a sector by sector basis, as funding would allow, over the last 30 years. Various projects have been proceeding through the approvals process. The Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan Environmental Assessment (EA) would result in the creation of a continuous access route along the waterfront between Bluffer’s Park and East Point Park. This work would include shoreline erosion control projects along the hazardous sectors of the Scarborough Bluffs.

57 Building on the recommendations of the ISMP, the Plan would address risks associated with ongoing erosion and coastal processes, aquatic and terrestrial habitat improvements and associated public use amenities. Implementation of the SWAP EA would reduce risks to public safety and reduce risks on hazard lands by providing long-term shoreline protection and public access to improve the functionality of the waterfront into the future. In addition to the provision of public access and safety, the SWAP EA will provide opportunities for aquatic habitat restoration and natural heritage improvements.

Large segments of the Scarborough Bluffs shoreline are in public ownership; however there are limited public access points (pedestrian or vehicular) to the water’s edge between Bluffer’s Park and East Point Park. Existing access points are: Bluffer’s Park via Brimley Road; Gates Gully/Bellamy Ravine at Ravine Drive; Guild Inn and along the shore eastward to Guildwood Parkway; and the East Point Park shoreline via Beechgrove Drive. TRCA maintains a construction access road between Bellamy Ravine and Guildwood Parkway.

The City of Toronto's Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan identifies the Scarborough waterfront as a long-term objective for trail development, recognizing the scale and scope of the planning and approvals associated with such development. City of Toronto Council adopted the Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan in June, 2012 (PW15.2). One of the recommendations relates to the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan, and reads as follows:

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and where appropriate, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to undertake and manage any Environmental Assessment Studies required for the new trail connection contained in the Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan and file the Environmental Study Report with the Ministry of the Environment;

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will proceed with an Individual Environmental Assessment, under the provincial Environmental Assessment Act. The first major step in the process is to prepare a baseline inventory of the study area, that is the shoreline from Bluffers Park to East Point Park. The next step is to produce and submit a Terms of Reference (ToR) to the Ministry of the Environment. The Terms of Reference provides the following information:  the purpose of the project;  a general project description and the environment that may be potentially affected;  alternatives that will be considered, how alternatives will be evaluated, and how the preferred alternative will be chosen;  public and agency consultation that will take place during the EA; other approvals that may be required; and  the proposed schedule.

Following a decision on the Terms of Reference by Ministry of the Environment, TRCA will prepare and submit the EA document for review and approval. This includes the preparation of an existing conditions report, including physical, biological and cultural resources; coastal, geotechnical and hydrogeological studies; assessments of trails, archaeological and built heritage; fish compensation, monitoring and mitigation plans; and extensive agency and public consultation.

58 Phase 1 of the project includes the initiation and completion of an Individual EA. Phases 2 and 3 of the project include a preliminary construction schedule to complete the project. A brief description of the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan work plan phases are described below.

Phase 1 – Initiation Planning: Environmental Assessment (Terms of Reference, existing conditions report, and public consultation), detailed design, land acquisition, approvals. Timing: 2014-2015.

Phase 2 - Construction Planning: detailed design, land acquisition, approvals. Construction: Bellamy Ravine; Bluffer’s Park sector; Sylvan/South Marine Drive and Guild Inn sectors. Timing: construction 2016-2020

Phase 3 – Construction Planning: detailed design, land acquisition, approvals. Construction: Guildwood Parkway, Grey Abbey and East Point Park sectors. Timing: construction 2020-2026

FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of the Environmental Assessment for the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan is estimated at $3 million, over two years. The City of Toronto has approved funds of $1.5 million to initiate the EA in 2014. TRCA staff will submit a 2015 capital budget submission to the City of Toronto to fund the balance of the environmental assessment work.

Report prepared by: Connie Pinto, extension 5387 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Connie Pinto, extension 5387 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 31, 2014

______

RES.#A37/14 - MULTI-USE TRAIL AND RESTORATION ALONG WEST DUFFINS CREEK (PICKERING) Valley Farm Road. Trail construction for the re-alignment of the West Duffins Creek Trail, from Valley Farm Road to Beverley Morgan Park, and restoration works on TRCA-owned lands.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) construct the West Duffins Creek trail and complete restoration works in cooperation with the City of Pickering. CARRIED

59 BACKGROUND In 2013, the City of Pickering requested that TRCA’s Restoration Services Division complete the tree clearing and grubbing works along a new trail alignment, through an environmentally sensitive area within the West Duffins Creek watershed. TRCA was asked to complete this work because it was TRCA property, and there were concerns surrounding the Migratory Bird Act, namely nesting birds in the work area. TRCA staff conducted nesting surveys along the new trail alignment and determined that the trees to be removed did not contain nesting birds. Further work involved TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services and survey and drafting services performing Stage 1 and 2 field assessments and land surveys, respectively, along the new trail footprint.

Permits and approvals obtained for the 2013 clearing/grubbing activities included: Ministry of Natural Resources Species at Risk, City of Pickering Forestry By-law and internal review through TRCA’s Planning Ecology, Planning and Development, Watershed Management, Property and Enforcement departments. Restoration Services completed the tree removal and grubbing along the new alignment on November 11, 2013.

Restoration Services prepared and submitted a package containing project cost estimates for both components of the work to the City on January 9, 2014. On February 24, 2014 the trail construction/re-alignment and restoration works report (ENG 03-14) was brought before the City of Pickering Council, seeking authorization to award these projects to TRCA as a single-source purchase (as per the City’s Purchasing Policy Item 09.09). On that date, the City of Pickering Council approved the hiring of TRCA in accordance with its purchasing policy, Resolution#183/14, as follows:

1. That Report ENG 03-14 of the Director, Engineering & Public Works regarding the construction of a section of the Multi-use trail and restoration along the West Duffins Creek be received;

2. That Council approve the hiring of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy 09.09;

3. That the quotation as submitted by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for the construction of a section of the Multi-use trail in the total amount of $188,076.64 (HST included) be accepted;

4. That the quotation as submitted by the TRCA for restoration work along the West Duffins Creek in the total amount of $95,880.47 (HST included) be accepted;

5. That the total gross project cost of $227,865.00 (HST included) including the quoted amount and other associated costs and the total net project cost of $205,200.00 (net of HST rebate) for the construction of a section of the Multi-use trail be accepted;

6. That the total gross project cost of $105,469.00 (HST included) including the quoted amount and other associated costs and the total net project cost of $94,978.00 (net of HST rebate) for restoration works along the West Duffins Creek be accepted;

60 7. That Council authorizes the Division Head, Finance & Treasurer to finance the two projects as follows:

a. The sum of $205,200.00 to be funded by a contribution from the Region of York for the construction of a section of the Multi-use trail;

b. The sum of $94,978.00 to be funded by a contribution from the Region of York for restoration works along the West Duffins Creek; and

8. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take necessary action to give effect thereto.

RATIONALE TRCA’s Restoration Services has been working on restoration projects within the City of Pickering, both on TRCA-owned lands and City-owned lands, for many years. Both of these projects were approved as part of the Southeast Collector Trunk Sewer enhancement agreement with the Region of York. The City of Pickering single-sourced the works because the majority of the trail construction, and the entire restoration works, fall within TRCA-owned lands and this reach of the West Duffins Creek is considered an environmentally sensitive area.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Restoration Services is proposing to begin restoration works in July, 2014 as the current trail and surrounding area is adjacent to a secondary school and heavily used by students. It is anticipated that once the school year is complete, the project area will have less traffic and public use. Restoration works include drainage enhancements (namely vernal pool creation), nesting box installation, snapping turtle habitat enhancement, approximately 100m of bank stabilization along a heavily eroded bank of the West Duffins Creek, former trail decommissioning and associated plantings (to be completed in fall, 2014). Trail construction will begin following restoration works in mid to late July.

Approximately 755m of trail construction will occur, between Valley Farm Road and Beverley Morgan Park, including several areas to be re-graded, a trail switch-back, post and paddle fencing and culvert installation (where required). Asphalt surfacing, as well as the balance of the trail construction from Beverley Morgan Park to Liverpool Road, will not be completed by TRCA but rather tendered out by the City of Pickering for completion at a later date.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Pickering Council has approved the works at a value of $205,200.00 for trail construction and $94,978.00 for restoration works. Both components of this project will be funded by a contribution from the Region of York as part of the Southeast Collector Trunk Sewer agreement. Additional project funding in the sum of $20,000.00 will be derived from TRCA’s 2014 Durham Terrestrial Natural Heritage account (for restoration works only).

Report prepared by: Ryan Rivet, extension 5761 Email: [email protected] For information contact: Ryan Rivet, extension 5761 Email: [email protected] Date: April 01, 2014 ______61 RES.#A38/14 - WARWICK NURSERY EXPANSION AND OPERATION TRCA/CVC Partnership. To authorize staff to enter into a partnership agreement with Credit Valley Conservation for the Phase 3 expansion of the Warwick Nursery site to facilitate production of container grown plant materials in support of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's watershed restoration programs and projects.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a partnership with Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) for the expansion of the CVC Warwick Nursery to facilitate and support the production of container grown trees and shrubs in support of TRCA watershed restoration programs and projects;

THAT TRCA's approval is subject to approval by Credit Valley Conservation Authority of the partnership proposal;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve related capital expenditures to a maximum of $200,000.00, plus HST;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized staff be directed to take the action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND For more than 50 years, TRCA has operated a nursery propagation and production program at various scales, supplying trees and shrubs to TRCA's programming needs. Within the past 15 to 20 years the focus of TRCA's production has been indigenous plants, consistent with the Terrestrial Natural Heritage program's ecological goals and objectives. The TRCA Nursery has expertise in the propagation and production of bare root stock which has served TRCA's corporate planting goals well over the decades and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

In 2008, CVC began working on the relocation of their nursery production facility from the Terra Cotta Conservation Area (Halton Region) to the Warwick Conservation Area (Town of Caledon, Peel Region), on Heart Lake Road just north of Olde Baseline Road, less than 2km from the TRCA watershed boundary. The CVC Nursery is focused on container stock production. The relocation was necessitated by the change in programming at Terra Cotta and the need to expand their nursery program to meet the future demands of CVC planting programs. At that time, TRCA staff held preliminary discussions with CVC staff and proposed a desire to cooperate with CVC in the production of container stock to serve both conservation authority's (CA) needs.

62 At the request of TRCA staff, CVC had identified a portion of the future growing area be allocated to assist TRCA in meeting a portion of its projected requirements of 20,000 to 25,000 units per year. By 2010 CVC had received approval to proceed with a phased development of the Warwick Nursery site. In 2012, CVC had completed the development of the first growing pads and initiated production at this site in spring 2013.

Over the past five years TRCA and CVC staff have held various meetings to discuss a potential partnership and process that would see TRCA provide financial investment and other expertise to assist CVC in developing the expansion of the growing pads and realize the objectives of both TRCA and CVC. In return, CVC would reciprocate with their expertise in container production and contribute the nursery operating costs (wages/benefits, pots and potting media, etc.) associated with the enhanced production.

Container stock provides the advantage of being less susceptible to changes in the weather, particularly during the critical spring and fall planting windows. Container grown plants allow those windows to be lengthened, thereby allowing the same level of staff resources to implement greater planting numbers. Containers are also well suited to volunteer plantings where training and expertise in the care and handling of plants is less controllable or event timing limits the potential use bare root stock.

The following table provides a summary of the total planting effort and container stock use by TRCA for the period since 2010:

YEAR TOTAL TRCA PLANTINGS TOTAL CONTAINERS USED 2010 254,086 22,000 2011 402,633 28,487 2012 313,289 37,179 2013 278,884 32,226 2014 (projected) 300,000 25,000 - 30,000

RATIONALE Both TRCA and CVC have expertise in the various aspects of growing native trees and shrubs using different methodology's. Both CA's will benefit from the expertise of the other without needing to duplicate infrastructure and/or services. TRCA and CVC provide a broad range of ecosystem restoration programming and planting services within the shared jurisdiction of Peel Region, and a mutually beneficial partnership demonstrates to our respective Authority's and regional partners an innovative and cost-effective means of meeting our common restoration goals.

TRCA would provide seedlings of known bioregional origin from our indigenous plant propagation program and receive back stock grown from locally collected and adapted sources. At the same time, CVC could receive the same stock from locally collected seed sources to use in their program.

Such a reciprocal agreement will also yield staff training opportunities to improve horticultural knowledge and practice related to container production.

63 FINANCIAL DETAILS The estimated budget cost of the proposed capital expansion project is as follows:

Site construction of growing pads $ 140,000 Irrigation system $ 10,000 Potting machine $ 35,000 Contingency allowance $ 15,000 Total $ 200,000

Funds to support TRCA's capital expansion of the Warwick Nursery site are available from reserves (925-50) and are budgeted within the 2014 capital budget. Eligible costs will be allocated to TRCA/CVC Warwick Nursery account 429-20.

TRCA will recover 100% of its capital investment through the production and receipt of equivalent value of container grown trees and shrubs. By agreement, both parties would monitor the invested costs and returns to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of assets. Based on a proposed cost recovery model, staff project that TRCA capital cost recovery would be realized within the initial five year term of the agreement.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE CVC staff is concurrently seeking authorization from their board to enter into this partnership agreement. Subject to that approval (CVC Board of Directors Meeting #491, scheduled to be held on May 9, 2014), staff will complete the negotiations to develop mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the final agreement for respective parties signatures.

The Town of Caledon is currently reviewing the site plan application in support of the Phase 3 expansion. On approval, TRCA would implement the construction and development work as proposed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Staff envision the construction work to be completed between June and September 2014 with a view to initiate full scale production at an expanded Warwick Nursery site in spring 2015.

Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 04, 2014

______

RES.#A39/14 - RENTAL OF A TEMPORARY BRIDGE Contract RSD14-52. Award of Contract RSD14-52 for the rental of a temporary bridge, City of Pickering.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

64 THAT Contract RSD14-52 for the supply, delivery and installation of a temporary bridge be awarded to McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $98,370.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $10,000.00 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2008, the City of Pickering working in partnership with TRCA, initiated the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Class Environmental Assessment (EA). The purpose of this undertaking is to create a safe harbour entrance that supports the marine function of the embayment, while preserving or enhancing the ecological conditions. Through the EA process, the preferred design was selected and consisted of two breakwater structures running perpendicular from the east and west spits of the harbour entrance that would replace the existing aging and deficient crib structures. The breakwaters are constructed of various types of aggregate material and will provide the adequate protection needed for proper marine navigation.

The primary construction site access approved in the EA process is via West Shore Boulevard and east along Beachpoint Promenade to the west side of the navigation channel with Liverpool Road as an alternate route to be used in a limited capacity until major phases are initiated. However, this route is restricted for deliveries due to weight restrictions on the existing bridge at the south end of Liverpool Road. In order to facilitate deliveries of equipment and materials for construction of the east breakwater using the primary access route, a barging system was effectively utilized thus allowing for the predominate use of the west spit haul route. However, construction of the proposed boardwalk feature to be installed on the east breakwater requires importing of equipment and materials including concrete trucks for the proposed deck. The barging system previously used is not feasible for transportation of concrete trucks for construction of the boardwalk feature for economic and safety reasons. As a result, TRCA has proposed to install a 25 metre temporary bridge to span the existing bridge at the south end of Liverpool Road to provide access to the east breakwater to complete the remainder of construction needed for the final phase of the project. The temporary bridge will be utilized for an estimated duration of approximately five months but will continue to maintain pedestrian access to the public during the construction period.

RATIONALE Tender RSD14-52 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo( http://www.biddingo.com/) on Wednesday, March 19, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Friday March 21, 2014. Tender packages were sent to five contractors as follows: 65  Acrow Bridges;  Bridgecon Construction;  Clearwater Structures;  Grascan Construction; and  McPherson-Andrews.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Thursday, March 27th, 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-52 – Rental of a Temporary Bridge

TOTAL TENDER BIDDERS AMOUNT (Plus HST) McPherson-Andrews Contracting $98,370.00 Clearwater Structures $118,250.00 Bridgecon Construction $142,358.06 Grascan Construction $177,000.00

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from McPherson-Andrews Contracting against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of McPherson-Andrews Contracting's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that McPherson-Andrews Contracting is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Mcpherson-Andrews Contracting be awarded Contract RSD14-52 for the supply, delivery and installation of a temporary bridge for a total amount not to exceed $98,370.00, plus a contingency amount of $10,000.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the Frenchman’s Bay Harbour Entrance Project are 100% recoverable from the City of Pickering.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Aaron D'Souza, extension 5775 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 09, 2014

______

66 RES.#A40/14 - SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD RETROFIT ACTION PLAN Progress Report and Program Review. Approval of recommendations arising from the five year sustainable neighbourhood retrofit action plan (SNAP) program review and progress toward development and implementation of five pilot SNAPs.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the recommendations arising from the Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP) Program five year review be approved;

THAT results and recommendations of the SNAP Program five year review be shared with program partners;

THAT all partners of the SNAP program be recognized and thanked for their contributions to this pilot program, including the following founding partners: Region of Peel, Region of York, City of Toronto, City of Brampton, Town of Richmond Hill, City of Mississauga, City of Markham, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Metcalf Foundation and RBC Foundation;

AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to continue to work with municipalities and other neighbourhood partners toward the successful implementation of the plans and the further development of new retrofit plans. CARRIED BACKGROUND The SNAP projects continue to represent an innovative model for sustainable urban renewal in older stable neighbourhoods. SNAPs are plans for measurable environmental improvement and community transformation. They address environmental objectives by identifying solutions that also meet the diverse objectives of municipal strategic plans and local community interests. Most importantly, they find ways to overcome implementation challenges. Each SNAP features unique initiatives to inspire residents, businesses and governments to take action. The SNAP program is led by TRCA in collaboration with many municipal, industry and community partners.

Since Authority approval of the first three pilot SNAP action plans in 2012, work has focused on the launch of initial implementation related activities in those SNAPs. They include County Court SNAP (Brampton), Lake Wilcox SNAP (Richmond Hill) and Black Creek SNAP (Toronto). Staff has also led the development of action plans in the two new SNAPs of Burnhamthorpe (Mississauga) and Bayview Glen (Markham). Recognizing that 2014 represents the fifth year of the SNAP Program, staff also undertook a review and evaluation of the program in consultation with TRCA's many partners. The following sections summarize significant achievements associated with the development and implementation of the pilot SNAPs; the SNAP program evaluation process and results; SNAP’s participation within the broader international field of sustainability retrofit; and a more detailed outline of highlights from each SNAP.

67 Significant SNAP Achievements

During the past two years, the pilot SNAPs have demonstrated new approaches to overcome challenges and advance urban sustainability.

Emerging SNAP action plans have been completed for Burnhamthorpe and Markham SNAPs, with further refinements of those plans underway. Notable themes include a re-imagination of public spaces, such as road rights of way and parks, to address diverse needs, and recognition of the opportunity that municipal capital works projects offer in leveraging other partners and potential funding for implementation.

Innovative residential retrofit programs have been tailor designed and launched in three different neighbourhoods, showing that TRCA's local market research is effective in engaging a new public and creating a product of interest. These programs were delivered with many private and public sector and community partners and have already resulted in implementation of many actions by homeowners, including:  Black Creek SNAP’s Harvest the Rain program engaged 6% of an historically disengaged community in the first six months and resulted in over 94 home consultations, 68 trees planted, 16 downspouts disconnected,166 rainbarrels installed and other actions.  Lake Wilcox SNAP’s Eco-landscaping program attracted over 250 interested homeowners since its first year, eight of whom who have completed full front yard makeovers and 19 have completed energy audits. Others have planted a total of 24 trees and installed 17 rainwater management elements such as raingardens or permeable paving.  County Court SNAP’s Green Home Program has focused on tree sale promotions and energy audit incentives, resulting in 40 trees planted, 26 fusion garden consultations, 203 low flow toilets installed and 19 energy audits completed.

The San Romanoway revitalization project was launched at the Jane and Finch towers. This project secured a Metcalf Foundation Reinventing Growth grant ($100,000) in recognition that it will demonstrate how environmental, social and economic outcomes can be achieved together through inspired initiatives. TRCA is partnering with the three tower owners/managers, residents, City of Toronto and community groups to deliver a balcony gardening pilot, expanded community gardens, a market and other landscape revitalization projects. These projects will involve residents, provide job skills training and build capacity for long term management. Over 400 residents attended an experiential “pop up park” event TRCA hosted to invite community input. The program delivered carpentry skills training to five at risk youth as part of the preparation of this event and showcased local musicians.

The City of Brampton’s first boulevard filter swale has been designed for implementation in fall 2014 along County Court Boulevard as part of a road resurfacing project. The bioswale will treat previously untreated stormwater runoff, extending the service life and maintenance requirements of the downstream stormwater management facility, and together with additional tree plantings will contribute to urban forest targets and enhance the aesthetics along this suburban arterial road. This is one example of how SNAP is bringing diverse departments and interests together.

68 SNAPs have engaged with over 100 partners representing business, government, community groups, industry associations (and many others), and secured close to $1 million in grants over the past two years. SNAPs are showing cost effective ways to work together to achieve our diverse objectives. SNAP is also helping to build capacity in several new social enterprises and nurture the formation of community social networks that serve a vital role in increasing a community’s resilience to extreme events and improve its liveability.

In 2014, SNAPs will deliver the second year of the residential retrofit programs in the first three pilot SNAPs. With the initial introduction and brand recognition now established, TRCA anticipates seeing big impact this year. TRCA will also test new approaches for boosting homeowner uptake of home retrofit actions including: negotiated bulk purchase deals for permeable paving; recognition yard signage designed by local school kids; and a program to promote lucrative energy and cost savings derived by installation of solar hot water heaters for swimming pools. As part of the San Romanoway revitalization project, TRCA will test crowdsourcing as a new tactic to solicit creative design ideas and raise funds. TRCA will finalize development of the Burnhamthorpe and Bayview Glen SNAPs with local involvement, and expect to begin a demonstration project in each neighbourhood.

SNAP Program Evaluation

Purpose and process In recognition that 2014 marks the fifth year of the SNAP program, including the completion of several action plans and a couple of years of implementation, TRCA staff initiated a program review in consultation with our partners. The program evaluation serves the following purposes: 1. Refine the planning model and increase effectiveness of SNAPs. 2. Recommend opportunities for scaling up retrofit solutions identified in pilot SNAPs. 3. Recommend ways to share knowledge about SNAP to other interested groups. 4. Recommend a future SNAP program and TRCA’s role. 5. Confirm place in the field of innovation related to sustainable urban retrofit and contribute recommendations for its advancement.

At this stage, the SNAP program review was primarily an exercise among TRCA and our SNAP partners. Input and feedback was gathered from the following sources: 1. Documentation of lessons learned that have been compiled by project management teams within individual SNAP projects throughout the planning process. 2. On line survey distributed to over 130 SNAP partners representing all sectors. 3. Interviews with approximately 10 partners representing each primary sector.

A background report is being prepared to summarize results of the evaluation. Key results, findings and recommended directions will be published in a summary report designed for a broad audience. A brief “how to” SNAP planning guide will be prepared and made available on the SNAP website for other groups beyond TRCA.

69 Results and Recommendations Partner feedback has indicated strong support for the SNAP projects. In particular, many partners have commented on how effective SNAPs have been at engaging homeowners, an issue which has been a key barrier to increasing participation in sustainable actions. Municipal and private sector partners have recognized that TRCA is uniquely positioned to play an effective role as a facilitator to bring diverse interests together and foster collaborative plans that address technical and community interests. One respondent described SNAP as “a place for forward thinking and smart conversation” and others have noted it has created a space for experimentation. SNAP has been effective at starting a collaborative discussion and creating a space for experimentation. Partners have cautioned that we need to be more patient in our expectations for the pace of implementation, and explained that the SNAP projects have been instrumental in laying the foundation for inter-departmental working relationships and new processes, which once worked out, will facilitate change in future. Partners have also offered suggestions for improved project management and delivery.

The following is a summary of key observations and recommended directions:

1. Refined Planning Model - The SNAP planning model and neighbourhood-scale approach appear to be an effective tool to guide on-the-ground implementation of higher level plans for sustainability, climate change adaptation and grey and green infrastructure renewal. Regardless of whether or not the environmental benefits are recognized, it is often the community benefits which are the most compelling and motivational for action. For example, SNAP offers unique contributions that:  brings communities and governments together to reimagine public spaces to meet diverse needs;  revitalizes older urban neighbourhoods by reintroducing nature and blending with community enterprise;  restores a healthy balance of environmental, social and economic wellbeing of urban spaces; and  nurtures stronger community social networks to increase community resilience.

Recommendation: Incorporate lessons learned from the pilot SNAPs to streamline the planning process and seek to identify more metrics to communicate and track the community socio-economic benefits that arise from these projects.

2. Scaling Up Residential Programs – SNAPs invest a lot in upfront market research to understand the interests, motivations and challenges of local homeowners, in order to design a tailored residential retrofit program with effective marketing, product, incentives and delivery. Once the program has been pilot tested and proven within the SNAP neighbourhood, there may be opportunities to achieve greater economies of scale and return on investment by expanding the program to a broader area having a similar driving issue, demographic and housing stock.

Recommendation: Explore with program partners the feasibility and potential interest in expanding the area of application of residential retrofit programs, once a level of success has been reached in the pilot.

70 3. Scaling Up Lessons from Public Infrastructure Renewal Concepts – By taking a place-based, collaborative approach, SNAPs have helped to identify design concepts for roads, parks and stormwater management facilities that can address diverse needs of many municipal departments and community interests. This can provide a basis for cost sharing and take advantage of opportunities that one capital project may offer to achieve other needs. Other specific project locations could also benefit from an integrated design at the neighbourhood scale and these locations could be identified upfront to facilitate long term collaborative capital planning. Some of these same concepts identified in the pilot SNAPs may also have application elsewhere.

Recommendation: Explore with municipal partners ways that we could work together to identify infrastructure project locations which could benefit from an integrated design (at site or neighbourhood scale) such that long term capital planning can be coordinated to take advantage of these opportunities.

4. Sharing Knowledge – TRCA staff has received enquiries from many groups beyond TRCA’s jurisdiction who are interested in learning more about our planning model or component projects. TRCA's own SNAP partners have also expressed an interest in dialogue with their counterparts in other SNAPs.

Recommendation: Share knowledge by publishing a simple SNAP planning guide, offering a SNAP advisory service on a fee for service basis, and facilitate intra-SNAP partner networking.

5. Future SNAPs – Much more experience can be learned from continued implementation of the pilot SNAPs, and as indicated, there are opportunities to scale up concepts arising from those SNAPs to broader geographic areas, thus potentially avoiding the need for a SNAP type project to be done in every neighbourhood. However, we believe there will still be neighbourhoods which would benefit from a SNAP approach. These areas would have multiple grey and green infrastructure renewal priorities and a strong requirement for participation by private landowners.

Recommendation: Continue to implement the pilot SNAPs and, as noted above, explore with municipal partners ways that we could work together to identify infrastructure project locations which could benefit from an integrated design at a neighbourhood scale.

There is a growing community of practice that recognizes the effectiveness of a neighbourhood, or “ecodistrict”, scale approach. TRCA's evaluation has generally confirmed that the SNAP program is employing many of the latest tactics in promoting urban retrofits, but the feedback also revealed some exciting new ideas and trends that TRCA may be able to incorporate into our programs. TRCA is experiencing some of the same pervasive challenges as others in the field, in the case of older stable urban settings, such as the lack of capital to undertake deep energy and rainwater retrofits and the low return on investment under current water and energy prices and absence of stormwater fee/credit systems.

71 Partner Thanks and Recognition Numerous partners have worked with TRCA on this pilot SNAP program (Attachment 1). Among this group, TRCA recognizes the following founding partners who have contributed significant financial and in-kind support, without which the SNAP program would not have been possible: Region of Peel, Region of York, City of Toronto, City of Brampton, Town of Richmond Hill, City of Mississauga, City of Markham, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Metcalf Foundation and RBC Foundation.

TRCA plans to host a celebration event on June 18, 2014 to thank and recognize our partners. This event will be planned in conjunction with the fifth anniversary of the Archetype Sustainable House and will share in a celebration and recognition of all of TRCA’s partners in sustainability.

SNAP’s Local, National and International Participation

SNAP staff actively participate in the urban sustainability retrofit community of practice locally, nationally and internationally, in order to stay abreast of trends and share our experience. TRCA does this by maintaining contact with key partners and by contributing written articles and conference presentations. The following summarizes key contributions during 2012-2014.

Conference/Roundtable presentations  Parallel 52/Dutch Consulate Sustainable Housing & Neighbourhood Transformation Video Conference Series and Report (Feb-May 2014, Toronto and Rotterdam)  Grey to Green Infrastructure Conference (Aug 2014, Toronto)  International Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference (Nov 2013, Brisbane)  CMHC Sustainable Neighbourhood Summit (Sept 2014; Feb 2013; Toronto)  Ontario Professional Planning Institute (OPPI) Conference (Nov 2014, Niagara Falls)  Federation of Canadian Municipalities Sustainable Communities Conference (Feb 2013, Windsor, ON)  Ecodistricts Summit (Nov 2013 and 2012-attendance only; 2011-presentation, Portland Oregon)  International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI - Canada) Living Cities Conference (Nov 2012, Hamilton, ON)  Canadian Institute of Professional Planners National Conference (2012, Ottawa)

Published articles  Ontario Professional Planning Institute Journal (May 2014)  International Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference Proceedings (Nov 2013)  Sustainable Building Magazine (Feb 2013)

Individual SNAP Highlights

Attachment 2 summarizes specific activities undertaken over the past two years and next steps for each of the five SNAPs. Activities are led by TRCA, unless otherwise identified. As noted earlier in this report, this work is in coordination with the many partners noted in Attachment 1. For more information about the overall SNAP action plans and activities see www.sustainableneighbourhoods.ca

72 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the SNAPs is in part from the Region of Peel, Region of York and City of Toronto capital budgets. These capital dollars have been critical in supporting the project management and planning role that TRCA performs. The capital budgets have also enabled us to leverage close to $1 Million in additional grants in the past two years, roughly doubling the regional capital budgets allocated to this program. In certain individual SNAPs, we have quadrupled the municipal capital budget. Other funding partners include private sector businesses, foundations and other levels of government. These partners continue to regard SNAP as a positive, innovative initiative that provides value.

Over the past two years, other funding partners have included: Private Foundations  RBC Foundation ($100,000);  Metcalf Foundation Reinventing Growth Grant ($100,000);  Toronto Community Foundation Vital Ideas Grant ($30,000);  Trees for Life ($200,000 fundraising goal). Private Sector Businesses  Enbridge ($60,000);  Donations and discounts of numerous products and services for:  Front Yard Makeovers and Eco-landscaping Program (including Cypress Hill Landscaping, Less Mess, Miller Waste, Unilock, Region of York’s Water for Tomorrow program);  Vegetable Garden Showcase demonstration homes and Harvest the Rain Program (e.g. Enbridge, Lowe’s, rainbarrel.ca);  Green Home Program tree sale (Sheridan Nurseries);  San Romanoway Tower Pop-up Park Community Event (ContractHer, Home Depot). Federal and provincial government and related groups  Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund ($78,000);  Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation ($7,000);  Ministry of the Environment’s Showcasing Water Innovation Grant ($175,000);  Ministry of the Environment’s Great Lakes Community Guardian Grant ($25,000). Local government  City of Mississauga ($75,000);  City of Markham ($25,000, plus $110,000 committed);  City of Toronto ($6,000);  City of Toronto’s Live Green grant ($25,000 support to a SNAP community partner) .

As a basic premise, the SNAP program seeks to establish long term financially sustainable implementation arrangements, which build upon existing delivery groups wherever possible. To this end, it is important to recognize a number of local delivery partners and emerging social enterprise arrangements who are providing in-kind services to SNAP:

73  LEAF;  Windfall Ecology Centre;  Jewish Vocation Centre (JVS) Services – youth employment training;  Food Share;  Black Creek Community Farm (Everdale, Afri-Can Food Basket);  Black Creek SNAP “Urban Orchard Group”;  Local retail businesses in each SNAP.

Report prepared by: Sonya Meek, extension 5253 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Sonya Meek, extension 5253 or Shannon Logan, 647-284-1583 Emails: [email protected] and [email protected] Date: April 11, 2014 Attachments: 2

74 Attachment 1 - SNAP Partners

Founding Partners: Community Champions Paul Gay (County Court SNAP) Region of Peel Marisa Mancuso (County Court SNAP) Region of York Pindy Sanghera (County Court SNAP) City of Toronto Les Molnar (County Court SNAP) City of Brampton Simi Kapur (Burnhamthorpe SNAP) Town of Richmond Hill Mimi Lau (Burnhamthorpe SNAP) City of Mississauga Euming Yu (Lake Wilcox SNAP) City of Markham Andy Yu (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Metcalf Foundation Joyce Ng (Lake Wilcox SNAP) RBC Foundation Tommy Chan (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Federation of Canadian Municipalities Kara Burgess (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Tammy Tam (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Local and Program Wide Partners: Robert Jackson (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Dorothy Rodrigues (Lake Wilcox SNAP) Utilities Enbridge Gas Major Landowners/Property Managers Enersource Bond Lake Public School Hydro One Brampton Brampton Golf Club Powerstream CAPREIT Toronto Hydro Duka Greenwin Community Organizations & Institutions Infrastructure Ontario Afri-Can Food Basket Jane Finch Mall Bond Lake Public School Pallisades Towers Condominium Corporation Black Creek Community Farm Peel Village Golf Course Black Creek Conservation Project Rockwood Mall Everdale Toronto Community Housing Corporation Foodshare Fresh City Farms Current Local Business Partners Future Watch Best Way Stone Limited GreenSaver Cypress Hill Landscape Design & Build Kampen’s Jane Finch Community Family Centre Landscaping Jewish Vocational Services (JVS) Less Mess Enviro Bag Lake Wilcox Public School Lowe’s LEAF Native Plant in Claremont Oak Ridges Lion’s Club Native Plant Nurseries Oak Ridges Friends of the Environment Oak Hill Garden Centre Oak Ridges Trail Association Oak Ridges Home Hardware Pallisades Media Arts Centre Oaks Concrete Products Rainbarrel.ca Ontario Flora Reaching Up Homework Club Permacon Rockwood Homeowners Association Sheridan Nurseries San Romanoway Revitalization Association Solar Ontario University Presbyterian Church Thompson Environmental Planning & Design Ltd. Windfall Ecology Centre Unilock York Region District School Board York Region Environmental Alliance

75 Professional Services Past Donors of Products & Services 1-800-Got-Junk Aquafor Beech Aluminart ARUP Aquascapes Ascentia Bernardin BRE CBRE Chalkboard Media Coloured Aggregates Dillon Consulting ContractHer DuToit Alsopp Hillier Dufferin Aggregates Keystone Interiors Filtrexx Canada LURA FVK Design Outside IN Gramma’s Oven Bakery Planning Alliance Greenpark Homes Powerline Films Gro-bark ProjectCity Hanson Hardscapes Schollen and Company Home Depot Swerhun Consulting Landsource Organix The Municipal Infrastructure Group Miller Waste Nick & Mira’s No Frills Partners in the Sustainability Field Petri & Sons Contracting BILD, Renomark Reliance Home Comfort Canada Green Building Council RenewAbility Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation RONA Canadian Water Resources Association EnerQuality Sears Canada Guelph GIG Tassone Landscape Construction Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute Landscape Threadleaf Ontario Tri-Land Environmental Ontario Water Works Association Unilock Project Neutral Upper Canada Stone Company Sustainable Buildings Canada Water Matrix The Natural Step Zander Sod Toronto Atmospheric Fund

Other Funding Partners Government of Ontario Mitacs Accelerate Ontario Toronto & Region Remedial Action Plan Toronto Community Foundation Trees for Life

76 Attachment 2 - Individual SNAP Highlights

Black Creek SNAP, Toronto

Harvest the Rain residential retrofit program

Promotes downspout disconnection and rain harvest supported vegetable gardens, while also advancing basement flood protection, tree planting, energy conservation and harvest sharing. Our strategic approach involves door opener incentives (rain barrel draw, discounted rain barrels and trees and free deluxe energy savings kit); door step home meetings to assist homeowners in identifying strategic retrofits and referrals to delivery partners.

2012-2013 Events  Two Vegetable Garden Showcase Demonstration Homes (fall 2012-spring 2013)  Rain barrel tailgate sales (May and June)  Garden Tours and Community BBQ (July)  Canning workshop (October)  Urban Orchard Group formation and Fruit Tree Care workshop (November) 2013 Program outcomes  94 home consultations (6% of homes)  166 rainbarrels distributed  16 downspouts disconnected  68 trees planted  8 energy conservation program participants undertaking actions  35 homeowners willing to donate surplus harvest

2014 Events and Program delivery plans  Workshops - energy efficiency (March), downspout disconnection (June)  Rain barrel tailgate sales (April, June)  Community BBQ (summer)  Black Creek Orchard Group monthly fruit tree talks  Program home consultations (April-June and Sept-Oct)

San Romanoway revitalization project (Described earlier in this report)

77 Lake Wilcox SNAP, Richmond Hill

Residential Eco-Landscaping Program

Promotes eco-friendly landscaping practices (native/water efficient plants, raingardens and other on site rainwater management practices, phosphorus management), as well as indoor water and energy efficiency and community stewardship. Our strategic approach involved the creation of trendy, custom garden designs for Lake Wilcox homes, easy and convenient assistance, negotiated discounts on garden supplies and community-spirited gardening events.

2012-2013 Events  Front Yard Makeover tours and community BBQ (Sept 2012 – 150 attendees)  Backyard Tree Sale pilot program (fall 2012)  Spring Garden Talk with Celebrity gardeners Mark Cullen and Lorraine Johnson (March – over 75 attendees)  Street Party Planting Event Grant including free soil, mulch, landscape design advice and volunteer assistance (May)  Energy audit/solar PV program (fall)  Renovation Trends workshop for renovators, contractors and homeowners (Nov)  Solar powered hot water heater for swimming pools pilot program (winter)

2012-2013 Program outcomes  Over 250 homeowners registered on mail list as interested in program  8 full front yard eco-landscape garden installations  24 trees planted  17 stormwater management elements installed (e.g. permeable paving, raingardens)  19 energy audits/10 solar PV assessments completed

2014 Events and Program delivery plans  Eco-landscaping workshop series (March-April)  Eight Front Yard Landscape Design Grants (March-April)  Exclusive discounts on design services and supplies (April-Oct)  Community volunteer gardening days (May-June)  Recognition yard signage designed by local school kids (May-Oct)  Garden tours and community celebration event (July)  Local invasive plant management (fall)

Bond Lake Public School Bioswale

This 2014 project involves creation of a bioswale to collect and treat stormwater runoff from the school roof and driveway. School children will participate in the plantings and educational messaging will promote eco-landscaping projects that can be done at home.

78 County Court SNAP, Brampton

Green Home Program

Promotes indoor and outdoor eco-actions for homes throughout the neighbourhood, as illustrated in the Green Home Makeover demonstration home on Turtlecreek Boulevard. Our strategic approach in 2013 focused on tree plantings and fusion gardening in response to homeowner interest in low maintenance lawns and involved easy access to discounted trees.

2013 Events  Tailgate tree sales in the park (April/May and Sept)  Monthly coffee nights with “Green Team” residents  Energy audit/Solar PV assessments (fall)

2012-2013 Program outcomes  40 trees planted  26 fusion garden consultations  203 low flow toilets installed  18 energy audits conducted

2014 Events and Program delivery plans  Five fusion garden grants (April-June)  Tree incentives linked with fusion garden consultations (April-June)  Community volunteer gardening day (May)  Recognition yard signage (April-Oct)  Community celebration event (Sept)

Public Realm Infrastructure Projects

The City of Brampton plans to install Boulevard Filter Swales and a tree planting project along County Court Boulevard in 2014, and continue to investigate other short term (1-2 years) SNAP actions including neighbourhood signage and an irrigation strategy for Peel Village Golf Course that could involve use of stormwater runoff from the adjacent subdivision.

The City has committed to seek funding and partnerships to support completion of medium (3-5 years) and long (5-10 year) term SNAP projects including: County Court Park retrofit and Upper Nine Stormwater Pond retrofit.

County Courthouse Green Parking Lot Infrastructure Ontario plans to install a green parking lot as part of their courthouse expansion project in 2014.

Bayview Glen SNAP, Markham

In 2013 the SNAP action plan’s themes were identified as follows: bundle of residential retrofits; grey to green infrastructure in road rights of way; parks revitalization; school demonstration projects; and sustainability guidelines for infill development.

79 In 2014, work will focus on further stakeholder engagement and technical analysis for the refinement of these themes and development of the full action plan. Key activities include:  Resident survey (April)  Municipal department workshops (March-April)  Stakeholder and community leader meetings (March-April)  Community event (June)  School demonstration project (ongoing)  Integrated SNAP action plan (summer)  Initial implementation of a quick start action (fall)

Burnhamthorpe SNAP, Mississauga

In 2013 consultants were hired to examine the proposed SNAP themes and community input and to develop a draft integrated SNAP action plan. TRCA facilitated additional input via a survey distributed to the Rockwood Homeowner’s Association and two community tree planting events.

In 2014, work will focus on further stakeholder engagement and input to the proposed draft SNAP Action Plan, through a series of targeted events in spring. We will also support an exciting community-led “movie nights” initiative. Planned activities include:  Balcony gardening workshop geared at tower residents  Engagement with tower property managers  Person on the street surveys at local commercial and community centres to solicit input from a cross section of residents  Local stream cleanup, invasive plant removal event  Movie nights (April-May)  Community leaders meeting and open house to seek input on the integrated SNAP action plan (summer)  Initial implementation of a quick start action (fall)

______

80 RES.#A41/14 - FOREST HEALTH AND EMERALD ASH BORER Annual Update. To provide an update on the status of significant or new forest health pests/threats for 2013 within the TRCA jurisdiction, and an update on the management to address the threat posed by the emerald ash borer to ash trees within the TRCA jurisdiction.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) owns and manages numerous forests and conservation areas and is engaged in numerous forest management initiatives on both private lands and TRCA-owned lands;

AND WHEREAS emerald ash borer (EAB) is an invasive insect species that poses a serious threat to all ash (Fraxinus spp) trees within the TRCA jurisdiction, affecting forest biodiversity, public safety and TRCA operations;

AND WHEREAS TRCA has the ability and responsibility to lessen the impact from forest pests and invasive species including EAB by developing effective management approaches;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff continue to work with all levels of government to monitor trends and conditions of current forest insect and invasive plant populations and to formulate appropriate strategies to manage or eliminate those threats;

THAT staff continue to integrate an appropriate EAB management approach into all relevant TRCA actions and initiatives;

THAT staff continue to engage with TRCA's partners in the coordinated and effective management of EAB, including providing expertise and advice to TRCA's municipal partners and neighbouring conservation authorities (CA) as they develop and implement their respective EAB management plans;

AND FURTHER THAT the forest health working group continue to report back annually to the Authority regarding issues and threats, including EAB, their implications and recommended responses. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #4/11, held on April 29, 2011, Resolution #A70/11 was approved as follows:

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff continue to work with all levels of government to monitor trends and conditions of current forest insect and invasive plant populations and to formulate appropriate strategies to manage or eliminate those threats;

AND FURTHER THAT the forest health working group continue to report back annually to the Authority regarding issues and threats, their implications and recommended responses. 81 The TRCA Forest Health Working Group was established in January 2010 to monitor forest health issues, facilitate coordination and improve efficiencies between internal departments and programs. The objectives of this report are to provide: 1) a summary of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) Silvicultural Forest Health Report, which outlines the status of significant or new forest health pests for 2013; and 2) a status report on TRCA's EAB management activities.

2013 Silvicultural Forest Health Report

The OMNR with the assistance of the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) and local agencies, monitors potentially harmful forest pest populations and forest damage caused by pest outbreaks and abiotic causes across Ontario. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) works to prevent the initial introduction and spread of non-native forest pests and diseases such as EAB and Asian long-horned beetle (ALHB). This report is intended to update the Authority on the newest and most pressing pest and disease concerns; it is not intended to provide a comprehensive summary of these concerns.

While 2013 was a relatively quiet year in relation to many of Ontario’s cyclical forest pests (e.g. forest tent caterpillar and gypsy moth), non-native invasive pest species continue to present the greatest concern related to the health of southern Ontario’s forests. As part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, TRCA’s Terrestrial Fixed Plot Monitoring is one of the tools used to monitor forest health. This program was initiated in 2008 to detect spatial and temporal trends in the vegetation, breeding bird, amphibian and Plethodontid salamander communities in select areas within the TRCA jurisdiction. The early findings from this monitoring program suggest that forest communities are relatively healthy. However, there are a few pests and diseases that are being tracked to determine their potential for long term health impacts. In addition, the number of snags (standing dead trees) is well below the threshold that has been set to determine healthy forests. This could potentially lead to additional ecological problems as snags represent a significant habitat feature for other species, including native birds, insects and fungi. Bird species such as woodpeckers feed on large amounts of insects thereby reducing forests pests, however, they require snags for their nesting habitat. Without these habitat features the biodiversity of forest systems may change.

Ice Storm 2013

The ice storm in late December 2013 also impacted forests across southwestern Ontario this past year. The immediate impacts from the ice storm were reported to the Authority on January 31, 2014 and are excerpted as follows:

82 "Although forest edges sustained significant damages due to the ice, this will not result in major long-term damages to forests as a whole. TRCA's Forest Hazard Management Program is effective and no changes are proposed to the program (or to the TRCA Hazard Tree Policy) as a result of recent weather event. Impacts to trees are much more significant on urban streets or in manicured parks and parking lots. Overall, the most damage to forested areas was seen on the edges of forest stands. These areas included the sides of lakes, ponds, marshes and meadows, where the trees generally were growing on an angle out towards the openings. The cumulative effect of trees not growing vertically and the general nature of the species of trees growing on the edges combined to create the observed damages. Early successional species, which tend to grow fastest and with the lowest structural integrity, incurred the most damage overall. Effected species were primarily Manitoba maple and willows, and to a lesser extent silver and red maple. The slower growing, stronger trees found inside of the woodlots have, for the most part, shown very little damage. Coniferous tree species showed surprisingly little damage, unless there had been defects present prior to the storm event. There has been almost no damage noted within areas of young reforestation, with overall survival and success of these not being negatively affected.

Managing of TRCA forests for biodiversity and overall forest health has kept the damage levels to a minimum. Therefore, no additional immediate costs have been incurred to remediate the impacts of the ice storm to forested areas. The damage occurring to the woodlots in the short term was very erratic. While most properties north of King Road had very little damage, some of the TRCA properties were impacted more than others. Four of the hardest hit properties were Boyd Conservation Area, Heart Lake Conservation Area, Albion Hills Conservation Area and Lake St. George Field Centre. Management plans for these areas will need to be revisited to ensure future resiliency of the lands in the face of more frequent severe weather events.

One cannot discount the potential impacts of increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events on forests. Long term impacts may include altered species compositions, greater potential for disease and pests due to tree injuries and reductions in age classes . Diminished leaf area and increases in disease and pests may cause heightened levels of tree mortality and a general decline in ecosystem services."

Asian Long-horned Beetle (ALHB)

On April 5, 2013, the ALHB infestation first detected in 2003 within the jurisdictions of the City of Toronto and the City of Vaughan was declared eradicated. Unfortunately, on August 13, 2013, a telephone call from a private landowner, and subsequent investigations by Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) revealed a second unrelated infestation in an industrial area near Pearson International Airport. Intense ground and aerial surveys were conducted within 800m of the initial find. Ground surveys were conducted in the immediate 800m to 2,400m radius, along with an area grid survey extending to a 10 km radius from the known point of infestation.

CFIA officially launched a new eradication program to address this infestation of ALHB in the municipalities of Mississauga and Toronto, and the community of Malton. Genetic testing has determined that this infestation is not linked to the original insect population found in 2003.

83 Host tree removal, started on February 19, 2014, is focused on removal of the top four genera of known host species within the 800m radius of the source of the current infestation. Timing of the removals was planned to coincide with winter conditions in an effort to mitigate ground disturbance and to avoid the spring freshet and breeding bird season. CFIA is leading the eradication effort in partnership with the City of Mississauga, the City of Toronto, Canadian Forest Service, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resource and TRCA. For more information regarding this infestation and the ministerial ordered ALHB regulated area, visit www.inspection.gc.ca.

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (HWA)

HWA is a non-native insect that has been present in North America for quite some time. First detected in British Columbia in the 1920's, where it has a minor impact on Western Hemlock ( Tsuga heterophylla), the recent infestations in Ontario are an extension of an infestation first reported in Virginia in 1951. Unfortunately Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), indigenous to Eastern Canada and TRCA's watersheds, is not nearly as resistant to this pest as its western counterpart, and consequently very few trees survive an infestation.

In the summer of 2012 HWA was detected for the first time in Ontario and within TRCA’s jurisdiction. Four young eastern hemlock trees on a residential property in Etobicoke were found to be infested with HWA. These trees were removed and surveys by the CFIA in the surrounding area did not find any additional infestations. The CFIA tracked these four infested trees to the Ontario nursery from which they were purchased and their suspect origin to a nursery in Pennsylvania.

On May 30, 2013 one eastern hemlock tree at Niagara Glen Park (on the Niagara River), Ontario was confirmed infested with HWA by the CFIA. The delimitation surveys conducted covered a 500m radius around the infestation and no additional infested trees were found. The infested tree was removed and incinerated on June 26, 2013. The CFIA collaborated with local and provincial partners in the removal and disposal of the infested tree on the property.

Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Management Update

EAB, which was first detected in the Windsor\Detroit area in 2002, is now present in Ontario, Quebec and 18 U.S. states. Some reports now place the number of ash trees killed by EAB at over 100 million, with up to 10 billion trees at risk. Several insecticides are registered in Canada for individual tree injections. The long term prospect of controlling this insect in North America is dependent on finding an effective biological control agent or on the emergence of a natural ecosystem response.

EAB was first detected in TRCA’s jurisdiction in the City of Toronto in 2007. EAB has now been detected in most TRCA municipalities; however, its presence is still sporadic in many areas, especially rural regions of TRCA's jurisdiction. Areas in Toronto and Vaughan are experiencing significant ash mortality; this trend will likely be observed throughout the TRCA jurisdiction over the next 6 to 10 years. Staff has conducted inspections utilizing the EAB branch sampling protocol to confirm infestations throughout most of TRCA's properties located south of Stouffville Road in the east and King Road in the west. It is anticipated that the impacts will be visible throughout TRCA watersheds by 2016.

84 Of special note in 2014 was the discovery that the infestation is much more wide spread and advanced than at first forecast. Properties that had not been identified as infested in 2012 were possibly in the third or fourth year of infestation when confirmed in 2013. These findings are consistent with those of other local and regional municipalities.

TRCA initiated targeted stem injection treatments in June 2012, focusing on high value trees and the protection of selected seed source trees of all indigenous ash species. TreeAzin® treatments will continue in 2014; there are no signs of EAB present in trees previously protected. Unfortunately the ice storm of December 2013 damaged several of the selected trees previously treated. Trees that were damaged too extensively to be saved will be removed in accordance with the TRCA Hazard Tree Policy, and will result in overall treatment numbers being lower than the original 474 stems. The exact number of trees lost will not be known until clean up operations from the storm are complete. Based on inspections at Heart Lake Conservation Area, Indian Line Campground and Black Creek Pioneer Village, losses of previously treated ash trees is expected to be approximately 15%.

Urban Forest Health Update

TRCA's continued participation in Trees for Life (TFL), a campaign of the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition (GIO), was reported to the Executive Committee on April 11th, 2014. This multi-organization partnership is working toward a long-term goal of 40% tree canopy cover in the urban areas of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). In June of 2013, TRCA was awarded a three year Ontario Trillium Foundation grant on behalf of GIO and TFL. This funding will continue to support the capacity building efforts of both GIO and TFL, as well as the salary for a full-time project manager.

TRCA is leading a number of applied urban forest research efforts that can help to meet the increasing demand for the services provided by the urban forest in TRCA’s jurisdiction. These include the following:  TRCA is working together with its partner municipalities and neighbouring conservation authorities to conduct urban forest studies that quantify the structure and function of the urban canopy and establish baselines for future monitoring. In 2013, the data collection and analysis components of the Town of Aurora urban forest study were completed. The results of these studies can inform comprehensive evaluations of damage caused by pests and extreme weather events, future vulnerability assessments, as well as strategic urban forest planning and management.  As a member of the Peel Region Urban Forest Working Group, TRCA is co-developing decision support tools that can guide strategic tree planting and establishment efforts in Peel and across the GTA.  Together with the Region of Peel, the cities of Brampton and Mississauga, and the Town of Caledon, TRCA is undertaking a climate change risk and vulnerability assessment that will evaluate the potential impacts of future extreme weather events on the natural heritage system and the urban forest.

85 WORK COMPLETED TO DATE Staff has completed an ash tree inventory for trees on TRCA-owned and managed properties with the potential to become hazards. The hazard potential is related to the position and size (DBH >20cm) of trees in respect of property boundaries, adjacent infrastructure/buildings and formalized public trails. Total TRCA ash resources inventoried includes 29,049 trees that meet the hazard potential criteria. These stems are distributed as follows:

Region No. of Ash Trees Peel 10,922 York 6,080 Durham 6,931 (1) Toronto 264 Rouge Park (York) 1,653 Rouge Park (Durham) 668 Rouge Park (Toronto) 2,531 TOTAL 29,049 (1) - Includes trees at Head Office and Black Creek Pioneer Village only. All other TRCA lands in the City of Toronto are under management agreement with the City.

Other notable 2013 achievements include:  EAB monitoring completed for 2013 across jurisdiction to determine spread and extent of infestation in TRCA watersheds;  TreeAzin® treatments completed on 474 ash trees during 2012 and 2013. Treatments to continue biennially;  removal of 264 EAB infested trees at Head Office, Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Black Creek Urban Farm;  preliminary discussions held with Parks Canada in regard to determining EAB management activities for Rouge Park lands and TRCA's role;  discussions with other CA's (Central Lake Ontario, Kawartha Region, Ganaraska Region, Lake Simcoe Region) servicing Durham Region regarding EAB issues and sharing of TRCA's management approach;  ongoing participation on the York Region EAB Technical Working Group (regional, municipal, provincial, federal and CA representation);  providing technical and logistical support to CFIA as part of the recent ALHB eradication efforts.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA has taken significant steps toward developing and implementing an effective plan for the management of EAB. In order to ensure effective implementation, management plans have been finalized that help to relate and incorporate the approved EAB management approach into existing forest health initiatives undertaken by TRCA. The regional municipalities of Peel and York have supported TRCA's requests for additional budget allocations to address EAB management on TRCA-owned and managed lands within their respective regions for 2014. A limited amount of funding is available from Durham Region for targeted EAB action.

Through ongoing Managed Forest Program activities and the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, staff will be monitoring forest insects and pests and implementing projects aimed to limit the impact of these agents on forest health and habitat. 86 Staff will be monitoring for the ice storm effects on forested tracts across the TRCA jurisdiction and will report back in early 2015 with regard to findings as part of the next Forest Health Update report.

FINANCIAL DETAILS It is estimated that TRCA's 2014 EAB management implementation activities will cost in the order of $552,000 as follows:

FUNDING PARTNER 2014 EAB Budget Estimate Approved Funding (includes (Region/Agency) 2013 Carry Forward) Peel $237,000 $237,000 York $151,000 $151,000 Durham $161,000 $13,200 (1) Toronto $13,000 $13,000 (2) Rouge Park/Parks Canada $75,750 pending (1) This figure represents a carry-forward from TRCA budgets allocated to other forestry initiatives in the City of Toronto. Additional funds for EAB management were not requested from the City of Toronto. (2) Rouge Park figures cover ash trees in York and Durham regions and exclude costs within the City of Toronto. It is anticipated that those costs would be carried by the City of Toronto under the current land management agreement with TRCA/Parks Canada.

The above costs reflect the relative distribution of ash tree assets on TRCA-owned and managed properties and are predicated on assumptions of ash tree mortality rates and associated abatements.

Funding is allocated within the 2014 capital budget from the regions of Peel and York to address TRCA's approved EAB management approach. A limited amount of capital funding is available from the Region of Durham to support EAB implementation. These funds will assist TRCA in addressing priority EAB abatement issues in concert with Durham Hazard Tree Abatement work.

TRCA's regular Managed Forest Program and hazard tree abatement programming are continuing and are budgeted within the 2014 operating and capital budgets respectively and delivered across the watersheds on a priority basis in accordance with forest management plans and Hazard Tree policy.

Report prepared by: Tom Hildebrand, extension 5379; Meaghan Eastwood, extension 5734; Sue Hayes, extension 5356 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] For Information contact: Tom Hildebrand, extension 5379 Emails: [email protected] Date: March 06, 2013

______

87 RES.#A42/14 - BOLTON CAMP REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Terms of Reference. Approval of terms of reference for the Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) establish a Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee to support the development of Bolton Camp as a community asset and resource;

THAT the Terms of Reference contained in Attachment 1 be approved;

THAT staff be directed to establish the membership of the committee, as prescribed in the Terms of Reference;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the outcomes of the design charrettes in the fall of 2014. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #5/10, held on June 25, 2010, Resolution #A102/10 was approved, in part, as follows:

THAT a partial taking containing 105.6 hectares (260.91 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land improved with in excess of 30 buildings and a private water system and sewage system including two sewage lagoons, said lands being Part of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Concession 8, Albion, Town of Caledon, in the Regional Municipality of Peel, municipally known as 13540-13650 Caledon-King Townline South, be purchased from the Hi-Lands of Bolton Corp.;

Since purchase of the property, TRCA staff has been consulting with municipal partners and community groups on redevelopment of the property and what it should ultimately be used for. Through this process, staff has developed a concept plan for repurposing Bolton Camp from its previous use as an overnight summer camp for youth and families of Toronto to an outdoor centre for participants of all ages. Proposed programming at the new Bolton Camp may include adventure, sports and fitness activities, community art and culture programs, outdoor education and training, leadership development and social entrepreneurship opportunities.

Staff envisions that this new facility will be a place where people come together to learn, live, play and share in experiences. The New Bolton Camp may have sports fields, a gymnasium, pool, green fitness equipment, yoga classes, running clinics, an outdoor community kitchen, smoothie or coffee bar, tree-top tours/canopy tours, ropes courses, theatre and art spaces, retail or market space and outdoor classrooms/collaboration spaces.

Gow Hastings Architects was contracted to prepare presentation drawings to assist TRCA with partnership development, community consultation and marketing to prospective tenants for the Bolton Camp redevelopment project. Focus of the renderings was on capturing the historic essence and usage of the site, while incorporating modern activities and features.

88 The following agencies have been actively consulted in the initial phases of the development of the new Bolton Camp vision and/or have expressed an interest in participating in the project:  Region of Peel;  Town of Caledon;  Family Services Toronto;  Caledon Community Services;  YMCA GTA;  Peel Children and Youth Initiative;  United Way;  Social Enterprise Toronto;  Learning Enrichment Foundation;  Peel District School Board and Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board;  Artscape;  City of Brampton;  Bolton Rotary Club; and  Humber College.

RATIONALE Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee Staff's view is that for the new Bolton Camp to be successful, programming should be community driven. As a result, a redevelopment committee will help shape the future of Bolton Camp and the programs that may be provided. During consultations with potential partners, many are in agreement with the need for a redevelopment committee and have committed to participating, including the Region of Peel and Town of Caledon. Staff recommends the Terms of Reference for the committee outlined in Attachment 1 be approved.

TRCA is exploring a different operating approach for the facility, rather than that traditionally used at TRCA parks and field centres where programming is primarily provided by TRCA staff. TRCA intends to open Bolton Camp up to a range of potential partners and contributors, including social enterprises, youth entrepreneurs and others, to take a shared stake in the success of this community venture and asset, both in programming and capital investment. The committee can provide valuable assistance in developing this operating model.

The purpose of the Committee is to:  Identify and cultivate new programming or enterprise opportunities that align with the Bolton Camp vision.  Assist TRCA in developing new partnerships in support of the redevelopment of Bolton Camp.  Support ongoing implementation of the Bolton Camp vision.  Encourage public awareness of Bolton Camp, its history and future plans for redevelopment of this community asset.  Assist in a capital campaign for site redevelopment.

Membership of the Committee will consist of:  Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (2)  Regional Chair (ex-officio) (1)  Regional or area municipal Councillors (2)  Peel District School Board (1)

89  Dufferin-Peel District School Board (1)  Caledon Community Services (1)  Town of Caledon Recreation Services (1)  Family Services Toronto (1)  YMCA GTA (1)  Two citizens-at-large (2)  Youth organization (2)  Others as identified by the Redevelopment Committee (Maximum 3)

Design Charrette To inform the work of the advisory committee, TRCA, in partnership with George Brown College's Institute without Boundaries is conducting two, 2-day design charrettes in May which will engage 160 high school students, as well as community members, and civic and business leaders from Caledon and Peel Region. The charrettes are intended to provide TRCA with 10-20 innovative and implementable pilot projects that focus on key themes and take advantage of the existing Bolton Camp site assets. A select number of the pilot projects will be chosen to be executed over the course of the summer, 2014. The pilot projects will be managed by TRCA in collaboration with charrette participants (students) and supported by other community and business project partners.

FINANCIAL DETAILS To move the redevelopment project forward with partners and to seek outside funding opportunities, TRCA is hiring a program manager. In addition, to operate the onsite program in the summer of 2014, in conjunction with the program manager, TRCA has assigned a project manager from TRCA's Project Management Office to be dedicated to the summer program.

Students participating in a charrette will be given an educational and creative experience that provides a chance to collaborate with and meet like-minded individuals and professionals. It is also a chance to enhance their hard and soft skills, working in a studio-like environment. An outcome of the charrettes is a unique summer employment opportunity for approximately 60 students that is not currently available in Caledon. The students will be provided with education opportunities with professionals in the areas of construction, landscaping, small business operations during their summer employment.

The employment costs over the next year are estimated at $330,000. In addition there will capital investment costs onsite of a scale to be determined after the design charrettes. The funding is available in the Region of Peel capital budget in the Bolton Camp Site Improvement Plan account. TRCA is seeking additional in-kind and financial funding partners.

90 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The outcomes anticipated for 2014 are: 1. establishment of the redevelopment committee; 2. development of 10-20 pilot projects ideas from the design charrettes; 3. begin implementation of the pilot projects using the skills of 60 students who participated in the charrettes.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327, Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Date: March 13, 2014 Attachments: 1

91 Attachment 1 Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee Terms of Reference

February 17, 2014

The Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee has been created to support the development of Bolton Camp as a community asset and resource. The purpose of the Committee is to:  Identify and cultivate new programming or enterprise opportunities that align with the Bolton Camp vision.  Assist TRCA in developing new partnerships in support of the redevelopment of Bolton Camp.  Support ongoing implementation of the Bolton Camp vision.  Encourage public awareness of Bolton Camp, its history and future plans for redevelopment of this community asset.  Assist in a capital campaign for site redevelopment.

The Committee is to be comprised of members with a range of skills, expertise and abilities, including:  strategic planning;  business development;  community facilities, including open space and sport and recreational planning;  arts and culture planning and programming;  social planning;  heritage; and  design and built form.

The Committee consists of 15 to 18 members, including two regional or area municipal councillors. Elected officials who are members are appointed for a term of four years, or until their successors are appointed by Regional Council. Non-elected members may be appointed for a term of up to two years, or until their successors are appointed.

Members are appointed as follows:  Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (2)  Regional Chair (ex-officio) (1)  Regional or area municipal Councillors (2)  Peel District School Board (1)  Dufferin-Peel District School Board (1)  Caledon Community Services (1)  Town of Caledon Recreation Services (1)  Family Services Toronto (1)  YMCA GTA (1)  Two citizens-at-large (2)  Youth organization (2)  Others as identified by the Redevelopment Committee (Maximum 3)

Operating guidelines for the Committee will be established and approved by the Committee.

______92 RES.#A43/14 - WEST NILE VIRUS UPDATE Summary of the 2013 West Nile Virus Monitoring and Surveillance program and receipt of the annual report - West Nile Virus Vector Larval Mosquito Monitoring Report - 2013.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the annual report "West Nile Virus Vector Larval Mosquito Monitoring Report - 2013" be received;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to circulate the annual report to the public health units of the regional municipalities of Peel, Durham, York and the City of Toronto;

THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue to participate in the Regional West Nile Virus Advisory Committees for Peel, Durham, York and the City of Toronto;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue West Nile virus larval mosquito monitoring in wetlands and stormwater management ponds on TRCA-owned land during the 2014 summer season. CARRIED BACKGROUND West Nile virus (WNV) is a seasonal disease known in Canada since 2001. Two key mosquito species, Culex pipiens and Culex restuans, are the primary species responsible for spreading the disease to humans in Ontario. The level of WNV activity and risk of exposure depends on the number of infected bird hosts and the number of adult mosquitos carrying the virus in a given year. WNV outbreaks are difficult to predict, therefore WNV management is focused on prevention and control, which is collectively undertaken by the provincial, regional and municipal health agencies in Ontario.

As a major owner of natural lands, including substantial wetland areas, TRCA has had an interest in the WNV issue. As a measure of due diligence and at the request of regional health units, TRCA has been routinely monitoring larval mosquito populations in TRCA's natural wetlands and selected stormwater management ponds (SWMPs) since 2003. The objective of the monitoring has been to identify preferred breeding sites of mosquitoes, assess the level of WNV risk, and reduce human exposure to the virus by taking appropriate measures like housekeeping activities (grading small depressions, garbage removal) and larvicide treatments, if necessary. TRCA's program activities include public education activities, collaborating with the regional health units and conducting mosquito larval monitoring on TRCA-owned lands. The data collected over the years have been beneficial in guiding management decisions related to wetland protection and creation, land management planning and has assisted the public health agencies with their public education and outreach campaigns.

At Authority Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013, Resolution #A32/13 was approved, in part, as follows:

93 ...AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue West Nile virus larval mosquito monitoring in wetlands and stormwater management ponds on TRCA-owned land during the 2013 summer season.

As per the Authority Resolution, the WNV surveillance and monitoring activities were again implemented in 2013. The following summarizes these activities and results:

Summary of WNV Program Activities in 2013 TRCA's program continued to implement its three-pronged approach including public education, collaboration with regional public health units, and larval mosquito monitoring and surveillance on TRCA properties. Public education activities in 2013 focused on updating and distribution of WNV related information and addressing public and staff inquires on WNV and standing water complaints.

Mosquito larvae monitoring was undertaken in 39 wetlands and six SWMPs across the TRCA jurisdiction from June 3 to August 22, 2013 to identify larval mosquito species distribution, abundance and community composition. Water quality data collection was terminated at the end of the 2012 field season due to the fact that no conclusive correlations could be made. An additional (fifth) sampling event, was collected in 2013 compared to only four in previous years. The data collected were used to determine potential WNV risk at each site throughout the summer.

Collaborations with regional health units required TRCA staff to attend regional public health WNV committee meetings, share collected data and notify the regions of any sites with high potential risk of WNV. TRCA received an Order on April 7, 2013 from the Medical Officer of Peel Regional Health under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.7 to assist with the implementation of control measures to reduce the number of mosquito larvae in the Heart Lake Wetland Complex in Brampton. The Wetland Complex continued to be an area of concern for WNV. It is anticipated that TRCA will receive another Order from the Peel Regional Medical Officer in 2014.

Summary of Results Obtained in 2013 The 2013 sampling season yielded a total of 6,650 mosquito larvae from wetlands and 496 mosquito larvae from SWMPs. As in previous years, the wetland habitats sampled supported a greater diversity of mosquitos with 11 different species being found while only seven species were found in SWMPs. Although mosquito larvae were more abundant overall in wetlands, higher concentrations of vector mosquito larvae (i.e. species most commonly found to spread WNV) were collected in SWMPs (Attachment 1).

Similar to the monitoring results from previous years, the data showed that most wetlands posed very low potential WNV risk. The results from 2013 mosquito larvae monitoring have indicated that although rare, localized WNV hot spots continue to occur on TRCA properties.

Through WNV risk assessment, five sites were identified as having high potential WNV risk in 2013: Grenadier Pond in High Park, L’Amoreaux Park North Pond, Topham Pond, Goldfish Pond in Tommy Thompson Park, and an unnamed wetland in Vaughan. Each of these sites received larvicide treatments by the regional health units as proactive measures to address WNV concerns. 94 It should be noted that the WNV itself was not found in the wetlands or SWMPs identified, and that the designation of a "hot spot" only implies that the larval mosquitos found are of the variety that have been known to transmit the virus to humans once they have emerged as adults and have first bitten an infected bird. The proactive nature of this monitoring program and the subsequent action is designed to control and reduce the number of the adult mosquitos available to transmit the virus, thus reducing the potential exposure to humans.

In southern Ontario, the species Culex pipiens is primarily responsible for spreading WNV to humans. A WNV positive mosquito "pool" is a collection of 50 adult mosquitoes that has been tested positive for the WNV in the lab. In 2012 and 2013 it was found that there was a three-week time lapse between the high numbers of Culex pipiens larvae found by TRCA and the increase of WNV positive mosquito pools identified by the regional health departments (Attachment 2). The graph also shows the relative differences between 2012 and 2013 in terms of the overall number of larvae, positive pools and human cases, which illustrates the higher severity of the WNV issue in 2012 compared to last year.

These findings indicate that larval mosquito surveillance programs are not only critical in detecting the location and abundance of vector mosquito larvae to enable timely management, but can also be used to help predict adult mosquito emergence and the potential of humans contracting the virus in a given year.

A copy of the Annual Report: "West Nile Virus Vector Larval Mosquito Monitoring Report - 2013" will be available on the corporate website (www.trca.on.ca; keyword: West Nile Virus) for reference. Copies will be provided to members upon request.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will continue surveillance activities at approximately 45 sites on TRCA-owned lands and will continue to liaise with regional health units and participate in WNV advisory committees throughout the 2014 field season. Staff will continue to respond to public inquiries on WNV and reports of standing water on TRCA property, in addition to providing general information for both the public and staff on WNV. Standing water complaints will be reviewed and addressed following the established Standing Water Complaint Procedure. Staff will continue to identify sites of concern on TRCA property through larval monitoring and advise other TRCA departments on maintenance or management duties required to reduce the number of potential breeding sites for mosquitoes.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the 2014 WNV surveillance and monitoring activities is available under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program with capital funding support from the regions of York, Peel and Durham and the City of Toronto. A small amount of revenue is generated (approximately $1,000) by the program on an annual basis through the provision of mosquito larvae identification training for regional health staff.

95 Overall this funding will be sufficient to support the 2014 surveillance field work and staff support to liaise with the regional health units and to respond to complaints. The funding is not however expected to cover any costs associated with control measures if deemed necessary. If larviciding or site remediation is required as a control measure, the associated costs will be covered through TRCA Land Management funding. However, there have been opportunities identified in the past two years to partner with the various regional health departments in order to have sites treated with larvicide in a timely manner and at no cost to TRCA.

Report prepared by: Scott Jarvie, 289-268-3941 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Jessica Fang, 289-268-3947 Email: [email protected] Date: March 26, 2014 Attachments: 2

96 Attachment 1

Number of Mosquito Larvae Collected in 2013

97 Attachment 2

Numbers of vector mosquito larvae, positive pools, and human cases, 2012-2013

(Larval data representing the results of TRCA mosquito larval monitoring; positive pools and human cases data representing the province-wide data published by Public Health Ontario

______98 RES.#A44/14 - ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LANDS Boyd Conservation Area, Regional Municipality of York, CFN 48334. Proposal to lease Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned land located within Boyd Conservation Area, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, to construct and operate a telecommunications tower and associated equipment.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been requested by Rogers Communications Inc. to enter into a lease arrangement for construction and operation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment on lands located within Boyd Conservation Area, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with Rogers Communications Inc. in this instance;

AND WHEREAS Vaughan City Council has approved a site development application to permit the installation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment by Rogers Communications Inc. conditional on the existing Telus tower being decommissioned no later than 90 days following the expiry of the existing five year lease, ensuring that Telus/Bell's current coverage and capacity is maintained;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease with Rogers Communications Inc. of approximately 0.007 hectares, more or less, (0.017 acres) together with use of an additional 0.067 hectares (0.167 acres) parcel of land for access and utilities for the construction and operation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment, said land being Part of Lot 12, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

THAT the lease with Rogers Communications Inc. be premised on the following:

(i) the initial term of the lease will be for five years, with three renewal options for successive five year periods, subject to the concurrence of TRCA;

(ii) the lease rate is to be $16,456.68 per annum to be increased by 2% per year;

(iii) Rogers Communications Inc. is to be responsible for all approvals required for construction of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment;

(iv) Rogers Communications Inc. shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the telecommunications tower and associated equipment;

(v) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the TRCA's solicitor;

THAT staff enter into discussions with Telus, Bell and Rogers to ensure all three carriers requirements are accommodated on the subject tower; 99 THAT the current Telus/Bell lease be terminated upon completion of the current five year term;

THAT an archaeological review to be completed at the expense of Rogers Communications Inc. with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of the TRCA;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA has been approached by Rogers Communications Inc. to locate a telecommunications tower and associated equipment on TRCA-owned land within Boyd Conservation Area. Rogers Communications Inc. equipment requirement for this proposal includes a tower not to exceed 50 metres in height along with a cabinet, housed in a 6.4 metre x 11 metre compound. The access right-of-way will be approximately 6 - 11 metres in width which will include a connection to existing electrical utilities. Rogers Communications Inc. has indicated that they will work with TRCA to develop a mutually agreed upon design for required shrouding.

On July 4th, 2002 TRCA entered into a five year lease with Telus Mobility and subsequently agreed to two extension periods of five years each. In 2008, Telus Mobility was approached by Bell to co-locate and re-build the existing telecommunications tower to suit their requirements, which was reflected in the Lease Amending Agreement and Site Lease Agreement, dated June 27th, 2008.

On September 19th, 2013, Rogers Communications Inc. completed their required public consultation, and has confirmed that no comments or objections to this tower location were submitted.

On December 10th, 2013 Vaughan City Council passed the following resolution;

That Site Development File DA.13.056 (Toronto and Region Conservation Authority) BE APPROVED, to permit the installation of a no higher than 50 metre high shrouded tripole telecommunication tower and associated radio equipment cabinets (Attachments #3 to # 5 inclusive) on the subject lands shown on Attachments #1 and #2, conditional upon the TRCA approving a lease agreement that would result in the existing Boyd tower being decommissioned and dismantled as soon as possible, but no later than 90 days after the expiry of the existing 5 year lease, ensuring that Telus/Bell’s current coverage and capacity requirements are maintained.

That the Al Palladini Telecommunication Tower be decommissioned and dismantled by July 2014.

Lease Agreement The area subject to this lease consists of approximately 0.007 hectares of land (0.017 acres), all of which is tableland. A sketch showing the lands subject to this lease is attached.

100 The following are the key terms of the proposed lease arrangement:

1. Lease Payment: $16,456.68 (present rate for the Boyd Conservation Area and Lake St. George Field Centre Telus towers excluding any sub-let revenue) plus HST per annum to be increased by 2% per year; 2. Initial Term: five years; 3. Renewals: three successive five year terms subject to TRCA concurrence; 4. Access: Rogers Communications Inc. will be provided with access to the antenna and shelter at all times; 5. Insurance: Rogers Communications Inc. will provide $5,000,000 in commercial general liability; 6. Realty Taxes: Rogers Communications Inc. will pay all taxes levied against the property; 7. Hydro: Rogers Communications Inc. will be responsible for electrical connections and charges relating to this use; 8. Approvals: Rogers Communications Inc. will comply will all required laws, directions, rules and regulations; 9. Equipment Removal: Rogers Communications Inc. will remove all equipment and restore the site to the satisfaction of TRCA within 120 days of termination of the lease.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Upon TRCA approval, the necessary discussions will commence with Telus, Bell and Rogers to ensure their requirements are accommodated on the new tower. Rogers has agreed to allow other carriers on this tower. Any other approvals required to bring the lease into effect will be pursued.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The $16,456.68 per year in revenues, as well as potential sublease revenues generated from this lease will be used for TRCA purposes.

Report prepared by: Jae R. Truesdell, extension 5247 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Jae R. Truesdell, extension 5247, Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] Date: April 17, 2014 Attachments: 1

101 Attachment 1

______

102 RES.#A45/14 - 2014 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL Recommends approval of the 2014 operating and capital budget. (Budget/Audit Res.#C3/14)

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Jack Heath

WHEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that a conservation authority, in establishing its annual levy, shall have the power to determine the proportion of the total benefit afforded to all the participating municipalities that is afforded to each of them;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, subject to such regulations under the Conservation Authorities Act as may be approved by the lieutenant-Governor-in-Council:

(i) all participating municipalities be designated as benefitting for programs included in the 2014 Operating Budget;

(ii) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) share of the cost of the programs included in the 2014 Operating Budget shall be raised from all participating municipalities as part of the General Levy;

(iii) the 2014 General Levy be apportioned to the participating municipalities in the proportion that the modified current value assessment of the whole is under the jurisdiction of TRCA, unless otherwise provided in the levy or a project;

(iv) the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to advise the participating municipalities, pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act and the regulations made thereunder, and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the general levy set forth in the 2014 Operating Budget, including property tax adjustments and non-Current Value Assessment (CVA) levy, and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the capital levy set forth in the 2014 Capital Budget and in the approved projects of TRCA;

THAT the 2014 Operating and Capital Budget, and all projects therein, be adopted;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to amend the 2014 Operating and Capital Budget to reflect actual 2014 provincial grant allocations in order to determine the amount of matching levy governed by regulation;

THAT the cost of property taxes imposed by municipalities on conservation lands owned by TRCA be charged as additional levy to the respective participating municipalities, excluding the cost of property taxes which are passed on to a third party under a lease or similar agreement;

THAT, except where statutory or regulatory requirements provide otherwise, staff be authorized to enter into agreements with private sector organizations, non-governmental organizations or government agencies for the undertaking of projects which are of benefit to TRCA and funded by the sponsoring organization or agency;

103 THAT, as required by Ontario Regulations 139/96 and 231/97, this recommendation and the accompanying budget documents, including the schedule of matching and non-matching levies, be approved by recorded vote;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as may be necessary to implement the foregoing, including obtaining approvals and the signing and execution of documents.

RECORDED VOTE Paul Ainslie Yea Ben Cachola Yea Bob Callahan Yea Raymond Cho Yea Ronald Chopowick Yea Vincent Crisanti Yea Michael Di Biase Yea Jack Heath Yea Mujeeb Khan Yea Gloria Lindsay Luby Yea Glenn Mason Yea Mike Mattos Yea Peter Milczyn Yea Gerri Lynn O'Connor Yea Linda Pabst Yea John Parker Yea Dave Ryan Yea Deb Schulte Yea John Sprovieri Yea Richard Whitehead Yea

THE MOTION WAS CARRIED

______

RES.#A46/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed 2058460 Ontario Inc., CFN 50634. Acquisition of property located to the rear of 1383, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B14/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

104 THAT 0.85 hectares (2.10 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 8, Concession 1 and designated as Parts 3, 11, 14 and 15 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Omari Mwinyi Surveying Ltd., under their Project No. 06-045-RS, dated May 21, 2013, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, located to the rear of 1383, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail, be purchased from 2058460 Ontario Inc.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A47/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed Whitetail Estates Ltd., CFN 50699. Acquisition of property located to the rear of 1385 Military Trail, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B15/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

THAT 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 8, Concession 1 and designated as Part 4 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Omari Mwinyi Surveying Ltd., under their Project No. 06-045-RS, dated May 21, 2013, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, located at the rear of 1385 Military Trail, be purchased from Whitetail Estates Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

105 AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A48/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed Glen Rouge Homes (Fawnridge) Inc., CFN 50633. Acquisition of property located to the rear of 1407 Military Trail, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B16/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

THAT 0.15 hectares (0.38 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 8, Concession 1 and designated as Part 4 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Omari Mwinyi Surveying Ltd., under their Project No. 12-047-R, dated November 26, 2013, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, located to the rear of 1407 Military Trail, be purchased from Glen Rouge Homes (Fawnridge) Inc.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A49/14 - TOWN OF AJAX Request for a Permanent Easement for a Splash Pad Outfall Structure, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham Carruthers Creek, CFN 50660. Receipt of a request from the Town of Ajax to provide a permanent easement for a Splash Pad Outfall Structure on lands located to the south of Ashbury Boulevard and west of Audley Road South, in the Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham. (Executive Res.#B17/14) 106 Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Town of Ajax to provide a permanent easement for a Splash Pad Outfall Structure on lands located to the south of Ashbury Boulevard and west of Audley Road South, in the Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham;

WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the Town of Ajax in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.014 hectares (0.036 acres), more or less, be granted to the Town of Ajax for a Splash Pad Outfall Structure, said lands being located to the south of Ashbury Boulevard and west of Audley Road South, being Part of Block 3 on Registered Plan 40M-2095 and designated as Part 1 on draft R-Plan by ERTL Surveyors OLS, project #14041, in the Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition to all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the Town of Ajax;

THAT the Town of Ajax is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the associated constructions works;

THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Town of Ajax;

THAT any TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed construction works be revegetated and/or stabilized following completion and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines;

THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended;

AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining required approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

107 RES.#A50/14 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance of Land for the Widening of Bathurst Street, between Regional Road 7 and Teston Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Don River Watershed, CFN 50698. Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the widening of Bathurst Street, between Regional Road 7 and Teston Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Don River watershed. (Executive Res.#B18/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the widening of Bathurst Street, between Regional Road 7 and Teston Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of York in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing 0.002 hectares (0.005 acres), more or less, required for the widening of Bathurst Street, between Regional Road 7 and Teston Road, said land being Part of Lot 23, Concession 2 and designated as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on Plan 65R-34656, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be conveyed to the Regional Municipality of York;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition to all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the Regional Municipality of York;

THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Regional Municipality of York;

THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff;

THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this conveyance;

THAT said conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED 108 RES.#A51/14 - CITY OF MARKHAM Conveyance of Lands required for widening of Main Street at the Bridge across the Rouge River, City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River Watershed, CFN 50559. Receipt of a request from the City of Markham for conveyance of lands required for the widening of Main Street at the bridge across the Rouge River, in the City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River watershed. (Executive Res.#B19/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Markham to convey lands for the widening of Main Street at the bridge across the Rouge River, City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the City of Markham in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing 0.12 hectares (0.28 acres), more or less, required for the widening of Main Street at the bridge across the Rouge River, said land being Part of Lots 9 and 10, Concessions 7 and 8, as shown on plans entitled: MAIN STREET MARKHAM - HIGHWAY 407 TO HIGHWAY 7 - PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS, prepared by McCormick Rankin Inc., dated January 28, 2014, in the City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, be conveyed to the City of Markham;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition to all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the City of Markham;

THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Markham;

THAT conveyance of the lands be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff;

THAT the City of Markham is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims related to injury, damage or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this conveyance;

THAT conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED 109 RES.#A52/14 - THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LAND Steeles Avenue and West of Goreway Drive, in the Mimico Creek Watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, CFN 50696. Proposal to lease Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned lands located south of Steeles Avenue and west of Goreway Drive, in the Mimico Creek watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, to construct and operate a watercourse monitoring station and associated equipment. (Executive Res.#B20/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been requested by the University of Toronto (U of T) to enter into a lease agreement for lands located south of Steeles Avenue and west of Goreway Drive, in the Mimico Creek watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel;

AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interested of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with U of T in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease with U of T for approximately 3 square metres, more or less, together with an access right-of-way to construct and operate a watercourse monitoring station and associated equipment, said land being part of lot 15, Concession 7, located south of Steeles Avenue and west of Goreway Drive, in the Mimico Creek watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel.

THAT the lease with U of T be premised on the following general terms and conditions:

(i) The initial term of the lease will be five years, with one renewal option for an additional five year period, at the sole option of TRCA;

(ii) The lease rate shall be a nominal sum of $2.00 per annum;

(iii) U of T shall be responsible for any and all approvals required for the construction and operation of the watercourse monitoring station and associated equipment;

(iv) U of T shall be soley responsible for any and all costs associated with the construction and operation of the watercourse monitoring station and associated equipment, as well as all legal and survey costs;

(v) U of T shall be responsible for any and all agreements required from adjacent owners for access to TRCA-owned lands;

(vi) Any further terms or conditions as deemed necessary or appropriate by TRCA staff and solicitor;

110 THAT an archaeological review shall be completed by U of T, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA, all at the sole expense of U of T;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action may be required to implement the lease, including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A53/14 - TREES FOR LIFE: A CAMPAIGN OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ONTARIO Progress update on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff involvement in Trees for Life, a campaign of the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. (Executive Res.#B21/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) vision for The Living City is dependent on healthy and resilient urban forests;

AND WHEREAS TRCA has played an important role in the development of programs and strategies dedicated to the protection and enhancement of urban forests and natural systems, including local urban forest studies, the Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy and the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition (GIO);

AND WHEREAS TRCA has the expertise and partnerships to coordinate collaborative efforts to advance the urban forest agenda in the Greater Toronto Area;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA continue to provide a Steering Committee member and project manager for Trees For Life, a campaign of the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition;

AND FURTHER THAT staff provide progress updates to the Authority as this initiative continues. CARRIED ______

RES.#A54/14 - SUPPLY OF RENTAL RATES FOR AN OPERATED HYDRAULIC BACKHOE Extension of Contract RSD13-036 for the supply of rental rates for an operated hydraulic backhoe with 6-way dozing capabilities, for a further one year period. (Executive Res.#B22/14)

111 Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: John Parker

THAT Contract RSD13-036 for the supply of rental rates for an operated hydraulic backhoe with 6-way dozing capabilities awarded in 2013 to Valefield Contracting Incorporated be extended for a period of one year to April 15, 2015, at a cost of $145,000.00, plus 10% contingency, plus HST, subject to terms, conditions and performance satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, for a revised total cost not to exceed $285,000.00, plus 10% contingency, plus HST. CARRIED ______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A55/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.2, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #2/14, hled on April 11, 2014, be received. CARRIED Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.2, Inclusive NATIVE MEADOW ENHANCEMENTS (Executive Res.#B23/14) ACQUISITION OF VEHICLES (Executive Res.#B24/14)

______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A56/14 - WORLD WILDLIFE FUND CANADA HUMBER FRESHWATER HEALTH ASSESSMENT Receipt of staff report in regard to World Wildlife Fund Canada Humber Freshwater Health Assessment.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the staff report regarding the World Wildlife Fund Humber Freshwater Health Assessment be received. CARRIED

112 BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, Resolution #A248/13 was approved as follows:

THAT staff be directed to compare World Wildlife Fund data on the Humber River to TRCA's data to determine if there is insufficient data or any discrepancies.

The World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) is undertaking a nation-wide Freshwater Health Assessment (FHA) on freshwater systems in Canada and is aiming to assess all freshwater systems by 2017. WWF has created the FHA framework as the overarching architecture for a long-term, national, results/impact oriented conservation campaign. WWF is also working with local groups and funding on-the-ground restoration and protection projects to help improve water health. FHAs have been completed to date by WWF for the Thames, Ottawa, Athabasca, Fraser, St. John, South Saskatchewan and Skeena rivers. The Humber River watershed is the first TRCA watershed that WWF has selected to report on due to data availability and WWF's interest in assessing urban rivers. Consequently, the Humber assessment will be used as a baseline for WWF's future work on threats assessments on urban rivers. The Humber FHA was released by WWF online March 21, 2014 on WWF's project website which TRCA is helping to promote within its network. In their next reporting phase, WWF plans on assessing the Don River watershed. Timelines for the release of the Don FHA are yet to be determined. The final WWF Humber Freshwater Health Assessment report is available at http://www.wwf.ca/conservation/freshwater/freshwaterhealth/humber/

Relevance to TRCA Report Cards

The WWF FHA reports on a set of four indicators: water flow, water quality, fish and benthic macroinvertebrates. Although the WWF FHAs report on some of the same indicators that TRCA typically reports on through its watershed report cards and The Living City Report Card, it differs from TRCA report cards in terms of the methodology and grading/scoring, thus, the results of the WWF Humber FHA can not be directly compared to the results from TRCA's report cards. TRCA will manage the communication of the different scores/results through a communications plan developed with WWF which will explain the difference between the WWF Humber FHA and TRCA report cards. Moving forward, TRCA will continue to report on the health of its watersheds using the methodology that was employed to develop past watershed report cards (2013) in order to ensure consistent reporting over the years.

In addition, TRCA report cards are a communications and watershed management tool which not only assess watershed conditions but also prescribe a framework for municipalities, residents, businesses, community organizations and other agencies to improve watershed health. This work also provides opportunities for TRCA to collaborate with WWF on the production of future regional and watershed report cards in terms of introducing new indicators and creating more opportunities for cross promotion.

113 Methodology and Data Sources

The methodology for the WWF Humber FHA has been developed by WWF, however, WWF has engaged TRCA staff in applying their methodology to the Humber watershed. TRCA provided data for the WWF Humber FHA and technical expertise for interpreting the data, including collection methods. TRCA technical and watershed specialist staff met with WWF staff in early January 2014 and provided detailed comments related to the WWF methodology (summarized in the section below). At this meeting, WWF also expressed interest in engaging the community in the development of the assessments and requested TRCA’s assistance in engaging its watershed committees. The WWF Humber FHA was presented to the joint Planning and Policy subcommittee of the Humber Watershed Alliance, Don Regeneration Council and Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition in January 2014. Members of this joint subcommittee were invited to comment on the assessment as well. WWF also presented their methodology and results to the Humber Watershed Alliance prior to the release of the assessment in March 2014.

TRCA Staff Comments and Updates to WWF Humber Freshwater Health Assessment Methodology

Since Authority Meeting #11/13, WWF has incorporated TRCA comments into their updated methodology for the Humber FHA. The updated methodology has modified scoring for the water flow, water quality and benthic macroinvertebrate indicators.

The following section summarizes the changes to WWF's methodology to date in response to TRCA staff input

Water Flow: The WWF freshwater water flow assessment for the Humber watershed was aimed at comparing historic flow data, which is presumed to be "natural," to current flow data. The goal is to show the changes (if any) to the flow regime over time by comparing median monthly and annual flow data. Trends in median monthly and annual flow provide an indication if the net flows within any given watershed are increasing or decreasing over time, and can also show when these changes are occurring seasonally. Median is used for streamflow trending as it is a more representative number than the statistical average. Median can also be considered as the th 50 percentile where half the values are below the median and half are above.

114 Increasing trends in median monthly and annual flows are typically due to changes in land cover, moving from natural cover to urbanized land uses. As the amount of impervious area increases, more rainfall runs off directly to the rivers leading to a net increase in mean monthly flows. Decreasing trends would be indicative of changes to water takings (Permission's to Take Water (PTTW)) within the system, major regulatory changes (dam operations) or a reduction of groundwater inputs. Decreasing trends could also represent a recovery to a more natural flow regime as stormwater management begins to mitigate the extra runoff generated by increases in impervious cover. Trends in median monthly and annual flow can also be accounted for by climatic inputs; where during an extended drought, there may be a reduction in mean monthly flows. However, the WWF study did not consider climatic inputs in their assessment. Since the Humber watershed is regulated (dammed), additional analysis was performed by WWF specifically comparing pre-dam flow regimes to post-dam flow regimes. The establishment of a dam within a watershed can have significant impacts on the natural flow regime. By design, dams exist to provide detention of excess runoff, spreading the hydrograph out over a longer period of time so as to reduce the peak flow rates. These changes to the natural regime, while important for flood management, can be detrimental to the natural habitat of aquatic species; with regards to flow timing, water temperatures and reduced floodplain flooding.

1. Data Requirements

Data requirements for this FHA required gauges to have at least 20 years of continuous data, without a gap of more than five years. Unfortunately the entire TRCA stream monitoring network had to be excluded as the earliest gauge that TRCA operates, installed in the late 1990s has less than 20 years of continuous data.

Data sufficiency scoring was based on the age and distribution of gauging data, where the Humber was found to be “Partially Sufficient”, which is defined as: “Monitoring stations in at least one subwatershed extending back to at least 1980 with continuous data, without gaps totaling more than 10 years until 2005 or more recent.”

As a comparison, to be ranked as “Sufficient” requirements are as follows: “Monitoring stations in 90% or more subwatersheds, including locations downstream of dams, with flow data extending back to at least 30 years before dam construction […], with continuous monitoring until 2010 or more recent.”

Given the inability to use TRCA data, WWF's flow assessment is based entirely on data collected by Water Survey Canada's long term monitoring stations. Long term trends were based on a maximum of two gauges within the Humber watershed, and short term recent trends were based on five gauges across the watershed.

115 2. Trends in Median Monthly and Annual Flow

This indicator was based on the number of months in the period of gauging records which showed a statistically significant trend. TRCA was concerned that the magnitude of change was not considered, and it was limited to a basic count of months. Additionally, small subwatersheds and individual tributaries were weighted the same as the main branch of the river. If these trends existed only in a minor system (Black Creek for example), the entire score of the watershed would be reduced despite the fact that Black Creek consists of less than 30 percent of the Humber watershed drainage area. To address these concerns, WWF added a weighting criterion to their assessment which considered the drainage area of each gauge by using mean flow rates.

Similar to monthly flow trends, this analysis counted the number of years on record where there was a statistically significant trend. TRCA had the same concerns outlined in the monthly trend section above and these concerns were addressed by WWF with the inclusion of the same a weighting criterion as that used for the monthly assessment. TRCA performs similar trend analysis as discussed above, however usually using a more limited and recent data set. The trends resulting from the WWF analysis generally echo the findings TRCA has seen using local data.

3. Pre vs Post Dam Flow Regime

This indicator compared pre and post-dam flow regimes, including median monthly flow, variability in monthly flow, and percent change in monthly flows. Results demonstrate if and how much the establishment of a dam has affected the "natural" flow regime. TRCA was concerned that since there is limited data available from before the construction of Claireville Dam, comparisons of flow regimes may not be representative of actual conditions. TRCA suggested that the analysis be limited to post-dam installation only, however WWF did not make these changes in their analysis.

TRCA does not perform pre to post-dam flow analysis in this manner, as the TRCA dams are intended for flood control as their primary role. Given this role, a change in the flow regime would suggest the dam is operating as designed, by holding back flood flows and releasing this water slowly over dry periods. TRCA analysis would be limited to exploring the reduction in peak flows and flood frequencies downstream of the structure.

Water Quality: The index score for water quality now refers to a median value for the proportion of excellences for the last five years of monitoring data. Previously in WWF's original analysis water quality was based on a single year (2011). This addresses variability that can be attributed to the nature of TRCA’s monitoring program which was designed to monitor ambient water quality conditions and is influenced by precipitation. A list of the water quality objectives used in analysis has been requested for review and staff has requested that this list is included in the technical report

116 Fish: WWF used historic survey data (pre monitoring data 2001) and TRCA regional monitoring data (2001 - 2010) to undertake their fish analysis for 1) median native species richness (# of different types of species) and 2) total number of species per year. Much of the historic data used by WWF were not collected for the purpose of statistically evaluating trends over-time at the watershed scale and the data limitations were discussed with WWF. Concern was around the story of declining fish community health in the highly urban subwatersheds would not be detected and told. For a national organization like WWF, reporting at the subwatershed scale does not make sense but it is appropriate for watershed managers to consider these very local conditions for setting restoration targets and actions. Biodiversity was recommended as a second informative metric as it allows one to understand the tolerance/sensitivity of the fish community represented and would provide greater understanding of subwatershed conditions. However, WWF's final assessment only took change species richness into account as they wanted to keep their methodology consistent across the nation.

Benthic Invertebrates: The score for the benthic macroinvertebrate index is now based on the median of the last five years of available monitoring data, previously the index was based on a single year (2011) of data. The concern was that there is some inherent natural variation in benthic invertebrates due to annual climate differences and variation in sampling date. The median value takes into account some of this natural variation due to annual climate differences.

NEXT STEPS TRCA staff to work with WWF to help promote the Humber Freshwater Health Assessment.

Report prepared by: Sonia Dhir, extension 5291, Christine Tu, extension 5707, Jamie Duncan, extension 5286, Angel Wallace, 289-268-3942 Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] For Information contact: Vicki McGrath, extension 5211 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 15, 2014

______

RES.#A57/14 - MAYORS' MEGAWATT CHALLENGE UPDATE Status update on the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge Program.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the update on the status of the Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge and Town Hall Challenge be received. CARRIED

117 BACKGROUND Since 2003, the Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge (MMC) has been engaging municipalities in lowering energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and operating costs in their own facilities, while demonstrating leadership in taking action towards more sustainable communities. Using a data driven approach to finding savings, municipalities enrolled in the program benchmark their utility data and share knowledge with their peers, assess their energy and environmental performance, identify strategic projects and track savings. They share knowledge and best practices at workshops and webinars, and employ a performance based conservation methodology which enables facility managers to find and prioritize energy saving projects and manage contractors to gain maximum results.

MMC Program Performance (2013 vs 2012 baseline):  total reduction in greenhouse gas emissions - 1,805 tonnes;  total energy savings - 11,390 eMWh (3.3% of total energy use);  total building floor area enrolled in MMC program - 1,059,189 m2 (11,401,110 sq. ft.);  building types enrolled: town halls/administration buildings; community centres/arenas/pools; fire halls.

Under Ontario's Green Energy Act, 2009 Regulation 397, municipalities are required to publically post energy data for their facilities. MMC conducted a review of 2012 energy data posted and determined that:  town/city halls of municipalities enrolled in MMC on average use 24% less energy than medium and large non-member municipalities town/city halls that had publicly posted their data;  100% of municipalities enrolled in MMC are in compliance with the Ontario Reg. 397 requirement to publicly post their data, while only 50% of other medium and large municipalities in the Province of Ontario are in compliance with Ontario Reg. 397

These results illustrate the effectiveness of the MMC’s collaborative, data-centric approach. MMC’s success has resulted in an expanded number of municipalities participating in the program. Current membership includes:  City of Mississauga, ON  City of Toronto, ON  Town of Caledon, ON  Town of Richmond Hill, ON  City of Oshawa, ON  City of Brampton, ON  Town of Gatineau, QC  City of Windsor, ON  City of Moncton, NB  City of Barrie, ON

In 2014, Ontario's Green Energy Act, 2009 Regulation 397 requires municipalities to develop and publicly post a five year energy management plan. For this reason, in 2014 the Mayor’s Megawatt Challenge will be focusing on workshops and webinars to help municipalities enrolled in MMC develop energy management plans that will be the most targeted and effective in the Province.

118 TOWN HALL CHALLENGE 20 BY ‘15 Through MMC, staff found that competition and recognition are effective tools for engaging municipalities in energy conservation. To take advantage of this fact, staff created the Town Hall Challenge 20 by '15, a friendly competition for municipal town's and city halls from across Canada. Town/city halls were selected for the first building challenge due to their prominence within the community. The goal of this challenge is for participants to achieve energy intensity of equal to or better than, 20 equivalent kilowatt hours of total energy use per square foot of floor area by 2015 (20 eq. kWh/sqft). MMC’s vast database of town hall energy data enabled Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and Enerlife Consulting to prepare a sector-leading, peer reviewed white paper establishing the validity of the 20 by '15 target.

The attached figure illustrates the benchmark curve for total energy use per sq. ft. for all of the towns and city halls in the program database. The curve shows that there is a wide range in energy use per sq. ft. for towns and city halls, in fact the best performing town/city hall uses only one fifth of the energy per sq. ft. of the worst performing town/city hall.

At this time, 3 of the 10 municipalities enrolled in the Town Hall Challenge have reached the 20 by '15 target while two others, Oshawa and Toronto City Halls, are very close to the target: 1. City of Moncton, NB – City Hall – has reached target; 2. City of Mississauga, ON – Civic Centre – has reached target; 3. City of Toronto, ON – Metro Hall – has reached target; 4. City of Oshawa, ON – City Hall - very close to target; 5. City of Toronto, ON – City Hall - very close to target.

Since enrolling in the program a number municipalities have shown that it is possible to move significantly up on the benchmark curve. For example, the City of Mississauga was able to reduce their energy use per sq. ft. from 24.4 in 2009 to reach the competition target of 20 eq. kWh/sq. ft in 2013. Toronto City Hall was using 33 eq. kWh/sq.ft. in 2010 and dropped that to 25 eq. kWh/sq.ft. by 2013. Facility staff at the City of Toronto has indicated that they identified additional savings potential and fully expect to do better than the 20 by '15 target over the next year or so.

The Mayors' Megawatt Challenge addresses a wide-array of municipal building types, so in addition to the Town Hall Challenge, the MMC program will develop a Community Centre Challenge as well as a Fire Hall Challenge in the near future.

Municipalities can enroll in the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge and the Town Hall Challenge 20 by '15 at any time.

RATIONALE The Mayors' Megawatt Challenge continues to provide value to member municipalities by helping them to identify and achieve their energy conservation potential and reduce costs. The program helps municipalities to be leaders in energy efficiency within their communities and to achieve greenhouse gas emission reductions targets as part of their climate change strategies.

119 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In 2014, MMC will:  offer four webinars and one sustainability forum;  continue to build Canada-wide participation in the Town Hall Challenge 20 by ’15, and report to participants on their current standing in the competition;  ensure MMC participants in Ontario are in compliance with the Green Energy Act Regulations;  maintain and build on partnerships with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and other provincial organizations to promote energy conservation at municipal facilities;  award qualifying MMC members with 5% award plaques for saving 5% in any energy/water category year over year.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge is derived from program membership fees and sponsorships. The Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge is delivered jointly by TRCA and Enerlife Consulting under a business agreement.

Report prepared by: Brian Dundas, extension 5262 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Bernie McIntyre, extension 5326 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 1, 2014 Attachments: 1

120 Attachment 1

The chart above is a benchmark graph for all town and city halls in the Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge database. The graph illustrates the wide range in energy intensity, equivalent kilo watt hours per square foot (ekWh/sq.ft.) between the best performing buildings (top) and the worst performing buildings (bottom). Benchmarking of performance and using utility data to identify energy conservation targets and strategic projects is a corner stone of the Mayors’ Megawatt Challenge.

______

121 RES.#A58/14 - SOCIAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT Information on the development of social enterprises at Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the staff report on Social Enterprise Development be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND This Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff report was requested by an Authority Member, to provide information on social enterprises and the potential for TRCA to become involved in such business operations.

Wikipedia defines a social enterprise as "an organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in human and environmental well-being, rather than maximizing profits for external shareholders. Social enterprises can be structured as a for-profit or non-profit, and may take the form of a co-operative, mutual organization, a social business, or a charity organization."

Additionally, the Social Enterprise Council of Canada defines social enterprises as "those that contribute to healthy communities through direct participation in the market and by strengthening non-profit organizations. Social enterprises:  fill niches that the commercial market does not meet  promote innovation  enhance the delivery of social, environmental, and cultural services  support the sustainability of non-profit organizations  stimulate local job creation and skill development  promote economic growth and neighbourhood revitalization  support an inclusive economy that provides employment and training opportunities for marginalized individuals"

As identified in Section 7 of Building The Living City, TRCA's 10 year strategic plan, a key aspect of implementing the strategic plan will require establishing new partnerships and business models to help achieve TRCA's strategic objectives. The field of social enterprises represents an opportunity to accommodate new programs and services that meet the needs of the communities while applying a business development approach to these programs.

Of key significance to the development of enterprises is the support of at-risk communities or marginalized segments of the population and the ability to provide employment opportunities that include training, job and career development and transition services.

TRCA is currently working with the Social Enterprise Network, The Learning Enrichment Foundation (LEF) and Caledon Community Services (CCS) to gain a better understanding of social enterprises and the potential role that TRCA can plan in the development and ongoing support of these ventures. Through these organizations TRCA is able to develop a network of existing social enterprises and potential partners for the creation of new and existing enterprises.

122 In the Toronto region and around the globe, there are a number of existing social enterprises that meet a range of community needs. Examples of social enterprises include:

Gateway Linens (Toronto) – Salvation Army Gateway Linens is a social purpose enterprise that is an industrial laundry facility providing training and employment to people living in the shelter system. Gateway Linens provides services to restaurants, spas, banquet halls, hotels, shelters and any other business or facility that requires a laundry service. The people doing the laundry are men who currently live in the shelter system. These men are working hard to rediscover their self-worth and their capacity so as to ultimately reintegrate into the workforce.

Haween Enterprises Inc. (Toronto) – Haween Enterprises is a community based sewing enterprise that provides sewing training, leadership skills and social support for immigrant women. Haween offers opportunities for employment for the women who participate in this program through making their own products as well as products for individuals and subcontractors. Haween’s products include conference and event tote bags, book bags for public and private schools, grocery bags and t-shirts. Haween Enterprises offers quality work for small businesses who want to offer a "Made in Canada" product. Some other products produced by Haween include soccer and volleyball shorts, place mats, tea cozies, chair covers, aprons and pillows.

Parkdale Green Thumb Enterprises (Toronto) – In partnership with Working for Change (Ontario Council of Alternative Businesses), Parkdale Green Thumb Enterprises (PGTE), established in 2001, is a social enterprise horticulture business that installs and maintains outdoor and indoor plants for business improvement areas (BIAs), non-profit organizations, hospitals, the private sector and community groups. PGTE also provide groundskeeping services for the non-profit housing sector. PGTE provides weekly lawn care and spring/fall clean ups. Lawn maintenance services include:  lawn mowing and trimming;  planting of annuals and perennials;  mulching of garden beds;  weeding and pruning;  removal of debris from walkways and gardens;  spring and fall clean ups.

The Learning Enrichment Foundation (Toronto) – LEF’s bicycle mechanic training facility operates as a shop with refurbished bicycles for sale, very reasonably priced repairs, maintenance and tune ups performed by students under supervision of an expert instructor. Shop stock varies so call for details. Graduates of the program go on to work in bicycle shops throughout the city. LEF is proud to have been selected to maintain bicycles of the BIXI Toronto fleet, providing additional skills and employment to graduates.

CleanSlate (Chicago) - Founded in 1991, The Cara Program is a non-profit organization that provides comprehensive training, quality job placement and critical support services to individuals who are homeless and/or struggling with poverty. In 2005, The Cara Program created Cleanslate, a neighborhood beautification business that provides 250 transitional jobs per year to individuals with significant obstacles to employment, including recent incarceration. Cleanslate generates $2.0 million in annual revenue by providing litter abatement, snow removal and light landscaping services for businesses and public entities.

123 AspenPointe (Colorado) - AspenPointe is an innovative company that solves social problems through behavioral healthcare, telephonic healthcare and social enterprise. By using business strategies to achieve change, AspenPointe builds healthy communities for Colorado. Since 1875 AspenPointe has served the Colorado Springs region to pursue their mission of Empowering Clients, Enriching Lives and Embracing Purpose.

AspenPointe serves the community through social enterprise business lines such as a café, furniture services, custodial, career services, education and GED programs to facilitate the health of their community. Each year they touch the lives of thousands of individuals such as at-risk youth, adults, seniors and our military men and women. AspenPointe removes barriers to opportunities by providing training, education and employment opportunities.

Fifteen (London, UK) – Founded by English celebrity chef Jamie Oliver in 2002, Fifteen started out as an ambitious effort to offer disadvantaged youths (aged 18-24) a means of creating better futures for themselves through the art of good food. The restaurant initiative was named for the 15 young people who originally entered apprenticeships under this program. Since the first establishment opened, Fifteen has:  Delivered delicious Italian food to patrons and opened two other restaurants in Amsterdam and Cornwall.  Trained 220 young locals in the art of cooking and hospitality and inspired many of its graduates to pursue successful careers in the restaurant business.  Reinforced the value of local produce and cooking techniques.

RATIONALE There are a number of opportunities for TRCA to either support or lead the development of social enterprises in the Toronto region: 1. developing in-house social enterprises that support TRCA’s vision for The Living City; 2. utilizing TRCA greenspace or facilities to support the creation of social enterprises within the communities we serve; 3. supporting and/or partnering with existing social enterprise start-ups that align with TRCA’s vision.

Through ongoing work to develop Bolton Camp and other sites, a number of specific social enterprise opportunities have begun to emerge as means through which to achieve specific strategic, programmatic or operational goals. Examples of potential social enterprise opportunities that may be developed as part of Bolton Camp and other TRCA centres or programs include:  fitness amenities and programs at TRCA facilities.;  landscape services and community greening enterprise;  community farm and kitchen enterprise;  locally grown or heritage food service and catering service;  multimedia and web development enterprise, including training and employment programs for youth;  shuttle transportation to TRCA events or facilities not accessible by transit.

For TRCA's annual Paddle the Don event, staff has contracted catering services from the social enterprise at Market 707, a service that staff became aware of through our relationship with Social Enterprise Toronto.

124 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will continue to explore potential opportunities to lead or support the development of social enterprises that meet the strategic objectives of TRCA.

FINANCIAL DETAILS No immediate financial impacts. Prior to social enterprise development, a full business case will be developed.

Report prepared by: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 10, 2014

______

RES.#A59/14 - GOOD NEWS STORIES Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from January - March, 2014

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the summary of Good News Stories from January - March, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities for the preceding few months is provided to the Authority every few months. The stories for October - December, 2013 are as follows:

January  In 2013 TRCA and The Living City Foundation staff engaged 12 businesses in corporate planting events within the Etobicoke and Mimico watersheds, over 700 corporate volunteers, planted over 5,300 native trees and shrubs and raised over $27,000 for future Etobicoke/Mimico restoration projects.  Sharp Canada, member of Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition, received recognition for being a Top 5 planter for the City of Mississauga's One Million Tree Program in 2013.  Toronto Council approved the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan Environmental Assessment work in 2014 - $1.5 million.  York Region funding Phase 2 of the Oak Ridges Corridor Spine Trail at $170,000.  Ontario Heritage Trust is awarding their Outstanding Community Heritage Trust award to the Rouge Park trail program and trail volunteers.  Awarded Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund grant of $78,800 for Burnhamthorpe SNAP (Sustainable Neighbourhoods Retrofit Action Plan).

125  Parks Canada has committed to support additional terrestrial field inventories in the Rouge National Urban Park in 2014. This will fill data gaps for vegetation community and flora/fauna species for this site and contribute to TRCA's knowledge of biodiversity in the Rouge watershed.  Harbourview Ontario mediation in Caledon - negotiated $140,000 in restoration funds.  Partners in Project Green (PPG) Materials Exchange Program seeing success with over 15 tonnes of office furniture and 61 recycling containers exchanged in January. Exchanges took place between the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation and The Furniture Guys, Weston Forest Products and Newmen Office Furniture, as well as Chrysler Canada and Knowlton Development Corp.  Record year for snowy owls across Ontario as a result of juvenile owls coming down, indicating it was a bumper year for reproduction.  Received $135,000 from Canada Climate Project, University of Waterloo to showcase five climate adaptation projects in the ground.  Owner of 42 Parklawn Road has agreed to regrade the site and convey the land to TRCA as it is the last missing piece in the Mimico trail system.

February  Harbourfront exhibit - Nine Rivers City considered one of their most popular exhibits.  Ontario Provincial Policy Statement on Land Use Planning released, with statements about the importance of green infrastructure, and more emphasis on innovative stormwater management, low impact development and energy management in new developments.  Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project Class Environmental Assessment received approval by the Ministry of the Environment on February 3, 2014. TRCA staff working with City of Pickering to complete final design and proceed to implementation next winter. Based on the success of this project to date, staff is exploring opportunities to undertake several other projects in partnership with the City of Pickering.  Toronto staff received approval from Council to enter into preferred source agreements (formalizes ad hoc existing arrangement) with TRCA to implement works of an environmental nature. The value of the work is approximately $10 million per year.  Discovery of 40 to 50 fossils (nautiloid cephalopod, Isotelus maximus trilobite) in Mimico Creek. The high school student who discovered them is working with the ROM and is writing a paper on the discoveries.  Heart Lake Road Ecology Monitoring Report and findings presented to the Brampton Environmental Planning and Advisory Committee (BEPAC). BEPAC members supported and endorsed TRCA staff recommendations.  PPG staff has created waste communications tools that are currently being delivered to 75 participants at the International Centre. The first tool is a gap analysis list with description and list of resources around four areas of waste (establish a baseline, communication, logistics, evaluation) and the second is a step-by-step tool to create a communications plan. This will be available to all TRCA employees through PPG's member only resource page.  Invited by Dutch Consulate to participate in joint sustainability exchange between Rotterdam and Toronto. Presented lessons learned from Sustainable Neighbourhoods Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP).  Stewardship staff delivered four training sessions across Ontario to share the Greening Your Grounds low impact development presentation, marketing materials and 55 page guide book with 60 staff representing 18 other conservation authorities.

126  TRCA co-hosting an Urban Road Ecology Workshop with Credit Valley Conservation. The intent of the workshop is to assist transportation and ecology decision makers at various levels of government to operationalize road ecology principles into their everyday decision making process. Given that road networks are integral parts of the urban landscape, the workshop will focus on how to practically and affordably link the principles of urban road ecology with the design of a functional and more resilient landscape for both human and non-human living beings.  TRCA is working with PanAm Path in Toronto in the implementation of an integrated trail system from Claireville Conservation Area, through the Humber, across Toronto and the Don River watershed, across the Highland watershed to the mouth of the Rouge. There will be 14 interactive sites along the way, and TRCA will be partnering in many. The Path will connect inter-regionally to Peel, York and Durham.  The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) officially launched an eradication program to address a new infestation of Asian long-horned beetle (ALHB) in the cities of Mississauga and Toronto. Tree removal, started on February 19, 2014, is focused on removal of the top four genera of known host species within an 800m radius of the source of the current infestation. CFIA is leading the eradication effort in partnership with Mississauga, Toronto, Canadian Forest Service, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resource and TRCA. For more information, visit www.inspection.gc.ca  777 Dundas Street East will be re-developed with a flood proofed commercial building. The blank south facade will be integrated with a re-naturalization plan and used for public art reflective of the Don River, Toronto's PanAm Trail and / or the Lower Don Art Trail.  The City of Ottawa has developed policies to protect headwater drainage features based on TRCA and Credit Valley Conservation's finalized headwater guideline that was approved by the Authority in July 2013.  TRCA staff person is an adjunct professor with the University of Toronto School of Environment, allowing TRCA to harness academic resources and funding.  Record year for revenue for cross country ski program at Albion Hills Conservation Area.  Nine Authority Members were presented with three and 10 years of service awards, for a total of 55 years of service.

March  Peel Region Council approved the expansion of the Peel Rural Water Quality Program grant categories. As a result, funding is now available for natural area enhancement and creation projects and composting.  400 people attended the 3rd Annual TRIECA Conference, a Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Conference. Attendees included product manufacturers, developers, consultants, contractors, municipal and conservation authority staff, provincial and federal government reps etc.  $40,000 cash to be provided by Intact Insurance and $80,000 in-kind donation of design services for BRE Innovation Park at The Living City Campus.  Peel Region Council approved the expansion of the Peel Rural Water Quality Program grant categories. As a result, funding is now available for natural area enhancement and creation projects and composting.  The renovations to the Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) administration offices are almost complete. When they are finished, Visitor Services will be moving there from Head Office.  Celebrated achievements of M2P and PAIE graduates and recognition of program stakeholders.

127  Mining and Lands Commissioner awarded costs to TRCA for Khalsa Darbar hearing, the first time TRCA has been awarded cost by the Commission.  Moscorp VII Developments agreed to provide $307,000 to support the construction of trail link which will include a pedestrian crossing over the Etobicoke Creek within the Valleywood community of the Town of Caledon. This trail link project will provide a valuable connection along the Etobicoke Creek Trail, providing local residents with a formal connection to the valleylands of the Etobicoke Creek headwaters and also create a much needed connection between the new and existing subdivisions within the Valleywood community.  First TRCA groundwater monitoring wells installed in Mimico Creek watershed, $35,000 in funding provided by University of Toronto.  Helping Hands for Heart Lake project by Scouts Canada funded ($2,000) as one of ten projects across Canada to promote Good Turn Week April 28-May 4. Project involves clearing brush from trails and building benches and picnic tables at Heart Lake Conservation Area.  Successful outcome of TRCA participation in the National Energy Board Hearings for the Enbridge Line 9 Pipeline. All of TRCA's concerns were addressed in the decision, and TRCA's contribution to the process was noted in the decision document.  Greenbelt Foundation funding $20,000 for TRCA trails strategy.  Successful in grant of $10,000 from the J.P. Bickell Foundation for BCPV.  Successful in grant of $20,000 from Telus Foundation for Weston Environmental Leaders Program, which is matched by the Weston Foundation so amounts to $40,000.  TTP infrastructure received the Ontario Association of Architects Award for Design Excellence. Buildings were designed by Montgomery Sisam Architects, and it was a three way partnership with TRCA, Waterfront Toronto and City of Toronto.  City of Toronto launched its Home Energy Loan Program, where residents can get a loan for home retrofits, and pay it back through their tax bill from the energy savings. Black Creek SNAP was identified as one of four pilot neighbourhoods and has received some funding from the City to promote this program.  On March 25th, the Ontario climate Consortium and Trent University launched its inaugural town hall in Peterborough with close to 200 people in attendance. Partners included Ganaraska, Kawartha Lakes and Otonabee River conservation authorities.  As a result of the Partners in Project Green (PPG) Waste Management program, 1,180 kilograms of Velcro was exchanged and incorporated into recycled plastic lumber and porta-potty liners through Paradise Recycling. This is an ongoing exchange, with an estimated annual diversion amount of 13,600 kgs. In addition, Knowlton Development Corp. sent the first box of cigarette waste, totalling 3.5 kgs, to TerraCycle Canada, which will be incorporated into plastic lumber products.  Final stages of completing Heart Lake operations centre.  Final stages of completing Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance east and west breakwaters, and work is coming in under budget which may lead to some additional work in implementing the master plan.  Completing master plan and EA for Ashbridge's Bay. Seeking Council approval to move into the construction phase.  Many TRCA staff participated in York Region GIS training opportunity.  Ontario Municipal Board settlement reached Ajax for a new mixed use development resulting in $23,000 for restoration work in the Carruthers watershed and improved stormwater management practices.

128  The Living City Campus was recognized as one of the top three businesses in Environmental Leadership for the Vaughan Chamber of Commerce Business Achievement Award.  University of Waterloo sustainability masters degree curriculum focuses on the TRCA strategic plan. University faculty plan to continue the approach and the relationship with TRCA in 2015.  Staff trained by the Ontario Trumpeter Swan Recovery program have banded the young of the first successful nesting pair of trumpeter swan on the Toronto waterfront at Tommy Thompson Park. The young are using the restored wetland habitats at TTP and represent the first wild trumpeters on the Toronto waterfront since the 1880's.  Staff participated as a panel expert on low impact development and shoreline restoration for a "Deep Green" forum in Ottawa. The unique approach facilitated discussion between community groups, the municipality, other levels of government and the developer to brainstorm ways to incorporate sustainable practices into a redevelopment site in the downtown core. In addition to LID, three other themes were discussed including energy, affordable housing/aging in place, and community amenities and connectivity. It allowed TRCA staff the opportunity to promote our work, including STEP and restoration services as well as make connections to other sustainability champions.  54 TRCA staff presented with 10, 15 and 25 years of service awards, for a total of 745 years of service.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 14, 2014

______

RES.#A60/14 - IN THE NEWS Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority media coverage from January - March, 2014.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the summary of media coverage from January to March, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's news coverage for the preceding few months is provided to the Authority on a quarterly basis.

A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period from January – March 2014 that mentioned Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) or Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) and other TRCA properties and programs (example: Tommy Thompson Park) produced 86 media mentions. The total media hits resulted in a total circulation/reach of approximately 8,100,000 with a total advertising value of $697,278. 129 These results only reflect a portion of media coverage, since the database does not monitor on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv interviews, smaller community papers and trade publications.

The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage received for January to March 2014.

Media Coverage Highlights

January  On January 7, the Toronto Star story "Toronto's road warriors put a beet on icy streets" outlines the use of salt on City of Toronto streets and the looks at beet juice as an alternative. The story quotes TRCA spokesperson who says road salt is a prime enemy to the ecosystem and that anything that reduces chloride in water and soil is beneficial to the environment. The article goes on to say that TRCA sees a decline in fish health and communities from salt use.  On January 8, the Toronto Star story "Toronto weather: A wild weather swing ahead for the city" includes quote from TRCA spokesperson. Story goes on to say that winter rainfall of 25 millimetres or more in a 24 hour period can trigger rainfall warnings and lead to flooding. TRCA is watching the weather because if there is a lot of rain, it can melt snow quickly and lead to flooding of rivers, as well as on streets and underpasses because snow and ice can block catch basins.  On January 9, the City Centre Mirror story "Toronto's ice storm cost city $106 million, special council meeting to be told" is about how Toronto's ice storm will cost the city of Toronto $106 million and has left it a "disaster area." Toronto Hydro alone will ring up $13.9 million in extra expenses for the ice storm and TRCA has apparently told the City its share of flood-related damage from July is $36 million.  On January 10, the Toronto Star story "City slammed for lack of storm readiness; Toronto ill-prepared for extreme conditions, environmental group says" discusses how Toronto is woefully unprepared for the next big storms, according to the head of the Toronto Environmental Alliance. Toronto City Manager Joe Pennachetti agreed that extreme weather needs more attention. The article states that the City Manager said that TRCA alone could use $200 million for flood mitigation measures along the City's rivers.  On January 10, the North York Mirror story "Flooding a concern in Toronto this weekend" as well as the Markham Economist and Sun story "Flooding feared as temps rise this weekend" both report on TRCA's flood outlook watershed conditions statement and warns residents to stay away from rivers and streams.  On January 11, CBC TV, Global News, City News, CTV interviewed TRCA spokesperson about the flood outlook watershed conditions statement.  On January 13, the Caledon Enterprise story "Extreme caution urged on Humber Valley Heritage Trail’ discusses how the Christmas ice storm wreaked heavy damage on the Humber Valley Trail. The Humber Valley Heritage Association operates the trail under a Licence Agreement with TRCA. A TRCA spokesperson recommended closing the trail at all access points, as a measure of public safety.

130  On January 18, the Toronto Star story "We must rebuild the canopy; fallout from the ice storm will claim an estimated two million trees in GTA" includes quote from TRCA spokesperson that "Toronto trees had a very bad day" to describe the impact of the December 21 ice storm had on trees. The article reports that there are 10 million trees in the public and private spaces of the City of Toronto, and the City is at risk of losing up to two million trees. City staff estimated that damage to the Toronto tree canopy may be in the range of 20 percent.  On January 23, the Scarborough Mirror story "More land to be added to Rouge Urban National Park" reports on how the Park is about to take another step forward by adding 5,600 more acres of public land. TRCA, that owns the zoo property, has recommended an agreement between the Zoo and Park for "ongoing collaboration, joint programming and shared facility management," including shared parking. Discussions would explore how the Zoo might be home to a joint visitor and education centre - a historic house managed by the Zoo called Valley Halla is mentioned as a place "with potential future uses" - as well as "a significant, welcoming entrance" for the Park. TRCA staff also want to conduct an update of the 35-year-old three-way agreement between the City, Aoo and TRCA which covers the Zoo's operation and maintenance.

February  On February 6, Canadian Property Management Magazine story "Road salt usage causing problems in Ontario" looks into the environmental impact of salt. TRCA spokesperson was interviewed for the story and said “We are getting spikes after storms that are pretty close to seawater levels (19,250 mg/l), and it’s staying around in the groundwater and the soil. We are now seeing chloride levels that are high in the summer when it’s not being used in the city.”  On February 12, Yonge Street Media story "The greenest industrial wasteland around" is a feature story on the success of Partners in Project Green. The article interviews Partners in Project Green manager to discuss the nearly 1,000 businesses teaming up in a myriad of consortiums and across a number of projects and initiatives who are collectively lessening their carbon footprint.  On February 18, a rise in temperature and rain conditions prompted CBC, Toronto Star, Global News, CKDO AM, Newstalk 1010, AM680, and CP24 to conduct interviews with TRCA spokesperson regarding risks and safety concerns.  On February 28, CTV News at Noon weather anchor Anwar Knight joined TRCA staff in the harbour to learn more about fish.

March  On March 1, Toronto Star story "Toronto’s 180th Birthday" lists 180 portraits of people who helped shape the City from 1834 to the present. It includes Charles Sauriol, the conservationist who fell in love with the Don Valley in his youth and devoted much of his life to preserving our natural heritage. He founded the Don Valley Conservation Association in 1946 and in 1957 became of member of Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (now TRCA), which acquired much of the valley and ravine lands over the next two decades. Sauriol wrote four books on the history of the Don River and led efforts to create other conservation areas in Toronto, including Black Creek Pioneer Village and Todmorden Mills.

131  From March 3 to March 26 several media stories were published about the Sugarbush Maple Syrup Festival at Kortright Centre for Conservation and Bruce’s Mill Conservation Area. The stories centred around the impact of the cold weather on maple syrup production, the science of sap flow and information about festival activities. Media coverage was garnered in this time frame from: CTV News at Noon, City TV News at 6, CTV News at 6, Fairchild TV, CTV The Social, Toronto Star, SBTN Canada Television, EnRoute Magazine, Weather Network, Global News, Beautiful Life TV, Breakfast Television on City TV, Vaughan Weekly, Stouffville Sun Tribune, TVO Kids and CTV Barrie.  On March 6, Toronto Star story "Enjoy your staycation’ Not leaving town but need to get out of the house" gives readers ideas on options for March Break activities including the Sherlock Holmes event at Black Creek Pioneer Village.  On March 8, Toronto Star story "Activities to spur fun this March Break" includes information about Black Creek Pioneer Village’s march break Sherlock Holmes event.  On March 8, AM 680 interviewed Black Creek Pioneer Village spokesperson about March Break activities in the Village.  On March 26 to April 7 additional media stories around Sugarbush Maple Syrup Festival were covered and included information about the festival one week extension. Covering this story were York Region Living , Vaughan Citizen, and CP24 morning show.  On March 18, Fairchild TV and Omni TV reported on the Professional Access and Integration Enhancement (PAIE) and Mentors to Professionals (M2P) Program graduation.  On March 21, the Toronto Star story "Humber River is alive and well. WWF's in-depth study finds the GTA waterway improving, but more can be done" discusses how the Humber River is relatively healthy and doing well, says a new report from the World Wildlife Fund. Humber's water flow is rated as fair, its water quality good, health of its fish good; its bugs, an important indicator of overall health of a river. TRCA specialist was interviewed for the story.  On March 11, Voice K Magazine, a magazine geared to youth interviewed Black Creek Pioneer Village spokesperson about the Sherlock Holmes March Break Event.  On March 25, Global Morning show interviewed a presenter with Lake Ontario Evenings, Hidden Secrets of the Lake edition.

Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 6, 2014

______

RES.#A61/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Dave Ryan

132 THAT Section IV item BAAB8.1 - 2013 Year Ed Financial Progress Report, contained in Budget/Audit Advisory Board Minutes #1/14, held on April 11, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A62/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Residential Rental Program, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #2/14, held on April 11, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A63/14 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, As Amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.15, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #2/14, held on April 11, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:37 a.m., on Friday, April 25, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

133 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #4/14 May 23, 2014

The Authority Meeting #4/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, May 23, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m.

PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Ben Cachola Member Bob Callahan Member Ronald Chopowick Member Vincent Crisanti Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Mujeeb Khan Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member John Parker Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Jim Tovey Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT David Barrow Member Raymond Cho Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Jack Heath Member Colleen Jordan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Peter Milczyn Member

134 RES.#A64/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/14, held on April 25, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation by Patrick Leys, Manager, Pipeline Projects and Amanda Abbate, Environmental Planner, TransCanada Pipelines Limited, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - TransCanada's Proposed King's North Connection Project.

(b) A presentation by Alex Dumesle, Manager, Partners in Project Green - Pearson Eco-Business Zone, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.2 - Partners in Project Green: Pearson Eco-Business Zone 2013 Annual Report.

RES.#A65/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED RES.#A66/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received. CARRIED ______

CORREPONDENCE

(a) A letter dated May 21, 2014 from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Policy & Government Relations, BILD, in regard to item AUTH7.4 - Planning and Permitting Administration Cost Recovery.

135 RES.#A67/14 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT above-noted correspondence (a) be received. CARRIED

136 CORRESPONDENCE AUTH6.1

137 ______

138 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A68/14 - TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED'S PROPOSED KING'S NORTH CONNECTION PROJECT AND EASTERN MAINLINE PROJECT To provide information on TransCanada Pipelines Limited's proposed King's North Connection Project and Eastern Mainline Project

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT TransCanada Pipelines Limited (TransCanada) be requested to provide Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) with their alternative routes report in support of their applications to the National Energy Board on the preferred routes of the King's North Connection Project and the Eastern Mainline Project for review and comment once complete.

AMENDMENT RES.#A69/14

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT the main motion be amended to read as follows:

THAT TransCanada Pipelines Limited (TransCanada) be requested to present to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) board their alternative routes report in support of their application to the National Energy Board on the preferred route of the King's North Connection Project for review and comment;

AND FURTHER THAT the proposed routing through the forested frontage of Claireville Conservation Area be avoided.

THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED

THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED

THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:

THAT TransCanada Pipelines Limited (TransCanada) be requested to present to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) board their alternative routes report in support of their application to the National Energy Board on the preferred route of the King's North Connection Project for review and comment;

AND FURTHER THAT the proposed routing through the forested frontage of Claireville Conservation Area be avoided.

139 BACKGROUND Through an informal request by a member of the Executive Committee staff were asked to arrange a presentation on TransCanada's two proposed natural gas pipeline projects in the Greater Toronto area and through the watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the King's North Connection Project and the Eastern Mainline Project (see map attachments).

King's North Connection Project The King's North Connection Project will provide natural gas to homes, businesses, schools and hospitals in Ontario and Eastern Canada. The project proposes to connect Enbridge's proposed Segment A pipeline (part of the approved GTA Project) at the Albion Road station in Toronto with TransCanada's existing Mainline at Major Mackenzie Drive in Vaughan, within the Humber Watershed.

The connection between the proposed Segment A and the existing Mainline in Vaughan will be approximately 13 kilometres in length and contain one 36" diameter natural gas transmission pipeline in an 18 metre wide permanent easement. The proposed connection will establish a new pipeline right-of-way in the Cities of Vaughan, Brampton and Toronto in the area of Highways 50, 407 and 427 (Attachment 1). The preliminary proposed route will traverse through TRCA property at the eastern border of Claireville Conservation Area, along Indian Line north to Albion Road and potentially north of Highway 407.

Several route alternatives are being evaluated in order to address all potential landowners concerns about feasibility. Technical studies are being conducted to verify feasibility of preferred pipeline alignments on TRCA lands and those of other private landowners. TRCA has provided base data to TransCanada to begin early analysis of the potential environmental impacts and to inform the routing evaluation. The number of watercourse crossings will depend on the final selected route.

Stakeholder engagement commenced in December 2013 and is ongoing. TransCanada and their consultants met with TRCA on January 21, 2014 and April 30, 2014 to discuss their proposed routes and TRCA's areas of interest. Further details related to crossing methodologies, mitigation and restoration opportunities will be reviewed through the detailed design process and permit approvals.

TransCanada takes additional safety precautions where pipelines cross roads, railway track, waterways and as well as in urban areas. The entire system is monitored 24 hours a day by highly trained TransCanada employees in the computerized control centre located in Calgary. Ongoing maintenance is performed on all portions of the pipeline system to monitor, inspect and maintain the integrity of the pipelines. Further discussion is required related to our lands and regulated areas as we move forward in the evaluation process.

140 TransCanada plans to submit the application for this project to the National Energy Board (NEB) in the summer/fall of 2014. The NEB is an independent federal regulator established to promote safety, security, environmental protection, and economic efficiency in the Canadian public interest. The NEB regulates pipelines, international power lines, energy development and trade and reports to Parliament through the Ministry of Natural Resources. Once an application is submitted, stakeholders have a continued opportunity to participate in the regulatory review process. After an application is submitted, the NEB will assess it and determine what type of regulatory review process is required. The NEB's involvement in a project does not end with an approval to construct. The NEB will attach any number of conditions to project approvals which it then monitors and enforces throughout the life cycle of the project.

Construction is scheduled for spring of 2015 with service commencing in fall/winter of 2015. Prior to the start of construction, municipal permits will be obtained for the project, as well as permits from local conservation authorities where works are located within regulated areas. Issues of pipeline integrity and any vulnerability through river crossings and floodways will be explored with TransCanada as well as safety contingency planning for emergency events.

Eastern Mainline Project TransCanada is proposing to construct and operate a new natural gas pipeline along its existing Canadian Mainline in Southeastern Ontario. Canadian Mainline system includes pipeline infrastructure within existing easements between North Bay, Toronto and Montreal. TransCanada will be conducting site assessments along the existing corridor between the City of Markham and Iroquois in the Township of South Dundas (Attachment 2). The project is currently in what TransCanada calls the Proposal Phase where the preliminary work that is required to finalize the scope of the project is done. This includes conceptual engineering and an evaluation of safety, environmental, social, and quality considerations.

TransCanada is currently meeting with regulators, First Nations and other stakeholders. There are public open houses planned for May/June where members of the public can come and find out more information about the project and ask questions of TransCanada representatives. At this point in the process TransCanada has not met with TRCA staff to discuss the project but has requested and received environmental data from TRCA to use in their analysis of impacts related to future works within the Rouge and Duffins watersheds.

The final requirements for any additional infrastructure will be based on identified customer needs. A detailed routing assessment will reflect stakeholder input, as well as environmental and technical evaluations of the existing corridor. As with the King's North Connection Project, this project will require approvals through the NEB. If this project proceeds to construction, permits from TRCA will also be required. Safety issues related to pipeline integrity will also be considered as pipeline plans come forward for review.

141 Environmental Safety Concerns Unlike oil, if there is a natural gas leak, the gas will escape into the atmosphere and not travel downstream in the rivers and streams as an oil spill would. As such, potential impacts to the environment are significantly reduced when compared to that of an oil spill. The greatest environmental risks with gas pipelines are fire and explosion from ignition of the gas. Third party strikes are the usual cause of rupture. A comprehensive "Call Before You Dig" program is implemented for all pipelines, including these pipelines. Natural gas pipelines are regulated by NEB under applicable industry codes and standards.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will continue to work with TransCanada through public consultation, permission to enter process for TRCA lands, and Ontario Regulation 166/06 permitting processes to ensure all water management, natural heritage management and regulatory issues are addressed in accordance with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, as well as the draft Living City Policies, and Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act.

Report prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5759 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5759 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 8, 2014 Attachments: 2

142 Attachment 1

143 Attachment 2

______

144 RES.#A70/14 - PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN: PEARSON ECO-BUSINESS ZONE 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Overview of Partners in Project Green’s 2013 accomplishments in the Pearson Eco-Business.

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT the Pearson Eco-Business Zone 2013 Annual Report be received;

AND FURTHER THAT the Pearson Eco-Business Zone 2013 Annual Report be presented to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) local and regional municipal partners involved in Partners in Project Green. CARRIED BACKGROUND Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone is an initiative of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Greater Toronto Airports Authority. Launched in 2008, the project aims to assist businesses reduce resource consumption, reduce operational costs and uncover new business opportunities, all while increasing the sustainable performance of the region as a whole. Partners in Project Green achieves these results by providing knowledge, effective programs and access to a community of like-minded peers.

The Partners in Project Green 2013 Annual Report captures the achievements of our partners, including impressive reductions in energy, water and waste, along with innovative sustainability projects. In addition, the 2013 Annual Report speaks to the work that was done to restructure Partners in Project Green’s governance and membership structures to further drive value for businesses in the Pearson Eco-Business Zone and beyond.

The full report can be found online at www.partnersinprojectgreen.com/2013Results. The report outlines the results of Partners in Project Green activities in 2013, and includes a variety of case studies on local sustainability leaders. The report also profiles members of Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee and Performance Area Committees.

Annual Report Highlights The following are highlights from the annual report:  3,076 companies completed electricity reduction projects, collectively saving 6,922 KW of electricity;  31 companies completed 43 projects to conserve 5,921,887 cubic metres of natural gas;  through Region of Peel and City of Toronto water programs, 12 companies in the Pearson Eco-Business Zone collectively reduced water consumption by 453,193,125 litres per year;  three material exchanges resulted in diverting approximately 65 tonnes of waste from landfill; and  Partners in Project Green hosted 1,448 representatives from 384 unique companies at training and networking events.

NEXT STEPS Present Partners in Project Green 2013 Annual Report to TRCA local and regional municipal partners involved in Partners in Project Green. FINANCIAL DETAILS 145 Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone is funded by the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, the Region of Peel and the City of Toronto. In addition, the project self-generated 10.2% of its total revenue sources in 2013.

In addition, Partners in Project Green financial details can be found here: http://ar2013.partnersinprojectgreen.com/results-financial/

Report prepared by: Jennifer Taves, extension 5570 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Jennifer Taves, extension 5570 Emails: [email protected] Date: April 08, 2014

______

RES.#A71/14 - PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development. Promoting A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development across the region and beyond.

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT the report regarding A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development, be received;

AND FURTHER THAT the Guide be actively promoted to TRCA’s local and regional municipal partners within the Pearson Eco-Business Zone, as well as to others upon request. CARRIED BACKGROUND Eco-business zones are areas of employment and/or industrial activity that promote environmental quality, economic vitality and social benefits through the continuum of planning, design, construction, long-term operations and decommissioning. The eco-business zone concept establishes a balance between social, economic and environmental objectives, which are clearly established at the forefront of the development process.

Over the past four years, TRCA has assisted the Town of Caledon in the Town’s pursuit to explore eco-business opportunities. TRCA first extended its Partners in Project Green programming to Caledon businesses in 2010. Subsequently, an Eco-Business Road Map was developed in partnership with TRCA’s Partners in Project Green program to help lay out the steps required to meet Town objectives. These efforts led to another partnership with TRCA in 2011 to create a staff guide that would be used to develop and implement eco-business zones in new employment areas throughout the municipality. With funding received from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' (FCM) Green Municipal Fund, TRCA hired a consultant to complete the majority of the review, development and consultation for this initiative.

146 Developer and staff workshops were held, and a review team made up of TRCA, Town of Caledon and Region of Peel staff had considerable input into the final document: A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development ( www.partnersinprojectgreen.com/files/Reports/Caledon%20EIP%20V%204.0_FINAL.pdf).

st On April 1 , 2014 Resolution RB1-2014-127 was passed directing Town of Caledon staff in part to utilize A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development as a resource for eco-business principles and concepts in the development of new employment land areas and for existing employment land areas that will be developed through plans of subdivision in the Town of Caledon.

The Guide was produced within the planning context of the Ontario Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2005, Region of Peel Official Plan and the Town of Caledon Official Plan. Aligned with the Town’s key strategic plans (i.e. Community-Based Strategic Plan, Community Climate Change Plan, Economic Development Strategy), the Guide incorporates regional and international best practices and innovative approaches to support eco-business zone development.

Purpose of the Guide The Guide is intended to be a resource as new employment areas are developed to ensure policies, procedures and standards are aligned with the intent of creating more sustainable employment lands throughout the Town of Caledon.

It is also intended that the Guide be shared with other municipalities to help create enhanced economic, social and environmental benefits in employment lands across the country.

Project Partners  Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) – funding partner;  Light House Sustainable Building Centre – consultant;  Town of Caledon – funding and delivery partner;  TRCA – funding and delivery partner;  Region of Peel – delivery partner.

Guide Contents The Guide is divided into eight sections covering a range of topics and providing municipal staff with the insights and tools necessary to encourage the development of eco-business zones (Attachment 1). Appendices also provide an illustrated glossary of terms, detailed case studies and a summary list of guidelines.

NEXT STEPS TRCA to actively promote the Guide to TRCA’s local and regional municipal partners within the Pearson Eco-Business Zone, as well as to others upon request.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding in the amount of $93,335 was approved by FCM, through its Green Municipal Fund. Additional support was also committed by the Town of Caledon ($28,267 cash and $46,411 in-kind) and TRCA ($48,087 cash and 16,970 in-kind) for the completion of the Guide.

147 Future promotion costs will be covered through the 2014 contributions from the Region of Peel, and are anticipated not to exceed $8,000 (including HST).

The Living City Strategic Plan Alignment The present initiative stems from the following strategies from The Living City Strategic Plan:  Leadership Strategy 1 - Green the Toronto region’s economy.  Leadership Strategy 4 - Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment.  Enabling Strategy 8 - Gather and share the best urban sustainability knowledge.

Report prepared by: Alex Dumesle, extension 5316 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Alex Dumesle, extension 5316 Email: [email protected] Date: May 05, 2014 Attachments: 1

148 Attachment 1

Table 1 - A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning & Development Table of Contents Section 1 Overview Section 2 What is an Eco-Business Zone? Guiding principles and case examples. Section 3 The Integrated Design Process What is it and how to form the team? Section 4 Eco-Business Subdivision Land use, subdivision layout, Planning access, movement, open space and stormwater management frameworks. Section 5 Eco-Business Infrastructure Land use, overall infrastructure Design layout, transportation, access, movement, open space, landscape and stormwater management frameworks, water and waste water, energy systems and materials use and management. Section 6 Eco-Business Parcel Parcel use, site layout, built form Development and character, transportation, access, movement, private open space, landscape and stormwater management frameworks, water and waste water, energy systems and materials use & management. Section 7 Case study: Coleraine Drive West Illustration of guiding principles using a hypothetical Eco-Business Zone and triple bottom line evaluation. Section 8 Implementation Tools Sample zoning and incentives.

______

149 RES.#A72/14 - PLANNING AND PERMITTING ADMINISTRATION COST RECOVERY Assessment of Cost Recovery and Service Delivery supporting the 2014-2015 Planning, Permitting and Environmental Assessment Review Services Fee Schedule.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff established the 2012-2013 Fees Schedule for all plan review services that aimed to achieve a 100% cost recovery target for the development review functions within the Planning and Development Division;

WHEREAS, staff have committed to monitor the trends in submission demand, level of service, revenue collection and cost recovery for the preliminary period of change in 2012-13 and report back to the Authority and our stakeholders on the status of cost recovery;

WHEREAS, TRCA follows the guidelines from the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees and TRCA’s Fee Policy Guideline 2009, a base fee adjustment for cost of living is required every two years, in addition to provision of a comprehensive level of service /cost recovery assessment;

AND WHEREAS TRCA has discussed the outcomes of the cost recovery assessment with our municipal partners, and BILD prior to seeking Authority approval;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the fee adjustment proposal be approved and that staff be authorized to make the refinements to the text as clarifications requested by BILD, and that the refined fee schedules be effective immediately to support the new growth planning efforts.

MOTION TO DEFER

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Jim Tovey

THAT item AUTH7.4 - Planning and Permitting Administration Cost Recovery be deferred to Authority Meeting #5/14, scheduled to be held on June 20, 2014.

THE MOTION TO DEFER WAS NOT CARRIED

THE MAIN MOTION WAS CARRIED

BACKGROUND The last comprehensive fee schedule adjustment and cost recovery assessment for TRCA’s Planning and Development function took place in late 2011.

150 At that time, a new fee schedule for 2012-13 was initiated based on trends of submissions for planning and permitting review and an assessment of the potential forecast of submissions – setting a new approach for fee recovery targeting a 100% revenue stream for development related submissions. The cost of staff delivery was also assessed on a projected basis at that time. Planning and Development staff have monitored the project review demands and revenue flow over the last two years to determine our current level of service and cost recovery.

In January of this year, TRCA adjusted the fee schedule to incorporate a cost of living inflationary increase of 5% (2.5% over 2 years) to be effective January 17,2014, with the understanding that a more comprehensive cost recovery effort would be conducted in the spring. Now that more detailed information has become available on service and financial performance we are bringing this assessment to the Authority. TRCA also has a better handle on the forthcoming growth related community plans now that landowners and municipalities have been in dialogue since the beginning of the new year.

We have conducted our assessment to meet the Province’s guidelines and TRCA’s Planning, Permitting and Environmental Assessment Fees Policy/Guideline 2009 in preparing this report.

The Planning and Development Division includes four (4) sub-groups – Planning and Regulation Development Review, Policy and Development Regulation, Environmental Assessment Planning and Compliance functions. These professional teams review all development and infrastructure projects affected by our regulation and mandate, from strategic policy planning, development and environmental assessment review through to construction compliance.

Generally, the implementation of the new fee schedule, as a method to improve service delivery has progressed very smoothly with the support of BILD and many of our municipal partners who are also anxious to move through the approvals process with adequate service coverage. We have successfully moved the cost recovery of the private landowner plan review from 55-60% in 2011 to just over 80% recovery in 2012 and 2013. Based on trends that we see in workload fluctuations year to year, this is an excellent outcome for the first 2-year fee recovery testing. Although we will continue to work towards a target of 90-100% to cover Planning Division deficiencies as we move into the next stages of growth planning, we believe that we have successfully achieved a major component of plan review financing and have alleviated pressures on the operating budget. Year to year there will be fluctuation in the range of general municipal planning activities that are required as well.

Trends in Workload and Service Delivery Planning and Development has assessed the workload volume and types of application reviews conducted for both 2012 and 2013. In 2012, Planning and Development experiences the highest volume of planning and permitting applications in about twelve years, with a distinct increase in the review of large scale Secondary Plans, Block Plans and associated MESP (Master Environmental Services Plans), as well as, technically complex submissions. Many of these applications are part of new growth area projects. Table 1 and Table 2 provide the comparative summary of submissions by municipality and by TRCA review team for the last few years including 2012 and 2013. Our summary follows:

151  The volume of new planning applications has remained steadily robust over the last few years with a milestone year in volume in 2012 for “base” planning applications. These reviews inclusive of consents, variances, site plans and draft plans of subdivision experienced a decrease in 2013 by about 50 applications out of a total 709 (7%) new applications in 2012. These changes were seen spread through Brampton, Richmond Hill and Toronto, with all other municipalities remaining steady in volume.

 Growth area MESP’s (Master Environmental Servicing Plans) tied to secondary plan and block plan projects consumed a huge effort in 2012 and 2013 with 17-18 projects of various scales, including the final expedited MESP and draft plan review efforts for the Seaton community in Durham. Work is anticipated for 7 additional MESP/subwatershed projects in 2014, spread through Caledon, Brampton, Vaughan and Markham.

 Construction permitting rose by 3% totaling 1064 new submissions in 2013 as the construction industry continues to be active building new communities and infrastructure plans evolve into implementation stages to support growth areas. This level of work is above our projections.

 Services in concept advisory services and solicitor realty inquiries have also remained steady over the last two years.

 The Environmental Assessments group has been building capacity for new infrastructure assignments through specialized service agreements. Environmental Assessments planning was down in volume in 2013 but the construction related detailed design and permitting activities increased significantly in the same year. New planning EA’s are anticipated to increase for 2014 as agencies shift their own work priorities.

 The number of compliance violations rose in 2013 due to the volume of construction activity and possibly the provision of increased presence in the field. A total of 131 violations were laid in 2013 versus 93 in 2012. Our restructured compliance team conducted a total of 3857 permit site inspections in 2013.

 The number of OMB hearings efforts has increased significantly as an outcome of several Official Plan Reviews in Richmond Hill, Mississauga, Brampton, and Vaughan. TRCA senior staff were actively involved in 31 hearings in 2013, inclusive of mediations and negotiations, with an additional 8 Official Plan OMB appeals with multiple appellants (Vaughan, for example, has 67 appellants with conservation related issues).

 TRCA Policy staff and Development Review have also been actively involved in 11 Comprehensive Reviews of Special Policy Areas (SPAs) and revitalization studies for flood vulnerable areas (FVA) across the jurisdiction to facilitate updated land use plans associated with flood management strategies. These include the Lower Don, Woodbridge, Toronto, Downtown Brampton, and Lake Wilcox in Richmond Hill, in which we are engaging with the Province for approvals. There are several new projects coming with new studies in Bolton, Markham, Brampton south, City of Mississauga and Toronto.

152 A major shift in service demand has occurred over the last 2 years with increases in expedited reviews driven by the applicants, the municipalities and/or by Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) appeals. Even certain MESP processing has been reviewed through OMB timetables which have put enormous pressure on senior staff time to not only review but attend mediations, strategic meetings and negotiations with our lawyers, as well as, conduct repetitive engineering modeling reviews to input into complex negotiations. These service delivery pressures are being felt by not just TRCA but by our municipal partners as well. TRCA's efforts save municipalities hundred of thousands of dollars for technical input and legal managing of important environmental issues through OMB.

No direct revenue covers these intense senior efforts or the loss of review effort on other competing applications. Similarly the same senior staff team and our policy team has been occupied with several Official Plan reviews in Markham, Vaughan, Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering and Richmond Hill, with subsequent OMB appeals bridging 2012 and 2013. These appeal hearings will continue into 2014 as well.

Changes in the fee schedule and resulting revenue for 2012 assisted greatly in building modest capacity for staff planners and ecology/engineering support for conducting the review of “base” applications for planning and permitting. However through 2013 increasing MESP technical reviews and complex negotiations drove the intensity of senior review effort up particularly with the concurrent reviews for major growth areas in neighbouring municipalities. Competing time demands between municipalities has been difficult to manage equally for all.

The development review workload pressures remained heavy in 2013 with over 31 OMB hearings/mediations, and 18 Municipal Growth Area (Secondary/Block) Plan processes. We are also working with Markham, Vaughan, Brampton and Caledon to set-up 7 new initiatives for growth plans involving secondary and block plan processes. Special study terms of reference for subwatershed and MESP technical work program cost recovery agreements are being put into place to cover the lack of staff capacity to conduct these new initiatives, particularly with competing municipal/developer needs. Discussions are initiated and agreements will need to be confirmed with landowner groups to set the appropriate fee mechanisms in place to address review responsibilities beyond the existing fee schedule level.

Fluctuations commonly occur with “base” planning and permitting applications from year to year, but a major shift to process growth area studies with municipal partners will be a huge part of a rapidly increasing workload for 2014 -15-16. Senior project management and technical capabilities are required from TRCA to support these complex efforts both for greenfield and urban intensification. We are projecting that there will be at least 23 active new community plan areas within our jurisdiction for 2014-15, on top of the regular base submissions.

Plan review continues to be technically complex as applications move into more sensitive landscapes with water balance considerations involving engineering modeling updates, geotechnical and hydrogeology expertise. Our engineering and hydrogeology staff complement is under increasing service pressure.

153 TRCA Development Planning and Policy teams are working together to complete 11 flood vulnerable Special Policy Area updates. These SPAs are often in areas needing development revitalization, and where development applications need input with updated hydrology modeling and risk assessment direction. This is a ground breaking work effort tailored to assist municipalities to set land use and development directions within flood vulnerable communities – particularly with the increasing concerns about severe storms and the impacts on older communities that are flood prone.

Environmental Assessment Trends In the suburban municipalities, there has been a steady increase in the number of regional and local infrastructure master plans, as well as, environmental assessment permitting. There has been steady growth in transit related projects, as well as utility projects that include gas lines and telecommunications. With 23 communities currently in the planning stages, it is anticipated that this growth will only continue to increase in future years. In developed communities, particularly Toronto, there has been a steady increase in the number of emergency works projects. This relates directly to the fact that old and failing infrastructure was historically built in valleylands. As the rivers and streams downcut and meander over time (a factor of natural process and exacerbated by poorly situated infrastructure and the effects of climate change), the infrastructure is left exposed. Repair to these pipes and bridges is becoming more complex, as well as, more urgent. As the city continues to intensify, the stress on the older infrastructure will also continue to increase, and it is fully anticipated that the trend in increased emergency projects will continue. Regardless of whether the infrastructure is serving suburban or urban nodes, the complexity of the TRCA review has also changed significantly to account for changes in science and information. Geomorphic assessments, political inputs, redevelopment/intensification occurring in regulated areas including flood vulnerable sites, ecologically sensitive or hazardous areas are all major factors in infrastructure development today. There is also a growing change in partnership opportunities between infrastructure providers and TRCA Restoration Services, from monitoring, to planting and stream realignments. These new synergies between the TRCA and the infrastructure provider to work together in the project construction phase provides essential expert services for challenging construction sites, saves public funds and timing delays to support public infrastructure and private community development.

TRCA provides our municipal partners, with service agreements, with a dedicated planning and technical review team, detailed service delivery standards, project tracking and reporting, monthly team meetings, and weekly in-office staff support. The fees are negotiated annually through the municipal capital delivery programs, including water and wastewater, roads and transit services. Service agreements have been in place with York and Peel Region, the City of Brampton and Enbridge Gas since early 2000’s and are continually refined to meet shifts in service demands. On a project basis, TRCA also has service agreements in place with Metrolinx Rapid Transit Implementation (RTI) and the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP). Negotiations are underway with the City of Markham and Metrolinx.

154 Level of Service Planning application timelines are usually lead by the municipal process, however, TRCA works to meet our 30-45 day turnaround for standard applications, with some exceptions for very complex files or where unusual technical assessments are required e.g. engineering modeling. Permitting applications also maintain an 80 to 90% adherence to provincial time guidelines.

Environmental Assessment team tracks and reports on a tight service delivery standard for its service delivery partners, and meets these standards 80-90% of the time. For non-service delivery partners, the standards are met approximately 70% of the time.

The following detailed summary provides an overview of the service delivery tied to current guidelines for Planning & Development submissions response in Peel, York and Durham Regions. We believe that our service delivery is generally quite exemplary under current workload pressures and the complexity of applications. Other agencies and municipalities are also facing service delivery challenges.

Peel and York Planning Review teams:

 Standard/Straight forward applications: includes standard permits, Committee of Adjustment, site plans and condominium applications, Very High consistency with service delivery guidelines - 90%+ compliance.

 Rezoning applications and OPAs: Very High, 90%+ compliance.

 Subdivisions: 75% compliance. Variance typically the result of incomplete or premature applications, and very complex subdivisions. Straight forward subdivisions have Very High compliance.

 MESPs less complex: generally meeting the 30-60 day review time (close to 60 days) Resubmission generally taking about 30 days, depending upon complexity. Overall compliance 80-90%. Typical reason for variance, workload volume both within and between teams.

 MESPs, Complex: Typical review time 90-120 days, where 100% completed within 120 days, 75% completed within 90 days, and approximately 60% completed within 60 days. Typical reasons for variance, lack of integrating of components of MESP, incomplete and piecemeal MESP submissions, errors in the submission, time delay between submission by developer to municipality and our receipt, and balancing workload.

The following service delivery comments are provided for Toronto and Durham Service Deliveries:

 Straightforward applications, includes standard permits, minor variances, site plans: Very high consistency with service delivery guidelines. 100% compliance. Typical minor works are turned around in about 2 weeks from complete application; variances are turned around within municipal deadline which is typically 20 days from date of notice.

155  Rezoning applications, OPAs, complex land division applications, major permits, permits associated with violations: Very high. 90% + compliance. In Toronto there is a strict "complete application determination" process which helps to speed up the process. Ajax also requires pre-consultation meetings.

 Subdivisions: Very high. 90% + compliance. In Pickering typical delays for the application are the result of incomplete or premature applications, and very complex subdivisions. Straight forward subdivisions or fully complete applications have very high compliance. Clearance of Draft Plan Conditions usually done in a matter of days.

 MESPs: Very high. TRCA has Seaton in this jurisdiction, and experience with A9, Duffins Heights and Duffins Precinct. TRCA met and exceeded the agreed upon 2 or 3 month turnaround. Delays are strictly the result of incomplete or simply incorrect or uncoordinated information being provided. The review team has been stellar through unrealistic deadlines.

The technical team disciplines in engineering, geotechnical and ecology are usually on or before service delivery deadlines with some exception when workload imbalances occur. Hydrogeology and geomorphology review is usually on time but with greater sensitivity to workload imbalance.

In a few municipalities, applications are routinely determined to be “complete” even when they clearly are not, which results in overall delays for the proponent. However, once complete, compliance is very high. Sometimes we end up with situations where the application materials are extremely disjointed and the review teams have more questions than comments. In those situations, we will call a technical workshop or special meeting with the municipality and the developer to clarify issues before sending out comments. In those cases, the comment letters appear delayed, but solutions are in progress.

York Region plan review teams, although split in 2 separate teams for better coverage has significant pressures for file review and has been addressing over double the volume of planning and permitting files that other regional municipalities forward for TRCA's input. Review team assistance is required.

Efficiency in Operations The Plan Review teams for Toronto, Durham, York and Peel have continued to run as lean as possible in 2012-13 with minor staffing adjustments to redistribute staffing skills covering submission demands. Each planning-project management team was adjusted by 0.5 FTE to assist in back-filling senior staff. The following overview provides just a 2013 snapshot of the planning team coverage and numbers of new applications per year/per planner/per team:

Peel /York East Team (includes Markham and Richmond Hill)

Planning Applications 360 Permits 257 Concepts/Advisory 44 Violations 19 Total New files 680 (managed by 7 FTE)

156 Toronto/Durham Team (includes Ajax, Pickering, Uxbridge)

Planning Applications 142 Permits 346 Concepts 83 Violations 31 Total New Files 602 (managed by 6 FTE)

Vaughan/York West Team (includes Aurora, King, Whitchurch-Stouffville)

Planning Applications 155 Permits 178 Concepts 43 Violations 30 Total New files 406 (managed by 5 FTE)

Each planner is managing between 100-150 files per year including a significant carry- over file base from previous years. This does not include responsibilities for hearings, mediations and other strategic efforts to assist municipalities such as DART/DARC collaborations, working meeting with applicants, pre-consultation file start-ups, etc.

Despite an effort to backfill our plan review team to allow more senior flexibility for major files, we continue to find pressures with accommodating a workload that comes from multiple municipalities and has no manageable timelines. In fact, with all municipalities well into their growth plan community plan projects, and gearing up for even more community plans driven by landowner objectives, the multiple pressures are not sustainable without a major infusion of funding tailored for senior staff time. The unscheduled “randomness” of applications, re-submissions and the short turnaround expectations for commenting and meetings with agencies has become difficult to coordinate and provide manpower, even with strident streamlining efforts completed every year. A greater level of project management has to be established between the municipalities, TRCA and the landowner teams to work through the processes constructively with high quality submissions, collaborative discussions, and realistic scheduling expectations.

The Enforcement/Compliance team was restructured in 2012-13 with a senior level retirement and a new managerial position. Re-structuring of staff responsibilities and balancing of workload took place within refined officer positions and new field boundaries. This re-structuring positively provided a net savings to the team in salary expenditure, a more efficient distribution of field responsibilities and capabilities within the 5-officer team, as well as, succession planning for future.

The Environmental Assessment team has remained steady with their base workload for lower tier and agency infrastructure, and service agreements for several municipalities in Peel, York, Brampton and Toronto. We continued to expand our service delivery capability through new service agreements with several transit and utility companies in 2012-13 to foster more responsive service delivery and dedicated staff involvement in submission review.

157 Value Added Services In the fee schedule of 2012, TRCA introduced several new “fees for service” categories to assist applicants move through the sometimes complex approval process particularly with technically challenged site proposals. Increased senior staff involvement in all levels of major applications has been inbedded in many projects over the last two years – this assists with proponent concerns and facilitating negotiations in a timely manner. Improved services for Pre-consultation efforts and project management assistance have been used with some proponents to manage through the complex approvals. The original expedited review fee was essentially tied to urgently needed conditions of draft approval – however, it is in increasing demand from applicants to be applied to other urgent approval situations. This service puts difficult demands on senior staff that are already working significant amounts of after hours. P&D have had to shift staff from other TRCA projects to work on demanding community growth projects and overlapping pressures from competing municipalities. Further consideration of this fee for service is warranted as growth area efforts continue.

We also continue, for instance, to respond and to attend negotiations for OMB hearings where we have no control over the triggers or process timing. Our expedited reviews and participation with municipalities assist the process and have usually allowed environmental issues to be mediated out of the hearing process, with benefits to the municipality and the applicant. We have been successful with these OMB endeavours with limited to no legal assistance and manage our legal fee budget carefully.

The technical collaborative that TRCA senior staff provides in all areas of environmental planning, engineering and ecology saves the municipalities the cost of individualized consulting and peer review funds associated with meeting complex legislative requirements and high service demand from the development industry.

Streamlining Efforts during 2012-13 Planning and Development has worked this year to improve many areas of our daily operations and customer service for efficiencies, as per our streamlining proposals of 2011. We have worked to improve:

 accounting and financial tracking through our new corporate accounting measures;

 established a pilot project for on-line payment;

 worked towards digital submission improvements with our partner municipalities and the consulting industry;

 established a major internal overhaul of our application/approval data base process – with a new streamlined digitized application circulation/ project tracking system;

 streamlined the approvals process for minor and standard permitting applications with the new Provincially approved staff delegation process. This is a significant scheduling improvement for both our development industry and municipal partners.

158 Details of the staff delegation process can be found in our report to the Authority on November

1,2013. Details are posted on our Planning and Development website.

Future streamlining efforts will include continued improvements towards less paperwork and digital efficiencies in file management, and more triage style/project management approaches to development review for large complex files.

Cost Recovery Analysis Table 3 provides an updated summary of the cost associated with the operation of the Planning & Development function (inclusive of engineering and ecology), with comparisons from 2011 through to 2013. Our staffing expenditures have remained similar to 2011 levels with only minor adjustments and reclassification of responsibilities. There has been no major staff infusion from 2011 staffing levels.

TRCA planning staff has worked diligently to collect fee revenues without the assistance of additional administrative support. The revenue generated in 2012 and 2013 is identified below and has done extremely well to recover the baseline cost (or over 80%) of our Planning & Development operations for Planning review. We will continue to work towards recovery of additional planning deficiencies to reach an estimated revenue target of $5,157,000 as established in our assessment of 2011. The revenue collected is highlighted below:

2012 2013 Total Planning and Permitting revenue $4,505,050 $4,192,000 Total Environmental Assessment revenue $626,220 $682,950 TOTAL REVENUE /collected $5,131,270 $4,874,950

There was a successful additional increase in collection of $1,455,050 in 2012 over 2011 revenue, and subsequently, $1,142,000 over 2011 in 2013. The difference in shortfall between our ideal revenue target and actual revenues for 2012-13 ranged between $650,000 - $965,000. Our ultimate target may need to be more flexible based on variables with the volume of base applications, however, we will work to decrease this gap with our revised fee proposal.

The Environmental Assessment team has recovered additional revenue on fee collection, as well as, with an additional increase of between $176,220 in 2012, and $232,950 in 2013, respectively. Although the EA team has not had such a marked increase through individual EA fee collection, they have been very successful building up annual revenue through a “service agreement” approach with municipalities with large EA volume and implementation timing pressures. These service agreements have worked so well to build dedicated staffing capacity on an annual basis, that other agencies and utility companies are now participating as well to obtain dedicated service and attention to fast tracked projects. The EA team has built an increase in agreement-type revenue from approx. $1.2 million in 2011 to $1.8 in 2013/14.

The Fee Collection Challenge

All Planning Departments in conservation authorities and municipal government experience fluctuations in types of applications and the roller-coaster of revenue generation due to changes in volume and complexity of applications versus the standard of service delivery.

159 For the Planning and Permitting Review function, the change in revenue in 2013 is directly attributable to three(3) factors:

 The decrease in approximately 50 major planning applications between 2012 and 2013 which caused a net loss of revenue of about $500,000 to $550,000. These applications included a shift of a mix of subdivisions, site plans, consents and a few OPA/ZBA in Toronto, Richmond Hill and Brampton.

 The loss of adequate fee coverage attributed to planning processes for complex files, MESP’s and special studies supporting growth areas including phasing of work, expedited requirements, inadequate or repetitive submissions, lack of project management, landowner complications and professional integration of technical findings. These workpath deviations have been out of our control.

 Lack of mechanisms to collect fees for unusual or prolonged and challenging processes e.g. OMB, Special Policy Area reviews, flood vulnerable growth area negotiations (e.g. Vaughan Metropolitan Centre), extended construction periods for permits and management of infractions/lack of compliance.

The first point is clear that reductions in volume will affect revenue, however, when TRCA is managing several thousand new and current applications in planning and permitting the full complement of experienced staff is required to maintain service delivery in busy times.

Our monitoring of complex application processes and the MESP service delivery identifies that our fee estimates were covering more straight forward block plans several years ago, but are not covering the complexities of recent large or complex submissions. Our MESP fee cannot adapt easily to the variations in each municipality without some custom negotiations to address anomalies in the process. For example, applicants are demanding phasing the MESP’s and fast tracking certain landholdings to address urgent employment targets, adding subwatershed/secondary planning processes as separate components, dividing community plans between landholders and professional teams, lack of adherence to approved Terms of Reference and agreed schedules, and creating unrealistic deadlines. All projects are requiring the need for extensive meetings and technical working sessions to generate project management moving forward and more collaborative solutions to difficult planning/technical issues.

TRCA’s current fee for MESP’s will not stretch to accommodate subwatershed work programs nor to absorb alterations in the process as described above. We particularly need additional coverage for fees for the extensive meeting and working sessions that are forming the norm with the applicant’s consultants and between the applicants and the public agencies, as well as processes that continue well past a 2-year norm.

160 Over the last few months, TRCA and several of our municipal partners have initiated discussions with several development teams in Markham, Brampton, and Vaughan about major, new projects and secondary planning processes that are coming forward for 2014 and 2015. All parties agree that a customized fee approach fronted by the developers is the only way to obtain funds to start new processes for seven new community initiatives – no agency has the staffing capacity right now without this funding assistance.

Many of our existing MESP’s that are in progress are well beyond the 2 year re-evaluation criteria in our guidelines. Our assessment indicates that in most active MESP processes we are spending on average about $100,000/per year/per MESP in staff time for 5 professional disciplines’ involvement, with up to $50,000 in additional meetings, working sessions and project coordination between landowners and municipalities. This exceeds our current fee for MESP’s when most are 3 years and longer in timing.

Our cost of living inflationary increase will generate about $200,000 of additional revenue for next year. To work closer to achieve our fee target coverage, TRCA would have to generate either another 20% more in fee generation or selectively adjust fees where workload pressures prevail, to accommodate an increased revenue stream for the planning and permitting function to move closer to the desired target.

Proposal for 2014- 2015 Cost Recovery It is recommended that in order to bring the level of service up to meet new workload demands through 2014 -15, and to target a revenue stream that more closely reaches 100% recovery, TRCA should not increase all fees but should adjust those application types that are putting more time/cost pressure on the staffing complement. The strategy should be three-fold:

1) Increase all major and complex file categories with an increased “coordination/project management” adjustment of 25%.

2) Adjust all current MESP processes to reflect additional efforts after a 2 year timeframe per our current guidelines, inclusive of coordination meetings, expedited review, phasing of project components, and, where appropriate, specialized technical review e.g. hydrogeology. Renegotiated fees will be customized on a time allowance basis.

3) Going forward, negotiate all new 2014-15 fee service agreements for subwatershed or MESP (Master Environmental Servicing Plans) with additional allowances for project management, phasing and expedited review work tasks, and other special timing and technical considerations as required. Allowances over and above the base MESP fee must be tailored to increased staffing capacity to take on concurrent studies within different municipalities.

Negotiations must also continue with municipal partners to build customized budgets for special urban revitalization studies outside the standard fee based structure (e.g. FVA's, urban MESP areas).

161 In addition, it is recommended that our new proposed fee schedule for 2014-15 include several minor modifications based on our discussions with staff and stakeholders about improved implementation, streamlining and housekeeping. Other minor refinements for streamlining include:

Planning and Permitting Fee Schedule  Expanding the concept development category to allow applicant more choice – residential, expedited real estate evaluation, technical review and input.  Blending the application and clearance fees for all OPA and ZBA’s for easier collection and streamlining.  Expanding the reactivation fee for larger projects.  Adding new clearance letter category for other agencies (MOE, NEC, etc.), new archaeological screening for private proposals on TRCA lands.  Providing Fisheries Act review changes and clarifications;  Adding a condominium administration clearance fee.  Adding a Conformity Review Fee  Clarification for Revisions, Re-issuance and Extensions of permits.

Environmental Assessment Fee Schedule  Modifications for clarity - the review of Crown Corporations applications and possible exemptions from TRCA regulatory approval;  New categories of fees to assist applicants of infrastructure projects e.g., Voluntary Project Review; National and Ontario Energy Board Applications; Environmental Management Plans (new category)  Clarification for Revisions, Re-Issuance and Extensions of permit;  Compliance Monitoring – clarification for additional site visits.

The following three figures (Tables 1, 2, 3) provide the updated proposals for the Planning, Permitting and Environmental Assessment Fee Schedules, inclusive of the recommendations included above.

Discussion with BILD and Municipal partners Discussions with our municipal partners and development industry representatives, who are most affected by the pressures of growth planning and construction implementation, have been ongoing since the beginning of 2014. Custom fee negotiations with the development community to cover Municipal and TRCA staffing requirements, have already been agreed to in several instances in Markham, Vaughan, Caledon, Pickering and Brampton. The principles of financial coverage of these staffing pressures needs to continue with landowners and consultants as TRCA moves forward with other growth area updates.

162 A formal presentation was completed on May 8th with BILD representatives to discuss our final draft of the Living City Policy document, and to review this cost recovery report and revised fee schedule as attached. A working session is also planned for May 16th with our BILD working committee.

Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 13, 2014 Attachments: 6

163 Attachment 1 Table 1 SUMMARY OF PLANNING APPLICATION RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY 2007-2013 Local Municipality YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Adjala-Tos. 1321002 Ajax 2727714121215 Aurora 2001011 Brampton 89 48 42 31 57 65 46 Caledon 63 70 63 37 55 68 93 King 43 29 20 28 22 32 32 Markham 60 56 32 45 66 56 51 Mississa uga 24 11 19 6 15 28 25 Mono 1100112 Niagara Esc. Com. 18 15 8 12 11 7 12 Pickering 30 55 46 25 26 24 21 Richmond Hill 82 103 73 84 115 157 129 Toronto 125 157 136 133 134 118 94 Uxbridge 66567512 Vaughan 119 105 73 103 130 114 112 Whitchurch-St. 23 18 12 7 5 19 10 Durham Region (region apps. 0200100 Peel Region (region apps.) 2100102 York Region (region apps.) 2100020 TOTAL: 717 708 538 533 658 709 659 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES Peel Region 196 145 132 86 139 168 178 York Region 331 312 210 268 338 381 335 Durham Region 63 90 58 45 46 41 48 Toronto 125 157 136 133 134 118 94 PLANNING TEAM Adjala, Brampton, Caledon, Markham, Miss., Mono, 338 307 239 216 320 382 360 Richm ond Hill Aurora, King, Vaughan, 187 152 105 139 157 166 155 Whitchurch-Stouffvile

Ajax, Pickering, Toronto, Uxbridge 188 245 194 178 179 159 142

164 Attachment 2 Table 2 Planning and Development

Performance/Trends - Updated April 2014

165 Attachment 3 Table 3

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT / ECOLOGY PLAN REVIEW FUNCTION Cost Assessment for 2012-13

Direct Plan & Permit Review Direct Levy/Capital Support for 2011 2012-2013 2011 2012-2013 Costs (Private Landowner Plan Input (Policy, Technical, $ $ $ $ Development) Public Infrastructure)

Planning staff 846,500 994,400 EA core staff (Planning) 549,000 596,000 Regulation staff 931,000 1,069,000 Expenses 40,000 40,000 Expenses 115,000 222,800 EA core staff (Ecology/engineering) 230,500 342,715 1,892,500 2,286,200 EA Property 90,000 90,000 EA Permit Compliance 175,000 178,200 IT Records/GIS 100,000 100,000 Permit Compliance 345,000 362,000 (2011 base) Subtotal 1,184,500 1,346,915

Ecology (Development Review) Planning/Ecology Service Level Deficiencies 1,219,500 902,950 200,000 - IT/Records/GIS 207,500 207,500 plus OVERHEAD 15% 207,670 202,000 Property 150,000 150,000 Total Levy Based EA Costs 1,592,170 1,548,915 Total existing operation 3,814,500 3,908,650 Policy/Supporting: Planning Admin./Policy 209,500 248,000 plus OVERHEAD 15% 572,200 586,300 Growth planning 147,000 142,000 (accounting/vehicles, insurance, etc.) Technical Regulation mapping 120,000 126,000 Baseline Costs * 4,386,700 4,495,000 SPA/Flood Risk 95,000 98,000 Planning Service Level Deficiencies 570,000 Regulation/Prov. Policy 137,000 130,000 Ecology Service Level Deficiencies 100,000 Floodplain mapping & modelling 200,000 232,000 plus OVERHEAD 15% 100,500 FVA & SPA technical studies 150,000 250,000 Total Plan & Permit Review Total Levy Capital support for Plan 5,157,200 2,650,670 2,774,915 Costs Input and EA Review

Separate Service Agreements 1.8 million

* Assumptions: - 20% removed for staff admin./policy/other responsibilities. - No policy in direct operations costs. - overtime not in/or full overhead. BASELINE SUMMARY: TOTAL Direct Plan and Permit Review Costs $5,157,200 TOTAL Levy Support for Plan Input $2,650,670 TOTAL Planning, EA and Permitting Function $7,807,870

April 2014

166 Attachment 4 Schedule #1 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for PLANNING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES May 2014 Introduction

TRCA’s Fee Schedule for Planning Services was approved by Resolution #A237/13 of the Authority on January 31, 2014. The Fee Schedule adheres to the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees, the TRCA’s Fee Policy Guideline 2009, and the range of planning services consistent with TRCA’s Memorandums of Understanding with area municipalities. The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of planning and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval efforts for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review charges, red line revision processing (where possible), and a project management assistance fee.

Administration of Applications and Fees

1. All planning application submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Planning and Development Division of TRCA. 2. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's planning area managers and the Director, Planning and Development on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 3. Pre-consultation - A pre-consultation meeting with the municipality and TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the planning application should be held. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If through the application processing, the scope of the application changes, then fee adjustments will be determined. All applications must be deemed complete, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing. 4. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that can not be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Director, Planning and Development and/or CEO’s Office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format with justification of appeal request is recommended. 5. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the Director, Planning and Development. 6. The application fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the municipality. The final clearance fee will be billed directly by the TRCA and paid prior to final clearance of an application. All payments must be made within 30 days of TRCA notification in writing. Interest will be charged and accumulated beyond 30 days. 7. Re-submission fees will be billed directly by the TRCA and must be paid prior to final clearance of an application. 8. Only one set of fees applies when processing and reviewing a combined application (e.g. a combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision application). The highest rate of fees applies. If the applications are received more than 6 months apart then separate fees apply. 9. The TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort or for development application scenarios not captured in the Fee Schedule. Custom fees will be negotiated for fast-tracked or unique circumstances for large scale or complex review efforts. Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling and may be charged to the applicant. TRCA reserves the right to assess fee requirements after one year of processing planning applications. Additional fees can be charged after one year and for unreasonable delays. 10. All application fees (except minor Concept Development) include one initial site visit, where appropriate. 11. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees to reflect new planning or regulatory legislative requirements.(e.g. Bill 51) 12. Base geotechnical and hydrogeology review is included. Applications will be subject to an additional fee for complex reviews and advisory services. TRCA will inform applicants as early as possible in the process. The standard additional charge is $2,100 and the major additional charge is $3,150 - $4,725 based on scope.

167 13. Any application that is inactive for 5 years or more is considered dormant by TRCA and a new application for processing and fee purposes is required. 14. Federal Fisheries Act changes: Modifications have been made to the fee schedules to reflect recent amendments to the Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) Level III partnership agreement under the Fisheries Act for development review applicants. TRCA will continue to deliver services directed toward the protection, restoration and management of aquatic systems, including fish and fish habitat as an integral part of its watershed management and regulatory responsibilities as well as agreements with Ministry of Natural Resources and our memoranda of understanding with municipalities. Fish habitat information and field data will be provided to applicants as needed for the new Fisheries Act self assessment process or any DFO authorizations

Administration of Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) Applications

The Fee Schedule sets a base fee across the jurisdiction as follows:

Proposals 25ha or less: $ 7,500 Base Fee Proposals greater than 25ha: $15,000 Base Fee

1. An additional baseline charge of $475 per gross hectare is applied to each application. The gross area includes natural systems. 2. An additional project management fee will be added to cover meetings for committee and team coordination, as well as, general meeting sessions (Range $25,000 - $50,000).

The following apply to MESP applications:

1. The Fee Schedule assumes an average 2 year timeframe for MESP completion. TRCA reserves the right to re-evaluate the MESP scope of work and progress related to fee status after a two year process. Additional fees will be added for extended timeframes and associated multiple reviews. Payment due for changes in scope and timeline at the 2-year review date. 2. A Terms of Reference for the MESP work tasks must be prepared and agreed to by all parties including the municipality, TRCA and the proponent. 3. Fee charges apply to Residential and Industrial/Commercial Block planning. Non-participating landowners need to apply and pay the MESP component commensurate with current fee at the time. 4. The fee schedule includes the following MESP milestone payment structure:

MESP PHASE OF WORK PAYABLE

a. Preliminary Initiation (at Project start-up) Base Fee applies (Scoping of MESP/Terms of Reference Initiation) b. Terms of Reference completion/MESP Initiation 50% payable (Includes existing conditions report/field work/ First MESP Submission/Review) c. Prior to First Submission Comments 20% payable d. Prior to issuance of final MESP approval by TRCA 30% payable (Maximum 3 review submissions)

5. All official plan amendment, zoning and draft plans of subdivision fee requirements that evolve out of the Secondary/Block Plan process and MESP process apply separately as per TRCA's approved Fee Schedule at the time of submission. No additional per lot charges will apply on draft plans of subdivision if an MESP is completed, approved and paid for. 6. Plans of subdivision that have not been studied under the MESP process will be charged an additional fee of $105 per unit, over and above the subdivision base and clearance fees (see schedule). Subdivisions not included as part of original MESP/Block Plan approval will be charged on a per unit basis for updated plans. 7. On occasion, MESP fee requirements may be scoped to the type of municipal process and scheduling parameters (e.g. fast-tracked, updates and transitional files, reduced scope of work, phasing, additional reviews).

168 8. Construction permits for works under TRCA's provincial regulation are charged separately at the time of detailed design and construction of draft plan components (such as stormwater management facilities, road/bridge crossings, pipe boring and drilling works, stream channel works, etc).

Definitions

The following definitions apply to applications to determine fee review category:

Screening Assessment – projects for which a letter/response is required from the TRCA (i.e. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) but does not affect the program or policy interests of the TRCA. No technical review is associated with this project.

Minor – projects for which a letter/response is required from the TRCA (i.e. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) which may affect the program or policy interests of the TRCA, and requires technical review related to only one technical discipline.

Standard – projects that meet TRCA policies, and require routine technical analysis (i.e. standard EIS review and/or water management screening and assessment, or standard geotechnical review).

Major – projects which are significant in geographic area, and/or for which submission of a suite of applicable technical studies is required to demonstrate that TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests can be met (e.g. ORM, Rouge Park, NEC). Major projects generally require more complex ecological, geotechnical, water resource engineering, hydrogeological, or fluvial geomorphic studies and assessment. Major projects may require more than one technical team or planning meeting.

Complex – projects for which a full suite of applicable technical studies are required to demonstrate consistency with TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests (e.g. ORM, Rouge Park, NEC). Complex projects typically involve extensive modifications to the landscape. Complex projects may also be characterized by one or more of the following: a. The need for multiple resubmissions or extensive working meetings; b. The need for additional TRCA technical assessments (i.e. technical modeling refinements); c. Extensive technical study review, including complex hydrogeological, fluvial geomorphology; natural channel design, wetland interference, environmental impact studies; d. Require more than one day of TRCA fieldwork.

Incomplete Submissions - A submission for review is deemed to be “incomplete” where TRCA has provided a checklist of requirements, and the application has not met all requirements.

Applicant Driven Formal Modification - A fee for an “applicant driven formal modification” will be charged where plans are submitted for review after the application has received planning approval from the municipality.

169 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for PLANNING SERVICES May 2014

Fee Schedule for Planning Services

170 171 172 173 Attachment 5

Schedule #2 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule For PERMITTING SERVICES For Development, Interference with Wetlands & Alterations To Shorelines & Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES May 2014

Introduction

TRCA’s Fee Schedule for Permitting Services for Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) was adopted by Resolution #A237/13 of the Authority on January 31, 2014. The Fee Schedule adheres to the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees, the TRCA’s Fee Policy Guideline 2009, and the range of planning services consistent with TRCA’s Memorandums of Understanding with area municipalities.

The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of regulatory and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval efforts for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review charges, red line revision processing (where possible), and a project management assistance fee.

Administration of Applications and Fees:

1. All permit application submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Planning and Development Division of TRCA. 2. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's planning area managers and the Director, Planning and Development on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 3. Pre-consultation - A pre-consultation meeting with TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the permit application is mandatory. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If through the application processing, the scope of the application changes, fee adjustments will be determined. All applications must be deemed complete, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing. 4. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that can not be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Director, Planning and Development and/or CEO's office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format with justification of appeal request is recommended for an appeal. 5. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the Director, Planning and Development. 6. The permit fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the TRCA. In the event that the permit fee is not paid at the time of filing an application, fees must be paid prior to issuing a permit. 7. The TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort. Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical, and specialized modelling and may be charged to the applicant. 8. All permits are issued for two years. Requests for a permit issuance beyond the standard two year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval.

174 9. There are no extensions for permits issued under Ontario Regulation 166/06. On a one-time basis, applicants may apply for a permit extension provided such requests are made and upon notification 60 days prior to the expiration of an Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit, applicants may apply for re-issuance of a new permit for the original approved works, before the works are considered new. Such requests will be assessed in accordance with any new updated technical hazard information and the current policies in place. There is no guarantee of an automatic approval. In the Application for Permit Re-issuance, applicants shall set out the reasons for which an extension is required. Requests for a permit extension/re-issuance beyond the standard two year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval. 10. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees related to regulatory legislation changes or updates. 11. Expedited Review Additional Charge applies only to unanticipated circumstances requiring fast-tracked approvals (primarily clearance), and can only be approved by Director as staffing capability allows.

Definitions

The following apply to Residential Property

Minor – projects for which a letter/response is required from TRCA (e.g. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) which may affect the program or policy interests of the TRCA, and requires technical review related to one technical discipline. Projects include ancillary structures such as decks, sheds, garages, and pools and placement of less than 30 cubic metres of fill.

Standard – projects that meet TRCA policies, and require routine technical analysis (e.g. standard EIS Environmental Impact Statement review and/or water management screening and assessment, or standard geotechnical review). Projects include additions, structures or buildings; works in the floodplain and placement of fill (over 30 cubic metres) and associated grading/fill placement.

Major – projects which are significant in geographic area, and/or for which submission of a suite of applicable technical studies is required to demonstrate that TRCA or partner municipality program and policy interests can be met. Major projects generally require more complex ecological, geotechnical, water resource engineering, hydrogeological, or fluvial geomorphic studies and assessment. Major projects may require more than one technical team or planning meeting. Projects include major additions (greater than 50% of the original ground floor area), new structures or buildings; all works in the floodplain; and the placement of 30 cubic metres or more of fill.

175 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule For PERMITTING SERVICES For Development, Interference with Wetlands & Alterations To Shorelines & Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) May 2014

176 177 178 Attachment 6

Schedule #3 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES May 2014

Introduction TRCA’s Fee Schedule for Environmental Assessment and Permitting Services was adopted by Resolution #A237/13 of the Authority Board on January 31, 2014. The Fee Schedule was developed in consultation with municipalities through an assessment of service delivery which adheres to the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees, the TRCA’s Fee Policy Guideline 2009, and the range of Environmental Assessment (EA) services consistent with TRCA’s Service Delivery Agreements and/or Memorandums of Understanding with area municipalities.

The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of EA and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval efforts for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review charges, red line revision processing (where possible), and a project management assistance fee.

General Notes 1. All EA and permit application submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Planning and Development Division of TRCA. 2. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's EA Senior Manager or the Director, Planning and Development on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 3. Pre-consultation - A pre-consultation meeting with TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the EA or permit application is mandatory. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If through the application processing, the scope of the application changes, fee adjustments will be determined. All applications must be deemed complete, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing. 4. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that cannot be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Director, Planning and Development and/or CEO's office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format with justification of appeal request is recommended. 5. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the EA Senior Manager or Director, Planning and Development. 6. The application fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the TRCA. Applications will not be processed until fees are received. 7. All permits are issued for two years. Requests for a permit issuance beyond the standard two year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval. 8. On a one-time basis, applicants may apply for a permit extension provided such requests are made 60 days prior to the expiration of an Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit. In the Application for Permit Re-issuance, applicants shall set out the reasons for which an extension is required. Requests for a permit extension/re-issuance beyond the standard two year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval. 9. Generally, only one set of fees applies when processing and reviewing a combined application (e.g. an EA Property Screening or Inquiry or an Ontario Regulation 166/06 Permit Application). The highest rate of fees applies. However, when there are two separate approvals required, such as a permit and site plan review, two separate fees are applied in accordance with the respective fee schedules. 10. TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort (e.g., Environmental Management Plan Review). Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling and may be charged to the applicant. 11. All application fees (except EA Property Screening or Inquiry) include one initial site visit, if needed, up to ½ day for minor or standard files and up to 1 day for major or complex files. 179 12. Specific Municipal Service Delivery Agreements take precedent over the fee schedule. 13. For Class Environmental Assessments, the schedules or categories specific to the respective class EA document or environmental assessment review procedures of utility boards or commissions, including Enbridge, Consumers Gas or Bell Canada, will be applied. 14. Planning Act applications rates can be found in the TRCA Planning Services Fee Schedule . 15. Routine Infrastructure Works Application review is subject to the respective TRCA procedure. 16. Emergency Works Application review is subject to the respective TRCA procedure. 17. Development activities within regulated areas that are on lands owned by, and/or conducted by, a provincial or federal agency, are exempt from the regulatory approval process under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act . As such permits in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06 are not required. Notwithstanding, the TRCA Voluntary Project Review process may apply as per #6 of the Proponents and Projects Exempt from the TRCA Regulatory Approval Process , below, and review fees will be charged. It should be noted that other legislation and approvals may apply to these projects and it is the responsibility of the proponent to obtain such approvals. 18. Development activities within regulated areas that are conducted by proponents identified, through legislation, as being exempt from the regulatory approval process under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, do not require permits in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06.Notwithstanding, the TRCA Voluntary Project Review process may apply as per #6 of the Proponents and Projects Exempt from the TRCA Regulatory Approval Process , below, and review fees will be charged. It should be noted that other legislation and approvals may apply to these projects and it is the responsibility of the proponent to obtain such approvals. 19. Unless noted above (#15 or 16) development activities within regulated areas, watercourse or wetlands on lands through which an easement, or other form of permission, has been obtained from a crown agency are not exempt from the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act . This includes, but is not limited to municipal, gas, oil, electricity or utility projects. 20. Minor project review means that no or limited technical Natural Heritage Impact Studies and engineering review reports are required as part of the submission, together with detailed design drawings if appropriate; standard project review means that scoped technical studies or reports are required as part of the submission (such as hydrology, ecological, stormwater), together with detailed design drawings if appropriate. Major and complex project review means that comprehensive technical studies or reports are required as part of the submission (such as meander belt, hydrogeology, geotechnical, environmental impact studies) together with detailed design drawings if appropriate. 21. TRCA has extensive environmental and cultural data that is available for use by the proponent, subject to the waiver of a legal disclaimer and the provision of user fees. Where there are data sharing agreements in place, municipalities, agencies and Crown corporations or agencies are exempt from these fees and the data will be provided free of charge. All others are expected to purchase data as per the fee schedule. Current data sharing agreements are in place with all municipalities in the TRCA jurisdiction, as well as the Ministry of Natural Resources, and various service agreement partners.

Proponents and Projects Exempt from the TRCA Regulatory Approval Process 1. In accordance with the Crown Agency Act , R.S.O. 1990, C. 48, s.1, and the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, C. 27, the following Crown corporations or agencies are exempt from the regulatory approval process under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act :

 Metrolinx  GO Transit  Hydro One* (and local subsidiaries, such as Brampton Hydro One)  Ministry of Transportation  Ontario Realty Corporation (Infrastructure Ontario)  Ministry of Natural Resources  Greater Toronto Airports Authority  Parc Downsview Park

*A memorandum of understanding (MOU) has been negotiated with Hydro One and Conservation Ontario and applies to all conservation authorities, including TRCA. The MOU prescribes the communication process to be followed between Hydro One and conservation authorities, as well as best management practices that may be implemented by Hydro One when carrying out construction or maintenance operations. Consultation with conservation authorities is required prior to all planned and emergency activities. It is acknowledged that conservation authorities may charge review fees. Permission to enter is required for works on conservation authority-owned lands, including access. 180 2. In accordance with the Canadian Transportation Act* , railways are exempt from the regulatory approval process under section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act for works essential to railway operations :

 Canadian National Railway  Canadian Pacific Railway

* Under the provisions of the Canadian Transportation Act, CN and CP railway companies are exempt from the regulatory approval process under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act for all works that are essential to railway operations. These works include, but are not limited to, watercourse alterations and diversions, culvert and bridge modifications, and the construction of tunnels, embankments, bridges and roads. However, the railway is to do as little damage as possible and is to restore watercourses as near as possible to its former condition.

3. In accordance with CPC-2-0-03 — Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems , antenna systems and towers (e.g., Rogers, Bell and TELUS), are exempt from Environmental Assessment Act, Planning Act , and Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act processes and requirements and are the direct responsibility of Industry Canada. Notwithstanding, there are provisions for stakeholder consultation that generally applies to all new towers greater than 15 metres in height. Proponents of these facilities will often use the site plan process under the Planning Act to facilitate such communication.

4. Environmental Assessment Act Requirements:

If projects are subject to a federal or provincial environmental assessment, review fees will be charged.

5. Planning Act Requirements:

If proponents are subject to review under the Planning Act, or seek approval under the Planning Act on a voluntary basis, review fees will be charged.

6. Detailed Design Requirements:

TRCA Permits: These proponents are exempt from the TRCA regulatory approval process (i.e., permits in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06 are not required),

TRCA Voluntary Project Review: Proponents may seek TRCA review on a voluntary basis. In such cases, TRCA will charge review fees to compensate for its time. In cases where the land owner requires TRCA Voluntary Project Review for a particular project, TRCA will charge the proponent review fees to compensate for its time.

Fisheries Act Approvals: Proponents are responsible for obtaining appropriate approvals independent of TRCA. Under the Fisheries Act self-assessment process, a proponent can voluntarily seek advice from TRCA as to whether the project is likely to cause “serious harm to fish” . In these instances TRCA, through its review, will assess if the project is likely to cause “serious harm to fish ” and advise the proponent.

Federal and Provincial Endangered Species Act Approvals: Proponents are responsible for obtaining appropriate approvals independent of TRCA.

National and Ontario Energy Board Applications

1. National and Ontario Energy Board Applications are a matter of exclusive federal or provincial jurisdiction, respectively, with the board itself being responsible for all decisions. Through these processes, proponents are required to consult community stakeholders, including conservation authorities. TRCA can chose to comment on these applications through the commenting process established by the OEB or NEB. While there are no provisions that would allow TRCA to charge review fees for participation in a NEB or OEB process, if conditions for NEB or OEB approval specifically require TRCA involvement, appropriate fees will be negotiated on a project specific basis. 181 2. On a case by case basis, an NEB or OEB application may also be subject to the federal or provincial Environmental Assessment Act. In these cases, the appropriate review fee will be charged.

3. These projects are not exempt from provisions under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act and as such, proponents are not exempt from review fees or the TRCA regulatory approval process (i.e., permits in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06) are required.

4. These proponents may or may not be exempt from approvals under the Fisheries Act or the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act and are responsible for obtaining the appropriate approvals independent of TRCA. In accordance with the self-assessment provisions of the Fisheries Act , through the permitting process TRCA will advise the proponent if the project is likely to cause “serious ham to fish ”.

182 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES May 2014

183 184 185 ______

186 RES.#A73/14 - PROPOSED REVITALIZATION OF THE GUILD INN Lease Agreement with Guild Inn Estate Inc. and the City of Toronto for the Operation of a Restaurant and Banquet Centre at the Guild Inn Site, CFN 23035. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for approval from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to enter into a lease with Guild Inn Estate Inc. for the operation of a restaurant and banquet centre facility - Guild Inn, Lake Ontario waterfront, City of Toronto.

Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Dave Ryan

WHEREAS the City of Toronto (the "City") leases certain Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) lands pursuant to a long-term ground lease agreement between TRCA and the City dated September 1, 1993 and expiring on September 1, 2083;

AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of a request from the City, for approval, to enter into a commercial lease with Guild Inn Estate Inc. (GIE), for the operation of a restaurant and banquet facility;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to enter into the subject lease in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT approval be granted to the City, to enter into a lease with GIE of approximately 0.58 hectares (1.42 acres) of TRCA-owned lands, being Part of Lots 13 & 14, Concession C, City of Toronto, for the operation of a restaurant and banquet facility subject to the following terms and conditions;

1) The initial term of the lease be 30 years, with one additional renewal option for 10 years at the sole option of GIE;

2) The lease be premised on terms and conditions deemed satisfactory to TRCA staff and their chosen solicitor;

3) The final form of lease will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be required;

THAT the lease be subject to approval by the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, C.27,as amended;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto City Council on July 16, 2013, adopted the following:

187 1) City Council approved the selection of Dynamic Hospitality and Entertainment Group ("Dynamic") to design, build, finance and operate a new restaurant and banquet/event centre at the Guild Inn site, and authorized staff to negotiate the terms and conditions of an agreement and report back to City Council on the results of the negotiations.

Toronto City Council on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014, adopted the following:

1. City Council grant authority to enter into a Letter of Intent (the "LOI") with GIE, a subsidiary of Dynamic, for a sublease transaction for the Guild Inn Building and certain surrounding lands to construct and operate the proposed restaurant and event/banquet/conference centre, substantially on terms and conditions set out in Schedule A of Attachment 1.

2. To implement the LOI, City Council granted authority to enter into a Sublease Agreement with GIE (the "Sublease) and any other project-related agreements required to implement the transaction contemplated by LOI and Sublease subject to such further or amended terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

3. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Real Estate Services to severally execute the Letter of Intent, Sublease and Project-Related Agreements on behalf of the City.

4. City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 25, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, following the execution of the Sublease with Guild Inn Estate Inc.

5. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer or designate, in consultation with the Acting General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation or designate, to administer and manage the Sublease and Project-Related Agreements including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

6. City Council authorize the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation or designate to approve necessary tree removal that may be required in the course of this project, subject to:

a. ensuring that no unnecessary destruction occurs, as per the appropriate City of Toronto Tree Protection Bylaws, and all impacts are mitigated to the fullest extent possible; and

188 b. receipt of satisfactory tree protection plan, tree replanting plan, and natural environment stewardship plan.

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the Letter of Intent, the Sublease and Project-Related Agreements, deliver any notices, and amend the commencement and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), as the City Solicitor may, from time to time, determine.

8. City Council pass a by-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, authorizing the City to:

a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement with Guild Inn Estate Inc. in respect of a portion of 205 Guildwood Parkway that will be used as an eligible municipal capital facility for community centre use, and parking ancillary to such use (the “Eligible Property”), in accordance with Ontario Regulation 598/06;

b. declare that the Eligible Property be used primarily for local community activities, for the purposes of the City, and for a public use; and

c. exempt the Eligible Property from property taxation for municipal and school purposes, which tax exemption is to be effective from the latter of the following dates: the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed, the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted, and the commencement date of the Sublease.

9. City Council authorize the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law when enacted pursuant to the requirements of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

10. City Council authorize the City, in its capacity as land owner only (and not in its capacity as a planning/regulatory authority) to consent to the submission by Guild Inn Estate Inc. of applications and documents required in connection with any regulatory approvals in respect of the Project and further, City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Real Estate Services to severally execute any documents required in this regard.

11. City Council authorize the introduction of any necessary Bills to City Council.

12. City Council authorize the public release of Schedule "A" to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation remain confidential as it contains information relating to the security of property belonging to the City.

189 Schedule "A" to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council).

The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation remains confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information relating to the security of property belonging to the City.

Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 25, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation remains confidential in its entirety at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information relating to the security of property belonging to the City. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 25, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation will be made public following the execution of the Sublease with Guild Inn Estate Inc.

The Subject lands are owned by TRCA and leased by the City under a long-term ground lease which expires on September 1, 2083. The main building is a white stucco Arts and Crafts style mansion which was constructed in 1914 and designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. For over a decade, the Guild site has been in steady decline primarily due to lack of public funds available for conservation and restoration. In October 2001 the City closed the Guild Inn, but the site and the grounds surrounding the Inn were kept open to the public for parkland usage. To advance the revitalization efforts for the Guild Inn site after previous unsuccessful attempts, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the design, construction, finance and operation of a restaurant and/or banquet centre and other complementary facilities at the site. Dynamic Hospitality & Entertainment Group was awarded the project by City Council at its meeting of July 16, 2013 and City staff was directed to negotiate with the proponent and report back on terms and conditions of an agreement.

GIE, a subsidiary of Dynamic, is proposing a series of capital improvements to, and the development of, new facilities on the site as part of their project. GIE's proposal would include: a) a 20,000-24,000 square foot complex combining banquet/event centre and restaurant that includes both the restoration of the Bickford House/Guild Inn, as it was originally constructed in 1914, and the removal of the subsequently added wings; b) the original Bickford House's exterior will be restored. The interior of the building will be restored preserving the heritage attributes in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act; c) the additions to the existing structure, featuring floor to ceiling windows capturing the view of the surrounding grounds, will house four separate event spaces with the capability to be combined as one space for larger events; d) first class restaurant with an adjoining patio that will cater both to the local community and destination visitors to this landmark;

190 e) reconstruction and expansion of the parking lots to accommodate the new facilities and future increased use of the park; and f) provision of access and use of the facilities for community and City purposes.

In addition to reviving the hospitality activities at the Guild, the restoration of the historic Bickford House and development of a banquet/event centre contributes to the City's overall vision of the Guild Inn Parklands. Economic Development and Culture is working with other City divisions, local residents and the arts community to develop the remaining parkland around the Bickford House as a cultural precinct. The setting with its architectural fragments and sculpture garden will be restored and active arts and crafts programming will be re-established in the other historic buildings on site, as well as in the new banquet/event centre. Together, these improvements will restore the site's identity as a cultural attraction and honour its history as a Guild of All Arts.

The proposed lease will be for a term of 30 years, with one additional renewal option of 10 years at the option of GIE. The lease will contain provisions advising GIE that this facility is operating in a public park and they will need to take appropriate measures to allow public access to the facility for the purpose of providing community permit space.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff and solicitor will work with the City of Toronto staff and GIE to finalize the lease.

Report prepared by: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620, Jae R. Truesdell, extension 5247 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Date: April 08, 2014 Attachments: 1

191 Attachment 1

______

192 RES.#A74/14 - ALBION HILLS FIELD CENTRE PHASE 5 RETROFIT PROJECT Tender PMO14-05. Award of Contract PMO14-05 for upgrades to the HVAC system, washrooms facilities, and lighting plan at the Albion Hills Field Centre, Town of Caledon.

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT contract PMO14-05 for the upgrades to the HVAC system, washroom facilities and lighting plan at the Albion Hills Field Centre be awarded to CLC Construction Ltd. at a cost not to exceed $686,563.50, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, subject to receipt of all necessary approvals, permits and funding, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT award of tender be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and legal advisors (if necessary);

THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is necssary to implement the contract, including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Constructed in 1962, the Albion Hills Field Centre (AHFC) is an existing one and half storey residential environmental education field centre located at Albion Hills Conservation Area, north of the Village of Bolton. The cedar and granite chalet style building is equipped with bedrooms, washrooms, classrooms, offices, cafeteria, lounge, dining hall and commercial kitchen facilities.

As part of the Region of Peel's Climate Change Mitigation Program, TRCA engaged Paul Didur Architects to undertake a facility assessment and conceptual redesign of the AFHC. The purpose of the assessment and redesign program was to provide a framework for major renovations and system retrofits to improve the environmental performance of the building while supporting climate change and sustainability learning programs for visiting students. In order to minimize disruption to student use throughout the school year, renovation and construction activities at AFHC are limited to late June through early September. As such, the complete retrofit of the field centre is being phased over a number of years with entire segments of the building being completed in each phase.

Four phases of the retrofit have been completed since 2008 and consisted of an assessment and redesign of the field centre, a new roof, electrical, mechanical, and fire code upgrades, a major kitchen renovation, exterior re-cladding, new windows and doors, and a new interior partition between the cafeteria and lounge. The total cost for the four phases of the retrofit was approximately $1.3 million.

193 The scope of work for Phase 5 consists of upgrades to the existing HVAC system, washroom upgrades (girls/boys dorm room facilities and ensuites), and a new lighting plan for the entire building. This major facility upgrade and retrofit will significantly contribute to AHFC's business sustainability and strengthen its position as an important environmental and sustainability education resource.

RATIONALE A Request for Tender (RFT) for general contractors was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo.com on April 17, 2014. The work includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the supply of labour, material, supervision and equipment to perform the prescribed scope of work. The general contractor will coordinate all construction activities to facilitate the proposed upgrades.

Bidders were required to submit a bid bond of 10% of the contract price at the time of the tender submission, as well as an Agreement to Bond from a bonding company for 50% Performance and 50% Labour and Material. Bidders were also required to attend a mandatory site meeting on April 24, 2014.

Tenders closed on May 8, 2014 and were opened by the Tender Opening Committee on May 8, 2014 with the following results:

BIDDERS TOTAL (Plus HST) CLC Construction Ltd. $686,563.50 ONIT Construction Inc. $770,964.00 MN Dynamic Construction Ltd. $816,417.00 R-Chad General Contracting $848,000.00 Citycore Construction $857,652.00 Jeffrey G. Wallans $886,915.00 Berkim Construction Inc. $1,033,366.00 Brown Daniels Associates $1,107,200.00 Martinway Contracting Ltd. Disqualified

Martinway Contracting Ltd. was disqualified as their tender submission was not complete.

Therefore, based on the bids received, staff recommends that Contract PMO14-05 for the Albion Hills Field Centre Phase 5 Retrofit Project be awarded to CLC Construction Inc. for the total cost not to exceed $686,563.50, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Partial funds required to complete this project are provided by Peel Region in the Peel Climate Change Mitigation capital budget 129-70. Staff will seek to secure additional funds required to complete the full scope of work or refine it based on the available funds. The final contract amount will be negotiated to reflect the total amount of funds available.

194 Report prepared by: Lisa Moore, 416-704-2476 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-844-3987 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 5, 2014

______

RES.#A75/14 - EROSION AND INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES ON THE GRANGER GREENWAY Update on the condition of trail infrastructure along the Humber Trail within the William Granger Greenway following the July 8, 2013 storm event.

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Paul Ainslie

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to conduct emergency works to remove a failing pedestrian bridge;

THAT TRCA staff continue to engage York Region to incorporate trail and/or bridge replacement options into the Major MacKenzie Road widening project;

THAT TRCA conduct any additional trail inventory and survey work deemed necessary;

THAT TRCA staff prepare the necessary plans and obtain any permits and approvals needed to repair the trail/bank erosion within Boyd Conservation Area;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized staff be directed to take the action necessary to implement the contract including obtaining any approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, Resolution #A225/13 was approved, in part, as follows:

...THAT staff report back on options to deal with erosion issues on the Granger Greenway;...

TRCA conducted an initial assessment of trail conditions and infrastructure within the William Granger Greenway following the storm event on July 8, 2013. During this assessment it was noted that the wooden pedestrian bridge, referred to as the Lady Simcoe Bridge, appeared to be sagging along its length and listing/sloping horizontally. Inspection of the river banks by TRCA staff determined that the banks and abutments were sound, and therefore not the cause. Subsequent inspection of the bridge structure by the original designer and manufacturer determined that the wooden timber bridge had simply reached the end of its useable life span (10-15 years).

195 Following that recommendation, TRCA blocked off access on either end of the bridge and posted appropriate closure signage. Follow-up inspections have revealed that trail users continue to remove the barriers on either end and use the bridge. TRCA staff has re-secured the bridge at least twice in the past two weeks. In order to mitigate the ongoing public safety threat TRCA recommends the immediate removal of the bridge deck from the abutments. Appropriate notice and signage will be posted at all trail access points, informing trail users that the connection from the Granger Trail to the William T. Foster’s Woods area is closed.

TRCA staff is also in ongoing discussions with the Region of York on the design and constructions of the Major MacKenzie Drive widening project. A component of this project will be the removal of the existing vehicle bridge over the East Humber River, and replacement with a much larger span bridge. Following initial inquiry by TRCA, York Region appears willing to incorporate additional trail and/or pedestrian bridge works into the overall project scope. Although construction of this portion of the project is not anticipated until 2016, it would re-establish a trail connection for local and regional trail users at no cost to TRCA. Were TRCA to pursue bridge replacement outside of the Major MacKenzie widening project, a permit from MNR under the Species at Risk Act would have to be obtained independently. Given TRCA experience in this regard, permit issuance would be a multi-year endeavor. Incorporating the replacement of trail infrastructure into the Major MacKenzie widening project will ensure a single, harmonized permitting process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).

TRCA staff has also identified a section of the Humber Trail within Boyd Conservation Area that has eroded into the river following the July 8, 2013 event. TRCA staff has already surveyed the site and developed a preliminary design to rebuild the river bank and rebuild the trail. However, a permit from MNR under the Species at Risk Act would also have to be obtained in order for the project to proceed. Trail users can currently bypass the affected area by using the Pierre and Janet Berton trail.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA will immediately remove the bridge deck from the abutments. Appropriate notice and signage will be posted at all trail access point, informing trail users that the connection from the Granger Trail to William T. Foster’s Woods area is closed.

TRCA staff will also continue to engage York Region to incorporate trail and/or bridge replacement options into the Major MacKenzie Road widening project.

In the meantime, TRCA will also collect detailed trail inventory and user survey data for the property. This will provide important information related to current and future anticipated levels of trail use and trail user preferences in the area.

Finally, TRCA staff will prepare the necessary plans and obtain any permits and approvals needed to repair the trail/bank erosion within Boyd Conservation Area.

196 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for emergency works as well as ongoing planning and design work are available within existing project budgets.

Report prepared by: Matt Kenel, extension 5325 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Matt Kenel, extension 5325 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 7, 2014 Attachments: 1

197 Attachment 1

198 RES.#A76/14 - ALTONA FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE Updating the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan (1996).

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has undertaken several site planning initiatives for the Altona Forest including the 1996 Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan, the 2002 Altona Forest Trail Plan, 2011 Altona South Trail Plan and several restoration site plans;

AND WHEREAS an update to the 1996 Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan was recommended after ten years;

AND WHEREAS the agreement between TRCA and the Speirs family will be continued to ensure the property is being managed with a focus on environmental protection;

AND WHEREAS an updated and coordinated vision and plan is needed in order to ensure the continued protection of the natural and cultural heritage value of the property as urban development continues to occur in the area;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff develop an Altona Forest Management Plan Update;

THAT staff establish an Advisory Committee, which would include representatives of the Aboriginal community, the Speirs family, the Altona Forest Stewardship Committee, local naturalist groups, interested community groups and businesses, community residents, agency staff, municipal staff and Councilors to assist with the development of the plan and to facilitate the opportunity for public input;

AND FURTHER THAT the draft Management Plan update, as developed with the assistance of the Altona Forest Management Plan Advisory Committee, be submitted to the Authority Board for approval. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Altona Forest property is located on approximately 56 hectares of environmentally significant land, within the southern portion of the City of Pickering in Durham Region. The property is almost entirely located within the Petticoat Creek watershed (48 hectares), with the remaining 8 hectares in the Frenchman’s Bay watershed. It is situated south of Finch Avenue, between Rosebank Road and Altona Road, and north of Sheppard Avenue. The Altona Forest consists of a healthy and diverse ecosystem within the urban center of the City of Pickering, featuring a mixed coniferous and deciduous forest providing important habitat for a large number of plants and animals.

199 The Altona Forest property under went changes starting in 1982 when the boundaries of the surrounding Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) were expanded to include what is now the Altona Forest property. This designation recognized the Altona Forest and surrounding area as an important part of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor, a band of almost continuous natural cover extending between Rouge Park and Duffins Creek, south of the glacial Lake Iroquois shoreline. This protected area contains a diverse vegetation community of upland forest, successional mesic forest, as well as meadow and old field habitat.

In the spring of 1993, following the implementation of Pickering Official Plan Amendment No. 79, and strong community support led in part by the late zoologist, and local resident Dr. J. Murray Speirs, the TRCA announced their intention to execute a 5 phased approach for the acquisition and management of the 53 hectare Altona Forest ESA. This land mass was to also include the addition of the dedicated J. Murray Speirs Ecological Reserve through the generous donation of the Speirs family. The final size of the acquisition amounted to 56 hectares of protected land.

The TRCA phased approach included the development of a management strategy for the property that consisted of the Site Securement and Protection Report (1995) and Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan (1996). The management plan outlined a set of goals and objectives with associated recommendations for the property. In summary, the goals and objectives delineated a non-interfering management strategy for the property. These guidelines outlined the need to retain the ecological function of the site by maintaining the diversity and health of its native species, habitats, ecological processes, and where appropriate to restore areas to an enhanced natural condition. Also highlighted within the strategy were TRCA’s interests in promoting opportunities for public education regarding the natural heritage of the Altona Forest while providing appropriate passive public use.

Following the completion of the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan (1996), TRCA has undertaken a variety of improvement projects throughout the property. These initiatives focused on improving the ecological quality of priority sites, as well as developing and improving nature based recreation opportunities where appropriate. The following list provides a brief summary of the deliverables achieved in the time following the Management Plan:

 Implementation of site securement recommendations;  Development and rehabilitation of three pond/wetland features;  Development of a 5 kilometre hiking trail and a 10 vehicle parking lot;  Approximately 355 meters of boardwalk installed;  Various trail upgrades including reroutes, surface capping and general maintenance;  Two river crossings installed;  Construction of two viewing platforms and interpretive signage;  Trail infrastructure including way-finding, trailheads and property signs;  Development of the Altona South Trail Plan (2011);  Hazard tree and invasive species management;  Various property studies and reports developed.

200 RATIONALE The originally designated timeframe for the Altona Forest Management Plan (1996) was 10 years, at which time an update was recommended. Given that the set timeframe for review has past, and recognizing the ongoing restoration and public use demand throughout the property, this has been identified as an opportune time to reassess and update the management strategy for the property. Also, acknowledging the ongoing residential developments in the immediate vicinity of the property, it is important to undertake a review of the existing management plan and associated recommendations to ensure that the sensitive ecosystems continue to be protected while providing the surrounding urban communities with opportunities for education, interpretation and passive nature based recreation.

The Altona Forest Management Plan Update will work to integrate a number of TRCA initiatives, most notably Building The Living City, the new 10 year strategic plan for TRCA. Specifically this Management Plan update will help TRCA achieve the strategy for rethinking greenspace to maximize its value (strategy #3), and to foster sustainable citizenship (strategy #5).

In order to best achieve The Living City vision, the Management Plan will address a variety of issues within the Altona Forest including:

 Continued and enhanced protection of the natural heritage system;  Recommendations for restoration and regeneration where possible;  Review and update the existing trail plan; and  Continued support and reinvigoration of community engagement programs.

Furthermore, the management plan will complement and forward the goals of a number of TRCA initiatives, including:

 The Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy; and  Petticoat Creek Watershed Action Plan (2012).

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The first step in the process will be the creation of a background report that will identify the property history, current land uses, policies, natural and cultural heritage resources, as well as public uses. Using that information, management zones will be developed that identify what areas must be protected and where to focus public use in less sensitive locations. The management plan will also contain management guidelines, including restoration areas and a trail plan, as well as an implementation strategy outlining preliminary costs. The planning process will be undertaken in the three phases described below:

Phase One  Develop updated Site Securement and Protection Plan  Complete a background report  Circulate a study newsletter  Establish an advisory committee and host meetings  Host a public information session.

201 Phase Two  Develop a plan vision  Determine draft management zones  Integrate watershed action plan recommendations  Draft an update to the trail plan  Host advisory committee meetings  Circulate a study newsletter  Host a public information session.

Phase Three  Finalize the updated trail plan  Finalize the management recommendations  Develop a plan implementation strategy and associated costs  Host an advisory committee meeting  Circulate a study newsletter  Host a public information session  Obtain partner and TRCA Board endorsement.

As part of the planning process, an advisory committee will be created to assist in determining the appropriate direction for the property. TRCA will invite representatives from the community, special interest groups and partners to sit on the committee for the duration of the project. The advisory committee members will play an integral role in developing goals and management recommendations for the Altona Forest management plan. The following groups should be represented on the committee:

 Members from the Aboriginal Community  Speirs Family  Altona Forest Stewardship Committee  City of Pickering  Durham Region  Local community  Local businesses  Special interest groups  Property users  TRCA.

The management plan is expected to be completed in late-2015. Following all necessary approvals, implementation of the management plan could begin in the 2016 field season. Necessary land management and projects already in planning will continue to be implemented in consultation with the Altona Forest Stewardship Committee during the planning process.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The development of the report is budgeted at $48,000 between 2014-2015 and is available as part of the Durham Watershed Trails account 109-06 and the Ad Hoc Property Management account at 005-10.

202 Report prepared by: Kim Krawczyk, 416.936.1335 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kim Krawczyk, 416.936.1335 or Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596 Emails: [email protected] or [email protected] Date: May 05, 2014

______

RES.#A77/14 - CLAIREVILLE LEADERSHIP ADVENTURE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT staff continue to work with community partners to implement the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan and develop recreation and tourism opportunities in keeping with the recommendations of the Management Plan. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee Meeting #1/14, held on March 7, 2014, the Members requested that staff report back on the Claireville Leadership Adventure Conservation Partnership. At Authority Meeting #7/05, held on September 30, 2005, Resolution #A201/05 was approved, in part, as follows:

THAT staff be directed to work with interested groups and agencies to develop experiential learning opportunities through recreational programs at the Claireville Conservation Area and report progress to the Authority;...

The Claireville Conservation Area (CA) is an 848 hectare (2,100 acre) parcel of land owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). The area is located in the West Humber subwatershed of the Humber River watershed. It is located in both the City of Toronto and the City of Brampton. There is a large flood control dam and reservoir on the south end of the property which was built in 1964. It is also the location of the Indian Line Campground, Wild Water Kingdom, Toronto District School Board Etobicoke Field Centre, Claireville Equestrian Ranch, Yeoman Rugby Club and some agricultural land rentals. A management plan was developed for Claireville CA in 1997. Over 80% of the property has been designated Nature Reserve, Natural Environment or Restoration zones to safeguard and enhance the form and function of the natural environment. A Natural Area Enhancement Plan was completed in 2000 to guide the implementation of restoration activities.

In response to the recommendation from the Claireville Management Plan for regular updates, an update was completed in 2011 and was adopted by the TRCA Board on March 25, 2011. The update outlined the many activities, initiatives and partnerships resulting from the implementation of the Management Plan. In addition, the update included an implementation schedule that was developed with the assistance and support of the Humber Watershed Alliance and Claireville Subcommittee.

203 Discussion The Claireville Leadership Adventure Conservation Partnership was a proposal to establish a partnership of organizations supportive of developing outdoor life skill activities for groups and individuals. The Partnership did not fully come to fruition and, instead, TRCA and City of Toronto staff worked with five groups to develop recreational and educational programs at Claireville CA. The groups involved were: Friends of Claireville, Scouts Canada, the City of TorontoInner City Outtripping Centre, the International Mountain Biking Association, Ontario Recreational Canoeing Association and Canoe Ontario. The result of these partnerships were outlined in the Claireville Management Plan update in 2011, and included:  Friends of Claireville, who received a Trillium Foundation grant, assisted TRCA with habitat restoration and bird box installation, recreational and educational events;  City of Toronto provided canoeing opportunities;  The Toronto District School Board provided outdoor educational experiences through the Etobicoke Field Centre, and;  Annual planting events to implement the Claireville Management Plan Although some of these groups continue to provide recreational and educational opportunities at Claireville CA, including the City of Toronto and the Toronto District School Board, the Friends of Claireville dissolved subsequent to the end of the Trillium Foundation funding.

At the March 25, 2011, Authority Board meeting, a staff report providing the updated Claireville CA Management Plan recommended that TRCA staff continue to work with local community groups on trail options and proceed with the construction of an inter-regional trail, subject to the availability of funding from the City of Brampton. TRCA staff have been working together with staff and members of Council from the City of Brampton to extend the trail system, via the concept of a heritage tourism trail, from Claireville CA to Brampton. This inter-regional trail would increase connection within Claireville CA and create greater opportunities for both the Cities of Toronto and Brampton residents and visitors. Currently, the trail is waiting for approval with the Ministry of Natural Resources due to the presence of species at risk in the vicinity of the proposed trail alignment. TRCA and MNR staff continue to work together to develop solutions in order to move the trail forward.

Recently, the City of Toronto initiated the PanAm Path, extending to Claireville CA within the City of Toronto by 2015. The City has committed $1.9 Million to create the physical Path. The active-living trail will consist of fifteen cultural programming zones spread out across the city trail system. The unveiling of the cultural zones is expected to begin sixteen weeks prior to the games (May 2015), starting at the First Nations Trails/Pickering Gate at the Rouge River; going from east to west, counting down to the ParapanAm games. From the Rouge park area/lake Ontario, the program will run westwards to the Highland Creek, along the hydro corridor to the Don River, southwards to the Martin Goodman trail along the waterfront till the Humber River, then northwards along the river valley till the Claireville Reservoir, where it will end. The PanAm Path to Clairville CA offers an excellent opportunity to revitalize interest in recreation and tourism in Claireville.

RATIONALE TRCA staff will continue to work with community partners to implement the Claireville CA Management Plan, to promote recreation and tourism at Claireville CA, in keeping with the recommendations of the management plan and provide regular progress updates to the Authority Board.

204 FINANCIAL DETAILS Claireville CA Management Plan implementation is supported by City of Toronto funding from account 113-11 and City of Brampton/Region of Peel funding from 126-84.

Report prepared by: Vicky McGrath, extension 5211 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Vicky McGrath, extension 5211 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 5, 2014

______

RES.#A78/14 - ONTARIO ICE STORM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Administrative requirements for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to apply for provincial assistance through the Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program.

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Chris Fonseca

THAT an application for provincial assistance through the Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program, for eligible costs of damages due to the December 2013 Ice Storm, be submitted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to the province;

THAT authority be delegated to the CFO to submit claims to the province on behalf of TRCA as per the conditions of the assistance program;

THAT staff request an extension to the June 22nd deadline for eligible expenses;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to seek financial assistance from municipalities to recover the cost of ice storm related damages that are not eligible for provincial assistance under the Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program or covered by insurance. CARRIED BACKGROUND In February 2014, the province of Ontario announced an Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program in response to the severe weather event on December 20-22, 2013. The province is working with the federal government for cost-sharing under the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements. As such, requests for assistance should be made to the provincial government. Conservation Authorities have been instructed to apply for assistance through this program directly to the province, and not through their respective municipalities. The Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program is a one-time response to the December 2013 Ice Storm; the Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance Program (ODRAP) remains in effect for other natural disasters.

205 Further details on the amount of funding available and the process for applying for funding will be released by the province over the coming weeks. Municipalities and Conservation Authorities must submit an "Expression of Interest" by June 16, 2014 with final submissions due in August 2014. The program covers ice-damage related costs incurred until June 22nd (6 months after the ice storm) for emergency response and recovery, including debris clean-up to protect public health and safety. The program will not cover normal operating expenses, tree replacement or tree canopy restoration, insurable items, or loss of revenue. Preliminary details on eligible and non-eligible items are provided in Attachment 1 - Ontario Ice Storm Assistance Program: What you need to know. Given that it was not possible to initiate much of the needed works immediately, due to frozen ground conditions, the deadline for eligible expenses presents a significant challenge for TRCA. The province has indicated that should TRCA require an extension to the deadline, a request should be made to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) through the Authority.

Staff provided initial estimates of costs due to the ice storm in previous reports to the Authority this year (meetings #11/13 and #2/14). A summary table of total costs by region is provided as Attachment 2 for reference. Actual costs and supporting documentation are currently being compiled for the submission to the province and will be packaged to meet provincial requirements once these details are released. In the meantime, the province has identified two administrative requirements:

1. Municipal applicants must submit a resolution seeking provincial assistance for the ice storm; and

2. Municipalities will be requested to confirm that authority is delegated to the treasurer to submit claims on behalf of the municipality.

Given that a substantial amount of the costs incurred to respond to the ice storm did not require overtime or contract workers (instead several activities were deferred for staff to undertake ice storm response activities), it is expected that provincial assistance will not cover all of the expenses incurred by TRCA to date. Once the amount of provincial assistance allocated to TRCA is known, staff will be engaging in discussions with our municipal partners to recover the balance of costs where reasonable.

Report prepared by: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 09, 2014 Attachments: 2

206 Attachment 1

207 208 Attachment 2 2013 Ice Storm: Estimated Total Cost of Damages by Region * Region Insurable Costs Non‐Insurable Costs Total Peel$ 63,426 $ 519,068.97 $ 582,494.97 Durham$ 11,547 $ 132,778 $ 144,325.55 York$ 64,433 $ 302,621 $ 367,053.98 Toronto$ 97,980 $ 53,472 $ 151,452.28 Total$ 237,386 $ 1,007,940 $ 1,245,326.78

2013 Ice Storm: Estimated Detailed Cost of Damages by Region * Region Operation Insurable Costs Non‐Insurable Costs Total

Peel Parks and Culture$ 50,200 $ 389,241 $ 439,441 Rental Property$ 2,226 $ 339 $ 2,565 Conservation Lands$ 10,000 $ 79,489 $ 89,489 Flood Control Channels $ ‐ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Education Centres$ 1,000 $ ‐ $ 1,000 Total Costs Peel: $ 63,426 $ 519,069 $ 582,495

Durham Parks and Culture $ ‐ $ 33,077 $ 33,077 Rental Property$ 1,947 $ ‐ $ 1,947 Conservation Lands$ 5,000 $ 99,701 $ 104,701 Flood Control Channels $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Education Centres$ 4,600 $ ‐ $ 4,600 Total Costs Durham: $ 11,547 $ 132,778 $ 144,326

York Parks and Culture$ 35,500 $ 185,264 $ 220,764 Rental Property$ 11,738 $ 3,446 $ 15,184 Conservation Lands$ 10,000 $ 83,102 $ 93,102 Flood Control Channels $ ‐ $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Education Centres$ 7,195 $ 15,810 $ 23,004 Total Costs York: $ 64,433 $ 302,621 $ 367,054

Toronto Parks and Culture$ 88,692 $ 38,077 $ 126,769 Rental Property$ 9,288 $ 396 $ 9,683 Conservation Lands $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Flood Control Channels $ ‐ $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Education Centres $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Total costs Toronto: $ 97,980 $ 53,472 $ 151,452

*Damage estimates as of March 13, 2014 ‐ does not include properties update of additional $20k in expenses ______209 RES.#A79/14 - G.ROSS LORD DAM EMERGENCY SPILL GATE UPGRADES Contract RSD14-47. Award of Contract RSD14-47 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for upgrades to the north and south emergency spill gates and for detailed design of an automated motor back-up system at G.Ross Lord Dam, City of Toronto

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT Contract RSD14-47 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for upgrades to the north and south emergency spill gates and for detailed design of an automated motor back-up system at G.Ross Lord Dam, City of Toronto be awarded to Ellisdon Corporation at a total cost not to exceed $292,040.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 25% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND G. Ross Lord Dam is considered a "Large Dam" under the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) classification system. The dam is located on the northeast corner of Finch Avenue West and Dufferin Street, in the City of Toronto. The dam was constructed in 1974 to control flooding along the West Don River from Finch Avenue south to the confluence with the East Don River at Don Mills Road. The dam is routinely inspected as part of TRCA's Flood Infrastructure Program. In 2011, a Dam Safety Review (DSR) was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Natural Resources 2011 Ontario Dam Safety Guidelines (ODSG). This review concluded that the Hazard Potential Classification (HPC) for G. Ross Lord Dam is Very High. A Very High HPC indicates that a dam failure has the potential for 11 or more fatalities in the downstream flood wave inundation area.

Due to the critical role that G. Ross Lord Dam has in providing flood protection, all components of the Dam are required to be in good working order. The emergency spillway gates at G. Ross Lord Dam, which are to be used when inflows threaten to overtop the dam, have been in operation for 40 years. As such, the gates are in need of a major overhaul to ensure their reliability in emergency situations. The overhaul will include applying corrosion protection and replacing the wire ropes, fan brakes and damaged bolts. As well, the existing motor back-up system, which allows the gates to be operated when hydro power is unavailable is outdated, difficult to use and does not meet existing health and safety regulations.

210 Therefore TRCA staff requires a qualified contractor to carry out upgrades to the emergency spillway gates and for the detailed design of a back-up motor system at G. Ross Lord Dam. The intention of these upgrades is to enhance G. Ross Lord Dam’s ability to safely manage flood waters and to meet current health and safety requirements. The maintenance upgrades will ensure the north and south emergency spillway gates can safely retain and control the release of water, and the design build of a new back-up motor system will provide a safer and easier method to allow operation of the emergency spill way gates during periods of electrical blackouts.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan where TRCA will strive to minimize or eliminate flood risk. This project will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Request for Pre-Qualification (RFPQ) for general contractors for Contract RSD14-47 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo(http://www.biddingo.com/) th on Friday, March 28 , 2014. Interested general contractors in pre-qualifying were advised that the criteria for evaluation will include the following in order to receive a tender package:  completeness of submission;  past experience with dam emergency spill gate retrofit projects of a similar program;  ability to meet construction schedule milestones;  ability to coordinate work by others;  construction experience with flood control dams; and  projects with construction budgets of $200,000 to $500,000.

Pre-qualification information was submitted by the following 4 general contractors:  Ellisdon;  Hydro Innovation  Linita; and  McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd.

The pre-qualifying documents were reviewed by the selection committee made up of TRCA staff whose evaluation was based on the previously defined criteria and reference checks for past completed projects.

Based on the evaluation process, Request for Tender documents were made available to the following 4 general contractors:  Ellisdon;  Hydro Innovation;  Linita; and  McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd.

th Three (3) pre-qualified companies attended a mandatory site meeting on Thursday April 10 , st st 2014. Proposals closed on May 1 , 2014 at 12:00pm and were opened on Thursday May 1 , 2014 by the Tender Opening Committee with the following results:

211 Contract RSD14-47 G. Ross Lord Dam Emergency Spill Gate Upgrades

TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT BIDDERS (Plus HST) Ellisdon $292,040.00 McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd. $315,752.00

The pre-qualified bidder's were evaluated by TRCA staff based on the bid submission costs and their ability to perform the scope of the work as specified in the Tender documents. Restoration Services staff reviewed the bids against its own cost estimates and has determined that the bids are of reasonable value. Hydro Innovation was subsequently disqualified from the bidding process as they were unable to attend the mandatory site meeting. Linita declined the opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the timelines and specifications stated in the contract documents.

Based on the evaluation of the bids received, staff recommend that EllisDon Coorporation be awarded Contract RSD14-47 supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for upgrades to the north and south emergency spill gates and for detailed design of a motor back-up system at G.Ross Lord Dam, City of Toronto at a total amount not to exceed $292,040.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 25% contingency , plus HST; it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications. The 25% contingency is to allow for extra costs that may be incurred as many of the parts in the gate motor units will not be visible until they are disassembled during the overhaul.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the G. Ross Lord Dam Generator Replacement Project are provided evenly between the Toronto Special Ask Capital Account (107-27) and the Ministry of Natural Resources Water and Erosion Control Infrastructure Program (WECI).

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 14, 2014

______

RES.#A80/14 - WOODBRIDGE SPECIAL POLICY AREA COMPREHENSIVE POLICY AND BOUNDARY UPDATE The City of Vaughan is updating the policies and boundary of the Woodbridge Special Policy Area based upon a comprehensive flood risk assessment, land use and policy review in accordance with provincial guidelines. The Authority is requested to endorse the Special Policy Area Justification Report for the Woodbridge Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment that will implement the updated Special Policy Area policies and boundary.

212 Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS the City of Vaughan, in collaboration with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), has prepared a comprehensive flood risk assessment, land use, policy and boundary review of the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA) in accordance with provincial guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing SPAs;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the request by the City of Vaughan to update the boundary and policies of the Woodbridge Special Policy Area as per the Special Policy Area Justification Report for the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan and associated Zoning By-law Amendment be supported for approval;

AND FURTHER THAT the City of Vaughan, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Ministry of Natural Resources be so advised by the CEO's Office. CARRIED BACKGROUND Woodbridge is one of four historic villages in the City of Vaughan and is located within the valley and tablelands associated with the Humber River. The Woodbridge Heritage Conservation District (HCD) within Woodbridge Centre represents one of the highest concentrations of heritage properties in the City. The Woodbridge Commercial Core is the historical commercial centre of the community. The built form and function of Woodbridge is an early example of a compact, mixed-use community centre.

A portion of the village, including the historical commercial core, is located within the flood plain of the Humber River. To allow for the continued viability of the historic core and address the significant social and economic hardships that would result from strict adherence to provincial one zone flood plain management policies, this area was established as a Special Policy Area in 1982 (Attachment 1). Since that time, the City has experienced significant growth and development pressures and received a number of applications for development within the SPA.

In 2009, the City of Vaughan initiated the planning process for the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan, a component of which included a comprehensive review of the SPA undertaken in cooperation with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Province. The Secondary Plan is one of five new secondary plans in Volume 2 of the new City of Vaughan Official Plan (VOP 2010, adopted September 7, 2010 and modified on February 26, 2013 and March 19, 2013). Volume 1 of the new City of Vaughan Official Plan contains city-wide policies. The Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan includes the proposed SPA boundaries, revised land use designations affecting the SPA, land use policies and SPA policies. The recommendations of this report pertain to the comprehensive SPA analysis, the outcome of which is to provide clarity within the policy framework and clearly establish the location, nature and extent of development that will enable appropriate revitalization and redevelopment of the historic centre to ensure its long term heath and vitality.

213 Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy Framework Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), 2014 establishes the policy framework for managing natural hazards, including flooding hazards. In accordance with provincial standards, flooding hazards may be managed through a One Zone Concept, a Two Zone Concept or a Special Policy Area approach. In general, the One Zone Concept is the primary provincial approach to managing flood risk through the planning process, which essentially requires that no new development be permitted within the flood plain. In exceptional circumstances, a Two Zone Concept or an SPA approach may be considered.

A “Special Policy Area” designation is a planning mechanism provided by the Province of Ontario to recognize the unique circumstances of historic communities that existed within flood vulnerable areas prior to the implementation of a provincial flood hazard planning policy and where it has been demonstrated that the application of the other flood plain management approaches (One Zone or Two Zone) would not allow for the continued social and economic viability and revitalization of these areas. New SPAs and any amendments to the policies, land use designations or boundaries of existing SPAs must be approved by both the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) and the Minister of Natural Resources (MNR) because they reflect a relaxation of natural hazard policies for flood-related events, where this is deemed appropriate. As stated in the PPS, SPAs are not intended to allow for new or intensified development, if a community has feasible opportunities for development outside the flood plain.

The proposal for a new SPA or modifications to the boundaries or policies of an existing provincially approved SPA may only be initiated by lower-tier or single-tier municipalities as the proponent. Such proposals must be undertaken in accordance with the Ministry of Natural Resources Technical Guide, Appendix 5 – River and Stream Systems: Flooding Hazard Limit, “ Procedures for Approval of New Special Policy Areas (SPAs) and Modifications to Existing SPAs Under the Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 (PPS, 2005), Policy 3.1.3 – Natural Hazards- Special Policy Area, dated January 2009". The policies and boundaries of an SPA are determined through a consultative process between the municipality, TRCA, MNR and MMAH, and implemented through amendments to a municipality’s Official Plan/Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law. These site specific SPA policies are used by TRCA staff to inform and guide TRCA's regulatory permitting responsibilities under Section 28(1) of the Conservation Authorities Act.

Existing Woodbridge Special Policy Area The Woodbridge SPA was first established through the approval of Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 145, in 1982. The boundary of the SPA, which consists of 10 subareas within the Humber River valley corridor along Islington Avenue and Woodbridge Avenue, was informed by the limit of the flood plain known at that time. The policies of the SPA were updated through OPA 240 in 1987 and again OPA 440 in 1994. The SPA policies include the technical requirements for development within the SPA. OPA 440 is recognized as the existing policies and boundaries of the SPA in the City of Vaughan.

214 Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis: Since 1994, no changes have been made to the Woodbridge SPA policies or boundaries. Subsequent to the receipt of a number of development applications in recent years, the Province (MMAH) requested that a comprehensive analysis and update to the SPA be undertaken to address all of the growth across the SPA. In addition, the City of Vaughan developed a new Official Plan that was adopted by Council in 2010. The SPA review is a component of the Woodbridge Focused Area Study, a product of which has been the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan. The two main components of the SPA review include undertaking a review of the SPA boundary, land use and policies and a risk assessment. The risk assessment was undertaken within the context of the City-wide Emergency Management Plan and considered aspects of geographic risk (i.e. avoiding risk) and operational risk (i.e. hazard response).

The City of Vaughan, in collaboration with TRCA, developed a submission package in accordance with the MNR 2009 technical guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing SPAs. The City presented the main results of the SPA review at public consultation meetings in April 2010 and in May 2010; the first draft of the SPA Justification Report was posted on the project website for the Vaughan Official Plan. The City of Vaughan submitted a revised SPA Justification Report to MMAH and MNR in November 2011 for provincial review. MMAH and MNR provided a preliminary review and requested additional information in their correspondence of April 12, 2012. The City's response to the Province's additional information request was provided on March 1, 2013, together with a revised SPA Justification Report. MMAH and MNR provided their formal 'one-window' response on December 17, 2013. Since the release of these comments, the City, MMAH, MNR and TRCA have been engaged in ongoing consultation and meetings in an effort to advance through the final stages of the SPA update and approval process. The City has now prepared a final revised SPA Justification Report to address the provincial 'one-window' comments. This includes the updated SPA policies that will rest within the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan and an associated Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA).

The provincial approval procedures require an endorsement of the proposed SPA Justification Report, Secondary Plan SPA policies and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council as part of the City’s final submission package to the Province. A similar endorsement on the technical material and the proposed Secondary Plan SPA policies and ZBA from TRCA's board is also required. A report to the City's Committee of the Whole was received on April 28, 2014. The recommendations of that report, together with revisions to two of the proposed SPA policies agreed to by the City, MMAH, MNR and TRCA, were endorsed by City Council on May 6, 2014. The details of the City’s report, including the SPA Justification Report, the Woodbridge Secondary Plan, and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment can be found at the following link: https://www.vaughan.ca/council/minutes_agendas/AgendaItems/CW0429_14_35.pdf.

The following is a summary of the key components of the Woodbridge SPA Justification Report.

215 Flood Risk within the Woodbridge SPA A fundamental element of the comprehensive review was to update the boundaries of the SPA based upon current flood plain mapping. The analyses of flood risk are based on the technical updates to the hydrologic modelling (Aquafour Beech, 2002) and hydraulic models for the Humber River (Greck and Associates Limited, 2002, Acres & Associates 2003, Acres International, 2004). These studies were finalized, peer reviewed and approved by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. The methodology for preparing hydrologic/hydraulic models and the specifications for regulatory mapping are prescribed by the Ministry of Natural Resources (Technical Guide – River and Stream Systems: Flooding Hazard Limit, 2002).

TRCA prepared a series of maps to illustrate the current technical flood plain information to inform and assist the City with the risk analysis, land use and emergency management components of the comprehensive SPA review. This included maps illustrating flood depths and velocities for both the Regulatory (Regional/Hurricane Hazel) Flood event and the 1:350 year storm. Modelling shows that flood depths during a Regulatory Flood will range from 0 to 3 plus metres within the SPA, with the areas of greatest depth along the Islington Avenue Corridor. The area of the historical commercial core, northwest of Woodbridge Avenue and Clarence Street experiences 0 to 1 metres of flooding during a Regulatory Flood and is not subject to flooding during a 1:350 year storm (more frequent event). In addition, TRCA generated a Regional Risk Analysis map (Attachment 2) in accordance with criteria set by MNR, to identify areas within the SPA that would be considered low and high risk for pedestrian access during a Regional Flood, and areas where flood depths would be less than 0.3 metres, (considered to be safe for vehicular access). Similarly, these results indicated areas along the Islington Corridor to be high risk and the historical commercial core to be low risk with safe vehicular ingress/egress access available during a Regional flood.

Land Use Planning - Growth Distribution The Province required supporting rationale for the projected growth in the SPA given that SPAs are not intended for intensification if there are feasible opportunities outside the floodplain. Land use designations in the SPA are intended to match previous approvals in OPA 440, with the exception of the low risk part of the SPA in the Woodbridge Commercial Core. The northwest corner of Woodbridge Avenue and Clarence Street, the only low risk part of the SPA with redevelopment potential for residential units, in which the Province's "risk to life" thresholds are not exceeded and ingress/egress is achievable during a Regulatory Flood, is recommended for modest additional dwelling units. The Mixed Use Commercial designation in OPA 440 is proposed to change to Mid-Rise Mixed-Use and Low-Rise Mixed-Use designations in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan.

In total, the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan provides for the 102 additional units in the SPA, directed to the Woodbridge Commercial Core, in addition to densities provided for in OPA 440. Of this 83% or 85 units are directed to the low risk part of the SPA and the remaining 17% or 17 units reflect a modest increase resulting from attempts to match density provisions in previous approvals in the commercial core with density provisions specified as Floor Space Index (FSI) in the new Vaughan Official Plan and Woodbridge Secondary Plan.

216 The Woodbridge Commercial Core is a Local Centre within Vaughan's urban structure as noted in Section 2.2.5.7 of the Vaughan Official Plan, adopted by City Council in September 2010 (VOP 2010). Pedestrian in scale, and featuring a mix of commercial and residential uses, Local Centres will continue to serve the surrounding Community Areas and accommodate moderate intensification. In the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan, the vision of the historical commercial core is one of an enhanced local centre, with some residential intensification, a strong animated commercial avenue and a designated public square. Permitting redevelopment in the Woodbridge Commercial Core is essential to strengthening its position as a Local Centre for the surrounding community. As a pedestrian oriented, mixed-use centre offering a range of commercial services and housing types, the Woodbridge Commercial Core fulfills both provincial and municipal planning goals related to the creation of compact mix-use centres. Redevelopment in the Market Lane area will allow this space to become the focal point of the Woodbridge Community. The Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan completes the revitalization process for the Woodbridge Commercial Core in the areas determined to be 'low risk' within the SPA. The redevelopment and revitalization of the historical commercial core is in keeping with the original intent of the SPA designation.

Emergency Management Under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, municipalities have the primary responsibility and authority for response to flooding and flood emergencies and the welfare of residents. The City of Vaughan and TRCA work closely together to ensure that the most current flood risk information is shared to facilitate the coordination of flood forecasting and emergency planning. TRCA operates a Flood Forecasting and Warning System that monitors watershed and weather conditions daily in order to issue timely warning of anticipated or actual flood conditions. Conditions during a flood event are closely monitored by TRCA and communicated to the municipality.

The City of Vaughan Emergency Management Response Plan is in compliance with the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act and Regulations. The City of Vaughan Emergency Plan and Re-Entry Evacuation Plan are publically available on the Emergency Planning Department website. In addressing the provincial SPA guidelines, the City of Vaughan developed a comprehensive risk assessment within the context of the City-wide Emergency Management Plan that considered aspects of both geographic risk (i.e. avoiding risk) and operational risk (i.e. hazard response). In addition to the City-wide, all hazards approach described in the City of Vaughan Emergency Plan, the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan includes specific policies to address emergency response and safe access through the development review process. The Emergency Planning Program and Vaughan Fire and Rescue Service (VFRS) are responsible for the review development applications in the SPA. Each proposed future development will be assessed based on its degree of risk, which will be included in the development review process. New residential apartment and or commercial/institutional development applications will be required to provide an emergency response plan specific to the proposed development. The application must also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City and TRCA that safe access is available in accordance with the criteria set as set out in the policies. The Emergency Planning Program and the VFRS have reviewed the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan and the Woodbridge Special Policy Area Justification Report and have confirmed in a letter to MMAH dated February 20, 2014 that the emergency management standards and practices currently in place support the proposed development as described in the Secondary Plan.

217 Summary of Changes to the SPA Boundary and Policies: The proposed SPA boundaries result largely from the an update to the flood plain mapping. In addition, an assessment was conducted of the land use designations and property boundaries of each parcel within the SPA. The following is a summary:  the existing 40.1 hectare SPA has been reduced to 29.8 hectares, resulting in an overall reduction in 10.3 hectares or 25.7% of the existing SPA;  parcels designated Natural Areas, including property owned by TRCA, were removed from the SPA as development is not intended to occur on these lands; and  lands located inside the previous regulatory flood plain but outside the updated flood plain were removed from the SPA.

The SPA policies from the previous Official Plan Amendment were generally brought forward and updated in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan to be consistent with current provincial legislation and the comprehensive SPA review. The following is a summary of changes:  the flood proofing standard is specified in one clear policy;  clarification of safe access with respect to pedestrian movement and vehicular traffic;  requirement for emergency response plans in accordance with the City's emergency management standards and practices;  a 'notwithstanding' policy to ensure that single-detached units are not converted to townhouse developments in the Low-Rise Residential designation, which would otherwise be a form of intensification in the SPA;  a 'notwithstanding' policy that new lot creation or unit creation in the Low-Rise Residential designation is prohibited; and  a density bonus is not permitted for properties in any land use designation in the SPA.

At the request of the Province, the City has prepared a Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) to ensure that residential dwellings and/or overnight accommodation uses on certain parcels within the updated SPA do not exceed the land use permissions in the new Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan. The Draft ZBA is an interim measure until the Comprehensive Zoning By-law is amended in conformity with the VOP 2010.

TRCA staff is satisfied that the updated SPA policies in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan and the Draft ZBA captures TRCA planning and regulatory interests, roles and responsibilities for development within the SPA. Staff recommends that they be supported.

Next Steps in the SPA Process The following is a summary of the concluding steps in the process to update the Woodbridge SPA boundary and policies, in accordance with the provincial guidelines:  City Council endorsement of the SPA Justification Report and Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan (May 6, 2014).  TRCA resolution of endorsement of the technical information to support the proposed update to the SPA boundary and policies in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan and the Draft ZBA.  Council/TRCA resolutions forwarded to MMAH/MNR.  City submission of final documentation to MMAH.  MMAH/MNR provide recommendation to Ministers.  Ministers of MMAH and MNR make a decision.

218 The Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan is currently under appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). It is anticipated that the Ministerial decision will be entered through the OMB process. It should be noted that in response to the notice of the recent Committee of the Whole meeting that was sent to all landowners in the SPA, the City of Vaughan did receive a few written communications from landowners or their agents, expressing concerns related to the SPA component of the Secondary Plan and the future redevelopment/intensification of their property. It is unknown at this time, to what extent these concerns will advance through the OMB process.

CONCLUSION The City of Vaughan, in collaboration with TRCA, has undertaken a comprehensive review of the Woodbridge Special Policy Area in accordance with provincial guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing SPAs. The Woodbridge SPA Justification Report is based upon a flood risk assessment using the most current flood plain information for the Humber River to inform land use and emergency management planning. The proposed SPA policies in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan set out a policy framework that will enable the continued revitalization and redevelopment of the historic commercial core and ensures that all development and redevelopment in the SPA is assessed for risk within the context of the City's emergency management standards and practices. The development of the City's submission package, proposed SPA polices, and ZBA have been subject to extensive discussions with MMAH and MNR. On this basis, TRCA staff recommends that the Authority support the Woodbridge SPA Justification Report and the proposed updates to the Woodbridge SPA policies and boundaries as set out in the Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan, and Draft ZBA, in order to advance to the next steps of the Provincial approval process.

Report prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 20, 2014 Attachments: 2

219 Attachment 1

220 Attachment 2

______

221 RES.#A81/14 - CITY OF TORONTO Request for a Permanent Easement for the Replacement of a Sanitary Trunk Sewer Beneath the G. Ross Lord Dam and Reservoir, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, CFN 50751. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the replacement of a sanitary trunk sewer beneath the G. Ross Lord Dam and Reservoir, located to the east of Dufferin Street and north of Finch Avenue West, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River watershed. (Executive Res.#B30/14)

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Ben Cachola

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the replacement of a sanitary trunk sewer, located to the east of Dufferin Street and north of Finch Avenue West, Don River watershed in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area);

AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 1.72 hectares (4.26 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for the replacement of a sanitary trunk sewer beneath the G. Ross Lord Dam and Reservoir, as shown on a plan prepared by the City of Toronto Engineering and Construction Services Department, Engineering Services Section, Land and Property Surveys, Sketch No. PS-2013-109, dated November 20, 2013;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition all legal, survey and other costs be paid by the City of Toronto;

THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction;

THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto;

THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated/stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines;

THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 be obtained by the City of Toronto prior to commencement of construction;

222 THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A82/14 - ONNI GROUP Request for Permanent Easement for Stormwater Outfall and Purchase of Property Located at the Southwest Corner of Park Lawn Road and Lakeshore Boulevard West in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed, CFN 50556 and CFN 50557. Receipt of a request from Onni Group to provide a stormwater outfall, located at the southwest corner of Park Lawn Road and Lakeshore Boulevard West in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B31/14)

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: John Parker

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Onni Group for a stormwater outfall which will facilitate the development of Onni Group's property at 2200 Lakeshore Boulevard in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area);

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with Onni Group in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing 0.0116 hectares (0.0286 acres), more or less, be granted to Onni Group for a stormwater outfall, described as Part 15 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by KRCMAR Surveyors Ltd. Job No. 10-076, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), subject to the following terms and conditions:

(a) the easement price is for a nominal consideration of two dollars ($2.00), plus all legal and survey costs incurred to complete the transaction;

(b) in addition, Onni Group will provide the following:

223 (i) conveyance of a parcel of land to TRCA for nominal consideration of $2.00 containing 0.3408 hectares (0.8421 acres), more or less, being Part of Lot 7 and Part of The Street (closed by By-Law 7415, Instrument No. ET75216) on Registered Plan 83, designated as Parts 2, 3, 5-14 inclusively on draft R-Plan by KRCMAR Surveyors Ltd. Job No 10-076, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), subject to a permanent easement for stormwater outfall;

(ii) construct the trail and landscaping works and implement the Ravine Stewardship Plan;

(c) all disturbed areas are to be restored to the satisfaction of TRCA as soon as possible after completion of construction;

(d) sediment control measures in a manner satisfactory to TRCA are to be practiced during construction;

(e) Onni Group is to be responsible for all repairs and/or maintenance of the stormwater outfall which maybe required in perpetuity and for indemnifying TRCA from any and all claims arising from the construction and use of the easement area;

(f) an archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of Onni Group to the satisfaction of TRCA;

(g) any additional consideration as deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or its solicitor;

THAT the sale be subject to the approval of Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A83/14 - UNIFORMED ANNUAL AND SEASONAL SECURITY SERVICES 2014-2017 Award of contract for uniformed security services for TRCA facilities. (Executive Res.#B32/14)

Moved by: Glenn Mason Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

224 THAT the contract to provide uniformed security services for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) public use facilities, campgrounds, offices and select properties for a three year (2014-2017) be awarded to Knights On Guard Protective Services at a total cost not to exceed $722,929.68, plus 15% contingency, plus HST it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications;

THAT an option one year extension at the discretion of TRCA staff be available at an additional cost not to exceed $240,976.56 plus 15% contingency, plus HST;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the contract, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A84/14 - PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 2014 Highlights of the new Provincial Policy Statement 2014. (Executive Res.#B33/14)

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Bob Callahan

THAT the Province of Ontario be commended for adding policies to the new Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2014 to address the "Urban Agenda";

THAT the Province be encouraged to begin immediately to hold consultation sessions with stakeholders to identify performance indicators for measuring the effectiveness of the PPS 2014 policies;

AND FURTHER THAT this report be circulated to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Conservation Ontario and municipal clerks in TRCA's jurisdiction. CARRIED ______

RES.#A85/14 - EXPANDING ONTARIO'S GREENBELT Confirming a request from Toronto Environmental Alliance to support and assist the City of Toronto in Growing the Greenbelt in urban river valleys. (Executive Res.#B34/14 & Res.#B35/14)

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) offer its support and assistance to the City of Toronto and to all municipalities within TRCA's watersheds who are considering recognizing the Greenbelt Plan's River Valley Connections in their official plans or adding public lands into the Urban River Valley designation of the Greenbelt Plan; 225 THAT TRCA continue its program of land acquisition in the valleys to complete the missing links and achieve a fully connected system of publicly owned urban valley lands;

THAT this report be circulated to all municipalities within TRCA watersheds;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the pilot projects with municipal partners in studying the impact of the expansion of the Greenbelt. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A86/14 - ONTARIO CLIMATE CONSORTIUM PROJECT Information on Award of Preferred Source Contract. Information regarding a preferred source contract awarded for the Ontario Climate Consortium project entitled “Comparison of Emerging Techniques for Updating Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves: Pilot Case Study for Toronto and Essex Regions.”

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the staff report regarding a preferred source contract with Dr. Paulin Coulibaly (McMaster University) for the project titled “Comparison of Emerging Techniques for Updating Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves: Pilot Case Study for Toronto and Essex Regions” be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND Since 2011, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has hosted the secretariat for the Ontario Climate Consortium (OCC). As the OCC Secretariat, staff is responsible for coordinating the activities of and acting as the administrative body for the OCC. The OCC has the mandate of leading initiatives aimed at mainstreaming climate change research across Ontario by linking partner universities with end-users, such as municipalities, conservation authorities and the private-sector. In seeking to address the challenge posed by incorporating climate change into the derivation of new intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves used in stormwater design, TRCA and the Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA) sought to engage OCC-member university researchers to undertake a study on this topic. Both TRCA and ERCA have identified a need to generate future IDF curves in their jurisdictions. There are however, a variety of methods for incorporating climate change into IDF curves and different approaches have been previously shown to result in highly divergent results. The aim of the study is to compare how a number of different methods currently being used in future IDF curve derivation compare.

226 Building on an initial literature review conducted by TRCA and ERCA staff, a concept note for a study comparing different methods for generating future IDF curves was developed and included a detailed list of researchers involved in IDF work in Ontario, Canada and a few international examples. A project review team comprised of members from ERCA, OCC and TRCA spoke to three different researchers across Ontario and concluded that Dr. Paulin Coulibaly (McMaster University) and Dr. Donald Burn (Waterloo University) had the right expertise, experience and were able to complete the study collaboratively and within the necessary timeline and budget. These two researchers were then invited to submit a detailed joint proposal for their collaborative work. Based on a satisfactory technical review of the proposal, and a cost estimate that was lower than originally budgeted by TRCA and ERCA, the project team proceeded with the administration of a contract to Dr. Coulibaly on behalf of both researchers. An agreement between TRCA and ERCA was also established, with ERCA contributing $35,636.00 (includes HST) toward the project and TRCA will be contributing $31,124.00. TRCA, as the OCC Secretariat is responsible for administering the agreement with Dr. Coulibaly.

As per criteria of 10 of Schedule “B” in TRCA’s Purchasing Policy, a contract was signed with the researcher, which staff had assumed was a representative of the University. Schedule 'B' allows for award of a contract on a preferred source basis without the need for approval of TRCA's Chief Executive Officer or the board if the following criteria 10 is met:  Research grants for special projects undertaken by qualified college or university staff and/or students acting on behalf of their respective institution

However, the first invoice was issued directly by the researcher and not by the university. Upon investigating the apparent discrepancy, staff discovered that it is common practice for university researchers to administer contracts directly within their own research accounts, as opposed to those administered by the University. Ideally, a research project such as this would be administered as a grant to a university under criteria 10 of Schedule “B” in TRCA’s Purchasing Policy. Given that the funds are being transferred directly to the researcher and not the university, the normal practice would have been for staff to seek approval of the Executive Committee to award the contract. However the work has already begun so staff has prepared this report to advise the board of this contract award. The rationale for having awarded the contract on a preferred source basis as per Sections 9.3.3 of TRCA’s Purchasing Policy is as follows:

9.3.3 The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably provided by any other supplier.

In this particular instance, both Dr. Paulin Coulibaly and Dr. Donald Burn possess specialized knowledge, skills, expertise, computational resources and experience required to undertake and successfully deliver a scientific study of this nature. Dr. Coulibaly has previously worked with the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario to develop future IDF curves, and Dr. Burn is widely recognized as an international expert in future and regional IDF analysis. Both researchers are also currently leading larger national efforts associated with IDF curve guidance and stormwater management through an NSERC Strategic Network called FloodNet. These researchers are working collaboratively on the current IDF project.

227 FINANCIAL DETAILS Total value of this research project is $59,079.65 (plus HST). ERCA is contributing $35,636.00 (includes HST) towards the costs of the project. TRCA will contribute $31,124.00 (including HST). Funding is available in climate science adaptation account 120-90.

Report prepared by: Chandra Sharma, extension 5237 Email: [email protected] For information contact: Harris Switzman, extension 5931 Email: [email protected] Date: May 05, 2014

______

RES.#A87/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - New Fisheries Act and Level III Agreement with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #3/14, held on May 2, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A88/14 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Cynthia Thorburn

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, As Amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.9, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #3/14, held on May 2, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

228 TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:42 a.m., on Friday, May 23, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

229 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #5/14

Friday, June 20, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #4/14, held on May 23, 2014 231

PRESENTATIONS A presentation of the Manulife Corporate Challenge Paddle to the Manulife Paddle the Don Corporate Challenge Winners 231 Bourrie, John, Project Manager, WSP Canada Inc. re: Central Pickering Development Plan Class Environmental Assessment. 231

CORRESPONDENCE A letter dated June 16, 2014 from Peter Milczyn, Toronto City Councillor re: Resignation as an Authority Member 231

AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 234

BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Contract RSD14-56 - Installation of Gated Parking Pay Toll System 238

CENTRAL PICKERING DEVELOPMENT PLAN CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 240

JULY 8th, 2013 STORM DAMAGE Contract #RSD14-58 - Detailed Design of Slope Stabilization Works at 111, 117, 137 and 139 Whitburn Crescent 252

MANAGED PRINT SERVICES 254

2013 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 256

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Shoreline, CFN 28292 256 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed Petro J. Developments Limited, CFN 50661 257

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, Moscorp VII Development Inc., CFN 50992 258

BRE INNOVATION PARK AT THE LIVING CITY CAMPUS AT KORTRIGHT 258

REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Behind 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, CFN 48048 259

CANADA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL GREATER TORONTO CHAPTER Continuation of Partnership Agreement 259

REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM Contract for 2014 Surface Water Quality Laboratory Analysis 260

NEWTONBROOK CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT Contract RSD14-04 - Asphalt Pathway Paving 260

HEART LAKE CONSERVATION AREA Paving of Asphalt Roadway, Contract RSD14-02 260

SOURCE WATER PROTECTION UPDATE AND NOTICE OF UPCOMING CONSULTATION FOR THE AMENDED PROPOSED SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN 260

PLANNING AND PERMITTING ADMINISTRATION COST RECOVERY Confirmation of final edits for the approved Fee Schedule 2014-2015 269

WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on March 18, 2014 277

NEGOTIATIONS FOR EXCHANGE OF LANDS Adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, CFN 48216 277 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #5/14 June 20, 2014

The Authority Meeting #5/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, June 20, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:40 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair David Barrow Member Ben Cachola Member Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Ronald Chopowick Member Vincent Crisanti Member Jack Heath Member Mujeeb Khan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Mike Mattos Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member John Sprovieri Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Paul Ainslie Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Colleen Jordan Member Glenn Mason Member Peter Milczyn Member John Parker Member Deb Schulte Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Jim Tovey Member

230 RES.#A89/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: David Barrow

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/13, held on May 23, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation of the Manulife Corporate Challenge Paddle to the Manulife Paddle the Don Corporate Challenge Winners.

(b) A presentation byJohn Bourrie, Project Manager, WSP Canada Inc. in regard to AUTH7.3 - Central Pickering Development Plan Class Environmental Assessment.

RES.#A90/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: David Barrow

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED RES.#A91/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Bob Callahan

THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received. CARRIED

______

CORRESPONDENCE

(a) A letter dated June 16, 2014 from Peter Milczyn, Toronto City Councillor, in regard to resignation as an Authority Member.

231 RES.#A92/14 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Councillor Peter Milczyn be congratulated on his election as MPP for Etobicoke-Lakeshore;

AND FURTHER THAT Councillor Milczyn be thanked for his years of service to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. CARRIED

232 CORRESPONDENCE (A)

______233 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A93/14 - AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Construction of Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project, City of Pickering, in the Region of Durham.

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: David Barrow

WHEREAS in 2012, the City of Pickering approved the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to undertake a Conservation Ontario Class Environmental Assessment for the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project;

AND WHEREAS the City of Pickering has approved TRCA to undertake the construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to enter into a memorandum of understanding with City of Pickering to carry out the Project;

THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement any agreements including obtaining needed approvals and the signing and execution of documents;

AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND Amberlea Creek is located in the City of Pickering and is one of four main tributaries that drain directly into Frenchman’s Bay. Its subwatershed covers approximately 380 ha of primarily developed land and 75% of the watercourse is enclosed in a stormsewer system.

In 2006, the City of Pickering undertook a Stormwater Management Master Plan (Plan) to address long-standing concerns regarding the ongoing decline in the quality of the Frenchman’ s Bay ecosystem by seeking means to control the quantity and quality of storm run-off entering the local creeks and the Bay itself. The Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project was identified as one of the key priorities of the Plan.

On June 18, 2012, City of Pickering Council authorized TRCA to undertake the planning, detailed design and approvals for the project. At Authority Meeting #5/12, held on June 22, 2012, Resolution #A95/12 directed staff to take the lead role in partnership with the City of Pickering to undertake a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) for the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project.

The project planning and design phases were undertaken in accordance with the Conservation Ontario’s Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects (2002, amended in 2013). The Class EA was filed with the Ministry of the Environment for review on August 21, 2013 and approval of the Class EA was received from the Minister’s office on February 3, 2014. 234 As part of the Class EA process, Aquafor Beech Limited and Terraprobe were retained to complete a detailed review and analysis of the fluvial geomorphological and geotechnical conditions of Amberlea Creek and assist with the development of alternative long-term remedial solutions. The detailed design for the proposed remedial works was undertaken in the spring of 2014. Permits and approvals for the works are currently under way by TRCA on behalf of the City of Pickering.

RATIONALE Based on TRCA’s expertise, ability to undertake the majority of the planned works in house, and in-depth knowledge of the sensitive site conditions and the project design, City of Pickering staff requested that TRCA provide a cost proposal for project management and construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project. Subsequent to TRCA’s proposal, on May 20, 2014, the Director, Engineering & Public Works brought forward Report ENG 11-14 to the City of Pickering Council, seeking authorization to award the project to TRCA. On that date, the City of Pickering Council approved the hiring of TRCA.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE During the Class EA for Amberlea Creek 15 erosion hazard and maintenance sites were identified that require remedial works to address the risk to existing residential structures and infrastructure. To resolve these hazards, Amberlea Creek was divided into three reaches and a range of alternatives were then developed and evaluated for each of the reaches. Through the evaluation of the alternatives, an overall preferred alternative for design and construction was identified for the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project, and is described as follows:

 Reach 1 (downstream end of Amberlea Creek, near Frenchman’s Bay and the Amberlea Creek pedestrian bridge): Only simple maintenance works to protect existing infrastructure are required in Reach 1. The existing Amberlea Creek pedestrian bridge was approved for replacement by City of Pickering Council on February 24, 2014. As part of the replacement of the bridge, the abutment protection works were removed at the site, and will be replaced during construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project. In addition, maintenance works will be completed for a storm outfall located on the valley slope south of the townhouses at 925 Bayly Street, where the headwall and existing concrete pipe are broken, to prevent the requirement for re-entry into the valley system in the near future for this purpose.

 Reach 2 (middle section of Amberlea Creek): Valley and stream based works are required at three separate erosion sites including the construction of two engineered vegetated buttress systems; and, one vegetated terrace system with plantings of native species where feasible, and non-native species where harsh conditions may prevent the establishment of native species.

 Reach 3 (upstream end of Amberlea Creek, includes Region of Durham culvert at Bayly Street): Complete realignment of the river channel will be required within the reach, and remedial works will be required at seven erosion sites. Construction will include: slope stabilization works at two sites; channel bank works at three sites including, the removal of a debris jam; and stabilization of the Bayly Street culvert including, the construction of an energy dissipation system and restoration of a storm outfall.

235 Construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project is planned to be completed by March 31, 2015 in accordance with the warm water fisheries timing window. Restoration of the project site will continue into summer of 2015.

All work required for the construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project will take place along the 600 m of watercourse south of Bayly Street from the Bayly Street Culvert (owned by the Region of Durham) to just south of the existing pedestrian bridge which is located at the downstream end of the creek. The construction of the works will be undertaken primarily on City of Pickering land with some works on TRCA land. The area is surrounded primarily by private residential land uses.

During construction, access to the site will be provided by the construction of a temporary access road which will begin at the parking lot of the West Shore Community Centre (owned by the City of Pickering). As the planned works are located within a confined forested valley system, the new 4 to 5 metre wide access road will be constructed along the base of the valley with two temporary creek crossings. Construction of the access road, slope stabilization and stream works will require removal of approximately 0.72ha (or 24.6%) of the treed area within the valley. Included in this estimate are 128 ash trees that will be removed from the ravine. Additionally, trees that suffered severe damage during the 2013 ice storm will also be removed during construction.

Upon completion of the remedial works the foundation for a 3 to 4 m wide maintenance access road and armourstone bridge abutments at the temporary creek crossing locations will be maintained to accommodate future monitoring and maintenance works. The access road will be top dressed and planted with hardy shrubs that will withstand occasional pruning to maintain the access corridor. Temporary crossing measures will be required to enter the upper reaches of the creek in the future.

As part of the site restoration activities, TRCA has prepared a planting plan that includes approximately 1.01ha of restoration planting and seeding that aims to re-establish native vegetation and improve the vegetation community composition within the ravine, and to ensure that forest cover is fully restored upon completion of the project. This planting plan includes site appropriate native species that will replace: non-native trees scheduled to be removed; all ash trees within the ravine; and, trees damaged during the 2013 ice storm. The restoration plan developed by TRCA also includes the provision of habitat features such as nesting boxes and aquatic habitat enhancements.

FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA will enter into a memorandum of understanding with the City of Pickering to fund the project, based on the approved budget of $2,067,231 excluding HST.

Report prepared by: Natalie Seniuk, extension 5655 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Natalie Seniuk, extension 5655 Emails: [email protected] Date: May 21, 2014 Attachments: 1 236 Attachment 1

______

237 RES.#A94/14 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Contract RSD14-56 - Installation of Gated Parking Pay Toll System. Award of Contract RSD14-56 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for installation of a gated parking pay toll system at Black Creek Pioneer Village parking lot, in the City of Toronto.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT Contract RSD14-56 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for installation of a gated parking pay toll system at Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) parking lot, in the City of Toronto be awarded to Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction at a total cost not to exceed $159,500.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 25% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA staff performed a traffic flow survey of the parking lot at BCPV and determined that on weekdays and weekends, when parking staff is unavailable to collect fees, approximately 1,500 cars accessed the parking lot at no cost on a weekly basis. Therefore TRCA proposes to install a gated parking system at BCPV that will operate 24 hours per day, 7 day per week. The proposed system will help create revenue and improve safety and security of the site. TRCA staff has projected that revenue collection from the new gated parking paytoll system will offset the cost incurred in construction six to eight months after the system has been initialized.

In 2013, TRCA retained Kavsky Engineering, through a competitive procurement process, for the design of a gated parking system at the north entrance of the parking lot at Black Creek Pioneer Village. The gated parking system design takes into account access for both visitors and staff members and allows for automated access control and fee collection. Upon further assessment of traffic flow at the BCPV parking lot, TRCA staff and Kavsky Engineering recommended that two gated entrances and two gated exits be installed to help accommodate large volumes of vehicles at peak hours, during major events and to provide greater flexibility for staff access. The recommended systems will feature the following:  flat-rate pay stations upon entry; payment with major credit cards, swiped-in passes or keyed-in pass codes;  parking system to include purchase confirmation receipts for convenience and record of visitors; 238  up-to-date computer operating system with an ID card printer and software that is compatible with BCPV server;  two gated entrance parking systems with motorized lift arms that open upon receiving a signal from a control computer;  two gated exit systems with magnetic loop sensors;  traffic counter display signs; and  six CCTV security cameras.

TRCA requires the services of a qualified contractor to carry out the fabrication and installation of the proposed parking system at Black Creek Pioneer Village.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number seven in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through stable and diversified funding TRCA will increase financial resilience.

Tender RSD14-56 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( http://www.biddingo.com/) on Thursday May 8th, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Thursday May 15th, 2014.

Request for Tender (RFT) packages were sent to 10 contractors as follows:  Cole Systems;  CT Tech;  Dig-Con International;  Dilisado Enterprises;  Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction;  LocoMobi;  R-Chad General Contracting;  Trinity;  WPS Canada Inc.; and  Zeag Canada.

nd The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Thursday, May 22 , 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-56 Black Creek Pioneer Village Parking Lot Improvement Project – Installation of a Gated Parking Pay Toll System

BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT (Plus HST) Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction $159,500.00 WPS Canada Inc. $200,499.00 Dilisado Enterprises $407,500.00 R-Chad General Contractors Inc. $475,000.00 Dig-Con International $1,030,700.00

Four contractors: CT Tech; LocoMobi; Trinity; and Zeag Canada, declined the opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the timelines and specifications stated in the contract documents. 239 The variance between the low and high bid is a result of each bidder's experience and specialization with the proposed work. Dig-Con International is a large corporation with high overhead that cannot compete with smaller companies that specialize in this line of work.

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommends that Jeffrey G. Wallans Construction be awarded Contract RSD14-56 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for installation of a gated parking pay toll system at Black Creek Pioneer Village parking lot, for a total amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 25% contingency, plus HST; it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications. The 25% contingency is to allow for extra costs associated with upgrading the existing electrical infrastructure as its current condition is unknown.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available through the City of Toronto, within the BCPV 2014 capital budget account # 503-65. Using the assumption that half of the approximate 1,500 none paying weekly parking lot users are staff or TRCA clients and that a large percentage of none paying users would find parking alternatives, staff is estimating that the gated parking lot system would generate an additional $2,100 a week in new revenue. This figure is based on using the current parking fee of $7.00 multiplied by 300 or 20% of the aforementioned weekly surveyed total.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 05, 2014

______

RES.#A95/14 - CENTRAL PICKERING DEVELOPMENT PLAN CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Request for the Regional Municipality of Durham to address outstanding TRCA concerns related to the Central Pickering Development Plan Class Environmental Assessment.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Bob Callahan

WHEREAS the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) was approved by the Province of Ontario in May 2006, establishing a comprehensive vision for Central Pickering including the urban community of Seaton; 240 WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff has reviewed the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the regional water, wastewater and transportation/transit systems for serving the Seaton development, identified a number of significant concerns and gaps, and in a letter dated June 10, 2014, requested that the Regional Municipality of Durham (Durham) make a commitment to addressing these concerns in the final EA;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Authority supports the TRCA staff request for a Region of Durham commitment to address outstanding concerns to the satisfaction of TRCA staff be included in the final EA, including preparation of studies and preliminary designs to address issues relating to provincial natural hazards, effective protection and enhancement of the natural heritage system and stormwater management, as well as a commitment to appropriately cost and budget for all new and improved infrastructure based on the outcome of the required studies and preliminary designs;

AND FURTHER THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham, City of Pickering, Town of Ajax, Province of Ontario and the Seaton Landowners Group be so advised. CARRIED

BACKGROUND The Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) was approved by the Province in May 2006 under the provisions of the Ontario Planning and Development Act. The Plan establishes a comprehensive vision for Central Pickering including a sustainable urban community in Seaton, an agricultural community in the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve and an extensive Natural Heritage System (NHS). The development planning area for Seaton is generally bounded by the CPR Belleville line to the south, Sideline 16/Pickering-Ajax boundary to the east, Highway 7 to the north and the York-Durham Townline to the west. For the purposes of this EA the boundary has been extended south of the CPR Belleville line to approximately Finch Avenue to include work along existing Whites Road and Brock Road, to ensure proper tie in with proposed development and work within the study boundaries.

Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) In 2009 Durham initiated a Class EA to develop a plan for the regional water, wastewater and transportation systems necessary to service the new Seaton development. Due to the scope and level of work involved in developing an EA for all of the regional infrastructure necessary to service this new community, TRCA entered into a Service Delivery agreement with the Region of Durham which involved meeting with Durham and their consultants on a regular basis to discuss and review issues throughout the development of the EA. The infrastructure networks examined a series of alternative alignments and configurations based on a set of evaluation criteria generally including the natural environment, transportation services, technical environment (constructabiltiy), social, cultural impacts and costs.

241 On May 13, 2014 TRCA staff was advised that Durham would be filing the final EA by June 30, 2014 in accordance with provisions made in an agreement with the Seaton Landowners Group. Further to provisions made in our service agreement, TRCA staff requested a copy of the draft EA for review. TRCA was provided with the draft reports, and given a two week window to provide comments. In its review, TRCA found that there were a number of deficiencies in the draft EA that will cause significant impacts to Durham at the permitting stage of the project. (Note: At this time staff has been advised that regional infrastructure permitting and construction may be conducted by the Seaton Landowners Group, in whole or in part, through future agreements with Durham).

Staff recognized that the technical deficiencies in the draft EA were too complex to be addressed prior to the filing of the final EA by the commitment date. Staff further recognized that once the EA is filed on June 30, 2014, TRCA will have two options for having its concerns addressed: Option 1) to request a commitment be made in the final EA to address TRCA concerns at the detailed design stage, prior to making the application for TRCA permits, and that the costs of the regional infrastructure be appropriately costed and budgeted for based (in part) on these studies; or Option 2) request a Part II Order from the Province of Ontario be granted. Because TRCA staff is of the opinion that its concerns can be addressed through the detailed design stage and that once addressed staff will be in the position to eventually recommend the Executive Committee approve the required permits, staff is recommending Option 1.

Recommended Alignments as Provided in the Draft EA Recommendations regarding the required regional road/transit, water and wastewater alignments have been made in the draft EA. The recommendations have been made based on site visits, meetings and review of technical baseline project data with TRCA, as well as consultation with the Region of Durham, the EA consultants (WSP Canada Inc.) and the Seaton Developers Group. A summary is provided below (Attachment 1 - Figure 5-1 for proposed road alignments).

Proposed Road Network The following are the recommended design concepts for each of the roads:  Brock Road: Existing Brock Road will be widened along its current alignment to six lanes from Finch Avenue north to Highway 7, bypassing the Hamlet of Brougham. The cross-section will generally consist of four lanes for general-purpose traffic plus two HOV/transit lanes. Pedestrian and cycling facilities will be accommodated through multi-use paths, sidewalks and/or bike lanes. Existing Brock Road crosses several tributaries, parallels several wetlands and environmentally sensitive areas, particularly near Taunton Road and runs adjacent to TRCA conservation lands located south of Concession 3 Road and north of Finch Avenue.  Taunton Road: Existing Taunton Road will be widened along its current alignment to six lanes between York-Durham Line and Brock Road. The existing bridge over the West Duffins Creek will be widened to the north using the existing footings. The cross-section will generally consist of four lanes for general-purpose traffic plus two HOV/transit lanes. Pedestrian and cycling facilities will be accommodated through multi-use paths, sidewalks and/or cycle tracks. TRCA conservation lands are located parallel to Taunton Road, west of Altona Road. Taunton Road also passes through environmentally sensitive areas, adjacent to wetlands and crosses several tributaries. Widening of the existing bridge over the West Duffins Creek will result in construction within a major valley feature. 242  Whites Road Extension: The Whites Road Extension consists of a continuous north-south six lane arterial road running between Finch Avenue and Highway 7 with a new north-south bridge structure across West Duffins Creek, through a major valley system, an environmentally sensitive area and terrestrial natural heritage system, south of Taunton Road. The new bridge will connect existing Whites Road to Sideline 26 where the White Road extension will continue north. The cross-section will be four lanes for general-purpose traffic plus two HOV/transit lanes. Pedestrian and cycling facilities will accommodate active transportation through multi-use paths, sidewalks and/or bike lanes. An overpass is proposed where existing Whites Road crosses the CP rail line, just north of Finch Avenue. Existing Whites Road from approximately Finch Avenue to just south of Taunton Road passes through wetlands, adjacent to conservation lands, through the Rouge/Duffins wildlife corridor and will cross over several headwater drainage features.  Whitevale Bypass: The Whitevale Bypass will generally consist of an east-west, four lane arterial road running from Sideline 16 west towards Sideline 22, along existing Whitevale Road. The new section of Whitevale Road (bypass) will then run in a south-westerly direction and connect to 14th Avenue at the York-Durham line. The cross-section will be 1-lane per direction between York-Durham Line and the bridge structure over West Duffins Creek, and two lanes per direction east of the West Duffins Creek bridge to Sideline 16. All lanes will be for general-purpose traffic, including mixed-traffic transit operations. Pedestrian and cycling facilities will be accommodated through paved bikeways, bike lanes and/or sidewalks. The proposed bypass will cross over several tributaries and headwater drainage features, through environmentally sensitive areas, and will involve a major crossing of the West Duffins through a major valley system. TRCA conservation lands will also be impacted near the crossing of the West Duffins.  Rossland Road Extension: The Rossland Road Extension will connect the existing Rossland Road/Concession Road 3 to Sideline 22. This segment of road will start at Brock Road, travel west past Valley Farm Road, continue in a north-west direction as an overpass at the CP rail line and will head north to connect to existing Sideline 22 at Taunton Road. From there the extension will head north to Highway 7. The cross-section will consist of two lanes per direction for general purpose traffic, including mixed-traffic transit operations. Pedestrian and cycling facilities will be accommodated through multi-use paths, bike lanes and/or sidewalks. Due to the presence of the Brock Landfill site at the current terminus of Concession Road 3 and the need to avoid purge wells at that site, the proposed road extension will impact TRCA lands to the south of existing Rossland Road/Concession Road 3, south of the Brock Landfill site. The Rossland Road extension will impact existing wetlands/tributaries, environmentally sensitive areas and will run parallel to the terrestrial natural heritage system and Iroquois Shoreline.

Proposed Water/Wastewater Six regional trunk sanitary sewers and five sewage pumping stations were identified to service Seaton (Attachment 2 - Figure 4-24, preferred shown as red alignments).

The siting of regional watermains is based on pressure zones and is dependent on the road layout and water system facilities required to service the development blocks. The preferred water system utilizes reservoir storage which is preferred over a series of elevated tanks. The preferred solution identified the need for five pumping stations, two reservoirs and one elevated tank in total to service the area (Attachment 3 - Figure 4-26).

243 Current Status of the Seaton Development Community In 2013 TRCA's Development Planning and Regulation staff worked with the City of Pickering, the Region of Durham and the Seaton Landowners Group to achieve final approval of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan and conditional approval of 21 draft plans of subdivision associated with over 1,067 ha of development. The effort culminated in a series of significant Ontario Municipal Board mediation sessions facilitated by TRCA's planning staff throughout the summer and fall of 2013. These intense collaborative sessions resulted in the natural heritage and water resource issues being ultimately resolved to TRCA and the City of Pickering's satisfaction, with many of these subdivisions being subject to "lot holds" in the form of "no pre-sale agreements" until such time as various water resource matters can be addressed.

The next step includes reviewing the Function Servicing Reports and detailed designs for the first phase of Seaton, starting with five subdivisions located generally south of Taunton Road and one subdivision located north of the Whitevale Golf Club. This effort is underway and continues a collaborative approach whereby TRCA staff meet every two weeks with the various developers and the City of Pickering to work through technical matters. The first site work is expected to begin in 2015, subject to various municipal, provincial and TRCA approvals.

Conditions Pursuant to TRCA Review of the Draft EA TRCA received the draft Environmental Study Report (ESR) on May 22, 2014 for an expedited two week review and preliminary comments were provided on June 10, 2014. It is TRCA's understanding that the final ESR will need to be filed for 90-day public review by the end of June 2014, as per a Memorandum of Understanding between Durham and the Seaton Landowners Group.

Notwithstanding the above, TRCA is concerned that a number of significant issues have not been addressed in the ESR. As such, due to timing constraints TRCA respectfully requested that the following commitments be included up front in a section of the EA and that discussions take place prior to the end of the 90-day review period to ensure that there is a comprehensive plan in place to resolve these items prior to the detailed design and permitting phase.

Typically during TRCA review of a draft EA, staff provide comments that if addressed, will lead to approval in principle of the final EA, and future recommendations of permit approval by the Executive Committee. The draft EA submitted to TRCA staff for the CPDP project is currently lacking in sufficient detail, however, with commitment to undertake appropriate studies, it is staff's opinion that our concerns will be satisfied. These studies will inform design details, construction timing and project cost. Staff is additionally concerned that if the studies are left to the permitting stage, there will be significant delays in permit approval and unexpected project cost increases. Staff is therefore recommending that these studies be done during a pre-design phase, be used to inform the capital budget process, and not be left to the permitting phase where cost increases and time delays will be inevitable.

In order to avoid these delays and to address outstanding TRCA concerns the following recommendations are provided to help inform the pre-design stage.

244 1. The boundary as laid out for Seaton through the CPDP process has since been revised in this EA to include road work south of the CP Rail (Rossland Road widening and White Road widening). Work is also proposed outside of the Seaton lands west of the West Duffins through the Agricultural Preserve (Whitevale Bypass, Taunton Road widening). In developing these alternatives a limited inventory of the natural heritage system was provided.

Recommendation: A detailed inventory is required of the natural heritage system that is located outside of the Seaton lands where infrastructure has been proposed as part of this EA, as this was not completed as part of the original analysis for Seaton.

2. Infrastructure impacts to the natural heritage system have not been quantified in a comprehensive manner to inform future mitigation, restoration and habitat off-set strategies.

Recommendation: A comprehensive mitigation and restoration plan be submitted prior to detail design for all infrastructure impacting the NHS quantifying the area of habitat lost or impacted including a habitat off-set strategy to address the loss of restorable habitat and ecosystem services.

3. The draft EA does not include a comprehensive plan for the study area showing how stormwater quality, quantity and erosion issues will be dealt with for the study area.

Recommendation: Details regarding stormwater quality, quantity and erosion requirements will be provided and developed to meet the requirements of the TRCA's Storm Water Management Criteria document, Duffins Hydrology Study (2013), Petticoat Hydrology Study (2006), and Hydrology Study: Stormwater Management Master Plan, Frenchman's Bay, (April 2009) for all proposed works, including areas within Seaton, as well as those outside of the original Seaton boundary. Other methods for quality/erosion control will be examined for areas that do not meet the quality/erosion control requirements (for example those noted in the EA as being serviced only by oil grit separators).

4. The draft EA does not provide a comprehensive plan identifying how uncontrolled storm flows along roads will be addressed.

Recommendation: A plan will be developed between the Region and developers for areas where uncontrolled storm flows along proposed infrastructure are expected. Any new stormwater management facilities and associated infrastructure shall be located consistent with the policies of the City of Pickering's Official Plan Amendment 22.

5. The draft EA identifies in several locations areas where there will be increases in flood elevations. Increases to flood elevations both upstream and downstream of proposed crossings are unacceptable. Further evaluation/justification for the culverts/bridge sizes will be required.

Recommendation: Work will be completed to ensure no increases to flood elevations upstream or downstream of any of the proposed works, to TRCA satisfaction.

245 6. The EA does not provide sufficient detail regarding the watercourse crossing structures, including but not limited to span sizes, flooding impacts, fluvial geomorphic processes, natural corridor connections and the need for eco-passages. Any cost estimates developed from the EA may be inaccurate and may change significantly based on further evaluation.

Recommendation: Technical justification (including but not necessarily limited to geomorphology, erosion analysis, hydraulic modeling, vegetation impacts, wildlife movement, eco-passages, corridor connectivity, groundwater impacts, geotechnical) is required for the sizing of all new, replacement or extended culverts and bridges, where necessary. Crossings will be designed based on field survey data, evaluated based on a comprehensive list of criteria (including but not limited to the locations of watercourses and topography) and will maintain wildlife connections through the NHS. It should be acknowledged in the EA that there is insufficient detail to develop preliminary costing for all structures, and therefore any budget estimates developed from the EA will be very preliminary and potentially subject to significant change as the detailed design progresses.

7. Due to time constraints it is unclear whether all of staff's outstanding concerns can be addressed within the final EA report. As a result, staff's major concerns will need to be addressed in order to help expedite the review and permitting process.

Recommendation: A pre-design brief to be completed prior to preparation of construction drawings for each project area that includes: a) All outstanding commitments from the EA b) A comprehensive review of all impacts to the NHS, including terrestrial, aquatic, water management, hydrogeologic and geotechnical issues c) Utility requirements, as the siting of utilities may have additional impacts on the NHS d) A comprehensive outline of all project areas that will require permits in accordance with Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 166/06, including roads and bridges, stormwater management, service facilities, water and wastewater infrastructure e) Preliminary structure design, including: i) staging/phasing of the specific study area ii) preliminary erosion and sediment control report and plans outlining how infrastructure and subdivision construction will be managed iii) identifying how construction of the regional infrastructure and private development will be coordinated to ensure that disturbance and cumulative impacts to the NHS are minimized and show how erosion and sediment controls are coordinated iv) identifying how stormwater management (SWM) will be addressed should the road work precede construction of the SWM ponds necessary to treat runoff f) Preliminary construction cost estimates for both structural and environmental aspects.

8. The draft EA does not provide details for long term slope stability in the key areas where infrastructure is proposed and where significant grading is expected. TRCA's main areas of concern include future Whites Road over the bluff, Whitevale Bypass over the West Duffins, Rossland Road overpass at the CP rail and Whites Road overpass at the CP rail. Notwithstanding, there may be other locations identified through further review which will need to be addressed at the design stage.

246 Recommendation: Comprehensive geotechnical studies, including a long-term slope stability assessment, will be completed for all locations in which active erosion or work within a valley is expected to take place and where significant grading will occur.

9. The draft EA does not clearly identify areas in which groundwater concerns are anticipated. The borehole logs provided are missing geodetic information and the groundwater elevations need to be provided. Key areas where infrastructure is proposed in or adjacent to wetlands will need to be identified.

Recommendation: Comprehensive hydrogeological studies will be completed or amended for all locations, as needed, and will include ground surface elevations and groundwater elevations. In areas where dewatering will be required to stabilize the site for construction, an environmental management plan following TRCA guidelines may be required.

10. The draft EA does not clearly identify the future impacts to TRCA lands/property as a result of the proposed work. Future impacts to TRCA lands will need to be identified and addressed.

Recommendation: Impacts to TRCA-owned lands will be identified early within the design process and archaeological investigations will need to be completed by TRCA staff. Anticipated property impacts will need to be addressed at the TRCA Directors level and property evaluations completed.

11. Several of the water/wastewater segments have been relocated from our previous review and now cross the natural heritage system rather than follow proposed road alignments. Further clarification for infrastructure within the NHS is required.

Recommendation: Water and wastewater alignments will be revisited to ensure that they follow proposed road alignments. Justification will need to be provided for areas where infrastructure cannot follow existing road segments and is expected to traverse the natural heritage system.

12. The draft EA identifies the water/wastewater system as following proposed trail connections, were appropriate however, there appears to be a lack of coordination for the trail alignments through this EA and other planning processes.

Recommendation: The water/wastewater alignments will follow the locations of proposed trail connections through the NHS where feasible. Justification, analysis and coordination around following the trail alignments should be provided.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE  It is TRCA's expectation that a response to the comments provided on the draft EA (sent June 10, 2014) will be provided by the Region and that TRCA's major concerns as identified in the above-noted report will be addressed prior to the commencement of the detailed design.  TRCA staff will continue to work with the Region of Durham through to the final EA and permitting stages in order to address outstanding items in order to meet the objectives and policies as setout in the CPDP, Official Plan Amendment 22 and the TRCA draft Living City Policies in efforts to work towards permitting requirements. 247  TRCA has advised Durham that its current service agreement will be completed once comments on the final EA have been provided, at the end of the 90-day review period, and requested that this agreement be renegotiated. At a high level, staff sees this agreement as needing to include provisions for detailed design, permitting review and construction compliance for the duration of project implementation. Further discussions and detailed negotiations with the Region of Durham, their consultant and the developers are not included in this current service agreement and will need to take place for the pre-design and permitting stages.

Report prepared by: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, Beth Williston, extension 5217 Emails: [email protected] and [email protected] For Information contact: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 11, 2014 Attachments: 3

248 Attachment 1

249 Attachment 2

250 Attachment 3

______251 RES.#A96/14 - JULY 8th, 2013 STORM DAMAGE Contract #RSD14-58 - Detailed Design of Slope Stabilization Works at 111, 117, 137 and 139 Whitburn Crescent. Extension of Contract #RSD14-58 to include additional geotechnical investigations and detailed design work at 135 and 137 Whitburn Crescent, City of Toronto.

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS the significant rainfall event of July 8th, 2013 caused very high flows and resulting erosion damages along a number of river systems, creating new sites where existing development and infrastructure is endangered, particularly within the City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS Terraprobe Inc. was requested by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) on an emergency basis to complete preliminary slope stability and erosion risk assessments of critical and high priority sites as documented in a final report by Terraprobe Inc. dated July 25th, 2013;

AND WHEREAS the detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments confirmed long-term risk to the properties at 111 and 117 Whitburn Crescent, and short-term risk to the property at 139 Whitburn Crescent;

AND WHEREAS approval to proceed with the repairs at the identified properties on Whitburn Crescent was granted by the Authority, subject to all approvals and confirmation of funding, at Authority Meeting #11/13 under Resolution #A225/13;

AND WHEREAS approval to retain Terraprobe Inc. to complete the detailed design of stabilization works at the identified properties and part of an additional property at 137 Whitburn Crescent was granted on a preferred source basis in late March 2014;

AND WHEREAS additional instability was observed at 135 and 137 Whitburn Crescent in spring 2014 which requires urgent analysis and stabilization works;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Contract #RSD14-58 for the detailed design of stabilization works at 111, 117, 137 and 139 Whitburn Crescent in the City of Toronto be increased by $21,455.00 to a total cost not to exceed $70,000.00, plus HST, to allow for the recommended expansion to the scope of work;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be directed to take such actions as is necessary to expand the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED

252 BACKGROUND Following initial review by TRCA inspectors of the damage from the July 8, 2013 storm, 27 sites were recommended for preliminary slope stability and erosion risk assessments by a third party engineering firm, which was awarded to Terraprobe Inc. (Terraprobe) on a preferred source basis in light of their extensive experience with assessing and remediating erosion and slope stability impacting urban residential properties with TRCA over the past 25 years. Following these preliminary geotechnical reviews, three properties which included 139 Whitburn Crescent were recommended for expedited detailed geotechnical assessments, which were subsequently completed by Terraprobe on a preferred source basis as approved at Executive Committee Meeting #7/13 under Resolution #B109/13; and 24 properties which included 111 and 117 Whitburn Crescent were recommended for detailed geotechnical assessments, which were also completed by Terraprobe through a competitive bidding process under Contract RSD13-101 over the fall and winter of 2013.

As the detailed geotechnical assessments for the identified properties on Whitburn Crescent have confirmed that these properties are at both short-term and long-term risk of further instability, at Authority Meeting #11/13 under Resolution #A225/13 staff was granted approval to proceed with the 2014 workplan presented, which included the implementation of repairs at these properties, subject to approval from the City of Toronto and confirmation of available funding.

Recognizing the need to proceed with stabilization works as soon as possible given the level of risk to the properties on Whitburn Crescent, and Terraprobe's special knowledge of the properties from the detailed investigations completed, Terraprobe was recommended to be retained on a preferred source basis to complete the detailed design of the repairs. Approval to award preferred source Contract #RSD14-58 was subsequently granted under CEO authorization in late March 2014.

During a site visit by staff to 139 Whitburn Crescent in late May 2014, significant instability was noted on the adjacent properties at 135 and 137 Whitburn Crescent, prompting staff to request a recommended course of action from Terraprobe. Shortly thereafter TRCA received a recommendation to expand the scope of work to complete a slope stability analysis for the adjacent properties and the detailed design of stabilization works.

RATIONALE Given the urgent need to expand the project area to address the additional instability observed at 135 and 137 Whitburn Crescent , and Terraprobe's intimate knowledge of the issues and solutions required, staff recommend that Preferred Source Contract #RSD14-58 be increased by $21,455 to a revised total not to exceed $70,000 plus HST, to provide for the necessary additional investigative and design work needed.

Approval to retain Terraprobe on a preferred source basis is in compliance with TRCA’s Purchasing Policy requirements under Section 9.3(2) and 9.3(3) which state:

The goods and services are required as a result of an emergency, which would not reasonably permit the use of the regular procurement methods.

253 The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably provided by any other supplier.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The revised upset limit for Contract #RSD14-58 is recommended to be increased from $44,045 plus a contingency of $4,500, plus HST, to a total not to exceed $70,000, plus HST. The increase will provide for additional geotechnical investigations and detailed design work at 135 and 137 Whitburn Crescent, quoted at $13,660, and an increase in the project contingency from the original $4,500 to $12,295 in the event that additional services are required during the remaining phases of the project.

Funding for the completion of this contract is available through 2014 enhanced erosion capital funding from the City of Toronto under account #133-02.

Report prepared by: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 16, 2014

______

RES.#A97/14 - MANAGED PRINT SERVICES Award of contract for managed print services.

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT the contract for managed print services for printers and photocopiers until December 31, 2017 be awarded to Laser Networks at a total cost not to exceed $160,000.00, plus 10% contingency, plus HST, based on estimated usage of devices. CARRIED BACKGROUND In October 2012, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) entered into a lease agreement with Xerox Canada for the replacement of TRCA's fleet of copiers and multi function devices. Xerox Canada is on the Province of Ontario's Vendor of Record list and TRCA selected Xerox as the preferred vendor through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.

In December 2013, Xerox Canada, as TRCA's vendor for copier devices made a proposal for supplying managed print services through their wholly owned subsidiary Laser Networks. Managed print services includes the supply of toners, inks or pigment based cartridges as well as maintenance, service repairs including parts and labour for copiers and laser printers.

254 RATIONALE TRCA staff asked Xerox Canada to analyze TRCA's current copier and all other printer usage over a number of weeks using a proprietary network software tool which measures and tracks individual device usage. Xerox Canada performed this data collection on two occasions to establish a reliable baseline for printer/copier usage. TRCA also reviewed yearly invoices for printer/copier toners and inks to establish a current annual cost for these consumables.

Xerox Canada provided a proposal to TRCA identifying the costs per page for each device eligible for the managed print service (large format plotters and ink jet printers are not eligible). Based on the existing cost estimates and usage it was determined that TRCA would save approximately $129.00 per month in copier and printer toners by using this service. This savings does not take into account the staff time saved by not having to troubleshoot printer problems as this is monitored remotely by the managed service, making repair calls, ordering and storage of toners. Toners are shipped directly from the managed print service company based on monitored usage in a "just-in-time-delivery" model.

Laser Networks is the preferred source for managed print services as it provides this service as a subsidiary of Xerox Canada and therefore are the only company that can provide this service to Xerox copiers. The monitoring technology offered by Laser Networks to provide real-time monitoring of usage, toner levels and repair/maintenance status of Xerox equipment is proprietary to Laser Networks as a subsidiary of Xerox Canada. As a result, staff recommends award of the contract on a preferred source basis as per Section 9.3.1a of TRCA's Purchasing Policy as follows:

1. The goods and services are only available from one source or one supplier by reason of: a. need for compatibility with goods and services previously acquired and there are no reasonable alternatives, substitutes or accommodations;

FINANCIAL DETAILS The contract cost for the managed print services for the term of 48 months is estimated to be approximately $160,000.00 based on estimated usage of devices in production, 10% contingency, plus HST. This cost represents $0.015 per page monochrome for networked devices, $0.1325 for colour networked devices, $0.0145 for monochrome non-networked devices plus $20.00 monthly base charge per device, $0.1325 for colour non-networked device plus $45.00 monthly base charge per device, plus HST. The funds are identified in TRCA's annual operating budget from TRCA's municipal funding partners.

Report prepared by: Chris Gerstenkorn, extension 5347 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Chris Gerstenkorn, extension 5347 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 04, 2014

______

255 RES.#A98/14 - 2013 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The 2013 audited financial statements are recommended for approval. (Budget/Audit Res.#C7/14)

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the transfer of funds from reserves to surplus in the amount of $302,000.00, as outlined in Note 7(a), "Continuity of reserves" to the financial statements be approved;

AND FURTHER THAT the 2013 audited financial statements, as presented, be approved, signed by the Chair and Secretary-Treasurer of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), and distributed to each member municipality and the Minister of Natural Resources, in accordance with subsection 38 (3) of the Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED ______

RES.#A99/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Shoreline, CFN 28292. Acquisition of property required to facilitate erosion control works on the Lake Ontario Shoreline in the City of Toronto – Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Waterfront Component. (Executive Res.#B42/14)

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT 0.334 hectares (0.825 acres ), more or less, of land improved with a 2-storey single family dwelling, being Lots 311-315, Plan 1566, City of Toronto, municipally know as 1 Midland Avenue, Scarborough, be purchased from Thomasene Tresa Tarasuk;

THAT the purchase price be $1.4 million dollars payable on the closing date;

THAT the owner be permitted to remain in possession of the dwelling for up to five years from the closing date subject to the owner paying market rent for the period of possession;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction and all reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

256 AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A100/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed Petro J. Developments Limited, CFN 50661. Acquisition of property located at 42 Park Lawn Road in the City of Toronto, under the 'Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B43/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT 0.253 hectares (0.625 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of Lot 7, Registered Plan 83, and designated as Parts 2 and 3 on draft Reference Plan prepared by David B. Searles Surveying Ltd. referenced as Drawing File 92-1-13.DWG, City of Toronto be purchased from Petro J. Developments Limited;

THAT the said conveyance include a reservation for Petro J. Developments Limited of a non-exclusive, temporary construction access easement for the construction and access and excavation of the development including underground parking over Part 3 on said draft Reference Plan which expires upon the earlier of: (a) the date of completion of all works relating to the development of 42 Parklawn Road; or (b) 21 years less one day from the date of transfer of the conveyance;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements and temporary construction easement;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

257 RES.#A101/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, Moscorp VII Development Inc., CFN 50992. Acquisition of property located to the west of Kennedy Road, and north of Mayfield Road, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B44/14)

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT 0.132 hectares (0.326 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 20, Concession 1 EHS and designated as Block 118 and Block 119 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by J. H. Gelbloom Surveying Limited, Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Project: 11-008 dated April 21, 2014, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, located to the west of Kennedy Road, and north of Mayfield Road, be purchased from Moscorp VII Development Inc.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A102/14 - BRE INNOVATION PARK AT THE LIVING CITY CAMPUS AT KORTRIGHT Receipt of the BRE Canada Innovation Park Business Plan and authorization to engage BRE UK to provide advisory services. (Executive Res.#B45/14)

Moved by: Vincent Crisanti Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to utilize $50,000 of funding received from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to hire BRE (Building Research Establishment) UK to continue providing advisory services related to partnership development, fundraising and technical expertise to further develop the demonstration buildings at Innovation Park; 258 THAT the BRE Canada Innovation Park Business Plan, dated March 10, 2014 be received;

THAT staff be directed to seek funding to complete the design and implementation of servicing, including watermain, wastewater and telecommunication services, to service both Innovation Park and the Kortright Visitor Centre, and to seek funding for refurbishment of the existing Greenworks Building as the Innovation Park Visitor’s Centre;

THAT staff be directed to seek in-kind donations (products and services) from suppliers, manufacturers, consultants, etc. to facilitate construction and implementation of the Innovation Park;

THAT staff be directed to establish an Innovation Park Advisory Committee;

THAT staff be directed to establish a Project Research Committee of academic representatives to assess needs and develop a research strategy;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action that may be required to develop and service the Innovation Park including approvals, negotiation and signing of Build Partner agreements, the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A103/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Mujeeb Khan Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A104/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: David Barrow

THAT Section II item EX8.2 - Canada Green Building Council Greater Toronto Chapter, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______259 RES.#A105/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Section II item EX8.3 - Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A106/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT Section II item EX8.4 - Newtonbrook Creek Bridge Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A107/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Section II item EX8.5 - Hearth Lake Conservation Area, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A108/14 - SOURCE WATER PROTECTION UPDATE AND NOTICE OF UPCOMING CONSULTATION FOR THE AMENDED PROPOSED SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN The Ministry of the Environment has provided comments on the Proposed Source Protection Plan submitted in October, 2012. The CTC SPC is proposing amendments to address comments received.

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Bob Callahan

THAT the Source Water Protection Update and Notice of Upcoming Consultation for the Amended Proposed Source Protection Plan be received. CARRIED 260 BACKGROUND At Toronto and Region Source Protection Authority Meeting #2/12, held on July 27, 2012, Resolution #SPA4/12 authorized the final consultation required to meet the TRSPA's regulatory obligations. Following the consultation, the Chair of the TRSPA along with the Chairs of the Credit Valley and Central Lake Ontario source protection authorities on October 22, 2012 jointly submitted to the Minister of the Environment (MOE) for approval the Proposed Source Protection Plan for the CTC Source Protection Region. The CTC is comprised of these three source protection areas. The Proposed Plan has been under review by Ministry staff who has made a series of comments and suggestions for amendments starting in late 2013. Final comments have not yet been received from the Director of the Source Protection Programs Branch at the date of this report but comments are anticipated in June.

The CTC Source Protection Committee (SPC) and staff have been reviewing the initial comments; discussing possible amendments with Ministry staff; and consulting with municipal staff since January 2014. At CTC SPC Meeting #4/14, scheduled to be held on June 24, 2014, the CTC SPC will be asked to approve amendments to the Plan which will then be open for public consultation for 35 days from mid-July to mid-August. Notices will be sent to the clerks of all municipalities partially or wholly located within the CTC, as well as other named implementing bodies; ads will be placed in local newspapers where there are vulnerable areas to which policies apply; and the documents and information on how to make comments will be posted on the CTC website www.ctcswp.ca. The Chair of the TRSPA will also receive a notice of the opportunity for the Authority to make comment. Staff will report at the July meeting of the Authority on the proposed amendments and seek approval at that time to submit comments on any matters of interest or concern to the TRSPA.

This report is being provided to inform Authority Members of the ongoing activities and pending public consultation.

Attachment 1 to this report is a summary of the technical and policy work, as well as activities to support municipalities in preparing for implementation that has been underway or completed since the last report to the TRSPA in July 2012.

NEXT STEPS Staff will report on the proposed amendments and will seek approval to submit comments on any matters of interest or concern to the TRSPA at the July meeting of the Authority. Following the public consultation, the CTC SPC will meet on September 23, 2014 to review the comments and matters raised to determine if any further amendments to the Plan or the accompanying Explanatory Document is required. The Chair of the SPC will forward the amended Plan and Explanatory Document as approved by the CTC SPC to each of the Chairs of the source protection authorities in the CTC, requesting they submit the documents to the Minister of the Environment for approval. CTC staff will provide all the required transmittal materials to each Chair.

Report prepared by: Beverley Thorpe, extension 5577 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Beverley Thorpe, extension 5577 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 05, 2014 Attachments: 1 261 Attachment 1 SUMMARY AND STATUS OF SOURCE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES IN THE CTC SOURCE PROTECTION REGION JULY 2012 TO JUNE 2014 1. TECHNICAL WORK Following submission of the Proposed Source Protection Plan in October 2012, staff continued to complete work on the Tier 3 (most detailed, local scale) water budgets for the Regions of Halton and York-Durham. At the request of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE), staff undertook a reassessment of the assignment of “Issue” label and delineation of “Issue Contributing Areas” (ICA) around some municipal wells where monitoring over a number of years showed rising concentrations of contaminants that could result in future levels above the Ontario Drinking Water Standards.

Completed Technical Work

Credit Valley Source Protection Area (CVSPA) Assessment Report (AR) The CVSPA AR was originally approved by the Ministry of the Environment in January 2012. On October 22, 2012 (in conjunction with the submission of the Proposed Source Protection Plan) a Proposed Update to the CVSPA Assessment Report was submitted to MOE with the newly re-delineated Wellhead Protection Area (WHPAs) in Acton and Georgetown. Subsequently MOE decided not to approve the report as an update was required stemming from the proposed changes to the ICAs and the completion of the Tier 3 Water Budget work and the identification of significant quantity threats in Acton and Georgetown.

In the newly delineated water quantity area, new draft Source Protection Plan policies for water quantity would apply. Changes to the ICA areas means that the existing proposed water quality policies would affect new property and business owners. Consultation consisted of notifications mailed to all landowners residing in the new water quantity area, identified by the Tier 3 Water Budget work and those newly affected by changes to the ICA, including municipal clerks and other implementing bodies. Staff also sent post cards to landowners who were no longer in a vulnerable area through the re-delineation, and also advertised in local newspapers. A public drop-in was also held on Saturday October 19, 2013 at the Georgetown Farmers Market.

Staff also received in December 2013 new technical direction from MOE on the method to assign risk levels to vulnerable areas for water quantity. As a result of the new guidance the risk level at the two vulnerable areas around the wells serving Acton remained unchanged (one area has a significant risk level and the other has a low risk level). However, the risk level for the vulnerable area around wells serving Georgetown was reduced from significant to moderate. This means that in the moderate risk level area only future and not existing activities that use groundwater or reduce recharge into the aquifer are considered significant water quantity threats. Existing activities are moderate threats.

Further Ministry staff directed in March 2014 that there should be changes to the mapping of vulnerable areas related to intakes in Lake Ontario. Following consultation, staff reviewed and addressed comments and sent revised text and maps to ministry staff for initial review prior to formal submission to the Minister.

262 The updated CVSPA AR addressing all of the above changes, including those submitted in the fall of 2013, will be submitted to the MOE for approval through the Chair of the Credit Valley Source Protection Area prior to submission of the amended Plan policies.

Toronto Region Source Protection Area (TRSPA) Assessment Report (AR) The TRSPA Assessment Report is currently being updated with the technical work of the Tier 3 Water Budget for York-Durham, which delineated a Local Area for quantity threats which straddles the CTC Source Protection Region (SPR) and the SGBLS (South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe) SPR. The two affected Source Protection Regions consolidated consultation efforts through joint newspaper ads and a public open house. This consultation ended on May 23, 2014. Staff is reviewing comments to incorporate in the Updated AR.

As with the CVSPA AR, Ministry staff directed in March 2014 that there should be changes to the mapping of vulnerable areas related to intakes in Lake Ontario in the TRSPA-AR. Once the draft is complete it will be sent to ministry staff for initial review prior to formal submission to the Minister. The updated TRSPA AR addressing all of the above changes will be submitted to the MOE for approval through the Chair of the Toronto and Region Source Protection Area prior to submission of the amended Plan policies.

2. POLICY WORK

MOE Review and Comments on the Proposed Source Protection Plan The MOE provided comments on the Proposed Source Protection Plan policies which had been submitted in October 2012 starting in late 2013 and continuing into 2014. The comments on the draft Water Quantity policies were received late October 2013 in response to a fall consultation on new draft Water Quantity policies and the original proposed comments; and comments on the original proposed Water Quality policies in early February 2014, and Lake Ontario policies in early April 2014.

Several SPC meetings have been held where staff was directed to make revisions and consult further with several municipal implementers, regarding specific policies. Concurrent with this two new rounds of public and municipal consultations were held on draft water quantity policies that will apply to newly identified vulnerable water quantity areas located around Region of Halton wells in the Town of Halton Hills (fall 2013) and the Regions of York wells located in the TRSPA and the Region of Durham well serving the Uxville industrial park (May 2014). This latter vulnerable area also extends into the South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe (SGBLS) Source Protection Region. The SGBLS Source Protection Committee is responsible to develop policies to address drinking water threats located in their Region.

It is anticipated that MOE will send their final comments in the form a Director’s Letter in June, 2014. Staff has worked closely with Ministry staff to discuss the comments received. Resolution has been reached on amendments to address most comments. It is likely that there will be a few policies which the CTC SPC feel should not be changed, particularly some directed to the MOE relating to threats to drinking water supplies located in Lake Ontario.

263 Upcoming Public Consultation on Amended Polices and Explanatory Document At the June 24th SPC meeting, the Committee will approve the amended suite of policies to be consulted upon. Public consultation on the amended Plan is at the discretion of the SPC. The CTC SPC is of the opinion that given the extent of the comments received from the Ministry in addition to two public consultations on new draft water quantity policies, it is in the public interest and beneficial for implementing bodies to have the opportunity to review the entire amended Plan and Explanatory Document.

Consultation will commence mid-July and run for a 35 day period to mid-August. Newspaper advertisements will be placed in local papers and the Amended Proposed Source Protection Plan will be posted on the CTC SPC website www.ctcswp.ca along with telephone and email contact information to reach staff. In addition, notices will be sent to all implementing bodies (municipal, provincial, source protection authority, federal and industry). CTC will not hold public open houses as the attendance at recent open houses has been extremely low. Staff will respond to any queries made via phone or email. Staff has projected an end of October submission of the Amended Proposed Source Protection Plan.

Staff is preparing the amended Plan and Explanatory Documents, maps and supporting information which is required as part of the submission.

The MOE had approved three source protection plans prior to the current election call: Lakehead (Thunder Bay), Matagami (Timmins area) and Niagara Peninsula. A number of other Plans have been re-submitted following review and amendments to address MOE comments. The remaining Plans are in the review process and/or waiting final MOE comments. The MOE staff currently anticipates that all Plans should be approved by the end of 2015.

3. ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT MUNICIPAL PREPARATION TO IMPLEMENT Following submission of the Proposed Source Protection Plan in October 2012, there was a shift in staff effort towards supporting municipalities to be ready to implement Plans. Through the funding submission for 2013-14, the MOE identified "supporting municipal readiness" as a core activity for SPA staff during the "transition" period. Eligible tasks included:  supporting the development of new business processes for the review of planning submissions for compliance with source protection plan policies  developing mapping and related support tools to aid in project review.  field verification of significant drinking water threats.

Source Protection Municipal Implementation Funding The MOE announced in late November 2013, one time grant funding to small municipalities to aid their efforts in preparing to implement policies. The grant amounts were awarded based on criteria developed by the province and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO):  AMO "Rural and Small Community Measure" where 25% or more of the municipality is in a rural area and the population is under 100,000, and  the municipality has vulnerable areas with significant drinking water threats, and  the municipality is required to implement policies using: o land use planning,

264 o Part IV tools under the Clean Water Act, (need to appoint a Risk Management Official, negotiate risk management plans and/or enforce prohibitions of activities under Part IV), or o education, outreach or incentive programs

In the CTC funding, was provided to a number of municipalities as shown in Table 1 below. The following municipalities who received funding also have to implement policies developed by the CTC Source Protection Committee which apply to vulnerable areas within the CTC:  County of Wellington and Town of Erin;  County of Dufferin and Townships of East Garafraxa and Amaranth and the Towns of Orangeville and Mono;  Town of Caledon  Township of King  Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville  Township of Uxbridge

CTC staff is working with staff of these municipalities to support them in identifying eligible activities that would be most useful given the Proposed CTC policies; to help facilitate developing collaborative projects (which are eligible for additional incentive funding up to $15,000 to each municipality if 4 or more collaborate); and to share information and approaches elsewhere to avoid duplication of efforts.

265 Table 1 Source Protection Municipal Implementation Funding to Municipalities Wholly or Partially within CTC

Municipality Grant Amount* Source Protection Area (SPA)

Adjala-Tosorontio, Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Toronto and $45,000 Township of Region SPA

Credit Valley SPA, Grand River SPA, Amaranth, Township of $45,000 Nottawasaga Valley SPA

Credit Valley SPA, Toronto and Region Caledon, Town of $30,000 SPA, Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Lake Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River SPA

Grand River SPA, Credit Valley SPA, Dufferin, County of $37,500 Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Saugeen Valley SPA, Toronto and Region SPA

East Garafraxa, $45,000 Credit Valley SPA, Grand River SPA Township of

Erin, Town of $52,500 Credit Valley SPA, Grand River SPA

Lake Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River King, Township of $37,500 SPA, Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Toronto and Region SPA

Credit Valley SPA, Grand River SPA, Mono, Town of $45,000 Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Toronto and Region SPA

Orangeville, Town of $45,000 Credit Valley SPA

Central Lake Ontario SPA, Lake Simcoe Scugog, Township of $30,000 and Couchiching/Black River SPA, Toronto And Region SPA, Kawartha-Haliburton SPA

Lake Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River SPA, Toronto and Region SPA, Simcoe, County of $47,809 Nottawasaga Valley SPA, Severn Sound SPA, Grey Sauble SPA 266 Municipality Grant Amount* Source Protection Area (SPA)

Central Lake Ontario SPA, Kawartha-Haliburton SPA, Lake Simcoe and Uxbridge, Township of $30,000 Couchiching/Black River SPA, Toronto and Region SPA

Maitland Valley SPA, Credit Valley SPA, Wellington, County of $45,000 Halton SPA, Hamilton SPA, Grand River SPA, Saugeen Valley SPA

Whitchurch-Stouffville, Lake Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River $37,500 Town of SPA, Toronto and Region SPA

Municipal Implementation Readiness Support As municipal readiness varies across the CTC a 'one-size fits all' approach to providing implementation support was not practical or efficient. The municipalities in whole or in part in the CTC vary in size, needs, and capacity. Further, CTC Source Protection policies to be implemented vary from one municipality to another depending upon the local threats (e.g., the set of policies that municipality A will have to implement may be quite different than those of municipality B). Therefore staff canvased municipalities and is tailoring support activities to their specific needs. Based on the concerns raised during the source protection plan preparation and the nature of the drinking water threats, the municipalities which have requested support to date have been: Halton/Halton Hills; Wellington/Erin; and Dufferin/Amaranth-East Garafraxa-Orangeville-Mono.

Threats Verification CVSPA staff has undertaken an enumeration of significant threats in the Halton Hills, Wellington and Dufferin region. A tiered approach was taken to confirm and document numbers and types of significant drinking water threats. Work began with a desktop review of the most current available information, targeted requests for information through surveys mailed to (e.g., fuel suppliers, questionnaires to residences) and follow up phone calls. The final stage was site visits to targeted threats (agricultural, commercial or industrial properties, not residences). The priority for threats verification was in WHPAs and ICAs for Orangeville, Mono and Amaranth wells; recently updated WHPAs for Acton and Georgetown; and WHPAs for Erin wells. As part of the support tools being provided is threats database that can be searched by the local risk management staff and who can update the information based on their activities.

Informal Meetings and Workshops CTC staff continued to work with the SPC rep for the Halton Region, Towns of Halton Hills and Erin, and the County of Wellington and attended the CTC Source Water Protection Municipal Liaison Working Group updating them when necessary.

267 Town of Erin and Halton Hills staff requested an interactive mapping tool to identify where and what policies apply both for internal application review and also to support municipal staff working with property owners. CTC staff enhanced the existing mapping tool available on the CTC website which allowed searching to identify where vulnerable areas are located by adding links to the policies that apply to a specific address or area. The updated mapping tool was launched along with a major update of the CTC website in 2013. The update to the website also included making it more accessible and compliant with the Persons with Disabilities Act. The refined mapping and policy identification has been very well received.

The CTC SPC member representing Dufferin County municipalities requested that an Advisory Group be formed of elected municipal representatives, himself and the CTC SPC Chair with administrative and technical support from CTC staff. These municipalities face a number of challenges to implementing policies as the vulnerable areas around the local wells cross municipal boundaries and numerous significant water quality and water quantity policies apply. The inaugural meeting took place in December 2013.

In late 2013 early 2014, CTC Source Protection Region staff hosted workshops for several municipalities to support the development of business processes and roles for the implementation of the plan. Workshops were also held at each Source Protection Authority office for staff involved in plan review to acquaint them with the vulnerable areas and proposed policies so that source protection matters are flagged in review of applications to the approving body. The Planning Approval Authority under the Planning Act is currently responsible for ensuring the municipal drinking water sources are protected under the Provincial Planning Statement of 2005 and the most recent update of 2014, even before the Source Protection Plan is approved.

In the fall of 2014, after submission of the amended Plan and Explanatory Document, CTC staff will host sessions with municipal staff targeted at interpretation of the amended proposed policies, monitoring and reporting responsibilities and continuing other readiness support activities through the current funding period to March 31, 2015. Support activities beginning in April 1, 2015 will be based on the Ministry of the Environment’s directions at that time on eligible activities, provincial funds available and the municipalities’ needs.

Guidance Documents Conservation Ontario has coordinated the production of eight guidance modules addressing topics of interest to municipalities. CTC staff has participated in review of these modules and have posted copies of each as they became available. Municipal staffs have received copies at meetings and links to the documents available for download on the CTC website. The final compendium was released by Conservation Ontario in May 2014. CTC staff is customizing each module to ensure that- information is relevant to the suite of policies that are in the CTC Source Protection Plan (e.g. editing references to drinking water threats to intakes located in inland lakes and rivers as there are no such systems in the CTC). Each updated module is posted as prepared so that all will be ready to coincide with fall 2014 workshops.

______

268 RES.#A109/14 - PLANNING AND PERMITTING ADMINISTRATION COST RECOVERY Confirmation of final edits for the approved Fee Schedule 2014-2015

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #4/14, held on May 23, 2014, Resolution #A72/14 approved Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) planning and permitting fee cost recovery and service delivery, and approved a new fee schedule for plan review services for 2014-15;

AND WHEREAS TRCA staff consulted with BILD (Building Industry and Land Development Association) and reviewed the cost recovery report and revised fee schedule, and agreed on requested additional minor edits for clarification;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the final fee wording clarification for standard and non-standard Master Environmental Servicing Plans (MESP) be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE TRCA planning staff met with BILD to conduct two working sessions regarding the review of TRCA's Cost Recovery report and associated plan review fee schedule of May 23, 2014. Representatives of the consulting and development industry and TRCA senior staff walked through the recommended changes and how they would be applied with plan review submissions. The requested changes are tied to the complexity of the growth planning projects that are ongoing in all municipalities across the TRCA jurisdiction as outlined in the TRCA report of May 23, 2014.

BILD representatives requested additional guideline wording be provided to clarify how standard and non-standard MESP fees would be estimated and negotiated, and clarity on the triggers for fee adjustments. The working group also supported the requirement of upfront fee payments to assist in financing the review process and staffing capacity to support the extensive workload that is anticipated over the next few years in growth area development across TRCA's municipalities.

TRCA agreed to these changes and propose the following text adjustments to the Planning Services Implementation Guidelines under the Administration of Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) Applications (Attachment 1):

Revision #1. Combine the Standard and Non-standard MESP/subwatershed Studies Section of Guideline #1 and Guideline #7 as follows:

269 Standard fee agreements – all new fee calculations will follow the base guidelines set herein with associated meeting coordination allowances at the study outset. Timeline schedules and Terms of Reference set with the municipalities and landowners will assist in work flow and anticipated work program completion. All studies will be re-evaluated at the two-year milestone (or as agreed in a Terms of Reference or upfront agreement) for changes in scope, extent of coordination and anticipated cost to complete remaining stages of work. Extended project delays may need re-evaluation on an annual basis to fairly determine project progress and adjust work program scoping with the municipality and landowner group participation. All evaluations will be provided in writing. Fees are required to build capacity for complex reviews and to meet service delivery needs for all.

Non-Standard fee agreements – On occasion, study review requirements need to be adjusted to unique circumstances to assist the municipality and/or landowners meet new conditions or timing considerations. These adjustments need to be incorporated into a non-standard MESP/subwatershed fee agreement to address variables in scheduling, numbers of reviews or staggered submissions, phasing, additional unanticipated technical reviews, updates and transitional files, reasonable expedited requirements. Changes to the base standard costing agreements will be negotiated on a time allowance basis upfront in a new process (when known) or at key annual evaluation milestones in active processes as noted above.

Revision #2. Administration of Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) Applications Guideline #4 – insert new text at beginning

All MESP fees are required at the initiation of the study or as negotiated through Terms of Reference and agreement.

The following alternative milestone payment structure still provides the minimum base payment schedule of older MESP agreements and can be adjusted through agreement.

The complete revised Schedule #1 is outlined in Attachment 1.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE These edits will be incorporated in TRCA's approved May 23, 2014 fee schedule and will be distributed to municipalities, stakeholder agencies, and BILD. All final fee schedules and guidelines will be posted on TRCA’s Planning and Development website for general information and updating.

Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Emails: [email protected] Date: June 18, 2014 Attachments: 1

270 Attachment 1 Schedule #1 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for PLANNING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES May 2014 Introduction TRCA’s Fee Schedule for Planning Services was approved by Resolution #A237/13 of the Authority on January 31, 2014. The Fee Schedule adheres to the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees, the TRCA’s Fee Policy Guideline 2009, and the range of planning services consistent with TRCA’s Memorandums of Understanding with area municipalities. The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of planning and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval efforts for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review charges, red line revision processing (where possible), and a project management assistance fee.

Administration of Applications and Fees (General Notes): 1. All planning application submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Planning and Development Division of TRCA. 2. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's planning area managers and the Director, Planning and Development on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 3. Pre-consultation - A pre-consultation meeting with the municipality and TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the planning application should be held. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If through the application processing, the scope of the application changes, then fee adjustments will be determined. All applications must be deemed complete, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing. 4. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that can not be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Director, Planning and Development and/or CEO’s office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format with justification of appeal request is recommended. 5. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the Director, Planning and Development. 6. The application fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the municipality. The final clearance fee will be billed directly by the TRCA and paid prior to final clearance of an application. All payments must be made within 30 days of TRCA notification in writing. Interest will be charged and accumulated beyond 30 days. 7. Re-submission fees will be billed directly by the TRCA and must be paid prior to final clearance of an application. 8. Only one set of fees applies when processing and reviewing a combined application (e.g. a combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision application). The highest rate of fees applies. If the applications are received more than 6 months apart then separate fees apply. 9. The TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort or for development application scenarios not captured in the Fee Schedule. Custom fees will be negotiated for fast-tracked or unique circumstances for large scale or complex review efforts. Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling and may be charged to the applicant. TRCA reserves the right to assess fee requirements after one year of processing planning applications. Additional fees can be charged after one year and for unreasonable delays. 10. All application fees (except minor Concept Development) include one initial site visit, where appropriate. 11. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees to reflect new planning or regulatory legislative requirements. 12. Base geotechnical and hydrogeology review is included. Applications will be subject to an additional fee for complex reviews and advisory services. TRCA will inform applicants as early as possible in the process. The standard additional charge is $2,100 and the major additional charge is $3,150 - $4,725 based on scope. 13. Any application that is inactive for 5 years or more is considered dormant by TRCA and a new application for processing and fee purposes is required.

271 14. Federal Fisheries Act changes: Modifications have been made to the fee schedules to reflect recent amendments to the Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) Level III partnership agreement under the Fisheries Act for development review applicants. TRCA will continue to deliver services directed toward the protection, restoration and management of aquatic systems, including fish and fish habitat as an integral part of its watershed management and regulatory responsibilities as well as agreements with Ministry of Natural Resources and our memoranda of understanding with municipalities. Fish habitat information and field data will be provided to applicants as needed for the new Fisheries Act self assessment process or any DFO authorizations.

Administration of Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) Applications The Fee Schedule sets a base fee across the jurisdiction as follows: Proposals 25ha or less: $ 7,500 Base Fee Proposals greater than 25ha: $15,000 Base Fee 1. A baseline charge of $475 per gross hectare is applied to each application. The gross area includes natural systems. 2. An additional project management fee will be added to cover meetings for committee and team coordination, as well as, general meeting sessions (Range $25,000 - $50,000).

The following apply to MESP applications: 1. The Fee Schedule assumes an average 2 year timeframe for MESP completion. TRCA reserves the right to re-evaluate the MESP scope of work and progress related to fee status after a two year process. Additional fees will be added for extended timeframes and associated multiple reviews. Payment due for changes in scope and timeline at the 2-year review date. Standard and Non-standard MESP/subwatershed Studies – Standard fee agreements – all new fee calculations will follow the base guidelines set herein with associated meeting coordination allowances at the study outset. Timeline schedules and Terms of Reference set with the municipalities and landowners will assist in work flow and anticipated work program completion. All studies will be re-evaluated at the 2-year milestone (or as agreed in a Terms of Reference or upfront agreement) for changes in scope, extent of coordination, and anticipated cost to complete remaining stages of work. Extended project delays may need re-evaluation on an annual basis to fairly determine project progress and adjust work program scoping with the municipality and landowner group participation. All evaluations will be provided in writing. Fees are required to build capacity for complex reviews and to meet service delivery needs for all. Non-Standard fee agreements – On occasion, study review requirements need to be adjusted to unique circumstances to assist the municipality and/or landowners meet new conditions or timing considerations. These adjustments need to be incorporated into a non-standard MESP/subwatershed fee agreement to address variables in scheduling, numbers of reviews or staggered submissions, phasing, additional unanticipated technical reviews, updates and transitional files, reasonable expedited requirements. Changes to the base standard costing agreements will be negotiated on a time allowance basis upfront in a new process (when known) or at key annual evaluation milestones in active processes as noted above. 2. A Terms of Reference for the MESP work tasks must be prepared and agreed to by all parties including the municipality, TRCA and the proponent. 3. Fee charges apply to Residential and Industrial/Commercial Block planning. Non-participating landowners need to apply and pay the MESP component commensurate with current fee at the time. 4. All MESP fees are required at the initiation of the study or as negotiated through Terms of Reference and agreement.

The following alternative milestone payment structure still provides the minimum base payment schedule of older MESP agreements and can be adjusted through agreement.

272 MESP PHASE OF WORK PAYABLE a. Preliminary Initiation (at Project start-up) Base Fee applies (Scoping of MESP/Terms of Reference Initiation) b. Terms of Reference completion/MESP Initiation 50% payable (Includes existing conditions report/field work/ First MESP Submission/Review) c. Prior to First Submission Comments 20% payable d. Prior to issuance of final MESP approval by TRCA 30% payable (Maximum 3 review submissions) 5. All official plan amendment, zoning and draft plans of subdivision fee requirements that evolve out of the Secondary/ Block Plan process and MESP process apply separately as per TRCA's approved Fee Schedule at the time of submission. No additional per lot charges will apply on draft plans of subdivision if an MESP is completed, approved and paid for. 6. Plans of subdivision that have not been studied under the MESP process will be charged an additional fee of $105 per unit, over and above the subdivision base and clearance fees (see schedule). Subdivisions not included as part of original MESP/Block Plan approval will be charged on a per unit basis for updated plans. 7. Construction permits for works under TRCA's provincial regulation are charged separately at the time of detailed design and construction of draft plan components (such as stormwater management facilities, road/bridge crossings, pipe boring and drilling works, stream channel works, etc).

Definitions

The following definitions apply to applications to determine fee review category:

Screening Assessment – projects for which a letter/response is required from the TRCA (i.e. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) but does not affect the program or policy interests of the TRCA. No technical review is associated with this project.

Minor – projects for which a letter/response is required from the TRCA (i.e. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) which may affect the program or policy interests of the TRCA, and requires technical review related to only one technical discipline.

Standard – projects that meet TRCA policies, and require routine technical analysis (i.e. standard EIS review and/or water management screening and assessment, or standard geotechnical review).

Major – projects which are significant in geographic area, and/or for which submission of a suite of applicable technical studies is required to demonstrate that TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests can be met (e.g. ORM, Rouge Park, NEC). Major projects generally require more complex ecological, geotechnical, water resource engineering, hydrogeological, or fluvial geomorphic studies and assessment. Major projects may require more than one technical team or planning meeting.

Complex – projects for which a full suite of applicable technical studies are required to demonstrate consistency with TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests (e.g. ORM, Rouge Park, NEC). Complex projects typically involve extensive modifications to the landscape. Complex projects may also be characterized by one or more of the following: a. The need for multiple resubmissions or extensive working meetings; b. The need for additional TRCA technical assessments (i.e. technical modeling refinements); c. Extensive technical study review, including complex hydrogeological, fluvial geomorphology; natural channel design, wetland interference, environmental impact studies; d. Require more than one day of TRCA fieldwork.

Incomplete Submissions - A submission for review is deemed to be “incomplete” where TRCA has provided a checklist of requirements, and the application has not met all requirements.

Applicant Driven Formal Modification - A fee for an “applicant driven formal modification” will be charged where plans are submitted for review after the application has received planning approval from the municipality. 273 274 275 ______

276 RES.#A110/14 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT Section IV item AUTH8.4 - Watershed Committee Minutes, be received. CARRIED Section IV Item 8.4 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on March 18, 2014

______

RES.#A111/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: Vincent Crisanti Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Negotiations for Exchange of Lands, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A112/14 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.14, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/14, held on June 6, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:43 a.m., on Friday, June 20, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks 277 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #6/14

Friday, July 25, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #5/14, held on June 20, 2014 279

APPOINTMENT TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AURHOTIRY FOR 2014 City of Toronto 279

PRESENTATIONS Dembe, Adam, Planner Conservation Lands, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan 279

NASHVILLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN 279

KING CITY CORPORATE CENTRE LTD. Ontario Municipal Board Hearing 291

EAST POINT PARK BIRD SANCTUARY - PAVILIONS AND LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS Contract Extension - Architectural Design and Construction Administration Services City of Toronto 297

OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Delegation of Approval 299

EROSION MANAGEMENT FOR THE JULY 8TH SEVERE WEATHER EVENT Mid-Year Update 301

KEATING CHANNEL DREDGING 308

VOIP, UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS Request for Proposal (RFP) PMO14-06 309

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Mayfield Road Portfolio Inc. 312 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed 1668872 Ontario Inc. (c/o Royal Pine Homes) 313

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM Request for Permanent Easement for Sanitary Sewer West Shore Area/City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham 314

TOWN OF CALEDON Conveyance of Lands and a Temporary Grading Easement for Reconstruction and Widening of Kennedy Road, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed 315

CODE OF CONDUCT 316

REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Behind 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York 316

GOOD NEWS STORIES 317

IN THE NEWS 320

WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES ETOBICOKE-MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on March 20, 2014 325 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE Minutes of Meeting #2/14, held on June 17, 2014 325

IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREET Proposed Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications – Ontario Municipal Board Order, City of Toronto, North York Community Council Area. 326

OFFICE ACCOMMODATION Lease of Office Space 326

ABSENTEEISM AND TURNOVER 326 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #6/14 July 25, 2014

The Authority Meeting #6/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, July 25, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:41 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Ben Cachola Member Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Vincent Crisanti Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Jack Heath Member Mujeeb Khan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Ron Moeser Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Jim Tovey Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Paul Ainslie Member David Barrow Member Ronald Chopowick Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Colleen Jordan Member John Parker Member

278 RES.#A113/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/14, held on June 20, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

RES.#A114/14 - APPOINTMENT TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FOR 2014 City of Toronto.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Raymond Cho

THAT Councillor Ron Moeser be recognized as a City of Toronto Member of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) until November 30, 2014 or until a successor is appointed, and as such is duly appointed and entitled to sit as Members of this Authority. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation by Adam Dembe, Planner, Conservation Lands, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan.

RES.#A115/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A116/14 - NASHVILLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN Approval in principle of the Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan.

279 Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT the draft Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan dated June 2014 be approved in principle;

THAT the draft Plan be circulated to the Township of King, the City of Vaughan and the Region of York requesting endorsement of the Plan;

THAT following circulation, staff report back to the Authority to confirm endorsement of the final Plan;

THAT the lands referred to as "Nashville Resource Management Tract", be renamed and referred to as the "Nashville Conservation Reserve";

AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff proceed to implement the ‘immediate’ projects outlined in the management plan document, in partnership with project stakeholders. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Nashville Resource Management Tract (NRMT) is a large TRCA-owned property located in the Region of York, within the municipalities of King and Vaughan. The landmass is approximately 820 hectares in size and is found within the Main Humber subwatershed of the Humber River watershed (see Attachment 1).

NRMT is a diverse site containing many different habitat types such as upland forests, bottomland forests, meadows, former agricultural fields, wetlands and small tributaries that feed in to the main stem of the upper Humber River. The property supports a variety of wildlife, provides significant deer wintering yards and is an important bird migratory corridor. Because of its large size, and current and future ecological value, the property is an integral part of TRCA’s natural heritage system. NRMT has remained mostly untouched for the past 50 years and is anticipated to become a destination for those wanting to experience the best of the Humber River watershed.

In 2007, TRCA initiated the preparation of the management plan for the NRMT. This was supported by Resolution #A229/07, approved at Authority Meeting #1/07, held on March 30, 2007.

In 2012, Resolution #A49/12 was approved at Authority Meeting #3/12, held on April 27, 2012, which re-established the management plan process for NRMT after other priority projects took precedence and delayed the completion of the plan. The resolution was as follows:

WHEREAS the draft Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan is being prepared;

AND WHEREAS public input is an important part of the management plan development process;

280 THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT to assist with the development of the management plan and to facilitate the opportunity for public input, staff be directed to appoint an Advisory Committee which includes members of the Humber Watershed Alliance, representatives of interested community groups, community residents, agency staff, municipal staff and the local and regional councillors for the area;

AND FURTHER THAT the draft management plan, as developed with the assistance of the Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan Advisory Committee, be submitted to the Authority for approval.

NRMT is subject to various levels of regulations and resides within three official plan areas: The York Region Official Plan (2010), City of Vaughan Official Plan (2010) and the Township of King Rural Official Plan (1970). The Greenbelt Plan is in effect and classified as ‘Protected Countryside’. NRMT, however, is outside the boundaries of the Oak Ridges Moraine. Finally, there are two plans in effect, Vision 2026, York Region’s Strategic Plan and the York Region Sustainability Strategy: Towards a Sustainable Region.

The Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan provides specific instructions on how to protect the natural heritage system of NRMT, while also providing visitors with nature-based recreation opportunities. A vision statement was developed for the property that provided the framework for which this plan was developed. Goals and objectives related to the protection and enhancement of the property were added to guide the actions of TRCA and all related stakeholders. Finally, specific management recommendations and actions were developed in order to provide instruction and direction on how to accomplish the goals and objectives of plan; and ultimately, realize the vision for NRMT.

Management Plan Update and Consultation The Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan has been developed through extensive consultation with partners, community groups, stakeholders and the public; and has been greatly strengthened by their input and expertise. Specifically, two separate committees assisted in the development of the Management Plan: a Staff Steering Committee and a Public Advisory Committee.

The Staff Steering Committee consisted of TRCA staff from a range of different internal divisions. The Public Advisory Committee was made up of representatives from the local municipalities, community groups, agencies, local stakeholders, as well as local area residents and landowners. All management plan components were either reviewed or contributed to by both the Staff Steering Committee and the Public Advisory Committee. The following is a breakdown of each phase of the Management Plan development process and the activities that took place within them:

Phase One (April, 2012 – December, 2012)  Completion of a background report that provides the following information:  a comprehensive review of existing plans and studies within the study area and the Humber River watershed;  documentation of existing and proposed land use and property ownership;  description of the current public uses and types of recreation activities within the area; 281  identification of property and public safety issues;  inventories of natural and cultural heritage resources, as well as identification of information gaps that may exist.  Circulation of public notices.  Hosting public information sessions to introduce the management plan.  Formation of staff and public advisory committees.

Phase Two (December, 2012 – October, 2013)  Development of a plan vision.  Determining draft management zones, such as Nature Reserve, Natural Environment, Restoration and Public Use.  Integrating watershed management recommendations.  Developing draft management and implementation recommendations.  Developing a draft trail plan.  Hosting advisory committee meetings to review the draft plan.  Circulating community newsletter study updates.  Hosting public information sessions to review draft material.

Phase Three (October, 2013 – Present)  Finalization of the trail plan.  Finalization the management recommendations.  Development of a plan implementation strategy and budget.  Hosting advisory committee meetings to review the final draft plan.  Circulation of community newsletter study updates.  Hosting a public information session to review the final draft plan.  Obtaining partner and TRCA board endorsement.

Vision and Management Principles The plan establishes a framework for appropriate environmental protection and restoration techniques and facilitates public input regarding appropriate use and future management of NRMT. The plan vision, goals and objectives are consistent with the recommendations outlined in:

 Building The Living City – 10 Year Strategic Plan (2013)  Humber River Watershed Plan: Pathways to a Healthy Humber (2008)  Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy (2007)  The Living City Region – A Strategic Vision for the New Millennium (2006)

Through consultation with the various committees, the following vision statement was created for the NRMT lands:

A vital and dynamic part of the connected greenspace in the upper Humber River Watershed, the Nashville Resource Management Tract boasts extensive, high quality habitat that supports a diverse suite of species. It is valued by community members and visitors alike for its unique cultural heritage resources, spectacular trails, and agricultural features.

282 A key item to note is inclusion of ‘agricultural features’. This was included as part of the vision for NRMT as a result of the following:

 Internal and external stakeholders wanted to recognize that a large amount of the property has historically been used for agricultural purposes (as well as the surrounding region).  One of the “paths” TRCA is following is to realize the ‘sustainable communities objective’ of The Living City vision which makes provisions for ‘sustainable near-urban agriculture’ on TRCA lands.  The Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan and the Greenbelt Plan all legislate the protection of agricultural land in southern Ontario and the Greater Golden Horseshoe, thereby signifying the importance of local food sources to urban areas.

In addition to the vision, a list of nine goals were established on the foundation of several existing TRCA land management strategies, policies and plans, and from the ideas put forth by the NRMT Management Plan advisory committees. Management goals have been organized in the following categories:

 Terrestrial Resources – To protect, restore and enhance the natural ecosystems and to ensure the health and diversity of native species, habitats, landscapes and ecological functions.  Aquatic Resources – To protect and enhance the form and function of the Humber River aquatic system and surrounding wetlands.  Cultural Heritage Resources – To celebrate the diverse cultural heritage of the Humber River and NRMT by protecting, conserving and interpreting archaeological and historic resources.  Nature-Based Public Use – To encourage healthy living by providing opportunities for appropriate and accessible nature-based recreation by providing safe, enjoyable and sustainable trail experiences.  Conservation Education – To promote knowledge and understanding of the natural and cultural values of the land and water, their protection and management requirements, as well as their significance, sensitivities and interrelationships within the NRMT and with surrounding areas.  Stewardship and Outreach – To inspire community stewardship through genuine engagement and consultation, provide innovative educational experiences and encourage partnerships that will achieve watershed and management plan objectives.  Conservation Lands Use and Management – To integrate NRMT as part of a sustainable community by planning for future development and achieving balance between demand for public use and need for natural heritage protection; to protect and enhance the integrity and economic viability of agricultural areas by valuing the community and educational aspects of agriculture.  Implementation, Monitoring and Review of the Management Plan – To implement a progressive land management model at the NRMT that will foster a strong sense of community involvement and provide a diverse and well-connected natural system.

Management Recommendations Management recommendations have been created to provide instruction and direction on how to accomplish the goals and objectives of the plan. Key management recommendations include the following: 283 Management Zones  Monitor all land management zones regularly for terrestrial natural heritage and public use indicators. Monitoring should include: species of regional conservation concern, public opinion surveys, trail user counts and other indicators developed as part of a monitoring program.  Restore, enhance and connect environmental features and functions within the land management zones to support TRCA’s Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy (TRCA, 2007).

Ecological  Mitigate the effects on drainage, seepage and recharge zones of any management actions (e.g. parking lots and trail surfaces).  Maximize natural cover through reforestation of interstitial open habitat, and by maintaining and enhancing continuous links between habitat patches.

Cultural  Protect and conserve all archeological sites to mitigate disturbances; and, conform to ministry standards and guidelines.  Pursue opportunities to preserve and interpret heritage sites for public education.

Social  Incorporate the guidelines and regulations set out in the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA, 2005) in trail design where needed.  Create a continuous network of trails through the use of loops and trail connections, allowing trail users to adapt the system to their individual needs.  Ensure continual monitoring and management of unauthorized uses occurring on the property in order to prevent environmental damage, protect public health and safety, and reduce maintenance costs.

Economic  Explore opportunities to partner on project implementation with the Township of King, the City of Vaughan, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, the Regional Municipality of York, local community groups and other interested stakeholders.  Research and apply for funding opportunities that would help offset implementation costs.

Updated Property Name A recommendation was made through the NRMT staff steering committee to change the name of the property as part of the management planning process. Following this recommendation, a survey was sent out to both staff and public advisory committees to accumulate a list of potential names. The public advisory committee determined from the set of potential names that the name should follow the newly established Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve property in Richmond Hill and rename the property "conservation reserve". The name "Nashville Conservation Reserve" reflects current and future management of the property and bestows a much more positive and meaningful title for the tract. The name change has become a recommendation of the management plan and will become finalized after approval by the Authority.

 Change the name of Nashville Resource Management Tract (NRMT) to Nashville Conservation Reserve (NCR). 284 Land Acquisition Potential TRCA is interested in acquiring the remaining property along the Humber River where there are two large privately-owned properties between the three parcels that make up NRMT. Acquiring these lands would fall under the Greenlands Acquisitions Project (GAP) for 2011-2015 and is supported by Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended and TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (1994). These last two sections separating NRMT are essential to the overall ecological health and integrity of the Humber River watershed and meet all the criteria to consider acquiring these lands.

 Renew efforts to acquire the remaining lands along the Humber River that surround the NRMT property.

Restoration Fill Project At Authority Meeting #2/12, held on March 30, 2012, Resolution #A25/12 in regard to the inland fill project for placement of clean topsoil in the Humber watershed was approved for a 1.8 hectare open table land site on the east side of Cold Creek and within the boundaries of NRMT. This resolution was adopted prior to the commencement of the management planning process. Existing table lands will be enhanced by creating wetland and interpretive opportunities while creating the foundation for diverse habitat and public features. It is anticipated that the design will accommodate approximately 60,000 cubic metres of topsoil. Additional information related to this project can be found in the background report for NRMT.

 Complete pre-approved restoration fill placement project for the purpose of creating sound and visual attenuation landforms, enhancing wetland interpretive habitat features and restoring forest cover.

Trail Plan Several communities are growing around the boundaries of the property and the demand for access to greenspace has grown significantly. Local municipalities and the Region of York have designed master trail plans that utilize TRCA property in some shape or form. In addition, several other local community groups such as the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association (HVHTA) and local equestrian riding clubs have indicated their desire to increase the length and quality of trails within the property. Currently, there are 3km of authorized trails and approximately 40km of unauthorized trails on the site.

The trail system complements the overall management plan for NRMT and offers guidelines for the development of an integrated trail system through the property. The plan includes local loop trails within the property boundary as well as inter-regional trails that connect to communities such as Nobleton, Kleinburg and Bolton. The trail system will accommodate hiking, biking, cross-country skiing and equestrian use and will offer different trail types, lengths and difficulties for each of these uses. Approximately 25 kilometres of trail have been proposed (including pre-existing authorized trails) which will reduce the total amount of trails on the property by roughly 37.5 percent (Attachment 1).

285 A significant recommendation during the draft trail planning process was to create a ‘trail hub’ at the corner of Huntington and Kirby Road. A trail hub can be defined as an area within TRCA property that has a greater number of trail connections, larger parking area and distinctive signage. The area would serve as the main entry point for most trail users. A key feature of the trail hub is to provide lower difficulty trails closer to the main parking area and increase in difficulty as users move further away.

With the implementation of the NRMT Trail Plan, TRCA will continue to work to complete the nature-based recreation components set out in the Humber River Watershed Plan while working with local and regional partners to achieve shared pedestrian and cycling goals and objectives. TRCA is close to achieving a full Humber River Trail System beginning at Albion Hills and ending at the mouth of the Humber River. NRMT is currently the largest section of the Humber River without a multi-use trail.

RATIONALE The population in the surrounding area is projected to rise significantly over the next 20 years; this will put increased stress on the lands, including demand for access and recreation. Additionally, development plans currently under way to the east and west of NRMT have the potential to impact the hydrology of the site, which many natural systems depend on. These future impacts underscore the need for careful planning, responsible management, and above all, restoration of the disturbed lands. The central aim is to mitigate environmental impacts and improve and protect the integrity of natural systems within and surrounding NRMT.

The NRMT Management Plan Update was developed in consultation with the Township of King, the City of Vaughan and the Region of York. All municipal members on the public advisory committee had the opportunity to review and comment on all the plan components and recommendations. Additionally, public interest groups and stakeholders were involved throughout the planning process and have expressed their support for the plan.

The NRMT Management Plan is consistent with TRCA policies and documents, as well as Ontario policy and provincial plans, municipal official plans and secondary plans. The plan addresses the increased responsibilities necessary to ensure that the property remains a model for conservation management in the Greater Toronto Area. The NRMT Management Plan was developed by following the principles laid out in TRCA’s 10-year Strategic Plan and will help move TRCA towards its vision for The Living City. The following is a breakdown of some of the strategic directions that were used to develop the management plan and a selection of Recommendations and Actions that will help achieve them:

286 Leadership Strategies Recommendations/Actions Manage our regional water resources Assess hydrological impacts of pending for current and future generations. development on surrounding lands. Rethink greenspace to maximize its Connect NRMT to local and regional trail systems. value. Foster sustainable citizenship. Involve community members to help care for and maintain trails. Tell the story of the Toronto region. Pursue opportunities to preserve and interpret heritage sites for public education. Enabling Strategies Build partnerships and new business Partner on project implementation with municipal models. and regional partners, local community groups and stakeholders. Measure performance. Monitor natural cover, wetland cover and enhancements to native habitats.

Finally, the NRMT Management Plan addresses property management and public safety issues, site securement, vegetation management, cultural heritage and stewardship objectives, as well as responds to future demands for nature based recreation opportunities in the region.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE NRMT is one of TRCA’s largest and most scenic properties, and as such, it requires the collaborative efforts of partner municipalities and region, interest groups and the local community.

TRCA will take the following actions:  Circulate the approved-in-principle plan to the municipal councils of the Township of King, the City of Vaughan and the Region of York for endorsement.  Request that the Township of King, the City of Vaughan and the Region of York include the Management Plan Update in their respective jurisdiction’s planning and land use policies and practices for the area.  Publish and distribute the Nashville Resource Management Tract Management Plan to relevant stakeholders and seek necessary consultation.  Continue to work with the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association (HVHTA) and the Nashville Conservation Reserve Stewardship Committee and trail captains program to assist with the implementation of the management plan.  Implement the Management Plan recommendations with the project partners and stewardship committee.

287 FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA has developed a budget in order to complete the goals, objectives and recommendations set out in the management plan. Implementation of the plan, has been separated in to three phases over a seven-year period, and is estimated to cost $3.3 million. The seven-year plan includes a detailed 25 kilometre trail plan, site-securement and protection projects, along with several natural and cultural heritage interpretive sites. A summarized implementation budget for the management plan has been included as Attachment 2. These are preliminary estimates subject to discussion with the potential funding partners and refinement of project requirements.

Staff has projected that 33.5% of the total projects costs can be directed towards the following TRCA account: 442-12 (spread out over a 7 year period). Funding for restoration opportunities will be secured prior to commencing restoration works. Staff will be approaching the Region of York to determine the most appropriate programs or partnerships that will further develop both the NRMT Trail Plan and municipal active transportation plans

Staff will also be approaching the Township of King, the City of Vaughan, local community groups and other interested stakeholders to share in the cost of plan implementation over the next seven years. Staff estimates that the project timeline would need to be extended by an additional 4-5 years if additional funds cannot be secured.

Report prepared by: Adam Dembe, extension 5939 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Adam Dembe, extension 5939 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 25, 2014 Attachments: 2

288 Attachment 1

289 Attachment 2 - NRMT Implementation Budget

______290 RES.#A117/14 - KING CITY CORPORATE CENTRE LTD. Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. Authorization for party status and to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board on referrals related to an Official Plan Amendment application, a Zoning By-law Amendment application and a Draft Plan of Subdivision application to permit the development of a proposed plan of subdivision on a 42.51 hectare (105.03 acre) parcel of land located east of Jane Street and south of King Road, described as Part of Lot 5, Concession 4 in the Township of King, Regional Municipality of York.

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT staff be directed to request party status before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and to appear on behalf of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in an appeal of an Official Plan Amendment application, a Zoning By-law Amendment application and a Draft Plan of Subdivision application on a parcel of land located east of Jane Street and south of King Road, described as Part of Lot 5, Concession 4 in the Township of King, Regional Municipality of York (File No. OP-2012-03, Z-2011-08 and 19T-11-K01);

THAT the OMB be advised that TRCA has outstanding issues relating to the Official Plan Amendment application, Zoning By-law Amendment application and Draft Plan of Subdivision application;

THAT staff be directed to work cooperatively with TRCA's municipal partner, the appellant and other parties to ensure that the requirements of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) and Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) are met;

THAT staff be authorized to retain legal counsel to pursue this appeal before the OMB, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT the OMB and all parties and participants to the hearing be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND Description of the Applications The proponent submitted applications to amend the Official Plan (King City Community Plan) and the Zoning By-law to facilitate the development of the subject lands for prestige employment, prestige employment retail and commercial uses, and institutional purposes within a proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision. These applications were initially received by TRCA on August 2, 2012. The applications have since been revised on several occasions with the most recent submission being received by TRCA on March 20, 2014. The current proposal consists of four Prestige Employment blocks, one Prestige Employment/Retail block, two Institutional blocks, one Stormwater Management Facility block, and other blocks for Environmental Protection, Buffer, Open Space and Reserve purposes.

The subject lands are currently designated Prestige Employment Area and Environmental Protection Area in the King City Community Plan. 291 The applications were appealed to the OMB by the proponent based on the Township of King's refusal to approve the proposed Plan of Subdivision and its refusal or neglect to enact the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, pursuant to the Planning Act.

TRCA staff has submitted written comments on the applications to the Township and the proponent on five occasions: August 10, 2012; November 12, 2012; March 26, 2013; May 28, 2013; and, April 7, 2014. These comments were provided based on staff review of the technical documents and associated re-submissions provided to our office. TRCA staff has also met with the proponent, its consultants and staff from the Township of King on numerous occasions.

Description of the Area The King City Corporate Centre Ltd. property is 42.51 hectares (105.03 acres) in total area and is located on the east side of Jane Street, south of King Road, in the southwest quadrant of King City, in the Township of King. The property is surrounded by environmental, institutional, agricultural, commercial, and existing and future residential uses.

The entire property is located within a designated “Settlement Area” according to the provincial government’s Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP). The proponent has been working with TRCA and Township staff to ensure this proposal conforms to the provisions of the ORMCP, which includes the identification and protection of the Key Natural Heritage Features and Key Hydrologic Features on the property.

Through this background work, several natural features were identified on and adjacent to the site. These include the East Humber River valley corridor to the west, a tributary of the East Humber River to the east, a woodlot to the east, an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) to the east and south, and several Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSWs) also to the east and south. These features are generally situated along the periphery of the site or just outside the property boundary. The remaining portions of the site have historically been used for agricultural purposes and are characterized by gently rolling topography.

The watercourses and wetlands on and adjacent to the property are regulated by TRCA pursuant to the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended). Permits are required from TRCA for works within the Regulated Area.

RATIONALE Based on materials before it in 2012, Township staff prepared a report to Council recommending refusal of the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications. The report raised concerns with respect to issues of conformity with the King City Community Plan, the Growth Plan and the Regional Municipality of York Official Plan, as the form, size, scale and range of retail and commercial uses proposed were seen as an employment lands conversion. On November 19, 2012, the report was considered by Council, which supported and approved the recommendations of Township staff. The decision of Council was subsequently appealed to the OMB by King City Corporate Centre Ltd.

TRCA does not have record of receiving the original notice of the appeal and, thus, only became aware of the matter in November 2013. 292 Subsequent to that, as a result of an OMB-led mediation process between the Township and King City Corporate Centre Ltd., Township staff wrote another report to Council recommending approval of only the Official Plan Amendment application in accordance with modifications made to the application by the proponent. Council supported and approved the recommendations of Township staff.

On December 18, 2013, the OMB heard a motion by another landowner in King City, King North Commercial Inc., which opposed the settlement reached between the Township and the proponent. Upon review of the motion and responses, the OMB deferred the hearing until June 2014 and granted King North Commercial Inc. party status in the proceedings.

At a subsequent prehearing conference on March 14, 2014, TRCA requested and was also granted party status by the OMB due to its outstanding comments on the Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications (outlined in a later section of this staff report).

On or around that same time, it was agreed by the parties that the hearing would occur in two phases. Phase 1 of the hearing commenced on June 2, 2014 and extended for seven days. The purpose of Phase 1 was to adjudicate the issues relating to the “institutional” and “ancillary commercial and retail” uses proposed by the applications, primarily the proposed Official Plan Amendment. These issues were not of concern to TRCA and it was excused from that phase of the hearing.

Phase 2 of the hearing is scheduled to begin on September 16, 2014 for a period of three days. Phase 2 will address the balance of the issues still to be finalized, which primarily relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application and the proposed Plan of Subdivision, as well as the balance of the issues relating to the Official Plan Amendment application.

TRCA Issues It had been anticipated that the bulk of TRCA’s issues would have been resolved by this point and that TRCA could remove itself as a party from these proceedings. However, given the recent focus on Phase 1 by the other parties, TRCA’s comments remain outstanding.

With Phase 1 now concluded, all parties are now focused on Phase 2. It is for this reason that staff is seeking direction from the Authority at this time to appear on behalf of TRCA in this appeal.

Based on staff review of the proponent's latest submission, there are generally five outstanding issues relating to the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment applications:

293 (1) Stormwater Management Pond Outlet TRCA staff has concerns related to the receiving system for the proposed stormwater management (SWM) pond outlet (i.e., a small drainage feature west of Jane Street, which outlets to the East Humber River). TRCA staff is concerned with the liability associated with directing such a large, highly impervious area to a small intermittent system, which is located on private property. In TRCA’s letter dated April 7, 2014, staff suggested relocating the proposed outlet point to an area immediately adjacent to the East Humber River via a storm sewer on public lands, or by providing a natural/engineered channel from the proposed pond outlet point to the East Humber River via a negotiated municipal easement through the privately owned lands west of Jane Street. The feasibility of these options needs to be explored by the proponent at this stage, as it may have implications on the draft plan.

(2) Other Stormwater Management Requirements TRCA staff has identified other SWM requirements (e.g., the need for an erosion assessment, details related to the design of the proposed 100 year capture systems, confirmation of the type of SWM pond proposed, sizing requirements of the emergency outlet and mapping of the potential flow routes, etc.) that need to be addressed by the proponent, which could impact the size and orientation of the SWM pond block and may necessitate the provision of additional lands for low impact development (LID) measures. These comments need to be addressed in order to confirm whether or not changes are required to the proposed draft plan and zoning.

(3) Potential Impacts to the Wetlands and Mitigation Requirements Additional pre-development monitoring and assessment is required (e.g., continuous groundwater and wetland surface water level measurements to assess seasonal fluctuations and possible hydraulic connections) in order to understand the potential impacts to the PSWs both on the property and on adjacent privately owned lands to the south and how those potential effects will be mitigated. The mitigation measures selected may have implications on the draft plan and zoning, which needs to be determined at this time.

(4) Low Impact Development Measures Additional LID measures may be required for SWM purposes (volume control), maintaining overall site water balance, mitigating impacts to the PSWs (feature based water balance), and achieving landform conservation objectives. The type, size and location of LID measures that may be required needs to be addressed at a preliminary level at this time as it may have impacts on the draft plan and zoning.

(5) Development Limits Finally, the draft plan needs to be revised to ensure no development blocks encroach into the minimum vegetation protection zones (MVPZs) of the natural features on and adjacent to the site. It appears there is one area of encroachment along the southern limit of the site that needs to be amended to ensure the MVPZ is fully within the proposed wetland buffer block.

294 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff will continue to work with the proponent and the Township of King to find an amenable resolution to this matter in order to avoid Phase 2 of the hearing. Given the nature of the outstanding comments and TRCA's working relationship with the Township and the proponent thus far, it is expected that the outstanding comments of TRCA can be addressed prior to the hearing.

Should a resolution not be reached between the parties, TRCA staff is also requesting the authorization of the Authority to attend the OMB hearing to ensure that TRCA interests are protected and addressed.

Staff has been in contact with legal counsel regarding this file and will continue to engage their services as needed as this matter progresses. Should legal counsel be required for the hearing, staff will coordinate with the other parties to ensure TRCA's presence at the hearing is shortened and legal costs are minimized.

Report prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 10, 2014 Attachments: 1

295 Attachment 1

______296 RES.#A118/14 - EAST POINT PARK BIRD SANCTUARY - PAVILIONS AND LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS Contract Extension - Architectural Design and Construction Administration Services, City of Toronto. To extend the contract with Plant Architect Inc. for architectural design revisions and construction administration services at East Point Park Bird Sanctuary.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT the existing contract for architectural design and construction administration services for pavilions and landscape elements at East Point Park Bird Sanctuary, be extended with Plant Architect Inc. (PAI), by the amount of $15,041.00 plus HST for a revised total upset contract price of $52,971.00 plus HST;

AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized and directed to take such action as may be necessary to implement this contract, including the signing of contract documents, or payment authorizations. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2008, the City of Toronto engaged with TRCA to undertake the preparation of a conceptual design for landscape elements in support of the Toronto Bird Flyways initiative. The City of Toronto engaged PAI to prepare design drawings and specifications for a bird blind that was to be installed at East Point Park as part of a larger project plan. That scope of work was expanded to include the development and detailing of additional landscape and architectural elements including an interpretive pavilion, entrance/wayfinding signage and a soundspace.

TRCA engaged PAI in August 2013 to provide additional professional services through a preferred source procurement process ($25,000 to less than $50,000). The contract was approved by TRCA's Chief Executive Officer for $33,000 plus HST with a provision for 15% contingency as required. These fees were to provide for:  building permit submission, code review and coordination;  construction administration and site reviews;  coordination with sub-consultants;  signage graphics/artwork preparation;  support to TRCA during tender preparation and review; and  revisions to drawings and details as a result of site conditions and building department permit requirements.

The project was tendered in fall 2013 in accordance with TRCA's policies and procurement process. The tender package included the provisional graphics/artwork details and specifications for pricing. As the bids received were all well above the project construction budget limit, staff deleted certain elements of the work to reduce the overall project cost to an acceptable level. This was done in consultation with the City of Toronto, a partner and funder for this work.

297 On January 14, 2014, staff authorized additional expenditures of $4,930.00 plus HST resulting from PAI's assistance to TRCA during the tender review process and for changes/revisions to the construction drawing and specifications. These costs were accommodated within the approved 15% contingency for a total revised contract price of $37,930.00 plus HST.

The tender award for construction was approved by Resolution #A230/13 at Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014.

In the interim, PAI continued to refine the graphics/artwork package at the direction of the City of Toronto, and the layout and pattern density of images and text increased substantially. The project had been tendered with the knowledge that the final graphics/artwork would be approved by the City and included in the final drawings and specifications package issued for construction. Any associated cost implications would also be accepted by the City.

RATIONALE Site work is well underway with foundations and footings in place awaiting the fabrication and delivery of the steel structure. During the shop drawing process and fabrication set up, an issue arose with the graphics and artwork files that necessitates revisions to the digital information in order for the production to proceed and deliver the detail, quality and consistency of images and text on the main pavilion wall panels. The issue arises from differences in how the different cutting processes and equipment translate and interpret the digital artwork files. The difficulties in translation arose when trying to convert the data from one format to another - "splines" to "arcs and lines". Laser cutting equipment uses CNC software that automatically reads and converts between the line formats. Water jet cutting software and equipment does not accept or convert the data from spline format.

The graphics and artwork files were originally provided by the consultant in a CAD format consistent with contract requirements and suitable for laser cutting purposes. Laser cutting was the specified fabrication method that was carried as part of the construction tender based on the provisional graphics/artwork package. The decision to change the methodology for fabrication from laser to water jet cutting was necessitated by the increased complexity and density of images and text in the final graphics/artwork package. Laser cut samples demonstrated that this fabrication method is no longer viable as the heat generated in the process deforms the steel and destroys the quality of the images. Water jet cutting technology is the only means of producing and delivering the detail and crispness of lines required in this project.

PAI has provided a cost proposal in the amount of $15,021 plus HST (inclusive of disbursements) to rectify the issues and verify the digital information to resume fabrication. They are able to implement the work immediately. Any further delays in addressing these changes will result in delays to the construction schedule and likely result in increased costs within that contract.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The revised upset contract limit is $52,971.00 including disbursements, plus HST. The City of Toronto has agreed to increase the project funding to cover these additional expenses.

298 All charges will be assigned to the East Point Park Bird Sanctuary project budget - 117-42.

Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 10, 2014

______

RES.#A119/14 - OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Delegation of Approval. Approval requirements for procurement of goods and services in support of fit-out of office space at 101 Exchange Avenue, City of Vaughan.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: John Sprovieri

THAT the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Authority be delegated approval to award goods and service contracts to support the fit-out of office space at 101 Exchange Avenue in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, if staff is unable to report to the Executive Committee or Authority as per Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Purchasing Policy due to timing constraints;

THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such actions as is necessary to implement these contracts including the signing and execution of documents;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the next Executive Committee or Authority as required after award of contracts. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #2/14, held on March 28, 2014, Resolution #A24/14 approved TRCA to enter into a lease for office space located at 101 Exchange Avenue in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York. Since TRCA received possession on June 15, 2014, staff has retained Ward99 Architects and initiated the planning and design of the new office accommodations to provide a healthy and inspiring work environment that promotes opportunities for strengthening inter-departmental staff relations, collaboration, and information exchange of new ideas.

299 In keeping with this vision, TRCA will be making a transition to a new open plan office layout. This office format was piloted in 2013 by TRCA's GIS group in an effort to optimize space, promote collaboration, and improve the distribution of natural light. This pilot project resulted in the replacement of the existing 30 year old modular office furniture system that was end of its economic life, with a new system designed to make efficient use of space and support staff daily work functions. Based on the success of this pilot, staff had been planning a phased capital replacement program to make a full transition at TRCA's Head Office. However with the upcoming move, staff will be undertaking further cost/benefit analysis of moving furniture that is scheduled for replacement within the next 3 years versus the expected savings TRCA might achieve from a larger bulk furniture order. All new furniture that will be purchased will be compatible with being moved to a new office location in the future, if necessary.

Other works being planned by TRCA staff in support of the upcoming office move include minor alterations to the interior of the building such as removal of some interior walls, new finishes (flooring and paint), relocation of the existing Head Office generator, as well as installation of IT data/receptacle connections, a new data centre and millwork. Staff will also be retaining the services of a moving firm to relocate furniture and equipment from the Downsview and Head Office locations to the 101 Exchange Ave.

RATIONALE As the lease for the Downsview Office expiries on July 31, 2014, and will be extended on a month-to-month basis, there is an urgent need to expedite the required refurbishment and furnishing (also referred to as fit-out) of the new office in order to relocate TRCA's staff from the Downsview location and minimize the need for additional lease payments. In order to allow appropriate lead time for material orders and to achieve the fall move deadline, staff seek Authority approval to delegate approval of award of such contracts to the Chief Executive Officer and Chair for any goods and services contracts that support the office fit-out and that staff report back to the Executive Committee or Authority on the outcome of the tender process at the next available meeting. Staff anticipate tenders will be issued in early August and be awarded in August or September. Staff will comply with the Purchasing Policy in the quotation process, but is recommending the elimination of the approval requirements of the Executive Committee and Authority as per Schedule 'A' of the Purchasing Policy.

FINANCIAL DETAILS A budget of approximately $1.5 million has been established for the overall project management, planning, design, and implementation of the office fit-out, as well as the removal of leasehold improvement at the Downsview Office. An additional budget of $1 million has been established for office furniture replacement. These budgets include a contingency of 25%. While we do not have all of the cost details, staff is of the opinion that the upper limit for this work will be $2.5 million and undertaken in 2014 and 2015. TRCA's Major Facilities budget in account #006-47 (Office Move 101 Exchange Avenue) will provide approximately $1.8 million of the required funding over the next two years. Should additional funding be required, it will be financed with unallocated surplus funds or reserves.

300 An additional staff report is on this agenda in regard to the VOIP (voice over IP) telephone system, the cost of which is in addition to the costs indicated above.

Report prepared by: Laura Stephenson, extension 5296 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Laura Stephenson, extension 5296 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 08, 2014

______

RES.#A120/14 - EROSION MANAGEMENT FOR THE JULY 8TH SEVERE WEATHER EVENT Mid-Year Update. Staff update on the management of erosion and slope instability hazards resulting from the severe weather event on July 8th, 2013.

Moved by: Chris Fonseca Seconded by: Ben Cachola

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff reported on the management of erosion and slope stability hazards related to the July 8, 2013 severe weather event at Authority Meeting #6/13, held on July 26, 2013 and Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014;

AND WHEREAS staff were directed at Authority Meeting #11/13 under Resolution #A225/13 to continue with ongoing geotechnical investigations to assess risk and rank priority erosion hazard sites for future stabilization works, and to carry out stabilization works on a priority basis as outlined in the workplan provided, using additional funding identified in TRCA’s 2014 - 2023 capital budgets;

AND WHEREAS staff identified the need for potential in-year adjustments to the 2014 workplan at Authority Meeting #11/13 due to changing priorities and potential project delays;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue with the implementation of the 2014 workplan, including the mid-year revisions outlined herein;

AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this report be provided to the cities of Toronto and Mississauga, and Region of Peel. CARRIED BACKGROUND On July 8, 2013 an intense downpour of precipitation rolled through the Toronto area, causing wide-spread flooding, surcharges of water infrastructure, and significant damage to the river and valley systems including extensive damage to park trails and pedestrian bridges, numerous debris jams, and an unprecedented number of slope failures on hundreds of private properties that border these natural areas. 301 The following morning, staff from TRCA's Erosion Management Program began responding to hundreds of calls and emails from private landowners, park users, municipal staff and the media about reports of damage left in the wake of the storm, carrying out inspections across the jurisdiction to inventory, assess and prioritize post-storm hazard sites. Less than three weeks later, on July 26, 2013 staff brought a report to Authority Meeting #6/13 providing an overview of the information collected to date with recommendations for further action. At that time, 141 properties had been inspected, six of which were initially flagged as critical (three were later downgraded to high priority following third-party reviews), 20 were flagged as high priority, 33 were flagged as medium priority, 66 as low priority and 16 sites with a priority of “none”, the latter primarily being recently completed TRCA erosion control sites where no appreciable damage was observed following the storm event, or where the damage was not related to river flooding or land erosion (e.g., basement flooding). At that time, preliminary damage estimates were in the order of $28 million.

At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014 staff provided an update to the Authority detailing the work completed to date, and the estimated cost of each major activity. By this time, the total number of sites inspected had risen to 482, and the preliminary estimate of damages had increased to approximately $37 million. It is noted that this estimate includes only those properties reported to and inspected by TRCA, and excludes damages to municipal lands and infrastructure, which TRCA's municipal partners have reported on separately (i.e., to avoid double-counting). It is also noted that the cost of erosion damage was coarsely estimated by staff using past similar projects for reference, and professional judgement. As such this estimate continues to be refined as more information regarding individual sites becomes available.

Also presented at Authority Meeting #11/13 was a list of projects recommended for remedial works in 2014 (i.e., the workplan), using 2014-2015 'Critical Erosion and Floodworks' funding from the City of Toronto, which also provides funding for priority projects not related to the July 8, 2013 flood; and 2014-2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel, pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funds. In accordance with TRCA's Erosion Management Program, all work was proposed to proceed on a priority basis, to ensure that the most hazardous sites are always addressed first.

This communication provides an update on the progress of work completed since the January 31, 2014 report to the Authority, to demonstrate TRCA's leadership in and unwavering commitment to erosion hazard mitigation and prevention in the Toronto region; and to request approval to continue on with the work being done with the funding provided by TRCA's municipal partners at the City of Toronto and Region of Peel to protect public safety, restore damaged properties and foster resilient valleys and shorelines.

302 RATIONALE As an update to the workplan presented at Authority Meeting #11/13, the current status of each project brought forward is provided in Attachment 1. As expected, some in-year adjustments to the workplan are and may continue to be required as more detailed information is received from engineering studies, subsequent storm events worsen conditions at certain sites, and other projects are delayed due to legal negotiations and other factors. It is therefore noted that the workplan is not a rigid and exhaustive list, but a framework to approach what is now a large backlog of state of good repair sites. In compliance with the original workplan approval, all work completed with the funding provided is done on a priority basis as best possible, and is subject to all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funding.

To ensure the details of all erosion restoration work related to the July 8, 2013 storm are made available to the Authority, TRCA's partners and the residents of the Toronto region, staff will provide another update to the Authority at year end.

FINANCIAL DETAILS As previously stated, damage resulting from the July 8th, 2013 storm to TRCA property and private properties inspected is estimated at $37M. The budget for storm-related studies and repairs in 2014 is $7M and $7M again in 2015 with special funding from the City of Toronto, and $1.5M in the Region of Peel, using core erosion management funding. All costs estimated were done coarsely using past similar works for reference and order of magnitude estimates from third-party engineering firms retained to complete preliminary and detailed assessments. As a substantial amount of work needs to be completed before detailed cost estimates can be prepared, a contingency allowance has been applied to all estimates to account for missing information at the time this report was prepared. As such, all costs are subject to change as more information becomes available.

Report prepared by: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 16, 2014 Attachments: 1

303 Attachment 1 Update on storm-related restoration projects for 2014-2015, revised July 16, 2014

PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF WORK STATUS AS OF JULY ESTIMATED SCHEDULE 16, 2014 BUDGET (2014-2015) CITY OF TORONTO PROJECTS 1.Detailed Detailed slope stability and erosion Draft reports received 800K (2014) Contract awarded geotechnical risk assessments of 72 properties for Bankview Circle, February; Studies investigations in the City of Toronto identified Bucksburn Road, commenced (Phase 2), City of through Phase 2 preliminary Grovetree Road, March and April Toronto assessments, plus 60 additional Lakeland Drive, and 2014; Results properties ranked medium-high or Strathavon Road; received May higher by TRCA inspectors, results under internal through August damaged during the July 8, 2013 review 2014; storm. Assessment of priorities August/Sept 2.#139 Whitburn Restoration of the low flow channel Low-flow restoration 2M (2014) Low-flow channel Crescent, #2-4 through the removal of woody and work complete; Note: budget restoration winter Jennifer Court, other debris and redistribution of Emergency EA process increased from 2014; channel and #111-117 in-stream materials; toe protection; in progress; Detailed 1.5M due to slope stabilization Whitburn Crescent, localized infrastructure protection design 90% complete additional work end City of Toronto (where required); slope instability July/early August stabilization works and general identified in pending approvals ravine restoration project limits in June 2014) 3.#5 Old Yonge Slope re-grading and additional Project commenced 500K (2014) Slope stabilization Street, City of foundation reinforcement; general June 2014; detailed summer/fall 2014 Toronto ravine restoration design in progress 4.#24 Bennington Slope stabilization and additional Detailed design nearing 500K (2014) Structural Heights Drive, City foundation reinforcement completion; Note: increased reinforcement of Toronto construction costs from 250K due to winter 2014 being reviewed unforseen (completed by shoring owner); slope requirements at stabilization fall the site 2014 5.#5-49 Moon Valley Remove unengineered structures; Detailed geotechnical 1M (2015) Detailed design Drive, City of slope re-grading; limited retaining investigation (through and Toronto walls where re-grading not project #1, this table) implementation possible 90% complete 2015 pending confirmation of available funding 6.#5-69 Riverhead Remove unengineered structures; Downspouts extended; 250K (2014) Phase 1 detailed Drive slope re-grading; limited retaining unstable structure 1.2M (2015) design and walls where re-grading not deconstructions in construction possible progress; additional summer/fall 2014; geotechnical Phase 2 2015 investigations required due to ongoing instability in project limits 304 PROJECT PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF STATUS AS OF JULY PRELIMINARY TENTATIVE WORK 16, 2014 BUDGET SCHEDULE (2014-2015) 7.Lower Mimico Environmental Assessment (EA) to Project delayed until 0K in 2014/2015 Data collection, Creek Erosion provide recommendations for Toronto Water Note: decreased analysis, Management Master long-term protection against completes the Mimico from 500K consultation and Plan ongoing erosion from Creek Geomorphic following development of approximately Bloor Street to The Systems Master Plan, discussions with recommendations Queensway. Further consultation tentatively commencing Toronto Water TBD with Toronto Water required. 2014 8.Flood Control Structural repairs and/or sediment Donino drop structure 1M (2014) Drop structure Channel and vegetation removals to restore complete; Black Creek 1M (2015) spring 2014; Maintenance capacity during storm events. channel maintenance channel Current priority flood control commencing maintenance July - channels for 2014+ are: July/August 2014 to the October 2014  Donino drop structure limit of available (Yonge-York Mills Channel) funding  Black Creek Channel (Scarlett Rd. section; Wilson Ave. section)  Sheppard Channel  Malvern Channel 9.#83 Fishleigh Priority bluff erosion hazard site Land acquisition 1.4M (2014) Land acquisition in Drive, #81 (not related to July 8, 2013 storm). expected by December 1.3M (2015) progress; Fishleigh Drive, #1 Work involves the acquisition of 31, 2014; shoreline works Midland Avenue #1 Midland and extension of 2015 shoreline protection below #83-81 Fishleigh Drive 10. 24-28 Norfield Slope re-grading and stabilization Legal agreements in 500K (2014) Slope re-grading Crescent (new July 2014) progress July/August 2014 Emergency Works 11. 114 Camborne Slope re-grading and stabilization Detailed study 50K (2014) Slope re-grading Avenue (new July 2014) complete (through August/September Phase 1 detailed 2014 assessments); detailed design ready to proceed

305 PROJECT PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF STATUS AS OF JULY PRELIMINARY TENTATIVE WORK 16, 2014 BUDGET SCHEDULE (2014-2015) 12.Additional The following properties have been Sites continue to be 1M (2015) Commence with candidate projects tentatively identified for repair in monitored and Note: reduced detailed design, 2014-2015 based on current re-prioritized as from 3.25M as a approvals and information available (listed required. New sites result of changes implementation on alphabetically) added and others to the 2014-2015 a priority basis as  9 Alderbrook Drive removed as noted. workplan funding is available.  14 Appletree Court Outstanding work  87-101 Bankview Circle remaining beyond  22-24 Bucksburn Road the 2014-2015  21-24 Disan Court preliminary funding  Enfield Park (added July 2014) allocation identified  Etobicoke Valley Park *requires would be deferred coordination with Toronto Parks to a future year Capital as it relates to other using enhanced works planned/underway in 2016-2023 funding vicinity from the City of  30 Grovetree Road (added July Toronto. 2014)  2191 Kipling Avenue (removed July 2014; being addressed by Toronto Parks Capital)  Mimico Trail behind Decarie Circle (added July 2014)  22-32 Norfield Crescent (escalated to emergency works in cooperation with Toronto Water July 2014 - see project #10, this table)  100 North Drive  Northline Road (Toronto Water building)  194 Rathburn Road (added July 2014)  19-25 Ridgegate Crescent  323 Riverview Drive  767 Royal York Road (added July 2014)  1025 Scarlett Road  75 Strathavon Drive  37-39 Topcliff Avenue  55 Van Dusen Boulevard  Wilket Creek (various sites) TOTAL 14M (2014-2015)

306 PROJECT PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF STATUS AS OF JULY PRELIMINARY TENTATIVE WORK 16, 2014 BUDGET SCHEDULE (2014-2015) REGION OF PEEL PROJECTS 1.Detailed Detailed slope stability and erosion Draft reports submitted 100K Contract awarded geotechnical risk assessments of 15 properties in (currently under review) February; Studies investigations (Phase Peel Region ranked medium-high commenced March 2) or higher by TRCA inspectors. and April 2014; Draft results received May and June 2014; results being reviewed

2.#3487-3533 Slope re-grading and restoration of Not started 800K (2015) Planning and Ponytrail Drive, City rear yards; toe protection design 2015; of Mississauga construction tentatively 2015-2016 3.#1876-1892 Slope re-grading and restoration of Not started 700K (2015) Planning and Steepbank Crescent, rear yards; toe protection design 2015; City of Mississauga construction tentatively 2015-2016 TOTAL 1.6M (2014-2015)

______307 RES.#A121/14 - KEATING CHANNEL DREDGING Continuation of annual maintenance dredging of Keating Channel, City of Toronto.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ron Moeser

WHEREAS there is a critical need with respect to interruptions to dredging of the Keating Channel resulting from damage to the Keating bridge and Cherry Street;

AND WHEREAS there is no meeting of the Authority in August;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) be authorized to approve contracts with the support of senior staff of the City of Toronto and Toronto Port Authority (TPA) to remove sediment as expeditiously as possible, subject to funding being available from existing funds on hand and the provision of additional funds if required from City of Toronto, TPA and other sources;

AND FURTHER THAT the CEO report back on the approval/solution at a future meeting of the Authority, including the resolution of funding. CARRIED BACKGROUND In July 2013, the lifting mechanism on the Keating Channel Bridge at Cherry Street failed. This is the second time since 2010 that the bridge is unable to open for an extended period of time. With the bridge stuck in the down position, dredging activities in the Keating Channel have halted.

Approximately 30,000 to 35,000 cubic metres of sediment is dredged from the Keating Channel on an annual basis and is paid for by TPA, City of Toronto and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). Dredging is undertaken to ensure safe navigation in the Keating Channel and Inner Harbour, and to reduce flood risk in the Lower Don area, including the Port Lands. Annual costs for dredging are shared as follows: TPA $160,000 a year and City/TRCA $320,000 a year.

Given the current failure of the lift bridge and the recent previous failure, approximately 80,000 cubic metres of additional sediment has accumulated in the Keating Channel. The majority of which is located in the eastern portion of the Keating Channel. Using the DELFT3D hydraulic model, it has been determined that this level of sediment accumulation has increased the risk due to flooding into the Port Lands from a 1% chance of occurrence any given year (1:100 year return flood) to a 4% chance of occurrence any given year (1:25 year return flood). Of particular concern is the shallow depth of water (1-2m deep) in the eastern portion of the Keating Channel. If dredging is not undertaken in 2014, the risk due to ice jam flood will be significantly higher during the winter 2015. Given this degree of flood risk, TRCA strongly recommends that at a minimum, 16,000 cubic metres of focused dredging (at the east end of the Keating Channel) be undertaken in 2014 and preferably the full 35,000 cubic metres. There is currently $100,000 of carry-over funding from 2013 that can be added to the overall annual budget of $480,000 for 2014.

308 TRCA and the City of Toronto are exploring parallel approaches to address dredging and related Keating bridge repair options, respectively:

1) TRCA is exploring dredging options with the bridge in the down position. This involves the release of tender in July to obtain bids using two separate approaches:

a) traditional mechanical dredging of the Keating Channel to awaiting trucks that will either travel to an awaiting barge at Essroc Quay or travel directly to Tommy Thompson Park (TTP) or other location. Given the trucks and need for double handling, this is anticipated to be costly; or

b) hydraulic dredging of the Keating Channel with a floating slurry pipe to Essroc Quay where the slurry will be dewatered and loaded onto an awaiting barge. This technology has not been used on the Keating Channel previously, needs to be pilot tested for the materials and conditions in Keating Channel, and involves some additional costs for the dewatering.

2) City of Toronto is exploring bridge repair options that would enable clamshell dredging in 2014. The current assumption is hydraulic dredging may be possible in 2014, more likely to be employed in 2015. This involves repairs that will address the lifting mechanism at current estimates up to $150,000, and carefully lifting and lowering the bridge to allow for TPA dredge and barge to operate, starting in fall 2014. The City is assessing the risks related to each repair.

A final decision regarding the dredging will be made by TPA, TRCA and the City of Toronto on the preferred approach once the tenders have been received by TRCA, and the City decision regarding bridge repairs has been made.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the Keating Channel Dredging Project are 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto and TPA in Account 207-01.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-844-3987 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 15, 2014

______

RES.#A122/14 - VOIP, UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS Request for Proposal (RFP) PMO14-06. Award of contract for goods and services required for the migration of existing Head Office telephony system to voice over internet protocol (VOIP) solution with future unified communications functionality.

309 Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT Contract #PMO14-06 for VOIP, Unified Communications Solutions be awarded to Bell Canada at a total cost not to exceed $483,841.66, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal resulting from evaluation criteria set out in the Request for Proposal (RFP);

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 25% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement with the above-mentioned proponent, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations with another bidder;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA's Head Office is currently using an aging Nortel telephone system which is reaching its "end of life" with regards to vendor support and maintenance. TRCA's existing telephone system also has a number of satellite office locations integrated together for voicemail and call centre activities. However, there are a large number of employees in other satellite office locations, conservation areas, and education field centres that are not integrated and utilize stand alone aging telephone equipment.

To overcome the challenges of the existing telephony system TRCA will be upgrading to a new and modern VOIP system. The upgrade will also coincide with the consolidation of the Downsview and 5 Shoreham locations to 101 Exchange Avenue and have the ability to transfer to another long term Head Office location in the future. The new telephone system will provide costs savings, increased productivity, and allow for more effective integration and support of employees in more remote locations. Staff will be more mobile and have access to any and all corporate and public information required to do their jobs effectively. This system will also meet TRCA's business needs and technical requirements as the future unified communications and network environment will have the ability to 'expand' as required by large public venues or in the case of natural disasters such as flooding.

In order to provide the goods and services required for the new VOIP telephone system and unified communications solution, TRCA will require the assistance of an integrative business communications firm to lead the design, construction, installation and provide technical support in order to meet TRCA's business and technology needs. The new system will include business internet protocol phones, contact centre solutions, conferencing capabilities, instant messaging, voicemail and potential hosted/cloud approach for future communications systems.

310 RATIONALE A list of proponents was compiled based on their involvement with similar projects and expertise in the field of VOIP and unified communications solutions. Request for Proposal #PMO14-06 was sent to the following five vendors on May 30, 2014:  Bell Canada;  Unity Connected Solutions;  BrantTel Networks;  Activo; and  Introtel.

On July 3rd, 2014 the Procurement Opening Committee opened the proposals with the following results:

BIDDERS Core VOIP System Additional Services TOTAL COST (cabling, network, (Plus HST) training) Bell Canada $295,684.45 $188,157.21 $483,841.66 BrantTel Networks $352,078.45 $159,975.00 $512,053.45 Unity Connected $756,454.30 $158,601.00 $915,055.30 Solutions Activo No Bid Introtel No Bid

Members of the selection committee, consisting of TRCA staff (Chris Gerstenkorn, Peter Wigham, and Lisa Moore), reviewed proposals based on a weighted scoring system consisting of 65% based on technical review of the proposal and the remaining 35% on the fee proposal. The criteria used to evaluate the submission and to select the recommended vendor included the following:  understanding of the project from a business, services and location perspective;  ability to comply with schedule, migration and project management;  corporate qualifications, applicable experience and customer references;  telecom/network/unified communications technical understanding and expertise; and  detailed cost breakdown.

The results of the evaluation are as follows:

BIDDERS RANKING (out of 100%) Bell Canada 81 Unity Connected Solutions 64 BrantTel Networks 63

311 Based on the complexity of the work, all three vendors were evaluated further through proposal clarifications, validation and reference checks. TRCA's current network services are provided by Bell Canada. Bell Canada is able to provide the best pricing for network services under their contract with the City of Toronto, which will reduce operating costs in the future. Although it is an additional service, the cabling component is critical to the implementation of the VOIP system. BrantTel and Bell Canada were the only vendors to provide pricing for this item, however, BrantTel did not include patch panels, communication racks and cable management systems as part of their cabling service. Finally, the Bell Canada proposed Mitel solution is a superior product to the Avaya solution proposed by BrantTel. The Mitel solution allows for better integration with Lotus Notes (TRCA's email system) and offers excellent network monitoring with manufacturer support. At the conclusion of the evaluation, TRCA staff determined that the technical proposal and fee proposal valued at $483,841.66 submitted by Bell Canada offered the best service for value.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The VOIP system will be financed through unallocated surplus funds or reserves.

Report prepared by: Lisa Moore, 416-704-2476 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Chris Gerstenkorn, extension 5347 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 25, 2014

______

RES.#A123/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel Mayfield Road Portfolio Inc., CFN 51018. Acquisition of property located west of Dixie Road, north of Mayfield Road, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B58/14)

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT 4.020 hectares (9.934 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 19, Concession 3 EHS (CHING) and designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 43R-35904, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, located to the west of Dixie Road and north of Mayfield Road, be purchased from Mayfield Road Portfolio Inc . (MRPI);

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

312 THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements and subject to TRCA entering into an easement and maintenance agreement for a proposed noise attenuation barrier with Acklands-Grainger Inc. (‘AGI’) on lands shown as Part 1 on Reference Plan 43R-35904;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transactions at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A124/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed 1668872 Ontario Inc. (c/o Royal Pine Homes), CFN 36059. Acquisition of property located east of Pine Valley Drive, south of Major Mackenzie Drive (rear of 9909 Pine Valley Drive), City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B59/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT 1.23 hectares (3.04 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 1, Registered Plan M-1191 and Part of Lot 20, Concession 6 and designated as Parts 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 11 and 20 on Plan 65R-34523, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located east of Pine Valley Drive, south of Major Mackenzie Drive (rear of 9909 Pine Valley Drive), be purchased from 1668872 Ontario Inc. (c/o Royal Pine Homes);

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______313 RES.#A125/14 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM Request for Permanent Easement for Sanitary Sewer West Shore Area/City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, CFN 50209. Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of Durham to provide a 35 metre extension to a permanent easement for the replacement of a portion of the Breezy Drive sanitary sewer located south of Sunrise Avenue and east of Westshore Boulevard, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham (Waterfront Pickering/Ajax Sector). (Executive Res.#B60/14)

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of Durham to provide a 35 metre extension to the permanent easement for the replacement of a portion of the Breezy Drive sanitary sewer located to the south of Sunrise Avenue and east of Westshore Boulevard, in the City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;

AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of Durham in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a 35 metre extension of a permanent easement containing a total of 0.003 hectares (0.007 acres), more or less, be granted the Regional Municipality of Durham for the replacement of a portion of the Breezy Drive sanitary sewer, said land being Block J, Registered Plan M-7, City of Pickering, Region of Durham, designated as Part 8, 9, and 10 on Plan 40R-5635;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition to all legal, survey and other costs be paid by the Regional Municipality of Durham;

THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham is to fully indemnify and hold harmless TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of any construction;

THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Regional Municipality of Durham;

THAT all lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated/stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines;

THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario regulation 166/06, as Amended, be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 314 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Sections 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A126/14 - TOWN OF CALEDON Conveyance of Lands and a Temporary Grading Easement for Reconstruction and Widening of Kennedy Road, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed, CFN 49509. Conveyance of lands and a temporary grading easement for the reconstruction and widening of Kennedy Road, to the north of Mayfield Road, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B61/14)

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon to convey certain lands for the reconstruction and widening of Kennedy Road to the north of Mayfield Road in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Town of Caledon in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA-owned lands containing 0.0135 hectares (0.0333 acres), more or less, be conveyed to the Town of Caledon for the reconstruction and widening of Kennedy Road, said lands being Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, East of Hurontario Street, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 43R-35719;

THAT a temporary grading easement be granted to the Town of Caledon involving a parcel of TRCA-owned lands containing 0.0301 hectares (0.0743 acres), more or less, for the reconstruction and widening of Kennedy Road, said land being Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, East of Hurontario Street, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 6 on Registered Plan 43R-35719;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition to all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the Town of Caledon;

315 THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Town of Caledon;

THAT all permits pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as Amended, be obtained by the Town of Caledon prior to commencement of any construction;

THAT any TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / rehabilitated to the satisfaction of TRCA staff;

THAT the Town of Caledon is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either directly or indirectly from this sale, temporary easement or the carrying out of construction;

THAT said conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A127/14 - CODE OF CONDUCT Recommended changes to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Code of Conduct. (Executive Res.#B62/14)

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Code of Conduct be amended as outlined in Attachment 1, including provisions for perceived conflict of interest, restrictions to rental of TRCA homes and administrative amendments. CARRIED ______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

RES.#A128/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

316 THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land Behind 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #5/14, held on July 4, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A129/14 - GOOD NEWS STORIES Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from April - June, 2014.

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT the summary of Good News Stories from April - June, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities for the preceding few months is provided to the Authority every few months. The stories for April - June, 2014 are as follows:

April

 TRCA Stewardship program received $158,000 from the Ontario Trillium Foundation for a three year project in the Valleywood and Southfields communities in Caledon.  Hosted York Region Envirothon at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area.  Received $25,000 from Boise Project Up, to revitalize the San Romanoway apartment complex at Jane Street and Finch Avenue, as part of the Black Creek SNAP.  A Guide to Eco-Business Zone Planning and Development was approved by Caledon Council. The guide will be integrated into the Town's planning process and TRCA will be promoting it with other municipalities.  Partners in Project Green's engagement program, The People Power Challenge, has 10 companies and 17 facilities signed on and will be reaching over 10,000 employees with its new mobile app.  Successful materials exchange where bamboo waste from pandas at Toronto Zoo will go to a local farmer. Looking to divert 160 tonnes over four years.  160 participants came out to network and hear Amanda Lang at Partners in Project Green's Spring Networking event.  6th annual Floods Happen workshop was well attended by municipal partners.  CBC filming a documentary on extreme weather, and TRCA is one of the organizations that will be highlighted. It will be aired in October.  Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) capital campaign for Flynn House has exceeded $75,000. Renovation to begin later this year.  TRCA received $209,000 from Environment Canada for LID Catchment Scale Pilot Project.

317  TRCA Research and Development, together with the Environmental Assessment Planning team co-hosted a workshop on the TRCA's new stream crossing guidelines. The workshop focused on the scientific methodologies behind the guidelines and touched on policy implications for TRCA. Presentations were made by experts at the Universities of Massachusetts, Kansas, Carlton and Toronto, as well as TRCA. The workshop will be used to inform TRCA program and policy development related to infrastructure development in the Greater Toronto Area. Attendees included provincial, municipal and adjacent conservation authority representatives, as well as academia and non-governmental organizations.  ICLEI Canada released BiodiverCities: A primer on nature in cities co-authored by TRCA. Highlights the importance of nature for quality of life, resilience and sustainability in Canadian cities.  Staff has observed a higher than usual number of long-eared owls during evening field inventories on several TRCA properties. This localized change in biodiversity may be the result of overall changes in their winter survival rates and prey abundance in this part of Ontario.  York University has renewed their commitment of $25,000 for the climate consortium.  Kortright has developed a new parent and tot program called "Little Saplings". This program engages children ages 1-5 years old over a six week period and engages the children in a variety of different activities that connect the children and parents to nature and the outdoors. There is a spring session (currently underway) and fall session planned.

May

 Finalized the lease arrangement for 101 Exchange Avenue.  Environmental Stewardship Pickering received the Durham Environmental Advisory Committee (DEAC) 2014 George A. Scott Stewardship Award.  Launched a biodiversity program with ESL students as a result of a TD Friends of the Environment (TDFEF) grant.  Hosted 2014 Bioblitz in the Humber watershed, with 550 registrants. Had the first sighting of a northern flying squirrel in 15 years in the Boyd North and Glassco Park tract.  Pickering staff report to Council recommending TRCA undertake the $2 million Amberlea Creek erosion control project was approved. The delivery of the Environmental Assessment (EA), detailed design and implementation for the project was a collaborative cross-divisional effort.  City of Toronto's PWIC approved report recommending the Ashbridges Bay EA be filed and TRCA lead detailed design of the Ashbridges Bay Landform.  Staff collecting data in the Rouge National Urban Park in partnership with Parks Canada confirmed the presence of two significant plant species (upland blueberry and Seneca snakeroot) that were historically found in the 1980's and early 2000's. This helps document the persistence of these sensitive species over three decades at this unique site.  Staff attended a conference on Urban Stream Ecology in Portland Oregon, and presented data collected through TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program on the topic of Urban Stream Syndome.  Received funding from TDFEF for new education program development at TTP, as well as funding for 10 classes to pilot this fall.

318  The TRCA/CVC (Credit Valley Conservation) partnership and site plan have been approved for the expansion of CVC's Warwick Nursery to propagate container grown native trees and shrubs. TRCA's Indigenous Plant Propagation program will provide seedlings from locally collected sources to support the production of approximately 25,000 units annually to enhance reforestation and habitat restoration efforts.  Held design charrettes with 140 Caledon high school students for Bolton Camp that have set the tone for redevelopment of the site, and provided a new model for development of programming at TRCA locations.  385 boats participated in Paddle the Don, raising $105,000 for conservation work in the Don River.  Receiving $500,000 in funding from MNR for three flood infrastructure projects: upgrading emergency gates at G. Ross Lord; new bridge railing at Claireville Dam; sediment removal at Black Creek Channel.  Seventy youth and leaders from Yellow Briar Area had an experiential learning opportunity at the Yellow Briar Cuboree May 23-25 at the Claireville Conservation Area. In addition, about 30 senior Beavers attended the White Tail Fun Day at the same location on the Saturday. The youth learned about nature and the outdoors in a beautiful conservation area setting.  About 40 senior scientists and planners from the ministries of the Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs attended a combination webinar and in-person workshop on May 12 with respect to the Risk Management Measures Catalogue and Water Quantity Risk Management Measures Evaluation Process, both of which were led by TRCA.  Over 60 Guides, Pathfinders, Beavers, Cubs and Scouts planted over 400 trees in Valleybrook Park in Brampton on May 3rd, in partnership with the City of Brampton and TRCA.  About 50 Cubs, Scouts and Venturers built 10 picnic tables at Heart Lake on May 3rd and 4th, with funding from the National Good Turn Week Fund. They also worked alongside TRCA staff clearing fallen trees and limbs from the December ice storm.

June

 From January to June, 2014 Stewardship delivered just over 120 events and engaged 5,083 residents across the TRCA jurisdiction. The hands-on activities include native tree/shrub/wildflower planting events, monitoring events, interpretive nature walks, community litter clean up events, movie screenings and homeowner workshops with a focus on low impact development and landscaping for water conservation (through the animation of our Greening Your Grounds homeowner guidebook).  The Outreach Education team is completing the Aquatic plants program this week. A total of 5,000 students planted 11,000 plants at 9 sites across the GTA.  Over 3,000 people attended the 16th annual Mill Pond Splash Eco Festival on June 1st. Participants planted 240 native trees and shrubs and 250 wildflowers. 23 garbage bags of garlic mustard were removed from Mill Pond Park.  Staff administered the 2014 Ontario Stream Assessment Protocol training course in Oshawa in Partnership with the Ministry of Natural Resources. Twenty-three participants were trained in this provincial protocol.  Staff administered a Fish Identification workshop and a workshop on the Ontario Benthos Biomonitoring protocol. A total of 35 participants received technical training.  Black Creek SNAP received $185,000 in funding from the Weston Family Parks Challenge. 319  Resistance board weir, a Ministry of Natural Resources/TRCA joint project in the Duffins Creek, caught a golden redhorse sucker which is considered very rare in Lake Ontario tributaries. This is the first confirmed record of this species in the Duffins Creek by the Royal Ontario Museum.  As part of the Eco Art Festival that was developed by No.9 with TRCA as a Program Partner (http://www.no9.ca/ecoartfest/), TRCA has sponsored the development of a historical mapping project related to the Don River in Toronto, titled Don Was Here. This project maps out the old meander belt of the Lower Don River between the years of 1857 and 1891. The footprint of the river during this time period has been outlined on the Lower Don Trail, as well as in an accompanying website (http://www.donwashere.com/).  The Town of Richmond Hill has contracted TRCA to undertake terrestrial inventories on all natural areas and parkland. Terrestrial staff has started this work which will complement TRCA's natural heritage assessment activities and contribute additional data on regional biodiversity and ecosystem form and function.  The final Public Information Centre for the East Don Trail Environmental Assessment was held on June 24th. Staff will be working with the City of Toronto to submit the Environmental Study Report and then move into the detailed design and approval phase in the fall. The estimated $17 million construction of the trail is targeted to be initiated in 2015.  First annual event, Bike the Creek attracted 180 riders. Sponsors and partners included Region of Peel, City of Brampton, Brampton Bicycle Advisory Committee, TRCA, Cyclepath Brampton and Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition.  The Harbourfront Centre, TRCA and Menkes exhibition called No Flat City with photos from around the GTA on TRCA lands was launched and will be displayed for the next year.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 7, 2014

______

RES.#A130/14 - IN THE NEWS Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from April - June, 2014.

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT the summary of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) media coverage from April to June, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of TRCA's news coverage for the preceding months is provided to the Authority on a quarterly basis.

320 A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period from April – June, 2014 that mentioned TRCA, Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) and other TRCA properties and programs (example: Tommy Thompson Park) produced 95 media mentions. The total media hits resulted in a total circulation/reach of approximately 12,500,000 with an estimated total advertising value of $451,000.

These results only reflect a portion of media coverage, since the database does not monitor on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv mentions, smaller community newspapers and trade publications.

The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage received for April - June 2014:

April  On April 5th, the Toronto Star story "Architects awards a public celebration" columnist Chris Hume discusses the upcoming Ontario Association of Architects awards. It is mentioned that in the past the association gave an award to the Tommy Thompson Park (TTP) Pavilion by Montgomery Sisam.  From April 9th - 12th, the Toronto Sun ran a series of negative stories and an opinion editorial regarding TRCA rental homes. Titles include "Working in a renter’s wonderland"; "Pols aim at TRCA"; "Kelly asks for report on TRCA properties"; "Oh homes, sweet homes"; "Authority operations ‘raises concerns"’.  On April 10th, CBC TV show "Our Toronto" filmed at Black Creek Historic Village to learn more about the history of Mother's Day tea and the Mother's Day Tea event taking place at the Village  On April 19th, the National Post story "Ravens spotted in Toronto set the birding world abuzz" is about how ravens have been spotted at Tommy Thompson Park. Ravens were common in Toronto in the 1800's, then when settlers came in and cleared the land, it killed the ravens off. A volunteer at Tommy Thompson Park will be keeping watch over the ravens.  On April 19th, the Toronto Star story "Evolution of the waterfront" is about a number of new development projects taking place around the Humber Bay Shores neighborhood. The story reports that this area will encompass a wide assortment of new condos, thousands of residents and a variety of shops, services, eateries and community amenities which includes TRCA’s Humber Bay Park.  On April 24th, CBC TV show "Our Toronto" paid a visit to TTP and discussed information about the park, birds and the Spring Bird Festival.  On April 25th, the Mississauga News story "City Hall hits energy challenge goal two years ahead of schedule" celebrates that Mississauga City Hall has been named one of the most energy-efficient city halls in the country by TRCA. City Hall had reached the "gold standard target of 20 equivalent kilowatt hours per square foot of energy intensity" based on its energy consumption in 2013.  On April 26th, the Toronto Star story "Garden invaders, prepare to meet your match" tells readers about invasive plants and how people can learn more about them from the booklet "Grow me instead" published in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, TRCA and Landscape Ontario.  On April 29th to April 30th, media outlets wrote that TRCA is warning residents to stay away from rivers and streams due to heavy rain. 321 May  On May 2nd, the Mississauga News story "Province now reviewing Lakeview waterfront plans" is about the plans to transform a section of Mississauga’s waterfront into a naturalized park have been placed in provincial hands. The plans include trails from Etobicoke Creek to the Lakefront Promenade Park. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC), which is leading the makeover along with the Region of Peel, with support from TRCA and the City of Mississauga, says when the project is complete this inaccessible stretch of shoreline will be turned into a naturalized park with public access and habitat for wildlife.  On May 2nd, the Beach Mirror story "Jane’s Walks this weekend in Beach-Riverdale" lists upcoming Jane’s walks in the neighborhood, including one called ‘Come PLAI with us in the new Port Lands' which is about the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative. The walk included information from partners Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC), Toronto City Planning department and TRCA.  On May 2nd, the Scarborough Mirror story "Community changes featured in upcoming Scarborough Jane’s Walks" included walk theme 'The changing urban forests of Midland Park' presented by TRCA and other groups.  On May 4th, the Brampton Guardian story "Brampton area scouts perform more than a couple of good deeds" is about how four dozen scouts, leaders and volunteers came to Heart Lake Conservation Area on May 3rd to undertake a cleanup of the park and build at least a dozen picnic benches. The troops worked alongside TRCA staff to clear debris caused by the December ice storm so that the walking trails, which have remained closed to the public, can become usable again.  On May 5th, the Mississauga News story "Peel expands rural water quality program" discusses new funding to help local farmers address soil and water quality issues. Peel funds the Rural Water Quality Program which is run by CVC and TRCA.  On May 7th, the Brampton Guardian story "New flood plain could spark downtown development" is about how Queen’s Park has signed off on a flood management plan that could pave the way for more development in downtown Brampton. Business leaders contend the decision could attract vital investment to breathe new life into downtown. The article also touches on needs for upgrades to the channel that protects downtown Brampton from flooding.  On May 8th, CTV News at Noon did several live segments at TTP to promote the Spring Bird Festival.  On May 8th, the Toronto Star story "Schoolkids dig the past- carefully" is about students from Durham Region Catholic schools who are learning about the past at archaeological sites and digging for Huron Wendat artifacts at a site on the edge of Pickering, with the help of TRCA staff.  On May 9th, CP24's Morning Show, interviewed TRCA staff at TTP to learn more about the Spring Bird Festival. About five segments were shot that day.  On May 10th, Rogers TV show "Rogers Daytime" and Fairchild TV did interviews with TRCA staff to learn more about the Spring Bird Festival.  On May 10th, the Toronto Star story "West Don Lands demonstrates Toronto's city-building capacity" is about the new West Don Lands neighbourhood, which will eventually have 6,000 residential units, and is now taking shape on a 32-hectare (80-acre) site bounded by the Don River to the east, King Street to the north, Parliament Street on the west and the railway tracks on the south. The article reviews the bureaucratic obstacles faced by TWRC to develop this area which the writer says is taking shape to represent a bold new vision of Toronto. 322  From May 11th - 14th, the Toronto Sun publishes stories regarding TRCA’s Swan Lake property, new head office and rental homes. Titles included "Richmond Hill mansion TRCA’s home away from home"; and "Conservation kingdom eyes new throne".  On May 12th, Rogers TV show "Yeast of Eden" visited Black Creek Historic Village to film TV segments to inform viewers about the brewery.  On May 16th, the Toronto Star story "A beer lover’s guide to Toronto" reviews some of Toronto’s local breweries including Black Creek Historic Brewery and recommends Black Creek Brown Ale.  On May 17th, the Chatham Daily News story "Muskoka Music Festival features world-class acts" is about top five unique places in the GTA to take children to this summer and includes BCPV listed as a destination.  On May 22nd, the Guelph Mercury story "Area families explore connections to British Home Children" is about different awareness events about this part of Canadian history including the First World War 100th anniversary ceremony on July 28th at Black Creek Pioneer Village.  On May 22nd, the Markham Economist and Sun story "Tree renewal to take root next spring in Markham" reports on how many streets where trees were damaged in December’s ice storm will not see new tress until next spring. The City of Markham is also working on removing tree debris from watercourses, which were assessed based on potential flooding damage. The city was waiting for approvals from the province’s ministry of natural resources and TRCA to be completed between July and September.  On May 23rd, the Toronto Sun and 24 Hours Magazine, both publish stories "Swan song for eggs" and "Queen's quay residents outraged over swan egg removal" which is about resident concerns about the management procedures of these non-native species. The article also includes a quote from TRCA staff explaining why these programs are needed.  On May 23rd, the Toronto Star story "What’s killing the Leslie Spit’s trees?" reports on double-crested cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park and the deterrent methods that TRCA staff do.  On May 25th, Doors Open web documentary producers visited BCPV to film for their series about Doors Open events throughout the City of Toronto.  On May 27th, the National Post story "Crowd sourcing science: Professional biologists team up with over 600 amateur naturalists for a Bio-Blitz in Toronto’s Humber River" is about the 24 hour bioblitz where citizen science took over the Humber River. The article mentions that Kortright Centre for Conservation and McMichael Art Gallery were the joint headquarters for the event.  On May 29th, the Kawartha Lakes This Week story "Emily woman on the hunt for First World War era dolls" is about a woman on a mission to dig through antique items in search for dolls made to locally raise money for First World War efforts. One of her quilts that she discovered was on display in May at BCPV before the presenters from the British Home Children Advocacy and Research Association bring it back to Emily Township.

June  On June 1st, the Toronto Star published editorials "Tree demise complicated" which brought about more context to trees and cormorants at TTP. The editorial gives accolades to TRCA citing the organization is doing a great job at using the park’s transformation by cormorants as opportunity to educate people about ecology. A second editorial stated that the double-crested cormorant’s comeback is an ecological miracle, not a disaster.

323  On June 5th, the Mississauga News story "Leave your car at home and win big" is about the new Let your Green Show campaign which kicked off June 5th and runs until October 31st. Participants will be rewarded for leaving their cars at home. The initiative is a partnership between Peel and the local municipalities, as well as CVC and TRCA.  On June 5th, the Vaughan Citizen story "York Regional Police to patrol in Vaughan parks" reports that when temperatures start soaring so do the number of calls to police about off road vehicles racing along residential streets and tearing up local parks. York Region Police, in partnership with City of Vaughn, York Region EMS and TRCA have launched Operation Safe Trails and Parks. The joint forces initiative aims to educate off-road vehicle riders about Vaughan’s ban on operating dirt bikes, ATVs, pocket bikes or minibikes on public property.  On June 6th, the Globe and Mail story "Buzz builds around bee condos" is about architects who are hard at work finishing the last of five bee condos that will populate various southern Ontario locations including one at the Black Creek Community Farm and one at the Kortright Centre for Conservation in Vaughan.  On June 10th, the Globe and Mail story "Pioneer Beer: It cures what 'ales' you" is about brewing in the historic brewery and the tours offered to the public.  On June 13th, the North York Mirror story "One hundred Revolutionary soldiers to take over Black Creek Pioneer Village Father’s Day Weekend" is about the Battle of Black Creek event and the different activities that dad might enjoy.  On June 17th, the Pickering News Advertiser story "Pickering to truck away problem geese" reports on how the City of Pickering will be rounding up and relocating geese that have taken up residence near Frenchman’s Bay. The City will work with TRCA to round up geese while they are molting and unable to fly.  On June 17th, East York Mirror story "Taylor Massey Creek restoration plans still waiting for approval" discusses how Taylor Massey Creek one of southern Ontario’s most polluted watercourses needs restoration. A volunteer group called The Taylor Massey Project had proposed a package of projects it had hoped that TRCA would adopt to restore the creek as part of the new Don Watershed Plan.  On June 18th, Yonge Street Media story "From Field to Stein: Ontario's only working historic brewery" features the brewing process, activities, events and tours taking place at BCPV, as well as the goals for bringing a historic brewery to life.  On June 20th, CTV News at Noon ran live segments at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area to promote the new Treetop Trekking aerial adventure park grand opening.  On June 23th, Mississauga News story "Future vision being developed for Small Arms Building" is about the potential future of this significant heritage site. It discusses further that TRCA has asked for expressions of interest to establish a plan to breathe new life into the 43,000 sq-ft heritage building.  On June 24th, the Beach Mirror story "Heritage plaques in support of the Lower Don river to be unveiled" reports on the historical significance of the Lower Don River. Heritage Toronto, TRCA and TWRC unveiled plaques on June 25th, which recognizes the straightening of the Don River and the Lower Don River railway crossing.  On June 26th, both CBC News and National Post report on stories about the June 25th rainfall. Titles include "Heavy rains bring flooding to parts of city" and "Toronto first responder’s rescue stranded motorists after torrential rain flood roads". Both stories mention flood warnings were issued by TRCA.

324  On June 27th, East York Mirror story "Storm flooding in Taylor Creek Park raises frustrations over restoration plans" reports on how the park suffered from another recent torrential rain fall. The overflow of stormwater caused Taylor-Massey Creek to flood in the surrounding areas. The Taylor-Massey Creek Restoration Plan is currently undergoing its agency and public consultation stage of the municipal class environmental assessment process. TRCA invited stakeholders to discuss alternative solutions the City of Toronto is considering to address the stream bank erosion in Taylor Massey Creek.  On June 27th, the Brampton Guardian story "Catholic schools earn high marks for environmentalism" is about how environmental conservation and education efforts have earned Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board a distinction only two other boards in the province have achieved. All 149 Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board schools have managed to receive EcoSchools Certification this year. Seven school boards, York University, and TRCA collaborated to bring this initiative forward.  On June 27th, the Toronto Star story "Feathered friends back in the spotlight" is about how a motorcycle training exercise was hit by a goose and seriously injured and earlier in the month in Ottawa a cyclist was reportedly attacked by a Canada goose. There are about 400,000 geese living in southern Ontario. The article discusses the goose population management program that is run by TRCA.

Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 8, 2014

______

RES.#A131/14 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT Section IV item AUTH8.3 - Watershed Committee Minutes, be received. CARRIED Section IV Item 8.3 ETOBICOKE-MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on March 20, 2014 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE Minutes of Meeting #2/14, held on June 17, 2014.

______

325 RES.#A132/14 - IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREET Proposed Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications – Ontario Municipal Board Order City of Toronto, North York Community Council Area.. Report on the Ontario Municipal Board decision with respect to development within a valley corridor and the natural heritage system.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the report dated June 19, 2014, summarizing the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) Order regarding 4155 Yonge Street in the City of Toronto, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A133/14 - OFFICE ACCOMMODATION Lease of Office Space. Update on the lease of office space at 101 Exchange Avenue, City of Vaughan.

Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: John Sprovieri

THAT the staff report dated June 18, 2014 regarding the lease of office space at 101 Exchange Avenue in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A134/14 - ABSENTEEISM AND TURNOVER 2013 Summary of absence due to illness and staff turnover rates for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Jim Tovey

THAT the staff report on Absenteeism and Turnover for 2013 for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A135/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

326 Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Cynthia Thorburn

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.11, with the exception of EX10.7, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #5/14, held on July 4, 2014, be received. CARRIED

RES.#A136/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, item EX10.7 - 4995 15th Sideroad, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #5/14, held on July 4, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:15 a.m., on Friday, July 25, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

327 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #7/14

Friday, September 19, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #6/14, held on July 25, 2014 329

PRESENTATIONS Gray, Darryl, Senior Manager, Education, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Bolton Camp Redevelopment Project. 329

Granger, Bill, Member of Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 1984 - 1996, and Chair 1992-1996, in regard to New Streamside Habitat Law - Local Conservation Now More Important Than Ever. 329

BOLTON CAMP REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 329

PEEL ECOSCHOOLS SUCCESS 335

EVERGREEN BRICK WORKS Extension of Loan Guarantee 337

CITY OF TORONTO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND CLEAN-OUT PARTNERSHIP UPDATE 341

PORTSIDE DEVELOPMENTS (KIPLING) INC. 345

AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Request for Tender #10000070 - Stone Material 352

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program and Mentoring to Placement for Environmental Professionals Program 354 OAK RIDGES CORRIDOR CONSERVATION RESERVE MULTI-USE TRAIL PHASE 2 Contract RSD14-131 - Nature Trail Construction 371

ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA ROADWAY BASE WORK Contract RSD14-141 Extension 373

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed, Tensilkote Limited (Pleasure Valley) 375

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Milne Property 376

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Toronto, Bell Wall International Construction Ltd. 377

COATSWORTH CUT PROJECT Contract RSD14-112 - Channel Maintenance Dredging 379

BLUFFER'S PARK PROJECT Contract RSD14-123 - Channel Maintenance Deredging 379

RENEWAL OF INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY 380

JULY 8, 2013 SEVERE FLOOD - DAMAGE RESTORATION WORK ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TORONTO 381

UPDATE ON EXPANDING ONTARIO'S GREENBELT 381

REQUESET FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY - OWNED LAND Behind 53 Timber Valley in the Town of Richmond Hill 381

REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY - OWNED LAND 17 Mill Street in the City of Markham 381

ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA 382

PUBLIC RECORD Authority Resolution #A244/08 382 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #7/14 September 19, 2014

The Authority Meeting #7/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, September 19, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Ben Cachola Member Bob Callahan Member Ronald Chopowick Member Michael Di Biase Member Jack Heath Member Colleen Jordan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Mike Mattos Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member

ABSENT Paul Ainslie Member David Barrow Member Raymond Cho Member Vincent Crisanti Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Chris Fonseca Member Mujeeb Khan Member Glenn Mason Member Ron Moeser Member John Parker Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Jim Tovey Member Richard Whitehead Member

328 RES.#A137/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/14, held on July 25, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation by Darryl Gray, Senior Manager, Education and Lisa Erdle, Ecology Crew Leader, TRCA in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Bolton Camp Redevelopment Project.

(b) A presentation by Bill Granger, Member of Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 1984 – 1996, and Chair 1992-1996, in regard to New Streamside Habitat Law – Local Conservation Now More Important Than Ever.

RES.#A138/14 - PRESENTATION

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A139/14 - BOLTON CAMP REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Overview of 2014 summer student employment program and next steps.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT the presentation by Darryl Gray, Senior Manager, Education and Lisa Erdle, Ecology Crew Leader, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in regard to the Bolton Camp Redevelopment Project be received;

AND FURTHER THAT the Peel District School Board and Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board be thanked for their support and participation in the design charrettes and the summer employment program. CARRIED

329 BACKGROUND History of Bolton Camp Bolton Camp opened in 1922, acting as a Fresh Air Camp for mothers with small children and boys and girls from low income families. It was operated by The Neighborhood Workers Association of Toronto and spanned over 92 acres of hillside and wooded glen. In its first year it is estimated that 160 city children and their mothers traveled from Toronto to the Bolton Camp site. During the great depression of the late 20’s and 30’s this camp was a bright place for many disadvantaged kids to escape the heat and extreme poverty of the city. The camp was available free of charge to many families (on a case by case basis) through the Fresh Air Fund. During this time, there were a total of four separate camps which shared property and resources - Rotary, Sherbourne, Hastings and Howell.

As WWII began, Bolton Camp served as a Cadet Training Centre for the Oakville High School Cadet Corps. After the war ended, the site continued to operate as a camp for underprivileged youth with approximately 169 buildings and serving more than 5,500 campers at its peak. An outdoor education and conference centre was added in 1972, and the Ruth Atkinson Hindmarsh Family Lodge in 1984 to accommodate new programming and provide services for a wider audience. However, the camp closed its doors in 1999 after 77 years of operation and has remain mostly closed since that date, with Toronto Montessori operating a school on the conference centre portion in the early 2000's.

TRCA Acquisition and Community Consultation At Authority Meeting #5/10, held on June 25, 2010, Resolution #A102/10 was approved, in part, as follows:

THAT a partial taking containing 105.6 hectares (260.91 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land improved with in excess of 30 buildings and a private water system and sewage system including two sewage lagoons, said lands being Part of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Concession 8, Albion, Town of Caledon, in the Regional Municipality of Peel, municipally known as 13540-13650 Caledon-King Townline South, be purchased from the Hi-Lands of Bolton Corp.;

Since purchase of the property, TRCA staff has been consulting with municipal partners and community groups on redevelopment of the property and what it should ultimately be used for. Through this process, staff has developed a concept plan for re-purposing Bolton Camp from its previous use as an overnight summer camp for youth and families of Toronto to an outdoor centre for participants of all ages. Proposed programming at the renewed Bolton Camp may include adventure, sports and fitness activities, community art and culture programs, outdoor education and training, leadership development and social entrepreneurship opportunities.

The following agencies have been actively consulted in the initial phases of the development of the new Bolton Camp vision and/or have expressed an interest in participating in the project:  Region of Peel;  Town of Caledon;  Family Services Toronto;  Caledon Community Services;  YMCA GTA;  Peel Children and Youth Initiative;  United Way; 330  Social Enterprise Toronto;  Learning Enrichment Foundation;  Peel District School Board and Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board;  Artscape;  City of Brampton;  Bolton Rotary Club; and  Humber College.

Staff envisions that this new facility will be a place where people come together to learn, live, play and share in experiences. The new Bolton Camp is proposed to have sports fields, a gymnasium, pool, green fitness equipment, yoga classes, running clinics, an outdoor community kitchen, smoothie or coffee bar, tree-top tours/canopy tours, ropes courses, theatre and art spaces, retail or market space and outdoor classrooms/collaboration and innovation spaces, amongst others. A key, and unique, aspect of the Bolton Camp plan is to allow and support a wide range of business models, including social enterprises, co-operatives, not-for profits, and others, that provide youth, community members, service club and local entrepreneurs the opportunity to take an active role in creating, developing and implementing programs, services and activities, while improving employment and economic outcomes in the region.

In January of 2014, as a component of the consultation process, George Brown College's Institute without Boundaries was contracted to conduct a series of design charrettes for students from secondary schools in Peel Region. These charrettes were structured to allow participating students to develop ideas that can contribute to the revitalization of Bolton Camp and transform it into a destination place within the greater regional context. The outcomes of the charrettes were to provide unique and creative solutions/pilot projects for site programming and activity planning that may be implemented over the summer of 2014.

On May 22, 23, 26 and 27, 2014 over 120 students from Peel Region schools participated in the two day sessions, led and facilitated by George Brown College faculty and students, along with industry experts and community leaders. Participating students were from Humberview Secondary School (Bolton), Mayfield Secondary School (Caledon), R.F. Hall Catholic Secondary School (Caledon East), St. Marguerite d'Youville Catholic Secondary School (Brampton), St. Michael Catholic Secondary School (Bolton) and Ascension of Our Lord Catholic Secondary School (Mississauga). Work was guided by 10 key considerations (user needs, local and regional resources, sustainable design principles, universal and ethical design principles, safety and security, community impact, feasibility and affordability, resiliency, maintenance, and innovation and creativity) and groups were organized based on five key themes that reflect the overall vision of the future Bolton Camp:  arts and culture;  health and wellness;  education and social development;  food;  eco-recreation.

331 Students were grouped into multi-disciplinary teams that were challenged to think creatively and work collaboratively in order to develop innovative program interventions suitable for implementation at Bolton Camp. The caliber of work and output from the students was extremely high and feedback from both the students and school board staff and administrators was that the charrettes were a valuable and unique learning experience that will benefit the participants as they move through their academic career and in to the workplace.

Student work through the charrettes resulted in twenty proposed program and facility recommendations that form the basis for short, medium and long term work to revitalize Bolton Camp. Some of the innovative concepts and outcomes from this work includes:  a cultural centre and cultural festival;  pop-up festivals and markets;  youth innovation incubator and leadership lounge;  an outdoor activity zone and adventure village;  maker spaces and new technology camps;  community and artisanal food spaces;  arts and culture retreat space;  walk-in movie nights;  family camps;  a treehouse village.

Student Summer Program As an outcome of the design charrettes, a summer employment program was developed to engage 70 secondary and college students in the initial stages of redevelopment of Bolton Camp, including clearing and securing buildings, improving habitat on site, clearing brush, building trails, social media and event planning, as well as implementing short-term recommendations stemming from the charrette process. Students participating in the design charrette program were given priority opportunities for employment, and the remaining students were hired through regular application and interview process and were drawn primarily from Peel Region with a small number from Toronto.

A unique component of the summer employment program was a strong emphasis on skill development and accelerating student knowledge and learning through mentorship. To achieve this, each participating student spent a minimum of one half day a week during the first month of their employment participating in seminars, field trips, hand-on learning experiences and connecting with experts from a wide range of fields. The intent of these mentorship experiences was to assist student learning and develop the skills required to complete their required tasks during their summer employment, as well as support their understanding and knowledge of specific professions or vocations that they may be interested in pursuing following their academic careers. Some of the development opportunities and mentorship opportunities included:  introduction to events and design -- Co-Effect Design;  accessible ramp design -- Ken Fukushima (Architect);  accessibility and design -- DesignABLE Environments Inc.;  creek restoration -- TRCA;  electrofishing and invertebrate studies -- TRCA;  furniture design and bee condos -- Sustainable T.O.;  branding and design -- Jacknife Design;  developing a Jane's Walk -- Jane's Walk. 332 In addition to these and other sessions, the students participated in field trips to Evergreen at the Brick Works, Todmorden Mills and YMCA Camp Cedar Glen, providing exposure to other similar regional attractions and improving their working knowledge of event planning and facility design and operations.

Over the course of the two month employment program, the summer students achieved considerable success in implementing a number of the key recommendations of the design charrettes, as well as preserving important built and natural heritage assets. Additionally, work was undertaken to develop Bolton Camp branding, websites, documentaries and a launch event to showcase the efforts to date, as well as future vision for this new facility. The following is a brief summary of work completed:  trail construction: 2km of new trails created;  habitat enhancement: bird boxes, snake hibernaculum, bee boxes and butterfly gardens were created or established and debris cleared from the creeks;  building restoration:  all 67 buildings were cleared out and boarded up. Over 320 cubic meters of waste was removed;  workshop was restored and secured, including new windows and doors;  the Kindergarten Building was cleaned and the interior painted;  three cabins were restored, including leveling and painting for future use.  furniture restoration: created restoration plans for 28 pieces of furniture salvaged from the site and restored them for use or sale at the open house event;  site maintenance and clearing: overgrown vegetation and hazard trees were removed, along with general turf maintenance;  marketing and communications:  webpage, newsletter and social media layouts were designed and a database of content developed;  a photographic summary of the site and a documentary of the students' work created;  way-finding and interpretive signage was developed.  arts and design:  preliminary brand and logo was developed;  unique sculptures were created using reclaimed materials;  an entrance sign and flag were developed;  murals were designed and painted at the Dining Hall and Gymnasium.

The culmination of the summer employment program will be a special launch event on October 4, 2014, where the students can showcase the work they have completed and welcome the community back to Bolton Camp. As part of their employment they have developed a series of activities and opportunities to engage the community in celebrating the history of Bolton Camp while exploring potential future uses of this site. Event activities will include:  video screenings;  Jane's Walks;  tours of restored buildings;  art displays;  children's activities, including a Bolton Camp colouring book;  silent auction of restored furniture and items donated by the community;  local food vendors and cooking demonstrations;  local exhibitors. 333 Invitations for the October 4 event have been circulated to the community as well as key stakeholders, partners and contributors.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Redevelopment of Bolton Camp is a multi-year project and will require a significant investment from both the public and private sectors. TRCA will be developing special capital submissions to regional, provincial and federal governments, as well as private foundations and corporations to support the ongoing development of Bolton Camp. Critical short term requirements include securing funding for infrastructure renewal, including site servicing (sewer, water and electrical services) and building rehabilitation that are necessary to support the development of new programming at Bolton Camp. The following is a short overview of the 2014 to 2016 draft work plan for Bolton Camp:  Complete Bolton Camp Concept and Master Plan.  Establish the Bolton Camp Redevelopment Committee composed of stakeholders and community members, as approved at Authority Meeting #3/14, held on April 25, 2014.  Convert the Dining Hall and Gymnasium into four season use buildings.  Develop summer employment program for 2015.  Develop summer recreation, camp and community programs beginning 2015.  Commence detailed design and implementation of infrastructure renewal projects, including site servicing (water, sewer and electrical services) and road and bridge repairs.  Source necessary funding, including public and private fundraising and community engagement campaigns.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The total 10 year project cost for the full redevelopment of Bolton Camp is anticipated to be between $15 and $20 million. TRCA has identified $5.2 million within the Peel Region Capital Budget for the period of 2015 - 2024, in account 433-01.

Site servicing of sewer and water is anticipated to cost between $2.4 and $2.6 million and is not included within the existing capital budget. TRCA staff is in discussions with Region of Peel staff regarding funding for site servicing.

Additional sources of federal, provincial and private funding for capital and program development are being explored.

Report prepared by: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 08, 2014

______

334 RES.#A140/14 - PEEL ECOSCHOOLS SUCCESS Update on status of the program and recognition.

Moved by: Colleen Jordan Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT the administration, staff and students of the Peel District School Board and Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board be recognized and congratulated for their outstanding achievement within the Ontario EcoSchools certification program from 2009 to 2014;

THAT the Chairs of the Boards of Trustees of the Peel District School Board and Dufferin-Peel District School Board be so advised;

AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) continue to support the Ontario EcoSchools program in Peel Region, contributing to a culture of sustainability across Ontario. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has been engaged by the Region of Peel to undertake a number of initiatives related to climate change mitigation and adaptation in Peel Region. Since 2008, the Peel District School Board (PDSB) and the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board (DPCDSB) have been supported in their efforts to address regional climate change priorities through TRCA’s implementation of the Ontario EcoSchools program. Under the Peel EcoSchools Project, TRCA’s experience and expertise are made available to both schools and school boards, fostering capacity-building across all board departments and within school communities.

The central objective of the Ontario EcoSchools program is to mitigate the effects of climate change through a process of whole-school engagement in environmental action. The program rests on a certification framework that provides schools and school boards with benchmarks for environmental practices. By focusing on the following key areas, the program seeks to align what is taught in schools with the operational aspects of school sites:  teamwork and leadership;  energy conservation;  waste minimization;  ecological literacy;  school ground greening;  environmental stewardship.

Since 2002, Ontario EcoSchools’ annual certification program has demonstrated a history of achieving results within a collaborative framework. For example, an independent analysis of schools in the Toronto District School Board revealed that on average, certified EcoSchools use 12% less electricity and 7% less natural gas than comparable non-certified EcoSchools ( Toronto District School Board Energy Management Program Review, 2006, ICF International, p.28-29).

Currently, 53 school boards in Ontario support the 1,745 certified schools across the province. 335 Accomplishments to Date As a result of the ongoing work of TRCA, PDSB, DPCDSB, the Region of Peel and TRCA's other community partners, the Peel EcoSchools Project has engaged approximately 65% of schools in the Region of Peel, representing over 150,000 students.

TRCA’s implementation of the Peel EcoSchools Project incorporates opportunities to tailor initiatives and promote projects that align directly with internal and regional climate change priorities. It ensures that through the delivery of the EcoSchools program, environmental messages are consistently and accurately communicated with school communities. This level of support for a school-based, integrated approach to addressing climate change is unique to the Peel EcoSchools Project and exceptional within the provincial EcoSchools network.

School data is collected and reviewed annually to capture the impact of the program and to guide future initiatives. A summary of key measurables can be found below.

Measurable Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Number of certified EcoSchools in Peel 53 106 165 183 239 Number of teachers participating in 261 345 429 259* 272 Professional Development Number of schools that have conducted 53 106 165 183 239 a school-wide Energy Conservation EcoReview Number of schools with weekly 33 56 109 118 163 waste-free or boomerang lunch programs Number of schools that completed a 35 58 114 117 126 school-wide waste audit Number of school-wide programs to 51 98 152 178 216 reduce fine paper use Number of school ground greening 40 67 116 94 150 projects (gardens, trees, outdoor classrooms, etc.) Number of school-based campaigns to 11 28 49 62 138 reduce single-use water bottles and/or promote tap water Number of active transportation or 11 24 28 57 50** walk-to-school campaigns *Fewer participants due to the labour situation with public school teachers. ** Some spring campaigns were delayed due to the extended winter season.

Other collaborative initiatives include:  Ongoing support for the development of board-level environmental committees.  The Great Gulp – Region of Peel awareness campaign about the benefits of tap water.  EcoFest – annual celebration event that recognizes school achievement.  Peel-specific school ground greening workshops for school staff and administration.  Consultation regarding community climate change action planning.  Active transportation initiatives and school trip planning.

336 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Moving forward, the Peel EcoSchools Project will focus on deepening whole-school engagement and will continue to work with stakeholders to develop locally relevant resources for school communities. Linking to the climate change priorities outlined by the Region of Peel, the distinct communities within the region, the school boards and TRCA, the project will support and recognize schools and school boards for their contribution to environmental action. Over the next academic year, it is TRCA's intention to further refine data collection systems, foster mentorship throughout the Region by implementing a “Demonstration EcoSchools” professional development model, and enhance outdoor spaces through the creation of a Peel greening guide.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The 2014 budget for Peel EcoSchools is $265,000 and funding is provided through Peel Region Climate Change Capital in Account 129-80.

Report prepared by: Lindsay Bunce, 289.268.3914 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Lindsay Bunce, 289.268.3914 Email: [email protected] Date: July 15, 2014

______

RES.#A141/14 - EVERGREEN BRICK WORKS Extension of Loan Guarantee. Extension of the bank loan guarantee for Evergreen for the development and operation of the Don Valley Brick Works.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) consent to extending the term of the current joint and several loan guarantee related to Evergreen's loan with the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) for the Brick Works Project by seven years, from its current expiration date of June 30, 2016, to the earlier of June 30, 2023, or termination or payout of the RBC loan;

THAT the joint and several loan guarantee be reduced in each calendar year to the amount as shown on Chart 2 of the staff report dated August 20, 2014;

THAT if Evergreen is unable to reach agreement with RBC on an amendment to the RBC loan, TRCA consents to Evergreen negotiating a new loan with another lender to replace the RBC loan;

THAT all amending and extension agreements, and all other agreements and undertakings, be on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and solicitor; 337 AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any and all actions necessary to implement the loan guarantee extension, including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, adopted the following:

1. City Council, subject to obtaining the consent of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (the "TRCA"), grant authority for the City, in conjunction with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, to:

1. Consent to and acknowledge an amendment to the terms of the RBC Loan to extend the RBC Loan to June 30, 2023 subject to the following conditions:

a. reducing the $500,000 Cash Funds (the "City-Held Funds") provided by Evergreen to the City as security under the Lease Agreement by $200,000 the first year and then $100,000 per year for the following three years, and to apply the City Held Funds to the RBC Loan in accordance with Columns I and II of Schedule A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and

b. requiring Evergreen to make annual principal payments on the RBC Loan in accordance with the schedule set out in Column III of Schedule A, so that together with payments made by the City of the City Held Funds, the maximum outstanding balance on the RBC Loan at the end of each calendar year shall not exceed the amount shown in Column IV of Schedule A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

2. If Evergreen is unable to reach agreement with RBC on an amendment to the RBC Loan on the terms set out in Part 1.1 above, to consent to Evergreen negotiating a new loan with another lender to replace the RBC Loan (the "Replacement Loan") on the terms set out in Part 1.1 above.

3. To amend the joint and several guarantee in respect of the Project, or provide a new joint and several guarantee to a new lender if Evergreen negotiates a Replacement Loan (the "Guarantee"), on the following terms:

a. extending the term of the Guarantee by 7 years, from its current expiration on June 30, 2016 to expiration on the earlier of June 30, 2023 or the earlier date of termination or payout of the RBC Loan or the Replacement Loan; and

b. reducing the amount of the Guarantee in each calendar year to the amount shown in Column II of Schedule B to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer. 338 2. City Council authorize the City to enter into any Project-related agreements and amending agreements, including without limitation loan-related documents, guarantees, leases, consents, acknowledgements and agreements or ancillary documents between any or all of the following, the City, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Evergreen and RBC, or another Lender, and any such other parties as may be required, which, in the opinion of the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, may be required, desirable or necessary to give effect to City Council's decision.

3. City Council request Evergreen Brick Works to report to the Executive Committee on their fundraising activities on an annual basis and be encouraged to enhance onsite promotion to visitors of donation opportunities.

TRCA owns the Don Valley Brick Works lands and the lands are under management agreement with the City of Toronto. In September of 2003, following discussions with TRCA and other stakeholders, the City of Toronto issued a request for proposal (RFP) seeking proponents to raise the capital necessary for the restoration and adaptive re-use of the heritage structures at the Don Valley Brick Works to create a centre for environmental learning and urban ecology (Project). Evergreen, a national registered charity incorporated in 1991, responded to the RFP. TRCA staff cooperated with the City in reviewing proposals and a Memorandum of Understanding was entered into with Evergreen to proceed with the Project.

In 2006, Evergreen submitted a Master Plan to the City for the restoration and adaptive re-use of the Don Valley Brick Works site, and subsequently entered into a ground lease with TRCA and the City for the Project. At that time, the Project cost was estimated at $50 million, of which Evergreen had received commitments from the Province of Ontario for $10 million and from the federal government for $15 million, and had raised over $6 million in private donation pledges. The City and TRCA were requested to provide a joint loan guarantee for $3 million towards the Project cost with a term to expire four years after substantial completion.

In 2007, the Project cost had increased to $55 million. The federal government increased its contribution to $20 million and Evergreen anticipated raising $12 million in private donations towards capital and a further $13 million in private donations towards programming. The City and TRCA agreed to an increase in the loan guarantee to $7.5 million. In 2008, various changes to the Project were made, but the Project cost remained unchanged at $55 million.

The Evergreen Brick Works Project was substantially completed at the end of December 2010 within the approved budget of $55 million. Evergreen raised almost $50.2 million of the Project's cost leaving a fundraising target shortfall of $4.8 million. Evergreen has financed the Project construction in part through a $11.52 million loan from Royal Bank of Canada, to which the City and TRCA provided the joint and several loan guarantee of up to $7.5 million. The RBC loan required Evergreen to show that they had sufficient committed pledges by September 30, 2011 to meet the shortfall, and other milestones to ensure the RBC loan would be extinguished by December 2014. In 2011, Evergreen requested an extension in the period to repay the loan due to slower than anticipated fundraising revenues. The City and TRCA granted Evergreen an 18 month extension to the loan guarantee term.

339 RATIONALE Evergreen has raised almost $50.2 million of the project cost, leaving a current fundraising shortfall of $4.8 million. In 2013, Evergreen ceased actively fundraising for the repayment of the RBC loan, an action arising from Evergreen's on-going discussions with their Board, lenders and other stakeholders. Evergreen has advised that the capital fundraising model is no longer effective as donors typically support new capital projects and Evergreen Brick Works is essentially complete. Evergreen's new strategy for repaying the loan has shifted from using a fundraising revenue model to business/site based earnings. This shift translates into lower but predictable annual loan repayments from operating cash flow.

Evergreen's primary source of operating income is from businesses that operate as social enterprises with events, garden markets and parking. Evergreen's financial statements show a track record of balanced budgets. Revenue has increased from $7.3 million in 2010 to a projected budget of approximately $12.6 million in 2014, providing a projected cash flow of approximately between $500,000 and $550,000 annually. Evergreen proposes to use this operating income directly to repay the outstanding capital loan.

City staff has undertaken a review of Evergreen's revised financing, operations and business plan and has determined that Evergreen is in a sound financial position to retire its debt obligations for the capital loan by June 2023 from operating income. The City has agreed to reducing the $500,000 cash funds provided by Evergreen to the City as security under the Lease Agreement by $200,000 the first year and then $100,000 per year for the following three years to be applied to the RBC loan. The proposed repayment schedule is set out in Chart 1.

RBC has not given final approval of the terms and conditions of the loan amendments. Should RBC's approval not be given, Evergreen will negotiate a new loan with another lender to replace the RBC loan.

The following charts are from City of Toronto staff report dated August 6, 2014:

Chart 1- Repayment Schedule

Period Ending Cash Security Security Evergreen Maximum RBC Held by City Applied by Principal Loan balance City to Loan Repayment of at end of Balance Loan Period June 30, 2014 500,000 4,800,000 December 31, 2014 300,000 200,000 300,000 4,300,000 December 31, 2015 200,000 100,000 400,000 3,800,000 December 31, 2016 100,000 100,000 400,000 3,300,000 December 31, 2017 0 100,000 400,000 2,800,000 December 31, 2018 0 0 400,000 2,400,000 December 31, 2019 0 0 500,000 1,900,000 December 31, 2020 0 0 500,000 1,400,000 December 31, 2021 0 0 500,000 900,000 December 31, 2022 0 0 500,000 400,000 June 30, 2023 0 0 400,000 0 340 Chart 2 - Maximum City/TRCA Loan Guarantee Amount

Year Maximum City/TRCA Loan Guarantee 2015 4,300,000 2016 3,800,000 2017 3,300,000 2018 2,800,000 2019 2,400,000 2020 1,900,000 2021 1,400,000 2022 900,000 2023 400,000 2024 0

FINANCIAL DETAILS There is no direct financial impact to TRCA arising from adoption of the recommendations, the effect of which is to extend the loan guarantee term by seven years to give additional time for Evergreen to repay the RBC loan. If consent for the extension is not granted, Evergreen may breach its loan conditions, and the RBC would exercise its right for payment by calling upon the loan guarantee provided by the City and TRCA.

Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] Date: August 20, 2014

______

RES.#A142/14 - CITY OF TORONTO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND CLEAN-OUT PARTNERSHIP UPDATE City of Toronto stormwater management pond project update; continue SWMP Maintenance and Clean-out Program for a further two ponds.

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has completed the clean-outs of three stormwater management ponds in partnership with the City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS the City of Toronto has requested TRCA to implement two additional pond clean-outs;

341 THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA continue to work with the City of Toronto for the delivery of a Stormwater Management Pond (SWMP) Maintenance and Clean-out Program;

THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to continue the partnership including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents;

AND FURTHER THAT approval be granted for TRCA to implement two additional stormwater management pond clean-outs in 2014-2015. CARRIED BACKGROUND In spring 2013, the Operations Division of Toronto Water approached TRCA's Restoration Services Division to seek opportunities for TRCA to assist with the maintenance of their stormwater management ponds. The City of Toronto is estimated to have approximately 63 SWMPs under its management. The City identified seven priority ponds for management and clean-out. Four of the ponds are located in Scarborough: Sisters of St. Joseph, Lansing, Centennial and L’Amoreaux. The other three are located within High Park: Wendigo, Upper & Lower Spring Creek and Lower Duck.

At Authority Meeting #7/13, held on September 27, 2013, Resolution #A141/13 was approved as follows:

THAT approval be granted for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to enter into a partnership with the City of Toronto for the delivery of a Stormwater Management Pond Maintenance and Clean-out Program;

THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the partnership including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents;

THAT approval be granted for TRCA to implement two stormwater management pond plans in 2013;

AND FURTHER THAT staff report back regularly on the progress of the project.

During the summer of 2013, TRCA completed maintenance and clean-out plans for the seven SWM ponds. Further to which, TRCA received approval from the City of Toronto to commence implementation for two of the seven ponds: Sisters of St. Joseph and Lansing SWMPs. Sediment quality testing prior to implementation indicated that dredgeate from both SWMPs would require an industrial disposal option, because contamination levels that exceeded the Ministry of the Environment's (MOE) 2011 guidelines for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property.

342 In September 2013, work began on Sisters of St. Joseph Pond, located northwest of St. Clair Avenue East and Warden Avenue in Scarborough. This SWMP discharges into Taylor Massey Creek in the Don watershed. Through a strategic mechanical dredging operation, and the use of a bentonite clay polymer additive (LiquiSorb 2000), 790 cubic metres of sediment was removed from the pond. Dredgeate contamination levels were again analyzed prior to hauling and met MOE's 2011 guidelines for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property. Therefore, the dredgeate could be disposed of in a residential/parkland fill site, rather than an industrial disposal site. An as-built survey of the SWMP was completed and the site was restored and planted. As a result of the parkland disposal option, as well as site efficiencies that were achieved, a cost savings of $134,431 was realized for the City of Toronto.

Sisters of St. Joseph Pond Clean-out Cost Savings to the City of Toronto

Total Estimate Cost Total Actual Cost Cost Savings $333,890 $199,459 $134,431

Upon completion of the first pond, the second pond, Lansing Pond, located southeast of the Highway 401 and Kennedy Road, in Scarborough was implemented. This SWMP discharges into the Bendale Branch of the West Highland Creek in the Highland Creek watershed. Through a strategic mechanical dredging operation, and the use of a bentonite clay polymer additive (LiquiSorb 2000), 640 cubic metres of sediment was removed from the pond. Dredgeate contamination levels were again analyzed prior to hauling, and after dredging, and met MOE's 2011 guidelines for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property. Therefore, the dredgeate could be disposed of in a residential/parkland fill site, rather than an industrial disposal site for which preliminary tests had indicated. An as-built survey of the SWMP was completed, the site was restored and planted. As a result of the parkland disposal option, as well as site efficiencies that were achieved, a cost savings of $164,399 was realized for the City of Toronto.

Lansing Pond Clean-out Cost Savings to the City of Toronto

Total Estimate Cost Total Actual Cost Cost Savings $328,197 $163,798 $164,399

TRCA realized a cost savings of nearly $300,000 from the implementation of the clean-outs of the first two ponds. The partnership with the City of Toronto enabled TRCA to pass these saving back to the City of Toronto. As a result, the City authorized the clean out of a third pond, Centennial Pond, immediately after the completion of Lansing Pond. TRCA was able to immediately mobilize and implement the clean-out plan for the third pond.

343 Centennial Pond is located northeast of Kingston Road and Meadowvale Road in Scarborough. This SWMP is an online pond and is part of Centennial Creek in the Highland Creek watershed. TRCA again strategically utilized mechanical dredging equipment, and removed 640 cubic metres of sediment from the SWMP. The dredging took place in the winter of 2014, and frozen material was handled, and stockpiled without the need of a bentonite clay polymer additive. The dredgeate was stockpiled on City of Toronto property immediately adjacent to the SWMP, and was left to be dewatered over the summer 2014. An as-built survey of the SWMP was completed, and the site was restored and planted. The dredgeate contaminant levels will be tested again in the fall of 2014 to determine the disposal option and associated cost. The total estimated cost of clean-out and disposal is $301,462.53. Upon re-analysis of the dredgeate and disposal of the material, the final costs will be realized. It is again anticipated that further savings to the City will be achieved.

On July 23, 2014, TRCA received authorization from the City of Toronto to commence SWMP clean-out activities at two additional ponds (Wendigo Pond and Upper & Lower Spring Creek ponds). These ponds are in High Park and the work is scheduled to commence in the fall of 2014.

RATIONALE TRCA has identified SWMPs as an integral component of water resources management within TRCA jurisdiction, as SWMPs improve water quality and provide flood and erosion control. Dredging these SWMPs will ensure they continue to provide the surrounding areas with effective flood control and water quality management. Without regular maintenance, the ponds cannot continue to provide flood control and water quality management as designed. TRCA recommends annual monitoring of SWMPs for sediment capacity and general condition, which is in keeping with MOE's guidelines for SWMPs.

The first three ponds were cleaned out because they were at capacity for sediment volume. These three ponds will become case studies and good examples of pond maintenance in TRCA’s jurisdiction.

TRCA has discussed the maintenance and management of SWMPs with various partner municipalities and agencies. It is agreed that there is an immediate need to showcase the feasibility and benefits of routine pond maintenance and the practical construction techniques. Many of the SWMPs across TRCA’s jurisdiction are now reaching their design capacities and are in need of maintenance. It is estimated that there are over 800 SWMPs within the City of Toronto, and York, Peel and Durham regions, with another 100 planned in the future to support proposed new development. This is a significant opportunity for TRCA to work with its partner municipalities to promote TRCA's programs and watershed management expertise.

The management of SWMPs is consistent with the TRCA’s Strategic Plan, specifically: priority strategy #2 manage our regional water resources for current and future generations, and strategy #7 build partnerships and new business models.

The opportunity to work with City of Toronto Water allows TRCA to promote its current pond management techniques, provides a cost effective option for our partner municipality, and advances the scientific knowledge and best management practices for SWMPs. This also provides the opportunity to target ponds that TRCA has assessed for retrofit potential to achieve higher water quality standards and flood protection. 344 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Work at Centennial Pond will be completed in fall 2014. Testing of dredgeate contaminant levels will determine the disposal option and final cost.

TRCA will commence clean-out implementation planning for two of the three High Park SWMPs (Wendigo Pond and Upper & Lower Spring Creek ponds), which are expected to be cleaned out in late 2014 and early 2015. It is recognized that High Park is a well-used area with many interested stakeholder groups, and therefore public consultation will be key in planning the SWMP clean-out activities. There is an opportunity to improve the parkette immediately north of Wendigo Pond, since this area will be the main access route to clean out the SWMP. TRCA will work with City of Toronto staff from Parks, Forestry & Recreation to determine if the parkette can be restored to a condition better than its current condition once the clean-out of Wendigo Pond is complete. Wendigo Pond is estimated to contain 1,008 cubic metres of sediment to be removed, and Upper & Lower Spring Creek ponds are estimated to contain 2,280 cubic metres of sediment to be removed.

TRCA will continue to meet biweekly with City of Toronto to plan and schedule the clean-out of SWMPs at High Park (Wendigo Pond, Upper & Lower Spring Creek Ponds and Lower Duck Pond) and L'Amoreaux Pond.

TRCA will showcase the recently dredged SWMPs (Sisters of St. Joseph, Lansing and Centennial Ponds) as case studies and make presentations to partners and industry.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The funding for the pond clean-outs is 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto, Toronto Water, within accounts 113-24 and 113-25 for Wendigo and the Spring Creek SWMPs, respectively. As with all of the SWMP clean-outs, any cost savings will be passed on to the City of Toronto for future SWMP work.

Report prepared by: Natalie Hryshko, 416-991-0658 Lauren MacNeil, extension 5383 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] For Information contact: Ralph Toninger, ext. 5366 Emails: [email protected] Date: July 9, 2013

______

RES.#A143/14 - PORTSIDE DEVELOPMENTS (KIPLING) INC. Authorization for party status and to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board on referrals related to an Official Plan Amendment application and a Zoning By-Law Amendment application to permit the development of a proposed 7-storey apartment building (condominium) on a property municipally known as 7476 Kipling Avenue, described as being Part of Lot 4, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan.

345 Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to request party status before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and to appear on behalf of TRCA in an appeal of an Official Plan Amendment application, and a Zoning By-Law Amendment application on lands on the west side of Kipling Avenue, south of Highway #7, municipally known as 7476 Kipling Avenue, in the City of Vaughan (File Nos. OP.13.003 and Z.13.005);

THAT the OMB be advised that TRCA has outstanding issues relating to the Official Plan Amendment application and Zoning By-Law Amendment application;

THAT staff be directed to work cooperatively with City of Vaughan, the appellant and other parties to ensure that the requirements of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) and Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) are met;

THAT staff be authorized to retain legal counsel to pursue this appeal before the OMB, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT the OMB and all parties and participants to the hearing be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND Description of the Applications The proponent submitted applications to amend the Official Plan (OP) and the Zoning By-Law of the Vaughan Planning Area to facilitate the development of a 7-storey apartment building (128 units) and 177 parking spaces (Condominium) on the subject lands. These applications were initially received by TRCA on April 22, 2013. The applications have since been revised on May 30, 2014.

The subject lands are currently designated ‘Low Rise Residential’ as per OPA #240 Section 3.2(h), which permits only single family dwellings. The lands are designated as ‘Low Rise Residential’, in the new Vaughan Official Plan (VOP) (2010), which was adopted by Vaughan Council on September 7, 2010 (as modified on September 27, March 20, 2012 and April, 2012) as further modified and endorsed by Region of York Council on June 28, 2012. The VOP 2010 is before the Ontario Municipal Board and most of it has been approved and is in effect.

Zoning By-Law 1-88 of the City of Vaughan zones the property as PB1 Parkway Belt 1, although the lands have been deleted from the Parkway Belt West Plan.

TRCA staff submitted written comments on the applications to the City and the proponent on June 10, 2013. TRCA comments were provided based on staff review of submitted technical documents. In addition, TRCA staff participated in a pre-consultation process with the applicant along with their consulting team. A site walk was conducted on June 19, 2012. At that time, the applicant and their consultants were informed of TRCA policies which would affect the redevelopment potential of the subject property.

346 Description of the Area The subject parcel is 1.38 ha (3.41 ac) in total area and is located on the west side of Kipling Avenue and south of Regional Road 7. The property contains a relatively steep and high/deep slope which forms the valley wall of the Rainbow/Robinson Creek valley corridor. Rainbow/Robinson Creek is a tributary to the Main Humber River and has been identified as redside dace habitat by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). This valley corridor is regulated by TRCA under Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, (Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses). Permits are required from TRCA for works within the Regulated Area including for site grading and development of the subject proposal.

This reach of the creek is generally covered with mature, forested and vegetated areas that extend up both sides of the valley and onto the adjacent tableland areas. The valley area and the mature forested tableland areas, are of high ecological value. These valley slopes along with the vegetated area surround and form part of the subject lands including the north, western and southern sides, while Kipling Avenue is located immediately east of the property.

In addition, it is noted that the subject lands are partially designated as Core Features under the City of Vaughan’s Natural Heritage Network in the VOP 2010 (Attachment 2). The woodlot identified on the subject site (which is also contiguous with the valley system) is also within the Regional Greenlands System within the York Region Official Plan.

RATIONALE Based on the materials and proposal before it, City of Vaughan Planning staff prepared a report to the Committee of the Whole of the City of Vaughan recommending refusal of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment applications (June 17, 2014). The report raised concerns with respect to issues of conformity with the Vaughan Official Plan, the Regional Municipality of York Official Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Growth Plan. It was noted that the proposal, when considered comprehensively in context with the existing low density residential community and the planned vision for the area, did not represent good planning. In addition, it was felt that the proposed development did not respect the local area and did not appropriately contribute to the existing community. The applications were not supported by staff or Council.

In addition to the recommendation to refuse the applications by City of Vaughan planning staff, Region of York staff do not support the applications as proposed. The proposed development was noted as being incompatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and did not represent appropriate development of the subject lands since the scale of the development proposed is not consistent or compatible with the existing community or the planned development envisaged by OPA #240.

On March 5, 2013, the applicant appealed Volume 1 and 2 of the VOP 2010 on the basis that no decision was made on the OP within 180 days as outlined in the Planning Act. The applicant appealed the policies that apply to the subject lands as they do not permit ‘Mid-Rise Residential’, the form of development proposed on the property.

347 On July 29, 2013 and September 12, 2013, the owner appealed the Zoning By-Law and Official Plan Amendment applications, respectively, to the OMB, citing that the City of Vaughan failed to make a decision on the applications within the timeframes prescribed by the Planning Act. Subsequent to this, an OMB Pre-hearing was held on March 27, 2014, with a second Pre-hearing conference scheduled for October 6, 2014, at which time an OMB hearing is expected to be scheduled. A hearing is expected to be scheduled for December 2014 or January 2015.

TRCA does not have a record of receiving the original notice of the appeal nor scheduled OMB Pre-hearing conference and thus, only became aware of the matter in May 2014.

TRCA Issues Based on staff review of the proponent’s submission including the most recent revisions, there are generally five outstanding issues relating to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications:

(1) Development Limits The limits of the natural features on the property including the physical top of bank and dripline of significant vegetation contiguous with the valley corridor have not been identified by TRCA staff nor delineated for the subject applications. Thus far, the applicant has provided conceptual site plans illustrating development and natural feature limits unilaterally established by the applicant and their consulting team. This requirement for a formal site walk to identify and establish the feature limit was conveyed at the pre-consultation/informal site walk on June 19, 2012 and in TRCA correspondence of June 10, 2013. In addition, the Long Term Stable Top of Bank needs to be incorporated in the development limit finalization and an appropriate development block confirmed. At this time, the proposed development encroaches upon several natural features including a woodlot contiguous with the valley corridor.

(2) Environmental Impact Study The applicant has submitted an Environmental Impact Study, which has been reviewed by TRCA technical staff. Several deficiencies have been identified; however, these issues have not been satisfactorily addressed: i) Encroachment of the development in the woodland on the property and into the valley corridor. ii) No analysis on the significance of this woodland and/or demonstrating that there will be minimal impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions. iii) No analysis of the loss of function of the existing feature.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff will continue to work with the proponent and the City of Vaughan to find an amenable resolution to this matter in order to avoid a full OMB hearing. It is hoped given the nature of our comments, the proposal can be revised sufficiently in order to comply with the PPS, its associated natural hazard policies and TRCA’s natural heritage policies and stormwater management criteria.

Should a resolution not be reached between the parties, TRCA staff is also requesting the authorization of the Authority to attend the OMB hearing to ensure that TRCA interests are protected and addressed. 348 Staff has been in contact with legal counsel regarding this file and will continue to engage their services as needed as this matter progresses. Should legal counsel be required for the hearing, staff will coordinate with other parties to ensure TRCA’s presence at the hearing is shortened and legal costs are minimized.

Report prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Emails: [email protected] Date: August 18, 2014 Attachments: 2

349 Attachment 1

350 Attachment 2

______

351 RES.#A144/14 - AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Request for Tender #10000070 - Stone Material. Award of Contract #10000070 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,775 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne armourstone, in support of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project, City of Pickering, Region of Durham.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Contract #10000070 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,775 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne armour stone to the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project, in the City of Pickering, be awarded to C.D.R Young's Aggregates Inc. for a total unit price of $63.50 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $239,712.50, plus a contingency amount of 20% to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT should staff be unable to achieve an acceptable contract with the awarded supplier, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other suppliers that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest compliant bidder;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2012 TRCA assumed the leadership role, in partnership with the City of Pickering, to undertake the planning, detailed design and approvals for the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project Class Environmental Assessment (EA). In May of 2014, TRCA was hired by the City of Pickering to undertake the implementation of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project, including the project management and construction or the proposed works. The purpose of this project is to minimize risk to life and property as a result of slope and channel erosion, while protection and restoring the natural attributes of Amberlea Creek.

Various aggregate materials will be required to complete the construction of the erosion control works including armourstone which will be used in the construction of:  an energy dissipation system that receives flows from a Region of Durham stormwater culvert that outlets into Amberlea Creek (located south of Bayly Street);  stabilization works for the stormwater culvert;  four buried armour stone walls;  abutment protection work for a pedestrian bridge that crosses Amberlea Creek; and,  temporary abutments to allow for crossing of Amberlea Creek during construction.

RATIONALE The Request for Tender for Contract #10000070 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo(http://www.biddingo.com/) on Wednesday, August 27, 2014. Bid invitations were also sent to:

352  Bot Aggregates Ltd.;  C.D.R. Young's Aggregates Inc.;  Dufferin Aggregates;  Glenn Windrem Trucking / 103477 Ontario Ltd.;  James Dick Construction Ltd.;  Miller Paving Ltd.;  Natural Stone Source Ontario;  Nelson Aggregates Co.; and,  Strada Aggregates.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the tenders on Friday, September 5, 2014 with the following results:

Contract #10000070 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,775 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne of armour stone BIDDERS TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF PER TONNE CONTRACT (Plus HST) (Plus HST) C.D.R. Young's Aggregates Inc. $63.50 $239,712.50 Dufferin Aggregates n/a No Bid Glenn Windrem Trucking / 1035477 Ontario Ltd. $65.00 $245,375.00 James Dick Construction Ltd. n/a No Bid Nelson Aggregates Co. n/a No Bid Strada Aggregates n/a No Bid

Based on the bids received, staff recommends that C.D.R. Young's Aggregates Inc. be awarded Contract #10000070 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,775 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne armourstone for the unit cost of $63.50 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed $239,712.50, plus HST, plus a contingency of 20% to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA staff cost estimates and specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the construction of the Amberlea Creek Erosion Control Project are 100% recoverable from the City of Pickering, further to the Memorandum of Understanding.

Report prepared by: Natalie Seniuk, extension 5655 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Natalie Seniuk, extension 5655 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 8, 2014

______

353 RES.#A145/14 - AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program and Mentoring to Placement for Environmental Professionals Program. The PAIE and M2P audited financial statements for the period April 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014 (PAIE) and April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014 (M2P) are presented for Authority approval.

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT the Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program (PAIE) and Mentoring to Placement Program (M2P) audited financial statements as presented, be approved and signed by the Chair in accordance with the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration Bridging Projects - Project Audit Guidelines. CARRIED BACKGROUND Funded by the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration (MCI), TRCA has been delivering the PAIE and M2P Ontario bridge training programs since 2006 to assist internationally trained professionals to access training, licensing and employment opportunities in their field within the environmental sector. As part of its project audit guidelines, MCI requires Authority approval of PAIE and M2P financial statements, as attached, as verification that the financial information in the audit reports are complete and accurate.

The accounting firm of Grant Thornton LLP, has completed its audits. The audited financial statements are presented as Attachments 1 and 2 (PAIE), 3 and 4 (M2P).

RATIONALE The approval of the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures attests to the following:  project funding has been solely applied to costs directly related to the project;  funding and/or expenditures from other sources, not directly related to this project, have not been included in the report;  reported expenditure is net of HST rebates;  shared costs have been properly apportioned to the project;  the project bears full responsibility for absorbing any project deficits;  project funds that were provided to the project prior to their immediate need were maintained in an interest-bearing account; and  interest earned on project funding has been credited to the project.

The Authority is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities for financial reporting and is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the financial statements.

Report prepared by: Leigha Abergel, extension 5343 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 Emails: [email protected] Date: August 27, 2014 Attachments: 4 354 Attachment 1

355 356 357 358 359 360 361 Attachment 2

362 Attachment 3

363 364 365 366 367 368 369 Attachment 4

______

370 RES.#A146/14 - OAK RIDGES CORRIDOR CONSERVATION RESERVE MULTI-USE TRAIL PHASE 2 Contract RSD14-131 - Nature Trail Construction. Award of Contract RSD14-131 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary to construct a nature trail in the Town of Richmond Hill.

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Contract RSD14-131 for the supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary to construct a nature trail in the Town of Richmond Hill be awarded to TBG Landscape Inc. for the total cost not to exceed $257,464.85, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 20% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve East is a 175 hectare conservation property located in the Town of Richmond Hill and owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Infrastructure Ontario. In 2011, TRCA completed the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan, which recommends the construction of a granular surface recreational spine trail through the property.

The recreational trail will be a 5.5 kilometre long linear section of new pedestrian and cycling trail infrastructure, located on scenic TRCA lands within the Town of Richmond Hill, and ideally situated to provide connection opportunities with inter-regional, regional, commuter and local trail networks. The trail represents a key piece of trail infrastructure in helping to achieve many of the trail planning and sustainable transportation objectives of the Regional Municipality of York, the Town of Richmond Hill, TRCA and the Oak Ridges Trail Association.

The construction of this trail will be implemented in four phases. Construction of Phase 1 was completed in the spring of 2014, at which time TRCA staff retained Sustainable Trails Ltd. to complete the detailed design for Phase 2 of the project. Phase 2 on the trail construction consists of a section of trail approximately 1.3 kilometres in length that traverses hilly, forested and environmentally sensitive terrain. The desired trail will be 3.0 metres in width and will have a granular surface.

371 TRCA now requires the services of a qualified contractor to carry out construction of the proposed trail which will include the installation of a 1.3 kilometre long granular trail, installation of an Envirolok retaining and the installation of four HDPE culverts. Construction will is scheduled to begin in October 2014.

RATIONALE Tender RSD14-131 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo( http://www.biddingo.com/) on Monday, August 25, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Wednesday, September 3, 2014. Tender packages were sent to 20 contractors as follows:  Ashland Paving Ltd.;  Blackstone Paving and Construction;  Bond Paving and Construction;  BOT Aggregates;  Esposito Bros Construction ltd.;  Hawkins Contracting;  Lomco;  McPherson-Andrews Contracting;  Melrose Paving;  Mopal Construction;  Pacific Paving ltd.;  RoyalCrest;  Serve Construction;  Speedside Construction ltd.;  Sustainable Trails;  TBG Landscape Inc.  Techno Metal Post;  Trisan Construction;  Trison Construction; and  Vertical Horizons Contracting ltd.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the tenders on Thursday, September 11, 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-131 Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Multi-Use Trail Phase 2 Nature Trail Construction

TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT BIDDERS (Plus HST) TBG Landscape Inc. $257,464.85 Esposito Bros Construction Ltd. $589,286.28

Eighteen contractors declined the opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the timelines and specifications stated in the contract documents.

372 The variance between the low and high bid is a result of each bidder's experience and specialization with the proposed work. Esposito Bros Construction Ltd. is a large corporation with high overhead that cannot compete with smaller companies that specialize in this line of work.

Staff reviewed the bid received from TBG Landscape Inc. against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of TBG Landscape Inc. experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that TBG Landscape Inc. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the evaluation of the bids received, staff recommend that TBG Landscape Inc. be awarded Contract RSD14-131 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary to construct a nature trail in the Town of Richmond Hill for a total amount not to exceed $257,464.85 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 20% contingency, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is available from the Regional Municipality of York through the Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership Program, the Town of Richmond Hill through funding committed for implementation of the Trail Plan for Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve East, and the Region of York Land Care Budget (account code 442-22).

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 09, 2014 ______

RES.#A147/14 - ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA ROADWAY BASE WORK Contract RSD14-141 Extension. Authorization to increase the approved value of Contract RSD14-141 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for roadway base repairs at Albion Hills Conservation Area in the Town of Caledon.

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT Contract RSD14-141 awarded to Diamond Earthworks Corporation Limited for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for 5,000 square metres of roadway base repairs at Albion Hills Conservation Area in the Town of Caledon be increased by 3,000 square metres at a cost of $50,582.92, for a revised total cost of $140,479.67, to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST. CARRIED 373 BACKGROUND The current roadway at Albion Hills Conservation Area (AHCA) is far past its life expectancy. Over time, the elements and traffic have caused several areas of the primary road network to deteriorate to the point that replacement is necessary to ensure the safety of users.

th Contract RSD14-141 received approval of TRCA's Chief Executive Officer on September 5 , 2014. The original scope of work for Contract RSD14-141 included roadway base repairs for approximately 5,000 square metres with drainage. The scope of work has now been increased to include an additional 3,000 square metres of roadway base repairs with drainage. The original scope of work was limited due to budget restrictions as staff estimates were higher than the rates provided within the tender bid. Therefore given the low unit rates provided by Diamond Earthworks Corporation Limited, TRCA is now able to expand the scope of work for Contract 14-141. The additional roadway construction will be completed along the 500 linear metre roadway leading to the Albion Hills Field Centre. The work will include scarification, re-grading, new granular installation and compacting the granular base to 98% Standard Proctor Density, with testing completed by Terraprobe.

The additional roadway repairs will ensure that AHCA roads are meeting the required safety regulations. TRCA staff, therefore, propose to retain Diamond Earthworks Corporation Limited for additional roadway base repairs along the 500 linear metre roadway leading to the Albion Hills Field Centre.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number four in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through new development and redevelopment TRCA will achieve a more sustainable balance and integration of natural and built elements.

The Town of Caledon committed to coordinate and pave the entire 8,000 square metre section of roadway within AHCA. Given the deteriorated state of the roadways within AHCA, paving will be a necessity to ensure the safety of the roads. Therefore TRCA staff has proposed to complete as much of the roadway base repairs as possible in 2014 in order to take advantage of the partnership with Town of Caledon.

The costs associated with Diamond Earthworks Corporation Limited to complete the additional roadway construction are based on the unit rates provided within Contract RSD14-141. Retaining Diamond Earthwork Corporation Limited will cut the costs of mobilization and demobilization and TRCA staff costs of procuring a new contract. The extra work will fall under the same terms and conditions as prescribed in Contract RSD14-141.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Upon Authority approval a Change Order will be issued to Diamond Earthworks Corporation Limited for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for additional roadway base repairs at Albion Hills Conservation Area in the Town of Caledon.

Funds to complete the original contract are provided by Peel Region in the Peel Campground capital budget 420-63.

374 Funds to complete the additional work are provided by Peel Region in the Peel Climate Change Mitigation capital budget 2014.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 17, 2014 ______

RES.#A148/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed Tensilkote Limited (Pleasure Valley), CFN 32424. Acquisition of a partial taking from a property located to the east of Brock Road and south of Albright Road in the Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham under the Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B77/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Deb Schulte

THAT 24.252 hectares (59.93 acres), more or less, of vacant lands, being Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 5, Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham, be purchased from Tensilkote Limited (Pleasure Valley);

THAT the purchase price be $646,388.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a lease for a term of up to 11 years for the paths and trails on the subject property, subject to Tensilkote Limited (Pleasure Valley) paying market rent for the term of the lease and terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and solicitors;

THAT acquisition by TRCA is conditional on the availability of all necessary funding;

THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction and all reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing and for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______375 RES.#A149/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Milne Property, CFN 50632. Donation of a parcel of land located east of Innis Lake Road, south of Old Church Road, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B78/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

WHEREAS Lorna Ann Milne wishes to donate 20.21 hectares (49.94 acres), more or less, of vacant ecologically sensitive lands;

AND WHEREAS The Living City Foundation will accept this donation and issue an income tax receipt to Lorna Ann Milne for the final appraised value, in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and Revenue Agency and terms of reference as required by the Ecological Gifts Program;

AND WHEREAS donations of assets to The Living City Foundation in support of a Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) managed project may be transferred to TRCA;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA accept title to the lands donated by Lorna Ann Milne to The Living City Foundation, situated to the east of Innis Lake Road and south of Old Church Road, said land being Part of Lot 19, Concession 2 ALBION, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel;

THAT TRCA shall be responsible for appraisal, environmental audit and reasonable legal fees associated with completion of the transaction;

THAT TRCA extend their appreciation and thanks to Lorna Ann Milne for her generous donation;

THAT TRCA grant a conservation easement to the Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust;

THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred, by both TRCA and The Living City Foundation, incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______376 RES.#A150/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Toronto Bell Wall International Construction Ltd., CFN 51220. Acquisition of property located south of Albion Road and west of Islington Avenue, in the City of Toronto, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011 - 2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B79/14)

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT 0.083 hectares (0.204 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Concession A, City of Toronto, located to the south of Albion Road and west of Islington Avenue, in the City of Toronto, be purchased from Bell Wall International Construction Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A151/14 - MIMICO WATERFRONT LINEAR PARK Vinen Atlantic S.A., CFN 32445. Settlement of compensation for rights expropriated for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project Phase 2. (Executive Res.#B80/14)

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the settlement of compensation be completed for the expropriation from Vinen Atlantic S.A. of the following property interests required for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Phase 2:

377 a) fee simple interest in, and riparian rights, if any, associated with Part of Lots 376 and 377, Registered Plan 164, designated as Part 1 on Expropriation Plan AT2615375, City of Toronto; b) fee simple interest in, and riparian rights, if any, associated with Part of Water Lots 4 and 5 patented to John Charles Horwood on August 30, 1910, CLS 55736, in front of Lot C, Broken Concession, designated as Part 1 on Expropriation Plan AT2615848, City of Toronto; c) fee simple interest in, and riparian rights, if any, associated with Part of Water Lot 6 patented to Thomas Norman Sampson on August 25, 1910, CLS 55735, in front of Lot 7, Registered Plan M-205, designated as Part 2 on Expropriation Plan AT2615848, City of Toronto; d) fee simple interest in, and riparian rights, if any, associated with Part of Water Lots 7 and 8 patented to William J. Bowman on August 22, 1910, CLS 55734, in front of Lots 5 and 6, Registered Plan M-205, designated as Part 3 on Expropriation Plan AT2615848, City of Toronto; e) any interest, including riparian rights, in Crown land described as part of the bed of Lake Ontario in front of Lot C, Range D, Geographic Township of Etobicoke, designated as Part 1 on Expropriation Plan CA814871;

THAT the settlement of the claim by Vinen Atlantic S.A. be as follows:

1) compensation of $2,455,752 for market value of the lands expropriated, injurious affection to Vinen Atlantic S.A. remaining lands and any disturbance suffered by Vinen Atlantic S.A. less a payment of $1,255,752 was made by TRCA leaving an outstanding amount of $1,200,000 to be paid;

2) TRCA will pay Vinen Atlantic S.A. simple interest at 6% as required by the Expropriations Act on the outstanding balance of compensation from time to time;

3) TRCA will pay reasonable legal, appraisal and other costs of Vinen Atlantic S.A. in determining compensation;

4) Vinen Atlantic S.A. will transfer to TRCA, at no cost, the water lots lying to the southeast of the expropriated lands described as Parts 1, 2, and 3 on Expropriation Plan AT2615848;

THAT Vinen Atlantic S.A. provide TRCA with a full and complete release of all claims pursuant to the Expropriations Act;

THAT Chappell Bushell Stewart, Barristers and Solicitors be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incidental to completing the transaction are to be paid by TRCA;

378 THAT Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) be advised of the settlement costs and all reasonable expenses paid for under the project budget as approved by TWRC;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A152/14 - COATSWORTH CUT PROJECT Contract RSD14-112 - Channel Maintenance Dredging. Award of Contract RSD14-112 for channel maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Coatsworth Cut, Ashbridge’s Bay Park, City of Toronto. (Executive Res.#B81/14)

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Contract RSD14-112 for the channel maintenance dredging of Coatsworth Cut be awarded to Catalina Excavating Inc. for the total cost not to exceed $129,250.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT staff be authorized to spend the project contingency amount of $70,000.00, if available, to complete additional dredging to the limit of available funding of $250,000.00 from the City of Toronto;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A153/14 - BLUFFER’S PARK PROJECT Contract RSD14-123 - Channel Maintenance Dredging. Award of Contract RSD14-123 for channel maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Bluffer’s Park, in the City of Toronto. (Executive Res.#B82/14)

379 Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Contract RSD14-123 be awarded to Galcon Marine Ltd. for the channel maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Bluffer's Park, in the City of Toronto at a total cost not to exceed $394,730.00.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $98,682.50 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A154/14 - RENEWAL OF INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY CFN 23033. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for renewal of an existing installation agreement. (Executive Res.#B83/14)

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Ben Cachola

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is the owner of Part of Lot 12, Concession VI and Lot 247, Registered Plan 1842, City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS the subject lands have been previously turned over to the City of Toronto for management purposes, in accordance with the terms of an agreement dated June 14, 1961;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA concur with the City of Toronto renewing the installation agreement with the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) for a term of three years commencing January 1, 2015, be approved;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______380 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A155/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT Section II item EX8.1 - July 8, 2013 Severe Flood - Damage Restoration Work on behalf the City of Toronto, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #6/14, held on August 8, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A156/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Section II item EX8.2 - Update on Expanding Ontario's Greenbelt, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #6/14, held on August 8, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A157/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land Behind 53 Timber Valley Avenue in the Town of Richmond Hill, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #7/14, held on September 5, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A158/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT Section II item EX8.2 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land at 17 Mill Street in the City of Markham, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #7/14, held on September 5, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______381 RES.#A159/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT Section II item EX8.3 - Albion Hills Conservation Area, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #7/14, held on September 5, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A160/14 - PUBLIC RECORD Authority Resolution #A244/08, CFN 12173. Recommendation approving settlement of compensation for rights expropriated for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project - Phase 2, becomes a public record.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT the following Resolution #A244/08 approved at Authority Meeting #8/08, held on October 24, 2008, be received and become a public record:

THAT the settlement of compensation be completed for the expropriation from Josephine and Lawrence Daley of all rights, title and interest including riparian rights to access Lake Ontario in a parcel of land consisting of 0.103 hectares, (0.255 acres), more or less, being Part of Lots 154 and 155, Plan 275 and Part of Beach lying in front of Lots on Plan 275, Geographic Township of Pickering, City of Toronto and designated as Part 2, Expropriation Plan AT1706444 together with a right-of-way over Part 1 and 3 on said Plan, on the following basis:

1) payment of compensation in the amount of $740,000;

2) reimbursement for costs associated with the negotiation and completion of this settlement:

THAT Chappell Bushell Stewart, Barristers and Solicitors be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incidental to completing the transaction are to be paid by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA);

THAT Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) be advised of the settlement costs and all reasonable expenses paid for under the project budget as approved by TWRC;

382 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required, and obtain any additional approvals required. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #8/08, held on October 24, 2008, Resolution #A244/08 was approved in camera as it pertains to legal matters in which TRCA is involved. Confidential minutes were retained as a record of this item at the meeting. As a matter of policy, TRCA reports back on in camera items when they can become public so a record of the resolution appears in public minutes.

RATIONALE At the time the report was prepared, TRCA had entered into an agreement with another owner under Section 30 of the Expropriation Act to allow construction of the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project Phase 2 to commence. A Section 30 agreement allows TRCA to obtain title to the property and allows the owner to have the opportunity to arbitrate the compensation payable without going through the expropriation process. This agreement has now been settled.

Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 25, 2008

______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A161/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.10, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #6/14, held on August 8, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A162/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Ben Cachola 383 THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.9, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #7/14, held on September 5, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:14 a.m., on Friday, September 19, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

384 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #8/14

Friday, October 31, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #7/14, held on September 19, 2014 386

DRAFT ENGAGEMENT GUIDELINES 386

SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Award of Contract #10000039 - Planning and Engineering Services 401

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK 403

BLACK CREEK CHANNEL Contract RSD14-146 - Disposal of Stockpiled Soils 405

BLACK CREEK CHANNEL Contract RSD14-160 – Concrete Channel Repairs 407

MUD CREEK REACH 2 RESTORATION PROJECT Contract #10000122 – Creek Bypass Pumping System Works 410

COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH PARK Contract #10000116 - Lookout Structure 412

2015 BUDGET UPDATE Update on the status of the 2015 TRCA budget process (Budget/Audit Res.#C10/14) 415

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain Conservation Component/Mimico Creek Watershed Etobicoke District, City of Toronto, Queenscorp Group 415

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed Whitshed Limited 416 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Request for Conveyance of Lands for Required Highway 427 Extension 417

AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Request for Tender #10000077 - Aggregate 419

AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Contract #10000114 for Engineering Services 419

GOOD NEWS STORIES 419

IN THE NEWS 424

PUBLIC RECORD Authority Resolution #A185/10 430 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #8/14 October 31, 2014

The Authority Meeting #8/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, October 31, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:52 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Vice Chair David Barrow Member Ben Cachola Member Ronald Chopowick Member Vincent Crisanti Member Michael Di Biase Member Jack Heath Member Colleen Jordan Member Mujeeb Khan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Ron Moeser Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Jim Tovey Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Paul Ainslie Member Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Chris Fonseca Member John Parker Member Dave Ryan Member Cynthia Thorburn Member

385 RES.#A163/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/14, held on September 19, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A164/14 - DRAFT ENGAGEMENT GUIDELINES Board endorsement of TRCA's Draft Engagement Guidelines and their circulation for comment.

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Colleen Jordan

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has had a long history of building relationships with Aboriginal communities that has brought a cultural richness to its programs and projects;

AND WHEREAS TRCA Restoration Services staff and Planning and Development staff have developed a draft guideline for directing TRCA staff in their engagement with Aboriginal communities (Attachment 1);

AND WHEREAS TRCA staff would like to seek input on the draft guidelines from Anishinaabe nations, the Huron-Wendat Nation, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and Métis councils, before finalizing them for use by TRCA staff;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Authority endorse the Draft Engagement Guidelines for circulation to Anishinaabe nations, the Huron-Wendat Nation, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and Métis councils (Attachment 2 for full list);

THAT staff report back to the Authority on the input received at the end of the commenting period;

AND FURTHER THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, regional and local municipalities in TRCA's jurisdiction, Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation, Conservation Ontario and neighbouring conservation authorities be so advised. CARRIED

386 BACKGROUND Over the last several decades, TRCA has developed important relationships with Aboriginal people (referred to within the Guidelines as nations, confederacies and councils), seeking and incorporating their input into TRCA projects and processes. While early engagement was informal, Constitutional amendments and Supreme Court of Canada decisions beginning in the 1980s set out more formal requirements for Aboriginal engagement. This case law underscores that Aboriginal people have a special relationship with the Crown that makes engagement an essential component of Crown decisions where there is potential to impact Aboriginal or treaty rights and interests. While parties that are not the Crown, such as conservation authorities, do not owe the Crown’s duty to consult, they do have the responsibility to undertake “procedural 1 aspects of consultation” , that may be delegated by the Crown. TRCA staff's experience has shown that meaningful and respectful engagement is key to successful projects. The TRCA Draft Engagement Guidelines provide guidance for TRCA staff about when and how to engage with Aboriginal people.

The following summarizes the history of TRCA’s engagement with Aboriginal people as background to TRCA’s Draft Engagement Guidelines.

Early Relationships: 1970s TRCA’s earliest known relationships with Aboriginal people began in the 1970s and were not triggered by direction from the federal or provincial governments. The relevant legislation during the 1970s and 1980s, such as the Environmental Assessment Act, the Planning Act and the Ontario Heritage Act, made no direct mention of Aboriginal people. Early relationships between TRCA and Aboriginal people stem from a shared interest in safeguarding ancestral archaeological sites, artifacts and burials. Specifically, TRCA staff routinely collaborate with descendant communities for the Boyd Archaeological Field School and have done so for more than 35 years. This has been done by inviting guest speakers on contemporary issues and traditional teachings of the different nations, hosting visits by elders and chiefs to the Seed-Barker site, and traditional ceremonies.

Evolving Relationships: 1980s - 2004 Legal developments in the 1980s caused Ontario to begin to articulate Aboriginal engagement requirements. Key milestones include: the repatriation of and amendment to the Canadian 2 Constitution in 1982 that recognized and affirmed Aboriginal rights , and Supreme Court of Canada decisions that interpreted the constitutional protections in light of the Crown’s fiduciary 3 relationship to Aboriginal people .

At this time, the Province of Ontario began to introduce stronger provincial mandates to address Aboriginal interests. Some key changes include:  In 1985, Ontario established the Office of Native Affairs Policy, renamed the Native Affairs Directorate in 1987 and Ontario Native Affairs Secretariat in 1990, indicating growing provincial attention to Aboriginal people's concerns.

387  In 1996 revisions to the Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.O 1990 mandated that the proponent consult with all interested persons when preparing an environmental assessment, and many proponents began to include Aboriginal communities on their notification lists. Engagement with Aboriginal people tended to be limited to notifications about projects, and TRCA met this standard.  While the Ontario Heritage Act remained silent on engaging with descendant communities, archaeologists in general, and TRCA in particular, pushed forward with stronger engagement practices.  TRCA archaeology’s internal guidelines were created during this time, and although silent on engagement, the document advocates for the preservation of Aboriginal heritage.  TRCA continued to collaborate informally with Aboriginal communities about the Boyd Archaeological Field School.

Due to evolving law and policy during the early 2000s, TRCA’s relationships with a number of communities were challenging. This was especially true when addressing Aboriginal concerns and interests in ancestral archaeological sites and artifacts. As there was little direction from provincial ministries at the time regarding engagement practices, TRCA compiled a list of Aboriginal communities with interest in TRCA’s jurisdiction including: the Mississaugas of the New Credit, the Huron-Wendat, Six Nations of the Grand River, the Williams Treaty First Nations and the Metis Nation of Ontario. TRCA began to engage in a dialogue with these communities that set the framework for future engagement processes.

Expectations Introduced: 2004 - 2010 4 The Supreme Court introduced the “Duty to Consult” with its trilogy of cases in 2004 and 2005. In 2007, the Ontario government established the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs to replace the Secretariat, “reflecting the importance of developing a stronger, broader partnership with 5 Aboriginal people in Ontario.” Ontario further developed its policy with the following key changes:  In 2006, Ontario introduced its “Draft Guidelines for Ministries on Consultation with 6 Aboriginal Peoples related to Aboriginal Rights and Treaty Rights”.  In 2007, the Ministry of the Environment Code of Practice for Consultation in Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Process included some guidance on Aboriginal consultation.  In 2007, the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment recognized “First Nations and Aboriginal Peoples are an important stakeholder group” but provided little guidance about what this meant in practice.  In 2009, Conservation Ontario’s Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects was amended to include Aboriginal engagement requirements.

388 As noted in the above documents, engagement requires discussions with a view to addressing Aboriginal people’s concerns. Meaningful engagement leads to positive and respectful relationships between the third party proponent and Aboriginal communities. TRCA has worked hard to build mutually respectful relationships with the Aboriginal communities who have an interest in TRCA’s jurisdiction.

During this period, TRCA made a concerted effort to involve Aboriginal communities in their environmental assessment and archaeological processes, including:  Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project Environmental Assessment (DMNP EA).  Royal Rouge Trail Erosion Control Project EA.  In 2007, the TRCA archaeology internal guidelines were revised to include the requirement for meaningful Aboriginal engagement.

Expectations Clarified: 2010 - present In the last five years, progress has been made towards greater detail in provincial policy regarding engagement with Aboriginal communities, including:  In 2013, the Ministry of the Environment amended the Conservation Ontario Class EA document to delegate the procedural aspects of rights-based Aboriginal consultation to proponents.  The Code of Practice, Consultation in Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Process, 2014 provides greater detail to proponents engaging Aboriginal people.  The new Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (MTCS 2011), and the accompanying Aboriginal Engagement Bulletin (MTCS 2011), sets out licence requirements for engaging with descendant communities.  TRCA hires Aboriginal archaeological monitors for archaeology projects that require such services, and where requested.  The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS 2014) for the first time acknowledges Aboriginal people, and the importance of consulting with Aboriginal communities on planning matters that may affect their rights and interests.

During this time, TRCA created a point person from the archaeology unit through which all of TRCA’s communications with Aboriginal communities is coordinated. Additionally, TRCA has continued to conduct in depth and mutually respectful engagement for projects subject to legislation requiring engagement (e.g. Environmental Assessments), such as:  East Don Trail Environmental Assessment;  Lakeview Waterfront Connection Environmental Assessment;  Ashbridges Bay Environmental Assessment.

Furthermore, TRCA has made a concerted effort to seek involvement from Aboriginal communities on projects that do not legally require engagement, but where common goals or shared interests might be present. For example:  Management plans such as the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan, where communities participated in the development of recommendations for the conservation lands related to habitat restoration and cultural heritage protection.

389  Special projects such as the creation of the Heart Lake Medicine Wheel Garden, where Aboriginal community members and TRCA staff collaborated to plant the garden and organize the opening ceremony.  Education projects such as the Boyd Archaeological Field School, where Aboriginal community members conducted lecture programs, ceremonies and site visits.

Current Highlights  TRCA staff have been contributing to municipal and regional consultation documents,  Example: the City of Toronto engagement guidelines for environmental assessments.  TRCA staff have been involved in working groups and committees regarding the creation of municipal and regional consultation documents,  Example: York Region Official Plan and Archaeological Management Plan, and consultation protocol.  Staff have been developing partnerships and initiatives with municipalities, such as the "Shared Path" in Toronto. Currently a similar project is being envisioned for Vaughan.  Staff have been meeting with nations, confederacies and councils with an interest, or with established or asserted rights, in TRCA’s jurisdiction.  Staff circulated TRCA’s Draft Living City Policies to Aboriginal communities.  TRCA continues to encourage staff development, including attendance at conferences and meetings, and attending roundtables about Aboriginal engagement.

RATIONALE The Supreme Court of Canada has determined that the provincial and federal governments (“the Crown”) and its agents owe a duty to consult Aboriginal peoples when contemplating conduct that may adversely affect existing or asserted Aboriginal or treaty rights. While third parties such as TRCA do not have this duty, the Crown may delegate procedural aspects of consultation to them through legislation or other means. As a result, TRCA conducts engagement for projects where and as delegated by legislation or other clear means.

TRCA is responsible for managing the engagement process for projects for which TRCA is the proponent. The TRCA department that currently carries out the engagement procedures is the Archaeology Resource Management Services department. The following is a list of legislation and related documents that may trigger engagement for TRCA Projects:  Environmental Assessment Act;  Conservation Ontario Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects (Conservation Ontario, January 2002) as amended (CO Class EA);  Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) or the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) may trigger engagement if delegated by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change;  Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002;  Ontario Heritage Act, 1990.

390 The Draft Engagement Guidelines were developed to address the growing need for the formalization of TRCA’s engagement processes. The guidelines provide TRCA with direction about when and how to engage with Aboriginal communities during TRCA projects. The Guidelines focus on the legal requirements of engagement; however, they do not preclude TRCA from working with nations, confederacies and councils on other initiatives where they share common ground and goals. The document contains information about when TRCA is required by law to conduct engagement. Further, they provide direction about determining who should be engaged, how to initiate engagement, and the extent of engagement required for any given project. The document also includes information about what to do in emergency situations, and how to address disputes that might arise during the course of the engagement process.

The Draft Engagement Guidelines were authored based on knowledge informed by municipal and regional documents, as well as TRCA’s in-house processes. These Guidelines were written under the guidance and advice of legal counsel to ensure compliance with the relevant legislation and case law. TRCA has also been working with relevant provincial ministries to capture the evolving requirements and processes of engagement and to analyze new information as it becomes available. This was especially important to ensure that TRCA practices are reflective of current provincial approaches and interpretations. In particular, TRCA has sought guidance from the relevant provincial ministries to clarify the roles and responsibilities of conservation authorities during the engagement process.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In the short term, it is recommended that these Draft Engagement Guidelines be endorsed by the Authority in draft format for circulation to aboriginal communities for comment. After taking any feedback received into consideration and making any necessary revisions to the draft guidelines, staff will report back to the Authority with a summary of these outcomes. In addition, TRCA must continue to seek guidance from provincial ministries as new information becomes available in order to ensure TRCA’s practices comply with provincial approaches and provincial and federal case law. Moving forward, TRCA is looking to develop an operational manual for staff who will be using the Engagement Guidelines that will provide detail about the processes and procedures of engagement for varying types of TRCA projects.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The Draft Engagement Guidelines reflect the current practices of TRCA when it engages with Aboriginal communities. In current practice, for projects where engagement occurs, the associated costs of TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services department must be incorporated into each project’s budget, to be determined in discussion with TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services. TRCA will not pay application fees to aboriginal communities for engagement. However, under special circumstances, TRCA may cover (depending on available funding) modest, ordinary expenses such as travel and meals.

Report prepared by: Amanda Parks, extension 6417, Margie Kenedy, extension 5270 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 01, 2014 Attachments: 3 391 Attachment 1 DRAFT ENGAGEMENT GUIDELINES (DRAFT – August 2014)

INTRODUCTION

The following are Guidelines for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) when it engages with Anishinaabe, Haudenosaunee and Huron-Wendat nations, and Métis councils about TRCA projects.

The Supreme Court of Canada has determined that the provincial and federal government (“the Crown”) and its agents owe a duty to consult Aboriginal peoples when it contemplates conduct that may adversely affect existing or asserted Aboriginal or treaty rights. While third parties such as TRCA do not have this duty, the Crown may delegate procedural aspects of consultation to them through legislation or other means.

TRCA conducts engagement for projects where and as delegated by legislation or other clear means. Where TRCA is unsure if engagement has been triggered for a project, TRCA will attempt to obtain clarification from the Crown about any roles and responsibilities that may be delegated to TRCA.

TRCA is responsible for managing the engagement process for projects for which TRCA is the proponent. The TRCA department that currently carries out the engagement procedures is the Archaeology Resource Management Services department. For a glossary of terms, see Appendix A.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

TRCA’s aim is to develop a positive relationship with nations, confederacies, and councils that have established or asserted rights that may be impacted by TRCA Projects, through a process of meaningful, mutually respectful engagement. There is no single way to conduct meaningful engagement. The process of engagement will vary depending on the project’s impacts and the level of interest indicated by nations, confederacies, and councils.

The engagement and commenting process must take place within the legislated timelines, described by the relevant legislation (e.g. Environmental Assessment Act).

These Guidelines do not preclude TRCA from working with nations, confederacies, and councils on other TRCA initiatives where they share common ground and goals such as educational programming, management/master plans, and property stewardship initiatives.

These Guidelines are not intended to alter the legal obligations of TRCA or nations, confederacies, and councils. TRCA will engage with nations, confederacies, and councils in accordance with these Guidelines, but must ensure that the engagement process meets the minimum standards set out in the relevant legislation.

392 WHEN TRCA IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO ENGAGE

TRCA carries out engagement for TRCA Projects that are subject to legislation requiring engagement.

The following is a list of legislation and related documents that may trigger engagement for TRCA Projects.

 Environmental Assessment (EA) Act  Conservation Ontario Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects (Conservation Ontario, January 2002) as amended (CO Class EA)  Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) or Environmental Protection Act (EPA) may trigger engagement if delegated by the Ministry of Environment  Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002  Ontario Heritage Act (1990)

WHEN TRCA MAY CONDUCT ENGAGEMENT ON BEHALF OF THIRD PARTIES

When a third party’s project or undertaking on TRCA-owned land triggers engagement, or when a third party employs TRCA as a consultant not on TRCA-owned land, TRCA may conduct engagement on behalf of the third party if agreed to in writing prior to the start of the project.

The parties will agree to roles and responsibilities for TRCA and the third party when conducting engagement. TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services may lead the engagement or assist the third party proponent with the process, if and as agreed. However, the third party proponent and the Crown will retain their respective responsibilities to ensure that the duty to consult is fulfilled.

Table 1 sets out some examples for determining when TRCA is the lead on engagement.

393 Table 1: Examples for Determining Engagement Lead

PROPONENT Trigger for Legislation Provincial/Federal Engagement TRCA Municipality Governments EA Act/ CO Environmental TRCA TBD at project TBD at project onset Class EA Assessment onset OWRA/ EPA Discharge or TRCA, if TBD at project TBD at project onset water taking requested by onset requiring Ministry of provincial Environment approval (ECA or PTTW) Funeral, Burial Identification of TRCA TBD at project TBD at project onset and Cremation ancestral human onset Services Act remains

Occasionally, TRCA may also be asked to take the lead on engagement when there are works by a municipality or a developer on TRCA-owned land that triggers engagement, or when one of TRCA’s projects requires a Planning Act application and the municipality requests that TRCA conduct the engagement.

THE PROCESS OF ENGAGEMENT

DETERMINING WHICH NATIONS, CONFEDERACIES, AND COUCNILS SHOULD BE ENGAGED TRCA will determine which nations, confederacies, and councils should be contacted based on understandings of:

 Traditional territories  Aboriginal and Treaty rights (established or asserted)  Potential impact of the project on Aboriginal and Treaty rights  Additional information provided by the Crown

TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services will identify the nations, confederacies, and councils that may be affected by the project, and seek confirmation from the provincial Ministry or federal department responsible for the regulatory approval required for the undertaking. TRCA will contact the Ontario Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (MAA) and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) prior to the start of a project for advice as to which communities may have an interest in a project. These government agencies can also provide up-to-date information related to land claims and specific treaties.

394 GIVING NOTICE Prior to the commencement of a TRCA project, TRCA will give notice to nations, confederacies, and councils about the project as required by the relevant legislation. The notification will provide sufficient information for communities to assess a project’s potential impact on their Aboriginal and/or treaty rights. The notification will also ask nations, confederacies, and councils to inform TRCA in writing whether or not a project will impact their Aboriginal and/or treaty rights, and in what ways.

TRCA will give initial notice by mail, personal delivery, or email, as requested. If the nations, confederacies, and councils do not respond, TRCA may follow up to ensure that the original correspondence was received.

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST If a nation, confederacy, or council expresses interest in a project, TRCA and the leadership or designated contact of the nation, confederacy, or council may meet to discuss the project, identify issues related to the impact on the Aboriginal and treaty rights, and discuss potential mitigation measures that may address the concerns expressed and impacts identified. In general, communication will begin in writing, and discussions may lead to phone conversations and/or in-person meetings when required.

Where an interested nation, confederacy, or council raises objections and then declines to participate, TRCA will seek advice from the Provincial or Federal government as appropriate. TRCA will continue to plan and implement the project consistent with legal requirements while continuing efforts to obtain input from the nation, confederacy, or council. TRCA will consider using a neutral third party to re-start discussions.

EXTENT OF ENGAGEMENT Appropriate engagement will vary depending on the context. In most cases, engagement will include:  Providing information about the project in a timely way,  Seeking input on impacts of the project,  Considering the input, and  Designing appropriate, reasonable and cost effective mitigation of potential impacts.

TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services will determine the extent of engagement for the project in consultation with TRCA staff, any third party proponent, and the potentially impacted nations, confederacies, and councils.

The extent of engagement with each nation confederacy, and council will vary depending on the strength of the right or claim and the seriousness of the impact of the proposed project on the right or claim of the nation, confederacy, and council.

FUNDING For projects where engagement will occur, the associated costs of TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services department must be incorporated into each project’s budget, to be determined in discussion with TRCA’s Archaeology Resource Management Services.

395 TRCA will not pay application fees to nations, confederacies, or councils for engagement. However, under special circumstances TRCA may cover (depending on available funding) modest, ordinary expenses such as travel and meals.

EMERGENCY SITUATIONS Should a situation arise that could reasonably be considered an emergency involving danger to property or to human health or safety, TRCA may proceed to address the emergency as necessary. If an Environmental Assessment is required following the emergency works to determine a long term solution, engagement will occur as required by the Environmental Assessment Act.

ELEVATION OF MATTERS IN DISPUTE TRCA will work cooperatively with nations, confederacies, or councils to resolve disputes. Should a dispute arise during the engagement process, TRCA will discuss the nature of the dispute with the nation, confederacy, or council’s contact for engagement and attempt, in good faith, to reach a resolution that is agreeable to each party. Should TRCA and the nation, confederacy, or council’s contact be unable to reach an agreement, TRCA will elevate the matter within its organization and make available the Chair of the TRCA Directors’ Committee (the CEO) to the Chief, traditional Chiefs’ Council, or President of the Métis Community Council, as appropriate to attempt to resolve the matter. Representatives of the nation, confederacy, or council may also choose to make a delegation to TRCA’s Board. Where these efforts do not resolve a dispute, TRCA may seek to resolve a dispute through the use of a mediator. Where collaborative efforts do not achieve a resolution, the matter will be referred to the Crown

RECORD OF ENGAGEMENT TRCA will keep detailed records respecting the process, including all correspondence, records of telephone conversations, e-mails, minutes and attendees of all meetings. This record of engagement will be included in the relevant reports, as may be required by the regulator. Nations, confederacies, or councils may share traditional knowledge with TRCA. In general, traditional knowledge refers to indigenous knowledge systems that have been developed and maintained over time. The TRCA will respect the policies and requests of the nation, confederacy, or council regarding the use of traditional knowledge. If a nation, confederacy, or council consents to share its traditional knowledge with the TRCA for the purpose of including in a project document submitted to the regulator, they should be informed that any portion of that knowledge that forms part of project documents may be made public and may be subject to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

396 APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following glossary terms apply to these Guidelines:

Aboriginal Peoples As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), Aboriginal Peoples is the collective name for the original people of North America and their descendants. The Canadian Constitution (the Constitution Act, 1982) recognizes three groups of Aboriginal peoples — Indians (commonly referred to as First Nations), Métis and Inuit. These are three separate peoples with unique heritages, languages, cultural practices and spiritual beliefs (Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs, 2013).

Wherever possible, TRCA refers to nations, councils or confederacies throughout this document. The term Aboriginal is used where it is part of a name of a government agency, or legal right or term in the Canadian Constitution, case law or statutes.

Aboriginal Rights As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), Aboriginal rights are collective rights, based on Aboriginal occupation and use of lands and customs, traditions and practices that make Aboriginal societies distinctive. For an activity to be an Aboriginal right, it must be an element of a practice, custom or tradition which is integral to the distinctive culture of the Aboriginal community claiming the right.

For First Nations communities: the activity must have existed at the time of first contact with Europeans. For Métis communities: the activity must have existed prior to the time of effective European control in an area.

In both instances, the current practice, custom or tradition must have continuity with the historic practice, custom or tradition, and it must remain integral to the community’s culture. Present-day activities may be exercised in a modern way. Aboriginal rights are protected by section 35 (1) of the Constitution Act, 1982.

Aboriginal Title As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), Aboriginal title is a type of Aboriginal right. Aboriginal title is the Aboriginal society's ongoing collective right to use and occupy (subject to certain restrictions) those lands that they used and occupied exclusively at the time the Crown assumed sovereignty over those lands. For Aboriginal title to be established:

 an Aboriginal community needs to have occupied the lands prior to the Crown asserting sovereignty over the lands  continuity must exist between present and pre-sovereignty occupation  the occupation must have been exclusive at the time the Crown asserted sovereignty over those lands

397 Aboriginal rights or title may be modified or surrendered through treaties. The impact of a treaty on Aboriginal rights or title will depend on the interpretation of the particular treaty.

Crown As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), in Canada, and in other Commonwealth countries, which recognize the same Queen as the formal head of state, the state (or government) is commonly referred to as "the Crown." In Ontario, the Crown refers to the Ontario and Federal governments.

Duty to Consult As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), he Supreme Court of Canada has determined that the constitutional protection accorded Aboriginal rights and treaty rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 requires the Crown to consult with Aboriginal people when it has knowledge of an existing or asserted Aboriginal or treaty right and contemplates conduct that may adversely affect the right in question. The Supreme Court of Canada has further determined that third parties do not owe a duty to consult Aboriginal people. The Crown may delegate “procedural aspects” of Aboriginal consultation to third parties through legislation and associated regulations, guidelines and policies.

Engagement Engagement refers to the “procedural aspects” of the Duty to Consult that the Provincial or Federal Crown may delegate to TRCA. The depth of engagement will vary depending on the strength of the right or claim and the seriousness of the impact of the proposed project on the right or claim.

Treaty As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), a treaty is an agreement made between the Crown and First Nations with the intention of creating mutually binding obligations, which would be solemnly respected.

Treaty Rights As defined by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (2013), Treaty rights are the specific rights of Aboriginal peoples embodied in the treaties they entered into with Crown governments (initially France and Britain, then Canada after Confederation). Generally, historic treaties are in writing. Courts have found that oral promises can also form part of a treaty and give rise to treaty rights. Some of the matters that treaty rights often relate to include:

 creating a reserve  paying out money  the right of Aboriginal communities to hunt, fish and trap subject to the terms of the treaty

Existing treaty rights are protected under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

398 Attachment 2 – Contact List

Beausoleil First Nation

Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation

Chippewas of Rama-Mnjikaning First Nation

Conseil de la Nation Huronne-Wendat

Coordinator Williams Treaty First Nations

Curve Lake First Nation

Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council, Haudenosaunee Development Institute

Hiawatha First Nation

Kawartha Nishnawbe First Nation

Mississaugas of Alderville First Nation

Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation

Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation

Moose Deer Point

Six Nations of the Grand River Territory

Métis Nation of Ontario

399 Attachment 3 - Endnotes

1 Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2004] 3SCR 511 at 53

2 Constitution Act, 1982

3 For example: Guerin v. Canada [1984] 2 SCR 335 confirmed the Crown’s fiduciary relationship with Aboriginal people; R. v. Sparrow [1990] SCR 1075 set out the test for the Crown as a fiduciary when passing laws that could infringe on Aboriginal rights; Delgamuukw v. the Queen [1997] 3 SCR 1010 set out the test for establishing Aboriginal title.

4 Haida Nation v. British Columbia, [2004] 3 511, Taku River Tlinglit First Nation v. Tulsequah Chief Mine Project [2004] 3 SCR 550, Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage) [2005] 3 SCR 388

5 https://www.ontario.ca/government/about-ministry-aboriginal-affairs

6 http://docs.files.ontario.ca/documents/258/3-maa-draft-guidelines-for-ministries-on.pdf

______400 RES.#A165/14 - SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Award of Contract #10000039 - Planning and Engineering Services. Award of Contract #10000039 for planning and engineering services for the Scarborough waterfront Project Environmental Assessment.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Ron Moeser

THAT Contract #10000039 to provide planning and engineering services in support of the Scarborough Waterfront Project Environmental Assessment be awarded to Dillon Consulting at a total cost not to exceed $479,879.00, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal best meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications set out in the Request for Proposal;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 30% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto City Council on December 16, 2013 adopted, in part, the following resolution:

City Council amend the Toronto Water budget by including $1.5 million for Environmental Assessment work on the Scarborough Waterfront Erosion Control and Access Plan with funding coming from the Toronto Water Capital Reserve (Ex.36.17).

At Authority Meeting #3/14, held on April 25, 2014, Resolution #A36/14 was approved, in part, as follows:

...THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to work with the City of Toronto to initiate the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan Individual Environmental Assessment.

Based on this direction, TRCA has initiated a study under the Environmental Assessment Act to create a system of public spaces along the Lake Ontario shoreline between Bluffer's Park and East Point Park. The preliminary objectives of the Project are: the integration of existing shoreline infrastructure or planned shoreline erosion works; acceleration of priority shoreline erosion control works along the Scarborough Bluffs and; the identification of access routes which will provide multiple benefits for public use and recreation, environmental sustainability and enhanced tourism opportunities. The preliminary vision of the Scarborough Waterfront Project is a system of linked scenic landscapes along the water's edge, providing a safe and accessible waterfront experience with opportunities to actively enjoy the outdoors, to relax and reflect, and to learn about and appreciate the natural and cultural heritage of the bluffs.

In support of the Environmental Assessment for the Scarborough Waterfront Project, TRCA requires a consultant team to provide professional planning and engineering services, as outlined in RFP #10000039, in order to fulfill the planning and design requirements as outlined in the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (EA Act). 401 RATIONALE Request for Proposals (RFP) for planning and engineering services in support of the Scarborough Waterfront Project Environmental Assessment was made publically available to prospective consultants via Biddingo.com on August 27, 2014 with a closing date of September 24, 2014. On September 24, TRCA received six proposals and bids in advance of the submission deadline. A summary of the bids submitted is provided as follows:

Firm Bid (Plus HST) Dillon Consulting Limited $427,579.00 MMM $586,617.50 SNC Lavalin $637,742.00 SENES $797,243.00 AECOM $664,628.50 Golder & Associates $1,190,295.00

The contract costs consists of a base cost of $427,579, plus $12,300 for additional assistance during Terms of Reference and Environmental Assessment review period, plus $40,000 for up to 20 additional meetings over the 10 meetings required in the RFP, for a total cost not to exceed $479,879, plus 30% contingency.

All six members of the Proposal Selection Committee, consisting of staff from TRCA and the City of Toronto, received copies of the proposals on September 24, 2014. At the Proposal Selection Committee review meeting held on September 29, 2014, consensus was reached by all members of the Committee that the proposal submitted by the team led by Dillon Consulting Limited best matched the criteria of the Request for Proposal and was the highest ranking proposal.

Proposals were evaluated and ranked based on the core requirements of the Request for Proposals. The criteria used to evaluate the submission and to select the successful consultant included the following:  applicable experience of the responding consulting firms;  experience, qualifications and availability of individual team members proposed for this project, including ability to work with multiple agencies and partners on a complex EA process that is undertaken in close proximity to other major projects;  consultants understanding of the assignment;  proposed approach and methodology for this assignment including an assessment of any anticipated difficulties and the proposed approach to overcome them;  proposed schedule and work plan, and ability to comply with the proposed schedule;  the itemized cost of additional works anticipated by the consultant above approved budget; and  total upset fee limit, which shall include all fees and disbursements, excluding HST.

402 During the Proposal Selection Committee review meeting, it was discussed that an additional 20 meetings, above the 10 identified in RFP, may be required during the course of the environmental assessment, at an additional cost of $40,000 ($2,000 per additional meeting). Further, the Selection Review Committee recommended that a 30% contingency allowance be identified for the contract as the size, scope and complexity of the project may require as yet undetermined additional investigations or studies in order to complete the environmental assessment. As such, the total cost of the contract for planning and engineering services is $479,879, plus 30% contingency, plus HST.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available for the Scarborough Waterfront Project Environmental Assessment in the Toronto capital budget account 204-01.

Report prepared by: Alexis Moxley, extension 5243 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Connie Pinto, extension 5387 Emails: [email protected] Date: September 17, 2014

______

RES.#A166/14 - ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK Supply and installation of one, 34 metre long, pre-engineered pedestrian bridge over Little Rouge Creek in Bob Hunter Memorial Park, in the City of Markham.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Ron Moeser

WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #3/10, Resolution #A49/10 approved Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff to assist Region of York with Environmental Assessment conditions that pertain to Bob Hunter Memorial park, as part of the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Project (SCEEP);

AND WHEREAS the supply and installation of one pedestrian bridge across the Little Rouge Creek as part of the Bub Hunter Multi-Use Trail, is a condition that pertains to Bob Hunter Memorial park;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the contract for the supply and installation of one, 34 metre long, pre-engineered pedestrian bridge over Little Rouge Creek in Bob Hunter Memorial Park be awarded to R&M Construction at a total cost not to exceed $196,614.00, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 20% of the total cost of the contract for eligible disbursements and as a contingency allowance, if deemed necessary; 403 AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the action necessary to implement the contract including obtain any approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In accordance with Authority Resolution #A49/10, TRCA, in partnership with the Region of York, is coordinating the design and construction of a 34 metre long, pre-engineered pedestrian bridge across the Little Rouge Creek as part of the Bub Hunter Multi-Use Trail. The bridge will be located within the Rouge National Urban Park and Little Rouge Creek Valley, and will provide pedestrians with safe access from the Little Rouge Corridor to Bob Hunter Memorial Park and the community of Boxgrove. The project is one of the SCEEP Environmental Assessment conditions that pertain to Bob Hunter Memorial Park.

RATIONALE Tender RSD13-123 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( http://www.biddingo.com) on Monday September 15, 2014. Tender packages were sent directly to five contractors as follows:  Hobden Construction Company Ltd.;  McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd.;  R&M Construction;  Rutherford Contracting Ltd.;  Serve Construction Ltd.

Bids were reviewed by TRCA staff (Ethan Griesbach, Chris Ulcar and Mark Lowe) on October 9th with the following results:

RSD13-123 Installation of One Pedestrian Bridge Bob Hunter Memorial Park Phase IV Pedestrian Bridge Design, City of Markham, Ontario

BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT (Plus HST) McPherson-Andrews Contracting Limited 246,910.40 Bronte Construction 231,341.00 Serve Construction 409,761.00 R&M Construction 196,614.00 Rankine Construction Ltd. 252,109.00 Guardian Bridge Rapid Construction Inc. 244,029.50 Esposito Bros Construction Ltd. 204,061.00 Rutherford Contracting Ltd. No Bid Mopal Construction Limited 291,236.02 R Chad General Contracting No Bid Jarlian Construction No Bid

404 Of the 11 contractors, three declined the opportunity to submit a bid – no reason was given. Restoration Services and Project Management Office staff reviewed the bid received from R&M Construction, against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of R&M Construction's experiences and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through a review of information provided by the contractor, which resulted in a conclusion that R&M Construction is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that R&M Construction be awarded Contract RSD13-123 for the installation of one, 34 metre long, pre-engineered pedestrian bridge across the Little Rouge Creek, in the City of Markham, for a total amount not to exceed $196,614.00, plus 20% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are provided by the Region of York through a funding agreement to implement the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancements at Bob Hunter Memorial Park. Funds to undertake this project are available within account #111-78.

Report prepared by: Ethan Griesbach, extension 5364 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Mark Lowe, extension 5388 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 10, 2014

______

RES.#A167/14 - BLACK CREEK CHANNEL Contract RSD14-146 - Disposal of Stockpiled Soils. Award of Contract RSD14-146 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for disposal of 2,300 tonnes of stockpiled soils.

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT Contract RSD14-146 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for disposal of 2,300 tonnes of stockpiled soils from the Black Creek Channel from Highway 401 to Queens Drive, in the City of Toronto be awarded to Roni Excavating at a total cost not to exceed $108,882.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 10% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

405 THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Black Creek Flood Control Channel is a 9 km concrete lined, trapezoidal channel constructed in the 1960’s – early 1970’s, designed using engineering principles of the time to efficiently convey flow through the highly urbanized area. In the aftermath of a flood event that th occurred on July 8 , 2013, large deposits of sediment were found in the limits of the channel, particularly in the area between Weston Road and Jane Street.

Following post-storm inspections by TRCA and City staff, it was determined that the accumulated sediment should be removed to restore conveyance capacity for future flood events. Phase 1, which consisted of removing sediment from Rockcliffe Boulevard to Weston Road was completed in November 2013. Phase 2, which is the focus of the current works, is the section of Black Creek Channel from Highway 401 to Queens Drive.

Soil testing to determine off-site disposal options for the sediment removed from the channel confirmed that the material is 'impacted' and must be hauled and disposed of by a Ministry of the Environment (MOE) licensed contractor to an MOE licensed facility.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through improvements to drainage and reduction of sediment inputs, this project will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Tender RSD14-146 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo( th http://www.biddingo.com/) on Thursday, September 18 , 2014 with a mandatory site nd information meeting held on Monday, September 22 , 2014. Tender packages were sent to 12 contractors as follows:  Ambler & Co Inc.;  Dynex Construction;  Esposito Bros.;  Four Seasons Site Development;  Humberview Maintenance;  Metric Construction;  Roni Excavating Ltd.;  Sunrise Contracting;  Superior Disposal;  TBG Landscape Inc;  TG Infrastructure; and  Titanium Contracting.

406 The Procurement Opening Committee opened tenders on Wednesday, September 25, 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-146 Black Creek Channel – Disposal of Stockpiled Soils

TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT BIDDERS (Plus HST) Roni Excavating $108,882.00 TBG Landscape Inc. $111,222.90 Ambler & Co $112,395.10

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Roni Excavating against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Roni Excavating's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Roni Excavating is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Roni Excavating be awarded Contract RSD14-141 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for disposal of 2,300 tonnes of stockpiled soils at a total amount not to exceed $108,882.00, plus 10% contingency allowance if deemed necessary to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to complete the project are available through TRCA's Black Creek Channel Maintenance account #107-25 from the City of Toronto.

Report prepared by: Craig Eden, 647-633-8406 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 20, 2014

______

RES.#A168/14 - BLACK CREEK CHANNEL Contract RSD14-160 – Concrete Channel Repairs. Award of Contract RSD14-160 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for repairs to the Black Creek concrete channel within the vicinity of Lambton Golf Course and Jane Street near Alliance Avenue in the City of Toronto.

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby

407 THAT Contract RSD14-160 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for concrete channel repairs at Black Creek Channel, in the City of Toronto be awarded to Esposito Bros. Construction at a total cost not to exceed $236,362.98 plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 30% of the contract price as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The project site is located within the Black Creek Channel, within the confines of Lambton Golf and Country Club, as well as additional repairs in the channel close to the Jane Street Bridge near Alliance Avenue in the City of Toronto. The existing channel has been in service for over 40 years and the trapezoidal structure has received little maintenance over that time. The channel was designed to protect the largely urbanized surrounding area from the significant flood risk inherent in the region.

The repairs that will be completed are threefold. First, several concrete slabs that line the channel have been damaged over time. Full replacement is necessary of approximately 19 panels with an additional 100 square metres of patch/repair work to be done on other panels within the job site. Second, a drop structure will be repaired under the bridge at Scarlett Road. Finally, four erosion scars created due to high flow levels and the drop structure under the bridge at Scarlett Road will be repaired.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through repairs to the channel, this project will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Tender RSD14-160 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( http://www.biddingo.com/) on October 7, 2014 with a mandatory site meeting held on October 14, 2014. Tender packages were sent to 28 contractors as follows:

408  Quattro Construction Ltd;  Greco Construction;  S. Larkin Developments;  Hamilton Halton Construction Association;  827133 Ontario Ltd.;  Martinway Contracting Limited;  Alpeza General Contracting;  McPherson-Andrews Contracting Limited;  AquaTech Dewatering Company Inc.;  PCL;  Atlas Dewatering Corporation;  R-Chad General Contracting Inc.;  Bermingham Foundation Solutions;  Rankine Construction Ltd.;  Bronte Construction;  Rockback Incorporated;  Camino Construction;  Seawaves Development Services Inc.;  Dean Construction;  Signature Contractors Windsor Inc.;  Dynex Construction;  Toronto Construction Association;  Esposito Bros. Construction;  Tower Restoration Ltd.;  Four Seasons Site Development Ltd.;  Trisan Construction; and;  Galcon Marine Ltd.;  Velez Construction Inc.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the tenders on October 21, 2014 with the following results:

Tender RSD14-160 Black Creek Channel – Concrete Channel Repairs

BIDDERS TOTAL (Plus HST) Esposito Bros. Construction $236,362.98 Four Seasons Site Development $241,000.00 Bronte Construction $270,000.00 R-Chad General Contractors Inc. $340,000.00 McPherson-Andrews Contracting Limited $412,060.00

Staff reviewed the bid received from Esposito Bros. Construction against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Esposito Bros. Construction's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Esposito Bros. Construction is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the evaluation of the bids received, staff recommend that Esposito Bros. Construction be awarded Contract RSD14-160 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for concrete channel repairs at Black Creek Channel, in the City of Toronto for a total amount not to exceed $236,362.98 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 30% contingency due to the unknown condition of the base underneath the concrete, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

409 FINANCIAL DETAILS 50% of funding is provided through the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry's Water and Erosion Control Infrastructure (WECI) Program. The remaining 50% is provided by Toronto Enhanced Capital Funding within account 107-24.

Report prepared by: Craig Eden, 647-633-8406 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-844-3987 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 21, 2014

______

RES.#A169/14 - MUD CREEK REACH 2 RESTORATION PROJECT Contract #10000122 – Creek Bypass Pumping System Works. Award of Contract #10000122 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for bypass pumping works within Mud Creek Reach 2 in the City of Toronto.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Ron Moeser

THAT Contract #10000122 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for bypass pumping works within Mud Creek Reach 2, in the City of Toronto be awarded to Xylem Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $142,820.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $14,282.00 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED

410 BACKGROUND The erosion issues affecting Mud Creek have been a concern to both the City of Toronto and TRCA for several years. In 2010, Toronto Water commissioned a geomorphic assessment of Mud Creek to characterize the subwatershed and watercourse in order to support the design of channel stabilization works. The study was titled Mud Creek Geomorphic Systems Master Plan (herein referred to as “the Master Plan”) and was finalized in August 2012 as part of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) undertaken by the City of Toronto. The Master Plan delineated Mud Creek into six distinct reaches each separated by culverts. Based on the findings of the Master Plan, the reaches were ranked by priority. Successful restoration works at Reach 1 and Reach 5 have been completed in recent years as their priorities ranked the highest and, in 2014, TRCA Is preparing to implement similar works at Reach 2.

The scope of the proposed works for Reach 2 includes the removal of debris and failed gabion basket retaining walls, channel re-grading armourstone weir construction, and bank stabilization with armourstone retaining walls and vegetated rock buttresses. Additionally, conveyance capacity through the splitter pipe to the wetlands at the north end of the Don Valley Brick Works will be ensured by the construction of an armourstone weir directly upstream of the pipe which should encourage a scour pool at the inlet of the pipe.

In order to complete these operations, a bypass pumping system is required for de-watering the work area for a duration of 20 weeks. Due to the environmental and public sensitivities of the in-creek work, specialized pumps and precautions are included in the contract price.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan. The restoration work done within Mud Creek Reach 2 will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Tender #10000122 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( nd http://www.biddingo.com/) on Thursday, October 2 , 2014.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the tenders on October 21, 2014 with the following results:

Tender #10000122 Mud Creek Restoration Project – Creek Bypass Pumping System Works

BIDDERS TOTAL (Plus HST) Xylem Inc. $142,820.00 Aquatech Pump and Power $167,500.00

411 Staff reviewed the bid received from Xylem Inc. against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Xylem Inc.'s experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Xylem Inc. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the evaluation of the bids received, staff recommend that Xylem Inc. be awarded Contract #10000122 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary to provide bypass pumping works within Mud Creek Reach 2 in the City of Toronto for a total amount not to exceed $142,820.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 10% contingency, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available within account #186-38 and are 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto.

Report prepared by: Craig Eden, 647-633-8406 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-844-3987 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 21, 2014

______

RES.#A170/14 - COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH PARK Contract #10000116 - Lookout Structure. Award of Contract #10000116 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for construction of a lookout structure at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, in the City of Toronto.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Ron Moeser

THAT Contract #10000116 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for construction of a lookout structure at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, in the City of Toronto be awarded to Cedar Springs Landscape Group Ltd. (CSL Group) at a total cost not to exceed $195,200.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 10% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications; 412 AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The current lookout structure located at Colonel Samuel Smith Park was constructed to coincide with the development of the park as a viewing platform from which visitors can observe wildlife and park scenery in a backwater estuary that connects to Lake Ontario. The current wood structure was built in the late 1990's and rests upon cement caissons. Over the years, due to the effects of weather, settlement and frost heaving, the lookout structure is no longer in a state of good repair. The City of Toronto, noting the deficiencies, contacted TRCA staff to remove and replace the existing structure with a new, more durable platform made of steel and wood.

TRCA now requires the services of a qualified contractor to carry out the construction of a new lookout structure at Colonel Samuel Smith Park in accordance with the approved design drawings and specifications.

RATIONALE This project is aligned with leadership strategy number three in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through thoughtful planning and action this project will create a network of greenspace and green infrastructure that weaves through every community to connect a healthy and resilient landscape.

Tender #10000116 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( rd http://www.biddingo.com/) on Friday, October 3 , 2014 with a mandatory site information th meeting held on Friday, October 10 , 2014. Tender packages were sent to the following 13 contractors:  Clearwater Structures;  CSL Group Ltd;  Esposito Bros. Construction;  Ferdom Construction;  HN Construction;  Hobden Construction;  Jeffrey G. Wallans;  Koler Construction Inc.;  McPherson-Andrews Contracting;  Midome Construction Services Ltd.;  Norfield Construction Inc.;  ONIT Construction; and  Rutherford Contracting.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 with the following results:

413 Tender #10000116 Colonel Samuel Smith Park - Lookout Structure

BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT (Plus HST) CSL Group Ltd $195,200.00 ONIT Construction $206,327.00 Norfield Construction Inc $213,832.65 McPherson-Andrews Contracting $223,431.00 Koler Construction Inc. $232,784.00 Jeffrey G. Wallans $253,746.00 Midome Construction Services Ltd. $260,000.00 Esposito Bros Construction $279,402.56 HN Construction $396,000.00

Four contractors: Clearwater Structures, Ferdom Construction, Hobden Construction and Rutherford Contracting declined the opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the timelines and specifications stated in the contract documents.

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from CSL Group against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of CSL Group's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that CSL Group is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that CSL Group be awarded Contract #10000116 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for construction of a lookout structure at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, in the City of Toronto, for a total amount not to exceed $195,200.00, to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 10% contingency, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

The tender bid package included provision for an alternative price to supply and install custom IPE wood decking which was recommended by the consultant as the material is more durable and has a longer life span. The 10% contingency allowance is to cover this cost and any additional construction costs based on approved changes necessitated by unforeseen site conditions.

414 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to undertake the demolition and reconstruction of the Colonel Sam Smith Park lookout structure and associated site restoration are 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto. Project costs will be assigned to account 117-41.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 22, 2014 ______

RES.#A171/14 - 2015 BUDGET UPDATE Update on the status of the 2015 TRCA budget process. (Budget/Audit Res.#C10/14)

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by Ronald Chopowick

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) 2015 operating budget make provision for a cost of living adjustment of two percent (2%) effective April 5, 2015;

THAT the preliminary estimates for the 2015 operating budget include municipal levy increases consistent with the guidelines determined by the respective participating municipality;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to submit the 2015 estimates and multi-year funding requests to the City of Toronto, the regional municipalities of Peel, York and Durham, the Town of Mono and the Township of Adjala-Tosorontio in accordance with their respective submission schedules. CARRIED ______

RES.#A172/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain Conservation Component/Mimico Creek Watershed Etobicoke District, City of Toronto Queenscorp Group, CFN 31362. Acquisition of property located midway between The Queensway and Queen Elizabeth Highway, at the rear of 150 Park Lawn, City of Toronto (Etobicoke District), under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed. (Executive Res.#B91/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Ben Cachola 415 THAT 0.016 hectares (0.040 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being part of Lots 288, 289 and 290, Registered Plan M-137 66R-27610, City of Toronto, located to the rear of 150 Park Lawn Road, in the City of Toronto, be purchased from Queenscorp Group (2392184 Ontario Inc.);

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A173/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed Whitshed Limited, CFN 51783. Acquisition of a lease agreement for an 11 year term on a property located to the east of Brock Road and south of Albright Road in the Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham, for the purpose of parking lot and trail connection development under the Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek watershed. (Executive Res.#B92/14)

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a lease agreement with Whitshed Limited to operate and manage a parking lot and trail connection on lands owned by Whitshed Limited, being Part of Lot 5, Concession 8, containing approximately 3.36 hectares (8.30 acres), located in the Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham;

THAT the term of the lease agreement be for eleven (11) years;

THAT the consideration be a nominal sum of $2.00 per annum;

THAT the final terms and conditions of the agreement be satisfactory to TRCA staff and solicitors;

416 AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever actions may be required to give effect thereto including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A174/14 - MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Request for Conveyance of Lands for Required Highway 427 Extension, CFN 51576. Conveyance of lands required for the construction of the extension of Highway 427, located north of Zenway Boulevard and East of Regional Road 27, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Humber River Watershed. (Executive Res.#B93/14)

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) to convey certain lands for the extension of Highway 427 to Major Mackenzie Drive in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with MTO in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA-owned lands containing 1.5767 hectares (3.896 acres), more or less, be conveyed to MTO for the extension of Highway 427, said lands being Part of Block 17, Registered Plan 65M-3966, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 65R-34775;

THAT consideration be $40,000.00 in addition to TRCA's reasonable legal fees and other costs to be paid by MTO;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents.

AMENDMENT RES.#A175/14

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT the following be inserted after the second paragraph of the main motion:

417 THAT the bridges required for the crossings of the Rainbow Creek valley system associated with the construction of Highway 427 be designed and built so as to provide a safe and attractive pedestrian trail system under the highway that will link to the valley trail system on either side of the highway;

THAT TRCA retain an easement for use of the trail under the bridges;

THAT staff report back on the issue if required; CARRIED

THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) to convey certain lands for the extension of Highway 427 to Major Mackenzie Drive in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with MTO in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA-owned lands containing 1.5767 hectares (3.896 acres), more or less, be conveyed to MTO for the extension of Highway 427, said lands being Part of Block 17, Registered Plan 65M-3966, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 65R-34775;

THAT consideration be $40,000.00 in addition to TRCA's reasonable legal fees and other costs to be paid by MTO;

THAT the bridges required for the crossings of the Rainbow Creek valley system associated with the construction of Highway 427 be designed and built so as to provide a safe and attractive pedestrian trail system under the highway that will link to the valley trail system on either side of the highway;

THAT TRCA retain an easement for use of the trail under the bridges;

THAT staff report back on the issue if required;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. ______

418 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A176/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Richard Whitehead

THAT Section II Items EX8.1 and EX8.2, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #8/14, held on October 10, 2014, be received. CARRIED Section II Items EX8.1 & EX8.2 AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Request for Tender #10000077 - Aggregate (Executive Res.#B94/14) AMBERLEA CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Contract #10000114 for Engineering Services (Executive Res.#B95/14)

______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A177/14 - GOOD NEWS STORIES Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from July - September, 2014.

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT the summary of Good News Stories from July - September, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities is provided to the Authority every few months. The stories for July - September, 2014 are as follows:

July and August

 Katy Perry visited Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) and mentioned her visit during her concert the next day.

 Stewardship is a successful recipient of Canon's Take Root Program grant presented by Evergreen Foundation, an award of $5,000 and a Canon PowerShot camera that will be put towards TRCA's existing Ontario Trillium Fund Valleywood Stewardship Project in Caledon - fall community planting event and creating stewardship kits for both of our two residential association groups (Valleywood & SouthFields Village).

419  Ontario Power Authority has agreed to contribute $250,000 to TRCA's Performance Based Conservation Pilot Program over the next three years. Enbridge Gas and Union Gas have also agreed to contribute $40,000 each to the project. The project is being carried out in partnership with Brampton Hydro One, Milton Hydro, Halton Hills Hydro, Peel Region Water and Halton Region Water. The intent of the project is to test how much better the Performance Based Conservation approach is in achieving deep energy savings in the commercial and institutional sectors, than business as usual.

 Introduced the newly re-branded Environmental Leaders of Tomorrow program, bringing TRCA Education’s suite of Integrated Learning Programs under one umbrella. Supporters of the program include: The W. Garfield Weston Foundation, Region of Peel, Telus Toronto Community Board, Canada Post Community Foundation, Manulife Paddle the Don and Alan & Patricia Koval Foundation.

 Through generous support from TD Friends of the Environment Foundation, TRCA has enhanced and expanded education programming at Tommy Thompson Park for students in grades 4 to 6. New programs will be offered during the fall and spring, focusing on the unique urban biodiversity of the park.

 Environment Canada approved three-year commitment of $73,000 for monitoring water quality in the Ajax and Pickering nearshore. Over $500,000 has been invested since 2006, through collaboration between TRCA, York and Durham regions, and Ministry of the Environment. This is one of the most comprehensive monitoring programs for the Great Lakes nearshore environment; results and analyses are shared with academics and the public.

 In preparation for the Monarch Teacher Network of Canada's "Teaching & Learning with Monarch Butterflies" workshops this summer, TRCA's Education team collected, reared and released more than 50 monarch butterflies. Over 120 educators and butterfly enthusiasts attended the five province-wide workshops. A newly developed workshop focussing on habitat creation for monarch butterflies and other pollinators was launched earlier this year, with sessions delivered in Winnipeg and Peel Region this summer.

 During TRCA's field surveys this year, TRCA recorded the second record for holly fern (polystichum lonchitis) for the jurisdiction. This is a species that is usually restricted to high quality Niagara Escarpment sites. It was found at Palgrave Mill Pond Forest and Wildlife Area, so finding this species along with other sensitive species attests to the high quality of the site.

 A crowd source design competition for the San Romanoway Revival Project at Jane-Finch attracted a dozen designs from around the world and 900 votes for favorite designs. The winning entry, by a new Toronto-based landscape designer, will provide the basis for more detailed master planning and implementation of community gardens, rainwater harvesting and landscape improvements. Over 65 tower residents participated in an edible balcony garden project this summer, which also created local employment and skills training opportunities.

 Black Creek SNAP Harvest the Rain residential program introduced an exciting surplus harvest donation initiative this summer, with over 36 homeowners donating produce that is collected by Black Creek Community Farm and delivered by Second Harvest to a seniors program at the San Romanoway towers.

420  Bayview Glen SNAP in Markham was awarded an FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities) Green Municipal Fund grant of $70,000 for completion of the Action Plan.

 Have seen growth of the Kortright Nature Day Camp programming over the past three years. In 2012 TRCA had approximately 60 campers, 2013 saw 286 campers come through and 2014 was a record summer with 524 campers, and a high rate of return of campers each summer. This growth is attributed to redesigning the summer camp model in 2013 from a generic nature camp to specific themed weeks, a new staff selection and training process and an increase in marketing efforts and mediums.

 Kortright's Little Saplings outdoor-based, experiential learning parent and tot program has seen a growth from 11 spring participants to 39 fall participants. It is early to attribute the growth to any one thing, but given we did not engage in additional marketing efforts for this program, we are optimistic that the spike in registration was due to the quality programming our instructors delivered and the resulting word of mouth.

 On September 6, Kortright hosted its debut event for the 5 Peaks Trail Running Series race, with approximately 400 racers taking part in this event with many smiling faces and some muddy participants crossing the finish line. Kortright hopes to be an annual host site for this event.

 Partners in Project Green (PPG) Materials Exchange helped facilitate Ciba Vision's donation of 380 kg of medical supplies to Canadian Relief for Syria, who will distribute them to a hospital on the Syrian-Turkish border.

 Considerable media attention around TRCA, Bentall Kennedy, Sawmill Sid and Weston Forest Products collaboration to demonstrate that infected ash trees can be converted into useable lumber. 16 trees were milled on-site to produce 2,462 kgs of lumber to be distributed into the marketplace.

 PPG Materials Exchange facilitated introductions between Goodwill and Greenspace Waste for an enhanced plastic recycling solution that will allow Goodwill to reduce its sorting costs, increase its revenues and divert 16,400 kg per month from landfill.

 PPG Energy Leaders Consortium members exceeded their original collective annual energy savings target of 15,500 eMWh by 21%, three months ahead of schedule. The energy saved form their 52 conservation projects is equivalent to the annual GHG emissions from 640 light duty vehicles or average energy used by 632 Ontario homes.

 PPG Eco-Efficiency energy audits completed for Medallion Corporation on two large apartment buildings. Three energy conservation opportunities identified with anticipated annual electricity savings of $50,000 and payback periods ranging from 4 to 36 months.

 PPG pilot project to assess water impact of on-site organics systems launched. STEP, PPG, Totally Green and Woodbine Entertainment collaborate on first five projects.

 PPG Let's Get Nosey Bus Tour on June 27 took 25 businesses to sites of innovative energy practices in the GTA. The GTAA Utilities Plant, Canadian Tire, Direct Energy Centre and Baka Mobile showed off their unique energy projects - everything from greenroofs to solar panel EV charging stations were demonstrated.

 DSC Labs recycled various plastics packaging from their imaging businesses diverting 254 kgs from landfill.

421  Stewardship staff developed a new partnership with the Shoresh Jewish Environmental Program at their Kavanah Community Garden site in Vaughan. TRCA hosted a pollinator planting and workshop for families that expanded the garden to include native plants that attract pollinators. The garden will be used for a variety of programming for children and local families.

 The Conservation Youth Corps program engaged 174 high school students from York and Peel Region in July and August. They completed outdoor stewardship work at 20 sites and collectively earned 5,800 volunteer hours. Work tasks included building sustainable garden beds, removing invasive plants, building a forest boardwalk, creating a new trail, mulching, weeding and painting.

 A Youth Stewardship Program was successfully piloted in partnership with the Thorncliffe Park Women's Committee and the City of Toronto. This one week initiative engaged 18 youth in stewardship activities within their local ravine in the Don River watershed. The program culminated with the participating youth planning and leading their own ravine hike for their family and friends.

 Stewardship staff partnered with the Big Carrot on their greenroof to host environmental films, every Thursday evening in August. Each film screening including a tour of the greenroof and a meet and greet for over 120 Toronto residents.

 Stewardship staff partnered with King Township staff to initiate a series of eight guided nature walks at Davis Park in Nobleton and King City Trails in King City. The walks were well received by local residents and provided us with an opportunity to expand TRCA's outreach in this community and work collaboratively with King Township community engagement staff.

 Albion Hills Conservation Area hosted one of Ontario's premiere adventure races in August, generating over $80,000 in revenue. Over 8,400 Mud Hero participants enjoyed this 6 km race featuring several military style obstacles.

September

 Toronto Hydro has agreed to sponsor Greening Health Care for 2014 and 2015 at a total value of $28,500.

 On August 24th, hundreds of dolls (along with their “families”) attended the first Maplelea Meet-Up at BCPV. A successful first-time partnership event between BCPV and Avonlea Traditions, the Maplelea Meet-Up brought in close to 1,000 visitors who enjoyed a Victorian tea party, took part in doll-inspired activities in the Village, and shopped in the Maplelea pop-up shop.

 Education has produced two field trip guides designed to introduce TRCA's education sites and programs to teachers: 1 targeted at elementary teachers and 1 targeted at secondary teachers. Clean, concise and fresh - making it easy to say yes to TRCA education.

 Environmental monitoring projects have received a significant amount of positive media coverage over the past several months.

 The number of teams participating in the Heart Lake Dragon Boat Festival increased by 110% to a total of 11 teams and over 230 paddlers plus spectators.

422  The Watershed Monitoring and Reporting team has updated their web content with more photos, stories and highlights of what TRCA's extensive monitoring data is showing.

 Toronto is expanding the stormwater cleanout program for 2014 to $1.2 million and has earmarked an additional $2.4 million for 2015.

 GIS finished updating natural cover layer, and according to what we are collecting and mapping, the amount of habitat coverage in the TRCA jurisdiction is increasing.

 Hosted SNAP Partner Recognition event to thank partners from our five neighbourhoods, share experiences and enjoy an inspiring keynote address from the Netherlands via live webcast. Published SNAP Five Year Program Review summary report with accomplishments of the five projects. Receiving $95,000 from City of Markham for Bayview Glen SNAP.

 Increase in education programming at Tommy Thompson Park with the launch of a new program, City Life, Wildlife, which compliments the highly successful Winged Migration program.

 Completed restoration of Marigold Creek so now have fish passage up to the top of the creek.

 Toronto Water wants Restoration Services to do another five years of ravine and watercourse inspections to identify and assess potential hazards to water infrastructure.

 70 secondary and college students were employed for the summer to redevelop Bolton Camp, including clearing and securing buildings, improving habitat on site, clearing brush, building trails, social media and event planning, as well as implementing short term recommendations stemming from the design charrette process. The culmination of their work was an Open House community event on October 4th which approximately 500 people attended.

 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Assistant Deputy Minister and his staff toured TRCA's habitat works on the Toronto waterfront from TRCA's Aqualab.

 TRCA taking lead role with Conservation Ontario on: updating business case on flood management; flood insurance and hazard mapping; and updating stormwater regulations and practice.

 Observed a bullfrog in one of the wetlands TRCA created in Bob Hunter Memorial Park, the first recorded sighting in 10 years.

 TRCA staff invited to present results of a water budget analysis project at Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change's Best in Science symposium.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 7, 2014

______

423 RES.#A178/14 - IN THE NEWS Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority media coverage from July - September, 2014.

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT the summary of media coverage from July - September, 2014 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) news coverage for the preceding months is provided to the Authority on a quarterly basis.

A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period from July - September, 2014 that mentioned TRCA, Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) and other TRCA properties and programs (example: Tommy Thompson Park) produced 71 media mentions. The total media hits resulted in a total circulation/reach of approximately 5,900,000 with a total advertising value of $157,284.

These results only reflect a portion of media coverage, since the database does not monitor on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv mentions, smaller community papers and trade publications.

The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage received for July - September, 2014.

July

 On July 1st, Torontoist story "Urban Planner: July 1" mentions Black Creek Historic Brewery’ s specialty ale Maple Porter as one of things you can do while seeing Canada’s past intertwined with its future as 40 people become Canadian citizens at Black Creek Pioneer Village.

 On July 4th, the Toronto Star story "City floats plan to raise DVP" the writer spoke to TRCA regarding the different solutions to end flooding on the Don Valley Parkway (DVP), such as raising the road level to combat problems along an often soggy stretch of the DVP.

 On July 4th, NRU Publishing story, "Greening Jane and Finch" is a story about how a design competition to revitalize the lands around the San Romanoway housing complex near Jane Street and Finch Avenue will beautify the area and add food resources to the community. TRCA has received 12 design ideas about the best way to revitalize the 6.5 hectare area around the complex and integrate elements such as urban agriculture and rainwater harvesting systems.

 On July 7th, the Toronto Sun and Owen Sound Sun Times story "Fish Condo lure fish back to T.O." describes the work that Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC), the Aquatic Habitat Group and TRCA are doing underwater to create new homes for fish. The homes are being created to bring different species back to the waterfront.

424  On July 7th, the Beaches Mirror story "Don Was Here project explores historical path of the lower Don River" discusses a unique interactive urban intervention project that is giving people the chance to retrace the original route of the lower Don River. Don Was Here, was made possible through a partnership with TRCA, also included two walking tours that explored the changing face of Toronto's Don River Valley and the relationship between the river, the valley and the city that developed alongside and around it.

 On July 8th, thestar.com story, "Big Ideas: A new island to anchor the Port Lands" talks about Villiers Island, a project by TWRC, which aims to turn 54 acres of the Port Lands into a new lakefront area, complete with public art and streets lined with retail and mixed use residential properties. If the plan overcomes a long list of hurdles - including garnering at least $800 million in funding and an environmental assessment - the island will be created when TRCA rebuilds the mouth of the Don River. The move is part of a plan to protect Riverdale and the Port Lands from flooding.

 On July 8th, CBC News did a story on the one year anniversary of the July 8, 2013 flood and spoke to a TRCA expert on lessons learned and Toronto’s preparedness.

 On July 8th, East York Mirror story, "Trail bridge reopening set for Taylor Creek Park" discusses the July 12th reopening of the bridge located on the trail connecting Halsey and Barrington Avenue. The bridge was destroyed two years ago during an extreme rainstorm. The City of Toronto is currently working with TRCA on a restoration plan for Taylor Massey Creek. Public consultation for the environmental assessment was under review and the final report of the study to be brought to City Council in September.

 On July 11th, Stouffville Sun- Tribune story, "BMX Project on track at Bruce’s Mill" discusses the new BMX track in Bruce’s Mill Conservation Area. The town is leasing the land from TRCA for $2 per year the next five years, with the option to renew. Along with the BMX track and Treetop Trekking, which opened in June, Bruce's Mill Conservation Area's defunct driving range will be resurrected, but not until next spring. It will be modelled after the driving range at Bathurst Glen Golf Course, which TRCA also operates. The Bruce's Mill driving range will be environmentally friendly and have a learning component to help grow the game with children.

 On July 17th, CTV News at Noon did several segments at Black Creek Pioneer Village to showcase the new Village Folk program.

 On July 21st, several radio and TV programs aired news about pop singer Katy Perry’s visit to Black Creek Pioneer Village. Media outlets included CityNews, ET Talk on CTV, ET Canada, 92.5 FM and other Toronto media.

 On July 22nd, Toronto Star story, "Revisit zip line ride for Earl Bales Park, councillor says" reports that the City of Toronto should take another look at installing a zip line at North York's Earl Bales Park after a similar attraction was approved at the Toronto Zoo, the local councillor says. The city's forestry division had objections to the Earl Bales proposal initially as did TRCA which is responsible for overseeing river valley lands in Toronto, including the Earl Bales ski hill area. Meanwhile, TRCA opened a zip line a year ago at Heart Lake Conservation Area in Brampton. The two sites are different in that the Heart Lake zip line is not in an ecologically sensitive area, while the Earl Bales proposal was to put it on a forested slope.

425  On July 22nd, North York Mirror story, "Black Creek Community Farm is a growing enterprise" is about the success of Black Creek Community Farm. The site is Toronto's largest urban farm as well as the City's first full-scale organic vegetable farm. It is owned by TRCA, the land is leased to Everdale, a not-for-profit organization that provides hands-on farming education through a number of programs.

 On July 23rd, Scarborough Mirror story, "Scarborough Waterfront Project would create continuous set of trails" is a story on how TRCA is planning for a park that will cover the entire waterfront of eastern Scarborough. TRCA is preparing an environmental study to create a "destination park featuring a system of linked scenic landscapes both along the top of the bluffs and at the water's edge," from Bluffers Park to East Point Park. Meant to extend a waterfront park already completed further to the east in Port Union, the larger stretch along Lake Ontario will give strollers and cyclists "safe public access to and along the waterfront while respecting the natural and scientific importance of the Scarborough Bluffs." Called the Scarborough Waterfront Project, it would effectively create a continuous set of trails, beaches and wetland areas from Bluffers to Pickering, and could cost $70 million.

 On July 24th, Brampton Guardian story, "Banner year for Brampton aerial park". Despite a harsh winter and ice storm that ravaged much of Brampton's tree canopy, the operators of Treetop Trekking say it has been a banner year for their north end aerial park. Treetop Trekking Brampton located in Heart Lake Conservation Area, is gearing up to celebrate the park's first year in business. More than 14,000 climbers have visited the park since opening at Heart Lake Conservation Area in August, 2013.

 On July 30th, National Post story, "How does the Conservation Authority count fish around Toronto?" discusses urban fishing in Toronto and the electrofishing work conducted by TRCA.

 On July 30th, Brampton Guardian story, "Minister touts local splash pads, pools funded by feds" spotlights government spending on community projects in Peel Region. Brampton-Springdale Tory MP Parm Gill joined federal Economic Development Minister Gary Goodyear at the Wild Wetland Splash and Pool facility at Heart Lake Conservation Area in Brampton. Ottawa provided $533,000 to TRCA, through the Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC) program in Ontario, toward total project costs of up to $1.6 million for this 840 sq.-m. swimming pool and splash pad with more than 30 wetland themed water features.

 On July 28th, media outlets, CBC News, Toronto Star, North York Mirror, Canadian Press, CBC Radio, Leader-Post, Waterloo Region Record and On the Scene Network covered the 100th anniversary of WWI British Home Child celebration at Black Creek Pioneer Village.

 On July 30th, NRU Publishing story, "Helping shape the new urban vision" highlights TRCA’ s Living City Policies. The article reports that TRCA is in the final stages of preparing The Living City Policies document, which is a consolidation of the 1994 Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and other strategic documents.

August

 On August 5th, Global News did a feature on "Hidden Gems" in the city. Part of their series included a visit to Tommy Thompson Park and BCPV.

426  On August 7th, Etobicoke Guardian story, "Botanical Garden and natural setting a hidden gem in Toronto" describes the Humber Arboretum. The Humber Arboretum and Centre for Urban Ecology create one of Toronto's premier urban ecosystems, while facilitating research and education and promoting conservation. It began through the initiative of Humber College horticulture students in 1977 and is a joint venture of the City of Toronto, Humber College and TRCA.

 On August 7th, North York Mirror story, "ARTS IN BRIEF: Quilts at the Creek comes to pioneer village" gives an overview of activities taking place at the Quilts at the Creek event at BCPV.

 On August 8th, Scarborough Mirror story, "Bluffs erosion concerns compel conservation authority to buy Scarborough House" describes how TRCA has agreed to pay $1.4 million for a house on Midland Avenue overlooking the Scarborough Bluffs, and to let the owner stay on, paying market rent, for up to five years. Shoreline protection works below the bluffs stopped rapid erosion which may have threatened many homes above, but a section of works below 1 Midland Avenue and three Fishleigh Drive homes was never completed. A TRCA report in June said this was done deliberately, "as a result of objections from the public regarding the loss of a significant feature along the Scarborough Bluffs known as 'the needles,'" below 1 Midland Avenue.

 On August 12th, Mississauga News story "Development approval gives Guild Inn a new lease on life" is about how after sitting abandoned and boarded up for over a decade, there are high hopes that Scarborough's landmark Guild Inn may soon reopen its doors. The City of Toronto has approved Dynamic Hospitality and Entertainment to redevelop the historic inn. Under the plan, the City would sublease the restaurant, banquet hall and pavilion to Dynamic, as TRCA owns the Guild Inn and the City leases it from TRCA.

 On August 13th, Etobicoke Guardian story, "Top 12 fin-tastic fishing spots in Toronto" provides a list of fishing spots that were recommended by TRCA and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.

 On August 13th, Yonge Street Media story, "Black Creek Community Farm, A hidden oasis near Jane and Finch" highlights the work being done at Black Creek Community Farm, a small, seven-acre farm that has technically been a part of the Toronto food system since 2004, but has recently come to light after being taken over by TRCA. After the City of Toronto cut its funding to the project in 2011, TRCA took over the land so it could be used for an urban agricultural project, which has become a blossoming priority for the organization.

 On August 14th, Yonge Street Media, CBC Radio Canada (French), Construction Canada covered Partners in Project Green event showcasing an innovative way to salvage the Toronto region's infested ash trees.

 August 15th, Toronto Star story, "Bitter winter a boon for Great Lakes" describes how boaters, cottagers and freighters on the Great Lakes are benefiting from last winter's polar vortex with water levels rising to average heights for the first time in more than a decade. TRCA spokesperson said in the article that it is too soon to tell whether the highs that lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior are experiencing are a climate change issue. Lake Ontario itself is just within the long-term average that it normally would be.

427  August 16th, Globe and Mail story, "A different kind of summer job: students bring new life to run-down camp" is about the work being done at Bolton Camp by summer students. The teenagers were hired by TRCA to restore Bolton Camp. Many of the students are learning on the job, not to mention in the great outdoors, to sand, drill, build stairs and restore habitats, hands-on skills they would not necessarily learn in high school. The students, many hired from with Peel Region, worked at turning the rundown, overgrown plot of land into what potentially could be an ideal place for community groups and high school classes. TRCA bought the over 250 acres of land in 2011 from a developer. For most of its existence, Bolton Camp was a campsite for low-income families, where mothers received parenting classes and children were led through nature-based activities.

 On August 17th, Fairchild TV covered Quilts at the Creek at Black Creek Pioneer Village.

 On August 27th, Yonge Street Media story "A beginner’s guide to wildlife in Toronto" gives an overview of wildlife in the City and the work TRCA does including electrofishing, wildlife monitoring, species of concern work and research at the Tommy Thompson Park Bird Research Station.

 On August 28th, Toronto Star story, "Invasive plant threatens birds on Leslie St. Spit" focuses on the fight to control phragmites australis from growing at Tommy Thompson Park. Phrag has been present in the park for over a decade, but became a real problem about five years ago. The phragmites incursion is bad news for shorebirds because it swallows the muddy border between water and shore that is flush with nutritious insects. TRCA has tried all manner of things to clear the park of phrag.

September

 On September 3rd, TVO Kids, filmed several back to school segments at BCPV to show their viewers what school was like in the 19th century.

 On September 4th, Brampton Guardian story, "Boisterous celebration planned for Dragonboat festival in Brampton" describes the synchronicity, endurance and team spirit that will be on full display at the 2014 Dragonboat Festival in Brampton. The colourful and high-energy event was organized by TRCA and the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition on September 13th at Heart Lake Conservation Area. Coverage of the event appeared in the Brampton Guardian after the event on September 14.

 On September 11th, Toronto Star story, "Rouge Park a go, Ottawa says" the paper learned that Ottawa is rejecting the Ontario government's demands on the Rouge National Urban Park and will proceed with or without the Province. On September 2nd, it was reported that Bill C-40 did not contain enough environmental protections. The Ontario government controls about two-thirds of the 58 square kilometres of land in what would be Canada's first urban national park. That includes a huge swath owned by TRCA that cannot be sold without provincial approval. The federal government owns the remaining third of the land, with the cities of Toronto and Markham having small parcels.

428  On September 16th, Toronto Star story, "Tommy Thompson nature centre is open, but doesn’t look like it" talks about the staff booth at Tommy Thompson Park that has been open on weekends since earlier this summer, to provide visitors with information on the park ecosystem. Fencing around the building remains in place due to issues with vandalism and graffiti. It is a place where the public can learn about the park's flora and fauna, and more displays and information will be added next year. Eventually, a visitor centre with washrooms will be built at the Leslie Street entrance.

 On September 17th, theweathernetwork.com story, "Where to watch the Salmon Run" included expert advice from TRCA staff on where to look to find salmon making their way up through the GTA’s river system.

 On September 19th, North York Mirror story, "Gold members to tour behind-scenes buildings at Black Creek" highlights a members event to tour the Dalziel Barn and other buildings located on the Village’s North Property.

 On September 20th, CBC.ca story, "What’s on in Toronto this weekend" includes information about Pioneer Harvest Festival at BCPV.

 On September 22th, CBC Metro Morning, interviewed a TRCA expert regarding the salmon run at Morningside Park.

 On September 25th, Ajax News Advertiser story, "Ajax volunteers help to improve water quality" describes how the Town of Ajax received a grant for $60,000 from the RBC Blue Water Project and $20,000 from TRCA to install the bioswales at Paradise Beach, and volunteers planted 600 trees in the area.

 On September 25th, Vaughan Citizen story, "Arts, culture take centre stage in Vaughan at various local fests" describes how Vaughan Culture Days will see community organizations and local artists across the City offering free, interactive activities at various locations including City Hall, the McMichael Canadian Art Collection and the Kortright Centre for Conservation.

 On September 25th, York Guardian story, "Top 5 places to relive your childhood in Toronto" includes Black Creek Pioneer Village.

 On September 26th, North York Mirror story, "Black Creek Pioneer Village recognizes British Home Children" describes the British Home Child Day activities taking place at the Village on September 28th.

 On September 31st, The Weather Network morning show did several interview spots with TRCA experts about the salmon run.

Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 15, 2014

______

429 RES.#A179/14 - PUBLIC RECORD Authority Resolution #A185/10 CFN 24191. Recommendation approving settlement of costs resulting from the expropriation of lands from V. and E. Gadzala Holdings Limited and 412264 Ontario Limited becomes a public record.

Moved by: Jim Tovey Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the following Resolution #A185/10 approved at Authority Meeting #8/10, held on October 29, 2010, be received and become a public record:

WHEREAS the Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto are 50% funding partners for the Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March, 1993) at a project budget of $8,350,000;

WHEREAS the Province and the City have agreed to fund their respective share of any additional costs associated with the expropriations of land should those costs exceed the amount of funding available for the project;

WHEREAS the Province and the City have contributed approximately $10.7 million over and above the original project budget for payment of the Gadzala award for market value, riparian rights, disturbance damages, injurious affection, Gadzala's Divisional Court costs and interest and the Red Carpet Inns Limited settlement;

WHEREAS Gadzala has proposed a settlement of costs and interest on the costs associated with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) expropriation and the City of Toronto's expropriation in the amount of $3,100,000 if paid in full by October 29, 2010, and an additional payment of $10,000 per month or part of a month if the payment is made after October 31, 2010;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Province of Ontario and City of Toronto be requested to provide their respective shares of the additional funding for the costs and interest on costs no later than November 26, 2010;

AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto and the Province of Ontario be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #8/10, held on October 29, 2010, Resolution #A185/10 was approved in camera as it pertains to legal matters in which TRCA is involved. Confidential minutes were retained as a record of this item at the meeting. As a matter of policy, TRCA reports back on in camera items when they can become public so a record of the resolution appears in public minutes.

430 RATIONALE At the time the report was prepared, there was one remaining outstanding expropriation for this project. We have been unable to settle this expropriation as the former owner cannot be located.

Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 21, 2014

______

RES.#A180/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Section IV item BAAB8.1 - 2014 Financial Progress Report to August 31, 2014, contained in Budget/Audit Advisory Board Minutes #3/14, held on October 31, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A181/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Colleen Jordan

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.13, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #8/14, held on October 10, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

431 TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:49 a.m., on Friday, October 31, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

432 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #9/14

Friday, November 28, 2014

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #8/14, held on October 31, 2014 434

DELEGATIONS A delegation by Dr. Asim Izzat of 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, in regard to item EX7.3 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land Behind 58 Park Drive. 434

PRESENTATIONS A presentation by Laurie Nelson, Senior Manager, Development, Planning and Policy, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - The Living City Polices for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.434

CORRESPONDENCE Material from Dr. Asim Izzat of 50 Park Drive, Toronto 435

THE LIVING CITY POLICIES FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE WATERSHEDS OF THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 443

WENDIGO POND AND UPPER & LOWER SPRING CREEK PONDS PROJECTS Contracts #10000107 and #10000108 - Disposal of Stormwater Management Pond Dredgeate 451

4180 to 4190 DUNDAS STREET WEST SLOPE STABILIZATION PROJECT Contract RSD14-73 - Soil Anchoring 454

ETOBICOKE VALLEY PARK EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROJECT Contract RSD14-182 456

HUMBER VALLEY MEADOWS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND RESTORATION PROJECT 460 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain Conservation Component Humber River Watershed, Town of Mono, County of Dufferin, Snider 463

GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed, City of Toronto Temple Emanu-El 464

REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Behind 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York 464

BELL MOBILITY INC. PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LANDS Caledon Equestrian Park, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel 465

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Request for a Permanent Easement for a new Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 42 Inch Diameter Natural Gas Pipeline, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel and City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed 466

LIVING CITY FARM Lease of Land 468

2015 FEE SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PROGRAMMING 468

SALARY GRID FOR FULL TIME SALARIED STAFF Amendment 469

MUD CREEK REACH 2 PROJECT Contract RSD14-163 471

SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES EVALUATION PROGRAM Progress Report 471

DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Legal Opinion In Regard to Encroachments Supplementary Report to Item EX7.3 476

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING Results of Hearings September 2013 To Date 481 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #9/14 November 28, 2014

The Authority Meeting #9/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, November 28, 2014. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:38 a.m.

PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Maria Augimeri Vice Chair David Barrow Member Ben Cachola Member Vincent Crisanti Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Jack Heath Member Mujeeb Khan Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Ron Moeser Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member Dave Ryan Member Deb Schulte Member John Sprovieri Member Cynthia Thorburn Member Richard Whitehead Member

ABSENT Bob Callahan Member Raymond Cho Member Ronald Chopowick Member Colleen Jordan Member Gloria Lindsay Luby Member John Parker Member Jim Tovey Member

433 RES.#A182/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8/14, held on October 31, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Michael Di Biase declared a conflict of interest in regard to items EX10.16, EX10.17, EX10.18 and EX10.19, all titled Di Poce Management Ltd. and Two-Seven Joint Venture Ltd. as a statement of claim has been filed against him by the applicant.

______

DELEGATIONS

(a) A delegation by Dr. Asim Izzat of 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, in regard to item EX7.3 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned Land Behind 58 Park Drive.

RES.#A183/14 - DELEGATIONS

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT above-noted delegation (a) be received. CARRIED ______

PRESENTATIONS

(a) A presentation by Laurie Nelson, Senior Manager, Development, Planning and Policy, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.1 - The Living City Polices for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

RES.#A184/14 - PRESENTATIONS

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED ______434 CORRESPONDENCE

(a) Material from Dr. Asim Izzat of 50 Park Drive, Toronto, in regard to delegation AUTH4.1.

RES.#A185/14 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT above-noted correspondence (a) be received. CARRIED

435 CORRESPONDENCE (A)

436 437 438 439 440 441 ______442 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A186/14 - THE LIVING CITY POLICIES FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE WATERSHEDS OF THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Recommending Authority approval of The Living City Polices for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Jack Heath

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff conducted a second and final round of public and stakeholder consultation on The Living City Policies draft document;

AND WHEREAS the document has now been finalized based on staff and stakeholder feedback;

AND WHEREAS the Province’s “Policies and Procedures for Conservation Authority Plan Review and Permitting Activities” (2010) states that conservation authority policies be “approved by the conservation authority Board of Directors”;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA adopt The Living City Policies for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to be effective immediately, and to replace the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program adopted by the Authority in October 1994;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA's municipal partners, provincial ministries, the Building Industry and Land Development Association, environmental non-governmental agencies, watershed and waterfront interest groups, neighbouring conservation authorities, and aboriginal nations, confederacies and councils be so advised by the CEO's Office.

RECORDED VOTE Paul Ainslie Yea Maria Augimeri Yea David Barrow Yea Ben Cachola Yea Vincent Crisanti Yea Glenn De Baeremaeker Yea Michael Di Biase Yea Chris Fonseca Yea Jack Heath Yea Mujeeb Khan Yea Glenn Mason Yea Mike Mattos Yea Ron Moeser Yea Gerri Lynn O'Connor Yea Linda Pabst Yea 443 RECORDED VOTE Cont'd Anthony Perruzza Yea Dave Ryan Yea Deb Schulte Yea John Sprovieri Yea Cynthia Thorburn Yea Richard Whitehead Yea

THE MOTION WAS CARRIED

BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, Resolution #A236/13 was approved as follows:

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff conducted public and stakeholder consultation on The Living City Policies draft document and have revised the draft document based on stakeholder feedback;

AND WHEREAS staff committed to reporting back to the board on the results of public consultation and on revisions to the draft document;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA release a revised draft of The Living City Policies draft document for final public and stakeholder consultation as outlined in this report;

THAT TRCA's municipal partners, provincial ministries, the Building Industry and Land Development Association, environmental non-governmental agencies, watershed and waterfront interest groups, neighbouring conservation authorities, and other stakeholders be so advised by the CEO's Office;

AND FURTHER THAT staff return to the board later in 2014 for formal adoption of The Living City Policies document.

As reflected in the above resolution, the Authority consented to TRCA Planning and Development staff releasing the revised (May 2014) draft of The Living City Policies (LCP) for a second and final round of comments. Since that time, staff have been working to collect, analyze and address comments on the revised draft and to ultimately finalize the document for Authority adoption.

The LCP is issued under the authority of Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act. Upon the Authority’s adoption of the LCP, it will apply to all new applications, matters, or proceedings applicable to TRCA’s roles in the planning and development process, submitted to TRCA on or after November 28, 2014. Given that the document is largely a policy expression of current practice and is consistent with the current legislative framework, the LCP will also apply to any active applications, matters or proceedings before TRCA as of November 28, 2014.

The purpose of The Living City Policies is four-fold: 1) To guide TRCA review of applications under the Planning Act and undertakings subject to the Environmental Assessment Act; 444 2) To provide the basis for approving permit applications under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act; 3) To inform TRCA’s advocacy role for The Living City and sustainable communities in the planning and development process; and 4) To assist and enable TRCA's partners’ and stakeholders’ contributions to building The Living City.

TRCA Planning and Development staff will be the main implementers of the LCP, with TRCA’s Ecology staff as the main source of technical support for their expertise in ecology, hydrology, hydraulics, hydrogeology, fluvial geomorphology and geotechnical reviews. Other TRCA sections such as Research and Development, Watershed Management, Restoration Services, Property Services, Conservation Lands, and Stewardship and Outreach Education may also provide support to Planning and Development staff in this regard.

For municipalities, the LCP provides greater clarity on TRCA’s roles in the planning and development process and helps to reinforce the already positive and productive working relationship TRCA has with its member municipalities. Indeed, many policy directions in the LCP are already embedded in recent official plan updates through TRCA’s engagement in municipal plan input and plan review work. Municipalities appreciated that the LCP would "provide guidance and a sound basis for understanding the TRCA's role as a commenting agency and the organization's role in promoting the Living City vision." The LCP does not trigger amendments to municipal official plans. Given that municipalities must update their official plans for consistency with the Provincial Policy Statement, TRCA staff appreciate that many of the policy topics in the LCP are also found in the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement, such as climate change in the context of natural hazards, green infrastructure and low impact development. Moreover, as mentioned, the LCP will inform TRCA staff input to future updates to municipal official plans, secondary plans, etc. and the review of development applications.

In accordance with provincial guidance for conservation authority policies, the LCP requires Authority approval. Staff, however, acknowledge that municipal council endorsements are welcome as an added layer of support for implementing the policies in the document. In the final round of consultation on the LCP (May 2014 version), some municipalities took a staff report on the document to their Council as an information item (i.e., Township of Uxbridge, the City of Markham, as well as York, Peel, and Durham regions).

The LCP consists of eight sections, a glossary, references and appendices. The following is an outline of the sections in the document: 1. Introduction Purpose, scope, updates, applicability, guidelines, and how to read this document 2. The Toronto Region A jurisdictional and biophysical overview of TRCA’s watersheds, and their issues, challenges and opportunities. 3. Legislative Foundation An overview of TRCA’s mandate as outlined in legislation, regulation, and agreements 4. TRCA History and Evolution to The Living City The evolution and adaptation of TRCA’s roles and responsibilities over time and looking ahead. 445 5. The Living City The Living City vision, mission, strategic objectives, and the corresponding principles for planning and development 6. Paths to Achieving The Living City: Policies for Sustainable Communities Policies for TRCA’s advocacy role in the process of building sustainable communities; recommendations for TRCA’s work with its partners and to approval authorities. 7. Policies for Environmental Planning Policies for TRCA’s role as a public commenting body, resource management agency, service provider and landowner under the Planning Act and the Environmental Assessment Act; this chapter also includes policies for TRCA’s delegated role under the Planning Act to represent the provincial interest in natural hazards. 8. Policies for the Administration of the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation Policies for TRCA’s regulatory review and permit approval process. Glossary - Definitions of terms used in the document References - Sources used in the development of the document Appendix A – Illustrative Examples of the Natural System Appendix B - Municipal Official Plan Policies for Approved Special Policy Areas and Two Zone Areas Appendix C - Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas Appendix D - Illustrative Examples of Additions to Existing Buildings within the Flood Hazard

Stakeholder Consultation 2014 In addition to having the LCP posted for review and comment on TRCA’s website since January 2013, staff offered another avenue for stakeholder and public input by holding an “open house” on the LCP, hosted at Black Creek Pioneer Village on May 21, 2014. Staff gave brief presentations on the LCP in afternoon and evening sessions. The sessions were well advertised, with notices in all of the GTA local newspapers, in the front section of the Toronto Star and on TRCA’s website. Attendees were primarily consultants; questions were largely those of clarification on TRCA, municipal, provincial and federal roles in the planning and development process.

Fifteen of the 18 municipalities circulated on the May 2014 LCP submitted written comments to TRCA staff. Similar to the last round of comments, the feedback was very positive with several municipalities stating that the document satisfactorily articulates TRCA’s role in the planning and development process, and will enhance an already beneficial working relationship between TRCA and its municipal partners. All of the municipalities, as well as the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) and the Niagara Escarpment Commission, stated that they appreciated that TRCA was able to address most of their comments through revisions to the January 2013 draft document, or by providing a rationale for the text remaining the same; this was done in a chart that contained all of the comments and the corresponding TRCA responses. The chart was released through email to all stakeholders and posted on the TRCA website, accompanied by a “track changes” version of the revised May 2014 LCP. Similarly, a link is being provided to all stakeholders that contains the full list of the written comments provided to TRCA on the May 2014 LCP, along with TRCA’s corresponding responses. 446 Municipalities A few municipalities had some new comments on this second draft of the LCP, or in some cases were not satisfied as to how TRCA proposed to address a number of their initial comments. Following is a synopsis of some of the more frequently made comments from municipalities and a summary of TRCA’s responses.

Natural Heritage System Planning One of the main themes from municipal comments in the initial round of comments in 2013 was the desire for the LCP to more clearly state that municipalities are the decision makers in the planning process and that the municipal official plan prevails, especially with respect to defining the boundaries of the natural heritage system. In response, the January 2013 LCP was revised to state this legislative distinction more clearly through text boxes and modifications to the planning policies in chapters 6 and 7. While most municipalities felt that these enhancements contained in the May 2014 version provided the appropriate recognition of responsibilities, some others requested additional emphasis to make this message even more prominent, particularly in the chapter 7 planning policies. TRCA staff directed these commenters to the enhanced text boxes and preambles which state that, “Ultimately, the limits of the Natural System adjacent to development are finalized by the municipality through the planning approval process.” It was also pointed out to these municipalities that the chapter 7 policies of the LCP clearly set out all of the factors under consideration when determining the boundaries of the natural heritage system, which first includes municipal official plan policies and schedules. This stands with the caveat that TRCA is in no way limited in exercising its rights under the Planning Act, the Conservation Authorities Act, or any other applicable legislation to independently appeal or advocate any position on a planning decision to the Ontario Municipal Board, as outlined in Memorandums of Understanding with municipalities.

Policy Phraseology Another comment made by some municipalities was that the phrase “It is the policy of TRCA” was not sufficient to identify and clearly distinguish the specific policies that are intended to provide a recommendation to approval authorities, and to ensure that the approach in the preamble (that explains TRCA’s role relative to the decision making role of municipalities) is clearly recognized in the policies. These commenters suggested that the phrase be revised to, “It is the policy of TRCA to recommend to approval authorities.” Staff’s response to this comment was that the phrase "to recommend" is already in some of the policies in the LCP where appropriate. In addition, the LCP’s use of the phrase "It is the policy of TRCA" is appropriate since this is TRCA's policy document, to be adopted by TRCA's board. Further, the general nature of the phrase, "It is the policy of TRCA" is intentional, given that for many policies in the section 6 advocacy chapter and the section 7 planning chapter, there are inherent, one, two or more of TRCA's roles, i.e., public commenting body, resource management agency, service provider, delegated provincial interest, landowner. The legislative basis for each of these roles is described in Chapter 3 of the LCP.

447 TRCA Compensation Protocol and Valley and Stream Corridor Crossings Guideline Another municipal issue that was raised again in this second round of comments was the status of TRCA’s Compensation Protocol. York, Durham and Peel regions all commented that they were eager to consult on TRCA’s draft Compensation Protocol. Staff acknowledged these comments and noted that the compensation policies in the LCP are general and do not refer specifically to the Protocol since it is not yet complete. Staff also removed the sections in the policy preamble that refer to the Protocol to be consistent with this approach. This is similar to the LCP’s treatment of the policies for road crossings of valley and stream corridors. The TRCA technical guideline for crossings is not yet complete and so neither the policies nor the preambles refer to it directly, but rather, reflect current practice for these types of projects. As well, TRCA staff confirm that there will be municipal consultation on both the Compensation Protocol and the Crossings guideline.

Province Provincial bodies commenting in this second round of consultation were the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and the Niagara Escarpment Commission. Both agencies were supportive of the document and made only minor comments for clarification in wording where provincial matters are referenced in the preambles and the policies. MNRF said in their comments: “Great job over all! Very thorough. It looks like a lot of work was done in pulling this together.” Similarly, the NEC stated: “Overall, the document is well-organized and easy-to-read. We commend TRCA staff on the efforts made in preparing the LCP.”

BILD Planning and Development staff introduced the May 2014 version of the LCP to the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) at a meeting held on May 8, 2014 to indicate how staff addressed their comments on the first draft. The meeting was generally positive and BILD has not submitted any further written comments. Staff have kept BILD informed about the progress of the document.

ENGOs No environmental non-government organizations commented in this round of consultation.

Conservation Authorities The Credit Valley Conservation Authority commented that the LCP should provide greater flexibility in its definition of headwater drainage features to reflect the flexibility that is in the technical document on these features, shared jointly by the two conservation authorities (CAs). TRCA staff responded that a slight modification to the definition, which would provide this flexibility, is appropriate as it reflects current practice for both CAs.

448 Aboriginal Communities Two of the contacts on TRCA’s circulation list of nations, confederacies and councils responded to notices about the LCP. The Mississaugas of the New Credit said that they would like to review the material, but did not submit written or verbal comments. Subsequent to this, TRCA staff had the opportunity in a meeting with the Mississaugas of the New Credit to provide them with a high level overview of the document. The Huron-Wendat requested funding from TRCA in order to do their review and did not submit written or verbal comments. TRCA could not grant the funding request, however, staff offered the alternatives of a webinar and a conference call for the Huron-Wendat to learn more about the project. TRCA has developed Engagement Guidelines to foster relationships with Aboriginal communities, which is being circulated in draft to the nations, confederacies and councils whose interests within TRCA watersheds may be affected by TRCA projects.

Legal Counsel Staff circulated the draft LCP to TRCA's legal counsel, who has had extensive experience working with conservation authorities and representing TRCA at the Ontario Municipal Board and Mining and Lands Commissioner hearings. The outcome of the review was some minor adjustments to the document to enhance clarity around the intent the policies.

TRCA Staff Planning and Development staff also conducted another round of internal review of the LCP in the last several months with TRCA Planning and Development staff and TRCA ecologists, engineers and hydrogeologists involved in plan and permit review. Both the Planning and Development staff and the technical staff were advised to “test” the draft policies by referring to them in their daily work. This resulted in helpful comments from staff to make minor modifications to wording in some of the preambles and policies to more closely reflect current practice, updated legislation and new technical information. Additional diagrams and photos with labels were also added to the LCP to further illustrate the intent of the policies.

DETAILS OF THE WORK TO BE DONE Overall, this final round of consultation on the LCP did not necessitate any major changes to the document from its previous iteration. A “track changes” version of the LCP dated November 2014 will be made available on TRCA’s website, which will show that the changes that have been made are minor. The LCP will become effective upon the Authority's approval and staff training on the document will commence shortly after. Staff training will emphasize: 1) The LCP is largely the policy expression of current practice. 2) Staff letters to approval authorities should reflect the structure of the LCP where staff must indicate in which capacity comments are being made, e.g., resource management agency, service provider, public commenting body, delegated provincial interest, regulator or landowner. 3) TRCA’s approved technical guidelines and checklists support the policies of the LCP and should be used to guide TRCA and municipal staff from a technical perspective, and should be used by proponents and their consultants to assist in preparation and review of development and infrastructure proposals.

449 For those who request it, information sessions on the LCP, through webinars and/or conference calls to further describe the project and its implementation, can be provided by TRCA Planning and Development staff. Any future updates to the policies of the LCP will be done with the appropriate public notice, stakeholder consultation, and TRCA board approval.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Conservation authorities have a legislated and mandated responsibility under the Conservation Authorities Act to have board approved policies. Funding for this project and its implementation is part of the regular planning and development divisional budgeting process.

SUMMARY In consultation with staff, municipalities, provincial bodies and other stakeholders, TRCA has completed a policy document to replace the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). The VSCMP has been a highly regarded document in the field of environmental planning by TRCA and its partners. The document’s ecosystem approach to watershed planning was leading-edge for its time and influenced municipal and provincial policy. Referenced in numerous decisions, the VSCMP has stood up well before the Ontario Municipal Board and the Mining and Lands Commissioner. Although the LCP will supersede the VSCMP, it encapsulates the VSCMP’s valuable foundation of principles and policy intent.

The LCP is consistent with the Leadership and Enabling Strategies from TRCA's 10-Year Strategic Plan, in particular, to manage our regional water resources for current and future generations, to create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment, and, to facilitate a region wide approach to sustainability. Above all, the LCP espouses the Strategic Plan's principle that natural systems provide fundamental and irreplaceable benefits that are vital to human health and well-being, and as such, the LCP promotes that nature must be a foremost consideration in city-building.

Staff are pleased to be bringing The Living City Policies for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to the Authority for approval. The long but rewarding process to consult on and finalize the document has resulted in a comprehensive and clear product that will serve well TRCA and all stakeholders in the planning and development process for the next 10 years. Incorporating the latest science from watershed plans and based on a 60-year history of watershed monitoring, the LCP implements innovative, risk-reducing strategies for flood plain and stormwater management, and a systems approach to natural heritage protection and enhancement. The current provincial policy directions for urban redevelopment and intensification, and the potential impacts of climate change, make TRCA's work with its partners in protecting life, property and habitat that much more important. Staff anticipate that the LCP will play a critical role in helping TRCA and its partners achieve The Living City vision for a new kind of community, where human settlement can flourish forever as part of nature’s beauty and diversity.

Report prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5763 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5763 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Date: October 20, 2014 ______450 RES.#A187/14 - WENDIGO POND AND UPPER & LOWER SPRING CREEK PONDS PROJECTS Contracts #10000107 and #10000108 - Disposal of Stormwater Management Pond Dredgeate. Award of Contract #10000107 Wendigo Pond and Contract #10000108 Upper and Lower Spring Creek Ponds for disposal of stormwater management pond dredgeate.

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Contract #10000107 for the disposal of stormwater management pond (SWMP) dredgeate for Wendigo Pond in High Park be awarded to Roni Excavating Ltd. for a total cost not to exceed $111,898.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA cost estimates and specifications;

THAT Contract #10000108 for the disposal of SWMP dredgeate for Upper and Lower Spring Creek Ponds in High Park be awarded to Roni Excavating Ltd. for a total cost not to exceed $240,040.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA cost estimates and specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND In spring 2013, Toronto Water Operations approached TRCA’s Restoration Services division to seek opportunities for TRCA to assist with the management of Toronto stormwater management ponds. Resolution #A141/13 at Authority Meeting #7/13, held on September 27, 2013 authorized TRCA to clean out three ponds: Sisters of St. Joseph, Lansing and Centennial. TRCA has continued the partnership with the City of Toronto, as authorized by Resolution #A142/14 at Authority Meeting #7/14, held on September 19, 2014. In 2014, the City of Toronto approved the budgets and work proposed in the Maintenance and Clean-out Plans for two more ponds, Wendigo Pond and Spring Creek Pond (Upper and Lower).

Wendigo Pond is located in the Humber River watershed, in High Park, immediately north of Grenadier Pond. This pond is at capacity for sediment volume, and without regular maintenance (i.e., dredging) the pond cannot continue to provide flood control and water quality management as designed. There are approximately 2,419 tonnes (1,052 cubic metres) of sediment to be removed from the pond.

Spring Creek Pond is expected to be cleaned out after Wendigo. Spring Creek Pond is located in the northeast corner of High Park. There are approximately 5,470 tonnes (2,378 cubic metres) of sediment to be removed from the pond.

TRCA will dewater the ponds during dredging and manage flow to ensure the operation of the ponds is maintained to provide downstream stormwater management benefits. The sediment will be dewatered on site and an approved sediment and erosion control plan will be used to ensure sediment is not released downstream. 451 Sediment sampling at both Wendigo and Spring Creek ponds revealed contamination levels consistent with SWMPs across the GTA. Sediment from SWMPs typically exceeds Ministry of the Environment's (MOE) 2011 guidelines for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property. Contamination levels at these two ponds were better than anticipated, but still slightly exceed the guidelines. Therefore, the material will be hauled away by a licensed contractor and disposed of at an Industrial/Commercial disposal facility that is operating under a MOE Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA).

TRCA will commence Wendigo Pond dredging in late November 2014. While sediment is dewatering on-site at Wendigo Pond, dredging will commence at Spring Creek Pond. After approximately four weeks, weather permitting, sediment is expected to be completely dewatered and can be hauled away and disposed of at the appropriate facility.

Most stormwater management ponds are designed to be cleaned out every decade, and the clean-out of these two ponds is expected to provide stormwater management benefits for that period of time. Once cleaned out, the ponds are also expected to benefit downstream water quality and aquatic habitat by operating at peak efficiency.

RATIONALE Requests for Quotation (RFQs) #10000107 and #10000108 were publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo (http://www.biddingo.com/) on October 28, 2014 for the haulage and disposal of sediment material of the two ponds. Based on the tested sediment quality, bidders were asked to provide two quotes: one for sediment meeting the MOE Residential/Parkland/Institutional guideline, and one for sediment that exceeds the guideline and requires disposal in an industrial facility.

A mandatory site information meeting was held on November 5, 2014. RFQ packages were given to the following three contractors that attended the site meeting:  AIM Environmental Group;  Ground Force Environmental Inc.;  Roni Excavating Ltd.

As a condition of the RFQ, only bidders that operate under an MOE Environmental Compliance Approval were considered to undertake the disposal of the sediment.

The Quotations were received on Wednesday, November 12, 2014, and opened by TRCA staff on November 13, 2014 with the following results:

Contract # 10000107 - Wendigo Pond (2,419 tonnes)

TOTAL (Plus HST) TOTAL (Plus HST) BIDDER Meets Residential/Parkland Exceeds Guidelines Residential/Parkland Guidelines AIM Environmental Group $112,681.10 $137,113.00 Ground Force Environmental Inc. $82,346.10 $130,968.00 Roni Excavating $75,613.00 $111,898.00

452 Contract # 10000108 - Spring Creek Pond, Upper & Lower (5,470 tonnes)

TOTAL (Plus HST) TOTAL (Plus HST) BIDDER Meets Residential/Parkland Exceeds Guidelines Residential/Parkland Guidelines AIM Environmental Group $241,673.00 $280,510.00 Ground Force Environmental Inc. $163,366.50 $277,416.00 Roni Excavating $147,050.00 $240,040.00

TRCA reviewed the three bids received against its own cost estimate and has determined that the lowest bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined on the contract documents. Roni Excavating Ltd. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Roni Excavating Ltd. be awarded Contracts #10000107 and #10000108 for the disposal of SWMP dredgeate at Wendigo Pond and Spring Creek Pond, High Park, for a total cost not to exceed $111,898.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST; and $240,040.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, respectively.

These projects are consistent with TRCA’s Strategic Plan, specifically: priority strategy #2 manage our regional water resources for current and future generations, and strategy #7 build partnerships and new business models.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA will execute the contract, including: oversight of the dredging, site supervision, management of the disposal contractor on site, certification of each load leaving the site, issuance of bills of lading to each truck, verification of the dumping site's MOE ECA, and random checks to follow trucks from dredging site to disposal site. These activities ensure the chain of custody of the dredged sediment from the SWMP to the licensed dump site operating under an MOE ECA.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of this contract is 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto, Toronto Water, District Operations and Maintenance, within accounts 113-24 and 113-25.

Report prepared by: Lauren MacNeil, extension 5383 Email: [email protected] For Information contact: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366 Email: [email protected] Date: November 04, 2014

______

453 RES.#A188/14 - 4180 to 4190 DUNDAS STREET WEST SLOPE STABILIZATION PROJECT Contract RSD14-73 - Soil Anchoring. Award of Contract RSD14-73 for supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for soil anchoring works at 4180 to 4190 Dundas Street West, in the City of Toronto.

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT Contract RSD14-73 for the supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for soil anchoring works at 4180 to 4190 Dundas Street West, in the City of Toronto be awarded to McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $343,473.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 10% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT the award of contract be conditional upon acceptance of TRCA's Phase 3 Offer of Service between TRCA and Delmanor Prince Edward Inc., and confirmation of available funding for the project;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Tridel submitted an application to the City of Toronto’s Planning Department in order to develop the properties at 4180 to 4190 Dundas Street West into a seniors’ rental apartment. A staff report developed by the City of Toronto’s Planning Department recommended approval of the application on the basis that the proposal would help realize the goals of the Dundas Street West Avenue Study by creating a safe and enjoyable pedestrian environment, encouraging a diversity of uses, and providing general enhancements to the natural environment. The staff report reviewed applications to amend the Official Plan with regard to the policy that specifies the setback of development from the top-of-bank and recommended approval.

In 2006, the top of bank was staked as part of the determination of the required development setback. In May 2010, the top of bank was re-staked and a Slope Stability Report was prepared by Toronto Inspection Limited (TIL). The report (dated June 15, 2010) identified a 4 metre toe erosion allowance, a further 6.5 metre inland setback from the top of bank, and an additional 10 metre setback as required by the City of Toronto Official Plan. The required setback for the development was therefore 20.5 metres. 454 The proposed building footprint encroached into the 10 metre setback required by the City of Toronto however an addendum to the TIL report dated July 14, 2010 stated that from a geotechnical perspective, any encroachment into the 10 metre setback required by the City of Toronto will have no adverse effect on the stability of the existing slope. On February 7, 2012, City Council adopted the motion to amend Zoning By-Law 717-2006 (dated December 16, 2011). A condition of the Site Plan Approval specified by the City of Toronto requires the design, implementation, securing and warranty of slope stabilization and erosion control works, comprehensive planting and ravine stewardship for the land north of the Long Term Stable Slope Crest (LTSSC) to the satisfaction of both TRCA and the City of Toronto (Urban Forestry). Said lands north of the LTSSC would then be transferred to TRCA.

Staff from TRCA and Tridel met on-site on March 22, 2013 to discuss the scale of slope stabilization and erosion control works required to secure site plan approvals. It was determined that professional consulting services would be required to define the appropriate scale and extent of slope stabilization and erosion control works at the site.

On May 29, 2013, Tridel partnered with TRCA on the basis of the common goal of eliminating erosion risk at the site by implementing a long-term solution to address the hazards present. It was agreed that TRCA would manage the procurement and design of the slope stabilization and erosion control works along the slope including the tableland area near the slope crest.

TRCA engaged a consulting firm to develop a design based on the proposed criteria, as outlined in the permitting process, and is now preparing to undertake implementation of the proposed solution, pending acceptance from Tridel of the final costing for the completion of works.

RATIONALE Tender RSD14-73 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo( http://www.biddingo.com/) on Tuesday, June 10, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Thursday, June 12, 2014. Tender packages were sent to 15 contractors as follows:  AMS Inc;  Blackstone Paving;  Bridgecon Construction;  Cambridge Landscaping;  Clearwater Structures;  Dynex Construction  Grascan Construction;  Hilton Construction;  Lomco;  Maram Building Corp.;  McPherson-Andrews.;  Metric Construction;  Mopal;  Roni Excavating;and  TBG Landscape Inc.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on August 7, 2014 with the following results: 455 Tender RSD14-73 4180-4190 Dundas Street West Slope Stabilization Project - Soil Anchoring Works

BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT (Plus HST)

McPherson-Andrews Contracting Limited $343,473.00 TBG Landscape Inc $360,404.49 Dynex Construction $436,025.00

Fifteen bidders attended the site meeting and after visiting the site several bidders indicated they were no longer interested in submitting a bid due to the scope of work. Furthermore, bidders indicated that due to scheduling conflicts and the workload involved, they were unable to submit a bid, resulting in only three bids ultimately being received.

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from McPherson-Andrews Contracting against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of McPherson-Andrews Contracting's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that McPherson-Andrews Contracting is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Contract RSD14-73 for the supply of all labour, equipment and materials necessary for soil anchoring works at 4180 to 4190 Dundas Street West, in the City of Toronto be awarded to McPherson-Andrews Contracting Ltd for a total amount not to exceed $343,473.00, plus a contingency amount of $34,347.30 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs are 100% recoverable from Tridel, through account code 170-15.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Patricia Newland, 416-392-9690 Emails: [email protected] Date: November 17, 2014

______

RES.#A189/14 - ETOBICOKE VALLEY PARK EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROJECT Contract RSD14-182. Award of Contract RSD14-182 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,000 tonnes of 2-4 tonne armour stone in support of the Etobicoke Valley Park Erosion Control Maintenance Project, City of Toronto. 456 Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Contract RSD14-182 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,000 tonnes of 2-4 tonne armourstone to the Etobicoke Valley Park Erosion Control Maintenance Project, in the City of Toronto, be awarded to B-Town Group for a total unit price of $62.50 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $187,500.00, plus a contingency amount of 10% to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

THAT Award of Contract RSD14-182 to B-Town Group be conditional upon inspection by TRCA confirming that the material meets TRCA's specifications as outlined in the contract documents;

THAT should the material be deemed unacceptable upon inspection, or staff be unable to achieve an acceptable contract with the awarded supplier, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other suppliers that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND On the evening of July 8th, 2013 a severe thunderstorm passed through the Greater Toronto Area, bringing large amounts of rainfall over the span of a few hours to the west end and downtown areas of the City of Toronto. This record amount of precipitation not only resulted in extensive flooding of major roadways and transit infrastructure, but also caused significant damage to the river and valley systems, the park amenities found within them, the water infrastructure buried beneath them, and many of the older neighbourhoods that border them.

The City of Toronto has retained TRCA to implement erosion control maintenance works at two locations along Etobicoke Creek between the QEW and Lakeshore Boulevard within Etobicoke Valley Park. The storm damage repair work for Sites # 1 & 2 will be completed on behalf of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in order to restore damaged erosion control works to a state of good repair.

The 2 - 4 tonne armourstone is required to construct the retaining wall.

RATIONALE Tender packages were sent to 13 suppliers as follows:  Brock Aggregates;  C.D.R. Young’s Aggregates Inc.;  Coco Aggregates;  Glenn Windrem Trucking;  J.C. Rock Ltd.;  BOT Aggregates;  Miller Paving Ltd.;  Nelson Aggregate Co.; 457  R.W. Tomlinson Ltd.;  Strada Aggregates;  Merv Johnston;  B-Town group; and  TBG Landscape Inc.

Tender RSD14-182 was also publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo (http://www.biddingo.com/) on Thursday, October 30, 2014. The Procurement Opening Committee opened tenders on Thursday, November 6, 2014 with the following results:

Contract RSD14-182 - Supply and Delivery of Approximately 3000 tonnes of 2-4 tonne Armourstone

TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT (Plus HST) (Plus HST) J.C. Rock Ltd. $60.62 $181,860.00 B-Town Group $62.50 $187,500.00 TBG Landscape Inc. $65.00 $195,000.00 Glenn Windrem Trucking $66.00 $198,000.00 C.D.R. Young’s Aggregates Inc. $66.31 $198,930.00

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff recommend rejecting the bid received by J.C. Rock Ltd. due to their poor performance on previous TRCA projects. Specifically, at the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project, the required armourstone did not meet material specifications as stated by the Contract. Furthermore, J.C. Rock Ltd. changed the quarry that was listed as the source of armourstone on their Form of Tender without notifying TRCA staff. This change was a direct violation of TRCA Contract Documents and the armourstone delivered to the site was not suitable and rejected upon delivery. As a result of this action by J.C. Rock Ltd., the construction schedule for the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project was negatively impacted. Due to the time sensitive nature of Etobicoke Valley Park Erosion Control Maintenance Project, TRCA cannot afford to risk a similar occurrence.

It is noted that while J.C. Rock Ltd. was invited to bid only to have their bid rejected, the Form of Tender that went to 13 suppliers included a request to bid on multiple types of stone (e.g. gabion stone, rip rap) under different contract numbers, and that there have been no significant issues with respect to their supply or delivery of these other materials. Future armourstone bids by J.C. Rock will be considered for projects with a smaller required tonnage, and shall be awarded only upon successful inspection at their listed quarry, however should any significant issues arise during the delivery process, staff recommend that a suspension be considered with prior approval from the Authority Board.

458 Based on the bids received, staff therefore recommends that B-Town Group be awarded Contract RSD14-182 for the supply and delivery of approximately 3,000 tonnes of 2-4 tonne armourstone for the unit cost of $62.50 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed $187,500.00, plus HST, they being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications for the contract. The contract is subject to a 10% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff. Staff recommend awarding the contract only upon successful inspection of the material at the supplier's quarry, confirming that the armourstone is uniform and stackable, and meets all other TRCA specifications.

TRCA and the City of Toronto have worked cooperatively on erosion control projects for more than 30 years. Many existing erosion control structures on City-lands were constructed by TRCA, and TRCA monitors this infrastructure on the City's behalf as a value-added service to the City through its long-standing Erosion Management Program.

There is value to the City in having TRCA provide services that eliminate the risk to life and property in a prompt, cost-effective and environmentally responsible manner. TRCA is able to provide effective management of natural environment projects using their highly specialized expertise and ability to expedite approvals, facilitate community involvement, meet tight deadlines and satisfy provincial and federal environmental standards.

Recognizing TRCA's value as a leader in environmental protection and restoration, Council recently amended Schedule A of Chapter 71, Financial Control, of the Toronto Municipal Code, which permits TRCA to deliver specific capital projects on their behalf. According to Section 22 of the amendments, the proposed bank stabilization works at Etobicoke Valley Park is eligible for TRCA to deliver on behalf of the City of Toronto. Furthermore, approval to proceed with this project was approved by the Executive Committee in August 2014 at Executive Meeting #6/14 under Resolution #B71/14.

This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA’s new strategic plan. Through the stabilization of the eroding bank, the adjacent pathway will be restored and public safety will be protected.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Contract RSD14-182 is 100% cost recoverable through the City of Toronto's Parks Capital Funding, under account 185-76.

Report prepared by: Craig Eden, 647-633-8406 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-844-3987 Emails: [email protected] Date: November 14, 2014

______

459 RES.#A190/14 - HUMBER VALLEY MEADOWS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND RESTORATION PROJECT Award of Contract RSD14-194 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for maintenance work for the stormwater management pond located at Humber Valley Meadows in the Town of Caledon.

Moved by: Glenn Mason Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker

THAT Contract RSD14-194 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for maintenance work for the stormwater management pond located at Humber Valley Meadows in the Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon be awarded to Esposito Bros Construction at a total cost not to exceed $189,936.27, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;

THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 10% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;

THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Humber Valley Meadows Stormwater Management Pond (SWMP) is a wetland facility constructed to provide quality and quantity control for stormwater runoff from the Humber Valley Meadows development within the Village of Bolton, in the Town of Caledon. Flows from the adjacent subdivision enter the SWMP via an open, overland flow channel (inlet channel) originating at an 800mm diameter outfall at the end of English Rose Lane and a 250mm diameter pipe at the bottom of the inlet channel. Downstream of the SWMP, flows from the bypass channel and the pond’s discharge pipe merge and are directed to an outlet channel which eventually empties into the Humber River.

Over time, the pond block has been frequently used as an informal trail system to access the Humber Valley Heritage Trail (HVHT). This has resulted in erosion of both the pond embankment and the slope adjacent to the outlet channel. In addition, the upper portion of the inlet channel is beginning to scour and the rip rap which was originally placed to protect the bed and banks from erosion is currently being outflanked. Furthermore, the meanders along the inlet channel are significantly undercut and undergoing major scouring.

As a result GHD Inc. was retained to conduct a geomorphic and hydrological analysis report of the study area which incorporated the SWMP and its inlet/outlet pipes, the by-pass channel, and the naturalized outlet channel located behind English Rose Lane. Based on the report received, detailed designs were required and obtained for the inlet, bypass and outlet channel. 460 The scope of work for the inlet channel generally consists of localized treatments and grade control at the bends as well as an enlargement of the upstream section of channel where overflow occurs. A step-pool sequence will be incorporated into the inlet design to stabilize the flow around the steep bends and eliminate erosion on the inside of the bends. The aim will be to limit bank erosion and overbank flow, prevent erosion shifting to unprotected banks and eliminate periodic washouts of the access road.

The bypass and outlet channel design will also incorporate grade control at all areas of concern. This will include lining of the bed and banks at the downstream end of the bypass channel, the series of knickpoints and the gully downstream of the outlet with 100-200mm rip rap and 40-50mm sub angular material. The downstream section of the gully channel will also be regraded to 3% based on a stable gradient as determined by GHD given the sands and gravels present on the bed.

RATIONALE As there are no TRCA staff available to implement this work prior to year end, TRCA is required to retain the services of a qualified contractor to undertake maintenance works to restore all components of the SWMP and prevent future erosion.

This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA's new strategic plan. Through improvements of the flow regime, this project will assist in the successful management of our regional water resources for current and future generations.

Contract RSD14-194 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo ( http://www.biddingo.com/) on Tuesday, November 4, 2014 with a mandatory site information meeting held on Friday, November 7, 2014. Tender packages were sent to the following 10 contractors:  Bronte Construction;  Cambridge Landscaping Inc.;  Cedar Springs Landscape Inc.;  Dynex Construction Inc.;  Esposito Bros;  Hilton Construction Corp.;  Jass Construction;  Seawaves Development Services Inc.;  TBG Landscape Inc.; and  Varcon Construction Corp.

The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Thursday, November 13, 2014 with the following results:

461 Contract RSD14-194 Humber Valley Meadows SWM Pond – Restoration Project

BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT (Plus HST) Jass Construction $138,000.00 Esposito Bros $189,936.27 TBG Landscape Inc. $190,333.68 Dynex Construction Inc $256,430.00 Cambridge Landscaping Inc. $282,639.00 Hilton Construction Corp. $458,600.00 Varcon Construction Corp. $575,200.00 Cedar Springs Landscape Inc. $604,275.00

The bid selection process included a review of the contractors ability to undertake similar projects and an assessment of previous performance in a number of areas including, but not limited to, similar work experience, quality of work, and health and safety. Although Jass Construction had the lowest bid overall, subsequent reference checks failed to demonstrate a history of similar work experience, making Esposito Bros the lowest bidder overall meeting TRCA's requirements.

Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Esposito Bros Construction against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of Esposito Bros Construction's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Esposito Bros Construction is capable of undertaking the scope of work.

Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Esposito Bros Construction be awarded Contract RSD14-194 for supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for maintenance work for the stormwater management pond located at Humber Valley Meadows, in the Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon, for a total amount not to exceed $189,936.27, to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus a 10% contingency, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available from the Region of Peel within account 128-93.

Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 647-808-5809 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702 Emails: [email protected] Date: November 14, 2014 ______

462 RES.#A191/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain Conservation Component Humber River Watershed Town of Mono, County of Dufferin Snider, CFN 49560. Donation of a parcel of land located east of 7th Line East and north of Highway 9, Town of Mono, County of Dufferin, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B105/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Jack Heath

WHEREAS Charles Edward Snider wishes to donate 0.88 hectares (2.18 acres), more or less, of vacant ecologically sensitive lands;

AND WHEREAS The Living City Foundation will accept this donation and issue an income tax receipt to Charles Edward Snider for the final appraised value, in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and Revenue Agency and terms of reference as required by the Ecological Gifts Program;

AND WHEREAS donations of assets to The Living City Foundation in support of a Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) managed project may be transferred to TRCA;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA accept title to the lands donated by Charles Edward Snider to The Living City Foundation, situated to the east of 7th Line East and north of Highway 9, said land being Part of Lot 1, Concession 7 EHS, in the Town of Mono, County of Dufferin;

THAT TRCA shall be responsible for appraisal, environmental audit and reasonable legal fees associated with completion of the transaction;

THAT TRCA extend their appreciation and thanks to Charles Edward Snider for his generous donation;

THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred, by both TRCA and The Living City Foundation, incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

463 RES.#A192/14 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed, City of Toronto Temple Emanu-El, CFN 50550. Acquisition of property located south of Vyner Road and west of Harrison Road, in the City of Toronto, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011 - 2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River watershed. (Executive Res.#B106/14)

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT 0.078 hectares (0.193 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 1, Registered Plan 4226, City of Toronto, located to the south of Vyner Road and west of Harrison Road, in the City of Toronto, be purchased from Temple Emanu-El;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A193/14 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Behind 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, CFN 48048. Recommendation that the subject TRCA-owned property, located to the rear of 58 Park Drive, City of Vaughan, Humber River watershed, be retained in TRCA ownership for conservation purposes. (Executive Res.#B107/14)

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT the staff report be referred back to staff to explore the feasibility of a lease arrangement or an encroachment easement for the encroached lands for the period of time that the applicant resides at 58 Park Drive and report back. CARRIED

464 MOTION #2 RES.#A194/14

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT the City of Vaughan be requested to transfer ownership of the watercourse lands adjacent to 58 Park Drive to TRCA while continuing maintenance of these lands under the management agreement with TRCA. CARRIED THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:

THAT the staff report be referred back to staff to explore the feasibility of a lease arrangement or an encroachment easement for the encroached lands for the period of time that the applicant resides at 58 Park Drive and report back;

AND FURTHER THAT the City of Vaughan be requested to transfer ownership of the watercourse lands adjacent to 58 Park Drive to TRCA while continuing maintenance of these lands under the management agreement with TRCA.

______

RES.#A195/14 - BELL MOBILITY INC. PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF LANDS Caledon Equestrian Park, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, CFN 50551. Proposal to lease Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned land located within the Caledon Equestrian Park,Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, to construct and operate a telecommunications tower and associated equipment. (Executive Res.#B108/14)

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Linda Pabst

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been requested by Bell Mobilty Inc. to enter into a lease arrangement for construction and operation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment on lands located within Caledon Equestrian Park, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with Bell Mobility Inc. in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease with Bell Mobility Inc. of approximately 0.023 hectares, more or less, (0.057 acres) together with use of an additional 0.052 hectares (0.129 acres) parcel of land for access and utilities for the construction and operation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment, said land being Part of Lot 27, Concession 7, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel; 465 THAT the lease with Bell Mobility Inc. be premised on the following:

(i) the initial term of the lease will be for five years, with three renewal options for successive five year periods, subject to the concurrence of TRCA;

(ii) the lease rate is to be $30,000 per annum to be increased by 2% per year, plus 50% co-location fees for all additional carriers on the tower;

(iii) Bell Mobility Inc. is to be responsible for all approvals required for construction of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment;

(iv) Bell Mobility Inc. shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the telecommunications tower and associated equipment;

(v) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the TRCA's solicitor;

THAT Bell Mobilty Inc. provides additional plantings to compensate for any vegetation loss within the 30 metre Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA;

THAT Bell Mobilty Inc. provides TRCA with an Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plan indicating the long-term monitoring and maintenance (minimum weekly and after any significant rain or snowmelt event, and repairs to be conducted within 48 hours), as necessary, of the construction area and adjacent undisturbed lands;

THAT an archaeological review be completed at the expense of Bell Mobility Inc. with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A196/14 - ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Request for a Permanent Easement for a new Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 42 Inch Diameter Natural Gas Pipeline City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel and City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed, CFN 51914. Receipt of a request from Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. to provide a permanent easement for a new NPS 42 inch diameter natural gas pipeline, south of Steeles Avenue, west of Highway 427, within Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel and City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B109/14)

466 Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Ron Moeser

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. to provide a permanent easement for a new Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 42 inch diameter natural gas pipeline, south of Steeles Avenue, west of Highway No. 427, within Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel and City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed;

AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.51 hectares (1.26 acres), more or less, be granted to Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. for a new NPS 42 inch diameter natural gas pipeline, said land being Part of Lot 14, Concession 9 SD, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Sexton McKay Ltd., under their Reference No. 12-12-100-10, Drawing SP3-RP20, dated May 16, 2014 and Part of Lot 39, Concession 4, FTH, City of Toronto, designated as Parts 10, 11, 12 and 13 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Sexton McKay Ltd., under their Reference No. 12-12-100-10, Drawing SP3-RP19, dated October 9, 2014, subject to the following terms and conditions:

(a) the easement price is $895,000, in addition to all legal, appraisal, survey and other costs incurred necessary to complete the transaction. In addition, Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. will contribute $595,000 toward the Claireville Land Management Implementation Plan;

(b) Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims arising from injury, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of any construction;

(c) Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. is to complete all construction prior to the beginning of the 2015 operating season for Wild Water Kingdom, being no later than May 1, 2015;

(d) an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the sole expense of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.;

(e) a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, be obtained by Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. from TRCA prior to commencement of construction;

(f) any additional terms or conditions deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or solicitor;

467 THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any necessary action required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any required approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A197/14 - LIVING CITY FARM Lease of Land. Approval to enter into a lease agreement with Akachi Farms for the purpose of establishing an urban farm operation that will develop a locally based, ecologically sustainable and economically viable agricultural enterprise on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority land at the Kortright Centre for Conservation, City of Vaughan. (Executive Res.#B110/14)

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Cynthia Thorburn

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a lease agreement with Akachi Farms for approximately seven acres of farmland, a greenhouse and three small animal enclosures (total area 12 acres) located at the Kortright Centre for Conservation, City of Vaughan;

THAT the term of the lease agreement shall be for five years with the option of renewal;

THAT the agreement be on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA solicitor and staff;

AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A198/14 - 2015 FEE SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PROGRAMMING Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2015 Fee Schedule for Public Facilities and Programming (Executive Res.#B111/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Glenn Mason

468 THAT the 2015 Fee Schedule for Public Facilities and Programming be amended as set out in Attachment 1, and become effective January 1, 2015, with the exception of student program fees, which are to become effective September 2015. CARRIED ______

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RES.#A199/14

Moved by: David Barrow Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT the committee move into closed session to discuss item EX7.8 - Salary Grid for Full Time Salaried Staff CARRIED

ARISE AND REPORT RES.#A200/14

Moved by: Linda Pabst Seconded by: Jack Heath

THAT the committee arise and report from closed session. CARRIED

RES.#A201/14 - SALARY GRID FOR FULL TIME SALARIED STAFF Amendment. Introduction of an additional salary range for senior management within the existing grid. (Executive Res.#B112/14)

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Dave Ryan

THAT the creation of a new salary range within the existing salary grid for senior leaders, be approved. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is evolving into a more organizationally flat structure with highly professional both technical and leadership senior staff. With a more collaborative structure, leaders will be expected to take on more responsibilities and in doing so will be compensated commensurate with those responsibilities.

469 Existing Salary Grid

Salary Range Level 1 Level 2 Level 4 14 (Director) $135,000 $148,408 $155,389 15 (Chief Executive $180,161 $197,027 $213,912 Officer)

Proposed Salary Grid

Salary Range Level 1 Level 2 Level 4 14 (Director) $135,000 $148,408 $155,389 15 (General Manager $157,680 $172,718 $184,650 or Department Head) NEW 16 (CEO) $180,161 $197,027 $213,912

RATIONALE TRCA management structure is based on a single hierarchy of functional leaders. The new mode of operations for TRCA will be a more flexible model, with more project based leaders, more collaboration across the organization and a shared decision making process to recognize the talents and competencies of TRCA staff. In some cases, a change in salary range may be temporary in nature or permanent. Leaders will have the opportunity to take on greater responsibilities in financial stewardship, partnership development and innovation. The new salary range recognizes that at the highest levels in the organization there will be opportunity to expand the scope of a role to better contribute to TRCA's success and provide appropriate compensation for accomplishments that grow the scale and effectiveness of various service areas.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The total increase to the salary grid will be limited and will be part of the existing Operating and Capital Budget allocation for 2014-2015.

Report prepared by: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219 Emails: [email protected] Date: October 20, 2014

______

470 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A202/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Section II Item EX8.1 - Mud Creek Reach 2 Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #9/14, held on November 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

RES.#A203/14 - SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES EVALUATION PROGRAM Progress Report. Update on the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program.

Moved by: Deb Schulte Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT the staff report on the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program (STEP) be received and that staff continue to report to the Authority on an annual basis. CARRIED BACKGROUND Many environmental technologies are introduced into the market place every year. Several of these offer innovative solutions for improving the environment and our standard of living. However, adoption of the technologies is often slow because of a lack of information on performance and cost effectiveness, as well as the perceived risk associated with implementing new products or practices.

The multi-agency Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program, led by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), was introduced in 2004 to help address these issues and accelerate the process of adoption. The program’s major objectives are to monitor and evaluate clean water, air and energy technologies and designs with respect to the environment and human health, and to work with municipal partners and other groups to address barriers, develop guidelines and foster broader implementation of the technologies.

The choice of projects reflects priorities identified by municipalities and other levels of government through various initiatives, including the Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan, the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan, drinking water source protection plans, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, regional water conservation programs (e.g., WaterSmart Peel, York's Water for Tomorrow, Toronto's Water Efficiency Program), municipal development standards, and municipal sustainable energy and climate change plans. Technologies monitored under the program are demonstration projects that have the potential for widespread application in urban environments, and contribute to reducing the environmental impacts of human activities and improving the quality of life for residents. 471 STEP has a strong knowledge transfer component delivered through various media. Project reports, fact sheets, decision support tools and updates are provided on a designated website (www.sustainabletechnologies.ca). Professional training courses and presentations at external events are delivered regularly throughout the year, and the Program hosts an annual two day conference on innovative stormwater management and construction site erosion and sediment control. STEP has also developed four on-line e-learning courses on construction site erosion and sediment control and stormwater management, offered through the STEP and The Living City Campus websites (www.livingcitycampus.com).

The Program has four key topic areas of focus:

1. Urban runoff management and green infrastructure: Projects in this category help improve the management of stormwater runoff for the protection of streams, lakes and built infrastructure. Particular emphasis is placed on low impact development (LID) approaches that provide both water quality and water balance control. Other topic areas include pollution prevention, natural channel design, water conservation and mitigation of thermal impacts from urban developments. Over 20 detailed monitoring evaluations have been completed since the Program was initiated. STEP has also prepared design guidance documents, produced literature reviews and developed life cycle costing tools to help accelerate adoption of the technologies.

2. Construction site erosion and sediment control: Construction activities associated with new developments are a significant source of stress to the natural environment. STEP has helped to address these issues through technical assessments of structural best practices, the development of best practice guidance documents, and a suite of training and certification programs tailored for development consultants, on-site environmental inspectors and contractors. STEP's Certified Inspectors Sediment and Erosion Control (CISEC) program is offered across Ontario and Alberta.

3. Preserving and restoring healthy urban soils: This is a program area that was initiated in 2010 in recognition of the importance of healthy soils in managing stormwater runoff and supporting vigorous plant and tree growth. Projects include the development of a best practices guide for preserving and restoring healthy soils on urban construction sites, and various evaluations of best practices relating to topsoil stockpiling on construction sites, and the use of organic amendments to create more absorbent landscapes and improve the quality of stormwater runoff.

4. Energy efficiency and renewables: Initiated in 2008, with the construction of the Archetype Sustainable Houses at The Living City Campus in Vaughan, this program area helps to facilitate broader uptake of technologies that help organizations mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change. Major project categories include renewable energy, residential home heating and cooling, smart grid infrastructure, and energy conservation and efficiency. Over 25 technology evaluations and decision support tools have been completed through partnerships with universities, TRCA's municipal partners, the Toronto Atmospheric Fund, Natural Resources Canada and other organizations.

472 In 2012, TRCA was designated under the Canadian Environmental Technology Verification (CETV) Program as the qualified organization responsible for performance verifications of stormwater management and renewable energy technologies. Through this designation, product manufacturers seeking to verify performance claims would be directed to TRCA by the delivery agent of the CETV program – Globe Performance Solutions - to either have their product tested or to validate performance testing conducted by qualified third parties. In 2013, STEP completed a laboratory verification protocol that specifies the testing procedures required for oil grit separator manufactured treatment devices seeking verification under the Canadian ETV Program. Manufacturer testing to the protocol began in early 2014. Verifications of laboratory tests are expected to be completed by TRCA starting in 2015.

Scientific evaluations of technologies often require the development of test facilities that can be customized to address specific research questions of interest. To help fulfill this need, STEP has constructed and instrumented a number of field test sites at The Living City Campus. These ‘living laboratories’ act as hands-on demonstrations for training and educational workshops, and provide the controlled, real world conditions needed to conduct monitoring evaluations.

Currently the Campus is home to four living laboratories for photovoltaics, small wind turbines, green building technologies and low impact development stormwater management practices. Two additional facilities for soil management practices and building integrated photovoltaics are currently being planned or under construction. Over 20 graduate university thesis projects have been conducted in partnership with STEP at these facilities since 2008. The Archetype Sustainable House hosts an advanced data acquisition system that collects and processes continuous data from over a thousand different sensors in the houses and field test sites.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A number of projects are currently underway or are planned for 2015. Some of these build upon issues or knowledge gaps identified in earlier studies, while others are new initiatives. STEP’s Clean Water projects are centered on the following themes:

 Evaluation of Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management: Projects in this category include (i) a full scale assessment of multiple LID practices on a new residential subdivision in Newmarket, (ii) an on-going side-by-side evaluation of the performance of two non-proprietary stormwater infiltration technologies retrofitted into a parking lot in Vaughan, and (iii) monitoring of a lined biofilter that treats runoff from a public road in Brampton.

 Best Practice Guidance Development: In 2015, STEP will be finalizing a comprehensive inspection and maintenance guide for LID practices that draws together experiences from cold climate jurisdictions across the world and provides detailed recommendations and procedures on municipal maintenance programs and LID maintenance practices. Also in 2015, STEP will be completing a guidance document targeted at municipalities and the development community that clarifies regulatory procedures and describes cost effective methods for maintaining stormwater ponds based on various local and international sources of information. Curriculum for professional training programs hosted by STEP will also be developed through the course of these projects.

473  Synthesis of Stormwater Practice Monitoring and Evaluation Studies: This project will review and synthesize findings and recommendations from over 13 technology performance evaluation studies conducted under STEP from 2004 to 2014. Results summarized within the context of other literature will be used to provide guidance to designers and municipalities on the relative effectiveness of a comprehensive range of different stormwater practices to mitigate the impacts of urban runoff on receiving waters, and provide support for addressing further study needs and communications objectives through partnerships.

 Mitigation of the Thermal Impacts of Stormwater Ponds: Although stormwater ponds are an effective means of improving the quality of urban runoff and controlling flow rates, they heat the water resulting in detrimental impacts on downstream aquatic communities adapted to cooler temperatures. In this ongoing project, various devices designed to cool water will be assessed and guidance will be provided on the optimal design of these structures both from the perspective of performance and long term functionality.

 Training and workshops: In addition to STEP's ongoing communications activities through written and electronic media, a minimum of 12 training events on stormwater management, erosion and sediment control, and facility operation and maintenance will be delivered in 2015. The target audience for these events will include design professionals, development consultants, municipal staff, construction contractors and environmental inspectors. STEP staff will also host and participate in a two-day international conference on cold climate stormwater management research and erosion and sediment control on March 25 and 26, 2015 (www.TRIECA.com).

In 2015, work through the sustainable energy component of STEP will focus on the following broad themes:

 Solar Technology Assessments: STEP continues to work with government and industry partners to develop the tools and resources required to support excellence in site selection, installation and monitoring of solar equipment on GTA solar facilities. An ongoing four year research project initiated in late 2012, and funded primarily through Natural Resources Canada, is testing and validating an international standard for PV (photovoltaic) module power and energy rating (IEC 61853). Broader use of this standard will help increase the reliability and optimized performance of PV in Canada.

 Green HVAC Systems for Low-rise Housing: The objective of the proposed work is to identify, develop, assess and validate new and emerging sustainable/green heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems (or mechanical systems). Ongoing studies in the Archetype House are examining the technical and economic feasibility of absorption chillers, intelligent HVAC controls, heat recovery ventilators and air source heat pumps, among other technologies. This series of projects is being conducted in partnership with the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department of Ryerson University.

474  Integration of Renewable Energy into Smart Micro-grid and Off-grid Systems: Climate change is affecting our weather patterns and resulting in more frequent extreme weather events that can result in the extended loss of essential power services. STEP is undertaking research on the integration of renewable energy technologies into smart micro-grid and smart off-grid systems, which will allow our communities to remain serviced during extreme weather events and extended service outages. The research being conducted with utilities, industry, educational institutions and TRCA's regional municipal partners will help provide valuable recommendations and data to stakeholders developing smart grid technologies and integration systems.

 Geothermal Technology Assessment Partnership: Geoexchange is one of the few alternative energy technologies that is economically practical without government subsidies. This ongoing joint project between TRCA, the Toronto Atmospheric Fund and the Ontario Geothermal Association, assesses the performance and barriers to geoexchange through monitoring assessments of existing installations and detailed surveys of system owners and operators. STEP is currently finalizing two assessment reports, a series of case studies and decision support tools for the procurement, design, installation, monitoring, operation and maintenance of geothermal energy systems.

 Combined Building Integrated PV/Thermal (BIPV/T) Collector with Variable Capacity Air Source Heat Pump for Net Zero Energy Building Applications: In this project, building integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems that produce electricity and recover useful thermal energy by circulating air or fluid behind the array of PV panels, are coupled with air source heat pumps (ASHPs). By providing space heating, domestic water heating, summertime cooling and electricity production, the coupling of BIPV/T with ASHP will bring new and existing residential and small commercial buildings closer to the goal of net zero energy status in a cost effective and climate friendly manner.

 Training and Workshops: Workshops will be hosted by STEP on a number of energy related themes, including STEP's regular renewable energy series for homeowners, the rooftop solar installation course, sustainable house design and geoexchange technologies. STEP will also be developing two on-line courses on the commissioning and long term operation and maintenance of solar installations.

Report prepared by: Tim Van Seters 289-268-3902 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Tim Van Seters 289-268-3902 Emails: [email protected] Date: November 18, 2014

______

475 RES.#A204/14 - DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Legal Opinion In Regard to Encroachments. Supplementary Report to Item EX7.3. Legal opinion involving the disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned land in order to resolve encroachments, as requested by the Executive Committee.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti

THAT the supplementary staff report dated November 18, 2014, relating to a legal opinion in regard to encroachments, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND Upon identification of an encroachment by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, it has been TRCA practice to request removal of the encroachment in its entirety. However, from time to time, an encroaching landowner has requested that TRCA divest a portion of its land where the encroachment has occurred, at which point the request is brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #26, adopted by TRCA at Authority Meeting #1/91, held on February 22, 1991.

Property Stewardship The subject TRCA lands behind 58 Park Drive, Vaughan, were acquired in 1962 with the assistance of the federal government to reduce the risk of negative impacts on communities within the Humber River corridor. The open space designation and requirement for a flood conveyance corridor remains necessary today and is recognized within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area.

Planning/Environmental Context Located on the main Humber River within an area subject to a depth of 2-3 metres of flooding during a regional storm event, the existing house is within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area in the City of Vaughan Official Plan. The policies recognize historical development and do not allow for new lot creation or expansion. The attached letter from Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, identifies the potential adverse implications of a sale of TRCA-owned property to encroaching landowners as both a regulator and owner of land.

As outlined, this particular request would contravene existing TRCA policies regarding development within a Special Policy Area and flood plain of the Humber River watershed. Accordingly, planning, building and regulatory permissions would be required from both the City of Vaughan and TRCA, placing both in conflict with existing policy. Development is not currently permitted upon the subject lands, and would not be supported by TRCA.

476 With regards to TRCA’s role as a landowner, the sale of the subject lands would create an adverse precedent and increase TRCA’s exposure to similar requests from adjacent landowners. Further, the sale of known, flood prone lands could result in legal action being taken against TRCA by the affected landowner(s).

Report prepared by: Jae R. Truesdell, extension 5247 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342, Jae R. Truesdell, extension 5247 Emails: [email protected] or [email protected] Date: November 18, 2014 Attachments: 1

477 Attachment 1

478 479 ______480 RES.#A205/14 - SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #9/14, held on November 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A206/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Richard Whitehead Seconded by: Linda Pabst

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.19, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #9/14, held on November 7, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:30 a.m., on Friday, November 28, 2014.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

481 INDEX TO

AUTHORITY MEETING #10/14

Friday, January 9, 2015

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #9/14, held on November 28, 2014 483

CORRESPONDENCE A letter dated December 18, 2014 from Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk, York Region, in regard to Appointments to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2014-2018 Term of Regional Council 483

APPOINTMENTS TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FOR 2015 485

EROSION MANAGEMENT FOR THE JULY 8TH, 2013 SEVERE WEATHER EVENT 2014 Year End Update 486

GREAT LAKES GUARDIAN COMMUNITY FUND GRANT Black Creek SNAP Harvest the Rain Program 504

CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA LAND MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 505

CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT, 2012-2013 513

CITY OF TORONTO Request for a Permanent Easement for the Replacement of the Black Creek Culvert beneath Jane Street, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed 517

SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF CLOTHING 2015 - 2017 Award of Contract #10000128 518

MEETING SCHEDULE 2015-2016 518 NEWTONBROOK CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT Extension of Contract RSD13-133 519

WWK RECREATION INC. (WILD WATER KINGDOM) Deferral of 2014 Rent 519

ALBION HILLS FIELD CENTRE PHASE 5 RETROFIT PROJECT Extension of Contract PMO13-03 519

P-524 SANITARY SEWER PROTECTION – BANK STABILIZATION PROJECT Contract RSD14-207 520

OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Procurement Report and Contract Extension 520 MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #10/14 January 9, 2015

The Authority Meeting #10/14, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, January 9, 2015. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:38 a.m.

PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Ben Cachola Member Ronald Chopowick Member Michael Di Biase Member Chris Fonseca Member Rob Ford Member Jennifer Innis Member Mujeeb Khan Member Matt Mahoney Member Giorgio Mammoliti Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Ron Moeser Member Jennifer O'Connell Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair Anthony Perruzza Member Gino Rosati Member John Sprovieri Member Cynthia Thorburn Member

ABSENT David Barrow Member Vincent Crisanti Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Jack Heath Member Colleen Jordan Member Linda Pabst Member Jim Tovey Member Justin Di Ciano Member

482 RES.#A207/14 - MINUTES

Moved by: Glenn Mason Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/14, held on November 28, 2014, be approved. CARRIED ______

CORRESPONDENCE

(a) A letter dated December 18, 2014 from Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk, York Region, in regard to Appointments to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2014-2018 Term of Regional Council.

RES.#A208/14 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Giorgio Mammoliti

WHEREAS the Region of York has requested that they be entitled to appoint an additional member to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA);

AND WHEREAS the current membership of the TRCA board resulted from a process to reduce the size of the board from 53 (including three provincial members) and was established by agreement among all of the participating municipalities in 1984 and approved by the Province of Ontario in 1986;

AND WHEREAS any change in the membership of the TRCA board would require a new agreement among all of the participating municipalities;

AND WHEREAS the Province of Ontario has recently indicated that it intends to undertake a review of the Conservation Authorities Act including matters of governance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a review of the number of appointments to TRCA be referred to staff for a report to be brought back to the Authority either as part of the review of the Act or upon completion of the provincial review of the Conservation Authorities Act;

AND FURTHER THAT the Region of York be so advised. CARRIED

483 CORRESPONDENCE (a)

______

484 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#A209/14 - APPOINTMENTS TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FOR 2015 The Secretary-Treasurer advises that new appointees to TRCA have been duly appointed and are entitled to sit as Members of this Authority until the 2015 annual meeting when all appointments for the 2015 meeting year will be confirmed.

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick

THAT the following be recognized as Members of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for the terms indicated and as such are duly appointed and entitled to sit as Members of this Authority until Annual Authority Meeting #1/15, scheduled to be held on January 30, 2015, or until their successors are appointed:

City of Toronto - until December 31, 2016 and until the first meeting of TRCA afterwords: Paul Ainslie Maria Augimeri Vincent Crisanti Glenn De Baeremaeker Justin J. Di Ciano Rob Ford Giorgio Mammoliti Ron Moeser Anthony Perruzza

Region of Peel - until November 30, 2018 or until successors are appointed by Regional Council: Chris Fonseca Jennifer Innis Matt Mahoney John Sprovieri Jim Tovey

Region of York - for the 2014-2018 term of Council: David Barrow Michael Di Biase Jack Heath Linda Pabst Gino Rosati

Region of Durham - for the 2014-2018 term of Council: Colleen Jordan Jennifer O'Connell

485 Town of Mono/Township of Adjala-Tosorontio - for the 2014-2018 term of Council: Glenn Mason

AND FURTHER THAT Bob Callahan, Raymond Cho, Gloria Lindsay Luby, John Parker, Dave Ryan, Deborah Schulte, Richard Whitehead be thanked for their service to TRCA. CARRIED BACKGROUND In December 2014, Councillors were appointed Members to TRCA for the following terms of office:  City of Toronto - until December 31, 2016 and until the first meeting of TRCA afterwards;  Region of Peel - until November 30, 2018 or until successors are appointed by Regional Council;  Region of York - for the 2014-2018 term of Council;  Region of Durham - for the 2014-2018 term of Council.

Each year at the Annual Meeting the Secretary-Treasurer advises who is entitled to sit as Members of the Authority for the upcoming year. Due to the change in membership, such advisement needs to be provided at the January 9, 2015 meeting, to be effective until Annual Meeting #1/15, scheduled to be held on January 30, 2015. As a result, the Secretary-Treasurer is advising that the above-noted individuals are duly appointed to sit as a Member of the Authority, effective January 9, 2015.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Emails: [email protected] Date: December 22, 2014

______

RES.#A210/14 - EROSION MANAGEMENT FOR THE JULY 8TH, 2013 SEVERE WEATHER EVENT 2014 Year End Update. Staff update on the management of erosion and slope instability hazards resulting from the severe weather event on July 8th, 2013.

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Ron Moeser

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff reported on the management of erosion and slope stability hazards related to the July 8, 2013 severe weather event at Authority meetings #6/13 held on July 26, 2013, #11/13 on January 31, 2014, and #6/14 on July 25, 2014;

AND WHEREAS TRCA staff was directed at Authority Meeting #6/14 under Resolution #A120/14 to continue with the implementation of several priority projects described in the revised 2014 workplan; 486 AND WHEREAS staff has identified the next group of tentative priorities for erosion control studies and works in the 2015 workplan provided herein;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be authorized to commence with the 2015 workplan pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and funding;

THAT staff be permitted to make in-year adjustments to the 2015 workplan due to changing priorities and potential project delays as necessary, contingent upon reporting on these adjustments at the July 2015 Authority meeting;

AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this report be provided to the cities of Toronto and Mississauga, and Region of Peel. CARRIED BACKGROUND On July 8, 2013 an intense downpour rolled through the Toronto area, causing wide-spread flooding, surcharges of water infrastructure, and significant damage to the river and valley systems including extensive damage to park trails and pedestrian bridges, numerous debris jams, and an unprecedented number of slope failures on hundreds of private properties that border these natural areas. TRCA Restoration Services staff became the first responders to flood and erosion related damage following this event, inventorying and assessing more than 500 sites over the course of several months.

On July 26, 2013 staff brought the first post-storm erosion damage report to Authority Meeting #6/13, providing an overview of the information collected to date with recommendations for further action. At that time, only 141 properties had been inspected and the full extent of damage was not known, however six sites were flagged as requiring immediate action due to the perceived level of risk to houses and/or municipal infrastructure. Staff acted quickly to initiate engineering investigations at these and other top priority sites to determine the appropriate course of action using reallocated 2013 funding.

At Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014, staff provided an update to the Authority detailing the work completed to date, and the estimated cost of each major activity. By this time, the total number of sites inspected had risen to 482, and the preliminary estimate of damages was approximately $37 million. It is noted that this estimate included only those properties reported to and inspected by TRCA, and excluded damages to municipal lands and infrastructure, which TRCA's municipal partners reported on separately to avoid double-counting.

Also presented at Authority Meeting #11/13 was a workplan outlining a list of projects recommended for remedial works in 2014 using 2014-2015 Critical Erosion and Floodworks funding from the City of Toronto, which also provides funding for priority projects not related to the July 8, 2013 flood; and 2014-2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel, pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funds. In accordance with TRCA's Erosion Management Program, all work was to proceed on a priority basis, to ensure the most hazardous sites be addressed first.

487 As an update to the January 2014 workplan, a mid-year report was brought to Authority Meeting #6/14 on July 25, 2014 to outline the in-year adjustments that were required following the receipt of more detailed information from engineering studies, additional storm damage at already known sites, and project delays due to stalled erosion agreements with individual property owners. It was noted that the workplan was neither a rigid nor exhaustive list, but a framework to approach what was, and continues to be, a large backlog of sites requiring erosion control works in the Toronto region.

This report provides an overview of all erosion restoration to be work completed or in progress as of December 31, 2014 with 2014 Critical Erosion and Floodworks funding from the City of Toronto and 2014 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel related to the July 8, 2013 storm. This report also requests approval of the 2015 workplan, allowing staff to continue protecting public safety, restoring damaged property and fostering resilient valleys and shorelines.

One of the major challenges in getting projects completed in 2014 was securing the necessary agreements with private landowners. In addition to delays securing temporary access to complete detailed investigations, securing the final erosion control agreements was often the lengthiest part of the project. These agreements require the benefiting landowner to agree to a number of conditions as a result of receiving the work, including that they convey the portion of the lands where the works are located into public ownership. Failing that, they must pay a portion of the project costs roughly equaling 10% of the total cost according to the approved Private Landowner Contribution for Erosion Control policy, as approved at Authority Meeting # 7/09 under Resolution #A159/09 (Attachment 1). The private landowner contribution policy was created to ensure that works constructed with public funding become public infrastructure for future monitoring and maintenance. Where the transfer of lands into public ownership is not possible or is undesirable, the financial contribution ensures that the landowner has contributed a reasonable amount toward the cost of the work, and also places the responsibility for future monitoring and maintenance on the landowner. As there is a general perception amongst private landowners that TRCA should fund the full cost of the work with no conditions, executing the erosion control agreements is generally a time consuming process. In fact, several homeowners have declined assistance with erosion control works because of the contribution requirement, despite the risks identified to their properties over the short and long-term through detailed geotechnical investigations. The question of liability has been raised if the homeowners refuse to enter into agreement with TRCA, and it is TRCA's understanding that as this assistance program is voluntary and there is no legal requirement to undertake this work, delaying or not undertaking projects should not result in any additional potential liability to TRCA or its funding partners.

To clarify TRCA's position on its erosion control assistance program, staff has published information on TRCA's Erosion Management webpage, has created a Storm Damage Information Portal where affected landowners can register to obtain more specific information regarding the status of their property, and has hosted a number of residents' meetings where the limitations and conditions of the assistance has been communicated. Finding additional ways of communicating with private landowners more effectively in this regard will continue to be a major focus as the second year of storm damage projects get ready to commence.

488 Another major challenge in 2014 was the need to escalate several projects in the City of Toronto to emergency works status as a result of ongoing erosion and slope failures over the summer; these sites are listed below. The majority of works have been completed by TRCA forces using heavy equipment procured through its 2013 annual heavy equipment contract #RSD13-01. For work that required specialized services, or where no staff and/or equipment resources were available at the time the work was required, TRCA issued all contracts with Director and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) approval in accordance with TRCA's Purchasing Policy for Procurements Not Requiring Board Approval; and with CEO approval for contracts exceeding these values in lieu of being able to follow normal procurement and board approval timelines due to the urgency of the work. Contracts that were executed with emergency CEO authorization are itemized in Attachment 2.

All works completed or in progress as of December 31, 2014 with 2014 Critical Erosion and Floodworks funding from the City of Toronto, and 2014 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel related to the July 8, 2013 storm, are summarized in Attachment 3.

RATIONALE Given TRCA’s specialized experience in the assessment and remediation of erosion and slope instability, staff request approval to proceed with the 2015 workplan presented in Attachment 4 using deferred 2014 and 2015 Critical Erosion and Flood Works funding from the City of Toronto, and 2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel, subject to all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funding. The sites listed in Attachment 4 are tentative based on best available information at the time this report was prepared, therefore revisions may be required as construction costs are refined or priorities change as a result of severe weather or delays securing agreements. Furthermore, the budget allocations for the 2015 tentative priorities listed are preliminary; as such, some projects may be accelerated or deferred as costs are refined in keeping within the funding that is available.

In light of the extent of erosion damage sustained in the City of Toronto during the July 8, 2013 storm event and the dynamic nature of the priority list, to ensure that all proposed repairs are carried out in a coordinated and efficient fashion, all Toronto projects in Attachment 4 are subject to review by City staff before TRCA proceeds with the work.

To ensure the details of all erosion restoration work related to the July 8, 2013 storm are made available to the Authority, TRCA's partners and the residents of the Toronto region, staff will provide another update at the July 2015 Authority meeting.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Damage resulting from the July 8th, 2013 storm to TRCA lands and private properties inspected was originally estimated at $37 million, which included a 50% contingency in absence of detailed estimates. A recent update of this estimate was carried out following the completion of several detailed investigations, with a revised estimate of $41 million including a reduced contingency of 25%. Costs are estimated using assumed repair solutions where detailed designs have not been completed, and order of magnitude estimates from staff and third-party engineering firms.

489 The budget for Critical Erosion and Flood Works in the City of Toronto for 2014 was $7 million, and year-end expenditures are estimated at approximately $5.8 million, representing a spend rate of almost 83%. As several 2014 priority projects are ongoing in 2015, all unspent funds are recommended to be carried forward to 2015 to fund the completion of these works.

The proposed budget for Critical Erosion and Flood Works in the City of Toronto for 2015 is $7 million, with $3.2 million allocated specifically to valley erosion hazards, 100% of which is currently proposed to be allocated specifically to properties damaged during the July 8th, 2013 event.

The 2014 budget for July 8, 2013 storm damage sites in Peel Region was $100,000 from core erosion funding, with year-end expenditures expected to be on target with an estimated spend rate of 100%.

The proposed 2015 budget for July 8, 2013 storm damage sites in Peel Region is currently under review, as the funding available also supports the maintenance of existing erosion control infrastructure and mitigation of other erosion hazards not related to the July 8th, 2013 storm.

Report prepared by: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Moranne McDonnell, 416-392-9725 Emails: [email protected] Date: December 16, 2014 Attachments: 4

490 Attachment 1 Private Landowner Contribution for Erosion Control, Approved at Authority #7/09 under Resolution #A159/09

Private Landowner Contribution for Erosion Control (a) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) will require a minimum of a permanent easement over the private property for the work area and access routes where it has been determined that title to the property is not required. A cash contribution in accordance with the approved scale will also be required;

(b) Where the property involved would meet other TRCA objectives, title to the lands must be transferred to TRCA as the owner contribution in lieu of a cash contribution;

(c) Where agreement to policy (b) cannot be achieved, the benefiting owner(s) will be assessed 100% of the cost of the works.

(d) Where works are carried out on TRCA-owned land for the protection of private property, the cash contribution will be waived;

(e) In all cases, the TRCA will require some form of binding indemnification agreement signed by the benefiting owner(s) which may be registered on title;

(f) The benefiting owner(s) may make representation to the Authority, Executive Committee, or any advisory board with regard to any aspect of the erosion control programs in accordance with procedures adopted by Authority Resolution #18/80;

(g) Where required, the cash contribution from the benefiting owner(s) will be based on the following schedules:

OWNER CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE

Residential Value of Works Owner Contribution Maximum Owner Contribution $ 0 - $15,000 $1,500 + 10% of (Cost – $0) $3,000 $15,000 - $30,000 $3,500 + 10% of (Cost –$15,000) $4,500 $30,000 - $50,000 $4,500 + 10% of (Cost – $30,000) $6,500 $50,000 - $75,000 $6,500 + 10% of (Cost – $50,000) $9,000 $75,000 - $100,000 $9,000 + 10% of (Cost – $75,000) $11,500 $100,000 and over $11,500 + 10% of (Cost – $100,000) TBD

491 Commercial / Industrial Value of Works Owner Contribution Maximum Owner Contribution $ 0 - $15,000 $2,200 + 15% of (Cost – $0) $4,400 $15,000 - $30,000 $4,400 + 15% of (Cost –$15,000) $6,600 $30,000 - $50,000 $6,600 + 15% of (Cost – $30,000) $9,600 $50,000 - $75,000 $9,600 + 15% of (Cost – $50,000) $13,350 $75,000 - $100,000 $13,350 + 15% of (Cost – $75,000) $17,100 $100,000 and over $11,500 + 15% of (Cost – $100,000) TBD

Procedures and guidelines pursuant to the Private Landowner Contribution for Erosion Control Monitoring and Maintenance Program policy shall be developed to ensure audit implementation compliance.

492 Attachment 2

2014 Projects Escalated to Emergency Works Status

1. Downsview Dells Park, Black Creek, including 2 and 4 Jennifer Court, 139 Whitburn Crescent, 111/117 Whitburn Crescent and 135-137 Whitburn Crescent, Toronto

The Downsview Dells area of Black Creek was one of the hardest hit areas of Toronto during the July 8th 2013 storm, putting homes, sanitary and storm infrastructure at risk from erosion and slope instability. In accordance with TRCA's approved process for remedial flood and erosion control projects, staff initiated a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) on May 8, 2014 to develop the preferred solution to address all of the sites identified at risk in the area, under one streamlined process. Over the summer of 2014 the project was in the early planning and design process, however on July 21, 2014 following a site visit by Toronto Water, staff expressed concern over the ongoing exposure of the sanitary sewer line crossing the creek at several sections between 4 Jennifer Court and 117 Whitburn Crescent, and requested that TRCA escalate the project to emergency works status. Staff immediately issued a Declaration of Emergency Works to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, providing notice that work needed to proceed as soon as possible to protect essential infrastructure and public safety.

TRCA forces mobilized the week of July 21, 2014 and have completed the works listed below to date:  sanitary sewer protection between 4 Jennifer Court and 139 Whitburn Crescent;  sanitary sewer protection downstream of 111 Whitburn Crescent;  storm sewer extension and slope stabilization at 2,4 Jennifer Court, including the following contracted works:

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-139 - Supply of labour, equipment and materials for the completion of all works to extend a 1350 mm concrete sewer pipe with new headwall, and installation of a 2400 mm diameter manhole. Awarded to Dynex Construction, at a total cost of $238,085.00 plus HST; plus $35,712.75 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-187 - Supply of labour, equipment and materials for slope stabilization works. Awarded to Dynex Construction at a total cost of $91,855.00 plus HST; plus $27,556.00 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff

 139 Whitburn Crescent slope stabilization (90% complete; to be completed following completion of 135-137 Whitburn construction), including the following contracted works:

Lowest Bid Not Accepted Contract #RSD14-191 - Supply and delivery of 1,300 tonnes of 2-4 tonne uniform stackable armourstone. Awarded to The B-Town Group (lowest bid rejected due to previous issues with quality of material) at a total cost of $78,325 plus HST; plus 50% contingency to be expended as authorized by staff .

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-192 - Supply and delivery of 500 tonnes of 300-600 mm rip rap stone. Awarded to J.C. Rock Limited at a total cost of $15,000 plus HST; plus 50% contingency to be expended as authorized by staff. 493 Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-193 - Supply and delivery of 550 tonnes of 100-200 mm gabion stone. Awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost of $15,400.00 plus HST; plus 50% contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

The total 2014 expenditures for this site is projected to be $1.6 million. Work is ongoing in 2015 as outlined in Attachment 4.

2. 1 Katrine Road - 53 Riverhead Drive, Toronto

The homes along Riverhead Drive and at 1 Katrine Drive also sustained significant damage during the July 8th storm, prompting TRCA to undertake a detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessment under Contract #RSD13-101 Area C, approved by the TRCA CEO on September 11, 2013 in compliance with TRCA's Purchasing Policy for Procurements Not Requiring Board Approval. Upon receipt of the results of the detailed investigation in spring 2014 confirming that several of the homes were at risk over the long-term if no works are carried out, TRCA initiated the Class EA process on May 8, 2014 to develop the preferred measure of erosion control at the site. Over the course of the summer following several intense downpours, staff was on site collecting environmental inventory data when it was noted that the slope was continuing to actively erode at some sections, prompting TRCA's geotechnical engineer to prepare a memo recommending that work commence as soon as possible to reduce the risk to essential structures and public safety. In response, TRCA declared emergency works on August 5th, 2014, notifying the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change that the project was being split into phases to expedite works at 1 Katrine Road and 69 - 53 Riverhead Drive.

Following declaration of emergency works for Phase 1 of the project, TRCA issued a design-build contract for a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) slope system; the preferred measure of stabilization recommended by TRCA's geotechnical engineer. At the time this report was prepared, the detailed design was 95% complete and 8/10 erosion control agreements had been secured with the benefiting landowners, with work tentatively scheduled to commence immediately upon receipt of the outstanding agreements.

The following contracts were issued with CEO authorization as part of the Phase 1 emergency-works:

Lowest Bid or Highest Ranking Contract #RSD14-140 - Conduct pre and post construction inspections for the properties. Awarded to Dynex Construction at a total cost of $1,128,512.00 plus HST; plus $112,851.20 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-136 - Geotechnical investigation (additional boreholes). Awarded to Soil-Engineers Ltd. at a total cost of $31,900.00 plus HST; plus $6,380.00 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-140A - Pre/post construction inspections. Awarded to AECOM Canada Ltd. at a total cost of $12,730.00 plus HST; plus $5,000.00 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

494 The total 2014 expenditures for this site is projected to be $400,000, with the construction of the MSE slope scheduled to commence in January 2015 pending the receipt of the outstanding erosion agreements. See Attachments 3 and 4 for more information.

3. 26 Norfield Crescent, Toronto

In July 2014 TRCA was underway with a detailed geotechnical investigation for the properties at 22-32 Norfield Crescent under Contract #RSD14-03 as approved at Executive Committee Meeting #1/14 on March 7, 2014 under Resolution #B9/14, when Toronto Water contacted TRCA and expressed concern over the actively eroding slope at #26 Norfield Crescent. Upon inspection by staff and following further discussions with Toronto Water, who were underway with the Berry Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer (STS) Emergency Works project below Norfield Crescent at the time, it was determined that the best course of action was to halt construction in Berry Creek and stabilize the slope at 26 Norfield Crescent under emergency works to reduce risk to the dwelling while the detailed investigation for the area at large and the creek work was being completed over the next 1 - 2 years.

TRCA issued a Declaration of Emergency Works to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change on August 5th, 2014 and immediately commenced with the in-house design of stabilization works, consisting of re-grading and buttressing with rip rap stone, topsoil and shrubs, and substantially completed the work in September 2014.

The following contracts were issued with emergency CEO authorization as part of the emergency works:

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-128 - Supply and delivery of 3,000 tonnes of 600 - 800 mm rip rap stone. Awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost of $100,860.00 plus HST; plus $50,430.00 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-129 - Supply and delivery of 2,000 tonnes of 100 - 150 mm gabion stone. Awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost of $59,240.00 plus HST; plus $29,620.00 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

Lowest Bid Contract #RSD14-130 - Supply and delivery of 500 tonnes of 19 mm clear stone. Awarded to Brock Aggregates Inc. at a total cost of $13,035.00 plus HST; plus $6,517.50 contingency to be expended as authorized by staff.

The total cost of this emergency work is estimated at $180,000 as shown in Attachment 3.

495 4. Lower Don Trail south of Pottery Road

In October 2014, TRCA was contacted by City of Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation (PF&R) staff regarding a section of riverbank along the Lower Don River south of Pottery Road that was actively eroding and placing a section of heavily used trail at risk of collapse. Upon inspection, staff recommended that interim stabilization works be carried out immediately. Staff acted quickly to determine the appropriate type and size of material to armour the bank, and secured the necessary approvals to undertake the work in late November 2014. The work was completed by TRCA with resources through its annual heavy equipment contract, and all contracts were issued in compliance with TRCA's Purchasing Policy for Procurements Not Requiring Board Approval.

The total cost of this emergency work is projected to be $50,000 as shown in Attachment 3.

5. 5 Old Yonge Street

The property at 5 Old Yonge Street was determined to be the most critical of all of the properties inspected by TRCA following the July 8, 2013 storm event, as the rear of the house was partially undermined by a large landslide following the collapse of existing retaining walls. The homeowner immediately took action to underpin a portion of the home, but lacked the resources to stabilize the slope on their own. TRCA completed a detailed slope stability assessment of the property under Contract #RSD13-116 as approved at Executive Committee Meeting #7/13 under Resolution #B109/13, and found that the slope was at further risk of failure, placing additional portions of the dwelling at risk beyond the areas that had been underpinned.

Following completion of the detailed slope stability assessment and confirmation to proceed with the project at Authority Meeting #6/14 on July 25, 2014 under Resolution #A120/14, staff retained Terraprobe under Preferred Source Contract #RSD14-102 in compliance with Procurements Not Requiring Board Approval to complete the detailed design of replacement stabilization works at the site.

In November 2014 Terraprobe advised TRCA that their structural engineering subcontractor, whom they were consulting with regarding the shoring wall being proposed to stabilize the upper slope, had inspected the emergency underpinning done by the homeowner, and that additional underpinning was required to be installed to protect the foundation. Following discussions between TRCA, Terraprobe and their subconsultants, the preferred course of action was to expedite the soil nailing and upper slope shoring components of the project, as these works are typically carried out by the same specialized contractors as the underpinning, which ideally would be completed before the structural works along the slope are installed.

On December 3, 2014 staff received emergency CEO authorization to increase Terraprobe's contract by $70,000 plus HST to allow for the additional engineering and design work associated with the underpinning and expedited phase 1 works, revising Contract #RSD14-102 to $93,770 plus HST.

496 Due to the complexity of the proposed works and the need for constant site supervision during construction, staff recommended that a general contractor be retained to oversee the implementation of the Phase 1 emergency works. At the time this report was prepared, staff issued Request for Quotation #RSD14-220 to two contractors experienced with TRCA projects involving structural work: McPherson-Andrews Contracting and Hobden Construction, and was awaiting quotes. Staff will report back at a future Authority meeting on the status of this contract and the progress of work.

It is noted that the City of Toronto is currently reviewing the additional underpinning required, and has indicated that the owner may be required to pay for this component of the project as it is beyond the scope of the slope stabilization works originally proposed. TRCA is currently liaising with City of Toronto staff and the property owner to negotiate an acceptable agreement and cost sharing arrangement. Work will not proceed until this agreement is in place.

The total cost of this emergency work is projected to be $200,000 in 2014, and $740,000 in 2015. See Attachment 3 for more information.

497 Attachment 3 Year end Update on 2014 Priority Erosion and Flood Restoration Projects

2014 DESCRIPTION OF 2014 STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 16, PROJECT FORECASTED WORK BUDGET 2014 EXPEND. CITY OF TORONTO - CRITICAL EROSION & FLOOD WORKS FUNDING Infrastructure  Drop structure work complete preservation;  Black Creek channel 2014 1. Flood Control conveyance work completed Channel $1,000,000 $1,000,000 capacity restoration;  Claireville and G. Ross Lord Maintenance protection of public Dam maintenance complete safety Bluff erosion hazard  Acquisition of 1 Midland mitigation complete 2. 1 Midland - threatening life and $1,400,000 $1,400,000  EA amendment for shoreline 81-83 Fishleigh property extension below 81-83 Fishleigh in progress 3. Valley Erosion Hazards See individual (including July $4,600,000 $3,495,000 See individual projects below projects below 8, 2013 storm damage sites)  July 8 storm erosion damage sites re-inspected  Tentative 2015 priorities a) Monitoring; Ongoing inspections determined through site visits Project & re-assessment of and receipt of detailed $240,000 Planning; Minor July 8 storm damage information from Phase 2 works properties detailed assessments (below)  Minor works consisting of downspout extensions, fencing, etc.  All draft reports received and b) Phase 2 Detailed being finalized; delayed due to detailed slope geotechnical revisions required stability and investigations of 132 $650,000  Results have informed 2015 erosion risk properties in the City tentative priorities (see assessments of Toronto Attachment 3)

498 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF 2014 2014 STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 16, WORK BUDGET FORECASTED 2014 EXPEND. c) Downsview  Emergency channel cleanout Dells STS / work complete Whitburn  Exposed sanitary sewer repairs Crescent to complete Jennifer Court  Jennifer Ct sector 90% Debris removal; Emergency complete localized Works  Construction @ 139 Whitburn infrastructure 90% complete protection; slope Includes: $1,600,000  135-137 Whitburn detailed stabilization works; design complete; tender in bank protection;  2,4 Jennifer Court, progress general ravine  111-117 Whitburn design-build restoration  39 Whitburn Cr. tender in progress  35,137 Whitburn  Work ongoing in 2015 Cr.  11,117 Whitburn Cr.  Phase 1 construction House (emergency works) January d) 5 Old Yonge reinforcement, upper 2015 pending Street including slope shoring wall, $200,000 agreements/approvals 14,16 Brookfield slope re-grading and  Phase 2 summer 2015 Rd general ravine pending approvals and restoration agreements  Geotech study complete; shoring wall identified as preferred solution  Detailed design on hold pending resolution of property Upper slope shoring e) 6-22 Northover agreements and completion of wall & downspout $60,000 Street Class EA process redirections  Downspout redirection plan under development  Downspout implementation 2015 pending approvals and agreements  MSE design-build complete Phase 1 emergency  Phase 1 emergency works works: Mechanically January 2015 pending Stabilized Earth landowner agreements (2/10 f) 1 Katrine Road; (MSE) slope (1 outstanding) 5-69 Riverhead $400,000 Katrine - 53  Phase 2 (select properties Drive Riverhead; slope between 5 to 45) to be re-grading and completed through Class EA buttressing (47-49) process  Work ongoing through 2015

499 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF 2014 2014 STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 16, WORK BUDGET FORECASTED 2014 EXPEND.  Design and approvals Removal of failing complete g) 114 Camborne retaining wall; $85,000  Final agreement in progress Avenue re-grading and  Construction January 2015 planting pending executed agreement  Emergency works complete h) 26 Norfield Slope re-grading,  Work completed in Crescent buttressing and $180,000 consultation with Toronto Emergency restoration Water re: Berry Creek Sanitary works Trunk Sewer (STS) work  Detailed design 90% complete  Agreement could not be i) 24 Bennington Upper slope shoring $30,000 executed; homeowner to pay Heights Drive wall full cost of work under permit from TRCA Temporary bank  Work substantially complete; j) Lower Don Trail protection to prevent final site restoration (seeding, Emergency collapse of paved $50,000 etc) spring 2015 as weather Works trail south of Pottery permits Rd. Balance to be carried forward CITY OF TORONTO TOTAL $7,000,000 $5,865,000 to 2015 for ongoing work REGION OF PEEL – CORE EROSION MANAGEMENT FUNDING Detailed slope  Studies complete stability and erosion  Priority for stabilization work Phase 2 Detailed risk assessments at being ranked against other geotechnical 15 properties along $100,000 $100,000 existing erosion hazards in investigations Steepbank Crescent Peel Region and Ponytrail Drive, City of Mississauga REGION OF PEEL TOTAL $100,000 $100,000

500 Attachment 4 Proposed 2015 Priority Erosion and Flood Restoration Projects, City of Toronto

2015 2015 PROPOSED SCOPE OF PROJECT PRELIM. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE WORK BUDGET  Yonge-York Mills Reach 3  Planning and design (all sites) sediment and vegetation winter-spring 2015 removal; development of  Commence channel maintenance 1.Flood Control permanent access point(s) for summer-fall 2015 Channel future maintenance $1,000,000 Maintenance  Sheppard Channel sediment and vegetation removal  Prosser JCC Channel vegetation removal  Complete EA amendment and secure Bluff erosion hazard mitigation approvals winter/spring 2015 2.1 Midland - 81-83 threatening life and property $1,300,000  Commence with shoreline stabilization Fishleigh and slope buttressing work summer 2015  Commence with detailed design Bluff erosion hazard mitigation winter 2015 3.441,447,449 threatening life and property  Secure approvals spring/summer $1,500,000 Guildwood Parkway 2015  Commence construction of preferred solution fall 2015 4.Valley Erosion Hazards (including July 8, 2013 storm  $3,200,000 damage sites)  Re-inspect all sites spring-summer 2015 to update priority list Ongoing inspections of July 8, Develop detailed workplans for 2015 Monitoring; Project 2013 storm damage sites; Project $300,000 projects and liaise with City staff Planning; minor works scoping; Minor works  Carry out minor works (fencing, signage, downspout extensions, etc) as needed Downsview Dells STS / Completion of stabilization works at $750,000  Commence 135-137 Whitburn late Whitburn Crescent to 111,117, 135,137 and 139 Whitburn January/early February 2015 Jennifer Court Crescent;  Complete 139 Whitburn immediately Emergency Works Completion of channel stabilization following 135-137 work; final site restoration  111-117 Whitburn tentatively Includes: scheduled for spring 2015 pending 2,4 Jennifer Court, approvals and agreements 139,137,135, 117, and  Channel restoration work ongoing 111 Whitburn Crescent through summer 2015  Final site restoration late summer 2015

501 PROJECT 2015 PROPOSED SCOPE OF 2015 PRELIM. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE WORK BUDGET

$434,000* -  Phase 1 work to be completed $640,000 January - March 2015 (2014 funds)  Phase 2 work summer 2015 pending approvals and agreements Complete Phase 1 emergency 5 Old Yonge Street *with up to works, and Phase 2 slope including 14,16 $206,000 re-grading and general ravine Brookfield Rd from owner restoration (TBD)

$100,000 (2015)  Complete downspout redirection plan winter 2015  Commence with implementation of Downspout redirections; finalize downspout redirections spring 2015 Class EA and submit for approval; $50,000 pending receipt of agreements 6-22 Northover Street continue erosion control (2014 funds)  Finalize Class EA winter 2015 agreement negotiations  Continue with agreement negotiations; detailed design and construction schedule to be developed pending receipt of agreements  Complete Phase 1 emergency works Phase 1 emergency works: $415,000 January 2015 pending landowner 1 Katrine Road; 5-69 Mechanically Stabilized Earth (2014 funds) agreements (2/10 outstanding) Riverhead Drive (MSE) slope (1 Katrine - 53  Phase 2 (select properties between 5 (select participating Riverhead); slope re-grading and $1,135,000 to 45) to be completed through Class properties) buttressing (47-49); Phase 2 Class (2015) EA process EA Phase 2 construction TBD 22-32 Norfield Crescent Class EA to determine preferred $50,000  Commence Class EA winter 2015 (excluding 26) measure of slope stabilization  Construction TBD pending completion of Class EA, receipt of agreements and approvals, and review of 2016 priorities 1025 Scarlett Road Slope stabilization to protect $500,000  Complete design and approvals apartment building and children’s winter/spring 2015 playground  Commence construction July 2015 pending approvals  767 Royal York Rd. Detailed design of preferred $365,000  Develop preferred solutions for each  39-41 Topcliff Ave. solutions property through 2015  19-31 Ridge Point  Construction schedules to be Cres. Note: Projects may be accelerated developing following receipt of  14 Appletree Ct or deferred as project costs are detailed estimates, and review of  22 Bucksburn Rd refined. priorities and available funding  19-25 Ridgegate Rd  30 Northline Rd TOTAL $7,000,000

502 PROJECT 2015 PROPOSED SCOPE OF 2015 PRELIM. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE WORK BUDGET The following July 8, 2013 storm damage sites have been assessed at a detailed level through Phase 2 Slope Stability and Erosion Risk Assessments (Attachment 2), and are listed in tentative order of priority for erosion control works as funding is available, subject to the receipt of all necessary approvals and agreements.  10 Kevi Lane  10 Burnhamthorpe Cr.  75 Strathavon Dr.  49 Collingdale Rd.  21-24 Disan Ct.  7-17 Eldorado Ct  58 Bexley Cr.  21-25 Peacham Cr.  Monitor all properties at least  12 King Georges Dr. once in summer 2015,  8 Earldown Dr. Included in Monitoring only in 2015 unless following reports of severe  Grandravine Dr. monitoring funds become available weather and upon request by  33-61 Moon Valley budget owner to update priorities for (participating properties) 2016 and beyond  178 Strathnairn Road  525 Donlands Ave.  30 Ladyshot Cr.  3-7 Windhill Cr.  323 Riverview Dr.*

*Under review; priority subject to revision Note: Any private properties being monitored by TRCA not listed above are considered lower priority and will not be recommended for remedial works until higher priority sites have been addressed. Priorities will be re-assessed on an ongoing basis and adjusted accordingly, to ensure that the most hazardous sites are addressed first.

______503 RES.#A211/14 - GREAT LAKES GUARDIAN COMMUNITY FUND GRANT Black Creek SNAP Harvest the Rain Program. Approval to enter into grant funding agreement with the Province of Ontario.

Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Michale Di Biase

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a grant funding agreement with the Province of Ontario for $25,000.00 in support of the Black Creek Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP) "Harvest the Rain" program in 2015, with deliverables as set out in the grant funding agreement and as summarized in this report. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA's Black Creek SNAP Harvest the Rain program applied and was successful in being offered a $25,000 Great Lakes Guardian Community Fund (GLGCF) grant, subject to Authority approval. The purpose of the provincial grant program is to support local projects that help people take action to protect and restore their corner of the Great Lakes. Projects must protect water quality for human and ecological health, and/or improve wetlands, beaches and coastal areas, and/or protect habitats and species. As a new condition of releasing the grant, the Province requires a resolution from the Authority as confirmation that the board knows and is in agreement with the contracting of this project.

The Harvest the Rain program is a residential retrofit program being implemented in the Black Creek SNAP neighbourhood. The program was created around the concept of delivering doorstep consultation services that entail a suite of programs and offers for a range of environmental and water and energy conservation related initiatives. The objectives of the program are to promote retrofit measures such as downspout disconnection and rain harvest supported vegetable gardens, while also promoting other key retrofits that address basement flooding protection, tree establishment, water and energy conservation, and surplus harvest donation. The program is delivered through free 30-minute door step home consultations, through which the Harvest the Rain program advisors assist homeowners in identifying strategic home retrofits and provide access to discounts. Door opener incentives for program participation include rain barrel draws, rain barrel and tree subsidies, and a free deluxe energy savings kit made possible by several grants and donations. Participants are also given a folder with printed program and how-to-do-it-yourself information, relevant application forms and seeds. Based on the results of the home consultation, referrals to implementation partners responsible for facilitating homeowner access to various retrofits and fixed income energy programs are coordinated. Implementation has been underway for two years, and the plan is to deliver the program again in spring 2015.

The grant supports the following program deliverables: tree subsidies, rain barrel subsidies, rain barrels for draws, home consultations with program advisors, communications materials, a summer garden tour and community celebration event, and a fall harvest festival.

504 Support from the GLGCF grant for the Harvest the Rain program has been critical to the program’s success. This innovative residential retrofit program was launched with a GLGCF grant in 2012. The demonstrated success of the program has contributed to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change awarding TRCA the grant again so that the Harvest the Rain program can continue its positive impact on improving environmental conditions in the Black Creek SNAP neighbourhood and in the process help to protect and restore the Great Lakes. The program has been positively received by the community. In less than two years, 8% of a historically difficult to reach population have been engaged through the Harvest the Rain home consultations. Almost all of these homeowners have implemented at least one of the above-mentioned retrofit measures promoted through the program, and many have implemented two or more, including disconnecting their downspouts, planting trees, participating in energy conservation programs, and donating surplus harvest from their vegetable gardens. FINANCIAL DETAILS

Additional funding for the HTR program is provided by the City of Toronto in its levy contributions and RBC Blue Water grant.

Report prepared by: Cathrin Winkelmann, extension 5795 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Cathrin Winkelmann, extension 5795 Emails: [email protected] Date: December 11, 2014

______

RES.#A212/14 - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA LAND MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Approval of the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan.

Moved by: Mujeeb Khan Seconded by: Mike Mattos

WHEREAS the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update was approved by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in 2011;

AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of funds to implement the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan be approved;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff continue to implement the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update. CARRIED 505 BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority updated the 1997 management plan for Claireville Conservation Area in 2012. At Authority Meeting #3/10, held on March 25, 2011, Resolution #A47/11 was approved as follows:

THAT the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan, dated March 2011, including updates described herein, be approved;

THAT funding for the implementation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan be included in the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) capital budget ten year forecast for Peel Region;

THAT copies of the updated Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan be distributed to members of the Humber Watershed Alliance and Councillors and staff representing the City of Brampton, City of Toronto and Region of Peel who have a jurisdictional interest in the Claireville area;

THAT the Regional Municipality of Peel, City of Brampton and City of Toronto be requested to include consideration of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan in planning decisions related to this geographic area;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff continue to work with local community groups on trail options for the alignment in the vicinity of Queen Street and staff invite Authority members to attend a site visit.

At Authority Meeting #7/11, held on July 29, 2011, Resolution #A150/11 and Resolution #A151/11 were approved as follows:

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to proceed with the construction of the inter-regional trail in accordance with the approved Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan and identified as TRCA's preferred alignment in the drawing included as Attachment 1, dated July 19, 2011;

THAT the construction of the trail be subject to the availability of funding from the City of Brampton;

THAT TRCA staff maximize environmental enhancements such as forest establishment, meadow protection, streambank planting, wetland creation and interpretive signs in association with the trail construction to improve public awareness and the overall health and diversity of the property;

THAT staff investigate with stakeholders other appropriate secondary walking trails that will link to neighbouring residential areas (i.e. Dunegrass Gate and McVean Drive) and points of interest within the Claireville Conservation Area;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action is necessary to implement the trail construction including obtaining necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. 506 The Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update (2012) is a comprehensive management plan to guide future use of this conservation area and replaces the 1997 version. New policies, plans and other studies as well as current and best land management planning techniques were considered in the updating of the management plan.

Based on input from partners, stakeholders and the public, the following statement was developed to reflect a strategic vision of Claireville Conservation Area over 50 years and to provide key direction towards implementation of the updated management plan:

Claireville Conservation Area is an oasis for wildlife and people – a healthy, diverse urban forest and one of the largest natural corridors in a major city region. It is a destination where the natural and cultural heritage resources are protected and restored through partnerships and community-based stewardship. Visitors enjoy year-round nature-based recreation and education experiences while respecting the unique environmental features.

Since the approval of the updated management plan for Claireville Conservation Area in 2011, TRCA has been implementing projects to support its vision, objectives and recommendations. Attachment 1 provides a list of the projects that have been initiated since 2011.

At Authority Meeting #9/14, held on November 28, 2014, Resolution #A196/14 granted a permanent easement to Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. for a new NPS 42 inch diameter natural gas pipeline through part of Claireville Conservation Area. Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. will contribute $595,000.00 toward the Claireville Land Management Implementation Plan as one of the terms and conditions of this easement.

TRCA is in the process of negotiating a permanent easement with TransCanada Pipelines Limited for a pipeline through another part of Claireville Conservation Area. Conversations with TransCanada Pipelines Limited are underway and the alignment and associated funds will be confirmed through the detailed design process, including permit and easement negotiations.

The implementation of the updated Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan (available upon request) requires cooperation between TRCA, partners and the public. TRCA has been implementing some of the recommendations of the updated management plan since its approval. However, there are many projects that are outstanding.

Since approval of the updated management plan for Claireville Conservation Area, TRCA adopted a new strategic plan to guide its interests and operations. As such, projects and priorities have responded accordingly. It was recognized that a comprehensive implementation plan for the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update was required to determine priorities based on current influences and funding frameworks. The result is the development of the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan.

507 RATIONALE The Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan provides additional implementation details for key recommendations in the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update and projects and initiatives that are consistent with the vision and recommendations presented in the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan Update. The projects were then evaluated based on anticipated funding and associated restrictions, urgency, ease of implementation, and potential for partner support and corresponding supporter recognition. A prioritized list of the projects is found in Attachment 2. These include inter-regional trail connections, event venue development, land and asset management, dam operation improvements and aquatic and terrestrial ecological management and restoration, at a cost of $23,510,000.00, including contingency and surcharges but excluding HST (in 2014 dollars).

Staff determined that the first priority should be the completion of the inter-regional trail connection in Claireville Conservation Area. Most of the inter-regional trail is already built or has dedicated funding for construction. The largest gap was the connection from Old Indian Line Road across the Claireville Reservoir to the west side of the reservoir where it would connect with an existing trail. The Wiley bridge is another feature of the system and is in need of rehabilitation. This project will provide opportunity for free public use of the property, connect the cities of Brampton and Toronto, and reduce environmental impacts of unauthorized trails and their proliferation. A total of $1,092,000.00 plus contingency, surcharges and taxes is required for completion of these areas of the West Humber inter-regional trail through Claireville Conservation Area.

Another series of priority projects relate to dam operation improvements. These include the installation of a gas line from Finch Avenue West to the dam control building and the dam operator’s house, replacement of the septic system that services the control building, and review and revision of the operation, maintenance and surveillance manual for the Claireville dam. Approximately $185,000.00 plus contingency, surcharges and taxes is required to improve the operation of the dam and its associated buildings.

Initiatives to improve the management of the Claireville Conservation Area lands and assets are another set of priority projects. It is estimated that $100,000.00 plus contingency, surcharges and taxes is required to inspect the lands and infrastructure, improve site servicing, and secure and protect the lands and assets to the satisfaction of TRCA. Many of the recommendations received through inspections and assessments will lead to future projects for Claireville Conservation Area.

An opportunity to further recreation engagement and economic development in the area through the creation of a gathering event venue at Claireville Conservation Area is another priority. A feasibility study and business case with identification of next steps requires $50,000.00, plus contingency, surcharges and taxes.

Finally, opportunities to enhance and manage aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems are the final priority identified in the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan. Enhancing forest, riparian, shoreline and wetland habitat, and addressing stream barriers, erosion, access, channel and outfall issues requires $16,383,400.00, plus contingency, surcharges and taxes. Much of this work is opportunistic and can be incorporated as other projects are completed. 508 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The successful implementation of the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan will require the efforts of TRCA and its partners. TRCA will take the following actions:  advise the Humber Watershed Alliance of the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan;  publish and distribute the Claireville Conservation Area Land Management Implementation Plan;  continue to seek public and private partnerships to fund the full implementation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan;  continue to re-evaluate implementation priorities based on available funds and opportunities.

FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA has received $595,000.00 from Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. toward the Claireville Land Management Implementation Plan as one of the terms and conditions of the granting of a permanent easement for a new NPS 42 inch diameter natural gas pipeline through part of Claireville Conservation Area. TransCanada Pipelines Limited will also require a permanent easement through a portion of Claireville Conservation Area for construction of a new pipeline. As part of said easement, TRCA will request additional funds to assist with implementation of the Claireville Land Management Implementation Plan.

Funds that will be directed to the inter-regional trail connection and the site securement and protection initiatives will alleviate some of the financial pressure on the Peel Land Care capital funds as they will allow some Peel Land Care funds to be redirected to other conservation land care projects within the Regional Municipality of Peel. Approximately $50,000.00 per year of the Peel Land Care funds are allocated to work at Claireville Conservation Area. An additional $180,000.00 has been assigned towards construction of the inter-regional trail through Claireville Conservation Area. Other TRCA capital accounts funded by the Regional Municipality of Peel, including various climate change and the public use infrastructure funds, will be able to more quickly meet their deliverables with this increased funding for projects at Claireville Conservation Area.

Report prepared by: Deanna Cheriton, extension 5204 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Deanna Cheriton, extension 5204, Mike Bender, 416-400-2111 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Date: December 17, 2014 Attachments: 2

509 Attachment 1 - Accomplishments since 2011, Claireville Conservation Area Project Details Status Land and asset Site securement Ongoing identification and removal of encroachments management and protection Installation of 1030 metres of fence and 2 gates

Preparation of a land inventory and audit report Land and asset Land Removal of almost 8000 kilograms of debris management management Removal of structures at Claireville Ranch and a portable classroom and site naturalized

Construction of a manure storage facility constructed

Preparation of a structural assessment report was prepared for the Claireville Barn

Initial rehabilitation of the McVean Barn with the construction of a water diversion channel and securement of the structure

Decommissioned 3 old wells

Removed 60 hazardous trees Land and asset McVean farm Continued use of the farm site as a near urban agriculture management hub

Barn improvements and securement, including downspout and siding repairs Land and asset Robinson house Ongoing exploration of re-use and disposal options management Trails Inter-regional trail Preparation of detailed construction plans and continued pursuance of permit approvals for areas north of Steeles Avenue

Development of a parking area at the Regional Road 107 trail head Trails Secondary trails Continued planning of a secondary trail system including a trail user survey and trail counter program

Inventoried 50 kilometres of trails

Built 2.5 kilometres of trails and 240 metres of boardwalk Terrestrial and Plantings 8305 aquatic/herbaceous, aquatic ecological 8063 shrubs/containers, 1750 trees, 1580 calipers and restoration 13,500 reforestation seedlings planted

510 Project Details Status Terrestrial and Forest restoration 10.14 hectares of forest and terrestrial habitat creation aquatic ecological restoration Terrestrial and Wetlands 3 hectares of wetlands creation aquatic ecological restoration restoration Terrestrial and Riparian 2.1 hectares of riparian plantings aquatic ecological restoration restoration Terrestrial and Meadow 5 hectares of meadow creation aquatic ecological restoration restoration Recreation Claireville Improvement of City of Toronto and City of Brampton day Conservation Area camp sites

1.1 kilometres of road regraded and compacted

Installed new property sign at Regional Road 107 entrance Recreation Indian Line Seeded 120 square metres Campground Installed 70 directional and campground signs

Retrofitted two buildings to create accessible showers, sinks, washrooms and doorways

Installed 158 square metres of metal roof at pool building

Improved 530 square metres of road

Installed accessible deck at camp store

Installed 20 building mounted and 25 street lights, using LED and photocells

Installed 8 roof mounted solar panels

511 Attachment 2 - Implementation priorities, Claireville Conservation Area Priority Area Project Estimated Cost* Project Lead Length 1 Inter-regional trail West Humber inter-regional $652,000.00 3 years Conservation connection trail connection Lands 2 Inter-regional trail Wiley concrete bowstring $40,000.00 1 year Conservation connection bridge rehabilitation designs Lands 3 Dam operation Natural gas service installation $150,000.00 1 year Property and Risk improvements to Claireville dam and dam Management operator house 4 Land and asset Site conditions assessments $50,000.00 12 to 18 Property and Risk management months Management 5 Dam operation Dam and dam operator house $30,000.00 1 year Property and Risk improvements septic system repair and Management upgrade 6 Inter-regional trail Wiley concrete bowstring $400,000.00 2 years Conservation connection bridge restoration Lands 7 Dam operation Peer review and revision of $5,000.00 1 year Flood improvements Claireville dam’s operation, Management maintenance and surveillance Services manual 8 Recreation Gathering event venue $50,000.00 12 to 18 Conservation engagement and feasibility studies and months Parks economic business case development development 9 Land and asset Site servicing improvements $25,000.00 12 to 18 Property and Risk management months Management 10 Land and asset Site securement and $25,000.00 12 to 18 Conservation management protection months Lands 11 Aquatic and Natural area enhancements $16,383,400.00 As Restoration terrestrial opportunities Projects ecological are available management and restoration SUBTOTAL 1 (Projects) $17,810,400.00

Contingency (20%) $3,562,080.00

SUBTOTAL 2 $21,372,480.00

Surcharges (10% on $2,137,248.00 Subtotal 2) TOTAL (excluding HST) $23,509,728.00

* 2014 dollars ______

512 RES.#A213/14 - CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT, 2012-2013 Receipt of staff report.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Glenn Mason

THAT the Corporate Sustainability Report (CSR) 2012 - 2013, for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) be received;

AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff prepare a corporate sustainability report every two years. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA's Corporate Sustainability program began in 1999 when the Authority approved a corporate Environmental Policy Statement and a framework to implement an environmental management system. The program has continued to evolve over time but has focussed primarily on measuring and reporting on TRCA's operational sustainability including such things as greenhouse gas emissions, energy and water use, vehicle fuel use, travel, solid waste and employee engagement. The Corporate Sustainability Report for 2012 - 2013 was developed in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines and represents a major shift in the direction of the program to include an assessment of TRCA's impact in eleven areas or aspects of sustainability including: flood protection; water management; land management; biodiversity; access to nature; community engagement; research and monitoring; government funding and funding diversity; policy development; eco-efficiencies and green economy. This report represents a first step in addressing the requirements of GRI G4 Guidelines. Future reports will bring additional transparency through increased stakeholder engagement, articulation of challenges and solutions, and quantification of impacts.

The GRI is an international not-for-profit with a mission to make sustainability reporting standard practice for all companies and organizations. GRI developed, in collaboration with experts, international working groups and many other stakeholders, a comprehensive sustainability reporting framework that has become the global standard in sustainability reporting. Their framework enables organizations to provide more transparency and accountability to their stakeholders and through their new G4 Guidelines, require stakeholder engagement in determining what is included in a sustainability report. The process for identifying the sustainability aspects of most importance for reporting to stakeholders is termed a materiality assessment.

In April 2014 the firm of Quinn and Partners was retained to work with staff to prepare TRCA's Corporate Sustainability Report for 2012 - 2013 using the G4 Guidelines of the GRI Framework. The report was prepared through the following steps:  Identification of a long list of relevant sustainability aspects for potential reporting through review of TRCA documents and websites and review of reporting by similar organizations internationally.  Consultation with internal and external stakeholders to identify a priority list of sustainability aspects for reporting.  Compilation of measures and case studies from 2012 and 2013 for each priority sustainability aspect. 513  Preparation of Sustainability Report text and graphics in alignment with the GRI Framework and G4 Guidelines.  Final report editing, design and layout.

For this first GRI aligned report, the consultant was only able to engage with eight external stakeholders that included a mix of large funding partners, peers in the environmental and sustainability fields, major clients of TRCA's work and a senior person from TRCA's governance structure. In addition, the internal consultations were limited to meeting with a dozen people from across the organization. However, the feedback received was very informative and identified many commonalities between what external and internal stakeholders felt were the most important sustainability aspects for TRCA's sustainability reporting. Based on stakeholder input, 11 priority sustainability aspects were identified and included in the report.

Report Highlights

Flood Protection: In 2012 and 2013 TRCA was responsible for maintaining 10 dams, 25 other flood control structures and hydrological models for all of the Toronto region's watersheds, producing approximately 500 flood line maps. The stormwater and floodline mapping and modeling we generate are critical to understanding and protecting against flood risks.

Water Management: As watershed managers TRCA works to protect the flow, quality and quantity of water within the Toronto region. TRCA creates understanding of the aquatic ecosystems and water resources through monitoring and evaluation programs. TRCA takes an active role in erosion control projects and apply our expertise in ecology, hydrology and hydrogeology through the land development application process and policy development. In 2013 TRCA partnered with the City of Toronto to clean out three of its stormwater management ponds, removing 207 truckloads of sediments and thereby improving water storage.

Land Management: TRCA's involvement in land management encompasses three of our key areas of focus: managing water resources; maximizing the value of greenspace; and creating communities that integrate nature with the built environment. TRCA protects, restores and enhances land quality through its programs, habitat restoration, policy development, development review and input, land acquisition and management of TRCA-held lands and structures. In 2013 an additional 64 hectares of land was acquired bringing TRCA's total land holdings to nearly 18,000 hectares.

Biodiversity: Biodiversity is an important measure of ecosystem health. TRCA protects and enhances biodiversity on TRCA managed land and waters across the region. To understand the current state and trends of biodiversity, TRCA measures, monitors and reports on habitats and species in the Toronto region. In 2013 TRCA staff and volunteers collected 88,000 data records observing or describing a plant, animal bird or insect. This information helps TRCA and its stakeholders inform plans and decisions that affect natural habitats. Habitat restoration is the foundation for increasing biodiversity and in 2013 TRCA restored more than 10 kilometres of riparian zones and shorelines and almost 100 hectares or wetland, riparian and terrestrial habitat. 514 Access to Nature: Connecting with nature is fundamental and enhances quality of life and supports human health. TRCA offers residents and visitors the opportunity to enjoy nature through its parks and trail infrastructure. The region has been gifted with extraordinary waterfront and valley and stream resources and TRCA helps to make these spaces attractive and accessible. In 2012 TRCA completed two new shoreline parks and in 2013 completed over six kilometres of new trails, installed new board walks, installed seven kiosks with educational signage and identified and removed 3,500 hazard trees.

Community Engagement: Engaging community and encouraging participation from the public in TRCA's work is central to success. In 2013, as part of TRCA's asset management and land planning processes, we hosted 27 public engagement sessions and stewardship meetings and distributed over 2,500 newsletters. More than 9,500 volunteers participated in TRCA's various programs across the region including birding at Tommy Thompson Park, participating in programs at Black Creek Pioneer Village, supporting the archaeology department, as well as participating in tree planting and clean up events. In addition, in 2012 and 2013 TRCA had 1.17 million and 1.44 million unique visitors to the TRCA website respectively.

Research and Monitoring: TRCA has a long history of supporting and collaborating on research related to water resources and ecosystem management with universities and government organizations. In more recent years with the growing portfolio of complex challenges associated with climate change, unprecedented rates or regional development and the transition to urban sustainability, TRCA has taken a stronger role in research and monitoring. In 2012 and 2013 TRCA participated in a wide range of research on stormwater management and renewable energy and energy efficient technologies through the Sustainable Technology Evaluation Program. TRCA led or participated in climate change research through the Ontario Climate Consortium, and in 2013 TRCA continued to monitor almost 1,500 sites across the region providing 382,000 soil, water, plant or animal samples.

Policy Development: Good policy is a foundation for meeting TRCA's collective goals. TRCA's policy input and development review activities tackle technically complex challenges through participation in the municipal decision making process that guides growth, redevelopment, revitalization and intensification. In 2012 and 2013 TRCA completed The Living City Policies for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (draft). This renewed policy framework will better achieve The Living City objectives as TRCA assists our partners to plan and design sustainable communities.

Government Funding and Funding Diversity: TRCA strives to achieve stable and diversified funding streams in order to deliver TRCA's strategic plan. Through the development of products, services and user fees, TRCA has been able to achieve approximately 30% of our funding from non-government sources in 2012 and 2013. Although 60% of TRCA's revenue continues to be provided by our municipal partners, 25% of these funds are for specific products and contract services outside of the annual budget discussions. In 2013 the Sustainable Communities Service Area received municipal funding of $3.1 million, which was slightly more than half of the total revenue for the Service Area, leveraging the municipal funding nearly one to one. 515 Eco-Efficiencies: Although TRCA is in the business of sustainability, we recognize that our daily operations can negatively impact the environment. TRCA's use of vehicles and equipment, energy consumption, the products we buy and what we do with our water and waste, speaks to the impacts of TRCA operations. To reduce TRCA's impact staff has been implementing energy efficiency measures in TRCA facilities and have seen energy use per employee decreased an average of 2% per year from 2008 to 2013. TRCA greenhouse gas emissions per employee have also been decreasing but in large part due to carbon reductions in the electricity supply.

Green Economy: TRCA's "Building the Living City" strategic plan's first leadership strategy is to green the Toronto regions' economy. In the work that TRCA does to create sustainable communities staff is dedicating resources to grow the green economy. TRCA programs are designed to improve the sustainability performance of existing economic sectors, increase the uptake of sustainable technology, materials and practices or build new sectors in growth areas such as renewable energy and green buildings. In 2012 TRCA initiated the BRE Innovation Park at The Living City Campus in partnership with the Building Research Establishment from Great Britain. When completed the Park will become one of a network of international innovation parks, it will have seven new demonstration buildings along with the existing LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Platinum Archetype Sustainable House, act as a Canadian hub of demonstration, research, measurement and verification of innovative construction methods, products and technologies.

Development of the Corporate Sustainability Report using the GRI G4 Guidelines has also helped staff to better understand that sustainability is a journey and that sustainability reporting can help to integrate sustainability strategy into corporate and financial planning.

Hard copies of the report will be available at the meeting.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE  continue to collect data on the eco-efficiency of TRCA operations for reporting in the corporate annual report;  expand stakeholder consultations on sustainability through the numerous watershed and project based stakeholder engagements conducted annually;  develop the processes necessary to capture and incorporate stakeholder feedback into sustainability and corporate strategy development;  prepare a GRI aligned corporate sustainability report every two years.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The consulting contract for this project, approved by the Chief Executive Officer, as per TRCA's Purchasing Police, was awarded to Quinn and Partners as they were the lowest bid and highest ranked with a total cost of $48,465. Funding for this project was allocated from the Community Transformation Program budget using funds from the Regional Municipality of Peel, City of Toronto and York Region. It is anticipated that approximately $50,000 will be required every two years to prepare a GRI aligned corporate sustainability report.

516 Report prepared by: Bernie McIntyre, 5326 Emails: [email protected] For Information contact: Bernie McIntyre, 5326 Emails: [email protected] Date: November 18, 2014

______

RES.#A214/14 - CITY OF TORONTO Request for a Permanent Easement for the Replacement of the Black Creek Culvert beneath Jane Street, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed, CFN 52063. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the replacement of the Black Creek culvert beneath Jane Street, located to the east of Jane Street and north of Troutbrooke Drive, within Downsview Dells Park, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed. (Executive Res.#B119/14)

Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: Glenn Mason

WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the replacement of the Black Creek culvert, located to the east of Jane Street and north of Troutbrooke Drive, within Downsview Dells Park, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed;

AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.47 hectares (1.17 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for the replacement of the Black Creek culvert beneath Jane Street, designated as Parts 2, 3 and 4, as shown on a plan prepared by the City of Toronto Engineering and Construction Services Department, Engineering Services Section, Land and Property Surveys, Sketch No. PS-2014-119, dated November 3, 2014;

THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, in addition all legal, survey and other costs be paid by the City of Toronto;

THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction;

517 THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto;

THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated/stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines;

THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, be obtained by the City of Toronto prior to commencement of construction;

THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended, if required;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A215/14 - SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF CLOTHING 2015 - 2017 Award of Contract #10000128. Award of Contract #10000128 for the supply and delivery of clothing for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff. (Executive Res.#B120/14)

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Contract #10000128 for Supply and Delivery of Clothing for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be awarded to Needham Promotions Inc. at an estimated cost of $135,000.00 per year for two years at a total estimated contract price of $270,000.00, plus HST, plus 10% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA specifications;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED ______

RES.#A216/14 - MEETING SCHEDULE 2015-2016 To provide a schedule of board meetings for the period beginning January 30, 2015 and ending February 26, 2016. (Executive Res.#B121/14)

518 Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Mike Mattos

THAT the Schedule of Meetings 2015-2016, dated December 1, 2014, be approved;

THAT the Executive Committee be delegated the powers of the Authority during the month of August, 2015, as defined in Section 2.10 of the Rules of Conduct;

AND FURTHER THAT the CEO's Office distribute this schedule at the earliest opportunity to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) watershed municipalities and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. CARRIED ______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

RES.#A217/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Paul Ainslie

THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Newtonbrook Creek Bridge Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A218/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Glenn Mason Seconded by: Ron Moeser

THAT Section II item EX8.2 - WWK Recreation Inc. (Wild Water Kingdom), contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A219/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Jennifer Innis Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan

THAT Section II item EX8.3 - Albion Hills Field Centre Phase 5 Retrofit Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______519 RES.#A220/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT Section II item EX8.4 - P-524 Sanitary Sewer Protection - Bank Stabilization Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

RES.#A221/14 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION

Moved by: Ben Cachola Seconded by: Paul Ainslie

THAT Section II item EX8.5 - Office Accommodation Project, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

RES.#A222/14 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED

Moved by: Mike Mattos Seconded by: Ben Cachola

THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.13, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/14, held on December 12, 2014, be received. CARRIED ______

TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:28 a.m., on Friday, January 9, 2015.

Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks 520