Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (Els)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (Els) Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs) Revised January 2019 Colorado State Board of Education Valentina Flores (D) 1st Congressional District Denver Angelika Schroeder (D) 2nd Congressional District Boulder Joyce Rankin (R) 3rd Congressional District Carbondale Debora Scheffel (R) 4th Congressional District Larkspur Steve Durham (R) 5th Congressional District, Chairman Colorado Springs Rebecca McClellan (R) 6th Congressional District Centennial Jane Goff (D) 7th Congressional District Arvada GUIDEBOOK ON DESIGNING, DELIVERING AND EVALUATING SERVICES FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS (ELs) Guidebook on Designing, Delivering, and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs) Revised January 2019 Foreword by: Kathy Escamilla University of Colorado, Boulder CB 247—School of Education Boulder, Colorado 80309-0247 [email protected] 303-492-0147 Fax: 303-492-2883 1 GUIDEBOOK ON DESIGNING, DELIVERING AND EVALUATING SERVICES FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS (ELs) Foreword The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) was signed into law on December 10, 2015. This measure reauthorized the 50-year-old Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the nation’s national education law and longstanding commitment to equal opportunity for all students. It affects all students in K-12 public schools. The ESSA replaces the previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which was enacted in 2002. Much like its predecessors, the main purpose of ESSA is to make sure public schools provide a quality education for all students. In contrast to NCLB, however, ESSA gives states more of a say in how schools account for student achievement. This includes the achievement of students in poverty, students who are labeled as English learners, minority students, and students in Special Education. ESSA includes a number of new requirements for the education of English Learners (ELs), including standardized criteria for identifying EL students and inclusion of English proficiency as a measurement of school quality. Further, states must demonstrate in their plans that they have adopted ELP standards derived from the four recognized domains of speaking, listening, reading, and writing; that address the different proficiency levels of ELs; and that are aligned with the state’s academic standards. This requirement differs from NCLB in that NCLB did not require that the English proficiency standards address the different English proficiency levels of English learners. Under NCLB, states could establish a single definition of “proficiency” rather than defining multiple proficiency levels as is now required. To accomplish the new mandates, it is important to note that ESSA has shifted much of the decision-making regarding the education and accountability for English learners to state governments with important and specific provisions requiring stakeholder engagement. As such, ESSA creates new opportunities for community and local educational agency input into how important decisions related to ELs are made. ESSA, just as previous federal education initiatives, outlines a series of policies designed to improve schools for all public school students. While the bill is specific with regard to assessment and accountability, and has turned over a great deal of authority to the states, one could reasonably argue that, like NCLB, it falls short of specific programmatic or instructional guidelines to help local school districts develop and implement instructional programs that will enable English learners and others to meet its mandates. Just as with NCLB, the “How to” of improving schooling for ELs has largely been left to states, which, along with local school districts and communities are now charged with making instructional and programmatic decisions for English learners. The newly implemented ESSA coupled with Colorado’s large and rapidly growing population of English learners will place greater responsibility not just on the state but also on local school districts and educators working in tandem with the state. Based on CDE statistics, in 2016-17 Colorado had 129,237 K-12 students who are labeled as English learners. This is an increase over 5,000 since 2013. English learners are now almost 15% of Colorado’s K-12 population. As has been the case over the past 25 years, the majority of Colorado’s English learners speak Spanish (84%), however, in addition there are 232 other languages represented in this population. Colorado school districts know that they must meet all ESSA mandates including those for ELs. However, there is no doubt that the vast majority of educators in Colorado do not want to see ELs simply survive and meet mandates in school. They want to insure that they thrive academically, linguistically and socially. Moreover, more than ever local school districts are hungry for guidance that will help them to be more effective with English learners. Given the new responsibility that the state has for implementation of ESSA, and the continued need to work in partnership with local school districts, the importance of this Guidebook for Colorado educators of ELs cannot be over- emphasized. This Guidebook provides solid and up-to-date information to the field without being overly prescriptive 2 Foreword or dogmatic. It avoids overly simplistic “one size fits all” suggestions for programs and instruction and acknowledges up front that learning a second language is a long and complex process. Effective programs for ELs must address the cognitive and linguistic needs of language learners; equally important, they also must address the psychological and emotional needs of ELs. The Guidebook, to its credit, outlines the totality of the language learning process. The Guidebook does not prescribe one specific program model or approach to teaching English learners as being superior to any other, but it does specify that “doing nothing” is not an option. Further, the Guidebook acknowledges that well prepared and knowledgeable teachers are a critical component of any effective program. The authors challenge head-on the current feel-good mantras in some educational circles that “good teaching is good teaching” and illustrate that teaching English learners effectively will require the creation and implementation of programs, specifically tailored to the needs of ELs, that are orchestrated by well prepared teachers who have the resources needed to implement comprehensive educational programs. In short, the Guidebook does not tell you what to do but it tells you that you must do something and you must be thoughtful and thorough about what you do. Moreover, it provides many solid suggestions about how to get started in program development, assessment and evaluation. Finally, it is important to note that the principles and practices proposed in this Guidebook speak to the fact that if English learners are to be successful in Colorado Schools, it will require that all educators assume responsibility for the education of ELs and parents of these children must be intimately and actively involved in educational decisions related to their children. The Colorado Department of Education is to be commended for the preparation of this Guidebook. The field is in great need of guidance and leadership in their efforts to meet the needs of the 129,000+ English learners in the state, and English learners, like their monolingual English peers, deserve a first class education, the best our state has to offer. Originally written by Kathy Escamilla in 2007 and updated in 2013-2014 with new student data and again in Nov. 2017 with information from the new Every Student Succeeds Act and new data on English learners from the Colorado Department of Education. Source: Based on the 2013–2014 Student October Report, “Pupil Membership by Instructional Program” located at http://www.cde.state.co.us/sites/default/files/documents/ cdereval/download/pdf/2012pm/pupilmembershipbyinstructionalprogram.pdf. Foreword 3 GUIDEBOOK ON DESIGNING, DELIVERING AND EVALUATING SERVICES FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS (ELs) Table of Contents Introduction and Guiding Principles . 7 1 Understanding English Learners (ELs) . 10 1.1 ELs in the United States and Colorado ......................................................10 1.2 Stages of Language Development ..........................................................12 1.3 Socio-Cultural Issues and Student Learning .................................................16 2 Federal and State Requirements . 18 2.1 Federal Laws and Legal Requirements ......................................................18 2.2 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), 2017 ...................................................20 2.3 Colorado State Laws .....................................................................25 3 Understanding the Districts’ Obligation for Identification, Assessment and Placement of ELs . 28 3.1 Procedures for the Identification and Assessment of ELs ......................................28 3.2 Data Reporting and Student October Count .................................................31 3.3 Language Proficiency Assessment Instruments. 32 3.4 Program Placement for ELs ...............................................................35 3.5 Redesignation and Exit Guidance (for the 2016–2017 School Year) ..............................37 4 Designing Effective Programs to Meet the Needs of ELs . 44 4.1 Understanding Comprehensive School Reform Guidelines ....................................44 4.2 Understanding and Selecting Language Instruction Educational
Recommended publications
  • Becas De Retención, Apoyo Y Excelencia Para Estudios De
    Convocatoria Becas de Retención, Apoyo y Excelencia para Estudios de Bachillerato La Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) invita a todos los jóvenes que están iniciando su bachillerato y requieren una beca para continuar sus estudios, a que se inscriban del 24 de noviembre al 5 de diciembre al proceso de selección de beneficiarios de los Programas de Becas de Retención, de Apoyo y de Excelencia (1). Los estudiantes de las instituciones públicas participantes (2) que estén interesados en obtener un apoyo económico podrán ingresar su solicitud en la página de Internet www.sep.gob.mx/becasmediasuperior, ó www.sep.gob.mx, donde encontrarán la solicitud de inscripción al programa. REQUISITOS GENERALES: a) Ser de nacionalidad mexicana. b) Contar con menos de 20 años de edad al momento de solicitar la beca. c) No estar recibiendo, de manera simultánea, una transferencia monetaria en calidad de beca educativa a través de otro programa gubernamental. d) Pertenecer a un hogar cuyo ingreso mensual por persona sea menor a 1, 139 pesos en zonas rurales, y de 1, 707 pesos en zonas urbanas. (3) En casos excepcionales y plenamente justificados, se otorgarán becas a estudiantes de familias cuyo ingreso sea mayor a la línea de pobreza patrimonial. e) Haber terminado sus estudios de secundaria. f) No haber reprobado el ciclo escolar inmediato anterior. g) Completar debidamente el formato de solicitud de beca. h) Haber sido aceptado o estar en trámites de inscripción en una institución pública de educación media superior del país para iniciar estudios en programas de profesional técnico, bachillerato general o bachillerato tecnológico, para las carreras en Instituciones especificadas en las reglas de operación de estos programas.
    [Show full text]
  • Tercera Reunión Ordinaria 2019
    TERCERA REUNIÓN ORDINARIA 2019 Con fundamento en el artículo 13 fracción IX de la Ley de Entidades Paraestatales del Estado de Oaxaca y del artículo 12° fracción XI del Decreto de Creación de la Comisión Estatal para la Planeación de la Educación Superior en el Estado de Oaxaca (COEPES Oaxaca), la Secretaría Técnica presenta el informe general de actividades correspondiente al periodo abril – junio de 2019 y que incluye los siguientes puntos I. Sistema Coordinado de Admisión a Primer Ingreso a la Educación Superior. SCAPIES 2019-2020 II. Pertinencia de nuevas instituciones de educación superior y programas educativos. Opiniones de pertinencia de instituciones particulares de educación superior. Nuevos programas educativos de instituciones públicas de educación superior. Solicitudes de nuevas instituciones públicas de educación superior. III. Actualización y Distribución de los Catálogos de Licenciatura y Posgrado 2019 – 2020. IV. Actualización y Difusión del Catálogo de Servicios de las Instituciones de Educación Superior para el Sector Productivo 2019. V. Sistema de Consulta de la Oferta Educativa de Licenciatura y Posgrado. VI. Estadística de procedencia de alumnos de nuevo ingreso a la educación superior. VII. Nuevo Portal Institucional de la COEPES Oaxaca. VIII. Plan Estratégico Institucional de la COEPES Oaxaca. IX. Solicitudes de información a la Secretaría Técnica de la COEPES Oaxaca. 1 I. SISTEMA COORDINADO DE ADMISIÓN A PRIMER INGRESO A LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR. (SCAPIES) SCAPIES 2019-2020 En el desarrollo del Sistema Coordinado de Admisión a Primer Ingreso a la Educación Superior (SCAPIES), se ha realizado las dos primera etapas del proceso de admisión en las instituciones de educación superior (IES) que en esta ocasión ofrecieron un total de 35,185 lugares disponibles para estudiantes de nuevo ingreso a las 500 licenciaturas e ingenierías que se ofrecen en las 96 instituciones educativas.
    [Show full text]
  • (ENILEMS) 2019. Diseño Conceptual
    Encuesta Nacional de Inserción Laboral de los Egresados de la Educación Media Superior (ENILEMS 2019) Diseño conceptual Presentación La Encuesta Nacional de Inserción Laboral de los Egresados de la Educación Media Superior (ENILEMS) 2019, es un esfuerzo conjunto de la Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) por conducto de la Subsecretaría de Educación Media Superior (SEMS) y del Instituto 2020 Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). La ENILEMS se suma a las encuestas en hogares que se realizan conceptual. en México, misma que se levanta de manera bienal desde 2010 como módulo de la Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE); sin embargo, en 2019, se realizó como una encuesta independiente, sin Diseño perder comparabilidad, dando así continuidad a la generación de esta 2019. información. Esta encuesta tiene como objetivo ofrecer información sobre las características educativas de la población de 18 a 20 años que (ENILEMS) concluyó la Educación Media Superior (EMS), así como de su transición a la educación superior y/o al mercado de trabajo. Superior En este documento se presentan los elementos metodológicos de Media la ENILEMS 2019, tomando como referencia los antecedentes sobre la importancia de contar con información de los egresados de la EMS, la información disponible sobre el tema; los aspectos generales y Educación metodológicos de la encuesta, y el contenido temático de la la información recopilada durante el levantamiento. de Egresados los de Laboral Inserción de Nacional I Encuesta INEGI. Índice 1. Introducción ............................................................................ 1 2. Antecedentes .......................................................................... 3 2.1 Reforma Integral de la Educación Media Superior (RIEMS) en México .................................................. 3 2.2 Información estadística disponible ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Consultation on Promotion of Mechanical Parts Industry, And
    Policy Consultation on Promotion of Mechanical Parts Industry, and Technical Manpower Development and Promotion of Industry-Academy Cooperation in Hidalgo of Mexico Policy Consultation on Promotion of Mechanical Parts Indus- try, and Technical Manpower Development and Promotion of Industry-Academy Cooperation in Hidalgo of Mexico Project Title Policy Consultation on Promotion of Mechanical Parts Industry, and Technical Manpower Development and Promotion of Industry-Academy Cooperation in Hidalgo of Mexico Prepared by Center for Korean Prosperity Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training Moravian Fratrum Consulting KR Consulting Supported by Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF), Republic of Korea Korea Development Institute (KDI) Prepared for The Government of the United Mexican States In cooperation with Mexican Agency for International Development Cooperation, United Mexican States Ministry of Education, United Mexican States Secretariat of Economic Development of the State of Hidalgo, United Mexican States Secretariat of Education of the State of Hidalgo Program Directors Hong Tack Chun, Executive Director, Center for International Development (CID), KDI MoonJoong Tcha, Senior Advisor to Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategy and Finance, Former Executive Director, CID, KDI Taihee Lee, Director, Division of KSP Consultation, CID, KDI Program Officer Jeong Seok Kim, Associate Research Fellow, Center for Korean Prosperity JongPil Moon, Research Associate, Division of KSP Consultation, CID, KDI Senior Advisor
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (Els)
    Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs) Revised October 2016 Colorado State Board of Education Valentina Flores (D) 1st Congressional District Denver Angelika Schroeder (D) 2nd Congressional District Boulder Joyce Rankin (R) 3rd Congressional District Carbondale Pam Mazanec (R) 4th Congressional District Larkspur Steve Durham (R) 5th Congressional District, Chairman Colorado Springs Debora Scheffel (R) 6th Congressional District Parker Jane Goff (D) 7th Congressional District Arvada GUIDEBOOK ON DESIGNING, DELIVERING AND EVALUATING SERVICES FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS (ELs) Guidebook on Designing, Delivering, and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs) Revised October 2016 Foreword by: Kathy Escamilla University of Colorado, Boulder CB 247—School of Education Boulder, Colorado 80309-0247 [email protected] 303-492-0147 Fax: 303-492-2883 1 GUIDEBOOK ON DESIGNING, DELIVERING AND EVALUATING SERVICES FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS (ELs) Foreword In 2001, the United States Congress passed a major educational reform bill known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB). While much criticism has been leveled at many aspects of NCLB, the act was clear in that both State Departments of Education and local school districts needed to serve and be accountable for English learners. Further, included in the mandate was the requirement that State Departments of Education and local schools disaggregate all student data on English learners (ELs) for the purposes of better identifying the needs of this population and monitoring their academic progress and growth toward full acquisition of English. NCLB, just as previous federal education initiatives, outlined a series of desired outcomes to its mandates. While the bill is specific with regard to desired outcomes, one could reasonably argue that it falls short of specific programmatic or instructional guidelines to help local school districts develop and implement programs that will enable English learners and others to meet its mandates.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring Upper Secondary Education System in Mexico: Improving Education Quality
    Global Development Network Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability Restructuring Upper Secondary Education System in Mexico: Improving Education Quality Antonio Surisadai Gómez López Sunny A. Villa Graduate School of Public Administration and Public Policy (EGAP), Tecnológico de Monterrey University March, 2013 The Global Development Network (GDN) is a public International Organization that builds research capacity in development globally. GDN supports researchers in developing and transition countries to generate and share high quality applied social science research to inform policymaking and advance social and economic development. Founded in 1999, GDN is headquartered in New Delhi, with offices in Cairo and Washington DC. This Research Paper has been prepared as part of the research which was conducted under the GDN Global Research Project “Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability”, implemented in partnership with Results for Development Institute (R4D), USA with the aim of building and strengthening institutional capacity for public expenditure analysis across developing and transitional countries. The Global Research Project is fully funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), UK. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. © GDN, 2013 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • DURANGO Información Del Ciclo Escolar 2018 - 2019 Indicadores Estatales De La Mejora Continua De La Educación
    Indicadores estatales de la mejora continua de la educación DURANGO Información del ciclo escolar 2018 - 2019 Indicadores estatales de la mejora continua de la educación. Directorio Durango. Información del ciclo escolar 2018-2019 Primera edición, 2021 Junta Directiva Coordinación general Etelvina Sandoval Flores Gabriela Begonia Naranjo Flores Presidenta Abel Encinas Muñoz María del Coral González Rendón Coordinación de análisis y procesamiento de datos Comisionada Luis Alberto Degante Méndez Alfonso Paz Rodríguez Silvia Valle Tépatl Comisionada Redacción y procesamiento de datos Brenda Alcalá Escamilla, Eduardo Ángeles Méndez, Carlos Alberto Florentino Castro López Basurto Díaz, Carlos Basurto Troncoso, Melba Beatriz Casellas Comisionado Argáez, Yoni Miguel Castillo Tzec, Alberto de la Rosa Rábago, Luis Alberto Degante Méndez, Víctor García Canul, Itzel Vanessa Oscar Daniel del Río Serrano García de Jesús, Raúl Guadalupe Antonio, Verónica Medrano Comisionado Camacho, Cristina Mexicano Melgar, Gerardo Mollinedo Beltrán, Alfonso Paz Rodríguez, Elba Ramos Ibarra, Zaira Carina Retana Alarcón, Raúl René Rojas Olmos, Edgar Valencia Romero, Armando de Luna Ávila Víctor Xochitototl Nava Secretaría Ejecutiva Laura Jéssica Cortázar Morán D. R. © Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la Educación Órgano Interno de Control Barranca del Muerto 341, col. San José Insurgentes, alcaldía Benito Juárez, C.P. 03900, México, Ciudad de México. Titulares de áreas Francisco Miranda López Coordinación editorial Evaluación Diagnóstica Blanca Estela Gayosso Sánchez. Directora de área Gabriela Begonia Naranjo Flores Editor responsable Apoyo y Seguimiento a la Mejora José Arturo Cosme Valadez. Subdirector de área Continua e Innovación Educativa Editora gráfica responsable Susana Justo Garza Martha Alfaro Aguilar. Subdirectora de área Vinculación e Integralidad del Aprendizaje Corrección de estilo y formación Salvador Sergio Ávila Figueroa Miguel Ángel de Jesús López Reyes Administración Hecho en México.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training
    OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training A Learning for Jobs Review of Mexico Viktória Kis, Kathrin Hoeckel, Paulo Santiago July 2009 OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training A Learning for Jobs Review of Mexico 2009 Viktória Kis, Kathrin Hoeckel and Paulo Santiago This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. ISBN 978-92-64-11388-6 (PDF) Series: OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training ISSN 2077-7736 (online) Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. © OECD 2009 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS – 3 Table of contents Summary: strengths, challenges and recommendations ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Perfil De La Educación En México
    Perfil de la educación en México Secretaría de Educación Pública Perfil de la educación en México fue elaborado por la Subsecretaría de Planeación y Coordina- ción, y editado bajo el cuidado de la Subsecretaría de Educación Básica y Normal, ambas de la Secretaría de Educación Pública. Coordinación Dulce María Nieto de Pascual Pola Elaboración de textos Rocío Antonio Ríos Cristina Herrera Espinoza Rosa Wolpert Kuri María Eugenia Ramírez Parra Salvador Rodríguez Fernández Primera edición. 1997 Segunda edición corregida, 1999 Tercera edición, 2000 D.R. © Secretaría de Educación Pública, 2000 Argentina 28, colonia Centro, 06020, México, D.F. ISBN 970-18-5301-8 Impreso en México / Printed in Mexico DISTRIBUCIÓN GRATUITA-PROHIBIDA SU VENTA Se autoriza su reproducción, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente. CONTENIDO Presentación 5 1. Contexto general 9 2. Principios generales y objetivos de la educación en México 13 2.1 El artículo tercero constitucional y la Ley General de Educación 13 2.2 El Acuerdo Nacional para la Modernización de la Educación Básica 14 3. El Programa de Desarrollo Educativo 1995-2000 17 4. Estructura y organización del Sistema Educativo Nacional 23 5. Principales características del Sistema Educativo Nacional por tipo y nivel 31 5.1 Administración y gestión de la educación básica federalizada 31 5.2 Educación preescolar 34 5.3 Educación primaria 35 5.4 Educación secundaria 40 5.5 Educación media superior 44 5.6 Educación superior 60 5.7 Educación para adultos 72 6. Acciones y apoyos educativos en favor de la equidad 83 6.1 Los programas compensatorios 85 6.2 Educación indígena 89 6.3 Educación comunitaria 95 6.4 Atención educativa a la población jornalera agrícola migrante 97 6.5 Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación (Progresa) 99 6.6 Libros de texto para educación secundaria 101 6.7 Educación especial 101 6.8 Becas en el ámbito de la Secretaría de Educación Pública 106 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Oferta Educativa De Bachillerato Y Capacitación Para El Trabajo
    Oferta Educativa de Bachillerato y Capacitación para el Trabajo Informes: Brasil 31, 1er. piso, Ofi. 332, Edificio SEP Colonia Centro C.P. 06029 Del. Cuauhtémoc México, Distrito Federal Tels.: 36 01 1000 y 36 01 1097 TELSEP: 01800 288 6688 (Lada sin costo) Con educación construimos los cimientos de un México seguro para ti y tu familia Subsecretaría de Educación www.sems.gob.mx Media Superior (SEMS) www.sep.gob.mx www.gobiernofederal.gob.mx Secretaría de Educación Pública Este programa es público, ajeno a cualquier partido político. Queda prohibido el uso para fines distintos a los establecidos en el programa. ¿Qué es la SEMS ? Creada en enero de 2005, la Subsecretaría de Educación Media Superior (SEMS) es la unidad administrativa de la Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) encargada de planear, programar, organizar, dirigir y evaluar los servicios que en el nivel de bachillerato ofrecen a la población los gobiernos federal y estatal, así como los sectores privados y sociales. Instituciones Educativas: Esta institución también tiene una intervención Dirección General del Bachillerato (DGB) relevante en los servicios educativos de bachillerato Colegio de Bachilleres y de capacitación para el trabajo que se prestan en los estados de la República, puesto que coordina Dirección General de Educación Tecnológica Agropecuaria (DGETA) académicamente dichos servicios y participa en el Dirección General de Educación en Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar (DGECyTM) financiamiento de los principales organismos Dirección General de Educación Tecnológica Industrial (DGETI) estatales. Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica (CONALEP) Dirección General de Centros de Formación para el Trabajo (DGCFT) Lo anterior incluye la formulación y actualización de programas de estudio que brinden educación Mapa de Servicios media superior de calidad, eficiente y pertinente, MODELO de acuerdo a las modalidades demandadas por el EDUCATIVO INSTITUCIONES QUE LO IMPARTEN desarrollo nacional y, en particular, por los sectores productivos y de bienes y servicios.
    [Show full text]
  • Directorio Caed Cons
    DIRECTORIO CAED CONS. ESTADO MUNICIPIO PLANTEL TELÉFONO DOMICILIO VICENTE MENDIOLA NO.26, COL. CIUDAD GUZMÁN 92 JALISCO CIUDAD GUZMÁN CBTIS 226 (01 341) 412 68 50 / 412 52 03 CENTRO, C.P. 49000, CD. GUZMÁN, JALISCO. (01 341) 41 2 60 10 / (01 341) 41 3 AV. JUAN JOSÉ ARREOLA ZUÑIGA No. 770, COL. 93 JALISCO CIUDAD GUZMÁN (ZAPOTLÁN EL GRANDE) CEB 5/5 88 85 MORELOS C.P. 49026 CD. GUZMAN, JALISCO (01 333) 651 40 03 / 651 42 59 Ext. SIERRA DE TECUÁN NO. 2165, COL.RESIDENCIAL SAN 94 JALISCO GUADALAJARA CBTIS 010 105 ELÍAS, C.P. 44240, GUADALAJARA, JALISCO. JAVIER VARGAS NO. 5330, COL. PASEOS DEL SOL, C.P. 95 JALISCO GUADALAJARA CBTIS 038 (01 333) 631 78 37, Ext. 12 045079, ZAPOPAN, JALISCO (01 387) 76 3 1135 / (01 387) 76 3 JOSE SANTANA NO. 800 Y RIVERA DEL LAGO, APARTADO 96 JALISCO JOCOTEPEC CETAC 001 29 12 POSTAL NO. 40, C.P. 45800, JOCOTEPEC, JALISCO. (01 392) 922 02 49 / (01 392) 922 AV DEL CECYT 100, COL. NUEVO FUERTE, C.P. 47899, 97 JALISCO OCOTLÁN CBTIS 049 3034 OCOTLÁN, JALISCO AV. POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL. NO.215, COL. EDUCACIÓN, 98 JALISCO PUERTO VALLARTA CBTIS 068 (01 322) 224 37 22 Ext. 103 C.P. 48338, PTO. VALLARTA, JALISCO. 01 33 36 705 45 51 / 01 33 36 70 CUAUHTÉMOC 65, COL. LAS JUNTAS, C.P. 45590, 99 JALISCO TLAQUEPAQUE CECATI 051 49 05 / (33) 36705256 TLAQUEPAQUE, JALISCO CIRCUITO MALECÓN PONIENTE NO. 117, 0133 36 80 1610 / 0133 36 80 80 100 JALISCO TONALÁ CECATI 097 COL.
    [Show full text]
  • The KOF Education System Factbook: Mexico
    The KOF Education System Factbook: Mexico Edition 1, May 2017 ETH Zurich KOF Swiss Economic Institute LEE G 116 Leonhardstrasse 21 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Phone +41 44 632 42 39 Fax +41 44 632 12 18 www.kof.ethz.ch [email protected] Table of Contents FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................... VI EDITING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... VII 1. Mexico’s Economy and its Political System ................................................................. 1 1.1 Mexico’s Economy ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Labor Market ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Overview of Mexico’s Labor Market .................................................................... 3 1.2.2 The Youth Labor Market ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 The KOF Youth Labor Market Index (KOF YLMI) for Mexico ............................. 7 1.3 The Political System .................................................................................................. 8 1.3.1 Overview of the Mexico’s Political System ......................................................... 8 1.3.2 Politics and Goals of the Education System ..................................................... 10 2. Formal System of Education .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]