VBI Private CP 2K11

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VBI Private CP 2K11 VBI Private CP 2k11 Private CP Private CP .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Private CP 1NC ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Private CP 1NC ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Privatized Space Now ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Privatized Space Cheaper/More Efficient .............................................................................................................. 5 Privatized Space Cheaper/Solves Econ ................................................................................................................ 6 Privatized Space Cheaper Solves Econ ................................................................................................................ 7 Solvency—Incentives ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Solvency—Incentives ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Solvency—Incentives ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Solvency—Incentives/Prizes ................................................................................................................................ 11 Solvency—Prizes ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Solvency—Prizes ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Solvency—Prizes ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Solvency—Asteroid Mining .................................................................................................................................. 15 Solvency—Asteroid Mining .................................................................................................................................. 16 Solvency—Generic Space ................................................................................................................................... 17 Solvency—Generic Space ................................................................................................................................... 18 Solvency—Mars ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Solvency—Moon .................................................................................................................................................. 20 Solvency—Military Communications .................................................................................................................... 21 Solvency—NASA ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Solvency—Planetary Defense ............................................................................................................................. 23 Solvency—SETI ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Solvency—Shuttle Gap ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Solvency—Space Tourism ................................................................................................................................... 26 Solvency—Space Plane ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Solvency—Space Shuttle ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Solvency—Space Solar ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Solvency—Space Solar ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Solvency—Space Tourism ................................................................................................................................... 31 Spending—Doesn’t Link to Spending .................................................................................................................. 32 Politics—Incentives/Prizes Unpopular ................................................................................................................. 33 Politics—Privatize Unpopular ............................................................................................................................... 34 AT: No Laws/Definitions/Framework for Private Space ....................................................................................... 35 AT: Legal Restrictions Prevent the CP ................................................................................................................. 36 AT: Government Key to Safety ............................................................................................................................ 37 AT: Permutation ................................................................................................................................................... 38 AT: NASA Key to Future Development ................................................................................................................ 39 AT: Private Space Can’t Get Started ................................................................................................................... 40 AT: Prizes Don’t Matter ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Aff—Government Better ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Aff—NASA Good .................................................................................................................................................. 43 Aff—Conspiracy Theory Links .............................................................................................................................. 44 Aff—Privatizationà Militarization ......................................................................................................................... 45 Aff—Private Spaceà Accidents ........................................................................................................................... 46 Aff—Permutation .................................................................................................................................................. 47 Aff—Privatization Fails ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Aff—Privatization Kills Heg .................................................................................................................................. 49 Page 1 of 49 VBI Private CP 2k11 Private CP 1NC Text: The United States Federal Government Should Provide Prizes and Tax Incentives to Encourage Private Corporations to [Affirmative Plan Area]. Government Run Space Programs are Subject to Nonsensical Bureaucratic Mistakes and Political Pressures That Fail the Missions of the Program Robert Garmong, Ph.D, writer for the Ayn Rand Institute, “Privatize Space Exploration,” Intellectual Conservative, July 22nd, 2005 (http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2005/07/22/privatize-space-exploration/) There is a contradiction at the heart of the space program: space exploration, as the grandest of man's technological advancements, requires the kind of bold innovation possible only to minds left free to pursue the best of their creative thinking and judgment. Yet, by funding the space program through taxation, we necessarily place it at the mercy of bureaucratic whim. The results are written all over the past twenty years of NASA's history: the space program is a political animal, marked by shifting, inconsistent, and ill-defined goals. The space shuttle was built and maintained to please clashing special interest groups, not to do a clearly defined job for which there was an economic and technical need. The shuttle was to launch satellites for the Department of Defense and private contractors -- which could be done more cheaply by lightweight, disposable rockets. It was to carry scientific experiments -- which could be done more efficiently by unmanned vehicles. But one "need" came before all technical issues: NASA's political need for showy manned vehicles. The result, as great a technical achievement as it is, was an over-sized, over-complicated, over-budget,
Recommended publications
  • SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R
    15TH ANNUAL FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE SPEAKERS COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION http://www.faa.gov/go/ast 15-16 FEBRUARY 2012 HQ-12-0163.INDD John R. Allen Christine Anderson Dr. John R. Allen serves as the Program Executive for Crew Health Christine Anderson is the Executive Director of the New Mexico and Safety at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, where he Spaceport Authority. She is responsible for the development oversees the space medicine activities conducted at the Johnson and operation of the first purpose-built commercial spaceport-- Space Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Allen received a B.A. in Speech Spaceport America. She is a recently retired Air Force civilian Communication from the University of Maryland (1975), a M.A. with 30 years service. She was a member of the Senior Executive in Audiology/Speech Pathology from The Catholic University Service, the civilian equivalent of the military rank of General of America (1977), and a Ph.D. in Audiology and Bioacoustics officer. Anderson was the founding Director of the Space from Baylor College of Medicine (1996). Upon completion of Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland his Master’s degree, he worked for the Easter Seals Treatment Air Force Base, New Mexico. She also served as the Director Center in Rockville, Maryland as an audiologist and speech- of the Space Technology Directorate at the Air Force Phillips language pathologist and received certification in both areas. Laboratory at Kirtland, and as the Director of the Military Satellite He joined the US Air Force in 1980, serving as Chief, Audiology Communications Joint Program Office at the Air Force Space at Andrews AFB, Maryland, and at the Wiesbaden Medical and Missile Systems Center in Los Angeles where she directed Center, Germany, and as Chief, Otolaryngology Services at the the development, acquisition and execution of a $50 billion Aeromedical Consultation Service, Brooks AFB, Texas, where portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization of Space – the Astrosociological Approach
    AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition AIAA 2007-6076 18 - 20 September 2007, Long Beach, California The Globalization of Space – The Astrosociological Approach Marilyn Dudley-Flores* and Thomas Gangale† OPS-Alaska, 2262 Magnolia Avenue, Petaluma, California 94952 USA [Abstract] The primary author coined the phrase “globalization of space” in the 1990s in lectures and presentations, thus the term was conceived in the sociological record. And, though texts and journal articles on sociology are full of studies of the phenomenon of globalization, sociologists are not serious about the study of those aerospatial events that made possible the extent of modern globalization. And, although it is in their purview, they do not keep track of advancements in the aerospace industry that can provide clues to where globalization is taking human societies. On the other hand, the “globalization of space” is referenced by a host of organizations connected to the aerospace community (i.e., NASA, the Air Force Academy, et al.). However, to the reverse of the sociological community, aerospace organizations have little concept of social factors at varying levels of analysis that can provide clues to where human societies are heading in space – a destination that will impact aerospace industries. The authors advocate for taking the astrosociological approach, a merging of social science and aerospace perspectives in order to examine the coming benefits and challenges to the globalization of space. Several topics, near-term to long-term, discussed in this report
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Settlement 2009
    SPACE SETTLEMENT 2009 National Space Society -· Mars 3009 (First Prize, Orbital Category) by Joe Vinton. England, United Kingdom. Medium: Digital. 2009 Colonies on Mars have now grown into cities to rival those on Earth. I never believed them when they said how Mars had grown. Has it really only been nine hundred years since the first settlement? We’ve come so far, so fast. I wonder where we’ll go next, if only we can convince the Mars counsel to fund us then we could send mining missions to Phobos and then beyond… Wow, the sun reflecting off the Silvan towers is unbelievably beautiful this time of day… I can’t wait to use SatSend and tell Molly; she’s going to love it here. January Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Events of the Month 28 29 30 31 123 December 2008 February 2009 Start of International Year S M T W T F S S M T W T F S New Year’s Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of Astronomy (IYA2009) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Italian astronomer Giuseppe 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Piazzi discovered 1 Ceres, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The vision of IYA2009 is to help the citizens of first and largest asteroid in 28 29 30 31 Solar System, ≈ 915 km in the world rediscover their place in the universe diameter (1801).
    [Show full text]
  • Moon, Mars & Beyond
    TTHHEE SSPPAACCEE EEXXPPLLOORRAATTIIOONN AALLLLIIAANNCCEE ENDORSE MOON, MARS & BEYOND: FUND THE FY2005 NASA EXPLORATION BUDGET REQUEST We Are The Space Exploration Alliance, an unprecedented partnership of twenty of the nation’s premier space advocacy groups, industry associations and space policy organizations. We Have Joined Together To urge endorsement and full funding of the new Vision for Space Exploration that will refocus NASA’s human space activities toward exploration, including a return to the Moon and moving on to Mars and beyond. Why Should You Endorse and Fund These Goals? Here are just two reasons: REASON #1: IT’S AFFORDABLE Critics of Moon, Mars & Beyond have largely focused on cost. Some falsely claim those costs will run into the trillions of dollars. Some erroneously suggest huge increases in the NASA budget will be required. HERE’S THE REAL STORY: “It is a “go as you can pay” plan where we achieve periodic milestones, technological advances, and discoveries based on what we can afford annually.” From the report of the President’s Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy June 16, 2004 With the clarity of a long-term vision focused on Moon, Mars & Beyond, NASA funding can be directed toward a set of coherent goals. Modest but steady growth in our national expenditures on space will move the nation toward these important goals, and the benefits those expenditures will provide. Aerospace Industries Association . Aerospace States Association . American Astronautical Society American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics . California Space Authority Federation of Galaxy Explorers . Florida Space Authority . Global Space Travelers . The Mars Society Moon Society .
    [Show full text]
  • 513691 Journal of Space Law 35.1.Ps
    JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW VOLUME 35, NUMBER 1 Spring 2009 1 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF LAW A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO SPACE LAW AND THE LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISING OUT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE. VOLUME 35 SPRING 2009 NUMBER 1 Editor-in-Chief Professor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, J.D. Executive Editor Jacqueline Etil Serrao, J.D., LL.M. Articles Editors Business Manager P.J. Blount Michelle Aten Jason A. Crook Michael S. Dodge Senior Staff Assistant Charley Foster Melissa Wilson Gretchen Harris Brad Laney Eric McAdamis Luke Neder Founder, Dr. Stephen Gorove (1917-2001) All correspondence with reference to this publication should be directed to the JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW, P.O. Box 1848, University of Mississippi School of Law, University, Mississippi 38677; [email protected]; tel: +1.662.915.6857, or fax: +1.662.915.6921. JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW. The subscription rate for 2009 is $100 U.S. for U.S. domestic/individual; $120 U.S. for U.S. domestic/organization; $105 U.S. for non-U.S./individual; $125 U.S. for non-U.S./organization. Single issues may be ordered at $70 per issue. For non-U.S. airmail, add $20 U.S. Please see subscription page at the back of this volume. Copyright © Journal of Space Law 2009. Suggested abbreviation: J. SPACE L. ISSN: 0095-7577 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF LAW A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO SPACE LAW AND THE LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISING OUT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE. VOLUME 35 SPRING 2009 NUMBER 1 CONTENTS Foreword ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Reach for the Moon and Mars? “It Is In
    Why Reach for the Moon and Mars? “It is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not know what benefits await us. But space is there, and we are going to climb it.” - John F. Kennedy, 1962 For the knowledge: Human exploration of the Moon and Mars will open vistas of new knowledge. With the support of a human lunar base, we can establish astronomical observatories of unmatched power, making fundamental discoveries about the physical structure of the cosmos. Our robots have revealed that Mars was once a warm, wet planet, potentially friendly to life. By sending human explorers to the Red Planet to search for life or its remains, we can discover if the development of life is a general phenomenon in the universe, and determine if life as we know it on Earth is the pattern for all life everywhere, or if we are just one example of a much greater tapestry. For the challenge: Societies are like individuals; they grow when they are challenged. A program to send humans to the Moon and Mars would be a bracing challenge, particularly to our nation’s youth. It would call out to every young person: “Learn your science and you can be a pioneer of new worlds.” As during Apollo, when such a call resulted in the doubling of the number of U.S. science and engineering graduates, this call to intellectual adventure would result in the production of millions of new scientists, engineers, inventors, doctors, and medical researchers—people whose inventions and discoveries would create new industries, strengthen our national defense, advance our health, and yield myriad other benefits on a scale that would utterly dwarf the expenditures on the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Miners-Manifesto-Mars.Pdf
    http://www.moonsociety.org/mars/ Let’s make the right choice - Mars and the Moon! Advantages of a low profile for shielding Mars looks like Arizona but feels like Antarctica Rover Opportunity at edge of Endeavor Crater Designing railroads and trains for Mars Designing planes that can fly in Mars’ thin air Breeding plants to be “Mars-hardy” Outposts between dunes, pulling sand over them These are just a few of the Mars-related topics covered in the past 25+ years. Read on for much more! Why Mars? The lunar and Martian frontiers will thrive much better as trading partners than either could on it own. Mars has little to trade to Earth, but a lot it can trade with the Moon. Both can/will thrive together! CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX MMM THEMES: MARS MMM #6 - "M" is for Missing Volatiles: Methane and 'Mmonia; Mars, PHOBOS, Deimos; Mars as I see it; MMM #16 Frontiers Have Rough Edges MMM #18 Importance of the M.U.S.-c.l.e.Plan for the Opening of Mars; Pavonis Mons MMM #19 Seizing the Reins of the Mars Bandwagon; Mars: Option to Stay; Mars Calendar MMM #30 NIMF: Nuclear rocket using Indigenous Martian Fuel; Wanted: Split personality types for Mars Expedition; Mars Calendar Postscript; Are there Meteor Showers on Mars? MMM #41 Imagineering Mars Rovers; Rethink Mars Sample Return; Lunar Development & Mars; Temptations to Eco-carelessness; The Romantic Touch of Old Barsoom MMM #42 Igloos: Atmosphere-derived shielding for lo-rem Martian Shelters MMM #54 Mars of Lore vs. Mars of Yore; vendors wanted for wheeled and walking Mars Rovers; Transforming Mars; Xities
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 19: Innovation on the Final Frontier: Space Guest:​Robert C
    Episode 19: Innovation on the final frontier: Space Guest: Robert C. Jacobson, author of Space is Open for Business, entrepreneur, advisor, ​ Principal at Space Angels and notable for his involvement in The Solar Library and The Lunar ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Library missions, in conversation with Kris Østergaard on how and why space is both an ​ ​ accelerant of innovation and a key player in solving the global grand challenges. Episode Highlights: ● 2:02 Introduction to Robert’s journey into space ​ ● 7:37 Brief journey on the history of space - then and now ​ ● 15:29 What accelerated space development? ​ ● 20:07 Space is segmented - how and what’s going on there? ​ ● 26:24 Timeline for harvesting energy from space ​ ● 29:16 Current biggest business opportunity in space ​ ● 37:09 Why would we want to innovate in space? ​ ● 38:22 What is the next big thing coming up in space in the next 5-10 years? ​ ● 49:03 How does humankind evolve in space and potential use for space ​ ● 54:35 Relationship between earth and space in 10 years ​ ● 57:44 Which industries should look into space? ​ ● 1:01:35 How to get in touch with Robert ​ Kris: So we're here on the Corporate Innovation Podcast with Robert C. Jacobson and Robert, ​ he's an entrepreneur, he's an advisor. And he's a space advocate who believes space is the key to humanity's successful future. He has served as a principal with Space Angels, formerly Space Angels Network, which is the leading source of capital for aerospace and aviation startups, and is on the board of directors for the Space Frontier Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel F.Hastings Assoc
    France and Japan in Space: Niche Market Players, with Evolving Assets and Roles by Damon R. Wells B.S., University of Oklahoma (1984) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 1991 @ Damon R. Wells, 1991. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author......................:'...... ... ::............................. ........ Department of Aýetics and Astronautics August, 1991 Certified by ................................................ .................. ..... Leon Trilling Professor, Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Certified by .......................... ... ... Os......... ... .. Daniel F.Hastings Assoc. Professor, Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by...... * .......... .• ..... ;.•...... * .. -..-..'. ......... Prof. Richard de Neufville ,, Cqhajr anjTechnology and Policy Program A A. r1A.L.~j~L.~LL U)..... .U .. P6f: HUirold Y. Wachman Chairman, Departmental Graduate Committee SEP- 21 4 1991 Aam France and Japan in Space: Niche Market Players, with Evolving Assets and Roles by Damon R. Wells Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on August, 1991, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY Abstract This thesis examines the nature, capabilities, and growth policies of the increasingly successful French and Japanese space programs, with an emphasis on their strate- gies for competing with the larger U.S. and Soviet programs. Toward that end, information and analyses are first presented with respect to the context and policy environment for the programs, including such issues as program structure, funding patterns, overall program goals, and the more general trends in each nation regard- ing high technology policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    #13 - novembre 2014 50 ANS ESRO 50 ANS ELDO L’ESAAURA 40 ANS LE 31 MAI 2015 50 ANS : EUROPE SPATIALE ESPACE & TEMPS Le mot du président IFHE Institut Français d’Histoire de l’Espace adresse de correspondance : 2, place Maurice Quentin Chers amis, 75039 Paris Cedex 01 Voici le second bulletin Espace & Temps de l’année. e-mail : [email protected] Désormais, avec la mise en service du site internet de l’IFHE Tél : 01 40 39 04 77 (http://ifhe.jimdo.com), nous prévoyons de mettre les informations sur la vie de l’institut sur le site et de réserver les colonnes du bul- L’institut Français d’Histoire de l’Espace (IFHE) est une letin à des articles historiques. association selon la Loi de 1901 créée le 22 mars 1999 qui s’est fixée pour obiectifs de valoriser l’histoire de l’espace Le 25 novembre, une conférence est organisée par la 3A et de participer à la sauvegarde et à la préservation du Cnes sur les 50 ans du CSG. L’année prochaine, nous célèbrerons patrimoine documentaire. Il est administré par un Conseil, le 50e anniversaire du premier satellite français le 26 novembre. et il s’est doté d’un Conseil Scientifique. Au premier trimestre 2015, la thèse de doctorat de Hervé Moulin, vice-président de l’IFHE, doit être publié par l’ESA aux Conseil d’administration éditions Beauchêne dans le cadre des 50 ans de l’Europe spatiale. Président d’honneur.......Michel Bignier Président....................Christian Lardier Puis nous aurons la publication du livre sur la coopéra- Vice-présidents.........Pr.
    [Show full text]