Buying Prosperity: the Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead, 1885-1914

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Buying Prosperity: the Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead, 1885-1914 Document generated on 10/02/2021 5 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine Buying Prosperity The Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead, 1885-1914 Thorold J. Tronrud Trends and Questions in New Historical Accounts of Policing Article abstract Volume 19, Number 1, June 1990 Though Fort William and Port Arthur (now Thunder Bay) used the full gamut of promotional tools to attract industry in the three decades before 1914, they URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1017574ar relied most heavily on bonusing. Together they granted more money in DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1017574ar bonuses to manufacturers than perhaps any other community in Canada. Such a policy occasioned much debate locally over the usefulness and propriety of See table of contents using tax dollars to subsidize industry. This article examines both the extent and effects of bonusing at the Lakehead and the debate it raised. It concludes that while bonuses could, in the short run, greatly affect the rate of industrial growth, the long-term survival of manufacturing depended on favourable Publisher(s) geography and a supportive economic environment. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Tronrud, T. J. (1990). Buying Prosperity: The Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead, 1885-1914. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017574ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1990 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Buying Prosperity: The Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead, 1885-1914 ThoroldJ. Tronrud Though Fort William and Port Arthur The transformation of central Canadian cities lobbying produced millions of dollars of (now Thunder Bay) used the full gamut into industrial centres in the three decades government subsidies for railway expansion of promotional tools to attract industry prior to 1910 had a loud echo on Ontario's and harbour developments such as dredging in the three decades before 1914, they northwestern frontier. The Canadian and the construction of breakwaters and relied most heavily on bonusing. Lakehead "must become one of the great shipping docks. The Lakehead's strategy was Together they granted more money in manufacturing centres of the Dominion. So distinctive, however, for two reasons: it bonuses to manufacturers than perhaps say the seers, — the men of prophetic reached full fruition after most promotional any other community in Canada. Such foresight. So say the practical businessmen campaigns elsewhere were winding down, a policy occasioned much debate locally who have their fingers on the pulse beats of and it made extraordinarily liberal use of over the usefulness and propriety of trade and development of the country." So financial inducements, or bonuses. using tax dollars to subsidize industry. said E. S. Rutledge, Fort William's town clerk, This article examines both the extent in 1898, and he spoke for almost every one of The extent to which industrial strategies, and and effects of bonusing at the Lakehead his fellow boosters in Fort William and Port the granting of bonuses in particular, can and the debate it raised. It concludes Arthur.1 Their ambitions knew no bounds: one explain industrial growth across Canada is that while bonuses could, in the short of the two towns, but never both together, part of a larger debate over the role of run, greatly affect the rate of industrial would inevitably become the "Chicago of the boosters and entrepreneurs in the urban growth, the long-term survival of North", the "Pittsburgh of Canada", or, at the economy. Are cities made by the people manufacturing depended on favourable very least, one of the nation's premier living in them — by the strength of personal geography and a supportive economic manufacturing centres exacting its tribute contacts, sound industrial policies, effective environment. from the entire West.2 Though scarcely more advertising and generous financing — or are than villages when Rutledge made his these factors subordinate to the largely prophesy, Fort William and Port Arthur had impersonal forces of location, markets, 3 6 Résumé definite metropolitan aspirations. With a resources and transportation? Most turn-of- single-minded devotion to this goal both the-century boosters were certain of their Durant les trois décennies précédant communities, emulating their Eastern control. Historians, however, are more 1914, sans négliger aucun moyen Canadian and American counterparts, divided. Some scholars have suggested that susceptible d'attirer l'industrie, Fort developed nearly identical industrial the strength and vigor of urban industrial William et Fort Arthur (aujourd'hui strategies and employed similar techniques in strategies can explain the success or failure of rebaptisée Thunder Bay) mirent an attempt to transform economies driven by individual towns; that, as E.J. Noble argues in fortement Vaccent sur les subventions. the extraction and movement of raw materials a case study of Orillia, "it is the skill and Ensemble elles versent ainsi aux — grain, forest products, fish and minerals in initiative of the entrepreneur which is the entreprises des sommes qui sans doute particular — into ones based firmly on the decisive factor in community growth".7 Beeby ne trouvaient d'équivalent dans aucune manufactured product. Though the two towns concurs by noting that Toronto's most ville canadienne. Ce faisant elles grew into fair-sized cities by 1914 primarily on successful period of manufacturing growth alimentèrent la controverse parmi leurs the strength of the transportation and coincided with a vigorous campaign to attract contribuables sur l'utilité et l'à-propos resource export sectors, local boosters industries through inducements. He de ce genre de mesure. Les auteurs persisted in viewing manufacturing as the concludes that comparing industrial analysent l'ampleur et les effets des mark of a stable prosperous and mature strategies could well explain the location of subventions au 'elles consentirent et les economy4 For the most part, the Lakehead's factories across Ontario.8 Bloomfield's study débats qui s'ensuivirent. B appert que si approach to attracting industry followed of Berlin yields similar results. She shows a de tels incitatif s pouvaient bel et bien, à familiar patterns, combining the promotional positive correlation between bonusing and court terme, stimuler la croissance rhetoric of the West with the financial economic growth in the city and asserts that industrielle, par la suite, la survie des inducements characteristic of Ontario cities.5 industrial success depended on a judicious entreprises reposait sur le dynamisme Promotional books and brochures were use of inducements.9 In each case inhibiting économique du milieu et sur les produced in abundance and delegations geographical and technological forces are conditions géographiques. travelled far and wide, attending trade fairs overcome by the determination of and expositions and talking to potential entrepreneurs.10 Weaver, on the other hand, investors. Industrial commissioners were hired downplays the influence of inducements by to coordinate activities, write advertising and noting how universal they were and, along make the necessary contacts. Considerable with others, considers geographical factors to / Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine Vol. XIX, No. 1 (June 1990) The Bonusing of Factories at the Lakehead have played a more significant role in Ptirtl the two Lakehead cities alone, between just determining the location of industry.11 Naylor 1901 and 1913, granted 20 such admits that "the bonusing system was central Fort William and Port Arthur were prodigious inducements worth $1,157,200 for an average to determining the distribution of the existing bonusers. Almost all manufacturing industries of $57,860 each; more than twelve times the industrial capacity" but nevertheless established in the communities prior to the amount given per city in the southern Ontario emphasizes the deleterious effects of first World War, particularly the large sample.15 municipal inducements. Such entrepreneurial enterprises, were bonused.13 Between 1885, efforts he sees as little more than "stop gap" when Port Arthur granted its first industrial Locally the range of cash bonuses was measures designed to fill a hole in the capital subsidy to a local foundry, and the end of extreme: the smallest, $2,500 to a foundry 12 market not filled by private sources. The 1913, the two municipalities gave to operator in 1890; the largest, $270,000 to the example of Fort William and Port Arthur is manufacturers in the form of cash payments, Canadian Car and Foundry Co. (Can Car) in particularly significant to this debate because loans or bond guarantees no less than $2.4 1912. Port Arthur granted only six cash of the extent to which the two ports relied million. (See Table 1) This represents more, bonuses, all after 1901, but these included upon financial inducements to entice, capture perhaps, than an other city in Canada. some of the largest — $250,000 to the and maintain industry. While municipal Between 1867 and 1900, according to Western Dry Dock and Ship Building Co., bonusing may indeed have been nearly Bloomfield's analysis, 178 southern Ontario $225,000 for the Atikokan Iron Company's universal, the amounts granted by each urban centres granted over 250 cash blast furnace, and $60,000 for the Brutinell community were far from equal. The bonuses worth slightly in excess of $2.1 Wire and Nail works. Fort William gave Lakehead gave to manufacturers over twelve million.
Recommended publications
  • Calgary Montreal Thunder Bay Halifax Saskatoon
    working together to create a national movement to strengthen “We all have a blueprint for life…and YOUTHSCAPE IS SUPPORTED BY youth engagement and build resilient communities. if we were just to show each other THE J. W. MCCONNELL FAMILY FOUNDATION AS PART OF A our plans…then maybe the bigger plan embracing bold visions for change! YOUTH ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY can start to change…to adapt to all TO FOSTER INNOVATIVE CHANGE YouthScape is based on the idea that young people can make important our needs…but we must first come AND BUILD RESILIENT contributions to building resilient communities and systems that are inclusive, together…this is the first step.” COMMUNITIES AT BOTH THE adaptable and healthy. Our society does not always support and recognize these LOCAL AND NATIONAL LEVEL. GABRIELLE FELIX & TALA TOOTOOSIS contributions, especially when youth are ‘diverse’, excluded and marginalized YOUTHSCAPE COORDINATORS THE INITIATIVE IS COORDINATED SASKATOON culturally or economically. By encouraging young people to develop their talents, BY THE INTERNATIONAL learn new skills and to become engaged in our communities, INSTITUTE FOR CHILD RIGHTS we can support positive change and make our communities AND DEVELOPMENT (IICRD), community : Thunder Bay, Ontario Thunder Bay stronger. YouthScape is an exciting Canada-wide initiative to AN ORGANIZATION THAT convening organization : United Way Thunder Bay : www.unitedway-tbay.on.ca engage all young people in creating change. building on collective strengths – SUPPORTS CROSS-COMMUNITY LEARNING AND RESEARCH, In this first phase, five YouthScape communities across Canada generating positive change INCREASES LOCAL CAPACITY AND have been selected to develop exciting new projects to create .
    [Show full text]
  • Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary
    www.thunderbay.noaa.gov (989) 356-8805 Alpena, MI49707 500 WestFletcherStreet Heritage Center Great LakesMaritime Contact Information N T ATIONAL ATIONAL HUNDER 83°30'W 83°15'W 83°00'W New Presque Isle Lighthouse Park M North Bay ARINE Wreck 82°45'W Old Presque Isle Lighthouse Park B S ANCTUARY North Albany Point Cornelia B. AY Windiate Albany • Types ofVesselsLostatThunderBay South Albany Point Sail Powered • • • Scows Ships, Brigs, Schooners Barks Lake Esau Grand Norman Island Wreck Point Presque Isle Lotus Lake Typo Lake of the Florida • Woods Steam Powered Brown • • Island Sidewheelers Propellers John J. Grand Audubon LAKE Lake iver R ll e B HURON Whiskey False Presque Isle Point • Other • • Unpowered Combustion Motor Powered 45°15'N 45°15'N Bell Czar Bolton Point Besser State Besser Bell Natural Area Wreck Defiance (by quantityoflossforallwrecks) Cargoes LostatThunderBay • • • • Iron ore Grain Coal Lumber products Ferron Point Mackinaw State Forest Dump Scow Rockport • • • • 23 Middle Island Sinkhole Fish Salt Package freight Stone Long Portsmouth Lake Middle Island Middle Island Lighthouse Middle Lake • • • Copper ore Passengers Steel Monaghan Point New Orleans 220 Long Lake Creek Morris D.M. Wilson Bay William A. Young South Ninemile Point Explore theThunderBayNationalMarineSanctuary Fall Creek Salvage Barge &Bathymetry Topography Lincoln Bay Nordmeer Contours inmeters Grass Lake Mackinaw State Forest Huron Bay 0 Maid of the Mist Roberts Cove N Stoneycroft Point or we gi an El Cajon Bay Ogarita t 23 Cre Fourmile Mackinaw State
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Forward Thunder
    Community Report 2001-2003 Mayor Lynn Peterson, Co-Chair Ray Riley, Co-Chair As the new Co-Chair of Fast Fast Forward is the community’s Inside: Forward, it is my privilege to intro- vision for the future and it is the voice duce this report to the community of the citizens of Thunder Bay. It was created through a public consultation Quality of Life 2 and to acknowledge the work of the former co-chair, Ken Boshcoff, dur- initiative in the late ‘90s and the out- ing the years it chronicles. We are come was a planning framework com- Our Community Partners 2 pleased to know we can count on plete with strategic directions, goals Ken’s continued support. and objectives. The role of the Fast Forward partner- Celebrating our As I said in my inaugural address to Successes 3 City Council last month, the building ship and steering committee is: blocks are in place like never before • to bring together community groups for a concrete action plan to benefit sharing common interests. Direction Thunder Bay 4 our community. We have: • to share information with and among • Fast Forward, the community devel- various interest groups. opment plan, which has been endorsed by more than 70 community • to report annually to the citizens on organizations. It provides us with a vision and a general blueprint. the community’s progress in achieving Fast Forward’s goals and objec- • the priorities honed by community leaders at the September tives, a sort of "How are we doing?" Economic Summit. • to fine-tune and adjust the planning framework to stay abreast of • an expanding community pride that comes from a series of remarkable the community’s changing needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Approved to Export Pelletized Screenings NOTICE This List Changes Frequently
    Facilities Approved to Export Pelletized Screenings NOTICE This list changes frequently. Contact the Seed Examination Facility (SEF) for possible updates to the list. [email protected] Phone: 301-313-9332 [email protected] Phone: 301-313-9329 The following facilities are approved to export pelletized screenings to the U.S. using Export Certificate Under CFIA Directive D-11-04. 1. Alliance Grain Terminal 1155 Stewart St. Vancouver, BC V6A 4H4, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-01 2. Cargill North Vancouver Terminal 801 Low Level Road North Vancouver, BC V7L 4J5, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-02 3. Cascadia Terminal 3333 New Brighton Road Vancouver, BC V5K 5J7, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-03 4. Pacific Terminal 1803 Stewart Street Vancouver, BC V5L 5G1, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-04 5. Rowland Seeds Inc. 421 1st Avenue South Vauxhall, AB T0K 2K0, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-06 6. Superior Elevator 140 Darrel Ave. Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6T8, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-07 02/2021 1 7. Viterra Inc. 609 Maureen Street Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6T2, Canada CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-05 8. G3 Terminal Vancouver 95 Brooksbank Avenue North Vancouver, BC V7J2B9 CFIA Facility Approval Number: CFIA-GSP-08 2 02/2021 Export Certificate Under CFIA Directive D-11-04 Export Certificate Under CFIA Directive D-11-04 Shipment Identification Number ______________ Facility Name Facility Address CFIA Facility Approval Number CFIA - GSP - ** Bin Number This certificate attests thatat the gragrainin screening ppellets in this consignment are not intendedntendednded to be used for planting, and; 1) Meet the processingrocessingcessing rerequirquirementuiremements as outlined in the compliancence agreemenagreementt betweebetween the above facility and the CFIAA ass per Directive D-1D-11-04.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • 125 Years of Care in the Community
    RESPONDING1884 TO UNMET N -EEDS 2009: 125 Years of Care in the Community Written by Peter Raffo RESPONDING TO UNMET NEEDS : 125 Years of Care in the Community Written by Peter Raffo Illustration of St. Joseph’s Hospital built in 1884 Copyright © 2009 St. Joseph’s Care Group All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by: St. Joseph’s Care Group P.O. Box 3251 35 Algoma St. N., Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7B 5G7 Telephone: (807) 768-4440 Email: [email protected] Website: www.sjcg.net Printed and Bound in Canada by Premier Printing Cover Design and Book Layout: Korkola Design Communications ISBN: 978-0-9692626-3-3 St. Joseph’s Care Group dedicates this book to the memory of Carole Judith Marie Faulkner (1934-2008) Nurse and Teacher. Member of the Board of St. Joseph’s Heritage (1990-95); Member of the Board of St. Joseph’s Care Group (1995-2003); Chair of the Board of St. Joseph’s Care Group (1999-2001) and Preston Reid (Jerry) Cook (1923-2009) A driving force in the development of St. Joseph’s Heritage. Member of the Board of St. Joseph’s General Hospital (1968-84); Chair of the Board of St. Joseph’s General Hospital(1974-75); 1st Chair of the Board of Management of St. Joseph’s Heritage (1976-83); 1st Chair of St. Joseph’s Foundation of Thunder Bay (1983-99) Illustration of St. Joseph’s Heritage Mission St.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeox FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA
    jEOX FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA 20th ANNUAL MEETING PROCEEDINGS TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY 1985 379 THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF CROW RATE RATIONALIZATION FOR DIVERTING CANADIAN GRAIN EXPORTS THROUGH UNITED STATES GULF PORTS JERRY E. FRUIN LONNIE DICKERSON Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota BACKGROUND As long as rail rates for Canadian export grain move- ments were restrained by law (the "Crow Rates") to a level substantially below variable costs, there was no incentive for Canadian export grain to be moved by low-cost land or water routes through the United States. However, our pre- vious research (1) indicated that as transport costs in- crease as a result of Crow Rate rationalization, the total logistics costs for some of Canada's export grain shipments could be reduced by utilizing barge transportation on the Mississippi River system or unit trains to deep-water ports on the U.S. Gulf. The objectives of this study were to de- termine the quantities of Canadian export grain that would be moved through the U.S. and the resulting, cost savings if such routes were utilized while minimizing the total logis- tics costs of Canadian grain exports. Our analysis included several combinations of possible rail rate levels and Mis- sissippi barge rate levels. The study looked at actual exports in 1981-82 and projected exports for 1990. Fruin & 1 Dickerson 380 THE GENERAL MODELA/ A linear programming cost minimization transshipment model was constructed. The model provided for moving three export grains from 21 supply regions over five possible routes to North American ports, and then by ocean vessel to 34 importing ports serving 32 importing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Network Status Report (As of 23:59) 2020-10-19
    Daily Network Status Report (As of 23:59) 2020-10-19 Highlights: Loads on Wheels ƕ Loads on wheels declined yesterday returning below the 12,000 car threshold reflecting lower volumes for both CN and CP. Cars Not Moving ƕ The system count of cars not moving increased yesterday for the second straight day climbing to their highest single day total in more than a month at more than 2,200 cars. ƕ The increase yesterday reflects higher counts on both CN and CP with the increase seen on CP doubling that seen on CN. Two days of increasing counts results in this week's levels currently tracking 23% higher than at this point last week. Port Unloads ƕ West coast unloads (1,175) rebounded yesterday reflecting improved unloads at both west coast ports. Thunder Bay unloads remain robust exceeding 450 cars yesterday. Today Change from Percent Change Daily Average Daily Average Percent Change Yesterday from Yesterday (Current Week) (Prior Week to Date) from Prior Week Loads On Wheels Canadian National 6,794 -128 -2% 6,858 6,944 -1% Canadian Pacific 4,820 -198 -4% 4,919 4,569 8% Canadian Shortlines 48 -120 -71% 108 170 -37% US Railways 184 -4 -2% 186 163 14% Total 11,846 -450 -4% 12,071 11,847 2% Loads Not Moving 48+ Hrs Canadian National 1,119 168 18% 1,035 805 29% Canadian Pacific 1,043 372 55% 857 632 36% Canadian Shortlines 39 0 0% 39 126 -69% US Railways 55 24 77% 43 38 13% Total 2,256 564 33% 1,974 1,602 23% Port Unloads Vancouver 973 92 10% 927 992 -7% Prince Rupert 202 97 92% 153 211 -28% Thunder Bay 454 97 27% 405 306 32% Total 1,629 286 21% 1,486 1,509 -2% West Coast Unloads 1,175 189 19% 1,080 1,203 -10% AG TRANSPORT COALITION 1 2020-10-19 Daily Network Status Report (As of 23:59) 2020-10-19 Loads on Wheels Daily traffic levels fell 5% last week as compared to the prior week averaging slightly more than 11,300 cars per day reflecting lower week over week volumes for both railways.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021
    i bl b i OOLIVERLIVERThe PPAIPOONGEAIPOONGE News Volume 24, Number 2 February 2021 Those Were the Nights that the Lights High Speed Funding Application Went ON in Oliver Paipoonge! Successful! Project to Start in 2021 On January 20th, the Provincial Tbaytel will be handling the pub- Government announced funding lic communications for the project. awards for several broadband pro- Tbaytel has established a project jects in Northwestern Ontario. An information website to provide application submitted by the information to the public, which Municipality for a broadband pro- includes a coverage map and fre- ject was included. quently asked questions (FAQs). The initial application was sub- The website address is: mitted by the Municipality in www.tbaytel.net/fibreexpansion August 2019. Once the initial appli- More information will be posted in cation was approved, the the future. Municipality submitted the final Unfortunately, not every area of application in November 2019. the Municipality is included in the After a reorganization of broadband project. Less densely settled parts of funding programs and a significant the Municipality are not in the cov- increase in the funding envelope by erage area because cost was the A THANK YOU FROM restock their shelves. Thank you to the Provincial Government, a overriding factor in determining the PINEGROVE UNITED CHURCH everyone that came through our review of our application by the coverage area. It is more costly to Pinegrove United Church would Trail of Lights and for your gen- Ministry of Infrastructure resulted in deploy fibre in areas where there are like to to say a big Thank You to erosity.
    [Show full text]
  • MANITOUWADGE by Amandine Martel & José-Karl Noiseux ]
    Community Labour Market Report MANITOUWADGE By Amandine Martel & José-Karl Noiseux ] The Community Labour Market Report series provides local labour market indicators to assist community leaders and organizations in the decision-making process. The goal of this report is to provide community actors with a better understanding of what is happening in their community. It does not attempt to explain the reasons behind the trends, spikes or troughs in the provided data. This information is intended as a starting point for an evidence-based conversation by the community about why certain changes are occurring. This report is a first step. It is now up to you, the reader, and your fellow community members to explore and address the challenges and opportunities your community is experiencing. This report examines current labour demand and supply data from Manitouwadge, Ontario, and analyzes how each data set aligns with the other. DEMAND 01. Employers Central to local labour market planning is an understanding of the characteristics of area employers, such as their numbers, size, and the industries they represent. Changes in any of these factors over time affect employment levels and opportunities within a local labour market. Manitouwadge’s employers are predominately small businesses. Indeed, 82.4 percent of businesses in the community have fewer than five employees (Table 2). By comparison, 87 percent of Ontario businesses had fewer than five employees in December 2016 (Statistics Canada, 2016). Furthermore, the total number of businesses in Manitouwadge decreased between December 2015 and December 2016 (Table 2). In addition, it is possible that the fluctuation in the size of businesses observed during this time period resulted in part due to some businesses downsizing their activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 6 Annual Report
    An agency of the Government of Ontario 2015–2016 ANNUAL REPORT Our Vision We will be the leader among science centres in providing inspirational, educational and entertaining science experiences. Our Purpose We inspire people of all ages to be engaged with the science in the world around them. Our Mandate • Offer a program of science learning across Northern Ontario • Operate a science centre • Operate a mining technology and earth sciences centre • Sell consulting services, exhibits and media productions to support the centre’s development Our Professional Values We Are…Accountable, Innovative Leaders We Have…Respect, Integrity and Teamwork Table of Contents 4 Message from the Chair and Chief Executive Officer 6 Fast Facts 8 Spotlight: Economic Impact 10 Spotlight: Serving Northern Ontario 12 Spotlight: Ontario Employer Designation 13 Spotlight: Focus on Leadership 14 Our 5-year Strategic Priorities 17 Strategic Priority 1: Great and Relevant Science Experiences 27 Strategic Priority 2: A Customer-Focused Culture of Operational Excellence 37 Strategic Priority 3: Long Term Financial Stability 46 Science North Funders, Donors and Sponsors 49 Science North Board of Trustees and Committee Members 50 Science North Staff Appendix: Audited Financial Statements Message from the Chair and Chief Executive Officer 2015-16 marked the third year in Science North’s and bring in a wider range of topics allows five-year strategic plan. We’re proud of the Science North to strategically expand organization’s progress in meeting its strategic programming to appeal to a broader audience, priorities and goals and delivering on Science including adults, young families and the teenage North’s mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Central Flysheet
    “Sports Central – Where Athletes Come To Play” CITY OF THUNDER BAY POPULATION: 120,000+ WHY THUNDER BAY? • One of Canada’s Best Outdoor Cities • Regional Centre for Northwest Ontario • Excellent sports facilities and affordable accommodations • International Airport • Friendly, accessible community • Skilled volunteers and inspired spectators with a SUCCESS STORIES passion for sports A proven track record for championship sports events. • Northern hospitality where athletes take centre stage 2024 Ontario Winter Games (Pending) World Taijiquan Championships 2022 Scotties Tournament of Hearts 2020 Manitoba Ontario Quebec Special Olympics Canada Winter Games Canadian WUSHU Championships 2019 Winnipeg TELUS Cup – Canadian Midget Hockey Championships 2018 Pinty’s Grand Slam of Curling – Tour Challenge 1 Hour Flight | 8 Hou r D 2 Hour F Canadian Cross Country Ski Championships riv light e | 1 6 H ou Canadian Firefighters Curling Championships r D ri ve 2017 U-18 IBAF Baseball World Cup U-16 Canadian Alpine Ski Championships Thunder Bay is located in the geographical 2016 centre of Canada on the northwest shore of Can-Am Police-Fire Games Lake Superior, 45 minutes from the USA border. PGA TOUR Canada – Staal Foundation Open 2015 Canadian Cross-Country Ski Championships CONNECTING TO THE CENTRE OF CANADA PGA TOUR Canada – Staal Foundation Open Thunder Bay International Airport is the third busiest airport in Ontario. MEMORABLE EXPERIENCES YQT • Air Canada, Westjet, Porter & Flair (Domestic) Advantage Daily connections, 16 to Toronto and 4 to Winnipeg No trip to Thunder Bay is complete withoutCo pyright © Free Vector Maps.com • Bearskin Airlines & Wasaya Airways (Regional) experiencing these iconic attractions. Daily connections, Northern Ontario and Northwestern Ontario • The Sleeping Giant • Terry Fox Monument All roads connect to Thunder Bay – Trans Canada • Fort William Historical Park Highway (east-west) and Highway 61 (south).
    [Show full text]