DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Access Pricing in the Water Sector a Discussion Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Access Pricing in the Water Sector a Discussion Paper Water today, water tomorrow Future access pricing in the water sector A discussion paper www.ofwat.gov.uk Future access pricing in the water sector 2 Water today, water tomorrow About this document This document introduces some of the terminology, concepts and issues we will need to consider in developing a new charging rules framework for access pricing for the water sector in England and Wales. It describes: • what access pricing is and why it matters; • some of the key issues we will need to consider around access pricing; • which costs could be considered in setting access prices; and • the lessons that we can learn from other sectors. The UK Government’s Water Bill, published in June 2013, will extend the role of competition in the sector in England. This will mean new companies will have access to the systems and services provided by monopoly water and sewerage and water only companies. The Water Bill also requires us to prepare rules that monopoly companies will need to follow in setting the prices they will charge for providing access. Contents 1. Why does access pricing matter? 4 2. What are the main issues? 8 3. Which costs should we consider? 12 4. What lessons can we learn from other sectors? 15 5. Next steps 26 6. Further information 27 3 Future access pricing in the water sector 1. Why does access pricing matter? Most people in England and And in June 2013, the UK Together these reforms will Wales receive their water Government published draft encourage: services from one of 19 licensed legislation (the Water Bill) to regional monopoly companies achieve this vision. Once the • greater competition in providing and their sewerage services from changes in the Bill become law, it certain services; one of 10 companies. Some will – among other things – allow: • the delivery of improved customers also receive services services, and lower prices to from licensed local companies • all non-household customers in end consumers; (new appointments). Only certain England to be able to choose • greater innovation; and non-household customers can their retail supplier (‘retail • increased transparency of costs choose their supplier. reforms’); and leading to more informed • new companies – called ‘new decision making around Each monopoly company entrants’ – to become licensed environmental trade-offs, in turn currently provides a ‘source to to supply particular wholesale leading to improved tap’ business in its area to services (‘upstream reforms’). environmental outcomes. household and non-household They would not have to provide customers (it is ‘vertically any retail services to end In particular, the UK Government integrated’). It controls: customers as they do under the has estimated there could be current water supply licensing overall benefits of £2 billion to • customer-facing (‘retail’) (WSL) framework. They would customers, the economy and the services such as reading water also be able to provide environment from its reform of meters and sending bills to sewerage services. wholesale services. customers; and • less customer-facing (‘wholesale’) services such as collecting and treating water and wastewater. The Water Bill Water supply licensing The Water White Paper (‘Water for Life’), which was published In 2005, the water supply licensing (WSL) framework was December 2011, described the introduced to encourage competition in water retailing UK Government’s vision for future water management in England in activities and upstream water resource activities. which: Under WSL, new companies can supply any non-household • the water sector is resilient; customer that uses more than five million litres of water a year • all water companies are more (50 million litres a year in Wales). efficient and customer focused; and Companies can only supply retail services or combined retail • water is valued as the precious resource it is. and wholesale services. So they are unable to specialise in offering particular services. This limits the scope for them to innovate and deliver lower prices or improved services. 4 Water today, water tomorrow The costs principle Access to what? Historically, the costs principle has been interpreted as If new entrants are to provide requiring monopoly companies to charge access prices based wholesale services, then they will on ‘ARROW’ costs. These are costs that, as a result of being need to interact with the existing replaced as the supplier, the monopoly company: monopoly water and sewerage companies. This may involve the monopoly companies charging • avoids; new entrants a price for using • reduces; or (‘accessing’) their infrastructure. • recovers in other ways. Access to a monopoly company’s water supply and sewerage infrastructure may include principle has been widely • principles for determining the access to: criticised as being anti- amount of any charge that may competitive and for giving little be imposed. • networks; incentive to monopoly water • storage facilities; and companies to become more Alongside charging rules, we will • treatment works. efficient. set rules in the form of codes of practice (‘market codes’), with For example, a new entrant could The Water Bill seeks to remove which all parties will have to apply for a ‘wholesale the costs principle from comply. These codes will describe authorisation’, which would legislation, and in its place give what is expected of all market enable it to introduce water into Ofwat the ability to issue new participants, which will enable the the supply system of an existing charging rules. market to operate efficiently in monopoly company. So, the customers’ interests. We set this monopoly company will charge a out in further detail in our price for moving the new entrant’s New charging rules discussion document on ‘Water water through its pipe network. market governance The Water Bill proposes that we arrangements’, which we A new entrant may also wish to should set charging rules for published in October 2013. purchase a range of other access pricing that cover: services from the monopoly company. • the types of charges that may be imposed; • the amount (or the maximum What price? amount), or methods for determining the amount (or In the past, prices that monopoly maximum amount), of any type companies could charge for of charge; access to their infrastructure have • principles for determining what been calculated by using the types of charges may or may ‘costs principle’. But the costs not be imposed; and 5 Future access pricing in the water sector Bulk supplies What should the charging Closely linked to access pricing is the pricing of bulk supplies. rules deliver? A bulk supply is a supply of water from one monopoly company to another. Bulk supplies are sometimes referred to As an economic regulator we have a range of duties. Our as ‘water trades’ as they are a way for companies to trade primary duties are to: water. • protect the interests of The Water Bill also seeks to provide Ofwat with the ability to consumers, wherever set charging rules for bulk supplies. So it may be desirable for appropriate by promoting us to consider the charging approach for bulk supplies competition; alongside access pricing, as there are many similar issues to • ensure that the companies properly carry out their be resolved across these two areas. This includes: functions; and • ensure that the companies can • sending efficient price signals; finance their functions. • encouraging environmentally sustainable outcomes; and • ensuring efficient companies can finance their functions. The Water Bill also proposes to give us a new primary duty to ensure resilience of water and sewerage services. Our secondary duties include: • promoting economy and efficiency; • ensuring that no undue preference or discrimination is The UK Government has estimated there could be overall benefits of £2 billion to customers, the economy and the environment from its reform of wholesale services 6 Water today, water tomorrow shown by companies in the around environmental trade-offs fixing of charges; (our sustainable development • contributing to the achievement duty). of sustainable development; and We will also need to ensure that • having regard to the principles the various stakeholders involved of best regulatory practice. in water and sewerage service delivery have appropriate controls We also need to have regard to and accountability on the quality the framework – and specific of water delivered to customers guidance – from the UK and and discharged into the Welsh Governments. environment. This is likely to be enforced through a combination So we will need to deliver an of market codes, licence access pricing framework that conditions, and/or other helps enable: subsidiary documents. • greater efficiency in the provision of services, leading to How will we develop new lower bills for customers (our access pricing rules? customer duty, and our efficiency duty); We plan to consult on our • more choice and flexibility in the preferred approach in due course. provision of services, leading to But we want to begin the debate greater sector-wide resilience with our stakeholders now on how (our yet to be enabled resilience to develop the best approach to duty); and access pricing, and would • greater transparency around welcome your views. costs, leading to more informed decisions being able to be made 7 Future access pricing in the water sector 2. What are the main issues? There are a number of issues we detailed information about their cause a change in their local will need to consider in costs would also place a burden costs (‘cost drivers’). But: developing our approach to on them – and ultimately access pricing. We explore some customers, who will pay these • this is provided it was more of them in more detail below. costs through their bills. efficient for companies to capture data on drivers rather One potential compromise would than their specific costs; and Preventing monopoly be for us to require companies to • producing and maintaining such abuse develop cost models based on models could still involve their average costs of providing companies using a significant The water sector in England and access, but with factors that amount of time and resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the Risk Landscape in UK Public Policy Discussion Paper [Or Working Paper, Etc.]
    Patrick Dunleavy, Christopher Gilson, Simon Bastow and Jane Tinkler The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the risk landscape in UK Public Policy Discussion paper [or working paper, etc.] Original citation: Dunleavy, Patrick, Christopher Gilson, Simon Bastow and Jane Tinkler (2009): The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the risk landscape in UK public policy. URN 09/1423. The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25785/ Originally available from LSE Public Policy Group Available in LSE Research Online: November 2009 © 2009 the authors LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the Risk Landscape in UK Public Policy Patrick Dunleavy, Christopher Gilson, Simon Bastow and Jane Tinkler October 2009 The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council This report was produced in July 2009 for the Risk and Regulation Advisory Council. The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council is an independent advisory group which aims to improve the understanding of public risk and how to respond to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office Preparedness for COVID-19 (Coronavirus): Management of the Borders: Government Response to the Committee’S Fifth Report
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Home Office preparedness for COVID-19 (coronavirus): management of the borders: Government Response to the Committee’s Fifth Report Sixth Special Report of Session 2019–21 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 November 2020 HC 974 Published on 13 November 2020 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Yvette Cooper MP (Labour, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) Chair Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North and Stoke Newington) Dehenna Davison MP (Conservative, Bishop Auckland) Ruth Edwards MP (Conservative, Rushcliffe) Laura Farris MP (Conservative, Newbury) Simon Fell MP (Conservative, Barrow and Furness) Andrew Gwynne MP (Labour, Denton and Reddish) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Dame Diana Johnson MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull North) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) Stuart C McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/. Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Home to School Travel and Transport Guidance Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities
    Home to school travel and transport guidance Statutory guidance for local authorities July 2014 Contents Summary 5 Review date 5 What legislation (including statutory instruments) does this guidance refer to? 5 Who is this guidance for? 5 Main points 6 Local authorities’ statutory duties 6 Part 1 - Statutory duties 7 1.1 Sustainable school travel 7 Assessing the travel and transport needs of children and young people 7 Audit of infrastructure to support sustainable school travel 8 Strategy to develop infrastructure to support travel needs of pupils 8 Promoting sustainable travel and transport to and from school 9 Publication of Sustainable Modes of Travel Strategy 9 1.2 Provision of travel arrangements 9 1.3 Provision of travel arrangements: Eligible children 10 Statutory walking distances eligibility 10 Special educational needs, a disability or mobility problems eligibility 10 Unsafe route eligibility 11 Extended rights eligibility 11 Accompaniment 11 Assessing route safety 12 Measurement of routes 12 Timing of assessment of eligibility 12 Qualifying school 13 Travel arrangements made by the local authority or other bodies/persons 13 Suitability of arrangements 14 Part 2 - Discretionary Arrangements 16 Travel arrangements for other children 16 Religion or belief 16 Part 3 - Transport Considerations 18 2 Safeguarding requirements 18 Training and Equalities 18 Bus safety considerations 18 Poor behaviour on school buses/other modes of transport 19 Partnership 19 Part 4 – Policy Changes 20 Publication of general arrangements and policies
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Green Book to Achieve Better Outcomes from Infrastructure Investment: ICE Discussion Paper
    Reforming the Green Book to achieve better outcomes from infrastructure investment: ICE discussion paper Executive summary If infrastructure is to play a key role in ‘levelling up’ the UK and creating better outcomes for society and the environment, it stands to reason that the appraisal and evaluation processes used to assess projects and programmes should be positioned to enable this to happen. The UK, through HM Treasury’s Green Book, is widely viewed as having among the most mature frameworks for assessing, appraising and prioritising infrastructure investment.1 However, concerns over unequal investment levels throughout the country have resulted in the government conducting a review of the Green Book, potentially leading to a re- evaluation of the methodology and guidance that determines what gets built where, who benefits and how they benefit. With £600 billion earmarked for spend on infrastructure by the end of the decade,2 the infrastructure sector is well placed to leverage investment to create additional social and environmental value and help rebuild local economies affected by Covid-19. As outlined in ICE’s report Covid-19 and the New Normal for Infrastructure Systems, society will expect to get more from infrastructure to support societal resilience and ensure the whole-life benefits of infrastructure investment are spread as widely as possible.3 This shift will drive a requirement for infrastructure to be recognised as a system, rather than as a collection of projects. The same report found strong support for the economic recovery from Covid-19 being a green one and for projects, programmes and investments across the infrastructure sector to be evaluated and prioritised on this basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Llwybr Newydd a New Wales Transport Strategy
    Llwybr Newydd The Wales Transport Strategy 2021 Contents From the Ministers 3 5. Holding ourselves and our partners to account 47 Introduction 5 5.1 Transport performance 1. Vision 11 board 48 5.2 A new evaluation 2. Our priorities 13 framework 48 3. Well-being ambitions 22 5.3 Modal shift 48 Good for people and 5.4 Well-being measures 49 communities 23 5.5 Data on modes and sectors 50 Good for the environment 27 6. The five ways of Good for the economy working 48 and places in Wales 31 6.1 Involvement 52 Good for culture and the Welsh language 34 6.2 Collaboration 52 6.3 Prevention 52 4. How we will deliver 38 6.4 Integration 52 4.1 Investing responsibly 40 6.5 Long-term 52 4.2 Delivery and action plans 41 4.3 Cross-cutting delivery 7. Mini-plans 53 pathways 42 7.1 Active travel 56 4.4 Working in partnership 45 7.2 Bus 60 4.5 Updating our policies 7.3 Rail 64 and governance 46 7.4 Roads, streets and parking 68 4.6 Skills and capacity 46 7.5 Third sector 72 7.6 Taxis and private hire vehicles (PHV) 76 7.7 Freight and logistics 80 7.8 Ports and maritime 84 7.9 Aviation 88 Llwybr Newydd - The Wales Transport Strategy 2021 2 But we won’t achieve that level of physical and digital connectivity change unless we take people with to support access to more local Croeso us, listening to users and involving services, more home and remote from the Ministers people in designing a transport working.
    [Show full text]
  • Home to School Travel and Transport for Children of Compulsory School Age Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities Consultation Draft
    Home to school travel and transport for children of compulsory school age Statutory guidance for local authorities Consultation draft July 2019 Contents Summary 4 About this guidance 4 Review date 4 What legislation does this guidance refer to? 4 Who is this guidance for? 4 Main points 5 Part 1: local authorities’ statutory duty in relation to eligible children 6 Categories of eligible children 7 Ways in which free home to school travel may be provided 10 What is a suitable school? 11 Qualifying schools 12 Free home to school travel to schools which are not qualifying schools 14 Children registered at more than one qualifying school 14 Assessing eligibility 15 Measurement of routes 15 Children with special educational needs, a disability or mobility problems 15 Route safety 15 Accompaniment 16 Other benefits or allowances 16 Part 2: local authorities’ discretionary power 18 Examples of ways in which local authorities might use their discretionary power 18 Part 3: suitability of transport arrangements 20 Journey times 20 Children with special educational needs, a disability or mobility problems 20 Children with medical needs 21 Safeguarding 21 Training 22 Poor behaviour on school transport 23 Part 4: local home to school travel policies 24 2 Elements of an effective travel policy 24 Policy changes 25 Part 5: appeals 27 Stage one: review by a senior officer 27 Stage two: review by an independent appeal panel 28 Flowchart of the suggested appeals process 30 Part 6: sustainable school travel 31 Sustainable Modes of Travel Strategy 31 Further
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to the Department for Transport July 2015 Overview Rail Roads Local Transport Aviation, Maritime and Other
    A Short Guide to the Department for Transport July 2015 Overview Rail Roads Local transport Aviation, maritime and other | About this guide This Short Guide summarises what the | Contact details Department for Transport (DfT) does, how much it costs, recent and planned changes and what to look out for across its main business areas and services. If you would like to know more about the NAO’s work on the Department for Transport, please contact: Rebecca Sheeran Director, Value for Money [email protected] 020 7798 7815 Matt Kay Director, Financial Audit [email protected] 020 7798 7916 If you are interested in the NAO’s work and support The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and for Parliament more widely, please contact: is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons Adrian Jenner and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other Director of Parliamentary Relations public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report [email protected] to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have 020 7798 7461 used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice For full iPad interactivity, please view this PDF help government improve public services, and our work led to Interactive in iBooks or GoodReader audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Accessibility to Local Services: a Journey Time Tool
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Examining transport accessibility to key local services Transport accessibility to local services: a journey time tool OCTOBER 2020 We are the UK’s independent public spending watchdog. We support Parliament in holding government to account and we help improve public services through our high-quality audits. The National Audit Office (NAO) scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government and the civil service. We help Parliament hold government to account and we use our insights to help people who manage and govern public bodies improve public services. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Gareth Davies, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. We audit the financial accounts of departments and other public bodies. We also examine and report on the value for money of how public money has been spent. In 2019, the NAO’s work led to a positive financial impact through reduced costs, improved service delivery, or other benefits to citizens, of £1.1 billion. Contents Overview 4 Preface COVID-19 6 Part One Introduction to the National Audit Office’s journey time tool 8 Part Two Background on local transport 14 Part Three Key insights 20 Part Four Methodology 38 Part Five Other work in the area 41 The National Audit Office study team For further information about the consisted of: National Audit Office please contact: Antonia Gracie and National Audit Office Helen Roberts, under the Press Office direction of Lee-Anne Murray. 157–197 Buckingham Palace Road This report can be found on the Victoria National Audit Office website at London www.nao.org.uk SW1W 9SP Tel: 020 7798 7400 Enquiries: www.nao.org.uk/contact-us Website: www.nao.org.uk If you are reading this document with a screen reader you may wish to use the bookmarks option to navigate through the parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland
    Research and Information Service Research Paper 7 October 2020 Des McKibbin Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland NIAR 289-20 This paper provides an overview of potential policies for decarbonising road and rail transport in Northern Ireland in support of UK wide commitments to reach net zero Green House Gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. It has been prepared for the NI Assembly Infrastructure Committee to inform their discussion on potential areas of inquiry. Paper 57/20 7 October 2020 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relate to our papers and these should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 289-20 Research Paper Executive Summary Policy Framework Tackling climate change requires an international effort and as such both the UK and the EU are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Both the UK and EU have signed up to international climate change obligations, such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The 2015 Paris Agreement, a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, has been signed by 194 states and the European Union The UK has ratified the Paris Agreement separately from the EU and has committed to upholding its Paris Agreement obligations post Brexit. The Climate Change Act 2008 (2008 Act) originally established long term statutory targets for the UK to achieve an 80% reduction in GHG by 2050 against a 1990 baseline.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from The
    Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Tel: 0300 330 3000 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/dft 21 November 2019 To whom it may concern, Temporarily exempting certain vehicles involved in home-to-school transport from the Public Service Vehicles Accessibility Regulations 2000 (PSVAR) This note concerns any home-to-school bus or coach services you may commission, in your capacity, for instance, as a local education authority, maintained school, academy, independent school, private school or Sixth Form college. If you are a local education authority, we would be grateful if you could ensure that this letter is disseminated urgently to any schools or colleges in your area that may arrange home-to-school transport for their pupils. As you may be aware, the Public Service Vehicles Accessibility Regulations 2000 (PSVAR) require buses and coaches designed to carry over twenty-two passengers on local and scheduled routes to incorporate features to enable disabled people to travel on them comfortably and safely, including a wheelchair space and a ramp or lift. The Regulations have applied to vehicles progressively over the past nineteen years, including coaches manufactured from 2005 onwards. From 1st January 2020, the Regulations will apply to any remaining coaches subject to them, which were manufactured before 2005. Confusion has arisen as to whether these provisions apply, inter alia, to any home-to- school service on which some or all of the seats are sold (rather than provided free of charge). Where a proportion of seats are sold, Such services are sometimes called “mixed services”.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for Education Responsible For?
    What is the Department for Education Responsible for? The Department for Education is one of 25 ministerial departments in the UK government and it is responsible for children’s services and education. It also has responsibility in England for policy in higher and further education and for apprenticeships. Its aim is to provide equal opportunities for children without regard for their background or family circumstances. The department oversees the teaching and learning of children in early years’ centres and in primary schools, as well as young people under the age of 19 in secondary education, sixth form centres and colleges. It supports professionals who work with children and young people and helps those who are disadvantaged to achieve more. It is also a responsibility of the Department for Education to ensure local services protect and support children. Policy for education, youth and children is devolved in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to their respective governments. Who Works for the Department for Education? Like the other ministerial departments such as Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Department for Transport, Ministry of Defence and the Home Office, the Department for Education mainly operates from ministerial offices in London. It does have staff in a number of other locations around the country but most of its business is conducted from the capital. The department employs almost 4,000 people under the auspices of the Secretary of State for Education. There are also senior roles for three Ministers of State with responsibilities for certain areas of education, such as school standards, apprenticeships and higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for Transport Organisation Chart
    DfT Board August 2013 Corporate Group Norman Baker MP Rt Hon Simon Burns MP Rt Hon Patrick McLoughlin MP Stephen Hammond MP Parliamentary under Secretary Minister of State for Transport Secretary of State for Transport Parliamentary under Secretary Rail Group International, Security and Environment Group Strategy and Major Projects Rail Commercial Rail Domestic Aviation Maritime Energy, Accident Maritime and Funding and Growth and Programme Franchising Commercial Technology and Investigation Coastguard Office Advice International Branches Agency Sam Laidlaw Alan Cook Sally Davis Ed Smith Mary Reilly John Kirkland Richard Brown Clare Moriarty Non-Executive Non-Executive Non-Executive Non-Executive Non-Executive Non-Executive Non-Executive Lucy Chadwick Director General, Director General, Nick Bisson Becky Wood Paul Rodgers Peter Wilkinson Mike Fuhr Rail Group International, Tricia Hayes Ian Woodman Michael Hurwitz Alan Massey Security and Chief Executive Portfolio Office Rail Policy Thameslink South/West Franchise Project Environment Group Transport Aviation Policy Maritime Environmental Rail Accident Director, Colette Carroll Paul Collins Programme Rowan Smith Director: Essex Security Strategy Implementation Commerce and Strategy Investigation Maritime Rail Funding David Blackall Thameslink – Thameside Beth Sizeland Kate Jennings Infrastructure Rupert Furness Branch Operations and Fares Intercity Express Commercial Stephen Marsh Environment and Airports Linda WiIlson Low Carbon Fuels Carolyn Griffiths Richard Parkes Jeremy Hotchkiss Programme
    [Show full text]