From Controlling Elements to Transposons: Barbara Mcclintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Controlling Elements to Transposons: Barbara Mcclintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C 454 Forum TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.26 No.7 July 2001 Historical Perspective From controlling elements to transposons: Barbara McClintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C. Comfort Why did it take so long for Barbara correspondence. From these and other to prevent her controlling elements from McClintock (Fig. 1) to win the Nobel Prize? materials, we can reconstruct the events moving because their effects were difficult In the mid-1940s, McClintock discovered leading up to the 1983 prize*. to study when they jumped around. She genetic transposition in maize. She What today are known as transposable never had any inclination to pursue the published her results over several years elements, McClintock called ‘controlling biochemistry of transposition. and, in 1951, gave a famous presentation elements’. During the years 1945–1946, at Current understanding of how gene at the Cold Spring Harbor Symposium, the Carnegie Dept of Genetics, Cold activity is regulated, of course, springs yet it took until 1983 for her to win a Nobel Spring Harbor, McClintock discovered a from the operon, François Jacob and Prize. The delay is widely attributed to a pair of genetic loci in maize that seemed to Jacques Monod’s 1960 model of a block of combination of gender bias and gendered trigger spontaneous and reversible structural genes under the control of an science. McClintock’s results were not mutations in what had been ordinary, adjacent set of regulatory genes (Fig. 2). accepted, the story goes, because women stable alleles. In the term of the day, they Though subsequent studies revealed in science are marginalized, because the made stable alleles into ‘mutable’ ones. sometimes baroque variations in idea of transposition was too far-fetched The resulting patterns in the maize leaves eukaryotes, the operon remains the core and because her scientific style was too and kernels indicated systematic theme (also the textbooks’ historical intuitive, too holistic and too feminine to alterations in mutation rates. McClintock starting point) of gene regulation. be believed. concluded that she had disrupted the cell’s Immediately following publication of the Most scientists I know detest this story. mechanism for regulating gene activity. operon model, McClintock wrote an article McClintock loathed it too. She was not By early 1948, difficulties in mapping the for The American Naturalist on the scorned, biologists insist, because she was loci led her to conclude that they were not, parallels between the control systems in a woman nor for any other reason, she was in fact, loci – sites on the chromosomes – maize and bacteria1. For a time, she even misunderstood. The intricacy of her but chromosomal elements that moved referred to her elements as ‘operators’ and experiments, combined with her eccentric, from place to place. It soon became clear ‘regulators’. Jacob and Monod were not elliptical style of presentation, made her that these new elements were capable of influenced by McClintock; when they science difficult to understand. exerting a wide range of actions upon the referred to controlling elements, it was as Furthermore, her findings were limited to genes. By 1950, McClintock had developed extrachromosomal episomes, perhaps maize, and their significance was not clear a theory about how controlling elements viral in origin, not as components of the until the late 1960s and early 1970s, when orchestrated development and transposition was found to be widespread differentiation of the organism. The key to in nature and of general importance. The her theory was coordinated transposition. Nobel Prize was not late; McClintock was In each nucleus, platoons of controlling early, ahead of her time. elements would transpose in concert, Both of these stories are myths. Both inhibiting and modulating the effects of assume that, had things gone differently, the genes to execute the developmental the transposition prize might have been program of the cell. awarded sooner. Both neglect the fact that Transposition was never in doubt. McClintock did not win the prize for what Other geneticists quickly confirmed she thought was most important in her transposition in maize, but, at the time, work. A closer look at how McClintock came few considered it McClintock’s major to receive the Nobel Prize reveals that she claim. Although McClintock was indeed won only after her major contribution to difficult to understand, all her peers science was recast to fit better with current grasped that her real point was control. understanding of the genome. Yet, to most scientists, transposition The McClintock papers within the seemed a random process. By ~1953, once Nobel archive will not be accessible until McClintock had thoroughly documented 2033. However, nominators retain the the fact of transposition, she worked hard rights to their nominations. Several scientists have generously made their *A fuller account of McClintock's life and science, including the events leading up to the Nobel Prize, can nominations and stories of McClintock be found in The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock's Barbara McClintock in the late 1940s. Photo kindly available to me; other evidence I have Search for the Patterns of Genetic Control by Nathaniel provided by the American Philosophical Society Library, gleaned from interviews and archived Comfort (Harvard University Press, 2001). Philadelphia, USA. http://tibs.trends.com 0968-0004/01/$ – see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0968-0004(01)01898-9 Forum TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.26 No.7 July 2001 455 Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. He (a)Controlling elements (b) Operon nominated McClintock jointly with Repressor Seymour Benzer, best known for his work on the fine structure of the gene. The nomination form contained a box labelled Structural gene Ds P O Structural gene ‘The nomination is based on the discovery Control sites of’. In this box, van Wyk entered ‘the Ac organization and function of the genome 4 Repressor in higher organisms’ . The summary Structural gene Ds P O Structural gene description of McClintock’s work stated that it had led to ‘the first clear Ds Structural gene enunciation of the distinction between structural and regulatory genetic Ti BS elements.’An accompanying detailed Fig. 2. Both McClintock’s controlling elements (a) and Jacob and Monod’s operon (b) modeled gene regulation by the description informed by Gordon Sato, a action of elements outside the structural gene. In McClintock’s model, the regulatory elements (Ac and Ds) acted by friend of van Wyk’s and a regular summer transposing into or next to the structural gene. Here, Ac activates Ds, causing Ds to transpose to a new position next to a structural gene. Insertion of the Ds element inhibits transcription of the gene. In the operon model, each set visitor at Cold Spring Harbor, stated that of structural genes had its own adjacent regulatory elements [O (operator) and P (promoter)]. In this diagram, McClintock had ‘laid the conceptual binding of repressor to an operator sequence silences gene transcription. Figure is adapted, with permission, from groundwork for the historic achievements The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock’s Search for the Patterns of Genetic Control, Harvard University Press. recognized in the honour conferred on Jacob and Monod by the Nobel Committee cell’s normal regulatory machinery. features that enabled these elements to in Physiology or Medicine.’After initial McClintock, however, saw her work as the remove themselves from and reinsert into review, the nomination was turned down. conceptual predecessor of the operon. the bacterial chromosome. Sequencing Meanwhile, transposable elements Seven years later, in 1967, McClintock and biochemistry revealed the existence of were being reframed in molecular terms. In won the Kimber Medal, which was unique base sequences – inverted repeats June 1976, at a Cold Spring Harbor awarded to distinguished geneticists by the – at either end of the elements that would meeting organized by Shapiro, Adhya and National Academy of Sciences each year be recognized by the enzymes responsible muologist Ahmad Bukhari, transposable from 1955 until 1970. McClintock had been for excision and ligation. By the mid- genetic elements or ‘transposons’ were on the short list since at least 1964. When 1970s, IS elements had been found in defined simply as pieces of DNA that can the award was to be announced, Marcus other organisms and shown to function in move from one place to another. By 1980, Rhoades, the award committee chairman a wide variety of ways. The rapid spread of transposons had become so important that and McClintock’s closest colleague, asked antibiotic-resistance genes was perhaps James Watson introduced the proceedings geneticist Tracy Sonneborn, the geneticist the most spectacular, but work on phage of a Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on best known for his investigations of mu, yeast mating-type switching and mobile genetic elements by writing that cytoplasmic inheritance in Paramecium, to other areas of research, all contributed to such a meeting had become ‘virtually review the proposed press release. a rapidly developing view that the unavoidable’5. By now, mobile elements Sonneborn, familiar with McClintock’s movement of genetic elements within and were mainly a subfield of microbial interpretation, suggested inserting ‘that between genomes was a mechanism of genetics. Papers at Cold Spring Harbor her studies of controlling systems of gene major importance. that summer touched on infectious disease, action were the precursors of the famous The new transposition workers quickly cancer, immunology and recombinant regulator–operon theory that won the discovered that McClintock had described DNA. However, one area that was not Nobel Prize for its promulgators and that transposition, in strictly genetic terms, discussed, was developmental regulation. their thinking was probably much long before. McClintock, then in her late In 1981, McClintock was besieged with influenced by Barbara’s notion of two- sixties, experienced a scientific awards. In June, she was made an member interacting controls’2.
Recommended publications
  • NIHAA Summer 1993
    The Newsletter of the NIH Alumni Association Summer 1993 Vol. 5, No . 2 date Nobel Laureate Harold Varmus Nominated as 14th NIH Director Ruth Kirschstein Named Acting Director President Clinton on A ug. 3 announced his intention to nominate Dr. Harold Eliot Varmus as the 14th director of th e National Institutes of Health. A Senate confirmation process must precede Yarmus· taking over leadership of the institutes. Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1989 for his work in cancer research. Va1111us. 53. is a professor of microbi­ ology. biochemistry. and biophysics. and the American Cancer Society pro­ fessor vfmoh:cu/ur >1iro/O£)' iJI l/Je Uni versity of California, San Francisco. He is a leader in the stu dy of cancer­ causing genes called "oncogenes," and an intemationall-y fecogni:z.ed authof\t-y Dr. Ruth l. Kirschsteln , acting NIH director on retroviruses. the viruses that cause Dr. Harold E. Varmus , direclor-designale AIDS and many cancers in animnl.. FIC 25 Years Old In '93 Thirty-eight-year NIH veteran Dr. Research Festival '93 Schedule Ruth Kirschstein. director of NIGM S Scholars-in-Residence (See Director p. 6) NIHAA Members Invited Program Celebrates To Alumni Symposium In This Issue Tile fas\ morning ofNCH Rc:-.c;\rch Nursing cell/er /J1·1·111111•s Festival '93-Monday. Sept. 20-has This year. the Fogarty Intern ational 17th i11s1it11tc• 111 NII/ p. ? been designated National lnsritute of Center (FIC) is 25 years old . T he cen­ Greeri11gs from 1/,11 1w11• NII /AA prl'sidt'lll. Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Tltolll(IS .I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising (PDF)
    Neuroscience 2013 SEE YOU IN San Diego November 9 – 13, 2013 Join the Society for Neuroscience Are you an SfN member? Join now and save on annual meeting registration. You’ll also enjoy these member-only benefits: • Abstract submission — only SfN members can submit abstracts for the annual meeting • Lower registration rates and more housing choices for the annual meeting • The Journal of Neuroscience — access The Journal online and receive a discounted subscription on the print version • Free essential color charges for The Journal of Neuroscience manuscripts, when first and last authors are members • Free online access to the European Journal of Neuroscience • Premium services on NeuroJobs, SfN’s online career resource • Member newsletters, including Neuroscience Quarterly and Nexus If you are not a member or let your membership lapse, there’s never been a better time to join or renew. Visit www.sfn.org/joinnow and start receiving your member benefits today. www.sfn.org/joinnow membership_full_page_ad.indd 1 1/25/10 2:27:58 PM The #1 Cited Journal in Neuroscience* Read The Journal of Neuroscience every week to keep up on what’s happening in the field. s4HENUMBERONECITEDJOURNAL INNEUROSCIENCE s4HEMOSTNEUROSCIENCEARTICLES PUBLISHEDEACHYEARNEARLY in 2011 s )MPACTFACTOR s 0UBLISHEDTIMESAYEAR ,EARNMOREABOUTMEMBERAND INSTITUTIONALSUBSCRIPTIONSAT *.EUROSCIORGSUBSCRIPTIONS *ISI Journal Citation Reports, 2011 The Journal of Neuroscience 4HE/FlCIAL*OURNALOFTHE3OCIETYFOR.EUROSCIENCE THE HISTORY OF NEUROSCIENCE IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY THE LIVES AND DISCOVERIES OF EMINENT SENIOR NEUROSCIENTISTS CAPTURED IN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL BOOKS AND VIDEOS The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography Series Edited by Larry R. Squire Outstanding neuroscientists tell the stories of their scientific work in this fascinating series of autobiographical essays.
    [Show full text]
  • 書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 N1 Ueber Das Zustandekommen Der
    書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-immunitat und der Tetanus-Immunitat bei thieren / Emil Adolf N1 1890 Georg thieme 1901 von Behring N2 Diphtherie und tetanus immunitaet / Emil Adolf von Behring und Kitasato 19-- [Akitomo Matsuki] 1901 Malarial fever its cause, prevention and treatment containing full details for the use of travellers, University press of N3 1902 1902 sportsmen, soldiers, and residents in malarious places / by Ronald Ross liverpool Ueber die Anwendung von concentrirten chemischen Lichtstrahlen in der Medicin / von Prof. Dr. Niels N4 1899 F.C.W.Vogel 1903 Ryberg Finsen Mit 4 Abbildungen und 2 Tafeln Twenty-five years of objective study of the higher nervous activity (behaviour) of animals / Ivan N5 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by W. Horsley Gantt ; with the collaboration of G. Volborth ; and c1928 International Publishing 1904 an introduction by Walter B. Cannon Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex / by Ivan Oxford University N6 1927 1904 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by G.V. Anrep Press N7 Die Ätiologie und die Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose / Robert Koch ; eingeleitet von M. Kirchner 1912 J.A.Barth 1905 N8 Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems / von Santiago Ramón y Cajal 1893 Veit 1906 Traité des fiévres palustres : avec la description des microbes du paludisme / par Charles Louis Alphonse N9 1884 Octave Doin 1907 Laveran N10 Embryologie des Scorpions / von Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1870 Wilhelm Engelmann 1908 Immunität bei Infektionskrankheiten / Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov ; einzig autorisierte übersetzung von Julius N11 1902 Gustav Fischer 1908 Meyer Die experimentelle Chemotherapie der Spirillosen : Syphilis, Rückfallfieber, Hühnerspirillose, Frambösie / N12 1910 J.Springer 1908 von Paul Ehrlich und S.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of DNA Structure and Function: Watson and Crick By: Leslie A
    01/08/2018 Discovery of DNA Double Helix: Watson and Crick | Learn Science at Scitable NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION | Lead Editor: Bob Moss Discovery of DNA Structure and Function: Watson and Crick By: Leslie A. Pray, Ph.D. © 2008 Nature Education Citation: Pray, L. (2008) Discovery of DNA structure and function: Watson and Crick. Nature Education 1(1):100 The landmark ideas of Watson and Crick relied heavily on the work of other scientists. What did the duo actually discover? Aa Aa Aa Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another. Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix. The First Piece of the Puzzle: Miescher Discovers DNA Although few people realize it, 1869 was a landmark year in genetic research, because it was the year in which Swiss physiological chemist Friedrich Miescher first identified what he called "nuclein" inside the nuclei of human white blood cells. (The term "nuclein" was later changed to "nucleic acid" and eventually to "deoxyribonucleic acid," or "DNA.") Miescher's plan was to isolate and characterize not the nuclein (which nobody at that time realized existed) but instead the protein components of leukocytes (white blood cells).
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME XL COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA 0 N Q UA NTITA T1VE BIOLO G Y Founded in 1933 by REGINALD G. HARRIS Director of the Biological Laboratory 1924 to 1936 Volume I (1933).Surface Phenomena Volume II (1934) Aspects of Growth Volume III (1935) Photochemical Reactions Volume IV (1936) Excitation Phenomena Volume V (1937) Internal Secretions Volume VI (1938) Protein Chemistry Volume VII (1939) Biological Oxidations Volume VIII (1940) Permeability and the Nature of Cell Membranes Volume IX (1941) Genes and Chromosomes: Structure and Organization Volume X (1942) The Relation of Hormones to Development Volume XI (1946) Heredity and Variation in Microorganisms Volume XII (1947) Nucleic Acids and Nucleoproteins Volume XIII (1948) Biological Applications of Tracer Elements Volume XIV (1949) Amino Acids and Proteins Volume XV (1950) Origin and Evolution of Man Volume XVI (1951) Genes and Mutations Volume XVII (1952) The Neuron Volume XVIII (1953) Viruses Volume XIX (1954) The Mammalian Fetus: Physiological Aspects of Development Volume XX (1955) Population Genetics: The Nature and Causes of Genetic Variability in Population Volume XXI (1956) Genetic Mechanisms: Structure and Function Volume XXII (1957) Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography Volume XXIII (1958) Exchange of Genetic Material: Mechanism and Consequences Volume XXIV (1959) Genetics and Twentieth Century Darwinism Volume XXV (1960) Biological Clocks Volume XXVI (1961) Cellular Regulatory Mechanisms Volume XXVII (1962) Basic
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile DNA Elements in Shigella Flexneri and Emergence of An- Tibiotic Resistance Crisis
    International Journal of Genomics and Data Mining Palchauduri S, et al. Int J Genom Data Min 01: 111. Research Article DOI: 10.29011/2577-0616.000111 Mobile DNA Elements in Shigella flexneri and Emergence of An- tibiotic Resistance Crisis Sunil Palchaudhuri1*, Anubha Palchaudhuri2, Archita Biswas2 1Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA 2Atlanta Health Centre, Kolkata, India *Corresponding author: Sunil Palchaudhuri,Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Tel: +13135771335; Email: [email protected] Citation:Palchaudhuri S, Palchaudhuri A, Biswas A (2017)Mobile DNA Elements in Shigella flexneri and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance Crisis. Int J Genom Data Min 01: 111. DOI: 10.29011/2577-0616.000111 Received Date: 18October, 2017; Accepted Date: 23 October, 2017; Published Date: 30 October, 2017 Introduction F Plasmid-Lederberg’s Fertility factor F of E. coli K-12. Prokaryotic mobile DNA elements were initially observed by • 100 Kb. Nobel Prize Winner Professor Barbara McClintock in 1983. Both • ori F-origin of F plasmid replication. (With the sequence for IS and Tn elements are defined as mobile DNA elements capable dna A gene to function) of inserting into many different sites of a single chromosome or different chromosomes as discrete, non-permuted DNA segments • rep-replication functions. [1,2]. In 1952 Dr Joshua Lederberg (a noble prize winner of 1958) • IS-insertion sequence (IS2, IS3 and IS1copies present in the has shown the presence of such elements IS1, IS2, IS3 and Tn host E. coli K-12.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer A++ Viewer
    PublisherInfo PublisherName : BioMed Central PublisherLocation : London PublisherImprintName : BioMed Central Ira Herskowitz dies ArticleInfo ArticleID : 4766 ArticleDOI : 10.1186/gb-spotlight-20030506-01 ArticleCitationID : spotlight-20030506-01 ArticleSequenceNumber : 118 ArticleCategory : Research news ArticleFirstPage : 1 ArticleLastPage : 4 RegistrationDate : 2003–5–6 ArticleHistory : OnlineDate : 2003–5–6 ArticleCopyright : BioMed Central Ltd2003 ArticleGrants : ArticleContext : 130594411 Brendan Maher Email: [email protected] Ira Herskowitz, professor of genetics at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), died at home on April 28 of pancreatic cancer. He was 56. Remembered for clarity of mind, exceptional science, enthusiastic teaching, and a love of music, his death sent a shock throughout the yeast community this week, where Herskowitz made many great contributions and friends. "It's a great loss to us all," said Paul Nurse, Nobel Laureate and new president of The Rockefeller University. "Ira Herskowitz had a huge influence on the yeast field and on me personally." Laureate Leland Hartwell, president of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center told us in an e-mail, "I'll bet there are few scientists in genetics, molecular and cell biology who were not personally affected by him." Born in Brooklyn, NY, Herskowitz moved with his family about the country as father Irwin, a Drosophilageneticist, took various academic positions. Herskowitz received a bachelor's degree in science from the California Institute of Technology in 1967 and a PhD in microbiology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1971. After a short postdoctoral stint there, he assumed an assistant professor position at the University of Oregon. Moving in 1982 to UCSF, he immediately revamped the genetics program there, chaired the department of biochemistry and biophysics from 1990 to 1995, and co-directed the program in human genetics from 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1] By: Lienhard, Dina A. Keywords: vision [2] Torsten Nils Wiesel studied visual information processing and development in the US during the twentieth century. He performed multiple experiments on cats in which he sewed one of their eyes shut and monitored the response of the cat’s visual system after opening the sutured eye. For his work on visual processing, Wiesel received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine [3] in 1981 along with David Hubel and Roger Sperry. Wiesel determined the critical period during which the visual system of a mammal [4] develops and studied how impairment at that stage of development can cause permanent damage to the neural pathways of the eye, allowing later researchers and surgeons to study the treatment of congenital vision disorders. Wiesel was born on 3 June 1924 in Uppsala, Sweden, to Anna-Lisa Bentzer Wiesel and Fritz Wiesel as their fifth and youngest child. Wiesel’s mother stayed at home and raised their children. His father was the head of and chief psychiatrist at a mental institution, Beckomberga Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, where the family lived. Wiesel described himself as lazy and playful during his childhood. He went to Whitlockska Samskolan, a coeducational private school in Stockholm, Sweden. At that time, Wiesel was interested in sports and became the president of his high school’s athletic association, which he described as his only achievement from his younger years. In 1941, at the age of seventeen, Wiesel enrolled at Karolinska Institutet (Royal Caroline Institute) in Solna, Sweden, where he pursued a medical degree and later pursued his own research.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock's World
    Barbara McClintock’s World Timeline adapted from Dolan DNA Learning Center exhibition 1902-1908 Barbara McClintock is born in Hartford, Connecticut, the third of four children of Sarah and Thomas Henry McClintock, a physician. She spends periods of her childhood in Massachusetts with her paternal aunt and uncle. Barbara at about age five. This prim and proper picture betrays the fact that she was, in fact, a self-reliant tomboy. Barbara’s individualism and self-sufficiency was apparent even in infancy. When Barbara was four months old, her parents changed her birth name, Eleanor, which they considered too delicate and feminine for such a rugged child. In grade school, Barbara persuaded her mother to have matching bloomers (shorts) made for her dresses – so she could more easily join her brother Tom in tree climbing, baseball, volleyball, My father tells me that at the and football. age of five I asked for a set of tools. He My mother used to did not get me the tools that you get for an adult; he put a pillow on the floor and give got me tools that would fit in my hands, and I didn’t me one toy and just leave me there. think they were adequate. Though I didn’t want to tell She said I didn’t cry, didn’t call for him that, they were not the tools I wanted. I wanted anything. real tools not tools for children. 1908-1918 McClintock’s family moves to Brooklyn in 1908, where she attends elementary and secondary school. In 1918, she graduates one semester early from Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty Years of Fighting Against Cancer in Serbia Ovarian Cancer Vaccine
    News Eighty years of fighting against cancer Recent study by Kunle Odunsi et al., Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, in Serbia New York, USA, showed an effects of vaccine based on NY-ESO-1, a „cancer This year on December 10th, Serbian society for the fight against cancer has testis“ antigen in preventing the recurrence of ovarian cancer. NY-ESO-1 is a ovarian celebrated the great jubilee - 80 years of its foundation. The celebration took „cancer-testis“ antigen expressed in epithelial cancer (EOC) and is place in Crystal Room of Belgrade’s Hyatt hotel, gathering many distinguished among the most immunogenic tumor antigens defined to date. presence + guests from the country and abroad. This remarkable event has been held Author’s previous study point to the role of of intraepithelial CD8 - under the auspices of the President of Republic of Serbia, Mr. Boris Tadić. infiltrating T lymphocytes in tumors that was associated with improved survival of The whole ceremony was presided by Prof. Dr. Slobodan Čikarić, actual presi- patients with the disease. The NY-ESO-1 peptide epitope, ESO157–170, is recog- + + dent of Society, who greeted guests and wished them a warm welcome. Than nized by HLA-DP4-restricted CD4 T cells and HLA-A2- and A24-restricted CD8 + followed the speech of Serbian health minister, Prof. Dr. Tomica Milosavljević T cells. To test whether providing cognate helper CD4 T cells would enhance who pointed out the importance of preventive measures and public education the antitumor immune response, Odunsi et al., conducted a phase I clinical trial along with timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment in global fight of immunization with ESO157–170 mixed with incomplete Freund's adjuvant + against cancer in Serbia.
    [Show full text]