DOCSLIB.ORG

Medicine COVID-19 and RACISM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Medicine COVID-19 and RACISM Columbia 2019–2020 ANNUAL REPORT Medicine Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons FIGHTING TWO VIRUSES: COVID-19 AND RACISM Features: 4 12 20 At a Crossroads: All Hands on Deck The Bioethics of Medicine and Genomics and Justice the Movement Pivot was the action verb that describes how VP&S clinicians, A new ethics division is Work toward health equality researchers, and students expanding VP&S scholarship has begun at VP&S and all confronted COVID-19 when the into the ethical, legal, and of academic medicine as early virus arrived in New York City. social implications of precision summer protests revealed From redeploying clinicians to medicine. The 360-degree the health disparities in areas outside their specialty to perspective includes “studying medicine in general and graduating fourth-year students the studies” as researchers especially in COVID-19 cases. early, VP&S helped “bend the continue to unleash the Students and faculty share curve” at the epicenter of the power to treat, prevent, and their own perspectives on nation’s pandemic. cure disease. The effort also the intersection of COVID-19 provides an opportunity to and Black Lives Matter. bring social science to bear on bioethical questions. On the Cover Steven McDonald, MD, a 2014 VP&S graduate, is one of five faculty members and medical students who share their perspectives on the Black Lives Matter movement. Read about the five and the VP&S plans to promote racial justice, Page 4. Photograph by Jörg Meyer ColumbiaMedicine | 2019–2020 Annual Report Issue Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons Departments: 2 Dean’s Message 24 Philanthropy News 28 2020 Year in Highlights · Research highlights · Patient care highlights · Education highlights · Community highlights · COVID-19 research highlights 54 About VP&S · Trustees Committee on the Health Sciences · CUIMC Administration · CUIMC Board of Advisors · CUIMC Advisory Group Chairs · VP&S Administration · Executive Committee of the Faculty Council · VP&S Department Chairs · Institutes, Centers, and VP&S Schoolwide Initiatives and Their Directors · Affiliated Hospitals · Facts and Statistics 29 2019–2020 VP&S Annual Report Office of the Interim Executive Vice President and Editor: Bonita Eaton Enochs Dean of the Faculties of Health Sciences and Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center Principal Writer: Sharon Tregaskis 630 W. 168th St. Contributing Writers: Barbara Brody, Kristin Bundy, New York, NY 10032 Julia Hickey, Brittany King, and Christine Yu Communications Office Art Director: Eson Chan Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons Produced by the Communications 701 W. 168th St., Box 153 Office at Columbia University New York, NY 10032 Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons Phone: 212-305-3900 Christopher DiFrancesco, Fax: 212-305-4521 Chief Communications Officer Office of Development Printed in November 2020 Columbia University Irving Medical Center 630 W. 168th St., P&S 2-421 New York, NY 10032 http://ps.columbia.edu/ Phone: 212-342-0088 • DEAN’S MESSAGE A YEAR LIKE NO OTHER s people all over the country watched, New We paused most research during the height of the York City became the epicenter of the U.S. pandemic—with the exception of COVID-19 research, ACOVID-19 pandemic and all eyes were on our research that could be performed remotely, and clinical faculty, students, and staff, as well as our colleagues at research that could directly benefit the patients being our partner, NewYork-Presbyterian. Our commitment studied—but an impressive amount of research had been to simultaneously treat patients, test best practices for published before the first COVID-19 patient appeared. helping those patients, and research the science of the Highlights of research projects, clinical advances, edu- virus was on view even beyond our national borders cational milestones, and community engagement fill and illustrated the strength of our great school’s part- several pages of this report, and a special section of nership with an equally great hospital. highlights is devoted to COVID-19 research. A pandemic alone would have been enough to define Several research highlights show the power of cryo- BARBARA ALPER BARBARA the 2020 fiscal year described in this annual report, electron microscopy (cryo-EM), a scientific advance which covers the year that began July 1, 2019, and ended for which Joachim Frank, PhD, shared the Nobel Prize June 30, 2020. But as we started to feel some relief from in Chemistry in 2017. The research made good use of fighting the virus, Black Lives Matter protests reminded the new Cryo-electron Microscopy Center that opened us of the health disparities revealed by COVID-19 and in the lower level of the Hammer Health Sciences Cen- other persistent structural racism in academic medicine ter. The center trains researchers and provides access and throughout society, unfortunately. to the advanced instrumentation, data collection These two history-changing phenomena converged capacity, and processing support required to incorpo- just as the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons rate cryo-EM into their studies at the medical center, at (VP&S) and the greater Columbia University Irving Columbia’s Zuckerman Institute, and at the New York Medical Center were transitioning to new leadership. Structural Biology Center campuses. As Lee Goldman, MD, prepared to step down as chief Although the final figures from the NIH are not yet executive of the medical center and dean of VP&S at available for the 2020 federal fiscal year, early indica- the end of Fiscal 2020, I was appointed by President tions show government support of our research remains Lee Bollinger as interim EVP and dean. Dr. Goldman strong, with VP&S receiving a substantial increase in was a good teacher during the transition and continues NIH funding this year. If the early figures are confirmed, to advise me on important matters. The last months of his tenure were unlike any other four-month period of The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center at Columbia, his 14 years as dean, but he was generous with his time led by David Ho, is one of the teams trying to identify potential antiviral drugs and antibodies for use against the in preparing me for the transition. new coronavirus. Pictured is Kenia De Los Santos, a senior Inside this annual report, you can read about the technician in Dr. Ho’s lab. impact of the pandemic on research, patient care, and education and the impact of the Black Lives Matter movement on five members of our community as illus- trative. A taskforce was commissioned by me with multiple working groups across the medical center in O’ROURKEJENNIFER July 2020, and a full report should be available for the Fall/Winter 2020 issue of Columbia Medicine. I will welcome your feedback on the steps we will take to strengthen our commitment to an inclusive work- place, our pledge to eliminate health disparities, and our efforts to educate and train a generation of health care professionals who will make equality a hallmark of health care for all. 2 Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons JENNIFER O’ROURKE we will move in NIH funding rankings from #9 in 2019 Preparing the next generation of physicians and to #5 in 2020. Another measure of our research excel- scientists will always be at the core of our mission, The Department of Emergency Medicine lence is Nature Index, an annual calculation of research and this year’s accomplishments in education were not has been on the front citations. In the 2019 index, Columbia University Irving dimmed by the changes put in place to respond to the lines of the pandemic Medical Center was No. 1 in the health care sector. We pandemic. Even though the way we taught students since the first patients were admitted in have ranked either No. 1 or No. 2 over the past five shifted, it was a momentary course change and we March. Wearing full years. Among medical schools ranked by the U.S. News hope to have all students back on campus next year, personal protective equipment are two & World Report, VP&S tied for sixth place this year, recognizing that many CUIMC students are on cam- emergency medicine our highest ranking in recent years. pus already. In addition to adjusting to online learning faculty: Angela Mills, As research advanced at VP&S during the year, so early in the pandemic, students stepped up to support department chair, and Penelope Lema. too did patient care. Most notable is the growth of our missions in new ways, whether collecting data for primary care. The recruitment of David Buchholz, research teams, taking on service-learning projects to MD, as senior founding medical director for primary support front-line workers, performing music to pro- care at ColumbiaDoctors and NewYork-Presbyterian vide respite for colleagues, or bringing together stu- has expanded our strategy to provide patients greater dents from around the world to collaborate virtually. access to primary care services across the New York I want to emphasize our deep partnership with metropolitan area. Plans are moving forward on new NewYork-Presbyterian in multiple domains related to primary care practice sites on the Upper West Side, clinical care, graduate medical education, and commu- in Midtown, and in Westchester. The Washington nity programs under the leadership of Dr. Steve Cor- Heights and Morningside campuses have primary care win, president and CEO. practices, part of the strategy to add 50 to 70 primary Every year we publish an annual report to document care doctors in the next five years in partnership with measurements of growth, and VP&S during the 2020 NewYork-Presbyterian. fiscal year showed growth, adaptation, and resiliency Confident that in-person outpatient care will always in abundance. While the year will best be remembered be an option—and for some patient care a necessity— for what changed us, it must also motivate the growth we are nonetheless heartened to see how quickly our that will strengthen us in the years ahead.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1] By: Lienhard, Dina A. Keywords: vision [2] Torsten Nils Wiesel studied visual information processing and development in the US during the twentieth century. He performed multiple experiments on cats in which he sewed one of their eyes shut and monitored the response of the cat’s visual system after opening the sutured eye. For his work on visual processing, Wiesel received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine [3] in 1981 along with David Hubel and Roger Sperry. Wiesel determined the critical period during which the visual system of a mammal [4] develops and studied how impairment at that stage of development can cause permanent damage to the neural pathways of the eye, allowing later researchers and surgeons to study the treatment of congenital vision disorders. Wiesel was born on 3 June 1924 in Uppsala, Sweden, to Anna-Lisa Bentzer Wiesel and Fritz Wiesel as their fifth and youngest child. Wiesel’s mother stayed at home and raised their children. His father was the head of and chief psychiatrist at a mental institution, Beckomberga Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, where the family lived. Wiesel described himself as lazy and playful during his childhood. He went to Whitlockska Samskolan, a coeducational private school in Stockholm, Sweden. At that time, Wiesel was interested in sports and became the president of his high school’s athletic association, which he described as his only achievement from his younger years. In 1941, at the age of seventeen, Wiesel enrolled at Karolinska Institutet (Royal Caroline Institute) in Solna, Sweden, where he pursued a medical degree and later pursued his own research.
    [Show full text]
  • From Controlling Elements to Transposons: Barbara Mcclintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C
    454 Forum TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.26 No.7 July 2001 Historical Perspective From controlling elements to transposons: Barbara McClintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C. Comfort Why did it take so long for Barbara correspondence. From these and other to prevent her controlling elements from McClintock (Fig. 1) to win the Nobel Prize? materials, we can reconstruct the events moving because their effects were difficult In the mid-1940s, McClintock discovered leading up to the 1983 prize*. to study when they jumped around. She genetic transposition in maize. She What today are known as transposable never had any inclination to pursue the published her results over several years elements, McClintock called ‘controlling biochemistry of transposition. and, in 1951, gave a famous presentation elements’. During the years 1945–1946, at Current understanding of how gene at the Cold Spring Harbor Symposium, the Carnegie Dept of Genetics, Cold activity is regulated, of course, springs yet it took until 1983 for her to win a Nobel Spring Harbor, McClintock discovered a from the operon, François Jacob and Prize. The delay is widely attributed to a pair of genetic loci in maize that seemed to Jacques Monod’s 1960 model of a block of combination of gender bias and gendered trigger spontaneous and reversible structural genes under the control of an science. McClintock’s results were not mutations in what had been ordinary, adjacent set of regulatory genes (Fig. 2). accepted, the story goes, because women stable alleles. In the term of the day, they Though subsequent studies revealed in science are marginalized, because the made stable alleles into ‘mutable’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perceptions of S&T in Brazil, Funding Crisis and the Future
    Public perceptions of S&T in Brazil, funding crisis and the future Interest in science and technology The interest in science and technology increased 15% in Brazil between the first and the more recent survey CGEE, 2015 Interest in science and technology European Union (2013) x Brazil (2015) 26% of the Brazilians are very interested in S&T, against 13% of the people interviewed in the European Union European Union 2013 Brazil 2015 Not interested Low interested Interested Very interested DK DA CGEE, 2015 Who is interested? DA DN Very interested Interested Not very interested Not interested Illiterate Elementary school Elementary High school University (incomplete) school (complete) degree (complete) CGEE, 2015 Those who have more formal education have more interest in S&T Do you remember... Do you know any Brazilian institution dedicated to scientific research? Do you remember the name of a Brazilian scientist? No Yes DA CGEE, 2015 50% of Brazilians think scientists are smart people who do useful things for humanity Science brings only benefits: 1987–12% 2006–29% 2010–38% 2015–54% What inspires the scientists? Helping humanity (34%), contributing to the advancement of knowledge (17%), contributing to the scientific and technological development of the country (15%) People in the government should follow guidelines developed by scientists Partially agree - 41% Completely agree - 18% Scientific and technological developments will lead to less social inequalities Partially agree - 35% Completely agree - 17% Considering the surveys... - People
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates
    The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Sunday, December 15, 2013 Calendar Directory Employment DONATE AWARDS & HONORS University Overview & Nobel Laureates Quick Facts History Since the institution's founding in 1901, 24 Nobel Prize winners have been associated with the university. Of these, two Faculty Awards are Rockefeller graduates (Edelman and Baltimore) and six laureates are current members of the Rockefeller faculty (Günter Blobel, Christian de Duve, Paul Greengard, Roderick MacKinnon, Paul Nurse and Torsten Wiesel). Nobel Prize Albert Lasker Awards Ralph M. Roderick Paul Nurse National Medal of Science Steinman MacKinnon 2001 Institute of Medicine 2011 2003 Physiology or National Academy of Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Sciences Medicine Gairdner Foundation International Award Campus Map & Views Travel Directions Paul Günter R. Bruce NYC Resources Greengard Blobel Merrifield Office of the President 2000 1999 1984 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Chief of Staff Medicine Medicine Board of Trustees and Corporate Officers Sustainability Torsten N. David Albert Contact Wiesel Baltimore Claude 1981 1975 1974 Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Christian George E. Stanford de Duve Palade Moore 1974 1974 1972 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Medicine William H. Gerald M. H. Keffer Stein Edelman Hartline 1972 1972 1967 Chemistry Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Peyton Joshua Edward L. Rous Lederberg Tatum 1966 1958 1958 http://www.rockefeller.edu/about/awards/nobel/[2013/12/16 7:42:49] The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Fritz A. John H. Wendell Lipmann Northrop M. Stanley 1953 1946 1946 Physiology or Chemistry Chemistry Medicine Herbert S.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    ii Science as a Superpower: MY LIFELONG FIGHT AGAINST DISEASE AND THE HEROES WHO MADE IT POSSIBLE By William A. Haseltine, PhD YOUNG READERS EDITION iii Copyright © 2021 by William A. Haseltine, PhD All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. iv “If I may offer advice to the young laboratory worker, it would be this: never neglect an extraordinary appearance or happening.” ─ Alexander Fleming v CONTENTS Introduction: Science as A Superpower! ............................1 Chapter 1: Penicillin, Polio, And Microbes ......................10 Chapter 2: Parallax Vision and Seeing the World ..........21 Chapter 3: Masters, Mars, And Lasers .............................37 Chapter 4: Activism, Genes, And Late-Night Labs ........58 Chapter 5: More Genes, Jims, And Johns .........................92 Chapter 6: Jobs, Riddles, And Making A (Big) Difference ......................................................................107 Chapter 7: Fighting Aids and Aiding the Fight ............133 Chapter 8: Down to Business ...........................................175 Chapter 9: Health for All, Far and Near.........................208 Chapter 10: The Golden Key ............................................235 Glossary of Terms ..............................................................246
    [Show full text]
  • Caltech News 28(3), 11 Ered, Ro Regenerate Cormecrions to Their Roger Sperry with His Work." Sperry Was Also an Avid Original Targets
    specificity of neural reconnection—that 1981 interview. "He soilpted phe• is, by the ability of neurons, when sev• nomenally. The Sperrys' home is filled Caltech News 28(3), 11 ered, ro regenerate cormecrions to their Roger Sperry with his work." Sperry was also an avid original targets. This work led in the paleontologist, with an extensive col• early 19(50s to a new theory explaining lection of prehistoric moUusks. 1913-1994 how neurons grow, assemble, and orga• "He was one of the premier experi• nize themselves in the brain by means mental neurobiologists of his time," Roger W. Spetiy, 1981 Nobel laure• of amazingly intricate, genetically said Norman Davidson, the Norman ate in physiology or medicine and the determined chemical codes. Chandler Professor of Chemical Biol• Institute's Board of Trustees Professor Sperry is best known for his "left- ogy, Emeritus, and executive oflScer for of Psychobiology, Emeritus, <;lied on brain/right-btain" research, work that biology at Caltech. "Those of us who April 17,1994, of a heart attack and of has had an incalculable impact on fields have kpown him since those early years complications associated with a neuro• ranging fimm neurophysiology to psy• will always remember the courage and muscular degenerative disease from chology to education. Working in the tenacity with which he continued to which he had suffered for many years. 1950s and early 1960s with patients carry on his work in later years in spite He was 80. who had had their corpus callosum— of a debilitating degenerative disease. A native of Hartford, Connecticut, the bundle of fibers connecting the left It was an inspiration ro all who knew Sperry earned his bachelor's degree in and right cerebral hemispheres—surgi• him." English literature from Oberlin College cally cut in an effort to control epilep• The late Caltech professor is sur• in 1935, then focused his attention on tic seizures, he demonstrated how the vived by his wife of 45 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University Honorary Degree Recipients 1989-2014
    Harvard University Honorary Degree Recipients 1989-2014 Name Degree Year Name Degree Year Daniel Aaron Litt.D. 2007 Bennett Carter Mus.D. 1994 Edward Abraham S.D. 1997 Robert L. Carter LL.D. 2004 José Antonio Abreu Mus.D. 2013 Thomas Cech S.D. 2010 Chinua Achebe Litt.D. 1996 Henry Chadwick D.D. 1997 John Adams Mus.D. 2012 Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. LL.D. 1995 Robert Adams, Jr. LL.D. 1992 Julia Child L.H.D. 1993 Karim the Aga Khan LL.D. 2008 Noam Chomsky LL.D. 2000 Lars Ahlfors S.D. 1989 Steven Chu S.D. 2009 Hélene Ahrweiler LL.D. 1995 Kenneth B. Clark LL.D. 1989 Madeleine Albright LL.D. 1997 William T. Coleman, Jr. LL.D. 1996 Isabel Allende Litt.D. 2014 James Comer LL.D. 2008 Pedro Almodóvar Art.D. 2009 Philip E. Converse LL.D. 2006 Harold Amos S.D. 1996 Sir David Cox S.D. 1999 Kofi Annan LL.D. 2004 Robert A. Dahl LL.D. 1998 Walter H. Annenberg L.H.D. 1996 D. Ronald Daniel LL.D. 2005 K. Anthony Appiah LL.D. 2012 Partha Dasgupta LL.D. 2013 Kenneth Arrow LL.D. 1999 Natalie Zemon Davis LL.D. 1996 John Ashbery Litt.D. 2001 Dominique de Menil L.H.D. 1992 Michael Atiyah S.D. 2006 Philippe de Montebello Art.D. 2006 Margaret Atwood Litt.D. 2004 W. Edwards Deming LL.D. 1993 Mary Ellen Avery S.D. 2005 Joan Didion Litt.D. 2009 Bernard Bailyn LL.D. 1999 Plácido Domingo Art.D. 2011 David Baltimore S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Rita Allen Foundation Scholars 1 PEOPLE Rita Allen Foundation Scholars: 1976–2016
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINS From the President . 4 Exploration and Discovery: 40 Years of the Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program . .5 Unexpected Connections: A Conversation with Arnold Levine . .6 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pioneering Pain Researcher Invests in Next Generation of Scholars: A Conversation with Kathleen Foley (1978) . .10 Douglas Fearon: Attacking Disease with Insights . .12 Jeffrey Macklis (1991): Making and Mending the Brain’s Machinery . .15 Gregory Hannon (2000): Tools for Tough Questions . .18 Joan Steitz, Carl Nathan (1984) and Charles Gilbert (1986) . 21 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Robert Weinberg (1976): The Genesis of Cancer Genetics . .26 Thomas Jessell (1984): Linking Molecules to Perception and Motion . 29 Titia de Lange (1995): The Complex Puzzle of Chromosome Ends . .32 Andrew Fire (1989): The Resonance of Gene Silencing . 35 Yigong Shi (1999): Illuminating the Cell’s Critical Systems . .37 SCHOLAR PROFILES Tom Maniatis (1978): Mastering Methods and Exploring Molecular Mechanisms . 40 Bruce Stillman (1983): The Foundations of DNA Replication . .43 Luis Villarreal (1983): A Life in Viruses . .46 Gilbert Chu (1988): DNA Dreamer . .49 Jon Levine (1988): A Passion for Deciphering Pain . 52 Susan Dymecki (1999): Serotonin Circuit Master . 55 Hao Wu (2002): The Cellular Dimensions of Immunity . .58 Ajay Chawla (2003): Beyond Immunity . 61 Christopher Lima (2003): Structure Meets Function . 64 Laura Johnston (2004): How Life Shapes Up . .67 Senthil Muthuswamy (2004): Tackling Cancer in Three Dimensions . .70 David Sabatini (2004): Fueling Cell Growth . .73 David Tuveson (2004): Decoding a Cryptic Cancer . 76 Hilary Coller (2005): When Cells Sleep . .79 Diana Bautista (2010): An Itch for Knowledge . .82 David Prober (2010): Sleeping Like the Fishes .
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994) [1] By: Lienhard, Dina A. Keywords: Chemoaffinity [2] Split-brain [3] Roger Wolcott Sperry [4] Roger Wolcott Sperry studied the function of the nervous system in the United States during the twentieth century. He studied split-brain patterns in cats and humans [5] that result from separating the two hemispheres of the brain after cutting thec orpus callosum [6], the bridge between the two hemispheres of the brain. He found that after separating thec orpus callosum [6], the two hemispheres of the brain could not communicate and they performed functions as if the other hemisphere did not exist. Sperry also studied optic nerve regeneration and developed the chemoaffinity hypothesis. The chemoaffinity hypothesis stated that axons, the long fiber-like part of neurons, connect to their target cells through special chemical markers. That challenged the previously accepted resonance principle of neuronal connection. In 1981 Sperry was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine along with David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel. Sperry was born on 20 August 1913 in Hartford, Connecticut, to Florence Kraemer Sperry and Francis Bushnell Sperry. He had one younger brother, Russel Loomis. Sperry's father was a banker and his mother was a business student. At the age of eleven, Sperry's father died and his mother became the assistant principal at a high school to financially support the family. During his high school career, Sperry participated in multiple varsity sports. Upon graduating high school, he received a four-year Miller academic scholarship to Oberlin College [7] in Oberlin, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Version of the Signal Hypothesis (1971) Proposed the Presence of a Signal Sequence (X) in the Nascent Polypeptide Chain
    The first version of the signal hypothesis (1971) proposed the presence of a signal sequence (X) in the nascent polypeptide chain. This sequence was predicted to be recog- nized by a ªbinding factorº that mediates binding to the ER membrane. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the ribosome ± Sec61 complex (1997) reveals the alignment of the tunnel in the large ribosomal subunit (blue) and the protein-conducting channel of Sec61 (red). 86 WILEY-VCH-Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2000 1439-4227/00/01/02 $ 17.50+.50/0 CHEMBIOCHEM 2000,1,86±102 Protein Targeting (Nobel Lecture)** Günter Blobel*[a] KEYWORDS: membranes ´ Nobel lecture ´ proteins ´ protein transport Prologue I began research in the sixties, first as a graduate student in the laboratory of Van R. Potter (Figure 1) at the McArdle Institute for Cancer Research of the University of Wisconsin in Madison. I continued as a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of George E. Palade (Figure 2) at The Rockefeller Uni- versity in New York City. At that time, the intracellular pathway of secretory pro- teins, from their synthesis to their extru- sion from the cell, the so-called ªsecre- tory pathwayº, had already been worked out by George Palade and his co-workers, primarily Philip Siekevitz, Jim Jamieson, and Lucien Caro (for review see the 1974 Nobel lecture by George Palade[1] ). Using Figure 3. The secretory pathway. Secretory proteins (indicated in red) are pulse ± chase labeling with radioactive synthesized on ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). They are then amino acids in tissue slices in conjunction transported via vesicular carriers through the Golgi complex and are finally exocytosed.
    [Show full text]