Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 144 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1998 No. 9 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 11, 1998, at 3:00 p.m. Senate TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1998 The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was into Your hands I commit My spirit.’’ now occur Wednesday morning at 10 called to order by the President pro Amen. a.m. I thank my colleagues for their tempore (Mr. THURMOND). attention to this and I urge they pay f particular attention to this cloning PRAYER RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY issue. The Senate needs to make a deci- LEADER sion on whether or not we want to The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John allow human cloning to go forward. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: There is a lot of concern about that. able majority leader, Senator LOTT of Gracious God, You have shown us the The President has indicated he is op- Mississippi, is recognized. power of an unreserved commitment. posed to it and we need to take this We prayerfully personalize the promise f issue up. of the psalmist, ‘‘We commit our way I urge the Senate to at least vote to to You, Lord. We also trust in You, and SCHEDULE go to debate on the substance of the You will bring Your plans to pass. We Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, this morn- bill itself. The cloture motion is on the rest in Your word, and wait patiently ing, under a previous consent, the Sen- motion to proceed. I think we ought to for You’’ (Psalm 37:5,7). In all the chal- ate will debate the motion to invoke have a beginning of a full discussion lenges of life, we’ve discovered that cloture on the nomination of David about this, see where there are dis- Solomon was right, ‘‘Commit your Satcher to be Surgeon General until 11 agreements and where maybe we can works to the Lord and your thoughts a.m. At 11 the Senate will vote on the come to agreements. If we do not do will be established’’ (Proverbs 16:3). motion to invoke cloture on the nomi- that, this process will be allowed and Over and over again, You have re- nation. Under the agreement that we there are going to be serious, I think, sponded to our commitment to solve reached last week, if cloture is in- scientific, medical, ethical and moral problems by providing us with clarity voked, a second vote will occur imme- questions that are going to be left dan- of thought and ingenious solutions. diately on the nomination itself. gling in the wind. If Senators have ad- You have revealed that commitment Therefore, Senators should be aware ditional ideas that they would like to is the key to opening the floodgate for that there may be two consecutive roll- offer in the form of amendments to this the inflow of Your Spirit. It is as if You call votes beginning at 11 a.m. human cloning issue, that is the way set all of the angels in heaven, all the As under the order, from 12:30, then, we should proceed. people who serve You on Earth, and the to 2:15, the Senate will recess for the I urge the Senate to begin to pay confluence of circumstances to help us. weekly policy luncheons to meet. Fol- close attention to this issue. The alter- Unexpected blessings happen; coinci- lowing the luncheons, the Senate may native is, perhaps, to do nothing, and I dent events occur; people respond; and begin consideration of the nomination think that would be a very dangerous the tangled mess of details is untan- of Judge Massiah-Jackson to be U.S. thing in this very important issue. gled. Amazed, we look back to the mo- District Judge for the Eastern District Mr. President, I see a Senator seeks ment when we gave up and You took of Pennsylvania. Therefore, further recognition. I yield the floor. over; when we let go and You took votes can be expected to occur fol- f hold; when we rested in You and You lowing the one or two votes at 11 replenished our strength. Lord, help us o’clock. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME to commit ourselves, our problems, and Also, I want to give Senators a re- The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. our hopes and dreams to You. In the minder that a cloture vote on the mo- ASHCROFT). Under the previous order, name of Jesus who prayed, ‘‘Father, tion to proceed to the cloning bill will the leadership time is reserved. ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S531 . VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:39 Oct 31, 2013 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4637 Sfmt 0634 E:\1998SENATE\S10FE8.REC S10FE8 mmaher on DSKCGSP4G1 with SOCIALSECURITY S532 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 10, 1998 EXECUTIVE SESSION again, I can simply say I disagree with tion his character or his veracity or his the President’s position on that issue. commitment to his profession. We have However I have discussed this issue a policy issue here. We need to address NOMINATION OF DAVID SATCHER, with Dr. Satcher and I have read what whether or not the fact that he sup- OF TENNESSEE, TO BE AN AS- he has written in response to questions ports the President, as all the Presi- SISTANT SECRETARY OF on this issue. I am satisfied he does not dent’s nominees for any position that HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, intend to use the position of Surgeon comes up are going to do—whether or MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE General to advocate or promote abor- not his support for the President in PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, AND tion in any way. In fact, he said: this case is sufficient to disqualify him SURGEON GENERAL OF THE Let me state unequivocally that I have no for this position. I think the answer to PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE intention of using the positions of Assistant that is no. I think he will be a good The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Secretary for Health and Surgeon General to Surgeon General. promote issues related to abortion. I share He does happen to be a Tennessean. the previous order, there will now be no one’s political agenda, and I want to use an hour debate, equally divided be- That does not disqualify him either, in the power of these positions to focus on my estimation. And therefore I re- tween the Senator from Vermont and issues that unite Americans and not divide the Senator from Missouri or their des- them. spectfully submit this gentleman ignees, prior to the cloture vote on the should be confirmed. He went on to say: I thank the Chair for the opportunity nomination of Dr. David Satcher of If I am confirmed by the Senate I will Tennessee to be Assistant Secretary of to speak this morning. I yield the floor. strongly promote a message of abstinence The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Health and Human Services and to be and responsibility to our youth which I be- GREGG). Who seeks time? The Senator Surgeon General. lieve can help to reduce the number of abor- tions in our country. from Missouri. The Senate resumed consideration of Mr. ASHCROFT. Mr. President, I the nomination. This is the commitment that he has made. Many of us have been concerned suggest the absence of a quorum and The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who ask unanimous consent the time be al- yields time? The Senator from Ten- in times past that this particular posi- tion of Surgeon General would be used lotted equally to both sides. nessee is recognized. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without as a bully pulpit by individuals to pro- Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. President, I objection, it is so ordered. The clerk mote policies that are contrary to the yield myself 10 minutes. will call the roll. best interests of this country. I think The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- The legislative clerk proceeded to it has been done in the past. I do not ator from Tennessee. call the roll. Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. President, I feel that Dr. Satcher will do this. I Mr. ASHCROFT. Mr. President, I ask rise in support of the nomination of Dr. think he has a good concept of the good unanimous consent that the order for David Satcher of Tennessee. I have lis- that can be done in this job. I think he the quorum call be rescinded. tened to the debate. I have talked to understands the terrible problems that The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Dr. Satcher about the issues involved. I our young people have. I think he sees HUTCHINSON). Without objection, it is am convinced that this is an out- an opportunity to do some good for so ordered. standing appointment that the Presi- these young people. Everything in his Mr. ASHCROFT. Mr. President, I rise dent has made. Whether you look at history indicates that that would be to speak against the confirmation of Dr. Satcher’s history in terms of his his attitude in approaching this posi- Dr. David Satcher, and I allocate my- commitment to his family, whether tion, and I believe him when he says self so much time as I may consume, you look in terms of his commitment that and I respect his position on that.
Recommended publications
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Torsten Wiesel (1924– ) [1] By: Lienhard, Dina A. Keywords: vision [2] Torsten Nils Wiesel studied visual information processing and development in the US during the twentieth century. He performed multiple experiments on cats in which he sewed one of their eyes shut and monitored the response of the cat’s visual system after opening the sutured eye. For his work on visual processing, Wiesel received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine [3] in 1981 along with David Hubel and Roger Sperry. Wiesel determined the critical period during which the visual system of a mammal [4] develops and studied how impairment at that stage of development can cause permanent damage to the neural pathways of the eye, allowing later researchers and surgeons to study the treatment of congenital vision disorders. Wiesel was born on 3 June 1924 in Uppsala, Sweden, to Anna-Lisa Bentzer Wiesel and Fritz Wiesel as their fifth and youngest child. Wiesel’s mother stayed at home and raised their children. His father was the head of and chief psychiatrist at a mental institution, Beckomberga Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, where the family lived. Wiesel described himself as lazy and playful during his childhood. He went to Whitlockska Samskolan, a coeducational private school in Stockholm, Sweden. At that time, Wiesel was interested in sports and became the president of his high school’s athletic association, which he described as his only achievement from his younger years. In 1941, at the age of seventeen, Wiesel enrolled at Karolinska Institutet (Royal Caroline Institute) in Solna, Sweden, where he pursued a medical degree and later pursued his own research.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine COVID-19 and RACISM
    Columbia 2019–2020 ANNUAL REPORT Medicine Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons FIGHTING TWO VIRUSES: COVID-19 AND RACISM Features: 4 12 20 At a Crossroads: All Hands on Deck The Bioethics of Medicine and Genomics and Justice the Movement Pivot was the action verb that describes how VP&S clinicians, A new ethics division is Work toward health equality researchers, and students expanding VP&S scholarship has begun at VP&S and all confronted COVID-19 when the into the ethical, legal, and of academic medicine as early virus arrived in New York City. social implications of precision summer protests revealed From redeploying clinicians to medicine. The 360-degree the health disparities in areas outside their specialty to perspective includes “studying medicine in general and graduating fourth-year students the studies” as researchers especially in COVID-19 cases. early, VP&S helped “bend the continue to unleash the Students and faculty share curve” at the epicenter of the power to treat, prevent, and their own perspectives on nation’s pandemic. cure disease. The effort also the intersection of COVID-19 provides an opportunity to and Black Lives Matter. bring social science to bear on bioethical questions. On the Cover Steven McDonald, MD, a 2014 VP&S graduate, is one of five faculty members and medical students who share their perspectives on the Black Lives Matter movement. Read about the five and the VP&S plans to promote racial justice, Page 4. Photograph by Jörg Meyer ColumbiaMedicine | 2019–2020 Annual Report Issue
    [Show full text]
  • From Controlling Elements to Transposons: Barbara Mcclintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C
    454 Forum TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.26 No.7 July 2001 Historical Perspective From controlling elements to transposons: Barbara McClintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C. Comfort Why did it take so long for Barbara correspondence. From these and other to prevent her controlling elements from McClintock (Fig. 1) to win the Nobel Prize? materials, we can reconstruct the events moving because their effects were difficult In the mid-1940s, McClintock discovered leading up to the 1983 prize*. to study when they jumped around. She genetic transposition in maize. She What today are known as transposable never had any inclination to pursue the published her results over several years elements, McClintock called ‘controlling biochemistry of transposition. and, in 1951, gave a famous presentation elements’. During the years 1945–1946, at Current understanding of how gene at the Cold Spring Harbor Symposium, the Carnegie Dept of Genetics, Cold activity is regulated, of course, springs yet it took until 1983 for her to win a Nobel Spring Harbor, McClintock discovered a from the operon, François Jacob and Prize. The delay is widely attributed to a pair of genetic loci in maize that seemed to Jacques Monod’s 1960 model of a block of combination of gender bias and gendered trigger spontaneous and reversible structural genes under the control of an science. McClintock’s results were not mutations in what had been ordinary, adjacent set of regulatory genes (Fig. 2). accepted, the story goes, because women stable alleles. In the term of the day, they Though subsequent studies revealed in science are marginalized, because the made stable alleles into ‘mutable’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perceptions of S&T in Brazil, Funding Crisis and the Future
    Public perceptions of S&T in Brazil, funding crisis and the future Interest in science and technology The interest in science and technology increased 15% in Brazil between the first and the more recent survey CGEE, 2015 Interest in science and technology European Union (2013) x Brazil (2015) 26% of the Brazilians are very interested in S&T, against 13% of the people interviewed in the European Union European Union 2013 Brazil 2015 Not interested Low interested Interested Very interested DK DA CGEE, 2015 Who is interested? DA DN Very interested Interested Not very interested Not interested Illiterate Elementary school Elementary High school University (incomplete) school (complete) degree (complete) CGEE, 2015 Those who have more formal education have more interest in S&T Do you remember... Do you know any Brazilian institution dedicated to scientific research? Do you remember the name of a Brazilian scientist? No Yes DA CGEE, 2015 50% of Brazilians think scientists are smart people who do useful things for humanity Science brings only benefits: 1987–12% 2006–29% 2010–38% 2015–54% What inspires the scientists? Helping humanity (34%), contributing to the advancement of knowledge (17%), contributing to the scientific and technological development of the country (15%) People in the government should follow guidelines developed by scientists Partially agree - 41% Completely agree - 18% Scientific and technological developments will lead to less social inequalities Partially agree - 35% Completely agree - 17% Considering the surveys... - People
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates
    The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Sunday, December 15, 2013 Calendar Directory Employment DONATE AWARDS & HONORS University Overview & Nobel Laureates Quick Facts History Since the institution's founding in 1901, 24 Nobel Prize winners have been associated with the university. Of these, two Faculty Awards are Rockefeller graduates (Edelman and Baltimore) and six laureates are current members of the Rockefeller faculty (Günter Blobel, Christian de Duve, Paul Greengard, Roderick MacKinnon, Paul Nurse and Torsten Wiesel). Nobel Prize Albert Lasker Awards Ralph M. Roderick Paul Nurse National Medal of Science Steinman MacKinnon 2001 Institute of Medicine 2011 2003 Physiology or National Academy of Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Sciences Medicine Gairdner Foundation International Award Campus Map & Views Travel Directions Paul Günter R. Bruce NYC Resources Greengard Blobel Merrifield Office of the President 2000 1999 1984 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Chief of Staff Medicine Medicine Board of Trustees and Corporate Officers Sustainability Torsten N. David Albert Contact Wiesel Baltimore Claude 1981 1975 1974 Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Christian George E. Stanford de Duve Palade Moore 1974 1974 1972 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Medicine William H. Gerald M. H. Keffer Stein Edelman Hartline 1972 1972 1967 Chemistry Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Peyton Joshua Edward L. Rous Lederberg Tatum 1966 1958 1958 http://www.rockefeller.edu/about/awards/nobel/[2013/12/16 7:42:49] The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Fritz A. John H. Wendell Lipmann Northrop M. Stanley 1953 1946 1946 Physiology or Chemistry Chemistry Medicine Herbert S.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    ii Science as a Superpower: MY LIFELONG FIGHT AGAINST DISEASE AND THE HEROES WHO MADE IT POSSIBLE By William A. Haseltine, PhD YOUNG READERS EDITION iii Copyright © 2021 by William A. Haseltine, PhD All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. iv “If I may offer advice to the young laboratory worker, it would be this: never neglect an extraordinary appearance or happening.” ─ Alexander Fleming v CONTENTS Introduction: Science as A Superpower! ............................1 Chapter 1: Penicillin, Polio, And Microbes ......................10 Chapter 2: Parallax Vision and Seeing the World ..........21 Chapter 3: Masters, Mars, And Lasers .............................37 Chapter 4: Activism, Genes, And Late-Night Labs ........58 Chapter 5: More Genes, Jims, And Johns .........................92 Chapter 6: Jobs, Riddles, And Making A (Big) Difference ......................................................................107 Chapter 7: Fighting Aids and Aiding the Fight ............133 Chapter 8: Down to Business ...........................................175 Chapter 9: Health for All, Far and Near.........................208 Chapter 10: The Golden Key ............................................235 Glossary of Terms ..............................................................246
    [Show full text]
  • Caltech News 28(3), 11 Ered, Ro Regenerate Cormecrions to Their Roger Sperry with His Work." Sperry Was Also an Avid Original Targets
    specificity of neural reconnection—that 1981 interview. "He soilpted phe• is, by the ability of neurons, when sev• nomenally. The Sperrys' home is filled Caltech News 28(3), 11 ered, ro regenerate cormecrions to their Roger Sperry with his work." Sperry was also an avid original targets. This work led in the paleontologist, with an extensive col• early 19(50s to a new theory explaining lection of prehistoric moUusks. 1913-1994 how neurons grow, assemble, and orga• "He was one of the premier experi• nize themselves in the brain by means mental neurobiologists of his time," Roger W. Spetiy, 1981 Nobel laure• of amazingly intricate, genetically said Norman Davidson, the Norman ate in physiology or medicine and the determined chemical codes. Chandler Professor of Chemical Biol• Institute's Board of Trustees Professor Sperry is best known for his "left- ogy, Emeritus, and executive oflScer for of Psychobiology, Emeritus, <;lied on brain/right-btain" research, work that biology at Caltech. "Those of us who April 17,1994, of a heart attack and of has had an incalculable impact on fields have kpown him since those early years complications associated with a neuro• ranging fimm neurophysiology to psy• will always remember the courage and muscular degenerative disease from chology to education. Working in the tenacity with which he continued to which he had suffered for many years. 1950s and early 1960s with patients carry on his work in later years in spite He was 80. who had had their corpus callosum— of a debilitating degenerative disease. A native of Hartford, Connecticut, the bundle of fibers connecting the left It was an inspiration ro all who knew Sperry earned his bachelor's degree in and right cerebral hemispheres—surgi• him." English literature from Oberlin College cally cut in an effort to control epilep• The late Caltech professor is sur• in 1935, then focused his attention on tic seizures, he demonstrated how the vived by his wife of 45 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University Honorary Degree Recipients 1989-2014
    Harvard University Honorary Degree Recipients 1989-2014 Name Degree Year Name Degree Year Daniel Aaron Litt.D. 2007 Bennett Carter Mus.D. 1994 Edward Abraham S.D. 1997 Robert L. Carter LL.D. 2004 José Antonio Abreu Mus.D. 2013 Thomas Cech S.D. 2010 Chinua Achebe Litt.D. 1996 Henry Chadwick D.D. 1997 John Adams Mus.D. 2012 Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. LL.D. 1995 Robert Adams, Jr. LL.D. 1992 Julia Child L.H.D. 1993 Karim the Aga Khan LL.D. 2008 Noam Chomsky LL.D. 2000 Lars Ahlfors S.D. 1989 Steven Chu S.D. 2009 Hélene Ahrweiler LL.D. 1995 Kenneth B. Clark LL.D. 1989 Madeleine Albright LL.D. 1997 William T. Coleman, Jr. LL.D. 1996 Isabel Allende Litt.D. 2014 James Comer LL.D. 2008 Pedro Almodóvar Art.D. 2009 Philip E. Converse LL.D. 2006 Harold Amos S.D. 1996 Sir David Cox S.D. 1999 Kofi Annan LL.D. 2004 Robert A. Dahl LL.D. 1998 Walter H. Annenberg L.H.D. 1996 D. Ronald Daniel LL.D. 2005 K. Anthony Appiah LL.D. 2012 Partha Dasgupta LL.D. 2013 Kenneth Arrow LL.D. 1999 Natalie Zemon Davis LL.D. 1996 John Ashbery Litt.D. 2001 Dominique de Menil L.H.D. 1992 Michael Atiyah S.D. 2006 Philippe de Montebello Art.D. 2006 Margaret Atwood Litt.D. 2004 W. Edwards Deming LL.D. 1993 Mary Ellen Avery S.D. 2005 Joan Didion Litt.D. 2009 Bernard Bailyn LL.D. 1999 Plácido Domingo Art.D. 2011 David Baltimore S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Rita Allen Foundation Scholars 1 PEOPLE Rita Allen Foundation Scholars: 1976–2016
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINS From the President . 4 Exploration and Discovery: 40 Years of the Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program . .5 Unexpected Connections: A Conversation with Arnold Levine . .6 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pioneering Pain Researcher Invests in Next Generation of Scholars: A Conversation with Kathleen Foley (1978) . .10 Douglas Fearon: Attacking Disease with Insights . .12 Jeffrey Macklis (1991): Making and Mending the Brain’s Machinery . .15 Gregory Hannon (2000): Tools for Tough Questions . .18 Joan Steitz, Carl Nathan (1984) and Charles Gilbert (1986) . 21 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Robert Weinberg (1976): The Genesis of Cancer Genetics . .26 Thomas Jessell (1984): Linking Molecules to Perception and Motion . 29 Titia de Lange (1995): The Complex Puzzle of Chromosome Ends . .32 Andrew Fire (1989): The Resonance of Gene Silencing . 35 Yigong Shi (1999): Illuminating the Cell’s Critical Systems . .37 SCHOLAR PROFILES Tom Maniatis (1978): Mastering Methods and Exploring Molecular Mechanisms . 40 Bruce Stillman (1983): The Foundations of DNA Replication . .43 Luis Villarreal (1983): A Life in Viruses . .46 Gilbert Chu (1988): DNA Dreamer . .49 Jon Levine (1988): A Passion for Deciphering Pain . 52 Susan Dymecki (1999): Serotonin Circuit Master . 55 Hao Wu (2002): The Cellular Dimensions of Immunity . .58 Ajay Chawla (2003): Beyond Immunity . 61 Christopher Lima (2003): Structure Meets Function . 64 Laura Johnston (2004): How Life Shapes Up . .67 Senthil Muthuswamy (2004): Tackling Cancer in Three Dimensions . .70 David Sabatini (2004): Fueling Cell Growth . .73 David Tuveson (2004): Decoding a Cryptic Cancer . 76 Hilary Coller (2005): When Cells Sleep . .79 Diana Bautista (2010): An Itch for Knowledge . .82 David Prober (2010): Sleeping Like the Fishes .
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994) [1] By: Lienhard, Dina A. Keywords: Chemoaffinity [2] Split-brain [3] Roger Wolcott Sperry [4] Roger Wolcott Sperry studied the function of the nervous system in the United States during the twentieth century. He studied split-brain patterns in cats and humans [5] that result from separating the two hemispheres of the brain after cutting thec orpus callosum [6], the bridge between the two hemispheres of the brain. He found that after separating thec orpus callosum [6], the two hemispheres of the brain could not communicate and they performed functions as if the other hemisphere did not exist. Sperry also studied optic nerve regeneration and developed the chemoaffinity hypothesis. The chemoaffinity hypothesis stated that axons, the long fiber-like part of neurons, connect to their target cells through special chemical markers. That challenged the previously accepted resonance principle of neuronal connection. In 1981 Sperry was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine along with David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel. Sperry was born on 20 August 1913 in Hartford, Connecticut, to Florence Kraemer Sperry and Francis Bushnell Sperry. He had one younger brother, Russel Loomis. Sperry's father was a banker and his mother was a business student. At the age of eleven, Sperry's father died and his mother became the assistant principal at a high school to financially support the family. During his high school career, Sperry participated in multiple varsity sports. Upon graduating high school, he received a four-year Miller academic scholarship to Oberlin College [7] in Oberlin, Ohio.
    [Show full text]