NEPA--Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEPA--Environmental Assessment United States Department of Environmental Assessment Agriculture Forest Service Tennessee Creek Project December 2013 Leadville Ranger District, San Isabel National Forest Lake County, Colorado Eagle - Holy Cross Ranger District, White River National Forest Eagle County, Colorado Mt. Zion looking towards Turquoise Lake. Photo by J. Windorski For More Information Contact: Tami Conner, District Ranger Leadville Ranger District 810 Front Street Leadville, CO 80461 719-486-0749 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Document Structure .................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 Location and Setting ................................................................................................................... 3 Management Direction ............................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and Need for Action ...................................................................................................... 9 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................................... 9 Decision Framework.................................................................................................................. 10 Public Involvement and Tribal Consultation ............................................................................. 10 Issues ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2 – Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 13 Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 13 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ................................................................. 38 Comparison of Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 38 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences ............................................................................ 40 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 40 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................. 42 Fire / Fuels ................................................................................................................................. 53 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 60 Recreation and Wilderness ....................................................................................................... 64 Lands Uses (Non-Recreation) and Minerals .............................................................................. 67 Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................... 69 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 104 Fisheries .................................................................................................................................. 107 Hydrology/Soils ....................................................................................................................... 117 Botany ..................................................................................................................................... 125 Specifically Required Disclosures ............................................................................................ 130 Chapter 4 – Consultation and Coordination ........................................................................ 132 Literature Cited and References ......................................................................................... 133 Glossary............................................................................................................................. 140 Appendix A – Law and Regulation....................................................................................... 145 Appendix B – Southern Rockies Lynx Amendment (SRLA) Analysis ....................................... 148 i List of Figures Figure 1.1 Tennessee Creek Project Vicinity Map Figure 1.2 Management Areas within the Project Area Figure 2.1 Map of Alternative 1 (Proposed Action) Figure 2.2 Map of Alternative 2 Figure 2.3 Locations of Halfmoon Creek Watershed Restoration and Habitat Improvement Projects Figure 3.1 Vegetation Condition Class Within and Adjacent to the Project Area CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION Document Structure ____________________________________ The Forest Service has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other relevant Federal and State laws and regulations. This Environmental Assessment discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts that would result from the proposed action and alternatives. The document is organized into four parts: Chapter 1 – Introduction: This section includes information on the history of the project proposal, the purpose of and need for the project, and the agency’s proposal for achieving that purpose and need. Chapter 2 – Comparison of Alternatives, including the Proposed Action: This section provides a more detailed description of the agency’s proposed action as well as an alternative method for achieving the stated purpose. These alternatives were developed based on significant issues raised by the public and other agencies. Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences: This section describes the environmental effects of implementing the proposed action and other alternatives. This analysis is organized by resource area. Within each section, the affected environment/existing condition is described first, followed by the effects of the No Action Alternative that provides a baseline for evaluation and comparison of the other alternatives that follow. Chapter 4 – Agencies and Persons Consulted: This section provides a list of preparers and agencies consulted during the development of the environmental assessment. Appendices: The appendices provide more detailed information to support the analyses presented in the environmental assessment. Additional documentation, including more detailed analyses of project-area resources, may be found in the project planning record located at the Leadville Ranger District Office in Leadville, Colorado. Introduction ___________________________________________ The Forest Service is proposing to complete vegetation management (both mechanical and prescribed fire treatments), wildlife habitat improvement, and watershed improvement projects on 16,450 acres. The majority of the project area is within the Leadville Ranger District of the San Isabel National Forest in Colorado. A minor part of the project area is located at the Ski Cooper Ski Area (Ski Cooper) within the Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District of the White River National Forest in Colorado. This action is needed to create forest conditions that are more resilient to outbreaks of insect, disease and wildfire; to improve habitat for threatened, endangered and sensitive species and other important wildlife species; and to provide for sustainable watershed conditions. The proposed action would create short term impacts that would provide long term benefits for the project area. Short term impacts would include modifications to the visual scenery, smoke from prescribed fire, and temporary shifts of visitors and wildlife from project implementation. 1 Draft Environmental Assessment Tennessee Creek Project December 2013 Background ___________________________________________ During the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the State Geologist for the Year 1877
    NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGICALSURVEYOF IN:LWJERSELz r ANNUAL REPORT OF TIIE STATEGEOLOGIST FOB TH-EYEAR IS77. TREe's'TON..N'. J, : _AAR. DAy & _'AAR, PRINTERS. NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOARD OF MANAGERS. His Excellency, JOSEPH D. BEDLE, Governor, and ex-off_eio Presi- dent of the Board ............................................................ Trenton. L CONGRES_SIO_AL DISTRICT. CIIXRL_S E. ELm:R, Esq ........................................................ Bridgeton. ItoN. ANDREW K, HAY .......................................................... Winslow. II. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT. I'[ON. "_VILLIAM PARRY ........................................................... Cinnamiuson. ' HON, H. S, LITTLE ................................................................. Trenton. 1II. CONGRESSlONAI_DISTRICT. HENRY AITKIN, Esq .............................................................. Elizabetll. ] JoHs VOUGI_T, M. D ............................................................. Freehold. IV. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT. SELDE._ T. SORA_'TO.'_, Esq ..................................................... Oxford. TtlO.MAS LAWRE_CE_ Esq...'. .................................................... Hamburg. v. CO._GRF._IO.'CAL DISTRICT. HO.N'. AUGUSTUS W. CUTLER ................................................... Morristown. (_OL. BENJA,'III_ _-YCRIGG ....................................................... Pf189aic. VI, CO_GRF_SIONAL DISTRICT. WILLIAM M. FORCg_ Esq ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GENESIS of the HONDSRUG a SAALIAN MEGAFLUTE, Drenthe, the Netherlands
    GENESIS OF THE HONDSRUG A SAALIAN MEGAFLUTE, Drenthe, the Netherlands ASPIRING EUROPEAN GEOPARK September 2012 E.P.H.Bregman F.W.H.Smit PROVINCE OF DRENTHE UTRECHT UNIVERSITY THE NETHERLANDS www. Geoparkdehondsrug.nl 1 Colophon E.P.H. Bregman, MSc, Province of Drenthe, Utrecht University. Adress: Province of Drenthe, Westerbrink 1, 9400 AC Assen. E-mail: [email protected] F.W.H. Smit, BSc Utrecht University, MSc Århus University (Denmark) E-mail: [email protected] This report is published by the Steering Group aspiring EUROPEAN GEOPARK de Hondsrug and will (partly or modified) be published as part of a Ph-D thesis of E.P.H.Bregman. Reprodution of this study (text and figures) at any way, or using data for presentations, lectures or publications is only allowed with permission of the main author, E.P.H.Bregman. © (2012) Steering Group aspiring EUROPEAN GEOPARK de HONDSRUG/E.P.H.Bregman This study is ordered by the Province of Drenthe and study is done under auspiciën of the Utrecht University, Faculty Geoscience, department Physical Geography. The Netherlands 2 Contents List of figures............................................................................................................................ 6 A proposed European Geopark................................................................................................ 8 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................11 1.1 Framework of the research.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of International Palaeoseismological Field Workshop
    Soft-sediment deformation structures and palaeoseismic phenomena in the South-eastern Baltic Region EXCURSION GUIDE & ABSTRACTS of International Palaeoseismological Field Workshop 17–21st September 2018 Lithuania–Latvia Vilnius, 2018 Soft-sediment deformation structures and palaeoseismic phenomena in the South-eastern Baltic Region. Excursion guide of International Palaeoseismological Field Workshop, 17–21st September 2018, Vilnius, Lithuania / Eds: M. Pisarska-Jamroży and A. Bitinas. Lithuanian Geological Survey, Lithuanian Geological Society, Vilnius, 2018. Publications. The papers prepared on the basis of oral and poster presentations may be printed in the international peer-reviewed journal Baltica (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/publications/ listingCategory/category.1020) Organizing Committee. Jolanta Čyžienė, Jonas Satkūnas, Aldona Damušytė (Lithuanian Geological Survey, Lithuanian Geological Society), Małgorzata Pisarska-Jamroży (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań), Albertas Bitinas (Nature Research Centre), Maris Nartišs (University of Latvia) Organizers Lithuanian Geological Survey, Lithuania Lithuanian Geological Society, Lithuania Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland Nature Research Centre, Vilnius University of Latvia, Riga Sponsors The workshop has been financially supported by a grant for the GREBAL project (No. 2015/19/B/ST10/00661) from the National Science Centre Poland Private sponsor JSC Geobaltic Layout and cover design: Ieva Antušienė Cover photo: Baltic Sea bluff near Jūrkalne, Latvia (S. Belzyt, 2018) © Lithuanian Geological Survey © Lithuanian Geological Society ISBN 978-9986-623-54-0 2 SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME 17 September (Monday) Registration, introduction and key lectures in the Lithuanian Geological Survey (Vilnius). Field trip: Laiciškėnai quarry. Accommodation in the Vila Bisena (www.vilaBisena.lt). Ice Break party. 18 September (Tuesday) Field trip: Kumečiai quarry and Slinktis outcrop on the Dubysa River.
    [Show full text]
  • B15 the Once Four Named Pleistocene Glacial Stages < Tills >
    METHODOLOGY 97 b15 The once four named Pleistocene Glacial Stages < tills > In lapidary inscriptions, a man is not upon oath. —Samuel Johnson.1 Two major schemes of harmonization [of Scripture and geology] were developed and refined during the nineteenth century: these were the gap and day-age interpretation of Genesis 1. —Davis A. Young.2 A. Bernardi in 1832 envisaged Europe covered by ice. This was to explain: “How rock fragments originating in the north came to where one finds them strewn and in mounds in Northern Germany and neighboring lands.”3 For that time, Louis Agassiz’s botanist/poet friend Karl Schimper in 1837 coined the term Eiszeit (ice age). Earlier, apposed to such, Agassiz had studied existing glaciers and their products: erratic boulders, glacially scoured, striated and polished bedrock, glacial moraines, and glacially modified landscape. However in 1837 he issued his famous “Neuchâtel Discourse ” volta-face. Materials formerly mapped as diluvium he reclassified as till and glacial outwash.4 In Britain, James Geikie in 1877 presented evidence of two glacial stages.5 In America, N. S. Shaler in 1889 presented evidence in New England of at least two ice sheet advances.6 In Europe, Albrecht Penck and Eduard Bruckner in 1909 noted remnants of four sets of river terraces in the outwash gravels in the northern foothill valleys of the Alps. These terraces can be correlated by their hydraulic heights. In Penk’s scheme, each accorded to a major advance of an otherwise diminishing ice sheet and so youngest is the lowest and oldest
    [Show full text]
  • Bolles, Edmund Blair. the Ice Finders: How a Poet, a Professor, and a Politician Discovered the Ice Age
    Index (unpublished) by Helene S. Ferranti to: Bolles, Edmund Blair. The Ice Finders: How a Poet, a Professor, and a Politician Discovered the Ice Age. Washington, DC: Counterpoint, 1999. A Alps origin, 65, 73, 87, 217, 221 Adams, Henry, 214 Amazon River expedition, Agassiz's, 238-39 the Advance (ship) American Geographical and Statistical Society, 7 cannabalized for fuel, 132, 134, 169 anticatastrophism, Lyell's, 38, 51, 73, 115, 143, Melville Bay crossing by, 45-48 180-81 rat infestation of, 131-32 Association of German Naturalists, 107 retreat party's return trips to, 170-71, 176 Agassiz, Alexander, 52 B Agassiz, Cécile, 42, 51-52, 178 Baker, Jefferson, death of, 98 Agassiz, Louis Beaumont, Élie de, catastrophism and, 89-90, beliefs/opinions: on catastrophism, 71-73, 222 87, 179-83, 235; on Beechy Island escape party, 102 creation/extinction of species, 29, Ben Nevis, 120-21, 122, 234 71-72, 89, 179-83, 184, 215-16, 235, Bex potholes, 52-53, 59 237-38; on drift theory, 53-59, 66; Bible, 198, 203 on evolution, 29, 181; religious, 29, biblical flood, 40, 93, 108-9 214-17, 239, 241 blocks of Monthey, 59, 115 character/personality: as fact-lover, 69-70, See also erratic boulders 239; thin skin of, 151; work habits, Bonaparte, Charles-Lucien, 109 27, 41, 59, 113, 217, 239 boulders, erratic. See erratic boulders early years: background, 25-27; as Cuvier Braun, Cécile. See Agassiz, Cecile protegé, 14-15, 25, 38; fossil fish Brazilian glacier theory, 239-40 investigations, 25, 28, 37-38, 40-41, Bridgewater treatise, 75, 107-9 51; marriage to Cécile (née Braun), British Association for the Advancement of 42, 51-52, 178; Neuchâtel Science, 117-19, 177, 179-81 appointment, 25-26; Neuchâtel Buch, Leopold von.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arkansas Valley Its Water
    BROCHURE NO. 5 THE FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS WATER PROJECT AND ITS STRUCTURE OF THE ARKANSAS VALLEY JS ITS WATER THE FUTURE OF ITS WATER IS THE SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO vVater C o n servancy Dis tric t LEGAL ACiEHCY FOR FRY - ARK WATER PROJECT P 0. BOX A40 • 905 HIWAY 50 WEST • PUEBLO COLORADO 81001 The headquarters for the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District is located ot 905 Highway 50 West in Pueblo, Colorado. The District is governed by a Boord of Directors consisting of fifteen men representing all segments of the economy in the Con­ servancy District. These Directors, in behalf of the nearly 400,000 citizens who live within the confines of the District, have assumed the responsibility of repaying a large shore of the reimbursable portion of the Project through the sale of imported Project water, storage fees for native water in the East Slope Reservoirs, and the sole of native water stored and not used within a specific period. The District, os provided by low levies on od volorem lox an­ nually which becomes port of the repayment pro­ gram. LOCATION THE PROJECT AND THE DISTRICT The Fryingpon-Arkonsas Project is located in central and southeastern Colorado. The collection and The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy diversion area is located in o mountainous and primi District , embracing the irrigable lands and munici­ tive oreo above on elevation of 10,000 feet on the polities of the Arkansas River Basin within the Proj­ headwaters of the Fryingpon and Roaring Fork ect oreo) was created in 1958 under the Colorado Rivers on the West Slope of the Continental Divide Water Conservancy District Statutes for developing in Pitkin and Eagle Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Leasing in the Lower Arkansas Valley
    DEVELOPMENT OF LAND FALLOWING- WATER LEASING IN THE LOWER ARKANSAS VALLEY (2002 through mid-2011) Sugar City (2011) JUNE 30, 2011 La Junta (2011) REPORT FOR THE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Formerly irrigated land below Colorado Canal (2011) Peter D. Nichols 1120 Lincoln Street • Suite 1600 Denver, Colorado 80203-2141 303-861-1963 [email protected] Currently irrigated land on the Ft. Lyon Canal ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed to the formation of the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District, and subsequent incorporation of the Lower Arkansas Valley Super Ditch Company, Inc. These included Leroy Mauch (Prowers County Commissioner), Lynden Gill (Bent County Commissioner), John Singletary, Loretta Kennedy (Pueblo County Commissioner), Ollie Ridley, Bill Long (Bent County Commissioner), Bob Bauserman, Kevin Karney and Jake Klein (Otero County Commissioners), John Rose, and H. Barton Mendenhall, as well as current and former board members and staff of the District Pete Moore (current Chair), Melissa Esquibel (Secretary), Wayne Whittaker (Treasurer), Anthony Nunez (Director), Reeves Brown (Director), and Jay Winner (General Manager) and current and former Board members of the Company, John Schweizer (President), Dale Mauch (Vice‐ President), Burt Heckman (Secretary), Frank Melinski (Treasurer), Mike Barolo, Donny Hansen, Joel Lundquist, Lee Schweizer and Ray Smith. Many also contributed to the preparation of this report. Veronique Van Gheem, Esq., initially drafted Parts 2, 3 and 4 while a law student at CU, and graciously assisted in revisions after graduation. Anthony van Westrum, Esq., Anthony van Westrum, LLC; Denis Clanahan, Esq., Clanahan, Beck & Bean; and, Tom McMahon, Esq., Jones & Keller drafted the sections on the corporate organization, taxation, and antitrust issues respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial Geology of New York City and Vicinity, P
    Sanders, J. E., and Merguerian, Charles, 1994b, The glacial geology of New York City and vicinity, p. 93-200 in A. I. Benimoff, ed., The Geology of Staten Island, New York, Field guide and proceedings, The Geological Association of New Jersey, XI Annual Meeting, 296 p. John E. Sanders* and Charles Merguerian Department of Geology 114 Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11549 *Office address: 145 Palisade St. Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 ABSTRACT The fundamental question pertaining to the Pleistocene features of the New York City region is: "Did one glacier do it all? or was more than one glacier involved?" Prior to Fuller's (1914) monographic study of Long Island's glacial stratigraphy, the one-glacier viewpoint of T. C. Chamberlin and R. D. Salisbury predominated. In Fuller's classification scheme, he included products of 4 glacial advances. In 1936, MacClintock and Richards rejected two of Fuller's key age assignments, and made a great leap backward to the one-glacier interpretation. Subsequently, most geologists have accepted the MacClintock-Richards view and have ignored Fuller's work; during the past half century, the one-glacial concept has become a virtual stampede. What is more, most previous workers have classified Long Island's two terminal- moraine ridges as products of the latest Pleistocene glaciation (i. e., Woodfordian; we shall italicize Pleistocene time terms). Fuller's age assignment was Early Wisconsinan. A few exceptions to the one-glacier viewpoint have been published. In southern CT, Flint (1961) found two tills: an upper Hamden Till with flow indicators oriented NNE-SSW, and a lower Lake Chamberlain Till with flow indicators oriented NNW-SSE, the same two directions of "diluvial currents" shown by Percival (1842).
    [Show full text]
  • A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates by Keith R. Long Open-File Report 91-0579 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1991 Preface In recent years, almost all countries in Latin America have adopted democratic political systems and liberal economic policies. The resulting favorable investment climate has spurred a new wave of North American investment in Latin American mineral resources and has improved cooperation between geoscience organizations on both continents. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has responded to the new situation through cooperative mineral resource investigations with a number of countries in Latin America. These activities are now being coordinated by the USGS's Center for Inter-American Mineral Resource Investigations (CIMRI), recently established in Tucson, Arizona. In the course of CIMRI's work, we have found a need for a compilation of Spanish geological and mining terminology that goes beyond the few Spanish-English geological dictionaries available. Even geologists who are fluent in Spanish often encounter local terminology oijerga that is unfamiliar. These terms, which have grown out of five centuries of mining tradition in Latin America, and frequently draw on native languages, usually cannot be found in standard dictionaries. There are, of course, many geological terms which can be recognized even by geologists who speak little or no Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
    Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Water Year 2014 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2015 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT WATER YEAR 2014 OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. PROJECT FEATURES IN OPERATION DURING WY2014 ........................................... 2 III. HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND WEATHER EVENTS IN WY2014 ...................... 5 IV. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS DURING WY2014 ........................................................ 8 APPENDIX A: WY2014 TABLES 1. Ruedi Reservoir Operations .................................................................................................. 19 2. Ruedi Reservoir Releases for Contracts .............................................................................. 20 3. Ruedi Reservoir Releases for Endangered Fish ................................................................... 21 4. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Transmountain Diversions ...................................................... 28 5. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Imports - Charles H. Boustead Tunnel Outlet ....................... 29 6. Turquoise Lake Operations ................................................................................................... 31 7. Twin Lakes/Mt. Elbert Forebay Operations .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Glossary of Geomorphology
    International Association of Geomorphologists Association Internationale des Géomorphologues ALPHABETICAL GLOSSARY OF GEOMORPHOLOGY Version 1.0 Prepared for the IAG by Andrew Goudie, July 2014 Suggestions for corrections and additions should be sent to [email protected] Abime A vertical shaft in karstic (limestone) areas Ablation The wasting and removal of material from a rock surface by weathering and erosion, or more specifically from a glacier surface by melting, erosion or calving Ablation till Glacial debris deposited when a glacier melts away Abrasion The mechanical wearing down, scraping, or grinding away of a rock surface by friction, ensuing from collision between particles during their transport in wind, ice, running water, waves or gravity. It is sometimes termed corrosion Abrasion notch An elongated cliff-base hollow (typically 1-2 m high and up to 3m recessed) cut out by abrasion, usually where breaking waves are armed with rock fragments Abrasion platform A smooth, seaward-sloping surface formed by abrasion, extending across a rocky shore and often continuing below low tide level as a broad, very gently sloping surface (plain of marine erosion) formed by long-continued abrasion Abrasion ramp A smooth, seaward-sloping segment formed by abrasion on a rocky shore, usually a few meters wide, close to the cliff base Abyss Either a deep part of the ocean or a ravine or deep gorge Abyssal hill A small hill that rises from the floor of an abyssal plain. They are the most abundant geomorphic structures on the planet Earth, covering more than 30% of the ocean floors Abyssal plain An underwater plain on the deep ocean floor, usually found at depths between 3000 and 6000 m.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Northern Ice Shield to the Alpine Glaciations a Quaternary Field Trip Through Germany
    DEUQUA excursions Edited by Daniela Sauer From the northern ice shield to the Alpine glaciations A Quaternary field trip through Germany GEOZON From the northern ice shield to the Alpine glaciations Preface Daniela Sauer The 10-day field trip described in this excursion guide was organized by a group of members of DEUQUA (Deutsche Quartärvereinigung = German Quaternary Union), coordinated by DEUQUA president Margot Böse. The tour was offered as a pre-congress field trip of the INQUA Congress in Bern, Switzerland, 21– 27 July 2011. Finally, the excursion got cancelled because not enough participants had registered. Apparently, many people were interested in the excursion but did not book it because of the high costs related to the 10-day trip. Because of the general interest, we decided nevertheless to finish the excursion guide. The route of the field trip follows a section through Germany from North to South, from the area of the Northern gla- ciation, to the Alpine glacial advances. It includes several places of historical importance, where milestones in Quaternary research have been achieved in the past, as well as new interesting sites where results of recent research is presented. The field trip starts at Greifswald in the very North-East of Germany. The first day is devoted to the Pleistocene and Ho- locene Evolution of coastal NE Germany. The Baltic coast with its characteristic cliffs provides excellent exposures showing the Late Pleistocene and Holocene stratigraphy and glaciotectonics. The most spectacular cliffs that are located on the island of Rügen, the largest island of Germany (926 km2) are shown.
    [Show full text]