The Arkansas Valley Its Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Arkansas Valley Its Water BROCHURE NO. 5 THE FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS WATER PROJECT AND ITS STRUCTURE OF THE ARKANSAS VALLEY JS ITS WATER THE FUTURE OF ITS WATER IS THE SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO vVater C o n servancy Dis tric t LEGAL ACiEHCY FOR FRY - ARK WATER PROJECT P 0. BOX A40 • 905 HIWAY 50 WEST • PUEBLO COLORADO 81001 The headquarters for the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District is located ot 905 Highway 50 West in Pueblo, Colorado. The District is governed by a Boord of Directors consisting of fifteen men representing all segments of the economy in the Con­ servancy District. These Directors, in behalf of the nearly 400,000 citizens who live within the confines of the District, have assumed the responsibility of repaying a large shore of the reimbursable portion of the Project through the sale of imported Project water, storage fees for native water in the East Slope Reservoirs, and the sole of native water stored and not used within a specific period. The District, os provided by low levies on od volorem lox an­ nually which becomes port of the repayment pro­ gram. LOCATION THE PROJECT AND THE DISTRICT The Fryingpon-Arkonsas Project is located in central and southeastern Colorado. The collection and The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy diversion area is located in o mountainous and primi District , embracing the irrigable lands and munici­ tive oreo above on elevation of 10,000 feet on the polities of the Arkansas River Basin within the Proj­ headwaters of the Fryingpon and Roaring Fork ect oreo) was created in 1958 under the Colorado Rivers on the West Slope of the Continental Divide Water Conservancy District Statutes for developing in Pitkin and Eagle Counties. The service area of the and administrating the Fryingpon-Arkonsos Project Project is located in the Arkansas River Basin on the (see Brochure No 1 ). East Slope of the Continental D,v,de in lake, Chof. fee, Fremont, ?ueblo, El Paso, Otero, Crowley, Bent, The Fryingpon Arkansas Water Project began os Prowers and K,owo Counties. The headwaters of the a dream many years ago, when o few visionary men Arkansas R·ver lie above timberline in the h'gh and women realized the seriousness of water. They mountains near leadvi le . The river then flows south set about studying the water lows of Colorado; the and east through canyons and foothills to the gently amounts of water to which the citizens of this Stole rolling high plo ns of eastern Colorado. The Arkansas were legally entitled, but which they were not using; River in Colorado stretches 340 miles from the Roc­ the engineering involved in making this water avail­ ky Mountains to the Colorodo-Konsos boundary and able to the citizens of Colorado; and the procedures comprises and oreo of 26, 150 square miles or ap­ to be followed in making their dreams o reality. proximately one fourth of the total area of the Stole. They sifted reams of information, held countless ln­ Stote and Out of-Stole meetings, and finally deter­ The Project headquarters is 1ocated in the First mined the Fryingpon Project was the best way to get National Bank Building in the C,ty of Pueblo. Other Colorado and Arkansas River water for the present principal Cities in the East Slope Project area ore and future citizens of this semi-arid Arkansas Volley. Leadville, Bueno Vista, Salido, Canon Cty, Colorado Sprngs, Rocky Ford, Lo Junta and Los Animas. On August 16, 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed the Bill , passed earlier by the Congress of the HISTORY OF THE AREA Un ited States, creating the Fryingpon Arkansas Proj­ ect. The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy The Arkansas River Basin was first explored by D strict become the legal agency responsible for the the Spanish from 1760 to 1780. The first official ex­ repoyment of the reimbursable portion of this multi­ ploration by the United States was made in 1806 by million dollar, mu ti-purpose Project. The information Lt. Zebulon Pike. later explorations were directed by contoined in this, and other Brochures, expla·n the Captain John C. Fremont and Captain John W. critical role being performed by the District and the Gunnison. The first permonent settlements were es­ serious responsibilities which have been imposed upon tablished after the discovery of gold in 1859. In the the fifteen men who serve os Directors for this ensuing years, o large influx of settlers to the Arkan· agency. 2 sos Valley occurred. Most were gold seekers of the "Pikes Peak or Bust" gold rush. A few were successful in their search, however, most of them went "busted". Many took up farming in the Arkansas River Valley in support of the mining industry. Permanent settle­ ments were established and the era of irrigation development began. The second major development in the Valley was ' the introduction of cattle. In 1862, John W. Prowers imported 100 head of cattle into the Valley. Because of his success in the cattle business, large herds were imported from Texas. By the end of October 1870, over 30,000 head of Texas cattle were in the Arkan­ sas region and 10,000 were reported to have been driven into Pueblo in the first ten days of November, 1870. The agricultural industry of the Arkansas Valley was firmly established at the start of the Twentieth Century. IRRIGATED ONIONS PHYSICAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Climate OF THE AREA The climate in the Project area ranges from sub­ humid in the high mountains to semi-arid in the lower Ir rig ation Development elevations. On the Western Slope in the collection area, the mean annual precipitation is 20 inches and Irrigation in the Arkansas Volley has grown steadily in importance since its introduction. Available the average temperature is 36.6 degrees Fahrenheit. stream runoff was utilized at the outset. But, as This is in contrast wirh the City of Pueblo on the markets developed and irrigation farming increased, Eastern Slope with a mean annual precipitation of the demand for late season water could not be sup­ 11.67 inches and average temperature of 5 2 degrees Fahrenheit. plied by unregulated streamflow. As a result, farmer­ owned mutual irrigation companies were formed. The average normal precipitation throughout the These companies constructed 15 reservoirs having a fifteen County region in the Arkansas River Drainage total storage capacity of 800,000 acre-feet, and 8 is approximately 13.66 inches per year. It is of interest transmountain diversion systems importing approxi­ to note what an average annual precipitation of mately 50,000 acre-feet of water annually. 13.66 inches mean to the Arkansas Valley. If it were possible to contain all of the average annual precipi­ The amount of irrigation water available in the tation which falls in the Arkansas Valley, and prevent Project area varies considerably from year to year. any from evaporating or leaving the Valley by The average flow of the Arkansas River at Pueblo streams, underground rivers, or other means, such is approximately 750 second-feet. The total adjudi­ m?i~ture would provide a total of approximately 18 cated direct flow rights on the main stem from the m,11,on acre-feet for use in the region. Temperature headwaters to the State line amount to 7,400 second­ and water usuage are closely related. Based upon the feet. Shortages as high as 78 percent of crop re­ 1963 water-use records from six communities in the quirement hove occured. Arkansas Valley, 78 percent of the total water used in the six communities was consumed during the Agricultural Products warmer months and 22 percent during the cooler The principal crops grown in the area of the winter months. The average monthly use during the Fryingpan-Arkansos Project ore alfalfa, corn, sor­ wa~mer part of the year was 15.3 million gallons, ghum and sugar beets. Specialty crops such as onions, while the cooler months averaged approximately 6.2 million gallons. beans, tomatoes and melons, ore grown extensively in the area. The farms within the Arksonsos Volley Evaporation is an important factor in the water hove a good balance between crop and livestock resource management of the region. A surprising farming. quantity of water is lost back to the atmosphere 3 4 through evaporation, and this amount varies in close gotion, municipal and industrial water, power, flood relationship to the different areas in t~e r~gion. control, fish and wildlife, recreation, and sediment Records indicate that the annual evaporation 1n the control. Arkansas Valley region ranges from 62 inches in the Eastern Counties to approximately 26.5 inches at The Project involves a transmountain diversion Turquoise Reservoir near Leadville. of water, thus requiring features on both the East and West Slopes of the Continental Divide. Water Population from the Colorado River Ba sin will be diverted for beneficial and consumptive uses in the Arkansas River Population of the Arkansas Valley has grown Basin in Colorado. The imported water, together with steadily, especially the Cities of Pueblo and Colorado regulated native Arkansas River water, will provide Springs. Pueblo's population was 52, 162 in 194? ~nd supplemental irrigation, municipal and industrial 91,181 in 1960. Colorado Springs has had a s1m1lar water, and enable power generation. Flood control growth rate going from 36,789 in 1940 to 70, 194 in will be provided by Pueblo Reservoir on the Arkansas 1960. Current estimated population for Colorado River immediately above Pueblo, Colorado. (See Springs and Pueblo is over 100,000 each. The popu­ Brochure No. 2) lation of the nine counties in which the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District is located has grown from a population of 204,465 in 1940 to REPAYMENT OF COSTS 342, 189 in 1960.
Recommended publications
  • Water Leasing in the Lower Arkansas Valley
    DEVELOPMENT OF LAND FALLOWING- WATER LEASING IN THE LOWER ARKANSAS VALLEY (2002 through mid-2011) Sugar City (2011) JUNE 30, 2011 La Junta (2011) REPORT FOR THE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Formerly irrigated land below Colorado Canal (2011) Peter D. Nichols 1120 Lincoln Street • Suite 1600 Denver, Colorado 80203-2141 303-861-1963 [email protected] Currently irrigated land on the Ft. Lyon Canal ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed to the formation of the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District, and subsequent incorporation of the Lower Arkansas Valley Super Ditch Company, Inc. These included Leroy Mauch (Prowers County Commissioner), Lynden Gill (Bent County Commissioner), John Singletary, Loretta Kennedy (Pueblo County Commissioner), Ollie Ridley, Bill Long (Bent County Commissioner), Bob Bauserman, Kevin Karney and Jake Klein (Otero County Commissioners), John Rose, and H. Barton Mendenhall, as well as current and former board members and staff of the District Pete Moore (current Chair), Melissa Esquibel (Secretary), Wayne Whittaker (Treasurer), Anthony Nunez (Director), Reeves Brown (Director), and Jay Winner (General Manager) and current and former Board members of the Company, John Schweizer (President), Dale Mauch (Vice‐ President), Burt Heckman (Secretary), Frank Melinski (Treasurer), Mike Barolo, Donny Hansen, Joel Lundquist, Lee Schweizer and Ray Smith. Many also contributed to the preparation of this report. Veronique Van Gheem, Esq., initially drafted Parts 2, 3 and 4 while a law student at CU, and graciously assisted in revisions after graduation. Anthony van Westrum, Esq., Anthony van Westrum, LLC; Denis Clanahan, Esq., Clanahan, Beck & Bean; and, Tom McMahon, Esq., Jones & Keller drafted the sections on the corporate organization, taxation, and antitrust issues respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
    Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Water Year 2014 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2015 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT WATER YEAR 2014 OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. PROJECT FEATURES IN OPERATION DURING WY2014 ........................................... 2 III. HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND WEATHER EVENTS IN WY2014 ...................... 5 IV. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS DURING WY2014 ........................................................ 8 APPENDIX A: WY2014 TABLES 1. Ruedi Reservoir Operations .................................................................................................. 19 2. Ruedi Reservoir Releases for Contracts .............................................................................. 20 3. Ruedi Reservoir Releases for Endangered Fish ................................................................... 21 4. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Transmountain Diversions ...................................................... 28 5. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Imports - Charles H. Boustead Tunnel Outlet ....................... 29 6. Turquoise Lake Operations ................................................................................................... 31 7. Twin Lakes/Mt. Elbert Forebay Operations .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Water-Systems Operations in the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado
    DESCRIPTION OF WATER-SYSTEMS OPERATIONS IN THE ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, COLORADO By P.O. Abbott U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4092 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT and the U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Lakewood, Colorado 1985 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Colorado District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey, MS 415 Western Distribution Branch Box 25046, Denver Federal Center U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 Lakewood, CO 80225 Box 25425, Denver Federal Center or Denver, CO 80225 Pueblo Subdistrict Chief Telephone (303) 236-7476 U.S. Geological Survey P.O. Box 1524 Pueblo, CO 81002 CONTENTS Page Glossary----------------- ---------------------------------------------- v Abstract---------------------------------------------- ----------------- i Introduction---- ------------------------------------ _________________ i Location of study area-------- ___-_________--------------_-_------ i Purpose and scope------------------------ ------ _________________ 3 Acknowledgments---------------------------------- _________________ 4 Geographic setting------- --------- ________________ _________________ 4 Population---------------------------------------------- -_-__----_ 4 Physiography and climate------------------------ ------------- --- 4 Drainage---------------------- ------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Cultural Resource Overview of the Bureau of Land Management’S Royal Gorge Field Office, Eastern Colorado
    Synthetic Cultural Resource Overview of the Bureau of Land Management’s Royal Gorge Field Office, Eastern Colorado by Rand A. Greubel, Jack E. Pfertsh, Charles A. Reed, Michael J. Prouty, Sara A. Millward, Jeremy Omvig, Jaclyn Mullen, Matthew J. Landt, and Jonathon C. Horn Principal Investigator: Rand A. Greubel Submitted by Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 2075 Montrose, Colorado 81402 (970) 249-6761 Prepared for Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office 3028 East Main Street Cañon City, CO 81212 Order No. 1422 L14PX01241 March 2017 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................... 1 Southern Rocky Mountains............................................................................................... 1 The Great Plains Province ................................................................................................ 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................... 7 The Paleoindian Stage ................................................................................................................................ 8 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • Rec-Erc-75-5 Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution In
    REC-ERC-75-5 ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS POLLUTION IN THE UPPER ARKANSAS RIVER OF COLORADO By J. F. LaBounty J. J. Sartoris L. D. Klein E. F. Monk H. A. Salman September 1975 Applied Sciences Branch Division of General Research Engineering and Research Center Denver, Colorado UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR * BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT Funding and support for this project were provided by the Lower Missouri Region and the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project of the Bureau of Reclamation. Research was performed under the supervision of T. E. Backstrom, Head, Physical Sciences and Chemical Engineering Section; T. R. Bartley, former Head, Environmental Sciences Section, (now retired); and L. 0. Timblin, Jr., Chief, Applied Sciences Branch. This report was developed as a result of a study requested by the Bureau of Reclamation's Lower Missouri Region and Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. Dr. D. A. Hoffman, formerly of the Bureau of Reclamation; and L. M. Finnell of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, were the sources of unpublished data from 1971 to 1973 included in this report. D. L. Gallat of Colorado State University identified invertebrates collected in 1974, and calculated indices from these collections. Personnel from the Colorado Division of Wildlife and Dr. Eric Bergersen of the Fish and Wildlife Service Colorado Cooperative Fishery Unit at Colorado State University assisted in collecting fish. Special thanks to Mr. Homer Huntsinger, the property owner, and the American Sportsman Club, who lease the land, for allowing samples to be obtained at station AR-9. The information in this report regarding commercial products or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes, and is not be be construed as endorsement of any product or firm by the Bureau of Reclamation.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPA--Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Environmental Assessment Agriculture Forest Service Tennessee Creek Project December 2013 Leadville Ranger District, San Isabel National Forest Lake County, Colorado Eagle - Holy Cross Ranger District, White River National Forest Eagle County, Colorado Mt. Zion looking towards Turquoise Lake. Photo by J. Windorski For More Information Contact: Tami Conner, District Ranger Leadville Ranger District 810 Front Street Leadville, CO 80461 719-486-0749 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment
    Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment A cooperative effort of the: USDI Bureau of Land Management USDI Bureau of Reclamation USDA Forest Service Colorado Department of Natural Resources Edited by Roy E. Smith and Linda M. Hill Though this document was produced through an interagency effort, the following BLM number has been assigned for tracking and administrative purposes: BLM/RS/ST-00/002+7200 Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment A cooperative effort of the: USDI Bureau of Land Management USDI Bureau of Reclamation USDA Forest Service Colorado Department of Natural Resources Edited by: Roy E. Smith and Linda M. Hill July 2000 Letter to Arkansas River Stakeholders The agencies that conducted this study and created tions, but rather, is only an information base for this report are jointly responsible, subject to exist- agency and public deliberations. The agencies ing rights, for managing the Arkansas River cor- recognize that our river management decisions are ridor and its associated reservoirs between Leadville limited by the necessity to supply water for domes- and Pueblo Reservoir. In 1993, these agencies tic, agricultural, and other uses in the basin consis- signed a memorandum of understanding with the tent with existing water rights held by water users. goal of creating a scientific foundation for river The cooperating agencies have a renewed commit- management processes. The outcome was a 6-year ment to work cooperatively with water users to study that resulted in agreement among the agen- fulfill legal entitlements to water deliveries while cies on the facts and assumptions that should be managing the river in a way that supports natural used in making river management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
    Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Jedediah S. Rogers Bureau of Reclamation 2006 Table of Contents Fryingpan-Arkansas Project .....................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History ....................................................15 Management and Uses of Project Water.....................................29 Conclusion............................................................32 About the Author .............................................................33 Bibliography ................................................................34 Government Documents .................................................34 Secondary Works .......................................................34 Unpublished Works .....................................................35 Index ......................................................................36 1 Fryingpan-Arkansas Project The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, or Fry-Ark as it is popularly known, is one of Colorado’s largest and most complicated Reclamation projects, second only to Colorado-Big Thompson. Like the CBT, the Fry-Ark is a transmontane diversion project, delivering water from the snowy slopes west of the Continental Divide to the thirsty fields, municipalities, and industries of the Arkansas River Valley. The diversion of water from the western slope across
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for the Bureau of Reclamation, Volume I: Section One: Summary of Findings, Section Two: Case Studies
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 1996 Restoring the West's Waters: Opportunities for the Bureau of Reclamation, Volume I: Section One: Summary of Findings, Section Two: Case Studies Lawrence J. MacDonnell Teresa A. Rice Judith Jacobsen University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Restoring the West’s Waters: Opportunities for the Bureau of Reclamation, Volume I: Section One: Summary of Findings, Section Two: Case Studies (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1996). RESTORING THE WEST’S WATERS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, VOLUME I: SECTION ONE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, SECTION TWO: CASE STUDIES (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1996). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. DRAFT DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Tate: 11:40Am REOSTG W10290 7/24MEM ORNDIR. 0 MIR TR11 IB ©1 111 MON VOLUME I SECTION ONE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SECTION TWO: CASE STUDIES Natural Resources Law Center February 1996 locations in the basin. The legislation provides some financial incentives to encourage adoption of more efficient water use practices. While the expenditure of funds is authorized under this bill, no funds have yet been appropriated and there is some question whether they will be.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Conservation and Management Plan
    2017 Conservation and Management Plan Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District www.secwcd.com Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District 2017 Water Conservaon and Management Plan 2 Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District 2017 Water Conservaon and Management Plan INSIDE . Introduction Page 4 Water Development History Project History Pages 5-7 District History Page 7 Enterprise Projects Page 8 Fry-Ark Diversions Page 9 Municipal Allocations Page 10 Municipal Conservation Pages 11-12 Major Conduits Page 13 Agricultural Benefits Pages 14-15 District Conservation Activities Water Storage, Supply Page 16 Water, Return Flow Sales Page 17 Conservation Outreach Page 18 Ark Basin Roundtable Page 19 Invasive Species Page 20 Weather Monitoring Page 21 Cooperative Programs Pages 22-24 Colorado River Issues Page 25 Watershed Health Page 26 Resource Management Page 27 Index of Appendices Pages 28-29 Next Steps Page 30 Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District 2017 Water Conservaon and Management Plan 3 2017 WATER CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN he Southeastern Colorado Water Con- T servancy District was formed in 1958 pri- marily to develop and administer the Fryingpan- Arkansas Project. The Project is rooted deeply in the history of the region, contemplated as early as 1925 when farmers and businesses in the Arkan- sas Valley looked to the other side of the Conti- nental Divide to gain supplemental water supplies in a basin where claims to water often outstripped availability. The need to use water W wisely to sustain . W agriculture, de- velop industry, build cities, and , preserve the en- . vironment is cen- Mission statement of SECWCD Public Law 87‐590 author‐ tral to the mis- ized the Secretary of Interi‐ sion of the Dis- or to “construct, operate trict.
    [Show full text]