DOCSLIB.ORG

Competition Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Competition Policy ISSN 1025-2266 COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER EC COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER Editors: 2008 Æ NUMBER 3 Inge Bernaerts Kevin Coates Published three times a year by the Thomas Deisenhofer Competition Directorate-General of the European Commission Address: European Commission, Also available online: J-70, 04/136 http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cpn/ Brussel B-1049 Bruxelles E-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://ec.europa.eu/ competition/index_en.html I N S I D E : • The design of competition policy institutions for the 21st century by Philip Lowe • The new State aid General Block Exemption Regulation • The new Guidelines on the application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to the maritime sector • The new settlement procedure in selected cartel cases • The CISAC decision • The Hellenic Shipyards decision: Limits to the application of Article 296 and indemnification provision in privatisation contracts MAIN DEVELOPMENTS ON • Antitrust — Cartels — Merger control — State aid control EUROPEAN COMMISSION Contents Articles 1 The design of competition policy institutions for the 21st century — the experience of the European Commission and DG Competition by Philip LOWE 12 The General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER): bigger, simpler and more economic by Harold NYSSENS 19 Rolling back regulation in the telecoms sector: a practical example by Ágnes SZARKA 25 The new Guidelines on the application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to the maritime sector by Carsten BERMIG and Cyril RITTER 30 The new settlement procedure in selected cartel cases by María Luisa TIERNO CENTELLA Opinions and comments 37 The importance of access to fuels for competition in the electricity sector: the case of lignite in Greece by Philippe CHAUVE and Polyvios PANAYIDES 41 Approved guarantee methods for regional aid or de-minimis aid — the German and the Hungarian example by Rolf TUCHHARDT, András TARI and Christophe GALAND 48 Economic analysis in vertical mergers by Raphaël DE CONINCK Antitrust 53 The CISAC decision — creating competition between collecting societies for music rights by Alain ANDRIES and Bruno JULIEN-MALVY Cartels 57 Recent cartel cases — Sodium Chlorate and Aluminium Fluoride by Anna TISSOT-FAVRE, Andrej KRÁLIK, Tiina PITKÄNEN and Petr ŠOCHMAN Merger control 61 Mergers: Main developments between 1 May and 31 August 2008 by Mary LOUGHRAN and John GATTI 70 Digital maps go vertical: TomTom/Tele Atlas and Nokia/NAVTEQ by Carles ESTEVA MOSSO, Michal MOTTL, Raphaël DE CONINCK and Franck DUPONT 75 Rewe/Adeg — Food for thought — Austrian markets for daily consumer goods by Michael KÖNIG, Yvonne SIMON, Emmanuel TERRASSE and Sandra KIJEWSKI State aid 81 Funding of public service broadcasting and State aid rules — two recent cases in Belgium and Ireland by Nóra TOSICS, Ronald VAN DE VEN and Alexander RIEDL 85 The principle of incentive effect applied to training aid — Some recent cases by Loredana VON BUTTLAR and Salim MEDGHOUL 89 The Hellenic Shipyards decision: Limits to the application of Article 296 and indemnification provision in privatisation contracts by Christophe GALAND 95 Information section © European Communities, 2008 Reproduction is authorised, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Requests for commercial reproduction should be sent to: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Author Services Unit, ‘Licences & Copyright’ 2, rue Mercier. L-2985 Luxembourg. Fax: (352) 29 29 42755. E-mail: [email protected] The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission. Responsibility for the information and views expressed lies entirely with the authors. Competition Policy Newsletter The design of competition policy institutions for the 21st century — ARTICLES the experience of the European Commission and DG Competition (1) by Philip LOWE (2) I. Introduction () () the European Union. It is this College of Commis- sioners that, on a proposal of the Commissioner for All competition policy and enforcement systems Competition, adopts final decisions in individual consist of essentially two components: the legal competition cases as well as on policy documents instruments (‘rules’) governing both substance, such as guidelines and notices, and legislative pro- competences and procedure, and the adminis- posals to the Council. On the basis of a delegation trative structures and processes through which of powers from the College (so-called empower- the legal instruments are implemented. Each of ment), the Commissioner for Competition can these is necessary for the success of the system as herself directly adopt certain preparatory or inter- a whole. Good rules remain a dead letter if there is mediary acts such as a Statement of Objections, no efficiently run organisation with the processes as well as final decisions in less important cases, to implement them. Conversely an efficiently man- such as a merger dealt with under ‘simplified’ pro- aged authority cannot compensate for fundamen- cedure. The decisions taken by the College and tal flaws in the rules which it is to implement. the Commissioner are prepared and implemented The analysis and design of these components by one of the departments of the Commission, in are also interdependent. The management of the case of competition, the Directorate General the processes within the organisation has to be for Competition, which currently has around 800 adapted to the rules which it has to apply. And the staff. rules must be shaped in a way that they can be I do not intend in the remaining sections of this implemented within the real world constraints to article to give further attention to the classical which the organisation is subject — such as lim- institutional issue of the degree of independence ited resources. of a competition authority, and in particular of Academic attention focuses mainly on the legal the Commission as a competition authority. How- instruments and not so much on the organisa- ever some remarks on our general approach to tional side. One reason for this is probably that this question may be useful. competition policy and enforcement is still mainly The European Commission finds itself in a sub- a subject for lawyers. Another reason could be stantially different position to a national author- that it is not easy for outsiders to obtain detailed ity. In the first place, its institutional independ- and comprehensive information about the inte- ence should not be in question. As reflected in the rior workings of a competition authority. Finally, EU treaties, its independence from national and it is perhaps assumed that the management of a political interests is fundamental to its mission of competition authority does not pose any different promoting the ‘common interest’ of the European challenge than the management of other public Union as a whole. or private institutions with a comparable mission and size. Secondly, the Commission has delegated fully its powers to investigate a case, and manage the due Before starting I need to make a preliminary point process, to DG Competition. The Commissioner that will be obvious to many, but which is none for Competition is in addition empowered to take the less important. The competition authority in decisions on cases and problems which raise no the European Union is not DG Competition, but significant policy issue. These arrangements offer the European Commission. The European Com- a solid guarantee of the integrity and impartial- mission is a collegiate institution composed of ity of investigations and their conclusions, while 27 Commissioners from the 27 Member States of reserving all key decisions on cases and policy for the college of Commissioners as a whole. (1) This is an abridged version of an article to be published in Competition Policy in the EU: Fifty Years On from Thirdly, a competition authority certainly needs to the Treaty of Rome. Editor: Professor Xavier Vives. be independent and impartial. But it should not be Oxford University Press, Forthcoming 2009 isolated or uninformed. It needs to be fully aware (2) Director General of the Directorate-General for Compe- tition at the European Commission. The views expressed of the market and regulatory environment around are personal to the author and do not necessarily reflect competition law enforcement. And it needs to be those of the European Commission. in a position to influence legislators and regula- Number 3 — 2008 1 Articles tors, particularly when competition problems can tive powers to gather relevant data and to set be better addressed by new or amended regula- priorities and focus its use of its legal instru- tion. This only underlines the advantage for EU ments accordingly. competition policy of having the work of the Competition Commissioner and DG Competition (2) The enforcement system must be designed in fully embedded within the Commission. Finally it a way that guarantees coherence and predict- is worth underlining again that the Commission ability for business: coherence ensures equal as an institution, and not just DG Competition, treatment. Predictability allows firms to plan retains the role of Europe’s competition author- for compliance. To achieve this, ex-ante rules ity. and individual enforcement decisions should be based on a common methodology, clear II. How to design a modern and publicised enforcement objectives and an competition policy and enforcement in-depth knowledge of how markets function. Again, there is a certain trade-off between system predictability and the need to deal with each Independently of whether we speak about merger case on its merits. Based on empirical evi- control, antitrust or State aid control, a competi- dence, some structures or conducts have tion authority should ideally intervene at the right almost always produced outcomes which are time, on the right markets, in relation to the right harmful to competition and to consumers. As problems and with the correct remedies. At the a result it may be possible to establish some same time, its intervention should be predictable, clear ex-ante rules which offer a high level of correct, and have a measurable positive impact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Registration Document Annual Financial Report SUMMARY
    2011 Registration Document Annual Financial Report SUMMARY 1 PRESENTATION OF THE GROUP 3 6 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 227 1.1 Main key figures 4 6.1 Information about the Company 228 1.2 The Group’s strategy and general structure 5 6.2 Information about the share capital 232 1.3 Minerals 10 6.3 Shareholding 238 1.4 Minerals for Ceramics, Refractories, 6.4 Elements which could have an impact Abrasives & Foundry 17 in the event of a takeover bid 241 1.5 Performance & Filtration Minerals 26 6.5 Imerys stock exchange information 242 1.6 Pigments for Paper & Packaging 32 6.6 Dividends 244 1.7 Materials & Monolithics 36 6.7 Shareholder relations 244 1.8 Innovation 43 6.8 Parent company/subsidiaries organization 245 1.9 Sustainable Development 48 ORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY REPORTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 65 7 SHAREHOLDERS’ GENERAL MEETING 2 OF APRIL 26, 2012 247 2.1 Board of Directors’ management report 66 2.2 Statutory Auditors' Reports 77 7.1 Presentation of the resolutions by the Board of Directors 248 7.2 Agenda 254 7.3 Draft resolutions 255 3 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 83 3.1 Board of Directors 84 3.2 Executive Management 103 PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 3.3 Compensation 105 8 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT AND THE AUDIT 3.4 Stock options 109 OF ACCOUNTS 261 3.5 Free shares 114 8.1 Person responsible for the Registration Document 262 3.6 Specific terms and restrictions applicable to grants 8.2 Certificate of the person responsible to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 116 for the Registration Document 262 3.7 Corporate officers’ transactions in securities
    [Show full text]
  • Devoir De Vigilance: Reforming Corporate Risk Engagement
    Devoir de Vigilance: Reforming Corporate Risk Engagement Copyright © Development International e.V., 2020 ISBN: 978-3-9820398-5-5 Authors: Juan Ignacio Ibañez, LL.M. Chris N. Bayer, PhD Jiahua Xu, PhD Anthony Cooper, J.D. Title: Devoir de Vigilance: Reforming Corporate Risk Engagement Date published: 9 June 2020 Funded by: iPoint-systems GmbH www.ipoint-systems.com 1 “Liberty consists of being able to do anything that does not harm another.” Article 4, Declaration of the Rights of the Man and of the Citizen of 1789, France 2 Executive Summary The objective of this systematic investigation is to gain a better understanding of how the 134 confirmed in-scope corporations are complying with – and implementing – France’s progressive Devoir de Vigilance law (LOI n° 2017-399 du 27 Mars 2017).1 We ask, in particular, what subject companies are doing to identify and mitigate social and environmental risk/impact factors in their operations, as well as for their subsidiaries, suppliers, and subcontractors. This investigation also aims to determine practical steps taken regarding the requirements of the law, i.e. how the corporations subject to the law are meeting these new requirements. Devoir de Vigilance is at the legislative forefront of the business and human rights movement. A few particular features of the law are worth highlighting. Notably, it: ● imposes a duty of vigilance (devoir de vigilance) which consists of a substantial standard of care and mandatory due diligence, as such distinct from a reporting requirement; ● sets a public reporting requirement for the vigilance plan and implementation report (compte rendu) on top of the substantial duty of vigilance; ● strengthens the accountability of parent companies for the actions of subsidiaries; ● encourages subject companies to develop their vigilance plan in association with stakeholders in society; ● imposes civil liability in case of non-compliance; ● allows stakeholders with a legitimate interest to seek injunctive relief in the case of a violation of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Centre of an Evolving Industrial World
    REGISTRATION AT THE CENTRE DOCUMENT 2011 OF AN EVOLVING INDUSTRIAL WORLD CONTENT 5.6. Major projects 130 1 Group overview 5 5.7. Responsibility for chemicals 133 5.8. Health and Safety 136 1.1. Group profi le 6 5.9. Human Resources 142 1.2. Key fi gures/Comments on the fi nancial year 7 5.10. Assurance report by one of the Statutory 1.3. History and development of the Company 12 Auditors on a selection of environmental, social and safety indicators 151 2 Activities 15 2.1. Group structure 16 6 Financial statements 153 2.2. The Nickel Division 16 6.1. 2011 consolidated fi nancial statements 154 2.3. The Manganese Division 26 6.2. 2011 separate fi nancial statements 233 2.4. Alloys Division 39 6.3. Consolidated fi nancial statements for 2010 2.5. Organisational Structure of ERAMET SA/ and 2009 260 ERAMET Holding company 48 6.4. Dividend policy 260 2.6. Activity of the Divisions in 2011 49 6.5. Fees paid to the Statutory Auditors 261 2.7. Production sites, plant and equipment 51 2.8. Research and Development/Reserves and Resources 52 7 Corporate and 3 share-capital information 263 Risk factors 65 7.1. Market in the Company’s shares 264 3.1. Commodity risk 66 7.2. Share capital 268 3.2. Special relationships with Group partners 66 7.3. Company information 275 3.3. Mining and industrial risks 68 7.4. Shareholders’ agreements 279 3.4. Legal and tax risks/Disputes 71 3.5. Liquidity, market and counterparty risks 73 3.6.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019
    a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA: the Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions
    The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions World Energy Outlook Special Report INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the full spectrum of IEA member countries: Spain energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Sweden coal supply and demand, renewable Austria Switzerland energy technologies, electricity Belgium Turkey markets, energy efficiency, access to Canada United Kingdom energy, demand side management Czech Republic United States and much more. Through its work, the Denmark IEA advocates policies that will Estonia IEA association countries: enhance the reliability, affordability Finland Brazil and sustainability of energy in its 30 France China member countries, 8 association Germany India countries and beyond. Greece Indonesia Hungary Morocco Please note that this publication is Ireland Singapore subject to specific restrictions that Italy South Africa limit its use and distribution. The Japan Thailand terms and conditions are available Korea online at www.iea.org/t&c/ Luxembourg Mexico This publication and any map included herein are Netherlands without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty New Zealand over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the Norway name of any territory, city or area. Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions Foreword Foreword Ever since the International Energy Agency (IEA) was founded in world to anticipate and navigate possible disruptions and avoid 1974 in the wake of severe disruptions to global oil markets that damaging outcomes for our economies and our planet. shook the world economy, its core mission has been to foster secure This special report is the most comprehensive global study of this and affordable energy supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • De Beers' New Strategy
    Personal copy; not for onward transmission De Beers’ new td. pany L strategy om In what is described by its chairman, Instead, it aims to be the ‘supplier of Nicky Oppenheimer, as “one of the choice’. However, it currently sells ron & C most significant developments the dia- about two thirds of the world’s annual mond industry has seen since the supply of rough diamonds, and the Georgian House 1930s”, De Beers this week unveiled a mines that it manages contribute about oeb A 63, Coleman Street new strategy whereby it will abandon 40% of world production. Hence it L London EC2R 5BB Tel :+44 (0)20 7628-1128 its long-held role as custodian of the remains very much the dominant play- REGULATED BY THE SFA diamond market, and focus instead on er, and intends to continue to sell dia- boosting demand. Since the depression monds to selected clients through its years of the 1930s when the price of dia- regular sales or ‘sights’ held roughly monds slumped, De Beers has stock- every five weeks. piled the world’s surplus diamonds as a There will be some marked changes means of controlling supply (and though in how the sights are conducted. prices). Under the new strategy, the At present, they are characterised by stockpile is not being eliminated but it their opacity. The 125 selected will be substantially reduced – to a sightholders or diamantaires – it is esti- working level of around six months’ mated that as many as 900 diaman- supply, equivalent to some US$2.5 bil- taires are on the ‘waiting list’ – have no lion.
    [Show full text]
  • France in the South Pacific Power and Politics
    France in the South Pacific Power and Politics France in the South Pacific Power and Politics Denise Fisher Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fisher, Denise, author. Title: France in the South Pacific : power and politics / Denise Fisher. ISBN: 9781922144942 (paperback) 9781922144959 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: France--Foreign relations--Oceania. Oceania--Foreign relations--France. France--Foreign relations--New Caledonia. New Caledonia--Foreign relations--France. Dewey Number: 327.44095 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2013 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii List of maps, figures and tables . ix Glossary and acronyms . xi Maps . xix Introduction . 1 Part I — France in the Pacific to the 1990s 1. The French Pacific presence to World War II . 13 2. France manages independence demands and nuclear testing 1945–1990s . 47 3 . Regional diplomatic offensive 1980s–1990s . 89 Part II — France in the Pacific: 1990s to present 4. New Caledonia: Implementation of the Noumea Accord and political evolution from 1998 . 99 5. French Polynesia: Autonomy or independence? . 179 6. France’s engagement in the region from the 1990s: France, its collectivities, the European Union and the region .
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Speaker
    Capital Markets Day 13th June 2019 POSITIONING IMERYS FOR PROFITABLE GROWTH Disclaimer More comprehensive information about Imerys may be obtained on its website (www.imerys.com), under Regulated Information, including its Registration Document filed under No. D.19-0175 March 20, 2019 with Autorité des Marchés Financiers. Imerys draws the attention of investors to the “Risk factors and Internal control” set forth in section 4 of the Registration Document. This document contains projections and other forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that such projections and forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties (many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Imerys) that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied. Photo credits: Imerys Photo Library, Reserved Rights, xxx. Capital Markets Day June 13, 2019 2 Capital Markets Day agenda TIME PRESENTATION SPEAKER 9:00am Welcome coffee 9:30am Imerys’ strengths and ambition Conrad KEIJZER – CEO 10:15am Imerys strategy for profitable growth Olivier HAUTIN – CSO 11:00am Break 11:30am Business areas presentations Conrad KEIJZER and SVPs 12:30pm Lunch break 13:30pm Capital allocation to ensure long term value creation Olivier PIROTTE – CFO 14:15pm Closing remarks Conrad KEIJZER – CEO 14:30pm Q&A Capital Markets Day June 13, 2019 3 Imerys’ strengths and ambition Conrad KEIJZER – Chief Executive Officer Capital Markets Day June 13, 2019 4 A new senior leadership team Who you will
    [Show full text]
  • Good Resilience of the Group in 2020, Thanks to Excellent Operational Performance and Strong Cash Generation in the Second Half
    Paris, 16 February 2021, 6:30 p.m. PRESS RELEASE Eramet: Good resilience of the Group in 2020, thanks to excellent operational performance and strong cash generation in the second half • Responsible crisis management • 2020 targets achieved for the Mining and Metals division: o 5.8 Mt of manganese ore produced (+22% vs 2019), more than 6 Mt of transported ore (+30%) in Gabon o 2.5 Mwmt of nickel ore exports in New Caledonia (+55%) o 3.4 Mwmt of nickel ore and 23.5 kt-Ni of ferroalloys produced in Indonesia • Costs control in the High-Performance Alloys division in H21 in very deteriorated aerospace and automotive markets (A&D costs down -24% vs Q1 2020) • EBITDA of €398m in 2020, with very strong growth in H2 (€278m) compared to H11 (€120m): o Nearly +€250m in intrinsic gains over the year, mainly thanks to the increase in manganese sales volumes and nickel ore exports o Nearly -€480m in negative impact of external factors, notably with a decrease in manganese ore (nearly -19%) and ferronickel (approximately -10%) prices as well as a profound and lasting aerospace crisis • Free Cash-Flow (“FCF”) close to break-even in 2020 thanks to strong cash generation in H2 (+€174m), reflecting structural progress, notably on WCR: o Favourable seasonality in mining activity in H2, marked by continued growth in volumes o First contribution of Weda Bay Nickel activity of up to nearly €60m in FCF in H2 o Return to FCF break-even for the High-Performance Alloys division in H2 (vs -€165m in H1), with a significant reduction in working capital requirement
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in Africa and the Middle East:A Legal Overview
    MINING IN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST A Legal Overview www.dlapiper.com | 01 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 05 Algeria .........................................................................................................................................................................07 Angola ........................................................................................................................................................................ 09 Bahrain........................................................................................................................................................................11 Botswana ...................................................................................................................................................................13 Burkina Faso ..............................................................................................................................................................15 Democratic Republic of Congo ............................................................................................................................17 Egypt ...........................................................................................................................................................................19 Gabon .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unveiling New Strategy October 4, 2013 London Disclaimer
    Unveiling New Strategy October 4, 2013 London Disclaimer The information contained herein has been prepared using information available to OJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel (“Norilsk Nickel” or “NN”) at the time of preparation of the presentation. External or other factors may have impacted on the business of Norilsk Nickel and the content of this presentation, since its preparation. In addition all relevant information about Norilsk Nickel may not be included in this presentation. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. Any forward looking information herein has been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Forward looking statements, by the nature, involve risk and uncertainty and Norilsk Nickel cautions that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Reference should be made to the most recent Annual Report for a description of major risk factors. There may be other factors, both known and unknown to Norilsk Nickel, which may have an impact on its performance. This presentation should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by Norilsk Nickel, which does not undertake an obligation to release any revision to these statements. Certain market share information and other statements in this presentation regarding the industry in which Norilsk Nickel operates and the position of Norilsk Nickel relative to its competitors are based upon information made publicly available by other metals and mining companies or obtained from trade and business organizations and associations. Such information and statements have not been verified by any independent sources, and measures of the financial or operating performance of Norilsk Nickel’s competitors used in evaluating comparative positions may have been calculated in a different manner to the corresponding measures employed by Norilsk Nickel.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Assessing the European Lithium Resource Potential
    Re-assessing the European lithium resource potential – A review of hard-rock resources and metallogeny Blandine Gourcerol, Eric Gloaguen, Jérémie Melleton, Johann Tuduri, Xavier Galiègue To cite this version: Blandine Gourcerol, Eric Gloaguen, Jérémie Melleton, Johann Tuduri, Xavier Galiègue. Re-assessing the European lithium resource potential – A review of hard-rock resources and metallogeny. Ore Geology Reviews, Elsevier, 2019, 109, pp.494-519. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.015. insu-02115174 HAL Id: insu-02115174 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02115174 Submitted on 30 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Re-assessing the European lithium resource potential – A review of hard-rock resources and metallogeny B. Gourcerol, E. Gloaguen, J. Melleton, J. Tuduri, Xavier Galiegue PII: S0169-1368(18)30801-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.015 Reference: OREGEO 2903 To appear in: Ore Geology Reviews Received Date: 20 September 2018 Revised Date: 15 April 2019 Accepted Date: 23 April 2019 Please cite this article as: B. Gourcerol, E. Gloaguen, J. Melleton, J. Tuduri, X. Galiegue, Re-assessing the European lithium resource potential – A review of hard-rock resources and metallogeny, Ore Geology Reviews (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.015 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]