DOCSLIB.ORG

Smscindexpp266-273.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INDEX References to illustrations are printed in italics. Ablin, Debbie, 42,92, 258 Azevedo, Margaret, 129 Bolinas-Stinson Beach Master Plan, Adelman, Brenda, 220, 222, 251, 260 34 Aggregate, 243-245, 257 Bagley, Bill, 120 Bolling, David, 224,260 Aggregate Resources Management Bahia Baulinas, 61 Bostick, Benton, 20, 22 (ARM) Plan, 205-206, 256, 257 Ballard, Allan, 87 Bostick, Dr. Warren, 20, 22 Agricultural and Aquifer Baptiste, Arnold, 107 Bouverie Audubon Preserve, xix, Preservation Zone, 205 Barbour, Nancy, 42, 92, 258 152, 153,155-159,258-259 Ah Pah Dam, 163 Barfield, Tom, 63 Bouverie, David, xix, 157, 159,254 Alexander Valley Reach, 236 Bay Conservation and Development Boxer, Senator Barbara, 93, 127,139 Alexander, Meg, 225,260 Commission, 18 Boyd, Rhoda, 67 Allen, Howard B„ 76,93,115,258-259 Beeby, David, 244 Brandt-Hawley, Susan, 208-209, 260 American River, 6 Behr, Peter, 66, 71, 89,97, 107, 128- Bransom-Cooke, Admiral, 65, 67 Anderson, Bruce, 200 129, 132,142,162,171, 191, Brower, David, 113 Angel Island, 12, 27 239,251 Brown, Governor Jerry, 168 Anton, John, 140 biography, 129,169 Brown, Governor Pat, xii, 33 Aquifers, importance of, 162-163 “Belling the cat”, 113,114, 205,207, Brown, Wishard, 148 See also Middle Reach; Sonoma- 209 Burge, Bob, 86 Marin Aquifer Benoist, Jay, 217 Army Corps of Engineers, 143,170, Benthos, 99 Cain, Brighton “Bugs,” 6 , 32,42 218 Bianchi, Al, 120 Cale, Mike, 192 and Bolinas Lagoon, 59, 81 Big Sulfur Creek, 152, 153 California Coastal Act of 1976, xiii, and Coyote Dam, 18, 33, 187 Bird research, 74-75 255 and Warm Springs Dam, 140, 188 Birds. See Eagles, Egrets, Hawks, California Coastal Conservancy, 219 Arnold, Jane and Stanleigh, 104 Herons California Committee of Two Arrigoni, Pat, 104 Block, Bishop Karl, 236 Million, 169-170 Arrigoni, Peter, 85, 104,105, 107, Bloomfield, Dr. Arthur, 7, 8, 236 Californians Organized to Acquire 117, 145 Blumin, Len, 92,258 Access to State Tidelands. See Aswan Dam, 245 Blumin, Patti, 91,258 COAAST Auburn Dam, 241 Boerger, Lt. Col. Frank, 166 California State Coastal Audubon Canyon Ranch, xiii, xviii, Bolinas, 69 Commission, 133,182, 255 28, 29, 39, 50, 92,94, 115, 128, Bolinas Harbor District, 33, 35, 57- California State Fish and Game, 237 254. 58,61-63,66, 68,254 California State Lands Commission, and Stan Picher, 53 Bolinas Lagoon, xiv, xviii, 3, 6, 15, 33,57 designated national landmark, 48, 16, 28-30,47, 54-62, 65-69,135 California State Water Resources 90 assessor’s map of tideland lots, 77 Control Board, 199 heronry (see Heronry) description, 31 California Water Resources land acquisitions, xviii-xix, 40, 55, encroaching development, 33, 34, Association, 170,186 58, 65,66, 68,74,75, 78,118, 81 Callison, Charles, 78 124,127,130-131 and freeway revolt, 29 Caltrans, 219,240,242 mission and purpose, 52,89, 90 heronry (see Heronry) Camp Dimond, 6 officers of, 258 illus., vi, 28, 30, 39, 46, 54, 56, 76, Can the Last Place Last?, 107, 110 origins of, 32 80 Canyon Ranch, 33, 35-36, 37. See policy shift, 89 importance of, 33 also Audubon Canyon Ranch purchase of, 40-42, 43 and logging, 85-86 Cape Cod National Seashore, 129 Ranch Volunteer Council, xviii, 91 and Pt. Reyes National Seashore, Carpenter, Ernie, 192, 192,206 reverter clause/protection of, 52 29,71 Cavagnaro, David, 93, 259 soil scientist’s dream, 81 rich habitat, 55,57 Cavagnaro, Maggie, 93 use of ACR land, 74 watershed description, 29 Cerini Ranch, xix, 127 See also Canyon Ranch Bolinas Lagoon Preserve, xviii, 70, Channelization, 111, 166, 193, 197, Audubon Society. See National 71 254 Audubon Society; Marin Bolinas Public Utilities District, 69 and siltation, 196 Audubon Society Bolinas Ridge, xii, 34, 39, 85 on Santa Rosa Plain, 196 26 6 SAVING THE MARIN-SONOMA COAST restoration after, 197 description, 123 Dunn Ranch, 127 Charter, Richard, 240 Preserve, 94, 95, 260 Chatham, Russell, 175 Eagles, 82, 83, 84 Circuit Riders, 219 Dams, xii, 4, 172, 193,223, 245, 246 Ecology, 6, 7 Clear cutting, 7 destructive effects of, 4, 102, 161, Economics and urban sprawl, 247 Clifford Conly Center, 127 165,245 Edelbrock, Jerry, 93 COAAST— Californians Organized and development, 71, 140,143, Education, 250. See also Strategy, to Acquire Access to State 145,241 education Tidelands, 181,182 and economic growth, 247 Eel River, vi, xiii, 18,152, 153, 164, Coastal Commission. See California effect on fish, 4, 15,139, 198 165 State Coastal Commission and fishing industry, 161, 170, and development, 186 Coastwalk, 128, 182-183 173,198,223 diversion, 230, 254, 255 Coey, Bob, 225,237 and flood control, 165, 190, 241 “Tunnel from Hell”, 172, 173, 198 Cohen, Aaron, 76 moratorium on, 169 Eel River Dams, 167,168,170-173, Cole, Edris, 49,91 See also Ah Pah Dam; Aswan 186 Colgrave, Gloria, 156 Dam; Auburn Dam; Columbia Eel River Tunnel, J72, 173,198 Collier, Randolph, the “Silver Fox”, River Dams; Coyote Dam; Dos Eel River Water Council, 143,145, 165, 169 Rios Dam; Eel River Dams; 164, 169,186,254 Collins, George, 120,126,132 Elwa Dam; Trinity Dam; Egger, Frank, 87 Columbia River dams, 4 Yellow Jacket Dam; Warm Egret heronry. See Heronry Conly, Clifford, Jr., xix, 77, 117,124, Springs Dam Egrets, 39, 43-45,54, 55, 56, 75, 90, 124-125, 127 Danielson, Bob, 63, 65 102,134 Conservation Associates, 126 Danielson, Nancy Kent, 63 effects of development on, 34,44 Conservation Foundation, 79,136 Day, Dick, 19,182 feeding grounds, 59 Cooper, Dr. Robert, 136 Dennis, Nona, 93,259 See also Great Egrets Cordell, Kim, 219 Designing with nature, xiii, 69,110, Einstein, H.A., 215 Cordero, Joan, 8 148-149 Elliott, Bob, 145-146 Corwin, Ruth, 117,136 Developers, xvii, 195,202,205 Ellman, George, 158,202 Coyote Dam, vi, 18, 3 3 ,152, 153, and Bolinas Ridge and Lagoon, 34 Ellman, Phyllis, 158, 259 236, 254 and politics, 250 Elwa Dam, 223 effect on Russian River, 178 Development, 72,200 Enid Thompson Ranch, 75,76 effect on water quality, 178 and water supply, 18, 145 Environment, and health, x-xvii, 10, erosion caused by, 187 effects of, 196,201, 213 247,249-250 flooding, 197 on floodplain, 212-213,246, 254 Environmental Action Committee of Craemer, Jack, 148 See also Bolinas Lagoon; Marin West Marin, 128 Creeks County; Richardson Bay; Environmental Forum of Marin, destruction of, 220,235 Sonoma County; Sprawl xviii, 89,92-93,102,225 importance of, 197,235 Dickey, Mrs. Donald, 22 Environmental Studies of Bolinas restoration, 225,239 Digger Bend, vi, 152, 153,158, 175, Lagoon and Tomales Bay, xviii See also Channelization; Big 213, 228, 236 Episcopal Bishop’s Ranch, 234 Sulfur Creek; Dry Creek; proposed mining of, 226 Erosion, 82, 85,102, 158, 193,198, Griffin Creek; Lagunitas Creek; Docent Training Program, xviii, 89, 235 Mark West Creek; Nicasio 91 Esposti, Nick, 192, 206,207, 209, Creek; San Rafael Creek; Santa Doctrine of Public Trust, 16, 134, 211,225,226,234 Rosa Creek; Sonoma Creek; 218 Estero Antonio, 109 Stuart Creek; Tamalpais Creek; Donahue, Cia, 91,258 Estuaries, brackish, 15 Turn Turn M ountain Creek; Dos Rios Dam, 108, 166,168-169, Euphrat, Fred, 226 Walker Creek; Willow Creek 172,254 Crevelli, John, 182 Dredging, 56, 58, 68, 256 Faber, Phyllis, 93,259 Cronin, Leo, 226 Drinking water, xii, 95,193,195, Fairfax, 86 Crosset, Cathy, 219 214,224, 235-236,240, 256-257 Felson, Jack, 146,147 Crossette, Barbara, 81 contamination of, 198,212, 220- Ferguson, Doug, 148 Crowley Marine Company, 22 221, 222, 226 Ferguson, Jane, 148,258 Crum, Eleanor Evans, 78 treatment of, 194, 212,222 Ferris, Miles, 220, 222 Cuneo, Kathy, 93, 259 Dry Creek, 152, 153, 180 Finley, Dr. Knox, 61 Curry, Dr. Robert, 208,239 Dubos, Rene Jules, 15 Finley, Malcom, 61 Cypress Grove, xix, 112, 113,116, Duck Island, xix, 97,102,127,260 Fisheries, xii, 161,170,173,198,223, 117, 118,129,260 Dugan, Barry, 207 212,245 INDEX 267 and dams, 161, 170,173,198,223 bars, 160, 162,226 formation of Environmental Fishing, 3, 7, 227 bed rivers, 160-163 Forum of Marin, 93,259 Fletcher, Dr. Grant, 121 bed tributaries, 153 Marin Audubon Society, 10, 21 Flood management, 240 beds, importance of, 163 Marin Countywide Plan, 111 Floodplain, 163 beds, instream, 241 Marin Municipal Water District development, 212-213,246, 254 economic value, 244 seat, 140-141,144,145 mining sites on, 198 filtration, 194 conservation projects outside Flooding, 193,196, 212-213,221 mining (see Mining) California, 155 and channelization, 196,213,254 mining firms, 226, 242-243, 256- move to Sonoma County, 155 and growth, 196 257 member of Eel River Water Follis, Mrs. Gwin (Bunny), 41 pits, 207,209, 211, 216, 239, 242 Council; 164, 169 Fonta, Rose Rodrigues da. See Rosie skimming, 177-178 founding of Hop Kiln Winery, Verrall vs. quarry rock, 243 177 Foppiano, Pete, 225 wars, 206,214 ARM Plan, 205 Freeways, xii, 34, 61,104,105, 117, See also Middle Reach Gravel suit against mining firms and 241 Aquifer Supervisors, 205 proposed West Marin, 29, 34, 71- Great Blue Herons, 34,43,44-45,56, Friends of the Russian River, 228, 74,72, 73, 97, 107,254,255 75 260 Friedman, Jerry, 120, 136, 137 Great Egrets, 2,3 ,3 4 Griffin Russian River Riparian Friends of the Estuary, 128,222 Green, Mark, 228 Preserve, 236 Friends of the Russian River, 211, Greenway Project, 236 in Egypt, 245 224-225,228-229,255,257, 260 Gregg, Harold, 68 Griffin, Mimi, 8 Fundraising, 42-43, 208,225 Griffin Creek, 177,180,225, 229, Growth 233-237,239 citizen-controlled growth, xiii, Gaffney, Karen, 219 Griffin Ranch, condemnation threat, 107, 108, 139, 142,254 Gaffney, Rose, 181 234 costs of, 142 Gahagan, Mike, 127 Griffin Russian River Riparian destructive
Recommended publications
  • Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne

    Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne

    From: Andrea Taber To: Rice, Katie; Kinsey, Steven; Adams, Susan; Arnold, Judy; Sears, Kathrin Cc: Dan Stein; Thorsen, Suzanne; Lai, Thomas Subject: Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Letter of Oppostion to the SCA Ordinance Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:12:53 PM Attachments: Document4.docx Dear Supervisors- Attached please find our letter of opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow as drafted by our attorney Neil Moran of Freitas McCarthy MacMahon & Keating, LLP. Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association May 3, 2013 Board of Supervisors of Marin County 3501 Civil Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 Re: Stream Conservation Area (SCA) Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: INTRODUCTION The Sleepy Hollow Homes Association (SHHA) objects to the proposed changes to Chapters 22.33 (Stream Protection) and 22.63 (Stream Conservation Area Permit) as they would apply to the residents of the unincorporated portion of San Anselmo known as Sleepy Hollow. We ask that the County exempt and/or delay implementation of any changes to Chapters 22.33 and 22.63 as to the city-centered corridor streams, including Sleepy Hollow. The SHHA supports implementation of the proposed amendments to the San Geronimo Valley, to protect wildlife habitat in streams where Coho Salmon currently exist. The SHHA supports regulations to ensure the health and survival of the species in these areas. The SHHA recognizes the urgency of this matter to the San Geronimo Valley, both for the survival of the endangered and declining Coho population and for the property rights of the affected residents who are currently subject to a building moratorium.
  • Initial Study/Environmental Assessment: Kent Island Restoration at Bolinas Lagoon

    Initial Study/Environmental Assessment: Kent Island Restoration at Bolinas Lagoon

    DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON Marin County Open Space District and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District August 2012 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON PREPARED FOR Marin County Open Space District Marin County Civic Center 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 499-6387 and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market St San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 503-6703 PREPARED BY Carmen Ecological Consulting Grassetti Environmental Consulting Peter R. Baye, Coastal Ecologist, Botanist August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Document Structure ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................3 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................3 2.2 Environmental Setting ..............................................................................................................3 2.3 Purpose and Need ..............................................................................................................6
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy

    Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy

    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
  • 2008 ANNUAL REPORT the Mission of the Marin Conservation League Is to Preserve, Protect and Enhance the Natural Assets of Marin County

    2008 ANNUAL REPORT the Mission of the Marin Conservation League Is to Preserve, Protect and Enhance the Natural Assets of Marin County

    Protecting Marin Since 1934 2008 ANNUAL REPORT The mission of the Marin Conservation League is to preserve, protect and enhance the natural assets of Marin County. MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE Dear Friends: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Offi cers Nona Dennis, Mill Valley, President It is my pleasure, on behalf of the Marin Conservation League Board of Daniel Sonnet, San Rafael, Directors, to report the League’s activities in 2008. You – the members First Vice President and supporters of MCL – are the foundation of this organization, and Roger Roberts, San Rafael we honor and thank you! Without your support, our accomplishments Second Vice President would not be possible. Larry Smith, Nicasio, Secretary Kenneth Drexler, Fairfax, Treasurer Directors This year was the League’s 74th year – an opportunity to review MCL’s Peter Asmus, Stinson Beach legacy and begin planning for our 75th anniversary. The most powerful lesson to emerge Betsy Bikle, Mill Valley from this legacy is that although decades have passed since MCL’s founding, the land Priscilla Bull, Kentfi eld protection tools, tactics, and strategies that were championed by the League’s founders are Joe Bunker, San Anselmo timeless – as relevant in 2008 as they were in 1934! The Action Calendar on pages 6 and 7 Carson Cox, Mill Valley provides abundant evidence of this truism. Bruce Fullerton, Mill Valley Jana Haehl, Corte Madera 2008 began with little warning of the economic diffi culties it would present. Now as Brannon Ketcham, Fairfax 2008 has turned into 2009, it is clear that economic downturn is having an impact on Marge Macris, Mill Valley environmental projects around the State.
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840

    Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840

    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
  • MARTIN GRIFFIN an Oral History Interview Conducted by Debra Schwartz in 2015

    MARTIN GRIFFIN an Oral History Interview Conducted by Debra Schwartz in 2015

    Mill Valley Oral History Program A collaboration between the Mill Valley Historical Society and the Mill Valley Public Library MARTIN GRIFFIN An Oral History Interview Conducted by Debra Schwartz in 2015 © 2015 by the Mill Valley Public Library TITLE: Oral History of Martin Griffin INTERVIEWER: Debra Schwartz DESCRIPTION: Transcript, 37 pages INTERVIEW DATE: October 20th, 2015 In this oral history, physician, naturalist, champion of open spaces and bane of developers Martin Griffin recounts with warmth and humor his long and extraordinarily active life. Born in Ogden, Utah, in 1920 to nature-loving parents, Martin moved with his family to Portland, Oregon, when the Great Depression hit, and then down to Los Angeles and finally up to Oakland, where he attended elementary school through high school. Martin recalls some early experiences that shaped his love for the environment, including his involvement with the Boy Scouts, where he met the graduate student entomologist Brighton C. “Bugs” Cain, who profoundly inspired him. It was also as a boy that Martin came over to Mill Valley for the first time, making his way by ferry and train, to go hiking on Mt. Tamalpais. He conjures the beautiful vision he had from the ridge that day of white birds down on Bolinas Lagoon, a vision which made such a powerful impression on him and would, years later, feed the flames of his conservationist passion. Martin recounts being involved in ROTC while an undergraduate at U.C. Berkeley, later attending medical school at Stanford, where he got married, and moving over to Marin to begin his medical practice.
  • Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning

    Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning

    Scanned for KRIS State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing LAGUNITAS CREEK, Marin County STREAM EVALUATION REPORT 86-2 APRIL 1986 IFIM study site near Tocaloma at about 35 cfs. IFIM study site near Gallager Ranch at about 22 cfs. ERRATA Page i Author Gary E. Smith2 Page 2 Paragraph 2, 14th line to Syncaris, it seems probable that the proposed summer and early Page 32 Recommendations, 3.a., first line If Nacasio Reservoir inflow during the preceeding month is Inside of back cover, photo caption, third line and deepened pools and Department of Fish and Game Stream Evaluation Report Report No. 86-2 Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County April, 1986 Gordon K. Van Vleck George Deukmejian Jack C. Parnell Secretary for Resources Governor Director The Resources Agency State of California Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, I/ By Gary E. Smith 2 Abstract The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology was used to assess steelhead and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow/habitat relationships and requirements in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. The annual flow regime developed considers individual species life stage needs. Approximately 37% of the average annual runoff is identified as being needed for spawning and rearing purposes. Typically, natural summer flows need augmentation and natural winter flows more than meet fishery needs. 1_/ Stream Evaluation Report No. 86-2, April 1986. Stream Evaluation Program. 2/ Environmental Services Division, Sacramento, California -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract...................................
  • Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council

    Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council

    Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Report Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council February 2018 Report Citation GFNMS Advisory Council, 2018. Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Report. Report of the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council for the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. San Francisco, CA. 197 pp. Cover photos (top left) Bodega Harbor Dredging, Cea Higgins (top right) Gleason Beach area, Doug George (bottom left) Aerial view of Stinson Beach and Seadrift, Bob Wilson (bottom right) Bolinas Highway revetment, Kate Bimrose This work was made possible with support from: i Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Working Group Members Chair: Cea Higgins, Sonoma Coast Surfrider; Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS) Advisory Council Hattie Brown, Sonoma County Regional Parks Jon Campo, Marin County Parks Clif Davenport, Coastal Sediment Management Workgroup Ashley Eagle-Gibbs, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin Brook Edwards, Wildlands Conservancy Leslie Ewing, California Coastal Commission Luke Farmer, Wildlands Conservancy Shannon Fiala, California Coastal Commission Stefan Galvez, Caltrans Brannon Ketcham, National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore John Largier, UC Davis Bodega Marine Lab, Sanctuary Advisory Council chair Neil Lassettre, Sonoma County Water Agency Bob Legge, Russian Riverkeeper Jack Liebster, County of Marin Planning Department Jeannine Manna, California Coastal Commission Abby Mohan,
  • MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE Parks and Open Space Committee September 13, 2018 MINUTES ATTENDEES: Nona Dennis, Chair, Greg Zitney

    MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE Parks and Open Space Committee September 13, 2018 MINUTES ATTENDEES: Nona Dennis, Chair, Greg Zitney

    MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE Parks and Open Space Committee September 13, 2018 MINUTES ATTENDEES: Nona Dennis, Chair, Greg Zitney, Larry Minikes, Linda Novy, Robert Eichstaedt, Arlin Weinberger, Larry Scheibel, Pat Nelson, Susan Stompe, Eva Buxton, Tom Boss, Nancy Benjamin, Roger Roberts, Amory Willis, Bob Miller, Jack Krystal, Joyce Britt, Diane Kay, Max Korten and Veronica Pearson (MCP), Mike Swezy (MMWD), Janet Klein and Claire Mooney (GGNParks Conservancy; One Tam),and Mia Monroe (GGNRA). Meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 1)Coastal Cleanup, September 15, Bay Model and Novato sites, 9:00 – noon; 2) China Camp SP Heritage Day, September 22; 3) MCL Walk into Conservation History: Marincello, September 29, 9:30 – 12:30: 4) MCL Business-Environment Breakfast: State Parks – Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, November 15, 7:30 – 9:00 a.m. Eva announced that 8 bills that would undermine the endangered species Act are pending in the Senate (Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 147, pp.35179-35201). Comments opposing the bills should go to your Senator by September 23. Added: MMWD Appreciation Picnic Oct. 13, Mc Nears Beach; Sky Ranch Celebration, Oct. 14; “Bay, Bikes, & Birds” Sept. 30, Master Gardeners on Cal-IPC (Eva Buxton), date?) MINUTES of August 9, approved with minor correction to date of Parks & Open Space Commission meeting, from September 13 to 20, Page 2, 1-d. INFORMATION UPDATES: 1. Marin County Parks, Open Space District a. Measure A Strategic Review in process. Max Korten reported that the department is doing a strategic review, including an on-line survey, to get community input.
  • Toll Facilities in the United States

    Toll Facilities in the United States

    TOLL FACILITIES US Department IN THE UNITED of Transportation Federal Highway STATES Administration BRIDGES-ROADS-TUNNELS-FERRIES February 1995 Publication No. FHWA-PL-95-034 TOLL FACILITIES US Department of Transporation Federal Highway IN THE UNITED STATES Administration Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries February 1995 Publication No: FHWA-PL-95-034 PREFACE This report contains selected information on toll facilities in the United States. The information is based on a survey of facilities in operation, financed, or under construction as of January 1, 1995. Beginning with this issue, Tables T-1 and T-2 include, where known: -- The direction of toll collection. -- The type of electronic toll collection system, if available. -- Whether the facility is part of the proposed National Highway System (NHS). A description of each table included in the report follows: Table T-1 contains information such as the name, financing or operating authority, location and termini, feature crossed, length, and road system for toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and ferries that connect highways. -- Parts 1 and 3 include the Interstate System route numbers for toll facilities located on the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. -- Parts 2 and 4 include a functional system identification code for non-Interstate System toll bridges, roads, and tunnels. -- Part 5 includes vehicular toll ferries. Table T-2 contains a list of those projects under serious consideration as toll facilities, awaiting completion of financing arrangements, or proposed as new toll facilities that are being studied for financial and operational feasibility. Table T-3 contains data on receipts of toll facilities.
  • The Natural Resources of Bolinas Lagoon: Their Status and Future

    The Natural Resources of Bolinas Lagoon: Their Status and Future

    The natural resources of Bolinas Lagoon: their status and future Item Type monograph Authors Giguere, Paul E.; Sturgeon, Merl A.; Inlay, M.W.; Aplin, John A.; Markel, Gerald W.; Speth, John; Arnett, G. Ray Publisher California Department of Fish and Game Download date 10/10/2021 07:39:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18462 St ate of California DEPARm OF FfSH &?D Gm THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF BOLINAS LAGOON TE3[EIR STATUS AND FUTURE Paul E. Giguere, Associate Fishery Biologist Assisted by Merl A. St urgeon, Assist ant Wildlife Manager-Bi ologist M. W. Inlay, Associate Wildlife Manager-Biologist John A. Aplin, Associate Marine Biologist Gerald W. Markel, Fish and Wildlife Assistant I1 John Speth, Associate Wildlife Manager-Biologist G. Ray &?nett, Director, lkpartment of Fish and Game December, 1970 Bolinas Peninsula and Lagoon (Dwcbury Reef in left foreground) Courtesy Aero F'hotographers, Sausalito The Department of Fish and Game thanks tie many persons who con- tributed assistance, advice and data during the preparation of this report. The authors are particularly grateful for the help received from the College of Marin Marine Station at Bolinas. Professor Al Malina and Mr. Craig Hansen provided reference materials, maps, and constructive criticism. Members of the Audubon Canyon Ranch were equally helpful. Mr. Clerin Zurnwalt, Ranch Naturalist, consented to the use of two of his fine photographs and reviewed the draft co~yof this report. Aero Photographers of Sausdito authorized the use of that firm's aerial photo of Bolinas Lagooa. Personnel of the Conservation Department, the Department of Navi- gation and Ocean Development, and the Marin County Planning Department Staff assisted in document research.
  • UCCE. the Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project

    UCCE. the Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project

    Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by University of California Cooperative Extension 1682 Novato Boulevard, Suite 150B, Novato, CA 94947 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Production of this report was made possible by a grant from The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project Project Coordinators Ellen Rilla Stephanie Larson Principal Writer and Photographer Lisa Bush Historical Profiles Dewey Livingston Water Quality Information n Oli l Pau Design Lisa Krieshok Typesetting Nan Perrott The University of California, in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and University policy, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, medical condition (cancer-related), ancestry, marital status, citizenship, sexual orientation, or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University also prohibits sexual harassment. Inquiries regarding the University's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560 (510) 987-0096. Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by n Extensio e Cooperativ a Californi f o y Universit 7 9494 A C , Novato , 15OB e Suit , Boulevard o Novat 2 168 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Acknowledgments The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project has been the work of many dedicated indi- l environmenta d an , agencies e resourc l natura , community l agricultura e th g representin s vidual d an s meeting g attendin y b d participate t tha s landowner y man e th o t l gratefu e ar e W .