DOCSLIB.ORG

Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning Scanned for KRIS State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing LAGUNITAS CREEK, Marin County STREAM EVALUATION REPORT 86-2 APRIL 1986 IFIM study site near Tocaloma at about 35 cfs. IFIM study site near Gallager Ranch at about 22 cfs. ERRATA Page i Author Gary E. Smith2 Page 2 Paragraph 2, 14th line to Syncaris, it seems probable that the proposed summer and early Page 32 Recommendations, 3.a., first line If Nacasio Reservoir inflow during the preceeding month is Inside of back cover, photo caption, third line and deepened pools and Department of Fish and Game Stream Evaluation Report Report No. 86-2 Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County April, 1986 Gordon K. Van Vleck George Deukmejian Jack C. Parnell Secretary for Resources Governor Director The Resources Agency State of California Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, I/ By Gary E. Smith 2 Abstract The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology was used to assess steelhead and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow/habitat relationships and requirements in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. The annual flow regime developed considers individual species life stage needs. Approximately 37% of the average annual runoff is identified as being needed for spawning and rearing purposes. Typically, natural summer flows need augmentation and natural winter flows more than meet fishery needs. 1_/ Stream Evaluation Report No. 86-2, April 1986. Stream Evaluation Program. 2/ Environmental Services Division, Sacramento, California -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................... i Table of Contents........................... ii List of Tables.............................. iii List of Figures............................. iv Foreward.................................... v Introduction................................ 1 Description of Study Area................... 5 Materials and Methods....................... 14 Results..................................... 21 Discussion.................................. 26 Recommendations............................. 32 Acknowledgements............................ 34 References.................................. 34 Appendix.................................... 37 -iii- LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Kent Reservoir physical characteristics, Lagunitas Creek Marin County, California........................... 5 2. Water diversions within the Lagunitas Creek basin, excluding Marin Municipal Water District diversions, Marin County, California.......................... 7 3. Lagunitas Creek mean monthly streamflow at the U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gauge near Pt. Reyes 9 Station, October 1974 through September 1983................. 4. Estimated unimpaired inflow into Lagunitas Creek upstream of Peters Dam, October 1927 through September 1983................................................... 10 5. Estimated unimpaired Lagunitas Creek mean monthly streamflow at Peters Dam, Taylor State Park, Nicasio Creek, and at Giacomini Dam, water years 1928 through 1983.................................................. 11 6. Stream discharges measured during the Lagunitas Creek instream flow investigation............................... 18 7. Substrate composition code for the Lagunitas Creek instream flow investigation............................... 18 8. Steelhead trout habitat /stream discharge relationship Lagunitas Creek........................................ 22 9. Coho salmon habitat/stream discharge relationship, Lagunitas Creek.................................... 24 10. Stream flow regime for maintenance of steelhead trout 29 and coho salmon resources, Lagunitas Creek.............. -iv- LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Lagunitas Creek watershed, Marin County, California.. 1 2. Water projects and diversion facilities and urban development within the Lagunitas Creek drainage...... 3 3. Lagunitas Creek longitudinal profile downstream of Peters Dam........................................... 6 4. Lagunitas Creek mean monthly discharge at the U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gauge near Point Reyes Station, October 1974 through September 1983......... 9 Estimated unimpaired Lagunitas Creek mean monthly 5. streamflow at Peters Dam, Taylor State Park, Nicasio Creek, and Giacomini Dam, water years 1928 through 1983................................................. 12 6. Steelhead trout and coho salmon species periodicity.. 13 7. Steelhead trout habitat/ stream discharge relationship, Lagunitas Creek........................ 23 8. Coho salmon habitat/stream discharge relationship, Lagunitas Creek...................................... 25 Mean monthly discharge, September 1927 through 9. October 1983, and fishery maintenance flows at Peters Dam and Taylor State Park, Lagunitas Creek........... 31 -v- FOREWORD California's waterways historically provided substantial habitats for numerous and diverse fish and wildlife resources. With the state's settlement and development, however, demands for various offstream water uses and hydroelectric power generation have generally conflicted with habitat needs and requirements of indigenous resources. Consequently, many of California's resources and habitats have experienced significant losses. These losses have been particularly acute for steelhead (Salmo gairdneri gairdneri) and salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Steelhead, coho salmon (O. kisutch) and king salmon (O. tshawytscha) are important, indigenous fisheries in California. These species support a large and popular anadromous sport fishery. In addition, coho and king salmon support a substantial commercial fishery. Unfortunately, these important resources are experiencing a decline in abundance and in capacity to naturally propagate. California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service studies show that 95% of California's historic steelhead and salmon habitat has been lost (Fisher 1979). In response to this habitat loss, steelhead and salmon populations have dwindled to only 20% and 35-40%, respectively, of their historic numbers (Anon. 1982; Fisher 1979). The importance of the State's steelhead and salmon resources has been clearly affirmed by the California Legislature and Governor (Anon. 1982). By overwhelming bipartisan vote, the Legislature has enacted and the Governor has signed a number of bills authorizing and funding an unprecedented foundation for steelhead and salmon resource restoration and enhancement during the next 2 decades. Included in this foundation are the Forest Improvement Act, Forest Resources Development Fund, Renewable Resources Investment Fund, Geothermal Resources Fund, and the Energy Resources Fund. The California Fish and Game Commission and the California Resources Agency recognize steelhead and salmon as valuable resources with strict environmental requirements and limited ranges (Anon. 1982; Anon. 1985). It is the Fish and Game Commission's policy to provide vigorous and healthy steelhead and salmon populations. The policy emphasizes that steelhead management shall be directed toward maintaining vigorous and healthy steelhead populations by maintaining adequate breeding stocks, suitable spawning areas, and by providing natural rearing of young fish to migratory size. Habitat maintenance, restoration, and improvement are also emphasized. Further, this policy mandates the Department of Fish and Game to develop and implement such programs by measuring and, wherever possible, by increasing steelhead abundance. Protection is to be provided by assessing habitat status and adverse impacts and by alleviating those aspects of projects, development, or activities which would, or already do, adversely impact steelhead habitat or steelhead populations. -vi- In recognition of the value and losses of steelhead and salmon resources and habitats, the Resources Agency has developed a set of long range goals to aid in restoration of these species (Anon. 1982). These goals include increasing steelhead and salmon spawning populations by 300,000, increasing the fishery catch by 600,000 fish, and reestablishing 500 miles of historic spawning and nursery areas. In view of the value of the State's steelhead and salmon resources and of the above mandates and policies, clearly the Department of Fish and Game is mandated to make every effort to effectively manage, maintain, and wherever possible, restore these valuable anadromous resources. Nowhere is the implementation of this effort more critical than in California's coastal streams and rivers. Water development, urbanization, and other activities have drastically depleted these resources and habitats, particularly in the southern portion of their range. Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, falls into the depleted category. This creek once supported substantial runs of steelhead and coho salmon. Water projects and other factors have contributed to the fishery's virtual demise, and today, only remnant runs remain. Thus, the Department developed the objective to restore the Lagunitas Creek steelhead and salmon resources and habitats. This report presents the results of the Department's assessment of steelhead trout and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow needs in Lagunitas Creek. INTRODUCTION Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California (Figure 1), supports several important aquatic resources. These resources have been adversely affected by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne
    From: Andrea Taber To: Rice, Katie; Kinsey, Steven; Adams, Susan; Arnold, Judy; Sears, Kathrin Cc: Dan Stein; Thorsen, Suzanne; Lai, Thomas Subject: Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Letter of Oppostion to the SCA Ordinance Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:12:53 PM Attachments: Document4.docx Dear Supervisors- Attached please find our letter of opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow as drafted by our attorney Neil Moran of Freitas McCarthy MacMahon & Keating, LLP. Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association May 3, 2013 Board of Supervisors of Marin County 3501 Civil Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 Re: Stream Conservation Area (SCA) Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: INTRODUCTION The Sleepy Hollow Homes Association (SHHA) objects to the proposed changes to Chapters 22.33 (Stream Protection) and 22.63 (Stream Conservation Area Permit) as they would apply to the residents of the unincorporated portion of San Anselmo known as Sleepy Hollow. We ask that the County exempt and/or delay implementation of any changes to Chapters 22.33 and 22.63 as to the city-centered corridor streams, including Sleepy Hollow. The SHHA supports implementation of the proposed amendments to the San Geronimo Valley, to protect wildlife habitat in streams where Coho Salmon currently exist. The SHHA supports regulations to ensure the health and survival of the species in these areas. The SHHA recognizes the urgency of this matter to the San Geronimo Valley, both for the survival of the endangered and declining Coho population and for the property rights of the affected residents who are currently subject to a building moratorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Watershed Sanitary Survey Update Marin Municipal Water District
    Bon Tempe Photo credit: Barb Stenson 2015 Watershed Sanitary Survey Update Marin Municipal Water District April 2016 K/J 1568032 Prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 2350 Mission College Blvd., Suite 525 Santa Clara, CA 95054 650-852-2800 FAX: 650-852-2899 Watershed Sanitary Survey Update 2015 Final April 2016 Prepared for Marin Municipal Water District 220 Nellen Avenue Corte Madera, CA 94925 K/J Project No. 1568032 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ vi Section 1: Status of 2010 Watershed Sanitary Survey Recommendations ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Status of Recommendations from 2010 WSS ........................................ 1 1.2.1 Sanitary Survey Action Plan (SSAP) .......................................... 2 1.2.1.1 Overall Watershed Recommendations (beneficial to both watersheds): ................................ 2 1.2.1.2 Mount Tamalpais Watershed Recommendations: ................................................... 3 1.2.1.3 Soulajule/Nicasio Watershed Recommendations: ................................................... 3 1.2.2 Watershed Management Practice Investigation
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagunitas Creek Floodplain and Riparian Enhancement Design
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT DESIGN Project No. 16-020-01. Project Manager: Joel Gerwein RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $490,578 to Turtle Island Restoration Network to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for restoration of floodplain coho salmon rearing habitat on a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek, Olema, Marin County. LOCATION: Olema, Marin County PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resources Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location Maps Exhibit 2: Site Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Section 31220 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of an amount not to exceed $490,578 (four hundred ninety thousand five hundred and seventy-eight dollars) to Turtle Island Restoration Network (TIRN) to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for a floodplain restoration project to improve coho salmon rearing habitat along a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek floodplain near the community of Olema, Marin County, subject to the condition that prior to the disbursement of any funds for the project, TIRN shall submit for the review and approval of the Conservancy’s Executive Officer a workplan, schedule and budget, and the names and qualifications of any contractors for the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: Page 1 of 12 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Smscindexpp266-273.Pdf
    INDEX References to illustrations are printed in italics. Ablin, Debbie, 42,92, 258 Azevedo, Margaret, 129 Bolinas-Stinson Beach Master Plan, Adelman, Brenda, 220, 222, 251, 260 34 Aggregate, 243-245, 257 Bagley, Bill, 120 Bolling, David, 224,260 Aggregate Resources Management Bahia Baulinas, 61 Bostick, Benton, 20, 22 (ARM) Plan, 205-206, 256, 257 Ballard, Allan, 87 Bostick, Dr. Warren, 20, 22 Agricultural and Aquifer Baptiste, Arnold, 107 Bouverie Audubon Preserve, xix, Preservation Zone, 205 Barbour, Nancy, 42, 92, 258 152, 153,155-159,258-259 Ah Pah Dam, 163 Barfield, Tom, 63 Bouverie, David, xix, 157, 159,254 Alexander Valley Reach, 236 Bay Conservation and Development Boxer, Senator Barbara, 93, 127,139 Alexander, Meg, 225,260 Commission, 18 Boyd, Rhoda, 67 Allen, Howard B„ 76,93,115,258-259 Beeby, David, 244 Brandt-Hawley, Susan, 208-209, 260 American River, 6 Behr, Peter, 66, 71, 89,97, 107, 128- Bransom-Cooke, Admiral, 65, 67 Anderson, Bruce, 200 129, 132,142,162,171, 191, Brower, David, 113 Angel Island, 12, 27 239,251 Brown, Governor Jerry, 168 Anton, John, 140 biography, 129,169 Brown, Governor Pat, xii, 33 Aquifers, importance of, 162-163 “Belling the cat”, 113,114, 205,207, Brown, Wishard, 148 See also Middle Reach; Sonoma- 209 Burge, Bob, 86 Marin Aquifer Benoist, Jay, 217 Army Corps of Engineers, 143,170, Benthos, 99 Cain, Brighton “Bugs,” 6 , 32,42 218 Bianchi, Al, 120 Cale, Mike, 192 and Bolinas Lagoon, 59, 81 Big Sulfur Creek, 152, 153 California Coastal Act of 1976, xiii, and Coyote Dam, 18, 33, 187 Bird research, 74-75 255 and Warm Springs Dam, 140, 188 Birds.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: a Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula
    Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: A Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula Trip highlights: San Andreas Fault, San Gregorio Fault, Point Reyes, Olema Valley, Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon, Drakes Bay, Salinian granitic rocks, Franciscan Complex, Tertiary sedimentary rocks, headlands, sea cliffs, beaches, coastal dunes, Kehoe Beach, Duxbury Reef, coastal prairie and maritime scrublands Point Reyes National Seashore is an ideal destination for field trips to examine the geology and natural history of the San Andreas Fault Zone and the North Coast of California. The San Andreas Fault Zone crosses the Point Reyes Peninsula between Bolinas Lagoon in the south and Tomales Bay in the north. The map below shows 13 selected field trip destinations where the bedrock, geologic structures, and landscape features can be examined. Geologic stops highlight the significance of the San Andreas and San Gregorio faults in the geologic history of the Point Reyes Peninsula. Historical information about the peninsula is also presented, including descriptions of the aftermath of the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Figure 9-1. Map of the Point Reyes National Seashore area. Numbered stops include: 1) Visitor Center and Earthquake Trail, 2) Tomales Bay Trail, 3) Point Reyes Lighthouse, 4) Chimney Rock area, 5) Drakes Beach, 6) Tomales Bay State Park, 7) Kehoe Beach, 8) McClures Beach, 9) Mount Vision on Inverness Ridge, 10) Limantour Beach, 11) Olema Valley, 12) Palomarin Beach, 13) Duxbury Reef 14) Bolinas Lagoon/Stinson Beach area. Features include: Point Reyes (PR), Tomales Bay (TB), Drakes Estero (DE), Bolinas Lagoon (BL), Point Reyes Station (PRS), San Rafael (SR), and San Francisco (SF), Lucas Valley Road (LVR), and Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (SFDB).
    [Show full text]
  • Lagunitas Creek Watershed Sediment Reduction And
    CONSOLIDATED PROPOSAL FOR COASTAL NONPOINT SOURCE PROJECTS (GRANT AGREEMENT NO. 04-155-552-2) FINAL PROJECT REPORT Prepared by Marin Municipal Water District Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed Friends of Novato Creek Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District Sonoma Ecology Center In partnership with North Bay Watershed Association May 2008 Acknowledgements The following individuals and consultants provided valuable review, comments, construction and oversight of the various project elements and studies completed under this project: Consultants and Contractors Pacific Watershed Associates Harold Appleton, Prunuske Chatham, Inc. Kathie Lowrey, Prunuske Chatham, Inc Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Sonoma Ecology Center County of Sonoma, GIS Dept. Laurel Collins, Watershed Sciences Gina Cuclis, Cuclis PR Funding for this project was provided by the State Water Resources Control Board under the Proposition 13 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grant Program with matching funds and in-kind contributions from the North Bay Watershed Association, California State Coastal Conservancy, the California Department of Fish and Game, Marin Municipal Water District, Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed, Ross Valley Sanitation District, Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, Town of San Anselmo, Marin Conservation Corps, Friends of Novato Creek, Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District, Sonoma Ecology Center, landowners and citizens in Petaluma & San Antonio Creek watersheds, and numerous volunteer efforts throughout the project area. Final Report Consolidated Concept Proposal for Nonpoint Source Projects, Greater San Pablo Bay Area Grant Agreement No. 04-155-552-2 Table of Contents Page A. Project Summary……………………………………………………………….. 1 B. Project Location ……………………………………………...………………… 2 C. Project Performance …………………….…………………………….…...… 7 1. San Anselmo Creek Park: Riprap Removal and Restoration Project Planning and Implementation…………………………..…… 7 Project Performance..………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation
    DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation Strategy for Steelhead and Coho Salmon August 10, 2011 DRAFT HCP Fisheries Conservation Strategy Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Approach to the Conservation Strategy .................................................................................... 10 3. Biological Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................. 13 4. Avoidance and Minimization Measures ..................................................................................... 15 4.1. Water Supply Operations ...................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1. Water Diversions ............................................................................................................ 15 4.1.1.1. Minimizing the effects of City Diversions ............................................................. 16 4.1.1.2. Rationale for Developing Instream Flow Targets ............................................... 18 4.1.1.3. Liddell Spring Diversion .......................................................................................... 21 4.1.1.4. Reggiardo Creek Diversion .................................................................................... 24 4.1.1.5. Laguna Creek Diversion ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Action Committee of West Marin's Point Reyes Birding
    Environmental Action Committee of West Marin’s Point Reyes Birding and Nature Festival Thursday, April 25th, 2019 Class Description 1. Special Keynote Thursday Outing & Lunch: Since the late 1990s, most of his attention has gone into the Kaufman Field Birding with the Kingbird Kenn Kaufman & Signed Book Guides. Countless hours in the field doing research and photography are Thursday, April 25, 2019 | 8:30 am – 1:00 pm followed up with countless hours of writing, editing, and design work, Difficulty/Length: Easy, 2-4 miles collaborating with experts in each subJect to ensure the highest quality in the Experience Levels/Ages: All finished books. Ticket Price: $175 | 16 participants Aside from the field guides, Kenn's best-known book is Kingbird Highway. Join author and well-known birder Kenn Kaufman and popular naturalist Published by Houghton Mifflin in 1997, it has become something of a cult David Wimpfheimer for this special morning of birding. We will sample several classic, especially among young birders. It tells the story of his adventures as a habitats as we travel from the wetlands of Tomales Bay to the interior teenager in the 1970s, thumbing rides all over North America in an obsessive search for birds. grasslands and oak woodlands near the town of Nicasio. In each habitat there will be different birds that we will learn about and identify by field marks and their vocalizations. From teal and yellowlegs to raptors, Lazuli buntings and Event Location: Various location around West Marin. Lark sparrows we will enJoy a large diversity of species. With any luck we may even see a kingbird, an iconic bird for Kenn.
    [Show full text]
  • UCCE. the Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project
    Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by University of California Cooperative Extension 1682 Novato Boulevard, Suite 150B, Novato, CA 94947 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Production of this report was made possible by a grant from The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project Project Coordinators Ellen Rilla Stephanie Larson Principal Writer and Photographer Lisa Bush Historical Profiles Dewey Livingston Water Quality Information n Oli l Pau Design Lisa Krieshok Typesetting Nan Perrott The University of California, in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and University policy, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, medical condition (cancer-related), ancestry, marital status, citizenship, sexual orientation, or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University also prohibits sexual harassment. Inquiries regarding the University's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560 (510) 987-0096. Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by n Extensio e Cooperativ a Californi f o y Universit 7 9494 A C , Novato , 15OB e Suit , Boulevard o Novat 2 168 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Acknowledgments The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project has been the work of many dedicated indi- l environmenta d an , agencies e resourc l natura , community l agricultura e th g representin s vidual d an s meeting g attendin y b d participate t tha s landowner y man e th o t l gratefu e ar e W .
    [Show full text]