Fy18 Annual Report Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Contract Aid-685-C-15-00001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fy18 Annual Report Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Contract Aid-685-C-15-00001 FY18 ANNUAL REPORT FEED THE FUTURE SENEGAL NAATAL MBAY CONTRACT AID-685-C-15-00001 FY18 ANNUAL REPORT FEED THE FUTURE SENEGAL NAATAL MBAY CONTRACT AID-685-C-15-00001 October 2018 Prepared for: Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Project Economic Growth Office, USAID/Senegal Prepared by RTI International 3040 East Cornwallis Rd. Post Office Box 121294 Research Triangle Park, NC 277009-2194 USA +1 (919) 541-6000 1 Cover photograph KOLDA – SENEGAL. A farmer examines his rice crop. Photo by /RTI International. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 2 FEED THE FUTURE SENEGAL – NAATAL MBAY – FY18 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 10 2. NAATAL MBAY COMPONENTS, VALUE CHAINS, AND ZONE OF INFLUENCE ....... 11 2.1 ZONES OF INFLUENCE AND CROP AREAS ............................................................................................................ 11 3. FY18 ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS .......................................................................................... 13 3.1 AGRICULTURAL INPUT AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Farmer-Led Extension Model ................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.2 Farmer Productivity Training and Monitoring ..................................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Seed System Strengthening ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.4 Contract Linkage Development ............................................................................................................. 23 3.1.5 Promoting Access to Agricultural Insurance ....................................................................................... 24 3.1.6 Climate Information Services ................................................................................................................. 27 3.2 AGRICULTURAL MARKETS IMPROVED .................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Integrated Credit Systems ...................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.2 Agricultural Insurance .............................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.3 Capital Investment .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.4 Information Technology for Finance and Trade .................................................................................. 38 3.2.5 Market Development ............................................................................................................................... 39 3.3 POLICY AND LEARNING ............................................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Technical Assistance and Advising ......................................................................................................... 40 3.3.2 Computerized Data-Sharing Platform for DRDRs ............................................................................. 41 3.3.3 Sharing of the Cereal Consumption Study Results ............................................................................. 41 3.4 LOCAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................. 42 3.4.1 Value Chain Partners ............................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.2 USAID Local Solutions Candidates ....................................................................................................... 43 3.4.3 Partner Capacity Building ........................................................................................................................ 44 4. CROSS-CUTTING ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 45 4.1 GENDER INTEGRATION ............................................................................................................................................... 45 4.2 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1 Improving Resilience to Economic and Environmental Shocks ........................................................ 46 4.2.2 Climate Information Services ................................................................................................................. 47 4.2.3 Continued Expansion of Rainfall-Tracking Program With Farmer Networks ............................... 49 4.2.4 Improved Natural Resource and Soil Management ............................................................................ 49 4.2.5 Training on Climate Change ................................................................................................................... 49 5. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ........................................................................................ 49 5.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE IN POST-HARVEST PROCESSING ACTIVITIES ........................................ 49 5.2 FALL ARMY WORM COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM ................................................................................................. 49 5.3 AFLATOXINS IN CEREALS ............................................................................................................................................ 50 6. OUTREACH AND INCLUSION .............................................................................................. 50 7. IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERSHIPS ................................................................................... 52 7.1 SYNERGY ACTIVITIES WITH OTHER USAID PROJECTS ...................................................................................... 52 8. MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND LEARNING ............................................................... 53 8.1 INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ......................................................................................... 53 8.1.1 Scaling of the CommAgri Application ................................................................................................... 53 8.1.2 Study on ICT in Rural Senegal ................................................................................................................ 54 8.2 SUPPORT TO CNCAS IN GEO-REFERENCING FINANCED AREAS .................................................................... 54 8.3 UPDATING OF MONITORING TOOLS ...................................................................................................................... 55 FEED THE FUTURE SENEGAL – NAATAL MBAY – FY18 ANNUAL REPORT i 8.3.1 Network Season Debriefings ................................................................................................................. 55 8.4 TRACEABILITY OF CERTIFIED SEEDS FOR RAIN-FED RICE ................................................................................ 55 8.5 EXTENSION OF THE NETWORK DATABASE-DRIVEN MONITORING SYSTEM.......................................... 55 8.6 STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................................ 56 8.6.1 Midline Study ............................................................................................................................................. 56 8.6.2 Capitalization Study .................................................................................................................................. 56 8.7 FIELD LEARNING VISITS ............................................................................................................................................... 57 9. PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 57 9.1 PRODUCTION OF TRAINING AND COMMUNICATION SUPPORT MATERIALS ........................................... 57 9.2 TV PANEL DEBATES ....................................................................................................................................................... 58 9.3 MASS AWARENESS RAISING ON GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES VIA COMMUNITY RADIOS ....... 58 10. FY19 PRIORITIES .................................................................................................................. 58 11. IMPLEMENTATION TRACKING TABLES ........................................................................ 60 COMPONENT 1 – AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVED .....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the Project to Strengthen Mother and Child Health and Health Information Systems (Pasmesiss) Government-To-Governm
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH AND HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PASMESISS) GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT FIXED-AMOUNT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 2018 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by Peter Cleaves, Lisa Slifer Mbacké, Mamadou Fall, Ndaté Guèye, Déguène Pouye and Mame Aïssatou Mbaye of Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company, for the USAID/Senegal Monitoring and Evaluation Project. EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH AND HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PASMESISS) GOVERNMENT-TO- GOVERNMENT FIXED-AMOUNT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Revised February 2018 Contracted under AID-685-C-15-00003 USAID Senegal Mission-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation Project Cover Photo: A mother with her child in Kaffrine Regional Hospital for a consultation. Credit: USAID/Senegal Monitoring and Evaluation Project DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................................ii Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CRVA Report – Senegal
    Country Risk and Vulnerability Assessment SENEGAL OCTOBER 2017 ECOWAS COMMISSION COMMISSION DE LA CEDEAO COMMISSÃO DA CEDEAO Country Risk and Vulnerability Assessment: Senegal | 1 DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo by Pshegubj, accessed via Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fishing_boats_in_Dakar.jpg). Reproduced under Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0. Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .....................................................................................................................................5 Message from the President of the ECOWAS Commission ........................................................................................7 Statement from the Vice President of the ECOWAS Commission .............................................................................8 Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................9 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Research Process ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Language Mapping in the Regions of Fatick, Kaffrine and Kaolack Lecture Pour Tous
    REPORT ON LANGUAGE MAPPING IN THE REGIONS OF FATICK, KAFFRINE AND KAOLACK LECTURE POUR TOUS Submitted: November 15, 2017 Revised: February 14, 2018 Contract Number: AID-OAA-I-14-00055/AID-685-TO-16-00003 Activity Start and End Date: October 26, 2016 to July 10, 2021 Total Award Amount: $71,097,573.00 Contract Officer’s Representative: Kadiatou Cisse Abbassi Submitted by: Chemonics International Sacre Coeur Pyrotechnie Lot No. 73, Cite Keur Gorgui Tel: 221 78585 66 51 Email: [email protected] Lecture Pour Tous - Report on Language Mapping – February 2018 1 REPORT ON LANGUAGE MAPPING IN THE REGIONS OF FATICK, KAFFRINE AND KAOLACK Contracted under AID-OAA-I-14-00055/AID-685-TO-16-00003 Lecture Pour Tous DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publicapublicationtion do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States AgenAgencycy for International Development or the United States Government. Lecture Pour Tous - Report on Language Mapping – February 2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 12 3. STUDY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Context of the study ............................................................................................................. 14 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • SÉNÉGAL Rapport Spécial
    SENEGAL Special Report August 31, 2015 Poor start to the agropastoral season in central and northern areas KEY MESSAGES This year, farmers are resorting to short-cycle varieties of cowpea and Souna millet crops more than usual as a strategy to limit the negative effects of the late start of the rains on crop production in order to ensure near-average crop yields. With the likely downsizing of the land area planted in groundnuts, Senegal’s main cash crop, household incomes between December and March will likely be below average. The poor pastoral conditions between February and June severely affected pastoral incomes, which have been well below-average as a result of the decline in animal production and livestock prices. The larger than usual numbers of animal deaths have adversely affected the livelihoods of pastoral households, limiting their food access on local markets. However, the recent recovery of pastures and replenishment of watering holes have helped improve the situation in many pastoral areas. Food assistance from the government and its humanitarian partners is easing poor households’ food insecurity. Humanitarian food and non-food assistance and cash transfer programs will limit the use of atypical coping strategies (ex. borrowing and reducing food and nonfood expenditures) by recipient households. An examination of food prices on domestic markets shows prices for locally grown millet still slightly above-average and prices for regular broken rice, the main foodstuff consumed by Senegalese households, at below-average levels. However, despite these prices, the below-average incomes of poor agropastoral households is preventing many households from adequating accessing these food items.
    [Show full text]
  • LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development
    GASTON BERGER UNIVERSITY LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development REPORT OF THE RESEARCH COMMITTEE FOR THE REALIZATION OF AN INVENTORY OF DATA AND TOOLS IN THE CADASTRAL SECTOR IN SENEGAL Presented by Mouhamadou Mawloud DIAKHATÉ Full Professor of Universities Laboratory Director October, 2020 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS INTRODUCTION I/ HISTORY OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE ORGANIZATION OF STATE STRUCTURES II/ INVENTORY OF STAKEHOLDERS AND EXISTING DATA III/ RESPONSIBILITIES AND COMMITMENT OF THE ACTORS IN THE COLLECTION OF CADASTRAL DATA IV/ RELIABLE CADASTRAL DATA AND MONITORING OF ODDS V/ ROADMAP FOR STRENGTHENING THE CADASTRAL ECOSYSTEM V.1 Objectives of strengthening the cadastral ecosystem V.2 Contribution of spatial remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) and statistics to the modernization of the national cadastre V.2.1. Implementation of a multi-purpose cadastre in Senegal V.2.2. Thematic maps V.2.3. 2D and 3D Carto. V.2.4. Statistical modelling V.2.5. Methodology for the elaboration of the comic book V.3 Content of the roadmap V.4. Priority and Roadmap Agenda CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY ITEMS 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANDS : National Agency of Statistics and Demography ArcGIS: Suite of geographic information software developed by Esri ADB: African Development Bank BAGDOC: Office of General Affairs and Documentation BD TOPO: Topographic data bank BLC: Office of Legislation and Litigation PRB: Public Relations Office CAGF: Framework for analysis of land governance CGE: Center for Large Enterprises
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Woodlands in the Groundnut Basin of Kaffrine Region in Senegal
    Bakhoum et al … J . Appl. Biosci. 2013 . Diversity of woodlands in the groundnut basin of Kaffrine, Senegal Journ al of Applied Biosciences 63 : 4 674 – 4688 ISSN 1997–5902 Diversity of woodlands in the groundnut basin of Kaffrine region in Senegal Charles Bakhoum 1*, Babou Ndour 2, Leonard Elie Akpo 3 1Département des opérations, World Vision Sénégal, B.P. 3731 RP, Dakar (Sénégal). 2Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles ISRA (CNRA) de Bambey, B.P. 53 Bambey 3Laboratoire d’Écologie végétale et Eco-hydrologie, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta DIOP, Sénégal, B.P. 5005 Dakar (Sénégal) *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Original submitted in on 15th November 2012. Published online at www.m.elewa.org on 30 th March 2013. ABSTRACT Objective: This work has examined the current state of woodlands in the groundnut basin to determine its importance Methodology and results: The floristic diversity of woodlands in the Groundnut Basin of was studied through ecological parameters. The woody flora contained 75 species with a predominance of three (3) families (Combretaceae, Mimosaceae and Caesalpiniaceae) represented by more than six (6) species. The statements from the four targeted rural communities indicated: 31 species for Ndiognick, 43 for Birkelane, 46 for Saly Escale and 48 for Ida mouride. The overall average density was 17 individuals/ha and varied depending on rural communities: 7 individuals/ha for Ndiognick, 9 individuals/ha for Birkelane, 18 individuals for Ida mouride and 39 individuals for Saly Escale. In Ndiognick and Birkelane rural communities, the cover was lower because they were less provided in species ( Cordyla pinnata, Combretum glutinosum, Piliostigma reticulatum and Adansonia digitata ) with summits higher than 5m 2/ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Universite Cheikh Anta Diop De Dakar Ecole
    UNIVERSITE CHEIKH ANTA DIOP DE DAKAR ECOLE DOCTORALE: SCIENCES DE LA VIE DE LA SANTE ET DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT (ED-SEV) ECOLE INTER ETATS DES SCIENCES ET MEDECINE VETERINAIRES (EISMV) Année: 2013 N° d’ordre : 65 GESTION DES LIGNEUX FOURRAGERS DANS UN AXE DE TRANSHUMANCE DE SAISON SECHE AU SENEGAL (Cas de la région de Kaffrine) Mémoire présenté et soutenu publiquement Samedi 21 Décembre 2013 pour obtenir le DOCTORAT en Biologie, Productions et Pathologies Animales Spécialité: PASTORALISME Option : Ecologie pastorale par: M. Oumar SARR Président : M. Sawadogo Jérôme Germain, Professeur titulaire, EISMV/UCAD Rapporteurs : M. Paul Marie Ndiaye, Chargé d’enseignements, FLSH/UCAD M. Mathieu Gueye, Maître de recherche, IFAN-CHAD/UCAD M. Léonard Elie AKPO, Professeur titulaire, UCAD Examinateur : M. Amadou Tamsir Diop, Directeur de recherche, LNERV/ISRA M. Yaya Thiongane, Directeur de recherche, LNERV/ISRA Directeur de thèse : M. Léonard Elie AKPO, Professeur titulaire, UCAD DEDICACES Qu’il me soit permis tout d’abord de rendre grâce à DIEU, le Bienfaiteur, le Miséricordieux. Guérissez nous dans le monde ici bas et préservez nous ensuite de la peur et de la tristesse dans la vie future. A mes grands parents, particulièrement à Mame Awa Cissé, Mère Anta, Mère Khady et mon défunt grand père Aliou Sarr, que la terre de Touba lui soit légère. A mes parents : mon père Mamadou, ma mère Noel Diop, ma tante Ndaye Dior et tous mes frères et sœurs. A mes tatas, Mariama Sarr et Adja Absa Sarr, vous êtes merveilleuses. A tous mes collègues de labo et mes promotionnaires. A tous mes amis, pour leur amitié sincère, mention spéciale à Abdallah Diallo, Djibril Cissé, Ibrahima Ndiaye, Nafi Dieng et Ababacar Diagne pour leur soutien durant toute la durée de ma thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Normative Influences on the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Among 0–14 Years Old Girls in Senegal: A
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Analysing Normative Influences on the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among 0–14 Years Old Girls in Senegal: A Spatial Bayesian Hierarchical Regression Approach Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala 1,2,*, Chibuzor Christopher Nnanatu 3 , Glory Atilola 3 , Paul Komba 3, Lubanzadio Mavatikua 3, Zhuzhi Moore 4 and Dennis Matanda 5 1 Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 2 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa 3 Department of Mathematics, Physics & Electrical Engineering (MPEE), Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] (C.C.N.); [email protected] (G.A.); [email protected] (P.K.); [email protected] (L.M.) 4 Independent Consultant, Vienna, VA 22182, USA; [email protected] 5 Population Council, Avenue 5, 3rd Floor, Rose Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful traditional practice affecting the health and rights of women and girls. This has raised global attention on the imple- Citation: Kandala, N.-B.; Nnanatu, mentation of strategies to eliminate the practice in conformity with the Sustainable Development C.C.; Atilola, G.; Komba, P.; Goals (SDGs). A recent study on the trends of FGM/C among Senegalese women (aged 15–49) Mavatikua, L.; Moore, Z.; Matanda, D. which examined how individual- and community-level factors affected the practice, found significant Analysing Normative Influences on regional variations in the practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014
    REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL One People - One Goal - One Faith Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014 TABLE OF Section 1: General information 3 CONTENTS Section 2: Current drought situation 6 Section 3: Description of intervention activities 11 Section 4: Summary analysis 22 Section 5: Standard operating procedures 23 Annex 1: Logical frame work 27 Annex 2: Action plan 28 Instructions: Please complete the Final Implementation Plan (FIP) providing as much detail as possible. Use your Operations Plan to assist you in completing FIP. Attach any relevant documents as Annexes. As per ARC Guidelines, the FIP must be submitted at least one month before the pay-out date. It can be submitted as soon as countries are notified by ARC Ltd. that a payout is likely . Countries may consult with the ARC Secretariat before submitting their FIPs. 2 01 Name of Country: Senegal GENERAL Contact Person for Final Implementation Plan (FIP): Name and surname: Mr Massamba DIOP Telephone: (+221)77 5291562 / INFORMATION (+221) 33 821 08 11 Email: [email protected] Bank account details for receiving payout: Banque Sahelo Saharienne pour l’Investissement et le Commerce (BSIC) Place de l’Independance Dakar No Ko 100 10 60 19 47 000 13 18 Coverage period: Year : 2014 Saison: 2014/2015 Expected payout amount as of : 10 December 8 200 000 000 CFA Expected payout date: 3 1.1. Early warning (EW) activities Indeed, a Rural Survey on Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition (ERASAN) was conducted over the period 14 to 01 In 1998 the Government of Senegal established a National 27 October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I
    Table of Contents I. Non-technical summary .......................................................................................... 13 I.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 I.2. Project description ............................................................................................... 13 I.3. Political, legal and institutional context ................................................................ 14 I.3.1. Policy framework ..................................................................................................... 14 I.3.2. Legal framework for environmental and social management ................................ 14 I.3.3. Institutional framework ........................................................................................... 14 I.4. Environmental and social situation of the project area ........................................ 15 I.4.1. Presentation of the physical environment .............................................................. 15 I.4.2. Presentation of the biological environment ............................................................ 16 I.4.3. Presentation of the human environment ................................................................ 16 I.5. Analysis of variants .............................................................................................. 17 I.6. Results of the public consultations ....................................................................... 17 I.7. Results of the
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape–Level Institutional Assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal
    Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92–9146–455–4 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for better and more sustainable use of livestock. ILRI is a member of the CGIAR Consortium, a global research partnership of 15 centres working with many partners for a food-secure future. ILRI has two main campuses in East Africa and other hubs in East, West and Southern Africa and South, Southeast and East Asia. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its science is carried out by 15 research centres that are members of the CGIAR Consortium in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles ii Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal Astou Diao Camara1 and Mamadou Fall2 1. Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (ISRA) 2. Cheikh Anta Diop University December 2015 Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal iii © 2015 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Licence. To view this licence, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy, duplicate or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmit any part of this publication or portions thereof without permission, and to make translations, adaptations, or other derivative works under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document
    FAO/GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PROJECT DOCUMENT PROJECT TITLE: Mainstreaming ecosystem-based approaches to climate-resilient rural livelihoods in vulnerable rural areas through the Farmer Field School methodology PROJECT SYMBOL: GCP/SEN/065/LDF Recipient country/ies: Senegal Resource Partner: LDCF FAO project ID: 5503 GEF/LDCF Project ID: 625461 Executing Partner(s): Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MAER) Expected EOD (starting date): 10/01/2015 Expected NTE (End date): 10/01/2020 Contribution to FAO’s a. Strategic objective/Organizational Result: SO2: OO1, OO2 ; SO3: Strategic Framework OO1 b. Regional Result/Priority Area: Reduction of vulnerability to threats to food security and nutrition; improved management and governance for sustainable use of natural resources c. Country Programming Framework Outcome: Country Programming Framework Outcome: CPF- 1 (Strengthening the resilience of vulnerable populations), and CPF-2 (growth, diversification and development of agro-forestry-pastoral production) GEF Focal Area/LDCF/SCCF: Climate Change Adaptation GEF/LDCF/SCCF Strategic Objectives: CCA-1: Reduce vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA-2: Increase adaptive capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA-3: Promote transfer and adoption of adaptation technology Environmental and Social Risk Classification: Low √ Moderate High Financing Plan: LDCF allocation: USD 6,228,995 USD 3,321,254 (PAFA-E) Co-financing: USD 9,769,939 (PASALouMaKaf) USD 4,022,146 (PADAER) USD 3,068,656 (ANGMV) USD 4,225,390 (PAPIL) USD 200,000 (FAO) Subtotal Co-financing: USD 24,607,385 USD 30,836,380 Total Budget: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Senegal's agricultural, pastoral and forest sectors are likely to be affected by climate change with regard to both food crop and forage crop yields.
    [Show full text]