DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Project to Strengthen Mother and Child Health and Health Information Systems (Pasmesiss) Government-To-Governm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Project to Strengthen Mother and Child Health and Health Information Systems (Pasmesiss) Government-To-Governm PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH AND HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PASMESISS) GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT FIXED-AMOUNT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 2018 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by Peter Cleaves, Lisa Slifer Mbacké, Mamadou Fall, Ndaté Guèye, Déguène Pouye and Mame Aïssatou Mbaye of Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company, for the USAID/Senegal Monitoring and Evaluation Project. EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH AND HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PASMESISS) GOVERNMENT-TO- GOVERNMENT FIXED-AMOUNT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Revised February 2018 Contracted under AID-685-C-15-00003 USAID Senegal Mission-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation Project Cover Photo: A mother with her child in Kaffrine Regional Hospital for a consultation. Credit: USAID/Senegal Monitoring and Evaluation Project DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................................ii Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Evaluation Purpose and Questions ....................................................................................................................... 1 Activity Background .................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Evaluation Design, Methods and Limitations ...................................................................................................... 1 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 1 Activity Background and Objectives ........................................................................................... 6 Activity Objectives ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Evaluation Questions .................................................................................................................... 6 Evaluation Methods and Limitations ........................................................................................... 7 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Limitations .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Findings and Conclusions.............................................................................................................. 9 Question 1: Pros & Cons? ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Question 2a: Building Institutional Capacity? ................................................................................................... 13 Question 2b: Training Gaps? ................................................................................................................................ 16 Question 3 Level of Ownership? ........................................................................................................................ 16 Question 4: Sustainability? .................................................................................................................................... 18 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 20 Annexes ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Annex I: PASMESISS Implementation ................................................................................................................. 23 Annex II: Sources of Information ........................................................................................................................ 33 Annex III: List of Key Informant Interview and Group Interview Participants ........................................ 35 Annex IV: HSS+ and PASMESISS Comparative Advantages ......................................................................... 40 Annex V: Notes sur la Comptabilité et Gestion Financière ......................................................................... 46 Annex VI: Notes sur le DHIS2 ............................................................................................................................ 54 Annex VII : Matrice des Recommandations et actions à mener ................................................................ 63 Annex VIII: Evaluation Statement of Work ...................................................................................................... 72 Annex IX : Data Collection Instruments .......................................................................................................... 31 Annex X: Evaluation Team CVs .......................................................................................................................... 35 Annex XI: Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................................... 50 PASMESISS G2G FARA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The evaluation team would like to express its sincere gratitude to the medical officials and stakeholders in the Kaffrine Region, particularly Mr. Jean Baptiste Coly, governor, and Dr. Momodou Moustapha Diop, chief regional doctor. From the outset of the team’s visit to Kaffrine, we were welcomed and provided with an open door to frank discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of PASMESISS. The evaluation team would also like to thank the many Ministry of Health and Social Action staff members in DAGE, DPRS and DSISS who took the time to meet with the evaluation team and answer numerous follow-up questions via phone and email. Special thanks go to the PASMESISS AOR at USAID, Dr. Oumar Sagna, who worked closely with the team in developing the original statement of work and field workplan and provided immediate and detailed responses to our numerous requests for additional documents and clarifications. PASMESISS G2G FARA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ii ACRONYMS ADIE Agence de l’Informatique de l’Etat ADS Automated Directives System AOR Agreement Officer’s Representative ARD Agence régionale de développement ARMP Autorité de Régulation des Marchés Publics CRV Comité Régional de Validation CS Comité de Santé DAGE Direction de l’Administration Générale et de l’Equipement DCFE Direction de la Coopération et des Financements Extérieurs DHIS District Health Information System DSISS Direction du Système d’information sanitaire et social DPRS Direction de la Planification de la recherche de des statistiques DS District Sanitaire EPS Etablissement Public de Santé FARA Fixed-Amount Reimbursable Agreement FCR Findings, Conclusions, Recommendations FD Financement Direct FY Fiscal Year GAT Government Agreement Team GATR Government Agreement Technical Representative GAVI Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization G2G Government to Government GoS Government of Senegal GoTAP Government Technical Assistance Provider HSS Health System Strengthening IGE Inspection Générale d’Etat IL Implementation Letter IP Implementing Partner LE Lettre d’Exécution MCD Médecin Chef de District MCR Médecin Chef de Région M&E Monitoring & Evaluation MEFP Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et du Plan PASMESISS G2G FARA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION iii MSAS Ministère de la Santé et de l’Action sociale MSI Management Systems International NHP National Health Plan OFM Office of Finance and Management (USAID) PASMESISS Programme d’amélioration de la santé, de l’enfant et du système d’information sanitaire et sociale PFMRAF Public Financial Management Risk Assessment Framework PNDS Plan National de Santé POCL Plan Opérationnel des Collectivités Locales PS Poste de Santé PTA Plan de travail annuel PTF Partenaire Technique et Financier PV Procès-Verbal (minutes, proceedings) RBM Results-Based Management REDISSE Projet Régional, d’amélioration des systèmes de surveillance des maladies régionales en Afrique de l’Ouest RM Région Médicale RSS Renforcement du Système de Santé SOW Statement of Work SRMNIA Santé Reproductive, Maternelle, Néonatale, Infantile et de l’Adolescent TDR Termes de Référence (Scope of Work) TOMPRO Logiciel de Management et Système automatisé intégré de gestion comptable USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government PASMESISS G2G FARA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Evaluation Purpose and Questions The purpose of this evaluation is to support both USAID/Senegal and the Government of Senegal (GoS) in identifying strengths and weaknesses in the current Government to Government (G2G) approach in improving health systems at the regional level. Through this evaluation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRVA Report – Senegal
    Country Risk and Vulnerability Assessment SENEGAL OCTOBER 2017 ECOWAS COMMISSION COMMISSION DE LA CEDEAO COMMISSÃO DA CEDEAO Country Risk and Vulnerability Assessment: Senegal | 1 DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo by Pshegubj, accessed via Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fishing_boats_in_Dakar.jpg). Reproduced under Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0. Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .....................................................................................................................................5 Message from the President of the ECOWAS Commission ........................................................................................7 Statement from the Vice President of the ECOWAS Commission .............................................................................8 Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................9 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Research Process ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Language Mapping in the Regions of Fatick, Kaffrine and Kaolack Lecture Pour Tous
    REPORT ON LANGUAGE MAPPING IN THE REGIONS OF FATICK, KAFFRINE AND KAOLACK LECTURE POUR TOUS Submitted: November 15, 2017 Revised: February 14, 2018 Contract Number: AID-OAA-I-14-00055/AID-685-TO-16-00003 Activity Start and End Date: October 26, 2016 to July 10, 2021 Total Award Amount: $71,097,573.00 Contract Officer’s Representative: Kadiatou Cisse Abbassi Submitted by: Chemonics International Sacre Coeur Pyrotechnie Lot No. 73, Cite Keur Gorgui Tel: 221 78585 66 51 Email: [email protected] Lecture Pour Tous - Report on Language Mapping – February 2018 1 REPORT ON LANGUAGE MAPPING IN THE REGIONS OF FATICK, KAFFRINE AND KAOLACK Contracted under AID-OAA-I-14-00055/AID-685-TO-16-00003 Lecture Pour Tous DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publicapublicationtion do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States AgenAgencycy for International Development or the United States Government. Lecture Pour Tous - Report on Language Mapping – February 2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 12 3. STUDY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Context of the study ............................................................................................................. 14 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • SÉNÉGAL Rapport Spécial
    SENEGAL Special Report August 31, 2015 Poor start to the agropastoral season in central and northern areas KEY MESSAGES This year, farmers are resorting to short-cycle varieties of cowpea and Souna millet crops more than usual as a strategy to limit the negative effects of the late start of the rains on crop production in order to ensure near-average crop yields. With the likely downsizing of the land area planted in groundnuts, Senegal’s main cash crop, household incomes between December and March will likely be below average. The poor pastoral conditions between February and June severely affected pastoral incomes, which have been well below-average as a result of the decline in animal production and livestock prices. The larger than usual numbers of animal deaths have adversely affected the livelihoods of pastoral households, limiting their food access on local markets. However, the recent recovery of pastures and replenishment of watering holes have helped improve the situation in many pastoral areas. Food assistance from the government and its humanitarian partners is easing poor households’ food insecurity. Humanitarian food and non-food assistance and cash transfer programs will limit the use of atypical coping strategies (ex. borrowing and reducing food and nonfood expenditures) by recipient households. An examination of food prices on domestic markets shows prices for locally grown millet still slightly above-average and prices for regular broken rice, the main foodstuff consumed by Senegalese households, at below-average levels. However, despite these prices, the below-average incomes of poor agropastoral households is preventing many households from adequating accessing these food items.
    [Show full text]
  • LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development
    GASTON BERGER UNIVERSITY LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development REPORT OF THE RESEARCH COMMITTEE FOR THE REALIZATION OF AN INVENTORY OF DATA AND TOOLS IN THE CADASTRAL SECTOR IN SENEGAL Presented by Mouhamadou Mawloud DIAKHATÉ Full Professor of Universities Laboratory Director October, 2020 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS INTRODUCTION I/ HISTORY OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE ORGANIZATION OF STATE STRUCTURES II/ INVENTORY OF STAKEHOLDERS AND EXISTING DATA III/ RESPONSIBILITIES AND COMMITMENT OF THE ACTORS IN THE COLLECTION OF CADASTRAL DATA IV/ RELIABLE CADASTRAL DATA AND MONITORING OF ODDS V/ ROADMAP FOR STRENGTHENING THE CADASTRAL ECOSYSTEM V.1 Objectives of strengthening the cadastral ecosystem V.2 Contribution of spatial remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) and statistics to the modernization of the national cadastre V.2.1. Implementation of a multi-purpose cadastre in Senegal V.2.2. Thematic maps V.2.3. 2D and 3D Carto. V.2.4. Statistical modelling V.2.5. Methodology for the elaboration of the comic book V.3 Content of the roadmap V.4. Priority and Roadmap Agenda CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY ITEMS 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANDS : National Agency of Statistics and Demography ArcGIS: Suite of geographic information software developed by Esri ADB: African Development Bank BAGDOC: Office of General Affairs and Documentation BD TOPO: Topographic data bank BLC: Office of Legislation and Litigation PRB: Public Relations Office CAGF: Framework for analysis of land governance CGE: Center for Large Enterprises
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Woodlands in the Groundnut Basin of Kaffrine Region in Senegal
    Bakhoum et al … J . Appl. Biosci. 2013 . Diversity of woodlands in the groundnut basin of Kaffrine, Senegal Journ al of Applied Biosciences 63 : 4 674 – 4688 ISSN 1997–5902 Diversity of woodlands in the groundnut basin of Kaffrine region in Senegal Charles Bakhoum 1*, Babou Ndour 2, Leonard Elie Akpo 3 1Département des opérations, World Vision Sénégal, B.P. 3731 RP, Dakar (Sénégal). 2Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles ISRA (CNRA) de Bambey, B.P. 53 Bambey 3Laboratoire d’Écologie végétale et Eco-hydrologie, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta DIOP, Sénégal, B.P. 5005 Dakar (Sénégal) *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Original submitted in on 15th November 2012. Published online at www.m.elewa.org on 30 th March 2013. ABSTRACT Objective: This work has examined the current state of woodlands in the groundnut basin to determine its importance Methodology and results: The floristic diversity of woodlands in the Groundnut Basin of was studied through ecological parameters. The woody flora contained 75 species with a predominance of three (3) families (Combretaceae, Mimosaceae and Caesalpiniaceae) represented by more than six (6) species. The statements from the four targeted rural communities indicated: 31 species for Ndiognick, 43 for Birkelane, 46 for Saly Escale and 48 for Ida mouride. The overall average density was 17 individuals/ha and varied depending on rural communities: 7 individuals/ha for Ndiognick, 9 individuals/ha for Birkelane, 18 individuals for Ida mouride and 39 individuals for Saly Escale. In Ndiognick and Birkelane rural communities, the cover was lower because they were less provided in species ( Cordyla pinnata, Combretum glutinosum, Piliostigma reticulatum and Adansonia digitata ) with summits higher than 5m 2/ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Universite Cheikh Anta Diop De Dakar Ecole
    UNIVERSITE CHEIKH ANTA DIOP DE DAKAR ECOLE DOCTORALE: SCIENCES DE LA VIE DE LA SANTE ET DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT (ED-SEV) ECOLE INTER ETATS DES SCIENCES ET MEDECINE VETERINAIRES (EISMV) Année: 2013 N° d’ordre : 65 GESTION DES LIGNEUX FOURRAGERS DANS UN AXE DE TRANSHUMANCE DE SAISON SECHE AU SENEGAL (Cas de la région de Kaffrine) Mémoire présenté et soutenu publiquement Samedi 21 Décembre 2013 pour obtenir le DOCTORAT en Biologie, Productions et Pathologies Animales Spécialité: PASTORALISME Option : Ecologie pastorale par: M. Oumar SARR Président : M. Sawadogo Jérôme Germain, Professeur titulaire, EISMV/UCAD Rapporteurs : M. Paul Marie Ndiaye, Chargé d’enseignements, FLSH/UCAD M. Mathieu Gueye, Maître de recherche, IFAN-CHAD/UCAD M. Léonard Elie AKPO, Professeur titulaire, UCAD Examinateur : M. Amadou Tamsir Diop, Directeur de recherche, LNERV/ISRA M. Yaya Thiongane, Directeur de recherche, LNERV/ISRA Directeur de thèse : M. Léonard Elie AKPO, Professeur titulaire, UCAD DEDICACES Qu’il me soit permis tout d’abord de rendre grâce à DIEU, le Bienfaiteur, le Miséricordieux. Guérissez nous dans le monde ici bas et préservez nous ensuite de la peur et de la tristesse dans la vie future. A mes grands parents, particulièrement à Mame Awa Cissé, Mère Anta, Mère Khady et mon défunt grand père Aliou Sarr, que la terre de Touba lui soit légère. A mes parents : mon père Mamadou, ma mère Noel Diop, ma tante Ndaye Dior et tous mes frères et sœurs. A mes tatas, Mariama Sarr et Adja Absa Sarr, vous êtes merveilleuses. A tous mes collègues de labo et mes promotionnaires. A tous mes amis, pour leur amitié sincère, mention spéciale à Abdallah Diallo, Djibril Cissé, Ibrahima Ndiaye, Nafi Dieng et Ababacar Diagne pour leur soutien durant toute la durée de ma thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Normative Influences on the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Among 0–14 Years Old Girls in Senegal: A
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Analysing Normative Influences on the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among 0–14 Years Old Girls in Senegal: A Spatial Bayesian Hierarchical Regression Approach Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala 1,2,*, Chibuzor Christopher Nnanatu 3 , Glory Atilola 3 , Paul Komba 3, Lubanzadio Mavatikua 3, Zhuzhi Moore 4 and Dennis Matanda 5 1 Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 2 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa 3 Department of Mathematics, Physics & Electrical Engineering (MPEE), Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] (C.C.N.); [email protected] (G.A.); [email protected] (P.K.); [email protected] (L.M.) 4 Independent Consultant, Vienna, VA 22182, USA; [email protected] 5 Population Council, Avenue 5, 3rd Floor, Rose Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful traditional practice affecting the health and rights of women and girls. This has raised global attention on the imple- Citation: Kandala, N.-B.; Nnanatu, mentation of strategies to eliminate the practice in conformity with the Sustainable Development C.C.; Atilola, G.; Komba, P.; Goals (SDGs). A recent study on the trends of FGM/C among Senegalese women (aged 15–49) Mavatikua, L.; Moore, Z.; Matanda, D. which examined how individual- and community-level factors affected the practice, found significant Analysing Normative Influences on regional variations in the practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014
    REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL One People - One Goal - One Faith Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014 TABLE OF Section 1: General information 3 CONTENTS Section 2: Current drought situation 6 Section 3: Description of intervention activities 11 Section 4: Summary analysis 22 Section 5: Standard operating procedures 23 Annex 1: Logical frame work 27 Annex 2: Action plan 28 Instructions: Please complete the Final Implementation Plan (FIP) providing as much detail as possible. Use your Operations Plan to assist you in completing FIP. Attach any relevant documents as Annexes. As per ARC Guidelines, the FIP must be submitted at least one month before the pay-out date. It can be submitted as soon as countries are notified by ARC Ltd. that a payout is likely . Countries may consult with the ARC Secretariat before submitting their FIPs. 2 01 Name of Country: Senegal GENERAL Contact Person for Final Implementation Plan (FIP): Name and surname: Mr Massamba DIOP Telephone: (+221)77 5291562 / INFORMATION (+221) 33 821 08 11 Email: [email protected] Bank account details for receiving payout: Banque Sahelo Saharienne pour l’Investissement et le Commerce (BSIC) Place de l’Independance Dakar No Ko 100 10 60 19 47 000 13 18 Coverage period: Year : 2014 Saison: 2014/2015 Expected payout amount as of : 10 December 8 200 000 000 CFA Expected payout date: 3 1.1. Early warning (EW) activities Indeed, a Rural Survey on Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition (ERASAN) was conducted over the period 14 to 01 In 1998 the Government of Senegal established a National 27 October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I
    Table of Contents I. Non-technical summary .......................................................................................... 13 I.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 I.2. Project description ............................................................................................... 13 I.3. Political, legal and institutional context ................................................................ 14 I.3.1. Policy framework ..................................................................................................... 14 I.3.2. Legal framework for environmental and social management ................................ 14 I.3.3. Institutional framework ........................................................................................... 14 I.4. Environmental and social situation of the project area ........................................ 15 I.4.1. Presentation of the physical environment .............................................................. 15 I.4.2. Presentation of the biological environment ............................................................ 16 I.4.3. Presentation of the human environment ................................................................ 16 I.5. Analysis of variants .............................................................................................. 17 I.6. Results of the public consultations ....................................................................... 17 I.7. Results of the
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape–Level Institutional Assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal
    Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92–9146–455–4 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for better and more sustainable use of livestock. ILRI is a member of the CGIAR Consortium, a global research partnership of 15 centres working with many partners for a food-secure future. ILRI has two main campuses in East Africa and other hubs in East, West and Southern Africa and South, Southeast and East Asia. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its science is carried out by 15 research centres that are members of the CGIAR Consortium in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles ii Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal Astou Diao Camara1 and Mamadou Fall2 1. Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (ISRA) 2. Cheikh Anta Diop University December 2015 Landscape–level institutional assessment of Baobolong, Kaffrine, Senegal iii © 2015 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Licence. To view this licence, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy, duplicate or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmit any part of this publication or portions thereof without permission, and to make translations, adaptations, or other derivative works under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document
    FAO/GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PROJECT DOCUMENT PROJECT TITLE: Mainstreaming ecosystem-based approaches to climate-resilient rural livelihoods in vulnerable rural areas through the Farmer Field School methodology PROJECT SYMBOL: GCP/SEN/065/LDF Recipient country/ies: Senegal Resource Partner: LDCF FAO project ID: 5503 GEF/LDCF Project ID: 625461 Executing Partner(s): Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MAER) Expected EOD (starting date): 10/01/2015 Expected NTE (End date): 10/01/2020 Contribution to FAO’s a. Strategic objective/Organizational Result: SO2: OO1, OO2 ; SO3: Strategic Framework OO1 b. Regional Result/Priority Area: Reduction of vulnerability to threats to food security and nutrition; improved management and governance for sustainable use of natural resources c. Country Programming Framework Outcome: Country Programming Framework Outcome: CPF- 1 (Strengthening the resilience of vulnerable populations), and CPF-2 (growth, diversification and development of agro-forestry-pastoral production) GEF Focal Area/LDCF/SCCF: Climate Change Adaptation GEF/LDCF/SCCF Strategic Objectives: CCA-1: Reduce vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA-2: Increase adaptive capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA-3: Promote transfer and adoption of adaptation technology Environmental and Social Risk Classification: Low √ Moderate High Financing Plan: LDCF allocation: USD 6,228,995 USD 3,321,254 (PAFA-E) Co-financing: USD 9,769,939 (PASALouMaKaf) USD 4,022,146 (PADAER) USD 3,068,656 (ANGMV) USD 4,225,390 (PAPIL) USD 200,000 (FAO) Subtotal Co-financing: USD 24,607,385 USD 30,836,380 Total Budget: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Senegal's agricultural, pastoral and forest sectors are likely to be affected by climate change with regard to both food crop and forage crop yields.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Development Assistance Framework for the Immediate Socio-Economic Response to COVID-19: Contextualization in Senegal
    United Nations development assistance framework for the immediate socio-economic response to COVID-19: Contextualization in Senegal October 2020 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMMEDIATE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESPONSE TO COVID-19 Preface In recent years, Senegal has recorded strong economic growth and significant progress in social development through the implementation of the Senegal Emergent Plan (PSE). Unfortunately, like other countries in the world and as various studies have shown, the impact of COVID-19 threatens to undermine the progress made by the country and in particular the achievement of the Goals set out in Agendas 2030 and Agenda 2063. The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a health crisis. It is also an economic, social, humanitarian, security and human rights crisis that affects us as individuals, families, communities and societies. To stem it, the Government of Senegal, under the leadership of President Macky SALL, has set up an Economic and Social Resilience Program (PRES) for very short-term actions. The magnitude of the shock resulting from this pandemic has necessitated the reorganization of development interventions through the Adjusted and Accelerated Priority Action Plan (PAP 2A) which not only provides a strengthened response to this shock, but also lays the foundations for a strong economic recovery that should keep the country on the initially adopted path of emergence. This United Nations Framework for Socio-Economic Response in Senegal is the collective contribution of the United Nations in Senegal in response to the socio-economic impact of COVID-19. The framework will put into practice the March 2020 report of the UN Secretary General “Shared responsibility, global solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19”.
    [Show full text]