The Muscogee Nation of Florida, Also Known As the Florida Tribe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Muscogee Nation of Florida, Also Known As the Florida Tribe MUSCOGEE NATION OF FLORIDA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Muscogee Nation ofFlorida, also known as the Florida Tribe ofEastem Creek Indians, is listed as Petitioner Number 32 in the Branch of Acknowledgment of the Bureau oflndian Affairs. We are a tribe of Creek Indian people from towns that existed as part of the Creek Confederacy in the Southeastern United States before the 1814 Treaty ofFt. Jackson. Our government is organized into 5 townships - a central governing township known as Choctawhatchee and 4 satellite townships known as Escambia, Red Ground, Apalachicola and Withalacoochee. Our tribal government consists of a National Council with representatives from each township, an Executive Branch of a Chief and Vice-Chief, and a Judicial Branch. Our townships are located across the interior of Northwest Florida and we are over 1100 members strong in a viable tribal entity. At one time, Creek domain extended through most of Alabama, Georgia and parts of Mississippi southward to the Gulf of Mexico. Those who formed our modem nation followed the rivers south into the State ofFlorida to escape the removal policies of the federal government. We came from the old towns of Eufaula, Hickory Ground, and Tuskegee. This migration into the new lands of Florida forced the reestablishment of our traditional grounds, communities, lifestyles, and governance. On August 1, 1814, General Andrew Jackson called for a meeting ofthe Chiefs ofthe Lower Creeks - friendly Creeks- to a meeting at Ft. Jackson. A small percentage of the Chiefs were in attendance for this signing away of our homeland. Shortly afterwards, Northwest Florida became a veritable highway for oppressed and struggling Creeks - the first stage of an Eastern Trail of Tears. The Adams-Onis Treaty with Spain, ratified in 1821, had confined white settlements in Florida to St. Augustine and Pensacola with the remainder occupied by Creek Indians. But, by 1823, Commissioner Gadsden urged the removal of Indians from Florida altogether. This policy was achieved through the Treaty ofCamp Moultrie signed on September 18, 1823. It was this treaty that began a division between the modem Creeks and the modem Seminoles. Ultimately, the Treaty of Payne's Landing, signed on May 9, 1832, required the removal of any remaining Creek Indians to Mississippi. After the Seminole's Treaty at Payne's Landing, the 'Apalachicola' Creeks located in Northwest Florida continued to be treated separately. Government agencies kept some records of those Creeks who emigrated or agreed to emigrate. In 1839, the reserve lands of the Aplachicolas were finally "laid off" in conformity with the provisions of the Treaty of Apalachicola that had been concluded on June 18, 1833. Historians failed to note the continuing and unbroken presence of Creek Indians in these eastern Lands. In fact, most people are unaware that there is a Creek people still cohesively living in North Florida who are attached to the Treaty Town ofChief John Blount and the towns of historic Creek Nation. Byl850, our people began the process of forced adaptation to survive. Even so, we continued to honor the basic traditions and governance methods carried from our original homelands in Alabama and Georgia down connecting rivers into Northwest Florida. We have faced and survived many forms of oppression in loss ofland, identity, ownership of traditional rights and practices, and the right to remain as Creek people to conduct our own governance and to serve our people in the common way that was brought from Alabama and Georgia. While new 1 MNF-PFD-V007-D0003 Page 1of5 adaptations were made, the Tribe suffered in its Florida homeland with the passage of state legislation that affected the Indian peoples ofNorth Florida. The Act of 185 3 passed by the General Assembly removed any possibility ofCreek people openly living their traditional lifestyles and worse, identifying themselves as a tribe. This was the first Act of Extermination by the State of Florida through the attempt to extinguish of any form of self governance, traditional ceremonies, practices and lifestyles as Indian people by threat of removal or death: "It shall be unlawful for any Indian or Indians to remain within the limits of this State, and any Indian or Indians that may remain, or may be found within the limits of this State, shall be captured and sent west of the Mississippi; provided, that Indians and half-breeds residing among the whites shall not be included in this section." However, this Act of Extermination did not prevent members of the tribe from living and residing and interacting with each other as Indian people. While the tribe was forced to acknowledge the new policies of the State of Florida and try to survive them, it remained a tribe and continued to function as a tribe with limited interference from the surrounding non-Indian communities. It continued to function with its leadership, subsistence type ofliving, traditions such as medicine and ceremonies, and in the existence ofits townships infrastructure. Second cousin exchange marriage became a way of protection of the Indian bloodline in the more remote areas of our townships. This Act of 1853 legislated the Creeks' adjustment to even the most basic element ofthe domestic lifestyle which was a forced racial change. There was no allowance made for "Indians" to remain in the rapidly changing areas ofNorthwest Florida. The Seminoles were afforded a reservation area in the Everglades, but this was not an option we, the Creeks in North Florida, were given. Consequently, we were left without any rights or provisions by the passage of this Act and in the eyes of the government of the State of Florida, there was no longer an Indian population in Northwest Florida to be required to respond to. In other words, the Creek of North Florida, now considered by historians to be its 'pioneer families', were legislated to disappear into the fabric of an emerging white or black population. This law remained a part of the statutes of the state until the federal Civil Rights Act superceded it. In order to protect and retain culture and heritage, the Creek people went "underground" - but still continued the expression of traditional customs, as well as, governance. Townships maintained a leadership vested in a central male, that was either elected by the members, passed down to another tribal member, or was self-appointed. Leadership was based on the man's ability to serve as a liaison between the tribal people and the non-Indian communities because of his bilingual abilities and literacy. These qualities were vital to the survival of the township for the protection from further erosion of the Creek identity and culture. The leader maintained a precarious balance serving as a representative, a mediator, a negotiator, and an advocate for the rights and protection of his community. On the local basis, he was the provider of goods and services for his people. Politically, he was also the liaison between other tribal leaders in other townships when meetings were called to discuss tribal affairs, for ceremonies such as at the grounds of Boggs Pond in Blountstown, for economic cooperation, or for civil and criminal legal issues. Even though legislation and local governments had to become a part of the Creek people's lives, the tribal government continued to 2 MNF-PFD-V007-D0003 Page 2 of 5 exist through its tribal township leaders, its elders, and its ceremonial events. Since 1862, the Bruce Community in Walton County Florida has served as a center for education, social interaction, and other types of traditional events that were and are still a part of Muscogee Nation. For the past 150 years, our people have maintained ceremonial events and traditional practices. One of the major events that took place in the lives of Creek people was the move to incorporate some sort of organized religion into the community through the work of outside missionaries and circuit riders in the late 1800s. The Bruce Church, established in 1912, is recognized as a Native American Church by the Methodist Conference. The community also had a separate Creek Indian School from 1890 until 1948 which had a cooperative arrangement between tribal leaders and the School Board of Walton County. Entering the new century of the 1900s, the communities and people of the Muscogee Nation continued to practice traditional form of government within the townships with traditional customs, medicine, language, hunting and fishing, and cooperative labor. During this period, the tribe saw an increase in its membership, and families had large groups of children. The men often maintained multiple households and the townships supported each other from a communal type living. In the late 1930s, however, the economics shifted and that affected the aboriginal area. Turpentine industries declined, as did logging. The tribal townships were faced with developing new methods to ensure the economic survival of their people. Liquor production filled this desperately needed void of revenue utilizing farming abilities and enabled the communities to locally produce crops for its creation such as com, rice, and sugar cane. This was a tribally sanctioned enterprise with many members across the townships actively involved. By 1940, the war effort of World War II brought in a new threat of extinction to the tribe. Eminent domain included lands owned and settled by Creek fishing families who were displaced into other areas and received little to no compensation. Again, these Indian families had to start over. One of the losses to the people was a ceremonial grounds located in the Mary Esther area, along with known burial areas that suddenly fell under federal jurisdiction through the establishment of Eglin and Hurlburt Air Force Bases. Under new management of the federal government, the tribe no longer had access to its aboriginal homelands for hunting and fishing.
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Flood Boundary
    MAY 4, 2021 COUSHATTA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA TRIBAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT MAY 2021 Prepared by BEVERLY O'DEA BRIDGEVIEW CONSULTING, LLC 915 N. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 (253) 380-5736 Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 2021 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Prepared for Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Coushatta Tribal Fire Department P.O. Box 818 Elton, LA 70532 Prepared by Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Beverly O’Dea 915 N. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 (253) 380-5736 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... xiii Plan Update ................................................................................................................................................. xiv Initial Response to the DMA for the Coushatta Tribe ........................................................................... xv The 2021 Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Update—What has changed? ................................................. xv Plan Development Methodology ............................................................................................................... xvii Chapter 1. Introduction to Hazzard Mitigation Planning ............................................... 1-1 1.1 Authority .............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT a to KING DECLARATION: Second Amended Complaint
    Case 2:12-cv-01079-MHT-CSC Document 159-2 Filed 06/05/19 Page 1 of 80 EXHIBIT A TO KING DECLARATION: Second Amended Complaint Case 2:12-cv-01079-MHT-CSC Document 159-2 Filed 06/05/19 Page 2 of 80 The Honorable Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe, HICKORY GROUND TRIBAL TOWN, and MEKKO GEORGE THOMPSON, individually and as traditional 2:12-cv-1079-MHT-CSC representative of the lineal descendants of those buried at Hickory Ground Tribal Town in Wetumpka, Alabama. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL v. COMPLAINT POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, a federally recognized tribe; STEPHANIE A. BRYAN, individually and in her official capacity as Chair of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (“Poarch”) Tribal Council; ROBERT R. MCGHEE, individually and in his official capacity as Vice Chair of Poarch Tribal Council; EDDIE L. TULLIS, individually and in his official capacity as Treasurer of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; CHARLOTTE MECKEL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; DEWITT CARTER, in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; SANDY HOLLINGER, individually and in her official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; KEITH MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; ARTHUR MOTHERSHED, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; GARVIS SELLS, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; BUFORD ROLIN, an individual; DAVID GEHMAN, an individual; LARRY HAIKEY, in his official capacity as Acting Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Officer; PCI GAMING AUTHORITY d/b/a WIND CREEK HOSPITALITY; WESTLY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminole Tribe Water Rights Experience (Stephen Walker)
    Challenges & Opportunities The Seminole Tribe of Florida’s Water Rights Experience By: Stephen A. Walker The Seminole Tribe of Florida: A History of Success • The Seminole Tribe of Florida is federally recognized by Section 16 of the Indian Reorganization of 1934 (25 U.S.C.§476) • The Seminole Tribe is recognized by the State of Florida pursuant to Chapter 285, Florida Statutes • Significant non reservation holdings including – Seminole Coconut Creek Casino – Hard Rock Hotel Chains A Brief History of The Seminole Tribe • The Seminole Tribe of Florida – Descendants of the Creek people - historic nations referred to as Creek or Cherokee people • 1800’s ordered to move to Oklahoma – “Trail of Tears” • 3 Seminole wars fought resisting removal – Never surrendered • By 1860 most Seminoles relocated, but many remained in the Everglades Reservations: A New Frontier for the Seminole People • The Seminoles resisted life on the reservations based on their belief of land ownership • By 1935 some Seminoles requested land be set aside for reservations • This divided the Seminole people into those that ultimately took the offer of reservation lands and those that later became the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida The Origins of the Modern Day Seminole Tribe • In 1953 the United States Congress passed legislation terminating federal tribal programs • The Seminole Tribe successfully argued against termination but immediately moved forward with: – Tribal Constitution – Obtained self governance through a tribal council – Created the Seminole Tribe
    [Show full text]
  • Muscogee (Creek) Nation Scholarship Foundation Program
    MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION PROGRAM James R. Floyd Health Care Management Scholarship Scholarship Description Chief James R. Floyd is the Principal Chief of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, the fourth largest Tribe in the Nation with more than 80,500 citizens. James grew up in Eufaula, Oklahoma. After completing his Associates Degree at OSU in Oklahoma City he started his professional career with the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tribe, working first in Environmental Services. He became the manager of Health Services, then Director of Community Services. In these positions he implemented the tribe’s first food distribution, social services, burial assistance, and school clothing allowance programs. Chief Floyd managed the first tribal-owned hospital in the United States at Okemah, and negotiated the transfer of the Okemah, Eufaula, Sapulpa, and Okmulgee Dental clinics from Indian Health Service to Muscogee (Creek) Tribal management. Chief Floyd is a strong advocate of higher education. Chief Floyd embraced and accepted his role as Principal Chief of the Nation’s fourth-largest Native American tribe in January of 2016. Throughout his career with the Indian Health Service and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Chief Floyd has continued to serve Native Americans throughout the United States, while always keeping in mind how his efforts could benefit his own Creek Nation. As a pioneer in Indian Health Care, Chief Floyd has been recognized nationally for establishing outreach to Native American communities. He ensured that the first of these reimbursements agreements was established with the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. He also held the first tribal veterans summit at Muskogee.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Agenda OK Indigenous Languages Conference
    United Nations International Year of Indigenous Languages Tribal Nations in Oklahoma Working to Preserve, Protect and Revitalize Our Languages November 15 & 16, 2019 Chickasaw Cultural Center, Sulphur, Oklahoma Agenda Coffee, tea, water and light snacks will be available throughout the Conference days 1st Day: Friday, November 15th 8:00 AM Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 AM Opening Prayer: Stanley Smith, Chickasaw Nation 8:45 – 9:15 AM Opening Words of Welcome and Introduction to the Conference ● Honorable Jefferson Keel, Lieutenant Governor of the Chickasaw Nation ● Rodney Factor, Assistant Band Chief, Seminole Nation, Board Member, International Indian Treaty Council ● Andrea Carmen, Yaqui Nation, Executive Director, International Indian Treaty Council 9:15 – 9:45 AM The United Nations Year of Indigenous Languages: Objectives, Outcomes and plans for an International Decade • Grand Chief Ed John, Hereditary Chief of Tl’azt’en Nation, Indigenous Co-Chair of UNESCO International Year of Indigenous Languages Steering Committee (via Skype) • Kristen Carpenter, Chair of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 9:45 – 10:00 AM Questions, comments and discussion. All participants. 10:00 AM – 11:15 AM Panel 1: How did we get here? Impacts of Colonization, Historical Trauma and Current Threats to Indigenous Languages • Casey Camp, Councilwoman of the Ponca Tribe, Hereditary Drumkeeper, Ponca Scalp Dance Society, Elder and Matriarch • Rodney Factor, Assistant Band Chief Seminole Nation • Miryam Yataco, Quechua, Peru, Language Educator • Richard A. Grounds, Ph.D., Yuchi/Seminole, Yuchi Language Project • Moderator: Bineshi Albert, Yuchi/Annishinaabe, Movement Building Coordinator, Indigenous Environmental Network 11:15 – 11:45 AM Questions, comments and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State of Winston"
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2019 Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston" Susan Neelly Deily-Swearingen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Deily-Swearingen, Susan Neelly, "Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston"" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2444. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REBEL REBELS: RACE, RESISTANCE, AND REMEMBRANCE IN THE FREE STATE OF WINSTON BY SUSAN NEELLY DEILY-SWEARINGEN B.A., Brandeis University M.A., Brown University M.A., University of New Hampshire DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May 2019 This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, J. William Harris, Professor of History Jason Sokol, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History and History Graduate Program Director Gregory McMahon, Professor of Classics Victoria E. Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos On April 18, 2019 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Line Volume Iii Caddo Indians: the Final Years
    BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS Jim Tiller Copyright © 2013 by Jim Tiller All rights reserved Bound versions of this book have been deposited at the following locations: Louisiana State University, Shreveport (Shreveport, Louisiana) Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Texas) Stephen F. Austin State University (Nacogdoches, Texas) Texas A&M University (College Station, Texas) Texas General Land Office (Archives and Records) (Austin, Texas) Texas State Library (Austin, Texas) University of North Texas (Denton, Texas) University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) To view a pdf of selected pages of this and other works by Jim Tiller, see: http://library.shsu.edu > Digital Collection > search for: Jim Tiller Electronic versions of Vol. I, II and III as well as a limited number of bound sets of the Before the Line series are available from: The Director, Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University, PO Box 2281 (1830 Bobby K. Marks Drive), Huntsville, Texas 77341 Phone: 936-294-1613 Design and production by Nancy T. Tiller The text typefaces are Adobe Caslon Pro and Myriad Pro ISBN 978-0-9633100-6-4 iv For the People of the Caddo Nation Also by Jim Tiller Our American Adventure: The History of a Pioneer East Texas Family, 1657-1967(2008) (with Albert Wayne Tiller) Named Best Family History Book by a Non-Professional Genealogist for 2008 by the Texas State Genealogical Society Before the Line Volume I An Annotated Atlas of International Boundaries and Republic of Texas Administrative Units Along the Sabine River-Caddo Lake Borderland, 1803-1841 (2010) Before the Line Volume II Letters From the Red River, 1809-1842 (2012) Jehiel Brooks and the Grappe Reservation: The Archival Record (working manuscript) vi CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business DECEMBER 2018 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Washington, DC 20425 national origin, or in the administration of justice. (202) 376-8128 voice • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information TTY Relay: 711 in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Casino Gaming by the Poarch Band Creek Indians In
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL SCIENCE ALSTON, THERESE A. B.A. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, 1981 M.A. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, 1986 TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY: A CASE STUDY OF CASINO GAMING BY THE POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS IN ALABAMA Committee Chair: William Boone, Ph.D. Dissertation dated May 2018 This case study examined casino gaming by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (PCI) in Alabama within the context of tribal sovereignty. It critiqued tribal developments over a five-year period beginning in 2009 with the opening of their first multi-million dollar casino and hotel. No previous studies on gaming or tribal sovereignty for this tribe existed. There were only a few studies on this dual topic for other Indian tribes but none of which utilized a political science theoretical approach. The study found that tribal sovereignty existed since American Indian tribes existed and sovereignty was strongest during the early treaty-making period. Thereafter, tribal authority and self-determination of Indian tribes became limited as it was redefined by federal policies, Congressional actions and Supreme Court decisions. i When treaty-making ended, the political history for Indian tribes became a narrative of termination, relocation and assimilation. The Poarch Band of Creeks Indians were a small group that remained poor and obscure after the Indian removal period. Casino gaming has given them an economic and political resurgence. The early legal interpretation of tribes’ political status was that of “domestic dependent nations” which continues to influence federal Indian policy today and thus the parameters of tribal sovereignty as well. While the level of federal dependency for some gaming tribes has been reduced, tribes are not fully self-sufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Organization of Maroon Communities in Suriname H.R.M
    The Political Organization of Maroon Communities in Suriname H.R.M. Libretto Translated from Dutch by Kenneth Bilby Maroons are descendants of Mricans forced basis of the relationship between the central gov­ to labor on plantations who escaped and, by wag­ ernment and the traditional Maroon authorities, ing guerilla wars in the 17th and 18th centuries, stipulated that the Maroons could move freely in succeeded in forming relatively independent the area they then occupied. They were, howev­ tribes* in the interior. Mter signing treaties with er, without legal title to the,land. The territory of the colonial rulers, the Maroons, also known as a tribe forms a unitary expanse of land, but is Bush Negroes, were able to build societies undis­ usually situated along a number of river basins. turbed, drawing upon their Mrican heritage. Although it is certain that not all Maroons The number of Maroons living in tribal soci­ had matrilineal origins, a system of matrilineal eties is presently estimated at 45,000, divided descent is practiced generally. among the following tribes: In each tribe, the government consists of the 1. Saramaka ( Saamaka) following: 2. Aukaners (Ndjuka or Okanisi) 1. A tribal or paramount chief ( Gaanman, 3. Matuwari (Matawai) Gaama) 4. Paramaka (Paamaka) 2. A number of head chiefs (Ede Kabiteni) 5. Aluku or Boni 3. A number of village chiefs (Kabiteni) The tribes took their names from the regions 4. A number of male and female under­ where they initially settled or from the name of a officers (Basia) chief. The territory of each tribe is bounded by The designation and installation of these officials mountains, rivers, watersheds and forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]