Tribal and House District Boundaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tribal and House District Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77 ! ! ! Cheyenne-Arapaho ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 23 ! ! 8 ! ! 73 ! ! ! ! 6 34 ! 4 ! 66 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! 4 ! ! Payne ! Chickasaw 43 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 75 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 98 ! ! ! ! 6! 8 ! ! ! Tulsa 4 ! ! 25 Dewey ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! Chilocco Indian School 5 44 ! 33 ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 59 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kingfisher 69 Cherokee ! Blaine ! ! 80 ! ! ! 86 ! 4 ! Wagoner 8 ! Choctaw ! ! ! ! ! 6 Logan ! 6 ! 45 ! ! ! Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 12 ! ! 30 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Adair ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 4 9 13 14 18 20 22 27 4 ! 25 ! Citizen Potawatomi* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! 29 ! 46 ! 10 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! 31 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 Comanche* 4 15 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! 8 5 Lincoln ! 47 ! Roger Mills ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 23 ! ! ! ! 16 3 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Custer ! ! ! 14 ! 39 ! ! Delaware* ! ! 32 ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! Muskogee ! ! ! O1k5mulgee 9 48 82 ! ! 57 ! ! ! 81 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! ! ! ! ! Eastern Shawnee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 96 ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 16 2 ! ! ! 6 ! ! 13 ! 84 Oklahoma ! 99 ! 10 ! ! ! 12 ! Canadian 49 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 97 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! Ft. Sill Apache* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Okfuskee Sequoyah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! 2 6 ! 43 85 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! 50 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! 60 ! ! ! ! 10 ! Iowa ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! 94 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 95 101 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 15 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 6 ! ! ! 90 ! McIntosh ! ! ! ! ! ! 24 ! ! ! ! ! 12 55 ! ! 51 ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kaw ! ! e ! 3 ! Beckham ! 53 ! i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Washita ! ! 47 91 ! ! 26 ! ! 4 15 ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! m ! ! ! ! ! ! 12 13 52 ! ! Kickapoo ! ! ! o Cleveland ! ! 46 ! ! Haskell ! ! ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! 15 ! 45 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 15 ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! Caddo Seminole ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Grady ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! Kiowa* 53 ! ! ! 44 ! ! w 28 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! 27 ! ! ! ! ! ! t 4 8 15 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! 24 ! Miami ! 15 ! 54 ! Hughes ! ! ! 56 1 o ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 15 ! ! ! ! 3 14 Modoc 2 3 5 ! McClain ! ! 16 ! ! 55 ! ! ! Greer ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Pittsburg ! ! Kiowa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 15 ! ! ! ! ! 8 ! 20 ! ! Muscogee (Creek) 2 3 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 17 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 56 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Latimer ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! 6 8 15 ! Osage ! ! 3 5 ! ! Le Flore ! ! ! ! ! 17 ! ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! 57 Harmon ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 42 ! ! 17 ! 51 ! ! Otoe-Missouri 6 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Pontotoc ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 19 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Garvin ! ! ! ! ! 18 ! Comanche 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 6 ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! 52 ! ! 64 ! ! 59 ! ! ! ! Jackson ! ! ! ! ! ! 62 ! ! 19 ! ! ! ! ! Pawnee ! Coal ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 8 ! ! ! ! 2 3 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 60 ! 8 ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! Stephens ! Peoria ! ! Murray ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 63 ! 8 ! ! ! ! Tillman ! ! 5 ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 61 ! ! Pushmataha ! ! Atoka ! Ponca ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 15 ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! 23 ! ! ! 22 62 ! ! ! Quapaw ! ! ! ! ! 65 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 48 ! ! ! ! ! 15 1 5 Cotton Johnston ! ! ! 22 ! 2 ! ! ! 24 ! ! 23 ! Sac and Fox ! 63 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Carter ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 8 ! ! 19 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 24 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Seminole 25 ! 50 ! ! ! 64 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 12 23 ! Jefferson ! ! ! 25 Seneca-Cayuga 2 6 15 ! ! ! ! 26 ! ! McCurtain ! ! 65 ! ! ! 79 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! 26 ! Marshall Choctaw Tonkawa 16 ! ! 27 ! ! ! 15 ! Love ! ! ! 66 ! 49 ! ! ! ! ! ! 80 ! ! ! ! ! ! Bryan ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! Wichita* 1 12 15 23 24 ! ! ! ! ! ! 15 ! ! ! ! ! 91 ! ! ! 28 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 67 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 27 ! ! ! 81 ! Wyandotte 15 ! 15 ! 29 ! ! 92 ! ! ! ! 68 ! ! ! ! ! 15 3 82 ! ! ! 15 ! 30 ! ! Tribal Towns ! 69 93 ! Legend ! 31 15 83 ! ! 1 Alabama-Quassarte* 70 94 ! ! 10 12 23 ! ! ! 32 15 2011-2020 House Districts ! Counties 2 Delaware 71 84 95 10 19 23 3 Euchee (Yuchi) 33 72 4 15 Shared Tribal Boundaries 85 96 1 10 12 Tribal Area 1 34 4 15 16 Kialegee* 73 86 4 Apache, Comanche, Kiowa, Ft. Sill Apache 15 16 97 4 Shawnee 35 17 19 74 4 Tribal Town 15 Absentee Shawnee and Citizen Potawatomi 4 16 87 5 Thlopthlocco 36 15 98 75 Caddo, Delaware, Wichita 6 United Keetoowah 11 16 21 88 37 76 15 99 Band of Cherokees 7 21 26 Tribal Boundaries 38 17 77 4 15 89 100 1 *shared boundaries 39 78 15 90 101 Source: Oklahoma DOT Oklahoma House of Representatives 14-1101 Tulsa Metro HD Oklahoma House of Representatives | 54th Legislature 11 Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Name HD Rogers HD HD Armes 63 Christian 93 DeWitt 38 Hamilton 89 Joyner 95 McCullough 30 Proctor 77 Nelson 87 Sanders 59 Thomsen 25 County 9 Osage 36 Banz 101 Cleveland 20 Dorman 65 Hardin 49 Kern 84 McDaniel 1 Pruett 19 Newell 28 Schwartz 43 Trebilcock 98 !16 4 County ! Bennett 2 Cockroft 27 Echols 90 Henke 71 Kirby 75 McDaniel 78 Quinn 9 Nollan 66 Scott 72 Turner 82 HD HD 74 Biggs 51 Condit 18 Enns 41 Hickman 58 Kouplen 24 McDaniel 83 Renegar 17 O'Donnell 23 Sears 11 Vaughan 37 35 HD 72 Billy 42 Coody 64 Fisher 60 Hoskin 6 Lockhart 3 McNiel 29 Reynolds 91 Ortega 52 Shannon 62 Virgin 44 HD Blackwell 61 Cooksey 39 Floyd 88 Hulbert 14 Martin 46 McPeak 13 Ritze 80 Osborn 47 Shelton 97 Walker 70 HD 77 HD Brown 4 Cox 5 Fourkiller 86 Inman 94 Martin 10 Moore 96 Roberts 21 Ownbey 48 Sherrer 8 Watson 79 73 23 Tulsa Brumbaugh 76 Dank 85 Glenn 7 Jackson 40 Matthews 73 Morrissette 92 Roberts 36 Perryman 56 Shoemake 16 Wesselhoft 54 HD County HD HD Cannaday 15 Denney 33 Grau 81 Johnson 50 McBride 53 Mulready 68 Rousselot 12 Peterson 67 Smalley 32 Williams 34 66 78 8 Casey 35 Derby 74 Hall 100 Jordan 69 McCall 22 Murphey 31 Russ 55 Pittman 99 Stiles 45 Wood 26 HD HD HD 71 Wright 57 70 75 HD HD HD 98 HD 29 68 !15 Oklahoma Native American Tribes HD 76 Wagoner HD Creek HD 67 County 12 1 Absentee Shawnee Tribe 2 Comanche Nation 13 Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 21 Ponca Tribe of Indians 1 Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town County 30 !3 HD HD 2025 South Gordon Cooper Drive 584 NW Bingo Rd 202 South Eight Tribes Trail 20 White Eagle Drive PO Box 187 69 80 HD Shawnee, OK 74801 Lawton, OK 73507 Miami, OK 74354 Ponca City, OK 74601 Wetumka, OK 74883 16 405-273-1050 580-492-3240 918-542-1445 580-762-8104 405-452-3987 www.astribe.com www.comanchenation.com www.miamination.com www.ponca.com www.alabama-quassarte.org OKiKngfCish Mer etroLogan HD HD County County 31 32 !10 2 Apache Tribe 3 Delaware Nation 14 Modoc Tribe 22 Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma 2 Delaware Tribe of Indians ! PO Box 1330 PO Box 825, 31064 State Hwy 281 418 "G" Southeast PO Box 765 170 N Barbara Street Anadarko, OK 73005 Anadarko, OK 73005 Miami, OK 74354 Quapaw, OK 74363 Bartlesville, OK 74006 HD HD HD 405-247-7305 405-247-2448 918-542-1190 918-542-1853 918-337-6590 59 39 41 www.apachetribe.org www.delawarenation.com www.modoctribe.net www.quapawtribe.com www.delawaretribe.org HD HD 82 HD 81 83 3 Caddo Nation 9 Eastern Shawnee Tribe 15 Muscogee Creek Nation 23 Sac and Fox Nation 3 Euchee (Yuchi) Tribe Canadian HD PO Box 487 12755 South 705 Road PO Box 580 920883 South Highway 99 804 E. Taft Suite H County 96 12 HD ! HD Binger, OK 73009 Wyandotte, OK 74370 Okmulgee, OK 74447 Stroud, OK 74079 Sapulpa, OK 74066 HD 85 100 HD 405-656-2344 918-666-2435 918-732-7600 918-968-3526 918-224-3065 60 97 Oklahoma www.caddonation-nsn.gov www.estoo-nsn.gov www.muscogeenation-nsn.gov www.sacandfoxnation-nsn.gov www.eucheetribe.com County HD HD Cherokee Nation Fort Sill Apache Tribe Osage Nation Seminole Nation Kialegee Tribal Town 43 4 2 16 24 1 99 PO Box 948 43187 US Hwy 281 627 Grandview PO Box 1498 PO Box 332 HD HD HD Talequah, OK 74465 Apache, OK 73006 Pawhuska, OK 74056 Wewoka, OK 74884 Wetumka, OK 74883 89 HD HD 92 94 918-453-5000 580-588-2298 918-287-5555
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Indian Land Claims: a Historical and Legal Perspective
    Delaware Indian land Claims: A Historical and Legal Perspective DAVID A. EZZO Alden, New York and MICHAEL MOSKOWITZ Wantagh, New York In this paper we shall discuss Delaware Indian land claims in both a histori­ cal and legal context. The first section of the paper deals with the historical background necessary to understand the land claims filed by the Delaware. In the second part of the paper the focus is on a legal review of the Delaware land claims cases. Ezzo is responsible for the first section while Moskowitz is responsible for the second section. 1. History The term Delaware has been used to describe the descendants of the Native Americans that resided in the Delaware River Valley and other adjacent areas at the start of the 17th century. The Delaware spoke two dialects: Munsee and Unami, both of these belong to the Eastern Algonquian Lan­ guage family. Goddard has noted that the Delaware never formed a single political unit. He also has noted that the term Delaware was only applied to these groups after they had migrated from their original Northeastern homeland. Goddard sums up the Delaware migration as follows: The piecemeal western migration, in the face of white settlement and its attendant pressures during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, left the Delaware in a number of widely scattered places in Southern Ontario, Western New York, Wisconsin, Kansas and Oklahoma. Their history involves the repeated divisions and consolidations of many villages and of local, political and linguistic groups that developed in complicated and incompletely known ways. In addition, individuals, families and small groups were constantly moving from place to place.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas
    Tonkawa Indians Before the time of the Spanish explorers, Native Americans inhabited the open ranges and woodlands of Texas. One group that made its mark in history is the Tonkawa Indians. These people were thought to have come to Texas as early as the seventeenth century. Tonkawa, a Waco Indian word, means, “they all stay together,” which eloquently describes this group of nomadic Indian tribes. There is scant archeological evidence of the Tonkawa people, and historians have several theories on the tribal structure and lifestyles of this group. Some believe the Tonkawa were actually a group of independent bands of Indians, which may have included the Sana, Toho, Tohaha, Cantona, and Cava Indians. In the early eighteenth century these bands of Indians were thought to have joined together to form Tonkawa Proper. There is some evidence that the Tonkawa actually came to Texas much earlier as one cohesive group of Tonkawa Indians that lived further north. These nomadic hunters lived in tepees made from buffalo hide, grass and other materials. Tepees allowed bands to easily pack their homes and move with the migrating herds of buffalo or to outrun their enemies. An elected tribal chief led each band of Tonkawa, and each band was composed of maternal clans. Unlike many societies that are patriarchal, the Tonkawa clan membership followed on the side of the mother. When a couple got married, the man would go live with his wife’s clan, and the children would become members of their mother’s clan as well. As a society that always stays together, the Tonkawa established a system that ensured all widows, widowers, and orphaned children were taken care of if their family members died.
    [Show full text]
  • WGSS Womenarehuman V7 N11 1978.Pdf (11.26Mb)
    W01\1EN ARE HUMAN WOMEN'S STUDIES LIBRARY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Volume 7 November 17, 1978 Number 11 REVIEWS other ways. She does not seem to in- Materials in the OSU Libraries about, tend to paint such a negative picture-- for and by women (the location is in- but negative it is. On the other hand, dicated above each number). To de- Goldsmith is aware of some of the pos- termine if a copy is available call 422-3900. sible psychological reasons behind the behavior of this rather bizarre person; the trouble is that she plays armchair psychiatrist too often. Then there is WOMEN'S Gilbert, Julie Goldsmith. Goldsmith's enormously annoying habit STUDIES Ferber, a biography. of repeating herself, and others, from PS3511 Garden City, New York, chapter to chapter and using incredibly E66Z8 G5 Doubleday & Co., 1978. pretentious language. She glibly uses "lagniappe"--a word I had to look up Edna Ferber's biography has been writ- in the dictionary--and frequently attri- ten by her great-niece, Julie Gilbert butes its use to others, as in this Goldsmith, who certainly seems to want sentence, allegedly spoken or written us to like Ferber, remember her for the by Kate Steichen, then an editor: many huge books she wrote, and gain " ••• At Doubleday we iust didn't take an insight into how Ferber lived on a any lagniappe or gravy from authors--let scale comparable to her books. These alone agents." My response to that books are huge in scope, and huge in comes from an old favorite line in the verbiage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
    Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021 Language Explainer This fact sheet summarizes, section-by-section, proposed Federal legislation relating to the Cherokee and Chickasaw Nations. If enacted, this bill would strengthen Tribal self- determination and empower Tribal-State partnerships by authorizing those Nations to compact with Oklahoma respecting criminal jurisdiction. The bill is proposed after consultation with those Nations and upon their request. Further, Oklahoma government officials have previously called for or otherwise offered public support for the approach integrated to this bill. Section 1 (Title) – Consistent with the bill’s scope and purpose, it is titled “Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021.” Section 2 (Definitions) – This section offers operative definitions for key terms in the bill, two of which are particularly important to the scope of its central authorization to compact. “Indian country” is defined by reference to statute, but “Indian land” is defined to include only lands universally understood to be “Indian country” prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt—lands such as Tribal trust land, restricted allotments, and so-called dependent Indian communities. As such, “Indian land” is a subset of “Indian country,” and as provided in later sections, no authority would be granted to affect by compact any jurisdiction on “Indian lands.” Section 3 (Findings) – The findings clarify the bill’s intent and purpose. Consistent with Federal law, they acknowledge each Nation’s reservation as “Indian country” for purposes of criminal jurisdiction. The findings note ongoing intergovernmental work to enhance Tribal-State coordination in reservation law enforcement and particularly commend the use of compacting for purposes of supporting Tribal self-determination and intergovernmental cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Advisory Committee Summer 2017 Agenda
    CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee Meeting Artesian Hotel 1001 West 1st Street, Sulphur, OK Note: All times are in Central Daylight Time (CDT) Tuesday, August 8, 2017 Federal Moderator: CDC Deputy Director/OSTLTS Director Tribal Moderator: Tribal Advisory Committee Chair 8:00 am Tribal Caucus (Tribal Members Only) This session is open only to currently enrolled members of federally recognized tribes. This session is closed to all federal employees, regardless of Tribal affiliation. 9:00 am Opening Blessing Jefferson Keel, MS (Chickasaw Nation), Lieutenant Governor, Chickasaw Nation Presentation of Colors—Chickasaw Nation Honor Guard 9:20 am Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC) Business and Tribal Support Unit (TSU) Briefing Update TSU developmental work and the recent evaluation of the Winter 2017 TAC meeting • Roll Call—Priyanka Oza, Public Health Advisor, TSU, OSTLTS, CDC • Reading of TAC Roles & Responsibilities—Chester Antone (Tohono O’odham Nation), Councilman, Tohono O’odham Nation; TAC Chair • Welcome from the Designated Federal Official—José T. Montero, MD, MHCDS, Director, OSTLTS; Deputy Director for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, CDC • Presentation of TAC business items— Captain Carmen Clelland, PharmD, MPA (Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes), US Public Health Service (USPHS); Associate Director for Tribal Support, OSTLTS, CDC Commander Damion Killsback, PharmD, MPH (Northern Cheyenne Tribe), USPHS; Deputy Associate Director for Tribal Support, OSTLTS, CDC 9:50 am CDC Office of the Director Updates Agency-wide activities
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Days of Oscar® 2010 Schedule
    31 DAYS OF OSCAR® 2010 SCHEDULE Monday, February 1 6:00 AM Only When I Laugh (’81) (Kevin Bacon, James Coco) 8:15 AM Man of La Mancha (’72) (James Coco, Harry Andrews) 10:30 AM 55 Days at Peking (’63) (Harry Andrews, Flora Robson) 1:30 PM Saratoga Trunk (’45) (Flora Robson, Jerry Austin) 4:00 PM The Adventures of Don Juan (’48) (Jerry Austin, Viveca Lindfors) 6:00 PM The Way We Were (’73) (Viveca Lindfors, Barbra Streisand) 8:00 PM Funny Girl (’68) (Barbra Streisand, Omar Sharif) 11:00 PM Lawrence of Arabia (’62) (Omar Sharif, Peter O’Toole) 3:00 AM Becket (’64) (Peter O’Toole, Martita Hunt) 5:30 AM Great Expectations (’46) (Martita Hunt, John Mills) Tuesday, February 2 7:30 AM Tunes of Glory (’60) (John Mills, John Fraser) 9:30 AM The Dam Busters (’55) (John Fraser, Laurence Naismith) 11:30 AM Mogambo (’53) (Laurence Naismith, Clark Gable) 1:30 PM Test Pilot (’38) (Clark Gable, Mary Howard) 3:30 PM Billy the Kid (’41) (Mary Howard, Henry O’Neill) 5:15 PM Mr. Dodd Takes the Air (’37) (Henry O’Neill, Frank McHugh) 6:45 PM One Way Passage (’32) (Frank McHugh, William Powell) 8:00 PM The Thin Man (’34) (William Powell, Myrna Loy) 10:00 PM The Best Years of Our Lives (’46) (Myrna Loy, Fredric March) 1:00 AM Inherit the Wind (’60) (Fredric March, Noah Beery, Jr.) 3:15 AM Sergeant York (’41) (Noah Beery, Jr., Walter Brennan) 5:30 AM These Three (’36) (Walter Brennan, Marcia Mae Jones) Wednesday, February 3 7:15 AM The Champ (’31) (Marcia Mae Jones, Walter Beery) 8:45 AM Viva Villa! (’34) (Walter Beery, Donald Cook) 10:45 AM The Pubic Enemy
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Line Volume Iii Caddo Indians: the Final Years
    BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS Jim Tiller Copyright © 2013 by Jim Tiller All rights reserved Bound versions of this book have been deposited at the following locations: Louisiana State University, Shreveport (Shreveport, Louisiana) Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Texas) Stephen F. Austin State University (Nacogdoches, Texas) Texas A&M University (College Station, Texas) Texas General Land Office (Archives and Records) (Austin, Texas) Texas State Library (Austin, Texas) University of North Texas (Denton, Texas) University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) To view a pdf of selected pages of this and other works by Jim Tiller, see: http://library.shsu.edu > Digital Collection > search for: Jim Tiller Electronic versions of Vol. I, II and III as well as a limited number of bound sets of the Before the Line series are available from: The Director, Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University, PO Box 2281 (1830 Bobby K. Marks Drive), Huntsville, Texas 77341 Phone: 936-294-1613 Design and production by Nancy T. Tiller The text typefaces are Adobe Caslon Pro and Myriad Pro ISBN 978-0-9633100-6-4 iv For the People of the Caddo Nation Also by Jim Tiller Our American Adventure: The History of a Pioneer East Texas Family, 1657-1967(2008) (with Albert Wayne Tiller) Named Best Family History Book by a Non-Professional Genealogist for 2008 by the Texas State Genealogical Society Before the Line Volume I An Annotated Atlas of International Boundaries and Republic of Texas Administrative Units Along the Sabine River-Caddo Lake Borderland, 1803-1841 (2010) Before the Line Volume II Letters From the Red River, 1809-1842 (2012) Jehiel Brooks and the Grappe Reservation: The Archival Record (working manuscript) vi CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography And
    Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography and Ethnohistory ______________________________________________________ 7.1 Introduction The earliest mention of the Comanche in the historical record date to 1706. Comanche ethnogenesis took place about two centuries earlier, after their separation from the Shoshone near the Wind River region. In a step-wise migration bands left the parent society and moved south along the eastern flank of the Rocky Mountains. Initially Comanche bands inhabited the central plains along the Platte, Republican, and Arkansas rivers in eastern Colorado. According to numerous scholars, the Comanche quickly transitioned from a Great Basin culture to a Great Plains life way, although the Comanche retained many Great Basin cultural beliefs and practices.1 However seeking greater trade opportunities and horses, along with the rapidly changing political economic conditions, Comanche bands migrated southeast. By the latter part of the eighteenth century the Comanche consolidated their position on the southern Great Plains after a series of territorial and economic conflicts various tribes and the Spanish.2 Strategically employing warfare, treaty negotiations, and alliances the Comanche controlled the region between the Arkansas and Pecos rivers, an area comprising present-day western Texas and Oklahoma, eastern New Mexico, southeast Colorado, and southwest Kansas.3 By 1820 the Comanche occupied primarily the territory south of the Arkansas River, while the Cheyenne and Arapaho occupied the lands north of the river.4 They controlled this region until the reservation period. The Comanche were never a tribe, unified under a centralized political structure. Rather Comanche ethnicity and social unity was based on common cultural traditions, 600 language, history, and political economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical
    Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical Ethnography ______________________________________________________ 3.1 Introduction The Arapaho believe they were the first people created on earth. The Arapaho called themselves, the Hinanae'inan, "Our Own Kind of People.”1 After their creation, Arapaho tradition places them at the earth's center. The belief in the centrality of their location is no accident. Sociologically, the Arapaho occupied the geographical center among the five ethnic distinct tribal-nations that existed prior to the direct European contact.2 3.2 Culture History and Territory Similar to many other societies, the ethnic formation of the Arapaho on the Great Plains into a tribal-nation was a complex sociological process. The original homeland for the tribe, according to evidence, was the region of the Red River and the Saskatchewan River in settled horticultural communities. From this original homeland various Arapaho divisions gradually migrated southwest, adapting to living on the Great Plains.3 One of the sacred objects, symbolic of their life as horticulturalists, that they carried with them onto the Northern Plains is a stone resembling an ear of corn. According to their oral traditions, the Arapaho were composed originally of five distinct tribes. 4 Arapaho elders remember the Black Hills country, and claim that they once owned that region, before moving south and west into the heart of the Great Plains. By the early nineteenth century, the Arapaho positioned themselves geographically from the two forks of the Cheyenne River, west of the Black Hills southward to the eastern front 87 of the central Rocky Mountains at the headwaters of the Arkansas River.5 By 1806 the Arapaho formed an alliance with the Cheyenne to resist against further intrusion west by the Sioux beyond the Missouri River.
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw Resistance to Removal (Part III) in May, Iti Fabvssa Began a Four Part Editor’S Note: This Not Fully Concluded for More Than 60 Years
    BISKINIK | August 2014 11 Choctaw Resistance to Removal (Part III) In May, Iti Fabvssa began a four part Editor’s Note: This not fully concluded for more than 60 years. In 1845, as a partial series, looking at different ways the month’s Iti Fabvssa is result of investigation, Congress granted some of the Choctaws who Choctaw people resisted Removal from part three in a four part remained in Mississippi script for the amount of land they were our homeland and the Trail of Tears. Iti Fabussa entitled to under the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek However, the series. First, we looked at armed resistance. full amount of script was redeemable only in Indian Territory Last month, we looked at ways Choctaw people resisted signing the (Oklahoma). Some Anglo-Americans quickly found ways of Dancing Rabbit Creek Treaty that ceded the last of the Choctaw defrauding Choctaw people out of this script. Businesses were even homeland, setting up the Trail of Tears. This month, we focus on set up for that sole purpose (Reeves 1985:225). Choctaw individuals who, after the Treaty was signed, refused to Some Anglo-Americans used increasingly brutal tactics. remove from the homeland. Choctaws who remained in Mississippi had their houses burned Several articles of the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek granted down, fences destroyed, and cattle sent in to graze down their land to named Choctaw individuals, to men bearing certain growing gardens. They were physically abused, chained, and even leadership titles in Choctaw society, to Choctaw people who had beaten to death (Tolbert 1958:66-67).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018NABI Teams.Pdf
    TEAM NAME COACH TRIBE STATE TEAM NAME COACH TRIBE STATE 1 ALASKA (D1) S. Craft Unalakleet, Akiachak, Akiak, Qipnag, Savoonga, Iqurmiut AK 33 THREE NATIONS (D1) G. Tashquinth Tohono O'odham, Navajo, Gila River AZ 2 APACHE OUTKAST (D1) J. Andreas White Mountain Apache AZ 34 TRIBAL BOYZ (D1) A. Strom Colville, Mekah, Nez Perce, Quinault, Umatilla, Yakama WA 3 APACHES (D1) T. Antonio San Carlos Apache AZ 35 U-NATION (D1) J. Miller Omaha Tribe of Nebraska NE 4 AZ WARRIORS (D1) R. Johnston Hopi, Dine, Onk Akimel O'odham, Tohono O'odham AZ 36 YAQUI WARRIORS (D1) N. Gorosave Pascua Yaqui AZ Pima, Tohono O'odham, Navajo, White Mountain Apache, 5 BADNATIONZ (D1) K. Miller Sr. Prairie Band Potawatomi, Kickapoo, Yakama KS 1 21ST NATIVES (D2) R. Lyons AZ Chemehuevi, Hualapai 6 BIRD CITY (D1) M. Barney Navajo AZ 2 AK-CHIN (D2) T. Carlyle Ak-Chin AZ 7 BLUBIRD BALLERZ (D1) B. Whitehorse Navajo UT 3 AZ FUTURE (D2) T. Blackwater Akimel O'odham, Dine, Hopi AZ 8 CHAOS (D1) D. Kohlus Cheyenne River Sioux, Standing Rock Sioux SD 4 AZ OUTLAWS (D2) S. Amador Mohave, Navajo, Chemehuevi, Digueno AZ CHEYENNEARAPAHO 9 R. Island Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes Of Oklahoma OK 5 AZ SPARTANS (D2) G. Pete Navajo AZ (D1) 10 FLIGHT 701 (D1) B. Kroupa Arikara, Hidatsa, Sioux ND 6 DJ RAP SQUAD (D2) R. Paytiamo Navajo NM 11 FMD (D1) Gerald Doka Yavapai, Pima, CRIT AZ 7 FORT YUMA (D2) D. Taylor Quechan CA 12 FORT MOJAVE (D1) J. Rodriguez Jr. Fort Mojave, Chemehuevi, Colorado River Indian Tribes CA 8 GILA RIVER (D2) R.
    [Show full text]