DOCSLIB.ORG

URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE Analysis of Urban Infrastructure Interventions, Vijayawada City, Andhra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE Analysis of Urban Infrastructure Interventions, Vijayawada City, Andhra URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE Analysis of Urban Infrastructure Interventions, Vijayawada City, Andhra Cost-Benefit Analysis AUTHORS: Parijat Dey O Rajesh Babu Senior Manager Assistant Vice President IL&FS APUIAML © 2018 Copenhagen Consensus Center [email protected] www.copenhagenconsensus.com This work has been produced as a part of the Andhra Pradesh Priorities project under the larger, India Consensus project. This project is undertaken in partnership with Tata Trusts. Some rights reserved This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution Please cite the work as follows: #AUTHOR NAME#, #PAPER TITLE#, Andhra Pradesh Priorities, Copenhagen Consensus Center, 2017. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. Third-party-content Copenhagen Consensus Center does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. If you wish to re-use a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures, or images. Cost Benefit Analysis of Urban Infrastructure Interventions, Vijayawada City, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Priorities An India Consensus Prioritization Project Parijat Dey1, O Rajesh Babu2 1Senior Manager, IL&FS 2 Assistant Vice President, APUIAML IL&FS Academy of Applied Development Table of Contents ACADEMIC ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 POLICY ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 THE PROBLEM ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Infrastructure Gap in Water Supply: .............................................................................................................................. 2 Infrastructure Gap in Sewage Infrastructure: ................................................................................................................ 3 Gap in Solid Waste Management Infrastructure: .......................................................................................................... 3 INTERVENTION 1: PROVISION OF PIPED WATER SUPPLY: ............................................................................................................. 3 Overview: ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Implementation Considerations: .................................................................................................................................... 4 Costs and Benefits ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTERVENTION 2: PROVISION FOR SEWERAGE FOR ALL HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................................ 6 Overview: ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Implementation Considerations: .................................................................................................................................... 6 Costs and Benefits ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 INTERVENTION 3: PROVISION FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: ................................................................................................. 8 Overview: ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Implementation Considerations: .................................................................................................................................... 8 Costs and Benefits ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 THEORY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13 CBA Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 OVERVIEW: VIJAYAWADA ............................................................................................................................................. 15 GEOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 DEMOGRAPHICS .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 HOUSEHOLD SIZE ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 ECONOMY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 INDUSTRIAL ESTATES............................................................................................................................................................. 17 INTERVENTION 1: PROVISION FOR PIPED WATER SUPPLY ............................................................................................. 18 DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION ............................................................................................................................................. 18 LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................................................................. 19 DATA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 CALCULATION OF COSTS AND BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................... 23 Estimation of Cost Elements: ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Estimation of Benefit Elements: ................................................................................................................................... 23 ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF EVIDENCE .................................................................................................................................. 25 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 INTERVENTION 2: PROVISION FOR SEWERAGE FOR ALL HOUSEHOLDS ......................................................................... 27 DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION .................................................................................................................................. 27 LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................................................................. 27 DATA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 CALCULATION OF COSTS AND BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................... 30 Estimation of Benefit Elements ..................................................................................................................................... 30 Estimation of Benefit Elements ..................................................................................................................................... 30 ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF EVIDENCE .................................................................................................................................. 31 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................................... 31 INTERVENTION 3: PROVISION FOR IMPROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT .............................................................. 32 OVERVIEW: ........................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • India's Largest Rural Sanitation Survey For
    INDIA’S LARGEST RURAL SANITATION SURVEY FOR RANKING OF STATES AND DISTRICTS Page 1 of 80 PREFACE The “Swachh Survekshan Grameen – 2018” was commissioned by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, through an independent survey agency. One month long survey, ranked all districts and states of India on the basis of quantitative and qualitative sanitation (Swachhta) parameters, towards their sanitation and cleanliness status. As part of Swachh Survekshan Grameen, 6867 villages in 685 Districts across India were covered. 34,000 public places namely schools, anganwadis, public health centres, haat-bazaars, religious places in these 6867 villages were visited to be surveyed. Around 1,62,000 citizens were interviewed in villages, for their feedback on issues related to the Swachh Bharat Mission. Citizens were also encouraged to provide online feedback on sanitation relation related issues. Feedback from collectives was obtained using community wide open meetings (khuli baithaks), personal interviews and Group Discussions (GDs). GDs were conducted in each village. More than 1.5 crore people participated in the SSG-2018 and provided their feedback. The SSG turned out to be massive mobilisation exercise with communities in each village undertaking special drives to improve the general cleanliness in their villages. Gram Panchayats invested funds from their local area development fund to improve the sanitation status in public places. The Ministry is encouraged with the overall outcomes of Swachh Survekshan Grameen 2018 and would like to institutionalise this for concurrent ranking of states and districts and obtaining citizens feedback. (Uma Bharti) MESSAGE Swachh Survekshan Grameen – 2018, launched on 13 July 2018, is a maiden attempt by Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MDWS) to rank states and districts on key sanitation parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Regional Context Analysis
    5 2 REGIONAL CONTEXT ANALYSIS This chapter broadly reviews the regional context of Andhra Pradesh. Capital Region’s locati on at the heart of Andhra Pradesh and proximity with the nearby big cies; seng the Capital Region’s intrinsic role as the new Gateway of East India and also an access to all regions of Andhra Pradesh. Air, Rail, Road and water connec vity of the Capital region with the nearest landlocked ci es; give Capital Region the key advantage with trade poten al. To be a key player in the region, improvements to infrastructure will help Capital Region to realize its highest poten al. A study of the acvie s around the Region reveals the opportunity for the C apital Region to be a central node in the region. This chapter covers the following topics broadly: 1 Upcoming Na onal Projects 2 Regional Advantage Post Bifurca on 3 Regional Connec vity 4 Analysis with respect to landcover, key ci es, environment and heritage 5 Constraints and Opportuni es Workers loading bananas from the fi elds 2.1NATIONAL CONTEXT dedicated Freight Corridor along the 6 East Coast Economic Corridor which is 2.1.1 UPCOMING NA expected to be func onal by the end TIONAL PROJECTS of the decade. The large agricultural produce and the many ports along the Ýã ÊÝã ÊÄÊî ÊÙÙ®ÊÙ coastline; will facilitate in posi oning Andhra Pradesh as the gateway for The Government of India is developing Inland transac ons. Industrial Corridors across India as global manufacturing and investment «®¦« ÝÖ Ù®½ des na ons. These corridors are expected to drive the manufacturing High Speed Rail Corpora on of growth in India within the next decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Swachh Survekshan 2020: Mohua
    Swachh Survekshan 2020: MoHUA drishtiias.com/printpdf/swachh-survekshan-2020-mogua Why in News Recently, the Swachh Survekshan 2020 report has been launched by the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA). It is the fifth edition of the annual cleanliness urban survey conducted by the MoHUA. It is one of the world’s largest sanitation surveys. Key Points This year the Ministry has released rankings based on the categorisation of cities on population, instead of releasing overall rankings. The categories based on population were introduced in 2019 for the first time but the exact groupings have been changed this year. 1/3 Major Categories and Rankings: Cities with a population of more than 10 lakh: Indore was ranked first, securing the rank for the fourth consecutive year, followed by Surat and Navi Mumbai. All the National Capital Region (NCR) cities, Greater Mumbai, Bruhat Bengaluru, Amritsar, Kota, Chennai, etc. have performed poorly. Patna with the rank 47, is at the bottom of the list. Cities with a population of 1-10 lakh: Chhattisgarh’s Ambikapur has been surveyed as the cleanest city in the country, followed by Mysore and New Delhi. Bihar’s Gaya with a rank of 382, is at the bottom. Cities with a population of less than 1 lakh: Karad has been ranked as the cleanest followed by Sasvad and Lonavala (all three in Maharashtra). Other Categories: Varanasi has been ranked the cleanest among 46 Ganga towns. Jalandhar got the top rank among cantonments. New Delhi was the cleanest capital city. Chhattisgarh was ranked the cleanest State out of those with over 100 urban local bodies (ULBs) or cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Swachh Bharat Mission (S.B.M): a Step Towards Environmental Protection and Health Concerns
    © 2021 JETIR July 2021, Volume 8, Issue 7 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) SWACHH BHARAT MISSION (S.B.M): A STEP TOWARDS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND HEALTH CONCERNS Dr.DHARMAVEER Research Supervisor Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce Sant Kavi Baba Baijnath Government P.G.College Harak, Barabanki (Affiliated to Dr.R.M.L.Awadh University, Ayodhya) NEHA SINGH Research Scholar, Department of Commerce Dr.R.M.L.Awadh University, Ayodhya (Under the Supervision of Dr.Dharmaveer) Dr MOHD NASEEM SIDDIQUI Life Member of I.S.C.A.Kolkata & Assistant Professor Department of Commerce. Mumtaz P.G.College,Lucknow (Associated to University of Lucknow) ABSTRACT Swachh Bharat Mission is a massive mass movement that seeks to create a Clean India by 2019. The father of our nation Mr. Mahatma Gandhi always puts the emphasis on swachhta as swachhta leads to healthy and prosperous life. Keeping this in mind, the Indian government has decided to launch the swachh bharat mission on October 2, 2014.The mission will cover all rural and urban areas. The urban component of the mission will be implemented by the Ministry of Urban Development, and the rural component by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. The programme includes elimination of open defecation, conversion of unsanitary toilets to pour flush toilets, eradication of manual scavenging, municipal solid waste management and bringing about a behavioural change in people regarding healthy sanitation practices.The mission aims to cover 1.04 crore households, provide 2.5 lakh community toilets, 2.6 lakh public toilets, and a solid waste management facility in each town.
    [Show full text]
  • SS2016 Report
    “There cannot be a bigger contributor than Mahatama Gandhi towards Swachh Bharat Mission. In the journey of one and a half years since the launch of the Mission, I would like to acknowledge the participation and involvement of citizens of the country - especially children, as also the positive and proactive role played by the media, in the Mission’s journey till date” Narendra Modi Prime Minister SWACHH SURVEKSHAN 3 FOREWORD M. Venkaiah Naidu, Minister of Urban Development, Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation and Parliamentary Afairs As a mark of respect to the father of the nation, our govern- ment has taken an ambitious pledge to make India Open Defecation Free and clean by 2nd October, 2019 through the Swachh Bharat Mission. We have taken up a multi-pronged strategy for making this mission successful, and turning it into a people’s movement. In its second year since launch, it is heartening to note that the Swachh Bharat Mission has caught the imagination of cit- izens. The increased participation from citizens, be it as part of our thematic drives, or voluntary ‘swachhata’ activities from inspired individuals and organizations, is slowly but surely pushing the Mission towards becoming a ‘Jan Andolan’. The “Swachh Survekshan” was launched in January 2016 to assess the sanitation and solid waste management status in 73 major cities in India (comprising 40% of India’s total urban population) - including 53 cities with a population of above 10 lakhs each, and state capitals. This was the first survey since the launch of Swachh Bharat Mission in October 2014, and I would like to thank the Quality Council of India for carrying out this survey on behalf of my Ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Vision Report.Indb
    DIMENSIONS OF GROWTH 4The economic development and socio-demographic strategy for a specifi c region would involve integra ng the current strengths of the region viz. exis ng economic ac vity levels, socio-demographic indicators, connec vity and linkages, natural resources, etc. with the overall vision of developing the region into a sustainable urban/ economic center. In view of this, a detailed review of the infl uence region (viz. Andhra Pradesh state) and the Capital Region has been undertaken to understand the current economic and demographic scenario, economic posi oning, key natural resources and raw materials present, industrial ac vity, infrastructure and key ini a ves proposed under the AP Reorganiza on Act, etc. This chapter is divided into the following sub sec ons: 1. Review of Exis ng Socio-Economic Informa on; 2. Regional Economic Analysis; 3. Benchmarking of Capital Ci es; 4. Economic Development Strategy for Capital Region; 5. Broad Demographic Projec ons. School Kids near Vijayawada 4.1REVIEW OF EXISTING SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION 48 4.1.1REGIONAL CONTEXT Andhra Pradesh Overview The state is very well connected to Located in the south-eastern part of the regional and na onal economic the country, Andhra Pradesh state is hubs such as Hyderabad, Chennai, bordered by Odisha & Chha sgarh Visakhapatnam, Bengaluru, Mumbai, on the North, Telangana & Karnataka etc. via these transit nodes on the west, Tamil Nadu towards the south and Bay of Bengal on the east. Fig.4.1 highlights the strategic loca onal The new state of Andhra Pradesh is advantages of the state in context of spread across an area of approximately the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit Evolution and Journey of Swachh Survekshan
    Toolkit Evolution and Journey of Swachh Survekshan 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 F 0 C U S Output Institutionalizing Physical Outcomes Sustainability Progress parameters Swachhata No.1 Cities Mysuru Indore TBD Transformation from ‘Monitoring Tool’ to ‘Governance Tool’ Balance 1,300 Marks 8% of Quarter-1 Quarter-1 1,300 April - June Q1 & Q2 2,000 marks marks = 100 Citizens’ Validation 15% of 1,500 Quarter-2 Q3 Quarter-2 1300 July - Sept Physical 2,000 marks Ranking Average = 200 Validation Quarterly Quarterly 6,000 = Assessments by Quarter-3 Assessors Quarter-3 77% of Oct - Dec 2,000 marks 1300 Marks for Marks for = 1000 25% of Total 200 Total 6,000 marks 1,300 marks Monthly MIS updated by ULBs by updated MIS Monthly Swachh Survekshan 2020 Weightage Total Marks 6,000 25% 25% 1,500 Marks 1,500 Marks 200 Marks Average Rank of Q1, Q2 & Q3 GFC (SWM) 1,000 Marks 1,300 Marks ODF /ODF+ / ODF++ 500 Marks Service Level 25% 1,500 Marks Progress 1,500 Marks 25% 25% of SS League 2020 Weightage will be added in final SS-2020 …Quarterly Assessments April 2019 to June 2019 I July 2019 to Sep 2019 I Oct 2019 to Dec 2019 Evaluation of Average Ranking of 3 Quarters KPMG.com/in Evaluation Matrix: Average Ranking of Cities in SS League 2020 For Marks (There will be one category for >1 Lakh population cities. However, in <1 Lakh SS-2020 200 population, cities will be categorized in 4 zones) WHY To encourage cities to improve their ranks in each quarter to get better average score Marks Distribution ULBs Quarterly Performance (Example) Evaluation of Quarterly Performance SSLeague 2020 SSLeague 2020 Marks Obtained In <1 Lakh population category, ULBs Average Rank Rank Max Marks 200 April-June Rank July - Sep Rank Oct - Dec Rank Max Marks 200 will be categorized into 4 zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of the Development of New Capital City and Urban Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh State, India Final Report
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Project to Promote Overseas Sales of Quality Energy Infrastructure Systems in Fiscal Year 2016 Feasibility Study of the Development of New Capital City and Urban Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh State, India Final Report March 2017 Sumitomo Corporation Feasibility Study of the Development of New Capital City and Urban Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh State, India Final Report Feasibility Study of the Development of New Capital City and Urban Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh State, India Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Area .............................................................................................................. 1-2 2 Present Condition and Development Plan of New Capital City and Surrounding Cities .................................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1 Present Condition...................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.1 General Condition ..................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.2 Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • “Children” in the Urban Vision of India, 2019
    CHILDREN IN THE URBAN VISION OF INDIA CFSC CHILD FRIENDLY SMART CITIES Children in the urban vision of India A Study of Children in CFSC Urban Missions of India CHILD CHILDREN“CHILDRE IN THEN” IN URBAN THE URBAN VISION VISION OF OFINDIA INDIAiii 1 FRIENDLY SMART CITIES TITLE “CHILDREN” IN THE URBAN VISION OF INDIA, 2019 PUBLISHER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF URBAN AFFAIRS, DELHI RESEARCH TEAM Kanak Tiwari, Ishleen Kaur, Naina Seth, Surbhi Zutshi Supported by: Divya Jindal, Yogita Lokhande, Sarika Chakrabarty, TC Sharma, Neha Awasthi, Kaustubh Parihar GRAPHIC DESIGN Deep Pahwa, Devender S Rawat, Bhavnesh Bhanot MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS Aparajita Ghatak, Aksheyta Gupta COPYRIGHT © NIUA (2019) YEAR OF PUBLISHING: 2019 DISCLAIMER This report is intended as a baseline study for status of children in urban India. While every effort has been made to ensure the correctness of data/information used in this report, neither the authors nor NIUA shall accept any legal liability for the accuracy or inferences drawn from the material contained therein or for any consequences arising from the use of this material. Depiction of boundaries shown in the maps are not authoritative. The boundaries and names shown and the statistics used on these maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance. These maps are prepared for visual and cartographic representation of tabular data. All photographs in the report have been duly credited to the respective photographers. Further information regarding photograph permissions should be redirected to the respective photographers. The full report should be referenced as follows: NIUA (2018) ““CHILDREN” IN THE URBAN VISION OF INDIA, 2019” Delhi, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Swachh Bharat Mission - Driving Behaviour Change at Scale
    The Making of a “Swachh” India Lessons from the Swachh Bharat Mission - Driving Behaviour Change at Scale KPMG.com/in Contents Page Foreword [01] Executive Summary [02] Background [04] The Scale of the Problem [05] Success Factor 1: Political Support Critical [06] Success Factor 2: Think Scale, not drip drip [07] Success Factor 3: Engagement with Stakeholders [08] Success Factor 4: Getting everyone involved [09] Success Factor 5: Success breeds success [11] Success Factor 6: Competition and Housekeeping [12] Underscoring all factors - Communications [13] Way Forward [14] References [15] Acknowledgements [16] © 2018, KPMG, and Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved Foreword The Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM), which is perhaps the largest Behaviour Change campaign ever, aims to make India a clean nation; is well on its way to meet its objective. There is enough evidence to show that India is on a new trajectory of growth owing to the achievements under the mission. SBM has witnessed a phenomenal increase in rural sanitation coverage from 39 per cent to 90 per cent in the last 4 years. It is heartening to see the people of our nation stepping beyond their roles as mere beneficiaries of the programme to leaders of it today. The large majority of citizens in rural India, especially the women, no longer have to suffer the indignity of having to go out into the open to defecate. In fact, women are becoming the primary force in driving the nation in becoming free from open defecation.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDHRA PRADESH October 2007
    ANDHRA PRADESH October 2007 www.ibef.org STATE ECONOMY & SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE www.ibef.org STATE ECONOMY & SOCIO-ECONOMY PROFILE ANDHRA PRADESH • October 2007 Andhra Pradesh – A Snapshot • Covering an area of 275,068 km, Andhra Pradesh is the Fourth largest State in India by Area • Second-longest coastline of 970 kilometres in the country • The state is divided into 23 districts • The state has two major rivers, Godavari and Krishna • 7 Agro climatic conditions and variety of soils to support cultivation of wide variety of crops • Hyderabad is the State capital Vijayawada, Vishakhatnam and Warangal as other key cities STATE ECONOMY & SOCIO-ECONOMY PROFILE ANDHRA PRADESH • October 2007 Demographic Profile Population Distribution of Population by Age Groups, Andhra Pradesh, 2001 0-4 • Fifth populous state in India with a population 5,012,932 1,671,429 5 to 14 of 76.2 million, constituting 7.43% of the 13,141,553 4,572,211 15 - 19 5,263,858 2,316,106 country’s population 20 -24 4,796,962 2,139,935 25 - 29 • Urban population constituted 27.3% of the total 4,779,944 1,982,327 30 - 34 population in 2001 (last Census) compared 4,020,132 1,605,373 35 - 39 to 26.89% in 1999 4,035,189 1,617,522 40 - 49 5,897,425 2,261,468 • Population density stands at 277 persons per sq. km. 50 - 59 3,868,354 1,305,759 60 -69 as against 313 persons per sq km in the country 2,883,813 825,463 70 - 79 • Sex ratio of 978 females per 1000 males as against 1,235,889 338,603 80 + 386,032 118,278 933 females per 1000 males across India A.NS* 78,984 54,446 n Rural n
    [Show full text]
  • World's Largest Cleanliness Survey
    YEARS OF Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs CELEBRATING Government of India THE MAHATMA ƓƑƒƕbঞ;v ѵĺƔƒ-h_"u;o1-ঞomv lr-1ঞm]Ɠƒuou;b;v] ’ World s largest cleanliness survey Years of Celebrating The Mahatma II III IV V Vinod Kumar Jindal Years of Celebrating The Mahatma Message from the Chairman, Karvy First of all, I would like to express my deep gra tude to the Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban), Ministry of Housing and Urban Aff airs for entrus ng Karvy Data Management Services Limited with conduc ng the Swachh Survekshan two years in a row. I sincerely hope we have been able to C. Parthasarathy live up to expecta ons. Chairman, Swachh Survekshan 2019 posed a unique challenge in the Karvy Data Management history of survey research in India, requiring us to complete Services Limited on-ground assessment across 4237 Urban Local Bodies and Cantonment Boards in a mere 28 days. The fi nal scoring and ranking was to be completed in a further 15 days. I am extremely proud of the fact that a team of over 4500 assessors on the ground and nearly 500 people at the back end worked relessly to deliver the project without any me overrun or compromise on quality. However, such an eff ort would not have been possible without the constant guidance and support we received from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Aff airs and the spirit of coopera on and support that we received from State Mission Directors and ULB nodal offi cers. We are truly grateful for the me and interest invested by them in helping us achieve such an Swachh Survekshan ambi ous target.
    [Show full text]