RSF Safety Guide for Journalists
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Face the Nation
© 2006 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved PLEASE CREDIT ANY QUOTES OR EXCERPTS FROM THIS CBS TELEVISION PROGRAM TO "CBS NEWS' FACE THE NATION. " CBS News FACE THE NATION Sunday, June 11, 2006 GUESTS: General GEORGE CASEY Commander, Multi-National Force, Iraq THOMAS FRIEDMAN Columnist, The New York Times LARA LOGAN CBS News Chief Foreign Correspondent ELIZABETH PALMER CBS News Correspondent MODERATOR: BOB SCHIEFFER - CBS News This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with FACE THE NATION - CBS NEWS 202-457-4481 BURRELLE'S INFORMATION SERVICES / 202-419-1859 / 800-456-2877 Face the Nation (CBS News) - Sunday, June 11, 2006 1 BOB SCHIEFFER, host: Today on FACE THE NATION, after Zarqawi. Is the death of the terrorist in Iraq a turning point? It took two 500-pound bombs, but US forces finally got him. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq. How will his death affect the war? We'll talk with Lara Logan, our chief foreign correspondent, and CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer, who is in Baghdad. Then we'll talk to our top general in Iraq, General George Casey, on where we go from here. We'll get analysis and perspective on all this from New York Times columnist Tom Friedman. And I'll have a final word on congressional ethics. Is that an oxymoron? But first, the death of Zarqawi on FACE THE NATION. Announcer: FACE THE NATION, with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. -
The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF JOURNALISM STORIES FROM THE FRONT LINES: FEMALE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS IN WAR ZONES JENNIFER CONNOR SUMMER 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Journalism with honors in Journalism. Reviewed and approved* by the following: Tony Barbieri Foster Professor of Writing and Editing Thesis Supervisor Martin Halstuk Associate Professor Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to examine the experience of women who cover war and conflict zones, with a special focus on those reporting in Iraq and Afghanistan. When western female war correspondents work in male-dominated cultures and situations of war, they encounter different challenges and advantages than male war correspondents. The level of danger associated with the assignments these women take on is evaluated in this thesis. Anecdotes from female war correspondents themselves, combined with outside analysis, reveal the types of situations unique to female war correspondents. More women choose to follow the story and witness history in the making by covering today‟s war and conflict zones. This trend parallels the greater presence of women in newsrooms, today. This thesis will shed light on what it means to be a female reporting on and working in dangerous conditions. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....1 Part 2. Dealing with Danger……………………………………………………………………...6 -
Reporting Facts: Free from Fear Or Favour
Reporting Facts: Free from Fear or Favour PREVIEW OF IN FOCUS REPORT ON WORLD TRENDS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN SOCIETIES. They make a vital contribution to achieving sustainable development – including, topically, Sustainable Development Goal 3 that calls for healthy lives and promoting well-being for all. In the context of COVID-19, this is more important than ever. Journalists need editorial independence in order to be professional, ethical and serve the public interest. But today, journalism is under increased threat as a result of public and private sector influence that endangers editorial independence. All over the world, journalists are struggling to stave off pressures and attacks from both external actors and decision-making systems or individuals in their own outlets. By far, the greatest menace to editorial independence in a growing number of countries across the world is media capture, a form of media control that is achieved through systematic steps by governments and powerful interest groups. This capture is through taking over and abusing: • regulatory mechanisms governing the media, • state-owned or state-controlled media operations, • public funds used to finance journalism, and • ownership of privately held news outlets. Such overpowering control of media leads to a shrinking of journalistic autonomy and contaminates the integrity of the news that is available to the public. However, there is push-back, and even more can be done to support editorial independence -
Download The
Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without regard to political ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. CHAIR HONORARY CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Kathleen Carroll Terry Anderson Joel Simon DIRECTORS Mhamed Krichen Ahmed Rashid al-jazeera Stephen J. Adler David Remnick reuters Isaac Lee the new yorker Franz Allina Lara Logan Alan Rusbridger Amanda Bennett cbs news lady margaret hall, oxford Krishna Bharat Rebecca MacKinnon David Schlesinger Susan Chira Kati Marton Karen Amanda Toulon bloomberg news the new york times Michael Massing Darren Walker Anne Garrels Geraldine Fabrikant Metz ford foundation the new york times Cheryl Gould Jacob Weisberg Victor Navasky the slate group Jonathan Klein the nation getty images Jon Williams Clarence Page rté Jane Kramer chicago tribune the new yorker SENIOR ADVISORS Steven L. Isenberg Sandra Mims Rowe Andrew Alexander David Marash Paul E. Steiger propublica Christiane Amanpour Charles L. Overby cnn international freedom forum Brian Williams msnbc Tom Brokaw Norman Pearlstine nbc news Matthew Winkler Sheila Coronel Dan Rather bloomberg news columbia university axs tv school of journalism Gene Roberts James C. -
“Authentic” News: Voices, Forms, and Strategies in Presenting Television News
International Journal of Communication 10(2016), 4239–4257 1932–8036/20160005 Doing “Authentic” News: Voices, Forms, and Strategies in Presenting Television News DEBING FENG1 Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, China Unlike print news that is static and mainly composed of written text, television news is dynamic and needs to be delivered with diversified presentational modes and forms. Drawing upon Bakhtin’s heteroglossia and Goffman’s production format of talk, this article examined the presentational forms and strategies deployed in BBC News at Ten and CCTV’s News Simulcast. It showed that the employment of different presentational elements and forms in the two programs reflects two contrasting types of news discourse. The discourse of BBC News tends to present different, and even confrontational, voices with diversified presentational forms, such as direct mode of address and “fresh talk,” thus likely to accentuate the authenticity of the news. The other type of discourse (i.e., CCTV News) seems to prefer monologic news presentation and prioritize studio-based, scripted news reading, such as on-camera address or voice- overs, and it thus creates a single authoritative voice that is likely to undermine the truth of the news. Keywords: authenticity, mode of address, presentational elements, voice, television news The discourse of television news has been widely studied within the linguistic world. Early in the 1970s, researchers in the field of critical linguistics (CL; e.g., Fowler, 1991; Fowler, Hodge, Kress, & Trew, 1979; Hodge & Kress, 1993) paid great attention to the ideological meaning of news by drawing upon a kit of linguistic tools such as modality, transitivity, and transformation. -
Radio and Television Correspondents' Dinner” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 6, folder “3/25/76 - Radio and Television Correspondents' Dinner” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Betty Ford donated to the United States of America her copyrights in all of her unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON March 19, 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: RED CAVANEY P~ER SORUM FROM: S AN PORTER . SUBJECT: Mrs; Ford Attendance at the Radio and TV Correspondent's Dinner (Fay Wells), Washington Hilton Hotel, March 26th Mrs. Ford will attend the Radio and TV Correspondent's Dinner as a guest of Fay Wells of Storer Broadcasting Company. Mrs. Ford has attended this dinner as Fay's guest for many years and has been very fond of Fay through the years . She will travel to the dinner with the President (the cocktail period is 6:30-8:00 in the Georgetown Suite). Mrs. Ford then will break from the President and will join Fay and her guests in the Jefferson Room for dinner (I understand the President will be eating in the Ballroom) . -
GOVERNOR's OFFICE of HIGHWAY SAFETY 2019 Annual Report
GEORGIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY 2019 Annual Report Prepared by: Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety 7 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW, Suite 643 Atlanta, GA 30334 Phone: (404) 656-6996 | Fax: (404) 651-9107 www.gahighwaysafety.org Brian Kemp, Governor Allen Poole, Director of GOHS Jimmy Sumner, Deputy Director of GOHS Scarlett Woods, Division Director, Planning and Programs Eshon Poythress, Program Director, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Roger Hayes, Division Director, Law Enforcement Services Robin Bazemore, Division Director, Fiscal Services Highway Safety Grant Programs Jared Eaves, Highway Enforcement of Aggressive Traffic (H.E.A.T) Amanda Jackson, Occupant Protection Kathryn Curtis, Young Adult/SADD/- Pedestrian/Bicycle/Motorcycle Powell Harrelson, High Visibility Enforcement Courtney Ruiz, Georgia Traffic Records Coordinator Josh Turner, Director, Georgia Driver’s Education Commission Statistical Analysis & Research Section Lila F. Ralston, Traffic Safety Research and Evaluation Group - University of Georgia Shenee Bryan, GOHS Epidemiologist TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................. i ABOUT GOHS ............................................................... 1 STATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................... 4 Problem Identification .............................................................................. 4 2018-2019 Target Assessment Overview .................................................... 6 Performance Measure Trends & Projections ................................................ -
Meeting of Television Professionals to Promote Dialogue and to Encourage Cooperative Action on the Middle East
MEETING OF TELEVISION PROFESSIONALS TO PROMOTE DIALOGUE AND TO ENCOURAGE COOPERATIVE ACTION ON THE MIDDLE EAST Report of a conference organized by Search for Common Ground with support from the Hollings Center in Istanbul, Turkey February 3-5, 2006 “We as journalists are part of this conflict. We try not to be…. We try for objectivity, but I don’t think we’ve been successful.” – Correspondent for Arab Satellite Station “The problem we have before us is not language or reporting; it is the problem of conflicting narratives… We don’t listen to each other; we don’t absorb each other’s story…. We have to meet somewhere on the road and strike a compromise.” – Israeli Anchor “This is a problem of a dialogue between two deaf people.” – Palestinian Independent TV Executive “It’s very important that tomorrow I will have friends from Palestinian TV and the Gulf. We are all doing the same news daily.” – Israeli Television Executive BACKGROUND The media's traditional approach to controversial and sensitive issues is to explore the extent and range of disagreement, but this rarely results in common understanding or provides a solution to a problem. In fact, the media often seems to exploit a contentious issue for its entertainment value, sometimes leaving readers and audiences with the impression that nothing positive can be achieved and that the extremes of opinion being presented are representative of the majority. In contrast, Common Ground methodologies encourage the exploration of possible areas of agreement between opposing sides of a discussion, try actively to subvert prejudices and stereotyping, to promote the dignity of all sides, and to encourage a positive vision. -
2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity
CI-18/COUNCIL-31/6/REV 2 2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity INTRODUCTION This report is submitted to the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) in line with the Decision on the Safety of Journalists and the issue of Impunity adopted by the Council at its 26th session on 27 March 2008, and renewed at subsequent sessions in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016. In its latest Decision, adopted in November 2016, the IPDC Council urged Member States to “continue to inform the Director-General of UNESCO, on a voluntary basis, on the status of the judicial inquiries conducted on each of the killings condemned by the Director-General”. The present report provides an analysis of the cases of killings of journalists and associated media personnel that were condemned by the Director-General in 2016 and 2017. It also takes stock of the status of judicial enquiries conducted on each of the killings recorded by UNESCO between 2006 and 2017, based on information provided by Member States. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Background and Context 2 3. Journalists’ killings in 2016 and 2017: key findings 7 3.1 Most dangerous regions 8 3.2 Rise in number of women journalists among fatalities 9 3.3 Highest number of killings among TV journalists 11 3.4 Majority of victims are local journalists 11 3.5 Freelance and staff journalists 12 3.6 More killings occurring in countries with no armed conflict 12 4. Member States’ responses: status of the judicial enquiries on cases of journalists killed from 2006 to end 2017 13 4.1 Decrease in Member State response rate to Director-General’s request 18 4.2 Slight reduction in impunity rate, but 89% of cases remain unresolved 19 4.3 Member States reporting on measures to promote safety of journalists and to combat impunity 22 5. -
How to Protect Journalists and Other Media Actors?
How to protect journalists and other media actors? Implementation Guide to Recommendation Council of Europe CM/Rec(2016)4 on the Protection of journalism DGI(2020)11 and safety of journalists and other media actors The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All requests concerning the reproduction or translation of all or part of this document should be addressed to the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other correspondence concerning this document should be addressed to the Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law. Layout: Council of Europe Photos: Shutterstock © Council of Europe, June 2020 How to protect journalists and other media actors? Implementation Guide to selected topics under the Protection and Prosecution pillars of the Guidelines of Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors DGI(2020)11 Contents I. Introduction and Methodology ..................................................................................................... 6 II. Analysis of selected areas of the Protection pillar of the Guidelines of Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 ................................................................................................................................ 8 A. Early-warning, rapid response mechanisms and protection measures to ensure the safety of journalists (paragraphs 8 – 10 of the Guidelines) -
Sexual Violence: Weapon of War, Impediment to Peace
issue 27 January 2007 Sexual violence: weapon of war, impediment to peace plus: n Massive displacement in Iraq n Forgotten Kosovo IDPs n Somalis risk death crossing Red Sea n Misrepresenting Sudan’s Lost Boys n Voices of displaced Colombians Published by the Refugee Studies Centre in association with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Corinne Owen from Forced Migration Review Forced Migration Review provides the a forum for the regular exchange of practical experience, information and editors ideas between researchers, refugees and internally displaced people, and This special issue of FMR builds on momentum generated by the International Symposium on those who work with them. It is published Sexual Violence in Conflict and Beyond, convened in Brussels in June 2006 by the Government in English, Spanish, Arabic and French of Belgium, the European Commission and the UN Population Fund (UNFPA). We are grateful to by the Refugee Studies Centre, University Thoraya Obaid, executive director of UNFPA, for giving FMR the opportunity to highlight progress of Oxford. FMR was launched in 1998 – and the ongoing challenges – in tackling the scourge of sexual violence in countries torn apart in partnership with the Norwegian by war. We would also like to thank her colleagues Pamela DeLargy, Cécile Mazzacurati and Refugee Council. Henia Dakkak for their invaluable assistance in planning and preparing this special issue. Editors The production and distribution costs of this issue have been funded by UNFPA, the European Commission, Belgian Development Cooperation, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Marion Couldrey & Dr Tim Morris Affairs, the Austrian Development Agency, Concern Worldwide, Oxfam Novib, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and the World Food Programme. -
Barbara Cochran
Cochran Rethinking Public Media: More Local, More Inclusive, More Interactive More Inclusive, Local, More More Rethinking Media: Public Rethinking PUBLIC MEDIA More Local, More Inclusive, More Interactive A WHITE PAPER BY BARBARA COCHRAN Communications and Society Program 10-021 Communications and Society Program A project of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program A project of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Rethinking Public Media: More Local, More Inclusive, More Interactive A White Paper on the Public Media Recommendations of the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy written by Barbara Cochran Communications and Society Program December 2010 The Aspen Institute and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation invite you to join the public dialogue around the Knight Commission’s recommendations at www.knightcomm.org or by using Twitter hashtag #knightcomm. Copyright 2010 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-536-6 10/021 Individuals are encouraged to cite this paper and its contents. In doing so, please include the following attribution: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program,Rethinking Public Media: More Local, More Inclusive, More Interactive, Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute, December 2010. For more information, contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, D.C.