Download The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download The Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without regard to political ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. CHAIR HONORARY CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Kathleen Carroll Terry Anderson Joel Simon DIRECTORS Mhamed Krichen Ahmed Rashid al-jazeera Stephen J. Adler David Remnick reuters Isaac Lee the new yorker Franz Allina Lara Logan Alan Rusbridger Amanda Bennett cbs news lady margaret hall, oxford Krishna Bharat Rebecca MacKinnon David Schlesinger Susan Chira Kati Marton Karen Amanda Toulon bloomberg news the new york times Michael Massing Darren Walker Anne Garrels Geraldine Fabrikant Metz ford foundation the new york times Cheryl Gould Jacob Weisberg Victor Navasky the slate group Jonathan Klein the nation getty images Jon Williams Clarence Page rté Jane Kramer chicago tribune the new yorker SENIOR ADVISORS Steven L. Isenberg Sandra Mims Rowe Andrew Alexander David Marash Paul E. Steiger propublica Christiane Amanpour Charles L. Overby cnn international freedom forum Brian Williams msnbc Tom Brokaw Norman Pearlstine nbc news Matthew Winkler Sheila Coronel Dan Rather bloomberg news columbia university axs tv school of journalism Gene Roberts James C. Goodale philip merrill college of debevoise & plimpton journalism, university of maryland © 2018 Committee to Protect Journalists, New York. All rights reserved. Design: John Emerson. ISBN 978-0-9991321-9-7 NOTHING TO DECLARE: WHY U.S. BORDER AGENCY’S VAST STOP AND SEARCH POWERS UNDERMINE PRESS FREEDOM About this report Secondary screenings of journalists crossing U.S. borders risk undermining press freedom as Custom and Border Protection agents search devices such as laptops or phones without warrant and question journalists about their reporting and contacts. As the government ramps up searches of electronic devices, rights groups mount legal challenges to fight invasive searches. A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists. Published October 22, 2018 This report was written by CPJ North America Program Coordinator Alexandra Ellerbeck and CPJ North America Research Assistant Stephanie Sugars, with additional research and reporting by North America Research Associate Avi Asher-Schapiro. CPJ Advocacy Director Courtney C. Radsch wrote the accompanying piece, “CPJ’s slog to improve DHS and CBP policy toward journalists.” Reporters Without Borders contributed research and data collection. Ellerbeck leads CPJ’s research on press freedom issues in North America. Prior to joining CPJ in 2015, Ellerbeck worked as the senior research assistant and regional Latin America expert for Freedom House’s annual publication “Freedom on the Net,” which surveys internet freedom in 65 countries. Sugars has reported for several international outlets, including Al Jazeera and Open Democracy. She graduated from New York University with a Masters in journalism and international relations in May 2018. Radsch serves as CPJ’s chief spokesperson on global press freedom issues and frequently writes and speaks about the intersection of media, technology, and human rights. Prior to joining CPJ, Asher-Schapiro was a staff writer at VICE News, International Business Times/Newsweek, and Tribune Media. His reporting on technology and human rights issues has been published in outlets including The New York Times, The Atlantic Monthly, and The Intercept. COVER PHOTO: Customs and Border Protection agents pictured at Los Angeles International Airport in January 2017. The agency’s power to search electronic devices without warrant has serious implications for press freedom. (Reuters/Patrick T. Fallon) 3 CONTENTS Report Summary 7 Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom 8 Changing the Landscape: Key rulings on border searches 12 CPJ’s slog to improve DHS and CBP policy toward journalists 15 CPJ Safety Advisory: Crossing U.S. borders 19 Recommendations 22 NOTHING TO DECLARE: WHY U.S. BORDER AGENCY’S VAST STOP AND SEARCH POWERS UNDERMINE PRESS FREEDOM Report Summary he ability of a government agent to scour a phone or staff crossing the border. laptop without any legal process is a chilling prospect, The agency is opaque about the data it collects and how Tparticularly for journalists working with whistleblowers. it works with other federal agencies. Several journalists But that is exactly the prospect journalists crossing a U.S. told us that a lack of transparency, particularly over infor- border face thanks to the wide powers granted to Customs mation sharing, was particularly worrying. and Border Protection agents, who can search electronic The potential impact of this is illustrated in documents devices without warrant, and question reporters about released in a 2010 case, when CBP—at the behest of Im- past and current work. migration and Customs Enforcement, which was working To measure the impact these warrantless searches have with several other federal agencies--searched the laptop on the media, CPJ and our partners at Reporters Without and phone of an activist as part of an investigation into Borders sent an open call to journalists who have been an alleged unauthorized leak of sensitive information. In stopped at a U.S. border. We spoke with two dozen jour- a separate legal filing, CBP listed “classified information” nalists and searched news reports and legal filings for pub- as an example of the contraband that it has power to in- lic cases. Ultimately, we identified 37 journalists who said tercept. they found the secondary screenings invasive. Of these The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees cases, 20 said that border agents conducted warrantless CBP, did not respond to our requests for comment for this searches of their electronic devices. report, despite repeated requests. While the number of public cases is small compared This is an important time to document the threats that with the millions of travelers who cross the U.S. border journalists face at the border. At least two bills are in Con- each day, we know that these searches can have an out- gress that, if enacted, would restrict the powers CBP has to sized effect. CBP figures show that in the past three years, conduct electronic device searches of citizens and perma- the agency tripled the number of warrantless electronic nent residents. Separately, our partners at the American device searches it conducts. Journalists told us that these Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Founda- searches and agents’ questions about their current and tion are challenging the constitutionality of warrantless past reporting are affecting their ability to protect sources electronic device searches in court. Our research shows and have impacted the way they plan reporting trips and that a fundamental change is necessary to protect the First travel. Newsrooms said that they were ramping up secu- and Fourth Amendments at the border, and for no group is rity training on digital protection and best practices for this more urgent than the press. 7 Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom avid Degner, an American photojournalist who spent only a fraction are included in the less than 1 percent of years working in Egypt, never expected that the digi- travelers whose electronic devices are searched. However, Dtal security habits he adopted while working in an authori- conversations with these journalists flagged several issues tarian country would be needed while traveling to the U.S. that threaten press freedom—a right that should be en- But when a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent shrined and protected for everyone who steps foot in the stopped him at a pre-clearance center in Toronto in 2016, U.S. the journalist said he found himself demanding that his The most serious issue is that CBP can, without war- rights to privacy be respected. rant, gain access to all the information stored on a phone Degner, who has worked for publications including Na- or laptop and share it with other federal agencies. For a tional Geographic, The New York Times Magazine, and journalist, this could expose contact information, notes, The Wall Street Journal, said that when he questioned images, and communication with, or documents from, what right the officer had to demand his phone and pass- confidential sources. words, the agent passed him a sheet of paper asserting Other issues include a lack of transparency about how that CBP—the U.S. law enforcement agency responsible CBP collects and shares data with domestic law enforce- for monitoring points of entry—had authority to examine ment and other agencies, and its assertion in a legal fil- anything brought into the U.S. ing in December 2017 that classified U.S. information is “Luckily I’m used to living in authoritarian countries among the items it considers contraband—a definition where police regularly stop people on the streets and de- that could have serious consequences for journalists in- mand to see their phones without cause,” Degner said, add- creasingly relying on whistleblowers when reporting on ing that he handed over his phone after the agent said CBP politics and national security. had power to confiscate it, and was relieved that he was in Journalists also said they are confused about their the habit of wiping his phone of sensitive information. rights, and the processes for requesting answers or seek- Over the past nine months, the Committee to Protect ing redress were often ineffective.
Recommended publications
  • Face the Nation
    © 2006 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved PLEASE CREDIT ANY QUOTES OR EXCERPTS FROM THIS CBS TELEVISION PROGRAM TO "CBS NEWS' FACE THE NATION. " CBS News FACE THE NATION Sunday, June 11, 2006 GUESTS: General GEORGE CASEY Commander, Multi-National Force, Iraq THOMAS FRIEDMAN Columnist, The New York Times LARA LOGAN CBS News Chief Foreign Correspondent ELIZABETH PALMER CBS News Correspondent MODERATOR: BOB SCHIEFFER - CBS News This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with FACE THE NATION - CBS NEWS 202-457-4481 BURRELLE'S INFORMATION SERVICES / 202-419-1859 / 800-456-2877 Face the Nation (CBS News) - Sunday, June 11, 2006 1 BOB SCHIEFFER, host: Today on FACE THE NATION, after Zarqawi. Is the death of the terrorist in Iraq a turning point? It took two 500-pound bombs, but US forces finally got him. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq. How will his death affect the war? We'll talk with Lara Logan, our chief foreign correspondent, and CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer, who is in Baghdad. Then we'll talk to our top general in Iraq, General George Casey, on where we go from here. We'll get analysis and perspective on all this from New York Times columnist Tom Friedman. And I'll have a final word on congressional ethics. Is that an oxymoron? But first, the death of Zarqawi on FACE THE NATION. Announcer: FACE THE NATION, with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF JOURNALISM STORIES FROM THE FRONT LINES: FEMALE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS IN WAR ZONES JENNIFER CONNOR SUMMER 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Journalism with honors in Journalism. Reviewed and approved* by the following: Tony Barbieri Foster Professor of Writing and Editing Thesis Supervisor Martin Halstuk Associate Professor Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to examine the experience of women who cover war and conflict zones, with a special focus on those reporting in Iraq and Afghanistan. When western female war correspondents work in male-dominated cultures and situations of war, they encounter different challenges and advantages than male war correspondents. The level of danger associated with the assignments these women take on is evaluated in this thesis. Anecdotes from female war correspondents themselves, combined with outside analysis, reveal the types of situations unique to female war correspondents. More women choose to follow the story and witness history in the making by covering today‟s war and conflict zones. This trend parallels the greater presence of women in newsrooms, today. This thesis will shed light on what it means to be a female reporting on and working in dangerous conditions. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....1 Part 2. Dealing with Danger……………………………………………………………………...6
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Be Done to Protect Schools and Universities from Military Use?
    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE DRAFT LUCENS GUIDELINES Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack GCPEA 1 GCPEA Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack What is military use of schools and universities? During armed conflicts, schools and universities are often used by armed forces and non-state armed groups as bases, barracks and temporary shelters, defensive and offensive positions or observation posts, weapons stores, and detention and interro - gation centres. Classrooms, school grounds, and lecture halls are also used for military training and to forcibly recruit children into armed groups. Sometimes schools and universities are taken over entirely, and students are pushed out completely. At other times education facilities are partially used for military purposes, with troops building a firing position on a school’s roof, or using a few classrooms, or occupying a playground while students continue to attend. Schools can be used for military purposes for a few days, months, or even years, and may be used during school hours, or when schools are not in session, over holidays, or in the evening. In all instances, military use of schools and universities puts students, teachers, and academics at risk. Where is military use of schools and universities happening? According to the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), between 2005 and 2014, national armed forces and non-state armed groups, multi-national forces, and even peacekeepers have used schools and universities in at least 25 countries during armed confict, including: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Georgia, India, Iraq, Israel/Palestine, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Uganda, Ukraine, and Yemen.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, 6-9 Pm
    For Immediate Release. Please add this information to your listings. Thank you! O’BORN CONTEMPORARY presents: REVOLUTION, a solo exhibition, featuring photographs from the Egyptian revolution by ED OU OCTOBER 1 – NOVEMBER 5, 2011 www.oborncontemporary.com DATES: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, 6-9 pm Exhibition Opening and Reception Show Continues to NOVEMBER 5, 2011 Artist will be in attendance. Saturday, October 1, 12-5 pm Informal artist tours & talks. LOCATION: 131 Ossington Avenue, Toronto. GALLERY HOURS: Tuesday – Saturday, 11 – 6 and by appointment. TELEPHONE: 416.413.9555 EXHIBITION STATEMENT: In January of 2011, Egyptians from all corners of the country erupted in mass protests, challenging the heavy-handed rule of President Hosni Mubarak. The entire world watched, as Egyptians fought to have their grievances heard using sticks, stones, shouts, cell phones, and computers. Over the course of eighteen days, protesters occupied Tahrir square, the symbolic heart of the revolution where Egyptians of all ages and parts of society could speak with one unified voice, demanding the ouster of the president. They debated politics, shared their testimonies, supported each other, and mapped out their hopes and dreams for their country. On February 11, President Mubarak resigned, ending thirty years of autocratic rule. As the euphoria and excitement dies down, Egyptians are beginning to question what they have actually achieved. They are asking themselves what they want to make of their new Egypt and how to reconcile with decades of mistrust of authority, corruption, and an economy in shambles. The difficult part arguably, is still to come. ABOUT THE ARTIST: Ed Ou (24) is a culturally ambiguous Canadian photojournalist who has been bouncing around the Middle East, former Soviet Union, Africa, and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Hearing: Nomination of Gina Haspel to Be the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
    S. HRG. 115–302 OPEN HEARING: NOMINATION OF GINA HASPEL TO BE THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–119 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHUCK SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS MAY 9, 2018 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon. Richard, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from North Carolina ................ 1 Warner, Mark R., Vice Chairman, a U.S. Senator from Virginia ........................ 3 WITNESSES Chambliss, Saxby, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane
    TIMELINE: Congressional Oversight in the Face of Executive Branch and Media Suppression: The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane 2009 FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation of the individual who would become Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source because of his ties to Russian intelligence officers.1 June 2009: FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) interviews Carter Page, who “immediately advised [them] that due to his work and overseas experiences, he has been questioned by and provides information to representatives of [another U.S. government agency] on an ongoing basis.”2 2011 February 2011: CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson begins reporting on “Operation Fast and Furious.” Later in the year, Attkisson notices “anomalies” with several of her work and personal electronic devices that persist into 2012.3 2012 September 11, 2012: Attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya.4 2013 March 2013: The existence of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server becomes publicly known.5 May 2013: o News reports reveal Obama’s Justice Department investigating leaks of classified information and targeting reporters, including secretly seizing “two months of phone records for reporters and editors of The Associated Press,”6 labeling Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “co-conspirator,” and obtaining a search warrant for Rosen’s personal emails.7 May 10, 2013: Reports reveal that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted and unfairly scrutinized conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status.8
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Ambiguous Role in Afghanistan
    MARCH 2010 . VOL 3 . ISSUE 3 garments, typically under a waistcoat so families of the bombers rejoice over the it is properly concealed. The orange color martyrdom mission, and some mothers Iran’s Ambiguous Role in detonation cord connects the explosives wear new black dresses to greet local Afghanistan vest or jacket to the striker sleeve, women after the death of their son. One which is adhered to the bomber’s left- bomber, however, explained that while By Sajjan M. Gohel hand wrist with duct tape. On reaching the mother of the bomber is typically the target, the ring of the striker sleeve sad, they cannot overtly express their iran is playing a pivotal role in is pulled with the right hand and the true feelings due to threats from the Afghanistan’s post-Taliban development. blast occurs. There is no evidence of any Taliban. It is a large source of foreign direct intoxicant administered to the suicide investment, and provides assistance bombers before the attack. Also, contrary to the general public’s in critical national infrastructure, perception, the Taliban do not regularly road construction, distribution of Since suicide bombers often either abort pay compensation to the families of energy supplies, and agricultural and their missions or are arrested before suicide bombers after an attack.47 Any communications development. Iran they can detonate their explosives, they posthumous compensation package is also shares ethnic, linguistic and have been able to narrate their pre- largely a myth. In some cases, when religious links with millions of Afghan attack emotions. The bombers’ felt no the parents of a bomber are extremely Shi`a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Obama/Pentagon War Narrative, the Real War and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter Revista De Paz Y Conflictos, Núm
    Revista de Paz y Conflictos E-ISSN: 1988-7221 revpaz@ugr.es Universidad de Granada España Herold, Marc W. The Obama/Pentagon War Narrative, the Real War and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter Revista de Paz y Conflictos, núm. 5, 2012, pp. 44-65 Universidad de Granada Granada, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=205024400003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative issn: 1988-7221 The Obama/Pentagon War Narrative, the Real War and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter El relato bélico de Obama y del Pentágono, la verdadera guerra y dónde importan realmente las número 5 año 2012 número muertes de los civiles afganos Recibido: 01/03/2011 Marc W. Herold Aceptado: 31/10/2011 marc.herold@unh.edu Profesor de Desarrollo Económico Universidad de New Hampshire en Durham (New Hampshire, EE.UU.) Abstract This essay explores upon two inter-related issues: (1) the course of America’s raging Afghan war as actually experienced on the ground as contrasted with the Pentagon and mainstream media narrative and (2) the unrelenting Obama/Pentagon efforts to control the public narrative of that war.1 As the real war on the ground spread geographically and violence intensified, U.S. efforts to construct a positive spin re-doubled. An examination of bodies – of foreign occupa- tion forces and innocent Afghan civilians – reveals a clear trade-off.
    [Show full text]
  • Lara Logan 60 Minutes Correspondent & CBS News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent
    Lara Logan 60 Minutes Correspondent & CBS News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Driven by an insatiable desire to constantly improve and impact the world around us, Logan began her journalism career when she was a 17 year old school girl in South Africa. As a teenager compelled to expose the atrocities of the Apartheid regime in South Africa, Logan discovered her passion for seeking truth and justice in an increasingly connected globe. Since her days as a young print reporter in South Africa, she has gone on to confront the harsh and dangerous realities of war, conflict and global change. The horror and injustice she witnessed has instilled in her a deep humility and a profound appreciation for life — and she wouldn’t have it any other way. Logan joined CBS in 2002 as a correspondent and a contributor to 60 Minutes II (2002-04). She has been CBS News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent since February 2006; she became a correspondent for 60 Minutes the same year. She reports regularly for the CBS Evening News and periodically appears on The Early Show and Face The Nation in addition to her 60 Minutes duties. Her reporting has brought her face to face with the day’s most diverse, relevant and intriguing issues, from gripping 60 Minutes interviews with Jane Goodall, Mark Wahlberg, and Staff Sgt. Sal Giunta, the first living soldier to win the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War, to her coverage of the war on terror. Most recently, Logan received the John F. Hogan Distinguished Service Award from RTDNA, followed immediately by her second Emmy award, this time for “Best Interview.” She’s been the recipient of the prestigious Daniel Pearl Award for Outstanding International Investigative Reporting, the David Bloom Award for excellence in enterprise reporting in 2008, and the 2007 Association of International Broadcasters’ Best International News Story Award for her report on the Taliban.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Foreign Reporting
    Montana Journalism Review Volume 1 Issue 40 Issue 40, 2011 Article 1 2011 Beyond Our Borders: The future of foreign reporting University of Montana--Missoula. School of Journalism Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mjr Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation School of Journalism, University of Montana--Missoula. (2011) "Beyond Our Borders: The future of foreign reporting," Montana Journalism Review: Vol. 1 : Iss. 40 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mjr/vol1/iss40/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Journalism Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact scholarworks@mso.umt.edu. School of Journalism: Beyond Our Borders: The future of foreign reporting MONTANA M JOURNALISM RJ REVIEW BEYOND OUR BORDERS The future of foreign reporting THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM VOL. 40, SUMMER 2011 Published by ScholarWorks at University of Montana, 2015 1 Montana Journalism Review, Vol. 1 [2015], Iss. 40, Art. 1 https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mjr/vol1/iss40/1 2 School of Journalism: Beyond Our Borders: The future of foreign reporting EDITOR’S NOTE In tribute to American photo- freelancing for Getty Images, and to two an unforgettable series detailing the journalist Chris Hondros, 41, who other extraordinary photojournalists, shooting of an Iraqi family by U.S. died in Misrata, Libya, on April 20 both British citizens, who ventured to troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of the Next-Generation Securedrop Workstation Freedom of the Press Foundation
    1 Design of the Next-Generation SecureDrop Workstation Freedom of the Press Foundation I. INTRODUCTION Whistleblowers expose wrongdoing, illegality, abuse, misconduct, waste, and/or threats to public health or safety. Whistleblowing has been critical for some of the most important stories in the history of investigative journalism, e.g. the Pentagon Papers, the Panama Papers, and the Snowden disclosures. From the Government Accountability Project’s Whistleblower Guide (1): The power of whistleblowers to hold institutions and leaders accountable very often depends on the critical work of journalists, who verify whistleblowers’ disclosures and then bring them to the public. The partnership between whistleblowers and journalists is essential to a functioning democracy. In the United States, shield laws and reporter’s privilege exists to protect the right of a journalist to not reveal the identity of a source. However, under both the Obama and Trump administrations, governments have attempted to identify journalistic sources via court orders to third parties holding journalist’s records. Under the Obama administration, the Associated Press had its telephone records acquired in order to identify a source (2). Under the Trump Administration, New York Times journalist Ali Watkins had her phone and email records acquired by court order (3). If source—journalist communications are mediated by third parties that can be subject to subpoena, source identities can be revealed without a journalist being aware due to a gag that is often associated with such court orders. Sources can face a range of reprisals. These could be personal reprisals such as reputational or relationship damage, or for employees that reveal wrongdoing, loss of employment and career opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • OPC Awards Dinner Honors Women and Exceptional International Journa
    MONTHLY NEWSLETTER I April-May 2018 OPC Awards Dinner Honors Women INSIDE and Exceptional International Journalism Annual Awards Dinner Photos 2-3, 5 her killer was sentenced to life in EVENT RECAP prison. Her parents, Ingrid and Award Winners 6-7 Joachim Wall, lit the Candle of by donna m. airoldi Event Recap: Remembrance for journalists who oreign correspondents PEN America Report have been imprisoned, killed or ha- on China Censors 8 gathered on April 26 to rassed while doing their jobs. celebrate their profession and F “We wish that we could sit over People Column 9-12 honor those who have persevered at our table as proud parents and in uncovering the truth despite the Press Freedom see our daughter receive an award 13 increasing challenges journalists Update for her stories,” said Ingrid Wall. face when doing their jobs. “We wish that every journalist in New Books 14 “There is unfortunately no sign the world could do very important that reporting abroad is becoming MOORE STEVE Q&A: work without risking their lives. Louise Boyle 15 any safer or any easier. There were And we wish for the next year José Díaz-Balart, presenter. at least 50 documented deaths of that there won’t be any need for a journalists last year, one of the remembrance candle.” respondent for Pakistan and Af- worst years on record. Several Another of the evening’s ghanistan for The Associated Press, hundred more have been jailed to themes focused on women on the received the prestigious President’s stop their reporting,” said keynote frontlines.
    [Show full text]