Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH Rwanda HUMAN Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-366-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-366-8 Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda I. Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology..................................................................................................................6 III. Recommendations......................................................................................................... 7 To the Rwandan government ...........................................................................................7 To the judicial system......................................................................................................7 To the Rwandan legislature............................................................................................. 8 To donors .......................................................................................................................8 IV. Background................................................................................................................. 10 V. Justice for the Genocide................................................................................................ 12 Practical Problems: Turning on the Lights ......................................................................12 Identifying and Prosecuting Perpetrators: the Issue of Scale..........................................13 The Legal Basis for Prosecution .....................................................................................14 Prosecution in Conventional Courts...............................................................................16 Gacaca: Popular or Political Justice? ..............................................................................17 “Justice is a Political Problem” ......................................................................................19 Reclassification by Administrative Decision...................................................................21 VI. Creating a Modern Professional Judicial System .......................................................... 23 Fewer Courts................................................................................................................. 24 Administrative Autonomy ............................................................................................. 26 More Highly Trained Personnel ......................................................................................27 Increased Efficiency...................................................................................................... 28 Greater Speed for Justice—but not for Genocide Cases ................................................. 29 Improved Protection for Human Rights...........................................................................31 VII. “Divisionism” and “Genocide Ideology” ..................................................................... 34 Imprecise Laws..............................................................................................................34 One Truth ..................................................................................................................... 36 The Campaign against “Divisionism” and “Genocide Ideology”.....................................37 Prosecutions of “Divisionism” and “Genocide Ideology” .............................................. 40 The New Law on “Genocide Ideology”............................................................................41 VIII. Independence of the Judiciary.................................................................................... 44 Law and Reality ............................................................................................................ 44 Limits on Administrative Autonomy ...............................................................................45 Misuse of Prosecutorial Power...................................................................................... 46 Interference in Judicial Cases......................................................................................... 51 Political Cases...............................................................................................................52 Genocide cases ............................................................................................................ 60 Other Cases.................................................................................................................. 64 Consequences of Trying to Remain Independent .......................................................... 66 Lack of Respect for Judicial Orders................................................................................ 67 IX. Challenges to Fair Trial Standards ............................................................................... 70 The Presumption of Innocence...................................................................................... 70 The Right to Present Witnesses......................................................................................73 The Right to Legal Counsel............................................................................................ 78 The Right to Humane conditions of Detention and Freedom from Torture ...................... 82 Protection from Double Jeopardy .................................................................................. 85 Monitoring Trials .......................................................................................................... 87 X. Equal Access to Justice: Prosecuting Crimes by RPA Soldiers ........................................89 Interface with Other Judicial Systems............................................................................ 94 XI. Future Plans for Justice................................................................................................96 XII. International Support .................................................................................................98 XIII. Acknowledgments................................................................................................... 100 XIV. Annex 1 - Number of Genocide Cases Judged.............................................................101 XV. Annex 2 - Analysis of RPA prosecutions by the Rwandan government for crimes committed in the year 1994 .............................................................................................103 I. Summary “We have beautiful laws, among the best in the world. But they are not obeyed.” — A Rwandan judge The Rwandan authorities have improved the delivery of justice in the last five years, a noteworthy achievement given the problems they faced. But the technical and formal improvements in laws and administrative structure have not been matched by gains in independence in the judiciary and assurance of rights to fair trial. The laws have changed considerably, the underlying political dynamics far less. So far, the political context has hindered the full realization of the potential of the reforms. When the government dominated by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) took power in Rwanda at the end of the 1994 genocide, it was confronted by the need to deliver justice for the horrible killings that had cost the lives of an estimated three-quarters of the Tutsi population. At the same time it saw the need to reform a judicial system, decrepit even before the onset of war and seriously damaged by the years of violence. From 1996 to 2002, the government brought some 7,000 persons to trial on charges of genocide and made some progress both in recruiting new staff and rebuilding the infrastructure of the judicial system. But as of 2001 more than a hundred thousand persons were still detained and the courts continued to operate much as they had in the past, slowly and inefficiently. The government sought to make faster progress in the judicial domain by undertaking two dramatic initiatives. It launched gacaca jurisdictions, a form of popular justice modeled on past customary conflict-resolution practices, to judge most cases of genocide. Hundreds of thousands of elected judges, chosen for their integrity rather than for their formal education, were authorized to deliver justice in the name of the local community. 1 Human Rights Watch July 2008 At the same time the government initiated a thorough reform of conventional justice, seeking to create a “modern” professional
Recommended publications
  • The International Response to Conflict and Genocide:Lessom from the Rwanda Experience
    The International Response to Conflict and Genocide: Lessons from the Rwanda Experience March 1996 Published by: Steering Committee of the Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda Editor: David Millwood Cover illustrations: Kiure F. Msangi Graphic design: Designgrafik, Copenhagen Prepress: Dansk Klich‚, Copenhagen Printing: Strandberg Grafisk, Odense ISBN: 87-7265-335-3 (Synthesis Report) ISBN: 87-7265-331-0 (1. Historical Perspective: Some Explanatory Factors) ISBN: 87-7265-332-9 (2. Early Warning and Conflict Management) ISBN: 87-7265-333-7 (3. Humanitarian Aid and Effects) ISBN: 87-7265-334-5 (4. Rebuilding Post-War Rwanda) This publication may be reproduced for free distribution and may be quoted provided the source - Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda - is mentioned. The report is printed on G-print Matt, a wood-free, medium-coated paper. G-print is manufactured without the use of chlorine and marked with the Nordic Swan, licence-no. 304 022. 2 The International Response to Conflict and Genocide: Lessons from the Rwanda Experience Study 2 Early Warning and Conflict Management by Howard Adelman York University Toronto, Canada Astri Suhrke Chr. Michelsen Institute Bergen, Norway with contributions by Bruce Jones London School of Economics, U.K. Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda 3 Contents Preface 5 Executive Summary 8 Acknowledgements 11 Introduction 12 Chapter 1: The Festering Refugee Problem 17 Chapter 2: Civil War, Civil Violence and International Response 20 (1 October 1990 - 4 August
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Constitution
    THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Table of Contents Preamble Title I: The State and National Sovereignty Chapter I: General Provisions Chapter II: Fundamental Principles Title II: Fundamental Rights of the Person and the Rights and Duties of the Citizen Chapter I: The Fundamental Rights of the Person Chapter II: The Rights and Duties of the Citizen Title III: Political Organizations Title IV: Powers Chapter I: General Provisions Chapter II: The Legislature Chapter III: The Executive Chapter IV: The Relationship Between the Legislative and the Executive Powers Chapter V: The Judicial Power Title V: Public Prosecution Chapter I: The Parquet Général of the Republic Chapter II: Military Prosecution Department Chapter III: The Supreme Council of the Prosecution Title VI: The Decentralized Powers Chapter I: General Principles Chapter II: The National Council of Dialogue Title VII: National Defense and Security Chapter I: The National Police Chapter II: The National Security Service Chapter III: The Rwanda Defense Forces Title VIII: Special Commissions and Organs Chapter I: General Provisions Chapter II: The National Commission for the Rights of the Person Chapter III: The National Unity and Reconciliation Commission Chapter IV: The National Commission for the Fight Against Genocide Chapter V: The National Electoral Commission Chapter VI: The Public Service Commission Chapter VII: The Office of the Ombudsman Chapter VIII: The Office of the Auditor-General of State Finances Chapter IX: The “Gender” Monitoring Office Chapter X: Chancellery
    [Show full text]
  • The Globalization of Human Rights in Post-Genocide Rwanda
    Bridges: A Journal of Student Research Issue 8 Article 5 2014 The Globalization of Human Rights in Post-Genocide Rwanda Sadara Shine Coastal Carolina University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/bridges Part of the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons, International Economics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Shine, Sadara (2014) "The Globalization of Human Rights in Post-Genocide Rwanda," Bridges: A Journal of Student Research: Vol. 8 : Iss. 8 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/bridges/vol8/iss8/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of Undergraduate Research at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bridges: A Journal of Student Research by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Globalization of Human Rights in Post-Genocide Rwanda Sadara Shine ABSTRACT In the past two decades, Rwanda has been through major changes, from a conflict-ridden society with deep divisions between the two main ethnic groups–Hutus and Tutsis–to a case of impressive economic growth. Despite the progress, deep divisions and human rights issues exist. To avoid the recurrence of any conflict, both state and non-state actors are playing varied roles in a post-genocide Rwanda. Based on both primary and secondary sources, this article argues that in an era of globalization and post- genocide in Rwanda, non-state actors like international non-governmental organizations have the most impact in the preservation of human rights. So, in spite of the multiplicity of actors working to protect human life and property in Rwanda, and recovery from the effects of genocide, the character and mode of operation of these non-state actors put them ahead of other actors in the achievement of this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Rhetoric Beyond The
    June 1993 Vol. 5, No. 7 BEYOND THE RHETORIC Continuing Human Rights Abuses in Rwanda Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................1 Background to the Conflict.............................................................2 The International Commission on Human Rights Abuses in Rwanda ........................................................................................................................3 New Massacres in the Northwest ................................................5 Elsewhere in Rwanda.........................................................................6 Killings in February and March......................................................7 Abuses by the Rwandan Armed Forces......................................7 Living with Fear....................................................................................12 The Displaced.......................................................................................15 Response of the Rwandan Government.................................16 Abuses by the Rwandan Patriotic Front.................................23 The International Role....................................................................25 Conclusion............................................................................................26 Recommendations...........................................................................28 INTRODUCTION More than 300 Tutsi and members of political parties opposed to Rwandan President Juvenal
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Women in Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence
    RURAL OBSERVER Nº 114 MAY 202 1 The Role of Women in Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence (English Version) João Feijó www.omrmz.org This study was carried out by the Observatory of Rural Areas with the support from Friedrich Ebert Stiftung d Secur n ity a e S c e a r i e e s P FES João Feijó The Role of Women in the Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence João Feijó The Role of Women in the Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence About the Author João Feijó is a sociologist and PhD in African Studies, having researched on identities, social representations, labor relations, and migrations in Mozambique. He is the coordinator of the technical council of the Observatory for the Rural Environment, where he coordinates the research line on “Poverty, inequalities and conflicts”. The article results from a research of the Observatory for Rural Environment (Observatório do Meio Rural - OMR) in cooperation with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Cover Art Artwork of Malangatana Ngwenya AD 1626, without a title. Published with the autorization of the Center for Photographic Documentation and Training (Centro de Documentação e Formação Fotografica - FCF). Imprint Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Peace and Security Competence Centre Sub-Saharan Africa Point E, boulevard de l’Est, Villa n°30 P.O. Box 15416 Dakar-Fann, Senegal Tel.: +221 33 859 20 02 Fax: +221 33 864 49 31 Email: [email protected] www.fes-pscc.org © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 2021 Layout: Green Eyez Design SARL, www.greeneyezdesign.com Cover art: Malangatana Ngwenya ISBN: 978-2-490093-28-1 Commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is not permitted without the written consent of the FES.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Trafficking in the United States Susan Burke Good Morning, I Am Susan Burke
    Human Trafficking in the United States Susan Burke Good morning, I am Susan Burke. I am a state court judge from Minneapolis, Minnesota. I am honored to be here with you today. Minnesota is on the northern border of the United States, halfway between the east and west coasts. I am especially glad to be here today because my house is already covered in snow, and the high temperature today is about 0 degrees Fahrenheit (or -18 degrees Celsius). Judge Ann Williams wanted to be here today. However, a training program for the entire judiciary of Zambia was unexpectedly moved to this week. Like all of us, Judge Williams is committed to eradicating modern slavery, preserving and protecting the dignity of the human body; fighting the “Globalization of Indifference,” and promoting justice and the common good. Let’s turn now to human trafficking in the United States. In the United States, increased awareness of human trafficking is shifting public perception. Where people used to see children and women as criminals and voluntary sex workers, more people now recognize them as victims of crime. The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA), passed in 2000, provided a holistic approach to countering human trafficking. The TVPA focuses on prevention by raising awareness both domestically and internationally. It increases protection for victims. It enhances prosecution of traffickers. Under the TVPA, the U.S. Department of State issues a Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report. The State Department collects data on human trafficking from governments around the world and sorts them into three tiers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adjudication of Genocide: Gacaca and the Road to Reconciliation in Rwanda
    SOSNOV_36.2_FINAL 6/5/2008 12:18:12 PM THE ADJUDICATION OF GENOCIDE: GACACA AND THE ROAD TO RECONCILIATION IN RWANDA 1 MAYA SOSNOV INTRODUCTION In 1994, Rwanda suffered one of the worst genocides in history. During 100 days of killing, 800,000 people died.2 More people died in three months than in over four years of conflict in Yugoslavia; moreover, the speed of killing was five times faster than the Nazi execution of the Final Solution.3 Unlike the killings that occurred during the Holocaust, Rwandans engaged in “a populist genocide,” in which many members of society, including children, participated in killing their neighbors with common farm tools (the most popular was the machete).4 While not all Hutus engaged in killing and not all victims were Tutsi, Hutus executed the vast majority of the killings and Tutsis were largely the target of their aggression.5 Fourteen years after the genocide, Rwanda is still struggling with how to rebuild the country and handle the mass atrocities that occurred. During the first four years following the genocide, four types of courts developed to prosecute genocidaires:6 the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, foreign courts exercising universal jurisdiction, domestic criminal courts, and a domestic military tribunal. Regrettably, none of these courts has been able to resolve the enormous problems related to adjudicating genocide suspects. In 2001, the government created gacaca, a fifth system for prosecuting genocidaires, to solve the problems it saw in the other courts. Gacaca is highly lauded by the government and many outside observers as the solution to Rwanda’s genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Consultant, We Present Two Articles on Pro Bono Consulting Efforts Being Made by the Statistical Consulting Community
    THE STATISTICAL CONSULTANT Section on Statistical Consulting American Statistical Association Christopher Holloman, Editor; Sarah Butler, Assistant Editor Winter 2010; Volume 27, No. 1 IN THIS ISSUE • Special Focus: Pro Bono Consulting • Introducing Statistics Without Borders • Update: Statistics in the Community • ASA Now Accepting Nominations for the W.J. Dixon Award for Excellence in Statistical Consulting • Statistics Resource Available for Purchase • Comments from the Past Chair • Comments from the Chair • Notes from the Editor Special Focus: Pro Bono Consulting Christopher Holloman , The Ohio State University 1 In this issue of The Statistical Consultant, we present two articles on pro bono consulting efforts being made by the statistical consulting community. In the first article, Jim Cochran provides an overview of Statistics Without Borders, a group providing statistical consulting to non-profit organizations around the world. In the second article, Meghan Honerlaw provides an update on Statistics in the Community (StatCom), the graduate student-run pro bono consulting program originating from Purdue University. 1 [email protected] Executive Committee of the ASA Section on Statistical Consulting Chair : Todd G. Nick, [email protected] Chair-Elect : James Grady, [email protected] Past Chair : Bruce Craig, [email protected] Program Chair (for 2010 JSM) : Walter Ambrosius, [email protected] Program Chair-Elect (for 2011 JSM) : Richard Ittenbach, [email protected] Secretary / Treasurer : Brenda Gillespie, [email protected] Publications Officer : Cynthia R. Long, [email protected] Webmaster : Chuck Kincaid, [email protected] Newsletter Editor : Christopher Holloman, [email protected] Assistant Newsletter Editor : Sarah Butler, [email protected] At Large Members : Larry D.
    [Show full text]
  • JICA-RI Working Paper No.32
    State-building in Conflict-Prone Countries Gacaca and DDR: The Disputable Record of State-Building in Rwanda Shinichi Takeuchi No. 32 July 2011 1 Use and dissemination of this working paper is encouraged; however, the JICA Research Institute requests due acknowledgement and a copy of any publication for which this working paper has provided input. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official positions of either the JICA Research Institute or JICA. JICA Research Institute 10-5 Ichigaya Honmura-cho Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 162-8433 JAPAN TEL: +81-3-3269-3374 FAX: +81-3-3269-2054 Copyright ©2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute All rights reserved. Gacaca and DDR: The Disputable Record of State-Building in Rwanda Shinichi Takeuchi* Abstract State-building is currently considered to be an indispensable process in overcoming state fragility: a condition characterized by frequent armed conflicts as well as chronic poverty. In this process, both the capacity and the legitimacy of the state are supposed to be enhanced; such balanced development of capacity and legitimacy has also been demanded in security sector reform (SSR), which is regarded as being a crucial part of post-conflict state-building. To enhance legitimacy, the importance of democratic governance is stressed in both state-building and SSR in post-conflict countries. In reality, however, the balanced enhancement of capacity and legitimacy has rarely been realized. In particular, legitimacy enhancement tends to stagnate in countries in which one of multiple warring parties takes a strong grip on state power.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS Version 12 Oktober 2012
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation Traces of Inspiration - The Usage of Foreign Citations by Supreme Courts Verfasserin Mag.a iur. Marianne Schulze, LL.M. angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktorin der Rechtswissenschaften (Dr.in iur.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl lt. A 083 101 Studienblatt: Dissertationsgebiet lt. Rechtswissenschaften Studienblatt: Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Clemens Jabloner IN MEMORIAM ROSINA SALZNER. ii iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS VII I. INTRODUCTION & THESIS 1 II. WHAT IS COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 3 1. Borrowing and other “Transfers” of Foreign Law(s) 4 2. The Institutionalization of Comparative Law 8 3. The Comparative “Method”? 12 4. Comparative Constitutionalism 15 5. Interim Findings 16 III. THE CURRENT EXCITEMENT ABOUT COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 18 1. “Globalization” 18 2. Human Rights 21 Excursus: The European Court of Human Rights 26 3. Dialogue of Judges 28 4. Interim Findings 29 IV. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CURRENT EXCITEMENT 31 1. The first special case: United States of America 31 a. Moods, Fads & Fashions: Recent Cases 32 b. Well Acquainted: A History of References 43 2. The Second Special Case: Austria by way of Germany 45 3. Interim Findings 52 V. PROBLEMS AND LIMITS OF COMPARATIVE LAW 54 1. Language 54 2. Structural limits 55 3. Transnational Law 56 4. Legal Families 57 5. Legal Culture 58 iv 6. “Civilized” World 59 7. Legal Imperialism 61 8. Civil and Common Law 64 9. Method(s) of Comparative Law 67 10. Functionalism 71 11. Selection 75 12. Providing Context 78 13. Interim Findings 82 VI. PURPOSE OF COMPARATIVE LAW 83 1. Predisposition of Judges 86 2. Legitimacy 88 Excursus: The (In)voluntary Nature of Comparative Constitutionalism 92 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Safer to Stay Silent
    SAFER TO STAY SILENT THE CHILLING EFFECT OF RWANDA’S LAWS ON ‘GENOCIDE IDEOLOGY’ AND ‘SECTARIANISM’ Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. Amnesty International Publications First published in 2010 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2010 Index: AFR 47/005/2010 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover photo: Courtroom in Rwanda, November 2009. © Amnesty International CONTENTS GLOSSARY...................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING of the CIVIL SOCIETY and PROJECT IDENTIFICATION of a SUPPORT PROGRAM to the CIVIL SOCIETY in RWANDA Letter of Contract N°2013/328195
    FRAMEWORK CONTRACT COM 2011 LOT 1 – STUDIES AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN ALL SECTORS MAPPING OF THE CIVIL SOCIETY AND PROJECT IDENTIFICATION OF A SUPPORT PROGRAM TO THE CIVIL SOCIETY IN RWANDA Letter of Contract N°2013/328195 FINAL REPORT MAPPING Prepared by Gianfrancesco COSTANTINI Stefano VERDECCHIA Fidèle RUTAYISIRE December 2013 The project is financed by The project is implemented by IBF International Consulting the European Union and STEM-VCR “The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.” TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Institutional Framework and objectives ................................................................................. 10 1.2 The EU policies for supporting CS ........................................................................................ 10 1.3 National policies for supporting CS ....................................................................................... 11 2 The categories used in the mapping .............................................................................................. 13 2.1 The concept of CS ................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 A tiered vision of CSOs ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]