Masterplan for Consultation (June/July 2019)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Masterplan for Consultation (June/July 2019) Masterplan For Consultation (June/July 2019) 1 Document 3.1 Dated June 2019 2 Foreword to Masterplan 2020 / 2044 Port of Waterford Company (Port of Waterford) is the commercial state company responsible for the operation and development of Waterford Port. The port is one of five ports of National Significance within the terms of National Ports Policy 2013 and is classified as a comprehensive port on the EU’s Ten-T network. Vision Our vision is to be the preferred cargo gateway for the South East Region Mission Our mission is to provide infrastructure and services to enable trade and economic development in the Region. Port Activity The Port is active in bulk handling, break bulk/project cargoes and container handling (Lo-Lo). Bulk and break-bulk volumes in 2018 exceeded 1.7 million tonnes with container handling standing at 44k TEU. The bulk side of the business is predominately import and focussed on agri-inputs. The container operation supports a wide range of imports and regional exporters from the food, pharmaceutical and other sectors. The annual value of goods through the Port was estimated at €1.7 billion in 2017 with just under 1,000 jobs in, or supported by businesses in, the port zone. Economic Context The Republic of Ireland is a trading nation and as an Island the movement of the vast majority of traded goods happens through our sea ports. The Irish economy has achieved impressive growth/recovery since 2013 with a concentration of this growth in and around the Greater Dublin Area. Brexit remains unresolved at time of drafting and the potential challenges arising here for the economy and for supply chains are significant. Dublin Port handles the majority of the Nations freight traffic. The impact of a number of years of record growth combined with a range of actions required to prepare for Brexit has meant that Dublin Port is experiencing some level of congestion and may not be as well positioned to deal with the full range of services as heretofore provided. In that context the Country’s other Ports may have to carry a greater share of the workload. Our economic analysis recommends a range of throughput projections due to the complexity and uncertainty of the economic situation. In particular we need to be mindful that changes in the National picture could dramatically change the demands faced by the Port. Environmental Context The Port operates within Waterford Harbour which includes the Lower River Suir SAC and River Barrow and River Nore SAC. The Harbour is ‘shared’ with a range of estuarial stakeholders and activities, including fishing, leisure, commercial and domestic activities. The Masterplan options and actions have been devised, designed and developed on an iterative basis that included an extensive formal process of environmental assessment and consultation. 3 Policy Context Project Ireland 2040 and the National Planning Framework sets out the vision for the development of the Country and there is a real focus on development of the Regions. Port of Waterford is identified as an important economic enabler. The forthcoming Regional Spatial and Economic Strategies is expected to build on that position and similarly the Marine Spatial Plan which is in development will recognise the role of our ports. Port of Waterford Strategy Strategy is formulated to position the Port within national, regional and local planning and economic policy. This positioning is supported by the long-term plan for the provision of infrastructure to deliver the future capacity required by the economy. The short to medium term delivery of strategy is communicated and monitored through the 5-year rolling corporate plan where the ports objectives and performance are set out. Ultimately ports provide infrastructure to deliver operational capacity. Port Capacity Port of Waterford is currently operating well within its operational capacity. The expected demand for port throughputs has been projected out for 25 years using a low, medium and high growth scenario. The low growth scenario sees the current berth infrastructure sufficing until 2037 when an additional 200m of quay is needed. There is no requirement for expansion of the container terminal under this scenario. In the medium growth scenario, we see bulk quay investments in 2029 (200m) and 2041 (200m) with again no container terminal investment required. In the high growth scenario, the bulk investments are similar to those under the medium picture but there is need for a container terminal investment in 2035. Under all scenarios we envisage a requirement for river management works to reduce maintenance dredging, facilitate larger ships and improve navigational safety and access. Furthermore, while there is no apparent and immediate pressure to provide enlarged quay/berth facilities it is necessary to remember that we are operating from a modest base and even moderate shifts in other parts of the economy could have a dramatic bearing on the Port of Waterford situation. This uncertainty combined with the timescales and challenges around consenting processes provides the motivation for a carefully constructed Masterplan to set out the plans for long term infrastructure provision. The size and timing of demand will evolve and the Port needs to be well positioned and flexible in order to deliver Masterplan projects if and as needed. The Masterplan This plan provides the framework to allow Port of Waterford bring forward essential projects for planning and consent purposes as required. It also clearly conveys the scope of the Port’s potential to deliver for the broad range of stakeholders and forms a solid basis for the future formulation of ports and logistical policy at National level. In developing our first formal Masterplan, Port of Waterford has: • Invested in and worked through a comprehensive hydrodynamic and sedimentation modelling process • Consulted with a wide range of stakeholders to understand the potential future commercial and economic challenges • Considered the environmental impacts of possible and potential actions using Strategic Environmental Assessment, Appropriate Assessment and Strategic Flood Risk Assessment • Looked at the geophysical attributes of the Masterplan area • Identified the planning and land use requirements • Assessed the engineering challenges and possible investment costs • Engaged in an economic analysis to understand future demand and its drivers 4 • Assessed market trends in the ports sector and forecast our future growth scenario’s • Prepared financial models for different growth scenarios The Masterplan seeks to set out a balanced and sustainable ‘menu’ of potential actions across the wide aspect of our activities. The plan is intended to be practical, achievable, modular in nature and respectful to the many stakeholders and interested parties that interact with us on so many levels. Port of Waterford is a significant economic facilitator with an important role to play in the economic development of the South East and further afield. To fulfil its role the Port needs to be positioned to deliver the infrastructure and capacity required of it in a timely manner. At a time of significant short- term uncertainty (e.g. Brexit) and when we are seeking to find responses to Climate Change and understand the future shape of our agriculture and transportation models, the onus is on us to have well considered plans in place. Chairman. Chief Executive. Date: 5 Contents Foreword to Masterplan 2020 / 2044 3 Contents 6 List of Figures 10 List of Tables 11 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Purpose of the Masterplan 12 1.2 General background 12 1.3 The Masterplan Objectives 13 1.4 Preparation and format of the Masterplan document 14 1.4.1 Main Contributors 14 1.4.2 Overview of contents of this document 14 1.5 Main Stakeholders and Consultation Process 14 1.5.1 Regulatory Bodies - Environmental issues 15 1.5.2 Other Bodies 15 1.5.3 Port operators and port users 15 1.6 Consultation Process 16 1.7 Scope boundaries of the Masterplan 16 2 Review of existing port infrastructure and operations 18 2.1 Overview 18 2.2 Port ownership and concession agreements 18 2.3 Port Management and stevedoring 18 2.4 Port Infrastructure 19 2.4.1 Marine access and operations 19 2.4.2 Port area and berths 22 2.4.3 Port equipment and landside storage areas 25 2.4.4 Port infrastructure services, power, water etc. 28 2.4.5 Hinterland connections and modal split (road, rail,) 28 2.4.6 Port infrastructure - general condition and useful life 29 2.5 Port Operations 29 2.5.1 Total port throughput 2008 - 2018 29 2.5.2 Dry bulk and general cargo vessel operations 30 2.5.3 Container operations 31 2.6 Establishing key performance indicators 33 3 Economic and financial review of the port 37 3.1 Economic importance of Port of Waterford 37 3.1.1 Introduction 37 3.1.2 The Belview Industrial Zone 37 3.1.3 Economic summary 37 3.2 Financial review of the port 38 4 Future Port Traffic Projections 40 4.1 Overview 40 4.2 Background 40 4.3 Economic profile of the South East Region 42 4.4 Profile of Irish merchandise trade 40 4.4.1 Background 40 4.4.2 Trends in Irish port performance 41 4.4.3 Profile of Port of Waterford 42 4.4.4 The growth outlook for trade though Port of Waterford 44 6 4.4.5 Scenario planning for Port of Waterford 44 4.4.6 Impact of competing ports 46 4.5 Other potential traffic and cargos 48 4.5.1 Overview 48 4.5.2 Opportunities for RoRo 48 4.5.3 Cruise vessels 49 4.5.4 Offshore supply/servicing vessels. 49 4.5.5 Livestock handling 50 5 Capacity analysis and future demand 51 5.1 Capacity analysis
Recommended publications
  • N11/N25 Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour Option Selection Newsletter - March 2021 N11/N25 Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour L Option Selection L Newsletter March 2021 Page 1
    N11/N25 Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour Option Selection Newsletter - March 2021 N11/N25 Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour l Option Selection l Newsletter March 2021 Page 1 Dear local resident, First and foremost, we hope this finds you safe and well in these challenging times. We are getting in touch to update you on the current status of the N11/N25 Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour project. Currently, Wexford County Council is in the process of studying feasible options for the development of the project, taking into account the feedback we received from local residents and community groups during the public consultation phase in July and August last year. The main objective of this stage is to identify a preferred scheme option that will deliver a safe, sustainable, high-quality and effective solution to meet the future transport needs of County Wexford, the South East region, and the country generally. The selected scheme option will then be developed further and in more depth, before it is submitted for planning approval. These are times of uncertainty and transformation, and the project must respond to these changes in order to ensure the development of a proposed scheme that meets the future needs of society in a sustainable and effective manner and in line with changing government policy. As a result, the option selection process is taking longer than was initially anticipated. This newsletter describes some of the complexities and challenges that have extended the option selection process, and presents some of the studies that are being carried out to assess the potential impacts that these changes may have on the project’s development.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Ports
    House of Commons Transport Committee Access to ports Eighth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/transcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 November 2013 HC 266 Published on 26 November 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Sarah Champion (Labour, Rotherham) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Jim Fitzpatrick (labour, Poplar and Limehouse) Karen Lumley (Conservative, Redditch) Jason McCartney (Conservative, Colne Valley) Karl McCartney (Conservative, Lincoln) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Miss Chloe Smith (Conservative, Norwich North) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Martin Vickers (Conservative, Cleethorpes) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/transcom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Into the Circumstances Surrounding the Loss of Propulsion on Board the Passenger Ro-Ro Motor Vessel 'Stena Europe' On
    REPORT INTO THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE LOSS OF PROPULSION ON BOARD THE PASSENGER RO-RO MOTOR VESSEL ‘STENA EUROPE’ ON 30TH JANUARY 2003 SHORTLY AFTER DEPARTING The Marine Casualty Investigation Board was ROSSLARE EUROPORT established on the 25 th March, 2003 under The Merchant Shipping (Investigation of Marine Casualties) Act 2000 The copyright in the enclosed report remains with the Marine Casualty Investigation Board by virtue of section 35(5) of the Merchant Shipping (Investigation of Marine Casualties) Act, 2000. No person may produce, reproduce or transmit in any form or by any means this report or any part thereof without the express permission of the Marine Casualty Investigation Board. This report may be freely used for educational purposes. 1 2 CONTENTS PAGE 1. SYNOPSIS 5 2. FACTUAL INFORMATION 6 3. EVENTS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT 8 4. THE INCIDENT 9 5. EVENTS AFTER THE INCIDENT 10 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS 16 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 18 8. APPENDICES 19 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . The preliminary investigation into this incident was conducted jointly with the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) of the United Kingdom Department for Transport. The Marine Casualty Investigation Board would like to thank the MAIB for the information furnished and for the Preliminary Examination Report provided. Some of the findings and recommendations of the MAIB are reproduced in this Report. 4 SYNOPSIS 1. SYNOPSIS 1.1 "Stena Europe", a 24,828 tonne ro-ro passenger ferry departed Rosslare Europort on 30th January 2003 at 12.09 hours for Fishguard, Wales with 155 passengers and 65 crew on board. 1.2 Approximately 30 minutes later the vessel suffered a complete loss of propulsion and drifted down onto and then past the Tuskar Rock Lighthouse off the Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Impact of the Channel Tunnel Throughout the Community
    -©fine Channel Tunnel s throughpdrth^Çpmmunity European Commission European Union Regional Policy and Cohesion Regional development studies The regional impact of the Channel Tunnel throughout the Community European Commission Already published in the series Regional development studies 01 — Demographic evolution in European regions (Demeter 2015) 02 — Socioeconomic situation and development of the regions in the neighbouring countries of the Community in Central and Eastern Europe 03 — Les politiques régionales dans l'opinion publique 04 — Urbanization and the functions of cities in the European Community 05 — The economic and social impact of reductions in defence spending and military forces on the regions of the Community 06 — New location factors for mobile investment in Europe 07 — Trade and foreign investment in the Community regions: the impact of economic reform in Central and Eastern Europe 08 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones atlánticas — Europa 2000 Study of prospects in the Atlantic regions — Europe 2000 Étude prospective des régions atlantiques — Europe 2000 09 — Financial engineering techniques applying to regions eligible under Objectives 1, 2 and 5b 10 — Interregional and cross-border cooperation in Europe 11 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones del Mediterráneo Oeste Évolution prospective des régions de la Méditerranée - Ouest Evoluzione delle prospettive delle regioni del Mediterraneo occidentale 12 — Valeur ajoutée et ingénierie du développement local 13 — The Nordic countries — what impact on planning and development
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report Non-Technical Summary
    Volume 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY MP2 PROJECT DUBLIN PORT COMPANY EIAR NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY MP2 PROJECT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 2 NEED FOR THE MP2 PROJECT ................................................................................................ 6 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 26 4 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................ 60 5 PROJECT CONSULTATION & SCOPING ............................................................................... 67 6 RISK OF MAJOR ACCIDENTS & DISASTERS ....................................................................... 76 7 BIODIVERSITY, FLORA & FAUNA .......................................................................................... 78 8 SOILS, GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................... 85 9 WATER QUALITY & FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 86 9.1 Water Quality .............................................................................................................................. 86 9.2 Flood Risk Assessment .............................................................................................................. 88 10 AIR QUALITY
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Review of the State Commercial Ports Operating Under Harbours Acts 1996 and 2000
    RAYMOND BURKE CONSULTING FARRELL GRANT SPARKS CORPORATE FINANCE POSFORD HASKONING HIGH LEVEL REVIEW OF THE STATE COMMERCIAL PORTS OPERATING UNDER THE HARBOURS ACTS 1996 AND 2000. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 1.2 CONTEXT 1 1.3 THE TIMING IS APPROPRIATE 3 1.4 CHANGING NEEDS 4 1.5 THE FOCUS OF THE REVIEW 5 1.6 APPROACH 5 1.7 PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS 6 1.8 VISION 8 1.9 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 9 1.10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 12 1.11 CONFIDENTIALITY 12 2. REGULATORY GOVERNANCE 13 2.1 WHAT DO WE MEAN BY REGULATORY GOVERNANCE? 13 2.2 THE HARBOURS’ ACTS 1946 - 2000 15 2.3 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS 17 2.4 OTHER REGULATORY LEGISLATION 17 2.5 DEVELOPMENT OF THE BROADER REGULATORY PROCESS IN IRELAND 17 2.6 OECD REVIEW OF REGULATORY REFORM 24 2.7 THE EU PORT SERVICES DIRECTIVE 26 3. PORT STRUCTURES 29 3.1 INTRODUCTION 29 3.2 ANALYSIS OF PORT GOVERNANCE MODELS 30 3.3 CRITIQUE OF PORT GOVERNANCE MODELS 33 3.4 PORTS OWNERSHIP MODELS – INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 34 3.5 LESSONS FOR IRELAND 46 4. OVERVIEW OF IRISH PORTS 49 4.1 INTRODUCTION 49 4.2 PORT OF CORK COMPANY 50 4.3 DROGHEDA PORT COMPANY 55 4.4 DUBLIN PORT COMPANY 58 4.5 DUNDALK PORT COMPANY 61 4.6 DUN LAOGHAIRE HARBOUR COMPANY 64 TABLE OF CONTENTS HIGH LEVEL REVIEW OF THE STATE COMMERCIAL PORTS OPERATING UNDER THE HARBOURS ACTS 1996 AND 2000. 4.7 PORT OF GALWAY 65 4.8 PORT OF NEW ROSS 68 4.9 SHANNON FOYNES PORT COMPANY 71 4.10 PORT OF WATERFORD 74 4.11 PORT OF WICKLOW 78 5.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE for HEAVY RAIL Dublin Is in the Process of Finally Deciding the Structure of Its Public Transport System, in Particular
    DECIDING ON DUBLIN'S INTEGRATED TRANSPORT POLICY THE CASE FOR HEAVY RAIL MARTIN ROGERS DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 1. B A C K G R O U N D Dublin is in the process of finally deciding the structure of its public transport system, in particular the form of rail-based transport to be employed in the capital. This process has been ongoing since the early nineties when the Dublin Transport Initiative (DTI) was established to put together a transportation plan for the Greater Dublin Area to the year 2011, publishing its final report in 1995 (DTI, 1995). The problem of resolving the public transport needs for the capital city has its basis in the recommendations of this report. This paper examines the data used to formulate the initial Core Strategy of projects contained within the DTI Final Report which dealt with all surface transport (road, rail, bus, cycling and walking), and examined transport in an integrated sense, inter-relating it with policies such as economic development, employment and the environment. This paper discusses whether the judgements made by the decision-makere within DTI Phase 2 regarding the most appropriate transport strategy for the region were, in retrospect, the correct ones. In particular, this report, in the opinion of the author, did not pick the correct suburban rail option for Dublin as part of its chosen core strategy. It also asks whether any suitable corrective action has been taken in the intervening years as part of the DTI review process to adjust the strategy, where appropriate, and whether the proposed strategy update corrects, to any extent, the original errors committed.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Waterford - from Sea to Mountains
    WALK WATERFORD - FROM SEA TO MOUNTAINS Walk Waterford is a series of recreational walks throughout Waterford. Choose a trail that suits you: from stunning coastal walks to breathtaking mountain scenery to tranquil woodland settings to picturesque towns and villages and Ireland’s oldest city. Find your trail in Waterford…where Ireland begins. HOW TO USE THIS BROCHURE This Walk Waterford Brochure is a guide to almost 40 walks all across Waterford. Each walk has a map, trail description and important trail information. Examples of the map and trail information symbols used are shown below. The trail maps give details of the trailhead location, nearest town/village and trail route. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information contained within this brochure no liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions. The brochure will make it possible to choose the trail that is right for you. Happy walking! MAP INFORMATION TRAIL INFORMATION NODA LÉARSCÁILE - MAP INFORMATION M2 GRADE Mótarbhealach Pointe Eolais Motorway i Information Point Multi-access, Easy, Moderate, N25 Débhealach Bia ar fáil 700 Dual Carriageway Food available Strenuous, Very Difficult N25 Príomhbhóthar Náisiúnta Páirceáil 600 National Primary Road P Parking R259 Bóthar Réigiúnach Meaisín Bainc 500 DISTANCE WAY MARKING Regional Road € Pass Machine Mionbhóthar Leithris 400 Other Road Toilets TYPE PARKING Bóthar Portaigh/Foraois Páirceáil Rothar 300 Bog/Forest Road Bicycle Parking Loop, Linear & TRAILHEAD 200 Cosán Neamhshainithe Ionad Amhairc Molta
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Annual Report and Accounts - Contents
    Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Annual Report and Accounts - Contents Contents Chief Executive’s Foreword 2 Annex to Foreword 4 Part 1 The Role of Waterways Ireland 6 Our Strategy 7 Our Key Performance Indicators 8 Working in Partnership 12 Part 2 Our Strategic Performance Maintaining World Class Waterways Corridors 14 Safeguarding our Environment and Heritage 16 Increasing Public Participation and Unlocking Opportunities 17 Ulster Canal 19 Ulstr Canal Greenway 19 Education and Legacy 20 World Canals Conference 20 Growing our Income 21 Corporate Governance 21 Part 3 Appendix 1 Waterways Ireland Organisational Structure 23 Appendix 2 Our People and Contact Details 24 Part 4 Accounts for the year ended 31st December 2018 25 1 Annual Report and Accounts - Chief Executive’s Foreword Chief Executive’s Foreword It has been a privilege to be the second Chief Executive of Waterways Ireland, a role I will leave at the end of January 2019. As an organisation we look after some of the island’s most valuable outdoor recreation resources and as an all island body have a clear challenge to demonstrate that working together we can deliver more for people across the island than working separately. The past five years have been challenging, a change in focus, moving from our customers being primarily boat owners to a much broader customer base and new opportunities for growing use of the waterways. Thanks to the skills and experience of our operational teams, despite greatly reduced funding, we have been able to respond to infrastructure failures, commenced lock gate manufacture and replacement, and maintained the hundreds of recreational and amenity sites across the waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission by Wexford County Council to the Public Consultation on The
    Submission by Wexford County Council to the Public Consultation on the Rail Review 2016 Report 18th January 2017 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Executive Summary 2 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Strategic Investment in Rail 5 4.0 Regard for Current Planning Policy 6 5.0 Current Service and Line Observations on the Rosslare Europort – Dublin city Rail Route 10 6.0 Financial Cost Savings & Additional Income 12 7.0 Conclusion 13 Appendices Appendix 1 14 Appendix 2 26 Appendix 3 32 Appendix 4 48 Appendix 5 52 Appendix 6 54 1 1.0 Executive Summary Wexford County Council welcomes the opportunity to make a submission in relation to the Rail Review Report published by the National Transport Authority and Iarnród Éireann in November 2016. The Rail Review identifies that cost savings would be made by suspending services on a number of rail lines in the country including the Dublin to Rosslare Europort line south of Gorey. Wexford County Council is emphatically opposed to the suspension of any rail services in County Wexford. The Council views the rail services serving Wexford as critically and strategically important for the social and economic benefit of the County. Wexford County Council is of the view that the main reason for relatively low passenger numbers using the Rosslare Europort to Dublin line is largely due to the poor level of service provided by Irish Rail on this line. There are generally only 4 scheduled services a day departing from Rosslare Europort - Dublin, the travel time is slow and the rolling stock inadequate given that DART rail carriages are often used for long distance journeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Vebraalto.Com
    62 Pakenham House, Spencer Dock, Dublin 1 D01TK72 No. 62 is a luxury, light filled 3 bedroom, 3 bathroom apartment located on the 2nd floor of this prestigious development and enjoys two large balconies with dual views over the landscaped courtyard and across the cityscape. Spencer Dock is a well managed development of modern apartment blocks each set around landscaped courtyards and is located on the north bank of the River Liffey, adjacent to the IFSC. Residents have the benefit of dedicated concierge together with a large underground carpark offering car and bicycle parking. This very spacious (96sqm/1033sq.ft) apartment benefits from high ceilings, contemporary fully fitted kitchen, energy efficient centralised heating system, luxury bathrooms and one designated parking space. The accommodation briefly comprises: entrance hallway, utility, open plan living/dining/kitchen, three-double bedrooms, two with en-suite bathrooms and a separate shower room. The living room has floor to ceiling windows and access to the large corner balcony. This is a central location in the heart of the Dublin Docklands with a superb range of amenities in the area. There is an assortment of bars, cafes, restaurants and shops are all on the doorstep. Spencer Dock is within a stroll of the Dublin Convention Centre, The Three Arena and the Bord Gáis Energy Theatre. Spencer Dock is exceptionally well connected with a range of transport options on your doorstep including Rail, Dart and LUAS plus the proposed DART underground station. There is also a choice of bicycle stations close by. The Dublin Port and the Port Tunnel with direct access to the airport just a few minutes’ drive away.
    [Show full text]
  • (Icelandic-Breeding & Feral Populations) in Ireland
    An assessment of the distribution range of Greylag (Icelandic-breeding & feral populations) in Ireland Helen Boland & Olivia Crowe Final report to the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the Northern Ireland Environment Agency December 2008 Address for correspondence: BirdWatch Ireland, 1 Springmount, Newtownmountkennedy, Co. Wicklow. Phone: + 353 1 2819878 Fax: + 353 1 2819763 Email: [email protected] Table of contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Results........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Coverage................................................................................................................................................... 3 Distribution ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Site accounts............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]