DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market WIK-Consult • Final Report Study for the European Commission, Directorate General for Internal Market and Services The Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market Authors: Alex Kalevi Dieke James I. Campbell Jr. Nicole Angenendt Gernot Müller Associate contributors: Alexandre De Streel, CRID Robert Queck, CRID The views and opinions expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Commission. Bad Honnef, September 2009 WIK-Consult GmbH Rhöndorfer Str. 68 53604 Bad Honnef Germany Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market I Contents Tables VII Figures X Case Histories XI Terms and Abbreviations XII Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose and outline of study 1 1.2 Acknowledgements 4 1.3 Overall methodology 5 1.4 Survey of national regulatory authorities, national competition authorities, and universal service providers 6 2 Overview of the Regulation of Postal Services 11 2.1 Evolution of the EU Postal Directive 12 2.2 Postal services and products in the EU/EEA market 14 2.3 Postal services ensured as universal services 18 2.4 Regulation of non-universal services 24 2.5 USPs, national USPs, and PPOs 26 3 Implementation of the Second Postal Directive 31 3.1 Regulatory framework 32 3.1.1 Postal laws and regulations 32 3.1.2 Postal authorities: Postal Ministries, USPs, NRAs, NCAs 35 3.1.3 Allocation of regulatory authority 39 3.1.4 Rights of ownership 45 3.2 National regulatory authorities 49 3.2.1 Establishment of NRAs 49 3.2.2 Mission and resources of NRAs 52 3.2.3 Independence of NRAs 63 3.2.4 Access to information and enforce orders 70 3.2.5 Enforcement authority 72 II Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market 3.2.6 Procedures, transparency, and appeals 74 3.3 Universal service obligation 78 3.3.1 Designation of universal service providers 78 3.3.2 Access facilities 79 3.3.3 Collection and delivery 81 3.3.4 Quality of service standards and monitoring at national level 83 3.3.5 Financing the net cost of the USO (if any) 88 3.4 Reserved area and special rights 90 3.4.1 Reserved area 90 3.4.2 VAT and postal services 93 3.4.3 Customs laws 96 3.4.4 International postal practices 99 3.4.5 Other special rights 105 3.5 Authorisation and licensing 106 3.5.1 Authorisations within the universal service area 106 3.5.2 Authorisations outside the universal service area 119 3.5.3 Authorisation procedures 122 3.5.4 Compensation fund 123 3.6 Regulation of the accounts of USPs 125 3.6.1 Separation of accounts 126 3.6.2 Allocation of costs generally 133 3.6.3 Allocation of delivery costs 137 3.6.4 Data quality 139 3.6.5 Verification and publication of regulatory accounts 140 3.6.6 Publication of audited financial accounts 142 3.7 Regulation of prices and terminal dues 143 3.7.1 Scope of price regulation 143 3.7.2 Cost-oriented, transparent, and affordable rates 146 3.7.3 Uniform rates 151 3.7.4 Methods of rate regulation 153 Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market III 3.7.5 Individual agreements and special tariffs 157 3.7.6 Rate investigations 164 3.7.7 Terminal dues and cross border mail 166 3.8 Protection of users 167 3.8.1 Establishment of user protection regulation 167 3.8.2 Remedies for users 171 3.8.3 Publication of user protection data 173 4 Application of Competition Law and State Aid Provisions in the Postal Sector 177 4.1 Application of antitrust to the postal sector 177 4.1.1 Cases decided by the European Commission 177 4.1.2 Cases by national competition authorities (NCAs) 188 4.1.3 Conclusions on the application of antitrust law 198 4.2 Application of state aid rules to the postal sector 201 4.2.1 Cases related to the Services of General Economic Interest 201 4.2.2 Cases related to the financial activities of the postal incumbents 208 4.2.3 Cases related to other issues 211 4.2.4 Conclusions on the application of state aid law 215 5 Preparations for the Third Postal Directive 217 5.1 Transposition of the Third Postal Directive 218 5.2 Ensuring universal service 219 5.2.1 Three options for ensuring universal service 219 5.2.2 Designation of USP(s) 225 5.2.3 Public procurement 228 5.3 Phasing out the reserved area and other special rights 231 5.3.1 Reserved area 231 5.3.2 Other special rights 232 5.4 Regulations for a multi-operator market 235 5.4.1 Access to postal infrastructure 235 5.4.2 Interoperability and the multi-operator environment 238 5.5 Revised relationship between postal and competition regulation 241 IV Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market 5.5.1 Consultation and coordination between NRA and NCA 242 5.5.2 Model for relations between postal and competition regulation 248 5.6 Definition of the universal service obligation 251 5.6.1 Demand for universal postal service in the future 252 5.6.2 Effects of uniform rate requirements 253 5.6.3 Elements of universal service and/or groups at risk (if any) 256 5.6.4 Evaluation of net cost of universal service (if any) 259 6 Best Regulatory Practices 263 6.1 Definition of 'best practice' 264 6.1.1 Compliance with the Third Postal Directive 264 6.1.2 Other factors relevant to best practice 265 6.2 Establishment and operation of postal NRAs 267 6.2.1 Allocation of regulatory authority 267 6.2.2 Independence of NRA 271 6.2.3 Resources of the NRA 272 6.2.4 NRA authority to gather information and enforce its orders 274 6.2.5 Procedures of the NRA 275 6.2.6 Public consultation by the NRA 276 6.2.7 Consultation between NRA and NCA 277 6.3 Striking a balance between the universal service obligation and full market opening 278 6.3.1 Range of services within the USO 278 6.3.2 Uniform rate requirements 281 6.3.3 Reliance on market forces to ensure universal service where feasible 283 6.3.4 Designation and public procurement to ensure universal service 285 6.3.5 Separation of designation and authorisation procedures 287 6.3.6 Authorisations for services within the universal service area 289 6.3.7 Conditions on authorisations 291 6.3.8 Scope of regulated accounts 293 6.3.9 Allocation of costs according to Article 14 296 6.3.10 Verification and transparency of accounting regulation 300 Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market V 6.4 Ensuring the universal service 301 6.4.1 Standards for access, affordability, and quality of service 301 6.4.2 Exceptions to the delivery frequency and quality of service of universal services 302 6.4.3 Price control of universal services provided by market dominant postal service providers 304 6.4.4 Delivery of inbound cross border postal items 307 6.4.5 Financing of the net cost of universal service (if any) 309 6.5 Ensuring full market opening for postal services 311 6.5.1 Phasing out of the reserved area 311 6.5.2 Planning for application of competition rules to protect full market opening 312 6.5.3 Access to national postal infrastructure 313 6.5.4 Access to elements of the international postal infrastructure 314 6.5.5 Valued-added tax 315 6.5.6 Customs laws 317 6.5.7 Facilitation of multi-operator environment 318 6.5.8 Review of application of laws generally for barriers to entry and market distortions 319 6.6 Protecting the rights of users 321 6.6.1 Transparency of prices and quality of service of universal services 321 6.6.2 Handling of user complaints 322 7 Cooperation Among NRAs 325 7.1 Current status of administrative cooperation in the postal sector 326 7.1.1 Postal Directive committee 327 7.1.2 CERP 328 7.2 Practice in other EU sectors 333 7.2.1 Competition authorities 333 7.2.2 Electronic communications 336 7.2.3 Energy 342 7.2.4 Railways 349 7.2.5 Conclusions from cooperation in other sectors 350 VI Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market 7.3 Recommendations for enhanced cooperation 353 7.3.1 The need for enhanced cooperation 353 7.3.2 Areas for cooperation among NRAs 356 7.3.3 An advisory group of postal regulators 360 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 363 8.1 Key regulatory tasks 364 8.2 Key institutional reforms 366 8.3 Evolution of the role of regulators in perspective 371 Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market VII Tables Table 1-1 Question modules for Internet survey 7 Table 1-2 Response rates by ministries and NRAs by question module (part 1) 8 Table 1-3 Response rates by ministries and NRAs by question module (part 2) 9 Table 1-4 Number of responses by NCAs, question module 401 9 Table 1-5 Number of responses by USPs, by question module 10 Table 2-1 Weighting of Member States in EU/EEA postal market 16 Table 2-2 Overview: services required by Postal Directive (as interpreted by NRAs) 19 Table 2-3 Overview: services ensured as universal services 20 Table 2-4 Overview: services ensured as universal services (USPs) 22 Table 3-1 Primary postal legislation 33 Table 3-2 Secondary postal legislation: dates of major measures 34 Table 3-3 Ministry with primary responsibility for postal services 36 Table 3-4 National universal service provider 37 Table 3-5 National competition authority and its role in postal sector 38 Table 3-6 Authority determining policy decisions required by Postal Directive 41 Table 3-7 Responsibility for administrative decisions required by Directive 43 Table 3-8 Government control of the public postal operator 45 Table 3-9 Primary national regulatory authority for postal services 50 Table 3-10 Resources of NRAs (2008) 52 Table 3-11 Average resources of NRAs by MS group (available data only) 56 Table 3-12 Organisation of the NRA 64 Table 3-13 Government supervision of NRA 66 Table 3-14 NRA authority to gather information 70 Table 3-15 Enforcement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proud of Progress. Better Prepared for the Future. CONTENTS an POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014
    AN POST AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT AN POST AnnuAl Report 2014 Proud of Progress. Better Prepared for the Future. CONTENTS AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Mission, Vision and Values 4 Board of Directors and Corporate Information 6 Chairman’s Statement 8 Management 10 Chief Executive’s Review 14 Financial Review 24 Universal Service 26 Sustainability 30 Stamp Issues and Philatelic Publications 36 Index to the Financial Statements 39 1 IN 2014 AN POST INCREASED TURNOVER & REDUCED OPERATING COSTS. 2 AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 €811.7m €820.6m €823.2m €814.7m Turnover Operating Costs 3 OUR MISSION To provide world class postal, distribution and financial services with unrivalled local community access and global connections. OUR VISION Working together as a united team, our ambition is to outperform the competition, delivering a better quality service, more efficiently, to more customers by continuously adapting, innovating and implementing change. 4 AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 OUR VALUES Quality Customer Service We deliver world class service quality by putting the customer first. Commercial Success We achieve commercial success to sustain and develop the business. Cost Competitiveness & Efficiency We run a cost competitive efficient Company. Respect & Personal Responsibility We respect each other and take personal responsibility. Respected Corporate Citizen We care for the environment and are engaged in the community. Innovation & Change We innovate, adapt and implement change successfully. 5 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE INFORMATION 1. 4. 8. 12. Christoph Jennifer William Peter Mueller Loftus Mooney Ormond 2. 5. 9. 13. Donal Patrick Ed William Connell Compton Murray Scally 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Universal Service Obligation: a Case of 29 Designated Operators in the European Countries
    Technological and Economic Development of Economy ISSN: 2029-4913 / eISSN: 2029-4921 2020 Volume 26 Issue 4: 785–807 https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12062 EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBLIGATION: A CASE OF 29 DESIGNATED OPERATORS IN THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Predrag RALEVIĆ 1, Momčilo DOBRODOLAC 2*, Libor ŠVADLENKA 3, Dragana ŠARAC 4, Dejan ĐURIĆ 5 1Technical College of Applied Sciences Uroševac, Leposavić, Serbia 2Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 3Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic 4Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia 5Higher School of Professional Business Studies, Novi Sad, Serbia Received 01 August 2019; accepted 25 January 2020 Abstract. The main aim of this paper is to perform efficiency and productivity analysis of Universal Service Obligation (USO) based on the Malmquist Productivity Indices (MPI) analysis. The study focuses on 29 Designated Operators (DOs) and two isolated periods, the years 2003 and 2017. There is a clear trend of workforce reduction (12%). Considering the postal services, the data confirm a general trend that the letter-post is in decline (30%) and the parcels are on the rise (52%). Consider- ing the financial results, both costs and revenues are increased; however, there is a higher increase of revenue (33.13%) compared to the cost (32.61%). Further, the results of implemented methodology are twofold. Firstly, a progress is determined at the average level of all observed DOs according to the efficiency and productivity indicators. Among other, the results indicate the increase of produc- tivity for both input MPI (3.5%) and output MPI (8%).
    [Show full text]
  • An Post Terms and Conditions for Bulk Mail Universal
    AN POST TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR BULK MAIL UNIVERSAL SERVICES AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 17 November 2014 - 1 - Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 PART 1 - Terms and Conditions applicable to all Bulk Mail Universal Services ........ 7 Section A - Preliminary .............................................................................................. 7 A.1 Commencement ................................................................................... 7 A.2 Definitions ............................................................................................. 7 A.3 An Post not a “Common Carrier” .......................................................... 7 A.4 An Post services offered subject to their availability ............................. 7 A.5 Confidentiality and Inviolability of Postal Packets ................................. 7 A.6 Applicable Law ..................................................................................... 8 Section B – Preparing your mail for posting ............................................................... 9 B.1 Information on size and weight restrictions ........................................... 9 B.2 Packing ............................................................................................... 10 B.3 Postal Addressing ............................................................................... 11 B.4 Return Postal Address .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research for Tran Committee
    STUDY Requested by the TRAN committee Postal services in the EU Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 629.201 - November 2019 EN RESEARCH FOR TRAN COMMITTEE Postal services in the EU Abstract This study aims at providing the European Parliament’s TRAN Committee with an overview of the EU postal services sector, including recent developments, and recommendations for EU policy-makers on how to further stimulate growth and competitiveness of the sector. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism. AUTHORS Copenhagen Economics: Henrik BALLEBYE OKHOLM, Martina FACINO, Mindaugas CERPICKIS, Martha LAHANN, Bruno BASALISCO Research manager: Esteban COITO GONZALEZ, Balázs MELLÁR Project and publication assistance: Adrienn BORKA Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to updates on our work for the TRAN Committee please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in November 2019 © European Union, 2019 This document is available on the internet in summary with option to download the full text at: http://bit.ly/2rupi0O This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2019)629201 Further information on research for TRAN by the Policy Department is available at: https://research4committees.blog/tran/ Follow us on Twitter: @PolicyTRAN Please use the following reference to cite this study: Copenhagen Economics 2019, Research for TRAN Committee – Postal Services in the EU, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels Please use the following reference for in-text citations: Copenhagen Economics (2019) DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • ERGP Working Draft 03 10 2013
    Ref. Ares(2015)5557902 - 03/12/2015 ERGP (13) 38rev1 – Report on end-2-end competition ERGP REPORT ON END-TO-END COMPETITION AND ACCESS IN EUROPEAN POSTAL MARKETS June 2014 ERGP (13) 38rev1 – Report on end-2-end competition Introduction Background The gradual market opening and liberalisation of European postal markets entered into its final phase with the adoption of Directive 2008/6/EC in January 2013. Directive 2008/6/EC was supported by two earlier Directives which began the liberalisation of letters and parcels. These three directives can be summarised as follows: 1997 Directive: service delivery of letters and parcels below 350 grams in weight, or those costing five times less than the standard service (basic tariff) were reserved to universal service providers. 2002 Directive: the reserved area was then reduced again in two stages: in 2003 to 100 grams and three times the basic tariff, and in 2006 to 50 grams and two and a half times the public tariff for an item of correspondence. 2008 Directive: the Third Directive provided the introduction of full competition in European postal sectors and the abolition of any reserved services for universal service providers. This Directive came into force on 27 February 2008 with some exceptions for eleven Member States such as new members and those with particular geographical issues making this impractical. The speed of liberalisation varied across member states. However, by 1 January 2011, 15 member states (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) had fully liberalised their postal markets.
    [Show full text]
  • DMM Advisory Keeping You Informed About Classification and Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service
    July 2, 2021 DMM Advisory Keeping you informed about classification and mailing standards of the United States Postal Service UPDATE 184: International Mail Service Updates Related to COVID-19 On July 2, 2021, the Postal Service received notifications from various postal operators regarding changes in international mail services due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The following countries have provided updates to certain mail services: Mauritius UPDATE: Mauritius Post has advised that the Government of Mauritius has announced the easing of COVID-related restrictions as of July 1, 2021, subject to strict adherence to sanitary protocols and measures. On July 15, 2021, Mauritius will gradually open its international borders. However, COVID-19 continues to have a direct impact on international inbound and outbound mails to and from Mauritius. Therefore, the previously announced provisions and force majeure continue to apply for all inbound and outbound international letter-post, parcel-post and EMS items. New Zealand UPDATE: New Zealand Post has advised that the level-2 alert in the Wellington region has ended as of June 29, 2021. Panama UPDATE: Correos de Panama has advised that post offices, mail processing centers (domestic and international) and the air transhipment office at Tocúmen International Airport are operating under normal working hours and the biosafety measures established by the Ministry of Health of Panama (MINSA). Correos de Panamá confirms that it is able to continue to receive inbound mail destined for Panama. However, Correos de Panama is unable to guarantee service standards for inbound and outbound mail. As a result, force majeure with respect to quality of service for all categories of mail items will apply until further notice.
    [Show full text]
  • POSTAL SAVINGS Reaching Everyone in Asia
    POSTAL SAVINGS Reaching Everyone in Asia Edited by Naoyuki Yoshino, José Ansón, and Matthias Helble ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK INSTITUTE Postal Savings - Reaching Everyone in Asia Edited by Naoyuki Yoshino, José Ansón, and Matthias Helble ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK INSTITUTE © 2018 Asian Development Bank Institute All rights reserved. First printed in 2018. ISBN: 978 4 89974 083 4 (Print) ISBN: 978 4 89974 084 1 (PDF) The views in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), its Advisory Council, ADB’s Board or Governors, or the governments of ADB members. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. ADBI uses proper ADB member names and abbreviations throughout and any variation or inaccuracy, including in citations and references, should be read as referring to the correct name. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “recognize,” “country,” or other geographical names in this publication, ADBI does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works without the express, written consent of ADBI. ADB recognizes “China” as the People’s Republic of China. Note: In this publication, “$” refers to US dollars. Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan www.adbi.org Contents List of illustrations v List of contributors ix List of abbreviations xi Introduction 1 Naoyuki Yoshino, José Ansón, and Matthias Helble PART I: Global Overview 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Postal Services
    Final Report Postal and Express Delivery Services Under the project Trade in Services under the Possible India-EU Trade and Investment Agreement Biswajit Nag Associate Professor Indian Institute of Foreign Trade and External Consultant, ICRIER Project Coordinator Arpita Mukherjee Professor, ICRIER November 2008 INDIAN COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH ON INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS i Acknowledgments The author is grateful to ICRIER for sponsoring this study. Discussion with Dr. Arpita Mukherjee (from ICRIER) and Mr. Amit Yadav (Ministry of Commerce) were extremely useful and the author conveys a special thanks to them. The support from Dr. Dripto Mukhopadhyay and Dr. Samantak Das, from ICMR in conducting surveys are acknowledged. Insights available from several officials in different government departments and courier companies have also proved useful for the study. However, the opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and not of the institute he belongs to or of the people who were consulted. For any query related to this paper, please contact Arpita Mukherjee, Professor, ICRIER at Tel.: +91-11-24645218-20 Extn. 230, Mob.: 9810189326, Email: [email protected] i Table of Contents Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................i List of Abbreviations .....................................................................................................ii Abstract.........................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Sector (2008-2010)
    Ref. Ares(2015)5384492 - 26/11/2015 PREFACE MAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE POSTAL SECTOR (2008-2010) PART B: COUNTRY FICHE APPENDIX | 29 NOVEMBER, 2010 PREFACE Authors: Henrik B. Okholm, Ph.D., Project Manager, Marcin Winiarczyk, Anna Möller, Claus Kastberg Nielsen, Ph.D., quality assurer. Client: DG MARKT Date: 10 November, 2010 Contact: SANKT ANNÆ PLADS 13, 2nd FLOOR | DK-1250 COPENHAGEN PHONE: +45 2333 1810 | FAX: +45 7027 0741 WWW.COPENHAGENECONOMICS.COM PREFACE TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 16 Lithuania .......................................................................................... 150 Chapter 1 Austria .................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 17 Luxembourg ..................................................................................... 158 Chapter 2 Belgium .............................................................................................. 18 Chapter 18 Malta ................................................................................................ 168 Chapter 3 Bulgaria .............................................................................................. 28 Chapter 19 Netherlands ...................................................................................... 179 Chapter 4 Cyprus ................................................................................................ 36 Chapter 20 Poland .............................................................................................. 189 Chapter 5 Czech Republic ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities
    European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities How post offices enhance their economic, social and environmental role in society With the support of the European Social Fund, PIC Adapt With the support of European © Olivier Cahay in cooperation with with the support of www.csreurope.org This report was prepared byCSR Europe in cooperation with the Corporate Citizenship Company in the framework of a yearlong project initiated by La Poste and with the support of the EU ADAPT Programme 3 4 European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities 35 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments Foreword 7 Executive summary 10 1. Introduction: background, methodology and aim of the report 12 2. Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility at European and international levels 2.1 A new paradigm in Europe 14 2.2 Corporate Social Responsibility – drivers of change 14 2.3 CSR – an evolving approach 16 2.4 Developments at European and international levels 17 3. Debate over developments in the European postal sector 3.1 Internal market for European postal services 19 3.2 Universal service safeguards 20 3.3 Pan-European co-ordination 20 3.4 Future trends 21 4. Social responsibility in action 4.1 Diversity and equal opportunity in the workforce 23 4.2 Training and career development 26 4.3 Health and safety 29 4.4 Social dialogue and employee consultation 31 4.5 Access to services for disadvantaged groups and local regeneration 32 4.6 Community involvement and charities 34 4.7 Environment 35 5. Going forwa r d: conclusions and rec o m m e n d a t i o n s 39 Appendix: The research process and roundtable discussions 41 Disclaimer: while every effort has been made to check that the contents of this report were correct at time of printing, the publishers retain sole responsibility for the contents.
    [Show full text]
  • DMM Advisory
    August 13, 2020 DMM Advisory Keeping you informed about classification and mailing standards of the United States Postal Service International Service Impacts – Country Suspensions as of August 14, 2020 Effective August 14, 2020, the Postal Service will temporarily suspend international mail acceptance to destinations where transportation is unavailable due to widespread cancellations and restrictions into the area. Customers are asked to refrain from mailing items addressed to the following country, until further notice: • Syria This service disruption affects Priority Mail Express International® (PMEI), Priority Mail International® (PMI), First-Class Mail International® (FCMI), First-Class Package International Service® (FCPIS®), International Priority Airmail® (IPA®), International Surface Air Lift® (ISAL®), and M-Bag® items. Unless otherwise noted, service suspensions to a particular country do not affect delivery of military and diplomatic mail. For already deposited items, other than Global Express Guarantee® (GXG®), Postal Service International Service Center (ISC) employees will endorse the items as “Mail Service Suspended — Return to Sender” and then place them in the mail stream for return. Due to COVID-19, international shipping has been suspended to many countries. According to DMM 604.9.2.3, customers are entitled to a full refund of their postage costs when service to the country of destination is suspended. The detailed procedures to obtain refunds for Retail Postage, eVS, PC Postage, and BMEU entered mail can be found through
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper
    Page 1/5 POSITION PAPER The ECORYS Study on “Development of competition in the European postal sector” 22 March 2006 PostEurop, the Association of 43 Postal Operators, holders of the Universal Service Obligation at national as well as at international level, through its Postal Directive Working Group, has followed with attention the progress and the outcome of the Study performed by ECORYS for the European Commission (DG Markt) titled : “The development of competition in the European postal sector”1. The Study has been made public in mid-August 2005. The European Commission hosted a workshop on 10 October 2005 during which ECORYS described the main results of its study. PostEurop has already taken the opportunity to issue its opinions on the progress of the ECORYS study and refers therefore to its existing Opinion Paper of 15 June 20052. Following the invitation of the European Commission, PostEurop is pleased to have the opportunity to convey the following position observations in order to positively contribute to the further definition of Community postal policy. 1. GENERAL REMARKS At first sight the study provides a fresh view on current developments within the European postal sector as well as its (possible) future. The report’s uniqueness lies in the fact that it combines up-to- date knowledge of postal companies, their processes, the markets they serve, current and potential competitive forces, strategic options and the impact of liberalisation to draw a picture of the possible future of the European postal sector. ECORYS is considering the development of competition on the upstream markets as an indicator of the overall process of liberalisation.
    [Show full text]