A/57/12 Annex I Item 5 of the Consolidated Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A/57/12 ANNEX I ITEM 5 OF THE CONSOLIDATED AGENDA GENERAL STATEMENTS 1. All speakers thanked the Director General for all his work and untiring efforts in the cause of IP, together with the Secretariat for the excellent documents prepared for the Assemblies meetings. 2. The Delegations and Representatives of the following 114 States, 3 intergovernmental organizations and 10 non-governmental organizations made statements under this agenda item: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Belarus, Benin, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Holy See, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Namibia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe, African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), Patent Office of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC Patent Office), South Centre (CS), American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Health and Environment Program (HEP), International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (FICPI), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), International Intellectual Property Commercialization Council (IIPCC), International Trademark Association (INTA), Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), North American Broadcasters Association (NABA) and Third World Network (TWN). 3. The Delegation of Senegal, speaking on behalf of the African Group , regretted that the agenda of the Assemblies seemed to remain unchanged over time, despite the huge amount of time and energy spent on negotiating its various composite items. This situation undermined fulfilment of one of the primary missions of WIPO, namely the global promotion of normative activity which should improve, develop and adapt to current requirements, needs and realities, especially in this era of digital technology and globalization. Considering the many issues and challenges arising from an economy generated by the intellectual property (IP) ecosystem, particularly in developing countries which had enormous industrial, artistic and literary potential, WIPO absolutely needed to intensify its development actions, in keeping with the recommendations of the Development Agenda (DA) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in order to achieve its mission of developing a balanced and efficient international IP system that promotes innovation and creativity in the interest of society. This meant, therefore, that WIPO was at the crossroads. Although significant progress had been made, many issues remained unresolved and had featured on the agenda of WIPO meetings for too long without any noticeable progress. Accordingly, there was need for substantive progress on the activities of the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) based on the three texts transmitted to the WIPO General Assembly which were expected to fill the international legal vacuum existing within this vast melting pot of creativity and innovation. Furthermore, the question of the IGC was an absolute priority and its resolution A/57/12 Annex I, page 2 would also help to preserve the fundamentals of the Organization which focus on the development dimension and the principle of a balanced global IP system. Moreover, it would be appropriate to agree on an ambitious work program for the IGC, with a clearly-defined timeframe that can yield tangible results and, especially, one or more legally-binding instruments capable of affording efficient and balanced protection to genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK) and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs). The African Group welcomed the unanimous agreement reached by Member States at the thirty-fourth session of the IGC in June 2017 to prolong the mandate of the Committee, thus managing to reduce their differences on fundamental questions relating to these three draft instruments. As a follow-up to this decision of major political significance, the African Group had presented a proposed work program contained in document WO/GA/49/17, to alternate the regular sessions of the Committee with meetings of the Intersessional Working Group in order to expedite the work of the IGC which had lasted for almost two decades. As regards convening of a diplomatic conference on the draft design law treaty (DLT), the African Group reaffirmed its commitment to participate constructively in the negotiations in accordance with the letter and the spirit of the WIPO General Assembly’s decision of 2015 but stated that this should be subject to prior resolution of the fundamental issues of technical assistance and disclosure. Other issues of special interest to the African Group included limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives, as well as limitations and exceptions for educational and research institutions and for persons with other disabilities. These themes had been discussed since the twelfth session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) in 2004. In that regard, the African Group had been hopeful that the SCCR would define a relevant action plan that would provide precise information on the nature of the appropriate international legal instrument(s). However, the Group remained deeply committed to the legally-binding nature of such instruments and the need to work on the basis of formal instruments. Lastly, with respect to External Offices, the twenty-sixth and twenty-seventh sessions of the Program and Budget Committee (PBC) had failed to decide on the locations of four field offices for the current and the next biennia. There was an absolute and urgent need to find a solution to this thorny and complex issue, especially given the current time constraints. The African Group remained committed to supporting this entire process. 4. The Delegation of Indonesia, speaking on behalf of the Asia and the Pacific Group , highlighted the importance that the region attached to IP as a catalyst of technological and socio-economic development. The number of patent, utility model, trademark and industrial design applications filed in the region had continued to rise and had accounted for 61.9 per cent of total filings worldwide in 2016. Moreover, the Group participated constructively in all WIPO committees, firm in the belief that the IP system must both protect holders’ rights and meet societal need in order to be fair, just and balanced. It therefore considered that its position in the IP world and its size as a Group should be reflected in a more balanced representation in all WIPO committees and governing bodies, in particular the WIPO Coordination Committee and the PBC. Calling for the External Office issue to be resolved at the earliest opportunity and in a manner consistent with the Guiding Principles, it reaffirmed the Group’s commitment to being included in the solution. It was gratified that the Independent Advisory Oversight Committee (IAOC) had been satisfied with the utilization of resources by the Internal Oversight Division (IOD), that WIPO’s financial performance had been sound and had yielded a surplus and an increase in net assets, and that programme performance for 2016-2017 had been assessed as being on track. It looked forward to agreement on the proposed Program and Budget for the 2018/19 biennium. It called on the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) to continue to mainstream development in all WIPO activities with a view to the implementation of the DA Recommendations. In particular, the inclusion of a standing agenda item on IP and development in the CDIP agenda would contextualise IPRs in the larger framework of development, ensure that IP regimes were crafted and optimized to foster holistic A/57/12 Annex I, page 3 socio-economic growth and sustainable development, and guide WIPO in implementing the SDGs and the WIPO DA, thus making IP work for all. It hoped that issues currently outstanding under the WIPO normative agenda would be resolved during the current series of meetings. Accordingly, it looked forward to the renewal of the mandate of the IGC, to the finalization of the international legal instrument effectively protecting GRs, TK and TCEs, and to the completion of negotiations on the Treaty on the Protection of Broadcasting Organizations in a manner consistent with the 2007 WIPO General Assembly mandate. It would participate in the discussion of matters arising under