DOCSLIB.ORG

"Our Good and Faithful Servant": James Moore Wayne and Georgia Unionism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History 4-23-2010 "Our Good and Faithful Servant": James Moore Wayne and Georgia Unionism Joel C. McMahon Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation McMahon, Joel C., ""Our Good and Faithful Servant": James Moore Wayne and Georgia Unionism." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2010. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/15 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “OUR GOOD AND FAITHFUL SERVANT”: JAMES MOORE WAYNE AND GEORGIA UNIONISM by JOEL C. MCMAHON Under the Direction of Dr. Wendy H. Venet ABSTRACT Since the Civil War, historians have tried to understand why eleven southern states seceded from the Union to form a new nation, the Confederate States of America. What compelled the South to favor disunion over union? While enduring stereotypes perpetuated by the Myth of the Lost Cause cast most southerners of the antebellum era as ardent secessionists, not all southerners favored disunion. In addition, not all states were enthusiastic about the prospects of leaving one Union only to join another. Secession and disunion have helped shape the identity of the imagined South, but many Georgians opposed secession. This dissertation examines the life of U.S. Supreme Court Justice James Moore Wayne (1790-1867), a staunch Unionist from Savannah, Georgia. Wayne remained on the U.S. Supreme Court during the American Civil War, and this study explores why he remained loyal to the Union when his home state joined the Confederacy. Examining the nature of Wayne’s Unionism opens many avenues of inquiry into the nature of Georgia’s attitudes toward union and disunion in the antebellum era. By exploring the political, economic and social dimensions of Georgia Unionism and long opposition to secession, this work will add to the growing list of studies of southern Unionists. INDEX WORDS: James Moore Wayne, Unionism, Disunion, Secession, American South, Savannah, Georgia, Supreme Court of the United States, Civil War, Antebellum Georgia “OUR GOOD AND FAITHFUL SERVANT”: JAMES MOORE WAYNE AND GEORGIA UNIONISM by JOEL C. MCMAHON A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2010 Copyright by Joel C. McMahon 2010 “OUR GOOD AND FAITHFUL SERVANT”: JAMES MOORE WAYNE AND GEORGIA UNIONISM by JOEL C. MCMAHON Committee Chair: Dr. Wendy H. Venet Committee: Dr. Clifford M. Kuhn Dr. Charles G. Steffen Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University May 2010 iv DEDICATION For my parents, James and Genevieve McMahon. Because of them, I am a Yankee by birth and Southern by the grace of God. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation often can be an infuriatingly lonely endeavor; however, researching a dissertation topic is not. Though often conceived as a solo effort, the dissertation, because of the assistance of so many people from so many places, is really a group project. It is a long-term process that requires the author to weave together threads of information gathered from disparate sources and stitch together patches of knowledge garnered from many archives and libraries. Behind every yellowed document and fragile book I touched, and within every library and archive I visited, are the people who help make history come alive. I have chased quite a few ghosts while trying to understand the life and times of James Moore Wayne, and I am indebted to many who helped me research, write and complete this dissertation. First, I would like to thank the archivists and librarians at the following institutions: the Georgia Historical Society in Savannah, Georgia; the Atlanta History Center; the King-Tisdell Cottage Foundation in Savannah, Georgia; the Independent Presbyterian Church in Savannah, Georgia; the Savannah College of Art and Design Library in Savannah, Georgia; the Girl Scouts of America; the Juliette Gordon Low Birthplace and Museum in Savannah, Georgia; National Archives and Records Administration in Morrow, Georgia; the Georgia Archives in Morrow Georgia; Pullen Memorial Library at Georgia State University and the Georgia State University Law Library in Atlanta, Georgia; Woodruff Memorial Library at Emory University Library in Atlanta, Georgia; Weltner Library at Oglethorpe University in Atlanta, Georgia; vi Georgia Institute of Technology Library and Information Center in Atlanta, Georgia; Princeton University Library; the Morris County, New Jersey Historical Society; the Supreme Court Historical Society; Clemson University Library in Clemson, South Carolina; the North Georgia College and State University Library in Dahlonega, Georgia; the University of Georgia Library in Athens, Georgia. In particular, I would like to thank archivist and genealogist Willard Rocker of the Washington Memorial Library in Macon, Georgia, who patiently and proficiently helped me decipher census records and tax digests. Second, I would like to thank my current and former colleagues and students at Georgia State University, Baker College, Mercer University, Georgia Perimeter College, and North Georgia College and State University who have supported and encouraged me over the years. In particular, I would like to thank Professors Tim Rennick, Chuck Steffen, and Kit Wellman of Georgia State University who taught me how to teach. In addition, Professors Doug Reynolds and Mohammed Hassen Ali, also of Georgia State University, offered levels of professionalism, collegiality, patience, and understanding that I can only now approximate and can only hope one day to achieve. In addition, I learn more from my students than I could ever teach, so it is and always will be an honor to be a part of their journey. Third, without the support and sound advice Dr. Wendy Hamand Venet of Georgia State University, under whose direction I wrote this dissertation, I would have never finished this project. Dr. Venet tolerated my periodic vents, listened attentively when I launched on speculative tangents, lured me back to terra firma vii when I rambled about the “flawed historical methodologies” I encountered, and understood without question when I put the project on hold several times over the years. For every false start I made and every delay I imposed, Dr. Venet always made herself available upon my return. Dr. Venet helped me transform passion into practice and realize the process was much more important than proving a hypothesis. I am indebted to the other members of my committee, Dr. Chuck Steffen and Dr. Cliff Kuhn, both of whom helped me close gaps in my analysis and identify possible avenues of inquiry. Finally, I owe a massive debt of gratitude to my family, who never stopped believing in me . even when I did. To Michele, my wife, that you for being my biggest fan . even when I do not deserve it. Your dreams are my dreams. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v CHAPTER 1. JAMES WAYNE AND GEORGIA UNIONISM: MEMORY, HISTORY AND METHOD 1 Secession and the Location of Sovereignty 13 Our Good and Faithful Servant 25 A Crowded Historiography 35 Methodology and Structure 50 2. JAMES WAYNE AND THE POLITICAL DIMENSION OF GEORGIA UNIONISM 59 Gladiatorial Activities: James Wayne’s Political Biography 70 Politics, Personalities, and Georgia’s Anti-Party System 81 “Noble Wayne”: Georgia’s First Supreme Court Justice 108 3. JAMES WAYNE AND THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF GEORGIA UNIONISM 122 The Wills and Ways of Two Generations of Georgians 128 Georgia’s Antebellum Economy 145 Jeremiahs and Judges: Georgia’s Political Economy and Economic Development 158 Tipping Point and Take-Off: Georgia on the Eve of the Civil War 172 4. JAMES WAYNE AND THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF GEORGIA UNIONISM 190 The Peculiar Institution in Georgia 200 The Peculiar Solution: Colonization 231 The Presidential Solution 245 5. CONCLUSION: A HOUSE DIVIDED 258 EPILOGUE: JAMES WAYNE IN BLACK AND WHITE 280 BIBLIOGRAPHY 290 1 CHAPTER ONE JAMES WAYNE AND GEORGIA UNIONISM: MEMORY, HISTORY AND METHOD “For men adapted their recollections to what they were suffering.”1 Thucydides “I know it is high treason,” wrote John Adams to Thomas Jefferson in 1819, “to express doubt of the perpetual duration of our vast American Empire and our free institutions . but I am sometimes Cassandra enough to dream that slavery might rend this mighty fabric in twain.” John Adams was not the only member of the Revolutionary generation who feared disunion. Noting that many of Adams’s contemporaries grappled uncomfortably with the peculiar institution, historian Elizabeth Varon states that “sectional antagonisms related to slavery shaped the constitutional Convention of 1787.” Subsequent generations inherited Adams’s fear and insecurity about the staying power of the nation, but this “jarring fear” of disunion was countered by the enduring and steadfast hope of those who held that 1 Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, Vol. 1, Henry Dale, trans. (London: George Bell and Sons, 1902), 123. 2 the bonds of union were strong enough to withstand the many political divisions, economic challenges, and competing social visions posing threats to the stability and survival of the Union.2 United States Supreme Court Justice James Wayne, a staunch and steadfast Georgia Unionist before and during the Civil War, was one of those who believed resolutely in the promise, the pragmatism, and the perpetuity of the Union. Erroneously remembered by history as a man whose views departed dramatically from those of other men of prominence in Georgia, evidence suggests that Wayne was not such an anomaly in his home state. Many antebellum Georgia leaders and ordinary Georgians exhibited “militantly Unionist” tendencies similar to those so strong and enduring like the ones of Wayne.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments
    A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren Paige Joyce Judson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts In Political Science Jason P. Kelly, Chair Wayne D. Moore Karen M. Hult August 7, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Judicial Politics, Electoral Realignment, Alteration to the Supreme Court Copyright 2014, Lauren J. Judson A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren J. Judson ABSTRACT During periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral realignments especially have the potential to increase tension between the branches. When a new party replaces the “old order” in both the legislature and the executive branches, the possibility for conflict emerges with the Court. Justices who make decisions based on old regime preferences of the party that had appointed them to the bench will likely clash with the new ideological preferences of the incoming party. In these circumstances, the president or Congress may seek to weaken the influence of the Court through court-curbing methods. One example Congress may utilize is changing the actual size of the Supreme The size of the Supreme Court has increased four times in United States history, and three out of the four alterations happened after an electoral realignment. Through analysis of Supreme Court cases, this thesis seeks to determine if, after an electoral realignment, holdings of the Court on issues of policy were more congruent with the new party in power after the change in composition as well to examine any change in individual vote tallies of the justices driven by the voting behavior of the newly appointed justice(s).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ball State Experience Pen Point Ball State ALUMNUS Executive Publisher: Edwin D
    cover layout:Layout 1 2/19/08 8:58 PM Page 1 Inside This Issue A Ball State University Alumni Association Publication March 2008 Vol. 65 No.5 Beyond the Classroom 10 Sidelines 28 40 under 40 33 Linda Huge fulfills a mission of keeping Hoosier history alive through her role as self-appointed school marm of a one-room schoolhouse in Fort Wayne. See the story on page 4. Ball State University NON-PROFIT ORG. Alumni Association U.S. POSTAGE Muncie, IN 47306-1099 PAID Huntington, IN Permit No. 832 CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The Ball State experience pen point Ball State ALUMNUS Executive Publisher: Edwin D. Shipley Editor: Charlotte Shepperd Communications Assistant: Julie Johnson f you don’t pass history on, it’s gone," according to 1959 Ball State graduate Linda Alumnus Assistants: Denise Greer, Jessica Riedel Huge. She has made it her full-time mission to educate Hoosiers on the history of Graduate Communications Assistants: their state as curator of a one-room schoolhouse in Fort Wayne. Huge’s story, on Danya Pysh, Katherine Tryon "I Undergraduate Communications Assistant: pages 4-5, describes how the self-appointed schoolmarm takes her personal passion for Sarah Davison history and instills listeners, both young and old, with knowledge. Contributing Writers: Th omas L. Farris Photographers: Sarah Davison, Steve Fulton, Ball State’s history as a public institution dates to 1918 when the Ball Brothers, after they Mike Hickey, John Huff er, Robin Jerstad had purchased it in 1917, gave 64-plus acres and two buildings to the state. Thereafter, we (Indianapolis Business Journal), Ernie Krug, Don Rogers became the Eastern Division of the Indiana State Normal School in Terre Haute.
    [Show full text]
  • Reminiscences of the United States Supreme Court
    YALE LAW JO URNAL. REMINISCENCES OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. On motion of Reverdy Johnson, at one time Attorney-General and afterward Senator in Congress from Maryland, I was admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court in 1865. Salmon P. Chase was then Chief Justice, and the associates were James M. Wayne, Robert C. Grier, Noah H. Swayne, David Davis, Samuel Nelson, Nathan Clifford, Samuel F. Miller and Stephen J. Field. All of these, ex- cepting Justice Field,* are now dead. I was in Washington at the inauguration of Franklin Pierce in 1853 and attended some of the sessions of the Supreme Court at that time. That court then con- sisted of Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice; John McLean, James M. Wayne, John Catron, Peter V. Daniel, Samuel Nelson, Robert C. Grier, Benjamin R. Curtis and John A. Campbell, associates, none of whom are now living. I never saw Taney, Catron or Daniel afterward, and have no very distinct impressions as to Catron or Daniel, but Chief Justice Taney was a noticeable man and his ap- pearance is still daguerreotyped upon my memory. He was a tall, angular and exceedingly slim man. Apparently there was little or no flesh upon his bones and his face was deeply furrowed by the ravages of time. His eyes surmounted by shaggy eyebrows were deeply set under a remarkably low forehead. There was a rough and rugged distinctness about all his features. He was appointed Chief Justice in 1836 and died in office when he was 88 years old. He was 8o years of age when he delivered the opinion of the court in the celebrated Dred Scott case.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Because John Marshall Said It, Doesn't Make It So: Ex Parte
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2000 Just Because John Marshall Said it, Doesn't Make it So: Ex Parte Bollman and the Illusory Prohibition on the Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners in the Judiciary Act of 1789 Eric M. Freedman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Eric M. Freedman, Just Because John Marshall Said it, Doesn't Make it So: Ex Parte Bollman and the Illusory Prohibition on the Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners in the Judiciary Act of 1789, 51 Ala. L. Rev. 531 (2000) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MILESTONES IN HABEAS CORPUS: PART I JUST BECAUSE JOHN MARSHALL SAID IT, DOESN'T MAKE IT So: Ex PARTE BoLLMAN AND THE ILLUSORY PROHIBITION ON THE FEDERAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR STATE PRISONERS IN THE JUDIcIARY ACT OF 1789 Eric M. Freedman* * Professor of Law, Hofstra University School of Law ([email protected]). BA 1975, Yale University;, MA 1977, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zea- land); J.D. 1979, Yale University. This work is copyrighted by the author, who retains all rights thereto.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sisson's Kingdom” Loyalty Divisions in Floyd County, Virginia, 1861-1865
    “Sisson’s Kingdom” Loyalty Divisions in Floyd County, Virginia, 1861-1865 Paul Randolph Dotson, Jr. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in History Dr. Crandall A. Shifflett, Chair Dr. James I. Robertson, Jr. Dr. Peter Wallenstein May 1, 1997 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Floyd County, Civil War, Unionism, Desertion, Appalachia “Sisson’s Kingdom” Loyalty Divisions in Floyd County, Virginia, 1861-1865 Paul Randolph Dotson, Jr. (ABSTRACT) “Sisson’s Kingdom” uses a community study paradigm to offer an interpretation of the Confederate homefront collapse of Floyd County, Virginia. The study focuses primarily on residents’ conflicting loyalty choices during the war, and attempts to explain the myriad of ways that their discord operated to remove Floyd County as a positive portion of the Confederate homefront. The study separates the “active Confederate disloyalty” of Floyd County’s Unionist inhabitants from the “passive Confederate disloyalty” of relatives or friends of local Confederate deserters. It then explores the conflicting loyalties of the county’s pro-Confederates, Unionists, and passive disloyalists, seeking to understand better the wide variety of loyalty choices available to residents as well as the consequences of their choices. To determine some of the significant factors contributing to the Floyd County community’s response to the Confederacy and Civil War, this thesis documents the various ways residents’ reactions took shape. Chapter One examines the roots of these decisions, exploring briefly Floyd County’s entrance into Virginia’s market economy during the 1850s and its residents’ conflicting choices during Virginia’s secession crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide
    Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Guide to the educational resources available on the GHS website Theme driven guide to: Online exhibits Biographical Materials Primary sources Classroom activities Today in Georgia History Episodes New Georgia Encyclopedia Articles Archival Collections Historical Markers Updated: July 2014 Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Table of Contents Pre-Colonial Native American Cultures 1 Early European Exploration 2-3 Colonial Establishing the Colony 3-4 Trustee Georgia 5-6 Royal Georgia 7-8 Revolutionary Georgia and the American Revolution 8-10 Early Republic 10-12 Expansion and Conflict in Georgia Creek and Cherokee Removal 12-13 Technology, Agriculture, & Expansion of Slavery 14-15 Civil War, Reconstruction, and the New South Secession 15-16 Civil War 17-19 Reconstruction 19-21 New South 21-23 Rise of Modern Georgia Great Depression and the New Deal 23-24 Culture, Society, and Politics 25-26 Global Conflict World War One 26-27 World War Two 27-28 Modern Georgia Modern Civil Rights Movement 28-30 Post-World War Two Georgia 31-32 Georgia Since 1970 33-34 Pre-Colonial Chapter by Chapter Primary Sources Chapter 2 The First Peoples of Georgia Pages from the rare book Etowah Papers: Exploration of the Etowah site in Georgia. Includes images of the site and artifacts found at the site. Native American Cultures Opening America’s Archives Primary Sources Set 1 (Early Georgia) SS8H1— The development of Native American cultures and the impact of European exploration and settlement on the Native American cultures in Georgia. Illustration based on French descriptions of Florida Na- tive Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Confederate: John H. Ash's Story Rediscovered
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2017 A Forgotten Confederate: John H. Ash's Story Rediscovered Heidi Moye Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Moye, Heidi, "A Forgotten Confederate: John H. Ash's Story Rediscovered" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1565. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1565 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FORGOTTEN CONFEDERATE: JOHN H. ASH’S STORY REDISCOVERED by HEIDI MOYE (Under the Direction of Anastatia Sims) ABSTRACT A historical study of a southern family living in Savannah, GA from shortly before the election of 1860 through the Civil War years based on the journals of John Hergen Ash II (1843-1918). INDEX WORDS: John Hergen Ash, Savannah, GA, Antebellum South, Civil War, 5th Georgia Cavalry, Georgia Hussars, Estella Powers Ash, Laura Dasher Ash, Eutoil Tallulah Foy Ash A FORGOTTEN CONFEDERATE: JOHN H. ASH’S STORY REDISCOVERED by HEIDI MOYE B. A., Georgia Southern University, 2012 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Georgia Southern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS STATESBORO, GEORGIA © 2017 HEIDI MOYE All Rights Reserved 1 A FORGOTTEN CONFEDERATE: JOHN H.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical List of Public Sculpture-1
    GEOGRAPHICAL LIST OF SELECTED PERMANENTLY DISPLAYED MAJOR WORKS BY DANIEL CHESTER FRENCH ♦ The following works have been included: Publicly accessible sculpture in parks, public gardens, squares, cemeteries Sculpture that is part of a building’s architecture, or is featured on the exterior of a building, or on the accessible grounds of a building State City Specific Location Title of Work Date CALIFORNIA San Francisco Golden Gate Park, Intersection of John F. THOMAS STARR KING, bronze statue 1888-92 Kennedy and Music Concourse Drives DC Washington Gallaudet College, Kendall Green THOMAS GALLAUDET MEMORIAL; bronze 1885-89 group DC Washington President’s Park, (“The Ellipse”), Executive *FRANCIS DAVIS MILLET AND MAJOR 1912-13 Avenue and Ellipse Drive, at northwest ARCHIBALD BUTT MEMORIAL, marble junction fountain reliefs DC Washington Dupont Circle *ADMIRAL SAMUEL FRANCIS DUPONT 1917-21 MEMORIAL (SEA, WIND and SKY), marble fountain reliefs DC Washington Lincoln Memorial, Lincoln Memorial Circle *ABRAHAM LINCOLN, marble statue 1911-22 NW DC Washington President’s Park South *FIRST DIVISION MEMORIAL (VICTORY), 1921-24 bronze statue GEORGIA Atlanta Norfolk Southern Corporation Plaza, 1200 *SAMUEL SPENCER, bronze statue 1909-10 Peachtree Street NE GEORGIA Savannah Chippewa Square GOVERNOR JAMES EDWARD 1907-10 OGLETHORPE, bronze statue ILLINOIS Chicago Garfield Park Conservatory INDIAN CORN (WOMAN AND BULL), bronze 1893? group !1 State City Specific Location Title of Work Date ILLINOIS Chicago Washington Park, 51st Street and Dr. GENERAL GEORGE WASHINGTON, bronze 1903-04 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, equestrian replica ILLINOIS Chicago Jackson Park THE REPUBLIC, gilded bronze statue 1915-18 ILLINOIS Chicago East Erie Street Victory (First Division Memorial); bronze 1921-24 reproduction ILLINOIS Danville In front of Federal Courthouse on Vermilion DANVILLE, ILLINOIS FOUNTAIN, by Paul 1913-15 Street Manship designed by D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution in the Supreme Court: State and Congressional Powers, 1801-1835 David P
    The University of Chicago Law Review Law__Review _VOLUME 49 NUMBER 4 FALL 1982 1982 by The University of Chicago The Constitution in the Supreme Court: State and Congressional Powers, 1801-1835 David P. Curriet This article is the third installment of an attempt to analyze and criticize the constitutional work of the Supreme Court in his- torical sequence, from the lawyer's point of view.' In the twelve years of its existence before the appointment of John Marshall as Chief Justice, the Supreme Court began to de- velop lasting principles of constitutional adjudication, but it de- cided few significant constitutional questions. In the first decade of Marshall's tenure, apart from Marbury v. Madison,2 the Court's constitutional docket consisted almost entirely of relatively minor matters respecting the powers of the federal courts. Although im- t Harry N. Wyatt Professor of Law, University of Chicago. I should like to thank my colleagues Frank Easterbrook, Richard Epstein, Richard Helmholz, Dennis Hutchinson, Stanton Krauss, Philip B. Kurland, Phil C. Neal, Rayman Solomon, and James B. White for their helpful comments and encouragement, and Locke Bowman and Paul Strella, Chicago class of 1982, for their valuable research assistance. I See Currie, The Constitution in the Supreme Court: 1789-1801, 48 U. CHI. L. REv. 819 (1981) [hereinafter cited as Currie, Supreme Court, 1789-1801]; Currie, The Constitu- tion in the Supreme Court: The Powers of the Federal Courts, 1801-1835, 49 U. CH. L. REv. 646 (1982) [hereinafter cited as Currie, FederalCourts, 1801-1835]. These articles form the beginning of a study to be published in book form by The University of Chicago Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Abington School District V. Schempp 1 Ableman V. Booth 1 Abortion 2
    TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Bill of Rights 66 Birth Control and Contraception 71 Abington School District v. Schempp 1 Hugo L. Black 73 Ableman v. Booth 1 Harry A. Blackmun 75 Abortion 2 John Blair, Jr. 77 Adamson v. California 8 Samuel Blatchford 78 Adarand Constructors v. Peña 8 Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 79 Adkins v. Children’s Hospital 10 Bob Jones University v. United States 80 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl 13 Boerne v. Flores 81 Advisory Opinions 15 Bolling v. Sharpe 81 Affirmative Action 15 Bond v. United States 82 Afroyim v. Rusk 21 Boumediene v. Bush 83 Age Discrimination 22 Bowers v. Hardwick 84 Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 24 Boyd v. United States 86 Allgeyer v. Louisiana 26 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale 86 Americans with Disabilities Act 27 Joseph P. Bradley 87 Antitrust Law 29 Bradwell v. Illinois 89 Appellate Jurisdiction 33 Louis D. Brandeis 90 Argersinger v. Hamlin 36 Brandenburg v. Ohio 92 Arizona v. United States 36 William J. Brennan, Jr. 92 Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing David J. Brewer 96 Development Corporation 37 Stephen G. Breyer 97 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 38 Briefs 99 Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 38 Bronson v. Kinzie 101 Assembly and Association, Freedom of 39 Henry B. Brown 101 Arizona v. Gant 42 Brown v. Board of Education 102 Atkins v. Virginia 43 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 104 Automobile Searches 45 Brown v. Maryland 106 Brown v. Mississippi 106 Bad Tendency Test 46 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 107 Bail 47 Buchanan v.
    [Show full text]
  • Roarin' Business Conference
    PARTY OF THE CENTURY RBC ROARIN’ BUSINESS CONFERENCE BALL STATE UNIVERSTIY March, 16th 2019 Michigan Tech University Great Lakes Affliate of Colleges and University Residence Halls – Regional Business Conference Table of Contents Letter from the Chair ………………… 3 The Theme ………………………………. 4 Meet the Party Hosts …………………. 5-10 Ball State Universtiy ………………….. 11-12 Conference Summary ………………… 13 Conference Schedule …………………. 14 Housing ………………………………….. 15 Registration …………………………….. 16 Dining …………………………………….. 17 Facilities …………………………………. 18 Ceremonies ..……………………………. 19 Philanthropy ..………………………….. 20 Transportation …………………………. 21-24 Volunteers ………………………………. 25 Budget ……………………………………. 26-27 Sponsorship …………………………….. 28 Sustainability …………………………… 29 Technology ……………………………… 30 Security ………………………………….. 31 Letter of Support……………………….. 32 Letter of Support ………………………. 33 Host Acknowledgement Form ………. 34-36 Registration Form……………………… 37-38 Alcohol and Drug Abuse Policy 39 Form ………………………………………. Sources …………………………………… 40 2 Letter from the Chair 3 Theme It is our hope, as the conference staff, to host a roarin’ good conference, based upon the theme of the 1920’s. The conference will be a celebration of the new century with a nod to the old. We, as the conference staff, would like to incorporate this theme throughout our conference. Our theme will allow us to continue an age old tradition of hosting a conference and celebrating a century of change. We invite you to ‘ankle’ over to the Roarin’ 2020 GLACURH Regional Business Conference. After Ball State’s own centennial, it would be a wonderful way to continue by hosting this conference. We wish to lead this conference in high spirits, and make this the Bee’s Knees of the year. Our theme will incorporate the 20’s highlife with the extravagant feel of a party. 4 Meet the Party Hosts Allison Norman - Conference Chair • Favorite thing about Ball State: The strong community that has been built on a medium-sized campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Justices
    The Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices *asterick denotes chief justice John Jay* (1789-95) Robert C. Grier (1846-70) John Rutledge* (1790-91; 1795) Benjamin R. Curtis (1851-57) William Cushing (1790-1810) John A. Campbell (1853-61) James Wilson (1789-98) Nathan Clifford (1858-81) John Blair, Jr. (1790-96) Noah Haynes Swayne (1862-81) James Iredell (1790-99) Samuel F. Miller (1862-90) Thomas Johnson (1792-93) David Davis (1862-77) William Paterson (1793-1806) Stephen J. Field (1863-97) Samuel Chase (1796-1811) Salmon P. Chase* (1864-73) Olliver Ellsworth* (1796-1800) William Strong (1870-80) ___________________ ___________________ Bushrod Washington (1799-1829) Joseph P. Bradley (1870-92) Alfred Moore (1800-1804) Ward Hunt (1873-82) John Marshall* (1801-35) Morrison R. Waite* (1874-88) William Johnson (1804-34) John M. Harlan (1877-1911) Henry B. Livingston (1807-23) William B. Woods (1881-87) Thomas Todd (1807-26) Stanley Matthews (1881-89) Gabriel Duvall (1811-35) Horace Gray (1882-1902) Joseph Story (1812-45) Samuel Blatchford (1882-93) Smith Thompson (1823-43) Lucius Q.C. Lamar (1883-93) Robert Trimble (1826-28) Melville W. Fuller* (1888-1910) ___________________ ___________________ John McLean (1830-61) David J. Brewer (1890-1910) Henry Baldwin (1830-44) Henry B. Brown (1891-1906) James Moore Wayne (1835-67) George Shiras, Jr. (1892-1903) Roger B. Taney* (1836-64) Howell E. Jackson (1893-95) Philip P. Barbour (1836-41) Edward D. White* (1894-1921) John Catron (1837-65) Rufus W. Peckham (1896-1909) John McKinley (1838-52) Joseph McKenna (1898-1925) Peter Vivian Daniel (1842-60) Oliver W.
    [Show full text]