DOCSLIB.ORG

Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) Agenda Item: 7A Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) Cabinet / Cabinet Panel CABINET Date 12 SEPTEMBER 2007 Portfolio(s) SCHOOLS Originating Service Group(s) PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Contact Officer(s)/ DEB BREEDON KEY DECISION NO Telephone Number(s) 01902 551250 IN FORWARD PLAN NO Title/Subject Matter FALLING SCHOOL PUPIL NUMBERS SCRUTINY REVIEW 1.0 Recommendation 1.1 That Cabinet receive the report and recommendations of the Review Group and refer the executive response to Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel. 2.0 Purpose of Report 2.1 To bring to the attention of Cabinet the report and recommendations of the Falling Pupil Numbers Scrutiny Review Group and to agree the executive response. (See appendix 1 & 2) 3.0 Background 3.1 In July 2006 members at a scrutiny away day identified public concerns relating to school mergers and closures as a topic that Members wished to investigate in a scrutiny review. The Scrutiny Review Group was established in December 2006 and agreed to consider the issue of falling pupil numbers and to consider the process of consultation and decision making in respect of falling pupil numbers. 3.2 The Review Group met on five occasions and visited four sites to inform the review. Date Purpose of the meeting 7 December 2006 to agree the scope for the review, receive background information and consider evidence 23 January 2007 site visit to Manor School 1 February 2007 to consider expert witness evidence, further evidence and report back from site visit 21 February 2007 to consider interim report, further evidence and identify findings and start to formulate recommendations 27 February 2007 site visits to Timken Vocational Centre, Grove Primary School and St Luke’s Primary School 5 April 2007 to consider report back from site visits, draft report and pull together findings 24 May 2007 to consider revised draft report and make recommendations 3.3 The group considered the ongoing consultation process in relation to Wednesfield Primary Schools organisation and determined that any scrutiny of the process being undertaken in this case would not be constructive. Members acknowledged that in this case Review Group members, who were also Ward Councillors and School Governors in Wednesfield, had made contributions to the consultation process for the school organisation. 3.4 During the investigation the Review Group worked closely with officers David Rawlinson and Paul Dean and was advised by Tim Westwood, Peter Hawthorne and Tony Pitchers. Some members conducted site visits to school premises, spoke to children and staff and reported back to the Review Group. 4.0 Messages from the Review 4.1 The Review Group considered the strategy to be a sound basis when considering the development and organisation of primary school education in the City, but recognised that in order to demonstrate a reasoned strategy to the community there is a need to look at surplus places ‘Citywide’ rather than on a piecemeal basis. Members felt that the consultation process should be strengthened to give cross party consensus to school organisation in the City. 4.2 The Review Group considered how the legislative changes, the developing role of Members in the community, developing extended schools agenda and other local initiatives give greater focus on schools at the core of local communities. The Group identified ways to reduce surplus places by improving the quality of our schools, promoting community identity in schools and attracting pupils into local schools. 4.3 Members recognised that whilst there are strategies in place to ensure the authority is planning and re-acting to surplus places both in primary and secondary education, there is a need to promote quality schools and to ensure the best locations for schools to suit the needs of the people in the City when building schools for the future. 4.4 The Review Group welcome the best practice and commitment carried out in schools in the City and seek to promote the following ethos in schools in Wolverhampton:- • Self Discipline • Respect • Self Respect • Self Worth • Strong expectations from staff and pupils 5.0 Performance Management Implications 5.1 The Council’s strategic model is supported by the Corporate Scorecard, containing a set of outcomes and targets to bring focus on the key areas for improvement if we are to deliver our corporate priorities. The scrutiny of falling pupil numbers supports the strategic priorities of delivering the best possible outcomes for children and young people and their families and becoming an excellent Council. 5.2 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 2007-08 Messages from the review (paragraph 4.0) suggest that numbers of surplus places directly affect the resources available and hence the quality of a school. This in turn will have an effect on pupil attainment, the KPIs for which are as follows: Strategic Corporate Service 2007-8 Measure and Target Model Plan group code priority 01 CYP CYP Increase the percentage of pupils achieving 5+ GCSEs at A*-C (including Maths and English) • 2007-8 - 60% • 2008-9 - 61% 02 CYP CYP Improve KS2 results in Maths and English • 2007-8 – Maths =74% ; English = 74% • 2008-9 – Maths =76% ; English = 76% 04 CYP CYP Achieve 58% of Looked After Children with 1+ GCSE at A* - G 06 SC CYP Increase post 16 participation in education and LSC funded work- based learning of 16 & 17 year olds • 2007-8 – 88% for post 16 yr olds • 2008-9 – 89% for post 16 yr olds 5.3 The report attached also takes account of recent legislative changes affecting school organisation, the mechanisms and processes required to deal with surplus places and supports the strategic priority of delivering an excellent Council 6.0 Financial Implications The recommendations outlined in this review should be met from within existing budget. 7.0 Equality Implications Overview and Scrutiny members have an important role in ensuring all children and young people receive services suitable to their needs that parents can choose the school their child attends, that the strategy for School organisation in Wolverhampton consults all interested parties in the community and considers the wider implications and long term sustainability of school organisation in Wolverhampton. Contact Officer: Deb Breedon Ext. 1250 Appendix 1 Falling School Pupil Numbers Scrutiny Review July 2007 - 1 - DB 12.9.07 Cabinet Contents Chair’s Foreword Introduction Page 3 Section 1 Recommendations Page 4-5 Section 2 Terms of Reference Page 6 Section 3 Background and Executive Summary Page 7 Section 4 The National Agenda Page 10 Section 5 Funding Page 11 Section 6 School Organisation Process Page 13 Section 7 Issues arising Page 16 The Current Pupil Admissions System Quality Schools Pupil mobility and cross border movement Transition from Key Stages 2 to 3 Pupil Retention post 16 Regeneration Section 8 Summary of Findings Page 23 Appendices Appendix 1 Age x Ward 2001 Census Data Appendix 2 Briefing note 14-19 Development Team Appendix 3 Wolverhampton Business Partnership Team Appendix 4 Building Schools for the Future (Secondary) Appendix 5 Map Primary Schools Location - population 5-10 years Appendix 6 Map Secondary Schools Location – population aged 11-15 years - 2 - DB 12.9.07 Cabinet Chair’s Foreward I would like to thank all Members, officers and representatives of the Education Business Partnership for their contributions during this review and on behalf of the Review Group I would like to offer a special thanks to staff and young people for their hospitality and enthusiasm during our visits to their premises. The issue of school closure is naturally a cause for public concern and is almost always a controversial issue for the Council to address. This review focused on falling pupil numbers in schools. We investigated the possible reasons and trends relating to surplus places in schools, we visited schools in the City and talked to staff and pupils and we considered all of the evidence to recognise possible actions, for consideration by Cabinet. We found this Review very interesting and were determined that the issue of surplus places in schools and school organisation should not be re-active, it is an issue that requires forward thinking, monitoring and a vision for how we want our schools in the City to be now and in the future. Ensuring they are fit for purpose for our future generations. Sandra Samuels Chair of Scrutiny Review Full membership of the Review can be seen at paragraph 2.2 of the report - 3 - DB 12.9.07 Cabinet Introduction Wolverhampton is a multi-cultural City and we recognise the importance and difficulties of providing school education in the City to suit every individuals needs. Our schools should provide a safe learning environment and respond to individuals needs, the diversity of our local communities and the growth and prosperity of the City. The Leader of the Council has outlined four priorities for the City– namely: • To deliver the best possible outcomes for Children and young people and their families • To make communities safer and stronger • To improve the health and wellbeing of our communities • To develop sustainable communities This review focuses on the issue of falling school pupil numbers and aims to make recommendations that support the leaders’ priorities. The City is by no means alone in its decision to close schools. There are approximately 500,000 primary school places in England that are empty. Across the Country there is a trend of falling pupil numbers in primary schools and the decline is expected to continue for at least the next twenty years. It is a matter for Children’s Services Authorities to decide how they deal with the challenge in their area. The overall aim of school organisation in Wolverhampton is to ensure sustainable and thriving schools where each and every child has the opportunity to succeed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Activities and Events
    Christmas Activities & Events - December 2015 If you would like any further information please contact the Family Information Service on 01384 814398 or email us at [email protected] or visit the website https://fis.dudley.gov.uk/fsd/PublicEnquiry/default.aspx Name Full Address Telephone Service Description From (Years) To (Years) Aladdin Birmingham Hippodrome Theatre 0844 338 5000 6DWXUGD\WK'HFHPEHU6XQGD\VW 3 99 Trust Ltd, Hurst Street, -DQXDU\ Birmingham, B5 4TB %LUPLQJKDP+LSSRGURPH¶VVSHFWDFXODU SDQWRPLPHH[WUDYDJDQ]D$ODGGLQVWDUV0DUWL 3HOORZDV$EDQD]DU-XOLDQ&ODU\DV6ODYHRIWKH 5LQJ/HH0HDGDV$ODGGLQDQG0DWW6ODFNDV :LVKHH:DVKHH3DFNHGZLWKVHQVDWLRQDOVSHFLDO HIIHFWVDPDJLFDO'IO\LQJFDUSHWULGHODXJKRXW ORXGFRPHG\DQGDQ$ODGGLQ¶VFDYHRIODYLVK VHWVDQGFRVWXPHVWKLV\HDU¶VSDQWRPLPHZLOOEH HYHU\WKLQJ\RXFRXOGZLVKIRU%RRN\RXUVHDWV QRZIRUDPDJLFFDUSHWULGH\RXZRQ¶WZDQWWR PLVV5HFRPPHQGHGIRUDJHQRRQHXQGHU ZLOOEHDGPLWWHG5HIHUWRZHEVLWHOLQNE\FOLFNLQJ RQ PRUHLQIRUPDWLRQRQWKLVSURYLGHU WRERRN WLFNHWVDQGILQGRXWGD\VDQGWLPHVRI SHUIRUPDQFHVRUFRQWDFWER[RIILFHIRUIXUWKHU LQIRUPDWLRQ Arley Arboretum - Meet Upper Arley, Arley, Bewdley, DY12 01299 861368 6DWXUGD\WK6XQGD\WK'HFHPEHU 2 12 Santa & Elf 1XJ 7KLV\HDU6DQWDZLOOEHKHUHLQKLVJURWWRZDLWLQJ WRKHDUZKDW\RXUOLWWOHRQHVZDQWIRU&KULVWPDV HYHU\ZHHNHQGOHDGLQJXSWR&KULVWPDV6DQWD V *URWWRSULFHVDUH SHUFKLOGLISUHERRNHG WKURXJKWKHHVWDWHRIILFHRU SHUFKLOGRQ WKHGRRU7KURXJKRXWWKHZKROHRI'HFHPEHU FKLOGUHQJRIUHHLQWR$UOH\$UERUHWXPDQGWKHUH ZLOODOVREHDIUHHHOIWUDLO&RQWDFWSURYLGHUIRU IXUWKHUGHWDLOV Name Full Address Telephone Service Description From (Years)
    [Show full text]
  • England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey
    England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey College Birmingham 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 865/4000 Abbeyfield School Chippenham 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton-on-Trent 312/5409 Abbotsfield School Uxbridge 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 825/6015 Akeley Wood Senior School Buckingham 935/4059 Alde Valley School Leiston 919/6003 Aldenham School Borehamwood 891/4117 Alderman White School and Language College Nottingham 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 845/4003 ARK William Parker Academy Hastings 371/4021 Armthorpe Academy Doncaster 885/4008 Arrow Vale RSA Academy Redditch 937/5401 Ash Green School Coventry 371/4000 Ash Hill Academy Doncaster 891/4009 Ashfield Comprehensive School Nottingham 801/4030 Ashton
    [Show full text]
  • A Place for Every Child
    A Place for Every Child The Vision for School Organisation in the City of Wolverhampton 2018-20 wolverhampton.gov.uk City of Wolverhampton Education Place Planning 2 City of Wolverhampton Council wolverhampton.gov.uk Contents CONTENTS 4 Chapter 1 34 Chapter 8 Executive summary Early Years Provision 18 Chapter 2 36 Chapter 9 Primary School Infant and Junior School Organisation Provision 20 Chapter 3 37 Chapter 10 Secondary School Post-16 Provision Organisation 22 Chapter 4 39 Chapter 11 The Introduction of Alternative Provision Additional School Places 27 Chapter 5 40 Chapter 12 Removal of Estate Management Maintained Provision/ Discontinuance of 41 Chapter 13 Maintained Provision Strategy Review 30 Chapter 6 42 Chapter 14 All-through Schools Resources 31 Chapter 7 43 Appendices Specialist Provision wolverhampton.gov.uk A Place for Every Child 3 Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary The main challenge that the City of Wolverhampton faces in relation to the organisation of school provision, is ensuring that sufficient high- quality school places are available to meet the needs of local communities across the City. Driven by a 24% increase in births between 2002 and 2016, levels of demand for school provision have increased significantly in recent years. In excess of 3,000 additional places have been commissioned since 2012 in primary schools and since 2017 in secondary schools, to cater for the demographic uplift. The recently witnessed increase in demand for primary provision in the City, has already started to impact on the City’s secondary estate and significant additional capacity will be required to cater for future cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority : Dudley
    Local Authority : Dudley Cohort KS4 Results Key Stage 2 to 4 CVA Expected progress from KS2-KS4 Year on year comparisons Absence Background % of pupils achieving at least an A*-G Level 2 (5+ A*- English English A*-C in a short course in Average C) including and maths and maths Level 2 Level 1 2 grades modern a modern total point English and Skills at Skills at (5+ A*- (5+ A*- A*-C in foreign foreign at least one score per School maths GCSEs Level 2 Level 1 C) G) science language language qualification pupil Local Authority 48.9% 52.1% 95.2% 66.7% 93.8% 48.0% 21.9% 35.4% 99.3% 406.2 Average England (maintained 50.7% 55.4% 94.5% 69.8% 93.6% 54.0% 28.4% 42.9% 99.5% 419.6 schools only) England (all schools) 49.8% 54.2% 90.8% 70.0% 92.3% 53.7% 31.7% 45.3% 98.9% 413.5 Bishop Milner 58% 58% 98% 71% 100% 58% 13% 19% 100% 415.8 Catholic School - Dudley Castle High School 29% 30% 87% 40% 84% 32% 8% 8% 99% 284.6 and Visual Arts College - Dudley The Coseley School - 39% 40% 96% 74% 96% 24% 12% 15% 99% 406.4 Bilston The Crestwood 42% 45% 91% 50% 90% 38% 40% 77% 100% 347.4 School - Kingswinford The Dormston 47% 47% 97% 75% 98% 78% 18% 27% 100% 453.3 School - Dudley The Earls High 47% 47% 98% 72% 96% 47% 34% 41% 99% 417.2 School - Halesowen The Ellowes Hall 61% 61% 97% 83% 97% 59% 8% 11% 99% 478.7 Sports College - Dudley Elmfield Rudolf 30% 53% 66% 30% 38% 0% 60% 64% 68% 159.9 .
    [Show full text]
  • Connected Networks
    ConnectEd Networks A unique Wolverhampton based partnership of over 100 local schools CN One CN Four CN Six and Seven Eastfield Nursery School Bantock Primary School Aldersley High School Eastfield Primary School Castlecroft Primary School Berrybrook Primary School Green Park Special School Highfields School Bushbury Nursery School Holy Rosary Catholic Primary Academy Merridale Primary School Bushbury Hill Primary School Moseley Park School Nishkam Primary School Dovecotes Primary School St Matthias School Penn Hall Special School Elston Hall Primary School Stow Heath Primary School Pennfields Special School Fallings Park Primary School Stow Lawn Primary School Smestow School Low Hill Nursery School Villiers Primary School Springdale Primary School Moreton Community School St Michael’s Catholic Primary Academy Ormiston NEW Academy CN Two Uplands Junior School Northwood Park Primary School Bilston Church of England Primary School Warstones Primary School Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Academy Bilston Nursery School Westacre Infant School Palmers Cross Primary School Field View Primary School Rakegate Primary School Holy Trinity Catholic Primary School St Mary’s Catholic Primary Academy Loxdale Primary School Westcroft School Ormiston SWB Academy Whitgreave Primary School St Martin’s Primary School Wilkinson Primary School CN Three CN Eight CN Five Colton Hills School Ashmore Park Nursery School Broadmeadow Special Nursery School Goldthorn Park Primary School Coppice Performing Arts School Christ Church Infant School Graiseley Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Schools
    List of West Midlands Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbot Beyne School Staffordshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Alcester Academy Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Alcester Grammar School Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Aldridge
    [Show full text]
  • The Stourbridge School of Art and Its Relations with the Glass Industry of the Stourbridge District, 1850-1905
    A PROVINCIAL SCHOOL OF ART AND LOCAL INDUSTRY: THE STOURBRIDGE SCHOOL OF ART AND ITS RELATIONS WITH THE GLASS INDUSTRY OF THE STOURBRIDGE DISTRICT, 1850-1905 by JAMES SCOTT MEASELL A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham April 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Founded in 1851, the Stourbridge School of Art offered instruction in drawing, art and design to students engaged in industries, especially glass. Using social history methodology and primary sources such as Government reports, local newspapers and school records, this thesis explores the school’s development from 1850 to 1905 and explicates its relationships with the local glass industry. Within the context of political, economic, social and cultural forces, the school contributed to the town’s civic culture and was supported by gentry, clergy and industrialists. The governing Council held public meetings and art exhibitions and dealt with management issues. Working class men attended evening classes. Women from wealthy families attended morning classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 715KB
    LBP0018 Written evidence submitted by The Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium Education Select Committee Left behind white pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds Inquiry SUBMISSION FROM THE NORTHERN POWERHOUSE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM Introduction and summary of recommendations Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium are a group of organisations with focus on education and disadvantage campaigning in the North of England, including SHINE, Northern Powerhouse Partnership (NPP) and Tutor Trust. This is a joint submission to the inquiry, acting together as ‘The Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium’. We make the case that ethnicity is a major factor in the long term disadvantage gap, in particular white working class girls and boys. These issues are highly concentrated in left behind towns and the most deprived communities across the North of England. In the submission, we recommend strong actions for Government in particular: o New smart Opportunity Areas across the North of England. o An Emergency Pupil Premium distribution arrangement for 2020-21, including reform to better tackle long-term disadvantage. o A Catch-up Premium for the return to school. o Support to Northern Universities to provide additional temporary capacity for tutoring, including a key role for recent graduates and students to take part in accredited training. About the Organisations in our consortium SHINE (Support and Help IN Education) are a charity based in Leeds that help to raise the attainment of disadvantaged children across the Northern Powerhouse. Trustees include Lord Jim O’Neill, also a co-founder of SHINE, and Raksha Pattni. The Northern Powerhouse Partnership’s Education Committee works as part of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership (NPP) focusing on the Education and Skills agenda in the North of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Version of Appendix 1 for City of Wolverhampton Youth Council
    [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] Cabinet Meeting Wednesday, 10 April 2019 Dear Councillor CABINET - WEDNESDAY, 10TH APRIL, 2019 Please find enclosed the final version of the Youth Council Annual Report 2018. If you have any queries about this meeting, please contact the democratic services team: Tel 01902 550320 Email [email protected] Address Democratic Services, Civic Centre, 1st floor, St Peter’s Square, Wolverhampton WV1 1RL Encs This page is intentionally left blank City of Wolverhampton Youth Council – Annual Report 2018 Page 3 Agenda Item No: 10 City of Wolverhampton Youth Council Annual Report 2018 1 City of Wolverhampton Youth Council – Annual Report 2018 Outgoing Chair’s Statement 03 Incoming Chair’s Foreword 05 Introduction 06 Page 4 Representation 08 Working with Decision Makers from the City Council 10 Local Recognition 13 Networking with other Youth Voice 14 Regional and National Work 15 Youth Police Crime Commissioners 16 Key Cities Youth Conference 17 Centro Youth Forum 18 Aims for 2019 19 2 City of Wolverhampton Youth Council – Annual Report 2018 OUTGOING CHAIR’S STATEMENT Firstly, I would like to wish Anna the best of luck as has given me and other young people some Chair over the next year. Not only do I know she’ll incredible opportunities. I've had the chance to have a wonderful time in the role, I know she is a represent the city at the UK Youth Parliament for two Page 5 very capable will do her absolute best for the young years. This experience has led to me speaking from people of Wolverhampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Admissions by
    Applications, Offers & Acceptances by UCAS Apply Centre 2019 UCAS Apply Centre School Name Postcode School Sector Applications Offers Acceptances 10002 Ysgol David Hughes LL59 5SS Maintained <3 <3 <3 10008 Redborne Upper School and Community College MK45 2NU Maintained 6 <3 <3 10011 Bedford Modern School MK41 7NT Independent 14 3 <3 10012 Bedford School MK40 2TU Independent 18 4 3 10018 Stratton Upper School, Bedfordshire SG18 8JB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10022 Queensbury Academy LU6 3BU Maintained <3 <3 <3 10024 Cedars Upper School, Bedfordshire LU7 2AE Maintained <3 <3 <3 10026 St Marylebone Church of England School W1U 5BA Maintained 10 3 3 10027 Luton VI Form College LU2 7EW Maintained 20 3 <3 10029 Abingdon School OX14 1DE Independent 25 6 5 10030 John Mason School, Abingdon OX14 1JB Maintained 4 <3 <3 10031 Our Lady's Abingdon Trustees Ltd OX14 3PS Independent 4 <3 <3 10032 Radley College OX14 2HR Independent 15 3 3 10033 St Helen & St Katharine OX14 1BE Independent 17 10 6 10034 Heathfield School, Berkshire SL5 8BQ Independent 3 <3 <3 10039 St Marys School, Ascot SL5 9JF Independent 10 <3 <3 10041 Ranelagh School RG12 9DA Maintained 8 <3 <3 10044 Edgbarrow School RG45 7HZ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10045 Wellington College, Crowthorne RG45 7PU Independent 38 14 12 10046 Didcot Sixth Form OX11 7AJ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10048 Faringdon Community College SN7 7LB Maintained 5 <3 <3 10050 Desborough College SL6 2QB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10051 Newlands Girls' School SL6 5JB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10053 Oxford Sixth Form College OX1 4HT Independent 3 <3
    [Show full text]
  • A Parents' Guide to Secondary School Admissions
    A parents’ guide to Secondary School Admissions 2019-20 This booklet describes Dudley Council’s arrangements for admitting children to secondary schools in September 2019 If you would like this document on audiotape, in large type, or a translation into your own community language please contact The School Admissions Service. One click… makes it quick www.dudley.gov.uk/admissions A parents’ guide to Secondary School Admissions 2019-20 One click… makes it quick www.dudley.gov.uk/admissions A guide for parents This booklet provides details of the admission arrangements that will operate at secondary schools in the Dudley borough for admissions in September 2019. We have also included general information which you may find useful. If you would like further information about a particular school, a more detailed booklet (‘the School Prospectus’) may be obtained direct from the individual secondary school concerned. Other documents available direct from the school or online include the School Profile and inspection reports by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). The Dudley Secondary School Performance Tables relating to the 2017 examination and test results are currently available from the People Directorate and public libraries. The results for 2018 will not be available until December 2018. Please pay particular attention to the timetable set out on Page 4, especially the closing date for applications, and the specific detail given about each school’s admission arrangements from Page 18 onwards. Local authorities (LAs) are required to liaise with each other in relation to the transfer of children from primary to secondary school for all schools, whether the schools are in Dudley or in other boroughs.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcestershire
    204 STOURBRIDGE. WORCESTERSHIRE. Mallen Thomas, Rising Sun P.H. Pedmore road, Lye Nicholls Henry, maltster, 179 High street Malpass Thomas (Mrs.), bill poster & porter, 15 Duke st Nichols Charlotte(Miss),ladies' school,Ued bank,OldSwinfordi Mark & Moody, printers, stationers & lithographers & pro- Nichols John, coach builder, 22 Hill street prietors & publishers of the " County Express," 52 & 53 Nicholson Agnes (Miss), haberdasher, see Capp & Nicholson. High street Nickless Hy. jun. Gate Hangs Well P.H, High pk. Wollastoll Market Street Dairy Co. fruit & poultry dealers,"3 Market st Nickless William, milk dealer, High park, Wollaston Marsden Edwin, Union inn, Chapel street, Lye Nickolls & Perks, grocers & chemists, 37 High street Marsden George, tailor, High street, Lye Noakes Henry, beer r~tailer, 108 Enville street Marshall James, glass manufacturer, W ollaston Nock James, wheelwright, Wollaston Marten Edward Bindon, civil engineer, & engineer to the Noke George, cabinet maker, Old Swinford Stourbridge Water Works & to the South Staffordshire Noonan John, tailor & woollen draper, 138 High street. Mines Drainage, Church Street chambers Norris Nimrod, Royal Oak P.H. Orchard lane, Lye Martin James, shopkeeper, Glebe lane Norris Thomas, butcher, Pedmore road, Lye Mason Charles, Nine hotel, & butcher, 27 High street North George, butcher, 64 High street Mason Isaac, colliery agent, Alonza villas, Baylie street North William, builder & contractor, 27 New road Math1eson Mary (Miss), milliner, 142 High street Nott John, beer retailer, Park
    [Show full text]