DOCSLIB.ORG

14 CFR Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
14 CFR Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee General Aviation Certification and Operations Issue Area Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group Task 1 – Ultralight Vehicles 47172· Federal Register I Vol. 58. "No. 171 I Tuesday, September 7, 1993 1 NcKAG'eS WashiDgton. OC Z059t, Telepbeae: (202) 1.67..;a150; FAX: (202} 267-5230. be reviewed with the ARAC Assistant Chair for General Aviation Operations SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Issues and the Chair of the Part 103 Federal Aviation Administndioo (FAAJ (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group, has established an Aviation Ru1emaking and the individual will be advised Advisory Committee (ARAC) (56 FR whether or not the request can be 2190, January 22. 1991; and 58 FR 9230, accommodated. February 19,1993). One8188theARAC. The Secretary of Transportation has deals with is general aviatiCIIl operations determined that the fonnation and use issues. These issues involve the . of the ARAC are necessary in the public operation of general aviation abaaft interest in connection with the and ~rtification of airmen. The Part 103 performance of duties of the FAA by (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group is . law. Meetings of the ARAC to consider being formed to review part 103 of the l general aviation operations issues will Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). be open to the public except as The Part t03 (UitraliAAt Vehicles) authoriZed by section lO(d) of the Working Group willlorward Federal Advisory Committee Act. recommendations to the ARAC. whk:h · Meetings of the Part 103 (Ultralight will determine whether to forward them Vehicles) Working Group will not be to the FAA. open to the public except to the extent Specifically. the Worldng Group'& task that individuals with an interest and is the following: The Part 103 (UltlaHght expertise 8re selected to participate. No Vehicles) Working Group Is charged public announcement of Working Group with reviewing part 103 oftbe FAR and meetings will be made. making a recotnmendation to the ARAC concerning whether new or 1'9Vl8ed Issued In Washington, DC, on August 30, standards are approprlate.IR reviewing . 1993. part 103, the working group should llonMyrea, consider: . Assistant Executive Director for General (a) United States Ultralight Aviation Operations Issues, Aviation AS&OCiation's petition to amend part 103 Rulemaldng Advisory Committee. (Docket No. 25591) and ell comments [FR Doc. 93-216~1 Filed 9-3-93; 8:45 am] submitted regardin~ the petition; 81ld 8IWNQ COOl ...,.. , .... (b) Adding defimtions&nd operating rules to apply to rotorcraft. If tlw ARAC detennines that a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking or Advisory Circular would be appropriate, those documents are to be submitted in the fonnat prescribed by the FAA. Reports A. The Working Group •~uld recommend time line{s) for completion of the task, including tbe rationale, for consideration at the meeting or the ARAC 1D consider general avlaUon Aviation Rutemaking Advisory operations issues beld followins Committee; Part 1G3 (Uttralight publication of this notice. Vehicles} Working Group B. The Working Group will give e status report on the task at each meeting AGENCY: Federal Aviation of the ARAC held to consider general Administration (FAA), DOT. aviation operations i~&ues. ACTION: Notice of establishment of Part The Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Working Group will be comprised or Group. experts from those organizations having an interest in the tasks aesigned. A SUMMARY: Notice is given of the Working Group member need not establishment of the Part 103 (Ultralight necessarily be a representatiYe of one of Vehicles) Working Group of the the member organizations of the ARAC. Aviation Rulemaking Advisory An individual who has expertitle in tbe Committee (ARAC). This notice infonns subject matter and wishes to becOme a the public of the activities of the ARAC member of the WorldngGroup shouJd 'n general aviation operations issues. write the person listed under the JR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. caption FOR FURTHER 1NFOAMA110N .Kon Myres, Assistant Executive Director CONTACT expressing that desire, for General Aviation Operations Issue&, describing his or her lntere&t in the task, Flight Standards Service (AFS--850), 800 and the expertise he or she would bring Independence Avenue, SW., to the Working Group. The request will Federal Register I Vol. 60, No. 123 I Tuesday, June 27, 1995 I Notices 33247 Aviation Rulemaking Advisory new or revised standards, under part 103 or a member of the working group should other regulations that may be affected, are write to the person listed Wlder the Committee; General Aviation appropriate. In reviewing part 103, the ARAC Operations Issues-Revised Task . should consider: caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION a. United States Ultralight Association's CONTACT expressing that desire, AGENCY: Federal AViation . petition to amend part 103 (Docket No. describing his or her interest in the task, Administration (FAA), DOT. ! 25591) and all comments submitted .and stating the expertise he or she ACTION: Notice of revised task regarding the petition; and would bring to the working group. The assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking b. Adding definitions and operating rules · request will be reviewed by the assistant Advisory Committee (ARAC). to apply to rotorcraft. chair, the assistant executive director, The FAA also has asked that ARAC and the working group chair, and the SUMMARY: Notice is given of a change in · the task assigned to and accepted by the determine if tulemaking action (e.g., individual will be advised whether or Aviation Rulemaking Advisory NPRM) should be taken or advisory not the request can be accommodated. Committee (ARAC). This notice. informs matenal should be issued. If so, ARAC The Secretary of Transportation has the public of the activities of ARAC. has been asked to prepare the necessary determined that the formation and use documents, including economic . of ARAC are necessary and in the public FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: interest in connection with the Mr. Louis C. Cusimano, Assistant analysis, to justify and carry out its recommendation(s). performance of duties imposed on the Executive Director for General Aviation FAA bylaw. Operations Issues, Aviation Rulemaking AR.Ac Acceptance of Revised Task Advisory Committee, Flight Standards Meetings of ARAC will be open to the ARAC has aecepted the revised task public, except as authorized by section Service (AFS-800), 800 Independence and has chosen to assign it to the Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 10(d) of the Federal Advisory existing Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Commitlee Ad. Meetings ofthe Part 103 telephone (202) 267-8452; fax (202) Working Group. The working group will 267-5094. (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group serve as staff to ARAC to assist ARAC will not be open to the public, except SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in the analysis of the assigned task. to the extent that individuals with an Working group recommendations must Background .interest and expertise are selected to be reviewed and approved by ARAC. If participate. No public announcement of The FAA has establishud an Aviation ARAC accepts the working group's working group meetings will be made. Rulemaking Advisory Committee to recommendations, it forwards them to Issued in Washington, DC, on June 16, · provide advice and recommendations to the FAA as ARAC recommendations. 1995. the FAA Administrator, through the Associate Administrator for Regulation Working Group Activity Leuis C. Cusimano, and Certification, on the full range of The Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Assistant Executive Director for GenE·ral the FAA's rulemaking activities with Working Group is expected to comply Aviation Operations Issues, Aviation respect to aviation-related issues .. This · with the procedures adopted .by ARAC. Rulemaking Advisory Committee. includes obtaining advice and As part of the procedures, the Working [FR Doc. 95-15726 Filed 6-26-95; 8:45am) recommendations on the FAA's group is expected to: BILUNG CODE 411D-13-M commitment to harmoni2;e its Federal ·1. Recommend a work plan for Aviation Regulations (FAR) and completion of the tasks, including the practices with its trading partners in rationale supporting such a plan, for Europe and Canada. consideration by ARAC. One area ARAC deals with is general 2. Give a detailed conceptual aviation operations issue:~. These issues presentation of the proposed involve the operation of general aviation recommendations, prior to proceeding aircraft and certification ofairmen in 14 with the work stated in item 3 below. CFR parts 61, 91, 103, 125, 133, 137,141, . 3. For each task, draft appropriate and 143. regulatory documents with supporting .economic and other required analyses, The Revised Task and/or any other related guidance This notice is to inform the public material or collateral documents the that the FAA has revised a taSk working group determines to be previously assigned to ARAC. The appropriate; or, if new or revised· . revised task has been accepted by requirements or compliance methods ARAC. The FAA has asktld ARAC to · are not recommended, a draft report provide advice and recommendation on stating the rationale for not making such the following revised task: recommendations. 4. Provide a status report at each Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles): Review part 103 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations and meeting of ARAC held to consi~er make a recommendation. to the Federal general aviation operations issues. Aviation Administration concerning whether Participation in the Working Group The Part 103 (Ultralight Vehicles) Working Group is composed of experts having an interest in the assigned task. A working group member need not be a representative of a member of the full committee. An individual whC? has expertise in the subject matt~r and wishes t~ become . -~ .. Recommendation: In December 1999, ARAC referred project to FAA. FAA Action: Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft; NPRM: FAA-2001-11333 Final Rule -- FAA-2001-11133 Tuesday, July 27, 2004 Part III Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 1, 21, et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MS – 204 Charles Lewis Aviation Collection
    MS – 204 Charles Lewis Aviation Collection Wright State University Special Collections and Archives Container Listing Sub-collection A: Airplanes Series 1: Evolution of the Airplane Box File Description 1 1 Evolution of Aeroplane I 2 Evolution of Aeroplane II 3 Evolution of Aeroplane III 4 Evolution of Aeroplane IV 5 Evolution of Aeroplane V 6 Evolution of Aeroplane VI 7 Evolution of Aeroplane VII 8 Missing Series 2: Pre-1914 Airplanes Sub-series 1: Drawings 9 Aeroplanes 10 The Aerial Postman – Auckland, New Zealand 11 Aeroplane and Storm 12 Airliner of the Future Sub-series 2: Planes and Pilots 13 Wright Aeroplane at LeMans 14 Wright Aeroplane at Rheims 15 Wilbur Wright at the Controls 16 Wright Aeroplane in Flight 17 Missing 18 Farman Airplane 19 Farman Airplane 20 Antoinette Aeroplane 21 Bleriot and His Monoplane 22 Bleriot Crossing the Channel 23 Bleriot Airplane 24 Cody, Deperdussin, and Hanriot Planes 25 Valentine’s Aeroplane 26 Missing 27 Valentine and His Aeroplane 28 Valentine and His Aeroplane 29 Caudron Biplane 30 BE Biplane 31 Latham Monoplane at Sangette Series 3: World War I Sub-series 1: Aerial Combat (Drawings) Box File Description 1 31a Moraine-Saulnier 31b 94th Aero Squadron – Nieuport 28 – 2nd Lt. Alan F. Winslow 31c Fraser Pigeon 31d Nieuports – Various Models – Probably at Issoudoun, France – Training 31e 94th Aero Squadron – Nieuport – Lt. Douglas Campbell 31f Nieuport 27 - Servicing 31g Nieuport 17 After Hit by Anti-Aircraft 31h 95th Aero Squadron – Nieuport 28 – Raoul Lufbery 32 Duel in the Air 33 Allied Aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Lighter-Than-Air Vehicles for Civilian and Military Applications
    Lighter-than-Air Vehicles for Civilian and Military Applications From the world leaders in the manufacture of aerostats, airships, air cell structures, gas balloons & tethered balloons Aerostats Parachute Training Balloons Airships Nose Docking and PARACHUTE TRAINING BALLOONS Mooring Mast System The airborne Parachute Training Balloon system (PTB) is used to give preliminary training in static line parachute jumping. For this purpose, an Instructor and a number of trainees are carried to the operational height in a balloon car, the winch is stopped, and when certain conditions are satisfied, the trainees are dispatched and make their parachute descent from the balloon car. GA-22 Airship Fully Autonomous AIRSHIPS An airship or dirigible is a type of aerostat or “lighter-than-air aircraft” that can be steered and propelled through the air using rudders and propellers or other thrust mechanisms. Unlike aerodynamic aircraft such as fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters, which produce lift by moving a wing through the air, aerostatic aircraft, and unlike hot air balloons, stay aloft by filling a large cavity with a AEROSTATS lifting gas. The main types of airship are non rigid (blimps), semi-rigid and rigid. Non rigid Aerostats are a cost effective and efficient way to raise a payload to a required altitude. airships use a pressure level in excess of the surrounding air pressure to retain Also known as a blimp or kite aerostat, aerostats have been in use since the early 19th century their shape during flight. Unlike the rigid design, the non-rigid airship’s gas for a variety of observation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Arctic Weather Ships Is Almost Certain to Be Controversial
    J. Gordon Vaeth airborne Arctic National Weather Satellite Center U. S. Weather Bureau weather ships Washington, D. C. Historical background In the mid-1920's Norway's Fridtjof Nansen organized an international association called Aeroarctic. As its name implies, its purpose was the scientific exploration of the north polar regions by aircraft, particularly by airship. When Nansen died in 1930 Dr. Hugo Eckener of Luftschiffbau-Zeppelin Company suc- ceeded him to the Aeroarctic presidency. He placed his airship, the Graf Zeppelin, at the disposal of the organization and the following year carried out a three-day flight over and along the shores of the Arctic Ocean. The roster of scientists who made this 1931 flight, which originated in Leningrad, in- cluded meteorologists and geographers from the United States, the Soviet Union, Sweden, and, of course, Germany. One of them was Professor Moltschanoff who would launch three of his early radiosondes from the dirigible before the expedition was over. During a trip which was completed without incident and which included a water land- ing off Franz Josef Land to rendezvous with the Soviet icebreaker Malygin, considerable new information on Arctic weather and geography was obtained. Means for Arctic More than thirty years have since elapsed. Overflight of Arctic waters is no longer his- weather observations toric or even newsworthy. Yet weather in the Polar Basin remains fragmentarily ob- served, known, and understood. To remedy this situation, the following are being actively proposed for widespread Arctic use: Automatic observing and reporting stations, similar to the isotopic-powered U. S. Weather Bureau station located in the Canadian Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy-Lift Systems
    I‘ ’, 1 NASA -! TP 1921 ’ .I I 1:. NASA Technical Paper 1921 c. 1 Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Buoyant Heavy-Lift Systems Mark D. Ardema SEPTEMBER 1981 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM NASA Technical Paper 1921 Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Buoyant Heavy-Lift Systems Mark D. Ardema Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1981 VEHICLECONCEPTS AND TECHNOLOGYREQUIREMENTS FOR BUOYANT HEAVY-LIFTSYSTEMS Mark D. Ardema Ames Research Center Several buoyant-vehicle (airship) concepts proposed for short hauls of heavy payloads are described. Numer- ous studies have identified operating cost and payload capacity advantages relative to existing or proposed heavy-lift helicopters for such vehicles. Applications mvolving payloads of from 15 tons up to 800 tons have been identified. The buoyant quad-rotor concept is discussed in detail, including the history of its development, current estimates of performance and economics, currently perceived technology requirements, and recent research and technology development. It is concluded that the buoyant quad-rotor, and possibly other buoyant vehicle concepts, has the potential of satisfying the market for very heavy vertical lift but that additional research and technology development are necessary. Because of uncertainties in analytical prediction methods and small-scale experimental measurements, there is a strong need for large or full-scale experiments in ground test facilities and, ultimately, with a flight research vehicle. INTRODUCTION world vehicles is about 18 tons. Listed in the figure are several payload candidates for airborne vertical lift that are beyond this 18-ton payload weight limit, Feasibility studies of modern airships (refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 38 How AAR Is Solving Singapore Doubles Its Workforce Crisis RICH MEDIA Down on Aviation ™ EXCLUSIVE $14.95 FEBRUARY 10-23, 2020 BRACING FOR Sustainability RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Airship Design [Pdf]
    Modern Airship Design Using CAD and Historical Case Studies A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering By Istiaq Madmud May 2015 approved by Dr. Nikos Mourtos Faculty Advisor AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Modern Airship Design MSAE Project Report By Istiaq Mahmud Signature Date Project Advisor: ____________________ ______________ Professor Dr. Nikos Mourtos Project Co-Advisor: ____________________ ______________ Graduate Coordinator: ____________________ ______________ Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0084 Istiaq Mahmud 009293011 Milpitas, (408) 384-1063, [email protected] Istiaq Mahmud Modern Airship Design 2 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Istiaq Mahmud Modern Airship Design 3 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Non‐Exclusive Distribution License for Submissions to the SJSU Institutional Repository By submitting this license, you (the author(s) or copyright owner) grant to San Jose State University (SJSU) the nonexclusive right to reproduce, convert (as defined below), and/or distribute your submission (including the abstract) worldwide in print and electronic format and in any medium, including but not limited to audio or video. You agree that SJSU may, without changing the content, convert the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation. You also agree that SJSU may keep more than one copy of this submission for purposes of security, back‐up and preservation. You represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights contained in this license. You also represent that your submission does not, to the best of your knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballooning Collection, the Cuthbert-Hodgson Collection, Which Is Probably One of the fi Nest of Its Kind in the World
    SOCIETY NEWS qÜÉ=pçÅáÉíóÛë=iáÄê~êó b~êäó=_~ääççåáåÖ iáíÜçÖê~éÜë=~åÇ=mêáåíë ÜÉ=oçó~ä=^Éêçå~ìíáÅ~ä=pçÅáÉíó áãéçêí~åí=îáëì~ä=êÉÅçêÇ=çÑ=ã~åÛë qiáÄê~êó= ÜçìëÉë= çåÉ= çÑ= íÜÉ É~êäó= ~ëÅÉåíë= áåíç= íÜÉ= ~áê= ~í= íÜÉ ïçêäÇÛë=ÑáåÉëí=ÅçääÉÅíáçåë=çÑ=É~êäó îÉêó= Ç~ïå= çÑ= ~îá~íáçå= ~ë Ä~ääççåáåÖ= ã~íÉêá~ä= EÄççâëI éçêíê~óÉÇ= Äó= áääìëíê~íçêë= ~åÇ é~ãéÜäÉíëI= åÉïëé~éÉê= ÅìííáåÖëI ÉåÖê~îÉêë=çÑ=íÜÉ=íáãÉK éêáåíë= ~åÇ= äáíÜçÖê~éÜë= ~åÇ qÜÉ= Ä~ääççå= ï~ë= Äçêå= áå ÅçããÉãçê~íáîÉ= ãÉÇ~äëF= ïÜáÅÜ cê~åÅÉ= áå= NTUP= ÇìêáåÖ= íÜÉ= ä~íÉJ Ü~ë= ÄÉÉå= ìëÉÇ= Äó= êÉëÉ~êÅÜÉêë NUíÜ= ÅÉåíìêó= båäáÖÜíÉåãÉåí Ñêçã= dÉêã~åóI= cê~åÅÉ= ~åÇ= íÜÉ éìêëìáí= çÑ= ëÅáÉåíáÑáÅ= âåçïäÉÇÖÉX råáíÉÇ=pí~íÉëK íÜÉ=~Äáäáíó=íç=íê~îÉä=íÜêçìÖÜ=íÜÉ `çãéäÉãÉåíáåÖ= íÜÉ= ÑáåÉ ~áê=çéÉåÉÇ=ìé=éÉçéäÉëÛ=ãáåÇë=íç ÅçääÉÅíáçå= çÑ= É~êäó= Ä~ääççåáåÖ íÜÉ= éçëëáÄáäáíáÉë= çÑ= ~Éêá~ä ~åÇ= ~Éêçå~ìíáÅ~ä= Äççâë= áë= ~ å~îáÖ~íáçå=~åÇ=åÉïë=çÑ=íÜÉ=É~êäó ã~àçê= ÅçääÉÅíáçå= çÑ= ~êçìåÇ= TMM ~ëÅÉåíë= ï~ë= íê~åëãáííÉÇ= ê~éáÇäó É~êäó= Ä~ääççåáåÖ= äáíÜçÖê~éÜëL ~Åêçëë= bìêçéÉK= ^= é~êí= çÑ= íÜáë éêáåíëLéçëíÉêëK= qÜáë= ÅçääÉÅíáçå= Ô éêçÅÉëë= ï~ë= íÜÉ= éêçÇìÅíáçå= çÑ ïÜáÅÜ= áë= Ä~ëÉÇ= ã~áåäó= çå= íÜÉ åìãÉêçìë= äáíÜçÖê~éÜëLéêáåíë ÜçäÇáåÖë= çÑ= íÜÉ= `ìíÜÄÉêíJ ÅçããÉãçê~íáåÖ= é~êíáÅìä~ê eçÇÖëçå= `çääÉÅíáçå= EïÜáÅÜ= ï~ë ~ëÅÉåíë= çê= ~Éêá~ä= îçó~ÖÉëI= ~åÇ áå=NVQT=éìêÅÜ~ëÉÇ=áå=áíë=ÉåíáêÉíó íÜÉ= iáÄê~êó= ÜçäÇë= Éñ~ãéäÉë= çÑ Äó= páê= cêÉÇÉêáÅâ= e~åÇäÉó= m~ÖÉ ã~åó= îáÉïë= çÑ= ~ëÅÉåíë= ~Åêçëë o^Ép=iáÄê~êó=éÜçíçëK ~åÇ= éêÉëÉåíÉÇ= íç= íÜÉ= pçÅáÉíóI _êáí~áåI= cê~åÅÉ= ~åÇ= çíÜÉê dÉçêÖÉ=`êìáÅâëÜ~åâ=Úq~ñá=_~ääççåëÛ=Ô Ú^=ëÅÉåÉ=áå=íÜÉ=c~êÅÉ=çÑ=içÑíó
    [Show full text]
  • Fly-By-Wire for Homebuilt Aircraft?
    ® www.kitplanes.com $4.99 CANADA $5.99 $4.99US $5.99CAN Fly-by-Wire 07 for Homebuilt Aircraft? 0 09281 03883 2 JULY 2004 VOLUME 21, NUMBER 7 ADVERTISER INFORMATION ONLINE AT WWW.KITPLANES.COM/FREEINFO.ASP ® On the cover: Brian Raeder’s dream of building an Flight Reports award-winning Sky Raider became a reality last year 32 THE ITALIAN JOB when he was honored at Oshkosh AirVenture with the How two builders constructed Italy’s most pop- Grand Champion award. Read about his triumph—and ular kit in six months; by Geoffrey P. Jones. what led up to it—on Page 8. Photo by Jim Raeder. 73 ROTOR ROUNDUP From helicopters to gyroplanes, continued; by Ken Armstrong. Builder Spotlight 8 GRAND CHAMPION SKY RAIDER How to build a show plane; by John M. Larsen. 14 GEAR UP! An RV-4 with a difference; by Ishmael Fuentes. 39 A LITTLE PERSONALITY Builders get creative on aircraft interiors and exteriors; edited by Cory Emberson. 44 BUILD A SEAREY, PART 3 We prepare the SeaRey for inspection and first flight; by Don Maxwell. 60 COMPLETIONS Builders share their successes. Shop Talk 55 AERO 'LECTRICS We test the ILS radios; by Jim Weir. 67 ENGINE BEAT Want to be your own mechanic? by John M. Larsen. Designer’s Notebook 52 WIND TUNNEL We discuss critical mach number; by Barnaby Wainfan. Exploring 2 AROUND THE PATCH Light-sport aircraft? Not quite yet; by Brian E. Clark. 6 WHAT’S NEW 8 Garmin’s 296 arrives; edited by Brian E. Clark. 19 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE BE SEATED How Oregon Aero “un-engineered” a safe seat for the RV-10; by Dave Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Listing of Amateur Built Aircraft Kits
    REVISED LISTING OF AMATEUR-BUILT AIRCRAFT KITS Updated on: June 22, 2021 The following is a revised listing of aircraft kits that have been evaluated and found eligible in meeting the “major portion” requirement of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 21, Certification Procedures for Products and Parts, specifically, § 21.191(g). • This listing is only representative of those kits where the kit manufacturer or distributor requested an evaluation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for eligibility and should not be construed as meaning the kit(s) are FAA “certified,” “certificated,” or “approved.” • There are other aircraft kits that may allow a builder to meet the “major portion” requirement of § 21.191(g), but those manufacturers or distributors have not requested an FAA evaluation. • The placement of an aircraft kit on this list is not a prerequisite for airworthiness certification. • The primary purpose of this listing is to assist FAA Inspectors/Designees and other interested individuals by eliminating the duplication of evaluations for “major portion” determination when the aircraft is presented for airworthiness certification as an “Amateur-Built Experimental.” • Kit manufacturers or distributors whose status is unknown are identified with a question (?) mark and their address has been deleted. Additional Information and Guidance • Advisory Circular (AC) 20-27G, Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft. • FAA Order 8130.35B, Amateur-Built Aircraft National Kit Evaluation Team • Contact your local FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) or Manufacturing Inspection District Office (MIDO). Those publications and other information pertaining to amateur-built experimental aircraft are available online at http://www.faa.gov/aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Scientific Ballooning Technology to High Altitude Airships
    Applications of Scientific Ballooning Technology to High Altitude Airships Michael S. Smith*, Raven Industries, Inc, Sulphur Springs, Texas, USA Edward Lee Rainwater , Raven Industries, Inc, Sulphur Springs, Texas, USA ABSTRACT been undertaken which attempted to solve the general problem by using tethered aerostats at very high In recent years, the potential use of High Altitude altitudes. Most of these programs were thwarted by Airships (HAA) as a platform for surveillance or problems associated with tether dynamics. communications operations has attracted growing interest. Many technical obstacles exist with regard to High Platform the successful launch, flight, and recovery of such systems. In the late 1960’s, Raven Industries was contracted to build a small stratospheric airship as a technology Many decades of technological innovation in the field demonstrator.1 The High Platform II vehicle was of scientific ballooning have resulted in a number of designed for a small payload of five pounds and a technologies that are directly applicable towards the cruising altitude of 67,000 feet. Since it was designed success of the HAA platform. Among these are as a technology demonstrator, the vehicle was advances in materials, design, and launch methods. programmed to track the sun during the flight. The Discussed herein are potential applications of these demonstration flight was considered a success by flying technologies towards the development of a viable High for two hours under power. It also did not carry any Altitude Airship system. batteries, so it could not operate at night. This is quite possibly the only airship ever to fly under power in the HISTORICAL BACKGROUND stratosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 91.113
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 91.113 (3) The instructor is current and (c) No person may operate an air- qualified to serve as pilot in command craft, carrying passengers for hire, in of the airplane, meets the requirements formation flight. of § 61.195(b), and has logged at least 25 hours of pilot-in-command flight time § 91.113 Right-of-way rules: Except in the make and model of airplane; and water operations. (4) The pilot in command and the in- (a) Inapplicability. This section does structor have determined the flight can not apply to the operation of an air- be conducted safely. craft on water. (c) No person may operate a civil air- (b) General. When weather conditions craft in simulated instrument flight permit, regardless of whether an oper- unless— ation is conducted under instrument (1) The other control seat is occupied flight rules or visual flight rules, vigi- by a safety pilot who possesses at least lance shall be maintained by each per- a private pilot certificate with cat- son operating an aircraft so as to see egory and class ratings appropriate to and avoid other aircraft. When a rule of the aircraft being flown. this section gives another aircraft the (2) The safety pilot has adequate vi- right-of-way, the pilot shall give way sion forward and to each side of the to that aircraft and may not pass over, aircraft, or a competent observer in the under, or ahead of it unless well clear. aircraft adequately supplements the vi- (c) In distress. An aircraft in distress sion of the safety pilot; and has the right-of-way over all other air (3) Except in the case of lighter-than- traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airship's Potential for Intertheater and Intratheater Airlift
    ii DISCLAIMER This thesis was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Air Force. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Logistics Flow During The Gulf War 1 Introduction 1 Strategic lift Phasing 4 Transportation/Support Modes 8 Mobility Studies 16 Summary 19 Conclusion 23 Notes 24 Filling The Gap: The Airship 28 Prologue 28 Introduction 31 The Airship in History 32 Airship Technology 42 Potential Military Roles 53 Conclusion 68 Epilogue 69 Notes 72 Selected Bibliography 77 iv ABSTRACT This paper asserts there exists a dangerous GAP in US strategic intertheater transportation capabilities, propounds a model describing the GAP, and proposes a solution to the problem. Logistics requirements fall into three broad, overlapping categories: Immediate, Mid- Term, and Sustainment requirements. These categories commence and terminate at different times depending on the theater of operations, with Immediate being the most time sensitive and Sustainment the least. They are: 1. Immediate: War materiel needed as soon as combat forces are inserted into a theater of operations in order to enable them to attain a credible defensive posture. 2. Mid-Term: War materiel, which strengthens in-place forces and permits expansion to higher force levels. 3. Sustainment: War materiel needed to maintain combat operations at the desired tempo. US strategic transport systems divide into two categories: airlift and sealift.
    [Show full text]